Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Nov 30;17(11):e0278288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278288

Macrosymbionts of starfish Echinaster luzonicus (Gray, 1840) in the waters of a volcanic western Pacific island

Li-Chun Tseng 1,#, Parinya Limviriyakul 2,#, Jiang-Shiou Hwang 1,3,4,*
Editor: Wan-Xi Yang5
PMCID: PMC9710757  PMID: 36449479

Abstract

During an investigation program of faunal diversity in the shallow reef zone of the active volcanic island off northeastern Taiwan in July and September 2020, numerous individuals of the starfish Echinaster luzonicus (Gray, 1840) were found, and some individuals were found with associated symbionts. Starfish sampling in the 150-m coral reef zone was undertaken at a depth of 8 m through scuba diving. For each type of potential macrosymbiont, both the dorsal and ventral sides were carefully examined. The prevalence of macrosymbionts on the starfish E. luzonicus was recorded. The most common symbiotic organism on E. luzonicus was the ectoparasitic snail Melanella martinii (A. Adams in Sowerby, 1854), followed by the pontoniine shrimp Zenopontonia soror (Nobili, 1904) and the rare polychaete scaleworm Asterophilia carlae Hanley, 1989. The prevalence ratio with host E. luzonicus was low and varied by 8.62% and 4.35%, 6.03% and 0%, and 0.86% and 0.72% in July and September 2020 for M. martinii, Z. soror, and A. carlae, respectively. The present study is the first to discover the scaleworm A. carlae as a macrosymbiont of the tropical starfish E. luzonicus, with a widespread distribution, off Taiwan’s northeastern coast, an area influenced by the Kuroshio Current.

Introduction

Kueishan Island (also known as Gueishan or Turtle Island) is a tiny active volcanic island located off the northeastern coast of Taiwan [1,2]. Shallow hydrothermal vents are located on the east and southeast sides of the island, which features a low pH and a high sulfur concentration [3,4]. This toxic environment has low biodiversity [5]; only a few species of mollusks [5,6], crabs [2,7], benthic copepods [8,9], and cnidarians [5,10] have been recorded. By contrast, the hydrothermal vents slightly affect the seawater on the northwest side of the island. The coastal area northwest of Kueishan Island has a coral reef zone with a length of approximately 150 m and a depth range of 1–8 m. Several biological studies have been conducted in this small and healthy reef zone; for example, Hung [11] reported 256 fish species belonging to 42 family, and Limviriyakul [12] recorded 57 species of symbiotic decapods from various hosts, including algae, sponges, hydroids, actiniarians, scleractinians, alcyonarians, crinoids, and echinoids.

Echinoderms, a well-defined and highly-derived clade of metazoans with approximately 7,000 species, can be found in various habitats ranging from shallow intertidal areas to abyssal depths [13]. Numerous echinoderms have been found with diverse macrosymbiotic organisms, including feather stars (crinoids) [1416], sea cucumbers (reviewed by Martin & Britayev [17]; Purcell et al. [18]), sea urchins [15,16,1921], brittle stars [17], and starfish [17,19], as well as the small crustacean copepod associated with brittle stars [22]. Approximately 1,500 species of starfish live in all marine waters [23], and 48 valid species from 10 families have been recorded in waters around Taiwan [24,25]. Notably, in the reef and coastal waters of Taiwan, several studies have investigated symbiotic shrimps [15,2628] and symbiotic crabs [20,22,29,30] on various host creatures. However, the evidence on the symbionts of echinoderms in the waters of Taiwan is scant [15,20], and no reports on the symbionts, particularly macrosymbionts, of starfish in the waters of Taiwan are available. Therefore, the diversity of starfish symbionts remains understudied.

Baseline information on the macrosymbionts of echinoderms is required. Thus, during the investigation program of faunal diversity in the present study, the often encountered starfish Echinaster luzonicus (Gray, 1840) in the reef zone of northwest Kueishan Island was studied to determine the diverse macrosymbionts of E. luzonicus, and the prevalence ratio of each macrosymbiont of E. luzonicus was compared.

Materials & methods

Study area description

Kueishan Island, with an area of approximately 2.841 km2, is an active volcanic island in the vicinity of Yilan City off Taiwan’s northeastern coast, in the southeastern East China Sea (Fig 1). Kueishan Island is so named for its turtle-shaped topography. Shallow hydrothermal vents can be found on the eastern and southeastern sides of Kueishan Island. The western side faces eastern Taiwan, and the northwestern coast has a shallow band zone of coral reefs of approximately 150 m in length (Fig 2A). Numerous fish species inhabit this small and healthy reef area (Fig 2B). The seabed is sandy in the deeper waters.

Fig 1. Map of the study area (upper); the gray area indicates the sampling locations (lower) around Kueishan Island from July to September 2020.

Fig 1

The asterisk indicates the hydrothermal vent (HV) area.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

The reef zone of northwestern Kueishan Island (A). The small and healthy reef has diverse fish (B), the starfish Echinaster luzonicus has highly variable colors (C), and the scaleworm Asterophilia carlae can be found in the field (D).

Field sampling and sample treatment

Investigations of faunal diversity were undertaken in July and September 2020. Starfish sampling in the 150-m coral reef zone was undertaken at a depth of 8 m through scuba diving. For each type of potential macrosymbiont, both the dorsal and ventral sides were carefully examined. The prevalence of macrosymbionts on the starfish E. luzonicus was recorded. In the study area, E. luzonicus was often encountered in the reef zone at depths between 5 and 8 m, with polymorphisms of morphology and color. Specifically, colors ranged from bright orange to dark brown, and most individuals had six arms with a length of approximately 5–8 cm. Some starfish were comet shaped, with one bigger arm capable of regenerating a disc with small arms (Fig 2C). Unexpectedly, a scaleworm A. carlae was found (Fig 2D).

Only a few symbiont individuals that were found for the first time were placed separately in a plastic ziplock bag and transported to the laboratory at National Taiwan Ocean University for photography and species identification.

Sample identification

In the laboratory, the collected animals were identified under a dissecting microscope (Olympus SZX16, Tokyo, Japan) using the keys described by the following researchers: Fauchald [31], Hanley [32], and Britayev and Fauchald [33] for polychaetes; Adams [34] and Okutani [35] for sea snails; and Bruce [36], Chace and Bruce [37], and Holthuis [38] for shrimp.

Results

Macrosymbionts of E. luzonicus

A total of 116 and 138 starfish (including the comet-shaped ones) were found in July and September 2020, respectively. On the northwest side of Kueishan Island, three species of macrosymbionts belonging to three classes of the animal kingdom were found on E. luzonicus, as follows: Gastropoda, Melanella martinii (A. Adams in Sowerby, 1854) (Littorinimorpha: Eulimidae) (Fig 3); Malacostraca, Zenopontonia soror (Nobili, 1904) (Decapoda: Palaemonidae) (Fig 4); and Polychaeta, Asterophilia carlae Hanley, 1989 (Phyllodocida: Polynoidae) (Fig 5) (Table 1). The scaleworm A. carlae found was the first discovery of this species in waters around Taiwan.

Fig 3. Symbiotic gastropod: White parasitic snail Melanella martinii (C. B. Adams, 1850).

Fig 3

The scale bar = 10 mm.

Fig 4. Symbiotic starfish shrimp: Zenopontonia soror (Nobili, 1904) with two types of color patterns.

Fig 4

The scale bar = 5 mm.

Fig 5. Symbiotic polychaete: Asterophilia carlae Hanley, 1989, anterior view (upper) and posterior view (lower).

Fig 5

The scale bar = 5 mm.

Table 1. Symbionts on starfish Echinaster luzonicus and their prevalence (%), as recorded in the July and September 2020 investigations.

Symbiont species Prevalence Synonymised names
July Sept.
Melanella martinii (Gastropoda) 8.62 4.35 Eulima martinii A. Adams in Sowerby, 1854 (MolluscaBase, 2021), Melanella candida F.P. Marrat, 1880 (Galli, 2015)
Zenopontonia soror (Malacostraca) 6.03 0 Periclimenes (Cristiger) frater Borradaile, 1915, Periclimenes bicolor Edmondson, 1935, Periclimenes frater Borradaile, Periclimenes parasiticus Borradaile, 1898, Periclimenes soror Nobili, 1904 (WoRMS, 2021)
Asterophilia carlae (Polychaeta) 0.86 0.72 None (Read & Fauchald, 2021b)

The three macrosymbiont species were found in different locations on the external body of the starfish. The snail M. martinii was found on the ventral side and was attached to the podia (also known as tube feet) close to the mouth or under the arms. The shrimp Z. soror was camouflaged (Fig 4) and was found on the ventral and lateral sides. Occasionally, this species was found underneath the starfish. The polychaete A. carlae was found on the ventral and lateral sides and occasionally on the dorsal side of the starfish, and it did not swim away when the host starfish was examined. Notably, all starfish individuals only hosted one species of macrosymbiont, and no more than one macrosymbiont species was observed on the same host starfish in the investigation.

Prevalence of macrosymbionts

The snail M. martinii and the polychaete A. carlae were recorded in the July and September 2020 investigations. In July and September 2020, the prevalence of the snail M. martinii was 8.52% and 4.35%, and that of the polychaete A. carlae was 0.86% and 0.72%, respectively. Z. soror only appeared in July, and its prevalence was 6.03% (Table 1). Regarding the number of symbiotic organisms recorded, 1–4, 2–5, and 1 individual snails, shrimps, and polychaetes were observed on starfish, respectively.

Discussion

Historical studies of E. luzonicus

Echinaster luzonicus is widely distributed in the intertidal zones and reefs of the Indo Pacific [39]. Several studies have recorded this species around the South China Sea, including in Taiwan [24], the Penghu Islands in the Taiwan Strait [40], the Dongsha Atoll of the northern South China Sea [41], southern Vietnam [42], Thailand [43], the Maldives and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands [44], the central South China Sea and Malaysia [45], Taiping Island in the southern part of the South China Sea [46], and Indonesia [47]. As mentioned, in the present study, the morphology and color of E. luzonicus observed varied. Of individuals of this species found in the Indian Ocean, Soota and Sastry [44] reported that they were autotomous, with five or more arms of unequal length. Their diverse color patterns indicate the high genetic variability of E. luzonicus within a population, with 22.9% polymorphic loci among 35 genetic loci in samples collected from Ryukyu Islands, Japan [48].

Several studies have reported that different macrosymbionts coexist on E. luzonicus, including the scaleworm Asterophylia culcitae [42], ctenophoran Coeloplana astericola [42,49,50], and shrimp Z. soror [42,51]. The copepods Doridicola echinasteris and Stellicola oreastriphilus have also been found [42]. They have evolved cryptically colors that are indistinguishable from those of its host starfish [52]. In the present study, three macrosymbionts of E. luzonicus were found in a small coral reef area. Until now, M. martinii and A. carlae had never been reported in the waters around Taiwan.

Macrosymbionts of E. luzonicus

Symbiosis, a mode of interaction between two heterospecific organisms, can be designated into three categories, namely mutualism, commensalism, and parasitism, depending on the presence or absence of “harm” or “benefit” in the partners [53]. In theory, the criteria of host mortality and metabolic dependency have often been used to determine the type of their interactions. However, the methods required to apply such criteria in marine ecosystems are costly and time consuming [54,55]. The type of symbiosis can be determined through indirect methods, such as laboratory observation of feeding behavior, in situ analysis [56] of the morphology and function of the mouth and foraging organ [5759], analysis of the digestive tract [60], and analysis of intestinal contents [55].

Coral reefs contain the largest diversity of symbiotic associations in marine environments [54]. At least 860 invertebrate species live in close association with stony corals, and they depend on their hosts for food and habitat [61]. These symbiotic associations make coral reef communities the most complex and biodiverse marine ecosystems in coastal areas [6163]. In reef areas, some host species are strongly reliant on their obligate symbionts to the point where they are unable to survive without them [61,64]. Understanding the modes in which marine fauna interact can help clarify their ecological roles and provide new insights into natural science. In this study, we found three species of macrosymbionts on E. luzonicus: M. martinii, Z. soror, and A. carlae. Several studies have revealed various ecological niches in the symbiotic relationship of these species with various hosts.

Melanella martinii—Notably, the snail M. martinii identified in both months of the investigation had not been reported previously in the waters of Kueishan Island. Studies have found M. martinii in the East China Sea, South China Sea, and Indo–West Pacific [65]; Japan [35]; Vietnam [66]; Cebu, Philippines [67]; Singapore [68]; Lombok, Indonesia [69]; and Australia [70]. Several reports have indicated the presence of several mollusks in the shallow waters of hydrothermal vent areas on the eastern side of Kueishan Island, but not M. martinii [5,6,71].

Among holothurian symbionts, sea snails in the genus Melanella are parasites [18,7274]. Most of them attach to the hosts’ skin, piercing through the tissue with their specialized proboscis and feeding on coelomocytes. These attachment strategies do not have severe effects on the hosts [18,72]. However, in this study, M. martinii was associated with starfish, an unusual host in the genus Melanella. Thus, due to the shortage of records and relevant evidence, whether the relationship between M. martinii and E. luzonicus is parasitic in nature remains unclear.

Symbiosis of several mollusks with various starfish species has been reported [50], such as Thyca crystallina and Stilifer cf. linckiae with the blue starfish Linckia laevigata [75], Granulithyca nardoafrianti with Nardoa frianti, T. crystallina with L. laevigata, and Stilifer spp. with L. laevigata and Culcita novaeguineae in the waters of southern Vietnam [42]. Furthermore, numerous species of starfish are prey and parasitic hosts for gastropods. For example, the giant triton Charonia tritonis preys on several asteroids, including the crown-of-thorns starfish Acanthaster planci [76]. The mollusks of Stylifer spp. consume the tissue of host starfish and are occasionally found within it [42].

Some eulimids are host-specific. A particular genus of eulimids tends to be restricted to a single class level or a lower taxon of echinoderm [72]. Gastropods of the genus Melanella are associated with holothurian hosts [72,73]. The present data revealed that M. martinii lived on the starfish of the class Asteroidea instead of on the usual holothurian hosts of its congeneric species. The association information of this snail is scarce; thus, further research is warranted. We also observed that the attachment of this snail to the starfish podia caused the starfish no injury. Therefore, we postulate that M. martinii might suck the body fluid of starfish but not consume their tissue.

Zenopontonia sororZ. soror has a worldwide distribution; it has been found in Hong Kong, Taiwan, Xisha Islands, Hainan, and the Indo-Pacific [65]; southern Taiwan, northern South China Sea [77]; Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Australia, New Caledonia, French Polynesia [12]; Vietnam [42,78]; Thailand [51]; and the Colombian Pacific [79]. In the current study, Z. soror was only found in the July investigation. Limviriyakul [12] did not find this species among the symbiotic crustaceans collected in the same area in April and September 2015. This shrimp may hide in the crevices of coral reefs or leap swiftly away when it detects an approaching diver [51]. It may also switch from one individual or species to another [78].

The shrimps Z. soror has been found on at least 23 species of shallow-water tropical starfish, such as Acanthaster planci, Culcita novaeguineae, Choriaster granulatus, and Linckia laevigata in Vietnam [78], as well as on various hosts, such as starfish and cushion stars. These include the crown-of-thorns starfish in Thailand [51], cushion star Culcita novaeguineae [80], and starfish Pentaceraster cumingi [79]. Zenopontonia soror can recognize, differentiate, and obtain protection from host species based on host-provided chemical and visual cues [78,80]. A record high of 25 Z. soror individuals was found on a single cushion star in the waters around Ko Waen Island in southern Thailand [51], and an even more astonishing 53 individuals were found on a crown-of-thorns starfish in Kuroshima Island, Japan [81]. The highest record in the present study was five shrimp on a single E. luzonicus. The difference in numbers may be attributable to variations in the size of the starfish species. Echinaster luzonicus is smaller than the cushion star and the crown-of-thorns starfish; thus, the load capacity of symbiotic shrimp is limited. This is also supported by Antokhina and Britayev [78], who suggested that the distribution of the starfish shrimp on its hosts in Vietnam does not depend directly on host abundance but is rather related to the host size, oral surface area, and morphological complexity.

Clear evidence obtained by directly observing, conducting experiments, and analyzing feeding appendages has led to the argument that Z. soror is an obligate commensal symbiont of starfish [36,78,80]. The shrimp highly depends on its host for nutrition and protection. The morphology of the mandible and chelae indicate that Z. soror may browse on mucus or mucus-entrapped particles [36]. Olliff [80] suggested that the shrimp may feed on host ectoparasites, similar to other symbionts living on larger hosts. Zenopontonia soror has the ability to change its color patterns to match its hosts in order to increase the survival rate [8082]. These observations demonstrate coevolution between the starfish host and the Z. soror symbiont.

Asterophilia carlae—The scaleworm A. carlae was a noteworthy discovery in our samples. This scaleworm belongs to the highly diverse family Polynoidae, which contains numerous symbiotic species associated with other marine invertebrates [17,83,84]. Asterophilia carlae is distributed in regions of the Pacific Ocean, Fiji, and temperate, subtropical, and tropical waters [85]. Taxonomic records reveal that this species had not been previously recorded in waters around Taiwan or in seas adjacent to Mainland China [65]. This is the first record of A. carlae with E. luzonicus in Taiwanese waters since it was originally observed on the blue starfish Linkia laevigater laevigata in Fijian and Indonesian waters [32]. Its congener species, A. culcitae Britayev & Fauchald, 2005 [33] was first reported to be distributed in Vietnam [42], but it has yet to be found in Taiwanese waters. Historical records of A. carlae in the waters of Taiwan are not available. The record made in the present study is the northernmost record of this species in the world. Notably, this study is the first to document A. carlae in these regional waters. However, details concerning the presence of A. carlae in the waters of Taiwan remain unclear.

Hosts of A. carlae are mainly restricted to the class Asteroidea; host species in the class Crinoidea are rare [17]. However, the relationship between A. carlae and many symbiont polynoid scaleworms and their hosts remains poorly understood [86]. Gastrolepidia clavigera, a widespread polynoid scaleworm, is very similar to A. carlae and is ectosymbiotic with holothuroids [33]. This species was considered commensal [17] until Britayev and Lyskin [55] revealed it to be a parasite; it was found to feed on host tissue. It also feeds on parasitic copepods, but this does not afford greater advantage than does association with a host. Nevertheless, some symbiotic relationships between two partners can be shifted depending on the situation, such as from commensalism to parasitism [87]. Knowledge of A. carlae and its hosts is insufficient to determine the mode of symbiosis. Further studies should carefully account for the presence or absence of “harm” and “benefit” to reveal the true interspecific interaction.

The intrusion of warm South China Sea water through the Luzon Strait in the northern South China Sea may play a pivotal role in transporting the copepod Calanoides philippinensis to the northern waters of the western Pacific Ocean under the influence of the Kuroshio Current [88,89]. The results suggest that A. carlae in planktonic larval stage may also use the same pathway to move northward to the Kueishan Island reef area. In sum, the Kuroshio Current might contribute crucially to the geographic dispersal and distribution of A. carlae.

Martin and Britayev [17] reported a prevalence of 3.3%–13% but did not mention the examined number of hosts. The prevalence might be influenced by variable bathymetric [90], spatial [91], temporal [17], and host-related factors [92]. The present study examination of 116 and 138 starfish species in July and September 2020, respectively, demonstrated that the prevalence of A. carlae was low (average: 0.79%). We confirm the presence of A. carlae in the study area. Further studies are warranted to provide information on species population, seasonal succession, and other biological factors.

Conclusion

Among diverse heterospecific associations, the best visualized results may be obtained for symbiosis, which is maintained through spatiotemporal adaptive interactions [53]. The present study documented three species of ectosymbionts obtained from E. luzonicus. The findings provide insights into the relationship between each macrosymbiont species and E. luzonicus; furthermore, they advance the knowledge of the ecological role of starfish and their symbiotic associations. Determining whether the relationship of these macrosymbionts with their host starfish was epibiotic, commensal, or parasitic was challenging. We found no evidence of injuries on the surface or soft tissue of host starfish. Studies on intraspecific interactions of symbionts and their possible effects on the growth of reef starfish under laboratory conditions are required to gain a comprehensive understanding of their symbiotic relationships in nature.

Supporting information

S1 File. Supporting information file provides information of all figures.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their invaluable, detailed suggestions and criticisms, which greatly enhanced this paper.

Data Availability

All relevant data pertaining to this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Funding Statement

Financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan through grant no. MOST 108-2811-M-019-504, MOST 109-2811-M-019-504 and MOST 110-2811-M-019-504 to L.-C. Tseng, as well as grant no. MOST 106-2621-M-019-001, MOST 107-2621-M-019-001, MOST 108-2621-M-019-003, MOST 109-2621-M-019-002, MOST 110-2621-M-019-001 and MOST 111-2621-M-019-001, and Center of Excellence for Ocean Engineering (Grant No. 109J13801-51 110J13801-51, 111J13801-51) to J.-S. Hwang. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Song S-R. The Kueishantau—An active volcanic island of Taiwan. Taiwan Nat Sci. 2013; 32: 74–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tseng L-C, Limviriyakul P, Ho P-H, Hwang J-S. The presence of Macromedaeus distinguendus (De Haan, 1835) (Brachyura, Xanthidae) in the shallow hydrothermal vent system off Northeastern Taiwan. Crustaceana. 2018; 91: 879–895. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hung J-J, Yeh H-Y, Peng S-H, Chang Y-P, Hwang J-S. External-forcing modulation on temporal variations of hydrothermalism-evidence from sediment cores in a submarine venting field off northeastern Taiwan. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13: e0207774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lebrato M, Wang YV, Tseng L-C, Achterberg EP, Chen X-G, Molinero J-C, et al. Earthquake and typhoon trigger unprecedented transient shifts in shallow hydrothermal vents biogeochemistry. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 16926. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53314-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chan BKK, Wang T-W, Chen P-C, Lin C-W, Chan T-Y, Tsang L-M. Community structure of macrobiota and environmental parameters in shallow water hydrothermal vents off Kueishan Island, Taiwan. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0148675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen C, Chan T-Y, Chan BKK. Molluscan diversity in shallow water hydrothermal vents off Kueishan Island, Taiwan. Mar Biodivers. 2017; 48: 709–714. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ng NK, Huang J-F, Ho P-H. Description of a new species of hydrothermal crab, Xenograpsus testudinatus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Grapsidae) from Taiwan. Natl Taiwan Mus. 2000; 10: 191–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dahms H-U, Tseng L-C, Hwang J-S. Life history of the copepod Paramphiascella sp. affected by hydrothermal vent effluents. J Mar Sci Tech-Taiw. 2013; 21: 297–303. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dahms H-U, Tseng L-C, Shim DM-C, Hwang J-S. Hydrothermal vent effluents affect life stages of the copepod Tisbe sp.. J Mar Sci Tech-Taiw. 2014; 22: 82–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chang C-M. Sulfide tolerance and detoxification of the vent crab, Xenograpsus testudinatus. Master thesis. Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University. Taipei, Taiwan. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hung HY. A study on community structure of coral reef fishes in the waters of Turtle Island, northeastern Taiwan. Master thesis, National Taiwan Ocean University. Keelung, Taiwan. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Limviriyakul P. Biodiversity of symbiotic associations of decapods and host selection of Tetralia rubridactyla in coral reefs of northeastern Taiwan. D. Phil. Dissertation, National Taiwan Ocean University. Keelung, Taiwan. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wray GA. Echinodermata. Spiny-skinned animals: sea urchins, starfish, and their allies. 1999. http://tolweb.org/Echinodermata/2497. Accessed 5 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Britayev TA, Beksheneva LF, Deart YV, Mekhova ES. Structure and variability of symbiotic assemblages associated with feather stars (Crinoidea: Comatulida) Himerometra robustipinna. Oceanology. 2016; 56: 666–674. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Limviriyakul P, Tseng L-C, Hwang J-S, Shih T-W. Anomuran and brachyuran symbiotic crabs in coastal areas between the southern Ryukyu arc and the Coral Triangle. Zool Stud. 2016a; 55: 1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Limviriyakul P, Tseng L-C, Shih T-W, Hwang J-S. Symbiotic decapods in reef area of northeastern Taiwan. J. Ocean Underw Technol. 2016b; 26: 13–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Martin D, Britayev TA. Symbiotic polychaetes: review of known species. Oceanogr Mar Biol, Annu Rev. 1998; 35: 217–340. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Purcell S, Conand C, Uthicke S, Byrne M. Ecological roles of exploited sea cucumbers. Oceanogr Mar Biol, Annu Rev. 2016; 54: 367–386. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yogesh Kumar JS, Raghunathan C, Venkataraman K. A report on some symbiotic shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda) from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Scholars Acad. J Biosci. 2015; 3: 113–119. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Limviriyakul P, Tseng L-C, Tsai Y-H, Hwang J-S, Shih T-W. Baseline diversity and host relationships of symbiotic caridean shrimps on the coast of northern Taiwan, southern East China Sea, prior to the establishment of a conservation area. Mar Biodivers. 2020; 50: 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brasseur L, Caulier G, Lepoint G, Gerbaux P, Eeckhaut I. Echinometra mathaei and its ectocommensal shrimps: The role of sea urchin spinochrome pigments in the symbiotic association. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 17540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ho JS, Dojiri M, Hendler G, Deets GB. A new species of Copepoda (Thaumatopsyllidae) symbiotic with a brittle star from California, USA, and designation of a new order Thaumatopsylloida. J Crustac Biol. 2003; 23: 582–594. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sweet E. Fossil Groups: Modern forms: Asteroids: Extant Orders of the Asteroidea. University of Bristol. 2005. https://web.archive.org/web/20070714073619/ http://palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/Palaeofiles/Fossilgroups/asteroz2/index_f/mod_fm.html. Accessed 12 March 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chao SM. New records of sea stars (Asteroidea: Echinodermata) from the continental shelf of Taiwan. Zool Stud. 2000; 39: 275–284. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chao SM. Research and status of Taiwan echinoderm diversity and database. In: 2008 Workshop: Research and status of Taiwan species diversity. 2008. http://2008checklist.biodiv.tw/disc2008/doc/Shi-Ming%20Chao.doc. Accessed 12 April 2021.
  • 26.Chan TY, Yu HP. Decapod crustacean fauna study in Taiwan. J Fish Soc Taiwan. 2002; 29: 163–171. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chang SC. Taxonomic studies on families Hippolytidae and Processidae (Crustacea, Decapoda, Caridea) of Taiwan. Master thesis, National Taiwan Ocean University. Keelung, Taiwan. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chang SC, Komai T, Chan TY. First record of the hippolytid shrimp genus Lebbeus White, 1847 (Decapoda: Caridea) from Taiwan, with the description of three new species. J Crustac Biol. 2010; 30: 727–744. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wei T-P, Hwang J-S, Tsai M-L, Fang L-S. New records of gall crabs (Decapoda, Cryptochiridae) from Orchid Island, Taiwan, northwestern Pacific. Crustaceana. 2005; 78: 1063–1077. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wei T-P, Chen H-C, Lee Y-C, Tsai M-L, Hwang J-S, Peng S-H, et al. Gall polymorphism of coral-inhabiting crabs (Decapoda, Cryptochiridae): A new perspective. J Mar Sci Tech-Taiw. 2013; 21: 304–307. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fauchald K. The polychaete worms. Definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. Nat Hist Mus Los Angeles County, Sci Ser. 1977; 28: 1–188. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hanley JR. Revision of the scaleworm genera Arctonoe Chamberlin and Gastrolepidia Schmarda (Polychaeta: Polynoidae) with the erection of a new subfamily Arctonoinae. The Beagle, Records of the Northern Territory Mus Arts Sci. 1989; 6: 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Britayev TA, Fauchald K. New species of symbiotic scaleworms Asterophilia (Polychaeta, Polynoidae) from Vietnam. Invertebr Zool. 2005; 2: 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Adams A. Monograph of the genera Eulima, Niso, Leiostraca, Obeliscus, Pyramidella, and Monoptygma. In: Sowerby GB II (ed.). Thesaurus Conchyliorum. 1854; 793–826, pls.169-172. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Okutani T. Marine mollusks in Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Tokai University Press. 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bruce AJ. The shrimps associated with Indo-west Pacific echinoderms, with the description of a new species in the genus Periclimenes Costa, 1844 (Crustacea: Pontoniinae). Aust Mus Mem. 1982; 16: 191–216. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chace FA, Bruce AJ. The caridean shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda) of the Albatross Philippine expedition, 1907–1910, Part 6: Superfamily Palaemonoidea. Smithson Contrib Zool. 1993; 543: 1–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Holthuis LB. The recent genera of the caridean and stenopodidean shrimps (Crustacea, Decapoda): With an appendix on the order Amphionidacea. Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, Leiden. 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Coleman N. Sea Stars: Echinoderms of Asia / Indo-Pacific. Australia: Neville Coleman’s Underwater Geographic Pty Ltd. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lu YL. A splendid sea world of Penghu. Special publication no. 16. Keelung: Fisheries Research Institute, Council of Agriculture. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ye LC. Dongsha- The blue coral sea. Taichung, Taiwan: Wu Nan Books. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Antokhina TI, Britayev TA. Sea stars and their macrosymbionts in the Bay of Nhatrang, Southern Vietnam. Paleontol J. 2012; 46: 894–908. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Putchakarn S, Sonchaeng P. Echinoderm fauna of Thailand: History and inventory reviews. Sci Asia. 2004; 30: 417–428. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Soota TD, Sastry DRK. A note on two species of Echinaster Müller and Troschel (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) from Indian Ocean. Records Zool Survey India. 1979; 75: 343–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sim YK, Tan SH, Zulfigar Y. The diversity and abundance of the Sea Stars (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) from coral reefs of the central South China Sea. Publ Seto Mar Biol Lab Spec Publ Ser. 2009; 9: 25–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shao KT, Lin HJ. A frontier in the South China Sea—Biodiversuty of Taiping Island, Nansha Islands. Wu-Nan Books. Taichung, Taiwan. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mbana YR, Daud Y, Bullu NI. Diversity of starfish (Asteroidea) in Lamalaka beach, Kecamatan Ile Boleng, East Flores District. Indigenous Biologi. 2020; 3: 57–67. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Matsuoka N. Genetic variation in two starfish, Acanthaster planci and Echinaster luzonicus, from Okinawa. Bull Fac Agric Life Sci, Hirosaki Univ. 2005; 8: 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mortensen T. Papers from Dr. Th. Mortensen’s Pacific Expedition, 1914–16, 39. Two new ctenophores. Vidensk Medd Dan Nat Foren Kjøbenhavn. 1927; 83: 277–288. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Barel CDN, Kramers PGN. A survey of the echinoderm associates of the north-east Atlantic area. Zool Verh. 1977; 156: 1–159. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Thamrongnawasawat T, Wisespongpand P, Limviriyakul P. Reef fauna of Thailand. The Agricultural Research Development Agency. Bangkok. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Byrne M, O’Hara TD. Australian echinoderms: Biology, ecology and evolution. CSIRO publishing. Clayton. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Castro P. Brachyuran crabs symbiotic with scleractinian corals: A review of their biology. Micronesica. 1976; 12: 99–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Castro P. Animal symbioses in coral reef communities: A review. Symbiosis. 1988; 5: 161–184. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Britayev TA, Lyskin SA. Feeding of the symbiotic polychaete Gastrolepidia clavigera (Polynoidae) and its interactions with its hosts. Doklady Biol Sci. 2002; 385: 352–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Knudsen JW. Trapezia and Tetralia (Decapoda, Brachyura, Xanthidae) as obligate ectoparasites of pocilloporid and acroporid corals. Pac Sci. 1967; 21: 51–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bruce AJ. Records of some rare pontoniid shrimps from Australian waters, with remarks upon the mouthparts of some species of the genus Periclimenes Costa, 1844. Zool Verh. 1971; 114: 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kropp RK. Feeding biology and mouthpart morphology of three species of coral gall crabs (Decapoda: Cryptochiridae). J Crustac Biol. 1986; 6: 377–384. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ashelby CW, De Grave S, Johnson ML. Preliminary observations on the mandibles of palaemonoid shrimp (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Palaemonoidea). PeerJ. 2015; 3: e846. doi: 10.7717/peerj.846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Stimson J. Stimulation of fat-body production in the polyps of the coral Pocillopora damicornis by the presence of mutualistic crabs of the genus Trapezia. Mar Biol. 1990; 106: 211–218. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Stella JS, Pratchett MS, Hutchings PA, Jones GP. Coral-associated invertebrates: Density, ecological importance and vulnerability to disturbance. Oceanogr Mar Biol, Annu Rev. 2011; 49:43–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Paulay G. Diversity and distribution of reef organisms. In: Birkeland C (ed.). Life and death of coral reefs. New York: Chapman and Hall. 1997; 298–353. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Veron JEN. Corals of the world. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville. 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Stewart HL, Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ, Brooks AJ. Symbiotic crabs maintain coral health by clearing sediments. Coral Reefs. 2006; 25: 609–615. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Liu R. Checklist of marine biota of China Seas. Science Press, Academia Sinica, Beijing. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hylleberg J, Kilburn RN. Marine molluscs of Vietnam: annotations, voucher material, and species in need of verification. Spec Publ Phuket Mar Biol Cent. 2003; 28: 1–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Galli C. Worldwide mollusc species data base, Family: Eulimidae. 2015. https://www.bagniliggia.it/WMSD/PDFFamily/EULIMIDAE.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2021.
  • 68.Tan SK, Woo HPM. A preliminary checklist of the molluscs of Singapore. Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, National University of Singapore. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Schepman MM. The Prosobranchia of the Siboga Expedition. Part III. Gymnoglossa. E.J. Brill, Leiden. 1909. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Odhner NH. Results of Dr E. Mjöbergs Swedish scientific expeditions to Australia 1910–1913, XVII. Mollusca. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Academiens Nya Handlingar, Stockholm. 1917.
  • 71.Chen YJ, Wu JY, Chen CTA, Liu LL. Effects of low-pH stress on shell traits of the dove snail, Anachis misera, inhabiting shallow-vent environments off Kueishan Islet, Taiwan. Biogeosciences. 2015; 12: 2631–2639. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Warén A. A Generic Revision of the Family Eulimidae (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia). J Molluscan Stud. 1983; 49: 1–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lyskin SA, Britaev TA. Symbionts of holothurians from South Vietnam: Intra-and interspecific interactions. Dokl Biol Sci. 2005; 401: 116–119. doi: 10.1007/s10630-005-0060-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Queiroz V, de Souza LS, Pimenta AD, Cunha CM. New host records to Melanella (Caenogastropoda: Eulimidae) from the Brazilian coast. Mar Biodiversity Rec. 2013; 6: 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Dgebuadze P, Kantor Y. Symbiotic associations between gastropods (Gastropoda, Eulimidae) and sea stars Linckia laevigata (Echinodermata, Asteroidea) in South Vietnam. Zool Zh. 2009; 88: 414–418. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hall MR, Motti C, Kroon F. The potential role of the giant triton snail, Charonia tritonis (Gastropoda: Ranellidae) in mitigating populations of the crown-of-thorns starfish. Integrated Pest Management of Crown-of-Thorns Starfish. Report to the National Environmental Science Programme. Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited, Cairns. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Jeng MS. Studies on the land and aquatic decapod crustacean fauna of the Kenting National Park (II)–Communities of decapod crustaceans around the sea. Kenting National Park, Ministry of the Interior, Pingtung. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Antokhina TI, Britayev TA. Host recognition behaviour and its specificity in pontoniine shrimp Zenopontonia soror (Nobili, 1904)(Decapoda: Caridea: Palaemonidae) associated with shallow-water sea stars. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2020; 524: 151302. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.González MJV, Borrero-Pérez GH. First records and new information on the associations of echinoderms with other phyla in the rocky reefs of northern Chocó, Colombian Pacific. ZooKeys. 2020; 921: 1–22. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.921.32802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Olliff ERR. Symbiosis of the sea star shrimp, Periclimenes soror Nobili, 1904 (Decapoda, Palaemonidae), and cushion star, Culcita novaeguineae Müller & Troschel, 1842 (Echinodermata, Asteroidea, Oreasteridae): host finding and benefits. Crustaceana. 2013; 86: 564–577. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sakaji H, Okutani T. Association of Periclimenes soror Nobili (Decapoda, Caridea) with starfishes off Kuroshima Island, Yaeyama group. Res on Crustac. 1988; 17: 29–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Antokhina TI, Sorokin PA. Molecular genetic analysis of the two morphs of sea star shrimp Periclimemes soror Nobili, 1904, the symbionts of tropic sea stars. Russ J Genet. 2010; 46: 855–860. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sugiyama T, Jimi N, Goto R. Widening the host range of the ectosymbiotic scale-worm Asterophilia culcitae (Annelida: Polynoidae) to three echinoderm classes, with data on its body color variation. Plankton Benthos Res. 2020; 15: 289–295. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Read G, Fauchald K. World Polychaeta Database. Polynoidae Kinberg, 1856. 2021a. http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=939. Accessed 3 May 2021.
  • 85.Read G, Fauchald K. World Polychaeta Database. Asterophilia carlae Hanley, 1989. 2021b. http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=326679. Accessed 12 March 2021.
  • 86.Britayev TA, Zamishliak EA. Association of the commensal scaleworm Gastrolepidia clavigera (Polychaeta: Polynoidae) with holothurians near the coast of South Vietnam. Ophelia. 1996; 45: 175–190. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Fautin DG, Guo CC, Hwang J-S. Costs and benefits of the symbiosis between the anemoneshrimp Periclimenes brevicarpalis and its host Entacmaea quadricolor. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1995; 129: 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tseng L-C, Hung J-J, Chen Q-C, Hwang J-S. Seasonality of the copepod assemblages associated with interplay waters off northeastern Taiwan. Helgol Mar Res. 2013; 67: 507–520. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Tseng L-C, Hung J-J, Molinero JC, Chen Q-C, Hwang J-S. Indicator species and seasonal succession of planktonic copepod assemblages driven by the interplay of subtropical and temperate waters in the southern East China Sea. Crustaceana. 2015; 88: 96–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Abelló P, Sardá R, Masalles D. Infestation of some mediterranean bracyuran crabs by the polychaete Iphitime cuenoti. Cah Biol Mar. 1988; 29: 149–162. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hendler G, Meyer DL. An association of a polychaete, Branchiosyllis exilis with an ophiuroid, Ophiocoma echinata, in Panama. Bull Mar Sci. 1982; 32: 736–744. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Comely CA, Ansell AD. The occurrence of the eunicid polychaetes Iphitime cuenoti Fauvel and I. paguri Fage & Legendre in crabs from the Scottish west coast. Ophelia. 1989; 31: 59–76. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Wan-Xi Yang

18 Jul 2022

PONE-D-21-26592Macrosymbionts of starfish Echinaster luzonicus (Gray, 1840), with a new biogeographic record of scaleworm Asterophilia carlae Hanley, 1989, in the waters of a volcanic western Pacific islandPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hwang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

1. Data in the current manuscript are from the year 2020. More data are needed for this work. 

2. The "Discussion" part needs in-depth-discussion.

3. This manuscript needs  a suitable title.

4. All figures should be added the scale bar.

If you plan to submit a revision, the revision will be sent to previous reviewers for further consideration. Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 01 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Wan-Xi Yang, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: "Financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan through grant no. MOST 108-2811-M-019-504, MOST 109-2811-M-019-504 and MOST 110-2811-M-019-504 to L.-C. Tseng, as well as grant no. MOST 106-2621-M-019-001, MOST 107-2621-M-019-001, MOST 108-2621-M-019-003, MOST 109-2621-M-019-002, and MOST 110-2621-M-019-001, and Center of Excellence for Ocean Engineering (Grant No. 109J13801-51) to J.-S. Hwang. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

We note that one or more of the authors is affiliated with the funding organization, indicating the funder may have had some role in the design, data collection, analysis or preparation of your manuscript for publication; in other words, the funder played an indirect role through the participation of the co-authors. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please do the following:

a. Review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. These amendments should be made in the online form.

b. Confirm in your cover letter that you agree with the following statement, and we will change the online submission form on your behalf: 

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.

4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

5. Please upload a copy of Supporting Information S1 file which you refer to in your text on page 24.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: After reading the whole manuscript, I do not see the reasons to why scaleworm Asterophilia carlae should appear in the title as there are other new findings as well. What is so special with scaleworm Asterophilia carlae?

Results were well presented and discussed. However, I suggest discussion to start with general observation followed by specific data. Therefore, from lines 277 to 290 where the others are discussing general observation, should have stated earlier.

Line 155: I don’t know the reason why the others present issues of medicinal value of the species Echinaster luzonicus. I think the others were supposed to confine themselves in distribution and variability among the study species especially in this paragraph.

Compare lines 157-159 and lines 130-132: While previous studies show different macrosymbionts to coexist on E. luzonicus, the findings of this study shows each individuat starfish to host one species of macrosymbiont. I therefore expected this to be discussed here

Reviewer #2: The data of the ms are only from 2020, so the results are somewhat accidental and simple, the reliability need to be considered. It is recommended to increase the sampling time. All figures should be added the scale bar.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Nov 30;17(11):e0278288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278288.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Sep 2022

Author responses to referee comments (29th August 2022)

Date: Jul 18 2022 03:12PM

To: "Jiang-Shiou Hwang" jshwang@mail.ntou.edu.tw;jshwang@ntou.edu.tw

From: "PLOS ONE" plosone@plos.org

Subject: PLOS ONE Decision: Revision required [PONE-D-21-26592]

PONE-D-21-26592

Macrosymbionts of starfish Echinaster luzonicus (Gray, 1840), with a new biogeographic record of scaleworm Asterophilia carlae Hanley, 1989, in the waters of a volcanic western Pacific island

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hwang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

1. Data in the current manuscript are from the year 2020. More data are needed for this work.

2. The "Discussion" part needs in-depth-discussion.

3. This manuscript needs a suitable title.

4. All figures should be added the scale bar.

If you plan to submit a revision, the revision will be sent to previous reviewers for further consideration.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 01 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

• A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

• A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

• An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Wan-Xi Yang, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Authors’ response: We are thankful for the very constructive comments and efforts from two reviewers. We fully agree with the suggestions and have corrected them accordingly and hopefully eradicated errors.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained for the work. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: "Financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan through grant no. MOST 108-2811-M-019-504, MOST 109-2811-M-019-504 and MOST 110-2811-M-019-504 to L.-C. Tseng, as well as grant no. MOST 106-2621-M-019-001, MOST 107-2621-M-019-001, MOST 108-2621-M-019-003, MOST 109-2621-M-019-002, and MOST 110-2621-M-019-001, and Center of Excellence for Ocean Engineering (Grant No. 109J13801-51) to J.-S. Hwang. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

We note that one or more of the authors is affiliated with the funding organization, indicating the funder may have had some role in the design, data collection, analysis or preparation of your manuscript for publication; in other words, the funder played an indirect role through the participation of the co-authors. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please do the following:

a. Review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. These amendments should be made in the online form.

b. Confirm in your cover letter that you agree with the following statement, and we will change the online submission form on your behalf:

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.

4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

5. Please upload a copy of Supporting Information S1 file which you refer to in your text on page 24.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1:

After reading the whole manuscript, I do not see the reasons to why scaleworm Asterophilia carlae should appear in the title as there are other new findings as well. What is so special with scaleworm Asterophilia carlae?

Authors’ response: We are thankful for the constructive comments. Since scaleworm Asterophilia carlae was found for the first time in the study waters, therefore its name was specifically put in the title. We changed the title to “Macrosymbionts of starfish Echinaster luzonicus (Gray, 1840) in the waters of a volcanic western Pacific island”.

Results were well presented and discussed. However, I suggest discussion to start with general observation followed by specific data. Therefore, from lines 277 to 290 where the others are discussing general observation, should have stated earlier.

Authors’ response: We are thankful for the very constructive comments and efforts from the reviewer. In the corrected version, we have rearranged the paragraphs and descriptions as suggested.

Line 155: I don’t know the reason why the others present issues of medicinal value of the species Echinaster luzonicus. I think the others were supposed to confine themselves in distribution and variability among the study species especially in this paragraph.

Authors’ response: Thanks for the useful advice. This sentence has been deleted as suggested.

Compare lines 157-159 and lines 130-132: While previous studies show different macrosymbionts to coexist on E. luzonicus, the findings of this study shows each individuat starfish to host one species of macrosymbiont. I therefore expected this to be discussed here.

Authors’ response: The term "coexist" means that these symbiotic animals have all been recorded on starfish E. luzonicus. These references do not record the presence of two coexisting animals on a single starfish individual.

Reviewer #2:

The data of the ms are only from 2020, so the results are somewhat accidental and simple, the reliability need to be considered. It is recommended to increase the sampling time. All figures should be added the scale bar.

Authors’ response: We are thankful for the suggestions. Due to research funding constraints, we can only conduct the survey in 2020, so we do not have survey data for 2021 to the present. The survey will continue in the future with the support of funding. In July of this year (2022), we visited the surveyed reefs again and only recorded Zenopontonia soror symbiosis with starfish E. luzonicus. So far, there are very few records of Asterophilia carlae, and probably its population is not abundant, so the chance of discovery is also very low. In 2020, both surveys covered more than 90% of the reef area, and the results obtained can definitely be relied on. We have added a scale bar in Figures 3-5 in the corrected version of the manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: MS TI starfish symbionts Response to Reviewers 0829.docx

Decision Letter 1

Wan-Xi Yang

15 Nov 2022

Macrosymbionts of starfish Echinaster luzonicus (Gray, 1840), with a new biogeographic record of scaleworm Asterophilia carlae Hanley, 1989, in the waters of a volcanic western Pacific island

PONE-D-21-26592R1

Dear Dr. Hwang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Wan-Xi Yang, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I accept the manuscript after major revision done. The authors were able to answer one question after another I gave in my first review. They also improved presentation of the manuscript, i find it to be better than the way it was before. Basing on my understanding and the way they discussed the data, I recommend that the manuscript is accepted

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Boping Tang

**********

Acceptance letter

Wan-Xi Yang

18 Nov 2022

PONE-D-21-26592R1

Macrosymbionts of starfish Echinaster luzonicus (Gray, 1840) in the waters of a volcanic western Pacific island

Dear Dr. Hwang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Wan-Xi Yang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Supporting information file provides information of all figures.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: MS TI starfish symbionts Response to Reviewers 0829.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data pertaining to this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES