Skip to main content
Women's Health Reports logoLink to Women's Health Reports
. 2022 Nov 14;3(1):931–936. doi: 10.1089/whr.2022.0026

Social Networking Services as a Tool for Support of Mothers: A Literature Review

Tomoko Oto 1,, Jun Watanabe 2,, Yasunobu Ito 3, Kazuhiko Kotani 2,*
PMCID: PMC9712041  PMID: 36479371

Abstract

Background:

Difficulties experienced by mothers in raising their children can be resolved using social networking services (SNSs). Being aware of issues associated with SNSs in such situations may be useful for supporting mothers. We herein review the issues associated with using SNSs to support mothers.

Methods:

This review was conducted using an electronic search engine to search for articles that described issues associated with using SNSs to support mothers, and which were published up to August 2022.

Results:

After screening, a total of 19 articles were included. We thematically categorized the contents into three major issues associated with using SNSs for support of mothers: (1) issues on the management side, (2) issues on the user side, and (3) social and environmental issues. The mainly discussed issues were the safety of using SNSs and/or securing and training human resources on the management side, busyness of mothers on the user side, as well as sociocultural and communication environment-related limitations as social and environmental issues.

Conclusions:

The issues we detected would aid in developing the use of SNSs as a tool to support mothers. Further research on these issues is needed.

Keywords: information technology, internet, mothers, social media, social support

Introduction

Life events, such as pregnancy, childbirth, and childcare, occasionally place negative stress on mothers' mental health; for instance, mothers tend to become depressed1 and to be isolated from diverse social networks.2 Social isolation lowers a mother's self-esteem, which in turn worsens her own health and thereby the health of her children.3 Postpartum depression (the incidence of which is estimated to be 12%–14%4,5) is a mental disorder that can lead to maternal suicide. Support for the health and well-being of all mothers and children is thus recognized to be a matter of global importance.6 However, with the exception of Northern Europe, the rate of men taking parental leave remains low worldwide; thus, the physical and mental burden of childcare on mothers remains high.7

For this reason, medical institutions offer some support services (e.g., childcare and postpartum breastfeeding guide) for mothers. This helps mothers gain knowledge and skill in childcare. When considering support for mothers during child-rearing, they may also need comprehensive nonmedical support from their families and other mothers. In addition, due to COVID-19 pandemic, mothers may be encouraged to avoid face-to-face connections and support. As a result, mothers are not able to help each other or receive appropriate information. Thus, online remote support has garnered attention over face-to-face support.

Currently, various social networking services (SNSs) have been developed, and research on supporting mothers with SNSs and the communities has been conducted in many countries. In general, such social networking and online networks have a positive impact on mothers.3,8–15 In particular, for socially vulnerable adolescent mothers, social networking sites are proper tools for receiving social support, including information on child-rearing.9,10,13 In relation to mental health, communication among mothers on social networking sites can reduce maternal stress9,12 and increase maternal self-esteem.9 Social networking sites are also reported to reduce mothers' sense of loneliness during child-rearing.3

Knowing the general issues related to SNSs may be useful for supporting mothers. However, such issues have not been summarized. This study therefore examined the issues associated with using SNSs as tools to support mothers in the medical field.

Methods

This review was conducted using an electronic search engine to identify published articles based on the following search keywords: mother, online social network, social networking service, SNS, social media. A search was then conducted using PubMed and CENTRAL for articles published through to August 3, 2022. Boolean operators were included in search terms, using truncation to further broaden results and include plurals or similar terminology: “Mothers”[Mesh] OR “Mother”[tiab] OR “mothers”[tiab]) AND (“Online Social Networking”[Mesh] OR “Online Social Network”[tiab] OR “Online Social Networking”[Mesh] OR “Online Social Networking”[tiab] OR “Social Networking Ser-vices “[tiab] OR “Social Networking Sites”[tiab] OR “SNS”[tiab] OR “ Social Media”[tiab].

The inclusion criteria were articles that evaluated the effects of SNS on maternal health in mothers. Articles that reported on the term “SNS” (the abbreviation) with a different meaning from social networking services (e.g., sympathetic nervous system16), articles in which the study subjects were not mothers (e.g., midwives17,18), which focused on the development of a system (e.g., the process of creation of messages19–21), and which provided an overview of SNSs (e.g., the actual states of use of SNSs in pregnancy22) were excluded.

Figure 1 shows the flowchart of the process. First, titles and abstracts were screened according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Second, full-text screening was conducted. Finally, selected articles were carefully read to identify factors that were issues associated with using SNSs in support. Quantitative studies using all methodologies were included in this review.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Flowchart of the study selection process. SNS, social networking service.

Issues associated with using SNSs to support mothers were identified and then categorized with reference to the methods using Nvivo23,24: First, selected articles were imported into Nvivo (ver. 20.5.0). Next, sentences from the text of the selected articles that were determined to be issues associated with using SNSs to support mothers were extracted and given appropriate node names to indicate their content. This process was repeated, and multiple nodes were created. After node extraction was completed, nodes with similar contents were grouped together. In this process, another author cross-checked for consistency in the coding approach and interpretation. Finally, the issues were summarized into the major categories of issues. This review method with its thematic categorization was similarly used in a previous study.11

Results

Screening results

After screening the titles and abstracts, 441 of 482 articles were excluded. After full-text screening, we excluded articles in which an SNS was not used (n = 8), which focused on the development of system (n = 7), which described the actual states of SNSs (n = 2), and in which the study subjects were not mothers (n = 1). Finally, 19 articles were included in this study (Fig. 1).25–43

Characteristics of the selected studies

The characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1. The country with the highest number of reported cases was the United States (n = 6). The common attribute of mothers was pregnancy (n = 5). The SNS most frequently used for intervention was Facebook (n = 13). The most common support target was breastfeeding (n = 6). Most study designs were based on intervention (n = 15). Most studies indicated the positive effect of SNS use on the support target (n = 15).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Included Studies in This Review

Authors Year Country Attributes of mothers Number SNS type Support target Effect Study design
Wallis et al.25 2021 AUS None in particular 120 Facebook Body image E I
Morse and Brown26 2021 UK Local group 2228 Facebook Breastfeeding E CS
Hui et al.27 2021 CAN Indigenous women 125 Facebook Prenatal education E I
Liu et al.28 2021 CHN None in particular 125 WeChat Mental health E I
Chatwin et a.29 2021 UK Pregnant women 156 Facebook Antenatal support E CS
Dumas et al.30 2020 CAN None in particular 84 Facebook Feeding behavior NE I
Dauphin et al.31 2020 USA Pregnant women 288 Facebook Breastfeeding E I
McCarthy et al.32 2020 UK Pregnant women 31 Facebook Information provision E I
Dumas et al.33 2020 CAN None in particular 84 Blog Feeding behavior NE I
Dumas et al.34 2020 CAN None in particular 84 Blog Feeding behavior NE I
Williams et al.35 2019 USA Pregnant, Hispanic women 23 Facebook Body weight E I
Cavalcanti et al.36 2019 BRA Women after childbirth 251 Facebook Breastfeeding E I
Wright et al.37 2019 USA None in particular 798 Blog Information provision E I
Boyd et al.38 2019 USA Depression, postpartum, ethnic minority 24 Facebook Parenting intervention E I
Daley et al.39 2018 USA Pregnant women 1093 Original website Vaccine hesitancy E I
Bridges et al.40 2018 AUS None in particular 1846 Facebook Breastfeeding E CS
Niela-Vilén et al.41 2016 FIN None in particular 124 Facebook Breastfeeding NE I
Bahkali et al.42 2015 SAU None in particular 484 Twitter Breastfeeding E CS
Herring et al.43 2014 USA Urban, low-income 18 Facebook Body weight E I

CS, cross-sectional study; E, effective; I, intervention study; NE, not effective; SNS, social networking service.

After extracting issues associated with using SNSs to support mothers from the 19 articles, three major issues were detected (Table 2): (1) issues on the management side, (2) issues on the user side, and (3) social and environmental issues. As listed in Table 2, first, the management side issues included the following nodes: information security (n = 10), securing and training human resources (n = 9), validity of the system (n = 5), provision of authoritative information (n = 3), quick response (n = 2), and scope of the control of the system (n = 1). These issues were largely related to the safe use of SNSs and the need for professional teams to support mothers.

Table 2.

Details of Issues

Issues Topics described in the articles Total number of articles
Management side Information security25,27,29,32,35,36,38,39,40,41
Securing and training human resources26,29,31,34,36,40–43
Validity of the system25,27,29,32,35
Provision of authoritative information29,32,37
Quick response27,32
Scope of control of system25
15
User side Busyness of mothers25,30,33,34,41
The existence of other support routes29,33,34
The psychological factors of mothers25,27,28,41
7
Social and environment Social and cultural limitations30,36
Communication environment-related limitations25
3

Reference numbers are shown on the top right for each topic.

Second, the user side issues included the following nodes: busyness of mothers (n = 5), existence of other support routes (n = 3), and psychological factors of mothers (n = 3). These issues were related to the situation of mothers with pregnancy, childbirth, and childcare. Third, the social and environmental issues included the following nodes: social and cultural limitations (n = 2) and communication environment-related limitations (n = 1). The issues concretely expressed that geographically, there are areas with no or slow Wi-Fi service25 and that families in low-income countries encounter some problems in joining SNSs or obtaining communication devices.36

Discussion

This study demonstrated three major issues associated with using SNSs as a tool to support mothers during a childbirth and childcare period; that is, the management side issues, user side issues, as well as social and environmental issues. This is the first review to summarize the issues associated with using SNSs for the support of mothers in the medical field. These issues can help SNSs become a more powerful tool for supporting mothers.

In this review, information security and/or securing and training human resources were the most frequently described topics. Information about pregnancy, childbirth, and childcare is extremely personal and private. The information requires sensitive treatment. When such mothers use SNSs, it would be crucial to protect their information. This seems to partly explain the fact that the information security was one of the most frequently described topics. We observed that Facebook was the most frequently used SNS in this review; even though Facebook can be used to create a closed group, information security remains the greatest concern. The information literacy of mothers who join and/or access SNSs is also debatable, although no articles about information literacy were found in this review.

In relation to such literacy, as another topic that was frequently described, securing and training human resources are mandatory when mothers use SNSs. Although mothers require correct medical information on pregnancy, childbirth, and childcare,26,29,31,34,36,40–43 incorrect information can be spread; thus, the involvement of human resources with professional knowledge in social networking sites that provide support for mothers is expected.32 In fact, we could observe that the individuals providing support included licensed midwives,29 trained peer breast-training counselors,40 and female obstetricians/gynecologists with more than 25 years of practice.42 However, securing and training such professional human resources are not commonly present worldwide.

Among the user side issues, busyness of mothers was the most frequently described topic.25,30,33,34,41 It is thought to be reasonable because of the consensus that mothers are busy from the time of pregnancy to the childbirth and childcare periods. The noteworthy point is that mothers stopped or declined to participate in SNSs because of their busy schedules.30,33,34 In this review, most studies found positive effects of SNS use on mothers' health conditions (Table 1); thus, we think that mothers stopping the use of SNSs or declining to use SNSs represent a serious problem. To address this, it is of the utmost importance to design SNSs in an easy way to suit the mothers' schedules.25 In addition, support is required to make the use of SNSs convenient for mothers.

Social and environmental issues included economic difficulties in obtaining access to SNSs and vulnerable communication environments (e.g., Wi-Fi service).25,30,36,44 These social and environmental issues are faced by many mothers all over the world. To overcome this, social support is needed to bridge the digital divide.45 This cannot be realized by efforts in the medical field alone; thus, collaboration with the government is necessary.

The present study was associated with some limitations. First, the areas where SNSs support has been used or is being considered in the articles are mostly developed countries (mainly in Europe and the United States) and such use has not been considered in Asia or developing countries. Therefore, research targeting Asia and developing countries is needed. Second, most of the research subjects were pregnant and breastfeeding women, with few studies on mothers with specific diseases or chronic illnesses. If a mother's problems are disease-specific, her SNS use could be different from that of non-diseased subjects. Third, there were no specific studies to compare the various methods of SNS use that provide effective support for mothers. This will be future work.

Conclusions

This study revealed three major issues with several topics associated with using SNSs as a tool to support mothers. These issues can provide focused hints for the future use of SNSs to support mothers, even while SNSs are simply adopted to supplement various support methods. Further research on this topic is needed.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by Scientific Research from the Foundation for Development of Community.

Abbreviations Used

CS

cross-sectional study

E

effective

I

intervention study

NE

not effective

SNS

social networking service

Authors' Contributions

T.O.: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, visualization, and writing—original draft preparation. J.W.: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, and visualization. K.K.: Conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervision, and project administration. Y.I.: Writing—review and editing, and supervision.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Funding Information

No funding was received for this article.

Cite this article as: Oto T, Watanabe J, Ito Y, Kotani K (2022) Social networking services as a tool for support of mothers: a literature review, Women's Health Reports 3:1, 931–936, DOI: 10.1089/whr.2022.0026.

References

  • 1. Taylor V. Rock a by baby: Feminism, self-help, and postpartum depression, 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Coontz S. The way we really are: Coming to terms with America's changing families. Fam Soc 1997;79:558–559. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mandai M, Kaso M, Takahashi Y, Nakayama T, Loneliness among mothers raising children under the age of 3 years and predictors with special reference to the use of SNS: A community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health 2018;18:131–142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Shorey S, Chee CYI, Ng ED, Chan YH, Tam WWS, Chong YS, Prevalence and incidence of postpartum depression among healthy mothers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res 2018;104:235–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tokumitsu K, Sugawara N, Maruo K, Suzuki T, Shimoda K, Yasui-Furukori N. Prevalence of perinatal depression among Japanese women: A meta-analysis. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2020;19:41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. WHO recommendations on postnatal care of the mother and newborn. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/97603 [Last accessed: December 31, 2021]. [PubMed]
  • 7. Chzhen Y, Gromada A, Rees G.. Are the world's richest countries family friendly?: Policy in the OECD and EU. Fam Friend Polic Rep 2019:1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Holtz B, Smock A, Gastelum DR. Connected motherhood: Social support for moms and moms-to-be on Facebook. Telemed J e-Health 2015;19:875–878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Nolan S, Hendricks J, Towell A. Social networking sites (SNS); exploring their uses and associated value for adolescent mothers in Western Australia in terms of social support provision and building social capital. Midwifery 2015;31:912–919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Nolan S, Hendricks J, Towell-Barnard A. Adolescent mothers' use of social networking sites creating positive mental health outcomes. Aust Nurs Midwifery J 2016;23:50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Nolan S, Hendricks J, Ferguson S. Towell, A. Social networking site (SNS) use by adolescent mothers: Can social support and social capital be enhanced by online social networks?—A structured review of the literature. Midwifery 2017;48:24–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Nolan S, Hendricks J, Ferguson S, Williamson M. Using narrative inquiry to listen to the voices of adolescent mothers in relation to their use of social networking sites (SNS). J Adv Nurs 2018;74:743–751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Nolan S, Hendricks J, Williamson M, Ferguson S. Social networking sites (SNS) as a tool for midwives to enhance social capital for adolescent mothers. Midwifery 2018;62:119–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Nolan SJ, Hendricks J, Williamson M, Ferguson SL. Social networking sites: Can midwives and nurses working with adolescent mothers harness their potential value? Int J Nurs Pract 2020;27:e12895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Bridges N. The faces of breastfeeding support: Experiences of mothers seeking breastfeeding support online. Breastfeed Rev J 2016;24:11–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bourjeili N, Turner M, Stinner J, Ely D. Sympathetic nervous system influences salt appetite in four strains of rats. Physiol Behav 1995;58:437–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. McCarthy R, Choucri L, Ormandy P, Brettle A. Midwifery continuity: The use of social media. Midwifery 2017;52:34–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Tully LA, Piotrowska PJ, Collins DAJ, et al. Evaluation of ‘the father effect’ media campaign to increase awareness of, and participation in, an online father-inclusive parenting program. Health Commun 2019;34:1423–1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Fisher CL, Wright KB, Rising CJ, et al. Helping mothers and daughters talk about environmental breast cancer risk and risk-reducing lifestyle behaviors. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:4757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Fisher CL, Wright KB, Rising CJ, et al. Culturally appropriate breast cancer and environmental risk messages: Targeting racially and ethnically diverse mothers. J Cancer Educ 2021;36:284–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Aryeetey R, Lasisi O, Hromi-Fiedler A, Carroll G, Pérez-Escamilla R, Harding K. Design and testing of communication materials for a breastfeeding social media marketing campaign: Breastfeed Ghana. Dig Health 2020;6:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Zhu C, Zeng R, Zhang W, Evans R, He R. Pregnancy-related information seeking and sharing in the social media era among expectant mothers: Qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2019;21:e13694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zamawe, FC. The implication of using NVivo software in qualitative data analysis: Evidence-based reflections. Malawi Med J 2015;27:13–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wong LP. Data analysis in qualitative research: A brief guide to using Nvivo. Malays Fam Physician 2008;3:14–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Wallis K, Prichard I, Hart L, Yager Z. The body confident mums challenge: A feasibility trial and qualitative evaluation of a body acceptance program delivered to mothers using Facebook. BMC Public Health 2021;21:1052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Morse H, Brown A. Accessing local support online: Mothers' experiences of local Breastfeeding Support Facebook groups. Matern Child Nutr 2021;17:e13227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Hui A, Philips-Beck W, Campbell R, et al. Impact of remote prenatal education on program participation and breastfeeding of women in rural and remote Indigenous communities. E Clin Med 2021;35:100851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Liu G, Wang S, Liao J, et al. The efficacy of WeChat-based parenting training on the psychological well-being of mothers with children with autism during the COVID-19 pandemic: Quasi-experimental study. JMIR Mental Health 2021;8:e23917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Chatwin J, Butler D, Jones J, James L, Choucri L, McCarthy R. Experiences of pregnant mothers using a social media based antenatal support service during the COVID-19 lockdown in the UK: Findings from a user survey. BMJ Open 2021;11:e040649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Dumas AA, Lemieux S, Lapointe A, Provencher V, Robitaille J, Desroches S. Recruitment and retention of mothers of preschoolers and school-aged children in a social media-delivered healthy eating intervention: Lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020;21:706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Dauphin C, Clark N, Cadzow R, et al. #Blackbreastsmatter: Process evaluation of recruitment and engagement of pregnant African American women for a social media intervention study to increase breastfeeding. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e16239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. McCarthy R, Byrne G, Brettle A, Choucri L, Ormandy P, Chatwin J. Midwife-moderated social media groups as a validated information source for women during pregnancy. Midwifery 2020;88:102710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Dumas AA, Lemieux S, Lapointe A, Provencher V, Robitaille J, Desroches S. Long-term effects of a healthy eating blog in mothers and children. Matern Child Nutr 2020;16:e12981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Dumas AA, Lemieux S, Lapointe A, Provencher V, Robitaille J, Desroches S. Effects of an evidence-informed healthy eating blog on dietary intakes and food-related behaviors of mothers of preschool- and school-aged children: A randomized controlled trial. J Acad Nutr Dietetics 2020;120:53–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Williams CB, LaCoursiere DY, Talavera GA, Gahagan S. A feasibility study to promote optimal weight in first time pregnant mothers and their babies: Lessons learned in a US-Mexico border community. Matern Child Health J 2019;23:578–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Cavalcanti DS, Cabral CS, Rodrigo Pinheiro de Toledo Vianna RP, Osório MM. Online participatory intervention to promote and support exclusive breastfeeding: Randomized clinical trial. Matern Child Nutr 2019;15:e12806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wright K, Fisher C, Rising C, Burke-Garcia A, Afanaseva D, Cai X. Partnering with mommy bloggers to disseminate breast cancer risk information: Social media intervention. J Med Internet Res 2019;21:e12441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Boyd RC, Price J, Mogul M, Yates T, Guevara JP. Pilot RCT of a social media parenting intervention for postpartum mothers with depression symptoms. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2019;37:290–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Daley MF, Narwaney KJ, Shoup JA, Wagner NM, Glanz JM. Addressing parents' vaccine concerns: A randomized trial of a social media intervention. Am J Prev Med 2018;55:44–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Bridges N, Howell G, Schmied V. Exploring breastfeeding support on social media. Int Breastfeed J 2018;13:22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Niela-Vilén H, Axelin A, Melender HL, Löyttyniemi E, Salanterä S. Breastfeeding preterm infants—A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of an Internet-based peer-support group. J Adv Nurs 2016;72:2495–2507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Bahkali S, Alkharjy N, Alowairdy M, Househ M, Da'ar O. Alsurimi, K. A social media campaign to promote breastfeeding among Saudi women: A web-based survey study. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015;213:247–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Herring SJ, Cruice JF, Bennett GG, Davey A, Foster GD. Using technology to promote postpartum weight loss in urban, low-income mothers: A pilot randomized controlled trial. J Nutr Educ Behav 2014;46:610–615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Grubesic TH, Durbin KM. The complex geographies of telelactation and access to community breastfeeding support in the state of Ohio. PLoS One 2020;15:e0242457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Acquavita SP, Krummel DA, Talks A, Cobb A, McClure E. Assessing the digital divide among low-income perinatal women: Opportunities for provision of health information and counseling. Telemed J E Health 2019;25:48–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Women's Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES