Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2022 Jun 16;48(6):4857–4865. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02017-7

Serum sclerostin levels in osteoporotic fracture patients

Erwin A Gorter 1,, Casper R Reinders 1, Pieta Krijnen 1, Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra 2, Inger B Schipper 1
PMCID: PMC9712313  PMID: 35705746

Abstract

Purpose

Sclerostin inhibits bone formation and stimulates bone resorption. Previous studies found a positive association between bone density and serum sclerostin, but literature on sclerostin levels in osteoporotic fracture patients is scarce. The aim of the present study was to compare the serum sclerostin levels in osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic fracture patients and to assess the correlation of the sclerostin levels with bone mineral density and vitamin D status.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we included patients over 50 years, with an extremity fracture after low-energy trauma treated between 2012 and 2018, with biobank samples and available bone density measurements by Dual X-ray Absorption. Osteoporosis was diagnosed according the World Health Organisation criteria. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as a 25(OH)D concentration < 30 nmol/L. After defrosting biobank samples, serum sclerostin was measured using the human SOST (sclerostin) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. We prespecified a subgroup analysis including only female patients.

Results

179 patients were included of whom 139(78%) were female. In 46 patients (25.7%), osteoporosis was diagnosed. Bone mineral density was positively associated with sclerostin levels (r = 0.17, p = 0.026) and patients with osteoporosis had a significantly lower serum sclerostin compared to non-osteoporotic fracture patients (mean 41.9 pmol/L vs 48.1 pmol/L; p = 0.03). This difference remained significant after correction for potential confounders. Similar results were found in the subgroup of female patients. No association between serum sclerostin and vitamin D deficiency was found.

Conclusion

Osteoporotic fracture patients had lower levels of sclerostin than non-osteoporotic fracture patients. Future research should focus on the use of sclerostin as biomarker for osteoporosis in fracture patients.

Keywords: Sclerostin, Fracture, Osteoporosis, Bone mineral density, Biomarker

Introduction

Sclerostin is expressed by the SOST gene and was originally identified in patients with sclerosteosis and van Buchem’s disease [1]. The genetic expression is suppressed by mechanical loading of osteocytes and is increased in case of unloading [2]. Sclerostin inhibits bone formation and stimulates bone resorption [3].

Many aspects of the effect range of sclerostin are still unclear. On one hand, an increased sclerostin concentration was found in fracture hematomas of trauma patients [4], suggesting a potential role for sclerostin during the fracture healing process. This possible involvement is supported by the finding that treatment with sclerostin antibodies enhanced bone formation in animal fracture models [58]. These findings have been confirmed by clinical studies on sclerostin antibodies. Antibodies used as anti-osteoporosis treatment showed increased bone density, bone formation and bone resorption-suppressing effects, [9] resulting in increased bone mass, strength and reduced fracture risks [10]. On the other hand, several previous studies discussed a positive association between bone density and serum sclerostin [1127]. A limited number of studies investigated the relation between osteoporosis and sclerostin levels and found divergent results [2832]. Three studies found a lower serum sclerostin concentration in patients with osteoporosis compared to non-osteoporotic patients [28, 29, 31]. One found no difference [30] and another study found an even higher level of sclerostin in osteoporotic patients [32].

Vitamin D, together with parathyroid hormone and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23), regulates the calcium and phosphate homeostasis and, like sclerostin, seems to be involved in the process of fracture healing [33]. In mice, deletion of the SOST gene resulted in a higher levels of serum 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and lower levels of 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, possibly mediated by decreasing FGF-23 [34]. Clinical studies showed an inversed relationship between sclerostin and serum 25OHD concentration, whereas vitamin D supplementation paradoxically increased sclerostin levels [3537]. On the other side, several studies have reported significantly lower levels of sclerostin after receiving vitamin D supplementation[3740], or no effect at all [4143]. This demonstrates that the exact interaction between vitamin D and sclerostin remains unexplained [3, 39, 43].

This study aimed to solve another piece of the puzzle regarding the relation between sclerostin and bone mineral density by comparing the serum sclerostin levels in a general fracture population of osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients with extremity fractures. We hypothesized that sclerostin levels would be positively associated with bone mineral density and subsequently lower levels of sclerostin would be found in osteoporotic fracture patients. Secondary, the relation between serum sclerostin levels and serum vitamin D status was studied in these patients.

Materials and methods

Study design and patient population

This retrospective cross-sectional study included samples from two existing biobanks from the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). One was the Biobank for Bone and Mineral Disorders, the other the vitamin D-study biobank. The biobank for Bone and Mineral Disorders holds blood samples of various patient groups, including fracture patients, whereas the vitamin D-study biobank includes blood samples of adult fracture patients that had participated in a previous study on vitamin D and fractures [44].

We included patients over 50 years with an extremity fracture after a low-energy trauma, who had a dual emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) within 1-year post-fracture. No hip fracture patients were included, because hip fracture patients are not treated in our university hospital. Patients with pathological fractures or multi-trauma patients were excluded. For our fracture liaison service, patients are identified on the departments of orthopaedic surgery, trauma surgery and the emergency department. All fracture patients over 50 years are voluntarily invited, with the exception of patients with an isolated fractures of the skull, hands or feet, a life expectancy < 12 months or who are treated for osteoporosis elsewhere. Full workup consists of a anamnesis, full physical examination, DXA/VFA and laboratory screening and determination of secondary causes of osteoporosis and gonadal status, as described by Malgo et al. [45].

This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the LUMC (B19.063). Previously, the medical ethics committee had approved the biobanking protocols for the Biobank for Bone and Mineral Disorders (EZ-BOT 2019-01) and the Vitamin D study (P12.058). The included patients for these studies gave written informed consent for the use of their blood and data in future studies at the time of blood sample collection.

Bone mineral density

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the lumbar spine (L1–L4) and at the left and right femoral neck using DXA with a Hologic QDR4500 scanner (Holologic, Bedford, MA, USA). T-scores were calculated using reference values from the Third National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES III) comparable with those of the Dutch population. Using World Health Organisation criteria, osteoporosis was defined as a BMD ≥ 2.5 standard deviation (SD) below the average value for young healthy women, expressed as a T-score of ≤ − 2.5. Osteopenia was defined as a BMD > 1SD but < 2.5 SD below the young adult mean (T-score between − 2.5 and − 1) and normal BMD was defined as a T-score ≥  − 1.0.

Laboratory

Serum samples were collected and stored according to the institutional biobank protocol at – 80 ℃. After defrosting, serum sclerostin was measured using the human SOST (sclerostin) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (MSD K151HGC-2, Maryland, USA) in batch analyses with control samples used in all batches, with normal values based on healthy controls 40.0 pg/ml; (95% CI 37.2–42.9 pg/m) [46] as a reference.

Laboratory measurements were already performed at time of blood withdrawal. Serum calcium (albumin-corrected) and creatinine were measured by semiautomated techniques. Plasma intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) was measured by immulite 2500 (Siemens Diagnostics, Breda, The Netherlands) and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH D) by the 25-OH-vitamin D Total assay (DiaSorin D.A./N.V., Brussels, Belgium). Vitamin D deficiency was defined as a serum 25(OH)D concentration less than 30 nmol/L [47].

Data

Data were collected from the electronic medical records of the included patients. This data included sex, age, length, weight, medical history (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyper(para)thyroidism, renal insufficiency and previous fractures), use of medication (vitamin D supplementation, corticosteroids) at the time of fracture and intoxications as well as fracture location. Lab results of the serum vitamin D, calcium, PTH levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were collected.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed for the total patient group as well as for the subgroup of female patients. Patient groups were compared using the Chi-squared test for categorical variables, or the Fisher’s exact test (if expected cell counts < 5). Continuous variables were compared with a t test. A result was considered statistically significant when a p value of < 0.05 was found. The association between sclerostin levels and BMD was assessed by a linear regression analysis. A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between sclerostin levels and osteoporosis while correcting for potential confounders pointed out by the univariable analysis (p < 0.10). Also, a multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between sclerostin levels and vitamin D deficiency. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 23; IBM company, New York) was used for data analysis.

Results

Demographics

A total of 179 patients (24 from the Biobank for Bone and Mineral Disorders and 155 from the Vitamin D biobank) with 181 fractures were included, with a mean age of 65.1 years [standard deviation (SD) 10.5]. All 139 female patients were postmenopausal. The median time between fracture and lab storage was 8 days (interquartile range 9 days) and between fracture and DXA-Scan was 39 days (interquartile range 32 days). Osteoporosis was diagnosed in 46 patients (25.7%) of the total patient group. In all cases of osteoporosis, anti-osteoporosis treatment was started after the DXA-Scan was performed and blood samples were collected. Vitamin D deficiency was found in 34 patients (19.0%). Most fractures were located in the forearm (56.4%) or in the ankle (14.9%; Table 1).

Table 1.

Anatomical location of fractures in 179 patients

Location, n (%) Frequency
Humerus 11 (6.1)
Forearm 102 (56.4)
Hand 16 (8.8)
Femur 2 (1.1)
Lower leg 9 (5.0)
Ankle 27 (14.9)
Foot 14 (7.7)
Total 181 (100)

Analysis of the patients’ characteristics (Table 2) showed that osteoporotic patients with a fracture had a lower body mass index (mean BMI 24.5 kg/m2 Vs 27.5 kg/m2; p < 0.001), used more frequently vitamin D supplementation (10.9% Vs 2.3%; p = 0.03), had a lower mean serum PTH (4.0 pmol/L Vs 5.0 pmol/L; p = 0.04) and a higher mean eGFR (64.4 min/ml/1.73m2 Vs 59.6 min/ml/1.73m2; p = 0.004) compared to the non-osteoporotic patients with a fracture. Patients with a vitamin D deficiency had more often comorbidity (100% Vs 87.6%; p = 0.02), a significantly lower mean serum corrected calcium concentration (2.33 mmol/L Vs 2.37 mmol/L; p = 0.03) and higher mean serum PTH (6.4 pmol/L Vs 4.4 pmol/L; p < 0.001).

Table 2.

Characteristics of fracture patients, by presence or absence of osteoporosis as diagnosed by endocrinologist, and vitamin D deficiency

Parameter Osteoporosis Vitamin D status
Osteoporosis (n = 46) No Osteoporosis (n = 133) p value Vitamin D
 < 30 nmol/L (n = 34)
Vitamin D
 ≥ 30 nmol/L (n = 145)
p value
General characteristics
 Male gender, n (%) 8 (17.4) 32 (24.1) 0.35 9 (26.5) 31 (21.4) 0.521
 Age (years), mean (SD) 66.9 (10.3) 64.4 (10.5) 0.17 69.0 (14.6) 64.2 (9.1) 0.02
 BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) 24.5 (3.0) 27.5 (4.4)  < 0.01 27.5 (4.8) 26.5 (4.2) 0.22
Medical history, n (%) 43 (93.9) 118 (88.7) 0.57 34 (100.0) 127 (87.6) 0.03
  Hypertension 20 (43.5) 44 (33.1) 0.21 17 (50.0) 98 (67.6) 0.05
  Diabetes 3 (6.5) 8 (6.0) 0.90 2 (5.9) 9 (6.2) 1.00
  COPD 1 (2.2) 6 (4.5) 0.68 1 (2.9) 4 (2.8) 1.00
  Hyper(para)thyroidism 1 (2.0) 4 (3.0) 0.77 3 (8.8) 4 (2.8) 0.13
  Renal insufficiency 0 (0) 6 (4.5) 0.34 2 (5.9) 4 (2.8) 0.32
   ≥ 2 previous fractures 13 (28.3) 21 (15.8) 0.06 6 (17.6) 28 (19.3) 1.00
Use of medication, n (%) 33 (71.7) 95 (71.4) 0.97 26 (76.5) 102 (70.3) 0.48
  Vitamin D 5 (10.9) 3 (2.3) 0.03 0 (0.0) 8 (5.5) 0.36
  Corticosteroids 2 (4.3) 15 (10.5) 0.37 5 (14.7) 11 (7.6) 0.19
Laboratory results, mean (SD)
 Vitamin D (nmol/L) 61.9 (30.6) 54.4 (27.1) 0.12
 Corrected calcium (mmol/L) 2.35 (0.08) 2.37 (0.10) 0.22 2.33 (0.06) 2.37 (0.10) 0.03
 PTH (pmol/L) 4.0 (1.6) 5.0 (3.3) 0.04 6.4 (4.2) 4.4 (2.4)  < 0.001
 eGFR (min/ml/1.73m2) 64.4 (12.9) 59.6 (8.0) 0.004 58.5 (12.9) 61.4 (8.7) 0.12
 Sclerostin (pmol/L) 41.9 (14.4) 48.1 (17.5) 0.03 42.7 (16.1) 47.4 (17.1) 0.15

Bold values indicate significant p values

BMI body mass index, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, PTH parathyroid hormone, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate

In the subgroup of 139 women with a mean age of 65.4 years (SD 10.4), osteoporosis was diagnosed in 38 patients (27.4%) and vitamin D deficiency was diagnosed in 25 patients (18.0%). Female osteoporotic patients with a fracture were found to have a lower body mass index (mean BMI 24.3 kg/m2 Vs 27.3 kg/m2; p < 0.001), used more frequently vitamin D supplementation (10.5% Vs 2.0%; p = 0.047), had a lower mean serum PTH (4.0 pmol/L Vs 5.2 pmol/L; p = 0.009) and a higher mean eGFR (64.5 min/ml Vs 59.4 min/ml/1.73m2; p = 0.04) compared to the non-osteoporotic patients with a fracture. Female patients with a vitamin D deficiency had a higher BMI (mean BMI 28.2 kg/m2 Vs 26.1 kg/m2; p = 0.03), had more often hypertension (56.0% Vs 28.1%; p = 0.007), a significantly lower mean serum concentration corrected calcium (2.34 mmol/L Vs 2.38 mmol/L; p = 0.04) and higher mean serum PTH (6.6 pmol/L Vs 4.5 pmol/L; p = 0.04).

Sclerostin

Overall, the study population had a mean serum sclerostin concentration of 46.5 pmol/L (SD 16.9).The bone mineral density was positively associated with the sclerostin levels (r = 0.17, p = 0.026) (Fig. 1). Subjects with osteoporosis had a significantly lower mean serum sclerostin concentration compared to non-osteoporotic fracture patients (41.9 pmol/L SD 14.4 vs 48.1 pmol/L SD 17.5; p = 0.03; Table 2; Fig. 2). After correction for potential confounders (p < 0.10 in Table 2) in the multivariate linear regression analysis the difference in sclerostin levels between the groups remained statistically significant (mean difference 6.5 pmol/L, 95% confidence interval 0.4–12.6, p = 0.04).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Scatterplot T-score Dexa-scan and serum concentration sclerostin

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Boxplot of presence or absence of osteoporosis and serum concentration sclerostin

In the subgroup analysis for female fracture patients, a similar difference in sclerostin levels was found between patients with or without osteoporosis (42.4 pmol/L SD 15.2 Vs 48.5 pmol/L SD 18.3; p = 0.05). Also after correction for potential confounders a difference of 7.4 pmol (95% confidence interval 0.4–14.4, p = 0.04) was found.

Vitamin D

Serum sclerostin levels did not differ between vitamin D-deficient patients and sufficient patients (42.7 pmol/L SD 16.1 vs 47.4 pmol/L SD 17.1; p = 0.15; Table 2; Fig. 3), also after correction for potential confounders (mean difference 0.8 pmol/L, 95% confidence interval − 7.4 to 5.8, p = 0.81).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Boxplot of presence or absence of vitamin D deficiency and serum concentration sclerostin

Female subjects with vitamin D deficiency showed a significantly lower mean serum concentration sclerostin compared to non-vitamin D-deficient patients(40.5 pmol/L SD 13.4 Vs 48.3 pmol/L SD 18.2; p = 0.05). After correction for potential confounders the difference in sclerostin levels was no longer statistically significant (mean difference 3.4 pmol/L, 95% confidence interval − 11.5 to 4.8, p = 0.41).

Discussion

In this study, we found a positive association between bone mineral density and serum sclerostin concentration. We found lower levels of sclerostin in osteoporotic fracture patients with low-energy extremity fractures. No differences in serum levels sclerostin were found with regard to the vitamin D status.

Unlike previously published studies, our study was performed in a general fracture population and did not only investigate the association of serum sclerostin with bone mineral density but also with the diagnosis osteoporosis. Only three studies performed in fracture patients were published previously. They also reported also a positive association with bone mineral density [15, 26, 27]. Both Arasu et al. [26] and Wanby et al. [15] included elderly geriatric patients (mean age 77 and 86, respectively) with hip fractures. Lim et. al [27] included only postmenopausal women (mean age 63) with an osteoporotic fracture (vertebral fracture and non-vertebral fractures in forearm, humerus, and hip). Compared to both Arasu et al. [26] and Wanby et al. [15] our study better reflects the mean age of the osteoporotic fracture population and the fractures included were not limited to a single anatomical location. Also, our study population was larger compared to that of Wanby et al. [15]. The study of Lim et al. [27] most resembled our study with regard to population size and included types of fractures, although they only included women. Similarly, in our subanalysis including only women, we also found a positive association between lower levels of sclerostin and osteoporotic women.

In various populations, also found a positive association between bone mineral density and serum sclerostin [1120]. With regard to serum sclerostin levels in osteoporotic versus non-osteoporotic patients, literature is less consistent. Three previous studies have also shown a lower serum sclerostin concentration in patients with osteoporosis compared to non-osteoporotic patients [28, 29, 31]. Lapauw et al. [28] compared 116 male idiopathic osteoporosis patients with that of 116 male, and age-matched controls. Basir et al. [29] studied 78 renal transplantation patients and Tian et al. [31] studied 500 postmenopausal women. Compared to our study, these studies were performed in non-fracture patients and in relatively young (mean age of 45, 41and 58, respectively) osteoporotic patients. On the other hand, no difference in sclerostin levels between osteoporotic patients and non-osteoporotic patients with spinal cord injury was found [30] and another study found an even higher level of sclerostin among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis compared to non-osteoporotic women [32].

Sclerostin has been reviewed as a potential biomarker for osteoporosis by Ramli et al. [25]. Based on the positive association between sclerostin levels and BMD, they concluded that sclerostin might be used as a predictor of osteoporosis but should not replace the DEXA for diagnosing osteoporosis [25]. Also Nagy et al. [48]. found sclerostin suitable as a biomarker for osteoporosis. With regard to predicting osteoporotic fractures, Ramli et al. [25] found sclerostin not suitable due to heterogeneous results found in their review [25]. Another review by Kim, et al. [49] also found ambiguous results and considered sclerostin not a predictor of a fracture.

Since sclerostin is predominantly synthesized by osteocytes, a possible explanation of the lower levels of sclerostin in osteoporotic patients is the age-dependent reduction in osteocyte number/density [5052] and change in morphology [53]. These alteration might result in an decreased functioning of the osteocyte, including the production of sclerostin. Moreover, in two studies, a decreased osteocyte density was found in patients with osteoporosis [54, 55]. In osteoporosis, the occurrence and density of mineralized lacunae is higher. This lacunar mineralization is associated with osteocyte apoptosis [56]. The involvement of osteocytes in osteoporosis is known from disuse osteoporosis; bone loss due to local skeletal unloading or systemic immobilization which results in increased osteocyte apoptosis and increased local sclerostin secretion by osteocytes with subsequent relative increased bone resorption compared to decreased bone formation [2]. Another explanation may be the presence of a reversed association between sclerostin and inferior bone quality. A negative feedback loop on sclerostin may exist, which is activated in osteoporosis or in other conditions causing a worse bone mineral density. Due to a lower concentration of sclerostin, less inhibition of bone formation and less stimulation of bone resorption occur which prevents further deterioration of bone mineral density. Also, the occurrence of the fracture itself could be considered as a bias influencing the amount of sclerostin, since sclerostin seems to be involved in fracture healing besides osteocytes [46, 8]. Literature on the effect of a fracture on the levels of sclerostin is scarce. Sarahrudi et al. [4] and Arasu et al. [26] reported an increased serum concentration in fracture patients compared to non-fracture patients. However, Wanby et al. [15] and Dovjak et al. [57] found no difference in sclerostin levels between fracture and non-fracture patients. Lim et al. [27] even found a lower level of sclerostin in fracture patients.

Our results did not show a difference in sclerostin levels between vitamin D-deficient patients and patients without a deficiency. Based on literature, it may be assumed that sclerostin is involved in the process of bone mineralization because of its potential interaction with vitamin D, PTH and FGF-23 [3, 43]. The exact mechanism of this regulation remains unknown especially due to the different results of in vitro and in vivo studies [3].

A limitation of this study was that seasonal variation in sclerostin was not accounted for, even though Dawson-Hughes et al. [58]. showed that this type of variation exists. We do, however, expect this to be of little influence since patients were included year-round. Furthermore, this study featured a population with a wide array of fractures leading to heterogeneity in the study population. The results are, therefore, not applicable to one specific fracture type or patient group. Another limitation is posed by the influence of the type of assay used for determination of serum sclerostin levels. Durosier et al. [16] tested multiple sclerostin assays in the same population and found that the MSD assay used in this study seems only to detect intact SOST molecules, causing an underestimation of the total serum concentration of sclerostin. This may hamper the comparison between levels of sclerostin found in our study and those in other studies, but not within our data, since in our study, the same method was used for all samples. Although this study had a retrospective design, the data were obtained with a standardized follow protocol via our fracture liaison service.

All patients were seen and investigated via the same fracture liaison service. However, the moment of blood investigations and biobanking differenced between the patients selected from the Biobank for Bone and Mineral Disorders and the vitamin D-study biobank. In case of the vitamin D study, laboratory investigations as well as the biobank storage were performed during the first follow-up visit at the outpatient clinic. In the other patients, laboratory investigations as well as the biobank storage were performed during the fracture liason service. All Dexa-scans were planned and performed via the fracture liaison service, this explains the time range in BMD measurements as not all measurements can be performed at short notice or due to a (patient or hospital) delay in the appointment at the FLS service. Overall, data from the fracture liaison service are based on daily practise and might induce heterogeneity. Also, the different timing of blood biobanking via two protocols contributes to this heterogeneity.

In conclusion, the bone mineral density in patients with an extremity fracture was positively associated with sclerostin levels and osteoporotic fracture patients had significantly lower levels of sclerostin compared to non-osteoporotic fracture patients. No correlation was found between serum vitamin D levels and sclerostin levels. Future research should focus on the use of sclerostin as biomarker for osteoporosis in fracture patients.

Author contributions

EG: conceptualization; methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft, visualization. CR: methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing initial draft. PK: methodology, writing—review and editing. NA: conceptualization, writing—review and editing IS: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervision.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Declarations

Conflict of of interest

E.A. Gorter, C.R. Reinders, P. Krijnen, N.M. Appelman-Dijkstra, I.B. Schipper declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

LUMC (B19.063).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  • 1.Balemans W, Ebeling M, Patel N, Van Hul E, Olson P, Dioszegi M, Lacza C, Wuyts W, Van Den Ende J, Willems P, et al. Increased bone density in sclerosteosis is due to the deficiency of a novel secreted protein (SOST) Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10(5):537–543. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.5.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rolvien T, Amling M. Disuse osteoporosis: clinical and mechanistic insights. Calcif Tissue Int. 2022;110(5):592–604. doi: 10.1007/s00223-021-00836-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Delgado-Calle J, Sato AY, Bellido T. Role and mechanism of action of sclerostin in bone. Bone. 2017;96:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sarahrudi K, Thomas A, Albrecht C, Aharinejad S. Strongly enhanced levels of sclerostin during human fracture healing. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(10):1549–1555. doi: 10.1002/jor.22129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kruck B, Zimmermann EA, Damerow S, Figge C, Julien C, Wulsten D, Thiele T, Martin M, Hamdy R, Reumann MK, et al. Sclerostin neutralizing antibody treatment enhances bone formation but does not rescue mechanically induced delayed healing. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(9):1686–1697. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Feng G, Chang-Qing Z, Yi-Min C, Xiao-Lin L. Systemic administration of sclerostin monoclonal antibody accelerates fracture healing in the femoral osteotomy model of young rats. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015;24(1):7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2014.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Haffner-Luntzer M. Experimental agents to improve fracture healing: utilizing the WNT signaling pathway. Injury. 2021;52(Suppl 2):S44–S48. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Choy MHV, Wong RMY, Chow SKH, Li MC, Chim YN, Li TK, Ho WT, Cheng JCY, Cheung WH. How much do we know about the role of osteocytes in different phases of fracture healing? A systematic review. J Orthop Translat. 2020;21:111–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2019.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maeda K, Kobayashi Y, Koide M, Uehara S, Okamoto M, Ishihara A, Kayama T, Saito M, Marumo K. The regulation of bone metabolism and disorders by Wnt signaling. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(22):5525. doi: 10.3390/ijms20225525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Solling ASK, Harslof T, Langdahl B. The clinical potential of romosozumab for the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2018;10(5–6):105–115. doi: 10.1177/1759720X18775936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Modder UI, Hoey KA, Amin S, McCready LK, Achenbach SJ, Riggs BL, Melton LJ, 3rd, Khosla S. Relation of age, gender, and bone mass to circulating sclerostin levels in women and men. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(2):373–379. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Garnero P, Sornay-Rendu E, Munoz F, Borel O, Chapurlat RD. Association of serum sclerostin with bone mineral density, bone turnover, steroid and parathyroid hormones, and fracture risk in postmenopausal women: the OFELY study. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(2):489–494. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-1978-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kuo TH, Lin WH, Chao JY, Wu AB, Tseng CC, Chang YT, Liou HH, Wang MC. Serum sclerostin levels are positively related to bone mineral density in peritoneal dialysis patients: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1452-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Coulson J, Bagley L, Barnouin Y, Bradburn S, Butler-Browne G, Gapeyeva H, Hogrel JY, Maden-Wilkinson T, Maier AB, Meskers C, et al. Circulating levels of dickkopf-1, osteoprotegerin and sclerostin are higher in old compared with young men and women and positively associated with whole-body bone mineral density in older adults. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(9):2683–2689. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4104-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wanby P, Nobin R, Von SP, Brudin L, Carlsson M. Serum levels of the bone turnover markers dickkopf-1, sclerostin, osteoprotegerin, osteopontin, osteocalcin and 25-hydroxyvitamin D in Swedish geriatric patients aged 75 years or older with a fresh hip fracture and in healthy controls. J Endocrinol Invest. 2016;39(8):855–863. doi: 10.1007/s40618-015-0421-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Durosier C, van Lierop A, Ferrari S, Chevalley T, Papapoulos S, Rizzoli R. Association of circulating sclerostin with bone mineral mass, microstructure, and turnover biochemical markers in healthy elderly men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(9):3873–3883. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ishimura E, Okuno S, Ichii M, Norimine K, Yamakawa T, Shoji S, Nishizawa Y, Inaba M. Relationship between serum sclerostin, bone metabolism markers, and bone mineral density in maintenance hemodialysis patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(11):4315–4320. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Amrein K, Amrein S, Drexler C, Dimai HP, Dobnig H, Pfeifer K, Tomaschitz A, Pieber TR, Fahrleitner-Pammer A. Sclerostin and its association with physical activity, age, gender, body composition, and bone mineral content in healthy adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(1):148–154. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hampson G, Edwards S, Conroy S, Blake GM, Fogelman I, Frost ML. The relationship between inhibitors of the Wnt signalling pathway (Dickkopf-1(DKK1) and sclerostin), bone mineral density, vascular calcification and arterial stiffness in post-menopausal women. Bone. 2013;56(1):42–47. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kerschan-Schindl K, Foger-Samwald U, Gleiss A, Kudlacek S, Wallwitz J, Pietschmann P. Circulating bioactive sclerostin levels in an Austrian population-based cohort. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2022;134(1–2):39–44. doi: 10.1007/s00508-021-01815-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cejka D, Jager-Lansky A, Kieweg H, Weber M, Bieglmayer C, Haider DG, Diarra D, Patsch JM, Kainberger F, Bohle B, et al. Sclerostin serum levels correlate positively with bone mineral density and microarchitecture in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(1):226–230. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.He J, Zhang H, Wang C, Zhang Z, Yue H, Hu W, Gu J, Fu W, Hu Y, Li M, et al. Associations of serum sclerostin and polymorphisms in the SOST gene with bone mineral density and markers of bone metabolism in postmenopausal Chinese women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(4):E665–673. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Register TC, Hruska KA, Divers J, Bowden DW, Palmer ND, Carr JJ, Wagenknecht LE, Hightower RC, Xu J, Smith SC, et al. Sclerostin is positively associated with bone mineral density in men and women and negatively associated with carotid calcified atherosclerotic plaque in men from the African American-Diabetes Heart Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(1):315–321. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Voskaridou E, Christoulas D, Plata E, Bratengeier C, Anastasilakis AD, Komninaka V, Kaliontzi D, Gkotzamanidou M, Polyzos SA, Dimopoulou M, et al. High circulating sclerostin is present in patients with thalassemia-associated osteoporosis and correlates with bone mineral density. Horm Metab Res. 2012;44(12):909–913. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1312618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ramli FF, Chin KY. A review of the potential application of osteocyte-related biomarkers, fibroblast growth factor-23, sclerostin, and dickkopf-1 in predicting osteoporosis and fractures. Diagnostics. 2020;10(3):145. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10030145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Arasu A, Cawthon PM, Lui LY, Do TP, Arora PS, Cauley JA, Ensrud KE, Cummings SR. Study of osteoporotic fractures research G: Serum sclerostin and risk of hip fracture in older Caucasian women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(6):2027–2032. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lim Y, Kim CH, Lee SY, Kim H, Ahn SH, Lee SH, Koh JM, Rhee Y, Baek KH, Min YK, et al. Decreased plasma levels of sclerostin but not dickkopf-1 are associated with an increased prevalence of osteoporotic fracture and lower bone mineral density in postmenopausal Korean women. Calcif Tissue Int. 2016;99(4):350–359. doi: 10.1007/s00223-016-0160-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lapauw B, Vandewalle S, Taes Y, Goemaere S, Zmierczak H, Collette J, Kaufman JM. Serum sclerostin levels in men with idiopathic osteoporosis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;168(4):615–620. doi: 10.1530/EJE-12-1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Basir H, Altunoren O, Erken E, Kilinc M, Sarisik FN, Isiktas S, Gungor O. Relationship between osteoporosis and serum sclerostin levels in kidney transplant recipients. Exp Clin Transplant. 2019 doi: 10.1530/EJE-12-1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maimoun L, Ben Bouallegue F, Gelis A, Aouinti S, Mura T, Philibert P, Souberbielle JC, Piketty M, Garnero P, Mariano-Goulart D, et al. Periostin and sclerostin levels in individuals with spinal cord injury and their relationship with bone mass, bone turnover, fracture and osteoporosis status. Bone. 2019;127:612–619. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tian J, Xu XJ, Shen L, Yang YP, Zhu R, Shuai B, Zhu XW, Li CG, Ma C, Lv L. Association of serum Dkk-1 levels with beta-catenin in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2015;35(2):212–218. doi: 10.1007/s11596-015-1413-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Suarjana IN, Isbagio H, Soewondo P, Rachman IA, Sadikin M, Prihartono J, Malik SG, Soeroso J. The role of serum expression levels of microrna-21 on bone mineral density in hypostrogenic postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: study on level of RANKL, OPG, TGFbeta-1, sclerostin, RANKL/OPG ratio, and physical activity. Acta Med Indones. 2019;51(3):245–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gorter EA, Hamdy NA, Appelman-Dijkstra NM, Schipper IB. The role of vitamin D in human fracture healing: a systematic review of the literature. Bone. 2014;64:288–297. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ryan ZC, Ketha H, McNulty MS, McGee-Lawrence M, Craig TA, Grande JP, Westendorf JJ, Singh RJ, Kumar R. Sclerostin alters serum vitamin D metabolite and fibroblast growth factor 23 concentrations and the urinary excretion of calcium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(15):6199–6204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221255110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ardawi MS, Al-Kadi HA, Rouzi AA, Qari MH. Determinants of serum sclerostin in healthy pre- and postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(12):2812–2822. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dawson-Hughes B, Harris SS, Ceglia L, Palermo NJ. Effect of supplemental vitamin D and calcium on serum sclerostin levels. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170(4):645–650. doi: 10.1530/EJE-13-0862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sankaralingam A, Roplekar R, Turner C, Dalton RN, Hampson G. Changes in dickkopf-1 (DKK1) and sclerostin following a loading dose of vitamin D 2 (300,000 IU) J Osteoporos. 2014;2014:682763. doi: 10.1155/2014/682763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Acibucu F, Dokmetas HS, Acibucu DO, Kilicli F, Aydemir M, Cakmak E. Effect of vitamin D treatment on serum sclerostin level. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2017;125(9):634–637. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1559790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cheng Q, Wu X, Du Y, Hong W, Tang W, Li H, Chen M, Zheng S. Levels of serum sclerostin, FGF-23, and intact parathyroid hormone in postmenopausal women treated with calcitriol. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:2367–2374. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S186199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cidem M, Karacan I, Arat NB, Zengi O, Ozkaya M, Guzel SP, Ozkan C, Beytemur O. Serum sclerostin is decreased following vitamin D treatment in young vitamin D-deficient female adults. Rheumatol Int. 2015;35(10):1739–1742. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3294-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yadav AK, Kumar V, Banerjee D, Gupta KL, Jha V. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on serum sclerostin levels in chronic kidney disease. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;180:15–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang D, Seo DH, Choi HS, Park HS, Chung YS, Lim SK. Effects of single vitamin D(3) injection (200,000 Units) on serum fibroblast growth factor 23 and sclerostin levels in subjects with vitamin D deficiency. Endocrinol Metab. 2017;32(4):451–459. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2017.32.4.451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jorde R, Stunes AK, Kubiak J, Joakimsen R, Grimnes G, Thorsby PM, Syversen U. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on bone turnover markers and other bone-related substances in subjects with vitamin D deficiency. Bone. 2019;124:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gorter EA, Krijnen P, Schipper IB. Vitamin D deficiency in adult fracture patients: prevalence and risk factors. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42(3):369–378. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Malgo F, Appelman-Dijkstra NM, Termaat MF, van der Heide HJ, Schipper IB, Rabelink TJ, Hamdy NA. High prevalence of secondary factors for bone fragility in patients with a recent fracture independently of BMD. Arch Osteoporos. 2016;11:12. doi: 10.1007/s11657-016-0258-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.van Lierop AH, Hamdy NA, van Egmond ME, Bakker E, Dikkers FG, Papapoulos SE. Van Buchem disease: clinical, biochemical, and densitometric features of patients and disease carriers. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(4):848–854. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Giustina A, Adler RA, Binkley N, Bouillon R, Ebeling PR, Lazaretti-Castro M, Marcocci C, Rizzoli R, Sempos CT, Bilezikian JP. Controversies in VItamin D: summary statement from an international conference. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(2):234–240. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-01414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nagy EE, Nagy-Finna C, Popoviciu H, Kovacs B. Soluble biomarkers of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis, from pathway mapping to clinical trials: an update. Clin Interv Aging. 2020;15:501–518. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S242288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kim BJ, Lee SH, Koh JM. Potential biomarkers to improve the prediction of osteoporotic fractures. Endocrinol Metab. 2020;35(1):55–63. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2020.35.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tiede-Lewis LM, Dallas SL. Changes in the osteocyte lacunocanalicular network with aging. Bone. 2019;122:101–113. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Busse B, Djonic D, Milovanovic P, Hahn M, Puschel K, Ritchie RO, Djuric M, Amling M. Decrease in the osteocyte lacunar density accompanied by hypermineralized lacunar occlusion reveals failure and delay of remodeling in aged human bone. Aging Cell. 2010;9(6):1065–1075. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00633.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ru JY, Wang YF. Osteocyte apoptosis: the roles and key molecular mechanisms in resorption-related bone diseases. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(10):846. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03059-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hemmatian H, Bakker AD, Klein-Nulend J, van Lenthe GH. Aging, osteocytes, and mechanotransduction. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2017;15(5):401–411. doi: 10.1007/s11914-017-0402-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mullender MG, Tan SD, Vico L, Alexandre C, Klein-Nulend J. Differences in osteocyte density and bone histomorphometry between men and women and between healthy and osteoporotic subjects. Calcif Tissue Int. 2005;77(5):291–296. doi: 10.1007/s00223-005-0043-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Qiu S, Rao DS, Palnitkar S, Parfitt AM. Reduced iliac cancellous osteocyte density in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(9):1657–1663. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.9.1657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Milovanovic P, Busse B. Phenomenon of osteocyte lacunar mineralization: indicator of former osteocyte death and a novel marker of impaired bone quality? Endocr Connect. 2020;9(4):R70–R80. doi: 10.1530/EC-19-0531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dovjak P, Dorfer S, Foger-Samwald U, Kudlacek S, Marculescu R, Pietschmann P. Serum levels of sclerostin and dickkopf-1: effects of age, gender and fracture status. Gerontology. 2014;60(6):493–501. doi: 10.1159/000358303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Dawson-Hughes B, Harris SS, Ceglia L, Palermo NJ. Serum sclerostin levels vary with season. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(1):E149–152. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Not applicable.


Articles from European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES