Skip to main content
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery logoLink to Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
letter
. 2022 Nov-Dec;37(6):963. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0577

Response to the “Glasgow Prognostic Score as A Marker of Mortality After TAVI”

Ipek Buber 1
PMCID: PMC9713651  PMID: 35895986

Dear Editor,

I have read the article entitled “Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI”, by Abacioglu et al. and published in the BJCVS, with great interest[1]. The investigators reported that the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) is an easy, noninvasive laboratory test which may be used as a predictive biomarker for outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Aortic stenosis is one of the most common valve diseases in the worldwide population[2], and the increase in the elderly population increases the frequency of TAVI, which is a well-established alternative to surgical valve replacement in patients at high surgical risk[3]. Conventional scoring systems, including logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE), EuroSCORE II, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score, are used to determine the surgical risk in patients undergoing TAVI[4]. However, these traditional risk scoring systems are sometimes inadequate to predict periprocedural and long-term mortality in patients undergoing TAVI. GPS is an inflammation-based prognostic score evaluated using the elevation of C-reactive protein and decrease in albumin concentration[5]. It is usually used to assess the risk in cancer patients undergoing surgery[6], and this score predicts the outcomes for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis[7], systemic lupus erythematosus[8], and inflammatory bowel diseases[9].

In this context, assessment of the GPS value, which is an easy and noninvasive tool, can be beneficial to determine the prognosis of patients undergoing TAVI because there is a requirement for new scores that will provide prognostic information in TAVI patients.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abacioglu OO, Koyunsever NY, Kilic S, Yildirim A, Kurt IH. Glasgow prognostic score as a marker of mortality after TAVI. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;36(6):796–801. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0269. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rajamannan NM, Bonow RO, Rahimtoola SH. Calcific aortic stenosis: an update. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007;4(5):254–262. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bach DS, Siao D, Girard SE, Duvernoy C, McCallister BD Jr, Gualano SK. Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: the potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(6):533–539. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.848259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Alpaslan E, Dursun H, Tanriverdi Z, Colluoglu T, Kaya D. New risk factors in determining long-term mortality in patients undergoing TAVI: can the conventional risk scores be used as a long-term mortality predictor? Kardiol Pol. 2020;78(3):219–226. doi: 10.33963/KP.15183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kinoshita A, Onoda H, Imai N, Iwaku A, Oishi M, Tanaka K, et al. The Glasgow prognostic score, an inflammation based prognostic score, predicts survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Eren T, Burcu B, Tombalak E, Ozdemir T, Leblebici M, Ozemir IA, et al. Clinical significance of the glasgow prognostic score for survival after colorectal cancer surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(6):1231–1238. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3114-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kang HS, Cho KW, Kwon SS, Kim YH. Prognostic significance of glasgow prognostic score in patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respirology. 2018;23(2):206–212. doi: 10.1111/resp.13184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Delcea C, Dima A, Jurcut C, Caraiola S, Badea C, Nitescu D, et al. Utility of the Glasgow Prognostic Score in systemic lupus erythematosus, in a single center cohort of 130 patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(Suppl 2):638.2–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhao C, Ding C, Xie T, Zhang T, Dai X, Wei Y, et al. Validation and optimization of the systemic inflammation-based modified glasgow prognostic score in predicting postoperative outcome of inflammatory bowel disease: preliminary data. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18771-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery are provided here courtesy of Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular

RESOURCES