Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278520

Inter-sleep stage variations in corrected QT interval differ between obstructive sleep apnea patients with and without stroke history

Serajeddin Ebrahimian 1,2,*, Saara Sillanmäki 3, Salla Hietakoste 1,2, Brett Duce 4,5, Antti Kulkas 1,6, Juha Töyräs 1,7,8, Timo Leppänen 1,2,7, Jukka A Lipponen 1,9, Samu Kainulainen 1,2
Editor: Tomohiko Ai10
PMCID: PMC9714836  PMID: 36454997

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is related to the progression of cardiovascular diseases (CVD); it is an independent risk factor for stroke and is also prevalent post-stroke. Furthermore, heart rate corrected QT (QTc) is an important predictor of the risk of arrhythmia and CVD. Thus, we aimed to investigate QTc interval variations in different sleep stages in OSA patients and whether nocturnal QTc intervals differ between OSA patients with and without stroke history. 18 OSA patients (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)≥15) with previously diagnosed stroke and 18 OSA patients (AHI≥15) without stroke history were studied. Subjects underwent full polysomnography including an electrocardiogram measured by modified lead II configuration. RR, QT, and QTc intervals were calculated in all sleep stages. Regression analysis was utilized to investigate possible confounding effects of sleep stages and stroke history on QTc intervals. Compared to patients without previous stroke history, QTc intervals were significantly higher (β = 34, p<0.01) in patients with stroke history independent of age, sex, body mass index, and OSA severity. N3 sleep (β = 5.8, p<0.01) and REM sleep (β = 2.8, p<0.01) increased QTc intervals in both patient groups. In addition, QTc intervals increased progressively (p<0.05) towards deeper sleep in both groups; however, the magnitude of changes compared to the wake stage was significantly higher (p<0.05) in patients with stroke history. The findings of this study indicate that especially in deeper sleep, OSA patients with a previous stroke have an elevated risk for QTc prolongation further increasing the risk for ventricular arrhythmogenicity and sudden cardiac death.

Introduction

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep disorder; globally it is estimated that nearly 1 billion adults have OSA and the prevalence can exceed 50% in some countries [1]. Even though OSA is strongly associated with the progression of cardiovascular diseases [2], the electrocardiogram (ECG) signal recorded during polysomnography (PSG) is rarely used. Yet, the nocturnal ECG might provide important information about the risk of cardiac events in OSA patients. In addition to cardiovascular diseases, OSA is considered an independent risk factor for stroke, but it can also be a consequence of a stroke [3]. This bidirectional interaction between OSA and stroke increases the risk of recurrent strokes [4]. This interaction emphasizes the importance of screening stroke patients for OSA to prevent recurrent strokes.

Although the cardiovascular consequences of OSA are not fully understood, certain alterations in cardiovascular function are reported to occur in OSA. For example, OSA causes intermittent hypoxia, arousals, and negative intrathoracic pressure swings [5]. These alterations in cardiovascular function disrupt the sympathetic and parasympathetic balance, causing a shift toward sympathetic predominance [5]. In turn, the alterations in sympathovagal balance may affect ventricular repolarization [6]. Prolonged heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc), a surrogate for ventricular repolarization, is also known to be associated with an increased risk of arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death [7]. Furthermore, QT interval prolongation is common following an acute stroke [8].

Several studies have demonstrated the association between OSA and QTc prolongation [912] albeit conflicting results exist [13, 14]. The results regarding the variations of QTc intervals in different sleep stages are also conflicting. While studies show different trends or insignificant changes in QTc interval toward deeper sleep stages in non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) stages, the longest QTc intervals are reported to occur in REM sleep [9, 15, 16]. However, in these studies, variations of QTc intervals were not investigated separately in different sleep stages and during wake [9, 1416].

Stroke patients are not routinely screened for OSA albeit they have a high risk of having OSA [17]. Currently, if no obvious cause of stroke can be found, stroke patients are screened with 24-h ECG monitoring giving a possibility to detect indirect electrophysiological consequences of OSA in this patient group. Thus, this study aimed to investigate inter-sleep stage variations of ventricular repolarization in OSA patients with previously diagnosed stroke by examining QTc intervals in different sleep stages. We hypothesize that the OSA patients with stroke history have longer QTc intervals compared to the OSA patients without stroke history and that QTc intervals in REM sleep are longer compared to the other sleep stages.

Methods

Dataset

The studied dataset is a subpopulation of a large retrospective study comprising over 900 consecutive PSG recordings of suspected OSA subjects. In this study, 18 subjects (13 men) with stroke history fulfilled the inclusion criteria: apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15, no ventricular pacing, and total sleep time ≥ 4 hours in PSG. The control group comprised 18 (12 men) subjects with similar inclusion criteria but without a previous stroke history. The subjects in the control group were randomly selected using a random number generator (“randi” function in MATLAB R2021b [MathWorks Inc, MA, USA]). The PSG recordings were conducted at the Sleep Disorders Centre, Princess Alexandra Hospital (Brisbane, Australia) during 2015–2017 using the Compumedics Grael acquisition system (Compumedics, Abbotsford, Australia). The recorded PSGs were manually scored in accordance with the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) 2012 guidelines [18]. The scoring protocol of PSGs is detailed in our previous studies [19, 20]. The retrospective data collection approval was granted by the Institutional Human Research Ethics Committee of the Princess Alexandra Hospital (HREC/16/QPAH/021 and LNR/2019/QMS/54313). Due to the study’s retrospective nature, the need for informed consent was waived by the Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee.

Analysis of the ECG recordings

The ECG signals were recorded with a sampling frequency of 256 Hz using a modified lead II configuration. Signals were truncated into 30-second segments according to sleep stages. The ECG analysis was performed with Kubios HRV software (Kubios Oy, Kuopio, Finland) [21]. Signals were detrended by the smoothness priors method [22] with a smoothing parameter of 500 and the Pan-Tompkins method [23] was used to detect the R-peaks in the segments. Furthermore, the average beat waveform was computed from each ECG segment after detecting all beats. A QT interval was measured from the beginning of the averaged QRS complex until the end of the T wave. QTc intervals were calculated according to Bazett’s formula [24]. ECG segments with ≥ 5% beat correction were excluded from the analysis to avoid the inclusion of low-quality segments. A slow heart rate (i.e. around 40–50 beats per minute [BPM]) during sleep is common [25] and can be further lowered due to possible transient decrease during apnea/hypopnea events [26]. However, as the low technical quality of ECG recording can lead to erroneously low HR values in segments due to missed R-peaks detection, we also considered an average HR of 30 BPM as a threshold for the exclusion of low-quality segments.

RR, QT, and QTc intervals were calculated for each ECG segment. Only those wake sections that continued for at least 3 minutes were considered to represent actual wake condition rather than short awakening between sleep stages. To evaluate the changes in the selected ECG parameters between sleep and resting states, the relative changes to the wake stage were also considered. This was done by subtracting the median value of the selected ECG parameter (i.e., RR, QT, or QTc) during the wake from the value calculated during different sleep stages. This procedure was applied for each subject to minimize the individual variation in the baseline measures and compensate for possible systematic errors, thus providing detailed information on the effect of sleep stages on ECG parameters.

The Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the changes in ECG features between sleep stages. Multiple regression analyses were utilized to analyze the effect of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), AHI, arousal index (AI), stroke history, and sleep stages on QTc intervals to identify possible confounding factors. Four linear regression models were utilized to investigate each sleep stage (N1, N2, N3, REM) independently pairwise with wake. This was done to investigate whether sleep stages have an independent effect on QTc intervals after adjustment for confounding factors. The statistical data analysis was performed with MATLAB R2021b. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The demographic data of the studied population are presented in Table 1 and the number of analyzed segments in each sleep stage is presented in Table 2.

Table 1. Demographic data and sleep characteristics of control and stroke groups.

Reported p-values are from the Mann-Whitney U test (for continuous variables) or the Chi-squared test (for categorical variables).

Characteristics Control (n = 18) Stroke (n = 18) p-value
Age (years) 48.3 (46.2, 49.6) 67.8 (55.6, 73.3) < 0.001
Sex, male/female 13/5 12/6 0.76
BMI (kg/m 2 ) 35.1 (31.0, 37.9) 36.2 (33.8, 43.5) 0.28
AHI (events/hour) 26.5 (19.6, 35.1) 30.3 (20.7, 33.6) 0.60
AI (events/hour) 4.7 (1.7, 8.1) 8.1 (3.7, 9.8) 0.35
TST (minutes) 339.7 (321.0, 368.5) 316.0 (283.0, 341.0) 0.03
Sleep efficiency (%) 79.6 (74.9, 82.7) 71.2 (66.7, 77.4) 0.02
N1 (% from TST) 13.2 (9.3, 17.5) 14.2 (7.8, 22.4) 0.85
N2 (% from TST) 49.1 (43.2, 59.0) 46.5 (42.6, 52.3) 0.32
N3 (% from TST) 17.5 (10.6, 23.9) 17.9 (10.7, 26.2) 0.92
REM (% from TST) 16.9 (13.7, 20.3) 18.8 (11.9, 24.8) 0.58

All values are presented as median (interquartile range), except sex. Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index, AHI = apnea-hypopnea index, AI = arousal index, TST = total sleep time, REM = rapid eye movement sleep.

Table 2. The number of analyzed electrocardiography segments in each sleep stage.

The Chi-squared test was applied to test the statistical significance of the segment’s distribution between groups.

Sleep stage Control (n = 18) Stroke (n = 18)
Wake (%) 1677 (13.0) 1935 (18.4)
N1 (%) 1595 (12.3) 1428 (13.6)
N2 (%) 5655 (43.7) 3953 (37.6)
N3 (%) 2196 (17.0) 1633 (15.5)
REM (%) 1801 (14.0) 1574 (14.9)
All stages 12924 10523

The number of analyzed segments in each sleep stage was significantly different (p <0.05) between the control and stroke groups.

RR, QT, and QTc intervals showed significant differences across sleep stages in both control and stroke groups (Fig 1), however, absolute values of QT and QTc were significantly (p<0.05) higher in the stroke group compared to the control group regardless of sleep stages. The QTc trend showed a steady increase (p<0.01) toward deeper sleep after an initial decrease in N1 in both groups (Fig 1).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Median QTc, QT, and RR intervals across sleep stages: (A) in the control group and (B) in the stroke group. Error bars represent median absolute deviations. p>0.05 = n.s., p<0.05 = *, p<0.01 = **.

Related to RR, QT, and QTc intervals, the magnitude of the changes from the wake stage was significantly higher (p<0.001) in the stroke group compared to the control group in all sleep stages (Table 3). The only exceptions were observed in QTc in N1 sleep and REM sleep.

Table 3. Median (interquartile range) of the QTc, QT, and RR interval changes in relation to the wake stage between the stroke and control group.

ΔQTc (ms) ΔQT (ms) ΔRR (ms)
Control Stroke p-value Control Stroke p-value Control Stroke p-value
N1 -3.2 (-10.1, 4.1) 0.2 (-8.0, 9.2) <0.001 7.0 (-2.0, 14.0) 10.0 (4.0, 22.0) <0.001 39.7 (1.7, 73.5) 44.3 (10.3, 78.3) <0.001
N2 1.6 (-7.2, 9.3) 5.7 (-4.0, 19.0) <0.001 8.0 (-4.0, 18.0) 12.0 (4.0, 26.0) <0.001 32.5 (-2.5, 77.6) 41.8 (-1.1, 88.1) <0.001
N3 6.6 (-7.4, 18.9) 10.0 (0, 20.9) <0.001 8.0 (-4.0, 20.0) 14.0 (4.0, 30.0) <0.001 12.6 (-11.6, 44.9) 42.4 (-10.3, 93.5) <0.001
REM 3.6 (-6.7, 15.9) 4.7 (-6.2, 15.4) 0.150 7.0 (-5.0, 18.0) 10.0 (-2.0, 22.0) <0.001 17.5 (-25.3, 61.2) 22.7 (-16.1, 81.1) <0.001

Similar to the absolute changes, RR, QT, and QTc intervals differed significantly across sleep stages while considering the relative changes to the wake stage (Fig 2). The magnitude of QTc changes in relation to the wake stage increased (p<0.01) towards deeper sleep and decreased (p<0.01) in the REM sleep in both control and stroke groups; the highest (p<0.01) changes occurred in the N3 stage. Also, QT increased steadily towards deeper sleep and decreased in REM sleep in both groups, however, these changes were more clearly visible in the stroke group.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Median QTc, QT, and RR interval changes in relation to the wake stage across sleep stages: (A) in the control group and (B) in the stroke group. Error bars represent median absolute deviations. p>0.05 = n.s., p<0.05 = *, p<0.0 1 = **.

Multiple regression analysis indicated that stroke history is significantly associated with QTc interval prolongation in OSA patients after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, AHI, and AI in all sleep stages (Table 4). Furthermore, N3 and REM sleep were associated with QTc interval prolongation compared to the wake stage after adjustment for all confounders (Table 4).

Table 4. Multiple regression analysis of the effects of confounding factors on QTc intervals in OSA patients.

Except for age and BMI, all parameters are categorical.

Predictors N1 Model N2 Model N3 Model REM Model
β- coefficient p-value β-coefficient p-value β- coefficient p-value β- coefficient p-value
Age -0.135 0.001 -0.124 0.003 -0.132 0.002 -0.118 0.005
Sex -13.345 <0.001 -13.274 <0.001 -13.118 <0.001 -13.268 <0.001
BMI 0.880 <0.001 0.893 <0.001 0.868 <0.001 0.894 <0.001
AHI -0.966 <0.001 -0.997 <0.001 -0.990 <0.001 -0.993 <0.001
AI 0.794 <0.001 0.795 <0.001 0.793 <0.001 0.791 <0.001
Stroke 34.789 <0.001 34.365 <0.001 34.563 <0.001 34.186 <0.001
Wake stage -3.316 <0.001 -0.909 0.226 -0.308 0.659 -0.942 0.177
Corresponding Sleep stage -12.143 <0.001 1.035 0.109 5.842 <0.001 2.749 0.001

Corresponding sleep stage differs for each model; N1 sleep for the N1 model, N2 sleep for the N2 model, N3 sleep for the N3 model, and REM sleep for the REM model. Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index. AHI = apnea-hypopnea index, AI = arousal index, REM = rapid eye movement.

Discussion

The current study examined changes in RR, QT, and QTc intervals during different sleep stages in OSA patients with and without stroke history. This is, to our knowledge, the first description of the inter-sleep stage variations of QTc intervals in patients with OSA and stroke history. Our findings suggest that stroke history is associated with a significant increase in QTc intervals independent of age, sex, BMI, AHI, AI, and sleep stages in OSA patients. As QTc interval prolongation is known to be associated with arrhythmogenicity [7], our results suggest that OSA patients with a stroke history may have an increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias.

In this study, the inter-sleep stage variations of RR, QT, and QTc intervals were studied to gain novel insight of sleep stage-specific cardiovascular risk in OSA patients with and without stroke history. Besides the absolute measures of ECG parameters, the relative change of the parameters from the wake was considered. In both control and stroke groups, QTc intervals increased progressively towards deeper sleep followed by a decrease in REM, the longest QTc intervals being in N3 sleep. In addition, the highest relative changes in ECG parameters were observed in N3 sleep. However, it is noteworthy that the magnitude of changes in QT and QTc intervals were significantly higher in OSA patients with stroke history compared to those without previous stroke history, indicating a higher risk of nocturnal QTc interval prolongation. In addition, regression analysis showed that N3 sleep and REM sleep are independently associated with QTc interval prolongation after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, AHI, AI, and stroke history. The longest QTc intervals were observed in N3 sleep in both groups possibly signaling for elevated risk of arrhythmogenesis during deep sleep.

Several pathophysiological consequences of OSA including hypoxemia, intrathoracic pressure swings, and recurrent arousals lead to autonomic nervous system (ANS) imbalance and may contribute to arrhythmogenesis [27]. Cardiac autonomic nervous activity influences QTc intervals and disruption of autonomic nervous pathways may lead to the prolongation of QTc intervals in healthy subjects [28]. Despite synergies between pathophysiological consequences of OSA, it has been suggested that the sympathovagal imbalance may be the primary cause of cardiac alterations and arrhythmogenesis [27]. Our findings did not support our initial hypothesis that elevated sympathetic activity in REM sleep would lead to longer QTc intervals compared to other stages. Autonomic system alterations in OSA patients consist of parasympathetic activation during respiratory events and sympathetic activation after events, leading to elevated sympathetic activity [27, 29]. Somers et al. showed in contrast to the normal subjects, sympathetic activity reaches high levels during sleep in OSA patients with peak activities during N2 and REM sleep [30]. In addition, Calvo et al. showed that severe OSA may be associated with an increased sympathetic modulation across all sleep stages [31]. Despite the evidence regarding altered autonomic system activity in OSA patients, previous results regarding QTc interval variations in OSA patients are conflicting. Zeng et al. reported a decrease in QTc as sleep gets deeper and an increase in QTc during REM sleep—the highest QTc intervals in REM sleep [9]. Lanfranchi et al. showed insignificant changes in QTc intervals during wake, N2, and N3 sleep and a significant increase in REM sleep [15]. Schmidt et al. reported a slight increase in QTc from the wake stage toward N3 sleep with an insignificant change between N3 and REM [16]. Conversely, our results indicate that QTc intervals increase significantly towards deeper sleep and are the longest in N3 sleep in OSA patients despite stroke history. We assume that by considering the QTc interval changes in relation to the wake stage, patient-specific variations in QTc intervals are compensated and give us new insights to the sleep-specific variations compared to the changes in absolute measures.

Although no studies have focused on altered autonomic system activity in OSA patients with stroke history, evidence of parasympathetic activity and sympathetic decline in post-stroke patients has been reported. Brunetti et al. observed that compared to controls, acute stroke patients have a predominant parasympathetic tone during wake and REM sleep accompanied by a reduction of sympathetic tone in REM and parasympathetic tone during N3 [32]. Tobaldini et al. reported predominant vagal modulation and decreased sympathetic modulation across all sleep stages [33]. Based on our observation of RR interval variations as a demonstration of sympathovagal balance, the most notable difference occurs in non-REM sleep specifically in N2 and N3 sleep between OSA patients with and without stroke history. In addition, total sleep time and sleep efficiency were significantly lower in OSA patients with stroke history, indicating the higher amount of wake during the night. These findings are in line with previous results indicating shorter total sleep time and lower sleep efficiency in stroke patients [34] which could be a possible cause of differences in sympathovagal balance between OSA patients with and without stroke history. Despite significant variation in QTc intervals between sleep stages, evidence regarding this distinct dynamicity of QTc intervals in OSA patients is inconclusive. Non-identical characteristics of the ANS in different sleep stages could be one of the causes for non-identical QTc intervals. Furthermore, the dynamicity of QTc intervals could be due to the synergies between the pathophysiological consequences of OSA and their immediate effect on QTc intervals. Recently it was shown that severe desaturation events prolong QTc intervals [35]. Therefore, further research into the effects of type and severity of apneic events on QTc intervals and the effects of pathological consequences of OSA on the ANS could reveal specific characteristics of distinct inter-sleep variation of QTc.

This study was not without limitations. First, the date of stroke occurrence before admitting to the PSGs and the information on the anatomical location of the stroke were not available in our data set. QTc prolongation and cardiac abnormalities have are to be the most prevalent in relation to strokes occurring in the insular region [8], showing the stroke region can affect the duration of QTc intervals. Second, a complete list of patients’ medications was not available in our dataset and thus, the possible confounding effect of medications could not be quantified in our work. Third, the OSA patients with stroke history were significantly older compared to patients without stroke history. Being a confounding factor, age had no considerable effect on our results as the estimated effect of age was small in our dataset. Fourth, regression analysis showed both the AHI and AI affect QTc intervals. Therefore, apneic events affect QTc intervals and further studies on the effects of apneic events and their occurrences in different sleep stages could reveal more about their immediate impact on QTc intervals and the risk of arrhythmias. Last, the number of male patients was higher compared to the females in both groups. There is a known association between sex and QTc intervals, females having longer QTc intervals compared to males [36] and this was also seen in the current data. Although sex was found to be a strong confounder in our data, the gender balance in the patient groups involved in this study was not statistically different. As stroke history and sleep stages were demonstrated to be independent factors in QTc interval prolongation, our results indicate that female OSA patients with stroke history are at a higher risk of QTc prolongation in deep sleep compared to males.

Conclusion

This study shows that the duration of QTc intervals increases progressively towards deeper sleep following by a decrease in the REM sleep in OSA patients with or without stroke history. Furthermore, the stroke history is associated with longer QTc intervals independent of age, sex, BMI, AHI, AI, and sleep stages in OSA patients. These findings indicate that OSA patients with a previous stroke have an elevated risk, especially during deeper sleep, for QTc prolongation—a known risk factor for ventricular arrhythmogenicity and sudden cardiac death.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist

(PDF)

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because of potentially identifying or sensitive patient information. These ethical restrictions are imposed by the Institutional Human Research Ethics Committee of the Princess Alexandra hospital. Data are available from the Institutional Human Research Ethics Committee of the Princess Alexandra Hospital (contact via MSH-Ethics@health.qld.gov.au) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. Researchers can contact the IHREC of PA Hospital and project steering committee will review the requests.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (965417 to T.L.); The Research Committee of the Kuopio University Hospital Catchment Area for the State Research Funding (5041804 to S.K., 5041798 to S.S., 5041790 S.H., 5041794 T.L., 5101137 to J.L. and 507T044 to J.L.); The Research Foundation of the Pulmonary Diseases (to S.K. and S.H.); The Academy of Finland (323536 to T.L.); Seinäjoki Central Hospital, the Competitive State Research Financing of Expert Responsibility Area of Tampere University Hospital (VTR3242 to A.K., VTR3249 to A.K., VTR 3256 to A.K., and EVO2089 to A.K.); NordForsk (90458 to T.L. and J.T.) via Business Finland (5133/31/2018 to T.L. and J.T.); the Finnish Cultural Foundation—Pohjois-Savo regional fund and Central Fund (to S.K.); Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation (to S.K. and A.K.); the Maud Kuistila Memorial Foundation (to S.K.); Instrumentarium Science Foundation (to S.H.); Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation (to S.H.); and The Foundation of Finnish Anti-Tuberculosis Association (to S.H.).

References

  • 1.Benjafield A V., Ayas NT, Eastwood PR, Heinzer R, Ip MSM, Morrell MJ, et al. Estimation of the global prevalence and burden of obstructive sleep apnoea: a literature-based analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7: 687–698. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30198-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bonsignore MR, Baiamonte P, Mazzuca E, Castrogiovanni A, Marrone O. Obstructive sleep apnea and comorbidities: A dangerous liaison. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2019;14: 1–12. doi: 10.1186/s40248-019-0172-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alexiev F, Brill AK, Ott SR, Duss S, Schmidt M, Bassetti CL. Sleep-disordered breathing and stroke: Chicken or egg? J Thorac Dis. 2018;10: S4244–S4252. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brown DL, Shafie-Khorassani F, Kim S, Chervin RD, Case E, Morgenstern LB, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing is associated with recurrent ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2019;50: 571–576. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Javaheri S, Barbe F, Campos-Rodriguez F, Dempsey JA, Khayat R, Javaheri S, et al. Sleep Apnea: Types, Mechanisms, and Clinical Cardiovascular Consequences. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69: 841–858. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Abildskov JA. Neural Mechanisms Involved in the Regulation of Ventricular Repolarization. Eur Heart J. 1985;6: 31–39. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/6.suppl_d.31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang Y, Post WS, Blasco-Colmenares E, Dalal D, Tomaselli GF, Guallara E. Electrocardiographic QT interval and mortality: A meta-analysis. Epidemiology. 2011;22: 660–670. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318225768b [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tatschl C, Stöllberger C, Matz K, Yilmaz N, Eckhardt R, Nowotny M, et al. Insular involvement is associated with QT prolongation: ECG abnormalities in patients with acute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;21: 47–53. doi: 10.1159/000089594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zeng L, Liang J, Liao Y, Zhou G, Zhang X, Luo Y. Variation of electrocardiogram features across sleep stages in healthy controls and in patients with sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome. Int Heart J. 2019;60: 121–128. doi: 10.1536/ihj.18-076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Çiçek D, Lakadamyali H, Gökay S, Sapmaz I, Muderrisoglu H. Effect of obstructive sleep apnea on heart rate, heart rate recovery and QTc and P-wave dispersion in newly diagnosed untreated patients. Am J Med Sci. 2012;344: 180–185. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318239a67f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bilal N, Dikmen N, Bozkus F, Sungur A, Sarica S, Orhan I, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with increased QT corrected interval dispersion: the effects of continuous positive airway pressure. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;84: 298–304. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schlatzer C, Schwarz EI, Sievi NA, Clarenbach CF, Gaisl T, Haegeli LM, et al. Intrathoracic pressure swings induced by simulated obstructive sleep apnoea promote arrhythmias in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;18: 64–70. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Barta K, Szabó Z, Kun C, Munkácsy C, Bene O, Magyar MT, et al. The effect of sleep apnea on QT interval, QT dispersion, and arrhythmias. Clin Cardiol. 2010;33. doi: 10.1002/clc.20619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Viigimae M, Karai D, Pilt K, Pirn P, Huhtala H, Polo O, et al. QT interval variability index and QT interval duration during different sleep stages in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med. 2017;37: 160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2017.06.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lanfranchi PA, Shamsuzzaman ASM, Ackerman MJ, Kara T, Jurak P, Wolk R, et al. Sex-selective QT prolongation during rapid eye movement sleep. Circulation. 2002;106: 1488–1492. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000030183.10934.95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schmidt M, Baumert M, Penzel T, Malberg H, Zaunseder S. Nocturnal ventricular repolarization lability predicts cardiovascular mortality in the sleep heart health study. Am J Physiol—Hear Circ Physiol. 2019;316: H495–H505. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00649.2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Leino A, Westeren-Punnonen S, Töyräs J, Myllymaa S, Leppänen T, Ylä-Herttuala S, et al. Acute stroke and TIA patients have specific polygraphic features of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath. 2020;24: 1495–1505. doi: 10.1007/s11325-019-02010-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Berry Richard B.; Brooks Rita; Gamaldo Charlene E.; Harding Susan M.; Lloyd Robin M.; Marcus Carole L.; et al. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology, and Technical Specifications, Version 2.2. Am Acad Sleep Med. 2012;176. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kainulainen S, Duce B, Korkalainen H, Oksenberg A, Leino A, Arnardottir ES, et al. Severe desaturations increase psychomotor vigilance task-based median reaction time and number of lapses in obstructive sleep apnoea patients. Eur Respir J. 2020;55. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01849-2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Duce B, Kulkas A, Langton C, Töyräs J, Hukins C. The AASM 2012 recommended hypopnea criteria increase the incidence of obstructive sleep apnea but not the proportion of positional obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med. 2016;26: 23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2016.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tarvainen MP, Niskanen JP, Lipponen JA, Ranta-aho PO, Karjalainen PA. Kubios HRV—Heart rate variability analysis software. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;113: 210–220. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.07.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tarvainen MP, Ranta-aho PO, Karjalainen PA. An advanced detrending method with application to HRV analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002;49: 172–175. doi: 10.1109/10.979357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pan J, Tompkins WJ. A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1985;BME-32: 230–236. doi: 10.1109/TBME.1985.325532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bazett HC. Aa analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 1997;2: 177–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.1997.tb00325.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sessa F, Anna V, Messina G, Cibelli G, Monda V, Marsala G, et al. Heart rate variability as predictive factor for sudden cardiac death. Aging (Albany NY). 2018;10: 166–177. doi: 10.18632/aging.101386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guilleminault C, Connolly S, Winkle R, Melvin K, Tilkian A. Cyclical variation of the heart rate in sleep apnoea syndrome: Mechanisms, and usefulness of 24 h electrocardiography as a screening technique. Lancet (London, England). 1984;1: 126–131. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)90062-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.May AM, Van Wagoner DR, Mehra R. OSA and Cardiac Arrhythmogenesis: Mechanistic Insights. Chest. 2017;151: 225–241. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.09.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Diedrich A, Jordan J, Shannon JR, Robertson D, Biaggioni I. Modulation of QT interval during autonomic nervous system blockade in humans. Circulation. 2002;106: 2238–2243. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000035241.76918.6c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Miglis MG. Autonomic dysfunction in primary sleep disorders. Sleep Med. 2016;19: 40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Somers VK, Dyken ME, Clary MP, Abboud FM. Sympathetic neural mechanisms in obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Invest. 1995;96: 1897–1904. doi: 10.1172/JCI118235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Calvo M, Jané R. Sleep Stage Influence on the Autonomic Modulation of Sleep Apnea Syndrome. 2019 Comput Cardiol Conf. 2019;45: 2–5. doi: 10.22489/cinc.2019.105 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brunetti V, Vollono C, Testani E, Pilato F, Della Marca G. Autonomic Nervous System Modifications During Wakefulness and Sleep in a Cohort of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;28: 1455–1462. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.03.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tobaldini E, Proserpio P, Oppo V, Figorilli M, Fiorelli EM, Manconi M, et al. Cardiac autonomic dynamics during sleep are lost in patients with TIA and stroke. J Sleep Res. 2020;29: 1–9. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Terzoudi A, Vorvolakos T, Heliopoulos I, Livaditis M, Vadikolias K, Piperidou H. Sleep architecture in stroke and relation to outcome. Eur Neurol. 2008;61: 16–22. doi: 10.1159/000165344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sillanmäki S, Lipponen JA, Korkalainen H, Kulkas A, Leppänen T, Nikkonen S, et al. QTc prolongation is associated with severe desaturations in stroke patients with sleep apnea. BMC Pulm Med. 2022;22: 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-01996-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Vicente J, Johannesen L, Galeotti L, Strauss DG. Mechanisms of sex and age differences in ventricular repolarization in humans. Am Heart J. 2014;168: 749-756.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Tomohiko Ai

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

28 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-23794Inter-sleep stage variations in corrected QT interval differ between obstructive sleep apnea patients with and without stroke historyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Ebrahimian,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Your paper was evaluated by an expert in the field and myself. Though the topic is interesting, the reviewer is concerned with some issues regarding analysis. Please read the comments and address the issues accordingly. 

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 12 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Tomohiko Ai, M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.  Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf  and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

“I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: J.L. is a shareholder of a company (Kubios) that designs ECG and heart rate variability analysis software. Other co-authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.”

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The present is an observational study

Methods. It should be added how "randomly selected" is defined

Methods. Please report the strobe statement https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/strobe/

Methods. It is not cleat how patients were selected. I think that there is a risk of bias toward those patients (probably at high risk) who had all these data available.

Methods. Tables should not be reported in the methods but in the results

Methods.It should be included why HR less than 30 should be defined as low

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Fabrizio D'Ascenzo

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Tomohiko Ai

18 Nov 2022

Inter-sleep stage variations in corrected QT interval differ between obstructive sleep apnea patients with and without stroke history

PONE-D-22-23794R1

Dear Dr. Ebrahimian,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Tomohiko Ai, M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Fabrizio D'Ascenzo

**********

Acceptance letter

Tomohiko Ai

24 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-23794R1

Inter-sleep stage variations in corrected QT interval differ between obstructive sleep apnea patients with and without stroke history

Dear Dr. Ebrahimian:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Tomohiko Ai

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Checklist

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    Data cannot be shared publicly because of potentially identifying or sensitive patient information. These ethical restrictions are imposed by the Institutional Human Research Ethics Committee of the Princess Alexandra hospital. Data are available from the Institutional Human Research Ethics Committee of the Princess Alexandra Hospital (contact via MSH-Ethics@health.qld.gov.au) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. Researchers can contact the IHREC of PA Hospital and project steering committee will review the requests.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES