Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277084

PNPLA3 allele frequency has no impact on biliary bile acid composition or disease course in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

Martti Färkkilä 1,*, Hannu Kautiainen 2,3, Andrea Tenca 1, Kalle Jokelainen 1, Johanna Arola 4
Editor: Antonio De Vincentis5
PMCID: PMC9714899  PMID: 36454904

Abstract

Background and aims

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic inflammatory disease that leads to bile duct strictures, cholestasis, and biliary cirrhosis. PNPLA3 (patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3), regulates cellular lipid synthesis by converting lysophosphatidic acid into phosphatidic acid. Isoleucine mutation to methionine at position 148 (I148M) causes a loss of this function. Only two studies, with contradictory results, have evaluated the role of PNPLA3 in PSC. The rs738409(G) variant of PNPLA3 has been associated with an increased risk for transplantation in male patients with dominant strictures (DS). The study aimed to evaluate the PNPLA3 allele frequency effect on the clinical outcomes, progression, and prognosis of PSC. Furthermore, we analyzed the impact of PNPLA3 on phospholipid and bile acid composition to evaluate the effect of the PNPLA3 status on UDCA response.

Patients and methods

We recruited 560 patients prospectively and collected clinical and laboratory data as well as liver histology and imaging findings. PNPLA3 (CC, CG, GG) alleles were analyzed with TaqManTM. We also analyzed bile acids (BA), cholesterol and phospholipids and individual BA from a sample aspirated during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC).

Results

Among the recruited patients, 58.4%, 35.7% and 5.9% had the wild (CC), heterozygous (CG) and homozygous (GG) alleles, respectively. The PNPLA3 haplotype did not impact bile composition or individual BA. In addition, we found no differences in age at diagnosis, disease progression, liver fibrosis or survival between the cohorts.

Conclusions

The PNPLA3 I148M variant had no significant impact on on bile composition, including UDCA content, clinical outcomes, progression of liver fibrosis, hepatobiliary cancer risk, liver transplantation, or overall survival.

Introduction

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the biliary epithelium leading to strictures and eventually biliary cirrhosis [1]. The clinical course of the disease is variable and unpredictable.

The etiopathogenesis of PSC is unknown. The disease is regarded a heterogeneous disorder with genetic, immunologic, and environmental factors [1, 2]. The risk of PSC is significantly increased in offsprings, siblings, and parents of the patients with the HR 11.5 (1.6–84.4), 11.1 (3.3–37.8), and 2.3 (0.9–6.1), respectively [3], suggesting a clear genetic predisposition. Several case–controlled genome-wide association studies have revealed ≥20 susceptibility loci [4], the strongest association being with the HLA complex [5]. The role of PNPLA3 (patatin-like phospholipase domain containing protein 3) in the pathogenesis and disease progression of several liver diseases, including PSC has also been studied [6]. PNPLA3 regulates cellular lipid synthesis by converting lysophosphatidic acid into phosphatidic acid. Isoleucine mutation to methionine at position 148 (I148M) of PNPLA3 causes a loss of this function leading to increased triglyceride synthesis and accumulation in the liver [7].

PNPLA3 mRNA is expressed in hepatic stellate cells [8]. PNPLA3 rs738409 C>G p.I148M is associated with steatosis and fibrosis and an increased risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer [6]. Additionally, the PNPLA3 variant has been associated with elevated of transaminases in general population [9] and in patients with IBD [10].

Little is known about the role of this PNPLA3 variant in regulating bile acid composition and phospholipid metabolism. Chen F et al. [11] analyzed fibroblast growth factor (FGF19) levels, a surrogate marker of farsenoid X receptor (FXR) activity in lean and obese patients with NAFLD. They found that FGF19 levels were significantly higher in lean patients, but the prevalence of PNPLA3 GG polymorphism was similar, suggesting that the rs738409 variant did not impact FXR activity. In addition, PNPLA3 has shown to promote phospholipid synthesis in mammalian cells [7]. The deficiencies of a biliary bicarbonate ‘‘umbrella”, and the loss of alkalization of cholangiocyte apical membrane proximity have been suggested to increase membrane permeability of toxic BA leading to bile duct injury, inflammation, and strictures in PSC [12, 13]. The integrity of the cholangiocyte apical glycocalyx appears to be critical for cholangiocyte protection [14]. The apical bile salt receptor, TGR5, and the glycocalyx stabilizing enzyme fucosyltransferase 2 [1, 15, 16] protect cholangiocytes against BA. Alterations in the biliary phospholipid composition in the pathogenesis of PSC are based on the Mdr2 gene knockout mice studies, shown to develop cholangitis spontaneously [17].

A study of the role of the rs738409 variant in PSC including two patient cohorts [18], demonstrated that the common I148M variant of the PNPLA3 gene was a risk factor for decreased survival. However, this was observed only in male PSC patients with advanced disease and dominant stricture (DS) requiring endoscopic intervention. Moreover, the variant was not significantly associated with the development of DS [18]. Another study included 178 patients with PSC and evaluated the impact of PNPLA3 p.I148M on liver injury in cholestatic liver diseases. It was observed that an increasing number of risk alleles had no impact on transaminases, the risk of cirrhosis, or the need for liver transplantation [19].

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), has widely been used to treat PSC patients with reduction of cholestatic liver enzymes. However, only 30–67% of patients respond to UDCA assessed by the decrease or normalization of serum-alkaline phosphatase (S-ALP), [2022]. Patients treated with UDCA, achieving a persistent improvement of S-ALP to <1.5 UNL, have significantly longer end-points- free survival [22]. However, UDCA has not been demonstrated to affect liver transplantation-free survival or liver-related death [23].

We evaluated the effect of PNPLA3 allele frequency on the clinical outcomes, disease progression and survival in a large population of PSC patients. Additionally, we analyzed the impact of PNPLA3 on biliary cholesterol, phospholipid, and BA composition in UDCA treatment-naïve patients and those on UDCA therapy to determine whether the PNPLA3 had an impact on UDCA response.

Material and methods

Patients

In total, 560 patients from the Helsinki University Hospital PSC registry based on hospital records were prospectively enrolled from 2010–2016 with follow-up till 2020. The diagnosis was based on the EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines [24]. All the patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC), and colonoscopy. Patients’ demographic, clinical and laboratory data, as well as liver histology and imaging findings, were collected (Table 1). Furthermore, 82% and 69% of male, and female patients, respectively, were diagnosed with IBD. Liver function tests were performed either a day before or on the day of ERC. For analysis of the I148M PNPLA3 polymorphism (rs738409), DNA was isolated from whole-blood samples using standard procedures. Additionally, PNPLA3 (CC, CG, GG) alleles were analyzed with TaqManTM SNP Genotyping Assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) [25]. A composite end point consisting of CCA, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver transplantation and deaths was created as a clinical outcome.

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients based on PNPLA3 haplotype.

Variables PNPLA3 rs738409 p for linearity
CC N = 327 (58.4%) CG N = 200 (35.7%) GG N = 33 (5.9%)
Number of males, (%) 192(59) 126(63) 18(55) 0.73
Age at PSC diagnosis, mean (SD) 37(14) 36(13) 36(13) 0.20
IBD, n (%) 240(73) 162(81) 24(73) 0.21
BMI, kg/m2,mean (SD) 25.6(4.2) 25.6(4.7) 26.2(4.4) 0.53
Age at diagnosis IBD, mean (SD) 27(12) 26(11) 29(12) 0.98
ERC score, median (IQR) 5 (2,9) 4 (2,8) 4 (2,7) 0.20
Histology, stage, number 146 85 16 0.67
 0 62(42) 40(47) 7(44)
 1 33(23) 20(24) 4(25)
 2 36(25) 13(15) 3(19)
 3 10(7) 8(9) 1(6)
 4 5(3) 4(5) 1(6)
Histology, grade, number, (%) 150 (58) 90 (35) 18 (7) 0.44
 0 89(59) 63(70) 10(56)
 1 42(28) 18(20) 5(28)
 2 10(7) 6(7) 3(17)
 3–4 9(6) 3(3) 0(0)
P-ALP, U/l, median (IQR) 138 (95,234) 132 (98,219) 146 (115,209) 0.92
P-GGT, U/l, median (IQR) 90 (34,248) 131 (43,265) 178 (66,272) 0.031
P-ALT, U/l, median (IQR) 43 (25,79) 48 (24,97) 51 (33,85) 0.19
P-AST, U/l, median (IQR) 35 (26,57) 39 (27,59) 50 (33,83) 0.016
P-ALB, g/l 38 (35,41) 38 (36,41) 39 (36,41) 0.23
P-Bilirubin, μmol/l, median (IQR) 11 (7,16) 11 (8,17) 11 (7,16) 0.69
B-Platelets, E9/l, median (IQR) 254 (205,314) 252 (210,307) 251 (212,312) 0.99
APRI, median (IQR) 0.36 (0.23,0.63) 0.39 (0.26,0.62) 0.46 (0.28,0.77) 0.074
FIB4, median (IQR) 1.15 (0.77,1.75) 1.10 (0.75,1.77) 1.10 (0.95,1.82) 0.78

Abbreviations: PSC, primary sclerosing cholangitis; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; BMI, body mass index; ERC, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography; P-ALP, alkaline phosphatase; P-GGT, gamma glutamyl transferase; P-ALT, alanine aminotransferase; P-AST, aspartate aminotransferase; P-ALB, albumin; APRI, AST-platelet ratio index.

ERC examinations and bile sample collection

The indications for ERC were 1) documentation of diagnosis due to elevated P-ALP levels in conjunction with IBD, 2) magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRCP) or liver biopsy suggestive of PSC, and 3) surveillance of disease progression and biliary dysplasia [24]. The ERC based diagnosis and dysplasia surveillance strategy at Helsinki University Hospital has been previously presented [26, 27]. Images were evaluated using the modified Amsterdam score [26]. DS observed during ERC was defined as a stenosis with a diameter of ≤1.5 mm of the common duct or ≤1.0 mm of a hepatic duct within 2 cm of the bifurcation. A dilatation was made when DS was diagnosed, or the cytology brush could not be passed through the stenosis.

Brush cytology

Brush cytology was collected from extra- and intrahepatic bile ducts, regardless of DS [26] using a brush with a guide wire (RX Cytology Brush, Boston Scientific, MA, USA).

Biliary bile samples

A bile sample was aspirated using a balloon catheter, immersed into liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 C°. Biliary BA, phospholipid and cholesterol composition were analyzed in a subgroup of 220 patients, with 56 UDCA treatment naïve patients and 164 patients on UDCA therapy. Bile acids were silylated to trimethyl silylethers and quantitated by gas-liquid chromatography (GLC) on the SE-30 capillary column and the individual BA content was analyzed [28]. The amount of BA was expressed as content (mM) and molar percentages (mM%); 5-α cholestane was used as an internal standard and phospholipids were analyzed enzymatically with commercial kits (Enzabil-kit; Nycomed).

Statistics

The descriptive statistics were presented as means with standard deviation (SD), as medians with interquartile range (IQR) or as counts with percentages. Group differences were evaluated using unpaired Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-squared test. Statistical significances for the hypothesis of linearity of clinical characteristics across PNPLA3 haplotype levels of clinical characteristics was evaluated using the Cochran-Armitage (chi-squared) test for trend, the Cuzick test, ordered logistic regression models and analysis of variance with appropriate contrast. Kaplan-Meier’s survival analysis was performed to estimate the cumulative survivals (Fig 1) and survival for composite end point (Fig 2): CCA, HCC, liver transplantation or liver related deaths; adjusted cumulative rates were estimated using two propensity score-based techniques, stratification, and weighting (MMWS, marginal mean weighting through stratification) [29]. MMWS is an extension of propensity score matching that combines propensity score stratification and inverse probability of treatment weighting. Overall cumulative rate relationships were investigated using the log-rank test or Cox proportional hazards models. The impact of PNPLA3 allele frequency and UDCA administration and their interaction were evaluated using two-way rank-based analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) factorial models [30]. The standardized mortality rate (SMR), which is the ratio between observed and expected numbers, was calculated using subject-year methods with 95% CIs, assuming a Poisson distribution.

Fig 1. Impact of PNPLA3 haplotype on the development of strictures assessed by the time to first dilatation.

Fig 1

Impact of the PNPLA3 haplotype; adjusted for sex and age at PSC diagnosis.

Fig 2. Proportion of patients who did not reach the composite end point (CCA, liver transplantation, and deaths) according to the PNPLA3 allele frequency; adjusted for sex and age at PSC diagnosis.

Fig 2

Furthermore, we calculated areas under the curve (AUC) with the trapezoidal method in terms of longitudinal ERC-score (ERCtwAUC). In case of violation of the assumptions, a bootstrap-type method was used (10 000 replications) to estimate 95% CI. All analyses were conducted using Stata (version 17.0, Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA).

Ethics

All the patients included in the PSC registry provided a written informed consent. The study was performed following the principles of GCP and in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (6th revision, 2008). The study protocol was approved by Helsinki University Hospital Ethical Committee IV, HUS/1566/2020.

Results

PNPLA3 allele frequency on the clinical course of the disease

Of the 560 patients, 327 (58.4%), 200 (35.7%), and 33 (5.9%) patients had the wild type (CC), heterozygous (CG) and 33 homozygous (GG) alleles, respectively. The follow-up time was 3990 person-years (mean 12.2 years), 2528 years (12.6 years) and 383 years (11.6 years), for patients with the CC, CG and GG haplotype, respectively. Clinical and laboratory data are presented in Table 1. No relationship in age at PSC diagnosis, median ERC score, or liver histology was observed between the cohorts grouped by the increasing allele frequency. In addition, plasma aspartate aminotransferase (P-AST) and P-gamma-glutamyl transferase (P-GT) were significantly increased with the increasing allele frequency. The PNPLA3 haplotype was not associated with liver fibrosis assessed by either APRI- and Fib4-score or the proportion of patients with advanced fibrosis (Metavir 3–4), (Table 1).

PNPLA3 haplotype and progression of bile duct changes at ERC

The progression of strictures needing dilatation was assessed by the time to first dilatation. In total, at least one dilatation was performed in 223 patients, 137, 73, and 13 patients with CC, CG and GG, respectively, during the follow-up period No relationship was observed between PNPLA3 haplotype and the development of strictures needing dilatation (p for linearity 0.30). The crude prevalence of patients needing dilatation at least once was 71% (95% CI: 59 to 82), 62% (49 to 75), and 50% (28 to 77) in patients with CC, CG, and GG alleles, respectively, for the 25-year follow-up, (p for linearity 0.29). Fig 1 shows the age at diagnosis and sex-adjusted time to first dilatation. The total ERC-scores and time weight AUC of ERC did not demonstrate any relationship with the increasing PNPLA3 allele frequency: (median 6.0, IQR 2.3,9.0), 5.4 (2.0,8.5), CG, and 5.4 (2.5,8.7) in CC, CG, and GG, respectively.

Development of hepatobiliary cancers and mortality

CCA or HCC (Table 2) was diagnosed in 35 patients during the follow-up; 23 (7%), 12(6%) and in no patients with CC, CG and GG haplotype, respectively, (p for linearity 0.19; adjusted for sex, age and IBD). In total, 76 patients underwent liver transplantation during the follow-up period: 40 (12.2%), 29 (14.5%), and 7 (21.2%) in CC, CG and GG-allele, respectively (p for linearity = 0.35 adjusted for sex, age and IBD). Fig 2 shows the overall survival, which is the proportion of patients that did not reach the composite end point; no relationship was observed between the groups (p for linearity 0.75). The 25-years crude survival rate was 48% (95% CI: 23–66), 48% (95% CI: 31 to 64), and 49 (95% CI: 0 to 83) in CC, CG, and GG haplotype, respectively (p for linearity = 0.88).

Table 2. Effect of PNPLA3 allele frequency on study population’s crude 25-year survival rate and significant outcomes.

Variables PNPLA3 rs738409 p for linearity**
Total (n) CC CG GG
N = 327 N = 200 N = 33
CCA 25 16 9 0 0.20
Survival,% (95% CI)* 92 (87 to 96) 95 (90 to 97) 100 (..)
HCC 11 8 3 0 0.21
Survival,% (95% CI)* 91 (78 to 97) 94 (76 to 98) 100 (..)
Liver transplantation, n (%) 76 40 29 7 0.35
Survival, (95% CI)* 56 (27 to 75) 51 (35 to 69) 49 (0 to 85)
Deaths, n (%) 32 21 9 2 0.55
Survival,% (95% CI)* 88 (81 to 93) 94 (89 to 98) 94 (81 to 100)

Abbreviations: CCA, cholangiocarcinoma, HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma

*Bias corrected bootstrap estimation (5000 replications) were used to derive 95% confidence intervals.

** Adjusted for sex, age and IBD

In the study population, 32 patients died, and the most common cause of death was CCA. No differences in mortality were observed between the groups (Table 2). The SMR in patients with CC, CG and GG haplotype was 1.40 (95%CI 0.92–2.15), 1,12 (95%CI 0,58–2,15), and 1.95 (95%CI 0,49–7,79), respectively.

Effect of UDCA therapy and PNPLA3 haplotype on bile composition

We evaluated the impact of PNPLA3 haplotype and UDCA administration on total biliary BA, cholesterol, and phospholipid composition in UDCA treatment naïve patients and those receiving UDCA therapy, (Table 3). The mean UDCA dose/kg (SD) was 17.1 (4.4), and the median (IQR) 18 (15–20). In UDCA treatment-naïve patients, the PNPLA3 haplotype did not impact the bile composition. In contrast, primary BA and deoxycholic acid (DCA) levels were decreased in patients receiving UDCA therapy; however, UDCA administration did not impact lithocholic acid levels. No interaction was observed between PNPLA3 haplotype and UDCA therapy on bile composition, Table 3).

Table 3. Impact of PNPLA3 allele frequency and UDCA administration and their interaction on bile composition in PSC.

Variable PNPLA3* Effect**
Haplotype CC CG GG Main Inter-action
UDCA UDCA UDCA Haplo UDCA
Use of UDCA Naïve
N = 27
Median (IQR)
Users
N = 95
Median (IQR)
Naïve
N = 23
Median (IQR)
Users
N = 57
Median (IQR)
Naïve
N = 6
Median (IQR)
Users
N = 12
Median (IQR)
p-value p-value p-value
Bile composition
Cholesterol, mM 2.62 (1.89,3.30) 1.57 (1.03,2.01) 2.92 (2.26,4.70) 1.28 (0.88,1.82) 2.74 (1.45,3.90) 1.17 (1.00,1.83) 0.80 <0.001 0.20
Bile acids, mM 20.4 (16.2,34.0) 22.9 (16.5,28.3) 23.5 (16.4,29.4) 21.4 (14.7,26.6) 25.8 (8.3,35.0) 21.7 (16.7,27.1) 0.97 0.36 0.72
Phospholipids, mM 8.3 (5.8,11.7) 8.9 (6.1,11.3) 9.4 (6.3,11.1) 7.9 (5.3,10.5) 11.1 (3.4,13.4) 7.4 (6.3,10.9) 0.78 0.34 0.87
Cholesterol, mM% 7.3 (6.0,10.3) 4.4 (3.5,5.6) 8.5 (6.4,12.0) 4.0 (3.0,5.3) 7.7 (7.2,10.7) 4.6 (3.4,6.4) 0.78 <0.001 0.36
Bile acids, mM% 68 (62,70) 69 (64,72) 65 (62,69) 69 (65,75) 65 (61,67) 68 (64,73) 0.41 0.006 0.68
Phospholipids, mM% 25 (22,28) 27 (23,30) 25 (22,27) 26 (22,29) 26 (25,31) 27 (23,30) 0.18 0.49 0.63
Bile acids, mg
Lithocholic 1.03 (0.65,2.32) 1.56 (0.41,3.33) 0.96 (0.45,1.45) 0.96 (0.22,3.28) 1.02 (0.54,1.15) 0.94 (0.27,3.33) 0.42 0.75 0.95
Deoxycholic 12.9 (3.2,24.1) 5.0 (0.2,9.2) 7.0 (2.0,18.6) 3.6 (0.1,9.5) 4.5 (1.1,10.2) 2.3 (0.2,12.6) 0.54 0.005 0.58
Chenodeoxy cholic 31.4 (24.1,36.1) 14.8 (11.8,20.3) 34.0 (24.9,36.9) 15.5 (13.1,21.3) 32.8 (13.9,37.5) 15.8 (13.3,25.8) 0.58 <0.001 0.44
Cholic 48.7 (34.8,65.0) 16.4 (11.9,23.1) 55.0 (45.1,62.4) 17.5 (13.0,25.4) 56.2 (48.9,59.9) 19.5 (12.6,32.9) 0.48 <0.001 0.33
UDCA 0.81 (0.56,1.95) 58.4 (50.2,64.1) 0.98 (0.46,2.56) 57.1 (46.0,65.3) 0.59 (0.51,1.38) 50.5 (39.5,59.4) 0.29 <0.001 0.87

*Values expressed as median (IQR)

**Adjusted for age and sex.

Abbreviations: mM, millimolar; UDCA, ursodeoxycholic acid

Discussion

We found that the PNPLA3 I148M variant did not significantly impact clinical outcomes, liver fibrosis, DS development, hepatobiliary cancer risk, need for transplantation, or survival. Neither did the increasing allele frequency had any impact on BA composition. UDCA therapy markedly reduced the primary BA; however, this was not reflected by changes in liver enzymes, such as P-ALP or bilirubin or disease progression.

Fat metabolism in liver may have a major impact on the pathophysiology of liver diseases. The PNPLA3 protein has lipase activity towards triglycerides in hepatocytes and retinyl esters in hepatic stellate cells [6]. The I148M substitution leads to a loss of this function, thus promoting triglyceride accumulation in hepatocytes. The PNPLA3 gene variant rs738409 C>G located on chromosome 22 has been associated with susceptibility to NAFLD [31, 32], development of fibrosis, increased risk of alcohol-related cirrhosis [6] and mortality from alcoholic hepatitis [33]. Moreover, rs738409(G) is a risk factor for hepatocellular cancer in alcoholic cirrhotic patients with a two-fold HCC risk [34]. PNPLA3 I148M variant exhibits increased LPAAT activity and leads to increased cellular lipid accumulation. It also promotes progression to chronic liver disease under a large variety of harmful stimuli for the liver such as cholestasis or bacterial endotoxemia as suggested in PSC. Primary hepatic stellate cells from patients with the PNPLA3-rs738409 GG variant displayed significantly higher expression and release of pro-inflammatory cytokine [35]. In addition, in patients with autoimmune hepatitis, the PNPLA3 I148M variant has been associated with the progression of liver disease despite steatosis being similar across all PNPLA3-rs738409 genotypes [36]. The function of PNPLA3 has been extensively studied, but the molecular mechanisms leading to fibrosis and carcinogenesis remain unclear [6]. I148M polymorphism has been suggested to represent a general modifier of fibrogenesis and a key player in liver disease progression [37]. Presently, there are no directly available data on the rs738409(G) variant and the expression of FXR, which is the most important regulator of bile acid metabolism, or CYP7A1 (cholesterol 7α hydroxylase) activity, which is the key enzyme of BA synthesis.

A recent study evaluating plasma BA profiles in PSC to predict hepatic decompensation, demonstrated that the risk was associated with increased concentration of total BA and conjugated fraction of many BA. In contrast, higher glycine: taurine conjugation ratios were protective [38]. Intestinal dysbiosis has been described in PSC patients with and without IBD [39]. The effect of the PNPLA3 rs738409 variant on gut microbiota has been evaluated only in a few studies. Monga Kravetz A et al. [40] demonstrated that this PNPLA3 variant caused an increased on Firmicutes/Bacteroides-ratio in obese youth with NAFLD.

Thus far, only two studies with contradictory results have evaluated the role of PNPLA3 in PSC [18, 19]. Furthermore, no studies have evaluated the impact of PNPLA3 allele frequency on bile composition or progression of bile duct changes or fibrosis. Friedrich et al. [18] demonstrated that male carriers of the I148M variant showed a significantly reduced survival free of liver transplantation, but only in the presence of a DS. They concluded that male carriers of the I148M variant could be regarded as a high-risk subgroup, regarding surveillance strategies and liver transplant allocation. Hence, testing for the PNPLA3 variant could improve therapeutic approaches in PSC. However, the conclusions were based on a cohort with only 23 males carrying the I148M genotype (CG or GG) with DS. In addition, the authors included a validation cohort of Norwegian PSC patients with endoscopic intervention, consisting of 32 males with the I148M variant. They demonstrated that the variant impaired actuarial survival free of liver transplantation in that cohort.

In our study including 70 patients with DS who carried the I148M variant, we could not confirm the results of Friedrich et al. [18]. The I148M variant did not impact bile duct disease assessed by sequential ERC examinations, development of cirrhosis or need for transplantation. In line with our results, Kruk et al. [19] could not find any significant differences in the genotype distribution of PNPLA3 observed between patients with cirrhosis and without cirrhosis. Neither were serum liver enzyme activities modified by the presence of risk variants. The prevalence of PNPLA3 haplotype CG (MM) was 34.8% and GG 4% (n = 7) in their study, compared to the present study, with CG 40% (n = 200) and GG 5.9% (n = 33), respectively. It was reported that CG haplotype prevalence in the general Finnish population was around 36% and that of GG was around 6% [41]. Hence, in Finland the PNPLA3 (RS738409 C>G P.I148M) allele frequency in PSC did not differ from that of the general population, suggesting that it is unlikely that PNPLA3 haplotype would predispose individuals to PSC development.

Strengths and limitations

A strength of the present study was the large patient population with sequential ERC examinations for evaluating bile duct disease progression and assessing liver fibrosis based on histology and noninvasive fibrosis markers. However, the study’s limitation was the relatively low number of late end points such as liver transplantation, CCA, or deaths.

Conclusions

The present study included 560 PSC patients with different disease states. We observed that the PNPLA3 I148M variant did not have any significant impact on clinical outcomes, progression of liver fibrosis, dominant stricture development, hepatobiliary cancer risk, the need for liver transplantation or patient survival. In addition, the allele frequency of PNPLA3 did not have any significant impact on bile composition. In contrast to the previous study [18] we could not identify rs738409 C>G p.I148M variant as a risk factor for PSC, and PNPLA3 genotyping does not seem to have any role in stratifying patients with PSC for surveillance.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge laboratory assistant, Leena Kaipiainen for bile analysis at Biomedicum Helsinki, POB 700, FI-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland, and study nurse Virpi Pelkonen for recruiting patients into the study.

List of abbreviations

AUC

area under curve

BA

bile acids

CA

cholic acid

CCA

cholangiocarcinoma

CDCA

chenodeoxycholic acid

DCA

deoxycholic acid

DS

dominant stricture

ERC

endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

ERCtwAUC

ERC time-weighted scores, area under curve

FXR

farnesoid X receptor

GLC

gas liquid chromatography

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

IBD

inflammatory bowel disease

LCA

lithocholic acid

mM

milliemolar

MRCP

magnetic resonance cholagio pancreatograph

P-ALP

plasma alkaline phosphatase

P-AST

plasma aspartate aminotransferase

P-GT

P-gammaglutamyl transferase

PNPLA3

patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3

PSC

Primary sclerosing cholangitis

SMR

standardized mortality rate

UDCA

ursodeoxycholic acid

UNL

upper normal limit

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

Financial support: The study was supported by a grant from State funding for University-level health research TYH2016208 (MF). https://hussote.sharepoint.com/sites/00004/Tutkimusrahoitus/Sivut/default.aspx The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Dyson JK, Beuers U, Jones DEJ, Lohse AW, Hudson M. Primary sclerosing cholangitis. Lancet. 2018. 23; 391:2547–2559. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30300-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tabibian JH, Ali AH, Lindor KD. Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis, Part 1: Epidemiology, Etiopathogenesis, Clinical Features, and Treatment. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2018; 14:293–304. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bergquist A, Montgomery SM, Bahmanyar S, Olsson R, Danielsson A, Lindgren S, et al. Increased risk of primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis in first-degree relatives of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6:939–943. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.03.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ji S-G, Juran BD, Mucha S, Folseraas T, Jostins L, Melum E, et al. Genome-wide association study of primary sclerosing cholangitis identifies new risk loci and quantifies the genetic relationship with inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Genet. 2017; 49: 269–273. doi: 10.1038/ng.3745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mells GF, Kaser A, Karlsen TH. Novel insights into autoimmune liver diseases provided by genome-wide association studies. J Autoimmun. 2013; 46:41–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2013.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Trépo E, Romeo S, Zucman-Rossi J, Nahon P. PNPLA3 gene in liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2016; 65:399–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kumari M, Schoiswohl G, Chitraju C, Paar M, Cornaciu I, Rangrez AY, et al. Adiponutrin functions as a nutritionally regulated lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase. Cell Metab. 2012; 15:691–702. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.04.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pirazzi C, Valenti L, Motta BM, Pingitore P, Hedfalk K, Mancina RM, et al. PNPLA3 has retinyl-palmitate lipase activity in human hepatic stellate cells. Hum Mol Genet 2014; 23:4077–4085. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chambers JC, Zhang W, Sehmi J, Li X, Wass MN, Van der Harst P, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies loci influencing concentrations of liver enzymes in plasma. Nat Genet 2011; 43:1131–1138. doi: 10.1038/ng.970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mancina RM, Spagnuolo R, Milano M, Brogneri S, Morrone A, Cosco C, et al. PNPLA3 148M Carriers with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Have Higher Susceptibility to Hepatic Steatosis and Higher Liver Enzymes. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016; 22:134–140. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen F, Esmaili S, Rogers GB, Bugianesi E, Petta S, Marchesini G, et al. Lean NAFLD: A Distinct Entity Shaped by Differential Metabolic Adaptation. Hepatology. 2020; 71:1213–1222. doi: 10.1002/hep.30908 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Beuers U, Hohenester S, De Buy Wenniger LJ, Kremer AE, Jansen PL, Elferink RP. The biliary HCO(3) umbrella: a unifying hypothesis on pathogenetic and therapeutic aspects of fibrosing cholangiopathies. Hepatology 2010; 52:1489–1496. doi: 10.1002/hep.23810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Karlsen TH, Boberg KM. Update on primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2013; 59:571–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hohenester S, Wenniger LM, Paulusma CC, van Vliet SJ, Jefferson DM, Elferink RP, et al. A biliary HCO3-umbrella constitutes a protective mechanism against bile acid-induced injury in human cholangiocytes. Hepatology 2012; 55:173–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Karlsen TH, Franke A, Melum E, Kaser A, Hov JR, Balschun T, et al. Genome-wide association analysis in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology 2010;138: 1102–1111. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.11.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Folseraas T, Melum E, Rausch P, Juran BD, Ellinghaus E, Shiryaev A, et al. Extended analysis of a genome-wide association study in primary sclerosing cholangitis detects multiple novel risk loci. J Hepatol 2012;57: 366–375. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.03.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fickert P, Fuchsbichler A, Wagner M, Zollner G, Kaser A, Tilg H, et al. Regurgitation of bile acids from leaky bile ducts causes sclerosing cholangitis in Mdr2 (Abcb4) knockout mice. Gastroenterology. 2004; 127:261–274. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Friedrich K, Rupp C, Hov JR, Steinebrunner N, Weiss KH, Stiehl A, et al. A frequent PNPLA3 variant is a sex specific disease modifier in PSC patients with bile duct stenosis. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e58734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kruk B, Liebe R, Milkiewicz M, Ewa Wunsch E, Raszeja-Wyszomirska J, Lammert F, et al. PNPLA3 p.I148M and TM6SF2 p.E167K variants do not predispose to liver injury in cholestatic liver diseases: A prospective analysis of 178 patients with PSC. PLoS One 2018;13: e0202942. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stanich PP, Björnsson E, Gossard AA, Enders F, Jorgensen R, Lindor KD. Alkaline phosphatase normalization is associated with better prognosis in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Dig Liver Dis. 2011; 43:309–313. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.12.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Al Mamari S1, Djordjevic J, Halliday JS, Chapman RW. Improvement of serum alkaline phosphatase to <1.5 upper limit of normal predicts better outcome and reduced risk of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. J Hepatol. 2013; 58:329–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rupp C, Rössler A, Halibasic E, Sauer P, Weiss K-H, Friedrich K, et al. Reduction in alkaline phosphatase is associated with longer survival in primary sclerosing cholangitis, independent of dominant stenosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014; 40:1292–1301. doi: 10.1111/apt.12979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Olsson R, Boberg KM, de Muckadell OS, Lindgren S, Hultcrantz R, Folvik G, et al. High-dose ursodeoxycholic acid in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a 5-year multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Gastroenterology 2005; 129:1464–1472. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on Sclerosing Cholangitis. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol. 2022: S0168-8278(22)00326-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 25.De la Vega FM, Lazaruk KD, Rhodes MD, Wenz MH. Assessment of two flexible and compatible SNP genotyping platforms: TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays and the SNPlex Genotyping System. Mutat Res 2005; 573:111–135. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Boyd S, Tenca A, Jokelainen K, Mustonen H, Krogerus L, Arola J, et al. Screening primary sclerosing cholangitis and biliary dysplasia with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and brush cytology: risk factors for biliary neoplasia. Endoscopy. 2016; 48:432–439. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-110792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Barner-Rasmussen N, Pukkala E, Jussila A, Färkkilä M. Epidemiology, risk of malignancy and patient survival in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a population-based study in Finland. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020; 55:74–81. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1707277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Grundy SM, Ahrens EH Jr, Miettinen TA. Quantitative isolation and gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of fecal bile acids. J Lipid Res 1965; 6:397–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Linden A. Combining propensity score-based stratification and weighting to improve causal inference in the evaluation of health care interventions. J Eval ClinPract. 2014; 20:1065–1071. doi: 10.1111/jep.12254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Uitema BE. Rank analysis of covariance. In: The analysis of covariance and alternatives. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1980. Sep: Chap. 12: 255–269. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Romeo S, Kozlitina J, Xing C, Pertsemlidis A, Cox D, Pennacchio LA, et al. Genetic variation in PNPLA3 confers susceptibility to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Genet 2008; 40:1461–1465. doi: 10.1038/ng.257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sookoian S., Castano G. O., Burgueno A. L., Gianotti T. F., Rosselli M. S., and Pirola C. J. A nonsynonymous gene variant in the adiponutrin gene is associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease severity. J. Lipid Res. 2009; 50:2111–2116. doi: 10.1194/jlr.P900013-JLR200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Atkinson SR, Way MJ, McQuillin A, Marsha Y. Morgan MY. Thursz MR. Homozygosity for rs738409:G in PNPLA3 is associated with increased mortality following an episode of severe alcoholic hepatitis. J Hepatol 2017; 67:120–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bruschi FV, et al. The PNPLA3 I148M variant modulates the fibrogenic phenotype of human hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology. 2017; 65:1875–1890. doi: 10.1002/hep.29041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mederacke Y-S, et al. The PNPLA3 rs738409 GG genotype is associated with poorer prognosis in 239 patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020; 51:1160–1168. doi: 10.1111/apt.15722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Trépo E, Nahon P, Bontempi G, Valenti L, Falleti E, Nischalke HD, et al. Association between the PNPLA3 (rs738409 C>G) variant and hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from a meta-analysis of individual participant data. Hepatology 2014; 59:2170–2177. doi: 10.1002/hep.26767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dongiovanni P, Donati B, Fares R, Lombardi R, Mancina RM, Romeo S, et al. L PNPLA3 I148M polymorphism and progressive liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19:6969–6978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mousa OY, Juran BD, McCauley BM, Vesterhus MN, Folseraas T, Turgeon CT, et al. Bile Acid Profiles in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and their Ability to Predict Hepatic Decompensation. Hepatology. 2020. Nov 23. doi: 10.1002/hep.31652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sabino J, Vieira-Silva S, Machiels K, et al. Primary sclerosing cholangitis is characterised by intestinal dysbiosis independent from IBD. Gut 2016; 65:1681–1689. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Monga Kravetz A, Testerman T, Galuppo B, Graf J, Pierpont B, Siebel S, et al. Effect of Gut Microbiota and PNPLA3 rs738409 Variant on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) in Obese Youth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 105: 3575–3585. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kotronen A, Johansson LE, Johansson LM, Roos C, Westerbacka J, Hamsten A, et al. A common variant in PNPLA3, which encodes adiponutrin, is associated with liver fat content in humans. Diabetologia 2009; 52:1056–1060. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1285-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Antonio De Vincentis

1 Jun 2022

PONE-D-21-38918The impact of PNPLA3 allele dose on biliary bile acid composition and disease course in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitisPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Färkkillä,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 14 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Antonio De Vincentis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

"Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The title reflects inappropriately the content of the study, in which no impact of PNPLA3 allele dose was find neither on BA composition nor disease course in patients with PSC. Please rephrase.

The allele groups of patients are not balanced in numerosity: only 5.9% of patients were mutated.

Was there any difference between the wildtype group and the CG-GG group?

To the knowledge of this reviewer, the pathogenesis of PSC is still unknown: published evidences address the PSC development to defects in mechanisms protecting against bile acid toxicity. In addition, the strong relationship of PSC in patients with IBD support the hypothesis of pro-inflammatory microbial components to the portal circulation and the possibility of an antigenic trigger of microbial origin. In the discussion authors say that to date, no data is available on the PNPLA3 variants and the expression of FXR. Though, to the knowledge of this reviewer this field has been explored in NAFLD patients, also with the analysis of gut microbiome. (Chen F et al., Lean NAFLD: A Distinct Entity Shaped by Differential Metabolic Adaptation. Hepatology. 2020) It could be interesting to know whether a correlation between PNPLA3, FXR expression, BA composition and gut microbiome could be found in PSC patients.

The statement in the discussion should be amended.

Authors reported 73%, 81%, 73% of patients with associated IBD according to CC, CG, GG PNPLA3 haplotype. There is no description of the severity of the disease, nor the medical-surgical treatment. Could you present these data?

Authors presented in the results section that P-AST and P-GT were significantly increased with increasing allele dose. Could you give an interpretation of this finding in the discussion?

Reviewer #2: Dear authors, thanks for giving me the opportunity to review your manuscript.

In the manuscript, the authors aim at demonstrating how the presence of different alleles of PNPLA3 might influence clinical outcome and bile composition in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Despite the conflicting results of the other studies available in the literature and the numerous sample studied (not always available in case of rare diseases), in the reviewer's opinion, the rationale of the study is not convincing and, unsurprisingly the results confirm it. PNPLA3 has been implied in fibrogenesis and carcinogenesis and has been linked to hepatocarcinoma which is not a frequent tumor in PSC patients. Furthermore, PSC patients usually develop liver fibrosis as a consequence of cholestasis and in many cases, the fibrosis is confined to the bile ducts. The mechanisms by which PNPLA3 induces liver damage are not completely understood and, in the reviewer's opinion, the rationale for studying their alleles in PSC is weak. However, the evaluation of bile acid composition may be interesting in these patients but a lot of confounding factors might be involved in this analysis (i.e. microbiota composition and IBD activity) which are not taken into account.

Furthermore, there are many punctuation errors in the manuscript and imprecisions.

Introduction:

The introduction is not fluent and the rationale is not well explained.

I suggest rephrasing sentences in lines 76 and 81.

In line 88 I would add that the UDCA effect on LT-free survival and liver-related death has never been demonstrated.

Methods:

The part on statistical analysis is too long and full of detail with respect to the data shown in the results section.

You mention a "compound" outcome in the results but I suppose composite outcomes have never been mentioned in the methods section. I suggest specifying the endpoints in this section.

Results:

line 162, specify the unit of measure of median values in brackets.

line 175, time to the first dilation since when? diagnosis? ERC?

in table 2 I would have distinguished HCC from CCA, which is, in the reviewer's opinion, quite important to the aim of the manuscript.

An English editing is suggested.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277084.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


1 Sep 2022

Response to reviewers’ comments

PONE-D-21-38918

The impact of PNPLA3 allele dose on biliary bile acid composition and disease course in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

PLOS ONE

Reviewer #1: The title reflects inappropriately the content of the study, in which no impact of PNPLA3 allele dose was find neither on BA composition nor disease course in patients with PSC. Please rephrase.

Response: The title has been rephrased: PNPLA3 ALLELE FREQUENCY HAS NO IMPACT ON BILIARY BILE ACID COMPOSITION OR DISEASE COURSE IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS

The allele groups of patients are not balanced in numerosity: only 5.9% of patients were mutated.

Response: The prevalence of the GG haplotype in the general Finnish population is around 6%, which is the same as in PSC patients cohort. PSC is a relatively rare disease and balancing the study population numerosity for PNPLA3 (RS738409 C>G P.I148M) allele homozygosity to the wild type would require a PSC population of 5540 cases. In the study of Friedrich K et al (ref 17) the total number of GG homozygotes from Germany and Norway was (4+19) =23 and in that of Kruk B et al (18) was 7. So, the number homozygotes (n=33) in the present study exceeds that of the two earlier published cohorts.

Was there any difference between the wildtype group and the CG-GG group?

Response: For clinical and laboratory parameters Only P-GT was higher in GC+GG-group compared to CC, see kindly Supplementary table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients based on PNPLA3 haplotype.

For clinical outcomes: CCA, HCC, liver transplantation and liver related deaths no statistically significant differences were seen in CC compared to GC+GG, see kindly Supplementary table 2. PNPLA3 allele dose and significant outcomes of study population. Crude 25 years survival.

To the knowledge of this reviewer, the pathogenesis of PSC is still unknown: published evidences address the PSC development to defects in mechanisms protecting against bile acid toxicity.

Response: We agree the referee, and this is referred in the introduction: ‘The BA toxicity and the deficiencies of a biliary bicarbonate ‘‘umbrella’’, the loss of alkalization of cholangiocyte apical membrane proximity has suggested to increase membrane permeability of toxic BA leading to bile duct injury, inflammation, and strictures in PSC (19,20). The integrity of the cholangiocyte apical glycocalyx appears to be critical for cholangiocyte protection (21).

In addition, the strong relationship of PSC in patients with IBD support the hypothesis of pro-inflammatory microbial components to the portal circulation and the possibility of an antigenic trigger of microbial origin. In the discussion authors say that to date, no data is available on the PNPLA3 variants and the expression of FXR. Though, to the knowledge of this reviewer this field has been explored in NAFLD patients, also with the analysis of gut microbiome. (Chen F et al., Lean NAFLD: A Distinct Entity Shaped by Differential Metabolic Adaptation. Hepatology. 2020) It could be interesting to know whether a correlation between PNPLA3, FXR expression, BA composition and gut microbiome could be found in PSC patients.

The statement in the discussion should be amended.

Response: Thank you for bringing up this important aspect. We have added a sentence regarding the FXR activity: Chen F et al. analyzed FGF19 levels, a surrogate marker of FXR activity in lean obese patients with NAFLD. ‘They found that FGF19 levels were significantly higher in lean patients, but the prevalence of PNPLA3 GG polymorphism was similar, suggesting that rs738409 variant does not have impact on FXR activity’. In addition, a comment regarding the role of PNPLA3 in gut microbiota was added.

Authors reported 73%, 81%, 73% of patients with associated IBD according to CC, CG, GG PNPLA3 haplotype. There is no description of the severity of the disease, nor the medical-surgical treatment. Could you present these data?

Response: The primary aim of the study was not to evaluate the role of PNPLA3 allele dose on treatment response or need for surgery in IBD. We have now made a secondary analysis of the impact of PNPLA3 haplotype on the activity and disease outcome of IBD based on PNPLA3 allele dose, see kindly Supplementary table 3.

Authors presented in the results section that P-AST and P-GT were significantly increased with increasing allele dose. Could you give an interpretation of this finding in the discussion?

Response: Also, in general population (15) and in IBD (16) the PNPLA3 variant has been associated with elevations of liver enzymes. IBD patients have a greater risk of hepatic steatosis (OR 2.9 95%CI 1.1–7.8), with increased circulating alanine transaminase (16). Elevation of ALT values were related with increasing dose of PNPLA3 variant.

In general population, the mechanism for elevation of liver enzymes associated with PNPLA3 variant is unclear (15). An addition concerning this has been included into discussion.

Reviewer #2: Dear authors, thanks for giving me the opportunity to review your manuscript.

In the manuscript, the authors aim at demonstrating how the presence of different alleles of PNPLA3 might influence clinical outcome and bile composition in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Despite the conflicting results of the other studies available in the literature and the numerous sample studied (not always available in case of rare diseases), in the reviewer's opinion, the rationale of the study is not convincing and, unsurprisingly the results confirm it. PNPLA3 has been implied in fibrogenesis and carcinogenesis and has been linked to hepatocarcinoma which is not a frequent tumor in PSC patients. Furthermore, PSC patients usually develop liver fibrosis as a consequence of cholestasis and in many cases, the fibrosis is confined to the bile ducts. The mechanisms by which PNPLA3 induces liver damage are not completely understood and, in the reviewer's opinion, the rationale for studying their alleles in PSC is weak. However, the evaluation of bile acid composition may be interesting in these patients, but a lot of confounding factors might be involved in this analysis (i.e. microbiota composition and IBD activity) which are not taken into account.

Response: The rationale to study PNPLA3 variant dose in PSC is based on the previously demonstrated role of PNPLA3 I148M variant exhibiting increased LPAAT activity and leads to increased cellular lipid accumulation and promote the disease progression to chronic liver disease under a large variety of harmful stimuli for the liver such as cholestasis or bacterial endotoxemia as suggested in PSC. Primary hepatic stellate cells from patients with the PNPLA3-rs738409 GG variant displayed significantly higher expression and release of pro-inflammatory cytokine (Bruschi FV, et al. The PNPLA3 I148M variant modulates the fibrogenic phenotype of human hepatic stellate cells.

Hepatology. 2017;65:1875-90).

In addition, in AIH patients, PNPLA3 I148M variant has shown to be associated with progressive disease despite the presence of steatosis being similar across all PNPLA3-rs738409 genotypes (Mederacke Y-S, et al. The PNPLA3 rs738409 GG genotype is associated with poorer prognosis in 239 patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;51:1160-8).

In present study, we also wanted to analyze the possible impact of the I148M variant on biliary cholesterol, phospholipid, and BA composition, not previously reported.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate PNPLA3 allele dose effect on the clinical manifestations, disease progression and survival in a large PSC population, based on previous studies suggesting that the common I148M variant of the PNPLA3 gene is a risk factor for reduced survival (17). The authors suggested that genetic testing for the common PNPLA3 variant might improve diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Furthermore, there are many punctuation errors in the manuscript and imprecisions.

Response: An English language edition has been done by Wiley Editing Services. A document of the manuscript edition is attached.

Introduction:

The introduction is not fluent and the rationale is not well explained.

I suggest rephrasing sentences in lines 76 and 81.

In line 88 I would add that the UDCA effect on LT-free survival and liver-related death has never been demonstrated.

Response: The rephrasing of the suggested sentences has been done.

A sentence: ‘However, the UDCA has not been demonstrated to have an effect on liver transplantation-free survival or on liver-related death’ have been added into introduction.

Methods:

The part on statistical analysis is too long and full of detail with respect to the data shown in the results section.

You mention a "compound" outcome in the results but I suppose composite outcomes have never been mentioned in the methods section. I suggest specifying the endpoints in this section.

Response: Statistics chapter has been written by biostatistician (HK). It has been shortened and describes now in detail what analysis have been done, and which tests have been used. The composite endpoint definition (CCA, HCC, liver related deaths, liver transplantation) has added in the Materials and Methods section.

Results:

line 162, specify the unit of measure of median values in brackets.

Response: The unit (years) has been added.

line 175, time to the first dilation since when? diagnosis? ERC?

Response: The time to first dilatation is defined as the time interval from first diagnostic ERC of the patient to the ERC when dilatation was first done.

In table 2 I would have distinguished HCC from CCA, which is, in the reviewer's opinion, quite important to the aim of the manuscript.

Response: We totally agree and the table 2 has been corrected according to referee’s comment. HCC (n=11) is added as a separate end point, demonstrating no differences between groups, see also supplementary table 2.

An English editing is suggested.

Response: An English language edition has been done by Wiley Editing Services. A document of the manuscript edition is attached.

See the attached file Response to reviewers’ comments with supplementary tables.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers comments 6.8.2022.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Antonio De Vincentis

4 Oct 2022

PONE-D-21-38918R1PNPLA3 allele frequency has no impact on biliary bile acid composition and disease course in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitisPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Färkkilä,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 18 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Antonio De Vincentis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank to the authors who addressed properly to all the raised questions. No further comments from this reviewer

Reviewer #2: In the abstract:

I would change “clinical manifestations” with clinical outcomes.

In the conclusions “Conclusions: PNPLA3 I148M variants have no a significant impact on either on bile composition including UDCA content, clinical manifestations, progression of liver fibrosis, the risk for hepatobiliary cancers, transplantation, or overall survival”. Check the grammar. For example on both before and after either and a before significant.

In the introduction:

- The reviewer would shorten the very long introduction. For example the sentence “However, PSC is associated with markedly increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) (2), with lifetime risk 10%-20% (3,4), or 398 - 1000-fold compared to the general population (4,5). Several risk factors for CCA in patients with PSC, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially ulcerative colitis (6), and older age at PSC diagnosis have been identified (4,7).” Is not so important in the context of the manuscript, in fact in the following part of the introduction you mention in patients with PNPLA3 variants have an increased risk of HCC and you don’t mention anymore CCA.

Some of the points explained in the introduction should be moved to the discussion which is shorter with respect to the introduction.

Results:

- Wording error in line 192.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277084.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


11 Oct 2022

Response to reviewers’ comments

Reviewer #1: Thank to the authors who addressed properly to all the raised questions. No further comments from this reviewer

Reviewer #2: In the abstract: I would change “clinical manifestations” with clinical outcomes.

The change has been done and the term ‘clinical manifestations’ has been replaced by ‘clinical outcomes’.

In the conclusions “Conclusions: PNPLA3 I148M variants have no a significant impact on either on bile composition including UDCA content, clinical manifestations, progression of liver fibrosis, the risk for hepatobiliary cancers, transplantation, or overall survival”. Check the grammar. For example on both before and after either and a before significant.

The conclusion in abstract has been rephrased as follow:” Conclusions: The PNPLA3 I148M variant had no significant impact on either on bile composition, including UDCA content, clinical outcomes, progression of liver fibrosis, hepatobiliary cancer risk, liver transplantation, or overall survival.

In the introduction:

- The reviewer would shorten the very long introduction. For example, the sentence “However, PSC is associated with markedly increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) (2), with lifetime risk 10%-20% (3,4), or 398 - 1000-fold compared to the general population (4,5). Several risk factors for CCA in patients with PSC, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially ulcerative colitis (6), and older age at PSC diagnosis have been identified (4,7).” Is not so important in the context of the manuscript, in fact in the following part of the introduction you mention in patients with PNPLA3 variants have an increased risk of HCC and you don’t mention anymore CCA.

The introduction has been shortened as suggested by reviewer #2: the sentence in rows 50-53 has been deleted. See also below the response to next reviewer’s comment.

The patients with PNPLA3 variants have been reported to have an increased risk of HCC and but there is no published data that the variants would increase the risk for CCA.

Some of the points explained in the introduction should be moved to the discussion which is shorter with respect to the introduction.

The following sentence from introduction (rows 81-87) has been moved into the discussion:” A recent study evaluating plasma BA profiles in PSC to predict hepatic decompensation, demonstrated that the risk was associated with increased concentration of total BA and conjugated fraction of many BA. In contrast, higher glycine: taurine conjugation ratios were protective (24). Intestinal dysbiosis has been described in PSC patients with and without IBD (25). The effect of the PNPLA3 rs738409 variant on gut microbiota has been evaluated only in a few studies. Monga Kravetz A et al. (26) demonstrated that this PNPLA3 variant caused an increased on Firmicutes/Bacteroides-ratio in obese youth with NAFLD.”

Results:

- Wording error in line 192.

The spelling mistake has been corrected.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers comments 091022.docx

Decision Letter 2

Antonio De Vincentis

20 Oct 2022

PNPLA3 allele frequency has no impact on biliary bile acid composition and disease course in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

PONE-D-21-38918R2

Dear Dr. Färkkilä,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Antonio De Vincentis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Acceptance letter

Antonio De Vincentis

22 Nov 2022

PONE-D-21-38918R2

PNPLA3 ALLELE FREQUENCY HAS NO IMPACT ON BILIARY BILE ACID COMPOSITION OR DISEASE COURSE IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS

Dear Dr. Färkkilä:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Antonio De Vincentis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers comments 6.8.2022.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers comments 091022.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES