Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278235

Psychological distress among people living with chronic medical illness and the general population, Northwest Ethiopia: A comparative cross-sectional study

Minale Tareke 1,*, Agegnehu Berie Bayeh 2, Minyichil Birhanu 3, Amsalu Belete 4
Editor: Tauqeer Hussain Mallhi5
PMCID: PMC9714906  PMID: 36454896

Abstract

Background

Psychological distress is often linked to and negatively affects the outcomes of chronic medical conditions; however, data on psychological distress and its predictors among individuals with chronic medical illnesses are scarce in developing countries like Ethiopia. The main objective of this study was to assess the magnitude and predictors of psychological distress among people living with chronic medical illness and the general population.

Methods

A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in Mecha demographic research center, Northwest Ethiopia. The participants were selected from the general population and outpatient departments. Kessler-10 (K-10) was used to assess psychological distress.

Result

The magnitude of psychological distress among people living with chronic medical illness and those from the general population was 62.0% and 35.1%, respectively. The odds of psychological distress in people living with chronic medical illness was three times more than the one in the general population. Divorced marital status, family history of chronic medical illness, and low social support were statistically significantly associated with psychological distress in both groups.

Conclusion

The magnitude of psychological distress was significantly higher among people living with chronic medical illness. Routine screening of such cases for psychological distress during their visits for their medical illness helps take appropriate therapeutic interventions.

Introduction

Mental disorders, which include psychological distress remained at the top of the global burden of disease. This has been highly worsened by the recent COVID-19 pandemic [1, 2]. Psychological distress is a state of emotional suffering characterized by symptoms of depression and anxiety which often co-exist with somatic complaints. It is a highly prevalent and disabling condition affecting about 10% of the world’s population once in their lifetime [3]. The 2010 Global Burden of Disease Study showed that major depression was the second leading cause of disability and a major contributor to the burden of suicide and ischemic heart disease [4, 5].

Three-quarters of individuals affected by psychological distress are found in low-income countries [6]. It is considered a silent epidemic throughout Africa due to substantial financial and systemic challenges [7]. Many factors are known to be associated with mental health problems [8]. Psychological distress is influenced by demographic factors, such as age, gender, lowest socioeconomic status, poorer physical health, low educational status, homelessness, and unemployment [4, 6, 9].

An epidemiological study done on mental disorders in Kenya found a 10.8% prevalence rate with no gender difference. Significant risk factors were age and the presence of physical illness [10]. A community-based cross-sectional study conducted in Northeast Ethiopia showed that the prevalence of common mental disorders was 32.4%. Being female, no formal education and low level of education, having a small family size, family history of mental illness, living with chronic illness, active smoking, and experiencing one or more stressful life events were significantly associated with common mental disorders. On the other hand, a high level of emotional support reduces the likelihood of occurrence of psychological distress by half [11].

Psychological distress is often linked to and worsens the outcomes for chronic diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS due to its effect to have unhealthy and risky behavior, non-adherence to prescribed medical regimens, and diminished immune functioning [5]. Untreated psychological distress resulted in poor control of sugar level in diabetes mellitus; worse treatment outcomes, poorer quality of life and greater disability in tuberculosis; uncontrolled seizure in epilepsy; and high blood pressure in hypertension [1215]. However, the magnitude and predictors of psychological distress among people living with chronic medical illness in low-income countries like Ethiopia remain under-researched. Hence, this study aimed at determining the magnitude and identifying predictors of psychological distress among people living with chronic medical illness in comparison with the general population in Northwest Ethiopia. The research hypothesis was that psychological distress was more prevalent among people living with chronic medical illness than in the general population. The findings of the study help increase the health care providers’ awareness of the magnitude of psychological distress and its predictors among both groups of the population. This, in turn, leads to early diagnosis and treatment of mental distress and improves treatment outcomes and quality of life.

Materials and methods

Study design, setting, and period

A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in Mecha demographic surveillance and field research center catchment areas in Mecha district, Northwest Ethiopia from March to April 2018. A facility-based sample of individuals who were diagnosed with chronic medical diseases (hypertension, tuberculosis, diabetes mellitus, HIV/AIDS, epilepsy, and asthma) was compared to a community-based representative sample of healthy individuals.

Target population

The target population included all individuals living in the Mecha district for at least six months, the minimum time duration one needs to qualify to be a resident in the district under local regulations.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

People living with chronic medical illness

All adults aged 18 years and above who have treatment follow-up for chronic medical illnesses at health facilities in the study district for at least 6 months were included in the interview.

Participants from the general population

All people aged 18 years and above who have been living in the area for at least six months were invited for the interview. Those who reported known chronic medical illnesses were excluded to control a potential confounding effect.

Sample size and sampling procedures

The sample size was calculated using Epi info StatCalc for a comparative cross-sectional study with a confidence interval of 95%, statistical power of 80%, level of significance of 5%, psychological distress among people attending outpatient departments for chronic diseases, and among community dwellers of 42.4% [13] and 32.4% [11], respectively with equal ratio. The sample size calculated was 387 for each of the two groups. A design effect of two was used to calculate the actual final sample size. A total of 1548 respondents were recruited for both groups.

The government health facilities in the study area were selected with a lottery method. The list of all catchment kebeles (districts) for the selected health facilities were obtained. The multistage sampling went on by taking a sample of Kebeles, villages, and then households using a lottery method. Proportional allocation of the calculated sample size to the selected villages and health facilities was done based on the proportion of people living with chronic medical illness in the health facilities. Finally, participants from the selected households and health facilities were recruited by a systematic random sampling.

Data collection tools, procedures, and measurements

Six data collectors and two supervisors were selected and given a two-day training. With daily supervision, the data was collected via face-to-face interview using a pre-tested structured questionnaire consisting of socio-demographic and psychosocial variables.

Socio-demographic variables included sex, age (in years), marital status, educational status, occupation, and monthly income (in Ethiopian birr, quartiles).

The psycho-social variables were family history of medical illness (yes, no) and mental illness (yes, no), family size, living condition (lives with family, relatives, alone, homeless), types of drugs (one, two, or more), duration of medication (0–5 years, > 5 years), stressful life events, and social support.

Psychological distress was assessed using K-10, a 10-item scale validated in Ethiopia and found in the Amharic version. It has a 5-point Likert scale from zero to four: 0 (none of the time), 1 (a little of the time), 2 (some of the time), 3 (most of the time), and 4 (all of the time). The total score for an individual ranges from zero to forty [16]. It measures the psychological distress experienced by people in the last 30 days before the study [17]. It has very good psychometric properties, 84.2% sensitivity and 77.8% specificity at a cut-off threshold of a minimum of 7 out of 40 [16, 18]. This cut-off point was used in this study to dichotomize psychological distress. A Cronbach’s alpha (0.94) demonstrated a high level of internal consistency for the K-10 items in this study.

Stressful life events were assessed using the List of Threatening Events (LTE), a 12-item self-report questionnaire. Participants indicated if these life events occurred in the six months before the data collection giving a total score of zero to twelve [19, 20]. It showed a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.46 in this study.

The level of social support was assessed using the Oslo Social Support Scale (OSSS-3), a self-reported 3-item measure of the number of confidants, sense of concern from people, and relationship with neighbors for practical help. The scores range from 3–14 with 3–8 (poor support), 9–11 (moderate support), and 12–14 (strong support) [21]. It showed a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.53 in this study.

Data handling and analysis

The data were entered, coded, checked, and cleaned using Epi-data version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 26 for analysis. Descriptive analysis was used to assess sociodemographic and other study variables. Factors with P-value < 0.20 on bivariable logistic analysis were entered into multivariable logistic regression. Statistical significance was determined at p-value < 0.05. The strength of association was interpreted using odds ratio and 95% confidence interval.

Ethical consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Bahir Dar University (IRB code number: አህጤኢ ም/ቴ/ሽ/ዳ/1/799). Permission and support letters were secured from the Amhara National Regional State Health Bureau and the administration offices of the study Kebeles and Health Centers. Written informed consent was obtained from each respondent. The respondents were given the right to refuse to take part in the study as well as to withdraw at any time during the study. Refusal to participate did not result in loss of medical care provided or any other benefits. No name or identifying information was indicated on the questionnaire, and all subjects were assured of confidentiality. Study participants found to have severe psychological distress were referred to the psychiatry clinic.

Result

Socio-demographic data of participants

Data were collected and analyzed from 707 individuals living with chronic medical illness and 776 participants from the general community giving a response rate of 95.7%. The mean age in years in chronic illness and community participants was 43.77 (±17.1) and 35.14 (±14.9), respectively. The two groups were compared for differences in their basic socio-demographic characteristics (Table 1) and psycho-social factors (Table 2).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of chronic medical illnesses and general community participants in Mecha demographic research center, Ethiopia.

Variables Community participants (n = 776) Chronic illness participants (n = 707) P- value
n (%) n (%)
Sex 0.257
 Female 430 (55.4) 371 (52.5)
 Male 346 (44.6) 336 (47.5)
Age <0.001
 18–24 197 (25.4) 83 (11.7)
 25–34 247 (31.8) 169 (23.9)
 35–44 163 (21) 128 (18.1)
 ≥45 169 (21.8) 327 (46.3)
Marital status 0.002
 Married 491 (63.3) 429 (60.7)
 Single 178 (22.9) 132 (18.7)
 Divorced 54 (7.0) 63 (8.9)
 Widowed 53 (6.8) 83 (11.7)
Educational status <0.001
 Cannot read and write 196 (25.3) 373 (52.8)
 Primary school (1–8) 179 (23.1) 169 (23.9)
 Secondary school (9–12) 192 (24.7) 105 (14.9)
 Diploma and above 209 (26.9) 60 (8.5)
Occupation <0.001
 Government employee 157 (20.2) 59 (8.3)
 Private employee 175 (22.6) 72 (10.2)
 Merchant 135 (17.4) 67 (9.5)
 Housewife 165 (21.3) 190 (26.9)
 Farmer 96 (12.4) 294 (41.6)
 Not having job 48 (6.2) 25 (3.5)
Monthly income* <0.001
 < 600 216 (27.8) 171 (24.2)
 600–999 128 (16.5) 80 (11.3)
 1000–2500 203 (26.2) 349 (49.4)
 >2500 229 (29.5) 107 (15.1)

* Monthly income (Ethiopian birr)

Table 2. Psycho-social factors among people living with chronic medical illness and general community participants in Mecha demographic research center, Ethiopia.

Variable Community participants (n = 776) Chronic illness participants (n = 707) P-value
n (%) n (%)
Family size 0.007
 <5 580 (74.7) 484 (68.5)
 ≥ 5 196 (25.3) 223 (31.5)
Living condition 0.011
 With family 636 (82.0) 619 (87.6)
 Alone 100 (12.9) 65 (9.2)
 Homeless/relatives 40 (5.1) 23 (3.3)
Social support <0.001
 Poor 157 (20.2) 48 (6.8)
 Moderate 390 (50.3) 268 (37.9)
 Strong 229 (29.5) 391 (55.3)
Stressful life events <0.001
 Yes 386 (49.7) 290 (41.0)
 No 390 (50.3) 417 (59.0)
Family history of medical illness 0.047
 Yes 181 (23.3) 135 (19.1)
 No 595 (76.7) 572 (80.9)
Family history of mental illness 0.144
 Yes 22 (2.8) 12 (1.7)
 No 754 (97.2) 695 (98.3)

Psychological distress among people living with chronic medical illness

The magnitude of psychological distress among people living with chronic medical illness was 62.0% (95% CI: 58.1, 65.6). It was found to be higher among people living with HIV/AIDS (75.2%) and those having two or more chronic medical diseases (71.4%) and hypertension (65.7%). For individuals with other types of chronic medical illnesses, the psychological distress estimates were epilepsy (59.8%), diabetes mellitus (56.0%), asthma (51.5%), and tuberculosis (32.6%). Being single (AOR: 1.70; 1.09, 2.64), divorced (AOR: 5.14; 2.40, 11.01), positive family history of chronic medical illness (AOR: 1.63; 1.06, 2.50), low social support (AOR: 1.51; 1.07, 2.12) and taking more than two types of drugs (AOR: 1.72; 1.23, 2.40) were statistically significantly associated with psychological distress among people living with chronic medical illness (Table 3).

Table 3. Bivariable and multivariable analysis of psychological distress among people living with chronic medical illness in Mecha demographic research center, Ethiopia (n = 707).

Variables Category Psychological distress COR (95% CI) AOR (95% CI) P-value
Yes No
Marital status Married 242 187 1 1
Single 85 49 1.39 (0.93,2.09) 1.70 (1.09,2.64) * 0.018
Divorced 54 9 4.63 (2.23,9.63) 5.14 (2.40,11.01) * 0.011
Widowed 57 26 1.69 (1.02,2.79) 1.65 (0.96,2.82) 0.065
Income (Ethiopian Birr) <600 95 76 0.90 (0.55,1.47) 0.67 (0.39,1.15) 0.152
600–999 51 29 1.28 (0.70,2.32) 0.99 (0.52,1.89) 0.981
1000–2500 230 119 1.40 (0.90,2.18) 1.23 (0.77,1.95) 0.387
>2500 62 45 1 1
Occupation Government 35 24 1 1
Private 49 23 1.46 (0.71,2.99) 1.60 (0.72,3.56) 0.248
Merchant 33 34 0.66 (0.32,1.35) 0.63 (0.30,1.32) 0.221
Housewife 120 70 1.17 (0.64,2.14) 1.50 (0.72,3.12) 0.272
Farmer 186 108 1.18 (0.66,2.09) 1.51 (0.75,3.02) 0.244
Not on job 15 10 1.03 (0.39,2.67) 1.65 (0.56,4.86) 0.358
Family medical illness Yes 96 39 1.65 (1.10,2.49) 1.63 (1.06,2.50) * 0.013
No 342 230 1 1
Living condition Family 378 241 1 1
Alone 47 18 1.66 (0.94,2.93) 1.53 (0.75,3.08) 0.228
Homeless/relatives 13 10 0.83 (0.36,1.92) 0.77 (0.30,1.99) 0.597
Social support Poor/moderate 219 97 1.77 (1.29,2.42) 1.51 (1.07,2.12) * 0.018
Strong 219 172 1 1
Types of drugs One 228 170 1 1
≥ two 209 99 1.57 (1.15,2.15) 1.72 (1.23,2.40) * 0.002
Medication Duration 0–5 years 374 219 1 1
> 5 years 62 50 0.72 (0.48,1.09) 0.70 (0.45,1.09) 0.144

* = p-value < 0.05(significant), 1 = Reference, COR = Crude odd ratio, AOR = Adjusted odd ratio

Psychological distress in the general population

The magnitude of psychological distress in the general population was 35.1% (95% CI: 31.7, 38.4%). Being female (AOR:1.77;1.20,2.62), divorced (AOR:1.96;1.02,3.76), widowed (AOR:2.88;1.41,5.88), merchant occupation (AOR:2.20;1.28,3.81), family history of medical illness (AOR:1.58;1.08,2.31), family history of mental illness (AOR:5.82;1.97,17.22), stressful life events (AOR:2.40;1.72,3.36) and poor social support (AOR:1.65;1.01,2.68) were statistically significantly associated with psychological distress in the general population (Table 4).

Table 4. Bivariable and multivariable analysis of psychological distress in the general population in Mecha demographic research center, Ethiopia (n = 776).

Variables Category Psychological distress COR (95%, CI) AOR (95%, CI) P-value
Yes No
Sex Male 102 244 1 1
Female 170 260 1.56 (1.16,2.11) 1.64 (1.20,2.56) * 0.008
Age(years) 18–24 61 136 0.40 (0.26,0.62) 0.62 (0.37,1.04) 0.139
25–34 70 177 0.35 (0.24,0.53) 0.55 (0.33,0.91) * 0.004
35–44 52 111 0.42 (0.27,0.66) 1.02 (0.54,1.89) 0.044
≥45 89 80 1 1
Marital status Married 153 338 1 1
Single 53 125 0.94 (0.64,1.36) 1.17 (0.82,1.97) 0.464
Divorced 30 24 2.76 (1.56,4.88) 1.96 (1.03,3.77) * 0.028
Widowed 36 17 4.68 (2.55,8.58) 3.03 (1.53,5.98) * 0.008
Income (Ethiopian Birr) <600 98 118 2.39 (1.60,3.56) 1.38 (0.78,2.46) 0.188
600–999 36 92 1.12 (0.69,1.83) 0.88 (0.46,1.67) 0.861
1000–2500 79 124 1.83 (1.23,2.76) 1.54 (0.94,2.52) 0.063
>2500 59 170 1 1
Occupation Government 34 123 1 1
Private 67 108 2.44 (1.38,3.65) 1.50 (0.87,2.60) 0.288
Merchant 57 78 2.64 (1.58,4.40) 2.20 (1.28,3.81) * 0.015
Housewife 67 98 2.47 (1.51,4.04) 1.44 (0.81,2.55) 0.395
Farmer 24 72 1.20 (0.66,2.19) 0.69 (0.34,1.41) 0.314
Not on job 23 25 3.32 (1.68,6.58) 1.39 (0.62,3.12) 0.547
Family history of medical illness Yes 88 93 2.11 (1.50,2.96) 1.58 (1.08,2.31) * 0.024
No 184 411 1 1
Family history of mental illness Yes 17 5 6.65 (2.42,18.24) 5.82 (1.97,17.22) * 0.002
No 255 499 1 1
Stressful life events Yes 98 292 2.44 (1.80,3.31) 2.40 (1.72,3.36) * <0.001
No 174 212 1 1
Social Support Poor 77 80 2.59 (1.69,3.97) 1.65 (1.01,2.68) * 0.045
Moderate 133 257 1.39 (0.97,1.99) 1.11 (0.75,1.65) 0.599
Strong 62 167 1 1

* = p-value < 0.05(significant), 1 = Reference, COR = Crude odd ratio, AOR = Adjusted odd ratio

Psychological distress comparison among people living with chronic medical illness and the general population

The burden of psychological distress was much higher in chronic medical illness study participants (62.0%, 95% CI, 58.7–65.5%) than the general population participants (35.1%, 95% CI, 31.7–38.7%). This difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 107.276, p < 0.001).

Males with chronic medical illness had psychological distress two times higher than those from the community (60.7% versus 29.5%). Besides, females in the chronic illness group had higher psychological distress than those in the community (63.1% versus 39.5%) (Table 5).

Table 5. Psychological distress distribution among people living with chronic medical illness and general community participants in Mecha demographic research center, Ethiopia.

Variable Category Psychological distress among community (n = 776) Psychological distress among chronic illness (n = 707)
Yes, n (%) No, n (%) Yes, n (%) No, n (%)
Family size <5 206 35.5) 374 (64.5) 301 (62.2) 183 (37.8)
≥ 5 66 (33.7) 130 (66.3) 137 (61.4) 86 (38.6)
Living condition With family 228 (35.8) 408 (64.2) 378 (61.1) 241 (38.9)
Alone 30 (30.0) 70 (70.0) 47 (72.3) 18 (27.7)
Homeless/relatives 14 (35.0) 26 (65.0) 13 (56.5) 10 (43.5)
Social support Poor 77 (49.0) 80 (51.0) 44 (91.7) 4 (8.3)
Moderate 133 (34.1) 257 (65.9) 175 (65.3) 93 (34.7)
Strong 62 (27.1) 167 (72.9) 219 (56.0) 172 (44.0)
Stressful life events Yes 174 (45.1) 212 (54.9) 179 (61.7) 111 (38.3)
No 98 (25.1) 292 (74.9) 259 (62.1) 158 (37.9)
Family history of medical illness Yes 88 (48.6) 93 (51.4) 96 (71.1) 39 (28.9)
No 184 (30.9) 411 (69.1) 342 (59.8) 230 (40.2)
Family history of mental illness Yes 17 (77.3) 5 (22.7) 9 (75.0) 3 (25.0)
No 255 (33.8) 499 (66.2) 429 (61.7) 266 (38.3)

Discussion

This study demonstrated that the burden of psychological distress was much higher among the chronic medical illness participants (62.0%, 95% CI, 58.7–65.5%) than the general population participants (35.1%, 95% CI, and 31.7–38.7%). It also indicated that this difference was statistically significant between the two groups. The odds of psychological distress among people with chronic medical illness was 3.2 times higher than the community sample. This was in line with and supported by a study that showed a three times higher risk of psychological distress among individuals with comorbid chronic medical illness than participants with no comorbid chronic medical illness [22]. The relationship between chronic disease and mental illness is generally thought to be bidirectional. People living with a serious mental illness are at higher risk of experiencing a wide range of chronic physical conditions. Conversely, people living with chronic medical conditions experience psychological distress twice the rate of the general population [23].

Among people living with chronic medical diseases, the study showed findings similar with those of other studies carried out in Ethiopia (63.3%) [24], Pakistan (60.2%, [25], Nigeria (64.4%) [26], and Delhi India (58.7%) [27]. However, the magnitude of psychological distress in this study was higher than that in studies done in Southern Ethiopia (39.2%) [28], Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (53.1%) [29], India (50.8%) [30], Kenya (42.3%) [31] and Iran (14%) [32]. These variations might possibly be a result of differences in sample size, inclusion criteria, screening instrument used to assess psychological distress, and the difference in the study population. In India, only 130 participants living with diabetes or hypertension were included in the study and they used General Health Questionnaire (GHQ 12) to assess psychological distress. The two studies from Ethiopia used Self-Reporting Questionnaires (SRQ-20).

The magnitude of psychological distress among the general population in this study was higher than in other community studies done in different parts of Ethiopia: Harari Regional State (14.9%), Addis Ababa (17.7%), Jimma Town (22.7%), and Illu Ababore Zone (27.2%) [3336]. This might be due to the differences in screening tool (Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20), study period, and sociodemographic characteristics. For instance, the proportion of female participants was higher in this study than in the study in Harari Regional State (55.4% versus 38.1%). In that study, women had a higher magnitude of of depression and anxiety than men [37].

On the other hand, the psychological distress in the current study was lower than that in a study in Silte Zone residents of Ethiopia (39.7%) [38]. This might be due to the fact that none of the study participants in Silte Zone had strong social support. In the current study, 29.5% had strong social support. Low social support is known to be associated with the risk of developing psychological distress or worsening of an already existing mental health problem [39]. An other possible explanation for the difference is that the proportion of respondents having a family history of mental illness in the current study was lower (2.8% versus 49.8%).

From the multivariable logistic regression analysis among chronic medical illness study participants, it was found that individuals who were single or divorced, having family history of medical illness, low social support, and taking two or more types of drugs were likely to have psychological distress. The result was consistent with findings of other studies [22, 28, 40]. Marriage is the central part of all human society and its effects on mental illness are often identified as a key component [41]. Research consistently has shown that divorced/ widowed marital status was positively associated with smoking, poor quality of life, high psychological distress, anxiety, and depression [42]. Being married brings social support which is a very crucial role in an individual’s life satisfaction and lack of social support can be a predictor of psychological problems relating to low self-esteem, loneliness, anxiety, and depression [43]. A systematic review and meta-analysis among people living with HIV/AIDS in Ethiopia showed a higher odds of depression among individuals with poor social support than those who had strong social support [44].

On the other hand, the study indicated that being female, divorced or widowed marital status, family history of medical illness, family history of mental illness, stressful life events, and low social support were factors significantly associated with psychological distress among community participants. This result was also consistent with findings of previous studies [35, 36, 38, 40, 45]. Disrupted marital status, low social support, having a family history of mental illness and stressful life events were strong risk factors to develop psychological distress. Family history of mental illness and stressful events in daily life significantly predict the onset and relapse of psychological distress [4648]. The rise of psychological distress in late-life mostly reflects losses in marriage, employment, functional limitations, chronic disease burden, denied their wisdom and power [4951].

Implication of the study

The study found a high magnitude of psychological distress among people with chronic medical conditions. This undiagnosed and untreated high psychological distress may lead to non-adherence to treatment and poor control of medical conditions. Studies showed that untreated psychological distress resulted in poor control of sugar level in diabetes mellitus [12]; worse treatment outcomes, poorer quality of life and greater disability in tuberculosis [13]; uncontrolled seizure in epilepsy [14]; and high blood pressure in hypertension [15]. The findings of this study increase the awareness among health care providers of the high magnitude of psychological distress among people living with chronic medical conditions so that its diagnosis and treatment may lead to improved treatment outcomes and quality of life of such cases.

Strengths and limitations of the study

To the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first study that compared psychological distress between people living with chronic medical diseases and the general population in Northwest Ethiopia. The other major strength of the study was that the outcome variable was assessed by using locally validated instrument having very good psychometric properties, Kessler-10. An important limitation of the study was that screening for chronic medical conditions like HIV, diabetes mellitus and hypertension was not done in the general community. In addition, authors want to stress that the tools used to measure stressful life events and social support have been found to have low Cronbach’s alpha. This might partly be due to the fact that the tools have few items. Scales with short list of items have difficulties in achieving high Cronbach’s alpha for it strongly depends on the number of items. Shorter scales may be considered reliable even when Cronbach’s alpha is below 0.7 which may be as low as 0.5 for a three-item scale [52]. Generally, we recommend readers of this paper to remain cognizant of the problematic points behind the interpretation and effects of low values of Cronbach’s alpha as a measure of reliability of scales.

Conclusion

Compared to the general population, people living with chronic medical illnesses had a high magnitude of psychological distress. Marital status, family history of medical illness, and low social support were statistically significant predictors of psychological distress in both comparative groups. The emotional dimension of chronic medical illnesses should always be given due consideration during the provision of medical care. Future studies should focus on the impact of diagnosis and treatment of psychological distress on the outcome and quality of life of people living with chronic medical illness.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Bivariable and multivariable logistic analysis of variables associated with psychological distress among all study participants in Mecha demographic research center, Ethiopia.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information file.

Funding Statement

This research work was financially supported by Bahir Dar University and the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.COVID-19 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2021. Nov 6;398(10312):1700–1712. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7 Epub 2021 Oct 8. ; PMCID: PMC8500697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chisholm D: Investing in mental health. EMHJ-Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 2015, 21(7):531–534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Layard R, Chisholm D, Patel V, Saxena S: Mental illness and unhappiness. 2013.
  • 4.MentalHealthFoundation: Fundamental Facts About Mental Health. 2015.
  • 5.Moussavi S, Chatterji S, Verdes E, Tandon A, Patel V, Ustun B: Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys. Lancet 2007, 370(9590):851–858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61415-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ehiemua S: MENTAL DISORDER: MENTAL HEALTH REMAINS AN INVISIBLE PROBLEM IN AFRICA. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences 2014, 2(4):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Caddick H, Horne B, Mackenzie J, Tilley H: Investing in mental health in low-income countries. London: Overseas Development Institute; 2016:1–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Monteiro NM: Addressing mental illness in Africa: Global health challenges and local opportunities. Community Psychology in Global Perspective 2015, 1(2):78–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Funk Michelle, Drew Natalie, Knapp Martin.: Mental health, poverty and development. Journal of public mental health. 2012, 11(4):166–185. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jenkins R, Njenga F, Okonji M, Kigamwa P, Baraza M, Ayuyo J, et al. Prevalence of common mental disorders in a rural district of Kenya, and socio-demographic risk factors. International journal of environmental research and public health 2012, 9(5):1810–1819. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9051810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yimam K, Kebede Y, Azale T: Prevalence of Common Mental Disorders and Associated Factors among Adults in Kombolcha Town, Northeast Ethiopia. J Depress Anxiety 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kalra S, Jena BN, Yeravdekar R: Emotional and psychological needs of people with diabetes. Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism 2018, 22(5):696. doi: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_579_17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ambaw F, Mayston R, Hanlon C, Medhin G, Alem A: Untreated depression and tuberculosis treatment outcomes, quality of life and disability, Ethiopia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2018, 96(4):243. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.192658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tareke M, Birehanu M, Amare D, Abate A: Common mental illness among epilepsy patients in Bahir Dar city, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2020, 15(1):e0227854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Asmare Y, Ali A, Belachew A: Magnitude and associated factors of depression among people with hypertension in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a hospital based cross-sectional study. BMC psychiatry 2022, 22(1):1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tesfaye M, Hanlon C, Wondimagegn D, Alem A: Detecting postnatal common mental disorders in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale and Kessler scales. Journal of affective disorders 2010, 122(1–2):102–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Andrews G, Slade T: Interpreting scores on the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10). Australian and New Zealand journal of public health 2001, 25(6):494–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2001.tb00310.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gebreegziabher Y, Girma E, Tesfaye M: Help-seeking behavior of Jimma university students with common mental disorders: A cross-sectional study. PloS one 2019, 14(2):e0212657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rosmalen J, Bos E, De Jonge P: Validation of the Long-term Difficulties Inventory (LDI) and the List of Threatening Experiences (LTE) as measures of stress in epidemiological population-based cohort studies. Psychological medicine 2012, 42(12):2599–2608. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712000608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brugha T, Bebbington P, Tennant C, Hurry J: The List of Threatening Experiences: a subset of 12 life event categories with considerable long-term contextual threat. Psychological medicine 1985, 15(1):189–194. doi: 10.1017/s003329170002105x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Abiola T, Udofia O, Zakari M: Psychometric properties of the 3-item oslo social support scale among clinical students of Bayero University Kano, Nigeria. Malaysian Journal of Psychiatry 2013, 22(2):32–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wubie MB, Alebachew MN, Yigzaw AB: Common mental disorders and its determinants among epileptic patients at an outpatient epileptic clinic in Felegehiwot Referral Hospital, Bahirdar, Ethiopia: cross-sectional study. International journal of mental health systems 2019, 13(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0333-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Canadian Mental Health Association. Recommendations for preventing and managing co-existing chronic physical conditions and mental illnesses. 2008.
  • 24.Ayana T, Roba K, Mabalhin M: Psychological Distress and Associated Factors among Adult Tuberculosis Patients Attending Public Health Institutions in Dire Dawa and Harar Cities, Eastern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health 2019, 19(1392). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vaswani M, Haider A, Zaib-un-Nisa R-u-R: FREQUENCY OF DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY AMONG ADULT EPILEPTIC PATIENTS. Baqai Journal of Health Sciences 2018, 21(2):8–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nkporbu AK, Stanley PC: Psychiatric Comorbidity in Essential Hypertension. Update on Essential Hypertension 2016:71–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bhatia M, Munjal S: Prevalence of depression in people living with HIV/AIDS undergoing ART and factors associated with it. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 2014, 8(10):WC01. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7725.4927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Denur M, Tesfaw G, Yohannis Z: The magnitude and correlates of common mental disorder among outpatient medical patients in Ethiopia: an institution based cross-sectional study. BMC research notes 2019, 12(1):1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tesfa S, Giru BW, Bedada T, Gela D: Mental Distress and Associated Factors Among Hospitalized Medical-Surgical Adult Inpatients in Public Hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2020: Cross-Sectional Study. Psychology Research and Behavior Management 2021, 14:1235. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S319634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Balajee KL, Kumar GS, Shidam UG: Comparison of psychological distress and its associated factors among chronic disease and healthy subjects in rural Puducherry, India. Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry 2017, 33(2):177. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ndetei DM, Khasakhala LI, Kuria MW, Mutiso VN, Ongecha-Owuor FA, Kokonya DA: The prevalence of mental disorders in adults in different level general medical facilities in Kenya: a cross-sectional study. Annals of general psychiatry 2009, 8(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-8-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Asadi-Pooya AA, Nabavizadeh SA, Sadeghian S, Shahisavandi M, Barzegar Z, Nezafat A, et al. Psychological Problems Among Patients With Chronic Medical Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acta Medica Iranica 2021, 59(6). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hunduma G, Girma M, Digaffe T, Weldegebreal F, Tola A: Prevalence and determinants of common mental illness among adult residents of Harari Regional State, Eastern Ethiopia. Pan African Medical Journal 2017, 28(1). doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.262.12508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gelaye B, Lemma S, Deyassa N, Bahretibeb Y, Tesfaye M, Berhane Y, et al. Prevalence and correlates of mental distress among working adults in Ethiopia. Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health 2012, 8:126–133. doi: 10.2174/1745017901208010126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mekonnen E, Esayas S: Correlates of mental distress in Jimma town, Ethiopia. Ethiopian journal of health sciences 2003, 13(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Engidaw NA, Abdu Z, Chinani I: Prevalence and associated factors of common mental disorders among residents of Illu Ababore zone, southwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 2020, 14(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00394-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Albert PR: Why is depression more prevalent in women? Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience: JPN 2015, 40(4):219. doi: 10.1503/jpn.150205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Muze M, Denur M, Hussein M, Muzemil M, Yesse M, Kedir S: Prevalence and Associated Factors of Common Mental Disorders Among Adult Residents in Silte Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 2021, 17(1). doi: 10.2174/1745017902117010128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bjørlykhaug KI, Karlsson B, Hesook SK, Kleppe LC: Social support and recovery from mental health problems: A scoping review. Nordic social work research 2021:1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Haile K, Sahile AT: Depressive symptoms in primary health care attendees in Sebeta Town, Ethiopia: Prevalence, associated factors, and detection by health workers. Science Progress 2021, 104(3):00368504211034304. doi: 10.1177/00368504211034304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Spiker RL: Mental health and marital status. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society 2014:1485–1489. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ding D, Gale J, Bauman A, Phongsavan P, Nguyen B: Effects of divorce and widowhood on subsequent health behaviours and outcomes in a sample of middle-aged and older Australian adults. Scientific Reports 2021, 11(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Khatiwada J, Muzembo BA, Wada K, Ikeda S: The effect of perceived social support on psychological distress and life satisfaction among Nepalese migrants in Japan. Plos one 2021, 16(2):e0246271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Weldesenbet AB, Kebede SA, Tusa BS: The Effect of Poor Social Support on Depression among HIV/AIDS Patients in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Depression Research and Treatment 2020, 2020. doi: 10.1155/2020/6633686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Habtamu Y, Admasu K, Tullu M, Kebede A: Magnitude of Common Mental Disorder and Factors Associated Among People Living in Addis Ababa Ethiopia 2018: Community Based Cross Sectional Study. Research Square 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Monroe SM: Major and minor life events as predictors of psychological distress: Further issues and findings. Journal of behavioral medicine 1983, 6(2):189–205. doi: 10.1007/BF00845380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Seki R, Hashimoto T, Tanaka M, Ishii H, Ogawa M, Sato A, et al. Identification of psychological features and development of an assessment tool for event-related psychological distress after experiencing non-traumatic stressful events. Plos one 2021, 16(3):e0249126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rohrer J, Rohland B, Denison A, Pierce JR Jr, Rasmussen NH: Family history of mental illness and frequent mental distress in community clinic patients. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2007, 13(3):435–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00737.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mirowsky J, Ross CE: Age and depression. Journal of health and social behavior 1992:187–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sutin AR, Terracciano A, Milaneschi Y, An Y, Ferrucci L, Zonderman AB: The trajectory of depressive symptoms across the adult life span. JAMA psychiatry 2013, 70(8):803–811. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Han LK, Schnack HG, Brouwer RM, Veltman DJ, van der Wee NJ, van Tol M-J, et al. Contributing factors to advanced brain aging in depression and anxiety disorders. Translational psychiatry 2021, 11(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Parkinson J: Review of scales of positive mental health validated for use with adults in the UK: Technical report. Health Scotland, a WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Promotion and Public Health Development 2007.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Bivariable and multivariable logistic analysis of variables associated with psychological distress among all study participants in Mecha demographic research center, Ethiopia.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information file.


Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES