Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0273113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273113

Physical and psychological health in intern paramedics commencing shift work: Protocol for an exploratory longitudinal study

Meagan E Crowther 1,*, Sally A Ferguson 1, Robert J Adams 2, Katya Kovac 1, Jessica L Paterson 3, Amy C Reynolds 2
Editor: Jianhong Zhou4
PMCID: PMC9714933  PMID: 36454797

Abstract

Background

Paramedics are routinely exposed to shift work. Existing research shows that shift work exposure is associated with adverse mental and physical health outcomes. However, the current understanding of the impact of commencing shift work in a paramedic role on health is limited. This can be addressed by recruiting new paramedics before they commence shift work, and conducting regular follow-ups of potential biological, psychological and social changes. The present study aimed to examine changes in biological, psychological and social factors relative to pre-shift work baseline in a cohort of paramedics commencing intern employment with an Australian ambulance service.

Method and analysis

This observational, mixed-methods, longitudinal study aims to recruit 40 interns from one Australian ambulance service. Data collection will occur at baseline (standard day schedule for initial training), and subsequently at three months, six months, nine months and twelve months, to measure biological, psychological and social changes relative to baseline measurements. Changes in cardiometabolic markers (cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting glucose), microbiome (self-collected stool samples), sleep and physical activity (actigraphy) will be measured. Interns will also complete a battery of self-report questionnaires, sleep diaries and qualitative interviews to explore various psychological and social variables over time. Statistical analyses will be conducted using mixed effects regression, specifying a random effect of subject on the intercept, allowing participants to vary according to individual baseline levels, as well as tracking progress over time, appropriately accounting for serial correlation. Qualitative study components will be analysed via coding and thematic analysis procedures.

Discussion

The present study protocol is a comprehensive outline of the observational study planned. The study will allow for greater knowledge of any changes in biological, psychological and social factors during a 12-month transition to shift work. The findings from the proposed study will have implications for the development of strategies to support early-career shift workers.

Introduction

In order to meet the 24/7 demands of emergency health care, shift work is a key component of routine paramedic duties. For paramedics, this involves work that is scheduled throughout the 24h day. ‘Shift work’ encompasses a variety of work schedules including: fixed (morning, evening and/or night), variable, and/or rotating (a combination of two or more shift types) [1, 2]. Shift work, and particularly night work, means that sleep, wake, physical activity and meal timings need to occur at times of the day that are biologically inappropriate, which contributes to misalignment of various intrinsic rhythms [3, 4]. Such circadian misalignment is associated with a range of biological, psychological and social disruptions [2, 5].

Commonly reported chronic health concerns in shift workers with medium- to longer-term exposure with shift work include weight gain and obesity, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular events [2, 6, 7]. Gastrointestinal distress [8, 9], poor mental health [10, 11], and somatic and musculoskeletal complaints [12, 13] are also more prevalent in shift working populations. In addition to chronic health concerns, shift workers commonly report insufficient and poor sleep [2, 14], as well as poorer health behaviours including higher levels of alcohol consumption (i.e. binge drinking) [15, 16], insufficient physical activity levels [17], and suboptimal nutritional intake [17, 18].

In addition to what is currently known about health outcomes in shift workers more broadly, evidence suggests that paramedics experience high levels of stress, depression, fatigue, burnout and increased risk of post-traumatic stress disorder [1923]. A recent systematic review suggests that organisational support and individual coping mechanisms may protect against the development of these mental health risks in paramedics [24]. There is a need to understand psychosocial factors that may support good health during the transition to shift work. Collectively, there is a lack of longitudinal studies that investigate changes, positive or negative, in physical and psychological health outcomes in paramedics, particularly when commencing their career [25], which makes it challenging to understand the temporality of these experiences.

A better understanding of the effects of shift work on a paramedic’s physical and psychological health is needed to determine associations with medium to long term health outcomes and if necessary, assist in early, preventive strategies to minimise adverse impacts of shift work on health and wellbeing.

To gain a complete picture of how shift work may be associated with changes in health over time, longitudinal follow-up across multiple time points, with a meaningful pre-exposure baseline is required. By examining changes from pre-shift work through the early months of a career, we can clarify important changes in biological, psychological and social factors for new paramedics.

Objectives

Given the limited existing evidence, this study is exploratory in nature. However, an overarching study aim, and specific aims, have been identified. Research questions have been identified for qualitative measures.

Overarching aim

The present study aims to characterise biological, psychological, and social changes during the paramedic intern year in a cohort of Australian paramedics.

Hypothesis

It is hypothesised that the transition to shift work will be associated with changes in cardiometabolic risk, the gut microbiome, health behaviours and wellbeing, when compared to baseline.

Specific aim 1

To determine whether there are clinically meaningful changes in cardiometabolic risk factors during the first year of shift work.

Specific aim 2

To characterise the relationship between onset of shift work and the gut microbiome.

Specific aim 3

To explore changes in health behaviours (e.g. physical activity, alcohol, smoking and dietary intake) and sleep over the first year of shift work.

Specific aim 4

To understand changes in psychosocial wellbeing during the first year of shift work.

Research questions for qualitative measures

  • RQ1. What are the perceived workplace and personal strategies for coping with sleep inertia in paramedic interns, and do these change over the first year of shift work?

  • RQ2. What are the perceived workplace and personal strategies for coping with on-call aspects of paramedic work in interns, and how do these change over the first year of shift work?

  • RQ3. What do paramedic interns know about formal and informal workplace support for exposure to traumatic events experienced at work?

Materials and methods

Study design

This is an exploratory, longitudinal mixed-methods study. Data collection will be conducted for each intern at five time points: baseline (during intern training, and before commencing shift work), three months, six months, nine months and 12 months.

Study population

Participants are newly employed intern paramedics (henceforth referred to as ‘interns’) from one Australian Ambulance service. Interns were chosen as the study population due to their regular requirement for shift work, the ability to capture a ‘baseline’ for each worker before commencing shift work, and the current, limited existing knowledge of the impact of emergency services work on biological, psychological and social factors during the transition to shift work [25]. Further, emergency personnel have a unique risk profile with their job requiring driving, delivering emergency health care and exposure trauma. Therefore, exploring the transition to emergency service work will provide crucial insights into a unique and vulnerable working population.

Ethics approval

This project has been approved by the appropriate health department with reciprocal approval from the CQUniversity Human Research Ethics Committee, project number 0000022264.

Study procedure

Recruitment and consent

Due to the exploratory nature of this study, and in line with similar exploratory protocols [26], we have not calculated a specific sample size. We aim to recruit 40 interns to allow for exploration of possible effects and necessary future sample sizes. Recruitment will be conducted in collaboration with South Australian Ambulance Service. All interns undertaking SAAS internship orientation during the study recruitment period will be invited to participate in the project by a senior researcher (ACR) within two weeks of commencing intern training. ACR will attend the training site during the intern orientation for each cohort, and provide a 30 minute presentation about the study. Following this presentation, interns will be able to ask any additional questions and sign up for the study if they choose. Participation is entirely voluntary, and intern paramedics are explicitly advised that participation is anonymous and will in no way impact their employment. Participants will only be recruited through the SAAS internship orientation, as outlined above.

Recruitment will continue with each new intake of interns until the target of n = 40 is reached. To minimise participant selection bias, all new interns commencing with South Australian Ambulance Service during the recruitment window will be invited to participate until the enrolment target is met.

Inclusion criteria

Participants must be new recruits to South Australian Ambulance Service and have recently (within 2 years) graduated from a tertiary paramedic qualification which meets the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency registration requirements for paramedicine.

Exclusion criteria

Individuals who meet any of the following criteria will not be eligible to participate:

  1. circumstances that interfere with the participant’s ability to give informed consent (diminished understanding or comprehension, or a language other than English spoken and an interpreter unavailable),

  2. Paid employment with another ambulance agency for >12 months at any time,

  3. Unwilling or unable to provide quarterly participation.

The exclusion of participants based on their ability to give informed consent is necessary given the sensitive health information collected during the research project. Participants who have worked for another ambulance agency for >12 months are not considered “new” paramedics and are therefore a different population, and are excluded. Finally, exclusion based on participants being unwilling or unable to commit to quarterly participation, ensures inclusion of participants who are able to contribute data which addresses the aims of the intended study.

Experienced research personnel will obtain written, informed consent from eligible participants during the enrolment session. At the time of enrolment, each participant’s email address and phone number are obtained for future contact.

Status and timeline of the study

The study commenced rolling recruitment in November 2020. It is expected that recruitment will end in Quarter 2, 2022. Data collection will not be completed until 12 months after final recruitment (approximately Quarter 2, 2023). Some preliminary analysis of the first recruitments is planned for November 2022 for a doctoral thesis. However, final results and publications are not planned until all data collection is finalised.

Data collection

Interns will be invited to complete biological (blood, stool samples), psychological and social (questionnaires and interviews) measures across five time points spanning 12 months. Table 1 provides an overview of which measures are collected at each time point. Contact will be maintained with interns via REDCap [27] initiated emails, text messages and phone calls throughout the study to support completion.

Table 1. Time points for measures collected in the study.

Measure Baseline (intern training) 3 months 6 months 9 months 12 months
Sleep and activity measurement
    Actigraphy (~7 days) x x x x x
Biological Measures
    Pathology (fasting) x x x x x
    Stool Sample(s) x x x
Self-report Measures
    Height and weight x x
    Questionnaires (see Table 2) x x x x x
    ASA24 food recall (via phone) [28] x x x x x
    Sleep diaries (7 Days) x x x x x
    NASA Task Load (7 Days) [29] x x x x x
Qualitative Measures
    Occupational trauma exposure+ x
    Sleep inertia awareness+ x
    Napping and sleep inertia on night shift+ x x x x

Note. ASA24; Automated Self-Administered 24-hour + Semi-structured interview script provided in S3S5 Appendices.

Interns will be provided a $30 gift card at each data collection point (maximum $150) as acknowledgement of time spent participating in the study.

  • T0: Baseline, prior to beginning shift work, completed during intern training

  • T1; 3 months after commencing the study (~6 weeks into shift work)

  • T2; 6 months after commencing the study

  • T3; 9 months after commencing the study

  • T4; 12 months after commencing the study

Primary outcomes

Cardiometabolic risk factors

Fasting blood samples are collected at each data collection point to assess cholesterol and triglycerides, fasting blood glucose, cortisol, and c-reactive protein. At recruitment, interns are provided with a blood collection form with their unique identification code. Interns are informed that blood tests must be taken in the morning, while fasting, and cannot be collected during the morning immediately following a night shift. Interns can take the blood request to any clinic location associated with the pathology provider that is convenient for them. Interns are reminded via text message to undertake their blood test as required. Participation in blood tests at each follow-up is voluntary, and interns who elect not to participate will not be sent follow-up blood request forms.

All blood test results will be reviewed by the research team physician. If any blood test returns a clinically significant abnormal finding: 1) Interns will be contacted about their results by the research team physician, and 2) Results will be provided to the appropriate GP for follow up, providing participant consent has been given.

Ethical approval stipulated that interns be allowed to participate in the study without completion of pathology, so interns could continue in follow ups if they chose, without continuing pathology measures. Therefore, there may not be pathology data for all participants.

Stool samples

Stool samples will be collected to assess the structure and function of the gastrointestinal microbiome, as this has recently been proposed as a mechanism linking shift work with metabolic health outcomes later in life [4, 30]. Interns will be asked to provide stool samples for analysis at baseline, the first follow-up and the 12-month (final) follow-up. Included with their stool sample collection kit are instructions, the stool collection tube (Norgen Biotek Corp, ON, Canada) and a flushable sample collection kit for convenient sample collection (HyStool, Aberlady, Scotland). A maximum of three samples will be requested per data collection point. Interns will be instructed at baseline and one month to collect their sample at their convenience. At 12 months, interns will be asked to provide three samples: one after a series of days off shift, one after a series of day shifts, and one after a series of night shifts to allow for assessment of temporal changes to the microbiome related to different shift schedules. Samples will be collected using Stool Nucleic Acid collection and preservation tubes (Norgen Biotek Corp, ON, Canada), allowing them to be stored at ambient temperature and removing the necessity for cold-chain transportation. A brief (~30 second) checklist will be completed for each sample to allow for interpretation of findings (see S1 Appendix). Interns will be reminded via text message to undertake and return stool samples as required.

Secondary outcomes

Objective sleep and physical activity

Activity monitors (GENEActiv, Actvinsights, UK) will be used at each time point to objectively measure sleep and physical activity. Interns will be sent a pre-programmed activity monitor at each data collection point. When the activity monitor has been posted by a research team member, a text message will be sent to the intern to inform them that it should arrive in a few days and to put the activity monitor on as soon as possible, and wear it for a minimum of seven days, before returning it in the provided pre-addressed and tracked postage satchel. Activity monitors will be worn in order to measure overall sleep and physical activity, and measure sleep in relation to certain shifts.

Self-report measures

The self-report measures described below are all collected via a REDCap [27, 31] survey. An overview of the items collected in the electronic survey is detailed in Table 2. Following enrolment, interns are emailed an invitation for the baseline survey. Interns can pause and restart the survey at any time by selecting “Save & Return”, which will email an updated survey link to the designated email account. If the survey is not initiated within seven days, a reminder email is sent via REDCap [27, 31]. Reminders are sent to interns until the survey is completed. Interns will also be reminded to complete the survey via text message or during quarterly qualitative interviews, as necessary.

Table 2. Overview of characterises of self-administered measures.
Instrument Captures Measured at: Time to self-administer Planned Scoring Interpretation (↑, higher score)
Standard Shiftwork Index (SSI) [32] Work context and shift system details
General job satisfaction [33]
Sleep
Chronic Fatigue
Physical health
Psychological health (General health questionnaire) [34]
Cognitive-somatic Anxiety [35]
Social and domestic situation
Coping
Circadian rhythm type (Composite morningness questionnaire) [36]
Circadian type (Circadian type inventory)
Eysenck Personality Inventory [37]
T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 30 mins Job satisfaction: 0–7
Sleep disturbance: 0–5
Chronic Fatigue: 5–50
Digestive health: 8–32
Cardiovascular health: 8–32
Psychological wellbeing: 0–36
Cognitive anxiety: 7–35
Somatic anxiety: 7–35
Social and domestic satisfaction: 21–105
Morningness Scale: 13–55
Circadian languidity: 10–50
Circadian flexibility: 8–40
Neuroticism: 6–24
Extraversion: 6–24
↑ = more satisfied
↑ = sleep disturbance
↑ = more fatigue
↑ = digestive problems
↑ = cardiovascular problems
↑ = poorer psychological health
↑ = greater anxiety
↑ = greater anxiety
↑ = more satisfaction
≤ 22 evening type
23–43 intermediate type
≥ 44 morning type
↑ = more circadian languidity
↑ = higher circadian flexibility
↓ = higher neuroticism
↓ = high extraversion
Shift work disorder screening questionnaire [38] 4-item screening tool to aid in diagnosis of shift work disorder. T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 ~5 mins In accordance with criteria specified by the developing authors [38] ↑ = likelihood of SWD
Short Form General Health survey (SF-20) [39] 20-item measures of physical functioning and wellbeing. T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 ~5 mins Physical Functioning: 0–100
Role Functioning: 0–100
Social Functioning: 0–100
Mental Health: 0–100
Health Perceptions: 0–100
Pain: 0–100
↑ = better health
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [40] Assess sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication and daytime dysfunction for previous 30 days. T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 5–10 mins Global Sleep Score: 0–21
Subjective Sleep Quality: 0–3
Sleep latency: 0–3
Sleep duration: 0–3
Habitual sleep efficacy: 0–3
Sleep disturbances: 0–3
Sleep medication: 0–3
Daytime dysfunction: 0–3
↑ = poorer sleep quality
Global sleep score > 5 = clinically poor sleep
Occupational Fatigue and Exhaustion Recovery Scale (OFER15) [41] 15-item scale measuring chronic work-related fatigue, end-of-shift states and recovery between shifts. T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 5 mins Chronic faituge:0–100
Acute fatigue: 0–100
Inter-shift recovery: 0–100
↑ = more chronic fatigue
↑ = more acute fatigue
↑ = more recovery between shifts
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [42] 27-item measure of physical activity for past seven days.
Job-related physical activity, transportation, housework/house maintenance/family caring, sport/leisure time activity and sedentary time.
T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 15–20 mins Walking: 3.3 METs
Moderate activity: 4 METs
Vigorous activity: 8 METs
↑ = more physical activity or more intensive physical activity
May be categorised in to High, Moderate Low Physical Activity levels
Post-traumatic stress disorder checklist for DMS-5 (PCL-5) [43] 20-item measure that assess DMS-5 symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 5–10 mins Symptom severity:0–80 ↑ = higher symptom severity
Newest Vital Sign (NVS) [44] 6-item measure of health literacy, using nutritional label. T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 3 mins Health Literacy: 0–6 ↑ = better health literacy
Shift worker risk perception questions 5-item measure intended to measure health risk perception in shift workers T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 3 mins Health risk perception: 5–25 ↑ = higher levels of perceived health risk
Sleep diaries– 7 days 24-hour period. Time to bed, time asleep, time awake, time out of bed, total sleep time, waking during sleep period, length of waking, sleepiness prior to sleep, sleepiness upon waking, self-report sleep quality, naps (Y/N), length of naps (if relevant). T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 ~5 mins Total sleep time
Time in bed
Sleep latency
Sleepiness prior to bed
Sleepiness on waking
Sleep quality
Naps
NA
NASA Task load (NASA-TLX) [29]– 7 days (when on shift) Shift start/finish time.
6-item workload assessment measuring mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, frustration.
T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 ~3 mins Workload: 0–100 ↑ = higher workload
Low: 0–9
Medium: 10–29
Somewhat high: 30–49
High: 50–79
Very high: 80–100

Note. DSMV = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, METs = Metabolic equivalent of task.

Shift system information

At baseline, to reduce unnecessary participant burden, a modified Standard Shift Work Index (SSI) [32] will be used. In the modified version, interns are asked to report their standard start and finish time of each training day (rather than individual shift type) as they are not yet working shift work. Shift system details are obtained at each time point after commencing shift work (T1 to T4) using the original SSI [32]. Interns are asked to list the normal start and end times of each of their shifts (e.g. morning, afternoon, night shifts). The SSI also asks interns to describe their preference of shifts and reasons for working shift work.

Sleep

Self-reported sleep will be investigated using the SSI [32] and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [40]. Further, to assess daily sleep time and quality, interns are asked to complete sleep diaries for seven consecutive days. Unlike the survey, no reminders are sent for sleep diaries to avoid over burdening interns with contact at each of the quarterly follow-ups. The use of multiple measures of sleep allows for assessment of self-reported habitual sleep (PSQI), and changes relative to shift schedules. The SSI asks interns to recall their habitual sleep on specific shifts, which allows exploration of how different shifts may be impacting interns’ sleep, which is not covered by the PSQI.

Physical activity

Self-report physical activity will be measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [42]. The IPAQ assesses work-related physical activity, as well as recreational activity and sitting time, which is important as the interns may experience changes in both work-related and leisure-time physical activity throughout the 12-month period.

Dietary intake

Dietary intake data will be collected using the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool–Australia 2016 (ASA24), developed by the National Cancer Institute [28]. The ASA24 is completed via phone, with a member of the research team asking interns to recall what they have consumed, where the food/drink was purchased, and the time of day of consumption. The ASA24 allows for calculation of both total 24-hour caloric consumption and nutritional values such as: sodium, protein, fat, sugar, carbohydrates, fibre and iron. The ASA24 also records timing of food consumption, which is relevant for interns who may be eating outside the biological norm [18].

Perceived health and wellbeing

Changes in perceived health and wellbeing will be assessed using various scales within the self-report data. The SF-20 [39] and SSI [32] will report measures of perceived wellbeing and physical health. The shift work disorder screening questionnaire [38] will identify interns who may be experiencing shift work disorder symptoms. Further, interns will complete the post-traumatic stress disorder checklist (PCL-5) [43] which examines possible PTSD symptoms given increased risk identified in the existing paramedic literature [19].

Occupational load

Following initiation of each data collection survey, the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) [29] will be sent together with self-reported sleep diaries to interns via REDCap [27, 31] for seven consecutive days. No reminders are sent for the NASA-TLX. Before completing the NASA-TLX, each intern is asked if they worked yesterday (Yes or No), and if they did not work they will not be asked to fill out a NASA-TLX for that day. When interns indicate that they have worked a shift the previous day, they are prompted to enter their shift start and finish times which allows for calculation of which shift they worked (e.g. night shift). Interns are then prompted to “Please answer these questions in regard to your overall work shift yesterday”, with standard NASA-TLX questions to follow.

Occupational fatigue and recovery

Fatigue associated with work and recovery in between shifts will be assessed using the OFER15 [41] at all quarterly data collection points.

Health literacy

The Newest Vital Sign [44] will be used to quantify the baseline health literacy of new intern paramedics and whether this changes over the course of 12-months work in healthcare.

Shift work risk perception

This 5-item measure was developed by the present study author (MEC), and is based on both previous evidence of health risk perception in shift workers [45] and the cardiovascular risk perception scale [46]. The scale aims to examine whether shift workers perceive shift work as a risk to their health (S2 Appendix), and whether this changes with onset of shift work.

Qualitative interview

At each data collection point, interns are contacted via text message to organise a convenient time for an interview. At the arranged time, interns are called by a research team member. Following completion of the ASA24, an audio recording device is turned on and interns are asked the appropriate interview questions for the time point (Table 2)—full semi-structured qualitative scripts are available in S3 and S4 Appendices. Baseline qualitative interviews will aim to investigate how intern paramedics perceive exposure to occupational trauma, and ask them to identify possible support strategies (S3 Appendix). The first qualitative interview following commencement of shift work (Time 1) will ask interns to recall their experience of sleep inertia and whether they have had any education regarding sleep inertia (S4 Appendix). Finally, all interviews from commencement of shift work (Time 1) will ask interns about their experience of napping, sleep inertia and performance on night shift which existing literature suggests may influence recovery and sleep in paramedics [47] (S5 Appendix). Further, interns will be asked to describe any strategies they use to combat sleep inertia to further understand countermeasures for the decline in performance upon waking associated with sleep inertia [48].

Statistical analysis

Analysis will be conducted to investigate any changes in i) cardiometabolic risk factors, ii) human gut microbiome, iii) health behaviours (e.g. physical activity, alcohol, smoking, dietary intake) and sleep, and iv) wellbeing during first year of shift work. Missing data will be addressed using multiple imputation, as appropriate. Descriptive statistics will be included to provide information regarding participant characteristics. To examine any changes over time, statistical modelling will be conducted using mixed effects regression, specifying a random effect of subject on the intercept, allowing interns to vary according to individual baseline levels, as well as tracking progress over time, appropriately accounting for serial correlation. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals will be considered during analyses. Key descriptive statistics (e.g. demographics, sleep and health at baseline) will be compared between participants lost to follow-up and those who continued within the study, using t-test or non-parametric equivalent if necessary, to determine any factors which differ between the two groups.

Qualitative interviews will be explored with thematic analysis to investigate i) perceived workplace and personal strategies for coping with sleep inertia, ii) perceived workplace and personal strategies for coping with on-call work, and iii) knowledge of formal and informal workplace supports for exposure to traumatic events experienced in their job role. Qualitative interview data will be managed using NVivo software [49] and thematically coded [50] and analysed using a general inductive approach since there are no prior hypotheses or assumptions.

Data management plan

Self-report data will be collected electronically via REDCap. All interview data, identifiable REDCap data and/or pathology results will be stored in a secured CQUniversity research drive. Only the immediate research team members will have access to this research drive. Each participant will be allocated a participant ID in order of recruitment, which will be used to de-identify all data. Paper copies of consent forms and any other paper results will be stored in a secure locked cabinet at Flinders University.

Dissemination

Final data analysis will begin after completing data collection. Preliminary analyses will be conducted on a partial sample for the purpose of PhD dissertations. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications and national and international conference presentations.

Discussion

Summary

Shift work is associated with negative health outcomes. Our understanding of possible underlying mechanisms for, or protective factors against, these medium- to long-term health outcomes, and the possible onset of these mechanisms during the transition to shift work are not well understood. This means we have no clear understanding of the sequalae of health changes, positive or negative, which impacts our ability to provide preventive advice and develop strategies for early career shift workers. The proposed study facilitates frequent, intensive, observational data collection during the 12-month internship program in the South Australian Ambulance Services internship program. Crucially, these findings will provide new knowledge of possible biological, psychological, and social changes during the transition to shift work, with likely applications beyond paramedicine to other shift working professions.

Strengths of the planned study

The proposed study is the first known study to utilise quarterly data collection together with a pre-shift work baseline to explore physical and psychological health changes across the first 12 months of paramedic employment. The aim of our study is to comprehensively examine biopsychosocial changes, within individuals, during the transition into shift work. These findings study will strengthen our understanding of the effect of commencing shift work on biological, psychological, and social factors early in shift work employment.

Limitations

The present study benefits from collecting data in the field, however, with this comes the limitation that we cannot attribute all changes to what we are measuring within the study. It is possible that changes may occur longitudinally that are not related to the transition to shift work. A further limitation is that the present study is conducted at a single site with interns recruited from one Australian ambulance service, therefore the outcomes may be less applicable across different sites or areas. However, given this is an exploratory study, it may be possible to extend across various sites and locations in future. The present study will be susceptible to selection bias. In order to best mitigate this, all eligible interns during the recruitment period will be offered the opportunity to participate, and we will transparently report any baseline differences in those who are lost to follow-up, compared to those who remain in the study. We will not be able to compare differences in those who did not consent to the study, as we do not have data on the interns not included in the present study. This risk of bias will be acknowledged in any reporting of findings from the study to provide context.

Conclusion

The proposed study will allow for better understanding of biopsychosocial changes during the transition to shift work. By conducting this exploratory, observational study we may better understand if any changes, positive or negative, occur during early career shift work.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. Microbiome checklist.

(DOCX)

S2 Appendix. Shift work risk perception scale.

(DOCX)

S3 Appendix. Occupational trauma exposure semi-structed qualitative script.

(DOCX)

S4 Appendix. Sleep inertia education experience semi-structed qualitative script.

(DOCX)

S5 Appendix. Napping and sleep inertia during night shifts semi-structed qualitative script.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge members of the research team who contributed to development of research questions included in this study, including Chris Howie (SA Ambulance Service), K Townsend & R Loudoun (Griffith University).

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.

Funding Statement

The study is funded by Central Queensland University internal Pilot Linkage Grant awarded to the research team with in-kind contributions from the South Australian Ambulance Service and Ambulance Employees Association SA, and an Australasian Sleep Association Rob Pierce Grant in Aid awarded to ACR. The lead author (MEC) is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program scholarship. The financial funders had and will not have a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Redeker Nancy S, Caruso Claire C, Hashmi Sarah D, Mullington Janet M, Grandner M, Morgenthaler Timothy I. Workplace interventions to promote sleep health and an alert, healthy workforce. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine.2019;15(04):649–57. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kecklund G, Axelsson J. Health consequences of shift work and insufficient sleep. BMJ. 2016;355:i5210. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baron KG, Reid KJ. Circadian misalignment and health. International Review of Psychiatry. 2014;26(2):139–54. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2014.911149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reynolds AC, Paterson JL, Ferguson SA, Stanley D, Wright KP Jr., Dawson D. The shift work and health research agenda: Considering changes in gut microbiota as a pathway linking shift work, sleep loss and circadian misalignment, and metabolic disease. Sleep Medicine Review. 2017;34:3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2016.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sofianopoulos S, Williams B, Archer F. Paramedics and the effects of shift work on sleep: a literature review. Emergency Medicine Journal. 2012;29(2):152. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.094342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Puttonen S, Härmä M, Hublin C. Shift work and cardiovascular disease—pathways from circadian stress to morbidity. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health. 2010;36(2):96–108. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu Q, Shi J, Duan P, Liu B, Li T, Wang C, et al. Is shift work associated with a higher risk of overweight or obesity? A systematic review of observational studies with meta-analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2018;47(6):1956–71. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lim SK, Yoo SJ, Koo DL, Park CA, Ryu HJ, Jung YJ, et al. Stress and sleep quality in doctors working on-call shifts are associated with functional gastrointestinal disorders. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017;23(18):3330–7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i18.3330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.van Mark A, Spallek M, Groneberg DA, Kessel R, Weiler SW. Correlates shift work with increased risk of gastrointestinal complaints or frequency of gastritis or peptic ulcer in H. pylori-infected shift workers? International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2010;83(4):423–31. doi: 10.1007/s00420-009-0495-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Norder G, Roelen CA, Bültmann U, van der Klink JJ. Shift work and mental health sickness absence: a 10-year observational cohort study among male production workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health. 2015;41(4):413–6. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Angerer P, Schmook R, Elfantel I, Li J. Night Work and the Risk of Depression. Deutsches Arzteblatt International.https://www.aerzteblatt.de/int 2017;114(24):404–11. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Barro D, Olinto MT, Macagnan JB, Henn RL, Pattussi MP, Faoro MW, et al. Job characteristics and musculoskeletal pain among shift workers of a poultry processing plant in Southern Brazil. Journal of Occupational Health. 2015;57(5):448–56. doi: 10.1539/joh.14-0201-OA [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tran TTT, Phan CTT, Pham TC, Nguyen QT. After-shift Musculoskeletal Disorder Symptoms in Female Workers and Work-related Factors: A Cross-sectional Study in a Seafood Processing Factory in Vietnam. AIMS Public Health. 2016;3(4):733–49. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.4.733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Akerstedt T, Wright KP Jr. Sleep Loss and Fatigue in Shift Work and Shift Work Disorder. Sleep Medicine Clinics. 2009;4(2):257–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2009.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Richter K, Peter L, Rodenbeck A, Weess HG, Riedel-Heller SG, Hillemacher T. Shiftwork and Alcohol Consumption: A Systematic Review of the Literature. European Addiction Research. 2021;27(1):9–15. doi: 10.1159/000507573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dorrian J, Skinner N. Alcohol consumption patterns of shiftworkers compared with dayworkers. Chronobiology International. 2012;29(5):610–8. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.675848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Crowther ME, Ferguson SA, Reynolds AC. Longitudinal studies of sleep, physical activity and nutritional intake in shift workers: A scoping review. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2022;63:101612. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2022.101612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gupta CC, Coates AM, Dorrian J, Banks S. The factors influencing the eating behaviour of shiftworkers: what, when, where and why. Industrial Health. 2019;57(4):419–53. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2018-0147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Berger W, Coutinho ES, Figueira I, Marques-Portella C, Luz MP, Neylan TC, et al. Rescuers at risk: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of the worldwide current prevalence and correlates of PTSD in rescue workers. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2012;47(6):1001–11. doi: 10.1007/s00127-011-0408-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Petrie K, Milligan-Saville J, Gayed A, Deady M, Phelps A, Dell L, et al. Prevalence of PTSD and common mental disorders amongst ambulance personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2018;53(9):897–909. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1539-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Khan WAA, Conduit R, Kennedy GA, Jackson ML. The relationship between shift-work, sleep, and mental health among paramedics in Australia. Sleep Health. 2020;6(3):330–7. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2019.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Thyer L, Simpson P, Nugteren BV. Burnout in Australian paramedics. International Paramedic Practice. 2018;8(3):48–55. doi: 10.12968/ippr.2018.8.3.48 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pyper Z, Paterson JL. Fatigue and mental health in Australian rural and regional ambulance personnel. Emerg Med Australas. 2016;28(1):62–6. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lawn S, Roberts L, Willis E, Couzner L, Mohammadi L, Goble E. The effects of emergency medical service work on the psychological, physical, and social well-being of ambulance personnel: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1). doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02752-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reynolds AC, Crowther ME, Ferguson SA, Paterson JL, Howie C, Adams RJ. Protecting the health and safety of the paramedic workforce in Australia: The role of cohort studies with new recruits. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 2021;33(5):935–7. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Harford M, Areia C, Villarroel M, Jorge J, Finnegan E, Davidson S, et al. Study protocol for an exploratory interventional study investigating the feasibility of video-based non-contact physiological monitoring in healthy volunteers by Mapping Of Lower Limb skIn pErfusion (MOLLIE). BMJ Open. 2020;10(6):e036235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2019;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Subar AF, Thompson FE, Potischman N, Forsyth BH, Buday R, Richards D, et al. Formative research of a quick list for an automated self-administered 24-hour dietary recall. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2007;107(6):1002–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Advances in psychology. 1988;52:139–83 [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Reynolds AC, Broussard J, Paterson JL, Wright KP Jr., Ferguson SA. Sleepy, circadian disrupted and sick: Could intestinal microbiota play an important role in shift worker health? Molecular Metabolism. 2016;6(1):12–3. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2016.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2009;42(2):377–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Barton J, Spelten E, Totterdell P, Smith L, Folkard S, Costa G. The Standard Shiftwork Index: a battery of questionnaires for assessing shiftwork-related problems. Work & Stress. 1995;9(1):4–30. doi: 10.1080/02678379508251582 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hackman JR, Oldham GR. Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1975;60(2):159–70. doi: 10.1037/h0076546 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Goldberg DP. The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire: A technique for the identification and assessment of non-psychotic psychiatric illness. Oxford, England: Oxford University; 1972. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schwartz GE, Davidson RJ, Goleman DJ. Patterning of cognitive and somatic processes in the self-regulation of anxiety: effects of meditation versus exercise. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1978;40(4):321–8. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197806000-00004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Smith CS, Reilly C, Midkiff K. Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1989;74(5):728–38. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Eysenck SBG, Eysenck HJ. An improved short questionnaire for the measurement of extraversion and neuroticism. Life Sciences. 1964;3(10):1103–9. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(64)90125-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Barger LK, Ogeil RP, Drake CL, O’Brien CS, Ng KT, Rajaratnam SMW. Validation of a Questionnaire to Screen for Shift Work Disorder. Sleep. 2012;35(12):1693–703. doi: 10.5665/sleep.2246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Medical Care. 1988;26(7):724–35. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatric Research. 1989;28(2):193–213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Winwood P, Lushington K, Winefield A. Further Development and Validation of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery (OFER) Scale. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2006;48:381–9. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000194164.14081.06 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Booth M. Assessment of Physical Activity: An International Perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2000;71(sup2):114–20. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2000.11082794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Weathers FW, Litz BT, Keane TM, Palmieri PA, Marx BP, Schnurr PP. The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) 2013. [Available from: Scale available from the National Center for PTSD at www.ptsd.va.gov] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Weiss BD, Mays MZ, Martz W, Castro KM, DeWalt DA, Pignone MP, et al. Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign. Annals of Family Medicine. 2005;3(6):514–22. doi: 10.1370/afm.405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Crowther ME, Reynolds AC, Ferguson SA, Adams R. Perceptions of the impact of non-standard work schedules on health in Australian graduates: An exploratory study. Industrial Health. 2020;58(1):54–62. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2019-0036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Barnhart JM, Wright ND, Freeman K, Silagy F, Correa N, Walker EA. Risk perception and its association with cardiac risk and health behaviors among urban minority adults: the Bronx Coronary Risk Perception study. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2009;23(5):339–42. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.07072574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Patterson PD, Weaver MD, Guyette FX, Martin-Gill C. Should public safety shift workers be allowed to nap while on duty? American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2020;63(10):843–50. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kovac K, Ferguson SA, Paterson JL, Aisbett B, Hilditch CJ, Reynolds AC, et al. Exercising Caution Upon Waking-Can Exercise Reduce Sleep Inertia? Frontiers is Physiology. 2020;11:254. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo (released in March 2020), https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
  • 50.Clarke V, Braun V, editors. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. 2013; London: Sage. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Dylan A Mordaunt

22 Jul 2022

PONE-D-22-14838Physical and psychological health in intern paramedics commencing shift work: Protocol for an exploratory longitudinal studyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Crowther,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

There are several suggestions made that once addressed, the manuscript would like meet the criteria for publication. I anticipate that the authors may not agree with all of these, and considered rebuttal would be acceptable. More detailed description of recruitment and sampling is necessary though. 

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 02 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Dylan A Mordaunt, MD, MPH, FRACP

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section: 

"ACR has received research grant funding from a variety of sources over the course of research relating to this manuscript, including the Sleep Health Foundation (including an unrestricted grant from Merck, Sharp & Dohme Australia and Carers Australia via the Sleep Health Foundation), Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Compumedics, the Australasian Sleep Association, the Hospital Research Foundation, Flinders Foundation, Safework SA, Sydney Trains, Arthritis Australia, Bundaberg Regional Council, Queensland Fire and Emergency Services and the Freemasons Foundation (SA). ACR has received personal fees for work related to her research from Sealy Australia and Teva Pharmaceuticals. Professor Robert Adams (RJA) reports grants from the Sleep Health Foundation, Philips Respironics, The National Health and Medical Research Council, ResMed Foundation, The Hospital Research Foundation, Flinders Foundation, Sydney Trains and the Research Network for Undersea Decision Superiority during the past 3 years.

No other authors have competing interests to declare."

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: ""This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared. 

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Thank you for your submission.

1) We've received a single review that points to primarily issues either with method description, or with discussion of limitations of the method, mostly related to sampling.

2) It would be helpful for the authors to address with some detail the source population, approach to sampling (e.g. snowball, convenience etc) in a PICOT manner.

3) There are notable exclusions, and although explanations of exclusions aren't necessarily standard elements of reporting checklists for survey studies, a description of the rationale behind these criteria would fit with quality rating tools for other article types and I think would help improve the quality of the paper.

4) The reviewer also raises the issue of a framing effect or bias. The disclosures are noted and as stated the primary funder is an independent entity with a public health remit. I think the authors could consider their framing with regards to the broad readership of PLoS One, and aim to present a more neutral setup prior to establishing the case that they conclude from the data. This is not merely a semantic suggestion, since rating tools for assessed quality of prospective cohort studies include risk of bias assessments (e.g. https://methods.cochrane.org/risk-bias-2).

With specific regards to the criteria for publication:

1. The study appears to present the results of an original protocol (an accepted article type at PLoS One).

2. Results are not reported, as it's a protocol.

3. Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a reasonable technical standard but warrant attention to the areas described above and by the reviewer.

4. Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data.

5. The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English.

6. The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity.

7. The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability, with the exception of the comments made above. I would suggest the authors consider the STROBE (https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/strobe/) and SPIRIT checklists (https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/spirit-2013-statement-defining-standard-protocol-items-for-clinical-trials/), acknowledging that this study does not meet criteria for these, but could help improve the study protocol quality. As stated above, it might also be worth considering assessed bias in your design, through a risk of bias tool such as cited.

NB: I have noted a disclosure to the staff editor that some of the authors and I have shared affiliations. I am an employee of Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, a clinician (medical practitioner) and am affiliated with Flinders University, but have noted that I have no past, current or planned collaborations with any of the authors. This statement is included for transparency.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does the manuscript provide a valid rationale for the proposed study, with clearly identified and justified research questions?

The research question outlined is expected to address a valid academic problem or topic and contribute to the base of knowledge in the field.

Reviewer #1: Yes

********** 

2. Is the protocol technically sound and planned in a manner that will lead to a meaningful outcome and allow testing the stated hypotheses?

The manuscript should describe the methods in sufficient detail to prevent undisclosed flexibility in the experimental procedure or analysis pipeline, including sufficient outcome-neutral conditions (e.g. necessary controls, absence of floor or ceiling effects) to test the proposed hypotheses and a statistical power analysis where applicable. As there may be aspects of the methodology and analysis which can only be refined once the work is undertaken, authors should outline potential assumptions and explicitly describe what aspects of the proposed analyses, if any, are exploratory.

Reviewer #1: Partly

********** 

3. Is the methodology feasible and described in sufficient detail to allow the work to be replicable?

Descriptions of methods and materials in the protocol should be reported in sufficient detail for another researcher to reproduce all experiments and analyses. The protocol should describe the appropriate controls, sample size calculations, and replication needed to ensure that the data are robust and reproducible.

Reviewer #1: Yes

********** 

4. Have the authors described where all data underlying the findings will be made available when the study is complete?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception, at the time of publication. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

********** 

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

********** 

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above and, if applicable, provide comments about issues authors must address before this protocol can be accepted for publication. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about research or publication ethics.

You may also provide optional suggestions and comments to authors that they might find helpful in planning their study.

(Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thanks for the opportunity to review and apologies for the delay.

Congratulations on your protocol on this essential and currently increasingly evidenced area.

The aims and objectives are clearly defined. A hypothesis should be provided.

The risk of selection bias is always present in these types of studies, particularly when participation is voluntary. I do not see a way around this, but worth considering in the analysis/discussion.

The columns in table 1 should be changed to the actual times, not just T0,1,2,3,4

The caption in table 1 is to be moved to methods.

Table 2 lists the surveys to be used. This seems excessive and may result in high drop-out rates due to survey fatigue. Consideration about consolidating this list will likely lead to a more complete, although truncated data set.

The statistical analysis plan lacks details.

Reading the paper, I get the sense that the authors want to demonstrate the extent of the negative impact of shift work. Rather they could take a more unbiased approach and aim to determine how commencing shift work impacts health in any direction.

********** 

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Jianhong Zhou

15 Sep 2022

Physical and psychological health in intern paramedics commencing shift work: Protocol for an exploratory longitudinal study

PONE-D-22-14838R1

Dear Dr. Crowther,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Jianhong Zhou

Staff Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Thank you for your resubmission. This now meets the criteria for publication.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Jianhong Zhou

21 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-14838R1

Physical and psychological health in intern paramedics commencing shift work: Protocol for an exploratory longitudinal study

Dear Dr. Crowther:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Jianhong Zhou

Staff Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Appendix. Microbiome checklist.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Appendix. Shift work risk perception scale.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Appendix. Occupational trauma exposure semi-structed qualitative script.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Appendix. Sleep inertia education experience semi-structed qualitative script.

    (DOCX)

    S5 Appendix. Napping and sleep inertia during night shifts semi-structed qualitative script.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewer.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES