Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2022 Nov 15;144(47):21648–21657. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c09103

A Chiral 19F NMR Reporter of Foldamer Conformation in Bilayers

Siyuan Wang †,, Flavio della Sala †,, Matthew J Cliff , George F S Whitehead , Iñigo J Vitórica-Yrezábal , Simon J Webb †,‡,*
PMCID: PMC9716558  PMID: 36379007

Abstract

graphic file with name ja2c09103_0011.jpg

Understanding and controlling peptide foldamer conformation in phospholipid bilayers is a key step toward their use as molecular information relays in membranes. To this end, a new 19F “reporter” tag has been developed and attached to dynamic peptide foldamers. The (R)-1-(trifluoromethyl)ethylamido ((R)-TFEA) reporter was attached to the C-terminus of α-amino-iso-butyric acid (Aib) foldamers. Crystallography confirmed that the foldamers adopted 310 helical conformations. Variable temperature (VT) NMR spectroscopy in organic solvents showed that the (R)-TFEA reporter had an intrinsic preference for P helicity, but the overall screw-sense was dominated by a chiral “controller” at the N-terminus. The 19F NMR chemical shift of the CF3 resonance was correlated with the ability of different N-terminal groups to induce either an M or a P helix in solution. In bilayers, a similar correlation was found. Solution 19F NMR spectroscopy on small unilamellar vesicle (SUV) suspensions containing the same family of (R)-TFEA-labeled foldamers showed broadened but resolvable 19F resonances, with each chemical shift mirroring their relative positions in organic solvents. These studies showed that foldamer conformational preferences are the same in phospholipid bilayers as in organic solvents and also revealed that phospholipid chirality has little influence on conformation.

Introduction

The development of synthetic oligomers able to mimic the function of transmembrane proteins will provide insights into key cellular processes, such as the transit of molecules and information across membranes.1,2 The ability to transmit molecular information across multinanometer distances (i.e., the width of a membrane) could also provide technology for new fields like molecular robotics,3 for example, by transferring instructions to a catalytic centre.4 Synthetic folded oligomers, foldamers, have shown great promise for mimicking the behavior of biological folded oligomers, such as proteins and oligosaccharides. The folded conformations of these oligomers can be either static or dynamic at room temperature, in the latter case often rapidly interconverting between a few similarly stable conformations5 that can be made responsive external stimuli.6 α-Amino-iso-butyric acid (Aib) foldamers are a well-studied class of dynamic foldamer with two principal conformations: 310 helices of either right-handed (P) or left-handed (M) screw sense. These rodlike hydrophobic peptides can embed into membranes; if long enough, they can span bilayers to produce ion channels and antibiotic activity that is reminiscent of the peptaibol antibiotics.7 Furthermore, using an external stimulus to switch between P and M helical sense along the entire length of a membrane-embedded Aib foldamers is proposed to mimic a key process in biological signal transduction, the relay of information across the multinanometer thickness of biological membranes.6a,6b

To design and operate such complex supramolecular systems, the conformational relay found in Aib foldamers needs to be understood and optimized in bilayers, which are complex anisotropic environments. We have recently shown that vibrational circular dichroism, Raman optical activity, fluorescence spectroscopy, and 19F solid-state NMR (ssNMR) spectroscopy can all provide complementary information on Aib foldamer conformation in lipid bilayers.6a,6b,810 In the latter case, the orthogonality and the high sensitivity of 19F nuclei facilitates NMR analysis in the 1H and 13C rich lipid matrix, where long acquisition times and line broadening are significant problems.1115

19F ssNMR spectroscopy can provide detailed insights into the conformations of membrane-bound peptides,11,12d,16 but the conditions used for ssNMR are not suitable for intact phospholipid vesicles. Phospholipid vesicle suspensions are biomimetic systems that better reflect the compartmentalized nature of intact cells.17 Although the anisotropy and slow tumbling rates of phospholipid vesicles broadens the resonances of vesicle-bound molecules, solution NMR spectroscopy on small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) can provide useful information. For example, SUV studies have revealed differences between the inner and outer leaflet environments18 and how peptide-membrane interactions depend on the bilayer curvature.19

19F NMR reporter tags on Aib foldamers have been used to report on the screw-sense ratio in organic solvents and phospholipid bilayers, using solution NMR and ssNMR spectroscopy, respectively. If the tag is achiral, such as the β,β′-difluoro-Aib (“Fib”) tag used by De Poli et al.,6a the 19F-containing reporter group can provide the magnitude of the excess of one helicity over the other (the “helical excess”, h.e., Figure 1) but will not reveal which helical sense is favored; to do so, a chiral reporter group is required. Chiral NMR reporter groups permit the preferred helical sense to be determined because the helical conformations are diastereomeric and have different spectroscopic properties. Because the reporter group itself is chiral, it may also exert a helical preference, although this preference should be as low as possible.20

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Aib foldamer with N-terminal controller (in red) and C-terminal (R)-TFEA reporter (in green), showing interconversion of M and P 310 helical conformations. (b) Expected 19F NMR signals from a foldamer with unequal populations of M and P 310 helical conformations that are in slow exchange (top) and fast exchange (bottom); the latter gives a singlet at the weighted average chemical shift. (c) Schematic representation of an Aib foldamer partitioning between aqueous buffer and the membrane of a DOPC SUV.

Our design of a new 19F NMR reporter involved the replacement of a methyl in an iso-propyl group with an isosteric trifluoromethyl (CF3). This was hoped to generate a chiral fluorinated reporter with two substituents of similar size, which might only generate a small helical preference. However, Bodero et al. reported that stereoselectively replacing a single methyl on Aib with CF3 provides a residue ((S)-TfmAla) that acts as an N-terminal controller for Aib foldamers, producing a significant h.e.0 of +80.21 The (R)-1-(trifluoromethyl)ethylamido ((R)-TFEA) reporter (Figure 1a, in green) was designed with this isosteric relationship in mind; it was hoped any intrinsic helical preference would be diminished by attachment to the C-terminus.22 Both enantiomers of the amine are commercially available, which will allow the effect of phospholipid chirality to be probed (Figure 1c). The (R)-TFEA reporter should also be relatively stable to most externally added reagents. The report it provides will depend on foldamer dynamics. If exchange between P and M helical conformations is slow, then each diastereomeric conformation will provide a distinct resonance and the integral of each will give the P/M ratio. However, if conformational exchange is fast on the 19F NMR timescale, then a weighted average signal will result with a chemical shift that reflects the P/M ratio (Figure 1b).

Herein, we describe the synthesis and study of a family of Aib foldamers bearing this C-terminal (R)-TFEA reporter group. These studies revealed how the 19F NMR resonance of the CF3 group responded to the screw-sense preference of different N-terminal residues in organic solvents and showed for the first time how solution NMR spectroscopy can reveal these conformational preferences in the bilayers of small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs).

Results and Discussion

The synthetic versatility of the (R)-TFEA reporter group allowed it to be installed in two steps from the readily accessible protected Aib tetramers 1 and 3a3g (Scheme 1).6b,7,23 This gave the family of Aib tetramers 5ag and 6. Foldamers 5b5g can be grouped into three pairs of diastereomers that have either the l- or d-enantiomer of a chiral residue at the N-terminus. Each N-terminal residue has a different ability to induce an h.e. in the following Aib chain. An N-terminal azide or Cbz(Gly) residue will not induce a screw-sense preference, but Cbz-capped phenylalanine (Phe), α-methylvaline (αMeVal), and (αMeVal)2 are all reported to induce an h.e. in Aib tetramers. Phe has a moderate ability to induce an h.e. whereas αMeVal and (αMeVal)2 are much stronger inducers of h.e.23a,24 If the (R)-TFEA reporter at the C-terminus has a screw-sense preference, then one of the diastereomers in each pair will have the terminal groups inducing the same screw-sense preference (i.e., both M or both P, which gives a screw-sense “match”) with the other diastereoisomer having opposing screw-sense preferences (i.e., one is M and the other P, which gives a screw-sense “mismatch”).

Scheme 1. Synthetic Strategy for Aib Tetramers 5a–g, 6, and 7a.

Scheme 1

(a) H2/Pd(C), EtOH, rt; (b) Cbz(Gly)OH or Cbz(d/l-Phe)OH, EDC.HCl, HOBt, DIPEA, CH2Cl2, rt; (c) (i) Cbz(d/l-αMeVal)OH, cyanuric fluoride, pyridine, CH2Cl2, rt; (ii) 2, CH2Cl2, DIPEA rt; (d) 3d or 3e, H2/Pd(C), MeOH, rt; (e) (i) Cbz(d/l-αMeVal)OH, tetramethylfluoroformamidinium hexafluorophosphate, pyridine, CH2Cl2, rt; (ii) DIPEA, CH2Cl2, rt; (f) CF3CO2H, CH2Cl2, rt; (g) (R)-2-amino-1,1,1-trifluoropropane.HCl, DIPEA, HATU, rt; and (h) (S)-2-amino-1,1,1-trifluoropropane.HCl, DIPEA, HATU, rt.

The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of 5a and 6 implied that 310 helices were formed. The azide-capped tetramer 6 in the solid state shows a strong band at 1661 cm–1 in the amide I region, which is diagnostic of a 310 helix (Figure S1, 6 also shows a strong azide band at 2110 cm–1).8a The corresponding FT-IR band for the glycine-capped compound 5a is found at 1655 cm–1 (Figure S2), which is between the regions typical for 310-helix (1658–1666 cm–1) and α-helix (1650–1658 cm–1).25

The circular dichroism (CD) spectrum of foldamer 6 with azide at the N-terminus was weak in acetonitrile and in methanol when compared to those foldamers with chiral N-terminal residues (Figures S3 and S4). The CD spectra of diastereomeric pairs of foldamers (5b/c, 5d/e, 5f/g) are not equal and opposite, although some pairs in CH3CN, such as 5b/c, 5d/e, and 5f/g, gave almost mirror image spectra. These observations suggested that the chiral (R)-TFEA reporter may exert relatively weak conformational control.

Solid-State Structures

A weak chiral influence from the (R)-TFEA reporter was also implied by the crystal structure of 6 (Figure 2). The solid-state structure shows two molecules in the unit cell, one with a P 310 helical structure (Figure 2b) and the other with a 310 helical structure of the opposite, M, sense (Figure 2a). The respective distorted 310 helices are maintained by an intramolecular ii + 3 hydrogen bonding pattern: one hydrogen bond between the C=O of the first Aib and the NH of the fourth Aib and the other between the C=O of the second Aib and the NH of the (R)-TFEA. The C-N dihedral angle in the reporter group in both M and P structures places the C–H anti to the N–H, mirroring the calculated antiperiplanar geometry of acetylated (R)-TFEA, AcNHCH(CF3)CH3.26 The C=O of the third and fourth Aib of the P helical foldamer form intermolecular hydrogen bonds with the NH of the first and second Aib residues of the neighboring M helical foldamer.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Solid-state structures showing (a) M and (b) P helical conformations adopted by 6 in the unit cell, with intramolecular hydrogen bonds shown. C atoms are shown in gray, N in light blue, O in red, and F in pale green. Some H atoms have been removed for clarity.

The foldamer with an l-αMeVal cap, which favors a P helix,23a,24 also gave crystals suitable for X-ray crystallographic structure determination (5d, Figure 3a). Once again, a 310 helix is adopted by the Aib foldamer body, with the expected P helical sense. The folding around the chiral residue shows that it has adopted a P type III β turn, with φ/ψ angles for the αMeVal and first Aib of −51°/–57° and −41°/–23°, respectively, similar to the ideal values of φ = −60° and ψ = −30°.27 Its diastereomeric counterpart, 5e, bearing a d-αMeVal cap that favors an M helix, was also crystallized (Figure 3b). The 310 helix adopted by the Aib foldamer body now has an M helical sense. An M type III’ β turn,28 with φ/ψ angles for the αMeVal and first Aib of +57°/+34° and +55°/+29° was observed at the N-terminus. The conformation in the (R)-TFEA reporter group in 5e is the same as in 5d, but the helix loop is now on the same side as the CF3 group.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Solid-state structures of (a) l-αMeVal capped tetramer 5d (P helix), (b) d-αMeVal capped tetramer 5e (M helix), and (c) l-Phe capped tetramer 5b (P helix). Intramolecular hydrogen bonds are shown. C atoms are shown in gray, N in light blue, O in red, and F in pale green. Some H atoms have been removed and molecules of solvation not shown for clarity.

Foldamer 5b with an l-Phe cap also gave crystals suitable for structure determination (Figure 3c). The solid-state structure showed that the foldamer had in fact adopted a P 310 helix in a structure analogous to that of 5d. This is the opposite of the M helix preferred by N-terminal Phe residues in solution and is due to the Phe residue adopting a type III β turn rather than the expected type II turn.29 It is reported that crystal packing forces can compete against the helical preference of a terminal chiral group if that preference is relatively weak, illustrated by the solid-state structures of Aib tetramers with either a Cbz(l-Val) cap30 or a Cbz(d-Phe) cap.9

Solution-Phase 19F NMR Spectroscopy of Foldamers in Organic Solvents

Given the reported dynamic behavior of Aib tetramers, it was anticipated that rapid exchange between P and M helical conformations in foldamers 5ag on the 1H NMR timescale would lead to the observation of weighted average spectra for each compound.30

1H NMR spectroscopy of foldamer 5a may provide insight into the ability of the (R)-TFEA reporter to induce a screw-sense preference. Fast exchange and a large h.e. in the Aib foldamer could cause the methylene protons of Gly in the foldamer to appear diastereotopic.30 However the 1H NMR spectrum of 5a in CD3CN and CD3OD at 298 K showed an unsplit but broadened resonance from these protons (Figures S5a and S6a). Although this observation could at first glance imply that the h.e. induced by a (R)-TFEA reporter is low, the relay of chirality from C-terminus to N-terminus is known to be less efficient than that for the reverse sense.22 In addition, the N-terminal Gly signal may not be especially sensitive to h.e. Indeed, comparison of the 1H NMR spectra of diastereomeric pairs of foldamers showed small differences that can only arise if the (R)-TFEA reporter is able to induce a local h.e., which is communicated down the helix. This is exemplified by l- and d-αMeVal-capped foldamers 5d and 5e, where the diastereotopic methyl groups of the iso-propyl in αMeVal have larger separation in 5e compared with those of 5d and the α-methyl chemical shifts are different by ca. 0.1 ppm (Figures S5b and S6b).

19F NMR spectroscopy of foldamers 5a–5g and 6 at 298 K in CD3OD gave spectra consistent with fast exchange between conformations. Foldamers 5a and 6, with achiral N-terminal residues, each showed a single resonance at, respectively, −78.688 and −78.716 ppm (Figure 4).31 These resonances are the weighted average of the chemical shifts for each diastereomeric conformation, which contain either a P or an M helix. As a weighted average, the position of this resonance should be directly related to the h.e. for each foldamer.32 Because neither azide nor Cbz(Gly) are chiral, the P/M ratio is determined by the inductive power of the (R)-TFEA reporter and should be the same for each. Indeed, these chemical shift values are similar, which also suggests that the reporter is not directly interacting with the N-terminal group. The small −28 ppb difference between 5a and 6 may be due to the greater hydrogen bonding ability of a Cbz(Gly) terminus stabilizing the 310-helix to a greater extent than an azide terminus.8a

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Partial 19F NMR spectra (CD3OD, all 376 MHz except 5b 470 MHz, 298 K) of, from top to bottom, 6, 5ag. Spectra referenced with C6F6 at −165.37 ppm (Figure S8).31

A chiral controller group at the Aib N-terminus will alter the P/M ratio and should produce changes in the chemical shift of the CF3 group (δ(CF3)) relative to 5a, which has the same hydrogen bond ability as 5b5e. In CD3OD, the Cbz(l-Phe) controller in 5b shifts the resonance by +0.211 ppm relative to that of 5a (Figure 4, positive values indicate a shift downfield), whereas the N-terminal Cbz(d-Phe) controller in 5c moves the resonance in the opposite direction (−0.169 ppm). An αMeVal group exerts stronger conformational control30 and has a correspondingly stronger effect on the position of the CF3 resonance. A Cbz(l-αMeVal) group shifts the resonance by −0.178 ppm, whereas an N-terminal Cbz(d-αMeVal) group shifts the resonance by +0.286 ppm. Adding another αMeVal group gives the strongest covalent controller reported to date30 and accordingly produces the strongest change in the location of the CF3 resonance (−0.209 ppm for Cbz(l-αMeVal)2 and +0.538 ppm for Cbz(d-αMeVal)2). Changing the solvent to CD3CN gave very similar observations, indicating that reporter function is largely solvent-independent (Table S1 and Figures S7 and S8).

The magnitude and direction of these changes in δ(CF3) broadly correlate with the reported abilities of each N-terminal residue to favor one screw sense over the other. The strength of the screw-sense preference of a given controller is often presented as an inferred helical excess (h.e.0), which corresponds to the helical excess adjacent to the controller at the foldamer N-terminus.21,30 Phe induces a moderate h.e.0 in the closest part of the helix (−52% for l, +52% for d), whereas αMeVal (+68% for l, −68% for d) and (αMeVal)2 (+95% for l, −95% for d) are stronger inducers of h.e.0.30 These h.e.0 values show that Cbz(l-Phe) and Cbz(d-αMeVal) both favor M helicity; they produce a downfield shift in the 19F NMR resonance of the reporter. On the other hand, Cbz(d-Phe) and Cbz(l-αMeVal) favor P helicity and produce an upfield shift in δ(CF3), albeit of smaller magnitude.

Smaller changes of δ(CF3) for foldamers with chiral controllers that favor P helicity compared to foldamers with the enantiomeric controllers that favor M helicity suggest that the (R)-TFEA reporter intrinsically produces an excess of P helix. This qualitative observation also suggests that it might be possible to devise a model that predicts δ(CF3) at 298 K by accounting for the combined screw-sense preferences of each controller and (R)-TFEA.

VT-NMR and Modeling

Variable temperature (VT) 19F NMR spectroscopy on 5b in CD3OD confirmed that this foldamer was in fast exchange at room temperature, as the single 19F resonance shifted and decoalesced to give a pair of resonances at −78.31 and −79.27 ppm at 233 K. These peaks were of unequal height (Figures 5a and S9) and integrated in an approximately 0.75:1 ratio, respectively.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) 19F VT-NMR spectra (CD3OD, 470 MHz) for l-Phe capped tetramer 5b showing the CF3 resonance. (b) Partial 19F NMR spectra (CD3OD, 470 MHz, 233 K) showing CF3 resonance of (d-αMeVal)2 (5g), l-Phe (5b), Gly (5a), d-Phe (5c), and (l-αMeVal)2 (5f). Spectra proton decoupled and referenced to C6F6 at −165.37 ppm.31

The diastereomeric foldamer 5c presented the same resonances but in a 0.04:1 ratio. Extending these 19F VT-NMR studies to Gly-capped 5a and (d-αMeVal)2-capped 5g showed that each had the same two peaks, but in 0.27:1 and 20:1 ratios, respectively. Foldamer 5f only showed one peak at −79.22 ppm, suggesting that the other peak at ca. −78.37 ppm is below the detection limit (i.e., <0.01:1 ratio).

These VT-NMR studies are consistent with interchange between P and M 310 helices becoming slow at low temperatures. Furthermore, because (d-αMeVal)2 is reported to induce M helicity in Aib foldamers,9,30 the larger resonance at ca. −78.37 ppm in its 19F NMR spectrum at 233 K is likely to be from the M helical conformer (Figure 5b). Conversely (l-αMeVal)2 induces P helicity, and the largest resonance is the one at ca. −79.22 ppm. Based upon these assumptions, foldamer 5a shows P/M ∼ 4, which confirms that the (R)-TFEA reporter group can induce a P helix. This ratio appears to be relatively solvent-independent; 5a in CD3CN at 233 K shows a 0.27:1 ratio for 19F NMR resonances at −79.62 ppm and −78.67 ppm (Figure S10). The observation of slow exchange allows the direct calculation of the observed helical excess (h.e.obs).30 For example, most powerful controllers, (d-αMeVal)2 and (l-αMeVal)2, produce h.e.obs values at 233 K of −0.91 and >0.99, respectively, which at 298 K correspond to 19F chemical shifts of −78.150 and −78.897 ppm.

To elaborate the relationship between δ(CF3) and the identity of each N-terminal residue, a model was developed that correlated the reported h.e.0 for each N-terminal group30 with the measured δ(CF3) of 5ag and 6. The VT-NMR spectrum of 5a at low temperatures provides the P/M ratio induced by the reporter group (∼3.76 in CD3OD). A free energy change (−3.4 kJ mol–1) can be estimated from this preference of the reporter for right-handed helix (ΔGR). Then, the reported h.e.0 induced by each controller residue can be converted into a Gibbs free energy (ΔGC) and then added to ΔGR. The resulting net free energy change (ΔGC + ΔGR) can be converted into a K value (the P/M ratio) for each foldamer (see the Supporting Information, Section 6). This calculation of K can also be represented in terms of h.e.0 and ΔGR (eq 1).

graphic file with name ja2c09103_m001.jpg 1

The weighted average 19F NMR signal at 298 K for each foldamer is then calculated using estimated δM = −78.03 ppm (for M helix) and δP = −78.90 ppm (for P helix) (eq 2).

graphic file with name ja2c09103_m002.jpg 2

This model gave good agreement with the measured chemical shifts at 298 K across the family 5a5g and 6 (Figure 6). It also replicated the nonlinear shape of the curve (not symmetrical about h.e.0 = 0), which occurs because the reporter itself has a chiral influence that induces a P helical screw sense. Those controller groups that also induce a P helical screw sense have less scope to increase the proportion of P helix; conversely, controllers that induce M screw sense have greater scope to do so. The net effect is that the change in chemical shift for different controllers is greatest for those that counteract the screw-sense preference of the (R)-TFEA reporter.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

19F NMR chemical shifts in CD3OD at 298 K for Aib tetramers 5a5g and 6 correlated with the reported ability of each chiral N-terminal group to induce a local helical excess (h.e.0).30 Curve fit assumes a preference of (R)-TFEA for right-handed helix (ΔGR) of −3.40 kJ mol–1. Chemical shifts calibrated to C6F6.31

This model also approximately replicated the P/M ratio derived from the two signals observed at 233 K in the VT-NMR data for compounds 5b (calculated as 1.25:1), 5c (calculated as 12.5:1), 5f (calculated as 154:1), and 5g (calculated as 0.01:1, Table S3). A similar treatment of the 19F VT-NMR data for foldamers in CD3CN (5a gave P/M of 3.70 and ΔGR = −3.22 kJ mol–1) also gave a good fit to the measured chemical shifts at room temperature in this solvent (Figure S11).

Solution-Phase 19F NMR Spectroscopy of Foldamers in Vesicle Membranes

Previously, ssNMR 19F spectroscopy showed the achiral 19F bearing “Fib” residue at the C-terminus of Aib foldamers gave resolvable resonances that reported on changes in conformation (the full width at half maximum (FWHM) was ca. >0.6 ppm).6a However the rapid spinning of ssNMR samples prevents the use of intact vesicles, so solution-phase NMR spectroscopy of intact SUVs was explored. It was hoped that loading (R)-TFEA labeled foldamers into SUVs composed of a lipid that gives a very fluid bilayer, 1,2-di-(9Z-octadecenoyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC), would lead to suitably narrow resonances (Figure 7a).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(a) Schematic representation of an Aib foldamer in buffer (“a”) partitioning into a vesicle bilayer and locating in either the inner (“b”) or the outer leaflet (“c”). (b) Partial 19F NMR spectra (1:9 D2O/H2O, 470 MHz, 298 K, [NaCl] = 100 mM, [MOPS] = 20 mM, pH 7.4; 376 MHz for 5b) of foldamers 5a-5g and 6 in DOPC SUVs. Unincorporated foldamer at −81.2 ppm (environment “a”) and incorporated foldamer at −82 to −84 ppm (environments “b” and “c”). Spectra referenced to KF at −125.300 ppm.

Because of expected low signal strength caused by line broadening, a high concentration of lipids (50 mM) and a high membrane loading of 11 mol % foldamer were used. SUVs were formed by 4 h bath sonication at 25 °C of suspensions of DOPC mixed with Aib foldamers 5a–g, 6, or a racemic mixture of 5b and 5c in buffered 1:9 D2O:H2O ([NaCl] = 100 mM, [MOPS] = 20 mM, pH 7.4), according to reported methodologies.33 Dynamic light scattering (DLS) showed that this procedure produced uniform and reproducible samples of SUVs with a hydrodynamic diameter of 30 to 40 nm (Figure S13).

The 19F NMR spectrum of each of these SUV suspensions showed a sharp peak at ca. −81.2 ppm and a broad peak between −82 and −84 ppm. The position of the sharp peak was similar between SUVs containing different foldamers, but the chemical shift of the broad peak, which had a FWHM typically around 0.3 ppm, was significantly different depending upon the identity of the N-terminal residue (Figure 7b).

To understand the appearance of these spectra, SUVs containing l-Phe capped foldamer 5b were analyzed further. The narrow linewidth of the sharp peak and its position at −81.162 ppm suggested that this peak arose from foldamer 5b that was unfolded in buffer34 and not incorporated in the SUVs (Figure 7a, labeled as “a”). This assignment was supported by 19F DOSY spectroscopy (Figure S14), which gave a diffusion coefficient of 9.85 × 10–6 cm2s–1 for the sharp peak and 9.36 × 10–7 cm2s–1 for the broad peak; the latter value is close to that reported for SUVs.35 Furthermore, purification of the SUV suspension by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) removed the sharp peak from the spectrum, leaving the broad resonance that was ascribed to the foldamer in the membrane (Figure S15a). Mass spectrometric analysis of a SEC fraction containing the sharp peak confirmed that it contained unincorporated tetramer (Figure S15b). Some foldamers were more difficult to incorporate into SUV membranes than others because of their lower solubility in the chloroform used during SUV preparation; the maximum solubility of 5d in CHCl3 was 288 mM, whereas the same value for its diastereomer 5e was 50 mM (see the Supporting Information, Section 9). This difference in solubility may cause the greater broadness of the 5e resonance, which was consistently observed in different preparations of 5e in DOPC SUVs, although the position of the peak remained the same (δF = −82.71 ± 0.02 ppm). Indeed, the chemical shift of the broad peak for these foldamers was not sensitive to membrane loading, for example, 5c gave the same chemical shift within the error over the range 2 to 11 mol % (see the Supporting Information, Section 8).

The position of the broad 19F NMR resonance for each embedded foldamer appears to reflect the ability of each controller to induce an h.e., which in turn confirms that the end-to-end helical relay is still present in DOPC bilayers. The foldamers capped with the best chiral controllers, (l-αMeVal)2 and (d-αMeVal)2, showed the broad peak either upfield (−83.426 ppm) or downfield (−82.211 ppm), respectively, compared to the foldamer with an achiral Gly cap (−82.915 ppm). The l-Phe and d-αMeVal capped foldamers, which have an excess of M helix, both show downfield shifted peaks, as observed in organic solvents. However, the d-Phe and l-αMeVal diastereomers show little difference in δ(CF3) compared to 5a and 6, suggesting that the reporter is even less responsive to increases in P helical conformation when in a bilayer. A similar effect was observed across a series of Fib-labeled Aib tetramers in membranes. 19F ssNMR showed that the response of the achiral Fib reporter to different chiral groups at the N-terminus was weaker in a membrane than in an organic solvent.6a Although δ(CF3) values in DOPC SUVs are markedly different for foldamers 5b and 5c compared to their δ(CF3) values in organic solvents, the sense of the h.e. in each foldamer is the same in DOPC as it is in organic solvents. Similarly, the chemical shift difference between diastereomers 5b and 5c is comparable in each environment (−0.222 ppm in SUVs, −0.284 ppm in CD3CN).

To confirm that these differences in δ(CF3) are not due to variations between SUV populations, a 1:1 mixture of the diastereomeric pair 5b and 5c was prepared and included in SUVs. The resulting 19F NMR spectrum (Figure 8) shows two overlapping broad peaks which are in approximately the same position as in the 19F NMR spectra of the individual foldamers in SUVs. Line fitting analysis of the two overlapping peaks gives a 1:1 ratio, confirming that these foldamers have similar propensities to be incorporated into SUVs (Figure S18).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Partial 19F NMR spectrum (1:9 D2O/H2O, 470 MHz, 298 K, [NaCl] = 100 mM, [MOPS] = 20 mM, pH 7.4) of foldamers 5b and 5c (1:1) in DOPC vesicles. Spectrum referenced to KF at −125.300 ppm.

The observation of a single broad signal for each of these tetrameric Aib foldamers in SUV membranes, despite the inner and outer leaflets forming distinct bilayer environments (Figure 7a), could have two possible explanations. If exchange of the 19F-labeled foldamers between leaflets is fast, then a single signal may be observed.36 Alternatively, if exchange is slow, then the chemical shifts may be coincident.18 To obtain more insights, the shift reagent Pr(III) was used. Addition of Pr(III) (2 mM) to blank DOPC SUVs shifted the outer leaflet phospholipid 31P NMR signals to produce two resonances, one each for inner and outer leaflets (Figure S17).37 A similar titration of Pr(III) (up to 5 mM) into DOPC SUVs containing 5b showed that the CF319F resonances from nonincorporated 5b (at −81.2 ppm) and added fluoride ions broadened and disappeared, but the broad CF3 resonance from membrane-embedded 5b did not split or move (Figure S16). This confirms that the foldamer has embedded in the membrane but the absence of any splitting or shifting prevents further conclusive analysis. Nonetheless, previous computational and linear dichroism studies on similar Aib tetramers suggest that 6 will be buried in the hydrophobic region of the bilayer with its helical axis oriented parallel to the bilayer surface.8b

Because the opposite chirality of the TFEA reporter is available, the effect of phospholipid chirality on foldamer conformation could be assessed. ssNMR studies on foldamers with the Fib reporter had suggested that the effect of bilayer chirality on h.e. is small,6a but enantiomers of a fluorescently labeled foldamer had shown a clear spectroscopic difference, although the magnitude of induction by the bilayer could not be quantified.9 Azido-capped Aib tetramer 7 (Scheme 1), the enantiomer of 6, was prepared and incorporated into DOPC SUVs. The respective NMR spectra showed broad peaks at −82.931 ppm for 6 in DOPC SUVs and –82.967 ppm for 7 in DOPC SUVs, a difference of only +36 ppb (Figure S19). This is much less than the difference between the Phe-capped pair 5b and 5c in DOPC SUVs (222 ppb) and is similar to the standard error (SE) for these δ(CF3) measurements (SE = 21 ppb, calculated from different preparations of 6 in DOPC SUVs). This suggests that the magnitude of M helix induction by natural DOPC on these foldamers is small, corresponding to an h.e.0 between 0 and –0.08 and much less than the effect of a chiral controller at the N-terminus.

Conclusions

The (R)-TFEA group can report on changes in the ratio of P helical to M helical conformations of Aib foldamers both in organic solvents and the membranes of phospholipid vesicles. The isosteric relationship between CF3 and methyl did not prevent this reporter from perturbing foldamer helical excess (h.e.), but (R)-TFEA still proved to be an effective reporter of h.e. in both environments. X-ray crystallography showed that helical induction from (R)-TFEA at the C-terminus did not overcome the preference of a strong M-helix inducer, d-αMeVal, although it could compete against the relatively weak controller l-Phe.

Variable temperature 19F NMR spectroscopy of Aib tetramers 5a-c, 5g-f allowed the measured chemical shifts of the CF3 resonances of 5a-g, 6 in organic solvents to be fitted to a simple model that correlated chemical shift with the reported helical preference of each N-terminal residue. This model confirmed that the (R)-TFEA reporter has a relatively weak bias for P helix over M helix (P/M ∼ 4). Similar chiral NMR reporters should also be effective provided that their chiral induction is less or similar to that of (R)-TFEA; stronger preferences will result in a loss of response to increases in one or other helical conformer.

Because this reporter provided conformational information from within the bilayers of intact phospholipid vesicles, it allowed us to verify that conformational preference from solution is maintained in phospholipid bilayers.6a,6b,8a,9 Both helical sense and differences in magnitude were reflected in the position of the broadened CF3 resonance. The respective resonances in bilayers from enantiomeric foldamers 6 (with (R)-TFEA) and 7 (with (S)-TFEA) also revealed that the magnitude of helical induction by natural (R)-phospholipids was not significant.9 The resonances from the (R)-TFEA reporter were sufficiently narrow that mixtures of diastereomeric foldamers in DOPC SUVs gave resolvable signals, which establishes a pathway to real-time NMR studies of P/M switching of Aib foldamer conformation induced by external stimuli.

The observation of resolvable 19F NMR signals from intact SUVs has allowed insight into important processes, including membrane partitioning and interactions with added ions in solution, that are not easily observable by ssNMR spectroscopy. Intact SUVs are more relevant to the structure of intact cells as they have enclosed volumes with defined chemical environments and may permit better mimics of GPCR function to be developed. For example, the use of SUVs may permit membrane-spanning foldamers undergoing conformational change to have dynamic interactions with encapsulated soluble reagents, producing outcomes that can be studied by the full suite of multinuclear NMR spectroscopic techniques.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC; grants EP/P027067/1 and EP/K039547/1) for funding and the University of Manchester Mass Spectrometry Service Centre for high-resolution mass spectrometry. All data supporting this study are provided are provided as the Supporting Information accompanying this paper.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.2c09103.

  • Experimental section and synthetic overview for compounds 5a–g, 6, and 7; FT-IR measurements; CD measurements; data modeling; and crystal data and structure refinement (PDF)

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ja2c09103_si_001.pdf (3.9MB, pdf)

References

  1. a Sato K.; Sasaki R.; Matsuda R.; Nakagawa M.; Ekimoto T.; Yamane T.; Ikeguchi M.; Tabata K. V.; Noji H.; Kinbara K. Supramolecular Mechanosensitive Potassium Channel Formed by Fluorinated Amphiphilic Cyclophane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 11802–11809. 10.1021/jacs.2c04118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Yan Z.-J.; Wang D.; Ye Z.; Fan T.; Wu G.; Deng L.; Yang L.; Li B.; Liu J.; Ma T.; Dong C.; Li Z.-T.; Xiao L.; Wang Y.; Wang W.; Hou J.-L. Artificial Aquaporin That Restores Wound Healing of Impaired Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 15638–15643. 10.1021/jacs.0c00601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Zheng S.-P.; Huang L.-B.; Sun Z.; Barboiu M. Self-Assembled Artificial Ion-Channels toward Natural Selection of Functions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 566–597. 10.1002/anie.201915287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Qi S.; Zhang C.; Yu H.; Zhang J.; Yan T.; Lin Z.; Yang B.; Dong Z. Foldamer-Based Potassium Channels with High Ion Selectivity and Transport Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 3284–3288. 10.1021/jacs.0c12128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Yan T.; Liu S.; Xu J.; Sun H.; Yu S.; Liu J. Unimolecular Helix-Based Transmembrane Nanochannel with a Smallest Luminal Cavity of 1 Å Expressing High Proton Selectivity and Transport Activity. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 10462–10468. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Yoo S. H.; Li B.; Dolain C.; Pasco M.; Guichard G. Urea based foldamers. Methods Enzymol. 2021, 656, 59–92. 10.1016/bs.mie.2021.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. a Langton M. J. Engineering of stimuli-responsive lipid-bilayer membranes using supramolecular systems. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2021, 5, 46–61. 10.1038/s41570-020-00233-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Kocsis I.; Ding Y.; Williams N. H.; Hunter C. A. Transmembrane signal transduction by cofactor transport. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 12377–12382. 10.1039/D1SC03910E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c della Sala F.; Tilly D. P.; Webb S. J.. Approaches Towards Synthetic Signal Transduction in Phospholipid Bilayers in New Trends in Macromolecular and Supramolecular Chemistry for Biological Applications, Abadie M. J. M., Eds.; Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2021; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]; d Bekus R.; Schrader T. Artificial Signal Transduction. ChemistryOpen 2020, 9, 667–682. 10.1002/open.201900367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Vanuytsel S.; Carniello J.; Wallace M. I. Artificial Signal Transduction across Membranes. ChemBioChem 2019, 20, 2569–2580. 10.1002/cbic.201900254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. a Borsley S.; Leigh D. A.; Roberts B. M. W. Chemical fuels for molecular machinery. Nat. Chem. 2022, 14, 728–738. 10.1038/s41557-022-00970-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Kassem S.; Lee A. T. L.; Leigh D. A.; Marcos V.; Palmer L. I.; Pisano S. Stereodivergent synthesis with a programmable molecular machine. Nature 2017, 549, 374–378. 10.1038/nature23677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tilly D. P.; Cullen W.; Zhong H.; Jamagne R.; Vitórica-Yrezábal I.; Webb S. J. α-Amino-iso-Butyric Acid Foldamers Terminated with Rhodium(I) N-Heterocyclic Carbene Catalysts. Chem. – Eur. J. 2022, 28, e202104293 10.1002/chem.202104293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. a Dolain C.; Jiang H.; Léger J.-M.; Guionneau P.; Huc I. Chiral Induction in Quinoline-Derived Oligoamide Foldamers: Assignment of Helical Handedness and Role of Steric Effects. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12943–12951. 10.1021/ja0527828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Le Bailly B. A. F.; Clayden J. Dynamic Foldamer Chemistry. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 4852–4863. 10.1039/C6CC00788K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Zheng L.; Zhan Y.; Yu C.; Huang F.; Wang Y.; Jiang H. Controlling Helix Sense at N- and C-Termini in Quinoline Oligoamide Foldamers by β-Pinene-Derived Pyridyl Moieties. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1482–1485. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Morris D. T. J.; Wales S. M.; Tilly D. P.; Farrar E. H. E.; Grayson M. N.; Ward J. W.; Clayden J. A molecular communication channel consisting of a single reversible chain of hydrogen bonds in a conformationally flexible oligomer. Chem 2021, 7, 2460–2472. 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. a De Poli M.; Zawodny W.; Quinonero O.; Lorch M.; Webb S. J.; Clayden J. Conformational photoswitching of a synthetic peptide foldamer bound within a phospholipid bilayer. Science 2016, 352, 575–580. 10.1126/science.aad8352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Lister F. G. A.; Le Bailly B. A. F.; Webb S. J.; Clayden J. Ligand-modulated conformational switching in a fully synthetic membrane-bound receptor. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 420–425. 10.1038/nchem.2736. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Wechsel R.; Žabka M.; Ward J. W.; Clayden J. Competing Hydrogen-Bond Polarities in a Dynamic Oligourea Foldamer: A Molecular Spring Torsion Balance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 3528–3531. 10.1021/jacs.8b00567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Pollastrini M.; Marafon G.; Clayden J.; Moretto A. Light-mediated control of activity in a photosensitive foldamer that mimics an esterase. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 2269–2272. 10.1039/D0CC08309G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Eccles N.; Le Bailly B. A. F.; della Sala F.; Vitórica-Yrezábal I. J.; Clayden J.; Webb S. J. Remote conformational responses to enantiomeric excess in carboxylate-binding dynamic foldamers. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 9331–9334. 10.1039/C9CC03895G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Wales S. M.; Morris D. T. J.; Clayden J. Reversible Capture and Release of a Ligand Mediated by a Long-Range Relayed Polarity Switch in a Urea Oligomer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 2841–2846. 10.1021/jacs.1c11928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Peters A. D.; Borsley S.; della Sala F.; Cairns-Gibson D. F.; Leonidou M.; Clayden J.; Whitehead G. F. S.; Vitórica-Yrezábal I. J.; Takano E.; Burthem J.; Cockroft S. L.; Webb S. J. Switchable foldamer ion channels with antibacterial activity. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 7023–7030. 10.1039/D0SC02393K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. a Lizio M. G.; Andrushchenko V.; Pike S. J.; Peters A. D.; Whitehead G. F. S.; Vitórica-Yrezábal I. J.; Mutter S. T.; Clayden J.; Bouř P.; Blanch E. W.; Webb S. J. Optically Active Vibrational Spectroscopy of α-Aminoisobutyric Acid Foldamers in Organic Solvents and Phospholipid Bilayers. Chem. – Eur. J. 2018, 24, 9399–9408. 10.1002/chem.201801121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Lizio M. G.; Campana M.; De Poli M.; Jefferies D. F.; Cullen W.; Andrushchenko V.; Chmel N. P.; Bouř P.; Khalid S.; Clayden J.; Blanch E.; Rodger A.; Webb S. J. Insight into the Mechanism of Action and Peptide-Membrane Interactions of Aib-Rich Peptides: Multitechnique Experimental and Theoretical Analysis. ChemBioChem 2021, 22, 1656–1667. 10.1002/cbic.202000834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lister F. G. A.; Eccles N.; Pike S. J.; Brown R. A.; Whitehead G. F. S.; Raftery J.; Webb S. J.; Clayden J. Bis-pyrene probes of foldamer conformation in solution and in phospholipid bilayers. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 6860–6870. 10.1039/C8SC02532K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pike S. J.; De Poli M.; Zawodny W.; Raftery J.; Webb S. J.; Clayden J. Diastereotopic fluorine substituents as 19F NMR probes of screw-sense preference in helical foldamers. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 3168–3176. 10.1039/c3ob40463c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Michurin O. M.; Tolmachova K.; Afonin S.; Babii O.; Grage S. L.; Ulrich A. S.; Komarov I. V.; Radchenko D. S. Conformationally Constrained Mono-Fluorinated Arginine as a Cationic Label for Solid-State 19F NMR Analysis of Membrane-Bound Peptides. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 3826–3833. 10.1002/ejoc.201800473. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. a Maisch D.; Wadhwani P.; Afonin S.; Böttcher C.; Koksch B.; Ulrich A. S. Chemical Labeling Strategy with (R)- and (S)-Trifluoromethylalanine for Solid State 19F NMR Analysis of Peptaibols in Membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15596–15597. 10.1021/ja9067595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Ieronimo M.; Afonin S.; Koch K.; Berditsch M.; Wadhwani P.; Ulrich A. S. 19F NMR Analysis of the Antimicrobial Peptide PGLa Bound to Native Cell Membranes from Bacterial Protoplasts and Human Erythrocytes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8822–8824. 10.1021/ja101608z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Misiewicz J.; Afonin S.; Grage S. L.; van den Berg J.; Strandberg E.; Wadhwani P.; Ulrich A. S. Action of the multifunctional peptide BP100 on native biomembranes examined by solid-state NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 2015, 61, 287–298. 10.1007/s10858-015-9897-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Grage S. L.; Kara S.; Bordessa A.; Doan V.; Rizzolo F.; Putzu M.; Kubař T.; Papini A. M.; Chaume G.; Brigaud T.; Afonin S.; Ulrich A. S. Orthogonal 19F-Labeling for Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy Reveals the Conformation and Orientation of Short Peptaibols in Membranes. Chem. – Eur. J. 2018, 24, 4328–4335. 10.1002/chem.201704307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Su Y.; DeGrado W. F.; Hong M. Orientation, Dynamics, and Lipid Interaction of an Antimicrobial Arylamide Investigated by 19F and 31P Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 9197–9205. 10.1021/ja103658h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Marsh E. N. G.; Suzuki Y. Using 19F NMR to Probe Biological Interactions of Proteins and Peptides. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 1242–1250. 10.1021/cb500111u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. a Suzuki Y.; Buer B. C.; Al-Hashimi H. M.; Marsh E. N. G. Using Fluorine Nuclear Magnetic Resonance To Probe Changes in the Structure and Dynamics of Membrane-Active Peptides Interacting with Lipid Bilayers. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 5979–5987. 10.1021/bi200639c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Buer B. C.; Levin B. J.; Marsh E. N. G. Perfluoro-tert-butyl-homoserine as a sensitive 19F NMR reporter for peptide-membrane interactions in solution. J. Pept. Sci. 2013, 19, 308–314. 10.1002/psc.2501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Strandberg E.; Ulrich A. S. Flow charts for the systematic solid-state 19F/2H-NMR structure analysis of membrane-bound peptides. Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 2020, 99, 79–118. 10.1016/bs.arnmr.2019.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fenske D. B. Structural and motional properties of vesicles as revealed by nuclear magnetic resonance. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1993, 64, 143–162. 10.1016/0009-3084(93)90063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu W.-G.; Dowd S. R.; Simplaceanu V.; Peng Z.-Y.; Ho C. 19F NMR Investigation of Molecular Motion and Packing in Sonicated Phospholipid Vesicles. Biochemistry 1985, 24, 7153–7161. 10.1021/bi00346a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Buer B. C.; Chugh J.; Al-Hashimi H. M.; Marsh E. N. G. Using Fluorine Nuclear Magnetic Resonance To Probe the Interaction of Membrane-Active Peptides with the Lipid Bilayer. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 5760–5765. 10.1021/bi100605e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Solà J.; Fletcher S. P.; Castellanos A.; Clayden J. Nanometer-Range Communication of Stereochemical Information by Reversible Switching of Molecular Helicity. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6836–6839. 10.1002/anie.201001130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bodero L.; Guitot K.; Lensen N.; Lequin O.; Brigaud T.; Ongeri S.; Chaume G. Introducing the Chiral Constrained α-Trifluoromethylalanine in Aib Foldamers to Control, Quantify and Assign the Helical Screw-Sense. Chem. – Eur. J. 2022, 28, e202103887 10.1002/chem.202103887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Solà J.; Helliwell M.; Clayden J. N- versus C-Terminal Control over the Screw-Sense Preference of the Configurationally Achiral, Conformationally Helical Peptide Motif Aib8GlyAib8. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4548–4549. 10.1021/ja100662d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. a Byrne L.; Solà J.; Boddaert T.; Marcelli T.; Adams R. W.; Morris G. A.; Clayden J. Foldamer-Mediated Remote Stereocontrol: >1,60 Asymmetric Induction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 151–155. 10.1002/anie.201308264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Clayden J.; Castellanos A.; Solà J.; Morris G. A. Quantifying End-to-End Conformational Communication of Chirality through an Achiral Peptide Chain. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5962–5965. 10.1002/anie.200901892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Pike S. J.; Diemer V.; Raftery J.; Webb S. J.; Clayden J. Designing Foldamer-Foldamer Interactions in Solution: The Roles of Helix Length and Terminus Functionality in Promoting the Self-Association of Aminoisobutyric Acid Oligomers. Chem. – Eur. J. 2014, 20, 15981–15990. 10.1002/chem.201403626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Solà J.; Morris G. A.; Clayden J. Measuring Screw-Sense Preference in a Helical Oligomer by Comparison of 13C NMR Signal Separation at Slow and Fast Exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3712–3715. 10.1021/ja1097034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Silva R. A. G. D.; Yasui S. C.; Kubelka J.; Formaggio F.; Crisma M.; Toniolo C.; Keiderling T. A. Discriminating 310- from α-helices: Vibrational and electronic CD and IR absorption study of related Aib-containing oligopeptides. Biopolymers 2002, 65, 229–243. 10.1002/bip.10241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cheng G.; Xia B.; Wu Q.; Lin X. Chemoenzymatic dynamic kinetic resolution of α-trifluoromethylated amines: influence of substitutions on the reversed stereoselectivity. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 9820–9828. 10.1039/c3ra40526e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. See Figure 3 in; Brown R. A.; Marcelli T.; De Poli M.; Solà J.; Clayden J. Induction of Unexpected Left-Handed Helicity by an N-Terminal L-Amino Acid in an Otherwise Achiral Peptide Chain. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1395–1399. 10.1002/anie.201107583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Venkatachalam C. M. Stereochemical criteria for polypeptides and proteins. V. Conformation of a system of three linked peptide units. Biopolymers 1968, 6, 1425–1436. 10.1002/bip.1968.360061006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. De Poli M.; De Zotti M.; Raftery J.; Aguilar J. A.; Morris G. A.; Clayden J. Left-Handed Helical Preference in an Achiral Peptide Chain Is Induced by an L-Amino Acid in an N-Terminal Type II β-Turn. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 2248–2255. 10.1021/jo302705k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. De Poli M.; Byrne L.; Brown R. A.; Solà J.; Castellanos A.; Boddaert T.; Wechsel R.; Beadle J. D.; Clayden J. Engineering the Structure of an N-Terminal β-Turn To Maximize Screw-Sense Preference in Achiral Helical Peptide Chains. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 4659–4675. 10.1021/jo500714b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rosenau C. P.; Jelier B. J.; Gossert A. D.; Togni A. Exposing the Origins of Irreproducibility in Fluorine NMR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 9528–9533. 10.1002/anie.201802620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Brown R. A.; Diemer V.; Webb S. J.; Clayden J. End-to-end conformational communication through a synthetic purinergic receptor by ligand-induced helicity switching. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 853–860. 10.1038/nchem.1747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. a Reid D. G.; Jackson J.; Tew D. G.; Gribble A. D. A fluorine-19 NMR study of interactions between the ATP-citrate lyase inhibitor SB-200517 and Model Membranes. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1995, 75, 93–96. 10.1016/0009-3084(94)02396-M. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Joyce R. E.; Williams T. L.; Serpell L. C.; Day I. J. Monitoring changes of paramagnetically-shifted 31P signals in phospholipid vesicles. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2016, 648, 124–129. 10.1016/j.cplett.2016.02.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. 80% D2O in CD3OD was sufficient to remove the helical relay in an Ac(αMeVal)-capped tetramer. See Le Bailly B. A. F.Controlling macromolecular conformation for the nanoscale transmission of information, Ph.D. Thesis; University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K., 2015. [Google Scholar]
  35. a Hinton D. P.; Johnson C. S. Jr. Diffusion ordered 2D NMR spectroscopy of phospholipid vesicles: determination of vesicle size distributions. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 9064–9072. 10.1021/j100137a038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Stilbs P.; Arvidson G.; Lindblom G. Vesicle membrane-water partition coefficients determined from Fourier transform pulsed-gradient spin-echo NMR based self-diffusion data. Application to anesthetic binding in tetracaine-phosphatidylcholine-water systems. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1984, 35, 309–314. 10.1016/0009-3084(84)90073-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Cavanaugh J. R.; Pfeffer P. E. 19F-Nuclear magnetic resonance of fluorine-labeled fatty acids in phospholipid bilayer vesicles. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1988, 49, 87–96. 10.1016/0009-3084(88)90068-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Grandjean J.; Laszlo P. Synergistic transport of praseodymium(3+) across lipid bilayers in the presence of two chemically distinct ionophores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 1472–1476. 10.1021/ja00317a048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ja2c09103_si_001.pdf (3.9MB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of the American Chemical Society are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES