Skip to main content
The Clinical Respiratory Journal logoLink to The Clinical Respiratory Journal
. 2022 Oct 18;16(12):777–792. doi: 10.1111/crj.13552

The association of chronic liver disorders with exacerbation of symptoms and complications related to COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of cohort studies

Maryam Afraie 1, Pardis Mohammadzedeh 1, Mobin Azami 2, Sorour Khateri 3, Kamran Zamani 2, Farhad Moradpour 4, Yousef Moradi 4,
PMCID: PMC9716710  PMID: 36254683

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this review was to combine the results of published cohort studies to determine the exact association between chronic liver disorders, and the severe form of COVID‐19, and its associated complications.

Methods

This meta‐analysis employed a keyword search (COVID‐19 and chronic liver disorders) using PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Embase (Elsevier). All articles related from January 2019 to May 2022 were reviewed. The STATA software was used for analysis.

Results

The risk of death in COVID‐19 patients with chronic liver disorders was higher than in ones without the chronic liver disease (RR: 1.52; CI 95%: 1.46–1.57; I 2: 86.14%). Also, the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and hospitalization in COVID‐19 patients with chronic liver disorders was higher than in ones without the chronic liver disease ([RR: 1.65; CI 95%: 1.09–2.50; I 2: 0.00%] and [RR: 1.39; CI 95%: 1.23–1.58; I 2: 0.20%]). Also, the meta‐analysis showed cough, headache, myalgia, nausea, diarrhea, and fatigue were 1.37 (CI 95%: 1.20–1.55), 1.23 (CI 95%: 1.09–1.38), 1.25 (CI 95%: 1.04–1.50), 1.19 (CI 95%: 1.02–1.40), 1.89 (CI 95%: 1.30–2.75), 1.49 (CI 95%: 1.07–2.09), and 1.14 (CI 95%: 0.98–1.33), respectively, whereas the risk of all these symptoms was higher in COVID‐19 patients with chronic liver diseases than ones without chronic liver disorders.

Conclusion

The mortality and complications due to COVID‐19 were significantly different between patients with the chronic liver disease and the general population.

Keywords: chronic liver disease, complications, COVID‐19, meta‐analysis, mortality


The risk of death in COVID‐19 patients with chronic liver disorders was higher than in ones without the chronic liver disease (RR: 1.52; CI 95%: 1.46–1.57; I 2: 86.14%).

graphic file with name CRJ-16-777-g003.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

The chronic liver disease (CLD) is a progressive deterioration of liver function over 6 months, which slowly progresses, leaving the liver unable to synthesize coagulation factors, and proteins, detoxify harmful metabolic products, and excrete bile. 1 , 2 It is a continuous process of inflammation, destruction, and regeneration of the liver parenchyma, which leads to fibrosis and cirrhosis. 1 , 3 CLD is caused by a wide range of causes, including toxins, long‐term alcohol abuse, infection, autoimmune diseases, genetic disorders, and metabolic disorders. 1 , 4 Cirrhosis is the final stage of CLD, which leads to liver dysfunction, extensive nodule formation, vascular reorganization, neo‐angiogenesis, and extracellular matrix deposition. 1 , 5 , 6 The underlying mechanism of fibrosis and cirrhosis at the cellular level is the uptake of stellate cells and fibroblasts, which leads to fibrosis while parenchymal regeneration relies on liver stem cells. 1 , 7 The CLD is a very common clinical condition and the focus is more on its common causes, clinical manifestations and management. 1 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 About 1.5 billion people worldwide have CLD, which causes more than 2 million deaths a year. 9 , 12 With the rapid spread of COVID‐19, there are considerable concerns that patients with CLD are a vulnerable population and at higher risks for the more severe form of COVID‐19 and its associated complications. 13 Early on, patients with underlying diseases such as diabetes, chronic lung diseases, cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, and cancer were labeled as those at high risks for severe COVID‐19. 14 Although the virus mainly affects the lungs, experiences of China and the United States suggest SARS‐CoV‐2 may affect extra‐pulmonary systems, including the gastrointestinal and hepato‐biliary systems. 15 , 16

However, it was not initially clear whether patients with the CLD were more susceptible to COVID‐19. Data from some recent studies showed the CLD in the absence of immunosuppressive therapy was not associated with an increased risk of COVID‐19, 17 whereas results from other studies showed the CLD, including patients with cirrhosis and non‐cirrhosis, was associated with higher rates of mortality because of COVID‐19. 18 , 19 , 20 Also, various reports from different countries showed more than half of the hospitalized adults due to COVID‐19 had abnormal aminotransferase levels and 2% to 11% of them had underlying liver diseases. 17 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 However, there are limited and conflicting reports on the liver disease nature among COVID‐19 patients, and it is unclear how underlying CLD affects liver injuries and clinical outcomes in these patients. 26 Due to the discrepancies in the results of previous studies and the importance of determining the association between various underlying diseases, especially liver disorders, and COVID‐19 and its severe form, the authors in this meta‐analysis decided to combine the results of published cohort studies to determine the exact association between chronic liver disorders, and the severe form of COVID‐19, and its associated complications.

2. METHODS

The guideline of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) was used to review meta‐analyses, and systematic reviews. 27 Also, the study protocol was registered in PROSPER with the code CRD42022327806.

2.1. Search strategy and screening

The search was performed without language restrictions. The search strategy consisted of the following main keywords extracted from Mesh:

“COVID 19,” “Liver Disease,” and “Chronic Liver Dysfunction.”

Search databases included PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Embase (Elsevier).

The search deadline was from January 1, 2019, to January 1, 2022. Duplicate published articles were removed considering their titles, authors, and publication years using Endnote software version 9. Then, the remaining studies were evaluated by reviewing their titles, abstracts, and full texts, considering the inclusion criteria. In addition to searching the mentioned databases, gray literature was searched by reviewing articles in the first 10 pages of Google scholar, and manual search was performed by reviewing references of related studies. Two authors (MA, MA) independently screened articles based on their titles, abstracts, and full texts, and disputes were resolved by the third one (YM). After screening, the studies were finally selected by evaluating their full texts.

2.2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were defined based on the PECOT structure as follows:

Population included the whole population, whether people with the CLD or healthy ones, exposure was considered as the presence of chronic liver disorders, comparison included comparing healthy people with those with chronic liver disorders, and outcomes included the COVID‐19 symptoms and its associated complications, such as hospitalization in the intensive care unit, death, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The intended studies to conduct meta‐analysis were cohort ones because this type of observational studies is much more important than others to examine the casual association.

Systematic reviews, case reports, case series, case controls, cross sectionals, clinical trials, and other interventional studies as well as letters to the editor were excluded from the present research. Also, studies that met the inclusion criteria but their full texts were not available, first by sending an email to their authors, the full texts were requested and if the authors did not respond, they were removed.

2.3. Data extraction

After three stages of evaluation of titles, abstracts, and full texts, the selected articles were retrieved for detailed analysis. Data were collected using a checklist included authors' names, country, publication year, study type, study population, sample size, data source, age, number of patients with COVID‐19, hospitalization and mortality due to COVID‐19, ARDS, need for ventilation, ICU hospitalization, and evaluation of COVID‐19 symptoms (fever, cough, weakness, chest pain, abdominal pain, CT scan, Chest X‐ray, respiratory problems and shortness of breath, decreased sense of smell decreased sense of taste, fatigue, headache, dizziness, myalgia, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting).

2.4. Risk of bias

Two of the authors (MA and PM) conducted a qualitative evaluation of the studies based on the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) checklist designed to evaluate the quality of observational studies. This tool examines each research with eight items in three groups, including how to select study samples, how to compare and analyze study groups, and how to measure and analyze the desired outcome. Each of these items is given a score of one if it is observed in the studies, and the maximum score for each study is 9 points. In case of discrepancies in the score assigned to the published articles, the discussion method and the third researcher were applied to reach an agreement.

2.5. Statistical analysis

To calculate the association, cumulative risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval and the meta set command were used considering logarithm and logarithm standard deviation of the RR. Heterogeneity was assessed between studies using the I 2 and Q Cochrane tests. Egger test was used to evaluate the publication bias. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 16.0 and P‐value < 0.05 was considered.

3. RESULTS

First, 2251 studies were collected by searching based on the search strategy in the desired databases, of which 491 studies were duplicated, and 1760 ones remained. After reviewing the remained articles based on their titles, abstracts and full texts, 17 studies were selected for analysis. All articles were conducted in 2020 and 2021 and were cohorts (Figure 1 and Tables 1 and 2).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

The flowchart of search strategy and syntax

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of included cohort studies (items related to COVID‐19 complications)

Ref. Authors (years) country Type of study Study population Sample size Data sources Age (male) Number of COVID‐19 Admission to hospital (COVID‐19) Mortality (COVID‐19) ARDS ICU Ventilation
28

Bahardoust, M.

(2021) (Iran)

Cohort

Liver disease + Covid‐19

Covid‐19

Liver disease = 81

Non‐liver disease = 921

Hospital 62.2

Liver disease = 81

Non‐liver disease = 921

Liver disease = 81

Non‐liver disease = 921

Liver disease = 76

non‐liver disease = 598

>7 day

Liver disease = 10

non‐liver disease = 65

NR NR NR
29 Bajaj, J. S. (2021) (use) Cohort

Covid‐19 alone

Covid‐19 + Cirrhosis

Cirrhosis alone

COVID‐19 alone = 108

COV + Cirrhosis = 37

Cirrhosis alone = 127

Hospital 61.3

COVID‐19 alone = 108

COVID‐19 + cirrhosis = 37

COVID‐19 alone = 108

COVID‐19 + cirrhosis = 37

Cirrhosis alone = 127

Covid‐19 = 15

Covid‐19 + Cirrhosis = 11

Cirrhosis = 24

NR

Covid‐19 = 41

Covid‐19 + Cirrhosis = 16

Cirrhosis = 31

Covid‐19 = 41

COVID‐19 + Cirrhosis = 14

Cirrhosis = 18

30

Davidov‐Derevynko, Y. (2021)

(Israel)

Cohort

COVID + Liver

COVID + non‐Liver

Covid‐19 = 323

Covid‐19 + Liver = 59

hospital 59.1

COVID‐19 = 323

COVID‐19 + Liver = 59

COVID‐19 = 323

COVID‐19 + Liver = 59

COVID‐19 = 22

COVID‐19 + Liver = 10

NR

COVID‐19 = 36

COVID‐19 + Liver = 9

COVID‐19 = 35

COVID‐19 + Liver = 9

31 Forlano, R. (2020) (England) Cohort

NAFLD + Covid‐19

Non‐NAFLD + Covid‐19

NAFLD + Covid‐19 = 61

Covid‐19 = 132

Hospital 70.5

NAFLD +Covid‐19 = 61

Covid‐19 = 132

NAFLD +Covid‐19 = 61

Covid‐19 = 132

NAFLD + Covid‐19 = 18

Covid‐19 = 41

NR

NAFLD + Covid‐19 = 11

Covid‐19 = 27

NR
32 Frager, S. Z. (2021) (USA) Cohort

Covid‐19 id

Covid‐19 + Liver

Covid‐19 = 2895

Covid‐19 + Liver = 457

Hospital

64.8

Covid‐19 = 2895

Covid‐19 + Liver = 457

Covid‐19 = 2895

Covid‐19 + Liver = 457

Covid‐19 = 769

Covid‐19 + Liver = 135

NR NR

Covid‐19 = 522

Covid‐19 + Liver = 108

33 Garrido, M. (2021) (Portugal) Cohort

Covid‐19 id

Covid‐19 + Liver

Covid‐19 = 303

Covid‐19 + Liver = 14

Hospital

70.5

Covid‐19 = 303

Covid‐19 + Liver = 14

Covid‐19 = 303

Covid‐19 + Liver = 14

Covid‐19 = 67

Covid‐19 + Liver = 4

NR NR

Covid‐19 = 18

Covid‐19 + Liver = 1

34 Guerra Veloz, M. F.(2021) (Spain) cohort

Covid‐19

Covid‐19 + Liver

Covid‐19 = 419

Covid‐19 + Liver = 28

40.8

Covid‐19 = 419

Covid‐19 + Liver = 28

Covid‐19 = 200

Covid‐19 + Liver = 26

Covid‐19 = 39

Covid‐19 + Liver = 8

Covid‐19 = 28

Covid‐19 + Liver = 3

Covid‐19 = 19

Covid‐19 + Liver = 2

26 Hashemi, N. (2020) (USA) Cohort

Covid‐19

Covid‐19 + Liver

Covid‐19 = 294

Covid‐19 + Liver = 69

Hospital 64.8

Covid‐19 = 294

Covid‐19 + Liver = 69

Covid‐19 = 294

Covid‐19 + Liver = 69

Covid‐19 = 39

Covid‐19 + Liver = 16

NR

Covid‐19 = 103

Covid‐19 + Liver = 34

Covid‐19 = 89

Covid‐19 + Liver = 33

35 Huang, R. (2020) (China) Cohort

Non‐NAFLD + Covid‐19

NAFLD + Covid‐19

Covid‐19 = 194

Covid‐19 + Liver = 86

Hospital 43.5

Covid‐19 = 194

Covid‐19 + Liver = 86

Covid‐19 = 194

Covid‐19 + Liver = 86

Covid‐19 = 0

Covid‐19 + Liver = 0

Covid‐19 = 2

Covid‐19 + Liver = 2

Covid‐19 = 13

Covid‐19 + Liver = 5

NR
36 Ji, D. (2020) (China) Cohort

Covid‐19

Covid‐19 + Liver

Covid‐19 = 118

Covid‐19 + Liver = 22

Hospital 63.6

Covid‐19 = 118

Covid‐19 + Liver = 22

Covid‐19 = 118

Covid‐19 + Liver = 22

Covid‐19 = 0

Covid‐19 + Liver = 1

NR NR NR
37 Lee, Y. R. (2020) (South Korea) Cohort

Covid‐19

Covid‐19 + Liver

COVID‐19 + Liver = 47

COVID‐19 = 958

Hospital 55.3

COVID‐19 + Liver = 47

COVID‐19 = 958

COVID‐19 + Liver = 47

COVID‐19 = 958

COVID‐19 + Liver = 7

COVID‐19 = 70

COVID‐19 + Liver = 8

COVID‐19 = 105

COVID‐19 + Liver = 8

COVID‐19 = 89

Invasive mechanical ventilation

COVID‐19 + Liver = 4

COVID‐19 = 66

Invasive mechanical ventilation and ECMO

COVID‐19 + Liver = 1

COVID‐19 = 17

38 Li, C. (2020) (China) Cohort

Covid‐19

Covid‐19 + Liver

COVID‐19 + Liver = 52

Covid‐19 = 52

Hospital 58.2

COVID‐19 + Liver = 52

COVID‐19 = 52

COVID‐19 + Liver = 52

COVID‐19 = 52

COVID‐19 + Liver = 9

COVID‐19 = 0

NR NR

Non‐invasive ventilation

COVID‐19 = 2

COVID‐19 + Liver = 5

Invasive mechanical ventilation

COVID‐19 = 1

COVID‐19 + Liver = 5

NO ventilation

COVID‐19 = 49

COVID‐19 + Liver = 42

39 Liaquat, H. (2021) (USA) Cohort

COVID‐19

COVID‐19 + Liver

COVID‐19 = 105

COVID‐19 + Liver = 34

Hospital 73.9

COVID‐19 = 105

COVID‐19 + Liver = 34

COVID‐19 = 105

COVID‐19 + Liver = 34

COVID‐19 = 29

COVID‐19 + Liver = 9

COVID‐19 = 41

COVID‐19 + Liver = 19

COVID‐19 = 25

COVID‐19 + Liver = 14

COVID‐19 = 11

COVID‐19 + Liver = 7

40 Mallet, V. (2020) (France) Cohort

COVID‐19

COVID‐19 + Liver

COVID‐19 = 243 634

COVID‐19 + Liver = 15 476

Hospital 70

COVID‐19 = 243 634

COVID‐19 + Liver = 15 476

COVID‐19 = 243 634

COVID‐19 + Liver = 15 476

COVID‐19 = 35 262

COVID‐19 + Liver = 2941

NR NR

COVID‐19 = 16 449

COVID‐19 + Liver = 1600

41 Ge, J. (2020) (USA) Cohort

1. Noncirrhosis/negative

2. Non‐cirrhosis/positive;

3. Cirrhosis/negative;

4. Cirrhosis/positive

1. Healthy = 128 864

2. COVID‐19 = 29 446

3. Cirrhosis = 53 476

4. Cirrhosis + Covid‐19 = 8941

Pop 53

2. COVID‐19 = 29 446

4. Cirrhosis + Covid‐19 = 8941

NR NR NR NR NR
19 Singh, S. (2020) (USA) Cohort

Covid‐19 + Liver

Covid‐19

All = 2780

Covid‐19 + Liver = 250

Covid‐19 = 2530

Pop 55.2

All = 2780

Covid‐19 + Liver = 250

Covid‐19 = 2530

Covid‐19 + Liver = 130

Covid‐19 = 760

Covid‐19 + Liver = 30

Covid‐19 = 110

NR NR NR
42 Younossi, Z. M. (2021) (USA) Cohort

NAFLD + Covid‐19

Non‐NAFLD + Covid‐19

NAFLD = 553

Non‐NAFLD = 2736

Hospital 54.7

NAFLD = 553

Non‐NAFLD = 2736

NAFLD = 553

Non‐NAFLD = 2736

NAFLD = 60

Non‐NAFLD = 239

NR

NAFLD = 196

Non‐NAFLD = 726

NAFLD = 76

Non‐NAFLD = 221

TABLE 2.

Characteristics of included cohort studies (items related to signs and symptoms of COVID‐19)

Fever Cough Chest pain Dizziness Headache Myalgia Diarrhea Vomiting Test sense Shortness of breath Abdominal pain Fatigue Dyspnea
28

Liver disease

≥38.5 = 35

<38.5 = 46

Non‐liver disease

≥38.5 = 175

<38.5 = 746

Liver disease = 47

Non‐liver disease = 552

Liver disease = 20

Non‐liver disease = 221

Liver disease = 20

Non‐liver disease = 313

Liver disease = 26

Non‐liver disease =

275

Liver disease = 49

Non‐liver disease = 485

Liver disease = 39

Non‐liver disease = 230

Liver disease = 37

Non‐liver disease = 276

Liver disease = 13

Non‐liver disease = 166

NR NR NR NR
29

Covid‐19 = 75

Covid‐19 + Cirrhosis = 20

Covid‐19 = 70

Covid‐19 + Cirrhosis = 26

Covid‐19 = 19

Covid‐19 + Cirrhosis = 3

Covid‐19 = 8

Covid‐19 + Cirrhosis = 4

Covid‐19 = 15

Covid‐19 + Cirrhosis = 2

Covid‐19 = 31

Covid‐19 + Cirrhosis = 4

Covid‐19 = 29

Covid‐19 + Cirrhosis = 3

Covid‐19 = 29

Covid‐19 + Cirrhosis = 4

NR

Covid‐19 = 74

Covid‐19 + Cirrhosis = 23

Covid‐19 = 17

Covid‐19 + Cirrhosis = 9

Covid‐19 = 44

Covid‐19 + Cirrhosis = 12

NR
33

Covid‐19 = 174

Covid‐19 + Liver = 8

Covid‐19 = 185

Covid‐19 + Liver = 10

NR NR

Covid‐19 = 46

Covid‐19 + Liver = 0

Covid‐19 = 69

Covid‐19 + Liver = 2

Covid‐19 = 38

Covid‐19 + Liver = 2

Covid‐19 = 23

Covid‐19 + Liver = 1

NR NR

Covid‐19 = 17

Covid‐19 + Liver = 2

Covid‐19 = 82

Covid‐19 + Liver = 3

Covid‐19 = 108

Covid‐19 + Liver = 6

35

Covid‐19 = 132

Covid‐19 + Liver = 55

Covid‐19 = 109

Covid‐19 + Liver = 47

NR NR

Covid‐19 = 16

Covid‐19 + Liver = 3

Covid‐19 = 21

Covid‐19 + Liver = 7

NR NR NR

Covid‐19 = 16

Covid‐19 + Liver = 7

NR

Covid‐19 = 42

Covid‐19 + Liver = 16

NR
37

COVID‐19 + Liver = 24

COVID‐19 = 425

COVID‐19 + Liver = 23

COVID‐19 = 544

NR NR

COVID‐19 + Liver = 8

COVID‐19 = 245

COVID‐19 + Liver = 9

COVID‐19 = 316

NR NR NR

COVID‐19 + Liver = 15

COVID‐19 = 232

NR NR NR
42

NAFLD = 319

Non‐NAFLD = 1283

NAFLD = 318

Non‐NAFLD = 1273

NAFLD = 23

Non‐NAFLD = 72

NAFLD = 74

Non‐NAFLD = 240

NAFLD = 101

Non‐NAFLD = 363

NR NR

NAFLD = 23

Non‐NAFLD = 72

NAFLD = 316

Non‐NAFLD = 1519

NAFLD = 144

Non‐NAFLD = 588

The risk of death in COVID‐19 patients with chronic liver disorders was compared with that in ones without the CLD in 15 studies. 19 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 42 In all of these studies, the mortality rate in patients with COVID‐19, and the CLD was higher than that in patients with COVID‐19, and without the CLD. 19 , 26 , 28 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 The cumulative RR after combining these studies was 1.52 (CI 95%: 1.46–1.57; I 2: 86.14%) (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

The pooled effect (risk ratio, RR) of chronic liver disorders on the mortality and admission to ICU related to COVID‐19

The risk of ARDS in patients with COVID‐19 who had chronic liver disorders was compared in three studies with those without chronic liver disorders. 35 , 37 , 39 The cumulative RR after combining these studies was 1.65 (CI 95%: 1.09–2.50; I 2: 0.00%) (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Results of meta‐analysis and reports pooled odds ratio based on symptoms and complications related to COVID‐19

Outcomes No. of study (SS) Sample size liver disease Sample size non‐liver disease No. of Covid‐19 Pooled RR Heterogeneity assessment
A B C D I 2 P‐value Test Q
Outcomes of Covid‐19 Mortality 15 (272767) 17 240 255 527 3269 33 767 13 971 221 760 1.52 (1.46–1.57) 86.14% 0.00 100.97
ARDS 3 (1424) 167 1257 29 148 138 1109 1.65 (1.09–2.50) 0.00% 1.00 0.00
ICU 9 (6243) 974 5269 296 1088 678 4181 1.39 (1.23–1.58) 0.00% 0.31 0.64
Ventilation 11 (268653) 16 826 251 827 1864 17 474 14 962 234 353 1.53 (1.46–1.60) 0.00% 0.86 5.50
Covid‐19 symptoms Fever 6 (6037) 818 5219 461 2264 357 2955 1.37 (1.20–1.55) 81.32% 0.00 26.77
Cough 8 (6280) 904 5376 536 2849 368 2527 1.23 (1.09–1.38) 46.65% 0.07 13.12
Chest pain 2 (1146) 118 1028 23 240 95 788 0.92 (0.59–1.42) 32.41% 0.22 1.48
Dizziness 3 (4435) 671 3764 47 393 624 3371 1.12 (0.85–1.48) 70.49% 0.03 6.78
Headache 5 (6037) 818 5219 113 837 705 4382 1.25 (1.04–1.50) 64.72% 0.02 11.34
Myalgia 6 (6037) 818 5219 172 1285 646 3934 1.19 (1.02–1.40) 67.92% 0.01 15.59
Diarrhea 3 (1463) 132 1331 44 297 88 1034 1.89 (1.30–2.75) 83.88% 0.00 12.41
Vomiting 3 (1463) 132 1331 42 328 90 1003 1.44 (0.99–2.09) 75.22% 0.02 8.07
Test sense 2 (4290) 634 3656 36 238 598 3418 1.26 (0.93–1.71) 53.75% 0.14 2.16
Shortness of breath 4 (4719) 723 3996 361 1841 362 2155 1.05 (0.92–1.21) 0.00% 0.60 1.89
Abdominal pain 2 (462) 51 411 11 34 40 377 1.61 (0.91–2.85) 0.00% 0.47 0.53
Fatigue 4 (4031) 690 3341 175 756 515 2585 1.14 (0.98–1.33) 28.31% 0.24 4.18
Dyspnea 3 (560) 100 460 49 198 51 262 1.49 (1.07–2.09) 0.00% 0.96 0.08

Note: A: COVID‐19 individual with CLD; B: Healthy individual with CLD; C: COVID‐19 individual without CLD; D: Healthy individual without CLD.

The risk of hospitalization of COVID‐19 patients who had chronic liver disorders in the intensive care unit was compared with that of ones without the CLD in nine studies, 26 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 37 , 39 , 42 , 43 in all of which the risk of hospitalization in the ICU was higher in the group of COVID‐19 patients with the CLD. 26 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 37 , 39 The cumulative RR after combining these studies was 1.39 (CI 95%: 1.23–1.58) with heterogeneity (I 2) of 0.2% (Figure 2).

The risk of need for ventilation in COVID‐19 patients who had the CLD was evaluated in 11 studies compared with those who did not have chronic liver disorders. 26 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 42 In all of these studies, the need for ventilation was higher in the group with the CLD 26 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 The frequency of need for ventilation was higher in the group of patients with COVID‐19 and liver disorders. 42 The cumulative RR after combining these studies was 1.53 (CI 95%: 1.46–1.60) with heterogeneity (I 2) equal to 0.2% (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The pooled effect (risk ratio, RR) of chronic liver disorders on the ventilation needs, fever, and cough related to COVID‐19

To determine the association between the COVID‐19 symptoms and chronic liver disorders, patients with COVID‐19 who had chronic liver disorders were compared with those who did not have the CLD, and the results of the meta‐analysis showed cough, headache, myalgia, nausea, diarrhea and fatigue were 1.37 (CI 95%: 1.20–1.55), 1.23 (CI 95%: 1.09–1.38), 1.25 (CI 95%: 1.04–1.50), 1.19 (CI 95%: 1.02–1.40), 1.89 (CI 95%: 1.30–2.75), 1.49 (CI 95%: 1.07–2.09), and 1.14 (CI 95%: 0.98–1.33), respectively, while the risk of all these symptoms was higher in COVID‐19 patients with underlying liver diseases than ones without chronic liver disorders. Other symptoms have been reported in the table (Figure 3 and Table 3).

To examine the publication bias, the Eggers test was performed, which was not significant in all variables except myalgia and headache. That is, the publication bias has not occurred.

3.1. Subgroups analysis

The results of subgroups analysis according to age and continents for symptoms and complications related to COVID‐19 were reported in Table 4. The results show that complications related to COVID‐19 are more significant and severe in patients with CLD with age <60 and live in Asia (Table 4).

TABLE 4.

The subgroups analysis of signs, symptoms, and complications related to COVID 19 in CLD patients based on continents and age

Outcomes Outcomes Subgroups No. of study (SS) Sample size liver disease Sample size non‐liver disease Pooled RR (95% CI) Heterogeneity assessment
I 2 P‐value Test Q
Outcomes of Covid‐19 Mortality America 6(10068) 1400 8668 1.35 (1.19–1.53) 76.39% 0.00 21.18
Asia 5(2632) 261 2371 2.66 (2.24–3.16) 84.49% 0.00 25.78
Europe 4(260027) 15 579 244 488 1.49 (1.43–1.55) 63.62% 0.04 8.25
ICU America 4(3936) 693 3243 1.43 (1.25–1.65) 0.00% 0.71 1.38
Asia 3(1668) 192 1475 1.34 (0.89–2.02) 0.00% 0.37 1.97
Europe 2(640) 89 551 1.00 (0.61–1.64) 0.00% 0.37 0.82
Ventilation America 5(7288) 1150 6238 1.47 (1.29–1.67) 11.55% 0.34 4.52
Asia 3(1491) 158 1333 1.55 (1.14–2.11) 0.00% 0.79 0.46
Europe 3(259874) 15 518 244 356 1.54 (1.47–1.62) 0.00% 0.97 0.06
Covid‐19 symptoms Fever America 2(3434) 590 2844 1.35 (1.16–1.57) 88.05% 0.00 8.37
Asia 3(2286) 214 2072 1.44 (1.13–1.84) 88.78% 0.00 17.83
Europe 1(317) 14 303 0.99 (0.35–2.78)
Cough America 3(3573) 624 2949 1.40 (1.21–1.61) 0.00% 0.37 1.98
Asia 4(2390) 266 2124 0.91 (0.73–1.13) 0.00% 0.89 0.63
Europe 1(317) 14 303 1.56 (0.50–4.88)
Outcomes of Covid‐19 Mortality <60 6(8007) 989 7018 1.89 (1.64–2.16) 75.76% 0.00 20.63
>60 9(264760) 16 251 248 509 1.49 (1.44–1.55) 88.57% 0.00 69.99
ICU <60 5(5403) 773 4630 1.40 (1.21–1.62) 0.00% 0.72 2.08
>60 4(840) 201 639 1.35 (1.05–1.75) 24.03% 0.27 3.95
Ventilation <60 5(5237) 739 4488 1.59 (1.34–1.89) 0.00% 0.97 0.49
>60 6(263426) 16 087 247 339 1.53 (1.46–1.60) 0.00% 0.44 4.82
Covid‐19 symptoms Fever <60 3(4574) 686 3888 1.33 (1.16–1.53) 65.85% 0.05 5.86
>60 3(1436) 132 1331 1.57 (1.15–2.15) 90.00% 0.00 20.00
Cough <60 4(4678) 738 3940 1.27 (1.12–1.45) 70.74% 0.02 10.25
>60 4(1602) 166 1436 1.02 (0.76–1.37) 0.00% 0.78 1.09

3.2. Discussion

The RR of complications and consequences of COVID‐19 in patients with the CLD during the pandemic period was examined in this study and the results showed the need for ventilation and ARDS had higher risks than other outcomes related to COVID‐19 in patients with chronic liver disorders. Exacerbation of alveolar epithelial damages, increased vascular permeability, and systemic inflammation are among the factors that predispose to increased ARDS in patients with the CLD. 44 , 45 Also, because these patients had a higher BMI and obesity was more prevalent in them, their need for ventilation was higher when they were infected with COVID‐19. 46

Due to the direct and significant effect of SARS‐CoV‐2 virus on ACE‐2 receptors in liver cells, patients with chronic liver disorders will have a more severe form of the disease if they develop COVID‐19, which causes their hospitalization in the intensive care unit of hospitals due to COVID‐19. According to the results of previous studies, patients with chronic liver disorders have a higher risk of being admitted to the intensive care unit than others in the community if they develop COVID‐19. In the present meta‐analysis, the same result was obtained, which was in line with the results of preliminary studies published in the world. 47 However, the results of some studies in the world have not shown this association, for example, a study by Huang, R. et al. showed the risk of hospitalization in intensive care unit due to COVID‐19 in patients with chronic liver disorders was not significantly different from other people in the community. 35 The reason for this inconsistency can be attributed to differences in the study method, how to collect information, and the type of patients studied in these articles.

Also, the risk of death due to COVID‐19 in the present meta‐analysis was significantly higher in patients with chronic liver disorders than other individuals. The reason for this can be attributed to the increase in inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐6, Ferritin and TNF‐alpha. 48 In patients with COVID‐19, inflammatory cytokines increase, eventually leading to a cytokine storm in more severe forms of the disease. On the other hand, for patients with severe forms of COVID‐19, drugs that aggravate cytokines and cause cytokine storms are prescribed, which may also exacerbate death in COVID‐19 patients with chronic liver disorders. Coincidence of chronic liver disorders and the use of anti‐COVID‐19 drugs significantly increases the risk of mortality in COVID‐19 patients with the CLD. Also, worsening liver function reduces the number and disrupt the function of neutrophils, monocytes and innate immune proteins, and ultimately the number of both B and T lymphocytes involved in acquired immunity decreases and eventually immune dysfunction increases. 49 , 50

In this study, in addition to the mentioned cases, the symptoms associated with COVID‐19 including fever, cough, headache, myalgia, nausea, diarrhea, and fatigue were also evaluated in patients with the CLD. The results of this meta‐analysis showed among these symptoms, nausea, diarrhea and abdominal pain were more common than other ones in patients with chronic liver disorders. Increased gastrointestinal symptoms may be due to liver dysfunction. In addition, other symptoms such as fever, cough, headache, myalgia, and fatigue were more common in patients with the underlying liver disease than in healthy individuals while cytokines were effective in worsening these symptoms. 48 The severity of various symptoms in patients with chronic liver disorders can affect outcomes of COVID‐19 and, as a result, increase the outcome and mortality in this group of patients.

Some studies on the effect of COVID‐19 on the incidence of liver disorders published results, which suggested in the case of COVID‐19 due to the widespread distribution of the main virus receptor called the angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the virus could cause a widespread disease with more involvement of extra‐pulmonary organs, especially the liver. ACE2 receptors are also expressed in the gastrointestinal tract, vascular endothelium, and hepatic cholangiocytes. 51 , 52 Various studies showed elevated liver enzymes indicated liver damages and were common in COVID‐19 patients with chronic and non‐CLDs. 52 On the other hand, initial clinical studies in this area also confirmed a significant increase in liver enzymes such as ALT, and AST due to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 The results of a meta‐analysis also showed the levels of ALP, and γ‐GT enzymes were significant as a result of cholangiocellular damages. 57 , 58 , 59 As the study results show, it is not yet clear how much an increase in liver enzyme levels can exacerbate the complications of COVID‐19 or the disease progression. In patients with COVID‐19 who have not had a chronic liver disorder or liver damage before infection, a slight liver disorder is found after recovery. 60 , 61

Abnormal results of liver tests were associated with more severe forms of COVID‐19 and mortality. Although RNAs of SARS‐CoV‐2 have been detected in the liver of patients with COVID‐19, it is not yet exactly clear how much SARS‐CoV‐2 infects the liver and multiplies in its cells. 17 , 51 The range of liver damages in the COVID‐19 disease may be direct infection by SARS‐CoV‐2, indirect involvement by systemic inflammation, and hypoxic changes. However, due to the major role of the liver in endobiotic and xenobiotic drug metabolism, coagulation, albumin, and production of acute phase reactants, liver dysfunction may affect the pathophysiology of the COVID‐19 disease. 62 , 63 The results of the present meta‐analysis along with other published results can be useful in finding many of these answers. They are also useful in updating treatment and prevention guidelines. This study was the first meta‐analysis to compare the complications and consequences associated with COVID‐19 in two groups of patients with the CLD and healthy ones. On the other hand, the results of subgroup analyses and overall results had a high homogeneity, which indicated the homogeneous and correct selection of initial studies in order to perform this meta‐analysis.

The heterogeneity in this meta‐analysis only was higher at two outcomes (Fever and Mortality). For detecting sources of this heterogeneity, all primary cohort studies were reviewed, and extracted related variables that reported in selected cohort studies completely. Between reported variables, age and continents were extracted. Other variables like type of underlying diseases, such as diabetes, coronary heart disease (CHD), and cancers, type of study population, type of measures tools for outcomes measure were not reported in selected cohort studies. The results of subgroup analysis based on age and continents show that the heterogeneity was decreased in many of categories, but in fever and mortality not decreased. This heterogeneity rate confirms the difference between the combined studies. This difference may be due to differences in some section of studies such as the methods of measuring the outcomes and the tools used, the methods of sampling, presence of important underlying diseases (comorbidities) like diabetes, CHD, cancers, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). These variables and factors not reported in selected cohort studies in this meta‐analysis, so authors could not subgroup analysis based on its.

The results of this research are also based on cohort studies, which are one of the most important observational studies in order to find a causal association, but the overall results of this study have not yet determined the exact association between SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and chronic liver disorders. In other words, according to the results of published studies, it can be claimed that there is a kind of causal association between these two factors, and in order to find it, studies based on genetics or molecular science such as Mendelian randomization are needed.

4. CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed the mortality and consequences due to COVID‐19 were significantly different between patients with the CLD and the general population. Also, the COVID‐19 symptoms in people with liver disorders were significantly more severe than those in healthy people. So, taking measures is necessary to manage them. It is recommended to reduce the risk of mortality and other consequences of COVID‐19 through screening and treating people with liver disorders in the lower stages of the CLD.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

YM: concept development (provided idea for the research). MA and PM: search strategy. MA, PM, and KZ: data extraction. YM: supervision. FM, SK, and MA: analysis/interpretation. All authors: writing (responsible for writing a substantive part of the manuscript).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank all the authors whose articles have been used in this meta‐analysis.

Afraie M, Mohammadzedeh P, Azami M, et al. The association of chronic liver disorders with exacerbation of symptoms and complications related to COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of cohort studies. Clin Respir J. 2022;16(12):777‐792. doi: 10.1111/crj.13552

Funding information No funding.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Sharma A, Nagalli S. Chronic Liver Disease. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2022. StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sivakrishnan S, Pharm M. Liver disease overview. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2019;8(1):1385‐1395. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Campana L, Esser H, Huch M, Forbes S. Liver regeneration and inflammation: from fundamental science to clinical applications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(9):608‐624. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00373-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wang X, Lin S‐X, Tao J, et al. Study of liver cirrhosis over ten consecutive years in southern China. World J Gastroenterol: WJG. 2014;20(37):13546‐13555. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Matsuda M, Seki E. The liver fibrosis niche: novel insights into the interplay between fibrosis‐composing mesenchymal cells, immune cells, endothelial cells, and extracellular matrix. Food Chem Toxicol. 2020;143:111556. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Pinzani M, Rombouts K. Liver fibrosis: from the bench to clinical targets. Dig Liver Dis. 2004;36(4):231‐242. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2004.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kisseleva T, Brenner D. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of liver fibrosis and its regression. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18(3):151‐166. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-00372-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Adhikari SP, Meng S, Wu Y‐J, et al. Epidemiology, causes, clinical manifestation and diagnosis, prevention and control of coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) during the early outbreak period: a scoping review. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00646-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Asrani SK, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath PS. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J Hepatol. 2019;70(1):151‐171. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hirode G, Saab S, Wong RJ. Trends in the burden of chronic liver disease among hospitalized US adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(4):e201997. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sepanlou SG, Safiri S, Bisignano C, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of cirrhosis by cause in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(3):245‐266. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30349-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. The Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789‐1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kim D, Adeniji N, Latt N, et al. Predictors of outcomes of COVID‐19 in patients with chronic liver disease: US multi‐center study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19(7):1469‐1479.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.09.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wang X, Fang X, Cai Z, et al. Comorbid chronic diseases and acute organ injuries are strongly correlated with disease severity and mortality among COVID‐19 patients: a systemic review and meta‐analysis. Research. 2020;2020:2402961. doi: 10.34133/2020/2402961 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Jin X, Lian J‐S, Hu J‐H, et al. Epidemiological, clinical and virological characteristics of 74 cases of coronavirus‐infected disease 2019 (COVID‐19) with gastrointestinal symptoms. Gut. 2020;69(6):1002‐1009. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zili Z, Ning Z, Yan S, Shengbo H, Bin C, Shu X. Effect of gastrointestinal symptoms on patients infected with COVID‐19. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(8):2294‐2297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zhang C, Shi L, Wang F‐S. Liver injury in COVID‐19: management and challenges. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(5):428‐430. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30057-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Moon AM, Webb GJ, Aloman C, et al. High mortality rates for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in patients with pre‐existing chronic liver disease and cirrhosis: preliminary results from an international registry. J Hepatol. 2020;73(3):705‐708. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.05.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Singh S, Khan A. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 among patients with preexisting liver disease in the United States: a multicenter research network study. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(2):768‐771.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sun J, Aghemo A, Forner A, Valenti L. COVID‐19 and liver disease. Liver Int. 2020;40(6):1278‐1281. doi: 10.1111/liv.14470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Cai Q, Huang D, Yu H, et al. COVID‐19: abnormal liver function tests. J Hepatol. 2020;73(3):566‐574. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.04.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Fan Z, Chen L, Li J. Clinical features of COVID‐19‐related liver damage. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(7):30482‐30481. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Guan W‐j, Ni Z‐y, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708‐1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Shi H, Han X, Jiang N, et al. Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(4):425‐434. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30086-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1061‐1069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hashemi N, Viveiros K, Redd WD, et al. Impact of chronic liver disease on outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID‐19: a multicenter United States experience. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(1):S581. doi: 10.14309/01.ajg.0000706696.57772.59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Bahardoust M, Heiat M, Khodabandeh M, et al. Predictors for the severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection in patients with underlying liver disease: a retrospective analytical study in Iran. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):3066. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82721-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bajaj JS, Garcia‐Tsao G, Biggins SW, et al. Comparison of mortality risk in patients with cirrhosis and COVID‐19 compared with patients with cirrhosis alone and COVID‐19 alone: multicentre matched cohort. Gut. 2021;70(3):531‐536. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Davidov‐Derevynko Y, Ben Yakov G, Wieder A, et al. The liver in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;33(1S):e313‐e319. doi: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Forlano R, Mullish BH, Mukherjee SK, et al. In‐hospital mortality is associated with inflammatory response in NAFLD patients admitted for COVID‐19. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10):e0240400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Frager SZ, Szymanski J, Schwartz JM, Massoumi HS, Kinkhabwala M, Wolkoff AW. Hepatic predictors of mortality in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2: role of initial aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase and preexisting cirrhosis. Hepatol Commun. 2021;5(3):424‐433. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Garrido M, Guedes TP, Silva JA, et al. Impact of liver test abnormalities and chronic liver disease on the clinical outcomes of patients hospitalized with covid‐19. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2021;28(4):253‐264. doi: 10.1159/000513593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Guerra Veloz MF, Cordero Ruiz P, Ríos‐Villegas MJ, et al. Liver manifestations in COVID‐19 and the influence of pre‐existing liver disease in the course of the infection. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas: Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestiva. 2021;113(2):103‐109. doi: 10.17235/reed.2020.7627/2020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Huang R, Zhu L, Wang J, et al. Clinical features of COVID‐19 patients with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol Commun. 2020;4(12):1758‐1768. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ji D, Zhang D, Yang T, et al. Effect of COVID‐19 on patients with compensated chronic liver diseases. Hepatol Int. 2020;14(5):701‐710. doi: 10.1007/s12072-020-10058-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Lee YR, Kang MK, Song JE, et al. Clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in patients with pre‐existing liver diseases: a multicenter study in South Korea. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2020;26(4):562‐576. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2020.0126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Li C, Chen Q, Wang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of chronic liver disease with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19): a cohort study in Wuhan, China. Aging. 2020;12(16):15938‐15945. doi: 10.18632/aging.103632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Liaquat H, Shupp B, Rollins S, Schneider Y, Matin A. Comparison of the impact of chronic corticosteroid therapy on critical care outcomes of COVID‐19 patients with and without history of chronic liver disease. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):19245. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98778-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Mallet V, Beeker N, Bouam S, et al. Prognosis of French COVID‐19 patients with chronic liver disease: a national retrospective cohort study for 2020. J Hepatol. 2021;75(4):848‐855. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.04.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Ge J, Pletcher MJ, Lai JC, Harper JR, Chute CG, Haendel MA. Outcomes of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis: a national COVID cohort collaborative study. Gastroenterology. 2021;161(5):1487‐1501.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Lam B, et al. Independent predictors of mortality among patients with NAFLD hospitalized with COVID‐19 infection. Hepatol Commun. 2021;21(10):18‐31. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Kumar P, Sharma M, Sulthana SF, Kulkarni A, Rao PN, Reddy DN. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2–related acute‐on‐chronic liver failure. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2021;11(3):404‐406. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2020.12.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Bernardi M, Moreau R, Angeli P, Schnabl B, Arroyo V. Mechanisms of decompensation and organ failure in cirrhosis: from peripheral arterial vasodilation to systemic inflammation hypothesis. J Hepatol. 2015;63(5):1272‐1284. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Gacouin A, Locufier M, Uhel F, et al. Liver cirrhosis is independently associated with 90‐day mortality in ARDS patients. Shock: Injury Inflamm Sepsis: Laboratory Clin Approach. 2016;45(1):16‐21. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kalligeros M, Shehadeh F, Mylona EK, et al. Association of obesity with disease severity among patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Obesity. 2020;28(7):1200‐1204. doi: 10.1002/oby.22859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Fan Z, Chen L, Li J, et al. Clinical features of COVID‐19‐related liver functional abnormality. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(7):1561‐1566. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Byl B, Roucloux I, Crusiaux A, Dupont E, Devière J. Tumor necrosis factor α and interleukin 6 plasma levels in infected cirrhotic patients. Gastroenterology. 1993;104(5):1492‐1497. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90361-F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Albillos A, Lario M, Álvarez‐Mon M. Cirrhosis‐associated immune dysfunction: distinctive features and clinical relevance. J Hepatol. 2014;61(6):1385‐1396. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bernsmeier C, Pop OT, Singanayagam A, et al. Patients with acute‐on‐chronic liver failure have increased numbers of regulatory immune cells expressing the receptor tyrosine kinase MERTK. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(3):603‐615.e14. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.11.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497‐506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Huang C, Wang A, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497‐506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Garrido I, Liberal R, Macedo G. COVID‐19 and liver disease—what we know on 1st May 2020. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;52(2):267‐275. doi: 10.1111/apt.15813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Jothimani D, Venugopal R, Abedin MF, Kaliamoorthy I, Rela M. COVID‐19 and the liver. J Hepatol. 2020;73(5):1231‐1240. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.06.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Sarin SK, Choudhury A, Lau GK, et al. Pre‐existing liver disease is associated with poor outcome in patients with SARS CoV2 infection; the APCOLIS study (APASL COVID‐19 liver injury Spectrum study). Hepatol Int. 2020;14(5):690‐700. doi: 10.1007/s12072-020-10072-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Skok K, Stelzl E, Trauner M, Kessler HH, Lax SF. Post‐mortem viral dynamics and tropism in COVID‐19 patients in correlation with organ damage. Virchows Arch. 2021;478(2):343‐353. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-02903-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Kulkarni AV, Kumar P, Tevethia HV, et al. Systematic review with meta‐analysis: liver manifestations and outcomes in COVID‐19. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;52(4):584‐599. doi: 10.1111/apt.15916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Kumar‐M P, Mishra S, Jha DK, et al. Coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) and the liver: a comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis. Hepatol Int. 2020;14(5):711‐722. doi: 10.1007/s12072-020-10071-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Yip TC‐F, Lui GC‐Y, Wong VW‐S, et al. Liver injury is independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID‐19. Gut. 2021;70(4):733‐742. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Li G, Pan X. Features of liver injury in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Bozhou, China. J Clin Hepatol. 2020;772‐774. [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Ridruejo E, Soza A. The liver in times of COVID‐19: what hepatologists should know. Ann Hepatol. 2020;19(4):353‐358. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2020.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Mantovani A, Beatrice G, Dalbeni A. Coronavirus disease 2019 and prevalence of chronic liver disease: a meta‐analysis. Liver Int. 2020;40(6):1316‐1320. doi: 10.1111/liv.14465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Parasa S, Desai M, Thoguluva Chandrasekar V, et al. Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and fecal viral shedding in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e2011335. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from The Clinical Respiratory Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES