Skip to main content
Advances in Respiratory Medicine logoLink to Advances in Respiratory Medicine
. 2022 Aug 12;90(4):338–348. doi: 10.3390/arm90040043

Association between Influenza and COVID-19 Viruses and the Risk of Atherosclerosis: Meta-Analysis Study and Systematic Review

Mahsa Jalili 1,2, Kourosh Sayehmiri 3,*, Nastaran Ansari 1, Behzad Pourhossein 1, Maryam Fazeli 1, Farid Azizi Jalilian 1,*
Editor: Katarzyna Górska
PMCID: PMC9717337  PMID: 36004963

Abstract

Highlights

  • Atherosclerosis is an important issue in health care systems and one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in patients.

  • There is evidence of an association between infectious diseases and atherosclerosis.

  • The present study demonstrates that infections with influenza and COVID-19 are risk factors for arthrosclerosis.

  • It seems necessary to consider different strategies for managing and eradicating viral infections.

Abstract

There is a lot of evidence to suggest that patients infected with the COVID-19 and influenza viruses are at risk of atherosclerosis. Additionally, there are heterogeneous studies on the risk of arthrosclerosis in patients infected with the influenza and COVID-19 viruses. We conducted a case–control and cross-sectional study and examined the association between the risk of atherosclerosis, and influenza virus (IV-A and IV-B) and COVID-19 infections in this study. We searched for keywords such as influenza virus, COVID-19 and atherosclerosis in English and Persian in well-known databases such as PubMed, SID, Magiran and Google Scholar. In this study, we analyzed the information using a meta-analysis, the random effect model, the I2 index and STAT (version 11.2). The results from the analysis of ten studies on influenza virus and nine studies on COVID-19 reviewed individually (totaling 6428 samples for influenza virus infections and 10,785 samples for COVID-19 infections) demonstrated a risk of arthrosclerosis in patients with influenza and COVID-19 infections, with an OR (odds ratio) = 0.45 ((95% CI): 0.25 to 0.64) and an OR (odds ratio) = 1.04 ((95% CI): 0.82 to 1.26), respectively. The present study provides new insights into the risk of atherosclerosis in patients infected with the COVID-19 and influenza viruses. Therefore, it seems necessary to consider different strategies for managing and eradicating viral infections among individuals.

Keywords: influenza virus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, 2019-nCOV, atherosclerosis, meta-analysis

1. Introduction

Preventive health care has been proposed to reduce the heavy burden of health care in communities worldwide [1]. Arthrosclerosis is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in older adults in developed countries [2]. Furthermore, many efforts have been made to correct or treat atherosclerosis and its complications. Additionally, atherosclerosis, as an inflammatory disease, affects the walls of blood vessels. This disease is characterized by the accumulation and progression of lipids in the walls of the arteries [3]. Furthermore, many factors cause atherosclerosis, including smoking, high blood pressure, many diseases and other environmental factors [4].

Many seroepidemiological studies have shown that persistent infections with bacterial or viral agents may be associated with atherosclerosis [5]. Evidence suggests that human atherosclerosis is associated with previous exposure to some pathogens such as Chlamydia pneumoniae, Helicobacter pylori, HIV, Porphyromonas gingivalis, CMV, Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2, Entro viruses, hepatitis A and influenza virus [6].

In a recent outbreak of COVID-19 infections, significant mortality was attributed to heart disease and atherosclerosis [7]. Previous studies have demonstrated conflicting reports on the association between infections with the influenza virus (IV) and coronavirus, and arthrosclerosis [8]. The results of some studies have demonstrated that influenza virus (IV-A and IV-B) and COVID-19 infections cannot predict the risk of arthrosclerosis and that the infectious burdens of these diseases are independent [9]. On the other hand, some researchers suggested that influenza virus (IV-A and IV-B) and COVID-19 infections may play roles in the development of atherosclerosis by specific mechanisms [10].

Due to the recent influenza virus (IV-A and IV-B) and COVID-19 epidemics, and the acute condition of patients with atherosclerosis, we hypothesized that previous COVID-19 and influenza virus (IV-A and IV-B) infections were associated with atherosclerosis. To prove this hypothesis, we conducted a meta-analysis study and systematic review study to investigate the association between influenza virus (IV-A and IV-B) and COVID-19 infections, and atherosclerosis.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Instructions

The present study was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines [11]. The study steps included searching for articles, selecting articles, evaluating the quality of the studies, extracting article information and performing statistical analyses. All steps were performed independently by two different authors. The third author supervised the collection of studies and acted as a judge for disagreements.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria and Information Sources

In order to identify appropriate studies on the risk of atherosclerosis in patients with COVID-19 and influenza, we considered case–control and cross-sectional studies. In this study, to avoid bias, all steps in the collection of studies were performed by two researchers. The third researcher only stepped in to further monitor and manage the process.

2.3. Search Strategy

We searched well-known databases. At first, reputable databases containing medical information were searched until 16 August 2020. These databases included ISI, Pubmed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane and Google scholar. In this study, the search was performed based on the following keywords: “influenza virus” [MeSH], “coronavirus” [MeSH], “COVID-19” [MeSH] and “atherosclerosis”.

2.4. Quality of Evaluation

In the present study, the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate non-standard studies. Finally, according to this checklist, the two researchers rated each of studies. To evaluate the quality, “high”, “medium” or “low” quality were considered for the articles. Hence, for each study, a score of more than 7 was considered to be of “high quality”, a score of 4–6 was considered to be of “average quality”, and a score of less than 4 was considered to be of “low quality”.

2.5. Included and Excluded Studies

In the present study, the inclusion criteria for CC studies (case–control studies) and CS study (cross-sectional studies) included influenza and coronavirus infections in patients with atherosclerosis.

The exclusion criteria include (1) studies that did not focus on influenza and coronavirus infections in patients with atherosclerosis, (2) duplicate studies, (3) studies with the full text not written in English, (4) studies for which the full text was inaccessible, and (5) studies that were not relevant to this topic.

2.6. Study Selection

In this study, all studies were imported into Zotero software (5.0.21; GMU, CHNM, Fairfax, VA, USA), and duplicate studies were eventually removed after “Finding Updates”. After deleting the authors names, journal names, and year of publication for all studies, each study was evaluated independently by the authors. In this study, all articles were screened separately by two authors (articles were reviewed by reading the title and summary of the article, as well as the titles and criteria for entry and exit of all articles (eligibility stage)). An expert researcher also participated in the final selection of articles, and the final decision was made by the expert researcher.

2.7. Information Extraction

In summary, an appropriate checklist was considered for the present study. The checklist included the author name(s), year of publication, place of study, sample size, tracking time, relative risk (RR), odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI (confidence interval), number of events in both groups (case and control) and age of participants. Additionally, the data were extracted by two researchers separately. The third researcher managed and monitored the information.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

In the present study, two tests were used to evaluate the articles: these two tests included Cochran’s Q test and the I2 index. The I2 index consists of four categories. A description of the classification of this index is described in Reference [12]. To obtain heterogeneity in articles, the subgroup analysis method was used. To measure the predictive power of each article, the sensitivity analysis method was used. To measure publication bias in the articles, Funnel design tests, and Egger and Begg tests were used. Finally, to obtain the statistical results, Version 2 of the meta-analysis software including: meta version 4.9-1 with R software version 3.5.1 was used. A value of p < 0.05 was considered for the evaluation of the tests.

3. Results

3.1. Search for Studies

A total of N = 287 studies were obtained from well-known databases and evaluated by two authors; the authors manually identified N = 21 articles (a total of 240 articles on influenza viruses and 68 articles on COVID-19 infection), and N = 199 (143 articles on influenza viruses and 56 articles on COVID-19 infection) articles were ruled out due to duplication. After screening the title and abstracts, N = 155 (110 articles on influenza viruses and 45 articles on COVID-19 infection) articles were ruled out due to irrelevancy. After finding the full text of an article, N = 102 (68 articles on influenza viruses and 34 articles on COVID-19 infection) articles were removed because their focus was not on our topic of interest. Additionally, articles with the full text not written in English or with inaccessible full texts (N = 37) (19 articles on influenza viruses and 18 articles on COVID-19 infection), letters to the editor without original information and true data (N = 12) (6 articles on influenza viruses and 6 articles on COVID-19 infection), review articles and case reports (N = 39) (25 articles on influenza viruses and 3 articles on COVID-19 infection), and articles of a low quality (N = 7) (14 articles on influenza viruses and 4 articles on COVID-19 infection) were removed. Finally, N =19 (10 articles on influenza viruses and 9 articles on COVID-19 infection) articles of good quality were included in this study (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flowchart of the selection studies for the analysis of influenza virus and its association with atherosclerosis (A). Flowchart of the selection studies for the analysis of COVID-19 (coronavirus) and its association with atherosclerosis (B).

3.2. Article Exclusivities

Relevant articles about atherosclerosis published in English were considered per the inclusion criteria. Articles with a selected non-random sample size, articles not related to the topic of interest, letters to the editor and case reports were removed (as explained in more detail above).

3.3. Risk of Bias in Articles

In the present study, articles of all methodological types were reviewed and then selected. Additionally, papers were evaluated according to their method and needed to receive sufficient points before inclusion in the present study.

3.4. Outcome of Articles

In an initial search performed by two independent researchers, the present study searched for related articles (N = 287) in the various databases mentioned above. The final articles consisted of CC studies (case–control studies) and CS studies (cross-sectional studies) that individuals met the criteria for entering meta-analysis and systematic review (Figure 1A,B).

3.5. Evaluation of Outcome

From a statistical point of view, an estimation of the association between influenza virus and COVID-19 (coronavirus) infections, and atherosclerosis is critical, and in the present study, we obtained OR (odds ratio) = 0.45 (95%CI: 0.25 to 0.64) and OR (odds ratio) = 1.04 (95%CI: 0.82 to 1.26), respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

This study assessed the association between influenza virus and atherosclerosis. In this chart, the studies are categorized into case– control, cross-sectional and hospital-based studies and separated by year published and name of the authors, supported by a model of random effects (A); [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. A meta-analysis was performed on the association between COVID-19 virus infection and atherosclerosis. In this chart, the studies are categorized into case–control, cross-sectional and hospital-based studies and separated by year published and name of the authors, supported by a model of random effects (B); [7,8,9,10,22,23,24,25,26]. PRISMA model in meta-analysis studies [11].

3.6. Additional Outcome

In the present study, a qualitative evaluation was performed. A quality rating was given to these studies (Table 1 and Table 2). In the present study, articles on the relationship between influenza virus infection and arthrosclerosis were separated for different types of influenza virus (types IV-A and IV-B) in separate flowcharts (Figure 3). Additionally, in another flowchart, the relationship between coronavirus infection and arthrosclerosis was separated based on the months of the year 2020 (Figure 4).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis study on the association between influenza virus and atherosclerosis.

ID Ref Writer The Year the Study Was Conducted The Country in Which the Study Was Conducted Design The Average Age of Study Participants Effective Size p Value Number of Sample Type of Flu Quality
OR 95% Cl
1 [13] Chiang 2017 Taiwan CC 76.8 0.8 0.78 0.82 0.01 160 IV-B High
2-1 [14] Guan 2008 China CC 60.0 3.3 1.5 7.04 0.003 209 IV-A Moderate
2-2 [14] Guan 2008 China CC 60.0 7.5 1.3 43.0 0.001 209 IV-B Moderate
3-1 [15] Xiuru Gu 2012 China CC 57.0 3.1 1.5 6.4 0.004 252 IV-A High
3-2 [15] Xiuru Gu 2012 China CC 57.0 10.2 5.7 20.0 0.001 252 IV-B High
4 [16] Barbera 2016 Spain CS 85.0 1.64 1.33 2.02 0.001 728 IV-A Moderate
5 [17] Mohammad 2020 Sweden CS 75.0 1.05 1.02 1.08 0.002 562 IV-A Moderate
6-1 [18] Maclntyr 2013 Australi CC 65.0 0.55 0.35 0.85 0.008 559 IV-B Weak
6-2 [18] MacIntyr 2013 Australi CC 65.0 1.98 1.2 3.3 0.001 559 IV-A Weak
7 [27] Clayton 2005 USA PHS 63.0 1.0 0.5 1.9 0.002 534 IV-A High
8 [19] Gash 2013 London CC 40.0 3.17 0.61 16.47 0.002 137 IV-B High
9 [20] Penttine 1996 Finland CC 49.5 1.77 1.07 2.93 0.001 3172 IV-A Moderate
10 [21] Clayton 2007 UK CC 72.0 2.48 1.67 3.7 0.002 115 IV-A Moderate
N total: 6428

OR: odds ratio, CC: case–control studies, CS: cross-sectional study, N and NO: number, PHS: prospective hospital-based study.

Table 2.

Characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis study on the association between COVID-19 (coronavirus) infection and atherosclerosis.

ID Ref Author Years Months Country Design Mean Age Effect Size p Value Sample Size Quality
OR 95% Cl
1 [22] Mandeep 2020 May Boston CS 65 2.70 2.08 3.51 0.001 8910 Moderate
2 [23] Shi Tai 2020 August China CC 51 2.65 1.01 6.89 0.001 332 High
3 [24] Yun Feng 2020 April China CC 58 3.02 1.45 6.32 0.004 476 High
4 [25] Huang 2020 February China CC 49 2.05 0.43 14.54 0.001 41 Moderate
5 [7] Qin 2020 April China CC 61 4.98 1.48 16.79 0.002 452 Weak
6 [8] Wan 2020 March China CC 56 16.59 1.93 142.0 0.002 135 Moderate
7 [9] Wang 2020 February China CC 66 2.76 1.03 7.35 0.001 138 High
8 [10] J. Zhang 2020 February China CC 64 1.95 0.62 34.11 0.004 140 High
9 [26] F. Zheng 2020 January China CC 57 4.61 0.62 34.11 0.002 161 Moderate
N total: 10,785

OR: odds ratio, CC: case–control studies, CS: cross-sectional study, N and NO: number.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A meta-analysis of the relationship between influenza virus types (types A and B) and atherosclerosis was performed. Throughout this chart, the studies are separated based on the types of influenza virus and their associations with atherosclerosis, supported by a random effects model; [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. PRISMA model in meta-analysis studies [11].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The correlation between a coronavirus or COVID_19 infection and atherosclerosis was assessed. Throughout this chart, the studies are separated based on the months of 2020, supported by a random effects model conducted by various authors; [8,9,10,22,23,24,25,26]. PRISMA model in meta-analysis studies [11].

4. Discussion

Consolidation of Evidence

Today, infectious diseases affect people much more severely and are spreading at a higher rate in all parts of the world. In the United States and most other developed countries, arthrosclerosis is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. In 2016, atherosclerosis, which affects the arteries of the heart and brain, caused nearly 18 million deaths worldwide. Atherosclerosis, or hardening of the arteries, is a complication that causes plaque to form inside the arteries [28,29]. Plaques are made of cholesterol, fatty substances, cell waste products, calcium and fibrin (blood-clotting agent) [30]. There is evidence of an association between infectious diseases and atherosclerosis. There are studies that have suggested bacterial and viral pathogens as one of the initiators or enhancers of atherosclerosis [31]. Several seroepidemiological and immunohistochemical studies were performed on viral infections, especially on different types of influenza viruses and on the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), with atherosclerosis [22]. Several studies demonstrated a possible association between influenza virus and coronavirus infections as a risk factor for plaque rupture (thrombosis) and infarction [23]. On the other hand, the effects of influenza virus and COVID-19 infections on atherosclerosis are highly controversial [24]. According to these confusing results, we decided to investigate the roles of influenza viruses (IV-A and IV-B) and coronavirus in atherosclerosis in the form of a meta-analysis study. Finally, in the present article, different types of influenza virus (IV-A, IV-B) and coronavirus were considered as two emerging risk factors in atherosclerosis.

5. Conclusions

In the present article, the association among influenza virus, COVID-19 (coronavirus), and atherosclerosis was evaluated. Briefly, from the results of this study, there is a relationship between the presence of influenza virus and coronavirus infections, and atherosclerosis. In addition, the results of this study showed that infections with the influenza virus and the coronavirus are one of the risk factors for atherosclerosis [25]. Therefore, a new approach must be taken to manage viral infections.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.A.J.; methodology, K.S.; software, B.P.; validation, M.F.; formal analysis, K.S.; investigation, N.A.; resources, B.P.; data curation, M.J., M.F.; writing—original draft preparation, M.J., M.F.; visualization, B.P.; supervision, F.A.J.; project administration, F.A.J.; funding acquisition, N.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The present study is approved and supported by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. Additionally, the ethics committee at Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran, has supported this study (ID: 140004153306). The ethical committee ID is IR. UMSHA.REC.1400.295.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All included studies were publicly available and published in indexed journals.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflict of interest among the authors.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Jalili M., Ansari N., Pourhossein B., Fazeli M., Jalilian F.A. An Overview of Antiviral Properties of Bacteriophages with Emphasis on the Treatment of COVID-19 Infection. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets. 2022;22:e240122200472. doi: 10.2174/1871526522666220124110547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mannino D.M., Doherty D.E., Buist A.S. Global Initiative on Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification of lung disease and mortality: Findings from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Respir. Med. 2006;100:115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jalili M., Nourmohammadi H., Sayehmiri K. Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae as two Emerging Risk Factors in Atherosclerosis: Meta-Analysis Study and Systematic Review. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets. 2021;22:74–83. doi: 10.2174/1871526521666210921121423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bonnet F., Irving K., Terra J.-L., Nony P., Berthezène F., Moulin P. Anxiety and depression are associated with unhealthy lifestyle in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis. 2005;178:339–344. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Campbell L.A., Rosenfeld M.E. Infection and atherosclerosis development. Arch. Med. Res. 2015;46:339–350. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2015.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rosenfeld M.E., Campbell L.A. Pathogens and atherosclerosis: Update on the potential contribution of multiple infectious organisms to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Thromb. Haemost. 2011;106:858–867. doi: 10.1160/TH11-06-0392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Qin C., Zhou L., Hu Z., Zhang S., Yang S., Tao Y., Xie C., Ma K., Shang K., Wang W., et al. Dysregulation of immune response in patients with coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;71:762–768. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wan S., Xiang Y.I., Fang W., Zheng Y., Li B., Hu Y., Yang R. Clinical features and treatment of COVID-19 patients in northeast Chongqing. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:797–806. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang D., Hu B., Hu C., Zhu F., Liu X., Zhang J., Peng Z. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323:1061–1069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang J.J., Dong X., Cao Y.Y., Yuan Y.D., Yang Y.B., Yan Y.Q., Gao Y.D. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy. 2020;75:1730–1741. doi: 10.1111/all.14238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.DerSimonian R., Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control. Clin. Trials. 1986;7:177–188. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chiang M.H., Wu H.H., Shih C.J., Chen Y.T., Kuo S.C., Chen T.L. Association between influenza vaccination and reduced risks of major adverse cardiovascular events in elderly patients. Am. Heart J. 2017;193:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guan X.R., Li X., Xin X.M., Jiang L.X., Cui L.Y., Wang L.F., Li H.Y. Influenza virus infection and risk of acute myocardial infarction. Inflammation. 2008;31:266–272. doi: 10.1007/s10753-008-9074-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guan X., Yang W., Sun X., Wang L., Ma B., Li H., Zhou J. Association of influenza virus infection and inflammatory cytokines with acute myocardial infarction. Inflamm. Res. 2012;61:591–598. doi: 10.1007/s00011-012-0449-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Puig-Barbera J., Natividad-Sancho A., Trushakova S., Sominina A., Pisareva M., Ciblak M.A. Epidemiology of hospital admissions with influenza during the 2013/2014 northern hemisphere influenza season: Results from the global influenza hospital surveillance network. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0154970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mohammad M.A., Tham J., Koul S., Rylance R., Bergh C., Erlinge D., Fröbert O. Association of acute myocardial infarction with influenza: A nationwide observational study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0236866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.MacIntyre C.R., Heywood A.E., Kovoor P., Ridda I., Seale H., Tan T., Dwyer D.E. Ischaemic heart disease, influenza and influenza vaccination: A prospective case control study. Heart. 2013;99:1843–1848. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Warren-Gash C., Geretti A.M., Hamilton G., Rakhit R.D., Smeeth L., Hayward A.C. Influenza-like illness in acute myocardial infarction patients during the winter wave of the influenza A H1N1 pandemic in London: A case–control study. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002604. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Penttinen J., Valonen P. The risk of myocardial infarction among Finnish farmers seeking medical care for an infection. Am. J. Public Health. 1996;86:1440–1442. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.86.10.1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Clayton T.C., Thompson M., Meade T.W. Recent respiratory infection and risk of cardiovascular disease: Case-control study through a general practice database. Eur. Heart J. 2008;29:96–103. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mehra M.R., Desai S.S., Kuy S., Henry T.D., Patel A.N. Cardiovascular disease, drug therapy, and mortality in COVID-19. New Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:e102. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 23.Tai S., Tang J., Yu B., Tang L., Wang Y., Zhang H., Zhou S. Association between cardiovascular burden and requirement of intensive care among patients with mild COVID-19. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2020;2020:9059562. doi: 10.1155/2020/9059562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Feng Y., Ling Y., Bai T., Xie Y., Huang J., Li J., Qu J. COVID-19 with different severities: A multicenter study of clinical features. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020;201:1380–1388. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202002-0445OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Huang D., Yang H., Yu H., Wang T., Yao R., Liang Z. A novel risk score to predict cardiovascular complications in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A retrospective, multicenter, observational study. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 2020;8:638–649. doi: 10.1002/iid3.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zheng F., Tang W., Li H., Huang Y., Xie Y., Zhou Z. Clinical characteristics of 161 cases of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Changsha. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020;24:3404–3410. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202003_20711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Clayton T., Capps N., Stephens N., Wedzicha J., Meade T. Recent respiratory infection and the risk of myocardial infarction. Heart. 2005;91:1601–1602. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.046920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jalili M., Ghafourian S., Badakhsh B. In vitro Eradication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Persister Cell Producers by Peganum harmala. Clin. Lab. 2022;68:6. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2021.210414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Saigusa R., Winkels H., Ley K. T cell subsets and functions in atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020;17:387–401. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0352-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ndrepepa G. Atherosclerosis & ischaemic heart disease: Here to stay or gone tomorrow. Indian J. Med. Res. 2017;146:293. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1668_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Streblow D.N., Orloff S.L., Nelson J.A. Do pathogens accelerate atherosclerosis? J. Nutr. 2001;131:2798S–2804S. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.10.2798S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All included studies were publicly available and published in indexed journals.


Articles from Advances in Respiratory Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES