Abstract
Background
Ventilatory ratio (VR) has been proposed as an alternative approach to estimate physiological dead space. However, the absolute value of VR, at constant dead space, might be affected by venous admixture and CO2 volume expired per minute (VCO2).
Methods
This was a retrospective, observational study of mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the UK and Italy. Venous admixture was either directly measured or estimated using the surrogate measure PaO2/FiO2 ratio. VCO2 was estimated through the resting energy expenditure derived from the Harris–Benedict formula.
Results
A total of 641 mechanically ventilated patients with mild (n=65), moderate (n=363), or severe (n=213) ARDS were studied. Venous admixture was measured (n=153 patients) or estimated using the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (n=448). The VR increased exponentially as a function of the dead space, and the absolute values of this relationship were a function of VCO2. At a physiological dead space of 0.6, VR was 1.1, 1.4, and 1.7 in patients with VCO2 equal to 200, 250, and 300, respectively. VR was independently associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR]=2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8–3.5), but was not associated when adjusted for VD/VTphys, VCO2, PaO2/FiO2 (ORadj=1.2; 95% CI, 0.7–2.1). These three variables remained independent predictors of ICU mortality (VD/VTphys [ORadj=17.9; 95% CI, 1.8–185; P<0.05]; VCO2 [ORadj=0.99; 95% CI, 0.99–1.00; P<0.001]; and PaO2/FiO2 (ORadj=0.99; 95% CI, 0.99–1.00; P<0.001]).
Conclusions
VR is a useful aggregate variable associated with outcome, but variables not associated with ventilation (VCO2 and venous admixture) strongly contribute to the high values of VR seen in patients with severe illness.
Keywords: ARDS, dead space, mechanical ventilation, venous admixture, ventilatory ratio
Editor's key points.
-
•
The use of ventilatory ratio to quantify physiological dead space is potentially limited by venous admixture and CO2 volume expired per minute.
-
•
The authors examined data from patients mechanically ventilated with ARDS.
-
•
Ventilatory ratio increased exponentially as a function of the dead space.
-
•
Ventilatory ratio was associated with mortality, but non-ventilatory variables were the chief contributors to high ventilatory ratio values associated with severe illness.
The physiological dead space (VD/VTphys) reflects the severity of lung injury1 and is a powerful prognostic factor in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).2, 3, 4 Its use, however, is uncommon, as it requires measurement of mixed expired CO2 and the simultaneous arterial blood sample to determine Paco 2. The ventilatory ratio (VR) has recently emerged as an alternative measure of ventilatory efficiency.
VR correlates strongly with VD/VTphys,5 does not require measurement of mixed expired CO2, and can be easily calculated from a few routinely collected variables.6 In addition, the unitless VR is easy to interpret, as it is normalised to a predefined ‘standard’ and quantifies the degree of impaired CO2 elimination in relation to an expected reference value. However, VR may be affected by factors such as venous admixture (Qva/Q) and CO2 volume expired per minute (VCO2), which can alter the absolute value of VR despite an unchanged dead space ventilation. The potential effects of these two factors on VR, in particular Qva/Q, have been described but not quantified.7 Specifically, there are no clinical data that establish the relative importance of measured Qva/Q on VR, nor the relative importance of VCO2 on VR when the VD/VTphys is adjusted for the degree of Qva/Q. These considerations are particularly important in patients with more severe disease, in whom the assumption that virtually all of the variations in VR are attributable to an increased VD/VTphys 8 may be confounded by the effect of larger venous admixture.
We compared VR and VD/VTphys in a large cohort of ventilated patients with ARDS, aiming to: (1) define the effect of Qva/Q and VCO2 on VR; (2) examine the relationship between mortality and VR corrected for physiological confounders; (3) provide theoretical models to explain the variations in VR which may occur for the same VD/VTphys.
Methods
Study design
This was a multicentre, retrospective, observational study including 641 patients with ARDS (448 patients admitted to Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK, from March 2020 to March 2021; and 193 admitted to San Paolo Hospital in Milan, Italy, from 2003 to 2018). All patients present in the databases were included into the analysis, except for seven patients who underwent extra-corporeal support. The study was approved by the institutional review board of each hospital, and written informed consent was obtained according to the national regulations of the participating institutions (see Supplementary material for details). All patients met ARDS criteria, according to the Berlin definition.9
Variables
The following variables were collected contemporaneously at the time of lowest PaO 2/FiO2 ratio during the first 24 h of mechanical ventilation: minute ventilation (VE), tidal volume (VT), ventilatory frequency, and arterial PCO2 (). VCO2 was estimated in all 641 patients using the Harris–Benedict formula10 and mixed-expired P co 2 (PECO2) was computed using the estimated VCO2/VE ratio. In 129 patients, both VCO2 and PECO2 were directly measured with capnometry. A subgroup of patients with normal Paco 2 (4.5–6 kPa) and VD/VTphys <0.35 was used to calculate the theoretical reference VE needed to estimate the VR.
Modelling of ventilatory ratio
To understand the relationships between VD/VTphys, VR, and venous admixture, we created a model as a function of their independent determinants: VCO2, minute ventilation (VE), venous admixture (Qva/Q), cardiac output (Qt), and arterial CO2 tension (Paco 2). The model derivation described in the supplement, shows that the VD/VTphys utilising arterial P co 2 as a surrogate of alveolar P co 2 depends on the alveolar/total ventilation ratio (Supplementary material, equation [6]) and the Qva/Q (Supplementary material, equation [8]). In addition, the VR depends both on VD/VTphys and VCO2 (Supplementary material, equation [15]).
Definition of dead space
Physiological dead space (VD/VTphys) was defined as the dead space calculated using the Bohr–Enghoff formula, which assumes a Qva/Q of zero (i.e. arterial P co 2 is equal to the alveolar P co 2).
Corrected dead space (VD/VTcorr) was defined as VD/VTphys corrected for the Qva/Q using the Kuwabara equation11 and its modification using CO2 content in the blood,12 rather than the CO2 pressure. As the dead space fraction obtained with both methods were similar, we have used the classical Kuwabara equation for simplicity.
Quantitative computed tomography
Quantitative chest CT was performed as previously described using a dedicated software (Maluna).13 , 14 We estimated lung weight, gas volume, and the amount of well-aerated, poorly aerated, and non-aerated tissues.
Statistical analysis
All continuous data are presented as means (standard deviation [sd]) with comparisons between two means performed using with Student's t-test, and with analysis of variance (anova) between more values. Categorical data were presented as counts and percentages, with comparisons between categories made using χ2 tests. Linear regression was used to test associations among variables.
The association between VR and ICU mortality was examined through univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. To assess the association of VR with mortality when adjusted for covariates which could have a contribution to the VR, we performed a multivariable logistic regression including VCO2, PaO 2/FiO2, and VD/VTphys. To make an additional comparison of the ORs, we standardised all covariates by subtracting the mean and dividing by their sd. After standardisation, the ORs refer to a unit change in sd of each covariate – therefore giving all covariates numerically similar scales. Model coefficients are reported for standardised and non-standardised data. The aim of this multivariable analysis was not to find a model which included all the factors potentially associated to outcome (i.e. age, mechanical power), but to explore the effects of the physiological variables which contribute to the VR and its association to outcome once adjusted by these physiological confounders.
Two-tailed P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed with R for Statistical Computing 4.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results
Patient characteristics
Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study cohort (n=641) at baseline, with ARDS severity categorised according to the Berlin definition.9 COVID-19 was the aetiology in 70% of the population (see Supplementary material for details). Patients with more severe ARDS had higher BMI, VE, Paco 2, and VR, and driving pressure and mechanical power; and lower P end-tidal co 2 (P et co 2) to Paco 2 ratio. ICU mortality increased with severity from 18% in mild, to 31% in moderate, and 46% in severe ARDS.
Table 1.
Demographic data of the whole study cohort. All data are presented as means (standard deviation). Analysis of variance (anova) was used to analyse mean values. ∗Data presented as absolute and relative frequencies (%).
| Overall (n=641) | Mild (n=65; 10.1%) | Moderate (n=363; 56.6%) | Severe (n=213; 33.2%) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 58 (17–88) | 55 (18–84) | 59 (17–88) | 58 (19–86) | 0.138 |
| Female (%)∗ | 195 (30.5) | 24 (37) | 108 (39) | 63 (30) | 0.485 |
| Height (cm) | 171 (8.9) | 172 (8.7) | 171 (9) | 171 (8.9) | 0.541 |
| Actual weight (kg) | 83 (20.8) | 78 (19.4) | 82 (19.5) | 88 (22.9) | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg m−2) | 28.4 (6.7) | 26.2 (5.5) | 27.8 (5.9) | 30.1 (7.9) | <0.001 |
| PaO2/FiO2 (kPa) | 17.2 (6.9) | 32 (4.4) | 18.4 (3.5) | 10.5 (1.8) | <0.001 |
| Minute ventilation (L min−1) | 8.7 (2.3) | 8.3 (2.1) | 8.5 (2.2) | 9.0 (2.6) | 0.007 |
| Respiratory rate (bpm) | 18 (4.3) | 17 (4.6) | 18 (4.2) | 19 (4.3) | <0.001 |
| Tidal volume kgPBW−1 (ml kg−1) | 7.4 (1.6) | 7.7 (1.6) | 7.3 (1.5) | 7.4 (1.7) | 0.349 |
| VCO2 (ml min−1) | 116.9 (34) | 114.2 (33.2) | 114.1 (32.1) | 122.4 (36.8) | 0.012 |
| Paco2 (kPa) | 6.1 (1.2) | 5.6 (0.9) | 6 (1.2) | 6.3 (1.3) | <0.001 |
| Physiological dead space | 0.55 (0.15) | 0.69 (0.13) | 0.72 (0.12) | 0.72 (0.13) | 0.225 |
| Ventilatory ratio | 1.51 (0.50) | 1.32 (0.37) | 1.47 (0.46) | 1.63 (0.57) | <0.001 |
| Pend-tidalco2/Paco2 | 0.79 (0.16) | 0.88 (0.14) | 0.81 (0.14) | 0.73 (0.16) | <0.001 |
| Mechanical power | 17 (7) | 15 (7) | 16 (6) | 18 (8) | 0.002 |
| Driving pressure (mm H2O) | 14 (4) | 13 (4) | 14 (4) | 15 (4) | <0.001 |
| ICU mortality (%)∗ | 224 (35%) | 12 (18%) | 114 (31%) | 98 (46%) | <0.001 |
Calculation of ventilatory ratio
The reference value used for VR computation was 5.3 kPa 0.1 L min−1 kg−1, derived from patients during anaesthesia,15 where 0.1 L min−1 kg−1 is assumed as the normal VE. To assess whether a similar reference value can be applied to critically ill patients, we selected among our 641 ICU patients 26 patients with ‘normal’ Paco 2 and VD/VTphys. The characteristics of this ARDS reference cohort are reported in Supplementary Table E1. The measured VE averaged 0.1 L min−1 kgPBW −1 and Paco 2 averaged 5.3 kPa (0.4) – which were similar to those found in patients undergoing anaesthesia5 , 15 and led to identical VR.
Quantitative chest CT scan and contemporaneous arterial and central venous blood gas samples were available in 153 patients (Table 2 ), allowing for the calculation of Qva/Q and determination of its effects on the VD/VTphys and VR. Qva/Q increased from 0.31 (0.15) in mild ARDS, and to 0.39 (0.11) and 0.61 (0.12), respectively, for moderate and severe ARDS, likely reflecting the increase in the non-aerated tissue fraction. The VD/VTphys in this cohort also increased with disease severity, increasing from 0.54 (0.13) in mild disease, to 0.57 (0.12) in moderate disease, and 0.65 (0.11) in severe disease (P<0.001). However, the physiological dead space corrected (VD/VTcorr) for Qva/Q was similar in all patients across severity categories.
Table 2.
Demographic data of the subgroup with chest computed tomography and paired central venous and arterial gases. All data are presented as means (standard deviation). Analysis of variance (anova) was used to analyse mean values. ∗Data presented as absolute and relative frequencies.
| Overall (n=153) | Mild (n=27) | Moderate (n=97) | Severe (n=29) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 59 (18–88) | 54 (18–84) | 60 (21–88) | 61 (19–86) | 0.226 |
| Female (%)∗ | 49 (33%) | 11 (41%) | 30 (31%) | 8 (28%) | 0.533 |
| Height (cm) | 170 (9.5) | 171 (9.5) | 170 (9.9) | 171 (7.9) | 0.785 |
| Actual weight (kg) | 77 (21.3) | 75 (18.1) | 75 (20.8) | 85 (29.3) | 0.056 |
| BMI (kg m−2) | 26.3 (6.4) | 25.7 (5.6) | 25.8 (5.8) | 28.8 (9.1) | 0.059 |
| PaO2/FiO2 (kPa) | 20 (7.6) | 32.4 (4.1) | 19.5 (3.7) | 10 (2.1) | <0.001 |
| Venous admixture | 0.42 (0.15) | 0.31 (0.15) | 0.39 (0.11) | 0.61 (0.12) | <0.001 |
| Minute ventilation (L min−1) | 8.7 (2.1) | 8.4 (1.6) | 8.6 (2.1) | 9.7 (2.3) | 0.032 |
| Ventilatory frequency (bpm) | 17 (4.5) | 16 (5.1) | 16 (4.3) | 19 (4.8) | 0.062 |
| Tidal volume/kgPBW (ml kg−1) | 8.3 (1.4) | 8.6 (1.4) | 8.6 (1.4) | 8.1 (1.3) | 0.485 |
| VCO2 (ml min−1) | 180 (39.8) | 180 (40.1) | 176 (36.7) | 191 (47.5) | 0.148 |
| Paco2 (kPa) | 45.2 (7.7) | 42.1 (5.4) | 44.4 (7.6) | 50.6 (7.7) | <0.001 |
| Physiological dead space | 0.58 (0.12) | 0.54 (0.13) | 0.57 (0.12) | 0.65 (0.11) | <0.001 |
| True dead space | 0.53 (0.13) | 0.51 (0.15) | 0.53 (0.13) | 0.53 (0.27) | 0.199 |
| Ventilatory ratio | 1.54 (0.45) | 1.38 (0.39) | 1.49 (0.45) | 1.86 (0.39) | <0.001 |
| Mechanical power | 19 (7) | 20 (8) | 18 (7) | 21 (8) | 0.002 |
| Driving pressure | 14 (4) | 14 (3) | 14 (4) | 15 (4) | <0.001 |
| Lung tissue mass (g) | 1480 (504) | 1234 (186.1) | 1429 (481) | 1894 (565.2) | <0.001 |
| Lung gas volume (ml) | 1141 (635) | 1192 (489) | 1173 (657) | 977 (673) | 0.319 |
| Non-aerated tissue fraction (%) | 42.6 (15.5) | 36.2 (13) | 41.5 (15.1) | 52.7 (14.8) | <0.001 |
| Poorly aerated tissue fraction (%) | 31.1 (11.3) | 30.6 (10.8) | 31.5 (11.8) | 30.1 (10.1) | 0.830 |
| Normally aerated tissue fraction (%) | 25.9 (13.3) | 32.9 (11.5) | 26.7 (12.9) | 16.8 (11.3) | <0.001 |
| ICU mortality (%)∗ | 63 (41%) | 7 (26%) | 34 (36%) | 22 (75%) | <0.001 |
Relationship between dead space, VCO2, and ventilatory ratio
The theoretical relationship between VR and VD/VTphys demonstrates that VR increases asymptotically with VD/VTphys, and its value depends on VCO2 (Fig 1 a). VRs <1 (0.86 [0.11], n=71), between 1 and 2 (1.44 [0.27], n=484) and >2 (2.41 [0.52], n=86) were respectively associated (Fig 1b) with VD/VTphys of 0.32 (0.11), 0.55 (0.1), and 0.73 (0.07). This exponential relationship was shifted on the vertical axis (VR) depending on VCO2. Patients with VCO2 values exceeding the median (208 [29] ml min−1) had a higher VR than patients with VCO2 below the median for the same calculated VD/VTphys. In both the theoretical (Fig 1a) and the actual cohort (Fig 1b), remarkably different VRs were associated with the same VD/VTphys, depending on the VCO2.
Fig 1.
(a) Theoretical model: ventilatory ratio as a function of the physiological dead space at VCO2 equal to 186 ml min−1 (median of the clinical cohort – blue line), 228 ml min−1 (50% above the median – red line), and 142 ml min−1 (50% below the median). (b) Clinical cohort (n=641): ventilatory ratio as a function of physiological dead space. Patients with VCO2 higher than median (186 ml min−1) are represented by red points (average VCO2 equal to 208 (29) ml min−1); patients with VCO2 below the median are represented by green points (average VCO2 equal to 164 (17) ml min−1).
Effects of venous admixture on physiological dead space and ventilatory ratio
Venous admixture and physiological dead space
Figure 2 shows the relationship between VD/VTcorr and VD/VTphys in our theoretical model (panel a) and in the subgroup of 153 patients in whom the computation of the VD/VTcorr for Qva/Q was possible (panel b). As shown, the relationship between VD/VTcorr and VD/VTphys was linear but shifted to the right with higher Qva/Q. Figure 2 shows that VD/VTphys, as measured in clinical practice, corresponds to VD/VTcorr only if Qva/Q is zero, that is the alveolar P co 2 equals the arterial P co 2. With increasing Qva/Q (Fig 2a), VD/VTcorr was remarkably lower than VD/VTphys. The difference between physiological and VD/VTcorr as a function of Qva/Q is reported in Supplementary Figure E1, panel A.
Fig 2.
(a) Theoretical model: the true physiological dead space as a function of physiological dead space at different venous admixture. The blue line is the identity line (venous admixture equal to zero), green line denotes venous admixture equals to 0.31, whereas the red line has venous admixture equal to 0.48. (b) Corrected dead space as a function of the physiological dead space in the clinical cohort of patients in which venous admixture was available. The venous admixture levels were the average above the median (0.31 [0.07]) and below the median (0.48 [0.13]).
Venous admixture and ventilatory ratio
In Fig 3 we report the differences between VR and the VR corrected for Qva/Q in mild, moderate, and severe ARDS. The difference between VR and VR corrected for Qva/Q becomes progressively larger with greater disease severity at different levels of VD/VTphys (Supplementary Figure E1, panel B).
Fig 3.
Effect of the venous admixture, measured as difference between ventilatory ratio and ventilatory ratio corrected for venous admixture, in different classes of ARDS severity. The greater is the venous admixture, the higher is its effect on the difference between measured and corrected ventilatory ratios. ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; VR, ventilatory ratio.
Associations of dead space and ventilatory ratio with mortality
In the entire cohort, VD/VTphys, PaO 2/FiO2, and VR were independently associated with mortality. The OR for mortality of VR and VD/VTphys were respectively 2.5 (95% CI, 1.8–3.5) and 7.04 (95% CI, 1.9–27.7). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.59–0.68) for VR and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.62–0.71) for VD/VTphys. When the effect of VR on mortality was adjusted – in a multivariable model – for variables proven to affect VR in the physiological modelling (i.e. VD/VTphys, VCO2, PaO 2/FiO2), VR was no longer independently associated with mortality, ORadj=1.2 (95% CI, 0.7–2.1).
On the contrary, VD/VTphys (ORadj=17.9; 95% CI, 1.8–185; P<0.05); VCO2 (ORadj=0.99; 95% CI, 0.99–1.00; P<0.001); and PaO 2/FiO2 (ORadj=0.99; 95% CI, 0.99–1.00; P<0.001) remained independent predictors of ICU mortality. To further investigate the relative association of each covariate on mortality, we used a standardised model including the same variables so that the resulting adjusted ORs refer to a unit change in sd – regardless of the real units, therefore giving all covariates similar numerical scale. Using this model, the standardised adjusted OR (ORst-adj) for mortality were 1.09 (95% CI, 0.8–1.5), 1.5 (95% CI, 1.1–2.1; P<0.05); 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58–0.87; P<0.001), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.55–0.81; P<0.001) for VR, VD/VTphys, VCO2, and PaO 2/FiO2, respectively, all independently associated with mortality. These results indicate that variations in VCO2 and PaO 2/FiO2 have a similar and important independent association with mortality and affect the prognostic prediction of VR.
Discussion
The main results of this study are: (1) the effect of Qva/Q on absolute VR becomes larger with increasing VD/VTphys; (2) the effect of VCO2 is also of major significance, particularly when VR is corrected for Qva/Q; (3) VR is a useful aggregate variable associated with outcome; however, it does not only reflect VD/VTphys but also important contributions from VCO2 (Fig 1) and Qva/Q, reflected by PaO 2/FiO2 (Supplementary Figure E2). These data suggest that VCO2 and Qva/Q contribute to the high values of VR seen in the most severe categories of patients.
The CO2-related variables are strongly related with structural lung changes in ARDS1 and in COVID-19 pneumonia.16 In the Bohr's formulation,17 VD/VTphys was measured as the difference between alveolar and mixed expired CO2 normalised to the alveolar P co 2 (Supplementary material, equation [1]). The alveolar P co 2, according to Riley and colleagues,18 is the pressure present continuously and uniformly in functioning alveoli, assuming that the quantity of CO2 exchanged from blood to alveoli occurs in equal proportion to the VCO2 measured in the expired air (Supplementary material, equation [2]). The dead space fraction computed in this model depends on the ratio between alveolar ventilation and minute ventilation, regardless of oxygenation status or VCO2. The measurement of alveolar P co 2, however, is complex and not easily performed in clinical practice; therefore, VD/VTphys is estimated using the Enghoff modification, where alveolar P co 2 is assumed equal to arterial P co 2.19 The dead space computed in this way was defined as ‘physiological’, as during health, the alveolar P co 2 and arterial P co 2 differ only by 0.1–0.4 kPa. In ARDS, however, the arterial P co 2 may substantially exceed the alveolar P co 2, because of the effect of Qva/Q. Indeed, the difference between arterial and alveolar P co 2 increases with Qva/Q and VCO2, whereas it decreases with cardiac output (Supplementary Figure E3). Therefore, the substitution of alveolar with the arterial P co 2 overestimates the true dead space. To correct for the Qva/Q effect, Kuwabara and Duncalf11 proposed an equation based on the mass conservation principle:
where CaCO2, CcCO2, and CvcCO2 are the CO2 contents in arterial, pulmonary (ventilated) capillary, and mixed venous blood, respectively. Kuwabara and Duncalf11 assumed that tensions and contents are in equilibrium and vary proportionately, and therefore the formula to correct dead space for shunt uses gas tensions instead of their contents. Although this assumption is not strictly accurate, using CO2 contents or tensions provided similar results (see supplement). Therefore, despite its limitations, the Kuwabara equation is the best available option to correct the dead space. The impact of Qva/Q on VD/VTphys may be relevant at Qva/Q>0.2–0.3 (Supplementary Fig. E1, panel A). Indeed, the ‘physiological’ dead space in pathological conditions represents the entirety of the gas exchange dysfunction, as it is influenced both by wasted ventilation (dead space ventilation) and wasted perfusion (Qva/Q).
VR has been proposed by Sinha and colleagues5 as an estimate of ventilatory efficiency. A theoretical analysis8 indicated that VCO2 and VD/VTphys are both determinants of VR. VR uses as a reference the product of ‘standard’ VE and the ‘standard’ Paco 2. The standard VE was derived, more than five decades ago, from normal subjects undergoing anaesthesia.15 Interestingly, we found similar values (0.1 kgPBW −1) in our subgroup of ARDS patients. VR values in the literature range from <1 in the anaesthetised cohorts (indicating the effects of normal VD/VTphys and Qva/Q and reduced VCO2) to >5 in ICU patients. The largest values of VR are unlikely to reflect the magnitude of dead space ventilation alone, and it is therefore unclear whether the higher absolute value of VR observed in severe ARDS reflects a worse dead space or the greater contribution of the Qva/Q. Our multivariable logistic regression indicates that VR alone is a useful aggregate variable associated with outcome with odds ratios similar to other studies.7 Because of the relationship between VR and PaO 2/FiO2 ratio, particularly in severe disease, VR should be interpreted accordingly and not considered a bedside index to estimate purely dead space. The physiological dead space and VR have a near-exponential relationship whose level depends on VCO2. Indeed, we found higher VR in patients with higher VCO2 (Fig 1).
Sinha and colleagues7 found weak and non-significant association between VCO2 and VR. They attributed this to the smaller and short-lived variation in VCO2 compared with the larger variations of VD/VTphys. However, we found that the effects of VCO2 are more marked when VR is corrected for Qva/Q. The recognition that venous admixture (Qva/Q) and VCO2 can change the absolute value of VR despite an unchanged dead space ventilation has several potential implications: (1) Changes in VR may not be attributed to a change in VD/VT if there are associated variations in oxygenation or VCO2. This may affect the interpretation of the effect of therapeutic manoeuvres such as prone position, PEEP selection, or pulmonary vasodilators on the change in VD/VT. In these examples, changes in VR may be determined by a variable combination of reduction in Qva/Q and VD/VT – but not necessarily exclusively in VD/VT. (2) In patients with more severe disease, the variations in VR may be confounded by the effect of larger Qva/Q. In this case, interventions that affect Qva/Q may disproportionally affect VR and affect the assumption of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. (3) Prediction models using VR as a proxy of VD/VT can inflate the range and its prognostic effect. (4) Although VCO2 disparities may appear a minor problem in general cohort, the VR dependency on this variable makes its use misleading in cases of abnormal VCO2 or during extracorporeal support, where a substantial portion of CO2 may be cleared by the membrane lung. In that setting, VD/VTphys fully reflects the lung status, whereas VR may appear normal or even low.
The major limitation of this work, beyond its retrospective design, is that VCO2 was estimated rather than measured. The computation relies on the Harris–Benedict equation, which estimates the ‘standard’ VCO2 production based on age, height, and weight (Supplementary material, equation [19]). In ICU patients, we may expect remarkable discrepancies between the actual and the predicted VCO2. Yet, in the 176 patients in which VCO2 was measured, the relationship with the computed VCO2 was acceptable and the bias between measured and computed VCO2 was –22 (48) ml, despite the large variability of their absolute values (Supplementary Fig. E4). Any inaccuracy of VCO2 estimation should affect the VD/VT (Supplementary material, Equation [2]), whereas it would not affect the calculation of VR. The measured and estimated VD/VTphys values computed in 176 individuals, however, were similar (0.65 [0.13] and 0.59 [0.12], respectively).
In conclusion, our data suggest that: (1) if one aims to strictly determine the true dead space in ARDS, the VD/VTphys must be corrected for Qva/Q; (2) the VD/VTphys is an estimate of the overall gas exchange (oxygenation and CO2 clearance) and, as such, a powerful clinical tool to assess the severity of the lung impairment; (3) ventilatory ratio alone is a useful variable associated with outcome; however, ventilatory ratio, as VD/VTphys, does not only reflect ventilated regions alone but also the important contributions of VCO2 and Qva/Q.
Authors' contributions
Study concept and design: LG, LC, JM, MQ, KM
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: RM, PP, LG, LC, OM, MB, SG, CZ, RD, MV, FR
First drafting of manuscript-writing committee: RM; PP, LG, FR, LC, BS, JM, MQ
Critical revision for important intellectual content and final approval of manuscript: LC, JM, MQ, RM, LC, JM, MQ, JW, DC
Statistical analysis: BS, JW, RM
Paper review and modifications: all authors
Administrative, technical or material support: KM, OM, PH
Declaration of Interest
LG reports a consultancy for General Electric and SIDAM. He also receives lecture fees from Estor and Mindray.
Funding
Sartorius AG (Göttingen, Germany) for an unrestricted grant for lung injury-related research to the Department of Anesthesiology of Göttingen University Medical Center; Klaus-Tschira Stiftung gGmbH, Heidelberg (development of the software for CT analysis).
Handling editor: Gareth Ackland
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.10.035.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Gattinoni L., Bombino M., Pelosi P., et al. Lung structure and function in different stages of severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA. 1994;271:1772–1779. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nuckton T.J., Pittet J.F. Pulmonary dead-space fraction as a risk factor for death in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1281–1286. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cressoni M., Cadringher P., Chiurazzi C., et al. Lung inhomogeneity in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:149–158. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201308-1567OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kallet R.H., Zhuo H., Liu K.D., Calfee C.S., Matthay M.A. On behalf of the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute ARDS Network Investigators. The association between physiologic dead-space fraction and mortality in subjects with ARDS enrolled in a prospective multi-center clinical trial. Respir Care. 2014;59:1611–1618. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sinha P., Fauvel N.J., Singh S., Soni N. Ventilatory ratio: a simple bedside measure of ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:692–697. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Morales-Quinteros L., Schultz M.J., Bringué J., et al. MARS Consortium Estimated dead space fraction and the ventilatory ratio are associated with mortality in early ARDS. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9:128. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0601-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sinha P., Calfee C.S., Beitler J.R., et al. Physiologic analysis and clinical performance of the ventilatory ratio in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199:333–341. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201804-0692OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sinha P., Fauvel N.J., Singh P., Soni N. Analysis of ventilatory ratio as a novel method to monitor ventilatory adequacy at the bedside. Crit Care. 2013;17:R34. doi: 10.1186/cc12541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ranieri V.M., Rubenfeld G.D., Thompson B.T., et al. ARDS Definition Task Force Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307:2526–2533. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Harris A., Benedict F. A biometric study of human basal metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1918;4:370–373. doi: 10.1073/pnas.4.12.370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kuwabara S., Duncalf D. Effect of anatomic shunt on physiologic deadspace-to-tidal volume ratio—a new equation. Anesthesiology. 1969;31:575–577. doi: 10.1097/00000542-196912000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Douglas A.R., Jones N.L., Reed J.W. Calculation of whole blood CO2 content. J Appl Physiol. 1988;65:473–477. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1988.65.1.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Herrmann P., Nguyen X., Luecke T., Quintel M. MALUNA 1.03 a software tool for the analysis of computed tomographic slice images of the lung. Jamal R Jaschinski H Published Online. 2002:389–395. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Herrmann P., Busana M., Cressoni M., et al. Using artificial intelligence for automatic segmentation of CT lung images in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Front Physiol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.676118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nunn J.F. Ventilation nomograms during anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1960;15:65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1960.tb13898.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rossi S., Palumbo M.M., Sverzellati N., et al. Mechanisms of oxygenation responses to proning and recruitment in COVID-19 pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48:56–66. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06562-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bohr C. Ueber die Lungenathmung1. Skand Arch Für Physiol. 1891;2:236–268. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Riley R.L., Lilienthal J.L., Proemmel D.D., Franke R.E. On the determination of the physiologically effective pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide in alveolar air. Am J Physiol. 1946;147:191–198. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1946.147.1.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Enghoff H. Volumen inefficax. Bermekungen zur Frage des shadlichen Raumes. Upsala Lakareforen Forh. 1938;44:191–218. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



