Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Dec 2;17(12):e0278564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278564

Mechanism of LH release after peripheral administration of kisspeptin in cattle

Carlos E P Leonardi 1, Rodrigo A Carrasco 1, Fernanda C F Dias 1, Eric M Zwiefelhofer 1, Gregg P Adams 1, Jaswant Singh 1,*
Editor: Peter J Hansen2
PMCID: PMC9718405  PMID: 36459509

Abstract

Kisspeptin modulates GnRH secretion in mammals and peripheral administration of 10-amino acid fragment of kisspeptin (Kp10) induces LH release and ovulation in cattle. Experiments were done to determine if iv administration of kisspeptin will activate GnRH neurons (i.e., after crossing the blood-brain barrier) and if pre-treatment with a GnRH receptor blocker will alter kisspeptin-induced LH release (from gonadotrophs) and ovulation. In Experiment 1, cows (n = 3 per group) were given human-Kisspeptin10 (hKp10; 3 x 15 mg iv at 60-min intervals) or normal saline and euthanized 150 min after treatment was initiated. Every 20th free-floating section (50 μm thickness) from the preoptic area to hypothalamus was double immunostained to colocalize GnRH- (DAB) and activated neurons (cFOS; Nickel-DAB). Kisspeptin induced plasma LH release from 15 to 150 min (P = 0.01) but the proportion of activated GnRH neurons did not differ between groups (5.8% and 3.5%, respectively; P = 0.11). Immunogold electron microscopy detected close contacts between kisspeptin fibers and GnRH terminals in the median eminence. In Experiment 2, pubertal heifers (n = 5 per group) were treated with 1) hKp10 iv, 2) Cetrorelix (GnRH antagonist; im) + hKp10 iv or 3) saline on Day 6 of the follicular wave under low-progesterone condition. A rise in plasma LH concentration was detected from 15 to 240 min in the hKp10 group but not in cetrorelix or control group (P<0.001). Ovulations were detected only in the hKp10 group (4/5; P = 0.02). Cetrorelix treatment was associated with regression of the preovulatory dominant follicle and emergence of a new follicular wave 3.4±0.75 days after the treatment in all five heifers. Results support the hypothesis that the effect of peripheral kisspeptin is mediated downstream of GnRH synthesis and does not involve GnRH-independent LH release from gonadotrophs. Peripheral kisspeptin may release pre-synthesized GnRH from the nerve terminals in areas outside the blood-brain barrier.

Introduction

Kisspeptin is a neuropeptide product of kiss-1 gene that is cleaved and/or degraded in 54-, 14-, 13- and 10-amino acid peptides [1]. Kisspeptin is highly expressed in the brain and mutations of kisspeptin receptor (Kiss1R), also named G-protein receptor-54 (GPR-54), induce hypothalamic hypogonadism and impaired reproductive maturation in humans and mice [2,3]. The C-terminal end of amino acid kisspeptin sequence is essential for complete activation of Kiss1R, and the shortest sequence form (10-amino acids) has higher bio-potency than longer forms [1,4]. Hypothalamic GnRH neurons express Kiss1R in rats [5,6]. Furthermore, GnRH and kisspeptin immunoreactive cells are located in the preoptic area and in the hypothalamus in mice, primates, sheep [79] and cattle [10], and its projection are detected in close association in the median eminence. Peripheral injections of kisspeptin induce luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion and ovulation in several mammalian species [1115] including cows [16,17] and seasonally anestrus sheep [11]. Further, intravenous administration of kisspeptin-10 induces the release of GnRH into the hypophyseal portal circulation in sheep [6]. It is unknown if the 10-amino acid kisspeptin fragment (kisspeptin-10) is able to cross the blood-brain barrier to stimulate GnRH neurons after peripheral injection in cattle.

The DNA-binding oncogene protein, c-FOS, changes gene transcription in response to cellular membrane signals and has been used as a biomarker to identify activated neurons after neuronal stimulation [5,1820]. The majority of neurons do not express c-FOS under baseline conditions [19,21], however, the expression of the c-FOS gene increase dramatically after neuronal stimulation resulting in c-FOS protein production within 2–5 h, with a peak between 60–90 min [21,22]. Thus, dual immunohistochemistry to co-localize a protein target and c-FOS expression is an effective tool to determine the activation of specific neuronal populations. There was a high correlation between increased c-FOS expression in GnRH neurons and the LH surge in male and female rats and ewes [5,19,23], but not in monkeys [24]. Bypassing the blood-brain barrier by intra-cerebroventricular administration of kisspeptin-10 induced concurrent LH secretion and cFOS expression in 85% of rat GnRH neurons after 2 hours of administration [5] with some evidence of neuronal activation after subcutaneous administration [15]. However, results of a study in ewes suggest that intravenous kisspeptin-10 administration may not cross the blood-brain barrier because the peptide was not detected in the cerebrospinal fluid [12]. It is not yet known if peripheral kisspeptin can activate the GnRH neurons in cattle.

Endogenous and exogenous GnRH induces release and synthesis of LH from the pituitary gland in cattle [25,26] and administration of a GnRH antagonist prevented the LH surge [27]. Peripheral administration of kisspeptin increased plasma LH concentration in ovariectomized cows [28] and pubertal heifers [29], and induced ovulation under a low-progesterone milieu [16]. In a previous study, we detected a progressive increase in LH secretion within 15 minutes after repeated intravenous administration of kisspeptin-10 in cows with plasma progesterone below 1.7 ng/mL [16]. However, the mechanism by which peripheral administration of kisspeptin-10 induces LH release in cows is unclear. In vitro studies in horses and cattle raise the possibility of direct LH release from anterior pituitary cells by kisspeptin [30,31]. Whether kisspeptin-10 crosses the blood-brain barrier to stimulate GnRH neuronal cell bodies, acts on GnRH nerve terminals in median eminence, or the observed LH release is due to a direct effect on the pituitary gonadotrophs in vivo remains unknown.

The objective of the present study was to elucidate if peripheral administration of kisspeptin will increase LH secretion through activation of GnRH neurons, and to determine if pre-treatment with a GnRH receptor blocker will alter the pattern of kisspeptin-induced LH release and ovulation. We tested the hypotheses that: 1) administration of human kisspeptin-10, given as multiple intravenous doses to cows in proestrus, will activate GnRH neurons to produce cFOS; 2) pre-treatment with a GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix) before kisspeptin treatment will suppress LH release and prevent ovulation in cattle.

Material and methods

Animals

Two experiments were conducted on non-pregnant cattle in the Fall season. Experiment 1 was conducted on lactating Holstein cows (n = 6; 674±7 Kg body weight) during October. Cows were kept in an outdoor pen with access to hay and water ad libitum, and milked twice daily. Experiment 2 was performed in November on Hereford crossbred heifers (n = 15; 500±24 Kg body weight, 17–18 month age) that had a corpus luteum in one of the ovaries at the start of experiment. The heifers were maintained in outdoors pens at the University of Saskatchewan LFCE Goodale Research Farm (52° north and 106° west). Heifers were fed barley silage and had hay and water ad libitum. A mineral salt block was available to heifers throughout the study period. All procedures were performed in accordance with Canadian Council on Animal Care and were approved by the University of Saskatchewan Protocol Review Committee.

Kisspeptin-10 peptide

The human Kisspeptin-10 (hKP-10) peptide (YNWNSFGLRF-NH2) was custom synthetized at >95% of purity (MW: 1318.44 g/mol) by GenScript USA Inc, Piscataway, NJ, USA. The sequence is based on the predicted C-terminal region (112-121-NH2) of human metastin (Gen Bank accession # AY117143) and has been previously used in cattle [16,28,29]. The peptide was previously tested for solubility and was dissolved in ultrapure water at 10 mg/mL.

Experiment 1: c-FOS expression after Kisspeptin-10 treatment during proestrus period

The ovarian status of cows (n = 6) was determined by transrectal ultrasonography using a 7.5 MHz linear-array transducer (MyLab 5, Esoate, Maastricht, Netherlands). Cows in which a corpus luteum (CL) was detected were selected and given 500 μg cloprostenol im (PGF2α; Estrumate, Merck Animal Health, Kirkland, QC, Canada) twice 12 hours apart to cause luteolysis and ovulation. Daily ovarian ultrasonography was performed to monitor follicle development and ovulation (Day 0). Ovulation was defined as the disappearance of a large follicle from one examination to the next, followed by the development of a CL. A luteolytic dose of PGF2α was given on Day 5.5 and repeated 12 hours later to create a proestrus phase. An indwelling jugular catheter was fitted in place 36 hours after first PGF2α im injection as described previously [32], and cows were assigned randomly to two groups: kisspeptin group (n = 3, 3 doses of 15 mg hKp10 iv at 60-min intervals), or control group (n = 3, 3 iv injections of 1.5 mL normal saline solution at 60-min intervals). The dose and frequency of treatment was determined based on our previous studies in cattle [16,17]. Blood samples were collected at 15 min intervals from -30 to 150 min (0 min = time of first injection) in heparinized tubes (Vacutainer, BD, Franklin Lakes NJ, USA). After the last blood collection, cows were euthanized by a bolus intravenous dose of sodium pentobarbital (Euthanyl Forte, 540 mg/mL, 1mL/5kg body weight, Bimeda-MTC Animal Health Inc, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada).

Tissue collection and preparation

After euthanasia, cow heads were removed at the level of third cervical vertebra, a plastic cannula was inserted into the lumen of left and right common carotid artery and held with hemostatic forceps for the perfusion procedure. The brain was perfused in situ with 4L of cold normal saline solution with 10 IU of heparin sodium per mL followed by 2L of 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 0.1M, pH = 7.4) using a peristaltic pump (~250 mL/min flow rate). Half of the volume was perfused through each artery (i.e., 2L cold normal saline and 1 L of 4% paraformaldehyde in the right carotid artery and the same volume through left carotid artery). Approximately 15 minutes after completion of the perfusion fixation procedure, the whole brain was removed by cutting the skull bones. The mid-brain (rostral portion of the preoptic area to the mammillary body) was dissected and placed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 hours at 4°C in the equivalent of 10 tissue-volumes. The brain tissue was cryoprotected by immersion in increasing concentration of sucrose solution in 0.1M PBS, beginning with 10%, 20% and 30% (w/v) until it sank. Finally, the tissue block containing the preoptic area (POA) and hypothalamus (approximately 40 mm length in rostral-caudal direction x 36 mm width x 40 mm height in dorso-ventral direction) was frozen at -80°C for ≥48 hour until sectioning. Serial brain sections (coronal sections) were obtained with a cryostat microtome at 50 μm thickness. Brain sections were immersed immediately in cryoprotectant solution containing 30% glucose and 30% glycerol, placed in 2mL tubes and stored at -20°C until further processing. The cryoprotectant solution remained liquid at this temperature. In total 405 to 486 sections were obtained per tissue block.

Dual immunohistochemistry of GnRH and cFOS

Every 20th free-floating section from POA to middle of mammillary body was processed by double immunostaining using two sequential avidin-biotin-peroxidase reactions optimized for thick (50μm) sections: nickel- diaminobenzidine reaction (purple-black; nuclear localization) for c-FOS and diaminobenzidine reaction (brown color; cytoplasmic localization in perikarya and nerve fibers) for GnRH. Since both antigens are in different cytosolic compartments, it was expected to have minimal crossreactivity. All solutions were made in 0.1M phosphate buffered saline pH 7.4 (PBS) unless otherwise specified and sections were washed in PBS 3 times x 5min on a rocking platform between all steps. The serial sections were warmed up to room temperature for 20 min before removal of the cryoprotection solution. The samples were placed individually in six wells plate dishes and identity of the sections were maintained throughout the staining procedure. The brain slices were washed three times (once 30 min, twice 5 min) in PBS before the antigen retrieval by placing them in the hot water bath at 90°C for 18min in 3mL of citrate buffer (0.01M, pH 6.0) containing 0.3% (v/v) Tween20. Following antigen retrieval, samples were allowed to cool for 20 min at room temperature and washed. The sections were incubated in a blocking solution (1% bovine serum albumin, 0.3% (v/v) TritonX) for 4h at room temperature on a rocking platform. Next, sections were incubated (without washing) in a polyclonal rabbit anti-c-FOS antiserum solution (1:30,000 dilution in blocking buffer; Catalog # ABE457, EMD Millipore, Germany) and incubated for 72 hours at 4°C. Following the primary antibody incubation, the sections were placed in 3% hydrogen peroxide solution for 30 min to quench endogenous peroxidase. Then, the samples were incubated for 1h in the biotin-conjugated secondary antibody (Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Biotin; Thermo Fisher Scientific C#31822) at a 1:500 dilution in PBS with 0.3% TritonX. Finally, the slides were immersed in a solution containing peroxidase-conjugated Streptavidin (Streptavidin-HRP, Jackson Immuno Research Inc. West Grove, PA, USA) diluted 1:10,000. The peroxidase activity was visualized by incubating the sections in a solution containing 2.5% nickel sulfate, diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate (DAB, 3,3’-Diaminobenzidin; Sigma-Aldrich, Inc.) and hydrogen peroxide (0.05% v/v). Upon color development, sections were then washed, immersed in polyclonal rabbit anti-GnRH antiserum for the sequential staining (1:40,000, LR-5, a generous gift from Dr. R. Benoit, McGill University, Montreal, Canada) and incubated for 72 hours at 4°C. The secondary antibody (Goat anti-Rabbit Biotin; Thermo Fisher Scientific Catalog # 31822) was used at 1:500 dilution for an hour. Finally, the slides were incubated in 1:10,000 peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin and the peroxidase activity was detected by the DAB-substrate (resulting in brown reaction). The free-floating sections were mounted on large glass slides (75 X 50 mm and 0.96 to 1.06 mm thickness; Corning Incorporated, USA). The slides were air dried at room temperature and coverslipped (48 X 65 mm, Number 1; Thermo Scientific, USA) using a xylene-based mounting medium (Eukitt, Sigma-Aldrich, Oukville, ON, Canada, #03989).

The number of GnRH perikarya (without cFOS-staining) and cFOS co-localized GnRH positive perikarya were recorded in different regions/neuronal nuclei of the POA and hypothalamus at 10x and 40x objective magnification. Every 20th serial section (i.e., at 1mm intervals) from the cranial POA to the mammillary body was analyzed.

DAB (GnRH) and immunogold (kisspeptin) staining for transmission electron microscopy

Midbrain sagittal sections containing the median eminence (n = 2 cows from the kisspeptin group) were processed for immunoelectron microscopy to determine the association between kisspeptin and GnRH nerve terminals. Enblock immunostaining of cryostat sections (50 μm thickness) was performed for GnRH using DAB procedure as describe in previous section. The median eminence containing DAB staining was dissected from the floating sections under a light microscope and further processed for LR white resin embedding. Samples were rinsed in sodium cacodylate buffer, and dehydrated through graded ethanol series and placed in LH white resin overnight for infiltration under black light. Ultrathin sections (60 to 80 nm thickness) were cut and placed on nickel grids. Samples were incubated in polyclonal rabbit anti-kisspeptin antiserum (1:10 dilution; AC566, a generous gift from Dr. Franceschini, INRA, Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, Nouzilly, France; [33]) and the antigen-antibody complex was detected with an anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to 10 nm gold particles (Goat anti-Rabbit Gold, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, #G7402). Sections were observed under a transmission electron microscope at 80 kv (Hitachi HT7700).

Antibody controls

The controls were performed with four sections (two from preoptic area, and two containing arcuate nucleus) per brain. The specificity of the GnRH and cFOS (S1 Fig) antibodies were tested by pre-adsorption with the GnRH peptide (ab 120184; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and cFOS protein (AB56280-1002 Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), respectivelly. The cFOS and GnRH immunoreactive cells were not detected by using pre-adsorption antibody to peptide or protein. Also, cFOS and GnRH antibodies were omitted during the procedure with no resultant immunoreaction.

Experiment 2: Effect of GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) on response to kisspeptin treatment

Heifers (n = 15) were selected from a larger group based on the detection of a CL by transrectal ultrasonography. Immediately after ultrasound examination, heifers were given PGF2α twice at an interval of 12-hours. To test our hypotheses, we used the low-progesterone bovine model described previously (Fig 1) [16]. Briefly, the ovaries were examined daily by ultrasonography to detect ovulation. Three days after ovulation, follicles ≥5mm in diameter in both ovaries were ablated by transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration, inducing the emergence of new follicular wave 1.5 day after the procedure [34]. After follicular ablation, a progesterone device was placed in the vagina (CIDR, Pfizer Canada, Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada). The day of wave emergence (Day 0) was defined as the day when the dominant follicle was first recorded (4 to 5 mm in diameter) with subsequent increase in diameter. Heifers were given PGF2α (500 μg cloprostenol im, Estrumate, Merck Animal Health, Kirkland, QC, Canada) on Days 3.5 and 4 (i.e., 8 and 8.5 days after ovulation) to cause luteolysis, however, the CIDR devices were left in place until Day 12 to maintain a low-progesterone milieu sufficient to prevent spontaneous ovulation. On Day 6, an indwelling jugular catheter was placed as described [32] and heifers were assigned randomly to three groups (n = 5 per group): 1) 3 iv doses of 15 mg human kisspeptin-10 at 1h intervals (Kp10 group), 2) pretreatment with single im dose of cetrorelix acetate (20 μg/Kg of body weight, GnRH antagonist—Sigma #C5249 diluted in 5% D-Manitol w/v, Sigma #M4125) followed 3h later with 3 iv doses of 15 mg human kisspeptin-10 at 1h intervals (Cetrorelix group), or 3) 3 iv doses of equivalent volume of normal saline at 1h intervals (Control group). Following treatment (on Day 6), ovarian ultrasound examinations were performed daily until the end of the experiment to detect ovulation of the extant dominant follicle (i.e., dominant follicle present at the time of treatment) or of the dominant follicle originating from a subsequent wave. The progesterone device was withdrawn on Day 12 (i.e., thirteen days after insertion) and ultrasound examinations were continued until ovulation was detected.

Fig 1. Experimental model used in Experiment 2.

Fig 1

Emergence of a new follicular wave (Day 0) was induced by follicular ablation (FA) three days after ovulation, and an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (CIDR) was inserted immediately after follicle ablation and left in place for 13 days. Luteolytic doses of a prostaglandin F analog (cloprostenol) were given on Day 3.5 and 4. Ovarian ultrasonography was performed daily during the experiment. Blood collection and treatment administration was done on Day 6.

Blood samples and hormone assays

Serial blood samples on the day of treatment were obtained at 15 min intervals from -30 to 150 min (0 min = time of first hKP-10 or saline injection) using an indwelling jugular catheter as described above in the experimental design section of previous experiment. All blood samples were collected in heparinized tubes (Vacutainer, BD, Franklin Lakes NJ, USA). Immediately after sampling, tubes were centrifuged at 1500 x g for 15 min, and plasma was separated and stored at -20°C.

The plasma samples from both experiments were analyzed for LH and progesterone concentration at the University of Wisconsin (Madison, WI, USA) in Dr O.J. Ginther’s Research Laboratory. Plasma LH concentrations were measured with a validated radioimmunoassay for cattle [35] with modifications as reported [36]. Briefly, LH concentrations were measured in duplicate using USDA-bLH-B-6 for 125I-iodination and for preparing reference standards, and USDA-309-684P as the primary antibody (National Hormone and Pituitary Program, Torrance, CA, USA). The standard curve ranged from 0.078 to 20.0 ng/mL with sensitivity of 0.1 ng mL-1. Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation and mean sensitivity were 6.23%, 12.24% and 0.03ng/mL, respectively. Progesterone concentrations were measured as described [37] in a single assay batch with a commercial solid-phase RIA kit containing antibody-coated tubes and 125I-labeled progesterone (ImmuChem Coated Tube progesterone 125 RIA kit, MP Biomedical, Costa Mesa, CA). The intra-assay coefficients of variation and sensitivity for progesterone were 11.97% and 0.06 ng/mL, respectively.

Statistical analyses

Data analyses were performed using SAS (Statistical Analysis System, software package 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). In both experiments, single-point measurements (i.e., diameter of the dominant follicle at the time of treatment and 24 hours after treatment; diameter of the CL at the time of treatment and progesterone concentration at the time of treatment) were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance or Student’s T-Test (for data with 2 treatment groups, Experiment 1). Statistical significance was assumed when the P-value was ≤0.05 whereas a tendency for a difference was assumed when the P-value was between >0.05 to ≤0.1. Tukey’s post-hoc test was used for multiple comparisons if the P-value for a test detected a difference. Ovulation rate was analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure.

Analyses of repeated measures data (e.g., LH plasma levels, follicular dynamic) were performed using MIXED models procedure, in which treatment, time, and treatment-by-time interaction were tested and a repeat statement was included in the syntax (repeated days subject = cowID). Initial analyses tested five covariance structures (SIMPLE, CS, AR(1), ANTE(1), or UN) and the model with smallest AICC value was selected for final analysis. All values are reported as mean ± SEM.

Results

Experiment 1: c-FOS expression after Kisspeptin-10 treatment during proestrus

The diameter of dominant ovarian follicle and CL at the time of PGF2α injection (Day 6 of follicular wave) and the time of treatment (Day 7) did not differ between groups (Table 1). Plasma progesterone concentrations on Day 7 were also similar (P = 0.15) between the groups. Overall, the concentrations of plasma LH were higher after kisspeptin treatment (Fig 2A, P = 0.01) than the control group but individual variations were noted (Fig 2B).

Table 1. Ovarian and endocrine responses (mean±SEM) of lactating cows in proestrus treated with three iv injections of 15mg human Kisspeptin-10 or normal saline (control) at 1h intervals on Day 7 (Day 0 = day of wave emergence) in Experiment 1.

Data were compared by t-test.

Endpoint Control
(n = 3)
Kisspeptin
(n = 3)
P-value
Plasma progesterone concentration on Day 7 (ng/ml) 1.74±0.11 0.96±0.43 0.15
Dominant follicle diameter (mm):
    on Day 6 15.33±0.22 16.75±0.52 0.06
    on Day 7 16.08±0.58 18.08±0.91 0.14
Corpus luteum diameter (mm):
    on Day 6 20.41±1.74 20.16±3.16 0.94
    on Day 7 16.91±0.08 16.51±1.52 0.79

Fig 2. Plasma LH concentration in the experiment 1.

Fig 2

A) Plasma LH plasma concentrations in lactating cows treated with three iv injections of 15mg human Kisspeptin-10 (kisspeptin; n = 3) or normal saline (control; n = 3) at 1h intervals on Day 7 (Day 0 = day of wave emergence) in Experiment 1. B) Plasma LH profiles of individual cows from the kisspeptin group illustrating similar pattern in two cows but varying magnitude of response among the three animals. Black arrows along the x-axes indicate the time of treatments.

The total number of GnRH immunoreactive perikarya (Fig 3A) did not differ between the treatment groups (kisspeptin: 44.33±7.3, control: 28.33±3.3; P = 0.11), nor did the proportion of GnRH perikarya that co-expressed c-FOS (Fig 3B) (kisspeptin: 5.8%, control: 3.5%; P = 0.11). Individual variations were recorded in the number of perikarya that express c-FOS only (Table 2).

Fig 3. Distribution of GnRH and c-FOS immunoreactive cells in the preoptic area and hypothalamus after administration of 3 doses of 15 mg human Kisspeptin-10 intravenously (at 1 hr intervals) during proestrous phase of estrous cycle in cows.

Fig 3

A) GnRH immunoreactive neurons (arrow) in the medial preoptic area (mPOA) nucleus showing cytoplasmic DAB (brown) staining. B) GnRH immunoreactive neurons that co-express c-FOS immunoreactive reaction (Nickel-DAB black color). Note that c-FOS is localized in the nucleus (arrow). C-D) GnRH (brown) and c-FOS (black) immunoreaction cells and nerve fibers in the arcuate nucleus and median eminence.

Table 2. Number of neurons expressing immunoreactivity for c-FOS positive perikarya (c-FOS), GnRH positive perikarya (GnRH) and GnRH neurons bodies that co-expressed cFOS protein (c-FOS and GnRH in the preoptic and hypothalamic area of cows 150 minutes after initiation of treatment with kisspeptin or saline (Time 0 = first administration).

Number of perikarya in preoptic area + hypothalamus
Cow Group c-FOS GnRH GnRH+cFOS
C1 control 248 35 1
C2 control 1860 25 0
C3 control 3954 25 1
T1 kisspeptin
599
58 4
T2 kisspeptin 1546 42 3
T3 kisspeptin 1031 33 1

Sagittal sections from tissues processed by immunoelectron microscopy demonstrated an close-appositions between kisspeptin and GnRH nerve terminals at the level of the median eminence. The secretory vesicles of GnRH were apparent as generalized electron dense areas (DAB reaction) within the terminal portion of GnRH axons while the Kp-immunoreactive nerve terminals showed aggregation of gold particles surrounding the GnRH nerve fibers (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Representative immuno-electron microscopy at the border of median eminence region of medio-basal hypothalamus in a proestrous cow after intravenous kisspeptin administration.

Fig 4

A) black arrows indicate synaptic terminals kisspeptin fiber projection, and white arrows indicate neurosecretory GnRH granules in axon terminals; B) Higher magnification from Fig A (black box) showing kisspeptin immunoreactive axon fiber projection is identified with gold particles (small black dots); C) Higher magnification from Fig A (dotted white rectangle) showing GnRH immunoreactive axon nerve terminal is identified with GnRH neurosecretory granules (DAB staining) surrounded by kisspeptin immunoreactivity (gold particles).

Experiment 2: Effect of GnRH antagonist on kisspeptin response

The diameter of the dominant ovarian follicle at the time of treatment (Day 6 of follicular wave) and 24h after treatment did not differ among the Kp10, Cetrorelix and Control groups (Table 3). Plasma progesterone concentrations were similar among groups at the time of treatment. The Kp10 group had higher plasma LH concentrations than the Cetrorelix and Control groups (P<0.001; Fig 5B). Plasma LH concentrations remained higher in the Kp10 group than the other two groups from 15 to 240 min (0 min = first injection of the treatment; Fig 5B). Ovulation of the extant dominant follicle was recorded in 4 of 5 heifers in the Kp10 group compared to 0 of 5 heifers in the Cetrorelix and Control groups (Table 3). A new follicular wave emerged immediately in all four heifers that ovulated after kisspeptin treatment (Fig 5A). Regression of the extant dominant follicle was recorded 3 to 4 days after treatment in the Cetrorelix group (Fig 5A). Emergence of a new follicular wave occurred 3.40±0.75 days after treatment in the Cetrorelix group (i.e., without ovulation of extant dominant follicle) compared to 2.75±0.75 days in the Kp10 group (after ovulation of extant dominant follicle in 4 of 5 heifers). In the Control group, the extant dominant follicles did not regress, and ovulated on Day 15 after CIDR removal (withdrawn on Day 12). All new dominant follicles from the Kp10 (n = 4) and Cetrorelix (n = 5) group ovulated on Day 15 after the CIDR removal (Day 12).

Table 3. Ovarian and endocrine responses (mean±SEM) of heifers treated with human Kisspeptin-10 (Kp10 group), pre-treatment with cetrorelix before Kisspeptin-10 (Cetrorelix group) or normal saline (Control group) intravenously under subluteal levels of plasma progesterone in Experiment 2.

Endpoint Kp10 (n = 5) Cetrorelix (n = 5) Control (n = 5) P-value *
Plasma progesterone on the day of treatment (Day 6)
1.86±0.43 1.41±0.56 1.86±0.38 0.73
Ovulation rate after treatments:
    number of heifer/total 4/5a 0/5b 0/5b 0.02
    hours after treatment 48 - -
Dominant follicle diameter (mm):
    at time of treatment 11.34±0.91 13.01±0.68 12.36±0.26 0.26
    24h after treatment 12.24±0.89 13.38±0.55 13.22±0.34 0.42
    48h after treatment* 16.51 12.91±0.55 14.67±0.56 0.06
Number of ovulations after CIDR removal on Day 12:
    Extant dominant follicle*# 1/1 0/5 5/5 0.01
    New dominant follicle* 4/4 5/5 0/0 0.81

a,bWithin rows, values with no common superscript are different (P≤0.05).

*Statistical analysis for two treatment groups (Cetrorelix versus Control).

Interval between treatment and ovulation.

#Dominant follicle present at the time of treatment.

Dominant follicle of a new wave that emerged after treatment.

Fig 5. Ovarian follicular dynamic and LH profile in heifers treated in the Experiment 2.

Fig 5

A) Growth profile of dominant follicle in pubertal heifers treated at Day 6 of follicular wave (day of wave emergence = Day 0) with human Kisspeptin-10 given as three injections of 15 mg at 60 minutes interval over a 2-hour period (Kp10 group, n = 5). Cetrorelix group (n = 5) was injected GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix, 20 μg/Kg body weight, intramuscular) 3 hours before kisspeptin treatment while the Control group (n = 5) was given three intravenous injections of normal saline. B) Plasma LH concentrations in Kp10, Cetrorelix and Control group heifers.

Discussion

Our research group recently discovered that multiple intravenous doses of kisspeptin at short intervals induce LH secretion and ovulation of dominant follicle in cattle under low plasma progesterone environment [16]. Kisspeptin neurons in hypothalamus are known to modulate GnRH secretion in several species [11,14,15] but the mechanism of action of peripheral administration of kisspeptin on hypothalamic-pituitary gonadal axis is unclear in cattle. Results of this study document that kisspeptin given intravenously at 1h intervals induced LH secretion confirming our previous results, but that this effect was not mediated through activation of GnRH neurons (i.e., no change in proportion of GnRH cells expressing cFOS) in the preoptic area or hypothalamus of cows in proestrus (i.e., the most permissive stage for kisspeptin action). Further, pre-treatment with a GnRH antagonist abolished the LH releasing effect of kisspeptin and prevented ovulation, ruling out direct effect of kisspeptin on gonadotrophs. Close contact between kisspeptin fibers and GnRH-containing nerve terminals in the median eminence was detected, and collectively, results support the hypothesis that the effect of peripheral kisspeptin administration is mediated downstream of GnRH synthesis, perhaps by inducing release of pre-synthesized GnRH from the nerve terminals in areas outside the blood-brain barrier.

While repeated administration of human kisspeptin-10 induced LH release in proestrous cows, the treatment did not induce GnRH neuronal transcription. Our results are consistent with previous studies in that peripheral administration of kisspeptin increased plasma LH concentrations in rats, sheep, cattle, goats, and horses [11,14,15,38,39]. However, we were unable to detect activation of GnRH cell bodies (i.e., no differences in cFOS expression in GnRH neurons between groups) when hypothalamic tissues were examined 2.5 hours after kisspeptin treatment. The approach used in this study to evaluate neuronal activation has been applied to investigate a large number of drugs that were administrated by peripheral route and their effect in GnRH neurons including kisspeptin [23,40,41]. In addition, the advantage of using cFOS expression is that these proteins are located in the nucleus, identification of the phenotype of the activated neurons using substances located within the cytoplasm, such as GnRH, can be accomplished with standard double-labeling immunocytochemical techniques which is the case of current study [41,42]. Furthermore, the plasma LH concentrations was two to three folds higher at the moment of brain collection, and within of 150 minutes after kisspeptin treatment which is appropriate to detect cFOS expression [42]. The preovulatory LH surge in sheep was associated to cFOS expression in 30–40% of hypothalamic GnRH neurons [19]. In contrast, human kisspeptin-10 induced LH release after intracerebroventricular and intraperitoneal administration but only induced c-FOS expression after the central administration [43]. Surgical models in sheep have shown that kisspeptin was undetectable (by radioimmunoassay) in cerebrospinal fluid after intravenous administration [12] while intravenous administration of kisspeptin stimulated the release of GnRH into hypophysial portal blood circulation in sheep [12]. Currently, this approach is not technically feasible in cattle but a similar mechanism of action of kisspeptin is plausible. We interpret our cFOS findings to support the hypothesis that intravenously administrated kisspeptin does not cross the blood brain barrier in cattle similar to that in sheep [44]. In contrast to these results, subcutaneous administration of kisspeptin enhanced cFOS immunoreactity in 60% of GnRH neurons in male rat within 3 hours [15] indicating that species difference may exist in selective permeability or active transport of kisspeptin across the blood brain barrier.

One possible mechanism by which circulating kisspeptin may be able to elicit the observed LH release would be by GnRH-independent direct action on pituitary gonadotrophs. This postulate is supported by in vitro studies using primary cultures of anterior pituitary cells from calves [30,45] and horses [31] wherein incubation with kisspeptin increased the level of LH in the culture medium. We planned our second experiment to address this line of thought–if the effect of peripheral kisspeptin treatment on LH release is independent of GnRH, then the blockage of GnRH receptors on gonadotrophs with an antagonist would not affect the kisspeptin-mediated LH release. However, we observed complete abolition of plasma LH peaks following kisspeptin treatment in heifers pre-treated with cetrorelix; thereby supporting the hypothesis that circulating kisspeptin causes LH release by a GnRH-mediated mechanism in vivo. Our results are similar to observations in the mouse and rat where LH secretion was suppressed by using GnRH receptor antagonists [4,15] and in sheep where disconnecting the pituitary from the hypothalamus prevented kisspeptin response [5,15,46]. A downstream effect of LH suppression in cetrorelix-treated heifers was also observed on the dominant follicle–all heifers failed to ovulate (0 ovulations of 5) in this group compared to 4 out of 5 heifers ovulating by 48 hours after kisspeptin treatment. Interestingly, the dominant follicle of all animals entered the regression phase by 72 hours after kisspeptin and GnRH antagonist treatment. A possible reason for the regression may be altered gene expression [47] and estradiol production by the dominant follicle [48] due to LH suppression [49].

If circulating kisspeptin does not activate the GnRH neurons and causes GnRH-mediated LH release in cattle, the question still stands–how does peripheral injections of kisspeptin augment LH plasma concentrations? Kisspeptin neurons are clustered in two locations a cranial population in the medial preoptic area and second aggregation in the caudal portion of arcuate nucleus [50], and in cows the majority of kisspeptin neurons are detected in the rostral and middle regions of the arcuate nucleus [10,51]. In contrast, GnRH neurons are scattered in the diagonal band of Broca, the medial preoptic area and anterior hypothalamus [52], while the median eminence has a high density of GnRH positive nervefibers close proximity to kisspeptin fibers and portal blood vessels in cows (unpublished) and in primates [7]. The effect of peripheral kisspeptin on the GnRH cells could be exerted at the neuronal terminals in the median eminence (Fig 4) and/or organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis, the target of GnRH secretion into the bloodstream. Additionally, the cFos protein expression is related to neuronal body stimulation and not necessarily axonal stimulation. As mentioned above, only the central administration of kisspeptin in mice induced cFOS expression in GnRH neurons which supported the idea that the stimulation at the perikarya is necessary to induce FOS. The terminals of the murine preoptic GnRH neurons axons reach the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis outside of blood-brain barrier [53]. That peripheral kisspeptin is acting at the median eminence is supported by the ability of kisspeptin to induce GnRH release ex vivo in sheep isolated media eminence, mouse mediobasal hypothalamus explants, and depolarization of GnRH neurons after exposed to kisspeptin onto GnRH nerve terminals [6,13,54]. This plausible explanation of release of pre-synthesized GnRH by action of circulating kisspeptin still remains to be tested by cause-and-effect experiments in cattle.

In conclusion, LH released in response to multiple intravenous doses of kisspeptin in cattle was mediated by a GnRH-dependent mechanism, but not through GnRH neuron activation as indicated by a failure to detect a treatment-induced increase in the proportions of cFOS positive GnRH immunoreactive neurons in the preoptic area and hypothalamus of cows. Pre-treatment with a GnRH antagonist, cetrorelix, 3 hours before initiation of intravenous treatments with kisspeptin suppressed the kisspeptin-induced LH surge, prevented ovulations, and caused regression of the extant dominant follicle followed by emergence of a new follicular wave, on average, 3.4 days after treatment in all five heifers. The likely mechanism of kisspeptin-mediated LH release is downstream of GnRH synthesis, perhaps by inducing release of pre-synthesized GnRH from the nerve terminals in the median eminence.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Pre-absorption cFos antiboby to cFos protein.

Fig A low magnification of a cow hypothalamus section stained with Anti fos antibody. Arrow indicates the area shown in Fig B. Fig B high magnification of fos immunoreactive nuclei in cow hypothalamus (arrows). Fig C cow hypothalamus section stained with preabsorbed Fos antibody (1μg of antibody with 10 μg of fos protein). Arrow indicates the area shown in Fig D. Fig D High magnification of the area indicated by an arrow in Fig C showing no immunoreactivity.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. O.J. Ginther (USA) for assistance with LH and progesterone radio-immunoassays, and L. Sobchishin from the WCVM Imaging Centre (Canada) for the help with electron microscope images. We also thank Isabel Franceschini from INRA (France) and Dr. R. Benoit from McGill University (Canada) for providing the anti-kisspeptin and anti-GnRH antibodies, respectively.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file.

Funding Statement

Research for this paper was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada Discovery grant (RGPIN-2017-05750) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Kotani M, Detheux M, Vandenbogaerde A, Communi D, Vanderwinden JM, Le Poul E, et al. The metastasis suppressor gene KiSS-1 encodes kisspeptins, the natural ligands of the orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR54. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(37):34631–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M104847200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Seminara SB, Messager S, Chatzidaki EE, Thresher RR, Acierno JS Jr., Shagoury JK, et al. The GPR54 gene as a regulator of puberty. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(17):1614–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035322 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.de Roux N, Genin E, Carel JC, Matsuda F, Chaussain JL, Milgrom E. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism due to loss of function of the KiSS1-derived peptide receptor GPR54. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(19):10972–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1834399100 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC196911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ohtaki T, Shintani Y, Honda S, Matsumoto H, Hori A, Kanehashi K, et al. Metastasis suppressor gene KiSS-1 encodes peptide ligand of a G-protein-coupled receptor. Nature. 2001;411(6837):613–7. doi: 10.1038/35079135 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Irwig MS, Fraley GS, Smith JT, Acohido BV, Popa SM, Cunningham MJ, et al. Kisspeptin activation of gonadotropin releasing hormone neurons and regulation of KiSS-1 mRNA in the male rat. Neuroendocrinology. 2004;80(4):264–72. doi: 10.1159/000083140 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Smith JT, Li Q, Yap KS, Shahab M, Roseweir AK, Millar RP, et al. Kisspeptin is essential for the full preovulatory LH surge and stimulates GnRH release from the isolated ovine median eminence. Endocrinology. 2011;152(3):1001–12. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-1225 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ramaswamy S, Guerriero KA, Gibbs RB, Plant TM. Structural interactions between kisspeptin and GnRH neurons in the mediobasal hypothalamus of the male rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) as revealed by double immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Endocrinology. 2008;149(9):4387–95. Epub 2008/05/31. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0438 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2553371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Smith JT, Coolen LM, Kriegsfeld LJ, Sari IP, Jaafarzadehshirazi MR, Maltby M, et al. Variation in kisspeptin and RFamide-related peptide (RFRP) expression and terminal connections to gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons in the brain: a novel medium for seasonal breeding in the sheep. Endocrinology. 2008;149(11):5770–82. Epub 2008/07/12. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0581 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2584593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Clarkson J, Herbison AE. Postnatal development of kisspeptin neurons in mouse hypothalamus; sexual dimorphism and projections to gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons. Endocrinology. 2006;147(12):5817–25. Epub 2006/09/09. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0787 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tanco VM, Whitlock BK, Jones MA, Wilborn RR, Brandebourg TD, Foradori CD. Distribution and regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone, kisspeptin, RF-amide related peptide-3, and dynorphin in the bovine hypothalamus. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1833. Epub 2016/03/26. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1833 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4806599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Caraty A, Smith JT, Lomet D, Ben Said S, Morrissey A, Cognie J, et al. Kisspeptin synchronizes preovulatory surges in cyclical ewes and causes ovulation in seasonally acyclic ewes. Endocrinology. 2007;148(11):5258–67. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0554 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Caraty A, Lomet D, Sebert ME, Guillaume D, Beltramo M, Evans NP. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone release into the hypophyseal portal blood of the ewe mirrors both pulsatile and continuous intravenous infusion of kisspeptin: an insight into kisspeptin’s mechanism of action. J Neuroendocrinol. 2013;25(6):537–46. doi: 10.1111/jne.12030 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.d’Anglemont de Tassigny X, Fagg LA, Carlton MB, Colledge WH. Kisspeptin can stimulate gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) release by a direct action at GnRH nerve terminals. Endocrinology. 2008;149(8):3926–32. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1487 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2488229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ezzat Ahmed A, Saito H, Sawada T, Yaegashi T, Yamashita T, Hirata T, et al. Characteristics of the stimulatory effect of kisspeptin-10 on the secretion of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and growth hormone in prepubertal male and female cattle. J Reprod Dev. 2009;55(6):650–4. doi: 10.1262/jrd.20255 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Matsui H, Takatsu Y, Kumano S, Matsumoto H, Ohtaki T. Peripheral administration of metastin induces marked gonadotropin release and ovulation in the rat. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;320(2):383–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.05.185 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Leonardi CEP, Dias FCF, Adams GP, Araujo ER, Singh J. Kisspeptin induces ovulation in heifers under low plasma progesterone concentrations. Theriogenology. 2020;141:26–34. Epub 2019/09/09. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.08.033 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Leonardi CEP, Dias FCF, Adams GP, Singh J. Effect of Kisspeptin-10 on plasma luteinizing hormone concentrations and follicular dynamics during the luteal phase in cattle. Theriogenology. 2018;119:268–74. Epub 2018/08/03. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.06.023 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dragunow M, Faull R. The use of c-fos as a metabolic marker in neuronal pathway tracing. J Neurosci Methods. 1989;29(3):261–5. Epub 1989/09/01. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(89)90150-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Moenter SM, Karsch FJ, Lehman MN. Fos expression during the estradiol-induced gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) surge of the ewe: induction in GnRH and other neurons. Endocrinology. 1993;133(2):896–903. Epub 1993/08/01. doi: 10.1210/endo.133.2.8344224 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Berghorn KA, Bonnett JH, Hoffman GE. cFos immunoreactivity is enhanced with biotin amplification. J Histochem Cytochem. 1994;42(12):1635–42. Epub 1994/12/01. doi: 10.1177/42.12.7983364 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Morgan JI, Cohen DR, Hempstead JL, Curran T. Mapping patterns of c-fos expression in the central nervous system after seizure. Science. 1987;237(4811):192–7. Epub 1987/07/10. doi: 10.1126/science.3037702 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Verbalis JG, Stricker EM, Robinson AG, Hoffman GE. Cholecystokinin activates C-fos expression in hypothalamic oxytocin and corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons. J Neuroendocrinol. 1991;3(2):205–13. Epub 1991/04/01. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.1991.tb00264.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hoffman GE, Lee WS, Attardi B, Yann V, Fitzsimmons MD. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone neurons express c-fos antigen after steroid activation. Endocrinology. 1990;126(3):1736–41. Epub 1990/03/01. doi: 10.1210/endo-126-3-1736 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Witkin JW, Xiao E, Popilskis S, Ferin M, Silverman AJ. FOS expression in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neuron does not increase during the ovarian steroid-induced GnRH surge in the rhesus monkey. Endocrinology. 1994;135(3):956–61. Epub 1994/09/01. doi: 10.1210/endo.135.3.8070392 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vizcarra JA, Wettemann RP, Braden TD, Turzillo AM, Nett TM. Effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse frequency on serum and pituitary concentrations of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone, GnRH receptors, and messenger ribonucleic acid for gonadotropin subunits in cows. Endocrinology. 1997;138(2):594–601. doi: 10.1210/endo.138.2.4938 WOS:A1997WC64600012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Arai S, Iwamura S, Hirose H. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone in third ventricular cerebrospinal fluid of the heifer during the estrous cycle. Biol Reprod. 2001;64(2):563–70. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod64.2.563 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ginther OJ, Santos VG, Mir RA, Beg MA. Role of LH in the progesterone increase during the bromocriptine-induced prolactin decrease in heifers. Theriogenology. 2012;78(9):1969–76. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.08.003 WOS:000310858700010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Whitlock BK, Daniel JA, Wilborn RR, Rodning SP, Maxwell HS, Steele BP, et al. Interaction of estrogen and progesterone on kisspeptin-10-stimulated luteinizing hormone and growth hormone in ovariectomized cows. Neuroendocrinology. 2008;88(3):212–5. doi: 10.1159/000146242 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kadokawa H, Matsui M, Hayashi K, Matsunaga N, Kawashima C, Shimizu T, et al. Peripheral administration of kisspeptin-10 increases plasma concentrations of GH as well as LH in prepubertal Holstein heifers. J Endocrinol. 2008;196(2):331–4. doi: 10.1677/JOE-07-0504 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ezzat AA, Saito H, Sawada T, Yaegashi T, Goto Y, Nakajima Y, et al. The role of sexual steroid hormones in the direct stimulation by Kisspeptin-10 of the secretion of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and prolactin from bovine anterior pituitary cells. Anim Reprod Sci. 2010;121(3–4):267–72. Epub 2010/07/03. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.06.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Magee C, Bruemmer JE, Kirkley KS, Sylvester LA, Runyan B, Nett TM, et al. Kisspeptin has an independent and direct effect on the pituitary gland in the mare. Theriogenology. 2020;157:199–209. Epub 2020/08/20. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.07.031 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bergfelt DR, Smith CA, Adams GP, Ginther OJ. Surges of FSH during the follicular and early luteal phases of the estrous cycle in heifers. Theriogenology. 1997;48(5):757–68. doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(97)00299-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Franceschini I, Lomet D, Cateau M, Delsol G, Tillet Y, Caraty A. Kisspeptin immunoreactive cells of the ovine preoptic area and arcuate nucleus co-express estrogen receptor alpha. Neurosci Lett. 2006;401(3):225–30. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.03.039 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bergfelt DR, Lightfoot KC, Adams GP. Ovarian Synchronization Following Ultrasound-Guided Transvaginal Follicle Ablation in Heifers. Theriogenology. 1994;42(6):895–907. WOS:A1994PP55800001. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(94)90113-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bolt DJ, Scott V, Kiracofe GH. Plasma-Lh and Fsh after Estradiol, Norgestomet and Gn-Rh Treatment in Ovariectomized Beef Heifers. Animal Reproduction Science. 1990;23(4):263–71. doi: 10.1016/0378-4320(90)90040-M WOS:A1990EM89300001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ginther OJ, Bergfelt DR, Kulick LJ, Kot K. Selection of the dominant follicle in cattle: Establishment of follicle deviation in less than 8 hours through depression of FSH concentrations. Theriogenology. 1999;52(6):1079–93. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00196-X WOS:000083806400012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ginther OJ, Beg MA, Gastal EL, Gastal MO, Baerwald AR, Pierson RA. Systemic concentrations of hormones during the development of follicular waves in mares and women: a comparative study. Reproduction. 2005;130(3):379–88. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00757 WOS:000231946900014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hashizume T, Saito H, Sawada T, Yaegashi T, Ezzat AA, Sawai K, et al. Characteristics of stimulation of gonadotropin secretion by kisspeptin-10 in female goats. Anim Reprod Sci. 2010;118(1):37–41. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.05.017 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Decourt C, Caraty A, Briant C, Guillaume D, Lomet D, Chesneau D, et al. Acute injection and chronic perfusion of kisspeptin elicit gonadotropins release but fail to trigger ovulation in the mare. Biol Reprod. 2014;90(2):36. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.113.114157 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hoffman GE, Le WW, Franceschini I, Caraty A, Advis JP. Expression of fos and in vivo median eminence release of LHRH identifies an active role for preoptic area kisspeptin neurons in synchronized surges of LH and LHRH in the ewe. Endocrinology. 2011;152(1):214–22. Epub 2010/11/05. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0066 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3219045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Carrasco RA, Leonardi CE, Pezo S, Adams GP. Hypothalamic involvement and the role of progesterone in the NGF-induced LH surge pathway. Reproduction. 2021;162(2):171–9. Epub 2021/06/16. doi: 10.1530/REP-20-0647 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hoffman GE, Smith MS, Verbalis JG. C-Fos and Related Immediate-Early Gene-Products as Markers of Activity in Neuroendocrine Systems. Front Neuroendocrin. 1993;14(3):173–213. doi: 10.1006/frne.1993.1006 WOS:A1993LJ98200001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.d’Anglemont de Tassigny X, Ackroyd KJ, Chatzidaki EE, Colledge WH. Kisspeptin signaling is required for peripheral but not central stimulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons by NMDA. J Neurosci. 2010;30(25):8581–90. Epub 2010/06/25. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5486-09.2010 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6634616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ezzat A, Pereira A, Clarke IJ. Kisspeptin is a component of the pulse generator for GnRH secretion in female sheep but not the pulse generator. Endocrinology. 2015;156(5):1828–37. Epub 2015/02/25. doi: 10.1210/en.2014-1756 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Suzuki S, Kadokawa H, Hashizume T. Direct kisspeptin-10 stimulation on luteinizing hormone secretion from bovine and porcine anterior pituitary cells. Anim Reprod Sci. 2008;103(3–4):360–5. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.05.016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Smith JT, Rao A, Pereira A, Caraty A, Millar RP, Clarke IJ. Kisspeptin is present in ovine hypophysial portal blood but does not increase during the preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge: evidence that gonadotropes are not direct targets of kisspeptin in vivo. Endocrinology. 2008;149(4):1951–9. Epub 2007/12/29. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1425 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Luo W, Gumen A, Haughian JM, Wiltbank MC. The role of luteinizing hormone in regulating gene expression during selection of a dominant follicle in cattle. Biol Reprod. 2011;84(2):369–78. Epub 2010/10/22. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.085274 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ginther OJ, Khan FA, Hannan MA, Rodriguez MB, Pugliesi G, Beg MA. Role of LH in luteolysis and growth of the ovulatory follicle and estradiol regulation of LH secretion in heifers. Theriogenology. 2012;77(7):1442–52. Epub 2012/01/31. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.11.014 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gomez-Leon VE, Ginther OJ, Domingues RR, Guimaraes JD, Wiltbank MC. Necessity for LH in selection and continued growth of the bovine dominant follicle. Reproduction. 2020;159(5):559–69. Epub 2020/02/14. doi: 10.1530/REP-19-0342 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lehman MN, Merkley CM, Coolen LM, Goodman RL. Anatomy of the kisspeptin neural network in mammals. Brain Res. 2010;1364:90–102. Epub 2010/09/23. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.020 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2992597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Alves BR, Cardoso RC, Prezotto LD, Thorson JF, Bedenbaugh M, Sharpton SM, et al. Elevated body weight gain during the juvenile period alters neuropeptide Y-gonadotropin-releasing hormone circuitry in prepubertal heifers. Biol Reprod. 2015;92(2):46. Epub 2014/12/17. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.114.124636 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Leshin LS, Rund LA, Crim JW, Kiser TE. Immunocytochemical Localization of Luteinizing-Hormone-Releasing Hormone and Proopiomelanocortin Neurons within the Preoptic Area and Hypothalamus of the Bovine Brain. Biology of Reproduction. 1988;39(4):963–75. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod39.4.963 WOS:A1988R172300025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Herde MK, Geist K, Campbell RE, Herbison AE. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons extend complex highly branched dendritic trees outside the blood-brain barrier. Endocrinology. 2011;152(10):3832–41. Epub 2011/07/28. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-1228 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Iremonger KJ, Porteous R, Herbison AE. Spike and Neuropeptide-Dependent Mechanisms Control GnRH Neuron Nerve Terminal Ca(2+) over Diverse Time Scales. J Neurosci. 2017;37(12):3342–51. Epub 2017/02/27. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2925-16.2017 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6596776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Peter J Hansen

26 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-22801Mechanism of LH release after peripheral administration of kisspeptin in cattlePLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Singh,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 10 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Peter J. Hansen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

4. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well. 

5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript by Leonardi et al. investigates the effects of exogenous administration of kisspeptin on LH secretion and ovulatory dynamics in cattle during the follicular phase of the estrous cycle. Additionally, authors investigate the effects of KP-10 on cFOS staining on GnRH neurons as a marker for neuronal activation. Finally, authors used electron microscopy to investigate close appositions between kisspeptin terminals and GnRH projections within the median eminence. In vivo studies were performed to characterize LH secretion, ovulatory response, and subsequent progesterone secretion in response to kisspeptin. To determine the role of GnRH on the kisspeptin-induced secretion of LH, authors included a group of heifers that was previously treated with a GnRH receptor antagonist. This is an interesting work using the bovine female as an animal model. Neuroendocrine research in cattle is scarce and findings in this species nicely complement the current knowledge body generated in primates, rodents, and sheep. The manuscript is well-written and easy to follow. The rationale for these studies is straightforward and well-described in the manuscript. Overall, the experiments appear to be well performed and described in good detail in the manuscript. Controls for immunohistochemistry procedures have been properly performed. Findings presented in the manuscript are novel and of importance relevance to the field of reproductive neuroendocrinology. The following points should be addressed during the revision:

Line 44 and throughout the manuscript: Since the ligand for the GPR54 has been identified, GPR54 has been renamed as Kiss1R. I suggest the authors could briefly mention here that GPR54 and Kiss1R are the same receptor and thereafter refer to the receptor as Kiss1R and not GPR54.

Line 48: “Furthermore, GnRH and kisspeptin immunoreactive cells are located in close association in the preoptic area and arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus in mice, primates, sheep [7-9] and cattle [10].”. This statement is not technically correct. Are the authors referring to cell bodies or neuronal projections? In rodents, GnRH neurons are limited to the POA. In ruminants and primates, GnRH neurons migrate caudally to the anterior portions of the hypothalamus. In rare occasions, GnRH neurons can be found in the ARC in cattle, but the large majority of GnRH neurons is located in the POA and in the anterior hypothalamic area (AHA). If authors are referring to GnRH neuronal projections, those are also not commonly present in the ARC. In all species mentioned above, the large majority of GnRH projections are in the zona externa of the median eminence. Obviously, a large amount of kisspeptin projections is also observed in the median eminence, particularly in the internal zone.

Line 81: “…to stimulate GnRH neuronal cell bodies, acts on GnRH nerve terminals…” Remove “or”

Line 125: Please explain how the Kp10 dose (15 mg) was determined? Extrapolation from other species? Previous studies in cattle?

Line 219: While properly explained in the Methods, the design for Expt. 2 is somewhat hard to follow. A diagram figure with the experimental timeline would help readers to better understand the experimental design for study 2.

Line 223: PGF2alpha: Dose? Manufacturer? Mode of administration?

Line 322: Remove underline between “sections” and “from”

Line 323: what do authors mean with “association between kisspeptin and GnRH nerve terminals”? I suggest the authors to replace “association” with “close-appositions” or another technical term.

Line 392: remove “but” after “cows”

Line 412: “Currently, this approach is not technically feasible in cattle but a similar mechanism of action of kisspeptin is plausible.” That is not necessarily correct since third ventricle cannulation can be used in cattle to collect CSF and characterize secretion of GnRH and other hypothalamic neuropeptides. Please see papers by G Williams et al. (Biology of Reproduction, 1998; 59(3), 676-683 among other papers by the same group).

Line 434: replace “interesting” with “interestingly”

Line 442: “Kisspeptin neurons are clustered in two locations in cows – a cranial population in the medial preoptic area and second aggregation in the caudal portion of arcuate nucleus [50]” This is not technically correct. In cattle, majority of kisspeptin neurons are located in the rostral and middle regions of the ARC (see Tanco et al., 2016 PeerJ and Alves et al., BOR 2015).

Reviewer #2: The manuscript titled "Mechanism of LH release after peripheral administration of kisspeptin in cattle" investigates the mechanism whereby kisspeptin can act in cattle (lactating- Exp 1; pubertal heifers-Exp 2) to stimulate LH secretion, be it in the brain or at the pituitary. The authors are using dual immunohistochemistry in Exp 1 to pinpoint where iv kisspeptin acts to stimulate LH secretion (a dosing regimen of kisspeptin was used in a previous study which determined the dose needed to achieve adequate LH response). In addition the neuroanatomical analysis, the authors have also conducted an in vivo experiment to administer kisspeptin with and without a GnRH receptor antagonist, thereby determining if kisspeptin acts directly at the pituitary to stimulate LH secretion. The introduction and discussion are both logically sound. While there is considerable enthusiasm for this work, the concerns listed below should be addressed before full support of publication can be given by this reviewer.

Major comments:

1) The sample size in Experiment 1 is very low. Together with the variability of cFos between animals and greater than 50% more GnRH neurons identified in the treatment group, could the authors accurately conclude there is no increased activity of GnRH neurons with kisspeptin administration?

2) Do the authors think the use of lactating cows with low LH response (2 of 3) may be a confounding factor in the cFos experiment?

3) Please include references to validated use of kisspeptin and cFos antibodies in bovine hypothalamic tissue or provide details of preabsorption experiments herein. Lack of primary is not sufficient to determine antibody specificity. Also include details on these important controls in either the methods section or results section.

Minor comments:

1) italicize the use of in vivo, in vitro, ex vivo, etc throughout text of manuscript

2) Line 383- replace "neuron" with "cell bodies" given that you are arguing the neuron is activated at the terminal to release GnRH but not at the cell body

3) Make sure to include Cetrorelix + Kp10 in Table 3 and Figure 4

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Rodolfo C. Cardoso

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 2;17(12):e0278564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278564.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


10 Nov 2022

Reviewer #1:

1. Line 44 and throughout the manuscript: Since the ligand for the GPR54 has been identified, GPR54 has been renamed as Kiss1R. I suggest the authors could briefly mention here that GPR54 and Kiss1R are the same receptor and thereafter refer to the receptor as Kiss1R and not GPR54.

Thank you for the suggestion. Proposed change was done.

2. Line 48: “Furthermore, GnRH and kisspeptin immunoreactive cells are located in close association in the preoptic area and arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus in mice, primates, sheep [7-9] and cattle [10].”. This statement is not technically correct. Are the authors referring to cell bodies or neuronal projections? In rodents, GnRH neurons are limited to the POA. In ruminants and primates, GnRH neurons migrate caudally to the anterior portions of the hypothalamus. In rare occasions, GnRH neurons can be found in the ARC in cattle, but the large majority of GnRH neurons is located in the POA and in the anterior hypothalamic area (AHA). If authors are referring to GnRH neuronal projections, those are also not commonly present in the ARC. In all species mentioned above, the large majority of GnRH projections are in the zona externa of the median eminence. Obviously, a large amount of kisspeptin projections is also observed in the median eminence, particularly in the internal zone.

Thank you for the detailed explanation. The sentence was change to “ Furthermore, GnRH and kisspeptin immunoreactive cells are located in the preoptic area and in the hypothalamus in mice, primates, sheep [7-9] and cattle [10], and its projection are detected in close association in the median eminence”.

3. Line 81: “…to stimulate GnRH neuronal cell bodies, acts on GnRH nerve terminals…” Remove “or”

It was removed

4. Line 125: Please explain how the Kp10 dose (15 mg) was determined? Extrapolation from other species? Previous studies in cattle?

The dose was determined based on our previous studies in cattle (Leonardi et al., 2018, Leonardi et al., 2020); “The dose and frequency of treatment was determined based on our previous studies in cattle [16, 17]”.

5. Line 219: While properly explained in the Methods, the design for Expt. 2 is somewhat hard to follow. A diagram figure with the experimental timeline would help readers to better understand the experimental design for study 2.

Thank you for the suggestion. Timeline diagram is now included as figure 1 in the revised manuscript

6. Line 223: PGF2alpha: Dose? Manufacturer? Mode of administration?

The sentence was add “(500 �g cloprostenol im, Estrumate, Merck Animal Health, Kirkland, QC, Canada)”

7. Line 322: Remove underline between “sections” and “from”

It was removed

8. Line 323: what do authors mean with “association between kisspeptin and GnRH nerve terminals”? I suggest the authors to replace “association” with “close-appositions” or another technical term.

It was replaced

9. Line 392: remove “but” after “cows”

It was removed

10. Line 412: “Currently, this approach is not technically feasible in cattle but a similar mechanism of action of kisspeptin is plausible.” That is not necessarily correct since third ventricle cannulation can be used in cattle to collect CSF and characterize secretion of GnRH and other hypothalamic neuropeptides. Please see papers by G Williams et al. (Biology of Reproduction, 1998; 59(3), 676-683 among other papers by the same group).

We were referring to hypophysial portal blood circulation. It is clarified in the revised manuscript.

11. Line 434: replace “interesting” with “interestingly”

It was fixed

12. Line 442: “Kisspeptin neurons are clustered in two locations in cows – a cranial population in the medial preoptic area and second aggregation in the caudal portion of arcuate nucleus [50]” This is not technically correct. In cattle, majority of kisspeptin neurons are located in the rostral and middle regions of the ARC (see Tanco et al., 2016 PeerJ and Alves et al., BOR 2015).

It was fixed

The sentence was added “and in cows the majority of kisspeptin neurons are detected in the rostral and middle regions of the arcuate nucleus [10, 51].”

Reviewer #2:

1. The sample size in Experiment 1 is very low. Together with the variability of cFos between animals and greater than 50% more GnRH neurons identified in the treatment group, could the authors accurately conclude there is no increased activity of GnRH neurons with kisspeptin administration?

We understand the reviewer inquiry, however the number of GnRH cells that co-expressed cFOS is very low in both treatments. For this reason we believe that there is no effect of kisspeptin on the cFos activation.

2. Do the authors think the use of lactating cows with low LH response (2 of 3) may be a confounding factor in the cFos experiment?

Also there was not difference in the LH concentration among animals in the pre-treatment period. So, in our opinion, this is no confounding due to lactation in this experiment. We believe that this may be attributed to individual variation post-treatment which could happen in frequent-bleeding studies.

3. Please include references to validated use of kisspeptin and cFos antibodies in bovine hypothalamic tissue or provide details of preabsorption experiments herein. Lack of primary is not sufficient to determine antibody specificity. Also include details on these important controls in either the methods section or results section.

We performed the absorption validation as suggested. This is now included as supplementary data with analyses and images of pre-absorption cFos antiboby to cFos protein.

4. italicize the use of in vivo, in vitro, ex vivo, etc throughout text of manuscript

It was changed

5. Line 383- replace "neuron" with "cell bodies" given that you are arguing the neuron is activated at the terminal to release GnRH but not at the cell body

It was replaced

6. Make sure to include Cetrorelix + Kp10 in Table 3 and Figure 4

Treatment of this group is described in the table and figure titles. So, we opted to keep the group name as cetrorelix. We hope that is OK with the reviewer.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Peter J Hansen

15 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-22801R1Mechanism of LH release after peripheral administration of kisspeptin in cattlePLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Singh,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Two changes are in order:I don't see any reference to the supplemental figure in the revised paper. Make sure you describe how the experiment was done in the methods and describe the results and cite Figure S1 in the Methods or Results section of  the paper.  My recommendation would be to include the figure with the paper itself and not as a supplemental Figure. If you do choose to make it supplementary, submit the figure as 1 pdf file that contains the figure and figure legend.  Send a copy of the manuscript that is not marked.  Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 30 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Peter J. Hansen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 2;17(12):e0278564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278564.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


17 Nov 2022

We would like to thank the editor suggestions. The information about the protein used to pre-absortion with cFOS and immunostaining results are in the manuscript, however, we would like to keep the figure as supplementary data with the changes suggested by the editor (PDF file with figure and figure legend).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Peter J Hansen

21 Nov 2022

Mechanism of LH release after peripheral administration of kisspeptin in cattle

PONE-D-22-22801R2

Dear Dr. Singh,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Peter J. Hansen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Peter J Hansen

25 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-22801R2

Mechanism of LH release after peripheral administration of kisspeptin in cattle

Dear Dr. Singh:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Peter J. Hansen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Pre-absorption cFos antiboby to cFos protein.

    Fig A low magnification of a cow hypothalamus section stained with Anti fos antibody. Arrow indicates the area shown in Fig B. Fig B high magnification of fos immunoreactive nuclei in cow hypothalamus (arrows). Fig C cow hypothalamus section stained with preabsorbed Fos antibody (1μg of antibody with 10 μg of fos protein). Arrow indicates the area shown in Fig D. Fig D High magnification of the area indicated by an arrow in Fig C showing no immunoreactivity.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES