Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2022 Nov 18;18(11):e1010991. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010991

Dissecting the invasion of Galleria mellonella by Yersinia enterocolitica reveals metabolic adaptations and a role of a phage lysis cassette in insect killing

Philipp-Albert Sänger 1, Stefanie Wagner 1, Elisabeth M Liebler-Tenorio 1, Thilo M Fuchs 1,*
Editor: Karla J F Satchell2
PMCID: PMC9718411  PMID: 36399504

Abstract

The human pathogen Yersinia enterocolitica strain W22703 is characterized by its toxicity towards invertebrates that requires the insecticidal toxin complex (Tc) proteins encoded by the pathogenicity island Tc-PAIYe. Molecular and pathophysiological details of insect larvae infection and killing by this pathogen, however, have not been dissected. Here, we applied oral infection of Galleria mellonella (Greater wax moth) larvae to study the colonisation, proliferation, tissue invasion, and killing activity of W22703. We demonstrated that this strain is strongly toxic towards the larvae, in which they proliferate by more than three orders of magnitude within six days post infection. Deletion mutants of the genes tcaA and tccC were atoxic for the insect. W22703 ΔtccC, in contrast to W22703 ΔtcaA, initially proliferated before being eliminated from the host, thus confirming TcaA as membrane-binding Tc subunit and TccC as cell toxin. Time course experiments revealed a Tc-dependent infection process starting with midgut colonisation that is followed by invasion of the hemolymph where the pathogen elicits morphological changes of hemocytes and strongly proliferates. The in vivo transcriptome of strain W22703 shows that the pathogen undergoes a drastic reprogramming of central cell functions and gains access to numerous carbohydrate and amino acid resources within the insect. Strikingly, a mutant lacking a phage-related holin/endolysin (HE) cassette, which is located within Tc-PAIYe, resembled the phenotypes of W22703 ΔtcaA, suggesting that this dual lysis cassette may be an example of a phage-related function that has been adapted for the release of a bacterial toxin.

Author summary

Interactions of bacteria with invertebrates took place over a long period of time, and it is assumed that these animals are not only a reservoir for human pathogens, but have also shaped their evolution. We here report that Y. enterocolitica colonizes the midgut of G. mellonella via the insecticidal toxin complex Tc and subsequently migrates through the epithelial cell layer within the first 18 hours of infection. Once reaching the hemolymph, the pathogen grows to high cell densities to finally kill the insect. The massive proliferation is fostered by a set of differentially regulated genes that constitutes an adaptation of Y. enterocolitica to the nutrient-rich environment encountered within the insect larvae. A successful infection not only depends on the insecticidal Tc, but also requires the activity of a phage-related lysis cassette that is involved in Tc release, probably without affecting bacterial cell integrity. We conclude that the investigation of oral invertebrate infections contributes to a better understanding of microbial pathogenicity.

Introduction

Several bacteria are known to successfully colonize and infect invertebrates and to eventually profit from their bioconversion [1]. Key factors for insect infection are the insecticidal toxin complex (Tc) proteins, which were first purified from Photorhabdus luminescens [2]. Their oral insecticidal activity is comparable to that of the Bacillus thuringiensis- (Bt-) toxin [2]. Homologues of the Tc proteins have been described in insect-associated bacteria such as Serratia entomophila and Xenorhabdus nematophilus. 3-D structural analysis of the tripartite Tc suggests a 5:1:1 stoichiometry of the A, B and C subunits, with the A subunit forming a pentamer that associates with a tightly bound 1:1 sub-complex of B and C [35]. The TcA subunits are assumed to bind to the membranes of insect midgut cells and harbour a neuraminidase-like region that possibly confers host-specificity [5]. The B and C proteins of P. luminescens form a large hollow structure encapsulating the toxic and the highly variable carboxyl-terminus of TcC that has recently been demonstrated to ADP-ribosylate actin and Rho-GTPases [68]. The attachment of the Tc to the host cell membrane via glycans [9,10] is either followed by receptor-mediated endocytosis or release of the ADP-ribosyltransferase into the target cell [3,5,11]. In a pH-dependent manner, the TcA translocation channel is injected into the membrane of the host cell, and conformational changes subsequently allow the toxic component to be released into the translocation channel of TcA and from there into the cytosol [5,12].

Insecticidal Tc proteins are also present in the three human pathogenic Yersinia species (spp.) and in Y. mollaretii [13]. The pathogen Y. enterocolitica is characterized by a unique lifecycle, as some of its representatives are able to switch between two distinct pathogenicity phases that manifest in invertebrates or mammals [14]. Strain W22703 (biotype 2, serotype O:9) carries the highly conserved chromosomal pathogenicity island Tc-PAIYe that encodes two regulators and TcA (tcaA, tcaB1, tcaB2), TcB (tcaC) and TcC (tccC1) toxin complex subunits. TcaA of Y. enterocolitica is essential for toxic activity towards larvae of the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta and the nematode C. elegans upon oral uptake of cell lysates or living cells [15,16]. Tc mutants of strain T83 were shown to be attenuated in their ability to colonize the gut of orally infected mice [17], a finding that is in line with the broad cytocidal host spectrum of bacterial toxins [18]. Y. enterocolitica W22703 produces Tc proteins at environmental temperatures, but not at 37°C [15,16]. The thermodependent activation of insecticidal activity is mainly the result of an antagonism between the regulators TcaR2 and YmoA. The thermolabile TcaR2 is essential and sufficient to activate tc gene transcription at low temperatures [19], whereas the Yersinia modulator of virulence, YmoA, a Hha-like protein that interacts with the DNA-binding protein H-NS, represses tc gene transcription at 37°C [20].

Remarkably, two highly conserved phage-related genes, which are not clustered with other phage determinants, are present in all insecticidal pathogenicity islands identified so far in Yersinia strains [13]. These genes termed holY and elyY are located between tcaC and tccC (S1A Fig), and their products were recently shown to act as a holin and an endolysin (HE), respectively [21]. ElyY revealed an endopeptidase with high substrate specificity that cleaves yersinial murein. Overexpression of HE lyses Y. enterocolitica at 37°C, but not at lower temperature [21]. Upon deletion of the gene encoding the Lon A protease, which is involved in the thermodependent regulation of Yersinia virulence properties [22,23], we observed lysis of the Y. enterocolitica mutant at 15°C, indicating that this enzyme controls the temperature-dependent activity of the HE cassette [24]. The biological role of this dual lysis cassette and its potential contribution to the insecticidal activity of Y. enterocolitica has not been elucidated.

Invertebrates are often used as alternative to mammalian models of infection to study bacterial or fungal pathogenicity and to evaluate therapeutic interventions [25]. Nematodes have successfully been used to identify virulence-related genes in a broad set of bacterial pathogens [16,26]. On the other hand, insect models such as Galleria mellonella, the Greater wax moth, are considered to provide further insights into pathogen-host-interactions due to their more elaborated innate immune system [2729]. They also allow subcutaneous injection as well as oral application of bacteria and fungi, in vivo imaging of bacterial cells, monitoring of intracellular gene expression, detection of immune responses, and the investigation of antimicrobial drugs [13,3034]. Subcutaneous infection of G. mellonella larvae demonstrated the insecticidal activity of several Yersinia spp. and identified the enterotoxin YacT of Y. frederiksenii [13,34,35]. Moreover, many Yersinia genes, including those contributing to virulence, are up-regulated at lower temperature [3638], corroborating the hypothesis that invertebrates are a natural host of pathogens and may therefore have fostered their evolution [39].

Here, we established and applied oral force-feeding of G. mellonella larvae with Y. enterocolitica to study molecular details of the subsequent gastrointestinal and systemic infection. Survival assays, histopathology, immunofluorescence, determination of cell numbers in time courses, transcriptomics, and infections with mutants were performed to dissect the distinct stages of G. mellonella infection by the bacterial pathogen as well as the roles of tc gene products.

Results

Oral infection of G. mellonella

We first optimized the use of G. mellonella larvae (Fig 1A) for oral infection with Y. enterocolitica. Bacteria injected into the mouth of larvae are expected to pass along the digestive tract (Fig 1B) that they colonize to prevent excretion. Histological analysis of larvae of approximately two cm length revealed distinct sections of the digestive tract (Fig 1C–1H), namely mouth, esophagus, crop, intestine, rectum, and anus.

Fig 1. Anatomy and histology of G. mellonella larvae with emphasis on the digestive tract.

Fig 1

(A) Underside of a G. mellonella larva. The foregut, the midgut, and the hindgut are indicated by arrows. (B) Dissected digestive tract after instillation with methylene blue. (C) Schematic drawing of the digestive tract. The stomadeal valve (SV) separates foregut lined by cuticular epithelium from midgut lined by glandular epithelium. The proctodeal valve (PV) is located between midgut and hindgut. The distinct epithelium cranial to the PV is labeled in green. The ingesta (I) in the midgut is covered by the peritrophic membrane (PM) and separated from the mucosa by the ectoperitrophic space. The crop and both valves are surrounded by a thick layer of musculature (red). (D) Longitudinal and sagittal histological section along the middle through G. mellonella. (E) Magnification of mouth, esophagus, and crop lined by the cuticular epithelium and surrounded by muscle cells. (F) Magnification of the SV between crop and midgut. (G) Magnification of the midgut lined by glandular epithelium. The ingesta is surrounded by the peritrophic matrix (PM) and separated from mucosa by the ectoperitrophic space. (H) Magnification of the PV between midgut and hindgut lined by cuticular epithelium. Vacuolated columnar epithelial cells line the midgut cranial to the PV. (D)-(H) are paraffin sections stained by hematoxylin and eosin. Sections are indicated by numbers: 1 = mouth, 2 = esophagus, 3 = crop, 4 = glandular intestine, 5 = transition zone, 6 = cuticular intestine, 7 = rectum, 8 = anus. Photos of representative preparations are shown; the scales are indicated.

Force-feeding of bacterial cultures was carefully performed by injection with a Hamilton syringe. In the case of accidental tissue perforation, resulting in direct injection of bacteria into the hemocoel and thus early death of larvae, the larvae were excluded from the experiment. Owing to the larva weight of 150–200 mg, a maximum of 5 μl culture or medium were applied. Preliminary experiments to establish the optimal infection dose were conducted within a range of 102 to 108 colony forming units (CFU) of Y. enterocolitica and showed dose-dependent phenotypes. When 107−108 CFU were injected, all larvae died between four and 14 h p.i., and the hemolymph of these cadavers contained Y. enterocolitica cells. No lethality and no melanisation, however, was observed after applying a lower dose of 102 to 104 cells at least until nine days p.i., and no Y. enterocolitica cells were detected in the hemolymph of the larvae. Finally, 105−106 CFU revealed as optimal dose to perform infections of G. mellonella larvae with Y. enterocolitica, a value that corresponds well with those used in subcutaneous applications [31,40].

TcaA and the lysis cassette are essential for the toxic activity of W22703 against G. mellonella larvae

Survival assays were performed with larvae of G. mellonella to further investigate the function of Tc-PAIYe determinants in the interaction of Y. enterocolitica with insects. Recently, we demonstrated that subcutaneous infection of G. mellonella larvae with W22703 (LD50 ~ 104 cells) results in a killing rate similar to that of W22703 ΔtcaA, suggesting that the Tc plays a main role in the initial phases of infection rather than during systemic infection [13]. Here, we orally infected larvae with 5.7 × 105 CFU, 7.8 × 105 CFU, 5.6 × 105 CFU, and 6.2 × 105 CFU, respectively, of W22703 and its mutants W22703 ΔtcaA, W22703 ΔHE, and W22703 ΔtccC, and monitored the larvae for nine days. Larvae infected with Y. enterocolitica strain W22703 exhibited a significantly reduced survival rate with a time to death of 50% (TD50) = 3.67 ± 1.12 days. In the infection experiments with the three mutants lacking tcaA, HE, and tccC, all larvae survived, corresponding to a challenge of the larvae with LB medium (Fig 2). To genetically validate that tcaA, HE, and tccC are essential for the toxicity of W22703 towards G. mellonella, we orally infected larvae with W22703 ΔtcaA/pACYC-tcaA (9.0 × 105 CFU), 4.0 × 105 CFU (W22703 ΔHE/pACYC-HE), and W22703 ΔtccC/pBAD-tccC (4.0 × 105 CFU). Due to the slight leakiness of the pBAD-promoter experienced recently [21], arabinose was not added to further induce tccC transcription. TD50 of 2.91 ± 1.46 days, 1.83 ± 0.51 days, and 3.90 ± 0.41 days, respectively, were determined. Thus, the mutants harbouring recombinant plasmids that complement the deletion did not significantly differ in their insecticidal activity from that of the parental strain W22703 after one week, demonstrating that the in trans complementation of ΔtcaA, ΔHE, and ΔtccC fully restored the insecticidal phenotype of W2703. Taken together, these life span assays indicate that the two toxin subunits TcaA and TccC as well as the HE lysis cassette are strictly required for the oral toxicity of Y. enterocolitica strain W22703 towards the insect larvae.

Fig 2. Role of TcaA, HE, and TccC in insecticidal activity of W22703 towards G. mellonella.

Fig 2

Larvae were orally infected with W22703, its mutants lacking tcaA, HE, and tccC, and with mutants carrying the plasmids pACYC-HE, pACYC-tcaA, and pBAD-tccC. Application of LB medium served as control. Life span assays were performed for nine days, and the viability of the larvae was monitored each day to determine the survival rate of the larvae. The raw data were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method. The Kaplan-Meier-plot is based on triplicates with 36 larvae in total per strain. The curves were compared to each other using the log-rank test, which generates a p value testing the null hypothesis that the survival curves are identical. Data were fit to exponential distribution. p values of 0.05 or less were considered significantly different from the null hypothesis (p value W22703 ΔHE/pACYC-HE = 0.0194; p value W22703 ΔtcaA/pACYC-tcaA = 0.0369; p value W22703 ΔtccC/pACYC-tccC = 0.0251). All graphs start at 100%.

In addition, we monitored the behaviour and the morphology of the larvae each day until six days post infection (p.i.), and again at day nine p.i. (Fig 3). Immediately after oral application, the control group infected with LB medium did not differ from the larvae infected with the three deletion mutants W22703 ΔHE, W22703 ΔtcaA, and W22703 ΔtccC with respect to motility and colour. In contrast, the application of W22703 and strains W22703 ΔHE/pACYC-HE, W22703 ΔtcaA/pACYC-tcaA, and W22703 ΔtccC/pBAD33-tccC resulted in a higher activity of the larvae. After 24 h, a strong melanization in the groups infected with W22703 and with the mutants harbouring complementing plasmids was observed. Similar to the untreated control groups, cocoons surrounded those larvae that had been infected with the deletion mutants, indicating that healthy individuals only are able to produce this protective housing. At days two to three, cocoon formation continued, whereas increasing numbers of larvae infected with W22703, W22703 ΔHE/pACYC-HE and W22703 ΔtcaA/pACYC-tcaA died. At days five to nine, morphological signs of infection did not further enhance. Nine days after infection, the first pupations events were observed.

Fig 3. External morphology of larvae following oral infection with W22703 and its mutants.

Fig 3

The photos illustrate the outcome of the experiment shown in Fig 2. Black animals were dead, anthracite ones still alive. The numbers in the upper right angle of each photo indicates dead animals at the respective time-point. Infections with W22703 ΔtccC/pBAD-tccC were not documented by photos.

Orally injected W22703 mutants lacking TcaA, HE, or TccC are eliminated by G. mellonella

Proliferation within the insect host would indicate a successful infection by Y. enterocolitica. To determine the bacterial load over the time, we infected G. mellonella larvae with the same strains used in Fig 2 and applied similar infection doses. One, three and six days p.i., the homogenate of six animals per time-point was plated on selective LB agar plates, and the CFU were enumerated. Strikingly, when we injected 9.0 ± 0.2 × 105 CFU of mutant W22703 ΔtcaA, the total numbers of surviving bacteria rapidly decreased to 1.0 × 103 after one day and to eleven CFU after three days, and the strain was completely absent from the larvae six days p.i., probably due to passage through the gut followed by excretion (Fig 4). In contrast, the mutants W22703 ΔHE and W22703 ΔtccC that were applied with 4.0 × 105 CFU and 4.0 × 105 CFU, respectively, proliferated within the first day p.i. to 2.2 × 106 CFU and 2.8 × 106 CFU, but were not detected from day three on. This discrepancy suggests that TcaA is involved in adherence to epithelial cells and thus in midgut colonization, without requiring TccC. When larvae were infected with 4.0 × 105 CFU of the ΔtcaA and ΔHE mutants, and with 1.4 × 106 CFU of strain W22703 ΔtccC, all of which carrying recombinant plasmids that complemented the chromosomally deleted genes, the bacterial burden at days one to six p.i. increased approximately to that of the parental strain W22703 applied with 9.0 × 105 CFU, indicating a successful complementation of the gene deletions.

Fig 4. Proliferation numbers of Y. enterocolitica W22703 strains in G. mellonella larvae.

Fig 4

Larvae were orally infected with W22703, W22703 ΔtcaA, W22703 ΔtcaA/pACAC-tcaA, W22703 ΔHE, W22703 ΔHE/pACYC-HE, W22703 ΔtccC, and W22703 ΔtccC/pBAD-tccC. Six animals per time-point were used, and the experiments were performed as triplicates, resulting in a total of 18 larvae per time-point per strain. Larvae fed with LB were used as a negative control. Standard deviations are indicated as error bars.

These data show that only strains able to produce TcaA, the lysis cassette, and TccC possess the capacity to successfully colonize and to proliferate within the larvae.

Time course of infection

The strongest proliferation of W22703 was observed between one and three days p.i. (Fig 4). We hypothesized that Y. enterocolitica starts its infection in the midgut and subsequently invades the tissues of G. mellonella larvae to proliferate in the hemolymph. To dissect the infection process preceding this multiplication in more detail, we performed a time course experiment using larvae infected with 6.3 × 105 Y. enterocolitica W22703 cells. Longitudinal sections through the middle of the larvae were prepared 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, 18 h, and 24 h p.i. and stained with FITC-conjugated Yersinia-antibodies. The histological analysis revealed that Y. enterocolitica is present in the midgut with increasing cell numbers until 12 h p.i. At this time-point, W22703 is mainly detected close to glandular epithelial cells of the midgut, implying a tropism of Y. enterocolitica for endodermal tissue (Fig 5A). Eighteen hours p.i., the gut appeared to be Yersinia-free, whereas a high number of cells is now detected in the hemolymph where W22703 proliferated with the next six hours to a high cell density. The larval tissues were completely overgrown with Y. enterocolitica 48 h p.i. when most animals were dead, indicating that the bacteria have started bioconversion of the cadaver (Fig 5B). To verify the finding that Y. enterocolitica W22703 cells are mainly found in the circulating fluid, we isolated 10 μl hemolymph from larvae infected with 1.6 × 105 bacteria. 24 h p.i., the animals showed clear signs of melanisation. The brownish hemolymph contained 2.3 × 107 to 4.7 × 107 CFU as detected on selective agar.

Fig 5. Time course of G. mellonella infection by Y. enterocolitica W22703.

Fig 5

The tissue sections monitored by fluorescence microscopy show antibody-stained Y. enterocolitica cells in the (A) gut or (B) hemolymph of G. mellonella 4 h, 6 h, 12 h, 18 h, and 24 h after infection. (C) The controls depict the gut area of G. mellonella that were fed with LB (left) or infected with E. coli (middle) 24 h ago. The tissue sections were stained with a Yersinia-specific or an E. coli-specific antibody. Functionality of the anti-E. coli antibody was demonstrated by the application of E. coli into muscle tissue of chicken (right). Cyan-coloured areas in the gut area of G. mellonella are unspecific bonds of the anti-E. coli antibody. Representative preparations are shown; the scale is indicated. 1 = intestinal epithelium, 2 = intestinal lumen, 3 = fat tissue, 4 = hemolymph, 5 = appendix, 6 = Malpighian vessels, 7 = muscle cells, 8 = E. coli, 9 = antibody cross reactions.

No fluorescence signal was obtained when we fed LB medium to larvae as a control (Fig 5C). Next, E. coli cultures were applied analogously to the experiments with Y. enterocolitica. Using an anti-E. coli antibody, E. coli cells, however, were not detected in the gut or in the hemolymph of G. mellonella 24 h after infection. To test the specificity of the antibody, E. coli DH5α cells were injected into muscle cells of a chicken leg and shown to be FITC-labeled 24 h p.i. The control experiments indicate that in contrast to Y. enterocolitica, E. coli is not able to survive in G. mellonella.

Taken these findings together, we demonstrated that Y. enterocolitica systemically infects G. mellonella larvae via colonization and penetration of the midgut epithelium to finally reach the hemolymph that allows massive proliferation of the pathogen.

Strains lacking insecticidal genes do not enter the hemolymph

To determine whether or not the factors encoded on the insecticidal Tc-PAIYe play a role during the infection process delineated above, G. mellonella larvae were orally infected with Y. enterocolitica W22703 (6.3 × 105 CFU), W22703 ΔtcaA (8.3 × 105 CFU), W22703 ΔtccC (6.4 × 105 CFU), W22703 ΔHE (7 × 105 CFU), and W22703 ΔtcaR2 (7.8 × 105 CFU). In contrast to the parental strain W22703 that proliferated to high cell numbers in the hemolymph, no mutant cells were detected by FITC-staining of tissue sections made 24 h p.i. (Fig 6A). These data confirm that the insecticidal Tc as well as the tc gene activator TcaR2 and the HE lysis cassette are required for full virulence of Y. enterocolitica W22703 towards G. mellonella. In particular, we hypothesize that the Tc-PAIYe is responsible for midgut colonization and entering of the hemolymph.

Fig 6. Detection of W22703 and its derivatives in the hemolymph of G. mellonella.

Fig 6

All photos show the hemolymph area of G. mellonella. (A) G. mellonella tissue sections 24 h p.i. with W22703 and its mutants. Staining was conducted using the anti-Yersinia antibody. (B) Tissue sections of larvae 24 h p.i. with W22703 tcaA::rfp, W22703 ΔHE tcaA::rfp, W22703 PHE::rfp, and W22703 ΔHE tcaA::rfp/pACYC HE. Staining was performed with the Yersinia-specific antibody (top row) or the anti-RFP antibody (bottom row), which was applied to the same tissue sections, to detect TcaA production as indicated exemplarily by arrows. Preparations of ten infected animals per strain were carried out. Photos of representative preparations are shown; the scales are indicated. 1 = exoskeleton, 2 = musculature, 3 = fat tissue, 4 = hemolymph.

Detection of TcaA::RFP in vivo depends on a functional lysis cassette

To further investigate the role of the HE cassette in Tc release, we infected G. mellonella larvae with the reporter strain W22703 tcaA::rfp. Following tissue section and immunostaining with anti-Yersinia antibody and anti-RFP antibody, we detected TcaA in Yersinia-rich hemolymph areas of G. mellonella 24 h p.i. with W22703 tcaA::rfp and W22703 ΔHE tcaA::rfp/pACYC-HE (Fig 6B). In the absence of the lysis cassette, however, TcaA::Rfp was not detected despite the presence of W22703 ΔHE tcaA::rfp cells. To test whether or not the promoter of the lysis cassette is active in vivo, we infected G. mellonella larvae with strain W22703 PHE::rfp that harbours a chromosomal transcriptional fusion of rfp with the HE promoter. Although this strain densely proliferated within the hemolymph, we failed to stain RFP possibly due to no or weak PHE activity, an inference that is in line with the results of the transcriptome analysis (S1B Fig). Taken together, these data suggest that the HE cassette is responsible for the transport of the insecticidal Tc.

Morphological effects of the TC on hemocytes

To investigate a possible activity of the insecticidal gene products on cells of the hemolymph, we monitored their morphology 24 p.i. For this purpose, hemolymph preparations of G. mellonella larvae were fixed with methanol and then stained by Giemsa solution. The hemocytes derived from W22703-treated larvae began to form aggregates in comparison with LB medium as control (Fig 7A). Cell agglutinations and a fading of the chromatin colour of the cell nucleus occurred more frequently. In contrast, hemolymph preparations of larvae one day after oral infection with W22703 mutants lacking tcaA, HE, tccC, or tcaR2, which encodes the activator of tc genes [19], showed hemocyte cell morphologies similar to those of the untreated controls (Fig 7B).

Fig 7. Hemocyte morphology 24 h p.i.

Fig 7

(A) Hemolymph cell preparations from G. mellonella orally infected with 6.1 × 105 CFU of W22703 or treated with LB medium as control. (B) Hemocytes of larvae after application of four W22703 mutants, showing cell morphology similar to those of the controls. Hemocyte aggregation and deformation was visible only upon infection with W22703. Hemolymph preparations were fixed with methanol and stained by Giemsa solution. Photos of representative preparations are shown; cells vary in size, the scale is indicated. An Olympus BX53 microscope (Olympus Europa, Hamburg, Germany) was used.

In vivo transcriptome analysis

To delineate the transcriptional profile of Y. enterocolitica during infection of G. mellonella, we enriched and isolated Y. enterocolitica by immunomagnetic separation [41] from the larvae 12 h and 24 h after infection. These two time-points were chosen due to the results of the time course experiments (Fig 5A and 5B). Growth of W22703 cells in minimal medium with glucose as the carbon and energy source served as the reference condition. Following RNA sequencing and read analysis, we identified ~3,600 protein-encoding genes from a genome carrying ~4,000 genes [14], pointing to a 90% coverage of the transcriptional responses investigated here. Setting the threshold to a log2 FC ≥ |1.5|, we determined 524 non-redundant transcripts to be significantly more abundant and 301 to be less abundant in contrast to the control (S1 Table).

Owing to their important role in infection, colonization, and killing of G. mellonella demonstrated above, we first analysed the transcriptional activity of genes located on the insecticidal island Tc-PAIYe. Strikingly, the genes encoding the activator TcaR2 and the two Tc subunits TcaA and TcaB were strongly induced (log2 FC = 3.9, 5.5, and 3.2, respectively) 12 h p.i., but to lesser extent 24 h p.i. (S1 Table, S1B Fig). The endolysin gene elyY was significantly up-regulated after 24 h, but not after 12 h, implying a possible role of this enzyme in the release of the Tc. Beside the tc genes, the pathogen induced 15 virulence genes including those involved in iron acquisition, whereas a set of eight genes of this category was repressed, suggesting a role during infection of other host organisms including mammals.

Other main functional categories affected by a transcriptional switch upon larva infection were the metabolism and transport of amino acid and carbohydrates, resistance mechanisms, signaling, and motility (Fig 8). Within larvae, Y. enterocolitica down-regulated the biosynthesis pathways of methionine, isoleucine, leucine, histidine, tryptophan, and glutamate (Table 1). In contrast, determinants responsible for the transport of methionine, glycine, glutamate, glutamine, and histidine appeared at higher abundance in vivo in contrast to the control. This finding confirms the assumption that these amino acids are readily available in the surrounding hemolymph. The synthesis of thiamine was repressed, a finding that agrees with the reduced biosynthesis of isoleucine and leucine that require this cofactor. Another large number of up-regulated genes belongs to the categories of carbohydrate metabolism. Y. enterocolitica activated transporters including phosphotransferase systems and/or enzymes involved in the uptake and/or degradation of glycerol, sorbose, mannitol, ribose, xylose, inositol, trehalose, N-acetylgalactosamine, N-acetylglucosamine, sucrose, and glucitol/sorbitol. In addition, the pathogen induced a huge set of genes encoding factors of the nucleotide and lipid metabolisms as well as of the TCA-cycle, pointing to an increased metabolic activity and proliferation within insect larvae. Biofilm formation is not required for the virulence against insect as several biofilm and fimbriae producing genes were repressed and a biofilm repressor gene was transcriptionally activated. Motility appeared to play a pivotal role in insect infection by Y. enterocolita and by Y. entomophaga [29,42], because a large set of genes involved in flagella synthesis was up-regulated. Induction and repression of genes responsible for cell membrane biosynthesis pointed to major rearrangements in particular of the outer membrane within the larvae. Intriguely, several genes encoding factors involved in signaling were transcriptionally activated in the invertebrate, including the lsr operon responsible for autoinducer 2 import, regulation, and degradation, and traI encoding an acyl-homoserine-lactone synthase. No phage genes were induced, but 13 phage genes were repressed in larva-infecting Y. enterocolitica (S1 Table).

Fig 8. COG categories of differentially expressed W22703 genes upon G. mellonella infection.

Fig 8

The numbers of down-regulated (light grey) and up-regulated (dark grey) genes in each COG category are indicated. The COG categories are ordered by descending ratio of up-to down-regulated genes. The data were taken from S1 Table.

Table 1. Selection of down (log2 FC < -1.5, red)- and up (log2 FC > -1.5, green)-regulated Y. enterocolitica genes 12 h and 24 h p.i.

AMP, antimicrobial peptide; P, phosphate; PTS, phosphotransferase system; BCAA, branched-chain amino acid; dep., dependent; n.s., not significant.

12 h 24 h gene name (predicted) function or product COG 12 h 24 h gene name (predicted) function or product COG 12 h 24 h gene name (predicted) function or product COG
virulence factors, iron metabolism virulence factors, iron metabolism cell wall, membrane, and envelop biogenesis
n.s. xaxB α-xenorhabdolysin family binary toxin R n.s. srfB virulence factor SrfB S murPQ, anmK anhydro-N-acetylmuramic acid utilization G
hxuB hemolysin secretion/activation U n.s. cirA iron-regulated outer virulence protein P ompD outer membrane pore protein M
n.s. yqfA hemolysin III S n.s. shlB hemolysin transporter/activator U galE UDP-glucose 4-epimerase M
n.s. lktD HlyD membrane-fusion protein of T1SS M n.s. hxuB hemolysin secretion/activation U n.s. ftsI cross-linking of the peptidoglycan cell wall M
n.s. mgtAC magnesium transporting P-type ATPase S n.s. sodA superoxide dismutase [Mn] C n.s. rfaQ lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis M
n.s. tcaR1 (aaeR) toxin complex gene repressor K /n.s. tcaAB insecticidal toxin complex subunits AB K agp glucose-1-phosphatase M
n.s. fepDG ferric enterobactin transport P n.s. tcaR2 toxin complex gene activator K emtA lytic murein transglycosylase M
dinI virulence protein MsgA S tpd high-affinity Fe2+ transport P n.s. mliC lysozyme inhibitor M
amino acid metabolism and transport ftnA ferritin-1, iron-storgae P n.s. glycosyltransferase M
metABCFHIJLNQS methionine biosynthesis/transport E sitABCD chelated iron transport system U n.s. lptD oligogalacturonate-specific porin (KdgM) M
mtnABCD methionine biosynthesis/transport E sitCD chelated iron transport system U n.s. slyB outer membrane lipoprotein Pcp M
n.s. map methionine aminopeptidase E n.s. fepA ferric enterobactin receptor M n.s. mppA periplasmic murein peptide-binding protein E
ilvABDEGMN isoleucine biosynthesis E n.s. hemR hemin receptor P signalling
n.s. livFGM BCAA transport U foxA ferrioxamine receptor P n.s. cstA carbon starvation protein A T
n.s. leuABCD leucine biosynthesis E fbpA Fe3+-binding periplasmic protein P n.s. dksA DnaK suppressor protein T
n.s. cysHIJM cysteine biosynthesis from sulfate EH hasA hemophore C cheV two component signalling adaptor domain T
n.s. cysCDGN assimilatory sulfate reduction F phlA hemolysin secretion/phospholipase IU n.s. lsrABCDGFKR autoinducer 2 import/regulation/degradation G
n.s. cysAPTW sulfate transport P amino acid metabolism and transport n.s. traI acyl-homoserine-lactone synthase H
n.s. hisDG histidine biosynthesis E n.s. metCIN methionine metabolism and transport E n.s. LuxR family transcription regulatory protein K
/n.s. trpEG/mtr tryptophan biosynthesis/transport EHU n.s. metE homocysteine methyltransferase E resistance
n.s. gltBD glutamate synthesis E metY o-acetylhomoserine (thiol)-lyase E n.s. crcB reduces fluoride concentration in the cell U
/n.s. ddpABCDF; oppD dipeptide transport E n.s. putAPY proline metabolism and transport E n.s. tehB tellurite resistance PQ
n.s. hutU histidine degradation E proX glycine betaine-binding protein E n.s. bleomycin resistance S
cofactors n.s. gcvHPT glycine degradation E yiiM 6-N-hydroxylaminopurine resistance S
thiCEFGHIS thiazole biosynthesis H n.s. ureCDEFG urease subunit/accessory proteins E n.s. cusA/czcA resistance-nodulation-cell division P
n.s. bioABCDF biotin synthesis H ureAB urease subunits E n.s. ohr organic hydroperoxide resistance O
n.s. birA biotin-operon repressor HK n.s. cysK cysteine synthase E n.s. bhsA multiple stress resistance S
fthC 5-formyltetrahydrofolate cyclo-ligase H tdcC threonine/serine transporter U n.s. cutC copper homeostasis P
n.s. lipB octanoyltransferase (lipoate-dep. enzymes) H n.s. tdcB threonine dehydratase E n.s. copA copper-exporting P-type ATPase P
n.s. moaD molybdopterin-convertion H n.s. thrA threonine synthesis E n.s. yobA copper resistance S
carbohydrate metabolism n.s. gltS sodium/glutamate symport P n.s. ampC β-lactamase V
yadE polysaccharide deacetylase G n.s. gltJ glutamate/aspartate transport system E n.s. penP β-lactamase V
suhB inositol-1-monophosphatase G gltI glutamate/aspartate-binding protein ET carbohydrate metabolism and transport
ybbD glycosyl hydrolase family G /n.s. glnPQ glutamine transport E n.s. gpmA phosphoglycerate mutase G
cell wall, membrane, and envelop biogenesis glnK nitrogen regulatory protein P-II 2 K glpF glycerol uptake facilitator U
n.s. lipid A biosynthetic process M glsA glutaminase 2 E n.s. glpDKQT glycerol catabolism G
ftsI peptidoglycan synthetase M n.s. aspA aspartate ammonia-lyase E n.s. sorBF sorbose-specific PTS G
n.s. murDF peptidoglycan synthesis M n.s. hisHIJMPQU histidine transport/degradation ET n.s. agaCV N-acetylgalactosamine permease G
mraY peptidoglycan synthesis M n.s. sdaABC serine dehydratase/transporter E n.s. celC lactose-cellobiose-chitobiose-specific PTS G
ftsW cell division D n.s. glyA serine hydroxymethyltransferase E n.s. ulaB ascorbate-specific PTS subunit G
n.s. O-antigen biosynthesis M trpDEG anthranilate phosphoribosyltransf./synthase F n.s. cmtB mannitol-specific cryptic PTS G
ompC outer membrane M n.s. tnaA tryptophanase E n.s. uhpAC regulation of hexose-P uptake G
n.s. lpxLM lipid A biosynthesis M n.s. argD succinylornithine transaminase H /n.s. xylFG D-xylose import G
murJ virulence factor mviN homolog U n.s. acyG subtilase E rbsB D-ribose-binding periplasmic protein G
n.s. lnt apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase M n.s. aroFP aromatic amino acid synthesis/transport E malEKMT maltose operon (uptake and regulation) S
ttgA membrane fusion protein M n.s. speF ornithine decarboxylase E lamB maltoporin (maltodextrin permease) E
mltD lytic murein transglycosylase D M n.s. prtA secreted protease E n.s. iolABCDGET inositol uptake and utilization C
n.s. tolA cell envelope integrity M n.s. pepD dipeptidase E n.s. dctA C4-dicarboxylate transport U
degP protease M n.s. tesA acyl-CoA thioesterase E n.s. dcuAB anaerobic C4-dicarboxylate transporter U
n.s. pgaBC biofilm PGA synthesis M n.s. ilvC ketol-acid reductoisomerase EH n.s. treBC trehalose uptake and utilization G
n.s. tolQR outer membrane stability U n.s. livK BCAA-binding protein E /n.s. srlAE glucitol sorbitol-specific PTS G
signalling n.s. tauABCD taurine transport and metabolism P n.s. sorbitol-6-P-2-dehydrogenase IQ
n.s. Lux regulon K cofactors n.s. mglABC (methyl) galactoside/galactose transport U
n.s. LuxR-family KT n.s. kbl 2-amino-3-ketobutyrate coenzyme A ligase H n.s. nagBE N-acetylglucosamine-transport/utilization G
resistance n.s. wrbA flavoprotein H fruB multiphosphoryl transfer protein G
yoaE heavy metal efflux pump P n.s. yfiQ CoA binding domain H n.s. pehX exo-poly-α-D-galacturonosidase G
n.d. tellurium-resistance S cell motility n.s. gmuD 6-phospho-β-glucosidase gmuD G
/n.s. cusA/czcA resistance-nodulation-cell division P cheR chemotaxis protein methyltransferase H n.s. fbaA fructose-bisP aldolase class 2 G
n.s. acrF acriflavine resistance V cheD2 methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein NT n.s. fbp fructose-1,6-bisP class 1 G
mdlB multidrug resistance V n.s. tar methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein NT n.s. ptsG glucose-specific PTS G
/n.s. arnT/arnB resistance to polymyxin and cationic AMP I cheABWYZ chemotaxis KT n.s. glgP glycogen phosphorylase G
zntA cadmium, zinc and mercury-transport P motAB chemotaxis N n.s. aglB 6-phospho-α-glucosidase G
n.s. YPO2978 chlorhexidine efflux transporter S flaA flagellin N n.s. gmhA phosphoheptose isomerase G
n.s. mdtK multidrug efflux pump P flgBCDEFGIKL flagellar hook and basal-body N n.s. scrK fructokinase G
n.s. aaeB p-hydroxybenzoic acid efflux pump U fliJLST flagellar proteins N n.s. gapA glyceraldehyde-3-P dehydrogenase A G
n.s. metallo-β-lactamase S fliDEFGHMN flagellar assembly, hook, basal body, M-ring N n.s. fruK 1-phosphofructokinase H
n.s./ flhCD flagellar transcriptional activator K glgC glucose-1-P adenylyltransferase H
flhB flagellar biosynthesis N n.s. phnJ synthesis of ADP-glucose H
n.s. mqsR motility quorum-sensing regulator mqsR K n.s. scrY sucrose porin M
pckA phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase F

To summarize, the transcriptional activity of Y. enterocolitica in larvae of G. mellonella was mainly characterized by a drastic reprogramming of the energy, amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism, by an increase of motility and signaling molecules, and by cell membrane rearrangements.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the oral infection of G. mellonella by a bacterial pathogen performed here is of yet unprecedented resolution with respect to the molecular details, although force-feeding of G. mellonella was already established [43,44]. In contrast to subcutaneous injection in the use of insect larvae as model for bacterial virulence properties towards mammals, oral application mimics natural routes of infection that in particular take place during the bioconversion of animal cadavers by bacteria, fungi, and larvae [45]. In the present study, oral application of Y. enterocolitica demonstrated that the larvae are a powerful tool for dissecting the molecular steps required for a successful and lethal infection of G. mellonella by this enteropathogen. The distinct phases of infection identified here include survival in the gut, adhesion to and penetration of the midgut epithelial cell layer, massive proliferation within the hemolymph, hemocyte deformation, and insect killing. Despite an oral infection dose between 4.0 × 105 and 3.0 × 106 CFU, only few Y. enterocolitica cells were found in the gut according to cell counting and immunostaining, indicating that the majority of the bacterial cells is unable to maintain itself, and that W22703 does not substantially proliferate in the gut. A few Y. enterocolitica W22703 cells were seen in close proximity to glandular epithelial cells of the midgut. They probably cross the epithelial barrier via M-cells and migrate into the underlying tissues. The proliferation data shown in Fig 4 allow the conclusion that TcaA enables the adherence to epithelial cells, whereas the enzymatic active subunit TccC plays a minor role here. The epithelial cell contact is compatible with the finding that the Tc of Y. pseudotuberculosis causes initial membrane ruffling of human colonic epithelial (Caco-2) cells [46]. The passage from the gut to the hemolymph occurs approximately 12 h to 18 h after ingestion, a delay reflecting the time of the invasion process. Once they reach the hemocoel, the open circulatory system of the larvae, the pathogen exhibits a massive proliferation, pointing to excellent growth conditions and nutrient availability in this compartment [29]. Strain W22703 seems to withstand the phagocytic or growth suppressing activities of the hemocytes, probably as a result of Tc activity as suggested by changes of the hemocyte morphology in the presence of TcaA, TccC, and HE.

The in vivo transcriptome of Y. enterocolitica delineates its physiological and biochemical adaptations to the insect. The pattern of up- and down-regulated genes not only point to the relevance of distinct virulence factors, signalling, and motility for a successful infection, but also to the availability of numerous carbohydrates and amino acids in the insect body that fuels the metabolism and thus the proliferation of Y. enterocolitica. The carbon and energy sources are derived from either the diet or the host, such as glycerol, ribose, inositol, N-acetylgalactosamine, or trehalose, which is present in the hemolymph as well as in honey, a component of G. mellonella feeding. The upregulation of genes involved in the uptake and degradation of sorbose and its reduced forms glucitol/sorbitol, of mannitol, of sucrose, and of xylose point to a specific metabolic adaptation of Y. enterocolitica to substrates fed by insects. Sorbose and mannitol are found in plant saps, and xylose is a monomer of hemicelluloses. Sucrose is one of the most concentrated nutrient available for sap-feeding insects [47]. In addition, the genes responsible for N-acetylglucosamine utilization suggests that chitin, a constituent part of the peritrophic matrices that line the inner surface of the gut in many insects [48], is not only degraded as a first step of colonization and invasion of the midgut epithelium, but metabolically utilized by the pathogen. When entering the G. mellonella larvae, strain W22703 in particular down-regulates the genes responsible for the synthesis of methionine, branched-chain amino acids, histidine, tryptophane, cysteine, and glutamate, indicating a sufficient availability of these amino acids within the insect. This is well in line with an increased capacity to import and degrade methionine, proline, glycine, urea, cysteine, threonine, glutamate/aspartate, serine, and histidine. Histidine is one of the most abundant free amino acids in the Hyalophora gloveri fat body [49]. It is worth to note that urease, inositol, and histidine degradation belong to metabolic properties that are common to Y. enterocolitica and P. luminescens [38]. The low temperature-dependent transcription of these and many other factors [37] fits to the proliferation of W22703 in insect larvae. Reprogramming of Y. enterocolitica in vivo activities also includes the increase of lipid import and degradation, and of energy production and conversion. The latter category reflects the massive proliferation in the hemolymph. In addition, the in vivo transcriptional pattern revealed the up-regulation of virulence factors mainly involved in hemolysis and iron scavenging, which are probably specifically directed against insects (S1 Table). A similar response was monitored in the interaction of Y. entomophaga with G. mellonella [35]. Autoinducer-2 import was also found to be up-regulated during insect infection. Given that more than 300 AI-2 regulated genes involved in regulation, metabolic activity, stress response and pathogenicity are known in P. luminescens [50], this points to an important role in signalling during insect infection.

We provide for the first time in vivo evidence for an involvement of the holin/endolysin cassette in Tc release and thus in nematocidal and insecticidal of Y. enterocolitica strain W22703. The dual lysis cassette is highly conserved in the genomes of Yersinia spp. where it is localised between genes encoding Tc subunits, and is also present in the Tc locus of P. luminescens [13]. These findings pointed to a functional role of the phage genes in the insecticidal activity of these bacteria, for example by cell lysis [51,52]. In Y. pestis, it was postulated that the release of the Tc is mediated by a type III secretion system (T3SS) [53], but this hypothesis was recently refuted [54]. This agrees with the lack of virulence plasmid pYV, which encodes a T3SS, in strain W22703 [14].

Thus far, there are only few examples of bacterial toxins that are released into the environment by phage-related factors. In Serratia marcescens, a holin and endopeptidase cassette were identified to be required for the secretion of a chitinase [55]. A further example of a correlation between phage lytic genes and toxicity is the putative coupling of the λ phage lytic cycle and the release of the phage-encoded toxin Stx from Shiga toxin producing E. coli [56,57]. An N-acetyl-ß-D-muramidase similar to phage endolysins was shown to be essential for Salmonella typhoid toxin secretion [58]. The holin-like protein TcdE was shown to be required for Clostridioides difficile toxins TcdA and TcdB secretion via pore formation, and toxin release is independent of bacterial cell lysis [59,60]. The frequent neighbourhood of phage-related lysis factors to bacterial toxins and other secreted factors supports the hypothesis that protein release upon the activities of a dual lysis cassette evolved multiple times and defines a more widespread mechanism that was proposed to be termed the type 10 secretion system [61].

The holin/endolysin activity of Y. enterocolitica may allow the passage of the Tc through the inner membrane and the peptidoglycan layer. Given that no export signature such as the presence of a signal peptide for the sec-dependent pathway was found in the toxin subunit sequences of Y. enterocolitica, it may be assumed that the holin acts as a pore for both the endolysin and the Tc proteins. The Tc proteins then possibly exerted their toxic activity via release into the extracellular space or by being bound on the surface of the bacterial cells, as demonstrated for both YitA and YipA of Y. pestis [62], followed by the internalisation of the whole Tc or subunit C into the host cell [5]. Alternatively, the Tc may be released upon cell lysis triggered by the HE cassette. However, the fact that Y. enterocolitica cells are less susceptible to HE-mediated cell lysis at 15°C in comparison with 37°C using an artificial overexpression plasmid system does not support this hypothesis [24]. Moreover, the lysis cassette is very tightly repressed in vitro [21], a finding that was confirmed by the in vivo transcriptome analysis in the present study that revealed slight inductions of elyY (log2 FC = 1.02) and hlyY (log2 FC = 0.87)(Fig 1B). However, these data do not exclude the possibility that a partial subpopulation of Y. enterocolitica undergoes cell suicide and releases the Tc for the benefit of cells not expressing the HE cassette. Such a liberation of cell contents via endolysin-mediated cell lysis has been proposed to explain membrane vesicle formation and biofilm development of Pseudomonas aeruginosa [63]. A detailed model of the molecular mechanism underlying the Tc release from Y. enterocolitica, however, remains to be elucidated.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids and growth conditions

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in S2 Table. All cultures were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (10 g/l tryptone, 5 g/l yeast extract, 5 g/l NaCl), in minimal medium consisting of M9 medium supplemented with 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM CaCl2 and 55.5 mM (1% w/v) glucose or on LB agar (LB broth supplemented with 1.5% agar). E. coli was grown at 37°C, and Y. enterocolitica at 30°C or as indicated. For growth studies, overnight cultures were diluted 1:1,000 in 200 ml flasks with 50 ml medium and incubated under vigorous shaking until cells reached stationary phase, or in microtitre plates with 200 μl medium per well. If appropriate, kanamycin (50 μg ml-1), streptomycin (50 μg ml-1), chloramphenicol (20 μg ml-1), tetracycline (12 μg ml-1), nalidixic acid (20 μg ml-1), or arabinose as indicated were added to the media. Each plate pack was tested for antibiotic activity using sensitive bacterial strains.

General molecular techniques

DNA manipulation and isolation of chromosomal DNA was performed according to standard procedures [64], or to the manufacturer’s protocol. Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were carried out as described recently [19]. Chromosomal DNA (100 ng) was used as template for PCR amplification.

Construction of mutants and plasmids

The construction of non-polar deletion mutants is exemplified here for the lysis cassette. Two fragments of 984 bp and 751 bp were amplified with the oligonucleotide pairs Hol.delF1/Hol.delR1 and Endo.delF2/Endo.delR2, and ligated via the introduced EcoRI sites. Following nested PCR with the oligonucleotides Hol.nestedAB and Endo.nestedCD and the ligation mixture as a template, the resulting fragment was cloned into pKNG101 via BamHI, giving rise to pKNG101ΔHE. The resulting construct was transformed from SM10 into W22703 by conjugation, and a selection procedure was performed as described recently [15]. Streptomycin-sensitive clones were screened by PCR to identify mutant W22703 ΔHE. The deletion was confirmed by sequencing. To complement W22703 ΔHE, the complete coding sequence of the holY/elyY cassette and 250 nucleotides of its upstream sequence were amplified and cloned into pACYC184 via EcoRI in DH5α. In the resulting plasmid pACYC184-HE, the direction of holY/elyY transcription corresponds to that of the disrupted plasmid gene encoding the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. The gene tccC was cloned into pBAD33 via SacI and PstI. All oligonucleotides used here are listed in S3 Table.

Bioassays

Larvae of G. mellonella were obtained from the Klee-Gartencenter + Zoo (Jena, Germany), and stored for less than one week at 15°C. Bacterial strains were grown to early stationary phase (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] ~ 1.35) at 20°C (Yersinia spp.), or at 37°C (DH5α). Larvae of instar 5–6 [65], 2–3 cm length and 120–150 mg in weight were used. Before application, the larvae were placed on ice for about 10 min as a light anesthesia. Five μl of the respective bacterial culture or its dilution in LB medium were applied orally using a Hamilton syringe (Hamilton 702 RN, 25 μl) with a very small and blunt cannula (needle gauge 33). For the application, the cannula was inserted over a maximal length of 1 mm into the space between the labrum and labium, and the liquid was applied slowly until being completely absorbed by the insect. During the infection experiments performed at 20°C-22°C, animals were not fed to ensure similar conditions.

Infection doses were determined by plating serial dilutions of the suspensions used for oral application. Selective agar plates with LB or Yersinia selective medium (Schiemann CIN medium, Oxoid, Wesel, Germany) were incubated at 30°C for 24 h. Infected larvae were kept up to nine days in the dark at the temperature indicated, and the numbers of killed and alive larvae were enumerated each day. Larvae were considered dead if they failed to respond to touch. The TD50 was calculated using the dose-response curve (drc) package of the R software. To recover bacteria from the larvae, the larvae were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol, washed in H2O and homogenized in a mortar. The homogenous mass was suspended into 1 ml LB, rigorously shaken with a vortex, and centrifuged at 500 rpm for 30 sec. CFU were enumerated as described above. Larvae not containing cells due to imperfect application or pathogen clearance were included in the calculation.

To prepare the gut of the insects, the larvae were incubated for 10 min on ice and then placed in PBS buffer cooled to 4°C for the subsequent intestinal preparation. The larvae were carefully opened making an incision along the coronal plane from the anterior to the posterior end using micro scissors and Dumont forceps (Manufactures D’Outils Dumont SA, Montignez, Switzerland). The entire innards were removed and the digestive tract was dissected, removing all of the fat and organ appendages. For further analysis, the prepared gut was placed in a new tube containing PBS or RNAlater (Thermo Fisher Scientific Life Technologies GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany).

Anatomic preparation of the digestive tract of G. mellonella

A solution of 2% methylene blue in distilled water was orally applied, and excessive dye was removed by washing. The main body cavity was opened from the head to tail along the ventral midline, and the cuticula was detached and pinned to a styrofoam plate. Under a binocular, the fat body and other organs were separated from the digestive tract. Oral cavity and anus were circumcised and the digestive tract removed.

Isolation of Y. enterocolitica cells from G. mellonella

Twenty-four hours after infection, the hemolymph of G. mellonella was taken with a sterile insulin syringe to a volume of 100 μl, transferred into Eppendorf tubes with 500 μl of resuspension buffer [1 × PBS, 0.5% biotin-free BSA, 10% (v/v) RNAlater (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Langenselbold, Germany)], and stored at 4°C for up to 24 h until further processing. After centrifugation at 9000 × g for 5 min, the pellet was resuspended and incubated in 750 μl of resuspension buffer for 10 min at 4° C under shaking. The suspension contained a Yersinia-specific antibody (anti-Y. enterocolitica O:9 mouse monoclonal, FITC, PROGEN Biotechnik GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) that had been diluted 1:250. The sediment obtained by centrifugation at 9,600 × g for 2 min was washed with cold separation buffer (1 × PBS, 0.5% biotin-free BSA, 2 mM EDTA pH 7.4) containing 10% RNAlater, centrifuged, resuspended in the same buffer, and incubated with 10 μl of streptavidin-coupled magnetic beads for 10 min. The washing and centrifugation steps from above were repeated, and the sediment was resuspended in 500 μl of separation buffer containing 10% RNAlater. Y. enterocolitica cells were separated using a MACS cell separation system with a LS column (Miltenyi Biotech, Aubum, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

RNA isolation

RNA was extracted and purified from 1 ml of a Y. enterocolitica suspension isolated from an in vitro bacterial culture or from 100 μl G. mellonella hemolymph by immunomagnetic separation [41] as described above, and stored in RNAlater (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The bacterial pellet was homogenized with PBS, and centrifuged for 5 min at 4°C and 9000 × g. For further cell lysis, 200 μl lysozme (3 mg/ml) were added and vortexed vigorously at 1,300 rpm for 15 min. After the lysate was transferred to a new tube with 50 mg of 0.1 mm Zirconia beads (Biospec, Bartlesville, U.S.A.), 700 μl of RLT buffer were added and the mixture was vortexed three times for 45 sec. After a further centrifugation step, the supernatant was transferred to a new tube, mixed with 470 μl of 100% ethanol, applied to the column, and processed further in the RNeasy Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). RNA quality was assessed using a 2100 Bioanalyser (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany).

Transcriptome analysis

Whole-transcriptome RNA library preparation with isolated RNA was performed as described [66]. Briefly, ribosomal RNAs were depleted using the Ribominus Transcriptome isolation Kit (Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany), and RNA was fragmented via a Covaris sonicator. Following de- and rephosphorylation, the TruSeq Small RNA Sample Kit (Illumina, Munich, Germany) was used for RT-PCR and gel purification of the resulting cDNAs. Libraries were then diluted and sequenced on a MiSeq sequencer (Illumina, Munich, Germany) using a MiSeq Reagent Kit v2 (50 cycles), resulting in 50 bp single-end reads. Illumina FASTQ files were mapped to the reference genome of Y. enterocolitica W22703 (accession number PRJEA59689; [14]) using Bowtie for Illumina implemented in Galaxy [67,68]. Artemis was used to visualize and calculate the number of reads mapping on each gene [69,70]. Gene counts of each library were normalized to the smallest library, and RPKM (reads per kilobase per million mapped reads) values were calculated. Fold changes (FC) between the different conditions were determined.

Histology

G. mellonella larvae were immobilized at 4°C, pinned on cork discs in a stretched position, and placed in 4% neutral buffered formaldehyde at least twelve hours for fixation. Larvae were removed from the cork discs and placed in 3 cm × 2,5 cm × 0,5 cm metal molds filled with 10% liquid agarose. They were oriented by forceps in a straight position with the legs up, and the agarose was allowed to solidify for 30 min at 4°C. After removing excessive agarose, larvae were dissected with a razor blade along the body midline in equal halves using mouth, tail, and legs for orientation. Both parts were placed with the cut surface downwards in cassettes. For paraffin embedding, formaldehyde was removed by rinsing in tap water. Tissues were dehydrated in graded ethanol followed by xylene, infiltrated with paraffin type 1 (Richard Allan Sci., Michigan, USA) in an automatic vacuum infiltration processor (Tissue-Tek VIP 6, Sakura, Staufen, Germany), and embedded in paraffin type 6 (Richard Allan Sci., Michigan, USA). Two μm paraffin sections made by an Epredia HM 355S automatic microtome (Fisher Scientific GmbH, Schwerte, Germany) were collected on charged glass slides and dried at 37°C for 24 to 48 h. Deparaffinised tissue section were stained with hemalaun and eosin for morphological orientation and identification of tissue lesions.

Immunofluorescence staining

To detect Y. enterocolitica by fluorescent-labelled antibodies, successive tissue sections were deparaffinized in xylene and graded ethanols, and antigen-demasked by digestion with 0.1% trypsin for 20 min at 37°C. After washing in PBS, a fluorescent-labelled anti-Y. enterocolitica O:9 mouse monoclonal antibody (FITC; PROGEN Biotechnik GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) was diluted 1:250 in PBS containing 3% BSA and applied for 1 h at room temperature (RT). An anti-E. coli polyclonal antibody (FITC) diluted 1:100 in PBS was used in controls (Genetex, Biozol Diagnostica Vertrieb GmbH, Leipziger Straße 4, 85386 Eching, Germany). For TcaA detection, an anti-RFP polyclonal antibody (Invitrogen) was diluted 1:250 in PBS with 3% BSA and incubated for 1 h at RT, followed by application of a goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) secondary antibody (Invitrogen) diluted 1:2,000. After a further washing step, tissue sections were covered-slipped with ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany). Microscopic slides were evaluated on a Zeiss Axio Imager 2 (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) using a dual emission filter set, allowing the simultaneous detection of FITC-marked bacteria in the green channel and imaging of the insect tissue through their own fluorescence in the red channel.

Giemsa staining of hemocytes

G. mellonella larvae were picked up and pricked in the aorta of the abdominal area with a sharp cannula. The escaping hemolymph fluid was placed on a microscopic slide. The preparations were dried for about 10 min at RT, followed by fixation for 10 min with methanol or acetone. The sections were placed in dH2O twice for 2 min and stained in the Giemsa solution (5 ml Giemsa stock solution in 80 ml dH2O) for 30 min. After staining, the preparation was differentiated with dH2O (and a few drops of acetic acid) until colouring to mauve, followed by exposure to 96% ethanol to extract colour surplus. Finally, the slides were washed 3 × 2 min in isopropanol, placed 2 × 2 min in xylene, and covered with Eukitt Quick-hardening mounting medium (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The microscopic slides were evaluated on a Zeiss Axio Imager 2 (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH).

Supporting information

S1 Fig

(A) map of the HE lysis cassette within Tc-PAIYe. (B) Transcriptional response in vivo of the genes located on Tc-PAIYe.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Heat map of differentially regulated Y. enterocolitica genes in vivo.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Jana Jagiela und Lisa Wolf for technical assistance, and Marcus Pfau for photographic work.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG); FU 375/4-1,2 to TMF. PAS received a salary from the DFG. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Weber M, Fuchs TM. Metabolism in the niche: a large-scale genome-based survey reveals inositol utilization to be widespread among soil, commensal, and pathogenic bacteria. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(4):e0201322. Epub 2022/08/05. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02013-22 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9430895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bowen D, Rocheleau TA, Blackburn M, Andreev O, Golubeva E, Bhartia R, et al. Insecticidal toxins from the bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens. Science. 1998;280(5372):2129–32. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5372.2129 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Landsberg MJ, Jones SA, Rothnagel R, Busby JN, Marshall SD, Simpson RM, et al. 3D structure of the Yersinia entomophaga toxin complex and implications for insecticidal activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(51):20544–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111155108 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gatsogiannis C, Lang AE, Meusch D, Pfaumann V, Hofnagel O, Benz R, et al. A syringe-like injection mechanism in Photorhabdus luminescens toxins. Nature. 2013;495(7442):520–3. doi: 10.1038/nature11987 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Meusch D, Gatsogiannis C, Efremov RG, Lang AE, Hofnagel O, Vetter IR, et al. Mechanism of Tc toxin action revealed in molecular detail. Nature. 2014;508(7494):61–5. doi: 10.1038/nature13015 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Busby JN, Panjikar S, Landsberg MJ, Hurst MR, Lott JS. The BC component of ABC toxins is an RHS-repeat-containing protein encapsulation device. Nature. 2013;501:547–50. doi: 10.1038/nature12465 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lang AE, Schmidt G, Schlosser A, Hey TD, Larrinua IM, Sheets JJ, et al. Photorhabdus luminescens toxins ADP-ribosylate actin and RhoA to force actin clustering. Science. 2010;327(5969):1139–42. doi: 10.1126/science.1184557 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Song N, Chen L, Zhou Z, Ren X, Liu B, Zhou S, et al. Genome-wide dissection reveals diverse pathogenic roles of bacterial Tc toxins. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(2):e1009102. Epub 2021/02/05. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009102 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7861908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Roderer D, Brocker F, Sitsel O, Kaplonek P, Leidreiter F, Seeberger PH, et al. Glycan-dependent cell adhesion mechanism of Tc toxins. Nature comm. 2020;11(1):2694. Epub 2020/06/03. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16536-7 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7264150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ng’ang’a PN, Siukstaite L, Lang AE, Bakker H, Romer W, Aktories K, et al. Involvement of N-glycans in binding of Photorhabdus luminescens Tc toxin. Cell Microbiol. 2021;23(8):e13326. Epub 2021/03/16. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13326 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sheets JJ, Hey TD, Fencil KJ, Burton SL, Ni W, Lang AE, et al. Insecticidal toxin complex proteins from Xenorhabdus nematophilus: structure and pore formation. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(26):22742–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.227009 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Roderer D, Raunser S. Tc toxin complexes: assembly, membrane permeation, and protein translocation. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2019;73:247–65. Epub 2019/05/30. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095531 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fuchs TM, Bresolin G, Marcinowski L, Schachtner J, Scherer S. Insecticidal genes of Yersinia spp.: taxonomical distribution, contribution to toxicity towards Manduca sexta and Galleria mellonella, and evolution. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8(1):214. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-214 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fuchs TM, Brandt K, Starke M, Rattei T. Shotgun sequencing of Yersinia enterocolitica strain W22703 (biotype 2, serotype O:9): genomic evidence for oscillation between invertebrates and mammals. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:168. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-168 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bresolin G, Morgan JA, Ilgen D, Scherer S, Fuchs TM. Low temperature-induced insecticidal activity of Yersinia enterocolitica. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59(2):503–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04916.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Spanier B, Starke M, Higel F, Scherer S, Fuchs TM. Yersinia enterocolitica infection and tcaA-dependent killing of Caenorhabditis elegans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(18):6277–85. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01274-10 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tennant SM, Skinner NA, Joe A, Robins-Browne RM. Homologues of insecticidal toxin complex genes in Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 1A and their contribution to virulence. Infect Immun. 2005;73(10):6860–7. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.10.6860-6867.2005 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mendoza-Almanza G, Esparza-Ibarra EL, Ayala-Lujan JL, Mercado-Reyes M, Godina-Gonzalez S, Hernandez-Barrales M, et al. The cytocidal spectrum of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins: from insects to human cancer cells. Toxins (Basel). 2020;12(5). Epub 2020/05/10. doi: 10.3390/toxins12050301 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7291302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Starke M, Richter M, Fuchs TM. The insecticidal toxin genes of Yersinia enterocolitica are activated by the thermolabile LTTR-like regulator TcaR2 at low temperatures Mol Microbiol. 2013;89(4):596–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Starke M, Fuchs TM. YmoA negatively controls the expression of insecticidal genes in Yersinia enterocolitica. Mol Microbiol. 2014;92:287–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Springer K, Reuter S, Knüpfer M, Schmauder L, Sänger P-A, Felsl A, et al. Activity of a holin-endolysin system in the insecticidal pathogenicity island of Yersinia enterocolitica. J Bacteriol. 2018;200:e00180–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jackson MW, Silva-Herzog E, Plano GV. The ATP-dependent ClpXP and Lon proteases regulate expression of the Yersinia pestis type III secretion system via regulated proteolysis of YmoA, a small histone-like protein. Mol Microbiol. 2004;54(5):1364–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04353.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Herbst K, Bujara M, Heroven AK, Opitz W, Weichert M, Zimmermann A, et al. Intrinsic thermal sensing controls proteolysis of Yersinia virulence regulator RovA. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(5):e1000435. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000435 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Springer K, Sanger PA, Felsl A, Fuchs TM. Lon protease- and temperature-dependent activity of a lysis cassette located in the insecticidal island of Yersinia enterocolitica. J Bacteriol. 2021;203(5):e00616–20. Epub 2020/12/09. doi: 10.1128/JB.00616-20 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7890549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cools F, Torfs E, Aizawa J, Vanhoutte B, Maes L, Caljon G, et al. Optimization and characterization of a Galleria mellonella larval infection model for virulence studies and the evaluation of therapeutics against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:311. Epub 2019/03/09. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00311 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6394149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sifri CD, Begun J, Ausubel FM. The worm has turned-microbial virulence modeled in Caenorhabditis elegans. Trends Microbiol. 2005;13(3):119–27. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.01.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vallet-Gely I, Lemaitre B, Boccard F. Bacterial strategies to overcome insect defences. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6(4):302–13. Epub 2008/03/11. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1870 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sheehan G, Farrell G, Kavanagh K. Immune priming: the secret weapon of the insect world. Virulence. 2020;11(1):238–46. Epub 2020/02/23. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1731137 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7051127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vesga P, Flury P, Vacheron J, Keel C, Croll D, Maurhofer M. Transcriptome plasticity underlying plant root colonization and insect invasion by Pseudomonas protegens. ISME J. 2020;14(11):2766–82. Epub 2020/09/04. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0729-9 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7784888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ramarao N, Nielsen-Leroux C, Lereclus D. The insect Galleria mellonella as a powerful infection model to investigate bacterial pathogenesis. J Vis Exp. 2012;(70):e4392. Epub 2012/12/29. doi: 10.3791/4392 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3567165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sheehan G, Dixon A, Kavanagh K. Utilization of Galleria mellonella larvae to characterize the development of Staphylococcus aureus infection. Microbiology. 2019;165(8):863–75. Epub 2019/05/21. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000813 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vertyporokh L, Wojda I. Immune response of Galleria mellonella after injection with non-lethal and lethal dosages of Candida albicans. J Invert Pathol. 2020;170:107327. Epub 2020/01/17. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2020.107327 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tsai CJ, Loh JM, Proft T. Galleria mellonella infection models for the study of bacterial diseases and for antimicrobial drug testing. Virulence. 2016;7(3):214–29. Epub 2016/01/06. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2015.1135289 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4871635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Springer K, Sanger PA, Moritz C, Felsl A, Rattei T, Fuchs TM. Insecticidal toxicity of Yersinia frederiksenii involves the novel enterotoxin YacT. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:392. Epub 2018/11/30. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00392 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6246891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Paulson AR, O’Callaghan M, Zhang XX, Rainey PB, Hurst MRH. In vivo transcriptome analysis provides insights into host-dependent expression of virulence factors by Yersinia entomophaga MH96, during infection of Galleria mellonella. G3 (Bethesda). 2021;11(1). Epub 2021/02/10. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkaa024 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7849909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Motin VL, Georgescu AM, Fitch JP, Gu PP, Nelson DO, Mabery SL, et al. Temporal global changes in gene expression during temperature transition in Yersinia pestis. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(18):6298–305. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.18.6298-6305.2004 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bresolin G, Neuhaus K, Scherer S, Fuchs TM. Transcriptional analysis of long-term adaptation of Yersinia enterocolitica to low-temperature growth. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(8):2945–58. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.8.2945-2958.2006 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Heermann R, Fuchs TM. Comparative analysis of the Photorhabdus luminescens and the Yersinia enterocolitica genomes: uncovering candidate genes involved in insect pathogenicity. BMC Genomics. 2008;9(1):40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-40 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Waterfield NR, Wren BW, ffrench-Constant RH. Invertebrates as a source of emerging human pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(10):833–41. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Barnoy S, Gancz H, Zhu Y, Honnold CL, Zurawski DV, Venkatesan MM. The Galleria mellonella larvae as an in vivo model for evaluation of Shigella virulence. Gut Microbes. 2017;8(4):335–50. Epub 2017/03/10. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1293225 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5570432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Prax N, Wagner S, Schardt J, Neuhaus K, Clavel T, Fuchs TM. A diet-specific microbiota drives Salmonella Typhimurium to adapt its in vivo response to plant-derived substrates. Anim Microbiome. 2021;3(1):24. Epub 2021/03/19. doi: 10.1186/s42523-021-00082-8 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7972205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Alenizi D, Ringwood T, Redhwan A, Bouraha B, Wren BW, Prentice M, et al. All Yersinia enterocolitica are pathogenic: virulence of phylogroup 1 Y. enterocolitica in a Galleria mellonella infection model. Microbiology. 2016;162(8):1379–87. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000311 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fedhila S, Buisson C, Dussurget O, Serror P, Glomski IJ, Liehl P, et al. Comparative analysis of the virulence of invertebrate and mammalian pathogenic bacteria in the oral insect infection model Galleria mellonella. J Invert Pathol. 2010;103(1):24–9. Epub 2009/10/06. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2009.09.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lange A, Schafer A, Bender A, Steimle A, Beier S, Parusel R, et al. Galleria mellonella: A novel invertebrate model to distinguish intestinal symbionts from pathobionts. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2114. Epub 2018/10/05. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02114 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6156133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Carter DO, Yellowlees D, Tibbett M. Cadaver decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Naturwissenschaften. 2007;94(1):12–24. Epub 2006/11/09. doi: 10.1007/s00114-006-0159-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Waterfield N, Hares M, Hinchliffe S, Wren B, ffrench-Constant R. The insect toxin complex of Yersinia. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;603:247–57. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-72124-8_22 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Holtof M, Lenaerts C, Cullen D, Vanden Broeck J. Extracellular nutrient digestion and absorption in the insect gut. Cell Tissue Res. 2019;377(3):397–414. Epub 2019/05/01. doi: 10.1007/s00441-019-03031-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Merzendorfer H. Insect chitin synthases: a review. J Comp Physiol B. 2006;176(1):1–15. Epub 2005/08/03. doi: 10.1007/s00360-005-0005-3 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Reddy SA, Huang JH, Liao WS. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in interleukin 1 signaling. Physical interaction with the interleukin 1 receptor and requirement in NFkappaB and AP-1 activation. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(46):29167–73. Epub 1997/11/20. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.46.29167 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Krin E, Chakroun N, Turlin E, Givaudan A, Gaboriau F, Bonne I, et al. Pleiotropic role of quorum-sensing autoinducer 2 in Photorhabdus luminescens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(10):6439–51. Epub 2006/10/06. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00398-06 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1610301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.ffrench-Constant R, Waterfield N, Daborn P, Joyce S, Bennett H, Au C, et al. Photorhabdus: towards a functional genomic analysis of a symbiont and pathogen. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003;26(5):433–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2003.tb00625.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Waterfield N, Dowling A, Sharma S, Daborn PJ, Potter U, ffrench-Constant RH. Oral toxicity of Photorhabdus luminescens W14 toxin complexes in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(11):5017–24. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.11.5017-5024.2001 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gendlina I, Held KG, Bartra SS, Gallis BM, Doneanu CE, Goodlett DR, et al. Identification and type III-dependent secretion of the Yersinia pestis insecticidal-like proteins. Mol Microbiol. 2007;64(5):1214–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05729.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Spinner JL, Carmody AB, Jarrett CO, Hinnebusch BJ. Role of Yersinia pestis toxin complex (Tc) family proteins in resistance to phagocytosis by polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Infect Immun. 2013;81:4041–52. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00648-13 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hamilton JJ, Marlow VL, Owen RA, Costa Mde A, Guo M, Buchanan G, et al. A holin and an endopeptidase are essential for chitinolytic protein secretion in Serratia marcescens. J Cell Biol. 2014;207(5):615–26. Epub 2014/12/10. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201404127 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4259817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Neely MN, Friedman DI. Functional and genetic analysis of regulatory regions of coliphage H-19B: location of shiga-like toxin and lysis genes suggest a role for phage functions in toxin release. Mol Microbiol. 1998;28(6):1255–67. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00890.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Waldor MK, Friedman DI. Phage regulatory circuits and virulence gene expression. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8(4):459–65. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.06.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hodak H, Galan JE. A Salmonella Typhi homologue of bacteriophage muramidases controls typhoid toxin secretion. EMBO Rep. 2013;14(1):95–102. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.186 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tan KS, Wee BY, Song KP. Evidence for holin function of tcdE gene in the pathogenicity of Clostridium difficile. J Med Microbiol. 2001;50(7):613–9. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-50-7-613 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Govind R, Dupuy B. Secretion of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B requires the holin-like protein TcdE. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(6):e1002727. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002727 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Palmer T, Finney AJ, Saha CK, Atkinson GC, Sargent F. A holin/peptidoglycan hydrolase-dependent protein secretion system. Mol Microbiol. 2021;115(3):345–55. Epub 2020/09/05. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14599 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Spinner JL, Jarrett CO, LaRock DL, Miller SI, Collins CM, Hinnebusch BJ. Yersinia pestis insecticidal-like toxin complex (Tc) family proteins: characterization of expression, subcellular localization, and potential role in infection of the flea vector. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:296. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-296 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Turnbull L, Toyofuku M, Hynen AL, Kurosawa M, Pessi G, Petty NK, et al. Explosive cell lysis as a mechanism for the biogenesis of bacterial membrane vesicles and biofilms. Nature comm. 2016;7:11220. Epub 2016/04/15. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11220 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4834629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jorjao AL, Oliveira LD, Scorzoni L, Figueiredo-Godoi LMA, Cristina APM, Jorge AOC, et al. From moths to caterpillars: Ideal conditions for Galleria mellonella rearing for in vivo microbiological studies. Virulence. 2018;9(1):383–9. Epub 2017/11/14. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2017.1397871 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5955185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Landstorfer R, Simon S, Schober S, Keim D, Scherer S, Neuhaus K. Comparison of strand-specific transcriptomes of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 EDL933 (EHEC) under eleven different environmental conditions including radish sprouts and cattle feces. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:353. Epub 2014/06/03. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-353 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4048457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Blankenberg D, Von Kuster G, Coraor N, Ananda G, Lazarus R, Mangan M, et al. Galaxy: a web-based genome analysis tool for experimentalists. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2010;Chapter 19:Unit 19 0 1–21. Epub 2010/01/14. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb1910s89 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4264107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Goecks J, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J, Galaxy T. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol. 2010;11(8):R86. Epub 2010/08/27. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2945788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream MA, et al. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2000;16(10):944–5. Epub 2000/12/20. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Carver T, Bohme U, Otto TD, Parkhill J, Berriman M. BamView: viewing mapped read alignment data in the context of the reference sequence. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(5):676–7. Epub 2010/01/15. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq010 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2828118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Karla JF Satchell

10 Oct 2022

Dear Dr Fuchs,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Dissecting the invasion of Galleria mellonella by Yersinia enterocolitica reveals metabolic adaptations and a role of a phage lysis cassette in insect killing" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

All of the further requests for this minor revision regard the manuscript text preparation. Please respond to all of the text edits requested by Reviewers #2 and #3 in a revised version. In addition, per request by Reviewer #3, go through the entire manuscript and check grammar usage to improve the overall text. The discussion in particularly needs to be improved for clarity.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Karla Satchell

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The author did a great job in reviewing their manuscript. In my opinion, the manuscript is ready for publication after the following minor points have been addressed:

Final sentence of abstract: as a hypothesis, this can of course be left in. But please rephrase to show that this is based on indirect evidence. I would suggest: "..., suggesting that this dual lysis cassette may be an example for a phage-related function that has been adapted for the release of a bacterial toxin". In the current form, this statement is too strong for the data provided in the manuscript.

"Even if this frameshift is not the result of a sequencing error, it obviously does not result in Tc inactivation. As this frameshift was not identified in most other Tc-PAI of yersiniae, we assume our statement to be correct." - Please provide fresh sequencing data for this region of W22703. The region between TcaA and TcaB2 is only 6100 bp, which can easily be covered by a colony PCR and the resulting PCR fragment sequenced. If the TcA component core is indeed split into three subunits, this would represent a novel finding and certainly be interesting for the field.

"This is given below figures 1E-H." - I still cannot relate these to the numbers 1-8 in Figure 1A-1D. Please explain which anatomical features correspond to which numbers.

"The presence of the plasmids in vivo was confirmed by periodic plating on selective and non-selective plates, not revealing differences in cell numbers." - Was a non-transformed control also checked in parallel to confirm selectivity is due to the antibiotic resistance cassette in plasmids rather than the cells acquiring resistance in situ?

"Infections with W22703 delta tccC are not shown to not overload the figure" - Please add the shown panel to the figure, this is important data.

"W22703 delta tccC/pBAD-tccC infections have not been documented by photos." - This is a shame from a consistency viewpoint in relation to the other, photographically documented data. Please change the Figure 3 legend from "are not shown" to "were not documented by photos" for the sake of clarity. In lines 141-152 the W22703 delta tccC/pBAD-tccC is not mentioned in comparison to other tested strains (as per line 133) - can this be fixed?

“This discrepancy suggests that TcaA is involved in adherence to epithelial cells and thus in midgut colonization, without requiring TccC.” - This would be a novel function for Tc toxins - they have so far been considered to function only as holotoxins. Perhaps this novelty should be highlighted.

In Figure 4, the error bars for W22703 delta HE, W22703 delta HE/pACYC-HE, W22703 delta tccC, and W22703 delta tccC/pBAD-tccC are missing, although the legend says the experiments were performed as triplicates. Please address this.

"The FC-value of holin gene is 0.87, thus pointing to a very slight transcription of this lysis gene as discussed, thus preventing cell death". A point well worth bringing up in the discussion, as it points to "a lack of cell lysis as prerequisite for Tc release", as you say in response to point 12.

Reviewer #3: The manuscript is in general improved with greater emphasis on TcA component and per os activity. the authors have attempted to address previous responses in the responses to reviewer sections and only carried through some of these corrections into the revised manuscript.

There are still some areas that if acted on may improve the readability of the revised manuscript , in addition to this a couple of contradictory sentences (as provided below) were noted which need to be clarified. I also think a final comprehensive proofreading of the manuscript is needed to smooth out some sections. Never the less the authors have clearly demonstrated the per os activity and a role of TcA in gut retention. On this note https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1230942/ refer to role of a TcA in gut retention in mouse (might be good to integrate this reference)

They have placed less emphasis on lysis where their transcriptome profile is only partly linked to that of the Tc cluster

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: No further experiments are required.

Reviewer #2: see above

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: see above

Reviewer #3: L78 I still think more information on Lon protease needs to be provided (this might be known to the authors but may not be known to the readers)

L107-118 I would argue if you have done through a serial dose series that seems to be enough data here to determine the Ld50 for a set time period eg but not necessarily 3 days post challenge

L130 perhaps say challenging larvae with LB medium ?

L133 still unsure about pARA leakiness can this be explained better can you place a example from another system I think a paper of Guzman (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7608087/) highlight basal leakyness andcould be referenced

L168 complemented plasmid carried the deleted genes is this correct? I might have though the complement plasmids carried the intact genes as per line 132-133 – please clarify (I might have miss read)

L220 contradicts the statements on Ll167=170 where full complementation is noted ?

L248 might be good to link 12-24 hour in potential role of tcca adhesion also what about holY?

L272 please expand on what the lux operon is so the reader has greater understanding

L275 can we refer to a table etc on the 13 phage genes

The discussion a bit hard to decipher in places, specifically how the examples given link with the findings of the study. Please edit a final time to improve clarity.

L289 majority excreted I might suggest in the absence of TcA the bacteria is unable to be maintain itself within the gut (this might be a better way to word this)

Is l 291 is this correct Pluminescens in the gut – in this respect the nematode typically infects the haemocoel as the first point of entry - please check

L 297 caco 2 gut cells could mention they are human derived

L304 what does readouts? mean please clarify

L343 possibly list the genes that specifically target insects

Table 1 though highlighted in table supp figure 1 I still might suggest highlight relevant TC and lysis genes

Figures are in general well presented

Fig 7 are the scales accurate of are cells observed in Tca minus? Which appear more larger?

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Decision Letter 1

Karla JF Satchell

8 Nov 2022

Dear Dr Fuchs,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Dissecting the invasion of Galleria mellonella by Yersinia enterocolitica reveals metabolic adaptations and a role of a phage lysis cassette in insect killing' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Karla J.F. Satchell, Ph.D.

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Karla Satchell

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

Karla JF Satchell

15 Nov 2022

Dear Dr Fuchs,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Dissecting the invasion of Galleria mellonella by Yersinia enterocolitica reveals metabolic adaptations and a role of a phage lysis cassette in insect killing," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig

    (A) map of the HE lysis cassette within Tc-PAIYe. (B) Transcriptional response in vivo of the genes located on Tc-PAIYe.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Heat map of differentially regulated Y. enterocolitica genes in vivo.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 128245_1_rebuttal_2432988_rgcd4q.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Second point by point answer.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES