Abstract
Quantitative multi-image analysis (QMA) is the systematic extraction of new information and insight through the simultaneous analysis of multiple, related images. We present examples illustrating the potential for QMA to advance materials research in multi-image characterization, automatic feature identification, and discovery of novel processing-structure–property relationships. We conclude by discussing opportunities and challenges for continued advancement of QMA, including instrumentation development, uncertainty quantification, and automatic parsing of literature data.
Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1557/s43579-022-00265-7.
Motivation
Images are among the most information-rich forms of data acquired in materials research. They are often presented individually, as the final output of a single observation, intended for direct visual inspection or quantitative analysis. However, as anyone who has seen a movie or viewed a stereograph can attest, images provide even more insight when grouped, rather than treated in isolation. We define quantitative multi-image analysis (QMA) as the systematic extraction of new information and insight through the simultaneous analysis of multiple, related images. This paper illustrates the potential for QMA to revolutionize materials research by transforming the way we use images. Our examples are drawn from metals research, but employ techniques that are transferrable to other material classes.
An image is fundamentally a l × m × n array of numbers, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The array encodes a m × n grid of locations and l different quantities for each location (for example, l = 1 in a grayscale image and l = 3 for RGB). One objective of image analysis is to identify features within the m × n grid of locations, e.g., through edge detection, segmentation, skeletonization, or chord-length distributions.[1,2] Another is to elicit insights from the l different data streams at each location, as in the inherently multi-modal images obtained by electron,[3–8] scanning probe,[9] and correlative[10,11] microscopy. QMA goes beyond these traditional forms of analysis by combining information from multiple images to improve statistical inferences, recognize feature evolution, or increase the number of data streams, l, at each location.
Figure 1.

An image is a grid of m × n locations, each of which has a stack of l numerical values associated with it.
Automation is essential for QMA: it makes simultaneous analysis of multiple image fast and reproducible,[12] reduces noise and errors,[13] and may be easily accomplished using ready available software, such as ImageJ[14] or MIPAR.[15] Moreover, it opens opportunities to employ computationally intensive techniques such as dimensionality reduction[16,17] and neural networks[3] to extract insights that are otherwise unobtainable. Therefore, our paper highlights automated computational methods for QMA.
Multi-image characterization of a single sample location
N images with one data stream taken at a single sample location, but with distinct imaging conditions, may be “stacked” to form a single image with l = N data streams. Using this approach, directional reflectance microscopy (DRM) obtains microstructure information from optical micrographs that would otherwise only be accessible in electron microscopy.[18] In polycrystals, local surface reflectivity is a function of the crystallographic orientation of individual grains. This phenomenon is the basis of classical metallography. However, inspection of a single micrograph permits only the qualitative conclusion that certain areas possess different crystal orientations and therefore belong to different grains. By contrast, DRM further recognizes that a polycrystal reflects light with varying intensity depending on illumination direction.[10] By stacking multiple micrographs taken at a single location over a range of illumination angles, as shown in Fig. 2, DRM determines the orientation of each grain quantitatively.
Figure 2.
DRM workflow (adapted from Refs. 19–21). (a) A typical DRM apparatus includes a stereo-microscope and motorized stage, which is used to control the illumination direction (parameterized by the elevation, , and azimuth, , angles). (b) Stack of optical micrographs taken for different combinations of and . (c) Directional reflectance signal from a single pixel in the DRM dataset (b). The signal quantifies how the pixel’s reflected light intensity changes as a function of and . Analysis of this information enables computing the local crystallographic orientation at the pixel. (d) Example DRM orientation map of an Inconel 718 sample produced using directed energy deposition technology. The map shows crystal orientation along the out-of-plane direction using the standard inverse pole figure color-coding. However, DRM can also measure the full three-dimensional crystal orientation.
Depending on the complexity of the optical signal, different algorithms may be employed to index crystallographic orientation. In some cases, it is sufficient to use computer vision to recognize specific signal patterns that are related to the underlying crystal structure [Fig. 2(c)].[19] In other cases, the measured signals may be compared against a dictionary of simulated ones, modeled through first-principal calculations, in search for the best match.[22] When the interpretation of the optical signal becomes more challenging—for example in multi-phase metal alloys—machine learning (ML) can establish the links between directional reflectance and crystal orientation.[21] Both types of algorithms are able to yield grain orientation maps that are essentially equivalent to those provided by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD),[23] but over much greater sample areas and without having to place the sample in a vacuum chamber.
DRM has been demonstrated on pure metals,[20,24] semiconductors,[19] metal alloys,[21] and ceramic reinforced polymer composites.[25] However, it holds greatest promise wherever conventional characterization techniques, such as EBSD, struggle to assess large-scale microstructure variability, e.g., in additively manufactured materials.[26,27] Other techniques that integrate multiple images to expand the microstructure information obtainable through optical microscopy include ones that vary light polarization to infer crystallographic textures[28–30] or, in some cases, full crystal orientations.[31] Crystallographic textures may also be inferred from topographic analysis.[32]
Another form of QMA correlates single-stream images taken at one location, but with distinct physical conditions imposed on the sample. For example, digital image correlation (DIC) computes local strains by comparing images under different imposed mechanical loads. Originally developed for 2D in-plane analysis with an optical camera,[33,34] DIC has now been applied to analyze images from SEM[35] and AFM,[36] out-of-plane measurement based on binocular stereovision,[37] as well as 3D x-ray computed tomography[38] (digital volumetric correlation). Strain fields obtained through DIC reveal local deformation behavior, such as planar slip and grain boundary sliding.[39] Supplementary Movie 1 illustrates multiple slip band formation in a Ni-base alloy during an in situ SEM tensile test.
Quantitative processing of DIC data provides new ways to understand material behavior at the microstructural level. For example, the Heaviside-DIC algorithm identifies displacement discontinuities due to localized slip.[40] Moreover, DIC data may be registered with the underlying microstructure (as characterized by EBSD) and analyzed by ML to identify active twinning systems,[41] predict strain at grain boundaries with different orientations relative to a loading axis,[42] as well as distortions near defects.[43]
Feature extraction through interpolation of image databases
Identification of features in an image may be posed as a multi-dimensional, nonlinear interpolation problem on a database of representative images where the features of interest have been identified in advance. For example, the DefectSegNet code[44] automatically identifies crystal defects, such as dislocations[45] or voids,[46] in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images. It requires a database of TEM images where the defects of interest have been previously identified, either via inspection by an expert or through automated image analysis (e.g., using the Sauvola method for dislocations[47] or subtraction of underfocus and overfocus images for voids[48]). These images are taken to be a representative sampling of a hypothetical set of all possible TEM micrographs containing the defects of interest.
For any given new TEM image, DefectSegNet generates a semantic segmentation image identifying defect pixels through interpolation of the database using a convolutional neural network (CNN), which is a type of machine learning algorithm for analyzing images. This method yields high accuracy, capable of detecting ~ 92% dislocations and ~ 99% voids correctly in TEM images where defects are clearly visible on a clean background.[44] Performance is poorer on micrographs that contain diffraction contrast artifacts (e.g., lattice distortion or bending contours). Figure 3 applies DefectSegNet to two example TEM images and compares it to conventional algorithms. The latter currently outperform DefectSegNet, but larger training sets that include images with diffraction contrast artifacts may mitigate this shortcoming of DefectSegNet.
Figure 3.
(a) TEM micrograph showing dislocations in Mg. Dislocation lines were identifies using (b) global thresholding, (c) the Sauvola method (a local thresholding method), and (d) DefectSegNet. TEM micrographs showing helium bubbles in Cu in (e) underfocus and (f) overfocus imaging conditions. Bubbles were detected using (g) the subtraction method and (h) DefectSegNet. Red arrows indicate locations where diffraction contrast artifacts make it difficult to currently identify dislocations or bubbles.
Mining processing–structure–property relationships
Image databases augmented with metadata that summarizes associated processing conditions or material properties may be analyzed to refine known processing–structure–property (PSP) relationships or discover new ones. Images published in the open literature constitute such a database, albeit not an easily searchable one. For example, after inspecting approximately 1000 manuscripts, McCue et al. identified 128 published studies reporting processing histories as well as high quality images for nanoporous gold (NPG): a well-studied material fabricated via selective dissolution of Ag from a AgAu alloy[49] [see Fig. 4(a)]. Using the AQUAMI software,[50] they characterized NPG microstructure consistently across all images and discovered quantitative relationships between NPG processing parameters (time and temperature) and ligament diameters, as shown in Fig. 4.
Figure 4.
(a) Original (top) and thresholded (bottom) SEM micrograph of nanoporous gold (NPG). (a)–(d) The AQUAMI code performs quantitative image analysis through noise removal, pixel-by-pixel segmentation, and measurement (here, ligament diameter and length). (e) Time–temperature processing map of NPG constructed using image data and metadata mined from the open literature. The boundaries between colored regions represent approximate isocontours of ligament diameter.
A common objective of data mining studies, such as the example given above, is to distill information into trends that can be easily understood by humans.[51–54] CNNs are also capable of integrating microscopy images and processing information to make property predictions.[55] A CNN, as illustrated in Fig. 5, extracts quantitative features from the micrograph and transforms the high-dimensional image into a useful lower dimensional representation. CNNs contain an encoder with many layers which successively extract more complex information from the image starting with features such as edges and textures in the initial layers to whole objects in the later layers. Each layer has many image filters which detect a single feature in the image. Similar to the DefectSegNet code[44] described in section “Feature extraction through interpolation of image databases”, such CNNs must be trained on a suitable database of images and associated metadata to determine appropriate feature extraction filters for the desired task. Pre-training encoders on a massive dataset of microscopy images improves performance on segmentation tasks when little training data is available, and the models are more robust to changes in imaging and sample conditions.[56] The quantitative information extracted by the CNN can be used to establish PSP relationships.[57–61]
Figure 5.
A typical convolutional neural network (CNN) consists of an encoder (outlined in blue) which extracts increasingly high-level features from an image in successive layers. The model also has a task specific head (in this case a classifier outlined in grey), which uses the feature vector generated from the encoder to perform image analysis tasks such as classification, segmentation, or property prediction.
Discussion
The foregoing examples illustrate the potential for QMA to advance materials research. They also shed light on challenges and opportunities for continued development of QMA methods. The first of these concerns physical tools. Today, multi-image characterization at individual sample locations (Sect. 2) is often carried out using custom-built tools. Incorporation of capabilities for varying illumination conditions—including angles of incidence, polarization, or wavelength—into commercial optical microscopes has the potential to advance QMA methods and make them more accessible to a broader community of researchers. In the case of DIC, while commercial tools are available for optical characterization, SEM-based DIC requires in-house integration of loading, imaging, and analysis. Moreover, there are currently no tools for out-of-plane displacement measurement in SEM-DIC, limiting its utility in characterizing surface topography changes, e.g., pile-up regions near micro- or nano-indents.[62] This shortcoming may be addressed by acquiring stereo SEM images using a tilting stage or by integrating SEM and AFM data.
Conclusions drawn from QMA require quantification of uncertainty. This topic has received considerable attention within the DIC community, due to inherent tradeoffs between smoothing of image noise and the resolution of the calculated strain map.[6,62,63] Uncertainty quantification challenges also arise in automated feature detection. For example, orientation and strain mapping in precession electron diffraction (PED)[64,65] and 4D-STEM[66] datasets (e.g., to detect geometrically necessary dislocations[67]) require precisely locating the centers of diffracted spots with non-uniform intensity.[68] This task calls for assessing the impact of approximations made during analysis on the resulting conclusions. This challenge also arises in TEM characterization of beam-sensitive materials, where very low electron doses are required to minimize electron-beam-induced damage. This constraint leads to noisy datasets that must be filtered using advanced statistical algorithms.[69,70]
Some of the QMA examples we gave require image databases. The materials informatics community is rapidly automating methods to identify features and extract PSP relationships from such databases.[53,71,72] This work mirrors the imaging revolution that previously occurred in medicine, where content-based image retrieval now aids in patient diagnosis and care.[52,73] However, labeled and parsed materials databases are limited in size and scope, focusing on specific subsets of metadata.[74–77] The most comprehensive set of data is still located in published manuscripts. There is a growing effort to parse, archive, and access microstructural data from the literature,[49] though automation of this task is only nascent.[78] Construction of image databases with web-scale quantities of data will enable discovery of new PSP relationships. This undertaking will undoubtedly benefit from continued development of CNNs and vision transformers.[79–82]
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgments
MJD was supported by the US Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration under award no. DE-NA0003857. IM was supported by an Early Career Faculty grant from NASA’s Space Technology Research Grants Program. MS was supported by the Ministry of Education of Singapore, Official Number: MOE2017-T2-2-119. JS was supported by the NASA Transformational Tools and Technologies (T3) project under the Transformative Aeronautics Concept Program within the Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate. KX was supported by the US National Science Foundation, Division of Materials Research, under award no. 2004752. KX is grateful to W.S. Lin for assistance with DefectSegNet.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Wojnar L. Image Analysis: Applications in Materials Engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim HN, Iskakov A, Liu X, Kaplan M, Kalidindi SR. Digital protocols for statistical quantification of microstructures from microscopy images of polycrystalline nickel-based superalloys. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s40192-022-00264-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Spurgeon SR, Ophus C, Jones L, Petford-Long A, Kalinin SV, Olszta MJ, Dunin-Borkowski RE, Salmon N, Hattar K, Yang WCD, Sharma R, Du YG, Chiaramonti A, Zheng HM, Buck EC, Kovarik L, Penn RL, Li DS, Zhang X, Murayama M, Taheri ML. Towards data-driven next-generation transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Mater. 2021;20(3):274–279. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-00833-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wright SI, Nowell MM, Lindeman SP, Camus PP, De Graef M, Jackson MA. Introduction and comparison of new EBSD post-processing methodologies. Ultramicroscopy. 2015;159:81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jha D, Singh S, Al-Bahrani R, Liao W-K, Choudhary A, De Graef M, Agrawal A. Extracting grain orientations from EBSD patterns of polycrystalline materials using convolutional neural networks. Microsc. Microanal. 2018;24(5):497–502. doi: 10.1017/S1431927618015131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kammers AD, Daly S. Digital image correlation under scanning electron microscopy: Methodology and validation. Exp. Mech. 2013;53(9):1743–1761. doi: 10.1007/s11340-013-9782-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kammers AD, Daly S. Self-assembled nanoparticle surface patterning for improved digital image correlation in a scanning electron microscope. Exp. Mech. 2013;53(8):1333–1341. doi: 10.1007/s11340-013-9734-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kalidindi SR, De Graef M. Materials data science: Current status and future outlook. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2015;45:171–193. doi: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-020844. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kalinin SV, Strelcov E, Belianinov A, Somnath S, Vasudevan RK, Lingerfelt EJ, Archibald RK, Chen CM, Proksch R, Laanait N, Jesse S. Big, deep, and smart data in scanning probe microscopy. ACS Nano. 2016;10(10):9068–9086. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b04212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Favret E, Povolo F, Canzian A. Determination of crystal orientations in aluminium by means of unidirectional laser oblique illumination (ULOI) Prakt. Metallogr.-Pract. Metallogr. 1999;36(4):206–215. doi: 10.1515/pm-1998-360407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gelb J, Harris W, Lechner L, Merkle A. Linking length scales and modalities with integrated. Correl. Microsc. Microsc. Microanal. 2016;22(S3):238–239. doi: 10.1017/S143192761600204X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Park C, Ding Y. Automating material image analysis for material discovery. MRS Commun. 2019;9(2):545–555. doi: 10.1557/mrc.2019.48. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Voyles PM. Informatics and data science in materials microscopy. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mat. Sci. 2017;21(3):141–158. doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2016.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chinga G, Johnsen PO, Dougherty R, Berli EL, Walter J. Quantification of the 3D microstructure of SC surfaces. J. Microsc.-Oxf. 2007;227(3):254–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01809.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sosa JM, Huber DE, Welk B, Fraser HL. Development and application of MIPAR(TM): A novel software package for two-and three-dimensional microstructural characterization. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 2014;3(1):18. doi: 10.1186/2193-9772-3-10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tenenbaum JB, de Silva V, Langford JC. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science. 2000;290(5500):2319. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5500.2319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lubbers N, Lookman T, Barros K. Inferring low-dimensional microstructure representations using convolutional neural networks. Phys. Rev. E. 2017 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.052111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Seita M, Nimerfroh MM, Demkowicz MJ. Acquisition of partial grain orientation information using optical microscopy. Acta Mater. 2017;123:70–81. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gaskey B, Hendl L, Wang X, Seita M. Optical characterization of grain orientation in crystalline materials. Acta Mater. 2020;194:558–564. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.05.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wittwer M, Gaskey B, Seita M. An automated and unbiased grain segmentation method based on directional reflectance microscopy. Mater. Charact. 2021;174:10. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.110978. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wittwer M, Seita M. A machine learning approach to map crystal orientation by optical microscopy. NPJ Comput. Mater. 2022;8(1):9. doi: 10.1038/s41524-021-00688-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhu C, Seita M. A physics-based model for crystal orientation dictionary indexing by directional reflectance microscopy. Acta Mater. 2022;231:117863. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.117863. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Humphreys FJ. Quantitative metallography by electron backscattered diffraction. J. Microsc.-Oxf. 1999;195:170–185. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.1999.00578.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang X, Gao S, Jain E, Gaskey B, Seita M. Measuring crystal orientation from etched surfaces via directional reflectance microscopy. J. Mater. Sci. 2020;55:11678. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chou VHY, Liu WC, Wittwer M, Le Ferrand H, Seita M. High-throughput microstructure and composition characterisation of microplatelet reinforced composites using directional reflectance microscopy. Acta Mater. 2022;229:117798. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.117798. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sofinowski K, Wittwer M, Seita M. Encoding data into metal alloys using laser powder bed fusion. Addit. Manuf. 2022;52:102683. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2022.102683. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.M. Seita, M. Wittwer, X. Wang, Optical Metallography of Fusion-Based Additively Manufactured Metals, Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering (Elsevier, 2020)
- 28.Wang X, Yang S, Seita M. Combining polarized light microscopy with machine learning to map crystallographic textures on cubic metals. Mater. Charact. 2022;190:112082. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.112082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jin K-W, De Graef M. Correlation of c-axis orientation of a-titanium grains with polarized light optical microscopy intensity profiles. Microsc. Microanal. 2018;24(S1):548–549. doi: 10.1017/S1431927618003239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.G.H. Brian, H.T. Jonathan, J.R. Brian, R.M. Joseph, D.U. Michael, Polarized reflectivity for quantitative crystallography of alpha-Titanium, Proc. SPIE (2019)
- 31.Ilchenko O, Pilgun Y, Kutsyk A, Bachmann F, Slipets R, Todeschini M, Okeyo PO, Poulsen HF, Boisen A. Fast and quantitative 2D and 3D orientation mapping using Raman microscopy. Nat. Commun. 2019;10(1):5555. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13504-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Speidel A, Su R, Mitchell-Smith J, Dryburgh P, Bisterov I, Pieris D, Li WQ, Patel R, Clark M, Clare AT. Crystallographic texture can be rapidly determined by electrochemical surface analytics. Acta Mater. 2018;159:89–101. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Peters WH, Ranson WF. Digital imaging techniques in experimental stress analysis. Opt. Eng. 1982;21(3):427–431. doi: 10.1117/12.7972925. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sutton MA, Wolters WJ, Peters WH, Ranson WF, McNeill SR. Determination of displacements using an improved digital correlation method. Image Vis. Comput. 1983;1(3):133–139. doi: 10.1016/0262-8856(83)90064-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lagattu F, Bridier F, Villechaise P, Brillaud J. In-plane strain measurements on a microscopic scale by coupling digital image correlation and an in situ SEM technique. Mater. Charact. 2006;56(1):10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2005.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chasiotis I, Knauss WG. A new microtensile tester for the study of MEMS materials with the aid of atomic force microscopy. Exp. Mech. 2002;42(1):51–57. doi: 10.1007/BF02411051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Luo PF, Chao YJ, Sutton MA, Peters WH. Accurate measurement of three-dimensional deformations in deformable and rigid bodies using computer vision. Exp. Mech. 1993;33(2):123–132. doi: 10.1007/BF02322488. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bay BK, Smith TS, Fyhrie DP, Saad M. Digital volume correlation: Three-dimensional strain mapping using X-ray tomography. Exp. Mech. 1999;39(3):217–226. doi: 10.1007/BF02323555. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Linne MA, Bieler TR, Daly S. The effect of microstructure on the relationship between grain boundary sliding and slip transmission in high purity aluminum. Int. J. Plast. 2020;135:102818. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102818. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Stinville JC, Callahan PG, Charpagne MA, Echlin MP, Valle V, Pollock TM. Direct measurements of slip irreversibility in a nickel-based superalloy using high resolution digital image correlation. Acta Mater. 2020;186:172–189. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chen Z, Daly S. Automated identification of deformation twin systems in Mg WE43 from SEM DIC. Mater. Charact. 2020;169:110628. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110628. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Vieira RB, Lambros J. Machine learning neural-network predictions for grain-boundary strain accumulation in a polycrystalline metal. Exp. Mech. 2021;61(4):627–639. doi: 10.1007/s11340-020-00687-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Muhammad W, Brahme AP, Ibragimova O, Kang J, Inal K. A machine learning framework to predict local strain distribution and the evolution of plastic anisotropy & fracture in additively manufactured alloys. Int. J. Plast. 2021;136:102867. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102867. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Roberts G, Haile SY, Sainju R, Edwards DJ, Hutchinson B, Zhu Y. Deep learning for semantic segmentation of defects in advanced STEM images of steels. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49105-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.D. Hull, D.J. Bacon, Introduction to Dislocations (Elsevier, 2011)
- 46.Nastasi M, Michael N, Mayer J, Hirvonen JK, James M. Ion-Solid Interactions: Fundamentals and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sauvola J, Pietikäinen M. Adaptive document image binarization. Pattern Recogn. 2000;33(2):225–236. doi: 10.1016/S0031-3203(99)00055-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Williams DB, Carter CB. The transmission electron microscope. Transmission electron microscopy: Springer; 1996. pp. 3–17. [Google Scholar]
- 49.McCue I, Stuckner J, Murayama M, Demkowicz MJ. Gaining new insights into nanoporous gold by mining and analysis of published images. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25122-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Stuckner J, Frei K, McCue I, Demkowicz MJ, Murayama M. AQUAMI: An open source Python package and GUI for the automatic quantitative analysis of morphologically complex multiphase materials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2017;139:329. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.08.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.C. Ordonez, E.R. Omiecinski, Image Mining: A New Approach for Data Mining (1998)
- 52.Lehmann TM, Guld MO, Deselaers T, Keysers D, Schubert H, Spitzer K, Ney H, Wein BB. Automatic categorization of medical images for content-based retrieval and data mining. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 2005;29(2–3):143–155. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2004.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gola J, Britz D, Staudt T, Winter M, Schneider AS, Ludovici M, Mucklich F. Advanced microstructure classification by data mining methods. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018;148:324–335. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wang YX, Zhang M, Lin AQ, Iyer A, Prasad AS, Li XL, Zhang YC, Schadler LS, Chen W, Brinson LC. Mining structure-property relationships in polymer nanocomposites using data driven finite element analysis and multi-task convolutional neural networks. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 2020;5(5):962–975. doi: 10.1039/D0ME00020E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.R. Noraas, N. Somanath, M. Giering, O.O. Olusegun, Structural Material Property Tailoring Using Deep Neural Networks, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019)
- 56.J. Stuckner, B. Harder, T. Smith, Microstructure Segmentation With Deep Learning Encoders Pre-Trained on a Large Microscopy Dataset, NASA (2022)
- 57.Cang RJ, Xu YPX, Chen SH, Liu YM, Jiao Y, Ren MY. Microstructure representation and reconstruction of heterogeneous materials via deep belief network for computational material design. J. Mech. Des. 2017;139(7):11. doi: 10.1115/1.4036649. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.DeCost BL, Lei B, Francis T, Holm EA. High throughput quantitative metallography for complex microstructures using deep learning: A case study in ultrahigh carbon steel. Microsc. Microanal. 2019;25(1):21–29. doi: 10.1017/S1431927618015635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Holm EA, Cohn R, Gao N, Kitahara AR, Matson TP, Lei B, Yarasi SR. Overview: Computer vision and machine learning for microstructural characterization and analysis. Metall. Mater. Trans. A-Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 2020;51(12):5985–5999. doi: 10.1007/s11661-020-06008-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Larmuseau M, Sluydts M, Theuwissen K, Duprez L, Dhaene T, Cottenier S. Compact representations of microstructure images using triplet networks. NPJ Comput. Mater. 2020;6(1):11. doi: 10.1038/s41524-020-00423-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Larmuseau M, Sluydts M, Theuwissen K, Duprez L, Dhaene T, Cottenier S. Race against the Machine: Can deep learning recognize microstructures as well as the trained human eye? Scripta Mater. 2021;193:33–37. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.10.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Liu M, McCue I, Demkowicz MJ. Quantifying surface deformation around micrometer-scale indents by digital image correlation. J. Mater. Res. 2021;36:2277. doi: 10.1557/s43578-020-00019-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Reu PL, Blaysat B, Andó E, Bhattacharya K, Couture C, Couty V, Deb D, Fayad SS, Iadicola MA, Jaminion S, Klein M, Landauer AK, Lava P, Liu M, Luan LK, Olufsen SN, Réthoré J, Roubin E, Seidl DT, Siebert T, Stamati O, Toussaint E, Turner D, Vemulapati CSR, Weikert T, Witz JF, Witzel O, Yang J. DIC challenge 2.0: Developing images and guidelines for evaluating accuracy and resolution of 2D analyses. Exp. Mech. 2022;62:639. doi: 10.1007/s11340-021-00806-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rottmann PF, Hemker KJ. Nanoscale elastic strain mapping of polycrystalline materials. Mater. Res. Lett. 2018;6(4):249–254. doi: 10.1080/21663831.2018.1436609. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ma L, Rottmann PF, Xie K, Hemker KJ. Nano-scale elastic strain maps of twins in magnesium alloys. Microsc. Microanal. 2018;24(S1):970–971. doi: 10.1017/S1431927618005342. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zeltmann SE, Müller A, Bustillo KC, Savitzky BH, Minor AM, Ophus C. Improved 4D-STEM strain mapping precision using patterned probes. Microsc. Microanal. 2019;25(S2):1958–1959. doi: 10.1017/S1431927619010523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Leff A, Weinberger C, Taheri M. Estimation of dislocation density from precession electron diffraction data using the Nye tensor. Ultramicroscopy. 2015;153:9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rouviere J-L, Béché A, Martin Y, Denneulin T, Cooper D. Improved strain precision with high spatial resolution using nanobeam precession electron diffraction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013;103(24):241913. doi: 10.1063/1.4829154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zhang C, Han R, Zhang AR, Voyles PM. Denoising atomic resolution 4D scanning transmission electron microscopy data with tensor singular value decomposition. Ultramicroscopy. 2020;219:113123. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Stuckner J, Shimizu T, Harano K, Nakamura E, Murayama M. Ultra-fast electron microscopic imaging of single molecules with a direct electron detection camera and noise reduction. Microsc. Microanal. 2020;26(4):667–675. doi: 10.1017/S1431927620001750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bostanabad R, Bui AT, Xie W, Apley DW, Chen W. Stochastic microstructure characterization and reconstruction via supervised learning. Acta Mater. 2016;103:89–102. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Warmuzek M, Zelawski M, Jalocha T. Application of the convolutional neural network for recognition of the metal alloys microstructure constituents based on their morphological characteristics. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2021;199:6. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110722. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, T. Brox, U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation, 18th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), Springer International Publishing Ag, Munich, 2015, pp. 234–241.
- 74.DeCost BL, Holm EA. A large dataset of synthetic SEM images of powder materials and their ground truth 3D structures. Data Brief. 2016;9:727–731. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.DeCost BL, Hecht MD, Francis T, Webler BA, Picard YN, Holm EA. UHCSDB: Ultrahigh carbon steel micrograph database tools for exploring large heterogeneous microstructure datasets. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 2017;6(2):197–205. doi: 10.1007/s40192-017-0097-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Aversa R, Modarres MH, Cozzini S, Ciancio R, Chiusole A. The first annotated set of scanning electron microscopy images for nanoscience. Sci. Data. 2018;5:8. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Karimi AM, Fada JS, Hossaine MA, Yang SY, Peshek TJ, Braid JL, French RH. Automated pipeline for photovoltaic module electroluminescence image processing and degradation feature classification. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2019;9(5):1324–1335. doi: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2920732. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.A.J. Yepes, P. Zhong, D. Burdick, ICDAR 2021 Competition on Scientific Literature Parsing, 16th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Springer International Publishing Ag, Electr Network, 2021, pp. 605–617
- 79.K.M. He, X.Y. Zhang, S.Q. Ren, J. Sun, IEEE, Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE, Seattle, 2016, pp. 770–778
- 80.G. Huang, Z. Liu, L. van der Maaten, K.Q. Weinberger, IEEE Densely Connected Convolutional Networks, 30th IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE, Honolulu, 2017, pp. 2261–2269
- 81.Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun. ACM. 2017;60(6):84–90. doi: 10.1145/3065386. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.C. Szegedy, S. Ioffe, V. Vanhoucke, A.A. Alemi, AAAI, Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the impact of residual connections on learning, 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Assoc Advancement Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, 2017, pp. 4278–4284
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




