Evidence of the impact of misleading descriptors on cigarette packaging and advertising on consumer perceptions and use intentions is well documented.1–4 Prominent examples include use of descriptors such as ‘natural’, ‘organic,’ and ‘additive-free’ by the brand Natural American Spirit (NAS), which have been found to mislead consumers to believe that NAS cigarettes are less harmful than other cigarette brands.2 5 This strategy has been successful for NAS, which saw a 97% increase in market share in the USA from 2014 to 2019,6 despite overall declines in cigarette smoking over this time period.7
In 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent a warning letter to Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company (SFNTC), a subsidiary of Reynolds American Inc. (RAI), for using descriptors in NAS marketing that communicated reduced risk without an FDA order to do so.8 An agreement between FDA and SFNTC/RAI was reached in 2017 specifying that the company would remove ‘additive-free’ and ‘natural’ from their packaging and advertising, with the exception of their brand name which remained Natural American Spirit.9 The terms of this agreement appear to have been specific to NAS and have not discouraged other cigarette brands from using similar descriptors.10 11 As we previously highlighted,10 non-cigarette tobacco products also appear to be mimicking NAS’ marketing strategy. For example, Backwoods, a mass merchandise cigar/cigarillo brand, which has promoted their ‘all-natural leaf wrapper’ since at least 2018,12 is the fastest growing cigar brand, with the largest increase in market share (16.1% average annual percentage change (AAPC)) from 2009 to 2020, compared with other major cigar brands.13
Recent marketing efforts in business-to-business (B2B) publications suggest that other cigar brands are following suit. Indeed, in B2B publications, we have seen an uptick in the past several months in the promotion of ‘natural’ and/or ‘leaf’ styles of cigars from major mass merchandise brands, including Swisher Sweets, Dutch Masters and Game (figure 1). This uptick is notable, as nature-related imagery and language have not been highly prevalent in cigar advertising in the past, according to content analyses published in the past decade.14 15 Black & Mild has also promoted their own ‘natural’ cigar (figure 2).16 In these advertisements, the term ‘natural’ is consistently paired with the word ‘leaf’ and/or a leaf image. In one advertisement from Dutch Masters for their ‘Dutch Leaf’ cigar, they state that ‘all-natural shoppers purchase more’ and that all-natural leaf cigars are outperforming other cigars in terms of sales. In an advertisement for Swisher Sweets Leaf cigars, which states on the package that they use ‘all-natural tobacco,’ the brand states that ‘more than ever, your customers are looking for something real,’ and highlights that the product will lead to quick profits.
Figure 1.
Advertisements from CSP Daily News and Convenience Store Magazine, 2021–2022.
Figure 2.
Advertisement for Black & Mild Natural Wrap cigars, 2018 (https://trinketsandtrash.org/detail.php?artifactid=13391&page=1).
With the industry promoting these products and their growth in B2B publications, we conducted our own analysis of cigar sales data to examine these trends. We estimated changes in US cigar sales by analysing data obtained from the Nielsen Company for all convenience stores (C-stores). For cigars, Nielsen provides data on features such as brand, flavour, pack size and claims (including ‘natural’) that are printed on unique packages sold (identified by unique UPC numbers). Using previously employed approaches,13 17 we coded Nielsen data for the presence of ‘natural’ descriptors on cigar packaging from 2017 to 2021 and analysed these data with National Cancer Institute’s Joinpoint, a segmented regression analysis application, to assess trends. We found that sales of cigars with a ‘natural’ descriptor were both prominent and growing, and that sales of such products greatly drove the overall increase in the cigar market during this time frame. The overall sales of cigars in C-stores, adjusted for inflation, significantly increased from $3.25 billion in 2017 to $3.66 billion in 2021 (AAPC, 3.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5% to 5.7%), p=0.031). Sales of cigars with a ‘natural’ descriptor grew at a faster pace (AAPC, 14.1% (95% CI, 9.8% to 18.5%), p=0.002), whereas sales of cigars without a ‘natural’ descriptor were flat and trended downwards (AAPC, −0.9% (95% CI, −3.0% to 1.2%), p=0.264). As such, the market share for cigars with a ‘natural’ descriptor increased from 22.3% in 2017 to 33.9% in 2021. During this same period, the number of unique cigar products sold with a ‘natural’ descriptor increased from 342 to 467, while products without ‘natural’ descriptors decreased from 2693 to 2410. We also observed differences in pack sizes between cigars with and without ‘natural descriptors.’ Among those with ‘natural’ descriptors, two packs (31.8%) and five packs (46.3%) comprised the majority of dollar sales in 2021. Most dollar sales among cigars without the ‘natural’ descriptors were singles (27.4%) and two packs (28.1%). Furthermore, the top 10 selling brands using a ‘natural’ descriptor were all cheaper mass merchandise cigar/cigarillo brands, rather than premium brands.
The growth of cigars that use the ‘natural’ descriptor is concerning for several reasons. As stated earlier, the cigarette literature demonstrates that the term ‘natural’ can mislead consumers, including young people,3–5 18 to believe that a product is less harmful than other brands.3 ‘Leaf’ imagery and language in the marketing of these cigars may implicitly communicate reduced harm, based on findings that NAS’ pro-environment packaging was rated as less harmful to oneself and others than another brand.19 Furthermore, both the ‘natural’ descriptor and ‘leaf’ imagery may increase product appeal. Indeed, research on cigarettes shows that both the ‘natural’ descriptor and imagery of flora (eg, leaves) are associated with curiosity and interest in the product among youth and young adults.20 Flora has also been found to increase cigarette advertisement receptivity among young people.21 Furthermore, one experimental study of Game cigarillos found that the ‘natural leaf’ descriptor increased young adults’ favourable beliefs about the quality of the cigar and its users.22 With the pending flavour ban for cigars,23 cigar companies may continue to heavily promote these products and potentially increase reliance on their use as a product benefit and selling feature in the absence of flavours. Given that cigars are growing in popularity13 and are disproportionately used by vulnerable populations,24 25 the FDA should consider policies to restrict the use of potentially misleading descriptors such as ‘natural’ in cigar marketing, as well as communication efforts to counter misperceptions of harm resulting from the use of these descriptors.
In addition to the mass merchandise cigar market, ‘natural’ descriptors on premium cigars are likely to play a role in the regulation of all cigar products. The definition of premium cigars currently employed by FDA inherently defines premium cigars as ‘natural’ (ie, whole leaf, no characterising flavours, no additives)26 and many premium cigars are described using this descriptor (figure 3). Despite the fact that premium cigars make up a small percent of the market,27 cigar trade associations that represent premium cigar companies have been successful in having regulations overturned that would require premarket approval for premium cigars and health warning statements on all cigar products.28 29 In the context of FDA’s withdrawal of an advance notice of proposed rulemaking for premium cigars30 and an impending flavoured cigar ban,23 ‘natural’ messaging could mark another foray by cigar companies to circumvent rules and manipulate their products to retain sales.31–33
Figure 3.
Instagram post from the Alec Bradley premium cigar account highlighting a natural premium cigar (4 January 2022).
Funding
This research was funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products under U54CA229973. OG was additionally supported by funding from the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (P30CA072720-5931). MJ was supported by funding from NCI (K01CA242591).
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: Disclaimer The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NCI or FDA.
Competing interests None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sanders-Jackson A, Tan ASL, Yie K. Effects of health-oriented descriptors on combustible cigarette and electronic cigarette packaging: an experiment among adult smokers in the United States. Tob Control 2018;27:534–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pearson JL, Richardson A, Feirman SP, et al. American spirit pack descriptors and perceptions of harm: a Crowdsourced comparison of modified packs. Nicotine Tob Res 2016;18:1749–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Czoli CD, Hammond D. Cigarette Packaging: Youth Perceptions of “Natural” Cigarettes, Filter References, and Contraband Tobacco. Journal of Adolescent Health 2014;54:33–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Morgan JC, Byron MJ, Baig SA, et al. How people think about the chemicals in cigarette smoke: a systematic review. J Behav Med 2017;40:553–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Byron MJ, Baig SA, Moracco KE, et al. Adolescents’ and adults’ perceptions of ‘natural’, ‘organic’ and ‘additive-free’ cigarettes, and the required disclaimers. Tob Control 2016;25:517–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Miller Lo EJ, Young WJ, Ganz O, et al. Trends in overall and menthol market shares of leading cigarette brands in the USA: 2014–2019. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:2270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cigarette Smoking Among U.S. Adults Hits All-Time Low [press release]. Atlanta, GA: 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Simoneau A, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Tobacco Products, Office of Compliance and Enforcement. Warning letter: SANTA Fe natural tobacco company, Inc. silver spring, MD, 2015. Available: https://web.archive.org/web/20150829183928/http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm459840.htm [Google Scholar]
- 9.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Tobacco Products, Office of Compliance and Enforcement. Memorandum Agreement Between The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) and RAI Services Company (RAIS)/Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc. (Santa Fe), (Dated: January 19, 2017). Silver Spring, MD, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ganz O, Delnevo CD, Lewis MJ. Following in the footsteps of natural American spirit: the emergence of Manitou cigarettes. Tob Control 2020;29:tobaccocontrol-2020–055614–e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Trinkets and Trash. Winston AD new Brunswick, NJ2022. Available: https://trinketsandtrash.org/detail.php?artifactid=15631&page=1
- 12.Smiley SL, Kim S, Mourali A, et al. Characterizing #Backwoods on Instagram: “The Number One Selling All Natural Cigar”. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:4584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Delnevo CD, Miller Lo E, Giovenco DP, et al. Cigar sales in convenience stores in the US, 2009–2020. JAMA 2021;326:2429–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moran MB, Heley K, Baldwin K, et al. Selling tobacco: a comprehensive analysis of the U.S. tobacco advertising landscape. Addict Behav 2019;96:100–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Richardson A, Ganz O, Vallone D. Tobacco on the web: surveillance and characterisation of online tobacco and e-cigarette advertising. Tob Control 2015;24:341–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Convenience Store Products. Black & Mild Natural Wrap. Available: https://www.cstoreproductsonline.com/tobacco/black-mild-natural-wrap
- 17.Delnevo CD, Giovenco DP, Miller Lo EJ. Changes in the Mass-merchandise cigar market since the tobacco control act. Tob Regul Sci 2017;3:8–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McDaniel PA, Malone RE. “I always thought they were all pure tobacco”: American smokers’ perceptions of “natural” cigarettes and tobacco industry advertising strategies. Tob Control 2007;16:e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Epperson AE, Lambin EF, Henriksen L, et al. Natural American spirit’s pro-environment packaging and perceptions of reduced-harm cigarettes. Prev Med 2019;126:105782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Moran MB, Heley K, Czaplicki L, et al. Tobacco advertising features that may contribute to product appeal among US adolescents and young adults. Nicotine Tob Res 2021;23:1373–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moran MB, Weiger C, Czaplicki L, et al. Evidence of youth-appealing cigarette advertising tactics from a randomized, controlled experiment. Nicotine Tob Res 2022. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac077. [Epub ahead of print: 24 Mar 2022]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Young WJ, Ganz O, Jeong M, et al. Perceptions of Game cigarillo packaging among young adult tobacco users: The effect of package color and the “natural leaf” descriptor. Addict Behav 2022;132:107334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Tobacco product standard for characterizing flavors in Cigars. federal register, 2022. Available: https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2022-08993.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gentzke AS, Wang TW, Jamal A, et al. Tobacco Product Use Among Middle and High School Students - United States, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:1881–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cornelius ME, Wang TW, Jamal A, et al. Tobacco Product Use Among Adults - United States, 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:1736–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.CTP Statement on Premarket Authorization Requirements for Premium Cigars [press release]. Silver Spring, MD: 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Maxwell JC. The Maxwell report: cigar industry in 2015. Richmond, VA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Leagle. com. Cigar association of America V. U.S. food and drug administration, 964 F.3d 56 (D.D.C. 2020), 2020. Available: https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20200707143
- 29.Leagle. com. Cigar association of America V. U.S. food and drug administration, 436 F.Supp.3d 70 (D.D.C. 2020), 2020. Available: https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20200707143
- 30.CTP Statement on Withdrawal of the Unified Agenda Entry Pertaining to the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Premium Cigars and Related Request for Information [press release]. Silver Spring, MD: 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Delnevo CD, Hrywna M. “A whole ‘nother smoke” or a cigarette in disguise: how RJ Reynolds reframed the image of little cigars. Am J Public Health 2007;97:1368–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Delnevo CD, Hrywna M. Clove cigar sales following the US flavoured cigarette ban. Tob Control 2015;24:e246–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Delnevo CD, Hrywna M, Giovenco DP, et al. Close, but no cigar: certain cigars are pseudo-cigarettes designed to evade regulation. Tob Control 2017;26:349–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]