Abstract
Background
Non-metallic nanomaterials do not stain enamel or dentin. Most have better biocompatibility than metallic nanomaterials do for management of dental caries.
Objective
The objective of this study is to review the types, properties and potential uses of non-metallic nanomaterials systematically for managing dental caries.
Methods
Two researchers independently performed a literature search of publications in English using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. The keywords used were (nanoparticles OR nanocomposites OR nanomaterials) AND (caries OR tooth decay). They screened the titles and abstracts to identify potentially eligible publications of original research reporting non-metallic nanomaterials for caries management. Then, they retrieved and studied the full text of the identified publications for inclusion in this study.
Results
Out of 2497 resulting publications, this study included 75 of those. The non-metallic nanomaterials used in these publications were categorized as biological organic nanomaterials (n=45), synthetic organic nanomaterials (n=15), carbon-based nanomaterials (n=13) and selenium nanomaterials (n=2). They inhibited bacteria growth and/or promoted remineralization. They could be incorporated in topical agents (29/75, 39%), dental adhesives (11/75, 15%), restorative fillers (4/75, 5%), dental sealant (3/75, 4%), oral drugs (3/75, 4%), toothpastes (2/75, 3%) and functional candies (1/75, 1%). Other publications (22/75, 29%) do not mention specific applications. However, most publications (67/75, 89%) were in vitro studies. Six publications (6/75, 8%) were animal studies, and only two publications (2/75, 3%) were clinical studies.
Conclusion
The literature showed non-metallic nanomaterials have antibacterial and/or remineralising properties. The most common type of non-metallic nanomaterials for caries management is organic nanomaterials. Non-metallic nanomaterials can be incorporated into dental sealants, toothpaste, dental adhesives, topical agents and even candies and drugs. However, the majority of the publications are in vitro studies, and only two publications are clinical studies.
Keywords: nanomaterials, nanoparticles, caries, prevention, antibacterial, remineralisation
Introduction
Dental caries is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases worldwide. Multiple pathological factors can trigger it, including cariogenic microbes, host or tooth surface, substrate and time.1 The colonized cariogenic microbes on tooth surfaces can metabolize fermentable carbohydrates and generate organic acids. Although enamel and dentin are highly mineralized hard tissues, these acids over a period can dissolve and diffuse into enamel and dentin.2,3 Continuous demineralization can destroy tooth structure and finally result in dental caries. Without treatment, dental caries can progress and lead to persistent pain and further infection.
The World Health Organization reported that dental caries is the fourth most expensive disease to treat, causing a significant global burden of disease.4 Clinicians largely use the conventional approach to manage dental caries with restoration.5 The current dental materials are principally silver amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement. They have their own limitations that affect clinical life span of the restorations. The World Dental Federation published its policy statement that advocated evidence-based caries-control measures for caries management.6 Researchers have been developing various dental materials to inhibit demineralization by repressing the growth of cariogenic bacteria and/or to promote remineralization by enhancing the deposition of minerals.3,7
Nanotechnology is a recent research trend that is particularly effective in developing various nanomaterials used in several application areas. Nanomaterials contain materials measured at the nanometer scale (1 to 100 nm). They exhibit unique mechanochemical and biological properties, such as huge surface-to-volume ratio, high strength and stability, strong solubility and chemical reactivity and promising antibacterial effects.8,9 Therefore, various nanomaterials have been developed for caries management and have shown auspicious results.8
Metallic nanomaterials, such as silver nanoparticles, have been widely used in caries management. They generally exhibit antibacterial activity through oxidative stress induction.10 However, they demonstrate only antibacterial ability, with no remineralization ability. In addition, some metallic nanomaterials have high cell toxicity and staining effects, which limit their clinical application.
Due to these disadvantages of metallic nanomaterials, researchers are gradually studying non-metallic nanomaterials. Non-metallic nanomaterials are nanomaterials without any metal element. Some non-metallic nanomaterials enhance remineralization by promoting mineral deposition and inducing hydroxyapatite formation. They can be a biomimetic material to regulate and orient the growth of enamel-like apatite. Some non-metallic nanomaterials effectively inhibit the growth of cariogenic bacteria, owing to their nano-scale size, unique active constituents and loaded antibacterial agents.11 They can protect teeth from demineralization without generating drug resistance. Figure 1 illustrates non-metallic nanomaterials’ remineralising and antibacterial properties in managing dental caries.
Figure 1.
Effects of non-metallic cariostatic nanomaterials on carious lesion.
Moreover, non-metallic nanomaterials exhibit promising biocompatibility compared to metallic nanomaterials. The addition of non-metallic nanomaterials in dental materials neither significantly alters their color nor affects their application. However, a search revealed that reviews of non-metallic nanomaterials for caries management have not been conducted. The purpose of this study is to review and summarize systematically the non-metallic nanomaterials developed for managing dental caries. This outline could help researchers identify the proper research direction to develop new non-metallic nanomaterials for caries management.
Methods
Search Strategy
Two independent investigators conducted a literature search to identify publications in three common databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science). The search was restricted to publications in English, with no limitations on the date of publication. The keywords were (nanoparticles OR nanocomposites OR nanomaterials) AND (caries OR tooth decay). The last search was conducted on 20 Jul 2022.
Study Selection and Data Extraction
This systematic review included original investigations of the non-metallic nanomaterials developed for caries management (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Flow chart of the literature search.
Two investigators independently checked and excluded duplicate publications from the three databases to generate a list of publications. They screened titles and abstracts of the publications to identify potentially eligible publications. They excluded literature reviews, studies on metal nanomaterials, studies not related to caries management and other irrelevant studies. Afterwards, the two investigators retrieved full texts of the remaining publications for review. They selected publications that non-metallic nanomaterials used as the active constituent for caries management. Then, they performed a manual screening to select eligible publications from the reference lists of the selected publications. They discussed with another investigator including the selected publications to determine the publications included in this review. They recorded the publications’ information, including authors, year, journal and issues; the nanomaterials studied; the study design; the anti-caries properties investigated and the potential uses of the nanomaterials.
Assessment of Risk of Bias
Two investigators independently assessed the risk of bias from individual studies. The assessment was adapted from a systematic review.3,12 They evaluated the study’s quality with seven parameters, which were 1) presence of control, 2) sample size justification, 3) material characterization, 4) biocompatibility assessment, 5) amount of material for assessment, 6) assessment time and 7) blinding of observers. Publications that reported only one to two items were classified as high risk of bias. Publications reporting three to five items were classified as medium risk, and those reporting more five items were regarded as low risk.
Results
The initial literature search yielded 2497 potentially eligible publications (666 publications in PubMed; 1073 publications in Scopus; 758 publications in Web of Science). Duplicate records of publications were excluded. After the titles and abstracts were screened, and 1775 publications were removed because they were literature reviews, studies not regarding non-metallic nanomaterials, studies not related to dental caries or other irrelevant studies. Another 48 publications were excluded because the non-metallic nanomaterials in these papers were not the active constituent for caries management. A search of the references of the selected publications yielded 21 publications that met the inclusion criteria. Therefore, 75 publications were included in this review.
The 75 publications were assessed for the risk of bias (Table 1). Seventy-three publications (73/75, 97%) had a medium risk of bias, 1 publication (1/75, 1%) presented a high risk of bias, and 1 publication (1/75, 1%) presented a low risk of bias. Of the 75 publications included, most publications (67/75, 89%) were in vitro studies, 6 (6/75, 8%) were animal studies and 2 (2/75, 3%) were clinical studies. The non-metallic nanomaterials demonstrated in these publications could be incorporated in topical agent (29/75, 39%), dental adhesives (11/75, 15%), restorative filler (4/75, 5%), dental sealant (3/75, 4%), oral drugs (3/75, 4%), toothpaste (2/75, 3%) and functional candies (1/75, 1%). Other publications (22/75, 29%) did not mention specific applications. The non-metallic nanomaterials reported were categorized as biological organic nanomaterials (n=45), synthetic organic nanomaterials (n=15), carbon-based nanomaterials (n=13) and selenium nanomaterials (n=2). Figures 3 and Figure 4 show the four groups of non-metallic cariostatic nanomaterials and their mechanism, respectively.
Table 1.
Risk of Bias of the Included Publications
| First Author, Year[Ref] | Items of Assessment | Score | Risk of Bias | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presence of Control | Sample Size Justification | Material Characterization | Biocompatibility Assessment | Amount of Material for Assessment | Assessment Time | Observer Blinding | |||
| Fernando, 201925 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
6 | Low (>5) | |
| Zhang, 202218 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Fang, 202219 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Zhang, 201920 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Zhul, 202133 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Javed, 202052 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Javed, 202153 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Jeong, 202155 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Sebelemetja, 202056 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Magalhães, 202146 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Barot, 202058 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Afrasiabi, 202060 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Feitosa, 201963 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Cao, 201774 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Feitosa, 201477 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Gautam, 201781 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Nizami, 202094 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Shahmoradi, 202299 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | Medium (3–5) | ||
| Tavaf, 201714 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Wang, 201815 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Wang, 201916 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Wang, 202122 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Li, 201426 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Niu, 202128 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Chen, 201631 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Smith, 200129 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Dogan et al, 201838 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Woolfolk, 202239 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Cao, 201440 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Wang, 202041 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Patil, 201549 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Wassel, 201748 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Pourhajibaghe, 202250 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Covarrubias, 201851 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Farzanegan, 202154 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Xu, 202157 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Zaleh, 202261 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Peng, 202265 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Yan, 201766 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Feitosa, 202162 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Beyth, 200668 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Beyth, 201269 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Karthikeyan, 201171 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Lee, 201072 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Toledano-Osorio, 202076 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Kaptan, 202278 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Zanni, 201685 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Bregnocchi, 201784 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Zhao, 202091 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Mao, 202195 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Wu, 202096 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| He, 201590 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Ghorbanzadeh, 202188 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Pourhajibagher, 202189 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Khosalim, 202193 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Wu, 201897 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Dhanraj, 202198 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | Medium (3–5) | |||
| Guo, 201913 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Jiang, 202117 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Chung, 201321 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Mehta, 201424 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Niu, 202127 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Otake, 199130 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Xu, 201832 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Ruan, 201335 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Ruan, 201436 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Ruan, 201637 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Aliasghari, 201647 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Deokar, 202045 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Karimi, 202059 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Sharon, 201870 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Ramalingam, 201273 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Hu, 202175 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Rago, 201583 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | Medium (3–5) | ||||
| Palaniswamy, 201623 | ![]() |
![]() |
2 | High (<3) | |||||
Figure 3.
Number of publications of the 4 non-metallic cariostatic nanomaterials.
Figure 4.
Mechanism of the 4 non-metallic cariostatic nanomaterials.
Discussion
Biological Organic Nanomaterials
Biological organic nanomaterials are nano-scale materials derived from organisms. These materials have attracted widespread attention due to their great biocompatibility, biodegradability and bioavailability.
Amino Acid-Based Nanomaterials
Amino acid-based nanomaterials are amino acids and their derivatives, including peptides and proteins. Amino acid-based nanomaterials are novel materials used for caries management. Table 2 summarizes 28 publications on the amino acid-based nanomaterials for caries management. Free amino acids, such as D-cysteine, process antibacterial properties. D-cysteine can inhibit the metabolic activity and lactic acid production of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Streptococcus sanguinis (S. sanguinis) biofilms.13
Table 2.
Studies on Amino Acid-Based Nanomaterials for Caries Management
| Author, Year[Ref] | Nanomaterial | Design | Properties | Potential Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guo et al, 201913 | Cysteine | In vitro | Inhibits growth of S. mutans, S. sanguinis | – |
| Tavaf et al, 201714 | Casein peptide | In vitro | Inhibits growth of S. mutans | – |
| Wang et al, 201815 | GH12 peptide | In vitro | Inhibits growth of S. mutans | – |
| Jiang et al, 202117 | GH12 peptide | In vitro | Inhibits growth of S. mutans | – |
| Wang et al, 201916 | GH12 peptide | Rat | Inhibits growth of S. mutans | Topical agent |
| Zhang et al, 202218 | pHly-1 peptide | In vitro | Inhibits growth of S. mutans | - |
| Fang et al, 202219 | Polyphemusin I peptide | In vitro | Inhibits growth of S. mutans | Topical agent |
| Zhang et al, 201920 | Diphosphoserine-polyphemusin I peptide | Rabbit | Inhibits growth of S. mutans | Topical agent |
| Chung et al, 201321 | 3 NSS peptide | In vitro | Promotes enamel remineralization | Topical agent |
| Wang et al, 202122 | RGDS peptide | In vitro | Promotes dentin remineralization | Topical agent |
| Palaniswamy et al, 201623 | Casein phosphopeptide | In vitro | Promotes enamel remineralization | Toothpaste |
| Mehta et al, 201424 | Casein phosphopeptide | In vitro | Promotes enamel remineralization | Toothpaste |
| Fernando et al, 201925 | Casein phosphopeptide | Clinical | Promotes enamel remineralization | Topical agent |
| Li et al, 201426 | Oligopeptide amphiphile | In vitro | Promotes enamel remineralization | Topical agent |
| Niu et al, 202128 | GA-KR12 peptide | In vitro | Inhibits growth of S. mutans; Promotes dentin remineralization | Topical agent |
| Niu et al, 202127 | GA-KR12 peptide | In vitro | Inhibits growth of S. mutans, S. sobrinus, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, A. naeslundii, C. albicans; Promotes enamel remineralization | Topical agent |
| Chen et al, 201631 | Immunoglobulin Y | In vitro | Inhibits growth of S. mutans | – |
| Smith et al, 200129 | Immunoglobulin Y | Rat | Inhibits growth of S. mutans | Oral drug |
| Otake et al, 199130 | Immunoglobulin Y | Rat | Inhibits growth of S. mutans | Oral drug |
| Zhu et al, 202133 | Chimeric lysin | In vitro | Inhibits growth of S. mutans | Topical agent |
| Xu et al, 201832 | Chimeric lysin | Rat | Inhibits growth of S. mutans, S. sobrinus | Topical agent |
| Ruan et al, 201335 | Amelogenin | In vitro | Promotes enamel remineralization | Topical agent |
| Ruan et al, 201436 | Amelogenin | In vitro | Promotes enamel remineralization | Topical agent |
| Ruan et al, 201637 | Amelogenin | In vitro | Promotes enamel remineralization | Topical agent |
| Dogan et al, 201838 | Amelogenin derivative | In vitro | Promotes enamel remineralization | Topical agent |
| Woolfolk et al, 202239 | Amelogenin derivative | In vitro | Promotes enamel and dentin remineralization | Topical agent |
| Cao et al, 201440 | Amelogenin mimics | In vitro | Promote dentin remineralization | Topical agent |
| Wang et al, 202041 | Amelogenin mimics | Rat | Promote enamel remineralization | Topical agent |
Peptides are short chains of amino acids that the amide type of covalent chemical bonds link. The constitutions of peptides vary based on types and sequences of amino acids, which generate unique properties of each peptide. Antimicrobial peptides have potent, broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties against oral pathogens. Researchers obtain antimicrobial peptides from extracting immune responses to microbial infections or artificial synthesis. A casein peptide that the partial proteolysis of milk caseins produces inhibits biofilm formation independently. It can be combined and used with silver nanoparticles to improve significantly the antibacterial effect against S. mutans.14 Some antimicrobial peptides, including GH12 peptide, pHly-1 peptide, polyphemusin I peptide and diphosphoserine-polyphemusin I peptide, have shown an antibacterial effect on the biomass and cariogenic activity of S. mutans in vitro.15–20 Notably, the GH-12 peptide exhibits good biocompatibility and a strong antibacterial effect against S. mutans on the molars of rats in vivo. GH-12 peptide is a potential topical agent to inhibit dental caries.16 Moreover, topical use of diphosphoserine-polyphemusin I peptide reduced the plaque on incisors of rabbits in vivo.20 Besides a strong antimicrobial effect, some peptides have remineralising properties that can be used for caries management. Two studies demonstrated that adding 3 NSS peptide and RGDS peptide into bioactive glass can enhance bio-remineralization of enamel and dentin.21,22 Casein phosphopeptide remineralizes the enamel when combined with stannous fluoride and amorphous calcium phosphate nanoparticles in toothpaste.23–25 Oligopeptide amphiphile is a biomimetic remineralising material. It can self-assemble into nano-fibers in the presence of calcium ions and work with the calcium ions to foster the biomimetic mineralization on enamel surface.26 Furthermore, GA-KR12 peptide is a dual-function peptide with an antibacterial and remineralising effect. It can inhibit the growth of multiple cariogenic microorganisms and enhance the remineralization on enamel and dentin.27,28
Some proteins can inhibit bacterial growth. Researchers used immunoglobulin Y as an oral drug and found that it can inhibit the growth of S. mutans through passive immunity in rats.29,30 Loading immunoglobulin Y on hydroxyapatite also improved the antibacterial property of hydroxyapatite.31 Chimeric lysin can cause high lytic activity in cariogenic microorganisms. The S. mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus (S. sobrinus) biofilm viability of teeth treated with chimeric lysin significantly decreased on the premolars of rats.32 The chimeric lysin can be combined with amorphous calcium phosphate in carboxymethyl chitosan nanogel to inhibit biofilm formation and promote remineralization.33
Apart from their antimicrobial properties, some proteins can act as biomimetic materials to regulate precipitation of calcium phosphate and protect teeth from demineralization. They can induce remineralization and form an enamel-like apatite under a physiological condition to prevent caries. Therefore, proteins are bioavailable alternatives to repair defective enamel. Amelogenin is a critical protein for controlling the organized growth of apatite crystals, which play a direct role in nucleation, crystal growth and the stretch spacing of hydroxyapatite crystallites.34 Amelogenin-containing chitosan hydrogels can induce the apatite crystals to form on the damaged human enamel.35–37 Amelogenin derivative is a small domain derived from native amelogenin. It can construct a mineral layer on the demineralized enamel.38 Amelogenin derivative also generates biomimetical remineralization on silver diamine fluoride-treated dentin.39 Besides, amelogenin mimics can bind to collagen fibrils and mimic the bio-mineralization process on enamel and dentin.40,41
Natural Extractive-Based Nanomaterials
Although nanoparticles can be obtained using various physicochemical methods, green synthesis of nanoparticles using natural extracts minimizes the usage of toxic chemicals.42 Table 3 summarizes the 17 publications on the natural extractive-based nanomaterials for managing dental caries.
Table 3.
Studies on Natural Extractive-Based Nanomaterials for Caries Management
| Author, Year[Ref] | Nanomaterial | Design | Properties | Potential Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliasghari et al, 201647 | Chitosan nanoparticles | In vitro | Inhibit growth of S. mutans, S. sanguinis | – |
| Patil et al, 201549 | Chitosan nanoparticles | In vitro | Inhibit growth of S. mutans, E. faecalis | – |
| Javed et al, 202052 | Chitosan nanoparticles | In vitro | Inhibit growth of S. mutans, L. acidophillus | Dental adhesive |
| Javed et al, 202153 | Chitosan nanoparticles | In vitro | Inhibit growth of S. mutans, L. acidophillus | Dental adhesive |
| Wassel et al, 201748 | Chitosan nanoparticles | In vitro | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Topical agent |
| Pourhajibagher et al, 202250 | Chitosan nanoparticles | In vitro | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Topical agent |
| Covarrubias et al, 201851 | Chitosan nanoparticles | In vitro | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Topical agent |
| Farzanegan et al, 202154 | Chitosan nanoparticles | Clinical | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Dental adhesive |
| Magalhães et al, 202146 | Chitosan nanoparticles | In vitro | Promote enamel remineralization | Topical agent |
| Deokar et al, 202045 | Chitosan nanoparticles | In vitro | Promote enamel remineralization | Topical agent |
| Jeong et al, 202155 | Cinnamon essential oil nanoemulsion | In vitro | Inhibits growth of oral microcosm | Topical agent |
| Sebelemetja et al, 202056 | Dodonaea viscosa var. angustifolia flavone nanoparticles | In vitro | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | – |
| Xu et al, 202157 | Epigallocatechin gallate nanovessicle | In vitro | Inhibits growth of S. mutans | Oral drug |
| Barot et al, 202058 | Farnesol halloysite nanotubes | In vitro | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Restorative filler |
| Karimi et al, 202059 | Thymol-cardamom-Lactobacillus plantarum nanoparticles | In vitro | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Functional candy |
| Afrasiabi et al, 202060 | Propolis nanoparticles | In vitro | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | – |
| Zaleh et al, 202261 | Propolis nanoparticles | In vitro | Promote enamel remineralization | Topical agent |
Chitosan is a natural polymer obtained by the alkaline hydrolysis of chitin. Chitosan is widely used in biomedicine materials because it has promising remineralising, antibacterial and biocompatible properties without toxicity.43,44 Chitosan nanoparticles have shown a remineralization ability on demineralized enamel.45,46 Due to their nanometric dimensions, chitosan nanomaterials exhibit a greater ability to penetrate the oral biofilm than ordinary chitosan does. Chitosan nanomaterials can be used as antimicrobial agents for caries management because they inhibit the formation of S. mutans and S. sanguinis biofilm.47 Moreover, chitosan nanoparticles can be applied as the matrix loaded with propolis, miswak, rutin and emodin to develop the anti-caries agent and dental varnish.48–50 The chitosan nanoparticles have also been used as the capping agent combined with copper, copper oxide, zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles to enhance the antibacterial property of dentin adhesive.51–54 A clinical study demonstrated that orthodontic adhesive containing chitosan-titanium dioxide nanoparticles could prevent white spot lesions. The orthodontic adhesive containing chitosan-titanium dioxide nanoparticles significantly inhibits the S. mutans compared to the commercial orthodontic adhesive.54
Moreover, plant extractives attract researchers’ interest due to their antibacterial properties for caries management. Cinnamon essential oil nanoemulsion exhibited a strongly inhibited the growth of an oral microcosm.55 Dodonaea viscosa var. angustifolia flavone nanoparticles significantly reduced the formation and acid production of S. mutans biofilm.56 Epigallocatechin gallate is an extracted polymer from green tea that shows remarkable anti-cariogenic bioactivity with poor stability.57 To increase the stability and efficacy of epigallocatechin gallate, researchers entrapped it in the oral nanovesicle to inhibit the production of glucan and formation of S. mutans biofilm.57 Farnesol is present in essential oils from many plants. Adding Farnesol halloysite nanotubes into composite resin creates antibacterial activity against S. mutans without compromising mechanical properties.58 Thymol-cardamom-Lactobacillus plantarum nanoparticles are prepared as functional candies to inhibit the growth of S. mutans for managing dental caries.59 In addition, propolis nanoparticles reduce the virulence of S. mutans and promote remineralization on enamel.60,61
Synthetic Organic Nanomaterials
Apart from natural extractive organic compounds, many synthetic organic nanomaterials have been investigated as anti-caries agents. They are often used as active components with carriers to construct hybrid nanomaterials. Table 4 summarizes 15 publications on the synthetic organic nanomaterials for managing dental caries. All were in vitro studies, and the systematic search yielded no clinical or animal studies on synthetic organic nanomaterials for caries management.
Table 4.
In vitro Studies* on Synthetic Organic Nanomaterials for Caries Management
| Author, Year[Ref] | Nanomaterial | Properties | Potential Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peng et al, 202265 | Chlorhexidine nanoparticles | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | – |
| Yan et al, 201766 | Chlorhexidine nanoparticles | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Dental sealant |
| Feitosa et al, 202162 | Chlorhexidine nanoparticles | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Dental sealant |
| Feitosa et al, 201963 | Chlorhexidine nanoparticles | Inhibit growth of S. mutans, L. casei | Dental adhesive |
| Beyth et al, 200668 | Quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Dental adhesive |
| Beyth et al, 201269 | Quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles | Inhibit growth of S. mutans, L. casei | Dental adhesive |
| Sharon et al, 201870 | Quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles | Inhibit growth of S. mutans, L. casei | Dental adhesive |
| Karthikeyan et al, 201171 | Cetylpyridinium chloride nanoemulsions | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | – |
| Lee et al, 201072 | Cetylpyridinium chloride nanoemulsions | Inhibit growth of S. mutans, L. casei | Topical agent |
| Ramalingam et al, 201273 | Cetylpyridinium chloride nanoemulsions | Inhibit growth of S. mutans, L. casei, A. viscosus, C. albicans | – |
| Cao et al, 201774 | Cationic polymer nanoparticles | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Restorative filler |
| Hu et al, 202175 | Cationic polymer nanoparticles | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Dental sealant |
| Toledano-Osorio et al, 202076 | Doxycycline nanoparticles | Inhibit growth of oral microcosm | Restorative filler |
| Feitosa et al, 201477 | Doxycycline halloysite nanotubes | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Dental adhesive |
| Kaptan et al, 202278 | Imidazole - benzimidazole nanoparticles | Inhibit growth of E. coli, P. aeruginosa, E. faecalis | Restorative filler |
Note: *The systematic search yielded no clinical or animal studies on synthetic organic nanomaterials for caries management.
Chlorhexidine is an antibacterial agent commonly used in dental practice as an antiseptic and disinfectant. Chlorhexidine nanoparticles inhibit S. mutans and Lactobacillus casei (L. casei) from growing and from forming their biofilms. They can be used as the filler in dentin adhesive and dental sealant for caries management.62,63 Nano-carriers loaded with chlorhexidine can build a drug delivery system for advanced antibacterial properties.64 Researchers have used various types of nano-carriers to synthesize a desirable anti-caries agent, including nanotubes, mesoporous nanoparticles and polymers. Chlorhexidine-loaded halloysite nanotubes effectively kill S. mutans, which can be used in a pit-and-fissure sealant. Additionally, some researchers have utilized poly (N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate-co-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate), a bio reagent for cell culture, as the pH-sensitive nano-carrier and chlorhexidine as the active ingredients. The system could control the release rate of chlorhexidine according to the pH value and it could exhibit lower cytotoxicity against human oral keratinocytes than free chlorhexidine does. The chlorhexidine in these delivery systems showed the same antibacterial effects on S. mutans biofilms as free chlorhexidine.65 A research group synthesized the chlorhexidine encapsulated with mesoporous silica and found it could improve the anti-microbial performance of glass ionomer cement without affecting its mechanical properties.66
Quaternary ammonium compound nanoparticles are cationic surfactants used to prevent caries. They are broad-spectrum antimicrobials with low toxicity.67 Quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles inhibit oral pathogens, such as S. mutans and L. casei. They can be incorporated into glass ionomer cements and resin composite.68,69 Adding quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles did not compromize the composite materials’ flexural modulus or the flexural strength.70 Cetylpyridinium chloride is another quaternary ammonium compound used in mouthwashes and toothpastes. Cetylpyridinium chloride nanoemulsions can inhibit S. mutans, L. casei, Actinomyces viscosus (A. viscosus) and Candida albicans (C. albicans) when applied to tooth surfaces.71–73 Furthermore, quaternary ammonium compound nanoparticles can cooperate with silver to synthesis a core-shell silver bromide–cationic polymer nanocomposite. This composite showed long-term antimicrobial properties against S. mutans. The cationic-polymer shell provides a sustained antibacterial effect in dental resins and sealants.74,75
Researchers also developed synthetic nanomaterials against cariogenic microorganisms. Doxycycline-nanoparticles-doped dental composite resins can reduce viability of oral biofilm.76 Another study encapsulated doxycycline in the halloysite nanotube to enhance the antibacterial effect of dental adhesive against S. mutans.77 Many fungicides contain imidazole and benzimidazole. Researchers synthesized imidazole and benzimidazole nanoparticles and incorporated them to inhibit bacteria. Studies have shown these antibacterial composite resins inhibit Escherichia coli (E. coli), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis).78
Carbon-Based Nanomaterials
Researchers also developed carbon-based nanomaterials for caries management. Carbon-based nanomaterials exhibit high mechanical strength.79,80 They have antibacterial and remineralising properties. Table 5 summarizes 13 publications on carbon-based nanomaterials for managing dental caries. All were in vitro studies, and the systematic search yielded no clinical or animal studies on carbon-based nanomaterials for caries management. The carbon-based nanomaterials in these publications can be categorized as carbon nanoparticles, graphene nanoplatelets, graphene oxide nanoplatelets and reduced graphene oxide nanoplatelets.
Table 5.
In vitro Studies* on Carbon-Based and Selenium Nanomaterials for Caries Management
| Author, Year[Ref] | Nanomaterial | Properties | Potential Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon-based nanomaterials | |||
| Gautam et al, 201781 | Carbon nanoparticles | Inhibit growth of oral microcosm | – |
| Rago et al, 201583 | Graphene nanoplatelets | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | – |
| Zanni et al, 201685 | Graphene nanoplatelets | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | – |
| Bregnocchi et al, 201784 | Graphene nanoplatelets | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Dental adhesive |
| Zhao et al, 202091 | Graphene oxide nanoplatelets | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | – |
| Mao et al, 202195 | Graphene oxide nanoplatelets | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | – |
| Wu et al, 202096 | Graphene oxide nanoplatelets | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | – |
| He et al, 201590 | Graphene oxide nanoplatelets | Inhibit growth of S. mutans, F. nucleatum, P. gingivalis | – |
| Ghorbanzadeh et al, 202188 | Graphene oxide nanoplatelets | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Dental adhesive |
| Pourhajibagher et al, 202189 | Graphene oxide nanoplatelets | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Dental adhesive |
| Khosalim et al, 202193 | Graphene oxide nanoplatelets | Promote dentin remineralization | Topical agent |
| Nizami et al, 202094 | Graphene oxide nanoplatelets | Inhibit growth of S. mutans; Promote dentin remineralization | Topical agent |
| Wu et al, 201897 | Reduced graphene oxide nanoplatelets | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | Topical agent |
| Selenium nanomaterials | |||
| Shahmoradi et al, 202299 | Selenium nanoparticles | Inhibit growth of S. mutans | – |
| Dhanraj et al, 202198 | Selenium nanoparticles | Inhibit growth of S. mutans, E. faecalis, L. casei, C. albicans, S. aureus | – |
Note: *The systematic search yielded no clinical or animal studies on carbon-based and selenium nanomaterials for caries management.
Carbon nanoparticles consist of pure carbon in various structures. They inhibit the growth of oral microcosms without toxicity to human cells.81 Graphene nanoplatelets are single layers of carbon allotrope arranged in a 2-dimensional honeycomb lattice nanoplatelet. Graphene nanoplatelets provide antibacterial protection against S. mutans.82 They can be used as the filler in dental adhesive to prevent caries without affecting the mechanical properties of adhesive.83,84 Graphene nanoplatelets can be platform-doped with other nanoparticles, such as zinc oxide nanoparticles, to obtain the enhanced inhibitory effect of biofilm formation.85 Graphene oxide nanoplatelets are oxidized graphene nanoplatelets.86,87 They can be added into an orthodontic adhesive to prevent white spot lesions after orthodontic treatment because of their antibacterial effects against S. mutans.88,89 Graphene oxide nanoplatelets can destroy the cell wall and membrane of S. mutans, Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) to inhibit biofilm formation.90–92 In addition, graphene oxide nanoplatelets showed a remineralising ability to occlude the exposed dentinal tubules and to promote the growth of hydroxyapatite crystal on demineralized dentin.93 Due to abundant oxygen groups on the surface of graphene oxide nanoplatelets, graphene oxide nanoplatelets can be functionalized with diverse antiseptics to give them enhanced antibacterial properties. Graphene oxide nanoplatelets combined with silver and copper nanoparticles have antimicrobial effects against S. mutans, with a superior aesthetic effect on dentin compared to silver diamine fluoride.94,95 A report also showed that loading graphene oxide nanoplatelets with polyethylenimine complexes and with antisense vicR RNA can reduce virulent-associated gene expressions and reduce the S. mutans biofilm from forming.96 Reduced graphene oxide nanoplatelets are another graphene derivative reduced from graphene oxide nanoplatelets. Reduced graphene oxide nanoplatelets have greater surface area and better mechanical strength than graphene oxide nanoplatelets do. Researchers found that the reduced graphene oxide nanoplatelets could link with silver nanoparticles to inhibit the growth of S. mutans biofilm.97
Selenium Nanomaterials
Selenium is an indispensable trace element for the human body’s cellular functions. Selenium in antioxidant enzymes and functional protein molecules plays a crucial role in reducing oxidative stress.98 Table 5 shows the 2 publications on selenium nanomaterials for managing dental caries. All were in vitro studies, and the systematic search yielded no clinical or animal studies on selenium nanomaterials for caries management. Selenium nanoparticles can inhibit growth of S. mutans, E. faecalis, L. casei, C. albicans and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and their biofilms.98,99 However, these studies were not performed on tooth tissue. Further studies are needed to explore the application of selenium nanomaterials for management of dental caries.
Conclusion
The most common type of non-metallic nanomaterials for caries management is organic nanomaterials. The literature showed non-metallic nanomaterials have antibacterial and/or remineralising properties. Non-metallic nanomaterials can be incorporated into dental sealants, toothpaste, dental adhesives, topical agents and even candies and drugs. However, the majority of the publications are in vitro studies, and only 2 publications are clinical studies.
Acknowledgments
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) – General Program No. 81870812.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.Collaborators GDaIIaP. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB. Dental caries. Lancet. 2007;369(9555):51–59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Niu JY, Yin IX, Wu WKK, Li QL, Mei ML, Chu CH. Antimicrobial peptides for the prevention and treatment of dental caries: a concise review. Arch Oral Biol. 2021;122:105022. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.105022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Petersen PE. World Health Organization global policy for improvement of oral health--World Health Assembly 2007. Int Dent J. 2008;58(3):115–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2008.tb00185.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hurlbutt M, Young DA. A best practices approach to caries management. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2014;14:77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pitts N, Zero D. White paper on dental caries prevention and management. FDI World Dent Fed. 2016;1:3–9. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhu T, Huang Z, Shu X, Zhang C, Dong Z, Peng Q. Functional nanomaterials and their potentials in antibacterial treatment of dental caries. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2022;218:112761. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Makkar H, Patri G. Fabrication and appraisal of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) - moxifloxacin nanoparticles using vitamin E-TPGS: a potential intracanal drug delivery agent. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(6):Zc05–Zc08. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/27633.9957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yin IX, Zhang J, Zhao IS, Mei ML, Li Q, Chu CH. The antibacterial mechanism of silver nanoparticles and its application in dentistry. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:2555–2562. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S246764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mammari N, Lamouroux E, Boudier A, Duval RE. Current knowledge on the oxidative-stress-mediated antimicrobial properties of metal-based nanoparticles. Microorganisms. 2022;10:2. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Clarkson BH, Exterkate RA. Noninvasive dentistry: a dream or reality? Caries Res. 2015;49(Suppl 1):11–17. doi: 10.1159/000380887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.AlShwaimi E, Bogari D, Ajaj R, Al-Shahrani S, Almas K, Majeed A. In vitro antimicrobial effectiveness of root canal sealers against Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review. J Endod. 2016;42(11):1588–1597. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Guo X, Liu S, Zhou X, et al. Effect of D-cysteine on dual-species biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tavaf Z, Tabatabaei M, Khalafi-Nezhad A, Panahi F. Evaluation of antibacterial, antibofilm and antioxidant activities of synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and casein peptide fragments against Streptococcus mutans. Eur J Integr Med. 2017;12:163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2017.05.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang Y, Wang X, Jiang W, et al. Antimicrobial peptide GH12 suppresses cariogenic virulence factors of Streptococcus mutans. J Oral Microbiol. 2018;10(1):1442089. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2018.1442089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang Y, Zeng Y, Wang Y, et al. Antimicrobial peptide GH12 targets Streptococcus mutans to arrest caries development in rats. J Oral Microbiol. 2019;11(1):1549921. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2018.1549921 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jiang W, Luo J, Wang Y, et al. The pH-responsive property of antimicrobial peptide GH12 enhances its anticaries effects at acidic pH. Caries Res. 2021;55(1):21–31. doi: 10.1159/000508458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang P, Wu S, Li J, et al. Dual-sensitive antibacterial peptide nanoparticles prevent dental caries. Theranostics. 2022;12(10):4818–4833. doi: 10.7150/thno.73181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fang Z, Zhang Y, Cao CY, Li QL, Wong HM. Constructing an anti-S. mutans and mineralizing membrane by combination self-assembled lysozyme with antimicrobial peptide. Mater Des. 2022;220:110891. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang LY, Fang ZH, Li QL, Cao CY. A tooth-binding antimicrobial peptide to prevent the formation of dental biofilm. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019;30(4):45. doi: 10.1007/s10856-019-6246-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chung HY, Li CC. Microstructure and nanomechanical properties of enamel remineralized with asparagine-serine-serine peptide. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013;33(2):969–973. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2012.11.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang SN, Sheng XY, Huang GB, Li QJ, Dong YM. Dentin remineralization induced by nanobioactive glass in association with RGDS peptide. Mater Today Commin. 2021;28:102515. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Palaniswamy UK, Prashar N, Kaushik M, Lakkam SR, Arya S, Pebbeti S. A comparative evaluation of remineralizing ability of bioactive glass and amorphous calcium phosphate casein phosphopeptide on early enamel lesion. Dent Res J. 2016;13(4):297–302. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.187872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mehta AB, Kumari V, Jose R, Izadikhah V. Remineralization potential of bioactive glass and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on initial carious lesion: an in-vitro pH-cycling study. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(1):3–7. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.124085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fernando JR, Shen P, Sim CPC, et al. Self-assembly of dental surface nanofilaments and remineralisation by SnF(2) and CPP-ACP nanocomplexes. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37580-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li QL, Ning TY, Cao Y, Zhang WB, Mei ML, Chu CH. A novel self-assembled oligopeptide amphiphile for biomimetic mineralization of enamel. BMC Biotechnol. 2014;14:32. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-14-32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Niu JY, Yin IX, Wu WKK, Li QL, Mei ML, Chu CH. A novel dual-action antimicrobial peptide for caries management. J Dent. 2021;111:103729. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Niu JY, Yin IX, Wu WKK, Li QL, Mei ML, Chu CH. Remineralising dentine caries using an artificial antimicrobial peptide: an in vitro study. J Dent. 2021;111:103736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Smith DJ, King WF, Godiska R, Tuomanen EL. Passive transfer of immunoglobulin Y antibody to Streptococcus mutans glucan binding protein B can confer protection against experimental dental caries. Infect Immun. 2001;69(5):3135–3142. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.5.3135-3142.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Otake S, Nishihara Y, Makimura M, et al. Protection of rats against dental caries by passive immunization with hen-egg-yolk antibody (IgY). J Dent Res. 1991;70(3):162–166. doi: 10.1177/00220345910700030101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen X, Yang B, Qi C, et al. DNA-templated microwave-hydrothermal synthesis of nanostructured hydroxyapatite for storing and sustained release of an antibacterial protein. Dalton Trans. 2016;45(4):1648–1656. doi: 10.1039/C5DT03357H [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xu J, Yang H, Bi Y, Li W, Wei H, Li Y. Activity of the chimeric lysin ClyR against common gram-positive oral microbes and its anticaries efficacy in rat models. Viruses. 2018;10(7):380. doi: 10.3390/v10070380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhu Y, Yan J, Mujtaba BM, Li Y, Wei H, Huang S. The dual anti-caries effect of carboxymethyl chitosan nanogel loaded with chimeric lysin ClyR and amorphous calcium phosphate. Eur J Oral Sci. 2021;129(3):e12784. doi: 10.1111/eos.12784 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Moradian-Oldak J. Protein-mediated enamel mineralization. Front Biosci. 2012;17(6):1996–2023. doi: 10.2741/4034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ruan QC, Zhang YZ, Yang XD, Nutt S, Moradian-Oldak J. An amelogenin-chitosan matrix promotes assembly of an enamel-like layer with a dense interface. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(7):7289–7297. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.04.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ruan Q, Moradian-Oldak J. Development of amelogenin-chitosan hydrogel for in vitro enamel regrowth with a dense interface. J Vis Exp. 2014;89. doi: 10.3791/51606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ruan Q, Liberman D, Bapat R, Chandrababu KB, Phark JH, Moradian-Oldak J. Efficacy of amelogenin-chitosan hydrogel in biomimetic repair of human enamel in pH-cycling systems. J Biomed Eng Inform. 2016;2(1):119–128. doi: 10.5430/jbei.v2n1p119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dogan S, Fong H, Yucesoy DT, et al. Biomimetic tooth repair: amelogenin-derived peptide enables in vitro remineralization of human enamel. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4(5):1788–1796. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Woolfolk SK, Cloyd AK, Ye Q, et al. Peptide-enabled nanocomposites offer biomimetic reconstruction of silver diamine fluoride-treated dental tissues. Polymers. 2022;14(7):1368. doi: 10.3390/polym14071368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cao Y, Liu W, Ning T, et al. A novel oligopeptide simulating dentine matrix protein 1 for biomimetic mineralization of dentine. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(3):873–881. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1035-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang D, Deng J, Deng X, Fang C, Zhang X, Yang P. Controlling enamel remineralization by amyloid-like amelogenin mimics. Adv Mater. 2020;32(31):e2002080. doi: 10.1002/adma.202002080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nguyen NTT, Nguyen LM, Nguyen TTT, Liew RK, Nguyen DTC, Tran TV. Recent advances on botanical biosynthesis of nanoparticles for catalytic, water treatment and agricultural applications: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2022;827:154160. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kou SG, Peters LM, Mucalo MR. Chitosan: a review of sources and preparation methods. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;169:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Li Y, Chi YQ, Yu CH, et al. Drug-free and non-crosslinked chitosan scaffolds with efficient antibacterial activity against both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;241:116386. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Deokar KK, Shashikiran ND, Maurya A, et al. Comparative evaluation of chitosan nanoparticles, silver diamine fluoride and acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on microhardness of artificial carious lesions created on extracted teeth. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(11):ZC20–ZC23. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Magalhães TC, Teixeira NM, França RS, et al. Synthesis of a chitosan nanoparticle suspension and its protective effects against enamel demineralization after an in vitro cariogenic challenge. J Appl Oral Sci. 2021;29:e20210120. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Aliasghari A, Rabbani Khorasgani M, Vaezifar S, Rahimi F, Younesi H, Khoroushi M. Evaluation of antibacterial efficiency of chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles on cariogenic streptococci: an in vitro study. Iran J Microbiol. 2016;8(2):93–100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wassel MO, Khattab MA. Antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans and inhibition of bacterial induced enamel demineralization of propolis, miswak, and chitosan nanoparticles based dental varnishes. J Adv Res. 2017;8(4):387–392. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2017.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Patil AG, Jobanputra AH. Rutin-chitosan nanoparticles: fabrication, characterization and application in dental disorders. Polym Plast Technol Eng. 2015;54(2):202–208. doi: 10.1080/03602559.2014.935425 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Pourhajibagher M, Keshavarz Valian N, Bahador A. Theranostic nanoplatforms of emodin-chitosan with blue laser light on enhancing the anti-biofilm activity of photodynamic therapy against Streptococcus mutans biofilms on the enamel surface. BMC Microbiol. 2022;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02481-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Covarrubias C, Trepiana D, Corral C. Synthesis of hybrid copper-chitosan nanoparticles with antibacterial activity against cariogenic Streptococcus mutans. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(3):379–384. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2017-195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Javed R, Rais F, Fatima H, et al. Chitosan encapsulated ZnO nanocomposites: fabrication, characterization, and functionalization of bio-dental approaches. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;116:111184. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Javed R, Rais F, Kaleem M, et al. Chitosan capping of CuO nanoparticles: facile chemical preparation, biological analysis, and applications in dentistry. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;167:1452–1467. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.11.099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Farzanegan F, Shahabi M, Niazi AE, Soleimanpour S, Shafaee H, Rangrazi A. Effect of the addition of Chitosan and TiO 2 nanoparticles on antibacterial properties of an orthodontic composite in fixed orthodontic treatment: a randomized clinical trial study. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2021;7(4):045017. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac0609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jeong YJ, Kim HE, Han SJ, Choi JS. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of cinnamon essential oil nanoemulsion against multi-species oral biofilms. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5911. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85375-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sebelemetja M, Moeno S, Patel M. Anti-acidogenic, anti-biofilm and slow release properties of Dodonaea viscosa var. angustifolia flavone stabilized polymeric nanoparticles. Arch Oral Biol. 2020;109:104586. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.104586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Xu X, Dai Z, Zhang Z, et al. Fabrication of oral nanovesicle in-situ gel based on epigallocatechin gallate phospholipid complex: application in dental anti-caries. Eur J Pharmacol. 2021;897:173951. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.173951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Barot T, Rawtani D, Kulkarni P, Hussain CM, Akkireddy S. Physicochemical and biological assessment of flowable resin composites incorporated with farnesol loaded halloysite nanotubes for dental applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;104:103675. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Karimi N, Jabbari V, Nazemi A, et al. Thymol, cardamom and Lactobacillus plantarum nanoparticles as a functional candy with high protection against Streptococcus mutans and tooth decay. Microb Pathog. 2020;148:104481. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Afrasiabi S, Pourhajibagher M, Chiniforush N, Bahador A. Propolis nanoparticle enhances the potency of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy against Streptococcus mutans in a synergistic manner. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15560. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72119-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zaleh AA, Salehi-Vaziri A, Pourhajibagher M, Bahador A. The synergistic effect of nano-propolis and curcumin-based photodynamic therapy on remineralization of white spot lesions: an ex vivo study. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022;38:102789. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Feitosa S, Carreiro AFP, Martins VM, Platt JA, Duarte S. Effect of a chlorhexidine-encapsulated nanotube modified pit-and-fissure sealant on oral biofilm. Dent Mater J. 2021;40(3):758–765. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2020-241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Feitosa SA, Palasuk J, Geraldeli S, Windsor LJ, Bottino MC. Physicochemical and biological properties of novel chlorhexidine-loaded nanotube-modified dentin adhesive. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019;107(3):868–875. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lim KS, Kam PC. Chlorhexidine--pharmacology and clinical applications. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008;36(4):502–512. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0803600404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Peng X, Han Q, Zhou X, et al. Effect of pH-sensitive nanoparticles on inhibiting oral biofilms. Drug Deliv. 2022;29(1):561–573. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2022.2037788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yan H, Yang H, Li K, Yu J, Huang C. Effects of chlorhexidine-encapsulated mesoporous silica nanoparticles on the anti-biofilm and mechanical properties of glass ionomer cement. Molecules. 2017;22(7):1225. doi: 10.3390/molecules22071225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zhu GY, Lu BY, Zhang TX, et al. Antibiofilm effect of drug-free and cationic poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles via nano-bacteria interactions. Nanomedicine. 2018;13(10):1093–1106. doi: 10.2217/nnm-2017-0391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Beyth N, Yudovin-Farber I, Bahir R, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles against Streptococcus mutans. Biomaterials. 2006;27(21):3995–4002. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Beyth N, Pilo R, Weiss EI. Antibacterial activity of dental cements containing quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles. J Nanomater. 2012;2012:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2012/814763 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sharon E, Sharabi R, Eden A, et al. Antibacterial activity of orthodontic cement containing quaternary ammonium polyethylenimine nanoparticles adjacent to orthodontic brackets. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(4):606. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Karthikeyan R, Amaechi BT, Rawls HR, Lee VA. Antimicrobial activity of nanoemulsion on cariogenic Streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol. 2011;56(5):437–445. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.10.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lee VA, Karthikeyan R, Rawls HR, Amaechi BT. Anti-cariogenic effect of a cetylpyridinium chloride-containing nanoemulsion. J Dent. 2010;38(9):742–749. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ramalingam K, Amaechi BT, Ralph RH, Lee VA. Antimicrobial activity of nanoemulsion on cariogenic planktonic and biofilm organisms. Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57(1):15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Cao W, Zhang Y, Wang X, et al. Development of a novel resin-based dental material with dual biocidal modes and sustained release of Ag(+) ions based on photocurable core-shell AgBr/cationic polymer nanocomposites. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2017;28(7):103. doi: 10.1007/s10856-017-5918-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Hu YT, Yu F, Tang XY, et al. The antibacterial effect and physical performance of pit and fissure sealants based on an antibacterial core-shell nanocomposite. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;117:104414. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Toledano-Osorio M, Osorio R, Aguilera FS, et al. Polymeric nanoparticles protect the resin-dentin bonded interface from cariogenic biofilm degradation. Acta Biomater. 2020;111:316–326. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Feitosa SA, Palasuk J, Kamocki K, et al. Doxycycline-encapsulated nanotube-modified dentin adhesives. J Dent Res. 2014;93(12):1270–1276. doi: 10.1177/0022034514549997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kaptan Usul S, Aslan A, Lüleci HB, et al. Investigation of antimicrobial and mechanical effects of functional nanoparticles in novel dental resin composites. J Dent. 2022;123:104180. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Lee SM, Yoo KH, Yoon SY, et al. Enamel anti-demineralization effect of orthodontic adhesive containing bioactive glass and graphene oxide: an in-vitro study. Materials. 2018;11(9):1728. doi: 10.3390/ma11091728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sun L, Yan Z, Duan Y, Zhang J, Liu B. Improvement of the mechanical, tribological and antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements by fluorinated graphene. Dent Mater. 2018;34(6):e115–e127. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Gautam G, Jha D, Gaurav SS, Sharma AK, Kumar P, Gautam HK. Synthesis of carbon nanoparticles from mustard oil and evaluation of their antibacterial activity against dental caries. Micro Nano Lett. 2017;12(10):799–802. doi: 10.1049/mnl.2017.0293 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Xia MY, Xie Y, Yu CH, et al. Graphene-based nanomaterials: the promising active agents for antibiotics-independent antibacterial applications. J Control Release. 2019;307:16–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Rago I, Bregnocchi A, Zanni E, et al. Antimicrobial activity of graphene nanoplatelets against streptococcus mutans. 2015 IEEE 15TH Int Conference Nanotechnol; 2015:9–12. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bregnocchi A, Zanni E, Uccelletti D, et al. Graphene-based dental adhesive with anti-biofilm activity. J Nanobiotechnology. 2017;15(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12951-017-0322-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Zanni E, Chandraiahgari CR, De Bellis G, et al. Zinc oxide nanorods-decorated graphene nanoplatelets: a promising antimicrobial agent against the cariogenic bacterium Streptococcus mutans. Nanomaterials. 2016;6(10):179. doi: 10.3390/nano6100179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Lu B-Y, Zhu G-Y, Yu C-H, et al. Functionalized graphene oxide nanosheets with unique three-in-one properties for efficient and tunable antibacterial applications. Nano Res. 2021;14(1):185–190. doi: 10.1007/s12274-020-3064-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Alam K, Jo YY, Park CK, Cho H. Synthesis of graphene oxide using atmospheric plasma for prospective biological applications. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:5813–5824. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S254860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Ghorbanzadeh R, Hosseinpour Nader A, Salehi-Vaziri A. The effects of bimodal action of photodynamic and photothermal therapy on antimicrobial and shear bond strength properties of orthodontic composite containing nano-graphene oxide. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021;36:102589. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102589 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Pourhajibagher M, Bahador A. Orthodontic adhesive doped with nano-graphene oxide: physico-mechanical and antimicrobial properties. Folia Med. 2021;63(3):413–421. doi: 10.3897/folmed.63.e53716 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.He J, Zhu X, Qi Z, et al. Killing dental pathogens using antibacterial graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(9):5605–5611. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b01069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Zhao M, Shan T, Wu Q, Gu L. The antibacterial effect of graphene oxide on Streptococcus mutans. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2020;20(4):2095–2103. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2020.17319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Yu CH, Chen GY, Xia MY, et al. Understanding the sheet size-antibacterial activity relationship of graphene oxide and the nano-bio interaction-based physical mechanisms. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020;191:111009. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Khosalim IP, Zhang YY, Yiu CKY, Wong HM. Electrophoresis-aided biomimetic mineralization system using graphene oxide for regeneration of hydroxyapatite on dentin. Materials. 2021;15(1):199. doi: 10.3390/ma15010199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Nizami MZI, Nishina Y, Yamamoto T, Shinoda-Ito Y, Takashiba S. Functionalized graphene oxide shields tooth dentin from decalcification. J Dent Res. 2020;99(2):182–188. doi: 10.1177/0022034519894583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Mao M, Zhang W, Huang Z, et al. Graphene oxide-copper nanocomposites suppress cariogenic Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:7727–7739. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S303521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Wu S, Liu Y, Zhang H, Lei L. Nano-graphene oxide with antisense vicR RNA reduced exopolysaccharide synthesis and biofilm aggregation for Streptococcus mutans. Dent Mater J. 2020;39(2):278–286. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Wu R, Zhao Q, Lu S, Fu Y, Yu D, Zhao W. Inhibitory effect of reduced graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite on progression of artificial enamel caries. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;27:e20180042. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Dhanraj G, Rajeshkumar S, Omri A. Anticariogenic effect of selenium nanoparticles synthesized using brassica oleracea. J Nanomater. 2021;2021:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2021/8115585 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Shahmoradi S, Shariati A, Amini SM, Zargar N, Yadegari Z, Darban-Sarokhalil D. The application of selenium nanoparticles for enhancing the efficacy of photodynamic inactivation of planktonic communities and the biofilm of Streptococcus mutans. BMC Res Notes. 2022;15(1). doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-05973-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
















































































































































































































































































































