Abstract
Low-cost and renewable adsorbent activated carbon from lignocellulosic biomass is a focus of worldwide concern due to its readily available waste disposal problems in the environment. Physical and chemical processes are the main procedures forproduction of biomass-activated carbon (AC). Activating lignocellulosic biomass by chemical methods in terms of energy performance, lower timecarbonization, and temperature is mutual forthe production of activated carbon. Out of chemical activating agents (H3PO4, H2SO4, ZnCl2, FeCl3, NaOH, KOH, and K2CO3), H3PO4 is the most commonly used chemical activating agent during the synthesis of activated carbon from lignocellulosic biomass because of its ease of recovery, low environmental impact, and higher carbon yield. The surface area of most activated carbon from lignocellulosic biomass by H3PO4was in the variability of 456.1–2806 m2/g, yielding 26.1–85 % and an extreme adsorption capacity of 2.5–89.29 mg/g. And also, high acids to precursor ratio and activation temperature of AC were synthesized from lignocellulosic biomass. Generally, the advantage of this review paper, gathers evidence from currently published articles deliberating chemical composition, proximate values, biomass activation methods, the elemental composition of lignocellulosic biomass, physio-chemical properties of different lignocellulosic materials AC synthesized using a phosphoric acid activation agent, and the usage of derived activated carbon through phosphoric acid activation for water disinfection, solute organic matter, energy storage, and heavy metal removal.
Keywords: Lignocellulosic biomass, Activated carbon, Phosphoric acid, Chemical activation, Parameter
Lignocellulosic biomass; Activated carbon; Phosphoric acid; Chemical activation; Parameter.
1. Introduction
Activated carbon is a carbonous solid widely used as a multipurpose adsorbent meant for the adsorption of liquid and gaseous phases. Activated carbon (AC) is produced from anextensive range of precursors, including char and agricultural waste [1]. Surface chemistry, microporosity, and porosity all affect how well AC can be removed from gas or liquid phases [2]. Activated carbons are made by choosing the right raw materials and making sure they cost many billions of dollars per year [3].
Generally, activated carbons are classified as commercial and low-cost types. Most commercial activated carbons are made from materials that can't be reused, like coal [4], animal bones [5], and apricot stone [6]. Low-cost activated carbons are made from renewable biomass or agricultural waste, like a lotus stalk [7], sewage sludge [8], waste tires [9], coconut shell [10], cane bagasse [11], almond shell [2], acorn shell [12], peanut shell [13], palm kernel shell [14], corncob [15], and Canarium Schwerin fruit Nutshell [16]. Commercial activated carbon is more expensive than non-commercial activated carbon because it is produced from non-renewable raw materials [17]. As a result, the majority of the numerous research efforts have focused on low-cost and environmentally friendly substitute constituents that can be converted into low-cost activated carbons, and the carbon content of these biomass precursors is lower when compared to non-renewable precursors like coal, anthracite, or peat. Nonetheless, their availability, low cost, and non-harmful nature have a greater impact than their lower carbon content and yields [18, 19]. The numerous investigations have been conducted about the synthesis of AC from various lignocellulosic materials through chemical activation of H3PO4 [20], H2SO4 [21], ZnCl2 [22], FeCl3 [23], NaOH [24], KOH [25], K2CO3 [26], CO2 [27], steam [28], composite ZnCl2–CuCl2 [29], H2O–CO2 [12] and physical methods (activation by steam, and carbon dioxide) [30], biological activated carbon (BAC) [31, 32], and hydrothermal carbonization [33, 34]. When compared to physical, biological, and hydrothermal activation with chemicalactivation, chemical activation methods are the most favoredas a result of low energy price, lower time of pyrolysis, high surface area, and more activated carbon yield products. Out of the chemical activation agents, phosphoric acid is further chosen due to its excellent synthesis of mesopores, resulting in higher total pore volume and diameters [18]. It delivers a familiar method to recover the AC product throughout the processing step which is only washing with water is required [35]. And also, when compared to ZnCl2, H3PO4 is the furthermost favoredas a result of the eco-friendly drawbacks related to ZnCl2 [36,37]. Additionally, AC synthesized with zinc chloride cannot be applied in food and medicinal factories as they may infect the product [18]. Up until recently, no review has been conducted on the many articles on the research conducted by numerous scholars on the synthesis of activated carbon (AC) from lignocellulosic-based activation by phosphoric acid and its performance in the elimination of volatile matter [38]and yields of activated carbon. This review work is therefore intended to provide adequate knowledge of the efforts made by innumerable investigators concerning the synthesis of AC from lignocellulosic materials activated by phosphoric acid and its advantages over other activation chemicals [11].
1.1. Precursor for synthesis of AC
Activated carbon can be synthesized from renewable or non-renewable carbonaceous precursors. It has been classified based on its initial precursor [19]. The kinds of precursor, impurities, activating agents, activation time, temperature, and acid-to-precursor ratio show a vital character in influencing the excellence, yield, and characteristics of the resulting AC [38]. The precursor selected for AC synthesis is principally based on availability, cost, and constancy of supply [27]. The use of any lignocellulose precursor for the production of AC has been observed by numerous investigators [18], and also any agricultural residue which has high or low organic content can be used for activated carbon production [39]. Figure 1 explains the diagram of biomass conversion to activated carbon using chemical activation methods.
Figure 1.
Mutual process flow diagram of lignocellulosic biomass conversion to activated carbon.
1.2. Chemical composition of the lignocellulosic biomass
Carbon content biomass is made of fiber (cellulose) and has the right properties, like activation time, temperature, and the impregnation ratio [19]. Because of activated carbons' multipurpose nature, their global market has recentlyhemicellulose and lignin. Cellulose is the most abundant mass component of the most common types [40]. Hemicellulose is a polysaccharide containing short divisional chains of sugar. It is typically composed of the pentoses D-xylose and L-arabinose and the hexoses D-glucose, D-mannose, and D-galactose, with minor quantities of L-rhamnose [41]. Lignin has a complicated molecular structure containing cross-linked phenolic polymers [42]. Lignocellulose biomass chemical composition differs by variety and production location and also changes significantly during biomass processing [43]. Biomass can be transformed into adsorbents, biofuels, and bioenergy in different ways. In the case of biomass conversion to an adsorbent or activated carbon, the chemical composition of each is a key characteristic to know before the synthesis of any AC. Table 1 displays the composition of some lignocellulose biomass and their proximate studies, namely, fixed carbon contents (FC), volatile matter [44], ash contents (A), and moisture (M) for precursor and after the conversation to activated carbon. Figure 2 shows the general (average) composition of lignocellulosic biomass.
Table 1.
Chemical composition and proximate values of some lignocellulosic biomass.
| Lignocellulosic biomass | Proximate analysis value |
Chemical composition |
References | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture contents (%) | Ash contents (%) | Volatile matter (%) | Fixed carbon (%) | Cellulose (%) | Hemicellulose (%) | Lignin (%) | ||
| Tomato leaves | 2.68 | 25.72 | 77.35 | 10.98 | 10.91 | 8.13 | 24.86 | [45, 46] |
| Barley straw | 11.5 | 5.3 | 76.2 | 18.5 | 56.2 | 7 | 9.2 | [47] |
| Jatropha shell | 1.02 | 6.81 | 82.43 | 9.74 | 34 | 40 | 12.7 | [48] |
| Coconut shell | 10.1 | 3.2 | 75.5 | 11.2 | 17.89 | 56.29 | 25.82 | [49] |
| Durian shell | 2.95 | 5.67 | 72.56 | 18.82 | 12.46 | 33.2 | 17.93 | [50] |
| Almond shell | 6.55 | 6.85 | 75.1 | 17.1 | 21.72 | 27.74 | 36.12 | [2, 51] |
| Sunflower shell | Nil | 1.8 | 81 | 17.2 | 67.1 | Nil | 27.1 | [52] |
| Karanja fruit hull | Nil | 1.54 | 82.37 | 14.06 | 33.72 | 25.18 | 38.62 | [53] |
| Benth fruit shell | 2.7 | 4.7 | 78.2 | 17.1 | 45.4 | 6.4 | 30.1 | [48] |
| Coffee husk | Nil | 7.17 | 74.71 | 18.12 | 30 | 22.5 | 17.4 | [51] |
| Delonix regia fruit pods | 0.22 | 2.8 | 92.03 | Nil | 13.9 | 24.13 | 23.36 | [54] |
| Walnut shell | 6.8 | 1.3 | 55.3 | 35.3 | 27.9 | 30.2 | 39.1 | [55] |
| Soya husks | 6.3 | 5.1 | 69.6 | 19 | 36.43 | 12.5 | 18.2 | [56] |
| Corn Kernel | 0 | 2.3 | 79.03 | 54.28 | 42.2 | 1.9 | 38.7 | [57, 58] |
| Banana empty fruitbunch | 5.21 | 15.73 | 78.83 | Nil | 8.3 | 21.23 | 19.06 | [54] |
Figure 2.
General (average) chemical composition of lignocellulosic biomass.
1.2.1. Cellulose
Cellulose is any carbon-based matter that is available in renewable biomass like agricultural harvests, soft and hardwoods, grasses and flowers, municipal wastes, and other residue materials [56]. Cellulose is the most plentiful carbohydrate polymer and acts as a structural apparatus for plant cells with lignin. Its biomass composition ranges between 35 and 50%. In recent times, cellulose is mostly used for the production of bioethanol [56].
1.2.2. Hemicellulose
Hemicellulose, a natural polymer found in lignocellulosic biomass, follows cellulose in abundance [57]. The component of hemicellulose in biomass is 20–35%. Arabinose, mannose, galactose, glucose, and xylose are the most common monomers that occur in hemicellulose. Hemicellulose is more hygroscopic, open-structured, and non-crystalline than cellulose [58].
1.2.3. Lignin
Lignin is also the furthermostplentiful biopolymer lignocellulosic biomass, and its component is (20–30%) [59]. The structure of lignin changes throughout cell development and its composition depends on environmental conditions. The arrangement of lignin in many lignocellulosic biomasses is quite different [60].
2. Proximate analysis of lignocellulose biomass
The proximate examination is the quantification of moisture contents, ash contents, volatile matter [44], and fixed carbon (FC) and has been broadly used for more than 160 years [61]. It provides an extensive understanding of biomass burning properties and estimates the emission of constituents like sulfur [62].
2.1. Moisture contents
The quantity of water existing in lignocellulosic raw materials and quantified as a proportion of the whole precursor mass is called moisture content. It is dependent on the kind of biomass, ranging from 15% in biomass straw to 90% in algae biomass [63]. In storage, degradation of biomass is strongly associated with moisture content and allows for safe long-term storage of lignocellulosic biomass [64]. Commonly, the higher the moisture content of biomass, the more energy is required for size reduction [65].
2.2. Ash contents
Ash is the residue obtained after the burning of coal or biomass. Based on the combustion of coal or lignocellulosic biomass, there are two types of ash residue generated [66, 67]. The first one is biomass bottom ash, synthesized in the incineration chamber that is composed of sands, mostly vitreous silica [44]. The second one is fly ash, which is the filtrate separated from gases outside the incineration chamber and it contains a fraction of inorganic or organic unburned carbon [68]. The properties of the biomass used, incineration technology, and operating conditions of the burning are the keyinfluences that affect the quality and quantity of biomass ash in the burning of lignocellulosic biomass [69]. When wood biomass is compared with agricultural residue, the biomass of wood has lower ash content than agricultural residue [66]. Agricultural biomass ash consists of different metal impurities like silicon, calcium, magnesium, aluminium, potassium, sodium, and titanium. All of these metal contents are commonly used as deacidifying soil, in the production of ceramics, andin the production of slag [70, 71].
2.3. Volatile matter
The percentage loss when coal or biomass is heated without air for moisture content adjustment is called volatile matter [61]. It usually contains a combination of long and short chains of hydrocarbons, aromatics, some sulfur, and carbon dioxide gases. Naturally, for many kinds of lignocellulosic biomass, the volatile matter is high. The quantity of volatile matter extant is strongly reliant on the nature of the carbonized biomass and the pyrolysis situations, activation temperature, and heating rate [72].
2.4. Fixed carbon cellulose
Fixed carbon (FC) is the compact carbon in the lignocellulosic biomass and coal, which remains in the ash during the incineration process after reactivation. It depends on the amount of volatile matter and is calculated with the present subtraction of moisture, ash, and volatile matter from one another [61]. Differences in heating rates will have a big impact on both the amount of ash and the amount of volatile matter that is made, as well as the amount of "fixed carbon" that is calculated [73].
3. Method of biomass activation for the synthesis of AC
As a whole, activated carbonis prepared from various biomasses using physical activation, chemical activation, biological activation [31, 32], and hydrothermal carbonization processes [74, 75]. The physical activation method comprises the conversion of precursors to bio-char [fixed carbon mass] using inert gases like steam, carbon dioxide, or gas mixtures during pyrolysis [76]. Meanwhile, chemical activation methods such as nitric acid (HNO3), phosphoric acid (H3PO4), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), and alkali (e.g., NaOH, KOH), or salts such as zinc chloride [77] have been used. In terms of energy efficiency, hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is an efficient technique for the synthesis of activated carbon compared to physical and chemical activation processes [78]. The physical activation causes difficulties, and technical problems, particularly when it is used with steam organized by the inert gas, and lastly, the advanced temperature is regularly practiced throughout the activation process [79]. The chemical activation process requires a lower time of pyrolysis and a lower activation temperature [76]. The Biological activated carbon (BAC) methodpropositionsnumerousadvantages to known watertreatment proceduresandthis is an actual and cost-inexpensive means for eliminating biodegradable organic matter through the microbe's takeoverof the activated carbon exterior [80]. However, biological activated carbon treatment techniques cannot biologically eliminate organic carbon beyond biodegradable dissolved organic carbon and filters become seemingly unproductive subsequently around a month of a continuous process [32, 81]. Hydrothermal carbonization does not use custom organic solvents, surfactants, or catalysts; hence it is called green methods [61] and HTC is more powerfully positive. It does not need pre-drying of the precursor [82]. However, there is a rare weakness to be considered, for instance, the consumption of water in a high quantity and the fluid effluent handling that rise the waste cost [83]. Hence, activation of carbon content precursors with H3PO4 has become an ever more popular technique for the huge-scale synthesis of ACs since the use of this chemical has some eco-friendly benefits, for example, ease of repossession, low energy price, and more activated carbon products in most recent studies [59].
3.1. Chemical impregnations
Several chemical impregnation techniques have been used in previous works to improve the exterior chemistry of activated carbons (ACS). Amongst these techniques, conservative solution impregnation is one of the most commonly used [84, 85]. The surface interaction of the AC can be proficiently improved through chemical impregnation that, organized by the inherent nature of the AC, can extremely increase the adsorption volume [86]. Most research studies [23] have previously reported the development of adsorptive characteristics of AC with strong acids such as H3PO4, H2SO4, alkali (i.e., NaOH, KOH), and metal species salts (i.e., Zn, Cu, Fe). Out of those activating chemicals stated, the most significant and normally applied to activate chemicals are phosphoric acid, zinc chloride, and alkaline metal compounds. H3PO4 and ZnCl2 are applied for the treatment of carbon-containing resources that have not been carbonized earlier [87]. But, rather than ZnCl2, H3PO4 is preferable because of environmental difficulties related to ZnCl2, [59]. Additional AC synthesized using phosphoric acid has good acceptance in nutrition, water, as well as chemical and pharmacological needs because of its non-contaminating nature [87].
3.1.1. Phosphoric acid as activating agents for biomass
Chemical activation encompasses pyrolysis and activation in a sole step in which the fresh biomass, soaked in convinced chemical agents, is thermally decomposed. The most common activating chemicals are H3PO4, ZnCl2, H2SO4, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and others [88]. Phosphoric acid shows vital activity in the bond split and the removal of the bio-polymers/water at low temperatures and is used as an activating acid agent in the activated carbon synthesis [89, 90]. As reported in previous studies, methods of H3PO4 biomass treatment start with cellulose depolymerization, followed by biopolymer dehydration, the creation of aromatic rings, and lastly, the removal of phosphate cluster [88]. A weak acid may also be valuable to hydrolyze cellulose to cellulase enzymes and it can live with the existence of salts possibly resulting from agricultural biomass, however strong acids willingly cause cation conversation, like proton leaching [91]. The extra addition of water to concentrated phosphoric acid causes hydrolysis of cellulose to occur through an esterification reaction [92]. And according to the previous studies [93], the mechanism of the raw material activation utilizing phosphoric acid can occur in three steps indicated in Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mechanism of the biomass activation steps utilizing phosphoric acid.
According to Yaxin Li et al. [94], phosphoric acid might also syndicateby organic material in biowastes to make phosphate and polyphosphate bonds that attach and cross-linkage polymer fragments.
The activation mechanism and the variations that the acid undertakes in the specific temperature ranges are described from Eqs. (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6).
At a temperature range of 100–400 °C
| 2H3PO4 → H4P2O7 + H2O | (1) |
| 3H3PO4 → H5P3O10 + 2H2O | (2) |
| nH3PO4 →Hn+2PnO3n+1 + (n – 1) H2O | (3) |
The adsorbed water is released and phosphoric acid is arid. As an outcome of the breakdown of the functional set CO2 and CO are released.
At a temperature range of 400–700 °C
| Hn+2PnO3n+1 → P4O10 + H2O | (4) |
| P4O10 + 2C → P4O6 + 2CO2 | (5) |
Due to dehydration of phosphoric acid (H3PO4), water (H2O) is released, and the resulting Di-phosphorus Penta oxide (P4O10), as a sturdy oxidant, reacts by carbon to make new and widening present pores, releasing carbon dioxide and as a result of the surface functional groups breakdown carbon monoxide is formed.
At temperatures 700–800 °C
| P4O10 or P4O6 + CHx → PH3 + CO2 or CO | (6) |
From Eq. 6, PH3 is created, and CO2 and CO are out as a consequence of reactions and the breakdown of functional groups. All these steps happen in the biomass pyrolysis process [94].
The previous information regarding the oxidation safety provided via phosphorous composites presented that the phosphorus compounds can evaporate from the carbon surface at temperatures higher than 800 °C and the reaction products permit the surface to create and produce pores [95].
3.2. Ultimate analysis of activated carbon
The ultimate examination is used to characterize biomass composition in wt. % carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur (if any). It also delivers a suitable technique for reporting the main organic elemental constituents of lignocellulosic biomass [96]. The carbon and hydrogen content in biomass increases the heating value, while the oxygen content decreases the heating value of biomass during pyrolysis. Nitrogen and sulfur content are the sources of NOx and SOx, respectively [97]. The ultimate analysis of lignocellulosic precursors is organized in Table 2.
Table 2.
Elemental composition of lignocellulose raw materials precursors.
| Precursor | Elemental composition |
References | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca (wt.%) | Hb (wt.%) | Nc (wt.%) | Od (wt.%) | Se (wt.%) | ||
| Wheat straw | 52.3 | 9.4 | 1.9 | 35.8 | 0.6 | [98, 99] |
| Bagasse | 41.55 | 5.55 | 0.03 | 52.86 | Nil | [100] |
| Corn stover | 47 | 5.66 | 0.65 | 41.4 | 0.06 | [101] |
| Chinese fir sawdust | 48.95 | 6.54 | 0.11 | 39.2 | Nil | [102] |
| Saw dust | 45.34 | 6.02 | 0.53 | 47.05 | 1.07 | [103] |
| Timothy grass | 49.2 | 9.3 | 2.2 | 38.4 | 0.9 | [98, 99] |
| Switchgrass | 47.3 | 5.31 | 0.51 | 41.6 | 0.1 | [101] |
| Rice stalk | 40.79 | 7.66 | 1.17 | 49.89 | 0.49 | [104] |
| Pine wood | 54.4 | 9.6 | 1.6 | 34 | 0.4 | [98, 99] |
| Bamboo | 45.53 | 4.61 | 0.22 | Nil | Nil | [105] |
| Rice husk | 35.6 | 4.5 | 0.19 | 59.7 | 0.02 | [106] |
| Olive stone | 44.8 | 6 | 0.1 | 49.09 | 0.01 | [107] |
| Palm kernel shell | 48.48 | 6.06 | 0.79 | 44.67 | 0.35 | [108] |
| Acacia cincinnata biomass | 48.47 | 5.5 | 0.82 | 45.21 | Nil | [109] |
| Loblolly pine chips | 50.5 | 6.26 | 0.09 | 42.6 | Nil | [110] |
| Napier grass stem | 51.61 | 6.01 | 0.99 | 41.07 | 0.32 | [111] |
| Typha angustifolia | 52.895 | 5.844 | 1.217 | 40.044 | Nil | [112] |
| Castor seed | 29.288 | 3.914 | Nil | 29.84 | 0.03 | [113] |
| Sweet sorghum | 22.08 | 6.52 | 0.21 | 71.2 | Nil | [114] |
| Durian shell | 60.31 | 8.47 | 3.06 | 28.06 | 0.1 | [115] |
| Sago biomass | 39.66 | 6.61 | 0.19 | 53.54 | 0.00 | [111] |
| Peanut shell | 50.64 | 6.86 | 1.18 | 41.32 | Nil | [116] |
| Palm shell | 19.74 | 5.32 | 0.08 | 44.86 | 0.16 | [117] |
| Elephant grass | 44.5 | 5.4 | 1.4 | 31.8 | Nil | [118] |
| Bagasse jatropha | 40.94 | 7.42 | 0.26 | 51.14 | 0.24 | [118] |
| Sunflower biomass | 35.83 | 5.2 | 0.16 | 58.55 | 0.26 | [109] |
| Corn cob | 41.16 | 5.11 | 0.46 | 53.27 | 0 | [119] |
| Rice husk | 30.4 | 4 | 0.9 | 21.1 | Nil | [117] |
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Oxygen
Sulfur
3.3. Effects of basic factors on yield, surface area, and textural of activated carbon
During the synthesis of activated carbon acid to precursor ratio, activation time and temperature, and sometimes size of precursor are crucial factor parameters on the yield, surface area, and pore volume of activated carbon. The main effects of those factors were discussed one by one below.
3.3.1. Acid to precursor ratio on yield and textural characters of activated carbon
The acid to precursor/impregnation ratio is the ratio of the mass of the chemical agent to the precursor [18, 19]. The structural character of activated carbon is related to raw materials, activation time, temperature, and acid to the precursor ratio of activating agents [120]. During the synthesis of activated carbon (AC) from lignocellulosic materials, as the impregnation ratio increases, the products of activated carbon decrease as a result of the reaction between the activationacid and volatile matter [44] of precursors in the activation procedure, and also the structure, or surface area, of activated carbon increases with impregnation ratio. Similar observations were made by Redzuan [93], Lim [87], and Lee [121]. However, some previous studies, like Olawale [16], indicated that as the impregnation ratio increases, the yield of AC also increases. This is related to the precursor variation, which causes a slight increase in yield, which is worth noting. Acid hydrolysis decomposes the polymers (e.g., cellulose) into slighter molecules, finally, sugars hydrolyze esters or ethers, thus these slighter fragments develop more reactive and tend to decompose with the creation of slighter molecules [93]. At low crosslinking ion gases, liquids and char were formed. Activated carbon at a high impregnation ratio has a high pore volume compared to a low impregnation ratio [122]. In other cases, the quantity of phosphoric used for impregnation was analyzed through the degree of impregnation ratio (IR) calculated by the eq. (7).
| (7) |
where, mp = mass of phosphoric acid (g) calculated from density of H3PO4, mb = mass of biomass (g) [123].
Figure 4 indicated the effects of the impregnation ratio on the surface area of activated carbon synthesized from rice husk via phosphoric acid at a constant 500 °C activation temperature and 60 of activation time respectively.
Figure 4.
Effect of impregnation ratio on a surface area of activated carbon from rice husk, preparation parameters T = 500 °C, and t = 60 min from [20, 124, 125, 126].
3.3.2. Effect of activation temperature on yield and textural properties of activated carbon
Activation of biomass at high temperatures is a basic technique of treatment of the sorption parameters of the activated, which creates new functional groups on the surface [127]. Increasing the activation temperature reduces the activated carbon yield due to lignin incineration in biomass and the release of more volatile compounds [128]. Increasing activation temperature also increases narrow micropores and widens the established micropores using activating chemicals due to the melting of compounds found in biomass [129]. Most of the previous studies supported this statement in their research papers. The mutual ranges of activation temperature in the synthesis ofAC by chemical activating agents were 400–900 [93,130,131].
3.3.3. The consequence of activation time on the yield and textural character of AC
Activation time and other parameters that affect the yield and structure of activated carbon also vary. According to previous literature, the yield of activated carbon decreases significantly as activation time increases. However, it is directly proportional to surface area and porosity due to the long reaction between the activation agent and biomass [28, 132]. The micropore of AC will tend to become mesoporous and macropore and the specific surface area of activated carbon will be reduced because of the loss of carbon for a lengthy activation time [133, 134].
3.3.4. Effect of activation time, temperature, and impregnation ratio on the surface morphology of AC
The activated carbon is classically smooth whereas occupied with more pores. This porosity of AC was observed by Scanning Electron Microscope [92]. Before any activation or treatment of biomass, there is no pore on the surface of lignocellulosic biomass. However, after pyrolysis of biomass at various activation times, temperature, and impregnation ratios, the pore/surface morphology of activated carbon developed more. The produced AC has typically a large pore ranging from 20 to 190 μm [135]. The impregnation ratio and activation temperature have been effective in producing well-established pores on the biomass-activated carbon as a result of depolymerization and subsequent release of volatile organic substances from carbonization [134].
3.4. Properties and characteristics of phosphorus impregnated AC
Activated carbon (AC) can be synthesized by physical or chemical activation methods. However, chemical activation has extra benefits over physical activation due to maximum carbon yield, high surface area, and well-grown porous texture in carbon [136]. Chemical activation also develops oxygenated surface complexes on the surface of activated carbon. The surface oxygen functional groups can be simply introduced to the carbon through diverse techniques of activation like the reaction between the carbon surface and solutions of oxidizing agents like H3PO4. Phosphoric acid activation is commonly preferred over zinc chloride agents as a consequence of ZnCl2 environmental influence and its activated carbon cannot be used in food, water, and pharmaceutical industries [87]. Chemical activation utilizing H3PO4 can simply expose pores and voids of the synthesized AC to improve its adsorption capability. Earlier, phosphoric acid activation has been applied to different lignocellulosic biomass such as cashew nut shells [137], palm kernel shells [121], pecan shells [138], durian shells [139], cotton stalk [122], pumpkin seed shell [140], nutshell [16], limonite acidissima shell [141], groundnut shell [142], almond shell [142], and date palm park [143] to produce low-cost activated carbon. Some literature on activation by phosphoric acid and correlated specifics about AC synthesized by this acid are enumerated in Table 3.
Table 3.
Review of activated carbon parameters and physio-chemical properties from different lignocellulosic materials using phosphoric acid activation agent.
| Precursor | Activation parameters |
Physio-chemical properties |
References | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) | Activation time (min.) | Impregnation ratio | Surface area (m2/g) | Pore volume (cm3/g) | Pore diameter (nm) | Yield (%) | ||
| Kenaf short fibers | 600 | 30 | 3:1 | 1570 | 0.63 | 3.96 | 40 | [144] |
| Baobab fruit shells | 700 | 150 | 1:1.75 | 1089 | 0.3464 | 1.45 | 80 | [145] |
| Cashew nut shells | 600 | 120 | 1.7:1 | 1514 | 1.147 | --- | 85 | [137] |
| Mustard straw | 768 | 60 | 4.2 | 498 | 0.32 | 2.64 | Nil | [146] |
| Pine wood sawdust | 800 | 15 | 1:1 | 1079 | 0.53 ± 0.06 | Nil | --- | [147] |
| Palm kernel shell | 600 | 120 | 1:1 | 456.47 | 0.13 | 0.63 | --- | [121] |
| Corn cob | 400 | 120 | 1:2 | 700 | 0.011 | --- | --- | [148] |
| Date palm bark | 400 | 180 | 40 wt.% | 902 | 0.49 | 2.16 | 30 | [143] |
| Maize tassel | 700 | 30 | 1:2 | 1262.5 | 1.54 | --- | --- | [149] |
| Coconut shell | 600 | 120 | 1:1 | 479.17 | 0.15 | 0.62 | --- | [121] |
| Palm shell | 475 | 75 | 1.75 | 2000 | 1.2 | - | 45–55 | [150] |
| Corn straw | 300 | 120 | 1 | 463.89 | 0.387 | Nil | Nil | [151] |
| Palm shell | 425 | 30 | 3 | 1109 | 0.903 | 3.2 | <30 | [150] |
| Lotus stalks | 450 | 60 | 40 wt.% | 1418.78 | 1.253 | 3.53 | [7] | |
| Kanlow Switchgrass | 900 | 60 | --- | 1373 | 1.43 | --- | --- | [152] |
| Durian shell | 500 | 20 | 30 wt.% | 1404 | Nil | Nil | Nil | [139] |
| Palm shell | 855 | 135 | 9.42 | 615 | 0.28 | -- | --- | [14] |
| Cotton stalk | 500 | 120 | 1.5 | 1720 | 0.89 | Nil | 56.8 | [122] |
| Camellia oleifera shell | 800 | 60 | 3:1 | 1076 | 1.17 | Nil | 56 | [153] |
| Fox nut shell | 700 | 60 | 1.5 | 2636 | 1.53 | 2.32 | 37.84 | [59] |
| Grape seed | 500 | 120 | 1:3 | 1139 | 0.24 | 3.5 | 50 | [154] |
| Pumpkin seed shell | 500 | 60 | 2 | 1421 | 0.908 | Nil | 31 | [140] |
| Paulownia wood | 400 | 60 | 4 | 2806 | 1.746 | -- | 42.6 | [155] |
| Raffia palm shell | 523.68 | 103.83 | 1:4 | 456.1 | 0.25 | 2.13 | 77.98 | [156] |
| Soap nutshell | 500 | 90 | 1:1 | 1287.77 | 0.89 | 0.139 | 40.97 | [157] |
3.4.1. Properties compared toanother chemical-based impregnation
During the impregnation step, monitoring physical or chemical exchanges happening in the bulk solution with the substratum is difficult because of the high polarity of phosphoric acid [158]. This means the concentration of acid solution has a key influence on the activation process with phosphoric acid [18]. Phosphoric acid, rather than other acids, basic and neutral activation [159], is preferred to give extreme yield, surface area, and porosity of activated carbon (AC) due to its growth of microporous and mesoporous pores in AC [140]. Phosphoric acid has two important applications: it recovers precursor incineration decomposition and develops a lattice structure [2]. But, the excessive amount of H3PO4 owing to the development of a protective coating on AC does not result in an increment of porosity [160]. Table 4 shows the properties and efficiency of phosphoric acid impregnation of activated carbon compared with other chemical agents.
Table 4.
Evaluation of the useful properties and textural features of AC synthesized from numerous biomass and activation with phosphoric acid.
| Precursor | Impregnation ratio (% w/w) | Activating temperature (°C) | Activating time (min) | Surface area (m2/g) | qmax (mg/g) | Adsorbate | Removal efficiency (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOSWa | 30 | 700 | 120 | 790 | 61 | Cadmium | 78 | [168] |
| Walnut shell | 2 | 500 | 90 | 789 | 6.1 | Zinc | Nil | [169] |
| Coconut shell | Nil | 900 | 120 | 1344.83 | 4.31 | Phenols | Nil | [170] |
| Coffee residue | 100 | 600 | 60 | 1003 | 89.29 | Lead | 83.5 | [171] |
| Foxtail palm fruit | 20 | 500 | 120 | Nil | 2.5 | Iron [172] | 99.9 | [173] |
| Rice husk | 2.5 | 500 | 120 | 1365 | Nil | Leachate | 84 | [20] |
| Edulis seed | 60 | 300 | 180 | 841 | 74.31 | Cationic dyes | 99.59 | [174] |
| Banana peel | 20 | 600 | 120 | 27.41 | 27.355 | Iron | 99.95 | [175] |
| Coconut coir | 50 (%v/v) | 450 | 60 | Nil | 41.1 | Pb [172] | 92.17 | [176] |
| Vitis vinifera leaf | 3 | 750 | 120 | 295.5 | 78.9 | PFOAb | 95 | [177] |
| African palm fruit | 50 (%v/v) | 300 | 120 | Nil | Nil | Copper | 96.7 | [178] |
Municipal solid waste
Perfluorooctanoic acid
3.5. Special features and related application
Activated carbon (AC) is a very important adsorbent as a result of its high pore structure, surface area, and high grade of surface reactivity. Furthermore, activated carbon is an economical adsorbent applied for drinking water purification, automotive applications, food-grade products, industrial gas purification, and metal recovery [161]. Hence, this adsorbent (AC) is prepared by modifying the synthesis conditions of the chemical activation process. In a chemical activation process, as discussed in section 1.2, the carbon-containing biomass is mixed with a chemical inhibiting the creation of tar (e.g., sulfuric acid, zinc chloride, potassium hydroxide, phosphoric acid, etc.) and, later, pyrolyzing and washing, the last AC is synthesized. H3PO4 is preferred over other chemical agents because of corrosion problems, incompetent chemical retrieval, and eco-friendly drawbacks related to other chemicals [162]. Currently, the use of AC procedures has become broadly well-known in drinking water treatment, groundwater restoration, contaminant gas adsorbents [163], metal ion removal [164], catalyst support [165], volatile organic compounds (VOC) [166], and the handling of service water [154]. Similarly, activated carbon is being applied to an increasing amount of wastewater treatment, whether it is in the methodical treatment of specific sewage streams [167]. Figure 5, represented the main application of activated carbon synthesized by phosphoric acid.
Figure 5.
Basic application of activated carbon produced from lignocellulosic biomass via a phosphoric acid agent.
3.5.1. Activated carbon for drinking water disinfection
Generally, sedimentation and sand filtration are the most common water treatment techniques. However, these techniques only remove about 20–30% of pollutants. Chlorine-based disinfection techniques proficiently remove microorganisms, but they produce carcinogenic disinfection by-products in the water [118]. Ultraviolet is also another method used to kill microorganisms from the water. However, it is costly and needs power sources to operate [179]. AC is broadly used in drinking water action in countless parts, including the elimination of heavy metals, organic matter, unpleasant taste, and micro-organisms [180]. Especially in recent times, impregnated activated carbon with inorganic nanoparticles (i.e., silver, zinc, copper, gold, and tin oxide) is the most common method of water disinfection due to microorganism growth on the surface of un-impregnated AC [181]. Hence, impregnated activated carbon by inorganic nanoparticles can kill bacteria like E. coli and protozoans like Entamoeba efficiently and simply by drinking water.
3.5.2. Activated carbon for removal of solute organic matter
Natural organic matter in water contains a diversity of compounds like humic acid, fulvic acid, proteins, carbohydrates, and carboxylic acid resulting from the microbial activities and deterioration of plants and animal residues [182]. According to previous studies, activated carbon can be used to remove organic matter based on the physicochemical characteristics (i.e., initial concentration, pH value, molecular size distribution, ionic strength, dissolved oxygen) of natural organic matter from water. The absorbability of organic matter on AC rises with increasing molecular size. This was clarified through the availability of adsorption sites in apertures for slight molecules. Organic matter is negatively charged at neutral pH and electrostatic repulsion or attraction between activated carbon and activated carbon surface charge depends on the amount of acid and basic functional groups [183].
3.5.3. Activated carbon for energy storage
Activated carbon (AC) is used in energy storage as a result of its excellent power density, long life cycle, good pore size, and extensive operating temperature variety [53, 184]. Because of its high conductivity, unique properties, and good electrochemical cycling, activated carbon biomass is in high demand as a conductor in electrochemical capacitances [185, 186]. The electrochemical capacities of ozone-treated carbon make it an especially appealing material for the construction of an electrochemical capacitor [185].
3.5.4. Activated carbon for gas storage
Adsorption of natural gas is a process in which natural gas is deposited on the surface of a porous material at moderately low pressures [186, 187]. The discharge of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the air raises the earth's greenhouse outcome, leading to a rise in the worldwide temperature. A probable resolution is an imprisonment and confiscation [188]. For such gas storage, AC is the farthest mutual adsorbent. Some researchers have emphasized the significance of the porosity and the density of the extreme gas storing volume. Both its adsorption capacity and its density have to be exploited [188, 189]. Adsorption kinetics, the heat of adsorption, and adsorption capacity are the main characteristics of activated carbon to store natural gases [190].
3.5.5. Activated carbon for removal of heavy metal
Heavy metals like Chromium, Copper, Zinc, Cobalt, Manganese, Cadmium, Lead, and Nickel that are natural constituents of the Earth's crust are typically related to toxicity [191]. The presence of those metals in the environment has effects on humans if the suitable levels are surpassed [192] and they are also present in ground and surface water [193]. Because of its accessibility, extensive surface area, porosity structure, and good adsorption volume, activated carbon is the furthermost economical, easiest, and most effective adsorbent material for the removal of heavy metals present in the environment (i.e., water and industrial waste). Table 4 shows also the removal percentages of heavy metals, organic matter, and others with phosphoric acid-impregnated activated carbon.
3.5.6. Activated carbon for contaminant gas adsorbents
Fossil fuel burning makes gaseous contaminants, producingdifferences in atmospheric composition. Sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NO, and particulate matter are themain components of air contamination and are the mostsources of environmental destruction and numerousillnesses, for example, cancer [194]. Gas contaminants primarily damage the immunological hematologic, inhaling ophthalmological, cardiologydermatological neuropsychiatric, and reproductive system [195]. AC obtained from biomass by phosphoric acid, usually prepared as waste, has been studied with a potential catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen dioxide [196] and sulfur dioxide [197].
3.5.7. The use of activated carbon as catalyst support
Lots of present-day's chemical processes need the usage of a catalyst supported by a carrier. The higher interior surface area, high inactivity, and flexibility produce activated carbons with ideal support in much utilization including valuable metal catalysis (e.g., Au, Pt, Pd,Ru, Rh, etc.) and base metal catalysts (e.g., Ni, Co, Cu, Zn, Fe) [198, 199]. As catalyst and catalyst support, activated carbon substance display considerable benefit in terms of activity, stabilization, and regenerability on metal or metal oxide catalysts. AC has all the required characteristics to be used as catalyst support andthey have special characteristics for example constancy in either acidic or basic media [165]. AC substantially enhanced the gasification achievement of biomass composition when it was used as catalyst support for platinum metal for the successful transformation of biomass hydrolysis to hydrogen with aqueous-phase revision [198].
4. Comparable evidence of AC yield and the surface area produced by H3PO4 with previous work
The use of phosphoric acidcan synthesize higher biomass-activated carbon yield and surface area as compared to other chemical agents [18]. Phosphoric acid prevents the waste of biomass via vaporization during thermal action, hence rising the activated carbon yield from carbonation, and also chemically bridges to the lignocellulosic biomass polymers and establishes phosphate groups creating cross-links [200]. Table 5 shows a contrast of theyield and surface area of biomass-activated carbon produced by phosphoric acid with other chemical agents stated in the literature.
Table 5.
Biomass AC yield synthesized by H3PO4 from different lignocellulosic materials comparison with different chemical agents.
| Precursors | Chemical agents | Yield (%) | BET Surface Area (m2/g) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Durian shell | KOH | 43.5 | 979 | [115] |
| H3PO4 | 63 | 1024 | [201] | |
| Coconut shell | KOH | 32 | 478 | [202] |
| H3PO4 | 36.9 | 891 | [203] | |
| ZnCl2 | 50.3 | 544.7 | [204] | |
| Rice husk | H3PO4 | 44.6 | 1820 | [205] |
| ZnCl2 | 32 | 578 | [206] | |
| H2SO4 | 36 | 681 | [17] | |
| NaOH | --- | 527 | [207] | |
| Palm shell | H3PO4 | 55 | 1109 | [150] |
| ZnCl2 | 38 | 743 | [208] | |
| KOH | 19.3 | 217 | [209] |
4.1. Prospects and challenges of phosphoric acid impregnated AC
Phosphoric acid was commonly used as a chemical activating agent for helping bond cleavage reactions and protecting the inside hole structure at the same time in chemical activation [210]. Phosphoric acid has two mutual features. It activates the biomass/precursor by entering the pores of the raw materials or biomass. Additionally, it is acidic, which is valuable in breaking chemical bonds and producing an increase in porosity [15]. Nevertheless, few research studies have discussed the challenges of activation by phosphoric acid. Precursor activation and pyrolysis by H3PO4 take 2–8 h, and phosphate ions can cause interference by precipitating a few elements to be analyzed [211].
5. Conclusion and perspectives
The review of lignocellulosic biomass as precursors for the synthesis of AC has been revised based on an important number of appropriate papers available up to now. The chemical activator agent is the main factor governing the efficiency and pertinency of biomass-activated carbon. Now, this paper review; H3PO4 as a chemical activating agent of lignocellulosic biomass for the synthesis of AC. These lignocellulosic biomasses are in the form of shells, husks, leaves, and grass, and are consequently used as adsorbents. According to the review, the yield, surface area, porosity, and surface functional groups of activated carbon adsorbents highly depend on activated temperature, activated time, and the acid-to precursor ratio of phosphoric acid. The synthesis of activated carbon by phosphoric acid has numerous advantages, like the acceptance of it in food, water, and non-contaminant in nature over other chemical activating agents. Various studies have been conducted on the application of activated carbon produced by phosphoric acid to the removal of organic materials, heavy metals (i.e., lead, copper, uranium, iron, manganese, zinc), and pollutants. The use of activated carbon from numerous lignocellulosic biomasses for pollutant removal is very widespread as a result of its good surface area and good porosity structure. However, there are various inadequacies in the use of modified biomass-activated carbon by inorganic nanoparticles for the elimination of contaminants. Based on the earmark contaminants, lignocellulosic biomass activated carbon impregnated with inorganic nanoparticles for water disinfection may be the best possible, rarely exceeding commercial activated carbons. Hence, with high performance and best impregnated with inorganic nanoparticles as per the elimination of contaminants like pathogens-bacteria from drinking water, the low-cost biomass activated carbon will positively occur in the future disinfectant adsorbent with the good killing of bacteria from contaminated water.
Declarations
Author contribution statement
All authors listed have significantly contributed to the development and the writing of this article.
Funding statement
This work was supported by Addis Ababa Science and Technology University.
Data availability statement
No data was used for the research described in the article.
Declaration of interest’s statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
No additional information is available for this paper.
References
- 1.Ukanwa K.S., et al. A review of chemicals to produce activated carbon from agricultural waste biomass. Sustainability. 2019;11(22):6204. [Google Scholar]
- 2.de Yuso A.M., Rubio B., Izquierdo M.T. Influence of activation atmosphere used in the chemical activation of almond shell on the characteristics and adsorption performance of activated carbons. Fuel Process. Technol. 2014;119:74–80. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arena N., Lee J., Clift R. Life Cycle Assessment of activated carbon production from coconut shells. J. Clean. Prod. 2016;125:68–77. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhao H., et al. Coal based activated carbon nanofibers prepared by electrospinning. J. Mater. Chem. 2014;2(24):9338–9344. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cechinel M.A.P., de Souza A.A.U. Study of lead (II) adsorption onto activated carbon originating from cow bone. J. Clean. Prod. 2014;65:342–349. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Abbas M., Kaddour S., Trari M. Kinetic and equilibrium studies of cobalt adsorption on apricot stone activated carbon. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014;20(3):745–751. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liu H., et al. Preparation of activated carbon from lotus stalks with the mixture of phosphoric acid and pentaerythritol impregnation and its application for Ni (II) sorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2012;209:155–162. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bjorklund K., Li L.Y. Adsorption of organic stormwater pollutants onto activated carbon from sewage sludge. J. Environ. Manag. 2017;197:490–497. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Betancur M., Martinez J.D., Murillo R. Production of activated carbon by waste tire thermochemical degradation with CO2. J. Hazard Mater. 2009;168(2-3):882–887. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Din A.T.M., Hameed B., Ahmad A.L. Batch adsorption of phenol onto physiochemical-activated coconut shell. J. Hazard Mater. 2009;161(2-3):1522–1529. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.da Cunha Goncalves G., Pereira N.C., Veit M.T. Production of bio-oil and activated carbon from sugarcane bagasse and molasses. Biomass Bioenergy. 2016;85:178–186. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Şahin Ö., Saka C. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from acorn shell by physical activation with H2O–CO2 in two-step pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2013;136:163–168. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang J., Ou L. Kinetic, isotherm and thermodynamic studies of the adsorption of crystal violet by activated carbon from peanut shells. Water Sci. Technol. 2013;67(4):737–744. doi: 10.2166/wst.2012.605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Arami-Niya A., et al. Production of microporous palm shell based activated carbon for methane adsorption: modeling and optimization using response surface methodology. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2012;90(6):776–784. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Feng P., et al. Biomass-based activated carbon and activators: preparation of activated carbon from corncob by chemical activation with biomass pyrolysis liquids. ACS Omega. 2020;5(37):24064–24072. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Olawale A.S., et al. 2015. Preparation of phosphoric acid activated carbons from Canarium Schweinfurthii Nutshell and its role in methylene blue adsorption; pp. 1–6.http://www.academicjournals.org/JCEMS [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen Y., et al. Application studies of activated carbon derived from rice husks produced by chemical-thermal process—a review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;163(1):39–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2011.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yahya M.A., Al-Qodah Z., Ngah C.Z. Agricultural bio-waste materials as potential sustainable precursors used for activated carbon production: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015;46:218–235. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dey N., et al. Nanomaterials for transforming barrier properties of lignocellulosic biomass towards potential applications–A review. Fuel. 2022;316 [Google Scholar]
- 20.Luo Y., et al. The performance of phosphoric acid in the preparation of activated carbon-containing phosphorus species from rice husk residue. J. Mater. Sci. 2019;54(6):5008–5021. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jawad A.H., et al. Adsorption of methylene blue onto activated carbon developed from biomass waste by H2SO4 activation: kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Desalination Water Treat. 2016;57(52):25194–25206. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ajmani A., et al. Packed bed column studies of hexavalent chromium adsorption by zinc chloride activated carbon synthesized from Phanera vahlii fruit biomass. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020;8(4) [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jawaduddin M., et al. Synthetic grey water treatment through FeCl3-activated carbon obtained from cotton stalks and river sand. Civil Eng. J. 2019;5(2):340–348. http://www.civilejournal.org/ [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang Y., et al. Utilization of wheat bran for producing activated carbon with high specific surface area via NaOH activation using industrial furnace. J. Clean. Prod. 2019;210:366–375. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rahman H.A., Chin S.X. Physical and chemical properties of the rice straw activated carbon produced from carbonization and KOH activation processes. Sains Malays. 2019;48(2):385–391. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Abdulhameed A.S., et al. Statistical modeling and mechanistic pathway for methylene blue dye removal by high surface area and mesoporous grass-based activated carbon using K2CO3 activator. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021;9(4) [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pallares J., Gonzalez-Cencerrado A., Arauzo I. Production and characterization of activated carbon from barley straw by physical activation with carbon dioxide and steam. Biomass Bioenergy. 2018;115:64–73. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhou J., Luo A., Zhao Y. Preparation and characterisation of activated carbon from waste tea by physical activation using steam. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2018;68(12):1269–1277. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2018.1460282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bian Y., et al. Recycling of waste sludge: preparation and application of sludge-based activated carbon. Int. J. Polymer Sci. 2018;2018 [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ogungbenro A.E., et al. Physical synthesis and characterization of activated carbon from date seeds for CO2 capture. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018;6(4):4245–4252. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Efeovbokhan V., et al. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing; 2019. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from plantain peel and coconut shell using biological activators. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Korotta-Gamage S.M., Sathasivan A. Potential of a biologically activated carbon treatment to remove organic carbon from surface waters. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017;124:82–90. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jain A., Balasubramanian R., Srinivasan M. Hydrothermal conversion of biomass waste to activated carbon with high porosity: a review. Chem. Eng. J. 2016;283:789–805. [Google Scholar]
- 34.MacDermid-Watts K., Pradhan R., Dutta A. Catalytic hydrothermal carbonization treatment of biomass for enhanced activated carbon: a review. Waste Biomass Valor. 2021;12(5):2171–2186. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang J., et al. Preparation of activated carbon from a renewable agricultural residue of pruning mulberry shoot. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010;9(19):2762–2767. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yakout S., El-Deen G.S. Characterization of activated carbon prepared by phosphoric acid activation of olive stones. Arab. J. Chem. 2016;9:S1155–S1162. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Foo P., Lee L. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science. 2010. Preparation of activated carbon from parkia speciosa pod by chemical activation. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Campbell Q., et al. The preparation of activated carbon from South African coal. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2012;112(1):37–44. http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/jsaimm/v112n1/v112n1a10.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liu X., et al. Characterization of activated carbon precursors prepared by dry-air oxidant and its effects on the adsorptions of activated carbons. Fuel. 2022;318 [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cai J., et al. Review of physicochemical properties and analytical characterization of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017;76:309–322. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hayes D.J. The Role of Catalysis for the Sustainable Production of Bio-Fuels and Bio-Chemicals. Elsevier; 2013. Biomass composition and its relevance to biorefining; pp. 27–65. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Xu F., et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of lignocellulosic biomass using infrared techniques: a mini-review. Appl. Energy. 2013;104:801–809. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Xu F., Shi Y.-C., Wang D. Towards understanding structural changes of photoperiod-sensitive sorghum biomass during sulfuric acid pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2013;135:704–709. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Modolo R., et al. Mortar formulations with bottom ash from biomass combustion. Construct. Build. Mater. 2013;45:275–281. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tiryaki B., et al. Comparison of activated carbon produced from natural biomass and equivalent chemical compositions. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2014;105:276–283. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yargic A.S.,, et al. Assessment of toxic copper (II) biosorption from aqueous solution by chemically-treated tomato waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2015;88:152–159. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fortunati E., et al. Revalorization of barley straw and husk as precursors for cellulose nanocrystals extraction and their effect on PVA_CH nanocomposites. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016;92:201–217. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Odetoye T., et al. Thermochemical characterisation of Parinari polyandra Benth fruit shell. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013;44:62–66. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rout T., et al. Exhaustive study of products obtained from coconut shell pyrolysis. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016;4(3):3696–3705. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liu H., et al. Optimizing bioenergy and by-product outputs from durian shell pyrolysis. Renew. Energy. 2021;164:407–418. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Martinez C.L.M., et al. Characterization of residual biomasses from the coffee production chain and assessment the potential for energy purposes. Biomass Bioenergy. 2019;120:68–76. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bilgic E., et al. Limits of variations on the structure and the fuel characteristics of sunflower seed shell through torrefaction. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016;144:197–202. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tan Y., Abdullah A., Hameed B. Product distribution of the thermal and catalytic fast pyrolysis of karanja (Pongamia pinnata) fruit hulls over a reusable silica-alumina catalyst. Fuel. 2019;245:89–95. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sugumaran P., et al. Production and characterization of activated carbon from banana empty fruit bunch and Delonix regia fruit pod. Journal of Sustainable Energy & Environment. 2012;3(3):125–132. doi=10. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yang W., et al. Preparation of biodegradable foam from walnut shells treated by subcritical water. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2015;90(1):44–49. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ferrer A., Salas C., Rojas O.J. Physical, thermal, chemical and rheological characterization of cellulosic microfibrils and microparticles produced from soybean hulls. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016;84:337–343. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Pitakpong A. The chemical properties and the combustion duration of fuel briquettes from corn kernel residues, Thailand. Turkish J. Comp. Math. Educ. (TURCOMAT) 2021;12(8):2340–2344. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tang Y., et al. Simultaneous saccharification and cofermentation of lignocellulosic residues from commercial furfural production and corn kernels using different nutrient media. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2011;4(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-4-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kumar A., Jena H.M. Preparation and characterization of high surface area activated carbon from Fox nut (Euryale ferox) shell by chemical activation with H3PO4. Results Phys. 2016;6:651–658. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Das P.K., Das B.P., Dash P. Refining Biomass Residues for Sustainable Energy and Bioproducts. Elsevier; 2020. Potentials of postharvest rice crop residues as a source of biofuel; pp. 275–301. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Garcia R., et al. Biomass proximate analysis using thermogravimetry. Bioresour. Technol. 2013;139:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Tillman D., Duong D., Harding N.S. Elsevier; 2012. Solid Fuel Blending: Principles, Practices, and Problems. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lago C., Caldes N., Lechon Y. Academic Press; 2018. The Role of Bioenergy in the Emerging Bioeconomy: Resources, Technologies, Sustainability and Policy. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Holm-Nielsen J.B., Ehimen E.A. Woodhead Publishing; 2016. Biomass Supply Chains for Bioenergy and Biorefining. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ani F.N. Electric Renewable Energy Systems”, Elsevier Inc; 2015. Utilization of Bioresources as Fuels and Energy Generation; pp. 140–155. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Agrela F., et al. New Trends in Eco-Efficient and Recycled concrete. Elsevier; 2019. Biomass fly ash and biomass bottom ash; pp. 23–58. [Google Scholar]
- 67.del Bosque I.S., et al. Waste and Byproducts in Cement-Based Materials. Elsevier; 2021. Industrial waste from biomass-fired electric power plants as alternative pozzolanic material; pp. 243–282. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Maschio S., et al. Fly and bottom ashes from biomass combustion as cement replacing components in mortars production: rheological behaviour of the pastes and materials compression strength. Chemosphere. 2011;85(4):666–671. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rajamma R., et al. Characterisation and use of biomass fly ash in cement-based materials. J. Hazard Mater. 2009;172(2-3):1049–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kizinievic O., Kizinievic V. Utilisation of wood ash from biomass for the production of ceramic products. Construct. Build. Mater. 2016;127:264–273. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Schiemenz K., Eichler-Lobermann B. Biomass ashes and their phosphorus fertilizing effect on different crops. Nutrient Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2010;87(3):471–482. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Caillat S., Vakkilainen E. Biomass combustion science, technology and engineering; 2013. Large-scale Biomass Combustion Plants: an Overview; pp. 189–224. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Erol M., Haykiri-Acma H., Kucukbayrak S. Calorific value estimation of biomass from their proximate analyses data. Renew. Energy. 2010;35(1):170–173. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Antero R.V.P., et al. A new approach to obtain mesoporous-activated carbon via hydrothermal carbonization of Brazilian Cerrado biomass combined with physical activation for bisphenol-A removal. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2019;206(11):1498–1514. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Tran H.N., Chao H.-P., You S.-J. Activated carbons from golden shower upon different chemical activation methods: synthesis and characterizations. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2018;36(1-2):95–113. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zubrik A., et al. Preparation of chemically activated carbon from waste biomass by single-stage and two-stage pyrolysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2017;143:643–653. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Fernandez M.E., et al. Development and characterization of activated hydrochars from orange peels as potential adsorbents for emerging organic contaminants. Bioresour. Technol. 2015;183:221–228. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ledesma B., et al. Method for promoting in-situ hydrochar porosity in hydrothermal carbonization of almond shells with air activation. J. Supercrit. Fluids. 2018;138:187–192. [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hadi P., et al. A critical review on preparation, characterization and utilization of sludge-derived activated carbons for wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2015;260:895–906. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Korotta-Gamage S.M., Sathasivan A. A review: potential and challenges of biologically activated carbon to remove natural organic matter in drinking water purification process. Chemosphere. 2017;167:120–138. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Dong L., et al. Study on reactivation cycle of biological activated carbon (BAC) in water treatment. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015;102:209–213. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Roman S., et al. Production of low-cost adsorbents with tunable surface chemistry by conjunction of hydrothermal carbonization and activation processes. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2013;165:127–133. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Saari J., et al. Integration of hydrothermal carbonization and a CHP plant: Part 2–operational and economic analysis. Energy. 2016;113:574–585. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Nabais J.V., et al. Influence of preparation conditions in the textural and chemical properties of activated carbons from a novel biomass precursor: the coffee endocarp. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99(15):7224–7231. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Adamski A., et al. Surface modification of ZrO2 nanopowder with oxovanadium species using slurry deposition and impregnation methods. J. Alloys Compd. 2007;442(1-2):302–305. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Somy A., et al. Adsorption of carbon dioxide using impregnated activated carbon promoted by Zinc. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 2009;3(3):249–254. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Lim W.C., Srinivasakannan C., Balasubramanian N. Activation of palm shells by phosphoric acid impregnation for high yielding activated carbon. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2010;88(2):181–186. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Deliyanni E.A. Interface Science and Technology. Elsevier; 2019. Low-cost activated carbon from rice wastes in liquid-phase adsorption; pp. 101–123. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Chang K.-L., et al. Rice straw-derived activated carbons for the removal of carbofuran from an aqueous solution. N. Carbon Mater. 2014;29(1):47–54. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Fierro V., et al. Rice straw as precursor of activated carbons: activation with ortho-phosphoric acid. J. Hazard Mater. 2010;181(1-3):27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Chung P.-W., et al. Hydrolysis catalysis of miscanthus xylan to xylose using weak-acid surface sites. ACS Catal. 2014;4(1):302–310. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kassem I., et al. Phosphoric acid-mediated green preparation of regenerated cellulose spheres and their use for all-cellulose cross-linked superabsorbent hydrogels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;162:136–149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Zakaria R., Jamalluddin N.A., Bakar M.Z.A. Effect of impregnation ratio and activation temperature on the yield and adsorption performance of mangrove based activated carbon for methylene blue removal. Res. Mater. 2021;10 [Google Scholar]
- 94.Li Y., et al. The role of H₃PO₄ in the preparation of activated carbon from naoh-treated rice husk residue. 2015. https://pubag.nal.usda.gov/catalog/6675012
- 95.Ziezio M., et al. Preparation and characterization of activated carbons obtained from the waste materials impregnated with phosphoric acid (V) Appl. Nanosci. 2020;10(12):4703–4716. [Google Scholar]
- 96.Gillespie G.D., et al. Prediction of quality parameters of biomass pellets from proximate and ultimate analysis. Fuel. 2013;111:771–777. [Google Scholar]
- 97.Hornung A. Elsevier Inc. Chapters; 2013. Biomass Combustion Science, Technology and Engineering: 8. Intermediate Pyrolysis of Biomass. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Mohanty P., et al. Evaluation of the physiochemical development of biochars obtained from pyrolysis of wheat straw, timothy grass and pinewood: effects of heating rate. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2013;104:485–493. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Nanda S., et al. Physico-chemical properties of bio-oils from pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass with high and slow heating rate. Energy Environ. Res. 2014;4(3):21. [Google Scholar]
- 100.Boonpoke A., et al. Synthesis of activated carbon and MCM-41 from bagasse and rice husk and their carbon dioxide adsorption capacity. J. Sustain. Energy Environ. 2011;2(2):77–81. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Siriluk-Chiarakorn/publication/266895645 [Google Scholar]
- 101.Cherubini F., Stromman A.H. Production of biofuels and biochemicals from lignocellulosic biomass: estimation of maximum theoretical yields and efficiencies using matrix algebra. Energy Fuel. 2010;24(4):2657–2666. [Google Scholar]
- 102.Qiu K.-q., Yang S.-w., Yang J. Characteristics of activated carbon prepared from Chinese fir sawdust by zinc chloride activation under vacuum condition. J. Cent. S. Univ. Technol. 2009;16(3):385–391. [Google Scholar]
- 103.Ibanez Garcia A., Martinez Garcia A., Ferrandiz Bou S. Study of the influence of the almond shell variety on the mechanical properties of starch-based polymer biocomposites. Polymers. 2020;12(9):2049. doi: 10.3390/polym12092049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Ai N., et al. Co-production of activated carbon and bio-oil from agricultural residues by molten salt pyrolysis. Bioresources. 2013;8(2):1551–1562. https://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/3424 [Google Scholar]
- 105.Hirunpraditkoon S., et al. Adsorption capacities of activated carbons prepared from bamboo by KOH activation. Int. J. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2011;5(6):491–495. [Google Scholar]
- 106.Wilson L., et al. Thermal characterization of tropical biomass feedstocks. Energy Convers. Manag. 2011;52(1):191–198. [Google Scholar]
- 107.Gonzalez J., et al. Pyrolysis of various biomass residues and char utilization for the production of activated carbons. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2009;85(1-2):134–141. [Google Scholar]
- 108.Asadieraghi M., Daud W.M.A.W. Characterization of lignocellulosic biomass thermal degradation and physiochemical structure: effects of demineralization by diverse acid solutions. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014;82:71–82. [Google Scholar]
- 109.Abdullah A., et al. Bioenergy potential and thermochemical characterization of lignocellulosic biomass residues available in Pakistan. Kor. J. Chem. Eng. 2020;37(11):1899–1906. [Google Scholar]
- 110.Park J., et al. Transformation of lignocellulosic biomass during torrefaction. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2013;100:199–206. [Google Scholar]
- 111.Lim C.H., et al. Novel input-output prediction approach for biomass pyrolysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2016;136:51–61. [Google Scholar]
- 112.Singh Y.D., Mahanta P., Bora U. Comprehensive characterization of lignocellulosic biomass through proximate, ultimate and compositional analysis for bioenergy production. Renew. Energy. 2017;103:490–500. [Google Scholar]
- 113.Singh R., Shadangi K. Liquid fuel from castor seeds by pyrolysis. Fuel. 2011;90(7):2538–2544. [Google Scholar]
- 114.Yin R., et al. Characterization of bio-oil and bio-char obtained from sweet sorghum bagasse fast pyrolysis with fractional condensers. Fuel. 2013;112:96–104. [Google Scholar]
- 115.Chandra T.C., et al. Activated carbon from durian shell: preparation and characterization. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2009;40(4):457–462. [Google Scholar]
- 116.Fermanelli C.S., et al. Pyrolysis and copyrolysis of three lignocellulosic biomass residues from the agro-food industry: a comparative study. Waste Manag. 2020;102:362–370. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.10.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Braga R.M., et al. Characterization and comparative study of pyrolysis kinetics of the rice husk and the elephant grass. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2014;115(2):1915–1920. [Google Scholar]
- 118.Biswas S., Mohanty P., Sharma D. Studies on co-cracking of jatropha oil with bagasse to obtain liquid, gaseous product and char. Renew. Energy. 2014;63:308–316. [Google Scholar]
- 119.Pahla G., et al. Energy densification of animal waste lignocellulose biomass and raw biomass. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2017;24(1):168–175. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJCc5b5e7b70 [Google Scholar]
- 120.Üner O., Bayrak Y. The effect of carbonization temperature, carbonization time and impregnation ratio on the properties of activated carbon produced from Arundo donax. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2018;268:225–234. [Google Scholar]
- 121.Lee C.L., et al. Production of bioadsorbent from phosphoric acid pretreated palm kernel shell and coconut shell by two-stage continuous physical activation via N2 and air. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018;5(12) doi: 10.1098/rsos.180775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Nahil M.A., Williams P.T. Pore characteristics of activated carbons from the phosphoric acid chemical activation of cotton stalks. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;37:142–149. [Google Scholar]
- 123.Mohammad Y., et al. Effect of phosphoric acid modification on characteristics of rice husk activated carbon. Iran. J. Energy Environ. 2015;6(1):20–25. [Google Scholar]
- 124.Li Y., et al. A new method of comprehensive utilization of rice husk. J. Hazard Mater. 2011;186(2-3):2151–2156. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Ding L., et al. A simple route for consecutive production of activated carbon and liquid compound fertilizer from rice husk. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2014;446:90–96. [Google Scholar]
- 126.Basta A., et al. Effect of deashing rice straws on their derived activated carbons produced by phosphoric acid activation. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35(5):1954–1959. [Google Scholar]
- 127.Ahmed M.B., et al. Progress in the preparation and application of modified biochar for improved contaminant removal from water and wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2016;214:836–851. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Mazlan M.A.F., et al. Activated carbon from rubber wood sawdust by carbon dioxide activation. Procedia Eng. 2016;148:530–537. [Google Scholar]
- 129.Quach N.K.N., et al. The influence of the activation temperature on the structural properties of the activated carbon xerogels and their electrochemical performance. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017;2017 [Google Scholar]
- 130.Angin D., Altintig E., Ennil T. Bioresource technology influence of process parameters on the surface and chemical properties of activated carbon obtained from biochar by chemical activation. Bioresour. Technol. 2013;148:542–549. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Ibrahim T., et al. Kinetics of the adsorption of anionic and cationic dyes in aqueous solution by low-cost activated carbons prepared from sea cake and cotton cake. Am. Chem. Sci. J. 2014;4:38–57. http://www.sciencedomain.org/ [Google Scholar]
- 132.Osman N., Shamsuddin N., Uemura Y. Activated carbon of oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB); core and shaggy. Procedia Eng. 2016;148:758–764. [Google Scholar]
- 133.Zhao Y., Fan R., Feng L. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing; 2019. Preparation and application of straw activated carbon. [Google Scholar]
- 134.Danish M., et al. Optimization study for preparation of activated carbon from Acacia mangium wood using phosphoric acid. Wood Sci. Technol. 2014;48(5):1069–1083. [Google Scholar]
- 135.Syafiuddin A., et al. Removal of silver nanoparticles from water environment: experimental, mathematical formulation, and cost analysis. Water Air Soil Poll. 2019;230(5):1–15. [Google Scholar]
- 136.Alzaydien A.S. Physical, chemical and adsorptive characteristics of local oak sawdust based activated carbons. Asian Journal of Scientific Research. 2016;9(2):45–56. [Google Scholar]
- 137.Geczo A., et al. Mechanistic insights into acetaminophen removal on cashew nut shell biomass-derived activated carbons. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 2021;28(42):58969–58982. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07562-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Guo Y., Rockstraw D.A. Activated carbons prepared from rice hull by one-step phosphoric acid activation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2007;100(1-3):12–19. [Google Scholar]
- 139.Tham Y., et al. Performances of toluene removal by activated carbon derived from durian shell. Bioresour. Technol. 2011;102(2):724–728. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Demiral İ., Şamdan C.A. Preparation and characterisation of activated carbon from pumpkin seed shell using H3PO4. Anadolu Univ. J. Sci. Technol. A-Appl. Sci. Eng. 2016;17(1):125–138. [Google Scholar]
- 141.Das S., Mishra S. Box-Behnken statistical design to optimize preparation of activated carbon from Limonia acidissima shell with desirability approach. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017;5(1):588–600. [Google Scholar]
- 142.Osobamiro T., Adegoke J., Osundeko A. Characterization of activated carbon synthesized from almond and groundnut shells. 2020. http://www.jmaterenvironsci.com
- 143.Haghbin M.R., Shahrak M.N. Process conditions optimization for the fabrication of highly porous activated carbon from date palm bark wastes for removing pollutants from water. Powder Technol. 2021;377:890–899. [Google Scholar]
- 144.Baek J., et al. Preparation and characterization of highly mesoporous activated short carbon fibers from kenaf precursors. Carbon letters. 2019;29(4):393–399. [Google Scholar]
- 145.Vunain E., Kenneth D., Biswick T. Synthesis and characterization of low-cost activated carbon prepared from Malawian baobab fruit shells by H3PO4 activation for removal of Cu (II) ions: equilibrium and kinetics studies. Appl. Water Sci. 2017;7(8):4301–4319. [Google Scholar]
- 146.Patidar K., Vashishtha M. Optimization of process variables to prepare mesoporous activated carbon from mustard straw for dye adsorption using response surface methodology. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 2020;231(10):1–17. [Google Scholar]
- 147.Gao X., et al. Preparation and characterization of high surface area activated carbon from pine wood sawdust by fast activation with H3PO4 in a spouted bed. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2018;20(2):925–936. [Google Scholar]
- 148.El-Sayed G.O., Yehia M.M., Asaad A.A. Assessment of activated carbon prepared from corncob by chemical activation with phosphoric acid. Water Res. Industry. 2014;7:66–75. [Google Scholar]
- 149.Olorundare O., et al. Potential application of activated carbon from maize tassel for the removal of heavy metals in water. Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C. 2012;50:104–110. [Google Scholar]
- 150.Lim W.C., Srinivasakannan C., Al Shoaibi A. Cleaner production of porous carbon from palm shells through recovery and reuse of phosphoric acid. J. Clean. Prod. 2015;102:501–511. [Google Scholar]
- 151.Yang Q., et al. Batch interaction of emerging tetracycline contaminant with novel phosphoric acid activated corn straw porous carbon: adsorption rate and nature of mechanism. Environ. Res. 2020;181 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Oginni O., et al. Effect of one-step and two-step H3PO4 activation on activated carbon characteristics. Biores. Technol. Rep. 2019;8 [Google Scholar]
- 153.Kang S., Jian-chun J., Dan-dan C. Preparation of activated carbon with highly developed mesoporous structure from Camellia oleifera shell through water vapor gasification and phosphoric acid modification. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35(8):3643–3647. [Google Scholar]
- 154.Al Bahri M., et al. Activated carbon from grape seeds upon chemical activation with phosphoric acid: application to the adsorption of diuron from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2012;203:348–356. [Google Scholar]
- 155.Yorgun S., Yildiz D. Preparation and characterization of activated carbons from Paulownia wood by chemical activation with H3PO4. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2015;53:122–131. [Google Scholar]
- 156.Iwar R.T., Katibi K.K., Oshido L.E. Heliyon; 2021. Meso-microporous Activated Carbon Derived from Raffia palm Shells: Optimization of Synthesis Conditions Using Response Surface Methodology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Patel R.K., et al. Adsorptive removal of methylene blue dye from soapnut shell & pineapple waste derived activated carbon. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2021;13(1):81–87. [Google Scholar]
- 158.Heidarinejad Z., et al. Methods for preparation and activation of activated carbon: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020;18(2):393–415. [Google Scholar]
- 159.Din M.I., Ashraf S., Intisar A. Comparative study of different activation treatments for the preparation of activated carbon: a mini-review. Sci. Prog. 2017;100(3):299–312. doi: 10.3184/003685017X14967570531606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Zhong Z.-Y., et al. Preparation of peanut hull-based activated carbon by microwave-induced phosphoric acid activation and its application in Remazol Brilliant Blue R adsorption. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2012;37(1):178–185. [Google Scholar]
- 161.Velasco L.F., Parra J.B., Ania C.O. Role of activated carbon features on the photocatalytic degradation of phenol. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010;256(17):5254–5258. [Google Scholar]
- 162.Kang Y.-H., et al. Using phosphoric acid-impregnated activated carbon to improve the efficiency of chemical filters for the removal of airborne molecular contaminants (AMCs) in the make-up air unit (MAU) of a cleanroom. Build. Environ. 2010;45(4):929–935. [Google Scholar]
- 163.Ma X., Ouyang F. Adsorption properties of biomass-based activated carbon prepared with spent coffee grounds and pomelo skin by phosphoric acid activation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013;268:566–570. [Google Scholar]
- 164.Tounsadi H., et al. Activated carbon from Diplotaxis Harra biomass: optimization of preparation conditions and heavy metal removal. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016;59:348–358. [Google Scholar]
- 165.Meryemoglu B., Irmak S., Hasanoglu A. Production of activated carbon materials from kenaf biomass to be used as catalyst support in aqueous-phase reforming process. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016;151:59–63. [Google Scholar]
- 166.Wang Y.-H., et al. Activated carbon fibers via reductive carbonization of cellulosic biomass for adsorption of nonpolar volatile organic compounds. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021;612 [Google Scholar]
- 167.Ambrosy J.M., et al. Achema 2018: adsorption. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2018;90(12):1974–1979. [Google Scholar]
- 168.Al-Malack M.H., Basaleh A.A. Adsorption of heavy metals using activated carbon produced from municipal organic solid waste. Desalination Water Treat. 2016;57(51):24519–24531. [Google Scholar]
- 169.Moreno-Barbosa J.J., et al. Removal of lead (II) and zinc (II) ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto activated carbon synthesized from watermelon shell and walnut shell. Adsorption. 2013;19(2-4):675–685. [Google Scholar]
- 170.Latinwo G., Agarry S. Removal of phenol from paint wastewater by adsorption onto phosphoric acid activated carbon produced from coconut shell: isothermal and kinetic modelling studies. Chem. Mater. Res. 2015;7:123–137. https://core.ac.uk/reader/234666650 [Google Scholar]
- 171.Boudrahem F., Soualah A., Aissani-Benissad F. Pb (II) and Cd (II) removal from aqueous solutions using activated carbon developed from coffee residue activated with phosphoric acid and zinc chloride. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2011;56(5):1946–1955. [Google Scholar]
- 172.Itoh K.-i., et al. Application of silica gel-supported polyphosphoric acid (PPA/SiO2) as a reusable solid acid catalyst to the synthesis of 3-benzoylisoxazoles and isoxazolines. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52(51):6892–6895. [Google Scholar]
- 173.Sairan N.S., Subki N.S., Nik Yusoff N.R. Removal of Pb (II), Fe (II) and Zn (II) using activated carbon produced from foxtail palm fruit chemically activated by KOH and H3PO4. J. Trop. Res. Sustain. Sci. 2019;7(1):19–22. http://www.jtrss.org/ [Google Scholar]
- 174.Igwegbe C.A., et al. Adsorption of cationic dyes on Dacryodes edulis seeds activated carbon modified using phosphoric acid and sodium chloride. Environ. Proc. 2020;7(4):1151–1171. [Google Scholar]
- 175.Kim H., et al. Removal efficiencies of manganese and iron using pristine and phosphoric acid pre-treated biochars made from banana peels. Water. 2020;12(4):1173. [Google Scholar]
- 176.Senarathna D.T.T.D., et al. Aqueous lead removal under optimized conditions using phosphoric acid activated coconut coir activated carbon. Am. J. Anal. Chem. 2020;11(12):389. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ [Google Scholar]
- 177.Fagbayigbo B.O., et al. Removal of PFOA and PFOS from aqueous solutions using activated carbon produced from Vitis vinifera leaf litter. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 2017;24(14):13107–13120. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8912-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Abdulrazak S., Hussaini K., Sani H. Evaluation of removal efficiency of heavy metals by low-cost activated carbon prepared from African palm fruit. Appl. Water Sci. 2017;7(6):3151–3155. [Google Scholar]
- 179.Dotson A.D., Metz D., Linden K.G. UV/H2O2 treatment of drinking water increases post-chlorination DBP formation. Water Res. 2010;44(12):3703–3713. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Golea D., et al. Influence of granular activated carbon media properties on natural organic matter and disinfection by-product precursor removal from drinking water. Water Res. 2020;174 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Marambio-Jones C., Hoek E. A review of the antibacterial effects of silver nanomaterials and potential implications for human health and the environment. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2010;12(5):1531–1551. [Google Scholar]
- 182.Schreiber B., et al. Adsorption of dissolved organic matter onto activated carbon—the influence of temperature, absorption wavelength, and molecular size. Water Res. 2005;39(15):3449–3456. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Fairey J.L., Speitel G.E., Katz L.E. Impact of natural organic matter on monochloramine reduction by granular activated carbon: the role of porosity and electrostatic surface properties. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40(13):4268–4273. doi: 10.1021/es060111j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Meng A., et al. Nanochain architectures constructed by hydrangea-like MoS2 nanoflowers and SiC nanowires: synthesis, mechanism and the enhanced electrochemical and wide-temperature properties as an additive-free negative electrode for supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2018;746:93–101. [Google Scholar]
- 185.Lota G., et al. The application of activated carbon modified by ozone treatment for energy storage. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2016;20(10):2857–2864. [Google Scholar]
- 186.Bastos-Neto M., et al. A theoretical and experimental study of charge and discharge cycles in a storage vessel for adsorbed natural gas. Adsorption. 2005;11(2):147–157. [Google Scholar]
- 187.Krishnan R.Y., et al. Advanced thermochemical conversion of algal biomass to liquid and gaseous biofuels: a comprehensive review of recent advances. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments. 2022;52 [Google Scholar]
- 188.Marco-Lozar J., et al. Activated carbon monoliths for gas storage at room temperature. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012;5(12):9833–9842. [Google Scholar]
- 189.Kunowsky M., et al. Hydrogen storage in CO2-activated amorphous nanofibers and their monoliths. Carbon. 2012;50(3):1407–1416. [Google Scholar]
- 190.El-Sharkawy I.I., et al. Investigation of natural gas storage through activated carbon. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2015;60(11):3215–3223. [Google Scholar]
- 191.Karnib M., et al. Heavy metals removal using activated carbon, silica and silica activated carbon composite. Energy Proc. 2014;50:113–120. [Google Scholar]
- 192.Hua M., et al. Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: a review. J. Haz. Mat. 2012;211:317–331. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Anirudhan T., Sreekumari S. Adsorptive removal of heavy metal ions from industrial effluents using activated carbon derived from waste coconut buttons. J. Environ. Sci. 2011;23(12):1989–1998. doi: 10.1016/s1001-0742(10)60515-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.El Morabet R. 2019. Effects of Outdoor Air Pollution on Human Health. [Google Scholar]
- 195.Heusinkveld H.J., et al. Neurodegenerative and neurological disorders by small inhaled particles. Neurotoxicology. 2016;56:94–106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2016.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Li W., et al. Utilization of sargassum based activated carbon as a potential waste derived catalyst for low temperature selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxides. Fuel. 2015;160:35–42. [Google Scholar]
- 197.Wang L., et al. Preparation of activated coke by carbonization, activation, ammonization and thermal treatment of sewage sludge and waste biomass for SO2 absorption applications. Fuel Proc. Technol. 2022;231 [Google Scholar]
- 198.Meryemoglu B., et al. Preparation of activated carbon supported Pt catalysts and optimization of their catalytic activities for hydrogen gas production from the hydrothermal treatment of biomass-derived compounds. Int. J. Hyd. Energy. 2012;37(23):17844–17852. [Google Scholar]
- 199.Fangaj E., Ceyhan A.A. Apricot Kernel shell waste treated with phosphoric acid used as a green, metal-free catalyst for hydrogen generation from hydrolysis of sodium borohydride. Int. J. Hyd. Energy. 2020;45(35):17104–17117. [Google Scholar]
- 200.Ferreira L.M., et al. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery; 2020. Adsorption Performance of Activated Charcoal from castor Seed Cake Prepared by Chemical Activation with Phosphoric Acid; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 201.Jun T.Y., et al. Effect of activation temperature and heating duration on physical characteristics of activated carbon prepared from agriculture waste. Environ. Asia. 2010;3:143–148. www.tshe.org/EA [Google Scholar]
- 202.Mohammed J., et al. Adsorption of benzene and toluene onto KOH activated coconut shell based carbon treated with NH3. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation. 2015;102:245–255. [Google Scholar]
- 203.Wang X., et al. Optimization of mesoporous activated carbon from coconut shells by chemical activation with phosphoric acid. BioResources. 2013;8(4):6184–6195. https://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/ [Google Scholar]
- 204.Jayabalakrishnan R.M., et al. Coconut shell derived ZnCl2 activated carbon for malachite green dye removal. Water Sci. Technol. 2021;83(5):1167–1182. doi: 10.2166/wst.2021.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Li Y., et al. A simple and highly effective process for the preparation of activated carbons with high surface area. Mat. Chem. Physics. 2011;127(3):495–500. [Google Scholar]
- 206.Zhu Y.C.Y., et al. Application studies of activated carbon derived from rice husks produced by chemical-thermal process–A review. Adv. Coll. Interf. Sci. 2011;163:39–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2011.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Zhang X., et al. Preparation of Fe/activated carbon directly from rice husk pyrolytic carbon and its application in catalytic hydroxylation of phenol. RSC Adv. 2015;5(7):4984–4992. [Google Scholar]
- 208.Afdhol M., et al. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing; 2017. Preparation of activated carbon from palm shells using KOH and ZnCl2 as the activating agent.https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/180/1/012282/meta [Google Scholar]
- 209.Rugayah A., Astimar A., Norzita N. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from palm kernel shell by physical activation with steam. J. Oil Palm Res. 2014;26(3):251–264. http://jopr.mpob.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/joprv26sep2014-rugayah.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 210.Olivares-Marin M., et al. Thermal behaviour of lignocellulosic material in the presence of phosphoric acid. Influence of the acid content in the initial solution. Carbon. 2006;11(44):2347–2350. [Google Scholar]
- 211.Hu Z., Qi L. 15.5-Sample digestion methods. Treatise on Geochem. 2014;1:87–109. (second ed.). Elsevier, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No data was used for the research described in the article.





