Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2022 Nov 22;13(47):11029–11035. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03040

Laser Spectroscopy of Aromatic Molecules with Optical Cycling Centers: Strontium(I) Phenoxides

Guanming Lao , Guo-Zhu Zhu †,*, Claire E Dickerson , Benjamin L Augenbraun ¶,§, Anastassia N Alexandrova ‡,, Justin R Caram ‡,, Eric R Hudson †,∥,, Wesley C Campbell †,∥,
PMCID: PMC9720742  PMID: 36413655

Abstract

graphic file with name jz2c03040_0006.jpg

We report the production and spectroscopic characterization of strontium(I) phenoxide (SrOC6H5 or SrOPh) and variants featuring electron-withdrawing groups designed to suppress vibrational excitation during spontaneous emission from the electronically excited state. Optical cycling closure of these species, which is the decoupling of the vibrational state changes from spontaneous optical decay, is found by dispersed laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy to be high, in accordance with theoretical predictions. A high-resolution, rotationally resolved laser excitation spectrum is recorded for SrOPh, allowing the estimation of spectroscopic constants and identification of candidate optical cycling transitions for future work. The results confirm the promise of strontium phenoxides for laser cooling and quantum state detection at the single-molecule level.


Optical cycling transitions in atoms allow laser cooling of the center-of-mass motion, laser state preparation, and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) state detection—open-channel operations at the heart of many promising applications of quantum technology, including quantum computation,1,2 atomic clocks,3,4 and quantum simulation.5,6 Optical cycling and cooling schemes have also been demonstrated in diatomic7,8 and even some small polyatomic molecules,9,10 including SrF,11 YO,12 CaF,13,14 YbF,15 BaF,16,17 MgF,18 AlF,19 SrOH,20 CaOH,21,22 YbOH,23 and CaOCH3.24 Because they possess rich internal structures and complex interactions, molecules provide new opportunities in studies of dark matter detection,25,26 measurement of electron’s electric-dipole moment,2729 parity violation tests,30,31 and changes to fundamental constants.32,33 The somewhat unexpected atom-like transitions supporting optical cycling and cooling in these small molecules have inspired searches for similar transitions in complex polyatomic molecules with an M–O–R structure,9,10,3440 where M is an alkaline-earth metal atom ionically bonded to oxygen (O) forming an optical cycling center (OCC) and R is a molecular ligand.3640 In these molecules, the remaining metal-centered radical electron forms the highest-occupied and the lowest-unoccupied molecular orbitals, HOMO and LUMO. For molecules with R having strong electron-withdrawing capability, the HOMO and LUMO are localized on M, which typically indicates that the OCC is highly decoupled from the vibrational degrees of freedom. As a result, the diagonal vibrational branching ratio (VBR, which is to say the probability that spontaneous decay occurs on the 0–0 transition) is high, indicating that the spontaneous emission happens without a vibrational state change. This allows such molecules to repeatedly scatter photons before being pumped to the vibrational dark states, furnishing mechanical control and state detection of single molecules via laser illumination.

Since optical cycling in this motif is predicted to be enhanced by the electron-withdrawing strength of the ligand, the diagonal VBR of M–O–R molecules could be tuned by functionalizing the ligand to promote this effect.34,39 For example, according to a recent measurement of the VBRs,41 laser cooling of CaOPh-3,4,5-F3 (Ph, phenyl group) appears feasible from the perspective that each molecule could scatter ≈1000 photons with six to eight lasers. Compared to CaOPh, the three substitutions of H → F in the 3, 4, and 5 positions on the ring enhance the electron-withdrawing strength of the ligand, rendering the Ca atom more ionic and thus suppressing spontaneous decays to excited vibrational states of the electronic ground state.

As molecules of M–O–R type, the strontinum variants, SrOPh-X, were also predicted to have high and tunable diagonal VBRs.39 Compared to CaOPh-X, although the diagonal VBRs were predicted to be lower, the predicted difference is of the same order as the variation in measured VBRs of various calcium species,41 suggesting that some of the strontium species may show better cycle closure if the variation is due to M-specific features. Further, Sr-containing molecules allow exploration of the role of strong spin–orbit coupling42 and nuclear spin structures.43 For the strontium variants, the excitation and repumping wavelengths can be directly produced by diode lasers.

Here, we report the production and spectroscopic characterization of strontium(I) phenoxide (SrOPh) and its derivatives, SrOPh-X (X = 3-CH3, 3-F, 3-CF3, and 3,4,5-F3, see Scheme 1). Gas-phase molecules are produced by the reaction of Sr atoms generated by the ablation of Sr metal with the corresponding organic precursor vapor and cooled via collisions with the neon buffer gas in a cryogenic cell at a temperature of ≈23 K. The first two electronically excited states, which have been theoretically proposed for optical cycling and laser cooling, are identified and the respective vibrational decays are observed using the dispersed laser-induced fluorescence (DLIF) spectroscopy. Details of the experimental and theoretical methods can be found in the Supporting Information.44 The diagonal vibrational branching ratios are estimated to be 0.82–0.96, which indicates promise for laser cooling with a handful of vibrational repump lasers. To further characterize candidate optical cycling transitions, we have measured the rotationally resolved excitation spectrum for the Inline graphic transition of SrOPh and obtained the molecular constants by fitting using PGOPHER.45

Scheme 1. Molecular Structures of Strontium(I) Phenoxide and Its Derivatives Studied in This Work.

Scheme 1

In the calcium and strontium phenoxides, transitions to the two lowest electronic states (Inline graphic and Inline graphic, Figure 1a) have been proposed for laser cooling, since almost all photon scatters go back to the vibrationless ground state Inline graphic.39,41,46Figure 1b shows the measured transition energies of all molecules show a linear correlation with the acid dissociation constants, pKa, of the precursor phenol. This linear trend has recently also been observed for CaOPh-X molecules.41,46 A lower pKa implies higher electron-withdrawing capability of the R–O ligand, which pulls the single electron away from the Sr atom, making it more ionic and increasing the HOMO–LUMO gap.39 Also shown are excitation energies calculated by time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT)44 which give a similar trend but systematically undershoot the excitation energies likely due to self-interaction error and approximate treatment of electronic correlation.47 The calculated energy gap of Inline graphic (36–68 cm–1) is much smaller than the measured gap (300–324 cm–1), similar to what was observed in CaOPh-X species but with a wider difference between the theory and measurement.41 The theory–experiment discrepancies of the Inline graphic energy gap are likely due to the lack of spin–orbit coupling (SOC) in calculations48 and the wider difference in SrOPh-X is due to the stronger SOC effects in Sr.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Schematic energy levels of the transitions proposed for laser cooling. The molecular orbital and the respective symmetry of each state are illustrated for SrOPh with a C2v point group. For molecules with Cs symmetry, the symmetries would be A′ Inline graphic, A″Inline graphic, and A′(Inline graphic). The principle inertial axes are also given. (b) Excitation energy versus pKa for Inline graphic and Inline graphic transitions for all studied species in an increasing order of ligand pKa.41 The linear fits of the experimental values yield Inline graphic (16380 – 142.8 × pKa) cm–1 and Inline graphic= (16777 – 152.3 × pKa) cm–1.

To measure the VBRs from the two electronic states, we performed DLIF spectroscopy of all molecules. Electronic excitation is provided by a pulsed dye laser (PDL) tuned to the 0–0 line, and the spectrometer grating was scanned in time (over repeated excitation) to select the wavelength of LIF photons sent to a photomultiplier tube (PMT).44Figure 2 shows the measured DLIF spectra of SrOPh while those of other species are presented in Figure S1. Figure 2a shows the spectrum of à 2B2 → X̃ 2A1 of SrOPh (Figure 1a) at an excitation of 669.06 nm. The strongest peak at the origin, labeled as Inline graphic, is due to the diagonal decay from Inline graphic to Inline graphic. The strong peak at −440 cm–1 is from excited atomic Sr created during laser ablation.49 The peak at −238 cm–1 is assigned to the strongest off-diagonal stretching mode ν3 (theory 241 cm–1) and the weak peak at −54 cm–1 is assigned to the low-frequency bending mode ν2 (theory 56 cm–1). The other two weak peaks at −100 cm–1 and −297 cm–1, which do not match the calculated frequencies of any fundamental vibrational modes, are assigned to the overtone of the bending mode A220 and a combinational mode of Inline graphic, respectively.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) and (b) Dispersed spectra of Inline graphic and Inline graphic, respectively, of SrOPh excited by pulsed dye laser and measured by a spectrometer coupled with PMT. The experimental curves (black) are fitted with the Gaussian functions (red). The positions of the blue, vertical lines illustrate the theoretical frequencies while the intensities show the vibrational branching ratios of different vibrational modes of SrOPh. The Sr impurity peak in (a) is from the Sr emission of Inline graphic at 689 nm.49 The assignments of all resolved vibrational peaks are indicated.

Figure 2b shows the spectrum of B̃ 2B1 → X̃ 2A1 of SrOPh (Figure 1a) at 655.68 nm. Aside from the strongest diagonal peak Inline graphic, four peaks are observed. The strong peak with a shift of −300 cm–1 is due to a diagonal decay Inline graphic from the Inline graphic state. The origin of the appearance of Inline graphic when exciting the Inline graphic is unknown but could be due to the collisional relaxation from Inline graphic to Inline graphic followed by fluorescence decay to the ground state Inline graphic.41,46,50 The identification of this feature as originating from the Inline graphic state is further confirmed by the observation of the decay to the stretching mode ν3 at −534 cm–1 from Inline graphic. The other two weak peaks, −238 cm–1 and −55 cm–1, are due to the vibrational decay to the stretching mode ν3 and bending mode ν2, respectively. The full width at half-maximum of all peaks is ≈22 cm–1 mainly due to the spectrometer resolution of approximately 20 cm–1. Another measurement was performed using a narrow-band continuous-wave (cw) laser to excite the Inline graphic of SrOPh and an electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) camera to capture the fluorescence photons dispersed by the spectrometer. This technique obtained a better spectral resolution (≈5 cm–1), allowing the resolution of the combinational vibrational mode of Inline graphic at −300 cm−1 (Figure S2), which is overlapped with the diagonal decay Inline graphic from the Inline graphic state and not observed in Figure 2b. The experimental and theoretical vibrational frequencies of all resolved fundamental modes are summarized in Table S1.

The relative heights of the peaks Inline graphic and Inline graphic in Figure 2 and Figures S1 and S2 imply that both transitions are very diagonal with few vibration-changing decays. To extract the VBRs, all peaks are fitted with Gaussian functions, as shown by the red traces in Figure 2, and the peak areas are extracted from the fits to obtain VBRs. A strict definition of VBR requires measurements of all vibrational decays. Due to finite measurement sensitivity Inline graphic and detection range (<600 cm–1), while we predict that our measurement is sensitive to the dominant leakage channels, the possibility of undetected decays contributes a systematic uncertainty on the measured VBRs.

For the vibrational decays that were identified for each molecule, and the ratios of line intensities to the total intensities of all observed peaks are presented in Figure 3a. In both electronic transitions, the relative ratios of observed peaks show good agreement with the calculated VBRs.44 The vibrational decays to the strongest off-diagonal Sr–O stretching mode (ν3, ν4, ν5, or ν6) and the low-frequency bending mode (ν1 or ν2) have been observed for all molecules. The theoretical VBRs of the low-frequency bending modes are underestimated, possibly due to the vibronic coupling and anharmonicity effect not considered in the calculation.39,41 SrOPh also shows unpredicted decays to the overtone of mode ν2 and a combinational mode ν2ν3 where the intensities could be from the vibronic coupling. The intensity ratios of all observed decays are summarized in Table S2. Figure 3b plots the estimated VBRs of the diagonal peak 000 of each transition as a function of ligand pKa. The scaled 00 VBRs are obtained by adding the estimated contribution of the unobserved peaks predicted by the theory to the normalized intensity ratios of the observed 000 intensities.44 Both SrOPh-3-F and SrOPh-3,4,5-F3 molecules show VBRs >95% for the Inline graphic transition and >90% for the Inline graphic transition, while SrOPh has the lowest VBR of 82.2% for Inline graphic transition. Due to the predominantly localized excitations and previous benchmarking results,3941,44,46 we find TD-DFT is sufficient to predict VBR trends in SrOPh optical cycling species. However, we find our theoretical calculations still lack important dynamic correlation and spin–orbit coupling which will affect important branching pathways. For high-level predictions beyond simple trends, we suggest choosing methods which can improve upon dynamic correlation systematically, such as coupled-cluster,3436 and incorporating the Breit–Pauli operator to compute spin–orbit coupling effects.51

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Intensity ratio of observed decays for Inline graphic and Inline graphic transitions. Error bars are statistical errors from Gaussian fits. The vibrational label νi indicates the final vibrational modes of the Inline graphic state. ν0 implys the decay that does not change the vibrational state. (b) Scaled 000 VBRs as a function of pKa of all species. The scaling adds the contributions of those unobserved vibrational decays predicted by the theory to the observed intensity ratios of 00 in (a). Error bars include the statistical errors from Gaussian fits and the systematic errors from the unobserved peaks.44

The VBRs for SrOPh-3-CF3 shows the largest discrepancy between the calculation and the measurement, potentially due to the larger vibronic mixing between the Inline graphic and Inline graphic caused by the low symmetry and large electron inductive effect from the CF3 group.41 The error bars include both the statistical uncertainties from the Gaussian fit and the systematic uncertainty estimate from the unobserved peaks. Three additional systematic errors, including signal drift during measurement, the wavelength response of the spectrometer, and the diagonal excitation from the vibrationally excited states, are estimated to be a few percent in total.44

To further investigate the potential of these species for optical cycling, a high-resolution excitation spectrum (obtained by collecting LIF as a continuous-wave (cw) excitation laser is scanned) of SrOPh for the Inline graphic transition is recorded at a step size of 25–50 MHz in a cryogenic buffer-gas beam (CBGB)44,52 and fitted with PGOPHER,45 as presented in Figure 4. Since SrOPh is an asymmetric-top molecule, the rotational states are labeled as Inline graphic, where N is the rotational angular momentum and a and c label the inertial axes lying along the Sr–O bond and perpendicular to the molecular plane (Figure 1a), respectively, Ka and Kc are the projection of N onto the two axes in the prolate and oblate limits, respectively. Figure 4a shows the expansion of the two congested bands at 15238.5 cm–1, while Figure 4 panels b and c show two well-resolved rotational bands. A full rotational analysis is difficult due to the high density of rotational lines in the middle of the spectrum (Figure 4a), but the individually resolved lines (Figure 4b,c) make it possible to fit the spectrum to extract some spectroscopic constants.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

High-resolution rotationally resolved excitation spectrum of the Inline graphic transition of SrOPh. The upper trace (blue) shows the experimental spectrum and the lower trace (black) is the simulated spectrum with a Gaussian line width of 70 MHz and a rotational temperature Tsim = 2.5 K. Insets a, b, and c are expansions of some local features. (a) displays detailed spectrum near 0–0 transition, while (b) and (c) show the Ka = 3 ← Ka = 2 and Ka = 4 ← Ka = 3 rotational bandheads, respectively. (d) shows the inferred position of the candidate rotational cycling transition between the spin-rotation manifold of the N″ = 1 state and N′ = 0 state.

Using a custom program to fit the spectral contour and PGOPHER(45) to refine and iterate the line assignments,44 we have assigned nearly 400 rotational transitions and obtained the final fitted spectrum given as the black traces in Figure 4. The fitting is in agreement with the experimental measurement for the middle broad bands and the Ka = 3 ← Ka = 2 and Ka = 4 ← Ka = 3 bands, as expanded in Figure 4a–c. The best fit molecular constants, including the transition energy, rotational constants, spin-rotation constants and centrifugal distortion corrections, are reported in Table 1. The measured rotational constants are in good agreement with the calculated values. The spin-rotation constant ϵaa in the ground state is too small to be determined from the spectrum, and ϵaa in the Inline graphic state is large because of the coupling to the Inline graphic state. The larger value of spin-rotation constant than the rotational constants in Inline graphic implies a strong SOC effect apart from the direct coupling between the spin and molecular rotation. Based on the second order perturbation theory53,54 and the measured constants, the SOC constant in SrOPh is estimated to be ≈272 cm–1, which is close to that of SrOH (A2Π, ≈265 cm–1).55 The large SOC also dominates the energy separation of Inline graphic, elucidating the discrepancy between the calculation and the measurement in Figure 1b.44,48

Table 1. Molecular Constants of SrOPh Obtained by Fitting the Rotationally-Resolved Excitation Spectrum in Figure 4 with PGOPHER (All Quantities in cm–1)a.

  2B1
2A1
constant exp cal exp cal
T0 15238.7155(23)      
A 0.1923(6) 0.1915 0.1934(11) 0.1916
1/2(B + C) 0.01520(36) 0.01522 0.01508(36) 0.01513
(B – C) × 103 1.28(20) 1.21 1.13(12) 1.19
ϵaa –0.6894(6)      
ϵbb × 103 34(10)   1.3(1.7)  
ϵcc × 103 16(7)   –1.3(1.8)  
DN × 108 –14(8)   –14(8)  
DNK × 107 –5(11)   –28(23)  
DK × 104 1.3(5)   5.2(1.1)  
HK × 106 3.0(1.4)   21(4)  
a

T0: electronic transition energy. A, B, C: molecular rotational constants. ϵaa, ϵbb, ϵcc: spin-rotation coupling constants. DN, DNK, DK: centrifugal distortion constants. HK: sextic centrifugal distortion correction.

While involving more parameters has been able to enhance the accuracy of fitting, many parameters in such scenarios tended to fit to values consistent with zero, and we therefore omit those in our analysis. The large error bars of some of the centrifugal distortion constants are mainly due to the uncertainty of the line assignment near the 0–0 transition. The rotational temperature from the fit is 2.5 K.44 The colder temperature is due to the free expansion of neon buffer gas from the cryogenic cell (≈23 K) to form a beam with SrOPh entrained.52 As the SrOPh Inline graphic transition dipole moment lies along the principle axis c (Figure 1b), the rotationally closed photon cycling transition is the c-type transition Inline graphic,38 which is estimated to be at 456.8391(7) THz based on the fitting results and shown in Figure 4a,d.

In summary, we have produced strontium(I) phenoxide (SrOPh) and derivatives featuring electron-withdrawing groups in a cryogenic cell. Two proposed laser cooling transitions (Inline graphic and Inline graphic) of each molecule have been identified and the transition energies show linear trends as the ligand pKa, which can be used to look for transitions of new molecules containing Sr. The overall vibrational branching ratios considering contributions of unobserved vibrational decays are estimated to be 82.2% to 95.8%. Among them, SrOPh-3-F and SrOPh-3,4,5-F3 molecules show diagonal VBRs >95%, potentially enabling laser cooling with fewer than ten vibrational repumping lasers. The rotationally resolved spectrum for the Inline graphic transition of SrOPh is presented and molecular constants are obtained. The spin–orbit interaction that couples the Inline graphic and Inline graphic states is estimated to be 275 cm–1, which has a strong effect on the energy splitting of Inline graphic. The rotational closure transition for optical cycling is estimated to be centered near 456.8391(7) THz. This work paves the way for optical cycling of SrOPh and other large molecules using diode lasers.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank John Doyle and Timothy Steimle for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the AFOSR (grant no. FA9550-20-1-0323), the NSF (grant no. OMA-2016245, PHY-2207985 and DGE-2034835), NSF Center for Chemical Innovation Phase I (grant no. CHE-20223563). This research is funded in part by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. Computational resources were provided by XSEDE and UCLA IDRE shared cluster hoffman2.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03040.

  • Experimental and theoretical methods, discussion of DLIF spectra of other molecules, error analysis of VBRs, fitting of high-resolution excitation spectrum, spin–orbit coupling effect in SrOPh, Tables S1–S5 of frequencies, intensity ratios, systematic error budget, intensity ratios and scaled VBRs, and excitation energies and FC factors, and Figures S1–S4 of fluorescence spectra and decay traces and of line assignments (PDF)

  • Transparent Peer Review report available (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

jz2c03040_si_001.pdf (2.8MB, pdf)

References

  1. Pino J. M.; Dreiling J. M.; Figgatt C.; Gaebler J. P.; Moses S. A.; Allman M.; Baldwin C.; Foss-Feig M.; Hayes D.; Mayer K.; et al. Demonstration of the Trapped-Ion Quantum CCD Computer Architecture. Nature 2021, 592, 209–213. 10.1038/s41586-021-03318-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Debnath S.; Linke N. M.; Figgatt C.; Landsman K. A.; Wright K.; Monroe C. Demonstration of a Small Programmable Quantum Computer with Atomic Qubits. Nature 2016, 536, 63–66. 10.1038/nature18648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ludlow A. D.; Boyd M. M.; Ye J.; Peik E.; Schmidt P. O. Optical Atomic Clocks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2015, 87, 637. 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.637. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brewer S. M.; Chen J.-S.; Hankin A. M.; Clements E. R.; Chou C. W.; Wineland D. J.; Hume D. B.; Leibrandt D. R. 27Al+ Quantum-Logic Clock with a Systematic Uncertainty below 10–18. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 033201. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.033201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Schäfer F.; Fukuhara T.; Sugawa S.; Takasu Y.; Takahashi Y. Tools for Quantum Simulation with Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2020, 2, 411–425. 10.1038/s42254-020-0195-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Monroe C.; Campbell W. C.; Duan L.-M.; Gong Z.-X.; Gorshkov A. V.; Hess P. W.; Islam R.; Kim K.; Linke N. M.; Pagano G.; et al. Programmable Quantum Simulations of Spin Systems with Trapped Ions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2021, 93, 025001. 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Di Rosa M. D. Laser-Cooling Molecules. Eur. Phys. J. D 2004, 31, 395–402. 10.1140/epjd/e2004-00167-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stuhl B. K.; Sawyer B. C.; Wang D.; Ye J. Magneto-Optical Trap for Polar Molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 243002. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.243002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Isaev T. A.; Berger R. Polyatomic Candidates for Cooling of Molecules with Lasers from Simple Theoretical Concepts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 063006. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.063006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kozyryev I.; Baum L.; Matsuda K.; Doyle J. M. Proposal for Laser Cooling of Complex Polyatomic Molecules. ChemPhysChem 2016, 17, 3641–3648. 10.1002/cphc.201601051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shuman E. S.; Barry J. F.; DeMille D. Laser Cooling of a Diatomic Molecule. Nature 2010, 467, 820–823. 10.1038/nature09443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hummon M. T.; Yeo M.; Stuhl B. K.; Collopy A. L.; Xia Y.; Ye J. 2D Magneto-Optical Trapping of Diatomic Molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 143001. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.143001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhelyazkova V.; Cournol A.; Wall T. E.; Matsushima A.; Hudson J. J.; Hinds E.; Tarbutt M.; Sauer B. Laser Cooling and Slowing of CaF Molecules. Phys. Rev. A 2014, 89, 053416. 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.053416. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Anderegg L.; Augenbraun B. L.; Chae E.; Hemmerling B.; Hutzler N. R.; Ravi A.; Collopy A.; Ye J.; Ketterle W.; Doyle J. M. Radio Frequency Magneto-Optical Trapping of CaF with High Density. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 103201. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.103201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lim J.; Almond J.; Trigatzis M.; Devlin J.; Fitch N.; Sauer B.; Tarbutt M.; Hinds E. Laser Cooled YbF Molecules for Measuring the Electron’s Electric Dipole Moment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 123201. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.123201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Albrecht R.; Scharwaechter M.; Sixt T.; Hofer L.; Langen T. Buffer-Gas Cooling, High-Resolution Spectroscopy, and Optical Cycling of Barium Monofluoride Molecules. Phys. Rev. A 2020, 101, 013413. 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.013413. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang Y.; Zeng Z.; Liang Q.; Bu W.; Yan B. Doppler Cooling of Buffer-Gas-Cooled Barium Monofluoride Molecules. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 105, 033307. 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.033307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gu R.; Yan K.; Wu D.; Wei J.; Xia Y.; Yin J. Radiative Force from Optical Cycling on Magnesium Monofluoride. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 105, 042806. 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.042806. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hofsäss S.; Doppelbauer M.; Wright S.; Kray S.; Sartakov B.; Pérez-Ríos J.; Meijer G.; Truppe S. Optical Cycling of AlF Molecules. New J. Phys. 2021, 23, 075001. 10.1088/1367-2630/ac06e5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kozyryev I.; Baum L.; Matsuda K.; Augenbraun B. L.; Anderegg L.; Sedlack A. P.; Doyle J. M. Sisyphus Laser Cooling of a Polyatomic Molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 173201. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.173201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Baum L.; Vilas N. B.; Hallas C.; Augenbraun B. L.; Raval S.; Mitra D.; Doyle J. M. 1D Magneto-Optical Trap of Polyatomic Molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 133201. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.133201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Vilas N. B.; Hallas C.; Anderegg L.; Robichaud P.; Winnicki A.; Mitra D.; Doyle J. M. Magneto-Optical Trapping and Sub-Doppler Cooling of a Polyatomic Molecule. Nature 2022, 606, 70–74. 10.1038/s41586-022-04620-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Augenbraun B. L.; Lasner Z. D.; Frenett A.; Sawaoka H.; Miller C.; Steimle T. C.; Doyle J. M. Laser-Cooled Polyatomic Molecules for Improved Electron Electric Dipole Moment Searches. New J. Phys. 2020, 22, 022003. 10.1088/1367-2630/ab687b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mitra D.; Vilas N. B.; Hallas C.; Anderegg L.; Augenbraun B. L.; Baum L.; Miller C.; Raval S.; Doyle J. M. Direct Laser Cooling of a Symmetric Top Molecule. Science 2020, 369, 1366–1369. 10.1126/science.abc5357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Graham P. W.; Rajendran S. Axion Dark Matter Detection with Cold Molecules. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 055013. 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.055013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Van Tilburg K.; Leefer N.; Bougas L.; Budker D. Search for Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter with Atomic Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 115, 011802. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.011802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hudson J. J.; Kara D. M.; Smallman I.; Sauer B. E.; Tarbutt M. R.; Hinds E. A. Improved Measurement of the Shape of the Electron. Nature 2011, 473, 493–496. 10.1038/nature10104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Baron J.; Campbell W. C.; DeMille D.; Doyle J. M.; Gabrielse G.; Gurevich Y. V.; Hess P. W.; Hutzler N. R.; Kirilov E.; Kozyryev I.; et al. Order of Magnitude Smaller Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron. Science 2014, 343, 269–272. 10.1126/science.1248213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Andreev V.; Ang D. G.; DeMille D.; Doyle J. M.; Gabrielse G.; Haefner J.; Hutzler N.; Meisenhelder C.; O’Leary B. R.; et al. Improved Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron. Nature 2018, 562, 355–360. 10.1038/s41586-018-0599-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tokunaga S. K.; Stoeffler C.; Auguste F.; Shelkovnikov A.; Daussy C.; Amy-Klein A.; Chardonnet C.; Darquié B. Probing Weak Force-Induced Parity Violation by High-Resolution Mid-Infrared Molecular Spectroscopy. Mol. Phys. 2013, 111, 2363–2373. 10.1080/00268976.2013.821186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Daussy C.; Marrel T.; Amy-Klein A.; Nguyen C.; Bordé C. J.; Chardonnet C. Limit on the Parity Nonconserving Energy Difference between the Enantiomers of a Chiral Molecule by Laser Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 1554. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1554. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shelkovnikov A.; Butcher R. J.; Chardonnet C.; Amy-Klein A. Stability of the Proton-to-Electron Mass Ratio. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 150801. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.150801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Truppe S.; Hendricks R.; Tokunaga S.; Lewandowski H.; Kozlov M.; Henkel C.; Hinds E.; Tarbutt M. A Search for Varying Fundamental Constants Using Hertz-Level Frequency Measurements of Cold CH Molecules. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2600. 10.1038/ncomms3600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ivanov M. V.; Bangerter F. H.; Krylov A. I. Towards a Rational Design of Laser-Coolable Molecules: Insights from Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster Calculations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 19447–19457. 10.1039/C9CP03914G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ivanov M. V.; Gulania S.; Krylov A. I. Two Cycling Centers in One Molecule: Communication by Through-Bond Interactions and Entanglement of the Unpaired Electrons. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 1297–1304. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ivanov M. V.; Bangerter F. H.; Wójcik P.; Krylov A. I. Toward Ultracold Organic Chemistry: Prospects of Laser Cooling Large Organic Molecules. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 6670–6676. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kłos J.; Kotochigova S. Prospects for Laser Cooling of Polyatomic Molecules with Increasing Complexity. Phys. Rev. Res. 2020, 2, 013384. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013384. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Augenbraun B. L.; Doyle J. M.; Zelevinsky T.; Kozyryev I. Molecular Asymmetry and Optical Cycling: Laser Cooling Asymmetric Top Molecules. Phys. Rev. X 2020, 10, 031022. 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.031022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Dickerson C. E.; Guo H.; Shin A. J.; Augenbraun B. L.; Caram J. R.; Campbell W. C.; Alexandrova A. N. Franck-Condon Tuning of Optical Cycling Centers by Organic Functionalization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 123002. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.123002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dickerson C. E.; Guo H.; Zhu G.-Z.; Hudson E. R.; Caram J. R.; Campbell W. C.; Alexandrova A. N. Optical Cycling Functionalization of Arenes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 3989–3995. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhu G.-Z.; Mitra D.; Augenbraun B. L.; Dickerson C. E.; Frim M. J.; Lao G.; Lasner Z. D.; Alexandrova A. N.; Campbell W. C.; Caram J. R.; et al. Functionalizing Aromatic Compounds with Optical Cycling Centers. Nature Chem. 2022, 14, 995–999. 10.1038/s41557-022-00998-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kolkowitz S.; Bromley S.; Bothwell T.; Wall M.; Marti G.; Koller A.; Zhang X.; Rey A.; Ye J. Spin–Orbit-Coupled Fermions in an Optical Lattice Clock. Nature 2017, 542, 66–70. 10.1038/nature20811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang X.; Bishof M.; Bromley S. L.; Kraus C. V.; Safronova M. S.; Zoller P.; Rey A. M.; Ye J. Spectroscopic Observation of SU (N)-Symmetric Interactions in Sr Orbital Magnetism. Science 2014, 345, 1467–1473. 10.1126/science.1254978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. See the Supporting Information for more details, including the experimental and theoretical methods, discussion of DLIF spectra of other molecules, error analysis, data fitting of high-resolution excitation spectrum, spin–orbit coupling effect in SrOPh, Tables S1–S5 and Figures S1–S4.
  45. Western C. M. PGOPHER: A Program for Simulating Rotational, Vibrational and Electronic Spectra. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 2017, 186, 221–242. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.04.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mitra D.; Lasner Z. D.; Zhu G.-Z.; Dickerson C. E.; Augenbraun B. L.; Bailey A. D.; Alexandrova A. N.; Campbell W. C.; Caram J. R.; Hudson E. R.; et al. Pathway Towards Optical Cycling and Laser Cooling of Functionalized Arenes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 7029–7035. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Acharya A.; Chaudhuri S.; Batista V. S. Can TDDFT Describe Excited Electronic States of Naphthol Photoacids? A Closer Look with EOM-CCSD. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 867–876. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Liu J. Rotational and Fine Structure of Open-Shell Molecules in Nearly Degenerate Electronic States. J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 148, 124112. 10.1063/1.5021946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kramida A.; Ralchenko Y.; Reader J.. N. A. T. NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.9), [Online]; National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2021; https://physics.nist.gov/asd.
  50. Paul A. C.; Sharma K.; Reza M. A.; Telfah H.; Miller T. A.; Liu J. Laser-Induced Fluorescence and Dispersed-Fluorescence Spectroscopy of the Ã2E2A1 Transition of Jet-Cooled Calcium Methoxide (CaOCH3) radicals. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 151, 134303. 10.1063/1.5104278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Marian C. M. Spin–Orbit Coupling and Intersystem Crossing in Molecules. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 187–203. 10.1002/wcms.83. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hutzler N. R.; Lu H.-I.; Doyle J. M. The Buffer Gas Beam: An Intense, Cold, and Slow Source for Atoms and Molecules. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 4803–4827. 10.1021/cr200362u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Van Vleck J. H. The Coupling of Angular Momentum Vectors in Molecules. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1951, 23, 213. 10.1103/RevModPhys.23.213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Morbi Z.; Zhao C.; Bernath P. F. A High-Resolution Analysis of the 2A12A1 Transition of CaNH2: Pure Precession in Polyatomic Molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 106, 4860–4868. 10.1063/1.473535. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Presunka P. I.; Coxon J. A. Laser Excitation and Dispersed Fluorescence Investigations of the Ã2Π – 2Σ+ System of SrOH. Chem. Phys. 1995, 190, 97–111. 10.1016/0301-0104(94)00330-D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Kramida A.; Ralchenko Y.; Reader J.. N. A. T. NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.9), [Online]; National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2021; https://physics.nist.gov/asd.

Supplementary Materials

jz2c03040_si_001.pdf (2.8MB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES