Abstract

We report the production and spectroscopic characterization of strontium(I) phenoxide (SrOC6H5 or SrOPh) and variants featuring electron-withdrawing groups designed to suppress vibrational excitation during spontaneous emission from the electronically excited state. Optical cycling closure of these species, which is the decoupling of the vibrational state changes from spontaneous optical decay, is found by dispersed laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy to be high, in accordance with theoretical predictions. A high-resolution, rotationally resolved laser excitation spectrum is recorded for SrOPh, allowing the estimation of spectroscopic constants and identification of candidate optical cycling transitions for future work. The results confirm the promise of strontium phenoxides for laser cooling and quantum state detection at the single-molecule level.
Optical cycling transitions in atoms allow laser cooling of the center-of-mass motion, laser state preparation, and laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) state detection—open-channel operations at the heart of many promising applications of quantum technology, including quantum computation,1,2 atomic clocks,3,4 and quantum simulation.5,6 Optical cycling and cooling schemes have also been demonstrated in diatomic7,8 and even some small polyatomic molecules,9,10 including SrF,11 YO,12 CaF,13,14 YbF,15 BaF,16,17 MgF,18 AlF,19 SrOH,20 CaOH,21,22 YbOH,23 and CaOCH3.24 Because they possess rich internal structures and complex interactions, molecules provide new opportunities in studies of dark matter detection,25,26 measurement of electron’s electric-dipole moment,27−29 parity violation tests,30,31 and changes to fundamental constants.32,33 The somewhat unexpected atom-like transitions supporting optical cycling and cooling in these small molecules have inspired searches for similar transitions in complex polyatomic molecules with an M–O–R structure,9,10,34−40 where M is an alkaline-earth metal atom ionically bonded to oxygen (O) forming an optical cycling center (OCC) and R is a molecular ligand.36−40 In these molecules, the remaining metal-centered radical electron forms the highest-occupied and the lowest-unoccupied molecular orbitals, HOMO and LUMO. For molecules with R having strong electron-withdrawing capability, the HOMO and LUMO are localized on M, which typically indicates that the OCC is highly decoupled from the vibrational degrees of freedom. As a result, the diagonal vibrational branching ratio (VBR, which is to say the probability that spontaneous decay occurs on the 0–0 transition) is high, indicating that the spontaneous emission happens without a vibrational state change. This allows such molecules to repeatedly scatter photons before being pumped to the vibrational dark states, furnishing mechanical control and state detection of single molecules via laser illumination.
Since optical cycling in this motif is predicted to be enhanced by the electron-withdrawing strength of the ligand, the diagonal VBR of M–O–R molecules could be tuned by functionalizing the ligand to promote this effect.34,39 For example, according to a recent measurement of the VBRs,41 laser cooling of CaOPh-3,4,5-F3 (Ph, phenyl group) appears feasible from the perspective that each molecule could scatter ≈1000 photons with six to eight lasers. Compared to CaOPh, the three substitutions of H → F in the 3, 4, and 5 positions on the ring enhance the electron-withdrawing strength of the ligand, rendering the Ca atom more ionic and thus suppressing spontaneous decays to excited vibrational states of the electronic ground state.
As molecules of M–O–R type, the strontinum variants, SrOPh-X, were also predicted to have high and tunable diagonal VBRs.39 Compared to CaOPh-X, although the diagonal VBRs were predicted to be lower, the predicted difference is of the same order as the variation in measured VBRs of various calcium species,41 suggesting that some of the strontium species may show better cycle closure if the variation is due to M-specific features. Further, Sr-containing molecules allow exploration of the role of strong spin–orbit coupling42 and nuclear spin structures.43 For the strontium variants, the excitation and repumping wavelengths can be directly produced by diode lasers.
Here, we report the production
and spectroscopic characterization
of strontium(I) phenoxide (SrOPh) and its derivatives, SrOPh-X (X
= 3-CH3, 3-F, 3-CF3, and 3,4,5-F3, see Scheme 1). Gas-phase
molecules are produced by the reaction of Sr atoms generated by the
ablation of Sr metal with the corresponding organic precursor vapor
and cooled via collisions with the neon buffer gas in a cryogenic
cell at a temperature of ≈23 K. The first two electronically
excited states, which have been theoretically proposed for optical
cycling and laser cooling, are identified and the respective vibrational
decays are observed using the dispersed laser-induced fluorescence
(DLIF) spectroscopy. Details of the experimental and theoretical methods
can be found in the Supporting Information.44 The diagonal vibrational branching
ratios are estimated to be 0.82–0.96, which indicates promise
for laser cooling with a handful of vibrational repump lasers. To
further characterize candidate optical cycling transitions, we have
measured the rotationally resolved excitation spectrum for the
transition of SrOPh and obtained the molecular
constants by fitting using PGOPHER.45
Scheme 1. Molecular Structures of Strontium(I) Phenoxide and Its Derivatives Studied in This Work.

In the calcium and strontium phenoxides, transitions
to the two
lowest electronic states (
and
, Figure 1a) have been proposed for laser cooling, since almost
all photon scatters go back to the vibrationless ground state
.39,41,46Figure 1b shows the
measured transition energies of all molecules show a linear correlation
with the acid dissociation constants, pKa, of the precursor phenol. This linear trend has recently also been
observed for CaOPh-X molecules.41,46 A lower pKa implies higher electron-withdrawing capability of the
R–O– ligand, which pulls the single electron
away from the Sr atom, making it more ionic and increasing the HOMO–LUMO
gap.39 Also shown are excitation energies
calculated by time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT)44 which give a similar trend but systematically
undershoot the excitation energies likely due to self-interaction
error and approximate treatment of electronic correlation.47 The calculated energy gap of
(36–68 cm–1) is
much smaller than the measured gap (300–324 cm–1), similar to what was observed in CaOPh-X species but with a wider
difference between the theory and measurement.41 The theory–experiment discrepancies of the
energy gap are likely due to the lack of
spin–orbit coupling (SOC) in calculations48 and the wider difference in SrOPh-X is due to the stronger
SOC effects in Sr.
Figure 1.

(a) Schematic energy levels of the transitions proposed
for laser
cooling. The molecular orbital and the respective symmetry of each
state are illustrated for SrOPh with a C2v point group. For molecules with Cs symmetry, the symmetries would be A′
, A″
, and A′(
). The principle inertial axes are also
given. (b) Excitation energy versus pKa for
and
transitions for all studied species in
an increasing order of ligand pKa.41 The linear fits of the experimental values yield
(16380 – 142.8 × pKa) cm–1 and
= (16777 – 152.3 × pKa) cm–1.
To measure the VBRs from the two electronic states,
we performed
DLIF spectroscopy of all molecules. Electronic excitation is provided
by a pulsed dye laser (PDL) tuned to the 0–0 line, and the
spectrometer grating was scanned in time (over repeated excitation)
to select the wavelength of LIF photons sent to a photomultiplier
tube (PMT).44Figure 2 shows the measured DLIF spectra of SrOPh
while those of other species are presented in Figure
S1. Figure 2a shows the spectrum of à 2B2 →
X̃ 2A1 of SrOPh (Figure 1a) at an excitation of 669.06 nm. The strongest
peak at the origin, labeled as
, is due to the diagonal decay from
to
. The strong peak at −440 cm–1 is from excited atomic Sr created during laser ablation.49 The peak at −238 cm–1 is assigned to the strongest off-diagonal stretching mode ν3 (theory 241 cm–1) and the weak peak at
−54 cm–1 is assigned to the low-frequency
bending mode ν2 (theory 56 cm–1). The other two weak peaks at −100 cm–1 and −297 cm–1, which do not match the calculated
frequencies of any fundamental vibrational modes, are assigned to
the overtone of the bending mode A220 and a combinational mode of
, respectively.
Figure 2.

(a) and (b) Dispersed
spectra of
and
, respectively, of SrOPh excited by pulsed
dye laser and measured by a spectrometer coupled with PMT. The experimental
curves (black) are fitted with the Gaussian functions (red). The positions
of the blue, vertical lines illustrate the theoretical frequencies
while the intensities show the vibrational branching ratios of different
vibrational modes of SrOPh. The Sr impurity peak in (a) is from the
Sr emission of
at 689 nm.49 The assignments of all resolved vibrational peaks are indicated.
Figure 2b shows
the spectrum of B̃ 2B1 → X̃ 2A1 of SrOPh (Figure 1a) at 655.68 nm. Aside from the strongest diagonal
peak
, four peaks are observed. The strong peak
with a shift of −300 cm–1 is due to a diagonal
decay
from the
state. The origin of the appearance of
when exciting the
is unknown but could be due to the collisional
relaxation from
to
followed by fluorescence decay to the ground
state
.41,46,50 The identification of this feature as originating from the
state is further confirmed by the observation
of the decay to the stretching mode ν3 at −534
cm–1 from
. The other two weak peaks, −238
cm–1 and −55 cm–1, are
due to the vibrational decay to the stretching mode ν3 and bending mode ν2, respectively. The full width
at half-maximum of all peaks is ≈22 cm–1 mainly
due to the spectrometer resolution of approximately 20 cm–1. Another measurement was performed using a narrow-band continuous-wave
(cw) laser to excite the
of SrOPh and an electron-multiplying charge-coupled
device (EMCCD) camera to capture the fluorescence photons dispersed
by the spectrometer. This technique obtained a better spectral resolution
(≈5 cm–1), allowing the resolution of the
combinational vibrational mode of
at −300 cm−1 (Figure S2), which is overlapped with the diagonal
decay
from the
state and not observed in Figure 2b. The experimental and theoretical
vibrational frequencies of all resolved fundamental modes are summarized
in Table S1.
The relative heights
of the peaks
and
in Figure 2 and Figures S1 and S2 imply
that both transitions are very diagonal with few vibration-changing
decays. To extract the VBRs, all peaks are fitted with Gaussian functions,
as shown by the red traces in Figure 2, and the peak areas are extracted from the fits to
obtain VBRs. A strict definition of VBR requires measurements of all
vibrational decays. Due to finite measurement sensitivity
and detection range (<600 cm–1), while we predict that our measurement is sensitive to the dominant
leakage channels, the possibility of undetected decays contributes
a systematic uncertainty on the measured VBRs.
For the vibrational
decays that were identified for each molecule,
and the ratios of line intensities to the total intensities of all observed peaks are presented in Figure 3a. In both electronic transitions, the relative
ratios of observed peaks show good agreement with the calculated VBRs.44 The vibrational decays to the strongest off-diagonal
Sr–O stretching mode (ν3, ν4, ν5, or ν6) and the low-frequency
bending mode (ν1 or ν2) have been
observed for all molecules. The theoretical VBRs of the low-frequency
bending modes are underestimated, possibly due to the vibronic coupling
and anharmonicity effect not considered in the calculation.39,41 SrOPh also shows unpredicted decays to the overtone of mode ν2 and a combinational mode ν2ν3 where the intensities could be from the vibronic coupling. The intensity
ratios of all observed decays are summarized in Table S2. Figure 3b plots the estimated VBRs of the diagonal peak 000 of each transition
as a function of ligand pKa. The scaled
00 VBRs are
obtained by adding the estimated contribution of the unobserved peaks
predicted by the theory to the normalized intensity ratios of the
observed 000 intensities.44 Both SrOPh-3-F and SrOPh-3,4,5-F3 molecules show VBRs >95% for the
transition and >90% for the
transition, while SrOPh has the lowest
VBR of 82.2% for
transition. Due to the predominantly localized
excitations and previous benchmarking results,39−41,44,46 we find TD-DFT is sufficient
to predict VBR trends in SrOPh optical cycling species. However, we
find our theoretical calculations still lack important dynamic correlation
and spin–orbit coupling which will affect important branching
pathways. For high-level predictions beyond simple trends, we suggest
choosing methods which can improve upon dynamic correlation systematically,
such as coupled-cluster,34−36 and incorporating the Breit–Pauli
operator to compute spin–orbit coupling effects.51
Figure 3.
(a) Intensity ratio of observed decays for
and
transitions. Error bars are statistical
errors from Gaussian fits. The vibrational label νi indicates the final vibrational modes of the
state. ν0 implys the decay
that does not change the vibrational state. (b) Scaled 000 VBRs as a function
of pKa of all species. The scaling adds
the contributions of those unobserved vibrational decays predicted
by the theory to the observed intensity ratios of 00 in (a). Error bars include the
statistical errors from Gaussian fits and the systematic errors from
the unobserved peaks.44
The VBRs for SrOPh-3-CF3 shows the largest
discrepancy
between the calculation and the measurement, potentially due to the
larger vibronic mixing between the
and
caused by the low symmetry and large electron
inductive effect from the CF3 group.41 The error bars include both the statistical uncertainties
from the Gaussian fit and the systematic uncertainty estimate from
the unobserved peaks. Three additional systematic errors, including
signal drift during measurement, the wavelength response of the spectrometer,
and the diagonal excitation from the vibrationally excited states,
are estimated to be a few percent in total.44
To further investigate the potential of these species for
optical
cycling, a high-resolution excitation spectrum (obtained by collecting
LIF as a continuous-wave (cw) excitation laser is scanned) of SrOPh
for the
transition is recorded at a step size of
25–50 MHz in a cryogenic buffer-gas beam (CBGB)44,52 and fitted with PGOPHER,45 as
presented in Figure 4. Since SrOPh is an asymmetric-top molecule, the rotational states
are labeled as
, where N is the rotational
angular momentum and a and c label
the inertial axes lying along the Sr–O bond and perpendicular
to the molecular plane (Figure 1a), respectively, Ka and Kc are the
projection of N onto the two axes in the prolate
and oblate limits, respectively. Figure 4a shows the expansion of the two congested
bands at 15238.5 cm–1, while Figure 4 panels b and c show two well-resolved rotational
bands. A full rotational analysis is difficult due to the high density
of rotational lines in the middle of the spectrum (Figure 4a), but the individually resolved
lines (Figure 4b,c)
make it possible to fit the spectrum to extract some spectroscopic
constants.
Figure 4.
High-resolution rotationally resolved excitation spectrum of the
transition of SrOPh. The upper trace (blue)
shows the experimental spectrum and the lower trace (black) is the
simulated spectrum with a Gaussian line width of 70 MHz and a rotational
temperature Tsim = 2.5 K. Insets a, b,
and c are expansions of some local features. (a) displays detailed
spectrum near 0–0 transition, while (b) and (c) show the Ka′ = 3 ← Ka = 2 and Ka′ = 4 ← Ka = 3 rotational bandheads, respectively. (d) shows
the inferred position of the candidate rotational cycling transition
between the spin-rotation manifold of the N″
= 1 state and N′ = 0 state.
Using a custom program to fit the spectral contour
and PGOPHER(45) to refine and iterate
the line assignments,44 we have assigned
nearly 400 rotational transitions
and obtained the final fitted spectrum given as the black traces in Figure 4. The fitting is
in agreement with the experimental measurement for the middle broad
bands and the Ka′ = 3 ← Ka = 2 and Ka′ = 4 ← Ka = 3 bands, as expanded in Figure 4a–c. The best
fit molecular constants, including the transition energy, rotational
constants, spin-rotation constants and centrifugal distortion corrections,
are reported in Table 1. The measured rotational constants are in good agreement with the
calculated values. The spin-rotation constant ϵaa in the ground state is too small to be determined
from the spectrum, and ϵaa in the
state is large because of the coupling
to the
state. The larger value of spin-rotation
constant than the rotational constants in
implies a strong SOC effect apart from
the direct coupling between the spin and molecular rotation. Based
on the second order perturbation theory53,54 and the measured
constants, the SOC constant in SrOPh is estimated to be ≈272
cm–1, which is close to that of SrOH (A2Π, ≈265 cm–1).55 The large SOC also dominates the energy separation of
, elucidating the discrepancy between the
calculation and the measurement in Figure 1b.44,48
Table 1. Molecular Constants of SrOPh Obtained by Fitting the Rotationally-Resolved Excitation Spectrum in Figure 4 with PGOPHER (All Quantities in cm–1)a.
| B̃ 2B1 |
X̃ 2A1 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| constant | exp | cal | exp | cal |
| T0 | 15238.7155(23) | |||
| A | 0.1923(6) | 0.1915 | 0.1934(11) | 0.1916 |
| 1/2(B + C) | 0.01520(36) | 0.01522 | 0.01508(36) | 0.01513 |
| (B – C) × 103 | 1.28(20) | 1.21 | 1.13(12) | 1.19 |
| ϵaa | –0.6894(6) | |||
| ϵbb × 103 | 34(10) | 1.3(1.7) | ||
| ϵcc × 103 | 16(7) | –1.3(1.8) | ||
| DN × 108 | –14(8) | –14(8) | ||
| DNK × 107 | –5(11) | –28(23) | ||
| DK × 104 | 1.3(5) | 5.2(1.1) | ||
| HK × 106 | 3.0(1.4) | 21(4) | ||
T0: electronic transition energy. A, B, C: molecular rotational constants. ϵaa, ϵbb, ϵcc: spin-rotation coupling constants. DN, DNK, DK: centrifugal distortion constants. HK: sextic centrifugal distortion correction.
While involving more parameters has been able to enhance
the accuracy
of fitting, many parameters in such scenarios tended to fit to values
consistent with zero, and we therefore omit those in our analysis.
The large error bars of some of the centrifugal distortion constants
are mainly due to the uncertainty of the line assignment near the
0–0 transition. The rotational temperature from the fit is
2.5 K.44 The colder temperature is due
to the free expansion of neon buffer gas from the cryogenic cell (≈23
K) to form a beam with SrOPh entrained.52 As the SrOPh
transition dipole moment lies along the
principle axis c (Figure 1b), the rotationally closed photon cycling
transition is the c-type transition
,38 which is
estimated to be at 456.8391(7) THz based on the fitting results and
shown in Figure 4a,d.
In summary, we have produced strontium(I) phenoxide (SrOPh) and
derivatives featuring electron-withdrawing groups in a cryogenic cell.
Two proposed laser cooling transitions (
and
) of each molecule have been identified
and the transition energies show linear trends as the ligand pKa, which can be used to look for transitions
of new molecules containing Sr. The overall vibrational branching
ratios considering contributions of unobserved vibrational decays
are estimated to be 82.2% to 95.8%. Among them, SrOPh-3-F and SrOPh-3,4,5-F3 molecules show diagonal VBRs >95%, potentially enabling
laser
cooling with fewer than ten vibrational repumping lasers. The rotationally
resolved spectrum for the
transition of SrOPh is presented and molecular
constants are obtained. The spin–orbit interaction that couples
the
and
states is estimated to be 275 cm–1, which has a strong effect on the energy splitting of
. The rotational closure transition for
optical cycling is estimated to be centered near 456.8391(7) THz.
This work paves the way for optical cycling of SrOPh and other large
molecules using diode lasers.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank John Doyle and Timothy Steimle for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the AFOSR (grant no. FA9550-20-1-0323), the NSF (grant no. OMA-2016245, PHY-2207985 and DGE-2034835), NSF Center for Chemical Innovation Phase I (grant no. CHE-20223563). This research is funded in part by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. Computational resources were provided by XSEDE and UCLA IDRE shared cluster hoffman2.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03040.
Experimental and theoretical methods, discussion of DLIF spectra of other molecules, error analysis of VBRs, fitting of high-resolution excitation spectrum, spin–orbit coupling effect in SrOPh, Tables S1–S5 of frequencies, intensity ratios, systematic error budget, intensity ratios and scaled VBRs, and excitation energies and FC factors, and Figures S1–S4 of fluorescence spectra and decay traces and of line assignments (PDF)
Transparent Peer Review report available (PDF)
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Pino J. M.; Dreiling J. M.; Figgatt C.; Gaebler J. P.; Moses S. A.; Allman M.; Baldwin C.; Foss-Feig M.; Hayes D.; Mayer K.; et al. Demonstration of the Trapped-Ion Quantum CCD Computer Architecture. Nature 2021, 592, 209–213. 10.1038/s41586-021-03318-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Debnath S.; Linke N. M.; Figgatt C.; Landsman K. A.; Wright K.; Monroe C. Demonstration of a Small Programmable Quantum Computer with Atomic Qubits. Nature 2016, 536, 63–66. 10.1038/nature18648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ludlow A. D.; Boyd M. M.; Ye J.; Peik E.; Schmidt P. O. Optical Atomic Clocks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2015, 87, 637. 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.637. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Brewer S. M.; Chen J.-S.; Hankin A. M.; Clements E. R.; Chou C. W.; Wineland D. J.; Hume D. B.; Leibrandt D. R. 27Al+ Quantum-Logic Clock with a Systematic Uncertainty below 10–18. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 033201. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.033201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schäfer F.; Fukuhara T.; Sugawa S.; Takasu Y.; Takahashi Y. Tools for Quantum Simulation with Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2020, 2, 411–425. 10.1038/s42254-020-0195-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Monroe C.; Campbell W. C.; Duan L.-M.; Gong Z.-X.; Gorshkov A. V.; Hess P. W.; Islam R.; Kim K.; Linke N. M.; Pagano G.; et al. Programmable Quantum Simulations of Spin Systems with Trapped Ions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2021, 93, 025001. 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Di Rosa M. D. Laser-Cooling Molecules. Eur. Phys. J. D 2004, 31, 395–402. 10.1140/epjd/e2004-00167-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stuhl B. K.; Sawyer B. C.; Wang D.; Ye J. Magneto-Optical Trap for Polar Molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 243002. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.243002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Isaev T. A.; Berger R. Polyatomic Candidates for Cooling of Molecules with Lasers from Simple Theoretical Concepts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 063006. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.063006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozyryev I.; Baum L.; Matsuda K.; Doyle J. M. Proposal for Laser Cooling of Complex Polyatomic Molecules. ChemPhysChem 2016, 17, 3641–3648. 10.1002/cphc.201601051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shuman E. S.; Barry J. F.; DeMille D. Laser Cooling of a Diatomic Molecule. Nature 2010, 467, 820–823. 10.1038/nature09443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hummon M. T.; Yeo M.; Stuhl B. K.; Collopy A. L.; Xia Y.; Ye J. 2D Magneto-Optical Trapping of Diatomic Molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 143001. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.143001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhelyazkova V.; Cournol A.; Wall T. E.; Matsushima A.; Hudson J. J.; Hinds E.; Tarbutt M.; Sauer B. Laser Cooling and Slowing of CaF Molecules. Phys. Rev. A 2014, 89, 053416. 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.053416. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Anderegg L.; Augenbraun B. L.; Chae E.; Hemmerling B.; Hutzler N. R.; Ravi A.; Collopy A.; Ye J.; Ketterle W.; Doyle J. M. Radio Frequency Magneto-Optical Trapping of CaF with High Density. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 103201. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.103201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lim J.; Almond J.; Trigatzis M.; Devlin J.; Fitch N.; Sauer B.; Tarbutt M.; Hinds E. Laser Cooled YbF Molecules for Measuring the Electron’s Electric Dipole Moment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 123201. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.123201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Albrecht R.; Scharwaechter M.; Sixt T.; Hofer L.; Langen T. Buffer-Gas Cooling, High-Resolution Spectroscopy, and Optical Cycling of Barium Monofluoride Molecules. Phys. Rev. A 2020, 101, 013413. 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.013413. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y.; Zeng Z.; Liang Q.; Bu W.; Yan B. Doppler Cooling of Buffer-Gas-Cooled Barium Monofluoride Molecules. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 105, 033307. 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.033307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gu R.; Yan K.; Wu D.; Wei J.; Xia Y.; Yin J. Radiative Force from Optical Cycling on Magnesium Monofluoride. Phys. Rev. A 2022, 105, 042806. 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.042806. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hofsäss S.; Doppelbauer M.; Wright S.; Kray S.; Sartakov B.; Pérez-Ríos J.; Meijer G.; Truppe S. Optical Cycling of AlF Molecules. New J. Phys. 2021, 23, 075001. 10.1088/1367-2630/ac06e5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kozyryev I.; Baum L.; Matsuda K.; Augenbraun B. L.; Anderegg L.; Sedlack A. P.; Doyle J. M. Sisyphus Laser Cooling of a Polyatomic Molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 173201. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.173201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baum L.; Vilas N. B.; Hallas C.; Augenbraun B. L.; Raval S.; Mitra D.; Doyle J. M. 1D Magneto-Optical Trap of Polyatomic Molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 133201. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.133201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vilas N. B.; Hallas C.; Anderegg L.; Robichaud P.; Winnicki A.; Mitra D.; Doyle J. M. Magneto-Optical Trapping and Sub-Doppler Cooling of a Polyatomic Molecule. Nature 2022, 606, 70–74. 10.1038/s41586-022-04620-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Augenbraun B. L.; Lasner Z. D.; Frenett A.; Sawaoka H.; Miller C.; Steimle T. C.; Doyle J. M. Laser-Cooled Polyatomic Molecules for Improved Electron Electric Dipole Moment Searches. New J. Phys. 2020, 22, 022003. 10.1088/1367-2630/ab687b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mitra D.; Vilas N. B.; Hallas C.; Anderegg L.; Augenbraun B. L.; Baum L.; Miller C.; Raval S.; Doyle J. M. Direct Laser Cooling of a Symmetric Top Molecule. Science 2020, 369, 1366–1369. 10.1126/science.abc5357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graham P. W.; Rajendran S. Axion Dark Matter Detection with Cold Molecules. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 055013. 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.055013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Van Tilburg K.; Leefer N.; Bougas L.; Budker D. Search for Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter with Atomic Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 115, 011802. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.011802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hudson J. J.; Kara D. M.; Smallman I.; Sauer B. E.; Tarbutt M. R.; Hinds E. A. Improved Measurement of the Shape of the Electron. Nature 2011, 473, 493–496. 10.1038/nature10104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baron J.; Campbell W. C.; DeMille D.; Doyle J. M.; Gabrielse G.; Gurevich Y. V.; Hess P. W.; Hutzler N. R.; Kirilov E.; Kozyryev I.; et al. Order of Magnitude Smaller Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron. Science 2014, 343, 269–272. 10.1126/science.1248213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andreev V.; Ang D. G.; DeMille D.; Doyle J. M.; Gabrielse G.; Haefner J.; Hutzler N.; Meisenhelder C.; O’Leary B. R.; et al. Improved Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron. Nature 2018, 562, 355–360. 10.1038/s41586-018-0599-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tokunaga S. K.; Stoeffler C.; Auguste F.; Shelkovnikov A.; Daussy C.; Amy-Klein A.; Chardonnet C.; Darquié B. Probing Weak Force-Induced Parity Violation by High-Resolution Mid-Infrared Molecular Spectroscopy. Mol. Phys. 2013, 111, 2363–2373. 10.1080/00268976.2013.821186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Daussy C.; Marrel T.; Amy-Klein A.; Nguyen C.; Bordé C. J.; Chardonnet C. Limit on the Parity Nonconserving Energy Difference between the Enantiomers of a Chiral Molecule by Laser Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 1554. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1554. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shelkovnikov A.; Butcher R. J.; Chardonnet C.; Amy-Klein A. Stability of the Proton-to-Electron Mass Ratio. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 150801. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.150801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Truppe S.; Hendricks R.; Tokunaga S.; Lewandowski H.; Kozlov M.; Henkel C.; Hinds E.; Tarbutt M. A Search for Varying Fundamental Constants Using Hertz-Level Frequency Measurements of Cold CH Molecules. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2600. 10.1038/ncomms3600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ivanov M. V.; Bangerter F. H.; Krylov A. I. Towards a Rational Design of Laser-Coolable Molecules: Insights from Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster Calculations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 19447–19457. 10.1039/C9CP03914G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ivanov M. V.; Gulania S.; Krylov A. I. Two Cycling Centers in One Molecule: Communication by Through-Bond Interactions and Entanglement of the Unpaired Electrons. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 1297–1304. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ivanov M. V.; Bangerter F. H.; Wójcik P.; Krylov A. I. Toward Ultracold Organic Chemistry: Prospects of Laser Cooling Large Organic Molecules. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 6670–6676. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kłos J.; Kotochigova S. Prospects for Laser Cooling of Polyatomic Molecules with Increasing Complexity. Phys. Rev. Res. 2020, 2, 013384. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013384. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Augenbraun B. L.; Doyle J. M.; Zelevinsky T.; Kozyryev I. Molecular Asymmetry and Optical Cycling: Laser Cooling Asymmetric Top Molecules. Phys. Rev. X 2020, 10, 031022. 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.031022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dickerson C. E.; Guo H.; Shin A. J.; Augenbraun B. L.; Caram J. R.; Campbell W. C.; Alexandrova A. N. Franck-Condon Tuning of Optical Cycling Centers by Organic Functionalization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 123002. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.123002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dickerson C. E.; Guo H.; Zhu G.-Z.; Hudson E. R.; Caram J. R.; Campbell W. C.; Alexandrova A. N. Optical Cycling Functionalization of Arenes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 3989–3995. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu G.-Z.; Mitra D.; Augenbraun B. L.; Dickerson C. E.; Frim M. J.; Lao G.; Lasner Z. D.; Alexandrova A. N.; Campbell W. C.; Caram J. R.; et al. Functionalizing Aromatic Compounds with Optical Cycling Centers. Nature Chem. 2022, 14, 995–999. 10.1038/s41557-022-00998-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kolkowitz S.; Bromley S.; Bothwell T.; Wall M.; Marti G.; Koller A.; Zhang X.; Rey A.; Ye J. Spin–Orbit-Coupled Fermions in an Optical Lattice Clock. Nature 2017, 542, 66–70. 10.1038/nature20811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang X.; Bishof M.; Bromley S. L.; Kraus C. V.; Safronova M. S.; Zoller P.; Rey A. M.; Ye J. Spectroscopic Observation of SU (N)-Symmetric Interactions in Sr Orbital Magnetism. Science 2014, 345, 1467–1473. 10.1126/science.1254978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- See the Supporting Information for more details, including the experimental and theoretical methods, discussion of DLIF spectra of other molecules, error analysis, data fitting of high-resolution excitation spectrum, spin–orbit coupling effect in SrOPh, Tables S1–S5 and Figures S1–S4.
- Western C. M. PGOPHER: A Program for Simulating Rotational, Vibrational and Electronic Spectra. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 2017, 186, 221–242. 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.04.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mitra D.; Lasner Z. D.; Zhu G.-Z.; Dickerson C. E.; Augenbraun B. L.; Bailey A. D.; Alexandrova A. N.; Campbell W. C.; Caram J. R.; Hudson E. R.; et al. Pathway Towards Optical Cycling and Laser Cooling of Functionalized Arenes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022, 13, 7029–7035. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Acharya A.; Chaudhuri S.; Batista V. S. Can TDDFT Describe Excited Electronic States of Naphthol Photoacids? A Closer Look with EOM-CCSD. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2018, 14, 867–876. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J. Rotational and Fine Structure of Open-Shell Molecules in Nearly Degenerate Electronic States. J. Chem. Phys. 2018, 148, 124112. 10.1063/1.5021946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kramida A.; Ralchenko Y.; Reader J.. N. A. T. NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.9), [Online]; National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2021; https://physics.nist.gov/asd.
- Paul A. C.; Sharma K.; Reza M. A.; Telfah H.; Miller T. A.; Liu J. Laser-Induced Fluorescence and Dispersed-Fluorescence Spectroscopy of the Ã2E – X̃2A1 Transition of Jet-Cooled Calcium Methoxide (CaOCH3) radicals. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 151, 134303. 10.1063/1.5104278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marian C. M. Spin–Orbit Coupling and Intersystem Crossing in Molecules. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 187–203. 10.1002/wcms.83. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hutzler N. R.; Lu H.-I.; Doyle J. M. The Buffer Gas Beam: An Intense, Cold, and Slow Source for Atoms and Molecules. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 4803–4827. 10.1021/cr200362u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Vleck J. H. The Coupling of Angular Momentum Vectors in Molecules. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1951, 23, 213. 10.1103/RevModPhys.23.213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Morbi Z.; Zhao C.; Bernath P. F. A High-Resolution Analysis of the C̃2A1 – X̃2A1 Transition of CaNH2: Pure Precession in Polyatomic Molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 106, 4860–4868. 10.1063/1.473535. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Presunka P. I.; Coxon J. A. Laser Excitation and Dispersed Fluorescence Investigations of the Ã2Π – X̃2Σ+ System of SrOH. Chem. Phys. 1995, 190, 97–111. 10.1016/0301-0104(94)00330-D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Kramida A.; Ralchenko Y.; Reader J.. N. A. T. NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.9), [Online]; National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2021; https://physics.nist.gov/asd.


