Seizures in patients with IDH-mutated lower grade gliomas

Abstract

Purpose

Most patients with Lower Grade Gliomas (LGG) present with epileptic seizures. Since the advent of molecular diagnostics, more homogenous sub-entities have emerged, including the isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutated (IDH-mutated) astrocytomas and 1p19q-codeleted oligodendrogliomas. We aimed to describe the occurrence of seizures in patients with molecularly defined LGG pre- and postoperatively and to analyze factors affecting seizure status postoperatively.

Methods

A population-based cohort of 130 adult patients with IDH-mutated WHO grade 2 or 3 astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas was assessed pertaining to seizure burden before and after surgery.

Results

Fifty-four (79.4%) patients with astrocytoma and 45 (72.6%) patients with oligodendroglioma had a history of seizures before surgery. At 12 months postoperatively, 51/67 (76.1%) patients with astrocytoma and 47/62 (75.8%) patients with oligodendrogliomas were seizure free. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, lower extent of resection (EOR) (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97–1.00, p = 0.01) and insular tumor location (OR 5.02; 95% CI 1.01–24.87, p = 0.048) were associated with presence of seizures within 1 year postoperatively in the entire LGG cohort. In sub-entities, EOR was in a similar manner associated with seizures postoperatively in astrocytomas (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96–0.99, p < 0.01) but not in oligodendrogliomas (p = 0.34).

Conclusion

Our results are well in line with data published for non-molecularly defined LGG with a large proportion of patients being seizure free at 1 year postoperative. Better seizure outcome was observed with increased EOR in astrocytomas, but this association was absent in oligodendrogliomas.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-022-04158-6.

Introduction

Lower grade gliomas (LGG) are slow-growing, infiltrating tumors that often cause epileptic seizures as the initial symptom [1]. The patients are young to middle-aged adults, typically in the middle of their careers and family lives. Even though rarely marked by overt neurological deficits from the tumors, epileptic seizures and effects from antiepileptic drugs may exert strong influence over the patient´s everyday life or ability to work and the unpredictable nature of seizures may provoke fear and loss of control. Epileptic seizure burden is one of the factors that affect quality of life the most in patients with LGG [2, 3]

Earlier works on LGG and epilepsy are largely from the pre-molecular era, where some included both WHO grade 1 and 2 tumors [4], while yet other reports analyze IDH-mutated (IDH-mut) and IDH-wildtype (IDH-wt) morphological grade 2 gliomas together. [5–7]

Molecular characterization of LGG has been found to be of major clinical importance and is since 2016 part of the WHO diagnostic criteria [8]. We now consider the IDH-mut the hallmark of the true LGG [8, 9]. With better classification, several authors note that the clinical importance of the distinction between WHO grade 2 and grade 3 IDH-mut LGG is of lesser importance in prognostication [10, 11]. In the light of these updates, it makes sense analyzing the more homogenous group of purely IDH-mut glioma with respect to epileptic seizures. Further, data for astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas should, when possible, be presented separately since these tumor subtypes differ in several aspects. The objective of the present study was to describe the pre- and postoperative seizure burden in IDH-mut diffuse grade 2 and 3 gliomas with and without 1p19q-codeletion. In addition, we wanted to analyze potential factors affecting postoperative seizure outcome for these patients.

Methods

Study population

Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with LGG within the western healthcare region in Sweden with a first-time surgery (resective or biopsy) between January 2010 and December 2020 were consecutively identified. Patients with a histomolecular diagnosis of IDH-mutated WHO grade 2 or 3 astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma were included in the study.

Data collection

Medical records and radiological images were used to identify patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Preoperative use of AEDs (AED preop) was defined as using at least one AED at the day of surgery. Importantly, primary prophylaxis with AEDs perioperatively was not used in the studied clinical setting. Time to surgery was calculated from the diagnostic scan date. Eloquent tumor location was assessed according to Chang et al. [12] For volume segmentation, semi-automatic segmentations with the software 3DSlicer version 4.6.2 or newer was made as described earlier [11, 13]. For biopsied patients, residual tumor volume was registered as equal to the preoperative tumor volume if no postoperative segmentation was made. Gross total resection (GTR) was defined as a residual tumor volume of 0 ml on T2/FLAIR-weighted postoperative MRI.

The pathological evaluation was initially made according to the WHO criteria valid at the time of surgery and when needed, reclassified as previously described so that IDH-mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status were known for all patients. [14]

Seizure outcome

Medical records were searched from the time of tumor discovery up to 2 years after surgery, to identify events of seizures. The most common way of reporting seizure outcome in the LGG research is through the Engel classification system [15], either applying Engel class 1 as seizure freedom postoperatively [6, 16, 17] or referring to class 1a only as seizure freedom [5, 18, 19]. The Engel class 1 definition (allowing for example “non-disabling” or a few disabling seizures) can be argued to be too permissive to be a suitable outcome measurement for the current population with their often-better preoperative seizure situation and shorter follow-up than for the patients undergoing pure epilepsy surgery, for whom the classification system was originally created [15]. In the present study, we chose to define seizure freedom as entirely free from seizures or aura (Engel class 1a/ILAE definition of seizure freedom) [20] with an only exception for seizures within the first week after surgery, ascribing these to the surgical trauma.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were done with SPSS, version 28 or newer (Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance level was set to p < 0.05. All tests were two-sided. Central tendencies are presented as means ± SD, or median with first and third quartile if skewed. Dichotomous data were analyzed with Fisher Exact test. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Epileptic seizures within the first year after surgery were set as outcome variable. Independent variables were chosen based on previous studies and presumed clinical relevance [5–7, 16–19, 21–23]. Variables associated at the p < 0.1 level in unadjusted analyses were entered into multivariable regression models. In the case of significant correlation between two continuous co-variates, only the one with the stronger association in univariable analysis was entered into the final adjusted model.

Response operative characteristics (ROC) curves were made to illustrate the predictive capacity of extent of resection (EOR) for seizure outcome. [24]

Results

In our cohort of 130 patients with IDH-mut LGG, 68 had astrocytomas (without 1p19q-codeletion) and 62 had oligodendrogliomas (with 1p19q-codeletion). The distribution over WHO grade was 66 WHO grade 2 tumors and 64 WHO grade 3 tumors (50.8 vs 49.2%). These and other characteristics divided upon tumor subtypes are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Tumor-, patient and treatment characteristics for all LGG and divided by tumor subtype. N = 130

	All LGG N = 130	Astrocytomas N = 68	Oligodendrogliomas N = 62
Age median (Q1:Q3)	42.0 (35.0:54.3)	36.5 (31.0:51.0)	46.0 (39.8:58.0)
Female sex n (%)	57 (43.8)	31 (45.6)	26 (41.9)
History of seizures preop n (%)	99 (76.2)	54 (79.4)	45 (72.6)
AED preop n (%)	84 (64.6)	46 (67.6)	38 (61.3)
KPS score ≤ 80 n (%)	51 (39.2)	27 (39.7)	24 (38.7)
Preop motor deficit n (%)	9 (6.9)	5 (7.3)	4 (6.5)
Main location n (%)
Frontal	81 (62.3)	37 (54.4)	44 (71.0)
Temporal	24 (18.5)	18 (26.5)	6 (9.7)
Parietal	15 (11.5)	10 (14.7)	5 (8.1)
Insular	9 (6.9)	3 (4.4)	6 (9.7)
Occipital	1 (0.8)	0 (0.0)	1 (1.6)
Eloquence, n (%)	82 (63.6)	49 (72.1)	33 (54.1)
Missing	1		1
Motor eloquence, n (%)	39 (30.2)	23 (33.8)	16 (26.2)
Missing	1		1
Time to surgery (months) median (Q1:Q3)	1.3 (0.7:2.9)	1.2 (0.6:2.5)	1.3 (0.8:3.5)
Missing	5	2	3
Intra-op motor mapping or awake surgery n (%)	38 (29.0)	17 (25.0)	21 (33.3)
Type of surgery
Biopsy, n (%)	9 (6.9)	6 (8.8)	3 (4.8)
Resection, n (%)	121 (93.1)	62 (91.2)	59 (95.2)
Tumor volume preop in cm3; median (Q1:Q3)	55.2 (28.4:105.3)	59.8 (30.7:107.4)	54.3 (25.8:93.9)
Missing	1		1
Tumor residual volume postopa in cm3; median (Q1:Q3)	8.6 (1.3:29.4)	8.9 (1.4:43.1)	8.0 (1.0:23.8)
Missing	3	2	1
EORa median (Q1:Q3)	85.4 (57.3:96.6)	85.1 (52.1:94.7)	87.4 (58.9:98.6)
GTR n (%)	25 (19.5)	11 (16.4)	14 (23.0)
Missing	2	1	1
Motor deficit postop, n (%)	32 (24.6)	15 (22.1)	17 (27.4)
WHO Grade n (%)
2	66 (50.8)	34 (50.0)	32 (51.6)
3	64 (49.2)	34 (50.0)	30 (48.4)
Radiotherapy within one year after surgery n (%)	91 (70)	53 (77.9)	38 (61.3)
Chemotherapy within one year after surgery n (%)	93 (71.5)	52 (76.5)	41 (66.1)
Seizures within 12 months postoperativelyb n (%)	31 (24.0)	16 (23.9)	15 (24.2)
Missing	1	1
Seizures within 24 months postoperativelyb n (%)	41 (32.5)	20 (30.8)	21 (34.4)
Missing	4	3	1
New onset seizures within 12 months n (%)	N = 31c 4 (12.9)	N = 14c 3 (21.4)	N = 17c 1 (5.9)
Missing	0	0	0
New onset seizures within 24 months postop (%)	N = 31c 7 (24.1)	N = 14c 3 (23.1)	N = 17c 4 (25.0)
missing	2	1	1

EOR Extent of resection, KPS Karnofsky performance status, GTR Gross total resection

^aEOR and residual tumor volume calculated for the entire cohort (both resections and biopsies)

^bSeizures first postoperative week excluded

^cN here denotes the initial number of patients who had not had seizures before surgery

The bolding of "N" in the end of the table was just used to draw attention to the fact that the numbers of patients for these analyses differ from those in the previous analyses. The bolding could be removed

Seizures

Pre-operatively

Out of the 130 patients, 99 (76.2%) had a history of at least one epileptic seizure before surgery (Fig. 1). There was no statistically significant difference in pre-operative seizure status over tumor subtype; 79.4% (54/68) of the astrocytoma patients, and 72.6% (45/62) of the oligodendroglioma patients had experienced pre-operative seizures (p = 0.41).

Fig. 1.

Seizure status at one year after surgery in LGG patients with and without preoperative seizures

Post-operatively

At 12 months after surgery 98/129 patients (76.0%) were entirely seizure free (Fig. 1), with an even distribution over tumor subtype (p = 1.00). After 24 months, an additional 10 patients had experienced at least one seizure, resulting in an overall seizure freedom since surgery of 67.5% (85/126). No statistically significant differences were seen over tumor subtype (p = 0.71).

Factors affecting seizure outcome after surgery

In the univariable analyses, we found that an increased EOR was correlated with better seizure outcome, while preoperative motor-deficits and insular tumor location was associated with increased risk for post-operative seizures (Table 2). In the multivariable analysis, only insular tumor location and EOR remained significant predictors of seizure outcome postop (Table 2).

Table 2.

Predictors for postoperative epileptic seizures within 12 months after surgery in LGG patients according to unadjusted and adjusted analysis. N = 129

Variable		Univariable analysis			Multivariable analysis
		Unadjusted odds ratio	95% CI	p-value	Adjusted odds ratio	95% CI	p-value
Sex	Female	1 (ref)
	Male	0.65	0.29–1.46	0.29
Age	per year	0.99	0.95–1.02	0.35
Preop tumor volume	per cm3	1.00	1.00–1.01	0.15			*
Preop motor deficit	No	1 (ref)
	Yes	4.52	1.13–18.05	0.03	3.96	0.92–17.03	0.06
1p19q-codeletion	No	1 (ref)
	Yes	1.02	0.45–2.28	0.97
WHO grade	Grade 2	1 (ref)
	Grade 3	0.69	0.31–1.57	0.38
Location of tumor	Frontal	1 (ref)
	Temporal	0.74	0.22–2.46	0.62	0.61	0.17–2.20	0.45
	Insular	6.18	1.34–28.48	0.02	5.02	1.01–24.87	0.048
	Other	1.54	0.48–4.99	0.47	1.35	0.40–4.60	0.63
Residual tumor volume	per cm3	1.01	1.00–1.02	0.06			*
EOR	per unit	0.98	0.97–0.99	< 0.01	0.98	0.97–1.00	0.01
Chemotherapy within 12 months postop	No	1 (ref)
	Yes	1.19	0.49–2.87	0.71
Radiotherapy within 12 months postop	No	1 (ref)
	Yes	1.33	0.54–3.31	0.54

EOR Extent of resection

*Not included in multivariable analysis due to significant correlation with EOR

Bold figures indicate statistical significance at the p<0.05-level

A corresponding sub-analysis was performed for astrocytomas (non-1p1q-codel) and oligodendrogliomas (1p19q-codel) separately.

In the multivariable analysis with preoperative motor deficit and EOR in astrocytomas only, EOR was the sole significant predictor of seizure outcome (p < 0.01) (Supplementary Table 1).

For oligodendrogliomas, no significant correlations were detected in multivariable analysis (Supplementary Table 2).

A ROC curve for EOR and seizure freedom was made for astrocytomas with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 (95% CI 0.62–0.89, p = 0.002) (Fig. 2a). A corresponding curve for oligodendrogliomas illustrates a lack of significant association between EOR and seizure outcome (AUC 0.55; 95% CI 0.37–0.74, p = 0.54) (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2.

A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for EOR and seizure freedom at one year after surgery. Patients with astrocytomas presented in (a), with an AUC of 0.75 indicating a moderate ability of EOR to predict seizure outcome. Patients with oligodendrogliomas presented in (b), with an AUC of 0,55 indicating a poor predictive ability. EOR  extent of resection, AUC area under the curve

Among the 11 astrocytoma patients without any residual tumor (GTR), all were seizure free, whereas 4/14 oligodendroglioma patients with GTR had experienced at least one seizure at 1 year postoperatively.

Discussion

This is to our knowledge the first study of epileptic seizures and seizure outcome in molecularly subtyped, purely IDH-mut LGG.

We found that approximately three out of four patients had experienced at least one epileptic seizure before surgery, a large majority of whom were on AEDs at the time of surgery. At 1 year postoperative, three out of four patients were seizure free. We saw no differences in seizure occurrence pre- or postoperatively between patients with 1p19q-codeleted tumors and astrocytomas. A significant correlation found between EOR and seizure freedom in astrocytomas was, quite surprisingly, absent in oligodendrogliomas.

Seizures at diagnosis

In the entire cohort, the incidence of pre-operative seizures was well in accord with the around 70–80% reported in earlier, mainly histological, LGG publications. [5–7, 25, 26]

An even higher incidence in an all IDH-mut cohort could have been suspected since epilepsy seems to be more common at diagnosis in IDH-mut tumors than in their IDH-wt counterparts [27–30]. However, low grade tumors like ganglioglioma and DNET that are even more epileptogenic than LGG may have affected results in older studies. [1]

Chang et al. in 2008 found that histologically defined oligodendroglioma and oligoastrocytoma subtypes were significantly more likely to be associated with seizures than astrocytomas [6]. However, in analyses where oligodendrogliomas are categorized according to molecular subgroups (WHO 2016) it seems that 1p19q-status is not a significant predictor for pre-operative epilepsy, which is also concordant with the results in our study. [5, 26, 31]

Preoperative seizure control

In some studies, the proportion of patients with preoperative seizure control (as opposed to intractable seizures) is about 85–90% [5, 18, 32],whereas Chang et al. in 2008 reported that 132/269 (49%) in their cohort had pharmacoresistant seizures before surgery (defined as having had at least one seizure within 3 months before surgery). The short median time from diagnosis to surgery in our material, prevented useful evaluation of the preoperative seizure control rate.

Seizure control after surgery

The proportion of seizure free patients at 1 year after surgery in our cohort was similar to that found in non-molecular series, typically reporting seizure freedom of 60–80% (range 37–82%) [6, 7, 16–19, 21, 26, 32]. There are several factors that affect results and that should be considered when interpreting seizure outcome in different studies. For example, the use of Engel class 1 by some authors [6, 16, 17] and Engel class 1a [5, 18, 19] by others is one probable factor affecting outcome. In some publications only patients with a history of seizures were included, which is also likely to impact the postoperative seizure free rates [16, 18, 19].

As seen in the meta-analysis by Bonney et al., [17] most studies on seizure control in LGG have rather short follow-up times; between 6 months to 1 year, but when longer follow-up is available it typically results in lower proportions of seizure control [21, 26]. We observed almost 10% drop in seizure freedom from 76.0 to 67.5% between 1- and 2-years postoperative (i.e., referring to patients that had been seizure free during the entire 2-year period after surgery). This effect is likely to be explained both by the natural course of the epileptic disease and possibly also by some patients experiencing tumor progression over time. [25]

New seizures after surgery and preoperative seizure control

The proportion of patients without a history of seizures at diagnosis, that develops seizures after surgery vary widely between studies (6–43%), as do the follow-up times in these studies (6–69 months) [6, 7, 21, 23, 26, 32].

At 1 year postoperatively, we saw that 12.9% (4/31) who initially were seizure free developed new onset seizures. At 2 years after surgery another three patients, thus cumulatively 24.1% (7/29) of those without preoperative seizures, had experienced at least one epileptic seizure (2 patients missing at 2 years).

Factors affecting seizure outcome

EOR and residual tumor volume

In several studies gross total resection (GTR), as opposed to subtotal resection (STR) or biopsy, has been observed to correlate with better seizure control in LGG [4, 5, 7, 12, 22].

In the present study, we found that higher EOR significantly improved seizure status, especially for astrocytoma patients. In several recent publications on seizure outcome in histological LGG, significant associations between EOR and seizure outcome have been found [16, 18, 19]. In a study by Xu et al., an EOR threshold is suggested with better seizure outcome when EOR > 80% is achieved [16]. Still et al. reported that postoperative seizure control was more likely when EOR was ≥ 91% and/or when residual tumor volume is ≤ 19 cm³ in supratentorial grade 2 gliomas (according to 2007 WHO classification system) whereas Ius et al. found that seizure outcome improved when EOR ≥ 85% was obtained or when residual tumor volume was ≤ 15 cm³ [18, 19].

In none of the studies above the correlation between EOR/residual volume and seizure outcome has been assessed in astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas separately. The unexpected absence of such a correlation in the oligodendroglioma cohort in the present study may be explained by our relatively small sample size—although relatively balanced between subtypes. However, it is also possible that the surgical effect on seizures is more pronounced for astrocytic tumors.

Although difficult to compare, and quite contrary to what would be expected in the case for overall survival, it is possible that EOR is a more important factor for seizure control than the highly interlinked factor of residual tumor volume. A small remnant of a large epileptogenic lesion may result in a better chance for seizure reduction than a biopsy of another (epileptogenic) tumor with size comparable to the remnant. In our material, the association to seizure outcome was more pronounced for EOR than for residual tumor volume.

Differing seizure mechanisms over time and between tumor subtypes?

Seizure pathogenesis in tumor associated epilepsy (TAE) is complex and not fully understood. A combination of factors such as abnormal expression of ion transporters, altered levels of amino acids in the tumor interstitium, and immunological activity is believed to cause TAE [1, 33, 34]. Mechanisms may differ between glioma types exemplified by the importance of different neurotransmitters in high- and low grade tumors where glutamate has been found to play a central role in seizure induction in high grade gliomas, whereas increased levels of the glutamate-like 2HG has been linked to seizures in IDH-mut tumors [28, 34–36] These alterations in neurotransmitter levels seem to be of main importance in the early stage of the TAE and it has been suggested that different pathogenesis may underlie seizures at presentation and later during the disease. [33, 35, 37]

Apart from tumoral and immediate peri-tumoral metabolic changes causing hyperexcitability of the cortex in diffuse glioma patients, other mechanisms such as possible alterations in synaptic plasticity and disturbance of cortico-cortical connections may cause the brain network distal to the tumor site to be affected [33]. In TAE generally, but also for oligodendrogliomas specifically, regions of cortex distant from the tumor have also been shown to be epileptiform or dysrhythmic [33, 34, 37, 38]. If the finding of this publication is valid, it is plausible that an increased propensity for oligodendrogliomas to cause seizures from such foci distant to the tumor site would explain the lesser response to EOR.

Tumor localization and pre-operative motor deficits

In some [5, 39] but not all [21, 22] studies, tumor localization has been found to affect seizure outcome. In a convincing study from Schucht et al. comparing postoperative seizure outcome in relation to localization, seizure freedom (Engel Class I) was achieved for only 12.1% of the 33 patients with tumors in the central area (motor and sensory strip) compared to 83.9% of the 31 patients with the frontal tumors [39]. This was irrespective of the high EOR of above 90% in both cohorts.

In the present study, postoperative seizures were more common in patients who had preoperative motor deficits or whose tumors were mainly located in the insula, the latter also in multivariable analysis and congruent with the findings in the large study by Pallud et al. [5] In the sub-analyses, the correlation between seizure outcome and tumor location was noted in univariable analyses as a tendency for worse post-operative seizure situation in oligodendrogliomas with insular location (OR 6.75; 95% CI 0.96–47.27, p= 0.054) whereas for astrocytomas, a pre-operative motor deficit was more indicative for postoperative seizures (p = 0.07; OR 5.65; 95% CI 0.85–37.46, p= 0.07).

Oncological therapy

In some earlier publications, postoperative therapy has been associated with better seizure outcome [23, 40–43]. We could, however, not detect any significant association between chemo-or radiotherapy within the first year of surgery and seizure freedom.

Limitations

The study is limited by its retrospective nature and its limited sample size of 130 patients. Another limitation is the lack of data on pre-operative seizure control. This information is, however, inherently difficult to obtain in the present era, where the time between seizure onset and surgery is generally too short for evaluation of seizure control/AED effect preoperatively. Strengths of the present study include the relatively long follow-up period, the inclusion of homogeneous tumors in line with what we now define as LGG, (i.e., diffuse gliomas with IDH-mut) and finally that molecular sub-types were evaluated separately.

Conclusion

In this population-based study, where all patients had IDH-mut LGG, we found that three out of four were seizure free (Engel Class 1A/ILAE seizure free) the first year after surgery and that a higher EOR was associated with higher probability of seizure freedom. The effect was prominent in astrocytomas, but not found in oligodendrogliomas when analyzed separately. Due to the unexpected lack of association of seizure outcome with EOR in oligodendrogliomas, further studies in the different molecular subgroups are warranted.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection and analysis were performed by IR and LC. The first draft of the manuscript was written by LC and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Supervision: ASJ.

Funding

Open access funding provided by University of Gothenburg. This study received financial support from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish Government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement in the form of ALF-Grant (ALFGBG-716671) and from the Swedish Research Council (2017–00944), as well as Grants from the Göteborg Medical Society (Göteborgs Läkaresällskap Grant Number 21/960642). The sponsors had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of the present study are not publicly available, due to them containing information that could compromise research participant privacy/consent. The data are however available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical approval

The study involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the regional ethical committee in the region of Västra Götaland (DNR 1067–16). The need for informed consent prior to 2017 was waived by the ethical committee and following 2017 it was based upon written informed consent.