Abstract
Background & aims
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification plays a critical role in progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and aerobic glycolysis is a hallmark of cancer including HCC. However, the role of YTHDF3, one member of the core readers of the m6A pathway, in aerobic glycolysis and progression of HCC is still unclear.
Methods
Expression levels of YTHDF3 in carcinoma and surrounding tissues of HCC patients were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Loss and gain-of-function experiments in vitro and in vivo were used to assess the effects of YTHDF3 on HCC cell proliferation, migration and invasion. The role of YTHDF3 in hepatocarcinogenesis was observed in a chemically induced HCC model with Ythdf3−/− mice. Untargeted metabolomics and glucose metabolism phenotype assays were performed to evaluate relationship between YTHDF3 and glucose metabolism. The effect of YTHDF3 on PFKL was assessed by methylated RNA immunoprecipitation assays (MeRIP). Co-immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence assays were performed to investigate the connection between YTHDF3 and PFKL.
Results
We found YTHDF3 expression was greatly upregulated in carcinoma tissues and it was correlated with poor prognosis of HCC patients. Gain-of-function and loss-of-function assays demonstrated YTHDF3 promoted proliferation, migration and invasion of HCC cells in vitro, and YTHDF3 knockdown inhibited xenograft tumor growth and lung metastasis of HCC cells in vivo. YTHDF3 knockout significantly suppressed hepatocarcinogenesis in chemically induced mice model. Mechanistically, YTHDF3 promoted aerobic glycolysis by promoting phosphofructokinase PFKL expression at both mRNA and protein levels. MeRIP assays showed YTHDF3 suppressed PFKL mRNA degradation via m6A modification. Surprisingly, PFKL positively regulated YTHDF3 protein expression, not as a glycolysis rate-limited enzyme, and PFKL knockdown effectively rescued the effects of YTHDF3 overexpression on proliferation, migration and invasion ability of Sk-Hep-1 and HepG2 cells. Notably, co-immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated PFKL interacted with YTHDF3 via EFTUD2, a core subunit of spliceosome involved in pre-mRNA splicing process, and ubiquitination assays showed PFKL could positively regulate YTHDF3 protein expression via inhibiting ubiquitination of YTHDF3 protein by EFTUD2.
Conclusions
our study uncovers the key role of YTHDF3 in HCC, characterizes a positive functional loop between YTHDF3 and phosphofructokinase PFKL in glucose metabolism of HCC, and suggests the connection between pre-mRNA splicing process and m6A modification.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13046-022-02538-4.
Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma, YTHDF3, PFKL, mRNA splicing
Introduction
Nowadays, liver cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the world [1]. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer. In terms of mortality, HCC is the second in males, and is the third among females in China [2]. As we all know, a large number of factors promote HCC carcinogenesis and progression, including viral hepatitis, excessive alcohol and various metabolic factors like obesity and fatty liver disease. Notably, increasing evidences suggest that alterations of epigenetic modifications including RNA modifications lead to dysfunction of oncogenic and tumor suppressor genes, promoting progression of HCC [3].
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification, the methylation of adenosine at position 6, is one of the best characterized RNA modifications among mRNA and non-coding RNAs in eukaryotic cells. m6A modification is a kind of dynamic modification, which can be actively regulated by the core components of m6A pathway, including writers, erasers and readers. More and more studies demonstrate that these core components of m6A modification play important roles in tumorigenesis and tumor progression among many types of cancer [4]. Among these core components, m6A is recognized by readers such as YTH domain family proteins (YTHDF1, YTHDF2, YTHDF3, and YTHDC2), which directly bind m6A sites of other complexes to regulate RNA metabolism, like pre-mRNA splicing, RNA folding and protein translation [5]. Interestingly, the roles of YTHDF1 or YTHDF2 in HCC have been explicitly illustrated recently [6, 7], but the role of YTHDF3 in HCC progression is still unclear.
Glycolysis is a crucial metabolic process in cells as it can provide energy quickly when cells are deprived of oxygen. Metabolism reprogramming has been regarded as a hallmark of cancer. In HCC, the transition from oxidative phosphorylation pathway to glycolysis pathway, a rapid but low-efficiency metabolic process, is critical for tumorigenesis and progression of HCC. Notably, cancer cells reprogram metabolic related enzymes to meet their demands, facilitate cancer cells proliferation, and provide a more suitable microenvironment for the survival of cancer cells [8]. However, the relationship between RNA modification and glycolysis, and the role of m6A modification among key glycolysis enzymes are still not well-studied.
Here, in our study, we characterized a functional loop between YTHDF3 and phosphofructokinase PFKL in glycolysis metabolism of HCC. We not only identified the role of YTHDF3 in m6A modification of PFKL mRNA but also established the unexpected role of phosphofructokinase PFKL in regulation of YTHDF3 and m6A modification.
Materials and methods
HCC patients’ clinical specimens and data
This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of Sun Yat-sen University (SYSKY-2022-120-01). All subjects have been informed of the study details and signed informed consent forms. HCC patients’ samples were collected from Department of Pathology at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) from July 2015 to December 2017 according to the following criteria. Firstly, they were diagnosed with HCC according to the updated diagnostic guidelines. Secondly, they couldn’t have other diseases that affected blood glucose level. Thirdly, they were able to cooperate with our researchers for following up.
Their carcinoma and surrounding tissues were collected and placed in liquid nitrogen, stored at − 80 °C until be used or made into paraffin sections. HCC patients’ clinicopathological characteristics and preoperative biochemical indicators were also collected. After patients discharged from hospital, they were followed up by telephone every 3 months so that we could master the prognosis of them. The end time of follow-up was December 31, 2020.
Histological analysis and immunohistochemistry (IHC)
The paraffin sections were deparaffinized with xylene and hydrated with gradient alcohol. Then we repaired the antigenic sites of section with EDTA buffer (1 mM, PH8.0) (ZSGB BIO, Beijing, China) by a high-pressure method. The sections were cooled to room temperature, sealed with peroxidase and goat serum successively, and incubated overnight with primary antibody at 4 °C. On the second day, the sections were incubated with secondary antibody at 37 °C for 30 min. We used Diaminobenzidine (DAB) (ZSGB BIO, Beijing, China) to stain the target proteins, and used hematoxylin to stain nucleus. We evaluated IHC staining scores according to the product of staining intensity and percentage of staining area of positive signal. Staining intensity was classified as zero (negative), one (weak), two (moderate) and three (strong) score. Percentage of staining area were classified as zero (< 5%), one (5–25%), two (25–50%), three (50–75%) and four (> 75%) score. The low and high expression group of specific protein was divided according to the median value of total staining score. All antibodies were described in additional files (Supplementary 1).
Cell culture and transfection
All cell lines, including Sk-Hep-1, SNU449, Huh7, HepG2, MHCC-97H, MHCC-97 L, SMMC-7721 and 293 T cells, were purchased from the Cell Bank of Type Culture Collection (Guangzhou Cellcook Biotech Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China). According to the requirement of cells, culturing cells with DMEM or RPMI1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin in a cell incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
According to the background expression of YTHDF3 among HCC cell lines, YTHDF3 overexpression lentivirus were transfected into Sk-Hep-1 and HepG2 cells to construct YTHDF3-stably-overexpressed cell lines. Meanwhile, two short hairpin RNAs (shYTHDF3–1 and shYTHDF3–2) were transfected into Huh7 and SNU449 cells to construct YTHDF3-stably-knocked down cell lines. After 2 weeks, we used puromycin (MP Biomedicals) to screen stably transfected cells. jetPRIME (Polyplus, Strasbourg, France) was used for transiently transfecting cells with plasmids or small interfering RNAs, and we collected cells for other experiments after transfecting for 48 hours.
RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR assay (qPCR)
We extracted total RNA of cells or tissues with Trizol reagent (ThermoFisher). Total RNA was reversed into cDNA with PrimeScript RT Master Mix (TAKARA). qPCR amplifications were performed according to manufacture manual, which is 95 °C for 30s, 95 °C 5 s, 60 °C 20 s for additional 40 cycles. Using β-actin as a control, 2-ΔΔCt method was adopted to calculated the relative mRNA expression of target gene. All primers were described in additional files (Supplementary 1).
Western blot analysis
Cell precipitate or tissues were fully lysed with middle strength RIPA peptide lysis buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology, Jiangsu, China) containing 1% protein phosphatase inhibitor, 1% protease inhibitor, and 1% phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and lysates were centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Using BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Jiangsu, China) to calculate total protein concentration of supernatant. 20 μg protein of each sample were electrophoresed under a constant voltage (120 V) and were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore) under a constant current (150 mA). Afterwards, the membranes were blocked with 5% fat-free milk for 1 hour, incubated with indicated primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C and incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 hour successively. We detected the specific protein by using enhanced chemiluminescence reagent. The relative expression of indicated proteins was normalized to β-actin. All antibodies were described in the additional file (Supplementary 1).
Cell proliferation assay
Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays were used to assess the proliferation capacity of HCC cells. HCC cells at exponential growth stage were cultured into a 96-well plate with 3 × 103 cells/well for 24 hours. CCK-8 reagent (DOJINDO) and completed medium were mixed in a ratio of 1:10. Adding 100 μl mixture to each well. Incubating them at 37 °C for 2 hours under without light conditions and measuring their absorbance values at 450 nm with a microplate reader. We continuously measured them for 5 days and drew the growth curves.
Colony forming assay
500 HCC cells at exponential growth stage were cultured into each well of 6-well plate with 2 ml complete medium. When visible colonies appeared in the wells, cells were terminated from culture. The colonies were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with crystal violet for 30 minutes each. Then washing the plates with running water and drying them naturally. An inverted microscope was used to count visible colonies.
Wound healing assay
Firstly, 1.5 × 106 cells were cultured into each well of 6-well plate with complete medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum for 24 h to form monolayer cells. Then the monolayer cells were scratched with a 200 μl tip, washed with PBS for three times and cultured in serum-free medium. Afterwards, the wound area was observed and photographed under inverted fluorescence microscope at 0 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after scratching. Image J software was used to calculate wound area of cells at indicated time. The wound healing rate is calculated as (A0 - An)/A0. A0 represents the wound area at 0 h, An represents the wound area at 12 h, 24 h or 48 h. Finally, we draw the wound healing rate curves and compared the HCC cells’ migration capacities.
Migration and invasion assay
Chambers with Matrigel were used to assess HCC cells’ invasion ability, while chambers without Matrigel were used to assess cells’ migration ability. 200 μl serum-free medium containing 5 × 104 HCC cells were added into upper chambers (8 μm, Corning Inc., USA) and 800 μl medium containing 20% fetal bovine serum was added to the lower chambers. The cells were cultured in an incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 24 hours. Then the upper chambers were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and were stained with crystal violet for 30 minutes each. Washing the chambers, capturing images with a forward microscope and counting the HCC cells that invaded or migrated into lower membrane surface at several randomly fields with Image J software.
In vivo tumorigenicity
All mice experiments were performed according to national and institutional guidelines from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees, and have been reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethical and Welfare Committee (AEWC) (Approval No. IACUC-AEWC-F2206018). BALB/c nu/nu male mice (four-week old) were purchased from Laboratory Animal Center, Sun Yat-sen University. All mice were housed in a specific pathogen free environment according to relevant rules.
In the subcutaneous xenograft tumor model, 100 μl mixture of PBS and Matrigel (1:1) (BioCoat) containing 1 × 107 HCC cells were subcutaneously injected into nude mice right flank (5 mice each group). Measuring the maximum and minimum diameters of tumors with a vernier caliper every four days and tumor volume was equal to 0.5xlargest diameterxsmallest diameterxsmallest diameter. After 24 days, the mice were sacrificed and tumors were made into paraffin section or stored at − 80 °C until use.
In the tail vein injection model, 400 μl PBS containing 5 × 106 HCC cells was slowly injected into tail vein of nude mice (5 mice each group). We continued to feed them for four weeks and sacrificed them and collected their lungs, then prepared paraffin sections of lung tissues and stained them with hematoxylin–eosin (HE). The number and total area of metastatic foci were calculated by the software KFBIO. Slide Viewer.
We purchased Ythdf3−/− C57BL/6 mouse which Ythdf3 genes were knocked out with CRISPR/Cas9 technology. The detail information was elaborated in additional files (Supplementary 2). Heterozygotes were used for mating in order to obtain more male Ythdf3+/+ and Ythdf3−/− mice. One step mouse genotyping kit (Vazyme, PD101) and agarose gel electrophoresis were used to identify the genotype of C57BL/6 mice (Supplementary Fig. 1a). The primers were described in additional files (Supplementary 1). Male Ythdf3+/+ and Ythdf3−/− mice were used to induce HCC model by administration of hepatocarcinogen diethylnitrosamine (DEN, 25 mg/kg, dissolved in PBS) (Rhawn) at 14 days of age, and 0.4 μl/g CCl4 (CCl4/olive oil 1:1 (vol: vol)) (Macklin) at 4 weeks old once a week for 28 weeks by intraperitoneal injection. Then they were sacrificed. The mice body weight and liver weight were recorded, the number and maximum diameter of liver tumors were measured, and the liver tissues and plasma were collected for other experiments.
Metabolites extraction
Samples from Ythdf3+/+ and Ythdf3−/− mice were thawed on ice. HCC tissues (about 50 mg) were transferred into a 1.5 ml microtube and were cut into small pieces. Extraction steps were as follows: (1) 1 ml methanol: acetonitrile: water (5:3:2) solution was added to precipitate protein and dissolve metabolites with two 5 mm magnetic beads on the high throughout tissue grinder (SCIENTZ-48, China) at 45 Hz for 10 min; (2) transfer the mixture into other microtube, add 500 μl normal saline, vortex for 10 min, and leave aside on ice for 5 min; (3) the mixture was centrifuged at 7800 g for 10 min at 4 °C and 500 μl supernatant was further transferred into other microtube; (4) concentrate the supernatants with a vacuum freeze concentrator.
UPLC-MS/MS analysis
Each sample was reconstituted by 80 μl methanol and 20 μl H2O and centrifuged at 12000 g for 10 min. A 60 μl aliquot of each supernatant was transferred to the auto-sampler vial. 10 μl each rest supernatant was pooled as QC (quality control) group. UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS analysis was performed with a ThermoScientific Ultimate 3000 UPLC couple with Orbitrap Exploris 480 MS in both positive and negative ionization mode using the H-ESI ion source. Samples were injected into a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH Amide Column(2.1x100mm, 1.7 μm) with a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min at 40 °C. Before the samples were analyzed, 10 QCs were injected for adjust the system consistency, and one QC was used to estimated system reproducibility and one blank was used to flush the column after each 5 samples were analyzed. The mobile phase consisted of phase A [95:5 (acetonitrile: water) containing 10 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid] and phase B [50:50 (acetonitrile: water) containing 10 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid]. The gradient was as follows: solvent B was held constant at 2% for 0.5 min and was increased from 2 to 50% by 12 min, then was deceased to 2% over 14 min, following holding constant in solvent B to 2% at 16 min and then to 98% at 16.1 min, all the method stopped at 23 min. The ion spray voltage was set to 3500 V for positive ion and 3000 V for negative ion mode. Full scan analysis was performed in the electrospray ionization mass spectrometry mode using electrospray ionization technique with coverage of mass range 50-1000 Da by using scan rate of 0.25 s, and the MS/MS screening was accomplished in the combinational mode of positive-information dependent acquisition (IDA) with a scan rate of 0.1 s.
Glycolysis phenotype assays
To understand how YTHDF3 affects glycolysis in HCC, glucose uptake colorimetric assay kit (Biovision), pyruvate colorimetric assay kit (Biovision), lactate assay kit II (Biovision), ATP colorimetric assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Jiangsu, China) were used. All experiments were performed at least 3 times according to manufacturer’s protocols and all results were normalized to cells number.
For glucose uptake assay, HCC cells at exponential growth stage were seeded into a 96-well plate with 5000 cells/well for 48 hours. Firstly, cells were starved with serum-free medium overnight to increase glucose uptake. Secondly, cells were incubated with 100 μl Krebs-Ringer-Phosphate-HEPES buffer (Ginbio, China) containing 2% BSA for 40 min and were stimulated with 1 μM insulin for 20 min to activate glucose transporter, then 10 μl 2-DG (10 mM) was added to incubate for 20 min. Thirdly, cells were lysed with 80 μl of extraction buffer at 85 °C for 40 min, then we cooled, neutralized, centrifugated the cell lysates at 12000 rpm for 10 min and collected supernatant. After NADPH generation, NADP degradation and recycling amplification reactions, measuring absorbance at 412 nm with microplate reader at 37 °C every 5 min until the 100 pmol standard reached 1.5–2.0 OD.
For pyruvate level assay, 30 μl plasma of each group was directly added into sample wells, while 2 × 106 HCC cells or 10 mg tissues were extracted with pyruvate assay buffer. Then centrifuged (10,000 g, 10 min, 4 °C) to remove insoluble material and collected supernatant. Added 30 μl supernatant and 20 μl pyruvate assay buffer into each well. Then they were incubated for 30 min at room temperature without light, and were measured absorbance at 570 nm with a microplate reader.
For lactate level assay, 20 μl plasma of each group was directly added into sample wells, while 2 × 106 HCC cells or 10 mg tissues were extracted with lactate assay buffer. Then centrifuged (10,000 g, 10 min, 4 °C) to remove all proteins. 20 μl supernatant, 30 μl lactate assay buffer and 50 μl reaction mix were added into each well. Afterwards, incubating the mixture for 30 min at room temperature without light and measured absorbance at 450 nm with a microplate reader.
For ATP level assay, we fully extracted 2 × 106 HCC cells with ATP lysate on ice, centrifuged (12,000 g, 5 min, 4 °C) and collected supernatant. Prepared and added 100 μl ATP detection working solution into per well at room temperature for 3 min so that the background ATP could be consumed. Then add 20 μl supernatant into wells and measured RLU (relative light unit) by using a luminometer.
Extracellular acidification rate and oxygen consumption rate assays
The extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) and cellular oxygen consumption rate (OCR) were performed with Agilent Seahorse XF Cell Glycolysis Stress Test Kit (Seahorse) and Cell Mito Stress Test Kit (Seahorse) by using the Seahorse XFe96 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience). Firstly, 1.5 × 104 HCC cells were cultured in seahorse XF cell culture microplates and hydrated a sensor cartridge with ddH2O at 37 °C in a non-CO2 incubator overnight. Secondly, for the ECAR analysis, prepared assay medium containing 2 mM glutamine, and prepared glucose (10 mmol/L), oligomycin (1.0 μmol/L), and 2-DG (50 mmol/L). For the OCR analysis, prepared assay medium with 1 mM pyruvate, 2 mM glutamine, and 10 mM glucose, and prepared oligomycin (1.5 μM), FCCP (p-trifluoromethoxy carbonyl cyanide phenylhydrazone, 1.0 μM), and rotenone/antimycin A (0.5 μM). Thirdly, these drugs were sequentially injected into each well at indicated time after the baseline measurements by using the analyzer. Finally, the data were collected and analyzed using the XFe96 Wave Software (Agilent).
RIP assay
Magna RIP Kit (Merck millipore) was used for RIP assay. Sk-Hep-1 and HepG2 cells at exponential growth stage were transiently transfected with 10 μg YTHDF3 plasmids in 10 cm plates for 48 hours, and they were lysed by RIP lysis buffer. RIP lysates were centrifuged and removed 10 μl of supernatant as “input”. Meanwhile, magnetic beads conjugated with anti-YTHDF3 antibody or anti-IgG antibody were prepared. Each rest supernatant and beads-antibody complex were added into RIP immunoprecipitation buffer and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Added proteinase K and 10% SDS and incubated at 55 °C for 30 minutes to digest protein. Then precipitated and purified RNA. Finally, a Nanodrop spectrophotometer was used to measure total RNA or “input”. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed to detect the relative expression of certain genes.
MeRIP-qPCR
EpiQuik™ CUT&RUN m6A RNA Enrichment Kit was used to investigated the m6A modification on specific mRNA transcripts. Firstly, 50 μg total RNA was isolated with Trizol reagent from Sk-Hep-1 and Huh7 cells. Secondly, fragments of RNA sequence containing the m6A target were cleaved, bound to magnetic beads containing m6A antibody, and pulled down. Thirdly, the enriched RNA was released, purified, and eluted. According to the information from SRAMP (http://www.cuilab.cn/sramp), we designed specific primers for YTHDF3 m6A-binding proteins. Finally, qPCR was conducted to detect the changes to m6A modification of certain genes. All primers were described in additional files (Supplementary 1).
RNA stability assay
Sk-Hep-1 and HepG2 were transfected with YTHDF3 plasmids, while Huh7 and SNU449 were transfected with siYTHDF3–1, siYTHDF3–2 for 48 hours. Thereafter, these cells were treated with Actinomycin D (ThermoFisher) at 5 μg/ml for 0 h, 3 h, 6 h and 9 h. Total RNA from these cells was extracted with Trizol. The relative expression of certain genes at indicated time was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. The degradation rate of mRNA is equal to the ratio of the level of mRNA at indicated time and the level of mRNA at 0 hour. We draw the degradation curve of specific genes on the basis of the degradation rates.
Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP)
1.0 × 106 HCC cells or 293 T cells were cultured for 24 hours in 10 cm dishes and they were transfected with 10 μg plasmids for 48 hours. Then they were lysed with weak strength RIPA peptide lysis buffer containing 1% protein phosphatase inhibitor, 1% protease inhibitor, and 1% phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) for 30 min at 4 °C and were centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 min. Collecting supernatant and allocating 10% as “input”. Adding corresponding antibodies into supernatant and incubating them overnight at 4 °C with rotation, then adding agarose A/G beads(1:10) (ThermoFisher) and continuously incubating them at 4 °C for 4–6 hours with rotation. Afterwards, centrifuging them at 3000 rpm for 5 min, discarding supernatant, washing beads with buffer (PBS + 0.5%Triton-100) for five times, resuspending beads with loading buffer (diluted with high strength RIPA peptide lysis buffer), boiling them at 100 °C for 10 min, and centrifuging at 3000 rpm for 5 min. At last, collecting supernatant protein and performing Western blot to verify the interactions between proteins.
Multi-label immunofluorescence staining
HCC patients’ paraffin sections were deparaffinized with xylene, hydrated with gradient alcohol, and antigen site retrieval with sodium citrate (PH 6.0) in microwave oven for 15 min. The sections were sealed with peroxidase and 5% albumin bovine serum successively. Then they were incubated with EFTUD2 primary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature, washed with PBS for three times, and incubated with secondary antibody (PANOVUE) labeled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) for 10 min at room temperature. Afterwards, adding fluorescent staining to amplify fluorescent signal for 10 min at room temperature and washing sections with PBS for three times. After that, the antigen sites were repaired by microwave oven again and the above steps were repeated to incubated PFKL and YTHDF3 primary antibody successively. Finally, adding DAPI, sealing sections and collecting images with Vectra Polaris Automated Quantitative Pathology Imaging System.
Cellular immunofluorescences
1.5 × 105 Sk-Hep-1 cells at exponential growth stage were cultured into confocal dishes for 48 hours. Then they were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and were washed with PBS for three times. Cellular membrane was broken with 0.5% Triton-100 for 10 min. The non-specific antigen sites were blocked with goat serum for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were incubated overnight with primary antibody at 4 °C, and were incubated with secondary antibody labeled with fluorescent tags for 30 min without light at room temperature. Finally, adding DAPI and taking pictures with Zeiss LSM 800 with airy scan system. All antibodies were described in the additional file (Supplementary 1).
Ubiquitination assays
Ubiquitination assays of SNU449 cells co-transfected ubiquitin, YTHDF3 and PFKL plasmids, or ubiquitin, YTHDF3 and EFTUD2 plasmids, or ubiquitin, YTHDF3, PFKL and EFTUD2 plasmids by using jetPRIME according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Polyplus, Strasbourg, France) for 24 hours. 20 nM MG-132 was added to RPMI1640 culture medium and cells were incubated continuously for 8 hours. Then, the cells were lysed with weak strength RIPA peptide lysis buffer containing 1% protein phosphatase inhibitor, 1% protease inhibitor, and 1% phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). Supernatant were incubated with indicated primary antibody overnight with rotation, and incubated with agarose A/G beads(1:10) (ThermoFisher) continuously for 4–6 hours at 4 °C. The eluted proteins were detected by western blotting.
Statistical analysis
Each assay was performed at least three independent experiments. SPSS 21.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.0 softwares were used. Mean ± SD was used for the quantitative data. The t test, t’ test and Wilcoxon test were chosen according to normality and variance homogeneity of the two independent groups, while one-way ANOVA analysis was used among three independent groups. Chi-square test was used for the qualitative data. Overall survival curves were plotted by Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by the log-rank test. Pearson correlation was used to evaluated the relationship between two continuous variables. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Image J software was used to qualified the green, red and yellow fluorescence co-localization signal intensity, and calculated relative Pearson’s and Mander’s coefficients.
Results
YTHDF3 is overexpressed in tumor samples from HCC patients and high expression of YTHDF3 is correlated with poor prognosis of HCC patients
In order to investigate the role of YTHDF3 in HCC, we performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) of paraffin sections from carcinoma and surrounding tissues of 466 patients diagnosed with HCC from July 2015 to December 2017 to study protein expression of YTHDF3 in HCC. We found protein expression of YTHDF3 in carcinoma tissues was greatly higher than that in normal counterpart surrounding tissues (Fig. 1a). Meanwhile, Western blot and qPCR assays showed that expressions of YTHDF3 in carcinoma tissues were greatly higher than those in normal counterpart surrounding tissues at both mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 1f and g). To further study the relationship between YTHDF3 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of HCC patients, 466 HCC patients were divided into YTHDF3 low-expression (IHC score<8) and high-expression group (IHC score ≥ 8) according to IHC median score of carcinoma tissue. We found that high YTHDF3 expression were correlated with larger tumor diameter (Fig. 1e), capsular invasion (Fig. 1c), vascular invasion (Fig. 1d) or the middle-late stage (Fig. 1b) of HCC patients (Supplementary Table 1).
Importantly, to study whether high YTHDF3 expression level can predict the prognosis of HCC patients, we followed up HCC patients from two cohorts and the end time of follow-up was December 31, 2020. The Kaplan–Meier analysis of 238 HCC patients from Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital indicated overexpression of YTHDF3 was correlated to poorer overall survival of HCC patients (log-rank = 5.104, P = 0.0239), and the median survival time of the YTHDF3 low-expression group was about 42.85 months, which was apparently longer than that in YTHDF3 high-expression group (about 33.95 months) (Fig. 1h upper). To further identify the prognosis value of YTHDF3 in HCC, the Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed in 263 HCC patients from Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center. The median survival time of YTHDF3 low-expression group was about 44.02 months, while the median survival time of YTHDF3 high-expression group was about 28.53 months (Fig. 1 h lower), supporting that overexpression of YTHDF3 predicts poor prognosis of HCC patients.
YTHDF3 promotes proliferation, migration and invasion of HCC cells in vitro and tumor growth and lung metastasis of HCC in vivo
In order to study the role of YTHDF3 in proliferation, migration, invasion and metastasis ability of HCC cells, we performed a series of gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments in vitro and in vivo. Firstly, we chose Sk-Hep-1 and HepG2 to establish YTHDF3-stably-overexpressed cell lines, and chose Huh7 and SNU449 to establish YTHDF3-stably-knockdown cell lines according to the background mRNA and protein levels of YTHDF3 in the seven HCC cell lines (Fig. 1i and j).
CCK8 proliferation assay, colony formation assay, transwell migration assay, wound healing assay and transwell invasion assay showed that overexpression YTHDF3 significantly enhanced proliferation, (Fig. 2a and b), migration (Fig. 2c and d) and invasion (Fig. 2e) ability of Sk-Hep-1 and HepG2 cells in vitro. Moreover, in subcutaneous tumor growth models of mice, YTHDF3 overexpression in Sk-Hep-1 cells facilitated tumor growth in vivo characterized as increasing tumor size and weight (Fig. 2f), and the percentage of Ki67 IHC staining (Fig. 2g), as compared with control group. In addition, orthotopic lung metastasis model of mice demonstrated that the number and total area of metastatic foci in lungs were significantly increased in upregulated YTHDF3 group compared with those in control group (Fig. 2h). In general, YTHDF3 overexpression promoted proliferation, migration and invasion of Sk-Hep-1 and HepG2 cells in vitro and tumor growth and lung metastasis of HCC in vivo.
To further determine the functions of YTHDF3 in HCC cells, we established YTHDF3-stably-knockdown cells with Huh7 and SNU449 by using a lentiviral shRNA technique. CCK8 proliferation assay, colony formation assay, transwell migration assay, wound healing assay and transwell invasion assay indicated that YTHDF3 knockdown significantly inhibited proliferation (Fig. 3a and b), migration (Fig. 3c and d), invasion ability (Fig. 3e) of Huh7 and SNU449 cells in vitro. Subcutaneous tumor growth model of mice demonstrated that YTHDF3 knockdown suppressed xenografted tumor growth, tumor weight, and tumor size of HCC cells in vivo (Fig. 3f and g). Meanwhile, in vivo, lung metastasis model of mice demonstrated that the number and total area of metastatic foci in lungs were clearly decreased in YTHDF3-knockdown groups compared with those in control groups (Fig. 3h).
Taken together, gain-of-function and loss-of-function assays uncovered that YTHDF3 promotes proliferation, migration and invasion of HCC cells in vitro and tumor growth and lung metastasis of HCC in vivo.
YTHDF3 knockout suppresses chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis in mice
Interestingly, when we divided HCC patients into YTHDF3 low-expression group and YTHDF3 high-expression group according to IHC staining scores of carcinoma tissue, we found that serum AFP level was significantly elevated in YTHDF3 high-expression group (Fig. 4a). Meanwhile, there was a positive correlation between serum AFP level and the expression of YTHDF3 in carcinoma tissue (r = 0.258, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4b and c, Supplementary Table 2). These results suggested the potential role of YTHDF3 in carcinogenesis of HCC.
To further study the role of YTHDF3 in hepatocarcinogenesis, we established YTHDF3 knockout (Ythdf3−/−) mice by CRISPR/Cas9 technology (Supplementary 2). Heterozygotes were used for mating in order to obtain more male Ythdf3−/− mice. Genotypic identification results were performed (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Mouse hepatocarcinogenesis model was induced with Ythdf3+/+ and Ythdf3−/− male mice by the administration of diethylnitrosamine (DEN) at 14 days old and CCl4 at 4 weeks old (once a week for 28 weeks) (Fig. 4d). In DEN and CCl4 induced HCC mice, we found the number, largest diameter of tumors, liver weight and tumor/body weight ratio of Ythdf3−/− mice were significantly decreased, compared with those of control Ythdf3+/+ mice (Fig. 4f and g). Immunohistochemistry staining showed that the expression of Ki67 of liver tumor from Ythdf3−/− mice was significantly decreased, compared with that from Ythdf3+/+ control mice (Fig. 4h). Moreover, in DEN and CCl4 induced HCC mouse model, Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that Ythdf3−/− mice had better overall survival time (log-rank = 4.024, P = 0.0449) than that of control wild-type mice. The median survival time of Ythdf3−/− mice was about 170.85 days, while the median survival time of Ythdf3+/+ mice was about 126.13 days (Fig. 4i). Accordingly, in DEN and CCl4 induced HCC mice, we found that serum AFP level of Ythdf3+/+ mice was significantly higher than that of Ythdf3−/− group (Fig. 4e).
In summary, our data indicated that YTHDF3 knockout suppresses chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis in mice.
YTHDF3 promotes glycolysis metabolism of HCC cells
Our study showed that YTHDF3 plays a key role in tumorigenesis and progression of HCC in vitro and in vivo. However, the function of YTHDF3 in glycolysis metabolism remains unclear. We compared the global metabolic profiles of HCC tissues from Ythdf3+/+ and Ythdf3−/− mice with untargeted metabolomics. In the results, we found that YTHDF3 knockout resulted in disorders of energy metabolic pathways, including glycolysis pathway (Supplementary Fig. 2.). What’s more, when we divided HCC patients into YTHDF3 low-expression group and YTHDF3 high-expression group according to IHC staining scores of carcinoma tissue, we found that blood glucose level of HCC patients in high-expression YTHDF3 group was much higher than that in low-expression YTHDF3 group. Moreover, the blood glucose level of Ythdf3−/− mice was greatly lower than that of Ythdf3+/+ mice (Fig. 5a). To investigate the relationship between YTHDF3 and glucose metabolism in HCC, we detected pyruvate and lactate levels of tumor tissue and plasma from chemically induced hepatocarcinogenesis mice. We found that pyruvate and lactate level in tumor tissue were substantially decreased in Ythdf3−/− mice (Fig. 5b), compared with those in Ythdf3+/+ mice, suggesting that YTHDF3 promotes growth and progression of HCC by glucose metabolism pathway.
To further establish the relationship between YTHDF3 and glucose metabolism in HCC, we performed a series of experiments to study glucose metabolism including glucose uptake assay, pyruvate and lactate level assay, ATP level assay after YTHDF3 knockdown or overexpression in indicated HCC cells. We found YTHDF3 knockdown in Huh7 and SNU449 cells inhibited glucose uptake, led to decreased levels of pyruvate and lactate and increased level of ATP (Fig. 5c). Moreover, YTHDF3 knockdown decreased extracellular acidification rate (ECAR, reflecting overall glycolytic flux) and increased cellular oxygen consumption rate (OCR, an indicator of mitochondrial oxidative respiration) in Huh7 and SNU449 cells (Fig. 5d). On the other hand, YTHDF3 overexpression promoted glucose uptake, led to increased levels of pyruvate and lactate and decreased level of ATP in Sk-Hep-1 and HepG2 cells (Fig. 5e), as well as the increased ECAR and decreased OCR (Fig. 5f).
In a word, YTHDF3 promotes glycolysis metabolism of HCC cells.
YTHDF3 promotes phosphofructokinase PFKL expression at both mRNA and protein levels
Many evidences show high rates of glucose metabolism and glycolysis are critical for cancer cells. However, the mechanisms by which glucose metabolism is reprogrammed in cancer cells are still unclear. To explore how YTHDF3 regulates glycolysis, we studied expression of mRNA and protein of rates-limited enzymes of glycolysis, including hexokinase 2 (HK2, catalyzing glucose to glucose 6-phosphate), phosphofructokinase-1 (PFK1, catalyzing fructose 6-phosphate to fructose 1,6-bisphosphate), pyruvate kinase (PKM, catalyzing phosphoenolpyruvate to pyruvate) and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH, catalyzing pyruvate to lactate) after YTHDF3 knockdown or overexpression in HCC cells. Notably, there are three isoforms of PFK1 in mammals, including PFK-M (found in muscle), PFK-P (found in plasma) and PFK-L (found in liver), and the proportion of these isoforms varies in different tissues depending on their different metabolism requirements (Fig. 6a). Surprisingly, we found that YTHDF3 overexpression resulted in increasing PFKL expressions at mRNA and protein levels in Sk-Hep-1 and HepG2 cells. Moreover, we found that YTHDF3 knockdown led to decreasing PFKL expressions at both mRNA and protein levels in Huh7 and SNU449 cells (Fig. 6b and c).
Interestingly, in clinical patients of HCC, q-PCR and Western blot results of fresh surrounding and carcinoma tissues indicated that high expressions of PFKL were largely associated with high expressions of YTHDF3 at both mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 6d and e). In addition, IHC staining among 456 paraffin sections of HCC patients showed that high expression of PFKL was associated with high expression of YTHDF3 while low expression of PFKL was associated with low expression of YTHDF3 (Fig. 6f). Moreover, there was a positive correlation between PFKL IHC score and YTHDF3 IHC score (r = 0.430, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 6g). Regarding of overall survival analysis, the Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that HCC patients with both low expressions of YTHDF3 and PFKL had better survival time than those patients with both high expressions of YTHDF3 and PFKL (log-rank = 7.157, P = 0.0075) (Fig. 6h). What’s more, we performed q-PCR, Western blot and IHC with DEN and CCl4-induced HCC mice liver tumor tissues. These assays demonstrated that mRNA and protein expression levels of PFKL in liver tumor tissues among Ythdf3−/− mice were significantly lower than those in Ythdf3+/+ mice (Fig. 6i, j, k, l). Finally, we cultured Huh7 and Sk-Hep-1 cells with glucose-free RPMI1640 medium for 0 h, 3 h, 6 h and 12 h, and performed Western Blot and qPCR assays with these cells. We found that the mRNA and protein expression of YTHDF3 and PFKL were decreased significantly under glucose deprivation condition (Fig. 7a and b).
Besides these observation, IHC staining showed that PFKL protein expression in carcinoma tissues was higher than that in surrounding tissues among paraffin sections of 456 HCC patients we collected (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that overexpression of PFKL was correlated with poor overall survival of HCC patients from Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital (log-rank = 4.234, P = 0.039) (Supplementary Fig. 1c) and Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center (log-rank = 4.437, P = 0.0352) (Supplementary Fig. 1d).
In summary, our study demonstrated that YTHDF3 promotes glycolysis by enhancing phosphofructokinase PFKL expression at both mRNA and protein level.
YTHDF3 suppressed the degradation of PFKL mRNA via m6A modification
In our previous results, we have found that YTHDF3 promotes PFKL expression at mRNA and protein levels. Since YTHDF3 is one of m6A binding proteins, we speculated whether YTHDF3 affected PFKL expression by m6A modification of PFKL mRNA.
RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation assays (RIP) showed there was a direct correlation between YTHDF3 and PFKL in mRNA level in Sk-Hep-1 and HepG2 cells (Fig. 7d). Next, we predicted the sites where PFKL mRNA might be m6A modified by YTHDF3 by using SRAMP (http://www.cuilab.cn/sramp) (Fig. 7c). MeRIP assays (Fig. 7e) were performed by using both wild-type (WT) and two mutant (Mut) PFKL plasmids at m6A modification site to further confirm the effect of YTHDF3 m6A modification on PFKL mRNA. In mutant PFKL plasmids, adenosine bases (A) in predicted m6A binding sites were replaced by guanine base (G) or thymine base (T) to eliminate the effect of m6A methylation, while WT plasmid contained intact m6A binding site (Fig. 7f). Expectedly, YTHDF3 enriched PFKL mRNA in PFKL mutant groups were decreased significantly (Fig. 7g), demonstrating that YTHDF3-guided m6A modification of PFKL mRNA is key for regulation of PFKL mRNA in Huh7 and Sk-Hep-1 cells. Furthermore, in the presence of actinomycin D (an agent that blocks synthesis of RNA), we found that YTHDF3 knockdown promoted the degradation of PFKL mRNA, whereas YTHDF3 overexpression suppressed the degradation of PFKL mRNA (Fig. 7h). In brief, we found that YTHDF3 inhibits PFKL mRNA degradation via m6A modification.
PFKL positively promotes YTHDF3 expression at protein level
It is reported that metabolic enzymes could have noncanonical functions in cancer and other pathologies [9]. As a key rate-limited enzyme, PFKL catalyzes conversion of fructose 6-phosphate to fructose 1,6-bisphosphate in glycolysis. However, the direct role of PFKL in m6A modification is unclear. We investigated whether PFKL could influence YTHDF3 expression in HCC, not as a key enzyme in glycolysis. After knocking down PFKL expression by transiently transfecting small interfering RNA targeting PFKL mRNA into Sk-Hep-1, HepG2 and SNU449 cells for 12 hours, we found that protein expression of YTHDF3 was decreased surprisingly (Fig. 8a). In contrast, we overexpressed PFKL protein by transiently transfecting PFKL plasmid into Sk-Hep-1 and HepG2 cells for 12 hours and found that protein expression of YTHDF3 was increased (Fig. 8b), indicating that YTHDF3 and PFKL have a positive loop regulation in HCC. Functionally, CCK8 proliferation assays, colony formation assays and transwell assays showed that PFKL knockdown successfully reversed the effects of YTHDF3 overexpression on proliferation (Fig. 8c, d), migration (Fig. 8e) and invasion ability (Fig. 8f) of Sk-Hep-1 and HepG2 cells. In short, PFKL positively regulates YTHDF3 expression at protein level.
PFKL protein positively regulates YTHDF3 protein expression via inhibiting ubiquitination of YTHDF3 protein by EFTUD2
We found that YTHDF3 promotes PFKL mRNA expression via m6A modification as predicted and PFKL promotes YTHDF3 expression at protein level unexpectedly. To uncover the relationship between YTHDF3 and PFKL at protein level, we performed endogenous co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays with Huh7 and SNU449 cells and it seems that there was an interaction between YTHDF3 and PFKL at protein level (Fig. 8g). Unfortunately, there was no direct interaction between YTHDF3 and PFKL in exogenous Co-IP assays with YTHDF3-stably-overexpressed cells Sk-Hep-1 and HepG2 (Fig. 8h). Moreover, the Co-IP assay of YTHDF3 and PFKL plasmids co-transfection also confirmed that there was no direct interaction between these two proteins (Fig. 8i). These results suggested that PFKL might bind to YTHDF3 by the helps of other proteins.
It is well known that m6A is one of the most common RNA modifications and crucial for maintaining RNA splicing, translation, stability, degradation and export [10]. Simultaneously, pre-mRNA splicing plays a vital important role in gene expression. Pre-mRNA splicing is divided into two parts including removing intron regions and joining coding exon sequences to form a mature mRNA for translation. The process is catalyzed by the spliceosome, which is constituted by U1, U2, U4/U6 and U5 small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs). EFTUD2 is a core subunit of the U5 snRNP component and it is related to the translation elongation factor-2 [11]. Hence, we guessed that PFKL might interact with YTHDF3 via EFTUD2 at protein level (Fig. 8j).
Co-IP experiments demonstrated that there was an interaction between YTHDF3 and PFKL after EFTUD2 plasmid was transiently transfected into Sk-Hep-1, Huh7 or SNU449 cells (Fig. 8k, l, m). Then, YTHDF3 and EFTUD2 plasmids, or PFKL and EFTUD2 plasmids were co-transfected into 293 T cells respectively. We found that there was a direct interaction between YTHDF3 and EFTUD2 (Fig. 8n) and there was a direct interaction between PFKL and EFTUD2 (Fig. 8o). When YTHDF3, EFTUD2 and PFKL three plasmids were co-transfected into 293 T cells, PFKL and YTHDF3 were also immunoprecipitated together (Fig. 8p). What’s more, confocal assays of three group with Sk-Hep-1 cells incubated PFKL and EFTUD2 antibodies (Pearson’s coefficient = 0.91, Mander’s coefficient = 0.966), YTHDF3 and EFTUD2 antibodies (Pearson’s coefficient = 0.63, Mander’s coefficient = 0.977), or YTHDF3 and PFKL antibodies (Pearson’s coefficient = 0.74, Mander’s coefficient = 0.991) also indicated that there was co-location between YTHDF3, PFKL and EFTUD2 (Fig. 9a), and multi-label immunofluorescence staining of different HCC patients further demonstrated that PFKL interacted with YTHDF3 via EFTUD2 at the protein level (Fig. 9b). These results suggested that PFKL could bind to YTHDF3 by the help of EFTUD2. However, it has not reported whether EFTUD2 has a crucial role in the protein fate of YTHDF3.
Ubiquitination assays of SNU449 cells co-transfected ubiquitin, YTHDF3 and PFKL plasmids, or ubiquitin, YTHDF3 and EFTUD2 plasmids, or ubiquitin, YTHDF3, PFKL and EFTUD2 plasmids for 24 hours were performed to study the effect of EFTUD2 on ubiquitination of YTHDF3 protein. 20 nM MG-132 was added to RPMI1640 culture medium and cells were incubated continuously for 8 hours. We found that co-transfection of YTHDF3 and PFKL plasmids had no effect on ubiquitination of YTHDF3 protein, while the process of ubiquitination of YTHDF3 protein was decreased in the presence of EFTUD2 plasmid (Fig. 9c, d and e). Thus, we could conclude that PFKL protein positively regulated YTHDF3 protein expression via inhibiting ubiquitination of YTHDF3 protein by EFTUD2. These results indicated that EFTUD2 may act as a scaffold in protein-protein interaction and regulate as ubiquitin modification enzyme in YTHDF3 protein degradation which need to be investigated in the future.
Discussion
Increasing evidences show that m6A modification of mRNA is critical for hepatocarcinogenesis and progression of HCC. Among them, a great mount of m6A “readers” such as YTHDC1/2, HNRNPA2B1, HNRNPC, HNRNPG, NKAP, IGF2BP1/2/3 and YTHDF1/2 are found to play significant roles in hepatocarcinogenesis and progression of HCC [12]. Nevertheless, the role of YTHDF3, a key reader in m6A modification in HCC is still unclear.
First of all, we found that YTHDF3 facilitates hepatocarcinogenesis and progression of HCC in vitro and in vivo. Clinically, YTHDF3 was overexpressed in carcinoma tissues among HCC patients and higher expression of YTHDF3 was correlated with poor prognosis of HCC patients. Functionally, YTHDF3 promoted proliferation, migration and invasion ability of HCC cells in vitro, and promoted xenograft tumor growth and lung metastasis in vivo. In addition, YTHDF3 contributed to hepatocarcinogenesis of mice induced by chemical carcinogens. At the same time, an analysis of the expression pattern of m6A regulator from Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus Database also shows that the expression of YTHDF3 is significantly increased in HCC tissues compared with normal tissues, and the high expression of YTHDF3 is closely related to the poor prognosis of HCC patients [13]. Moreover, highly-expressed lysine-specific demethylase 5B can promote proliferation, migration, invasion and other malignant phenotypes of HCC cells through miR-448 /YTHDF3/ITGA6 (Integrin subunit alpha 6) axis in hepatocellular carcinoma, confirming that YTHDF3 plays an important role in the occurrence and development of HCC [14]. These results are consistent with our findings. Interestingly, YTHDF3 was also found to play the key role in colorectal cancer [15] and breast cancer brain metastasis [16].
Next, we compared the global metabolic profiles of HCC tissues from Ythdf3+/+ and Ythdf3−/− mice with untargeted metabolomics. We found that YTHDF3 knockout results in disorders of energy metabolic pathways, including glycolysis pathway in HCC. We found that the blood glucose level of high-expression YTHDF3 HCC patients was much higher than that in low-expression YTHDF3 HCC patients. In addition, the levels of blood glucose, pyruvate and lactate of liver tumor tissue of Ythdf3−/− mice were obviously lower than those of Ythdf3+/+ mice in DEN and CCl4-induced HCC mice model. What’s more, at cellular level, YTHDF3 overexpression promoted glucose uptake, pyruvate and lactate production in HCC cells. As we know, metabolism reprogramming is a fundamental characteristic of cancers. The Warburg effect or aerobic glycolysis is a key reprogrammed metabolic pathway in cancers [17]. With respect to m6A modification and cancer aerobic glycolysis, it is reported that ALKBH5 enhances chemosensitivity of cells to cisplatin via glycolysis in bladder cancer [18], METTL3 overexpression enhances glycolysis metabolism and promotes tumor growth in HCC [19] and demethylase FTO can regulate PKM2 mRNA and promote its translation through m6A modification, thus promoting hepatocellular carcinoma tumorigenesis [20]. And our study suggests the key role of YTHDF3 in glucose metabolism of HCC.
Moreover, we found that YTHDF3 as a m6A “reader” protein, inhibits a key rate-limited enzyme of glycolysis PFKL mRNA degradation via m6A modification. Our MeRIP-qPCR assays demonstrated that YTHDF3 regulated PFKL expression at mRNA level via m6A modification, and RNA stability assays showed that YTHDF3 overexpression suppressed the degradation of PFKL mRNA. Nowadays, it is generally believed that YTHDF3 can facilitate translation of its target RNA interacting with YTHDF1, and affect methylated mRNA decay mediated through YTHDF2 [21]. It is reported that in hepatocellular carcinoma, circ-KIAA1429 promoted the progression of HCC by inhibiting the degradation of Zeb1 mRNA through the m6A-YTHDF3-Zeb1 axis [22], and in our study, YTHDF3 promotes the expression of PFKL by inhibiting degradation of PFKL mRNA, thereby promoting progression of HCC. Hence, our study establishes the functional connection between m6A “reader” protein YTHDF3 and rate-limited enzyme of glycolysis PFKL in HCC. What’s more, we also found that the expression of PFKL is significantly increased in carcinoma tissues in HCC and high expression of PFKL is associated with poor prognosis of HCC patients, supporting the key role of PFKL in HCC suggested by other studies [23, 24].
More importantly, we found that PFKL, a key rate-limited enzyme of glycolysis regulates m6A RNA modification by positively regulates YTHDF3 protein expression. Our results showed that protein expression of YTHDF3 was decreased after PFKL knockdown, and rescue experiments confirmed that PFKL knockdown reversed the effects of YTHDF3 overexpression on proliferation, migration and invasion ability of HCC cells. It has been widely believed that PFKL is a kind of kinase, physiologically catalyzing fructose 6-phosphate to fructose 1,6-bisphosphate in glycolysis. Interestingly, our study establishes a connection that PFKL reversely affects m6A modification “reader” YTHDF3 at protein level, not as a key rate-limited enzyme in HCC for the first time. In some cases, noncanonical functions of metabolic enzymes are closely associated with their canonical functions, while the non-canonical functions of metabolic enzymes often independently regulate processes that are highly relevant for cell transformation and cancer development, including promoting uncontrolled cell proliferation, inducing resistance to apoptosis or enhancing cell migration [25]. In recent years, more and more studies have shown that the rate-limited enzymes of glycolysis can regulate several non-glycolysis processes in the occurrence and progression of different cancers. For example, HK2 contributes to cell proliferation, migration, invasion, angiogenesis and drug resistance in HCC, and it can interact with voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 1 to inhibit cell apoptosis [26]. In addition, PKM2 can interact with transcription factors, such as HIF-1α, β-catenin/c-Myc, NF-κB and STAT3 [27, 28] to promote target genes transcription and enhance cancer cells growth and angiogenesis [29].
It is reported that m6A modification is involved in several processes of mRNA maturation, including splicing, nucleus export, translation, and degradation, like METTL3 regulates processing and metabolism of cellular RNAs by catalyzing the addition of m6A to mRNAs [30], and YTHDC1 recruits pre-mRNA splicing factor SRSF3 to bind regions of targeted mRNAs, directly regulating mRNA splicing [31]. Referring to EFTUD2, researchers have found that it can promote progression of HCC and its high expression indicates patients’ poor prognosis [32]. Herein, we found that PFKL protein positively regulates YTHDF3 protein expression via inhibiting ubiquitination of YTHDF3 protein by EFTUD2, forming a functional loop between pre-mRNA splicing process and m6A modification of mRNA. Through a series of endogenous and exogenous COIP assays, we confirmed that there were interactions between EFTUD2 with PFKL or YTHDF3 at protein level. Immunofluorescence assays also verified the co-localization of YTHDF3, PFKL and EFTUD2 at clinical and cellular levels. Ubiquitination assays demonstrated that co-transfection of YTHDF3 and PFKL plasmids had no effect on ubiquitination of YTHDF3 protein, while the process of ubiquitination of YTHDF3 protein was decreased in the presence of EFTUD2 plasmid, concluding that PFKL protein positively regulated YTHDF3 protein expression via inhibiting ubiquitination of YTHDF3 protein by EFTUD2. These results indicated that EFTUD2 may act as a scaffold in protein-protein interaction and regulate as ubiquitin modification enzyme in YTHDF3 protein degradation which need to be investigated in the future. Collectively, our study links pre-mRNA splicing process, m6A modification of mRNA and glycolysis in HCC, which may offer a promising approach for understanding the mechanism of HCC progression.
Conclusion
In a word, our study found that YTHDF3 facilitates hepatocarcinogenesis and progression of HCC, and YTHDF3 overexpression predicts poor overall survival of HCC patients. In terms of mechanism, on the one hand, YTHDF3 is important for glycolysis metabolism of HCC, and it promotes the expression of PFKL at mRNA and protein levels. As a m6A reader, YTHDF3 inhibits PFKL mRNA degradation via m6A modification, accelerating aerobic glycolysis and progression of HCC. On the other hand, PFKL positively regulates the expression YTHDF3 at protein level, not as a kind of kinase, PFKL and YTHDF3 interact with each other by EFTUD2, and PFKL protein positively regulates YTHDF3 protein expression via inhibiting ubiquitination of YTHDF3 protein by EFTUD2, establishing a connection between pre-mRNA splicing and m6A modification in HCC (Fig. 9f).
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgments
Mass spectrometry analysis was performed by the Bioinformatics and Omics Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen Univeristy.
Abbreviations
- YTHDF3
YTH domain family protein 3
- PFKL
Phosphofructokinase, liver type
- m6A
N6-methyladenosine
- HCC
Hepatocellular carcinoma
- ATP
Adenosine triphosphate
- MeRIP
Methylated RNA immunoprecipitation
- COIP
Co-immunoprecipitation
- EFTUD2
Elongation factor Tu GTP binding domain containing 2
- SD
Standard deviation
- IHC
Immunohistochemistry
- qPCR
Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction
- shRNA
Short hairpin RNA
- AFP
α-fetoprotein
- CRISPR/Cas9
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR associated 9
- DEN
Diethylnitrosamine
- CCl4
Carbon tetrachloride
- ECAR
Extracellular acidification rate
- OCR
Oxygen consumption rate
- HK
Hexokinase
- G-6-P
Glucose 6-phosphate
- GPI
Phosphohexose isomerase
- F-6-G
Fructose 6-phosphate
- PFK1
Phosphofructokinase-1
- ADP
Adenosine diphosphate
- F-1,6-bisp
Fructose 1,6-biophosphate
- ALDO
Aldolase
- G3P
Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate
- GAPDH
Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphatedehydrogenase
- 1,3-PGA
1,3-biphosphoglycerate
- PGK
Phosphoglycerate kinase
- 3-PGA
3-phosphoglycerate
- PGAM
Phosphoglycerate mutase
- 2-PGA
2-phosphoglycerate
- ENO
Enolase
- PEP
Phosphoenolpyruvate
- PKM
Pyruvate kinase
- LDH
Lactic dehydrogenase
- PFKM
Phosphofructokinase, muscle type
- PFKP
Phosphofructokinase, plasma type
- RIP
RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation
- SiRNA
Small interfering RNA
- snRNPs
Small nuclear ribonucleoproteins
Authors’ contributions
Jianming Li conducted and designed the study, drafted the manuscript; Rong Zhou and Wen Ni performed most of the experiments; Yunxia Zhou performed some western blot and qPCR assays; Chao Qin and Aijun Zhou collected clinical and animal paraffin sections; Yuqing Li, Jianping Huo and Lijuan Bian contributed to immunohistochemistry analysis; Rong Zhou analyzed data and drafted the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Foundation of China (Grant No. 82130080, U1801282, 81,802,382, 81,702,322, 82,273,145), Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2019B020229002), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021A1515010224), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant numbers 2021 M690170, 2022 T150749).
Availability of data and materials
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article. All experiments involved in this study were repeated at least 3 times. Original data can be provided for reviewing.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of Sun Yat-sen University (SYSKY-2022-120-01). All hepatocellular carcinoma patients have been informed of the study details and signed informed consent forms. All mice experiments were performed according to national and institutional guidelines from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees, and have been reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethical and Welfare Committee (AEWC) (Approval No. IACUC-AEWC-F2206018).
Consent for publication
We confirm: that this study described has not been published before; that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors.
Competing interests
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by all co-authors.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rong Zhou and Wen Ni contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.World Health Organaization. Cancer. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/. Accessed 16 Apr 2017.
- 2.Omata M, Cheng A-L, Kokudo N, et al. Asia–Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int. 2017;11(4):317–370. doi: 10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhu L-R, Ni W-J, Cai M, et al. Advances in RNA epigenetic modifications in hepatocellular carcinoma and potential targeted intervention strategies. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:777007. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.777007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhao Q, Zhao Y, Wei H, et al. m6A RNA modification modulates PI3K/Akt/mTOR signal pathway in gastrointestinal Cancer. Theranostics. 2020;10(21):9528–9543. doi: 10.7150/thno.42971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yang Y, Hsu PJ, Chen Y-S, et al. Dynamic transcriptomic m6A decoration: writers, erasers, readers and functions in RNA metabolism. Cell Res. 2018;28:616–624. doi: 10.1038/s41422-018-0040-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhou Y, Yin Z, Hou B, et al. Expression profiles and prognostic significance of RNA N6-methyladenosine-related genes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: evidence from independent datasets. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:3921–3931. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S191565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang C, Huang S, Zhuang H, et al. YTHDF2 promotes the liver cancer stem cell phenotype and cancer metastasis by regulating OCT4 expression via m6A RNA methylation. Oncogene. 2020;39(23):4507–4518. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-1303-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shang R-Z, Shi-Bin Q, Wang D-S. Reprogramming of glucose metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma: Progress and prospects. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(45):9933–9943. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i45.9933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xu D, Shao F, Bian X, et al. The evolving landscape of noncanonical functions of metabolic enzymes in cancer and other pathologies[J] Cell Metab. 2021;33(1):33–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mohammad Burhan Uddin Zhishan Wang and Chengfeng Yang, dysregulations of functional RNA modifications in cancer, cancer stemness and cancer therapeutics. Theranostics. 2020;10(7):3164–3189. doi: 10.7150/thno.41687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Frazer LN, Nancollis V, O’Keefe RT. The role of Snu114p during pre-mRNA splicing. Biochem Soc Trans. 2008;36:551–553. doi: 10.1042/BST0360551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Qin S, Mao Y, Chen X, et al. The functional roles, cross-talk and clinical implications of m6A modification and circRNA in hepatocellular carcinoma. International Jounal of Biological Carcinoma. 2021;17(12):3059–3079. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.62767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yin T, Zhao L, Yao S. Comprehensive characterization of m6A methylation and its impact on prognosis, genome instability, and tumor microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma[J] BMC Med Genet. 2022;15(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12920-022-01207-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Guo J-C, Liu Z, Yang Y-J, et al. KDM5B promotes self-renewal of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through the microRNA-448–mediated YTHDF3/ITGA6 axis[J] J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25(13):5949–5962. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ni W, Yao S, Zhou Y, et al. Long noncoding RNA GAS5 inhibits progression of colorectal cancer by interacting with and triggering YAP phosphorylation and degradation and is negatively regulated by the m6A reader YTHDF3. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:143. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1079-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chang G, Shi L, Ye Y, et al. YTHDF3 induces the translation of m6A-enriched gene transcripts to promote breast cancer brain metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2020;38:857–871. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ganapathy-Kanniappan S. Linking tumor glycolysis and immune evasion in cancer: emerging concepts and therapeutic opportunities. 2017;1868(1):212–220. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hao Y, Yang X, Tang J, et al. ALKBH5 inhibited cell proliferation and sensitized bladder cancer cells to cisplatin by m6A-CK2α-mediated glycolysis. Molecular Therapy-Nucleic Acids. 2021;23:27–41. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.10.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lin Y, Wei X, Jian Z, et al. METTL3 expression is associated with glycolysis metabolism and sensitivity to glycolytic stress in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Medicine. 2020;9(8):2859–2867. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li J, Zhu L, Shi Y, et al. m6A demethylase FTO promotes hepatocellular carcinoma tumorigenesis via mediating PKM2 demethylation[J] Am J Transl Res. 2019;11:6084–6092. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shi H, Wang X, Zhike L, et al. YTHDF3 facilitates translation and decay of N6-methyladenosine-modified RNA. Cell Res. 2017;27(3):315–328. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang M, Yang Y, Yang J, et al. Circ_KIAA1429 accelerates hepatocellular carcinoma advancement through the mechanism of m6A-YTHDF3-Zeb1. Life Sci. 2020;25(13):5949–5962. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Feng Y, Zhang Y, Cai Y, et al. A20 targets PFKL and glycolysis to inhibit the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(2):89. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2278-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee NCW, Carella MA, Papa S, et al. High expression of glycolytic genes in cirrhosis correlates with the risk of developing liver cancer. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2018;6:138. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2018.00138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Snaebjornsson MT, Schulze A. Non-canonical functions of enzymes facilitate cross-talk between cell metabolic and regulatory pathways[J] Exp Mol Med. 2018;50(4):34. doi: 10.1038/s12276-018-0065-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shili X, Herschman HR. A tumor agnostic therapeutic strategy for hexokinase 1-null/hexokinase 2-positive cancers. Cancer Res. 2019;79:5907–5914. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-1789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.van Niekerk G, Engelbrecht AM. Role of PKM2 in directing the metabolic fate of glucose in cancer: a potential therapeutic target. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2018;41(4):343–351. doi: 10.1007/s13402-018-0383-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shang RZ, Qu SB, Wang DS. Reprogramming of glucose metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma: Progress and prospects. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(45):9933–9943. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i45.9933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Azoitei N, Becher A, Steinestel K, et al. PKM2 promotes tumor angiogenesis by regulating HIF-1α through NF-κB activation. Mol Cancer. 2016;15:3. doi: 10.1186/s12943-015-0490-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Price AM, Hayer KE, McIntyre ABR, et al. Direct RNA sequencing reveals m6A modifications on adenovirus RNA are necessary for efficient splicing. Nat Commun. 2020;11:6016. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19787-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xiao W, Adhikari S, Dahal U, et al. Nuclear m6A reader YTHDC1 regulates mRNA splicing. Mol Cell. 2016;61(4):507–519. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mengxian T, He L, You Y, et al. EFTUD2 maintains the survival of tumor cells and promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression via the activation of STAT3. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(10):830. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-03040-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article. All experiments involved in this study were repeated at least 3 times. Original data can be provided for reviewing.