Skip to main content
ASN NEURO logoLink to ASN NEURO
. 2022 Dec 4;14:17590914221142360. doi: 10.1177/17590914221142360

Rab11 and Its Role in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Pinky Sultana 1, Jiri Novotny 1,
PMCID: PMC9726856  PMID: 36464817

Abstract

Vesicles mediate the trafficking of membranes/proteins in the endocytic and secretory pathways. These pathways are regulated by small GTPases of the Rab family. Rab proteins belong to the Ras superfamily of GTPases, which are significantly involved in various intracellular trafficking and signaling processes in the nervous system. Rab11 is known to play a key role especially in recycling many proteins, including receptors important for signal transduction and preservation of functional activities of nerve cells. Rab11 activity is controlled by GEFs (guanine exchange factors) and GAPs (GTPase activating proteins), which regulate its function through modulating GTP/GDP exchange and the intrinsic GTPase activity, respectively. Rab11 is involved in the transport of several growth factor molecules important for the development and repair of neurons. Overexpression of Rab11 has been shown to significantly enhance vesicle trafficking. On the other hand, a reduced expression of Rab11 was observed in several neurodegenerative diseases. Current evidence appears to support the notion that Rab11 and its cognate proteins may be potential targets for therapeutic intervention. In this review, we briefly discuss the function of Rab11 and its related interaction partners in intracellular pathways that may be involved in neurodegenerative processes.

Keywords: neurodegenerative diseases, Rab11, Rab11-FIPs, vesicle trafficking

Introduction

Rab proteins (20−25 kDa) are monomeric G proteins that form the largest group of the Ras superfamily, with 70 members in humans. Most of these proteins are expressed ubiquitously, and some are tissue-specific. Eleven Rab11 proteins have been found in yeast, 33 in Drosophila melanogaster (Zhang et al., 2007), 29 in Caenorhabditis elegans (Pereira-Leal & Seabra, 2000), and 57 in Arabidopsis thaliana (Vernoud et al., 2003). These proteins play an important role in regulating membrane trafficking during vesicle formation, budding, motility, tethering, and finally fusion (reviewed by Bhuin & Roy, 2014). The Rab11 subfamily consists of three members, Rab11a, Rab11b, and Rab11c/Rab25. Each Rab protein has a specific location related to its physiological functions. Rab11a is ubiquitously expressed, Rab11b is enriched in the brain, testis, and heart, and Rab25/rab11c is restricted to epithelia, as studied in mouse cells (Bhartur et al., 2000). Rab11 was first recognized as a marker for recycling endosomes. It regulates vesicles via the recycling endosome compartment and early endosomes to the trans-Golgi network and plasma membrane (Ullrich et al., 1996).

Rabs are molecular switches that regulate intracellular transport in eukaryotes. Rab11 cycles between an inactive GDP (guanosine diphosphate)-bound state and an active GTP (guanosine triphosphate)-bound state (Grosshan et al., 2006). In its inactive state, Rab11 forms a complex with RabGDI (Rab guanine dissociation inhibitor) and remains in the cytoplasm to avoid nonspecific activation. Once it receives signals for activation, the RabGDI complex is transported to the membrane and undergoes nucleotide exchange of GDP for GTP mediated by guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF). Activation is followed by recruitment of host effectors, which perform further functions in membrane trafficking. Once cycling is complete, GTP bound to Rab11 is hydrolyzed by GTPase-activating protein (GAP) and resumes its inactive state (Dirac-Svejstrup et al., 1997; Ingmundson et al., 2007; Machner & Isberg, 2007; Sivars et al., 2003). Rab11 directs various cargo proteins and membranes through the long loop of endosomal recycling, thereby regulating vesicle trafficking pathways and ensuring the transport of endosomes from the plasma membrane to the endosomal recycling compartment and vice versa (Stenmark, 2009). The functions of Rab11 are carried out through its interaction with various effector proteins. In this context, the Rab11-family interacting proteins (FIPs), which possess a Rab-binding domain (RBD) and mediate GTP-dependent interactions with Rab GTPases, have been attributed a special role. These proteins are known to facilitate Rab11-dependent vesicle recycling (Baetz & Goldenring, 2013). A schematic illustration of the Rab11 GTPase cycle is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of Rab11 GTPase cycling between active and inactive states. GDF (GDI dissociation factor) interacts with GDI bound to Rab11GDP to free Rab11GDP and allow its activation. GEF then exchanges GDP for GTP, converting the inactive Rab11 to its active state. Rab11GTP is now ready to interact with the effector proteins.

In the past decade, Rab11 proteins and the components of Rab11-mediated intracellular trafficking and signaling pathways have emerged as molecules possibly involved in etiology of some neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, the presumed role of these proteins in neurodegeneration should be better addressed by future studies.

Rab11 Proteins

The Rab11 subfamily consists of three members, Rab11a, Rab11b, and Rab11c/Rab25. A brief characterization of these proteins is given below.

Rab11a

Rab11a is ubiquitously expressed. It is a vastly studied and characterized member of the Rab11 family. It localizes in the endocytic recycling compartments (Ullrich et al., 1996). The role of Rab11a in controlling the trafficking of receptors from the endoplasmic reticulum compartment (ERC) to the plasma membrane has been extensively discussed by Maxfield & McGraw (2004). It transports cargoes from peripheral sorting endosomes (SEs) to recycling endosomes (REs) (Horgan et al., 2010). In the trans-Golgi network (TGN) Rab11a routes vesicle trafficking between the TGN and ERC or plasma membrane. It plays a vital role in controlling tissue homeostasis during embryonic development and the postnatal period. Total knockout of Rab11a was found to be embryonic lethal in a mouse model. Interestingly, brain-specific Rab11a knockout showed no overt abnormalities in brain architecture, but, on the other hand, intestine-specific Rab11a knockout resulted in mislocalization of apical proteins in the intestine (Sobajima et al., 2014). This study raises the question of whether other family members such as Rab11b or Rab11c/Rab25 might be able to compensate for the normal neuronal phenotype in the brain. In this context, a closer examination of the knockout mouse models of Rab11b or Rab11c might be an important consideration. It should also be mentioned here that Rab11a affects several cellular processes, including cytokinesis, phagocytosis, cell migration, immunological synapses, etc. (Assaker et al., 2010; Fielding et al., 2005; Gorska et al., 2009).

Rab11b

Rab11b is abundant in the brain, heart, and testis and is also enriched in the ERC, which recycles the transferrin receptor. In contrast to Rab11a, Rab11b is localized to the apical pericentriolar region in the gastric parietal cells (Lapierre et al., 2003). It also controls the trafficking of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) in polarized epithelial cells (Silvis et al., 2009). In addition, it regulates insulin granule exocytosis (Sugawara et al., 2009). Lamers et al. (2017) reported that certain dominant de novo missense mutations in Rab11b with a distinct brain phenotype impair intellectual abilities and are associated with absent speech, epilepsy, and hypotonia. This suggests the important role of Rab11b in the brain and may be consistent with the above speculations about its possible compensatory role in the case of Rab11a dysfunction.

Rab11c/25

Rab11c or Rab25 is highly expressed in polarized epithelial cells of the lung, kidney, and gastrointestinal mucosa (Goldenring et al., 1993). Loss of Rab25 promotes colorectal adenocarcinomas suggesting that it may play a critical role as a tumor suppressor or oncogene in intestinal epithelial cells (Nam et al., 2010). Rab25 promotes the development and neoplastic transition of skin squamous cell carcinoma through dysregulation of integrin trafficking (Jeong et al., 2019). In addition, it was found that downregulation of Rab25 is associated with a subtype of breast cancer, making this protein therapeutic target in luminal B breast cancer tumors (Belhadj et al., 2020). While it is evident that Rab25 plays an important role in cancer, its function in neurodegenerative diseases remains to be explored.

Rab11-FIPs and Their Functions

The downstream machinery of Rab11 GTPases identified an evolutionarily conserved protein family known as the Rab11-family interacting proteins (FIPs). They consist of five members: Rip11/FIP5/Gaf-1/Gaf1b, FIP2, RCP/FIP1/FIP1C (Rab coupling protein), FIP3/arfophilin/eferin, and FIP4/arfophilin-2 (Hales et al., 2001; Lindsay et al., 2002; Prekeris et al., 2000). The C-termini of the FIPs include a highly conserved Rab11-binding domain consisting of 20 amino acids. The FIPs are divided into two classes depending on the presence of a calcium-binding domain in the N-terminus. Class I consists of FIP1, FIP2, and FIP5, while class II consists of FIP3 and FIP4 (Wallace et al., 2002). These proteins can bind to motor proteins such as myosin V, kinesin, and dynein to regulate the endosomal recycling process, depending on their specificity of protein, lipid, and calcium binding abilities and their post-translational modification by phosphorylation.

As shown in Figure 2, Rab11-FIP proteins include protein domains/motifs such as the Rab-binding domain (RBD) that mediates GTP-dependent interactions with Rab GTPases. C2 or EF-hand domains of the FIPs confer sensitivity to calcium and phospholipid binding. An α helical coiled-coil structure of these proteins mediates homodimerization by binding the switch I and switch II regions of two Rab11a-GTP molecules (Eathiraj et al., 2006; Jagoe et al., 2006). The switch I and switch II regions are nucleotide-sensitive regions that are the major binding sites for Rab11 effectors (Pasqualato et al., 2004). These proteins regulate various membrane trafficking events, which can be classified into the following three actions: cargo recycling, membrane delivery, and associating motor proteins. The functions of the FIPs are listed in Table 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Schematic representation of Rab11-FIPs. C2 = C2 domain, EF = EF-hand domain, PRR = protein-rich region, CC = coiled coil domain, ABD = Arf6 binding domain, RBD = Rab11 binding domain.

Table 1.

The Role of Rab11-FIP Binding Domains

FIP Function References
FIP1 Binds to Golgin-97 and mediates tethering and fusion of recycling endosomes to the TGN; regulates trafficking during early membrane recycling; regulates adiponectin trafficking and release; mediates MUC13 trafficking in colonic goblet cells; and participates in the oncogenic effects of mutant p53 Jing et al. (2010); Schafer et al. (2016); Carson et al. (2013); Rathan-Kumar et al. (2022); von Grabowiecki et al. (2021); Tang et al. (2021)
FIP2 Recycling of transferrin, AQP2, and CXCR2; trafficking of RSV, GLUT4, and FAT/CD36; involved in disseminating gastric cancer; regulates cell migration of colorectal cancer cells Lindsay et al. (2002); Nedvetsky et al. (2007); Fan et al. (2004); Utley et al. (2008); Schwenk et al. (2007); Dong et al. (2016); Xu et al. (2016)
FIP3 Regulates dendritic formation, facilitated by Tsg101 to regulate cardiac hypertrophy. Yazaki et al. (2014); Essandoh et al. (2019)
FIP4 Predominant in neural tissues; binds to Tsg101 for cytokinesis, regulates neuronal migration during cortical layer formation; affects progress of pancreatic cancer Muto et al. (2006); Horgan et al. (2012); Hara et al. (2018); He et al. (2017)
FIP5 Translocates GLUT4 to cell surface of adipocytes; recycles α5β1 integrin and EGFR1; controls transcytosis of polymeric immunoglobulin receptors; regulates apical trafficking and lumenogenesis Welsh et al. (2007); Caswell et al. (2008); Su et al. (2010); Li et al. (2014)

Note. AQP2 = aquaporin 2, CXCR2 = chemokine receptor 2, EGFR1 = epidermal growth factor receptor 1, FAT/CD36 = fatty acid translocase, GLUT4 = glucose transporter 4, RSV = respiratory syncytial virus, TGN = trans-Golgi network.

The N-terminal C2 domains of Class I Rab11-FIPs regulate most recycling cargoes to docking sites on the phospholipid-enriched plasma membrane (Lindsay & McCaffrey, 2004). Class II has been shown to play a key role in supplying endosomal material during cell division. Both members of class II bind to a member of the Arf6 GTPases. Arf6 recruits both FIP3 and FIP4 to the cleavage furrow and midbody during cytokinesis (Fielding et al., 2005; Simon et al., 2008). For transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane or vice versa, FIPs associate motor proteins with members of the Rab11 subfamily (Figure 3). FIP1 interacts directly with the motor protein myosin Vb to regulate recycling of Rab11a vesicles. Mutation of Rab11-FIP1 causes trafficking between early and late endosomes to stop at certain points and may destabilize the recycling system. This may indicate that there are multiple pathways with recycling endosomes where dynamic trafficking decisions are made (Schafer et al., 2014). Interestingly, a PEST (Pro-Glu-Ser-Thr) motif exists in FIP1 that targets a protein for proteolytic degradation, and once the recycled endosome reaches the plasma membrane, FIP1 is inactivated by calpain (Marie et al., 2005). It would be important to determine how FIP1 interacts with the proteins using the PEST motif. FIP3 binds to kinesin 1 and dynein 1 to mediate endosomal recycling in the endosomal recycling compartment (ERC). However, it is not yet clear how this regulation is maintained (Horgan et al., 2010; Simon & Prekeris, 2008). FIP2 and FIP5 are known to be regulated by phosphorylation, and the C2 domain of FIP5 binds to phospholipids in a magnesium-dependent manner. FIP5 associates with kinesin 2 (a primary FIP5 endosome motor) along with several partner proteins to move endosomes from the centrosome to the cleavage furrow during apical lumen formation (Li et al., 2014). Rab11 interacts with several cargoes and interacting proteins listed in Supplemental Tables S1 and S2, respectively.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Illustration of the endocytic pathway and the role of Rab11-FIPs in vesicle transport. Rab11-FIP heterodimers containing cargo are bound to motor proteins for transport from the endoplasmic reticulum compartment (ERC) to the plasma membrane or from the plasma membrane to the ERC.

The Role of Rab11 in Recycling Endosomes

Rab11 protein is involved in several cellular trafficking pathways. It is localized in the TGN and post-Golgi vesicles of the secretory pathway, where it controls recycling endosomes. Dysfunctional Rab11 mutants cause inhibition of transferrin recycling from late recycling endosomes (Ullrich et al., 1996). In polarized epithelial cells, Rab11 has ben shown to be localized in the pericentriolar endosomal compartments (Casanova et al., 1999). A recent analysis suggests that Rab11 is dynamically distributed in neuronal cells to ensure proper protein delivery during neuronal development (Siri et al., 2020). It plays an important role in regulating the transport of numerous receptors/cargoes that are constitutively recycled (Supplemental Table S1). Some cargoes such as cholesterol and transferrin receptors are found in all cell types, cargoes such as AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid) receptors are important for neurons (Correia et al., 2008). Rab11-dependent pathways represent a key component involved in neuronal migration, which is critical for mammalian brain formation. In a study using in utero electroporation, the role of endocytic pathways in neuronal migration in the developing cerebral cortex was investigated in vivo (Kawauchi et al., 2010). These authors observed dysregulation of migration when the Rab11-dependent pathway was suppressed. They found that recycling of Rab11-dependent N-cadherin is important for neuronal migration during brain maturation in mammals. The developing mammalian brain requires AMPA receptor trafficking and dendritic spine growth. Rab11 forms complexes with motor proteins that direct vesicles to subcellular sites of different polarity via microtubule tracks. Actin-dependent myosin Vb has been shown to mobilize AMPA receptors for postsynaptic plasticity in neurons. Myosin Vb interacts with Rab11-linked recycling endosomes and disruption of this interaction prevents AMPA receptor insertion (Wang et al., 2008). AMPA receptors important for long-term potentiation (LTP) are trafficked via the Rab11 bound endocytic recycling pathway from dendritic shafts to spines using Rab11 effectors. To maintain LTP, exocytosis of AMPA receptors from recycling endosomes to extrasynaptic sites must occur (Correia et al., 2008; Park, 2018; Park et al., 2004). In addition, synaptic trafficking of AMPA receptors also plays an important role in long-term depression (LTD) (Bacaj et al., 2015). In general, Rab11 provides exocytic processes at the TGN and recycling processes at the pericentriolar recycling endosome. Rab11 is closely related to the exocyst complex (exocyst, a downstream effector of Rab11, is a protein complex that mediates vesicles at the plasma membrane for exocytosis). Rab proteins and their interaction with exocyst have been studied in yeast to understand the mechanism of polarized exocytosis. Das and Guo (2011) suggested that there are a number of protein interactions between Rab11 and the exocyst complex involving the tethering of secretory vesicles to the plasma membrane. The molecular mechanism involving the Rab cascade is still unclear for mammalian homologs.

The Role of GEFs and GAPs in the Secretory Pathway

It is known that the GDP/GTP binding state of Rab11 determines its interaction with its effectors. The GDP/GTP cycle is regulated by GAPs and GEFs. Whereas GAPs catalyze the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP, GEFs mediate the exchange of GDP for GTP and thus control the cellular functions of small GTPases.

Rab11 GEFs

GEFs for several Rab proteins are still unknown. One report suggests that huntingtin (Htt, a protein involved in Huntington′s disease), which is located at endosomal membranes, may participate in guanine nucleotide exchange on Rab11. However, it does not interact directly with Rab11 but in complex with Rab11 GEF. Moreover, the mutant form of Htt inhibits Rab11 activity and impairs vesicle formation on recycling endosomes (Li et al., 2008, 2009). In 2012, Xiong et al. reported that Crag is a Rab11 GEF important for trafficking of light-induced rhodopsin in Drosophila photoreceptor cells. Crag consists of the calmodulin-binding domain, and in the presence of calcium, its GEF activity promotes the release of GDP (Xiong et al., 2012). A motor protein known as myosin Vb plays a key role in recycling of endosomes to the plasma membrane. It binds to calmodulin via EF-hand calcium-binding motifs encoded by the class II of Rab11-FIPs. This also suggests that calcium is an essential element for Rab11 function (Welz et al., 2014). Crag has three mammalian homologs, DENND4A, B, and C, with DENND4B having the highest homology. Therefore, DENND4 proteins deserve further exploration. Parcas (Pcs), another GEF involved in rhodopsin transport in Drosophila photoreceptors, has been reported to play an important role in eye development (Otsuka et al., 2019). Rab11-interacting protein-1 (REI-1) was discovered to be the GEF for Rab11 in C. elegans, and it is important during cytokinesis in the embryo. REI-1 and its human homolog SH3-binding protein 5 (SH3BP5) were found to have strong GEF activity toward Rab11a in vitro (Sakaguchi et al., 2015). SH3BP5 interacts with the N-terminal region, switch I, interswitch, and switch II of Rab11a (Goto-Ito, Morooka et al., 2019). Interestingly, the Rab-GEF domains of REI-1 do not resemble DENN (Barr & Lambright, 2010). Figure 4 shows that the zinc-binding motif (Btk-type zinc finger) is conserved from C. elegans to humans.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Representation of different Rab11 GEF protein domains and Btk-binding motifs. These sequences are highly conserved from C. elegans to H. sapiens.

Rab11 GAPs

A group of proteins with the TBC (Tre-2, Bub2, Cdc16) domain includes Rab GAPs, namely TBC1D11, TBC1D15, EVI5, and TBC1D9B (Dabbeekeh et al., 2007; Gallo et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2005). TBC provides two catalytic residues (arginine, glutamine finger), thereby stabilizing the GTP-hydrolysis transition state (Pan et al., 2006). EVI5 has been extensively studied and shown to be an essential regulator of the proper Rab11 function. EVI5 GAP activity in Drosophila is required for border cell migration in a Rab11-dependent manner. Loss or increase in of EVI5 function impedes cell migration by disrupting Rab11-dependent polarization of active guidance receptors (Laflamme et al., 2012), suggesting tight regulation of recycling endosomes for spatial restriction of receptor tyrosine kinase at the edge of migrating cells. The precise roles of TBC1D15 and TBC1D11 remain unclear. In addition to Rab11, they also activate the GTPases Rab7 and Rab4. Interestingly, overexpression of TBC1D9B reduces the rate of basolateral to apical IgA transcytosis (Rab11a-dependent pathway) but shows no effect on basolateral recycling of transferrin receptors or epidermal growth factor receptor. It reduces the amount of GTP-bound Rab11 and disrupts its interaction with its effector Sec15A (Gallo et al., 2014).

The Role of Rab11 in Transcytosis

A transcellular transport process in polarized cells is referred to as transcytosis, which allows communication between apical and basolateral plasma membrane regions. In developing neurons, polarized membrane trafficking of signaling receptors is essential in response to stimuli such as growth and survival. Figure 5 illustrates transcytosis in polarized and neuronal cells. In polarized cells, transcytosis targets newly synthesized proteins toward the apical surface by internalizing basolateral membrane protein targeted to the apical surface (Anderson et al., 2005). In neuronal cells, newly synthesized molecules are inserted into the soma surface for endocytosis and are targeted to the axon via Rab11-bound recycling endosomes (Ascaño et al., 2009). The recycling endosome acts as a hub and sorts apically directed proteins. Silencing of Rab11FIP5 has been reported to disrupt transcytosis (Su et al., 2010). Another study showed that Rab11-FIP2 regulates transcytosis in MDCK cells through its phosphorylation at Ser-227 by MARK2 (Ducharme et al., 2006) and also controls epithelial cell polarity (Lapierre et al., 2012). In neurons, the transcytotic pathway directs proteins (e.g., L1/NgCAM, VAMP2, and TrkA) from the somatodendritic membrane to the axonal surface (Ascaño et al., 2009; Sampo et al., 2003). Importantly, the endocytic and transcytotic pathways may be impaired in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Reduction of lipoprotein transcytosis to the axon was found to lead to neuron-specific impairment of axonal delivery. Transcytosis of axonal amyloid-beta precursor protein (APP) and lipoproteins from the soma to the axon appears to be strongly dependent on Rab11. Defects in recycling endosomes and knockdown of Rab11 have been shown to reduce in APP density and lipoprotein transcytosis (Woodruff et al., 2016). In addition, axonal β-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) was observed to initiate APP processing of endosomes in a Rab11-dependent manner by sorting endosomes to axons in hippocampal neurons (Buggia-Prévot et al., 2014), suggesting that manipulation of BACE1 may modulate amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) transport in a Rab11-dependent manner and serve as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of Alzmeimer′s disease. Macromolecules are also transported from the axonal membrane to the somatodendritic surface via a partially retrograde axonal transport pathway. Glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were found to be taken up by hypoglossal neurons and directed to cell bodies in small vesicles. The trophic factors are either degraded in the cell body or recycled for transcytosis and accumulate at dendritic synapses (Rind et al., 2005). These studies demonstrate the important role of Rab11 in transport processes in neurons.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

A schematic showing the crucial role of Rab11 in transcytosis in polar epithelial cells and neuronal cells. (A) In epithelial cells, new proteins from basolateral early endosomes (BEE) are transported toward apical recycling endosomes (ARE) and to lysosomes, where they are destined to form late endosome (LE). Proteins in ARE are bound to Rab11 to be either transported to the apical region or returned to the trans-Golgi network (TGN). (B) In neurons, proteins are endocytosed from the somatodendritic space into early endosomes (EE) and moved to late endosomes (LE), which fuse with lysosomes, or they are trancytosed anterogradely to the axon via Rab11-positive recycling endosomes (RE), where they fuse with the membrane or bud out and return to the TGN.

Autophagy

Autophagy is an intracellular, lysosome-dependent degradation process in eukaryotes that may also involve vesicular trafficking. Rab11 exerts a critical function in the formation of amphisomes, which are autophagosomes fused to multivesicular bodies (MVBs) or endosomes (Morvan et al., 2009). The crucial role of Rab11 in the formation of amphisomes during autophagy is illustrated in Figure 6. Rab11-GTP has been reported to be required for amphisome formation in starving K562 cells, and the Rab11-dependent autophagic pathway has been shown to help get rid of endocytic compartments and also remove other organelles (Fader et al., 2008). TBC1D14, a TBC domain protein (Rab-GAP) regulates autophagosome formation by Rab11-positive recycling endosomes. Interestingly, detailed characterization of TBC1D14 revealed that it has no GAP function but has effector function (Longatti et al., 2012). Overexpression of TBC1D14 may lead to misplacement of Rab11, resulting in disruption of recycling transport and autophagosome formation. Therefore, investigation of other Rab targets for TBC1D14 may provide an explanation for the mechanism of how it affects Rab11 function. TBC1D14 bound to Rab11 can also bind to the TRAPP III complex (a multisubunit tethering complex and also a GEF for Rab1) via its N-terminus and activates Rab1, converting the Rab11-positive membrane to a Rab1-positive membrane, facilitating the movement of endosomes to Golgi traffic. Together, they regulate ATG9 (autophagy protein) trafficking from the peripheral recycling endosome to the early Golgi, which is required for the initiation of autophagy (Lamb et al., 2016). It would be of interest to understand how Rab11-Rab1 exchange occurs and whether other cargos use this pathway and contribute to the initiation of autophagy. In addition, Rab11-positive membranes allow autophagy of the transferrin receptor and damaged mitochondria. Upon starvation, phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PI3P) is formed on Rab11-positive membrane, which has been shown to recruit a protein WIPI2 that attaches to autophagic precursor membranes by binding to Rab11. It is worth noting that the loss of Rab11 impairs the autophagy machinery (Puri et al., 2018). This suggests that the Rab11-positive membranes are a preliminary platform for autophagosome formation.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

A schematic showing the crucial role of Rab11 in the formation of amphisomes during autophagy. Early endosomes form multivesicular bodies (MVBs), which then fuse with the autophagosome to form amphisome with the help of Rab11; the amphisome is either taken up by lysosomes or used to transport of membranes to the plasma membrane for recycling purposes.

The TRAPP Complex and Neurological Diseases

Transport protein particle (TRAPP), which was first identified in yeast, is a tethering factor consisting of several subunits. It comprises an entire family of complexes, namely I, II, and III. TRAPP complexes are conserved from yeast to humans. The core of each complex consists of seven subunits, namely Trs20, Bet5, Bet3 (2 copies), Trs23, Trs31, and Trs33, and only these subunits constitute TRAPP I. Besides that, TRAPP II and TRAPP III contain another four subunits (Tca17, Trs65, Trs120, and Trs130) and one subunit (Trs85), respectively. Although the subunits are conserved, only the human TRAPP II and TRAPP III have been described. The human TRAPP complexes contain similar core proteins named TRAPPC1, TRAPPC2, TRAPPC3, TRAPPC4, TRAPPC5, and TRAPPC6. Human TRAPP II additionally contains TRAPPC9 and TRAPPC10, while TRAPP III additionally contains TRAPPC8, TRAPPC11, TRAPPC12, and TRAPPC13 (Kim et al., 2016). All three TRAPP complexes show GEF activity toward the Rab1 homolog in yeast, Ypt1p. The TRAPP II complex acts as a GEF toward Ypt31, the Rab11 homolog in yeast (Thomas & Fromme, 2016). In Drosophila, the Trs120 homolog bru functions in the Golgi and interacts with Rab11 (Robinett et al., 2009). In Arabidopsis, TRAPP II is linked to the plant Rab11 ortholog Rab-A (Qi et al., 2011), suggesting that TRAPP II as a GEF is not restricted to yeast.

Based on the knockdown effect of mTrs130, Yamasaki et al. suggested that mammalian TRAPP II (mTRAPP II) functions in ER-to-Golgi transport (Yamasaki et al., 2009). mTRAPP II and Rab11 are associated together for transport from the Golgi to the plasma membrane in human cells during primary cilia assembly, indicating a link between Rab11 and mTRAPP II (Westlake et al., 2011). A recent study showed that a Rac1GEF kalirin associates with mTRAPP II and regulates Rab11 function in recycling endosomes (Wang et al., 2020). Depletion of kalirin resulted in downregulation of TRAPPC9 (the subunit of mTRAPP II) due to a decrease in Rab11 GEF activity on cellular membranes. TRAPPC9/NIBP (NIK and IKK2 binding protein) is a key player in the TRAPP II complex and is known for its important role in NF-|B signaling in the central nervous system (Hu et al., 2005). Rab11 has also been found to recruit Rabin8, which interacts with TRAPPC9 and causes activation of Rab8 to promote ciliogenesis (Knödler et al., 2010). Interestingly, Myo5B has been described as a new interacting partner for TRAPPC9 (Bodnar et al., 2020). Disruption of the interaction of Myo5b with Rab11-FIP2 can abolish exocytosis from recycling endosomes, thereby preventing AMPA receptor insertion and spine growth. These data suggest a direct link between TRAPPC9 and Rab11. It is important to note that a recent study demonstrated the interaction of mTRAPP II with inactive Rab11, proving that TRAPPC9 is a Rab11GEF. In addition, extensive behavioral testing was performed in a knockout (KO) mouse model that revealed a robust role of TRAPPC9 in memory and defects in the brain (Ke et al., 2020). For example, in an open field test the KO mice were less active and did not explore the arena. The female KO mice showed no interest in dealing with unfamiliar objects compared with their wild-type (WT) counterparts and the KO mice also had poor motor skill memory with impaired coordination. Although their vision and swimming ability were similar to WT, the KO mice found the submerged platform much more slowly. Dopamine receptor neurons were also affected by loss of TRAPPC9, explaining the contribution of impaired endocytic Rab11 recycling to poor performance on cognitive tasks. Interestingly, TRAPPC9 KO mice showed increased levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein in glial cells of the corpus callosum and dentate gyrus, suggesting the onset of astrogliosis (a defense mechanism of astrocytes against harmful stimuli), which in turn suggests a possible role of TRAPPC9 in neuropsychiatric disorders. Nevertheless, it is not clear how the loss of TRAPPC9 may affect the glial cells function. In general, these findings suggest the involvement of TRAPPC9 in brain function and learning ability.

Mutations in TRAPPC9 have been identified in patients with nonsyndromic autosomal recessive mental retardation (NS-ARMR). This phenotype has been associated with downregulated NF-κB activation and impaired trafficking function of TRAPPC9 (Mir et al., 2009). In addition, TRAPPC9 may be implicated in several other neurological diseases (Supplemental Table S3). The involvement of Rab11 protein in the mechanical pathway causing neurodegenerative disorder has become increasingly clear over the past decade. Disruption of the trafficking pathway is actively involved in several neurological disorders, which are described below.

Huntington's Disease

Huntington's disease (HD) is an autosomal inherited neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the accumulation of polyglutamine in the amino-terminal portion of Htt protein. Htt is distributed mainly in the cytoplasm. It localizes in vesicles, endosomes and plasma membranes. Htt plays an important role in the movement of Rab11 vesicles within axons (Power et al., 2012). Patients with HD suffer from loss of neurons in the striatum and cortex. Htt plays a functional role in multipolar-bipolar transition via a novel Htt-Rab11-N-cadherin pathway (Barnat et al., 2017). Importantly, mutant Htt has been shown to inhibit Rab11 function (Li et al., 2008). In addition, mutant Htt impairs endocytic recycling from the ERC to the plasma membrane and aggregation of mutant Htt disrupts trafficking of membrane materials to dendritic spines and eventually leads to loss of spines (Richards et al., 2011). It has been reported that overexpression of Rab11 can improve synaptic dysfunction and delay the progression of HD (Steinert et al., 2012). Using real-time 3D tracking of single synaptic vesicles, abnormal movements and vesicle pools were observed in HD mice, and these abnormal movements were dramatically rescued by overexpression of Rab11, suggesting that these phenomena may be an early stage of the pathogenic mechanism (Chen et al., 2021). A recent study by Akbergenova and Littleton (2017) showed that pathogenic Htt in the Drosophila model exhibits a defective synaptic endosomal trafficking associated with expansion of a recycling endosomal signaling compartment containing sorting nexin 16 and a decrease in late endosomes containing Rab11. In parallel with the disruption of endosomal compartments, pathogenic Htt enhanced bone morphogenetic protein signaling, leading to excessive synaptic growth. Apparently, pathogenic Htt directly induces neuropathology by impairing synaptic endosomal signaling. Changes in synaptic morphology caused by abnormal endosomal function may contribute to the lethality resulting from mutant Htt expression, indicating the important role of proper trafficking between endosomal compartments (Akbergenova & Littleton, 2017). Interestingly, HD mice showed significantly less Rab11 along with alterations in transferrin receptor recycling from recycling endosomes back to the plasma membrane. Considering that overexpression of Rab11 protects primary neurons from glutamate toxicity (Li et al., 2009), dysfunctional Rab11 could act as a vulnerability factor for Rab11 membrane-bound cargoes in the early onset of HD. It is known that glucose transporter 3 (GLUT3) and Rab11 are associated with glucose metabolism, and dysfunction of Rab11 is a major cause of glucose metabolism disorders in HD (McClory et al., 2014). In wild-type neurons, glucose uptake can be altered by the expression of dominant-negative/dominant-active Rab11, suggesting that Rab11 is required for the maintenance of normal neuronal glucose uptake. These results suggest that impaired Rab11 activity may be one of the main causes of glucose hypometabolism seen in HD (Li et al., 2012). Htt also regulates polarized vesicular transport by forming a complex with Rab11a (Elias et al., 2015). Because Htt plays a key role in Rab11-regulated vesicle movement within axons, mutant Htt causing impaired transport represents early neuropathology in HD. Interestingly, overexpression of Rab11 prevented synaptic dysfunction in the Drosophila model of HD by normalizing the size of synaptic vesicle which in turn improved locomotion defects in Drosophila larvae (Giorgini & Steinert, 2013). Moreover, overexpression of Rab4 together with Rab11 could rescue synaptic dysfunction and larval locomotion mediated by polyQ-HTT (White et al., 2020). The glutamate/cysteine transporter (EAAC1), which ensures the uptake of extracellular cysteine required for the de novo synthesis of glutathione in neurons, provides another interesting link between Rab11 function and HD pathology. Constitutive trafficking of EAAC1 from recycling endosomes depends on Rab11 activity, which is impaired in the brain of HD. Dysfunction of Rab11 slows trafficking of EAAC1 to the cell surface and impairs the uptake of cysteine, resulting in deficient synthesis of glutathione and inadequate clearance of reactive oxygen species (Li et al., 2010). It is evident that Rab11 may play a prominent role in the pathology of HD, but a detailed mechanism of how Rab11 mediates all its effects remains to be explored.

Alzheimer's Diseases

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive memory loss and cognitive deficits. It is generally believed that AD pathogenesis is driven by formation of toxic clusters of Aβ. An abnormal amyloid precursor protein that produces a toxic Aβ leads to plaque accumulation, synaptic disruption, and neurodegeneration. RNAi screening studies of Rab GTPases have shown that Rab11 controls endosomal recycling of β-secretase in the plasma membrane, thereby affecting Aβ production. Endocytosed Aβ in neurons is transported through early to late endosomes and then to lysosomes for degradation via Rab11-positive recycling vesicles. Its clearance is regulated by apolipoprotein E (ApoE) and any disruption to this pathway causes accumulation of Aβ aggregates and neuronal toxicity (Li et al., 2012). Early studies reported that estrogen is a regulator in the trans-Golgi network (TGN). It has been shown that 17β-estradiol (17β-E2) plays a role in the formation of vesicles containing APP from the TGN and that recruitment of Rab11 from the cytosol is an important step in this process (Greenfield et al., 2002). This study sheds light on the role of Rab11 in AD via regulation of the secretory pathway. It has been observed that the endosomal Ser/Thr kinase called lemur tail kinase 1 (LMTK1) is involved in regulating the endosomal localization of the β-secretase BACE1 and its accumulation in presynaptic terminals (Komaki et al., 2022). BACE1 is important for the β-cleavage of APP, the initial and rate-limiting step of Aβ formation. In this context, it is worth noting that a novel modulator called LMTK1 controls the GAP activity of TBC1D9B on Rab11a and TBC1D9B mediates LMTK1 activity on Rab11a via the LMTK1-TBC1D9B-Rab11a signaling cascade. It therefore regulates dendritic spine formation in neurons (Nishino et al., 2019). Further studies may shed light on how LMTK1 regulates Rab11a-dependent trafficking and whether it affects brain cognitive functions. Impairment of Rab11 function has been reported to reduce total and endocytosed BACE1 in axons (Buggia-Prévot et al., 2014). Electrochemiluminescence assays indicated that BACE-1-mediated processing of APP is impaired by Rab11 silencing, demonstrating a robust role of Rab11 in APP processing, Aβ production, and Aβ exosome release (Udayar et al., 2013). It is clear that neuronal functions depend on endosomal pathways. The endosomal pathway consists of extracellular vesicles (EVs) including exosomes and microvesicles. Endosomal cargoes are incorporated into extracellular vesicles. Neuronal EVs are critical for intercellular communication, which has been extensively reviewed by Holm et al. (2018). Cargoes which are sorted in EVs at presynaptic vesicles depend on a balance between the endosomal retromer complex and Rab11-mediated recycling in the brains of AD patients. Loss of the endosomal retromer complex leads to accumulation of EV cargoes which include APP in presynaptic terminals of motor neurons in a drosophila model (Walsh et al., 2021). Postsynaptic trafficking also plays an important role in regulating the structure and function of synapses. In a study of the late onset of AD (LOAD), the protein BIN1 showed abundance in the postsynaptic compartment. BIN1 tightly colocalizes with clathrin (a key protein in endocytosis) and localize with the GTPases Rab11 and Arf, that is, in the exocytic pathway. When the Bin1 gene is knock out, its protein content in synapses decreases, leading to the LOAD. However, Bin1 manipulations has smaller effects suggesting more additional studies is required to explore the pathway for LOAD pathology (Schürmann et al., 2020). It is important to point out the role of phosphatidylinositol-binding clathrin assembly protein (PICALM), which has been found to regulate clathrin-dependent internalization of Aβ and to control the trafficking of this peptide to Rab11 for its transcytosis and clearance (Zhao et al., 2015). Endocytosis has been observed to be impaired in AD. Accumulation of APP slows vesicle formation from the endocytic compartment characterized by the presence of the transcytotic GTPase Rab11. Impairment of endocytic axonal delivery of lipoproteins is caused by decreasing levels of lipoprotein endocytosis and transcytosis to the axon. This may lead to further neuron-specific impairments (Woodruff, 2016), suggesting that impairment of transcytotic trafficking may be one of the main reasons for AD. Recently, M6a, a neuronal glycoprotein, has been reported to possibly play a role in several neurological diseases, including AD (Aparicio et al., 2020). This protein is involved in neurite elongation, synapse formation, and spine growth and is trafficked back to the neuronal membrane via Rab11-positive endosomes (Garcia et al., 2017). It was found that the number of synapses is positively influenced by an increased amount of M6a on the cell surface (Garcia et al., 2017). Considering that the number of synapses is crucial for proper brain functioning, Rab11-bound M6a might be important for the etiology of AD. The above data suggest that Rab11, as a key player that regulates the trafficking pathways involved in the modulation of Aβ levels, may possibly be associated with the pathogenesis of AD. Deciphering the molecular complexity associated with Rab11 function may provide new therapeutic ideas for the treatment of AD.

Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder caused by mutations in the gene encoding leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) and the deposition of Lewy bodies composed mainly of α-synuclein (aSyn). The Rab11-rabin8-Rab8A cascade has been shown to regulate LRRK2-mediated inactivation of Rab8A, thereby disrupting endolysosomal trafficking (Rivero-Ríos et al., 2019). In Drosophila, LRRK2 regulates synaptic endocytosis together with Vps35 and Rab11 (Inoshita et al., 2017). In microglia, LRRK2 was found to negatively regulate the clearance of aSyn which was accompanied by downregulation of the endocytosis pathway (Maekawa et al., 2016). There is some evidence that Rab11 can participate in regulating aSyn secretion. Extracellular aSyn is resecreted out of the neurons via Rab11 recycling endosomes in which Rab11a interacts with heat shock protein 90 (Liu et al., 2009). The autophagy-lysosomal pathway (ALP) is involved in the degradation of extracellular aSyn, however, it also plays a role in the intercellular accumulation of aSyn. Inhibition of ALP reduced aSyn aggregation and increased secretion of smaller oligomers by exosomes and Rab11-associated pathways (Poehler et al., 2014). An RNAi-based screening of live cells revealed nine Rab GTPases that modulate aSyn aggregation, with Rab8b, Rab11a, and Rab13 playing a major role in eliminating aSyn inclusions (Goncalves et al., 2016). Silencing of Rab11 increased the secretion of aSyn, suggesting that the secretion and aggregation of aSyn is modulated by the involvement of Rab11 (Chutna et al., 2014). The size of synaptic vesicles was found to increase upon synaptic potentiation induced by aSyn. Overexpression of Rab11 reversed this effect in fruit flies, indicating the importance of Rab11 for synaptic function (Breda et al., 2015). Alterations in aSyn are known to disrupt neuronal vesicle formation and transport. Overexpressed Rab11 has been reported to enhance synaptic potentiation and modulate aSyn-dependent synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration. It decreases aSyn inclusions and cellular toxicity. By an undetermined mechanism, aSyn is actively secreted via endocytic, exosomal, and secretory pathways. Importantly, dominant-active Rab11 exhibits a clearance property as it eliminates toxic insoluble aSyn, indicating its therapeutic relevance to PD (Breda et al., 2015). Damaged mitochondria and oxidative stress are important factors contributing to age-related neurological diseases. Dysfunctional mitochondria have been studied in detail at PD. Rai and Roy (2022) have found a close relationship between Rab11 and clearance of damaged mitochondria. The clearance pathway links two important proteins called PARKIN and PINK1. In their study, using Drosophilla models of PD with mutant Park13 and Rab11 knockouts, they found that the brains of the mutant Park13 larvae had low Rab11 levels, which were associated with increased oxidative stress and loss of dopaminergic neuronal networks. Overexpression of Rab11 significantly enhanced these networks and vesicle trafficking, suggesting that Rab11 has a direct regulatory role in the mitophagy pathway. Rab11 is involved in the clearance of aSyn aggregates and dysfunctional mitochondria in PD models, suggesting that it may be a potential candidate for therapeutic intervention.

In the context of possible involvement of Rab11 in the pathogenesis of neurological disorders, it should be mentioned here that the disrupted Rab11-regulated endosomal recycling has recently been linked to neurodegeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Mitra et al., 2019). Some other diseases in which Rab11 may play a role, are listed in Supplemental Table S4.

Conclusion

Rab11 as a master GTPase is a well-characterized molecule that contributes significantly to Rab11-mediated endosomal recycling and trafficking in neuronal cells. It is a key regulatory molecule involved in the coordinated trafficking of receptors important for neuronal growth, such as AMPA receptors, integrin, Trk, protrudin, etc. Rab11 has an extensive protein-protein network that transports various cargo molecules. It interacts with different effectors depending on the GDP/GTP binding state, which is an on/off switch that determines its function. GAPs and GEFs regulate the GDP/GTP binding state. Rab11-FIPs play an important role in neuronal transcytosis by transporting proteins from the somatodendritic membrane to the axonal surface. Rab11 mediates the fusion of MVBs with autophagosomes to form amphisomes that direct transferrin receptors and damaged mitochondria into autophagy, and also delivers membrane components to the plasma membrane. A tethering complex consisting of multiple subunits, termed the Trapp complex, has been shown to be a GEF for the Rab11 homolog in yeast, and TRAPPC9 has been determined to be a GEF for Rab11 in mammals. Rab11 may play an important neuroprotective role in several neurodegenerative diseases by ameliorating synaptic dysfunction at HD, clearing Aβ at AD, and maintaining synaptic vesicle size at PD. Some of the important questions that remain to be investigated are the mechanism behind Rab11-mediated signaling pathways, their regulation, and the molecular mechanism of upstream activation of Rab11 family members. It is essential to understand the potential of physical interactions between different complexes and their regulators in specific intracellular pathways. Studies investigating the regulation of the mitophagy pathway by Rab11 have so far been limited to PD. Therefore, it would be interesting to find out whether Rab11-regulated mitophagy is also relevant to other age-related neurodegenerative diseases. In recent years, the importance of glial cells as key partners in neuronal modulation has become increasingly clear, and studies focusing on the regulation of neuronal signaling by glial cells are ongoing. In this context, it could be of interest to investigate whether Rab11 may be implicated in maintaining neuronal network plasticity via glial cells. Because members of the Rab11 GTPase family are critically involved in intracellular trafficking processes in developing or aging neurons and in nerve repair, a possible contribution of Rab11 and its cognate partners to neurodegeneration should be further investigated in future studies.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-asn-10.1177_17590914221142360 - Supplemental material for Rab11 and Its Role in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-asn-10.1177_17590914221142360 for Rab11 and Its Role in Neurodegenerative Diseases by Pinky Sultana and Jiri Novotny in ASN Neuro

Footnotes

Authors Note: Both authors were involved with the article preparation and editing.

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Charles University, Faculty of Science, (grant number SVV-260871/2020).

Supplemental Material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

  1. Akbergenova Y., Littleton J.T. (2017). Pathogenic Huntington alters BMP signaling and synaptic growth through local disruptions of endosomal compartments. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(12), 3425–3439. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2752-16.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson E., Maday S., Sfakianos J., Hull M., Winckler B., Sheff D., Fölsch H., Mellman I. (2005). Transcytosis of NgCAM in epithelial cells reflects differential signal recognition on the endocytic and secretory pathways. Journal of Cell Biology, 170(4), 595–605. 10.1083/jcb.200506051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aparicio G. I., Formoso K., León A., Frasch A. C., Scorticati C. (2020) Identification of potential interacting proteins with the extracellular loops of the neuronal glycoprotein M6a by TMT/MS. Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, 12, 28. 10.3389/fnsyn.2020.00028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ascaño M., Richmond A., Borden P., Kuruvilla R. (2009). Axonal targeting of Trk receptors via transcytosis regulates sensitivity to neurotrophin responses. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(37), 11674–11685. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1542-09.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Assaker G., Ramel D., Wculek S. K., González-Gaitán M., Emery G. (2010). Spatial restriction of receptor tyrosine kinase activity through a polarized endocytic cycle controls border cell migration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(52), 22558–22563. https://doi:10.1073/pnas.1010795108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bacaj T., Ahmad M., Jurado S., Malenka R. C., Sudhof T. C. (2015) Synaptic function of Rab11Fip5: Selective requirement for hippocampal long-term depression. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(19), 7460–7474. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1581-14.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baetz N. W., Goldenring J. R. (2013). Rab11-family interacting proteins define spatially and temporally distinct regions within the dynamic Rab11a-dependent recycling system. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 24(5), 643–658. 10.1091/mbc.e12-09-0659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barnat M., Le Friec J., Benstaali C., Humbert S. (2017). Huntingtin-Mediated multipolar-bipolar transition of newborn cortical neurons is critical for their postnatal neuronal morphology. Neuron, 93(1), 99–114. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Barr F., Lambright D. G. (2010). Rab GEFs and GAPs. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 22(4), 461–470. 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.04.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Belhadj A., Addou-Klouche L., Bouakline I., Medjamia M., Benammar H. J., Sahraoui T. (2020). Immunohistochemical staining for ras-related protein 25 (RAB25) associates with luminal B breast cancer subtype. Gulf Journal of Oncology, 1(32), 26–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bhartur S. G., Calhoun B. C., Woodrum J., Kurkjian J., Iyer S., Lai F., Goldenring J. R. (2000). Genomic structure of murine Rab11 family members. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 269(2), 611–617. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2000.2334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bhuin T., Roy J. K. (2014). Rab proteins: The key regulators of intracellular vesicle transport. Experimental Cell Research, 328(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.07.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bodnar B., DeGruttola A., Zhu Y., Lin Y., Zhang Y., Mo X., Hu W. (2020). Emerging role of NIK/IKK2-binding protein (NIBP)/trafficking protein particle complex 9 (TRAPPC9) in nervous system diseases. Translational Research, 224, 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2020.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Breda C., Nugent M. L., Estranero J. G., Kyriacou C. P., Outeiro T. F., Steinert J. R., Giorgini F. (2015). Rab11 modulates α-synuclein-mediated defects in synaptic transmission and behaviour. Human Molecular Genetics, 24(4), 1077–1091. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddu521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Buggia-Prévot V., Fernandez C. G., Riordan S., Vetrivel K. S., Roseman J., Waters J., Bindokas V. P., Vassar R., Thinakaran G. (2014). Axonal BACE1 dynamics and targeting in hippocampal neurons: A role for Rab11 GTPase. Molecular Neurodegeneration, 9, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1326-9-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Carson B. P., Del Bas J. M., Moreno-Navarrete J. M., Fernandez-Real J. M., Mora S. (2013). The rab11 effector protein FIP1 regulates adiponectin trafficking and secretion. PLoS One, 8(9), e74687. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Casanova J. E., Wang X., Kumar R., Bhartur S. G., Navarre J., Woodrum J. E., Altschuler Y., Ray G. S., Goldenring J. R. (1999). Association of Rab25 and Rab11a with the apical recycling system of polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 10(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.10.1.47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Caswell P. T., Chan M., Lindsay A. J., McCaffrey M. W., Boettiger D., Norman J. C. (2008). Rab-coupling protein coordinates recycling of alpha5beta1 integrin and EGFR1 to promote cell migration in 3D microenvironments. Journal of Cell Biology, 183(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200804140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen S., Yoo H., Li C. H., Park C., Park G., Tan L. Y., Jung S., Park H. (2021). Real-time three-dimensional tracking of single vesicles reveals abnormal motion and pools of synaptic vesicles in neurons of Huntington’s disease mice. iScience, 24(10), 103181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chutna O. Gonçalves S. Villar-Piqué A. Guerreiro P., Marijanovic Z. Mendes T., Ramalho J. Emmanouilidou E. Ventura S. Klucken J., Barral D. C. Giorgini F. Vekrellis K. Outeiro T. F. (2014). The small GTPase Rab11 co-localizes with α-synuclein in intracellular inclusions and modulates its aggregation, secretion and toxicity. Human molecular genetics, 23(25), 6732–6745. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddu391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Correia S. S., Bassani S., Brown T. C., Lisé M. F., Backos D. S., El-Husseini A., Passafaro M., Esteban J. A. (2008). Motor protein-dependent transport of AMPA receptors into spines during long-term potentiation. Nature Neuroscience, 11(4), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dabbeekeh J. T., Faitar S. L., Dufresne C. P., Cowell J. K. (2007). The EVI5 TBC domain provides the GTPase-activating protein motif for RAB11. Oncogene, 26(19), 2804–2808. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Das A., Guo W. (2011). Rabs and the exocyst in ciliogenesis, tubulogenesis and beyond. Trends in Cell Biology, 21(17), 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2011.03.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dirac-Svejstrup A. B., Sumizawa T., Pfeffer S. R. (1997). Identification of a GDI displacement factor that releases endosomal rab GTPases from rab-GDI. EMBO Journal, 16(3), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.3.465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dong W., Qin G., Shen R. (2016). Rab11-FIP2 promotes the metastasis of gastric cancer cells. International Journal of Cancer, 138(7), 1680–1688. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ducharme N. A., Hales C. M., Lapierre L. A., Ham A. J., Oztan A., Apodaca G., Goldenring J. R. (2006). MARK2/EMK1/Par-1Balpha Phosphorylation of Rab11-family interacting protein 2 is necessary for the timely establishment of polarity in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 17(8), 3625–3637. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e05-08-0736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Eathiraj S., Mishra A., Prekeris R., Lambright D. G. (2006). Structural basis for Rab11-mediated recruitment of FIP3 to recycling endosomes. Journal of Molecular Biology, 364(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.08.064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Elias S., Mcguire J. R., Yu H. (2015). Huntingtin is required for epithelial polarity through RAB11A-mediated apical trafficking of PAR3-aPKC. PLoS Biology, 13(5), e1002142. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Essandoh K., Deng S., Wang X., Jiang M., Mu X., Peng J., Li Y., Peng T., Wagner K. U., Rubinstein J., & Fan G. C. (2019). Tsg101 positively regulates physiologic-like cardiac hypertrophy through FIP3-mediated endosomal recycling of IGF-1R. FASEB Journal, 33(6),, 7451–7466. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201802338RR [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Fader C. M., Sánchez D., Furlán M., Colombo M. I. (2008). Induction of autophagy promotes fusion of multivesicular bodies with autophagic vacuoles in k562 cells. Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark), 9(2), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00677.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fan G. H., Lapierre L. A., Goldenring J. R., Sai J., Richmond A. (2004). Rab11-family interacting protein 2 and myosin VB are required for CXCR2 recycling and receptor-mediated chemotaxis. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 15(5), 2456–2469. https://doi: 10.1091/mbc.e03-09-0706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Fielding A. B., Schonteich E., Matheson J., Wilson G., Yu X., Hickson G. R., Srivastava S., Baldwin S. A., Prekeris R., Gould G. W. (2005). Rab11-FIP3 and FIP4 interact with Arf6 and the exocyst to control membrane traffic in cytokinesis. EMBO Journal, 24(19), 3389–3399. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gallo L. I., Liao Y., Ruiz W. G., Clayton D. R., Li M., Liu Y. J., Jiang Y., Fukuda M., Apodaca G., Yin X. M. (2014). TBC1D9B Functions as a GTPase-activating protein for Rab11a in polarized MDCK cells. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 25(23), 3779–3797. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E13-10-0604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Garcia M. D., Formoso K., Aparicio G. I., Frasch A., Scorticati C. (2017). The membrane glycoprotein M6a endocytic/recycling pathway involves clathrin-mediated endocytosis and affects neuronal synapses. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, 10, 296. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2017.00296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Giorgini F., Steinert J. R. (2013). Rab11 as a modulator of synaptic transmission. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 6(6), e26807. https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.26807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Goldenring J. R., Shen K. R., Vaughan H. D., Modlin I. M. (1993). Identification of a small GTP-binding protein, Rab25, expressed in the gastrointestinal mucosa, kidney, and lung. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 268(25), 18419–18422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gonçalves S. A., Macedo D., Raquel H., Simões P. D., Giorgini F., Ramalho J. S., Barral D. C., Ferreira Moita L., Outeiro T. F. (2016). shRNA-based screen identifies endocytic recycling pathway components that act as genetic modifiers of alpha-synuclein aggregation, secretion and toxicity. PLoS Genetics, 12(4), e1005995. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gorska M. M., Liang Q., Karim Z., Alam R. (2009). Uncoordinated 119 protein controls trafficking of Lck via the Rab11 endosome and is critical for immunological synapse formation. Journal of Immunology, 183(3), 1675–1684. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0900792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Goto-Ito S., Morooka N., Yamagata A., Sato Y., Sato K., Fukai S. (2019). Structural basis of guanine nucleotide exchange for Rab11 by SH3BP5. Life Science Alliance, 2(2), e201900297. https://doi.org/10.26508/lsa.201900297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Greenfield J. P., Leung L. W., Cai D., Kaasik K., Gross R. S., Rodriguez-Boulan E., Greengard P., Xu H. (2002). Estrogen lowers Alzheimer beta-amyloid generation by stimulating trans-Golgi network vesicle biogenesis. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277(14), 12128–12136. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110009200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Grosshans B. L., Ortiz D., Novick P. (2006). Rabs and their effectors: Achieving specificity in membrane traffic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(32), 11821–11827. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601617103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hales C. M., Griner R., Hobdy-Henderson K. C., Dorn M. C., Hardy D., Kumar R., Navarre J., Chan E. K., Lapierre L. A., Goldenring J. R. (2001). Identification and characterization of a family of Rab11-interacting proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276(42), 39067–39075. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M104831200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hara Y., Fukaya M., Sugawara T., Sakagami H. (2018). FIP4/Arfophilin-2 Plays overlapping but distinct roles from FIP3/arfophilin-1 in neuronal migration during cortical layer formation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 48(9), 3082–3096. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. He Y., Ye M., Zhou L., Shan Y., Lu G., Zhou Y., Zhong J., Zheng J., Xue Z., Cai Z. (2017). High Rab11-FIP4 expression predicts poor prognosis and exhibits tumor promotion in pancreatic cancer. International Journal of Oncology, 50(2), 396–404. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2016.3828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Holm M. M., Kaiser J., Schwab M. E. (2018). Extracellular vesicles: Multimodal envoys in neural maintenance and repair. Trends in Neurosciences, 41(6), 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2018.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Horgan C. P., Hanscom S. R., Jolly R. S., Futter C. E., McCaffrey M. W. (2010). Rab11-FIP3 links the Rab11 GTPase and cytoplasmic dynein to mediate transport to the endosomal-recycling compartment. Journal of Cell Science, 123(Pt 2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.052670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Horgan C. P., Hanscom S. R., Kelly E. E., McCaffrey M. W. (2012). Tumor susceptibility gene 101 (TSG101) is a novel binding-partner for the class II Rab11-FIPs. PLoS One, 7(2), e32030. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hu W. H., Pendergast J. S., Mo X. M., Brambilla R., Bracchi-Ricard V., Li F., Walters W. M., Blits B., He L., Schaal S. M., Bethea J. R. (2005). NIBP, a novel NIK and IKK(beta)-binding protein that enhances NF-(kappa)B activation. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 280(32), 29233–29241. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M501670200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ingmundson A., Delprato A., Lambright D. G., Roy C. R. (2007). Legionella pneumophila proteins that regulate Rab1 membrane cycling. Nature, 450(7168), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Inoshita T., Arano T., Hosaka Y., Meng H., Umezaki Y., Kosugi S., Morimoto T., Koike M., Chang H. Y., Imai Y., Hattori N. (2017). Vps35 in cooperation with LRRK2 regulates synaptic vesicle endocytosis through the endosomal pathway in drosophila. Human Molecular Genetics, 26(5), 2933–2948. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddx179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Jagoe W. N., Lindsay A. J., Read R. J., McCoy A. J., McCaffrey M. W., Khan A. R. (2006). Crystal structure of rab11 in complex with rab11 family interacting protein 2. Structure (London, England: 1993), 14(8), 1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2006.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Jeong H., Lim K. M., Kim K. H., Cho Y., Lee B., Knowles B. C., Roland J. T., Zwerner J. P., Goldenring J. R., Nam K. T. (2019). Loss of Rab25 promotes the development of skin squamous cell carcinoma through the dysregulation of integrin trafficking. Journal of Pathology, 249(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.5311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Jing J., Junutula J. R., Wu C., Burden J., Matern H., Peden A. A., Prekeris R. (2010). FIP1/RCP Binding to Golgin-97 regulates retrograde transport from recycling endosomes to the trans-Golgi network. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 21(17), 3041–3053. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-04-0313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kawauchi T., Sekine K., Shikanai M., Chihama K., Tomita K., Kubo K., Nakajima K., Nabeshima Y., Hoshino M. (2010). Rab GTPases-dependent endocytic pathways regulate neuronal migration and maturation through N-cadherin trafficking. Neuron, 67(4), 588–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ke Y., Weng M., Chhetri G., Usman M., Li Y., Yu Q., Ding Y., Wang Z., Wang X., Sultana P., DiFiglia M., Li X. (2020). Trappc9 deficiency in mice impairs learning and memory by causing imbalance of dopamine D1 and D2 neurons. Science Advances, 6(47), eabb7781. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abb7781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kim J. J., Lipatova Z., Segev N. (2016). TRAPP Complexes in secretion and autophagy. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 4, 20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2016.00020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Knödler A., Feng S., Zhang J., Zhang X., Das A., Peränen J. & Guo W. (2010). Coordination of Rab8 and Rab11 in primary ciliogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(14), 6346–6351. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002401107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Komaki K., Takano T., Sato Y., Asada A., Ikeda S., Yamada K., Wei R., Huo A., Fukuchi A., Saito T., Ando K., Murayama S., Araki W., Kametani F., Hasegawa M., Iwatsubo T., Tomomura M., Fukuda M., Hisanaga S. I. (2022). Lemur tail kinase 1 (LMTK1) regulates the endosomal localization of β-secretase BACE1. Journal of Biochemistry, 170(6), 729–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvab094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Laflamme C., Assaker G., Ramel D., Dorn J. F., She D., Maddox P. S., Emery G. (2012). Evi5 promotes collective cell migration through its Rab-GAP activity. Journal of Cell Biology, 198(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201112114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lamb C. A., Nühlen S., Judith D., Frith D., Snijders A. P., Behrends C., Tooze S. A. (2016). TBC1D14 Regulates autophagy via the TRAPP complex and ATG9 traffic. EMBO Journal, 35(3), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201592695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lamers I. Reijnders M. Venselaar H. Kraus A. Study DDD Jansen S. de Vries B. Houge G. Gradek G. A. Seo J. Choi M. Chae J. H. van der Burgt I. Pfundt R. Letteboer S. van Beersum S. Dusseljee S. Brunner H. G. Doherty D., … Roepman R. (2017). Recurrent De Novo mutations disturbing the GTP/GDP binding pocket of RAB11B cause intellectual disability and a distinctive brain phenotype. American Journal of Human Genetics, 101(5), 824–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.09.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Lapierre L. A., Avant K. M., Caldwell C. M., Oztan A., Apodaca G., Knowles B. C., Roland J. T., Ducharme N. A., Goldenring J. R. (2012). Phosphorylation of Rab11-FIP2 regulates polarity in MDCK cells. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 23(12), 2302–2318. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-08-0681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Lapierre L. A., Dorn M. C., Zimmerman C. F., Navarre J., Burnette J. O., Goldenring J. R. (2003). Rab11b resides in a vesicular compartment distinct from Rab11a in parietal cells and other epithelial cells. Experimental Cell Research, 290(2), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-4827(03)00340-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Li D., Kuehn E. W., Prekeris R. (2014). Kinesin-2 mediates apical endosome transport during epithelial lumen formation. Cellular Logistics, 4(1), e28928. https://doi.org/10.4161/cl.28928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Li D., Mangan A., Cicchini L., Margolis B., Prekeris R. (2014). FIP5 Phosphorylation during mitosis regulates apical trafficking and lumenogenesis. EMBO Reports, 15(4), 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/embr.201338128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Li H., Li H. F., Felder R. A., Periasamy A., Jose P. A. (2008). Rab4 and Rab11 coordinately regulate the recycling of angiotensin II type I receptor as demonstrated by fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 13(3), 031206. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2943286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Li J., Kanekiyo T., Shinohara M., Zhang Y., LaDu M. J., Xu H., Bu G. (2012). Differential regulation of amyloid-β endocytic trafficking and lysosomal degradation by apolipoprotein E isoforms. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287(53), 44593–44601. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.420224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Li X., Sapp E., Chase K., Comer-Tierney L. A., Masso N., Alexander J., Reeves P., Kegel K. B., Valencia A., Esteves M., Aronin N., Difiglia M. (2009). Disruption of Rab11 activity in a knock-in mouse model of Huntington’s disease. Neurobiology of Disease, 36(2), 374–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2009.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Li X., Sapp E., Valencia A., Kegel K. B., Qin Z. H., Alexander J., Masso N., Reeves P., Ritch J. J., Zeitlin S., Aronin N., Difiglia M. (2008). A function of huntingtin in guanine nucleotide exchange on Rab11. Neuroreport, 19(16), 1643–1647. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e328315cd4c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Li X., Standley C., Sapp E., Valencia A., Qin Z. H., Kegel K. B., Yoder J., Comer-Tierney L. A., Esteves M., Chase K., Alexander J., Masso N., Sobin L., Bellve K., Tuft R., Lifshitz L., Fogarty K., Aronin N., DiFiglia M. (2009). Mutant huntingtin impairs vesicle formation from recycling endosomes by interfering with Rab11 activity. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 29(22), 6106–6116. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00420-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Li X., Valencia A., McClory H., Sapp E., Kegel K. B., & Difiglia M. (2012). Deficient Rab11 activity underlies glucose hypometabolism in primary neurons of Huntington’s disease mice. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 421(4), 727–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.04.070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Li X., Valencia A., Sapp E., Masso N., Alexander J., Reeves P., Kegel K. B., Aronin N., Difiglia M. (2010). Aberrant Rab11-dependent trafficking of the neuronal glutamate transporter EAAC1 causes oxidative stress and cell death in Huntington’s disease. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(13), 4552–4561. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5865-09.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Lin T., Kao H. H., Chou C. H., Chou C. Y., Liao Y. C., Lee H. H. (2020). Rab11 activation by Ik2 kinase is required for dendrite pruning in drosophila sensory neurons. PLoS Genetics, 16(2), e1008626. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Lindsay A. J., Hendrick A. G., Cantalupo G., Senic-Matuglia F., Goud B., Bucci C., McCaffrey M. W. (2002). Rab coupling protein (RCP), a novel Rab4 and Rab11 effector protein. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277(14), 12190–12199. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M108665200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lindsay A. J., McCaffrey M. W. (2002). Rab11-FIP2 functions in transferrin recycling and associates with endosomal membranes via its COOH-terminal domain. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277(30), 27193–27199. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M200757200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lindsay A. J., McCaffrey M. W. (2004). The C2 domains of the class I Rab11 family of interacting proteins target recycling vesicles to the plasma membrane. Journal of Cell Science, 117(Pt19), 4365–4375. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Liu J., Zhang J. P., Shi M., Quinn T., Bradner J., Beyer R., Chen S., Zhang J. (2009). Rab11a and HSP90 regulate recycling of extracellular alpha-synuclein. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(5), 1480–1485. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6202-08.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Lock J. G., Stow J. L. (2005). Rab11 in recycling endosomes regulates the sorting and basolateral transport of E-cadherin. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 16(4), 1744–1755. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e04-10-0867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Longatti A., Lamb C. A., Razi M., Yoshimura S., Barr F. A., Tooze S. A. (2012). TBC1D14 Regulates autophagosome formation via Rab11- and ULK1-positive recycling endosomes. Journal of Cell Biology, 197(5), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201111079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Luiro K., Yliannala K., Ahtiainen L., Maunu H., Järvelä I., Kyttälä A., Jalanko A. (2004). Interconnections of CLN3, Hook1 and Rab proteins link batten disease to defects in the endocytic pathway. Human Molecular Genetics, 13(23), 3017–3027. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddh321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Machner M. P., Isberg R. R. (2007). A bifunctional bacterial protein links GDI displacement to Rab1 activation. Science, 318(5852), 974–977. https://doi: 10.1126/science.1149121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Maekawa T., Sasaoka T., Azuma S., Ichikawa T., Melrose H. L., Farrer M. J., Obata F. (2016). Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) regulates α-synuclein clearance in microglia. BMC Neuroscience, 17(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-016-0315-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Mammoto A., Ohtsuka T., Hotta I., Sasaki T., Takai Y. (1999). Rab11BP/rabphilin-11, a downstream target of rab11 small G protein implicated in vesicle recycling. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 274)(36), 25517–25524. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.36.25517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Manderson A. P., Kay J. G., Hammond L. A., Brown D. L., Stow J. L. (2007). Subcompartments of the macrophage recycling endosome direct the differential secretion of IL-6 and TNFalpha. Journal of Cell Biology, 178(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200612131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Marie N., Lindsay A. J., McCaffrey M. W. (2005). Rab coupling protein is selectively degraded by calpain in a Ca2+-dependent manner. Biochemical Journal, 389(Pt 1), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20042116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Martin-Negrier M. L., Charron G., Bloch B. (2006). Receptor recycling mediates plasma membrane recovery of dopamine D1 receptors in dendrites and axons after agonist-induced endocytosis in primary cultures of striatal neurons. Synapse, 60(3), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.20296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Martin-Peña A., Ferrus A. (2020). CCB Is involved in actin-based axonal transport of selected synaptic proteins. Journal of Neuroscience, 40(3), 542–556. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0915-18.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Mashukova A., Spehr M., Hatt H., Neuhaus E. M. (2006). Beta-arrestin2-mediated internalization of mammalian odorant receptors. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(39), 9902–9912. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2897-06.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Massignan T., Biasini E., Lauranzano E., Veglianese P., Pignataro M., Fioriti L., Harris D. A., Salmona M., Chiesa R., Bonetto V. (2010). Mutant prion protein expression is associated with an alteration of the rab GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha (GDI)/Rab11 pathway. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 9(4), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M900271-MCP200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Matthies H. J., Moore J. L., Saunders C., Matthies D. S., Lapierre L. A., Goldenring J. R., Blakely R. D., Galli A. (2010). Rab11 supports amphetamine-stimulated norepinephrine transporter trafficking. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(23), 7863–7877. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4574-09.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Maxfield F. R., McGraw T. E. (2004). Endocytic recycling. Nature Reviews, 5(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. McClory H., Williams D., Sapp E., Gatune L. W., Wang P., DiFiglia M., Li X. (2014). Glucose transporter 3 is a rab11-dependent trafficking cargo and its transport to the cell surface is reduced in neurons of CAG140 Huntington’s disease mice. Acta Neuropathologica Communications, 2, 179. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-014-0178-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Mir A. Kaufman L. Noor A. Motazacker M. M. Jamil T. Azam M. Kahrizi K. Rafiq M. A. Weksberg R. Nasr T. Naeem F. Tzschach A. Kuss A. W. Ishak G. E. Doherty D. Ropers H. H. Barkovich A. J. Najmabadi H. Ayub M., … Vincent J. B. (2009). Identification of mutations in TRAPPC9, which encodes the NIK- and IKK-beta-binding protein, in nonsyndromic autosomal-recessive mental retardation. American Journal of Human Genetics, 85(6), 909–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.11.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Miserey-Lenkei S., Waharte F., Boulet A., Cuif M. H., Tenza D., El Marjou A., Raposo G., Salamero J., Héliot L., Goud B., Monier S. (2007). Rab6-interacting protein 1 links Rab6 and Rab11 function. Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark), 8(10), 1385–1403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00612.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Mitchell H., Choudhury A., Pagano R. E., Leof E. B. (2004). Ligand-dependent and -independent transforming growth factor-beta receptor recycling regulated by clathrin-mediated endocytosis and Rab11. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 15(9), 4166–4178. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e04-03-0245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Mitra J., Hegde P. M., Hegde M. L. (2019). Loss of endosomal recycling factor RAB11 coupled with complex regulation of MAPK/ERK/AKT signaling in postmortem spinal cord specimens of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Molecular Brain, 12(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-019-0475-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Mochida G. H., Mahajnah M., Hill A. D., Basel-Vanagaite L., Gleason D., Hill R. S., Bodell A., Crosier M., Straussberg R., Walsh C. A. (2009). A truncating mutation of TRAPPC9 is associated with autosomal-recessive intellectual disability and postnatal microcephaly. American Journal of Human Genetics, 85(6), 897–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Moore R. H., Millman E. E., Alpizar-Foster E., Dai W., Knoll B. J. (2004). Rab11 regulates the recycling and lysosome targeting of beta2-adrenergic receptors. Journal of Cell Science, 117(Pt 15), 3107–3117. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Moriwaki Y., Ohno Y., Ishii T., Takamura Y., Kita Y., Watabe K., Sango K., Tsuji S., Misawa H. (2018). SIMPLE Binds specifically to PI4P through SIMPLE-like domain and participates in protein trafficking in the trans-Golgi network and/or recycling endosomes. PLoS One, 13(6), e0199829. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Mortreux J., Busa T., Germain D. P., Nadeau G., Puechberty J., Coubes C., Gatinois V., Cacciagli P., Duffourd Y., Pinard J. M., Tevissen H., Villard L., Sanlaville D., Philip N., Missirian C. (2018). The role of CNVs in the etiology of rare autosomal recessive disorders: The example of TRAPPC9-associated intellectual disability. European Journal of Human Genetics, 26(1), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-017-0018-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Morvan J., Köchl R., Watson R., Collinson L. M., Jefferies H. B., Tooze S. A. (2009). In vitro reconstitution of fusion between immature autophagosomes and endosomes. Autophagy, 5(5), 676–689. ttps://doi.org/10.4161/auto.5.5.8378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Moya-Alvarado G., Gonzalez A., Stuardo N., Bronfman F. C. (2018). Brain-Derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) regulates Rab5-positive early endosomes in hippocampal neurons to induce dendritic branching. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 12, 493. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Muto A., Arai K., Watanabe S. (2006). Rab11-FIP4 is predominantly expressed in neural tissues and involved in proliferation as well as in differentiation during zebrafish retinal development. Developmental Biology, 292(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.12.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Nam K. T., Lee H. J., Smith J. J., Lapierre L. A., Kamath V. P., Chen X., Aronow B. J., Yeatman T. J., Bhartur S. G., Calhoun B. C., Condie B., Manley N. R., Beauchamp R. D., Coffey R. J., Goldenring J. R. (2010). Loss of Rab25 promotes the development of intestinal neoplasia in mice and is associated with human colorectal adenocarcinomas. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 120(3), 840–849. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI40728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Nayak R. C., Keshava S., Esmon C. T., Pendurthi U. R., Rao L. V. (2013). Rab GTPases regulate endothelial cell protein C receptor-mediated endocytosis and trafficking of factor VIIa. PLoS One, 8(3), e59304. https://doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Nedvetsky P. I., Stefan E., Frische S., Santamaria K., Wiesner B., Valenti G., Hammer J. A., 3rd, Nielsen S., Goldenring J. R., Rosenthal W., Klussmann E. (2007). A role of myosin vb and Rab11-FIP2 in the aquaporin-2 shuttle. Traffic, 8(2), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00508.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Nishino H., Saito T., Wei R., Takano T., Tsutsumi K., Taniguchi M., Ando K., Tomomura M., Fukuda M., Hisanaga S. I. (2019). The LMTK1-TBC1D9B-Rab11A cascade regulates dendritic spine formation via endosome trafficking. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(48), 9491–9502. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3209-18.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Núñez E., Pérez-Siles G., Rodenstein L., Alonso-Torres P., Zafra F., Jiménez E., Aragón C., López-Corcuera B. (2009). Subcellular localization of the neuronal glycine transporter GLYT2 in brainstem. Traffic, 10(7), 829–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00911.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. O’Brien C. E., Bonanno L., Zhang H., Wyss-Coray T. (2015). Beclin 1 regulates neuronal transforming growth factor-β signaling by mediating recycling of the type I receptor ALK5. Molecular Neurodegeneration, 10, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-015-0065-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Oehlke O., Martin H. W., Osterberg N., Roussa E. (2011). Rab11b and its effector Rip11 regulate the acidosis-induced traffic of V-ATPase in salivary ducts. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 226(3), 638–651. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.22388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Oguchi M. E., Noguchi K., Fukuda M. (2017). TBC1D12 Is a novel Rab11-binding protein that modulates neurite outgrowth of PC12 cells. PLoS One, 12(4), e0174883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. O’Reilly M. K., Tian H., Paulson J. C. (2011). CD22 Is a recycling receptor that can shuttle cargo between the cell surface and endosomal compartments of B cells. Journal of Immunology, 186(3), 1554–1563. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1003005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Otsuka Y., Satoh T., Nakayama N., Inaba R., Yamashita H., Satoh A. K. (2019). Parcas is the predominant Rab11-GEF for rhodopsin transport in Drosophila photoreceptors. Journal of Cell Science, 132(15), jcs231431. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.231431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Palmieri D., Bouadis A., Ronchetti R., Merino M. J., Steeg P. S. (2006). Rab11a differentially modulates epidermal growth factor-induced proliferation and motility in immortal breast cells. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 100(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9244-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Pan X., Eathiraj S., Munson M., Lambright D. G. (2006). TBC-domain GAPs for rab GTPases accelerate GTP hydrolysis by a dual-finger mechanism. Nature, 442(7100), 303–306. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Park M. (2018). AMPA Receptor trafficking for postsynaptic potentiation. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 12, 361. https://doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Park M., Penick E. C., Edwards J. G., Kauer J. A., Ehlers M. D. (2004). Recycling endosomes supply AMPA receptors for LTP. Science, 305(5692), 1972–1975. https://doi: 10.1126/science.1102026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Parmar H. B., Duncan R. (2016). A novel tribasic Golgi export signal directs cargo protein interaction with activated Rab11 and AP-1-dependent Golgi-plasma membrane trafficking. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 27(8), 1320–1331. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-12-0845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Pasqualato S., Senic-Matuglia F., Renault L., Goud B., Salamero J., Cherfils J. (2004). The structural GDP/GTP cycle of Rab11 reveals a novel interface involved in the dynamics of recycling endosomes. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(12), 11480–11488. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M310558200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Pereira-Leal J. B., Seabra M. C. (2000). The mammalian rab family of small GTPases: Definition of family and subfamily sequence motifs suggests a mechanism for functional specificity in the Ras superfamily. Journal of Molecular Biology, 301(4), 1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Perez Bay A. E., Schreiner R., Benedicto I., Paz Marzolo M., Banfelder J., Weinstein A. M., & Rodriguez-Boulan E., J. (2016). The fast-recycling receptor megalin defines the apical recycling pathway of epithelial cells. Nature Communications, 7, 11550. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Poehler A. M., Xiang W., Spitzer P., May V. E., Meixner H., Rockenstein E., Chutna O., Outeiro T. F., Winkler J., Masliah E., Klucken J. (2014). Autophagy modulates SNCA/α-synuclein release, thereby generating a hostile microenvironment. Autophagy, 10(12), 2171–2192. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.36436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Powelka A. M., Sun J., Li J., Gao M., Shaw L. M., Sonnenberg A., Hsu V. W. (2004). Stimulation-dependent recycling of integrin beta1 regulated by ARF6 and Rab11. Traffic, 5(1), 20–36. https://doi:10.1111/j.1600-0854.2004.00150.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Power D, Srinivasan S., Gunawardena S. (2012). In-vivo evidence for the disruption of Rab11 vesicle transport by loss of huntingtin. Neuroreport, 23(16), 970–977. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e328359d990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Prekeris R., Klumperman J., Scheller R. H. (2000). A Rab11/Rip11 protein complex regulates apical membrane trafficking via recycling endosomes. Molecular Cell, 6(6), 1437–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00140-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Puri C., Vicinanza M., Ashkenazi A., Gratian M. J., Zhang Q., Bento C. F., Renna M., Menzies F. M., Rubinsztein D. C. (2018). The RAB11A-positive compartment is a primary platform for autophagosome assembly mediated by WIPI2 recognition of PI3P-RAB11A. Developmental Cell, 45(1), 114–131.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2018.03.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Qi X., Kaneda M., Chen J., Geitmann A., Zheng H. (2011). A specific role for Arabidopsis TRAPPII in post-Golgi trafficking that is crucial for cytokinesis and cell polarity. Plant Journal, 68(2), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04681.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Rai P., Roy J. K. (2022). Rab11 regulates mitophagy signaling pathway of parkin and Pink1 in the drosophila model of Parkinson’s disease. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 626, 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.08.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Rathan-Kumar S., Roland J. T., Momoh M., Goldstein A., Lapierre L. A., Manning E., Mitchell L., Norman J., Kaji I., Goldenring J. R. (2022). Rab11FIP1-deficient mice develop spontaneous inflammation and show increased susceptibility to colon damage. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 323(3), G239–G254. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00042.2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Reefman E., Kay J. G., Wood S. M., Offenhäuser C., Brown D. L., Roy S., Stanley A. C., Low P. C., Manderson A. P., Stow J. L. (2010). Cytokine secretion is distinct from secretion of cytotoxic granules in NK cells. Journal of Immunology, 184(9), 4852–4862. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0803954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Richards P., Didszun C., Campesan S., Simpson A., Horley B., Young K. W., Glynn P., Cain K., Kyriacou C. P., Giorgini F., Nicotera P. (2011). Dendritic spine loss and neurodegeneration is rescued by Rab11 in models of Huntington’s disease. Cell Death and Differentiation, 18(2), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2010.127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Rind H. B., Butowt R., von Bartheld C. S. (2005). Synaptic targeting of retrogradely transported trophic factors in motoneurons: Comparison of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and cardiotrophin-1 with tetanus toxin. Journal of Beuroscience, 25(3), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4322-04.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Rivero-Ríos P., Romo-Lozano M., Madero-Pérez J., Thomas A. P., Biosa A., Greggio E., Hilfiker S. (2019). The G2019S variant of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) alters endolysosomal trafficking by impairing the function of the GTPase RAB8A. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 294(13) 4738–4758. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA118.005008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Robinett C. C., Giansanti M. G., Gatti M., Fuller M. T. (2009). TRAPPII Is required for cleavage furrow ingression and localization of Rab11 in dividing male meiotic cells of drosophila. Journal of Cell Science, 122(Pt 24), 4526–4534. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.054536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Roland J. T., Lapierre L. A., Goldenring J. R. (2009). Alternative splicing in class V myosins determines association with Rab10. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 284(2), 1213–1223. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M805957200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Roosterman D., Cottrell G. S., Schmidlin F., Steinhoff M., Bunnett N. W. (2004). Recycling and resensitization of the neurokinin 1 receptor. Influence of agonist concentration and rab GTPases. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(29), 30670–30679. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M402479200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Rowe R. K., Suszko J. W., Pekosz A. (2008). Roles for the recycling endosome, Rab8, and Rab11 in hantavirus release from epithelial cells. Virology, 382(2), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2008.09.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Sakaguchi A., Sato M., Sato K., Gengyo-Ando K., Yorimitsu T., Nakai J., Hara T., Sato K., Sato K. (2015). REI-1 is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor regulating RAB-11 localization and function in C. elegans embryos. Developmental Cell, 35(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Sakane H., Yamamoto H., Kikuchi A. (2010). LRP6 Is internalized by Dkk1 to suppress its phosphorylation in the lipid raft and is recycled for reuse. Journal of Cell Science, 123(Pt 3), 360–368. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.058008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Sampo B., Kaech S., Kunz S., Banker G. (2003). Two distinct mechanisms target membrane proteins to the axonal surface. Neuron, 37(4), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00058-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Sato K., Sakaguchi A., Sato M. (2016). REI/SH3BP5 protein family: New GEFs for Rab11. Cell Cycle, 15(6), 767–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2015.1137710 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Schafer J. C., Baetz N. W., Lapierre L. A., McRae R. E., Roland J. T., Goldenring J. R. (2014). Rab11-FIP2 interaction with MYO5B regulates movement of Rab11a-containing recycling vesicles. Traffic, 15(3), 292–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/tra.12146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Schafer J. C., McRae R. E., Manning E. H., Lapierre L. A., Goldenring J. R. (2016). Rab11-FIP1A regulates early trafficking into the recycling endosomes. Experimental Cell Research, 340(2), 259–273. https://doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Schürmann B., Bermingham D. P., Kopeikina K. J., Myczek K., Yoon S., Horan K. E., Kelly C. J., Martin-de-Saavedra M. D., Forrest M. P., Fawcett-Patel J. M., Smith K. R., Gao R., Bach A., Burette A. C., Rappoport J. Z., Weinberg R. J., Martina M., Penzes P. (2020). A novel role for the late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD)-associated protein Bin1 in regulating postsynaptic trafficking and glutamatergic signaling. Molecular Psychiatry, 25(9), 2000–2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0407-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Schwenk B. M. Hartmann H. Serdaroglu A. Schludi M. H. Hornburg D. Meissner F. Orozco D. Colombo A. Tahirovic S. Michaelsen M. Schreiber F. Haupt S. Peitz M. Brüstle O. Küpper C. Klopstock T. Otto M. Ludolph A. C. Arzberger T., … Edbauer D. (2016). TDP-43 loss of function inhibits endosomal trafficking and alters trophic signaling in neurons. EMBO Journal, 35(21), 2350–2370. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201694221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Schwenk R. W., Luiken J. J., Eckel J. (2007). FIP2 And Rip11 specify Rab11a-mediated cellular distribution of GLUT4 and FAT/CD36 in H9c2-hIR cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 363(1), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.08.111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Sharma M., Redpath G. M., Williams M. J., McCormick S. P. (2017). Recycling of apolipoprotein(a) after PlgRKT-mediated endocytosis of lipoprotein(a). Circulation Research, 120(7), 1091–1102. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.310272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Shirane M., Nakayama K. I. (2006). Protrudin induces neurite formation by directional membrane trafficking. Science, 314(5800). 818–821. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Silvis M. R., Bertrand C. A., Ameen N., Golin-Bisello F., Butterworth M. B., Frizzell R. A., Bradbury N. A. (2009). Rab11b regulates the apical recycling of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in polarized intestinal epithelial cells. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 20(8), 2337–2350. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e08-01-0084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Simon G. C., Prekeris R. (2008). Mechanisms regulating targeting of recycling endosomes to the cleavage furrow during cytokinesis. Biochemical Society Transactions, 36(Pt 3), 391–394. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0360391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Simon G. C., Schonteich E., Wu C. C., Piekny A., Ekiert D., Yu X., Gould G. W., Glotzer M., Prekeris R. (2008). Sequential cyk-4 binding to ECT2 and FIP3 regulates cleavage furrow ingression and abscission during cytokinesis. EMBO Journal, 27(13), 1791–1803. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Siri S. O., Rozés-Salvador V., de la Villarmois E. A., Ghersi M. S., Quassollo G., Pérez M. F., Conde C. (2020). Decrease of Rab11 prevents the correct dendritic arborization, synaptic plasticity and spatial memory formation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Molecular Cell Research, 1867(9), 118735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Sirokmány G., Szidonya L., Káldi K., Gáborik Z., Ligeti E., Geiszt M. (2006). Sec14 homology domain targets p50RhoGAP to endosomes and provides a link between rab and rho GTPases. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 281(9), 6096–6105. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M510619200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Sivars U., Aivazian D., Pfeffer S. R. (2003). Yip3 catalyses the dissociation of endosomal rab-GDI complexes. Nature, 425(6960), 856–859. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Sobajima T., Yoshimura S., Iwano T., Kunii M., Watanabe M., Atik N., Mushiake S., Morii E., Koyama Y., Miyoshi E., Harada A. (2014). Rab11a is required for apical protein localisation in the intestine. Biology Open, 4(1), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.20148532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Sobajima T., Yoshimura S. I., Maeda T., Miyata H., Miyoshi E., Harada A. (2018). The Rab11-binding protein RELCH/KIAA1468 controls intracellular cholesterol distribution. Journal of Cell Biology, 217(5), 1777–1796. https://doi:10.1083/jcb.201709123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Solinger J. A., Rashid H. O., Prescianotto-Baschong C., Spang A. (2020). FERARI Is required for Rab11-dependent endocytic recycling. Nature Cell Biology, 22(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-019-0456-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Steinert J. R., Campesan S., Richards P., Kyriacou C. P., Forsythe I. D., Giorgini F. (2012). Rab11 rescues synaptic dysfunction and behavioural deficits in a drosophila model of Huntington’s disease. Human Molecular Genetics, 21(13), 2912–2922. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/dds117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Stendel C., Roos A., Kleine H., Arnaud E., Ozçelik M., Sidiropoulos P. N., Zenker J., Schüpfer F., Lehmann U., Sobota R. M., Litchfield D. W., Lüscher B., Chrast R., Suter U., Senderek J. (2010). SH3TC2, A protein mutant in charcot-marie-tooth neuropathy, links peripheral nerve myelination to endosomal recycling. Brain, 133(Pt 8), 2462–2474. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Stenmark H. (2009). Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nature Reviews, 10(8). 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Su T., Bryant D. M., Luton F., Vergés M., Ulrich S. M., Hansen K. C., Datta A., Eastburn D. J., Burlingame A. L., Shokat K. M., Mostov K. E. (2010). A kinase cascade leading to Rab11-FIP5 controls transcytosis of the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor. Nature Cell Biology, 12(12), 1143–1153. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Sugawara K., Shibasaki T., Mizoguchi A., Saito T., Seino S. (2009). Rab11 and its effector Rip11 participate in regulation of insulin granule exocytosis. Genes to Cells, 14(4), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2009.01285.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Takano T., Urushibara T., Yoshioka N., Saito T., Fukuda M., Tomomura M., Hisanaga S. (2014). LMTK1 Regulates dendritic formation by regulating movement of Rab11A-positive endosomes. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 25(11), 1755–1768. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E14-01-0675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Tang Q., Lento A., Suzuki K., Efe G., Karakasheva T., Long A., Giroux V., Islam M., Wileyto E. P., Klein-Szanto A. J., Nakagawa H., Bass A., Rustgi A. K. (2021). Rab11-FIP1 mediates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and invasion in esophageal cancer. EMBO Reports, 22(2), e48351. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201948351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Terada K., Horinouchi T., Fujioka Y., Higashi T., Nepal P., Horiguchi M., Karki S., Hatate C., Hoshi A., Harada T., Mai Y., Ohba Y., Miwa S. (2014). Agonist-promoted ubiquitination differentially regulates receptor trafficking of endothelin type A and type B receptors. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 289(51), 35283–35295. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.544171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Thomas L. L., Fromme J. C. (2016). GTPase cross talk regulates TRAPPII activation of Rab11 homologues during vesicle biogenesis. Journal of Cell Biology, 215(4), 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201608123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Tong M., Chan K. W., Bao J. Y., Wong K. Y., Chen J. N., Kwan P. S., Tang K. H., Fu L., Qin Y. R., Lok S., Guan X. Y., Ma S. (2012). Rab25 is a tumor suppressor gene with antiangiogenic and anti-invasive activities in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Research, 72(22), 6024–6035. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Tower-Gilchrist C., Lee E., Sztul E. (2011). Endosomal trafficking of the G protein-coupled receptor somatostatin receptor 3. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 413(4), 555–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.08.137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Tran-Van-Minh A., Dolphin A. C. (2010). The alpha2delta ligand gabapentin inhibits the Rab11-dependent recycling of the calcium channel subunit alpha2delta-2. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(38), 12856–12867. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2700-10.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Tu K., Li J., Verma V. K., Liu C., Billadeau D. D., Lamprecht G., Xiang X., Guo L., Dhanasekaran R., Roberts L. R., Shah V. H., Kang N. (2015). Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein promotes activation of hepatic stellate cells by regulating Rab11-dependent plasma membrane targeting of transforming growth factor beta receptors. Hepatology, 61(1), 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.27251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Udayar V., Buggia-Prévot V., Guerreiro R. L., Siegel G., Rambabu N., Soohoo A. L., Ponnusamy M., Siegenthaler B., Bali J., Simons AESG, Ries M., Puthenveedu J., Hardy M. A., Thinakaran J., & Rajendran G., L. (2013). A paired RNAi and RabGAP overexpression screen identifies Rab11 as a regulator of β-amyloid production. Cell Reports, 5(6), 1536–1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Ullrich O., Reinsch S., Urbé S., Zerial M., Parton R. G. (1996). Rab11 regulates recycling through the pericentriolar recycling endosome. Journal of Cell Biology, 135(4), 913–924. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.135.4.913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Utley T. J., Ducharme N. A., Varthakavi V., Shepherd B. E., Santangelo P. J., Lindquist M. E., Goldenring J. R., Crowe J. E., Jr (2008). Respiratory syncytial virus uses a Vps4-independent budding mechanism controlled by Rab11-FIP2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(29), 10209–10214. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0712144105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Uzan-Gafsou S., Bausinger H., Proamer F., Monier S., Lipsker D., Cazenave J. P., Goud B., de la Salle H., Hanau D., Salamero J. (2007). Rab11A controls the biogenesis of birbeck granules by regulating langerin recycling and stability. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 18(8), 3169–3179. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e06-09-0779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. van de Graaf S. F., Chang Q., Mensenkamp A. R., Hoenderop J. G., Bindels R. J. (2006). Direct interaction with Rab11a targets the epithelial Ca2+ channels TRPV5 and TRPV6 to the plasma membrane. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 26(1), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.26.1.303-312.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Vernoud V., Horton A. C., Yang Z., Nielsen E. (2003). Analysis of the small GTPase gene superfamily of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 131(3), 1191–1208. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.013052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Wallace D. M., Lindsay A. J., Hendrick A. G., McCaffrey M. W. (2002). The novel Rab11-FIP/rip/RCP family of proteins displays extensive homo- and hetero-interacting abilities. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 292(4), 909–915. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2002.6736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Walsh R. B., Dresselhaus E. C., Becalska A. N., Zunitch M. J., Blanchette C. R., Scalera A. L., Lemos T., Lee S. M., Apiki J., Wang S., Isaac B., Yeh A., Koles K., Rodal A. A. (2021). Opposing functions for retromer and Rab11 in extracellular vesicle traffic at presynaptic terminals. Journal of Cell Biology, 220(8), e202012034. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202012034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Wang J., Lv X., Wu Y., Xu T., Jiao M., Yang R., Li X., Chen M., Yan Y., Chen C., Dong W., Yang W., Zhuo M., Chen T., Luo J., Qiu S. (2018). Postsynaptic RIM1 modulates synaptic function by facilitating membrane delivery of recycling NMDARs in hippocampal neurons. Nature Communications, 9(1), 2267. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04672-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Wang X., Weng M., Ke Y., Sapp E., DiFiglia M., Li X. (2020). Kalirin interacts with TRAPP and regulates Rab11 and endosomal recycling. Cells, 9(5), 1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9051132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Wang Z., Edwards J. G., Riley N., Provance D. W., Jr, Karcher R., Li X. D., Davison I. G., Ikebe M., Mercer J. A., Kauer J. A., Ehlers M. D. (2008). Myosin vb mobilizes recycling endosomes and AMPA receptors for postsynaptic plasticity. Cell, 135(3), 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Welsh G. I., Leney S. E., Lloyd-Lewis B., Wherlock M., Lindsay A. J., McCaffrey M. W., Tavaré J. M. (2007). Rip11 is a Rab11- and AS160-RabGAP-binding protein required for insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in adipocytes. Journal of Cell Science, 120(Pt 23), 4197–4208. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.007310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Welz T., Wellbourne-Wood J., Kerkhoff E. (2014). Orchestration of cell surface proteins by Rab11. Trends in Cell Biology, 24(7), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2014.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Westlake C. J., Baye L. M., Nachury M. V., Wright K. J., Ervin K. E., Phu L., Chalouni C., Beck J. S., Kirkpatrick D. S., Slusarski D. C., Sheffield V. C., Scheller R. H., Jackson P. K. (2011). Primary cilia membrane assembly is initiated by Rab11 and transport protein particle II (TRAPPII) complex-dependent trafficking of Rabin8 to the centrosome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(7), 2759–2764. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018823108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. White J. A, 2nd, Krzystek T. J., Hoffmar-Glennon H., Thant C., Zimmerman K., Iacobucci G., Vail J., Thurston L., Rahman S. & Gunawardena S. (2020). Excess Rab4 rescues synaptic and behavioral dysfunction caused by defective HTT-Rab4 axonal transport in Huntington’s disease. Acta Neuropathologica Communications, 8(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-020-00964-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Woodruff G., Reyna S. M., Dunlap M., Van Der Kant R., Callender J. A., Young J. E., Roberts E. A. & Goldstein L. S. (2016). Defective transcytosis of APP and lipoproteins in human iPSC-derived neurons with familial Alzheimer’s disease mutations. Cell Reports, 17(3), 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Xiong B., Bayat V., Jaiswal M., Zhang K., Sandoval H., Charng W. L., Li T., David G., Duraine L., Lin Y. Q., Neely G. G., Yamamoto S., Bellen H. J. (2012). Crag is a GEF for Rab11 required for rhodopsin trafficking and maintenance of adult photoreceptor cells. PLoS Biology, 10(12), e1001438. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Xu C. L., Wang J. Z., Xia X. P., Pan C. W., Shao X. X., Xia S. L., Yang S. X., Zheng B. (2016). Rab11-FIP2 promotes colorectal cancer migration and invasion by regulating PI3K/AKT/MMP7 signaling pathway. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 470(2), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.01.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Yamasaki A., Menon S., Yu S., Barrowman J., Meerloo T., Oorschot V., Klumperman J., Satoh A., Ferro-Novick S. (2009). Mtrs130 is a component of a mammalian TRAPPII complex, a Rab1 GEF that binds to COPI-coated vesicles. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 20(19), 4205–4215. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e09-05-0387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Yazaki Y., Hara Y., Tamaki H., Fukaya M., Sakagami H. (2014). Endosomal localization of FIP3/arfophilin-1 and its involvement in dendritic formation of mouse hippocampal neurons. Brain Research, 1557, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.02.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Zhang J., Schulze K. L., Hiesinger P. R., Suyama K., Wang S., Fish M., Acar M., Hoskins R. A., Bellen H. J., Scott M. P. (2007). Thirty-one flavors of drosophila rab proteins. Genetics, 176(2), 1307–1322. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.066761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Zhang X. M., Walsh B., Mitchell C. A., Rowe T. (2005). TBC Domain family, member 15 is a novel mammalian rab GTPase-activating protein with substrate preference for Rab7. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 335(1), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Zhao L., Ji X., Zhang X., Li L., Jin Y., Liu W. (2018). FLCN Is a novel Rab11A-interacting protein that is involved in the Rab11A-mediated recycling transport. Journal of Cell Science, 131(24), jcs218792. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.218792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Zhao Z. Sagare A. P. Ma Q. Halliday M. R. Kong P. Kisler K. Winkler E. A. Ramanathan A. Kanekiyo T. Bu G. Owens N. C. Rege S. V. Si G. Ahuja A. Zhu D. Miller C. A. Schneider J. A. Maeda M. Maeda T., … Zlokovic B. V. (2015). Central role for PICALM in amyloid-β blood-brain barrier transcytosis and clearance. Nature Neuroscience, 18(7), 978–987. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sj-docx-1-asn-10.1177_17590914221142360 - Supplemental material for Rab11 and Its Role in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-asn-10.1177_17590914221142360 for Rab11 and Its Role in Neurodegenerative Diseases by Pinky Sultana and Jiri Novotny in ASN Neuro


Articles from ASN NEURO are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES