Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Dec 7;133:95–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.11.022

(Mis-)Judgment of infection risks is associated with additional workload among healthcare workers when treating isolated patients

S Gaube a,b,, S Däumling a,c, I Biebl b,c, A Rath a, A Caplunik-Pratsch a, W Schneider-Brachert a
PMCID: PMC9727961  PMID: 36496091

The COVID-19 pandemic has an immense negative impact on healthcare workers' (HCWs') mental health leading to more burnout, depression, anxiety, and insomnia [1,2]. According to a meta-analysis, high workloads, elevated infection risk perception, and lacking specialized training are especially detrimental [1]. However, COVID-19 is not the only infectious disease that HCWs face. Multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are ubiquitous in hospitals and lead to increased patient mortality [3,4]. To prevent their transmission, similar protective measures to those for COVID-19 are taken, such as contact isolation and wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) [5]. Therefore, caring for patients with MDROs might likewise cause higher workloads and perception of infection risk. The present study is the first to compare HCWs' self-reported workload and task-related colonisation risk perception after performing care tasks on isolated and non-isolated patients. Moreover, we investigated whether the perception of task-related and task-independent colonisation risks, as well as knowledge about appropriate infection prevention behaviour were associated with experiencing additional workload when caring for isolated patients.

We conducted a repeated-measures study with N = 45 HCWs (71.1% female, 95.6% nurses) at a tertiary care hospital. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was used to measure self-reported workload [6,7]. HCWs rated all NASA-TLX dimensions twice, directly after a care task on an isolated patient and after the same task on a non-isolated patient. Participants evaluated their task-related risk of becoming colonised while performing the task both times. Moreover, HCWs rated their task-independent risk once for the following pathogens: vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (3 MRGN, 4 MRGN according to the German classification [8]), and COVID-19. Finally, we assessed participants' perception of additional workload and their self-reported knowledge about appropriate infection prevention behaviour when caring for isolated patients. Data were collected between October 2021 and February 2022. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the University Hospital Regensburg (# 21-2428-101), and participants gave informed consent. The questionnaire, de-identified data, analysis script, and supplements are available in the Supplementary Information.

First, we compared the NASA-TLX dimensions and the overall task workload after completing the care task on an isolated and a non-isolated patient (Figure 1 a). We found that the task on an isolated patient was more physically demanding, effortful and frustrating. Moreover, the overall task workload was significantly higher when caring for an isolated patient. Next, we saw that caring for isolated patients resulted in significantly higher perception of task-related risk of becoming colonised while performing the task (Figure 1b). Furthermore, Figure 1c shows that HCWs, on average, rate their task-independent risk for various pathogens between 3 = medium and 4 = high. Finally, we tested whether knowledge about appropriate infection prevention behaviour, task-related and overall task-independent colonisation risk perception predict HCWs' evaluation of additional workload when caring for isolated patients. Higher task-related risk perception was associated with experiencing additional workload (t = 2.39, p=0.022) while self-reported knowledge (t=1.28, p=0.209) and task-independent risk perception (t=-1.04, p=0.306) were not. A secondary analysis including only nurses yielded almost identical results (see Supplementary data).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Means of: (a) National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) dimensions and overall task workload; (b) task-related colonisation risk perception; (c) task-independent colonisation risk perception. MRGN = multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria; MRSA = meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; VRE = vancomycin-resistant enterococci.p≤0.05, ∗∗ p≤0.001. ns = not significant.

This is the first study using the NASA-TLX to empirically show that HCWs' self-reported workload is higher after performing a care task on isolated than non-isolated patients. It is plausible that caring for an isolated patient is physically demanding, requires effort, and leads to frustration because PPE can limit mobility and be prohibitively warm. Surprisingly, HCWs rated their task-related risk of becoming colonised with a pathogen while caring for an isolated patient higher. This finding may indicate misconceptions about the extent and effectiveness of existing infection prevention measures. Hospitals in Germany generally do not screen every patient for MDROs and other infectious diseases, only at-risk patients. Therefore, the colonisation risk from treating an unscreened patient without PPE should be perceived as higher than treating a positively tested patient with PPE. This effect might also be concerning when considering the significant association between task-related risk ratings and the perception that caring for isolated patients increases the workload. The present study has some limitations: (1) the small sample size, (2) it was conducted at a single centre, and (3) data were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic, which might have biased the results.

Our findings contribute to a better understanding of how the COVID-19 pandemic and the occurrence of MDROs might impact HCWs' mental health. More patients are treated in contact isolation resulting in higher workloads and infection risk perceptions. Considering the increasing prevalence of MDROs and risk of emerging infectious pathogens, ideally the ratio between HCWs and isolated patients should be improved, and staff should be reassured about the effectiveness of infection prevention measures to reduce the workload and risk perception to some degree.

Author contributions

S.G.: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, project administration, visualization, writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. S.D.: investigation (data collection), writing – original draft. I.B.: investigation (data collection), writing – review and editing. A.R.: methodology, writing – review and editing. A.C.P.: methodology, writing – review and editing. W.S.B.: resources, writing – review and editing, supervision.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Funding sources

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2022.11.022.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.zip (3.7KB, zip)
Multimedia component 2
mmc2.zip (4.1KB, zip)
Multimedia component 3
mmc3.xlsx (16.4KB, xlsx)
Multimedia component 4
mmc4.xlsx (13.7KB, xlsx)
Multimedia component 5
mmc5.pdf (174.3KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Galanis P., Vraka I., Fragkou D., Bilali A., Kaitelidou D. Nurses’ burnout and associated risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77:3286–3302. doi: 10.1111/jan.14839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dragioti E., Tsartsalis D., Mentis M., Mantzoukas S., Gouva M. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of hospital staff: an umbrella review of 44 meta-analyses. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022;131 doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tanwar J., Das S., Fatima Z., Hameed S. Multidrug resistance: an emerging crisis. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2014;2014:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2014/541340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2021. Global antimicrobial resistance and use surveillance system (GLASS) report 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Siegel J.D., Rhinehart E., Jackson M., Chiarello L. Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in health care settings. Am J Infect Control. 2006;35:165–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.006. 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hart S.G. NASA-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX): 20 years later. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2006;50:904–908. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hart S.G., Staveland L.E. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv Psychol. 1988;52:139–183. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention Hygienemaßnahmen bei Infektionen oder Besiedlung mit multiresistenten gramnegativen Stäbchen: empfehlung der Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention (KRINKO) beim Robert Koch-Institut. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012;55:1311–1354. doi: 10.1007/s00103-012-1549-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.zip (3.7KB, zip)
Multimedia component 2
mmc2.zip (4.1KB, zip)
Multimedia component 3
mmc3.xlsx (16.4KB, xlsx)
Multimedia component 4
mmc4.xlsx (13.7KB, xlsx)
Multimedia component 5
mmc5.pdf (174.3KB, pdf)

Articles from The Journal of Hospital Infection are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES