Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 7.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Hypertens Rep. 2022 Jun 16;24(9):361–374. doi: 10.1007/s11906-022-01201-9

Inverse Salt Sensitivity of Blood Pressure: Mechanisms and Potential Relevance for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

Robin A Felder 1, John J Gildea 1, Peng Xu 1, Wei Yue 1, Ines Armando 2, Robert M Carey 3, Pedro A Jose 2
PMCID: PMC9728138  NIHMSID: NIHMS1852019  PMID: 35708819

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To review the etiology of inverse salt sensitivity of blood pressure (BP).

Recent Findings

Both high and low sodium (Na+) intake can be associated with increased BP and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, little is known regarding the mechanisms involved in the increase in BP in response to low Na+ intake, a condition termed inverse salt sensitivity of BP, which affects approximately 15% of the adult population. The renal proximal tubule is important in regulating up to 70% of renal Na+ transport. The renin-angiotensin and renal dopaminergic systems play both synergistic and opposing roles in the regulation of Na+ transport in this nephron segment. Clinical studies have demonstrated that individuals express a “personal salt index” (PSI) that marks whether they are salt-resistant, salt-sensitive, or inverse salt-sensitive. Inverse salt sensitivity results in part from genetic polymorphisms in various Na+ regulatory genes leading to a decrease in natriuretic activity and an increase in renal tubular Na+ reabsorption leading to an increase in BP.

Summary

This article reviews the potential mechanisms of a new pathophysiologic entity, inverse salt sensitivity of BP, which affects approximately 15% of the general adult population.

Keywords: Angiotensin, Angiotensin receptor, Renin, Dopamine, Dopamine receptor, Inverse salt sensitivity, Salt sensitivity

Introduction

Blood pressure (BP) can be reduced in individuals with hypertension by reducing dietary Na+ intake [1, 2••, 3••, 4]. Many studies have demonstrated a sustained increase in blood pressure (BP) in response to an increase in dietary Na+ intake [1, 516], as well as an increase in cardiovascular events and mortality [1419]. Salt sensitivity (SS) of BP, defined as a rise in BP in response to an increase in Na+ intake, is present in approximately 50% of hypertensive adults. However, about 25% of individuals with normal BP are also salt-sensitive (SS) [14, 20]. Past controlled Na+ intake studies have used either low or high Na+ diets, relative to average daily consumption by Americans, and variable cutoffs for classifying individuals as SS or salt-resistant (SR). A long-term clinical study has shown that SS normotensives have the same mortality rates as hypertensives [14]. However, little is known about individuals at the opposite end of the SS spectrum, those who are inverse salt-sensitive (ISS), defined as those demonstrating an increase in BP in response to low Na+ intake. ISS, which was recently discovered as masquerading within the broad SR category, has a prevalence of approximately 15% of the general population. [2126]. Figure 1 shows a model of the effect of sustained diets of low (10 mmol/day Na+), intermediate (140 mmol/day Na+), and high Na+ (300 mmol/day Na+) on BP in hypertensive, normotensive, SS, and ISS individuals in the University of Virginia (UVA) Salt Study. Table 1 facilitates the conversion between the concentrations of Na+ mentioned in this review and other popular units used in the literature and lay press. ISS individuals are those with ≥ 7 mm Hg decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) when transitioning from normal to high Na+ diet and an increase in MAP ≥ 7 mm Hg when transitioning from normal to low Na+ diet (Fig. 2). Hypertensive adults are now classified as having sustained BP ≥ 130/80 mm Hg [1], and the prevalence of hypertension has been predicted to rise to approximately 45.6% in the American adult population [27], of which approximately 15% may have ISS hypertension.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

This model shows the relationship between dietary Na+ and BP (BP) in SR normotensive, SS, ISS, and hypertensive individuals. The daily dietary Na+ intake used in the UVA Salt Studies are 10 mmol/day (low Na+ intake), 140 mmol/day (moderate Na+ intake), and 300 mmol/day (high Na+ intake). SR normotensive individuals maintain their BP at or below the ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults (< 130/80 mm Hg systolic/diastolic) at both ends of the high and low Na+ dietary spectrum (blue symbols). SR hypertensive individuals have elevated BP, which is relatively unaffected by Na+ intake, but some individuals can reduce their elevated BP to some degree on a low Na+ intake (red triangle). SS individuals have normal BP on normal Na+ intake but have elevated BP on a high Na+ intake, which can be ameliorated by low Na+ intake (green square). ISS individuals have a response to dietary Na+ intake that is opposite to SS individuals (orange circle). Very low Na+ intake increases BP, which can be ameliorated by increasing their Na+ intake. ISS individuals are those with ≥ 7 mm Hg decrease in MAP when transitioning from normal to high Na+ intake and an increase in MAP ≥ 7 mm Hg when transitioning from normal to low Na+ intake, as shown in Fig. 2

Table 1.

Equivalent Na+ concentrations in mmol, milligrams (mg), grams (g), and teaspoon (tsp)

Sodium (mmol) Sodium (mg) Salt (g) Salt (tsp)

10 230 0.585 0.1
140 3220 8.2 1.39
300 6897 17.55 3.08

1 mol sodium = 23 g

1 mol sodium in salt (NaCl) = 58.5 g

milliequivalents = millimoles

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Data are shown from three independent salt study cohorts placed on one week of high and low Na+ intakes. The ranked magnitude of directional change in BP from each volunteer participant is shown and graphed in rank order on the X-axis, with the Y-axis being proportional to the increase, lack of change, or decrease in mean arterial BP (ΔMAP) when transitioning between the two diets. Since the order of the diets from low to high or high to low was randomized to rule out directional bias, we graphed the directional change in the ΔMAP. ISS subjects are those having a negative change in MAP (≥ − 7 mm) when transitioning from low to high Na+ intake or a positive change in ΔMAP (≥ 7 mm) when transitioning from high to low Na.+ intake (4 to 16%). Data are from the University of Virginia’s (UVA) Salt Study, Harvard’s Hyperpath Study, and the University of Maryland’s HAPI salt study, as noted on the graph. SS individuals (approximately 18%) are on the extreme right-hand side of this graph and are not the subject of this review

Cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure hospitalization are increased in some individuals who consume low amounts of Na+ (< 1.2–3 g/day) [15, 18, 2224, 28, 29, 30•]. There is still considerable debate as to why a low Na+ intake could lead to increased mortality. Cappuccio et al. [3••] demonstrated in clinical studies that the use of the Kawasaki formula to estimate 24-h urinary Na+ excretion could lead to an overestimation of Na+ consumption at the lowest levels of intake and underestimation of Na+ consumption at the highest levels of intake due to systematic bias. The overestimation is such that it could falsely raise the negative outcomes at the lowest Na+ intake levels. By contrast, the estimations of Na+ intakes are more accurate with 24-h urine collections. Other studies that used 24-h urine collections to estimate Na+ consumption confirm the increased mortality on low Na+ diets [15, 18, 31]. We hypothesize that individuals with ISS hypertension could be the reason for the more negative cardiovascular sequelae that result from low Na+ diets mentioned above. A randomly selected study cohort showed about 15% of hypertensive participants have ISS hypertension in our study [5], as well as studies by Overlack et al. [22, 24] and Longworth et al. [32], and a prevalence of as high as 40% as reported by Castiglioni et al. [33••]. While this review does not address the long-term consequences (e.g., cardiovascular disease and death) of ISS hypertension, it does address the biological, genetic, and epigenetic mechanisms associated with the paradoxical increase in BP in adults consuming a low Na+ diet. When approached from a mechanistic viewpoint, future epidemiological studies will be better equipped to stratify SS and ISS cohorts in order to appropriately determine if clinical outcomes are related to the known mechanisms of BP dysregulation found in ISS hypertension.

The dietary Na+ recommendation of the Institute of Medicine/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) [1, 19] is intended to be a generalized recommendation for any population. Recently, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) both recommended a daily intake of 2300 mg NaCl. However, it is becoming clear that each individual retains or eliminates Na+ in an individual manner, for which we have coined the term “Personal Salt Index” (PSI) [34] and SS-index by Castiglioni et al. [33••] that is genetically programmed but has substantial environmental and behavioral influences [35]. Thus, further research is needed to understand how both low and high Na+ intakes affect cardiovascular disease and death. Three NHLBI-funded studies [5, 36] have accumulated data demonstrating agreement that the prevalence of ISS hypertension (aka counter-regulators) constitutes approximately 15% of the adult population, suggesting that ISS hypertension needs to be better understood and accepted [2229, 30•, 32, 33••, 34]. The ranked magnitude response of each participant on high and low Na+ intake from 3 different cohorts, the UVA Salt Study [5], the University of Maryland HAPI study [36], and the Harvard HyperPATH study, using a MAP cutoff value of 7 mm Hg [unpublished] is depicted in Fig. 2. In other studies, three definitions of ISS (aka counter-regulator [23]) were used: an increase in ambulatory BP (≥ 5 mm Hg MAP, or systolic BP ≥ 4 mm Hg) [23] on a low Na+ intake (< 1.4 g NaCl/day (< 551 mg sodium)) or a decrease in MAP ≥ 5 mm Hg or systolic BP ≥ 4 mm Hg on a high Na+ intake (> 10 g NaCl/day (> 3,934 mmol sodium)) [22, 24, 30•]. Castiglioni et al. used the term “sodium sensitivity index” for the ratio of the change in MAP and change in urinary Na+ (ΔMAP/ΔUNaV) expressed in mm Hg/mol Na+/day (> 15 mm Hg/mol Na+/day for SS individuals and ≤ 15 mm Hg/mol Na+/day for ISS individuals) [33••].

Because many Na+ sensitivity studies use arbitrary BP cutoffs for defining SS, SR, and ISS, we performed statistical analysis of our UVA Salt Study utilizing the K-means clustering method (Squared Euclidean Distance), shown in Fig. 3. The UVA Salt Study data on individual BP variation caused by a change in Na+ intake had a Gaussian distribution in SR subjects and non-Gaussian distribution in SS and ISS subjects. We hypothesize that the non-Gaussian distribution in ISS and SS participants is the consequence of the influence of several genes [37] that independently regulate renal tubular Na+ transport, the sum of which is related to the BP phenotype. This is similar to the report of Ji and Lifton et al. that several independent gene variants involved in the regulation of renal tubular Na+ and K+ transport can cause a decrease in BP that would protect an individual from hypertension [38].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Statistical justification for the cutoff points between the ISS, SR, and SS groups was determined from the UVA Salt Study as follows. We plotted all 306 delta MAP (ΔMAP) (dots) from the UVA Salt Study and then used the K-Means Clustering method (Squared Euclidean Distance), which shows that the data may be categorized into the three groups, namely ISS (inverse salt-sensitive) on the left, SS (salt-sensitive) on the right, and SR (salt-resistant) in the middle. The centroids of the three clusters were mapped to ΔMAP inverse salt sensitivity, salt resistance, and salt sensitivity values: − 8.142, 0.138, and 9.137, respectively. The boundary points of ΔMAP between the adjacent clusters are − 4 and 4.6, respectively. By assuming the control group as ΔMAP between − 7 and 7 mm Hg, the data of the control group were fitted by the linear regression (Y = 0.0594*X − 8.537, R2 = 0.9951, n = 219) (straight line). The overall data were fitted to the 3rd-order polynomial curve (Y = − 14.38 + 0.219*X − 0.001208*X2 + (2.685e − 6)X3, R.2 = 0.9887, n = 306) (see curved line). Allowing a ± 5% variation, the linear regression curve of the control group may have the cross points at the boundary (ISS N = 52, − 5.8) and (SR N = 249, 6.65). Performing a post hoc power check, the powers between the clusters (± 7 mm Hg boundary) are all around 1. We hypothesize that the non-Gaussian nature of the ISS ΔMAP may be due to additional genes variants, as yet to be discovered

Alternatives to Dietary Protocols Using Surrogate Markers for Determining PSI

Surrogate markers of BP have been studied in an attempt to obviate the need for measuring Na+ intake and excretion [6]. We isolated freshly excreted renal proximal tubule cells (RPTCs) from our Na+ study participants to measure Na+ regulated cellular receptor pathways. Specifically, we measured the ability of RPTCs to recruit dopamine type-1 receptors (D1R) to the cell membrane in response to an increase in intracellular Na+ by monensin (a Na+ ionophore) and the intracellular calcium response to angiotensin II (Ang II) which are impaired in SS individuals [21]. The inverse linear relationship between these 2 parameters and the magnitude of the change in BP [ΔMAP] support the hypothesis that the impairment of renal tubular Na+ transport by these 2 pathways may define an individual’s PSI. Importantly, the characterization of D1R recruitment and Ang II-stimulated Ca++ signaling was performed 5 years after dietary Na+ phenotyping, indicating independence of the marker from the current Na+ intake of the subject. Additionally, 45 micro-RNAs (miRNAs) were measured in the urine of adults who express ISS, SR, or SS phenotype [39, 40]. The miRNAs only originate from the renal tissue because exosomes cannot cross the glomerular filtration barrier and many miRNAs found in urine have not been measured in serum [40, 41]. Some of these miRNAs are known to participate in the regulation of signaling pathways involved in hypertension (e.g., peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ, epidermal growth factor receptor, transforming growth factor-β1, phosphatase and tensin homolog/phosphoinositide 3-kinase) [6, 42]. These preliminary clinical studies hold promise for cost-effective methods to screen for SS [6] and ISS phenotypes [21, 34, 39, 40, 42].

Genetic Determinants of Inverse Salt Sensitivity of BP

Many genetic determinants of SS are known, and the current consensus is that combinations of gene variants determine one’s PSI [5, 34, 4346]. Variants of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase type 4 (GRK4) are associated with SS in humans [34, 44, 4750] and cause SS or SR [51] hypertension when expressed in mice, which is dependent on the GRK4 variant and genetic background of the mice in which it is expressed [5153]. Variants in the human SLC4A5 gene that encodes for the Na+ bicarbonate electrogenic cotransporter type 2 (NBCe2) are strongly associated with the SS hypertensive phenotype [5, 34, 54]. The angiotensin (Ang) type 1 receptor (AT1R) is an antinatriuretic G protein-coupled receptor that increases calcium signaling via Ang II in ISS [21]. A model of various renin-angiotensin system (RAS) components contributing to Na+ balance is shown in Fig. 4. Enzymes that convert RAS peptides into downstream mediators of Na+ balance may also play a role in the pathogenesis of ISS, such as aminopeptidase N (APN) which converts Ang III into angiotensin IV (Ang IV) and reduces the levels of Ang III, the preferred endogenous agonist of the natriuretic Ang II type 2 receptor (AT2R) [55]. APN, per se, positively regulates cytokine activity and thus can be pro-inflammatory [56], but has variable effects on BP. The intracerebroventricular infusion of APN decreases BP; APN has also been reported to inhibit Na+/K+/ATPase activity in LLC-PKI cells, an epithelial cell line derived from pig kidneys [57]. By contrast, we have reported that the inhibition of APN by preventing the degradation of Ang III to Ang IV restores the ability of AT1R blockers to induce natriuresis in the spontaneously hypertensive rat [58]. Overlack et al. found a steeper increase in plasma renin activity in ISS when compared with SR and SS humans placed on a low Na+ intake, indicating that ISS subjects may have an overstimulated RAS [22]. Additional work is required not only to quantify the RAS peptides but also to determine the relative activities of the enzymes involved in the production of RAS peptides under various amounts of Na+ intake to which the kidney is exposed.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Mechanistic model of our hypothesis that the D2R is at least one etiology of inverse salt sensitivity of blood pressure. The top line shows the model of a normally operating renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in a salt-resistant individual. Various RAS peptides result from successive proteolytic catalysis of angiotensinogen (AGT) into shorter forms of AGT named Ang I-IV. The RAS proteolytic sequential enzyme cascade consists of renin, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), aminopeptidase A (APA), and aminopeptidase N (APN). There are other members of RAS but are beyond the scope of this review. “Normal” salt-resistant individuals maintain a homeostatic balance between the antinatriuretic angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R) and the natriuretic angiotensin type 2 receptor (AT2R). In inverse salt-sensitive (ISS) study participants (lower panel), the response to low Na+ intake is shown on the left column and the response to high Na+ intake on the right column. APN is increased in ISS on low Na+ intake and is hypothesized to decrease under high Na+ intake. The low Na+ intake stimulation of APN is hypothesized to cause a depletion of Ang III, thus lowering the natriuresis caused by Ang III, via the AT2R. The D2R wild type is shown in the 2nd row on the left, which normally suppresses AT1R-mediated antinatriuresis to maintain Na+ intake in balance. Human D2R gene (DRD2) variants associated with inverse salt sensitivity have a reduced capacity to keep the AT1R in check (low Na+ intake response in inverse salt sensitivity) and thus leads to increased AT1R-mediated renal tubular Na+ reabsorption. The high Na+ intake response, in contrast to the low Na+ intake response, to DRD2 variants is hypothesized to cause a decrease in the activity of APN, leading to increased Ang III (agonist for the AT2R) levels, causing an increase in Na.+ excretion and a lowering of BP

The Dopamine Type 2 Receptor (D2R) and ISS

The dopamine type 2 receptor (D2R) has been reported to interact negatively with the AT1R in several tissues, including the kidney [5961]. The D2R and their other members of the D2-like receptor subfamily, D3R and D4R, are expressed in the kidney [62] and are involved with Na+ homeostasis and the regulation of inflammation [63, 64]. The D2R decreases reactive oxygen species production through stimulation of sestrin 2 and paraoxonase 2 (PON2), and inhibition of NADPH [65] oxidase activity, keeping BP in the normal range [66]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the DRD2 decrease D2R expression and activity. DRD2 rs6276 (1347G > A) at 3’UTR (MAF 0.484) has decreased D2R function, and DRD2 rs6277 (957C > T exon 7 synonymous mutation, MAF = 0.273) has decreased DRD2 mRNA stability [67]. These DRD2 variants increase inflammation and fibrosis in human RPTCs [67]. Deficient dopamine D2R function causes renal inflammation independently of high BP [68]. Renal-selective rescue of D2R function reverses the renal injury and high BP caused by renal Drd2 deficiency in mice [69]. DRD2 variant-mediated dysregulation of the RAS may contribute to the pathogenesis of ISS hypertension [70].

Catecholaminergic Regulation of BP

The D2R interacts with other cardiovascular regulating systems to keep the BP normal during high, normal, and low Na+ intake, via a negative interaction with antinatriuretic AT1R and/or α1-adrenoceptor. For example, decreasing sympathetic nerve activity with etamicastat normalizes the increased blood pressure of mice with germline deletion of Drd2 or mice with selective renal silencing of Drd2 [119]. The D2R can also antagonize the stimulatory effects of Ang II on inflammation [68]. D2-like receptor stimulation inhibits Ang II-mediated stimulation of Na+K+/ATPase activity and inhibition of cAMP production in renal proximal tubules [59]. In ISS with compromised D2R the RAS system fails to be inhibited and thus leads to ISS hypertension. For example, AT1R may be responsible for the decreased renal expression of natriuretic D1R and D2R in obese Zucker rats [136].

The salt resistance in SJL and BALB/c mice may be related to the increase in renal dopamine production and normal D1R and D5R function with the increase in Na+ intake [7779]. In the salt-resistant Wistar rat [80], D3R and AT2R interact to increase Na+ excretion [76]. We propose that a similar mechanism occurs in SR mice normally expressing the wild-type D2R. When Na+ intake is high, circulating norepinephrine [8183], systemic norepinephrine spillover [84], urinary norepinephrine [85], and renal norepinephrine overflow [86] are decreased, relative to when Na+ intake is low, keeping BP in the normal range [87]. High Na+ intake also causes the phosphorylation of NHE-3, and redistribution of NHE-3, NaPi2, NKCC2, β-ENaC, α1 and β 1 Na+-K+/ATPase, and AT2R from plasma membrane fractions to intracellular fractions in RPTs, resulting in a decrease in RPT Na+ transport [88]. The opposite occurs when Na+ intake is low, and in addition, circulating norepinephrine [81, 82, 85], systemic norepinephrine spillover [84], urinary norepinephrine [85], and renal sympathetic activity [86] are increased, relative to what occurs with Na+ intake is high [86]. With low Na+ intake, the inhibitory effect of D2Rs on RPT Na+ transport is minimized by the increased activity of the renal RAS and adrenergic system [87], similar to the increase in RAS activity that we reported for the D1R [89]. Total renal [90] and plasma membrane [91] expressions of NCC and α-ENaC but not NHE-3 or NKCC2 increase in rats fed a low NaCl diet. However, in mice [92], low Na+ intake increased renal tubular total and cell surface NHE3, NKCC2, and gamma-ENaC, as observed in rats. In mice, renal tubular NHE-3 is required to maintain Na+ and water homeostasis and BP [93].

Other Genes Associated with ISS

Two Na+/myoinositol cotransporters, SMIT1 (SLC5A3) and SMIT2 (SLC5A11, SGLT6), are expressed in the kidney, but SMIT2 is responsible for the apical myoinositol transport in the RPT [94]. In mice (0.025–0.05% NaCl) also increases the renal expression of SLCA511 (unpublished), aiding the increase in renal Na+ reabsorption (Fig. 5), as described for NHE3; an interaction between NHE3 and SLC5A11 remains to be determined. In mice, the D2R is important in the negative regulation of SLCA511 expression in the kidney because deletion of D2R only in the RPT increases renal SLCA511 protein expression (unpublished). In humans, the CC genotype in SLC5A11 is associated with lower serum myoinositol concentration, relative to the normal TT genotype [95], which presumably is due to an increase in its (myoinositol) excretion. However, normally D2R expression/function inhibits SLC5A11 activity so that a negative Na+ balance should not occur. When Na+ intake is low, the expression of the wild-type sodium/myoinositol transporter (SLCA511 (T/T)) increases, aiding the increase in Na+ reabsorption and a positive Na+ balance ensues until the ECF volume is normalized and BP remains normal (Fig. 5). When Na+ intake is high, the presence of SLC5A11 containing the SNPs (T/C) or SLC5A11 (C/C) decreases sodium/myoinositol cotransporter activity [95] which results in an increase in Na+ excretion. However, normally, D2R expression/function inhibits SLC5A11 activity so that a negative Na+ balance should not occur. When Na+ intake is low, the natriuretic effect of SLC5A11 (T/C), SLC5A11 (C/C) [95] persists, but the increase circulating norepinephrine [82, 83], systemic norepinephrine spillover [84], urinary norepinephrine [85], and renal norepinephrine overflow [86] also persists, relative to what occurs when Na+ intake is high [87]. When Na+ intake is low, the inhibitory effect of D2Rs on RPT transport is minimized by the increased activity of the renal RAS and adrenergic system, similar to the increase in RAS activity that we reported for the D1R [89]. Ang II and norepinephrine increase NHE3 activity [96]. As stated above, in mice, renal tubular NHE3 is required to maintain Na+ and water homeostasis and BP [92]. The increase in norepinephrine activity causes a redistribution of NHE-3 to the RPT plasma membrane, increasing its activity and, thus, Na+ transport [97]. Ang II via AT1R also promotes the dephosphorylation of NHE-3, increasing its activity [98]. A positive Na+ balance ensues until a normal BP is achieved (Fig. 6).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

The normal D2R negatively interacts with AT1R and α1-adrenergic receptors and positively interacts with the AT2R to regulate sodium transport in the RPT, via NHE3 and SLC5A11 (SGLT6). Normal D2R and SLC5A11 (T/T) regulate renal sodium transport in the RPT properly, and therefore, the BP is normal. A dashed red line (- - -) indicates inhibition, while a continuous green line (–––) indicates stimulation

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

The normal D2R negatively interacts with AT1R and α1-adrenergic receptors and positively interacts with the AT2R to inhibit sodium transport in the RPT, via NHE3 and SLC5A11 (SGLT6). The SLC5A11 heterozygous (T/C) and homozygous variants (C/C) decrease rather than increase Na.+/myoinositol cotransport. However, the presence of a normal D2R keeps RPT transport and BP normal. A dashed red line (- - - -) indicates inhibition, while a continuous green line (–––) indicates stimulation

Other Pathways Potentially Associated with ISS

The non-osmotic storage of Na + in the body’s extracellular space such as in blood vessels and skin could act as a buffer that would have minimal effect on extracellular volume [99, 100]. It has been hypothesized that negative charges in endothelium glycocalyx neutralize the positive charge on Na+ to enable non-osmotic storage. In ISS, the effect of high salt diets may not lead to salt sensitivity if the ISS individuals have a greater glycocalyx Na+ capacity than SR or SS individuals, such is found in men vs. women [101].

Low D2R Expression/Activity and Presence of SLC5A11 (C/C) in ISS (Fig. 7)

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

The low D2R expression/function cannot negatively regulate SLC5A11 (C/C), adding to the increase in sodium excretion on high salt intake. On low salt intake, the natriuretic effect of SLC5A11 (C/C) remains increased caused by the decreased D2R expression/function. However, the increase in both RAS and α1-adrenergic nervous system increase renal sodium transport (via NHE3 mainly, as well as NCC and Na+, K+/ATPase). Sodium retention occurs, and eventually, BP increases, a case of inverse salt sensitivity of blood pressure. A dashed red line (- - -) indicates inhibition, while a continuous green line (–––) indicates stimulation

When Na+ intake is high, catecholamine and renin levels decrease and NHE3 activity decreases. However, the low D2R expression/function cannot prevent the ability of SLC5A11 (C/C) to decrease Na+ and myoinositol transport [95], adding to the increase in Na+ excretion. The persistence of the negative Na+ balance eventually results in a decrease in BP.

By contrast, when Na+ intake is low, the low D2R expression results in overactivity of NHE3 (plus NCC and Na+K+/ATPase), facilitated by increased Ang II and α-adrenergic action (see above), accompanied by impaired natriuretic activity (decreased plasma membrane expression of AT2R) [89]. The natriuretic effect of SLC5A11 (C/C) should persist because of decreased D2R expression/function. However, on a low salt diet, the marked increase in both RAS and α-adrenergic activities [102106] that may be caused in part by the inability of abnormal D2R to inhibit them would result in an inappropriate increase in renal Na+ transport. Na+ retention occurs, and eventually, BP increases, a case of ISS hypertension.

Contributing to these changes in BP is the circaseptan Na+ excretion rhythm which is a 7-day rhythm around which many biological processes revolve [107]. A recent meta-analysis on the effect of the dose and duration of dietary Na+ studies on the activation of the RAS and sympathetic nervous system may not lead to circaseptan rhythms if the dietary studies are conducted with longer interventions (> 14 days) [108].

Association of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the D2R and ISS

DRD2 is encoded on chromosome 11q23.2 and expressed as D2 (short), D2 (long), and D2(X1) isoforms [109]. The two DRD2 variants, rs6276 and rs6277, were found to be associated with a rise in BP on the low Na+ (10 mmol/day) diet of a two-week controlled Na+ BP study [5]. The quantitative assessment found that the DRD2 variants were associated with ISS (rs6276 and rs6267 have P values of 1.0 × 10−2 and 3.8 × 10−2 with odds ratios of 0.32 and 0.48 in unadjusted regression models, respectively) (unpublished data). The rise in MAP on a low Na+ diet correlated with the number of SNPs in DRD2, achieving significance with 2 or more DRD2 SNPs. There was a 1 mm Hg increase in MAP per DRD2 SNP (p < 0.01, y = 1.077 × 0.074, R2 = 0.8517, n = 174) (Fig. 8). Plasma membrane D2R expression was measured using an extracellular epitope-specific rabbit anti-D2R antibody and found to be reduced by 25.3 ± 0.5% in RPTCs from ISS subjects (p < 0.01, N = 5/group), relative to RPTCs from SR subjects (unpublished data). To date, the D2R is the only gene with SNPs associated with the ISS phenotype. However, additional contributors to the ISS phenotype undoubtedly exist because some ISS individuals have wild-type DRD2.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

The number of DRD2 SNPs at both rs6276 and is6277 is graphed vs. the delta MAP measured during the transition from low to a high Na+ intake. (A) There is a linear relationship between the number of allelic variants and the change (Δ) in MAP (y = 0.73X − 0.06, R.2 = 0.83, p < 0.05, n = 280). (B) The cohort is divided into two groups, those with two or less DRD2 SNPs and those with 3 or 4 DRD2 SNPs. ΔMAP is significantly different between the two groups (0–2 SNPs: − 1.23 ± 0.46, n = 164; 3–4 SNPs: 0.74 ± 0.64, n = 116; p < 0.05)

Epigenetics and ISS Hypertension

Epigenetics may also be involved in the etiology of ISS hypertension. The epigenetic regulation of gene transcription and translation can be influenced by diet [110112]. An increase or decrease in oxidative stress caused by diet can also provoke changes in epigenetics [112, 113]. Thus, increased Na+ intake can increase oxidative stress and can also influence epigenetics [114116]. The renal D2R and D5R receptor, among others, regulate several redox enzymes [52, 66, 117122]. D5R influences redox signaling by inhibiting NADPH oxidase via phospholipase D2 and stimulating superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase, glutamyl cysteine transferase, and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) [123]. The D2R also influences redox signaling by inhibiting the pro-oxidant NADPH oxidase [65] and activating antioxidant enzymes DJ-1, PON2, HO-2, glutathione, catalase, and SOD [117, 119, 120, 123125]. The dopaminergic system opposes RAS signaling, at least, in part, through specific receptor signaling pathways [126]. The D3R, D4R, and D5R oppose RAS signaling by inhibiting the expression of AT1R, a known mediator of pro-oxidant activity [127129]. The D2R opposes aldosterone production, another pro-oxidant component of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, yet blocking aldosterone binding with spironolactone does not block ROS production [120].

Micro-RNAs (miRNAs), which can regulate the transcription of DNA, are epigenetic markers for various diseases. Micro-RNAs in urinary exosomes and their association with an individual’s BP response to dietary Na+ intake have been studied [130]. A wide microarray containing 1898 probes was used to examine the human urinary exosomal miRNome. We extended these studies, and as previously described, of the 194 miRNAs found in the subjects tested, 45 miRNAs had significant associations with SS or ISS [40]. Although not differentially expressed, miR-485-5p is one of the 194 miRNAs found and binds to the DRD2 rs6276, reducing D2R expression [131]. Furthermore, a miRNA mimic that behaved just as the endogenous mir-485-5p miRNA reduced the expression of D2R, but only in the RPTCs from the urine of individuals with ISS hypertension. A miRNA blocker inhibited endogenous miRNAs, resulting in normalizing the expression of the D2R (unpublished data). Fourteen additional miRNAs were found to be associated with ISS hypertension [40]. Among these 14 miRNAs, miRNA 30c-1-3p is pro-inflammatory [132], but its role in the inflammation that occurs with decreased D2R expression [67, 68, 70, 117, 133135] remains to be determined.

Conclusions

ISS individuals have a paradoxically elevated BP, even to hypertensive levels, when consuming low levels of Na+ (essentially equivalent to the strict vegan diets that are gaining in popularity for health and ethical reasons). At least one pathway involved in the pathogenesis of inverse salt sensitivity is the D2R pathway; reduced D2R expression or function has been shown to contribute to the pathogenesis of ISS. There are likely many other pathways, such as the Na+/myoinositol pathway described above. An ISS individual’s magnitude of BP rise will likely be determined by the summation of pathways that cause an increase in renal tubular Na+ reabsorption that is mediated by increased activity of RAS and the adrenergic nervous system-mediated renal Na+ transport. The differential diagnosis of hypertension should include ISS that can be ameliorated by increasing Na+ intake, thus avoiding the overuse of antihypertensive medications with potential side effects. What was not reviewed here is the role of the non-osmotic extracellular glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) Na+ storage buffer on ISS which may play a significant role in ISS hypertension.

Novelty and Significance.

1. What is new?

  • Both high and low Na+ intakes associate with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, but the etiology of the high mortality in individuals with low Na+ intake is unknown.

  • 15% of the adult population may have “inverse salt sensitivity” which is an increase in BP in response to low Na+ intake.

2. What is relevant?

  • ISS hypertension is due, at least in part, to DRD2 variants, associated with decreased renal proximal tubule cell expression of D2R, that increases renal tubular Na+ reabsorption under low Na+ intake.

  • High blood pressure may be reduced to the normotensive range by increasing Na+ consumption in individuals with ISS hypertension.

3. Conclusion

  • Inverse salt sensitivity, which is an increase in blood pressure induced by low Na+ intake, is associated with an overactive RAS and adrenergic system caused by a decrease in D2R receptor expression in the kidney due to DRD2 gene variants. D2R function is required to suppress the RAS- and adrenergic-mediated stimulation of renal tubular Na+ transport.

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Brackston Mitchell and Huichun Xu at the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Department of Medicine University of Maryland School of Medicine, and Dr. Gordon Williams at Brigham and Woman’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, for sharing their salt sensitivity data that appear in Fig. 2. This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) P01 HL074940; the Principal Investigator is Dr. Felder. Dr. Carey is Principal Investigator of R01 HL128189 and Project Director for Program Project Grant, P01 HL074940. Dr. Jose is Principal Investigator of R01 DK039308 and R01 DK119652 and Project Director of P01 HL074940.

Abbreviations

Ang

Angiotensin

AT1R

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor

AT2R

Angiotensin II type 2 receptor

BP

Blood pressure

D2R

Dopamine type 2 receptor

DRD2

Dopamine type 2 receptor gene

GRK4

G protein-coupled receptor kinase type 4

MAP

Mean arterial pressure

ISS

Inverse salt-sensitive and inverse salt sensitivity

SR

Salt-resistant

SS

Salt-sensitive

uRPTCs

Urine renal proximal tubule cells

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest The authors, Robin A. Felder, John J. Gildea, Peng Xu, Wei Yue, Ines Armando, Robert M. Carey, and Pedro A. Jose, declare no competing interests.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines). All authors have read and approved the submission of the manuscript; the manuscript, figures, and tables have not been published and are not being considered for publication elsewhere, except for abstracts presented to the American Heart Association Hypertension conference in the 2018–2021 Scientific Sessions.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:

• Of importance

•• Of major importance

  • 1.Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, DePalma SM, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones DW, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2018;138:e484–594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.••. He FJ, Tan M, Ma Y, MacGregor GA. Salt reduction to prevent hypertension and cardiovascular disease: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:632–47. This comprehensive review highlights the important role of elevated dietary salt in cardiovascular disease with or without elevated blood pressure.
  • 3.••. Cappuccio FP, Beer M, Strazzullo P, Network ESA. Population dietary salt reduction and the risk of cardiovascular disease. A scientific statement from the European Salt Action Network. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;29:107–114. This paper discusses the fact that a low salt diet can lead to increased morbidity and mortality.
  • 4.Elfassy T, Chamany S, Bartley K, Yi SS, Angell SY. Lower 24-h urinary sodium excretion is associated with hypertension control: the 2010 Heart Follow-Up Study. J Hum Hypertens. 2020;34:624–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carey RM, Schoeffel CD, Gildea JJ, Jones JE, McGrath HE, Gordon LN, Park MJ, Sobota RS, Underwood PC, Williams J, et al. Salt sensitivity of blood pressure is associated with polymorphisms in the sodium-bicarbonate cotransporter. Hypertension. 2012;60:1359–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Elijovich F, Weinberger MH, Anderson CA, Appel LJ, Bursztyn M, Cook NR, Dart RA, Newton-Cheh CH, Sacks FM, Laffer CL, et al. Salt sensitivity of blood pressure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2016;68:e7–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rucker AJ, Rudemiller NP, Crowley SD. Salt, hypertension, and immunity. Annu Rev Physiol. 2018;80:283–307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lastra G, Dhuper S, Johnson MS, Sowers JR. Salt, aldosterone, and insulin resistance: impact on the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:577–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kurtz TW, DiCarlo SE, Pravenec M, Morris RC. The American Heart Association Scientific Statement on salt sensitivity of blood pressure: prompting consideration of alternative conceptual frameworks for the pathogenesis of salt sensitivity? J Hypertens. 2017;35:2214–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Skrabal F, Herholz H, Neumayr M, Hamberger L, Ledochowski M, Sporer H, Hortnagl H, Schwarz S, Schonitzer D. Salt sensitivity in humans is linked to enhanced sympathetic responsiveness and to enhanced proximal tubular reabsorption. Hypertension. 1984;6:152–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Majid DS, Kopkan L. Nitric oxide and superoxide interactions in the kidney and their implication in the development of salt-sensitive hypertension. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2007;34:946–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sigmund CD, Carey RM, Appel LJ, Arnett DK, Bosworth HB, Cushman WC, Galis ZS, Green Parker M, Hall JE, Harrison DG, et al. Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on hypertension: barriers to translation. Hypertension. 2020;75:902–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Raizada MK, Joe B, Bryan NS, Chang EB, Dewhirst FE, Borisy GG, Galis ZS, Henderson W, Jose PA, Ketchum CJ, et al. Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on the role of microbiota in blood pressure regulation: current status and future directions. Hypertension. 2017;HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Weinberger MH, Fineberg NS, Fineberg SE, Weinberger M. Salt sensitivity, pulse pressure, and death in normal and hypertensive humans. Hypertension. 2001;37:429–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alderman MH, Cohen HW. Dietary sodium intake and cardiovascular mortality: controversy resolved? Curr Hypertens Rep. 2012;14:193–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.O’Donnell M, Mente A, Alderman MH, Brady AJB, Diaz R, Gupta R, López-Jaramillo P, Luft FC, Lüscher TF, Mancia G, et al. Salt and cardiovascular disease: insufficient evidence to recommend low sodium intake. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:3363–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Asayama K, Stolarz-Skrzypek K, Persu A, Staessen JA. Systematic review of health outcomes in relation to salt intake highlights the widening divide between guidelines and the evidence. Am J Hypertens. 2014;27:1138–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.O’Donnell M, Mente A, Rangarajan S, McQueen MJ, Wang X, Liu L, Yan H, Lee SF, Mony P, Devanath A, et al. Urinary sodium and potassium excretion, mortality, and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:612–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Strom BL, Anderson CA, Ix JH. Sodium reduction in populations: insights from the Institute of Medicine committee. JAMA. 2013;310:31–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Morimoto A, Uzu T, Fujii T, Nishimura M, Kuroda S, Nakamura S, Inenaga T, Kimura G. Sodium sensitivity and cardiovascular events in patients with essential hypertension. Lancet. 1997;350:1734–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gildea JJ, Lahiff DT, Van Sciver RE, Weiss RS, Shah N, McGrath HE, Schoeffel CD, Jose PA, Carey RM, Felder RA. A linear relationship between the ex-vivo sodium mediated expression of two sodium regulatory pathways as a surrogate marker of salt sensitivity of blood pressure in exfoliated human renal proximal tubule cells: the virtual renal biopsy. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;421:236–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Overlack A, Ruppert M, Kolloch R, Göbel B, Kraft K, Diehl J, Schmitt W, Stumpe KO. Divergent hemodynamic and hormonal responses to varying salt intake in normotensive subjects. Hypertension. 1993;22:331–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Montasser ME, Douglas JA, Roy-Gagnon MH, Van Hout CV, Weir MR, Vogel R, Parsa A, Steinle NI, Snitker S, Brereton NH, Chang YP, Shuldiner AR, Mitchell BD. Determinants of blood pressure response to low-salt intake in a healthy adult population. Journal of Clinical Hypertension (Greenwich). 2011;13:795–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Overlack A, Ruppert M, Kolloch R, Kraft K, Stumpe KO. Age is a major determinant of the divergent blood pressure responses to varying salt intake in essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8(8):829–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mente A, O’Donnell MJ, Rangarajan S, McQueen MJ, Poirier P, Wielgosz A, Morrison H, Li W, Wang X, Di C, et al. Association of urinary sodium and potassium excretion with blood pressure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:601–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Miller JZ, Weinberger MH, Daugherty SA, Fineberg NS, Christian JC, Grim CE. Heterogeneity of blood pressure response to dietary sodium restriction in normotensive adults. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:245–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Carey RM, Muntner P, Bosworth HB, Whelton PK. Prevention and control of hypertension: JACC health promotion series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1278–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stolarz-Skrzypek K, Kuznetsova T, Thijs L, Tikhonoff V, Seidlerová J, Richart T, Jin Y, Olszanecka A, Malyutina S, Casiglia E, et al. Fatal and nonfatal outcomes, incidence of hypertension, and blood pressure changes in relation to urinary sodium excretion. JAMA. 2011;305:1777–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Graudal N, Jürgens G. Conflicting evidence on health effects associated with salt reduction calls for a redesign of the salt dietary guidelines. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;61:20–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.•. Alderman MH, Blumenfeld JD. Hypertension: evolving from standardized to individualized care. J Hypertens. 2020;38:1251–4. This paper provides the case for individualized recommendations on how patient treatment regimens should be individualized.
  • 31.Thomas MC, Moran J, Forsblom C, Harjutsalo V, Thorn L, Ahola A, Wadén J, Tolonen N, Saraheimo M, Gordin D, et al. The association between dietary sodium intake, ESRD, and all-cause mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:861–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Longworth DL, Drayer JI, Weber MA, Laragh JH. Divergent blood pressure responses during short-term sodium restriction in hypertension. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1980;27:544–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.••. Castiglioni P, Parati G, Lazzeroni D, Bini M, Faini A, Brambilla L, Brambilla V, Coruzzi P. Hemodynamic and autonomic response to different salt intakes in normotensive individuals. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5: e003736. These studies clearly described the ISS phenotype as being distinct from salt resistant individuals.
  • 34.Felder RA, White MJ, Williams SM, Jose PA. Diagnostic tools for hypertension and salt sensitivity testing. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2013;22:65–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Willett WC, McCullough ML. Dietary pattern analysis for the evaluation of dietary guidelines. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17(Suppl 1):75–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mitchell BD, McArdle PF, Shen H, Rampersaud E, Pollin TI, Bielak LF, Jaquish C, Douglas JA, Roy-Gagnon MH, Sack P, et al. The genetic response to short-term interventions affecting cardiovascular function: rationale and design of the Heredity and Phenotype Intervention (HAPI) Heart Study. Am Heart J. 2008;155:823–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Welling PA. Rare mutations in renal sodium and potassium transporter genes exhibit impaired transport function. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2014;23(1):1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ji W, Foo JN, O’Roak BJ, Zhao H, Larson MG, Simon DB, Newton-Cheh C, State MW, Levy D, Lifton RP. Rare independent mutations in renal salt handling genes contribute to blood pressure variation. Nat Genet. 2008;40:592–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gildea JJ, Van Sciver R, McGrath HE, Weiss R, Shah I, Shan N, Felder RA. Renal proximal tubule cells isolated from human urine report the degree of salt sensitivity in test subjects. Hypertension. 2010;56: e61. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gildea JJ, Carlson JM, Schoeffel CD, Carey RM, Felder RA. Urinary exosome miRNome analysis and its applications to salt sensitivity of blood pressure. Clin Biochem. 2013;46:1131–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pisitkun T, Shen RF, Knepper MA. Identification and proteomic profiling of exosomes in human urine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:13368–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tan PPS, Hall D, Chilian WM, Chia YC, Mohd Zain S, Lim HM, Kumar DN, Ching SM, Low TY, Md Noh MF, et al. Exosomal microRNAs in the development of essential hypertension and its potential as biomarkers. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2021;320:H1486–1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Manosroi W, Williams GH. Genetics of human primary hypertension: focus on hormonal mechanisms. Endocr Rev. 2019;40:825–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rayner B, Ramesar R, Steyn K, Levitt N, Lombard C, Charlton K. G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 4 polymorphisms predict blood pressure response to dietary modification in Black patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2012;26:334–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jeong S, Kim JY, Cho Y, Koh SB, Kim N, Choi JR. Genetically, dietary sodium intake is causally associated with salt-sensitive hypertension risk in a community-based cohort study: a Mendelian randomization approach. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2020;22:45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lee M, Kim MK, Kim SM, Park H, Park CG, Park HK. Gender-based differences on the association between salt-sensitive genes and obesity in Korean children aged between 8 and 9 years. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0120111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sanada H, Yatabe J, Midorikawa S, Hashimoto S, Watanabe T, Moore JH, Ritchie MD, Williams SM, Pezzullo JC, Sasaki M, et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms for diagnosis of salt-sensitive hypertension. Clin Chem. 2006;52:352–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bengra C, Mifflin TE, Khripin Y, Manunta P, Williams SM, Jose PA, Felder RA. Genotyping of essential hypertension single-nucleotide polymorphisms by a homogeneous PCR method with universal energy transfer primers. Clin Chem. 2002;48:2131–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang Z, Zeng C, Villar VA, Chen SY, Konkalmatt P, Wang X, Asico LD, Jones JE, Yang Y, Sanada H, Felder RA, Eisner GM, Weir MR, Armando I, Jose PA. Human GRK4γ142v variant promotes angiotensin II type I receptor-mediated hypertension via renal histone deacetylase type 1 inhibition. Hypertension. 2016;67:325–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sanada H, Yoneda M, Yatabe J, Williams SM, Bartlett J, White MJ, Gordon LN, Felder RA, Eisner GM, Armando I, et al. Common variants of the G protein-coupled receptor type 4 are associated with human essential hypertension and predict the blood pressure response to angiotensin receptor blockade. Pharmacogenomics J. 2016;16:3–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Diao Z, Asico LD, Villar VAM, Zheng X, Cuevas S, Armando I, Jose PA, Wang X. Increased renal oxidative stress in salt-sensitive human GRK4γ486V transgenic mice. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017;106:80–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Armando I, Konkalmatt P, Felder RA, Jose PA. The renal dopaminergic system: novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in hypertension and kidney disease. Transl Res. 2015;165:505–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Harris RC, Zhang MZ. Dopamine, the kidney, and hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2012;14:138–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Felder RA, Jose PA, Xu P, Gildea JJ. The renal sodium bicarbonate cotransporter NBCe2: is it a major contributor to sodium and pH homeostasis? Curr Hypertens Rep. 2016;18:71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Padia SH, Kemp BA, Howell NL, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Roques BP, Carey RM. Conversion of renal angiotensin II to angiotensin III is critical for AT2 receptor-mediated natriuresis in rats. Hypertension. 2008;51:460–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Röhnert P, Schmidt W, Emmerlich P, Goihl A, Wrenger S, Bank U, Nordhoff K, Täger M, Ansorge S, Reinhold D, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV, aminopeptidase N and DPIV/APN-like proteases in cerebral ischemia. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kotlo K, Shukla S, Tawar U, Skidgel RA, Danziger RS. Aminopeptidase N reduces basolateral Na+ -K+ -ATPase in proximal tubule cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007;293:F1047–1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Padia SH, Howell NL, Kemp BA, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Roques BP, Carey RM. Intrarenal aminopeptidase N inhibition restores defective angiontesin II type 2-mediated natriuresis in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2010;55:474–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hussain T, Abdul-Wahab R, Kotak DK, Lokhandwala MF. Bromocriptine regulates angiotensin II response on sodium pump in proximal tubules. Hypertension. 1998;32:1054–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sarkar C, Ganju RK, Pompili VJ, Chakroborty D. Enhanced peripheral dopamine impairs post-ischemic healing by suppressing angiotensin receptor type 1 expression in endothelial cells and inhibiting angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 2017;20:97–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Garrido-Gil P, Dominguez-Meijide A, Moratalla R, Guerra MJ, Labandeira-Garcia JL. Aging-related dysregulation in enteric dopamine and angiotensin system interactions: implications for gastrointestinal dysfunction in the elderly. Oncotarget. 2018;9:10834–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gao DQ, Canessa LM, Mouradian MM, Jose PA. Expression of the D2 subfamily of dopamine receptor genes in kidney. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:F646–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Choi MR, Kouyoumdzian NM, Rukavina Mikusic NL, Kravetz MC, Rosón MI, Rodríguez Fermepin M, Fernández BE. Renal dopaminergic system: pathophysiological implications and clinical perspectives. World J Nephrol. 2015;4:196–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Feng Y, Lu Y. Immunomodulatory effects of dopamine in inflammatory diseases. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 663102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yang Y, Zhang Y, Cuevas S, Villar VA, Escano C, D Asico L, Yu P, Grandy DK, Felder RA, Armando I, et al. Paraoxonase 2 decreases renal reactive oxygen species production, lowers blood pressure, and mediates dopamine D2 receptor-induced inhibition of NADPH oxidase. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53:437–446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yang Y, Cuevas S, Yang S, Villar VA, Escano C, Asico L, Yu P, Jiang X, Weinman EJ, Armando I, et al. Sestrin2 decreases renal oxidative stress, lowers blood pressure, and mediates dopamine D2 receptor-induced inhibition of reactive oxygen species production. Hypertension. 2014;64:825–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Jiang X, Konkalmatt P, Yang Y, Gildea J, Jones JE, Cuevas S, Felder RA, Jose PA, Armando I. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the dopamine D2 receptor increase inflammation and fibrosis in human renal proximal tubule cells. Hypertension. 2014;63:e74–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhang Y, Cuevas S, Asico LD, Escano C, Yang Y, Pascua AM, Wang X, Jones JE, Grandy D, Eisner G, et al. Deficient dopamine D2 receptor function causes renal inflammation independently of high blood pressure. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: e38745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Konkalmatt PR, Asico LD, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Drachenberg C, Zheng X, Han F, Jose PA, Armando I. Renal rescue of dopamine D2 receptor function reverses renal injury and high blood pressure. JCI Insight. 2016;1: e85888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gildea J, Daley M, Xu P, Shiermeyer K, Yue W, Carey R, Jose P, Felder R. Differential redox signaling in urine derived renal proximal tubule cells isolated from inverse salt sensitive vs salt resistant clinical study participants. Hypertension. 2020;76:AP009. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Cao G, Della Penna SL, Kouyoumdzian NM, Choi MR, Gorzalczany S, Fernández BE, Toblli JE, Rosón MI. Immunohistochemical expression of intrarenal renin angiotensin system components in response to tempol in rats fed a high salt diet. World J Nephrol. 2017;6:29–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Samuel P, Ali Q, Sabuhi R, Wu Y, Hussain T. High Na intake increases renal angiotensin II levels and reduces expression of the ACE2-AT(2)R-MasR axis in obese Zucker rats. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2012;303:F412–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gonzalez M, Lobos L, Castillo F, Galleguillos L, Lopez NC, Michea L. High-salt diet inhibits expression of angiotensin type 2 receptor in resistance arteries. Hypertension. 2005;45:853–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Dopona EPB, Rocha VF, Furukawa LNS, Oliveira IB, Heimann JC. Myocardial hypertrophy induced by high salt consumption is prevented by angiotensin II AT2 receptor agonist. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;29:301–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Gildea JJ, Wang X, Shah N, Tran H, Spinosa M, Van Sciver R, Sasaki M, Yatabe J, Carey RM, Jose PA, et al. Dopamine and angiotensin type 2 receptors cooperatively inhibit sodium transport in human renal proximal tubule cells. Hypertension. 2012;60:396–403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Yang S, Han Y, Zheng S, Kou X, Asico LD, Huang H, Gao Z, Jose PA, Zeng C. Enhanced natriuresis and diuresis in Wistar rats caused by the costimulation of renal dopamine D3 and angiotensin II type 2 receptors. Am J Hypertens. 2015;28:1267–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Escano CS, Armando I, Wang X, Asico LD, Pascua A, Yang Y, Wang Z, Lau YS, Jose PA. Renal dopaminergic defect in C57Bl/6J mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009;297:R1660–1669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Jiang X, Chen W, Liu X, Wang Z, Liu Y, Felder RA, Gildea JJ, Jose PA, Qin C, Yang Z. The synergistic roles of cholecystokinin B and dopamine D5 receptors on the regulation of renal sodium excretion. PLoS ONE. 2016;11: e0146641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Jiang X, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Yang J, Asico LD, Chen W, Felder RA, Armando I, Jose PA, Yang Z. Gastrin stimulates renal dopamine production by increasing the renal tubular uptake of l-DOPA. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2017;312:E1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Svitok P, Molcan L, Vesela A, Kruzliak P, Moravcik R, Zeman M. Increased salt intake during early ontogenesis lead to development of arterial hypertension in salt-resistant Wistar rats. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2015;37:142–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Walsh KR, Kuwabara JT, Shim JW, Wainford RD. Norepinephrine-evoked salt-sensitive hypertension requires impaired renal sodium chloride cotransporter activity in Sprague-Dawley rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2016;310:R115–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sharma AM, Schorr U, Oelkers W, Distler A. Effects of sodium salts on plasma renin activity and norepinephrine response to orthostasis in salt-sensitive normotensive subjects. Am J Hypertens. 1993;6:780–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wainford RD, Carmichael CY, Pascale CL, Kuwabara JT. Gαi2-protein-mediated signal transduction: central nervous system molecular mechanism countering the development of sodium-dependent hypertension. Hypertension. 2015;65:178–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Stein CM, Nelson R, Brown M, He H, Wood M, Wood AJ. Dietary sodium intake modulates systemic but not forearm norepinephrine release. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995;58:425–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Stupin A, Drenjančević I, Šušnjara P, Debeljak Ž, Kolobarić N, Jukić I, Mihaljević Z, Martinović G, Selthofer-Relatić K. Is there association between altered adrenergic system activity and microvascular endothelial dysfunction induced by a 7-day high salt intake in young healthy individuals. Nutrients. 2021;13:1731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Friberg P, Meredith I, Jennings G, Lambert G, Fazio V, Esler M. Evidence for increased renal norepinephrine overflow during sodium restriction in humans. Hypertension. 1990;16:121–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Graudal NA, Hubeck-Graudal T, Jurgens G. Effects of low sodium diet versus high sodium diet on blood pressure, renin, aldosterone, catecholamines, cholesterol, and triglyceride. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD004022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Yang L, Sandberg M, Can A, Pihakashi-Maunsback K, McDonough A. Effects of dietary salt on renal Na+ transporters’ subcellular distribution, abundance, and phosphorylation status. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;295:F1003–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Natarajan AR, Eisner GM, Armando I, Browning S, Pezzullo JC, Rhee L, Dajani M, Carey RM, Jose PA. The Renin-Angiotensin and Renal Dopaminergic Systems Interact in Normotensive Humans. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:265–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Masilamani S, Wang X, Kim GH, Brooks H, Nielsen J, Nielsen S, Nakamura K, Stokes JB, Knepper MA. Time course of renal Na-K-ATPase, NHE3, NKCC2, NCC, and ENaC abundance changes with dietary NaCl restriction. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2002;283:F648–657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Frindt G, Palmer LG. Surface expression of sodium channels and transporters in rat kidney: effects of dietary sodium. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009;297:F1249–1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Udwan K, Abed A, Roth I, Dizin E, Maillard M, Bettoni C, Loffing J, Wagner CA, Edwards A, Feraille E. Dietary sodium induces a redistribution of the tubular metabolic workload. J Physiol. 2017;595:6905–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Fenton RA, Poulsen SB, de la Mora CS, Soleimani M, Dominguez Rieg JA, Rieg T. Renal tubular NHE3 is required in the maintenance of water and sodium chloride homeostasis. Kidney Int. 2017;92:397–414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Lahjouji K, Aouameur R, Bissonnette P, Coady MJ, Bichet DG, Lapointe JY. Expression and functionality of the Na+/myo-inositol cotransporter SMIT2 in rabbit kidney. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1768:1154–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Groenen PM, Klootwijk R, Schijvenaars MM, Straatman H, Mariman EC, Franke B, Steegers-Theunissen RP. Spina bifida and genetic factors related to myo-inositol, glucose, and zinc. Mol Genet Metab. 2004;82:154–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Packer M. Activation and inhibition of sodium-hydrogen exchanger is a mechanism that links the pathophysiology and treatment of diabetes mellitus with that of heart failure. Circulation. 2017;136:1548–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Yang LE, Leong PK, Ye S, Campese VM, McDonough AA. Responses of proximal tubule sodium transporters to acute injury-induced hypertension. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003;284:F313–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Crajoinas RO, Polidoro JZ, Carneiro de Morais CP, CasteloBranco RC, Girardi AC. Angiotensin II counteracts the effects of cAMP/PKA on NHE3 activity and phosphorylation in proximal tubule cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2016;311:C768–C776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Titze J, Rakova N, Kopp C, Dahlmann A, Jantsch J, Luft FC. Balancing wobbles in the body sodium. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016;31(7):1078–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Kirabo A A new paradigm of sodium regulation in inflammation and hypertension. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2017;313(6):R706–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Viknesh Selvarajah V, Mäki-Petäjä K, Pedro L, Bruggraber S, Keith Burling K, Goodhart A, Brown M, McEniery C, Wilkinson I. Novel mechanism for buffering dietary salt in humans: efects of salt loading on skin sodium, vascular endothelial growth factor C, and blood pressure. Hypertension. 2017;70(5):930–937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Wang J, Deng Y, Zou X, Luo H, Jose PA, Fu C, Yang J, Zeng C. Long-term low salt diet increases blood pressure by activation of the renin-angiotensin and sympathetic nervous systems. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2019;41:739–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Webb DJ, Clark SA, Brown WB, Fraser R, Lever AF, Murray GD, Robertson JI. Dietary sodium deprivation raises blood pressure in the rat but does not produce irreversible hyperaldosteronism. J Hypertens. 1987;5:525–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ott CE, Welch WJ, Lorenz JN, Whitescarver SA, Kotchen TA. Effect of salt deprivation on blood pressure in rats. Am J Physiol. 1989;256:H1426–1431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Drüeke TB, Muntzel M. Heterogeneity of blood pressure responses to salt restriction and salt appetite in rats. Klin Wochenschr. 1991;69(Suppl 25):73–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Vari RC, Freeman RH, Davis JO, Sweet WD. Role of renal nerves in rats with low-sodium, one-kidney hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1986;250:H189–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Rakova N, Jüttner K, Dahlmann A, Schröder A, Linz P, Kopp C, Rauh M, Goller U, Beck L, Agureev A, et al. Long-term space flight simulation reveals infradian rhythmicity in human Na(+) balance. Cell Metab. 2013;17:125–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Huang L, Trieu K, Yoshimura S, Neal B, Woodward M, Campbell NRC, Li Q, Lackland DT, Leung AA, Anderson CAM, et al. Effect of dose and duration of reduction in dietary sodium on blood pressure levels: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2020;368: m315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Galan-Rodriguez B, Martin E, Brouillet E, Déglon N, Betuing S, Caboche J. Coupling of D2R Short but not D2R long receptor isoform to the Rho/ROCK signaling pathway renders striatal neurons vulnerable to mutant huntingtin. Eur J Neurosci. 2017;45:198–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Glier MB, Green TJ, Devlin AM. Methyl nutrients, DNA methylation, and cardiovascular disease. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2014;58:172–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Randunu RS, Bertolo RF. The effects of maternal and postnatal dietary methyl nutrients on epigenetic changes that lead to non-communicable diseases in adulthood. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Wang J, Yin N, Deng Y, Wei Y, Huang Y, Pu X, Li L, Zheng Y, Guo J, Yu J, et al. Ascorbic acid protects against hypertension through downregulation of ACE1 gene expression mediated by histone deacetylation in prenatal inflammation-induced offspring. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Lamothe J, Khurana S, Tharmalingam S, Williamson C, Byrne CJ, Lees SJ, Khaper N, Kumar A, Tai TC. Oxidative stress mediates the fetal programming of hypertension by glucocorticoids. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10:531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Feng W, Dell’Italia LJ, Sanders PW. Novel paradigms of salt and hypertension. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:1362–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Shabaka A, Cases-Corona C, Fernandez-Juarez G. Therapeutic insights in chronic kidney disease progression. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8: 645187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Kawarazaki W, Fujita T. Kidney and epigenetic mechanisms of salt-sensitive hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17:350–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Cuevas S, Yang Y, Konkalmatt P, Asico LD, Feranil J, Jones J, Villar VA, Armando I, Jose PA. Role of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 in the oxidative stress-dependent hypertension associated with the depletion of DJ-1. Hypertension. 2015;65:1251–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Qaddumi WN, Jose PA. The role of the renal dopaminergic system and oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Biomedicines. 2021;9:139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Armando I, Asico LD, Wang X, Jones JE, Serrão MP, Cuevas S, Grandy DK, Soares-da-Silva P, Jose PA. Antihypertensive effect of etamicastat in dopamine D2 receptor-deficient mice. Hypertens Res. 2018;41:489–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Armando I, Wang X, Villar VA, Jones JE, Asico LD, Escano C, Jose PA. Reactive oxygen species-dependent hypertension in dopamine D2 receptor-deficient mice. Hypertension. 2007;49:672–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Cuevas S, Villar VAM, Jose PA. Genetic polymorphisms associated with reactive oxygen species and blood pressure regulation. Pharmacogenomics J. 2019;19:315–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Banday AA, Lokhandwala MF. Transcriptional regulation of renal dopamine D1 receptor function during oxidative stress. Hypertension. 2015;65:1064–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Yang S, Yang Y, Yu P, Yang J, Jiang X, Villar VA, Sibley DR, Jose PA, Zeng C. Dopamine D1 and D5 receptors differentially regulate oxidative stress through paraoxonase 2 in kidney cells. Free Radic Res. 2015;49:397–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Xia XG, Schmidt N, Teismann P, Ferger B, Schulz JB. Dopamine mediates striatal malonate toxicity via dopamine transporter-dependent generation of reactive oxygen species and D2 but not D1 receptor activation. J Neurochem. 2001;79:63–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Gerö D, Módis K, Nagy N, Szoleczky P, Tóth ZD, Dormán G, Szabó C. Oxidant-induced cardiomyocyte injury: identification of the cytoprotective effect of a dopamine 1 receptor agonist using a cell-based high-throughput assay. Int J Mol Med. 2007;20:749–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Gildea JJ. Dopamine and angiotensin as renal counterregulatory systems controlling sodium balance. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2009;18:28–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Bek MJ, Wang X, Asico LD, Jones JE, Zheng S, Li X, Eisner GM, Grandy DK, Carey RM, Soares-da-Silva P, et al. Angiotensin-II type 1 receptor-mediated hypertension in D4 dopamine receptor-deficient mice. Hypertension. 2006;47:288–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Li H, Armando I, Yu P, Escano C, Mueller SC, Asico L, Pascua A, Lu Q, Wang X, Villar VA, et al. Dopamine 5 receptor mediates Ang II type 1 receptor degradation via a ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in mice and human cells. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:2180–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Gildea JJ, Wang X, Jose PA, Felder RA. Differential D1 and D5 receptor regulation and degradation of the angiotensin type 1 receptor. Hypertension. 2008;51:360–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Khella HW, Bakhet M, Lichner Z, Romaschin AD, Jewett MA, Yousef GM. MicroRNAs in Kidney Disease: an emerging understanding. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61:798–808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Gildea J, Xu P, Schiermeyer K, Yue W, Carey R, Jose P, Felder R. The etiology of inverse salt sensitivity of blood pressure: Mirna-485-5p binds to the dopamine type 2 receptor (D2R) SNP Rs6276 and decreases D2R expression. Hypertension. 2020;76:A2. [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Wu M, Liang G, Duan H, Yang X, Qin G, Sang N. Synergistic effects of sulfur dioxide and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on pulmonary pro-fibrosis via mir-30c-1-3p/transforming growth factor β type II receptor axis. Chemosphere. 2019;219:268–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Zhang Y, Jiang X, Qin C, Cuevas S, Jose PA, Armando I. Dopamine D2 receptors’ effects on renal inflammation are mediated by regulation of PP2A function. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016;310:F128–134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Rukavina Mikusic NL, Silva MG, Mazzitelli LR, Santos RAS, Gómez KA, Grecco HE, Gironacci MM. Interaction between the angiotensin-(1–7) Mas receptor and the dopamine D2 receptor: implications in inflammation. Hypertension. 2021;77:1659–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Han X, Li B, Ye X, Mulatibieke T, Wu J, Dai J, Wu D, Ni J, Zhang R, Xue J, Wan R, Wang X, Hu G. Dopamine D 2 receptor signalling controls inflammation in acute pancreatitis via a PP2A-dependent Akt/NF-κB signalling pathway. Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174:4751–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Wang X, Li F, Jose PA, Ecelbarger CM. Reduction of renal dopamine receptor expression in obese Zucker rats: role of sex and angiotensin II. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;299(5):F1164–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES