Skip to main content
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology logoLink to Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
. 2020 Sep 28;30(12):1927–1936. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2007.07032

Immunomodulatory Activities of Body Wall Fatty Acids Extracted from Halocynthia aurantium on RAW264.7 Cells

Chaiwat Monmai 1, A-Yeong Jang 2, Ji-Eun Kim 2, Sang-Min Lee 2,3, SangGuan You 1,2,4, SeokBeom Kang 5, Tae Ho Lee 6, Woo Jung Park 1,2,4,*
PMCID: PMC9728411  PMID: 33046674

Abstract

Tunicates are known to contain biologically active materials and one species in particular, the sea peach (Halocynthia aurantium), has not been thoroughly studied. In this study we aimed to analyze the fatty acids profile of the H. aurantium body wall and its immunomodulatory effects on RAW264.7 macrophage-like cells. The fatty acids were classified into three categories: saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). Omega-3 fatty acid content, including EPA and DHA, was higher than omega-6 fatty acids. H. aurantium body wall fatty acids exhibited enhanced immune response and anti-inflammatory effects on RAW264.7 macrophage-like cells. Under normal conditions, fatty acids significantly increase nitric oxide (NO) and PGE2 production in a dose-dependent manner, thereby improving the immune response. On the other hand, in LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells, fatty acids significantly decreased nitric oxide (NO) and PGE2 production in a dose-dependent manner, thereby enhancing anti-inflammatory effects. Fatty acids transcriptionally control the expression of the immune-associated genes, iNOS, IL-1β, IL-6, COX-2, and TNF-α, via the MAPK and NF-κB signaling cascades in RAW264.7 cells. However, in LPSstimulated RAW264.7 cells, H. aurantium body wall fatty acids significantly inhibited expression of inflammatory cytokine; similarly, production of COX-2 and PGE2 was inhibited. The results of our present study provide insight into the immune-improving and anti-inflammatory effects of H. aurantium body wall fatty acids on macrophages. In addition, our study demonstrates that H. aurantium body wall is a potential source of immune regulatory components.

Keywords: Halocynthia aurantium, body wall, fatty acids, immune-regulation, NF-κB, MAPK

Introduction

The immune system plays an important role in maintaining homeostasis and preventing disease by destroying harmful foreign substances or organisms and preventing harmful cell changes [1-3]. Macrophages are important immune regulatory cells known to exhibit various biological activities [4] and are associated with cytokine secretion, immune cell recruitment, microbicidal functions, and microbe phagocytosis [5]. Activation of macrophages induces expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and production of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and TNF-α, which play crucial roles in inflammation [6], and IL-6, which supports the differentiation of B cells [7]. Macrophage activation pathways are therefore promising targets for disease prevention [8].

Fatty acids such as saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), have been reported to be beneficial in improving patients with chronic diseases including cancers [9], cardiovascular disease [10], and diabetes [11]. Great attention has been paid to PUFAs, which are classified into two groups according to the first double bond location from the methyl terminus of the fatty acid chain; omega-3 (n-3) and omega-6 (n-6) with double bonds on the third and sixth carbon from the chain terminus, respectively. PUFAs are major structural components of phospholipid membranes and are critical for membrane structure and function [12]. They play important roles in body functions, including the immune system, blood clotting, cholesterol metabolism, and brain development and functioning [13, 14]. In addition, PUFAs modulate inflammatory reactions by producing pro- and anti-inflammatory lipid mediators called ‘eicosanoids’ [15]. An important inflammatory eicosanoid, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), stimulates the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 in macrophage cells, leading to vasodilation and pain. It also provokes the production of diverse cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 [16].

As seafood, sea squirts (Halocynthia roretzi) are a potential source of various biologically active components such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), carotenoids, taurine, and plasmalogen [17, 18]. According to Murakami, sea squirt carotenoid inhibited immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase [19] and repressed both superoxide and nitric oxide generation [20]. Furthermore, acethlene carotenoids contained in sea squirt lipids reduced the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-6 and IL-1β from macrophage-like RAW264.7 cells stimulated by lipopolysaccharides [21]. Another report showed that sea squirt halocynthiaxanthin and fucoxanthinol induced apoptosis in human leukemia and colon cancer cells [22].

Unlike other species of sea squirt, to the best of our knowledge, no research has been done on the benefits of Halocynthia aurantium fatty acids. H. aurantium is an edible marine invertebrate that inhabits the East Sea, and it is consumed in the countries of East Asia, including Korea and Japan [23]. H. aurantium is thought to contain diverse biologically active components [24]. In this study, we explored the immunomodulation effects of H. aurantium body wall fatty acids on the macrophage-like RAW264.7 cell line.

Materials and Methods

Sea Squirt Samples

Halocynthia aurantium is a valuable benthic marine organism found in the northern region of the East Sea, Korea [25]. The sea squirt prefers attachment to vertical rock faces in subtidal areas at a depth of up to 100 meters [26]. Sea squirt samples were obtained from the East Sea near Gangwon Province, South Korea. After removal of the sea squirt tunic, the outer (Fig. 1) and inner membranes of the body wall were removed for fatty acid extraction.

Fig. 1. The structure of H. aurantium.

Fig. 1

The body has a tunic (outer protective covering). After removal of the tunic, there is a thin layer which is the outer membrane of the body wall (OM). Inside the OM there is a thicker dermis, the inner membrane of the body wall (IM).

Fatty Acid Extraction and Analysis

Fatty acid was extracted from the outer and inner membranes of the body wall (OM and IM) of the sea squirt according to the Garces and Mancha method [27]. The extracted fatty acid was dissolved in DMSO to a final concentration of 20 mg/ml. The experiment was performed in quintuplicate (n = 5). Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) was prepared following the previously described method [28]. Prepared FAMEs were analyzed using gas chromatography (GC) flame-ionization detection (FID) (Perkin Elmer, USA). GC analysis was done using the capillary column (SPTM-2560, 100 m × 0.25 mm i.d., film thickness 0.20 μm). The GC standard is shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Fatty acid retention times in the GC standard.

Peak No. Retention time (min) Fatty acid
1 10.397 C4:0
2 11.082 C6:0
3 12.281 C8:0
4 14.251 C10:0
5 15.608 C11:0
6 17.058 C12:0
7 18.753 C13:0
8 20.430 C14:0
9 21.869 C14:1
10 23.605 C16:0
11 26.747 C17:1
12 27.349 C18:0
13 27.934 C18:1n9(t)
14 28.199 C18:1n9(c)
15 28.946 C19:0
16 29.604 C18:2n6(c)
17 30.528 C20:0
18 30.622 C18:3n6
19 31.237 C20:1
20 31.306 C18:3n3
21 32.093 C21:0
22 32.646 C20:2
23 33.645 C20:3n6
24 34.262 C22:1n9
25 34.395 C20:3n3
26 34.470 C20:4n6
27 35.211 C23:0
28 35.753 C22:2
29 36.341 C24:0
30 36.845 EPA
31 37.688 C24:1
32 41.116 DHA

Macrophage Viability and NO Production Analysis

Macrophage-like RAW264.7 cells were suspended in RPMI-1640 medium (supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin) and seeded at a concentration of 1 × 105 cells/well. The plate was incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. Different concentrations of OM and IM fatty acids were added to the cultured medium and the plate was incubated for 1 h. Cells were stimulated with and without 1 μg/ml of LPS to activate the inflammatory response and then incubated for another 24 h in the same condition. After incubation, 100 μl of supernatant from each well was analyzed for nitric oxide concentration using Griess reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) [29, 30]. For cultured cells, EZ-Cytox Cell Viability Assay Kit (Daeil Labservice, South Korea) was used to determine macrophage viability [31]. The macrophage proliferation ratio was calculated based on the following formula:

Macrophageviabilityratio(%)=theabsorbanceat450nmofthetestgrouptheabsorbanceat450nmofthecontrolgroup×100

RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription

Total RNA was isolated from the treated RAW264.7 cells (according to the method of macrophage viability and NO production) using TRI Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., USA). RNA was precipitated by adding 100% isopropanol and incubating at 4°C for at least 10 min. The RNA pellet was collected by centrifugation and washing with 75% ethanol. After the last washing, the RNA pellet was dissolved in nuclease-free water and the concentration was measured using a nanophotometer (Implen Inc., Germany). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using a high capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Analysis of Immune Gene Expression Using Quantitative Real-Time PCR

The immune-associated genes expression level was evaluated using the QuantStudio 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The qPCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara Bio Inc., Japan) with a 96-well format in a total reaction volume of 20 μl/well. The reaction mixture consisted of 0.4 μM of each specific primer pair (Table 2) and 0.1 ng of cDNA templates. The quantification results were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCT method [32] and compared with β-actin as the reference mRNA.

Table 2.

Sequences of oligonucleotide primers used for macrophage immune-associated genes test.

Gene Accession No. Sequence
iNOS BC062378.1 Forward primer: TTCCAGAATCCCTGGACAAG
Reverse primer: TGGTCAAACTCTTGGGGTTC
IL-1β NM_008361.4 Forward primer: GGGCCTCAAAGGAAAGAATC
Reverse primer: TACCAGTTGGGGAACTCTGC
IL-6 NM_031168.2 Forward primer: AGTTGCCTTCTTGGGACTGA
Reverse primer: CAGAATTGCCATTGCACAAC
COX-2 NM_011198.4 Forward primer: AGAAGGAAATGGCTGCAGAA
Reverse primer: GCTCGGCTTCCAGTATTGAG
TNF-α D84199.2 Forward primer: ATGAGCACAGAAAGCATGATC
Reverse primer: TACAGGCTTGTCACTCGAATT
β-actin NM_007393.5 Forward primer: CCACAGCTGAGAGGAAATC
Reverse primer: AAGGAAGGCTGGAAAAGAGC

Phagocytosis Uptake Assay

RAW264.7 cells were incubated with varying concentrations of H. aurantium body wall fatty acids for 24 h. Then, the cells were collected and incubated with 1 mg/ml of FITC-dextran (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) at 37°C for 1 h. The phagocytosis reaction was stopped using ice-cold PBS and then the cells were washed three times with cold PBS. Cellular uptake of FITC-dextran was analyzed using a CytoFLEX Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., USA).

Quantification of PGE2

The PGE2 ELISA Kit (Enzo Life Sciences, USA) was used to determine the production of PGE2 in the cell culture medium according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Colorization was done using p-nitrophenyl phosphate substrate, and the optical density was evaluated at 405 nm. The production of PGE2 was analyzed based on a standard curve.

Western Blot Assay

RAW264.7 cells were seeded at the concentration of 2 × 106 cells/well in a 6-well plate and incubated for 24 h. The cells were cultured with varying concentrations of H. aurantium body wall fatty acids before stimulating with or without 1 μg/ml of LPS. After 24 h incubation, the cells were collected and the protein was extracted using RIPA buffer (Tech & Innovation, China) containing 0.1% protease inhibitor (Thermo Fisher). The extracted protein was quantified using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific). Thirty micrograms of protein from each sample were collected using SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. The western blot assay was carried out as described previously [33]. After membrane blocking, the membrane was incubated with antibodies specific to phospho (p)-NF-κB p65 (1:1,000, Cell Signaling Technology), p-p38 (1:1,000, Cell Signaling Technology), p-ERK1/2 (1:1,000, Cell Signaling Technology), p-JNK (1:1,000, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and α-tubulin (1:1,000, Abcam, USA). The Pierce ECL Plus Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Scientific) was used to detect protein signals. The blot was captured using the ChemiDoc XRS+ imaging system (Bio-Rad, USA) and quantified using ImageLab software (version 4.1, Bio-Rad).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using ‘Statistix 8.1’ Statistics software. The fatty acid analysis was run in triplicate, and the data were presented as the mean value with standard deviation. Statistical differences were tested using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple-range test at p < 0.05. Macrophage proliferation, NO production, immune-associated gene expression, and production of PGE2 results were compared to model control using one-way ANOVA. Differences were considered significant if p < 0.01.

Results

Fatty Acid Analysis of H. aurantium Body Wall

The extract of total fatty acid from the sea squirt OM and IM amounted to approximately 3.78 ± 0.44% (0.17 ± 0.02 g) and 3.48 ± 0.34% (0.16 ± 0.02 g) of the input raw material, respectively. Total fatty acids from the OM and IM of the sea squirt body walls are shown in Fig. 2. The three groups of fatty acids (SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs) from the OM accounted for 24.8 ± 2.5%, 9.7 ± 1.2%, and 65.5 ± 1.6% of the total fatty acids respectively. SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs from the IM accounted for 18.0 ± 0.3%, 23.0 ± 2.1%, and 58.9 ± 2.1% of total fatty acids respectively. Both the OM and IM contained higher levels of omega-3 PUFA than omega-6 PUFA. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5n-3) levels were higher than those of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3).

Fig. 2. The fatty acid composition of body wall fatty acids extracted from H. aurantium, (A) outer membrane (OM), and (B) inner membrane (IM).

Fig. 2

Data are presented as means±standard deviation. The letters (a–i) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the amounts of fatty acids, which were obtained from OM and IM fatty acid.

H. aurantium Body Wall Fatty Acid Effect on RAW264.7 Cell Viability

RAW264.7 cell viability was determined at varying fatty acid concentrations using the EZ-Cytox Cell Viability Assay Kit (Fig. 3A). OM fatty acids did not exhibit cytotoxicity at nearly all experimental concentrations. IM fatty acids showed low cell viability at concentrations between 3.5–4.0%.

Fig. 3. The effect of body wall fatty acids extracted from H. aurantium, (A) effect on macrophage viability, (B) effect on NO oxide production in RAW264.7 cells, and (C) effect on NO production in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells.

Fig. 3

Significant differences at p < 0.01 compared to DMSO or LPS.

H. aurantium Body Wall Fatty Acid Effect on NO Production

To examine the potential immune-enhancing and anti-inflammation effects of H. aurantium body wall fatty acids, we evaluated nitric oxide (NO) production of RAW264.7 cells, which is a biomarker for immune regulation [34]. Fig. 3B shows the immune-enhancing effects in which fatty acids increased NO production in a dose-dependent manner. IM fatty acid showed high levels of NO production with high concentrations (2.5–4.0%). On the other hand, Fig. 3C shows the potential anti-inflammatory properties of fatty acids. The inflammatory response was stimulated in RAW264.7 cells, and fatty acids extracted from the body wall significantly repressed the production of LPS-stimulated NO production depending on the concentration.

H. aurantium Body Wall Fatty Acid Effect on Immune-Associated Gene Expression

Fig. 4 showed the immune-modulation of H. aurantium body wall fatty acids via immune-associated gene expression in RAW264.7 cells. In Figs. 4A and 4B, H. aurantium body wall fatty acids enhanced the expression of immune-associated genes in RAW264.7 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. The expression of TNF-α and IL-1β was increased by both sources of body wall fatty acids, while the expression levels of iNOS, COX-2, and IL-6 in IM were higher in IM than in OM. In contrast, Figs. 4C and 4D show that H. aurantium body wall fatty acids inhibited the expression level of most immune-associated genes in a dose-dependent manner in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. The immune-associated expression for most genes was reduced by treatment with H. aurantium body wall fatty acids, and iNOS and TNF-α expression was also reduced with a reduced concentration of body wall fatty acids from both sources.

Fig. 4. The effect of body wall fatty acids extracted from H. aurantium on immune-associated mRNA expression, (A) effect of OM fatty acids on RAW264.7 cells, (B) effect of IM fatty acids on RAW264.7 cells, (C) effect of OM fatty acids in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells and (D) effect of IM fatty acids on LPSstimulated RAW264.7 cells.

Fig. 4

Significant differences at p < 0.01 compared to DMSO or LPS.

H. aurantium Body Wall Fatty Acid Effect on Phagocytic Uptake of RAW264.7 Cells

As shown in Fig. 5, OM and IM fatty acids from H. aurantium increased the phagocytosis of the RAW264.7 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Treatment with 0.5% OM significantly increased phagocytosis of cells while treatment of 0.5% IM did not show any changes. However, at high doses of IM, 1.5%, and 2.0%, there were increased numbers of phagocytosis cells than at the same doses of OM.

Fig. 5. Effect of body wall fatty acids extracted from H. aurantium on phagocytic uptake from RAW264.7 cells.

Fig. 5

(A) Representative of flow cytometry analysis of FITC-dextran uptake, (B) the percentage of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of cells pre-incubated with OM fatty acid, and (C) the percentage of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of cells preincubated with IM fatty acid. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (n = 3). Significant differences at p < 0.01 compared to RPMI.

H. aurantium Body Wall Fatty Acid Effect on PGE2 Production

The immune-enhancing and anti-inflammatory effects of H. aurantium body wall fatty acids were analyzed based on the amounts of PGE2, an important factor in immune regulation. As shown in Fig. 6A, PGE2 production increased with higher concentration of fatty acids in RAW264.7 cells. The level of PGE2 production was slightly higher with IM fatty acids than with OM fatty acids, with no significant difference between them. In contrast, fatty acids inhibited the production of PGE2 in a dose-dependent manner in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells (Fig. 6B).

Fig. 6. The effect of body wall fatty acids extracted from H. aurantium on PGE2 production, (A) effect in RAW264.7 cells, and (B) effect in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells.

Fig. 6

Significant differences at p < 0.01 compared to DMSO or LPS.

H. aurantium Body Wall Fatty Acid Effect on Protein-Associated NF-κB and MAPK Pathways

To investigate the cellular immune signaling pathway utilized by H. aurantium body wall fatty acids, we evaluated the production of NF-κB and MAPK-associated proteins using western blotting. Figs. 7A–7D showed that H. aurantium body wall fatty acids stimulated the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNK, and p38 in the MAPK pathway in a dose-dependent manner. Both sources of body wall fatty acids also intensely activated the phosphorylation of NF-κB p-65 in the NF-κB signaling pathway in a dose-dependent manner. The proteins associated with NF-κB and MAPK pathways were also investigated for their effects on anti-inflammatory signaling pathways of LPS-stimulated and H. aurantium body wall fatty acid- treated RAW264.7 cells. As shown in Figs. 7E–7H, both body wall fatty acids repressed the phosphorylation of NF-κB p-65, ERK1/2, JNK, and p38 in a dose-dependent manner. Interestingly, OM fatty acids exhibited a higher inhibitory effect on the phosphorylation of p38, ERK1/2, JNK, and NF-κB p-65 in the NF-κB pathway than IM fatty acids; however, there was increased phosphorylation of JNK, and ERK1/2 of the MAPK pathway with IM fatty acids treatment.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

The effect of body wall fatty acids extracted from H. aurantium on proteins associated with the NF-κB and MAPK pathways, (A) western blot of OM fatty acids in RAW264.7 cells, (B) relative band intensity of OM fatty acids in RAW264.7 cells, (C) western blot of IM fatty acids in RAW264.7 cells, (D) relative band intensity of IM fatty acid in RAW264.7 cells, (E) western blot of OM fatty acids in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells, (F) relative band intensity of OM fatty acids in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells, (G) western blot of IM fatty acids in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells, and (H) relative band intensity of IM fatty acids in LPSstimulated RAW264.7 cells.

Discussion

Sea squirts are known to contain biologically active components such as carotenoids, taurine, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and plasmalogen [23]. Based on our fatty acid analysis of H. aurantium body walls, omega-3 PUFAs, EPA and DHA are the most abundant fatty acids, while SFAs and MUFAs such as PA, SA, and OA are the least abundant. Evidence shows that long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids such as EPA and DHA exert their anti-inflammatory effects by interrupting TLR signaling and producing anti-inflammatory eicosanoid, stimulated by their incorporation into the plasma membrane [35, 36]. Moreover, EPA and DHA are known to be associated with alteration of cell membrane phospholipid fatty acid composition, disruption of lipid rafts, and deactivation of NF-κB leading to changes in gene expression related to the immune system and fatty acid metabolism [16]. Therefore, H. aurantium body walls may be important reservoirs of EPA and DHA, precursors for inflammatory regulation components like eicosanoids and docosanoids [37].

Macrophages are important players in inflammatory response. During acute and chronic inflammation, macrophages trigger the production of NO stimulating the killing of microorganisms within their phagolysosomes [38]. We analyzed macrophage-like cells to understand the immune regulatory effects of H. aurantium body wall fatty acids. As shown in Fig. 3A, they did not exhibit cytotoxicity. However, high concentrations (3.5−4.0%) of IM fatty acids led to low RAW264.7 cell viability, indicating that OM fatty acids are safe at concentrations below 4.0%unlike high concentrations of IM fatty acids. Further, we evaluated nitric oxide (NO) and PGE2, as important immune functional biomarkers responsible for pain, fever, swelling, and tenderness. Our results showed that the H. aurantium body wall fatty acids increased the production of NO and PGE2 in a dose-dependent manner. On the other hand, in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells, production of NO and PGE2 decreased in a dose-dependent manner. This is an indication that H. aurantium body wall fatty acids increased immune regulatory biomarkers NO and PGE2 for immune improvement and reduced those biomarkers for anti-inflammatory effects.

Macrophage phagocytosis plays a key role in clearing foreign substances such as pathogenic bacteria [39]. In this study, we measured the phagocytic activity of OM and IM fatty acids by staining dextran with FITC. Fig. 5 shows that OM and IM fatty acids enhance the phagocytic function of RAW264.7 cells in a dose-dependent manner.

NO and PGE2 production have the same effect on the expression of immune-associated genes iNOS, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and COX-2. These genes are known to tune immune related functions of macrophages, while their gene products, such as inflammatory moderators and associated cytokines, are associated with NF-κB signaling responses through the phosphorylation and degradation of IκBα [40, 41]. Additionally, immune components such as cytokines and stress regulate MAPKs (ERK1/2, JNK, and p38), which are known to regulate cell growth and differentiation [31]. Importantly, MAPK signaling is thought to abate NF-κB signaling, stressing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and inflammatory processes [42, 43].

In our results, fatty acids increased immune-associated genes expression in a dose-dependent manner in non-LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells (Figs. 4A and 4B) and diminished gene expression in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells (Figs. 4C and 4D). The gene expression stimulated NF-κB p-65 and MAPK-associated ERK1/2, JNK, and p38 to control immune reactions for both immune improvement (Figs. 7A−7D) and anti-inflammatory effects (Figs. 7E−7H). This suggests that H. aurantium body wall fatty acids modulate immune responses via MAPK and the NF-κB immune-signaling cascade [44-46].

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that fatty acids extracted from the outer and inner membranes of sea squirt enhanced the immune response and anti-inflammatory effects of RAW264.7 cells. We evaluated varying responses of key immune biomarkers; NO and PGE2, immune-associated gene expression, and MAPK and NF-κB signaling cascade in controlling immune reactions. The results of this study provide insight into the immune regulatory functions of H. aurantium body wall fatty acids composed of SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs on macrophages. In addition, our study demonstrated that the H. aurantium body wall is a potential source of immune regulatory components, and therefore provides a framework for further research on H. aurantium fatty acids as a solution for immune modulation.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Marine Bio-Regional Specialization Leading Technology Development Program (D11413914H480000100), funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries in Korea, and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2019R1A2B5B01070542). This research project was also supported by the University Emphasis Research Institute Support Program (No.2018R1A61A03023584) at the National Research Foundation of Korea.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Fang Q, Wang JF, Zha XQ, Cui SH, Cao L, Luo JP. Immunomodulatory activity on macrophage of a purified polysaccharide extracted from Laminaria japonica. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015;134:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hooper LV, Littman DR, Macpherson AJ. Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science. 2012;336:1268–1273. doi: 10.1126/science.1223490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Taniguchi Y, Yoshioka N, Nakata K, Nishizawa T, Inagawa H, Kohchi C, et al. Mechanism for maintaining homeostasis in the immune system of the intestine. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:4855–4860. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gordon S, Martinez FO. Alternative activation of macrophages: mechanism and functions. Immunity. 2010;32:593–604. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schroder K, Hertzog PJ, Ravasi T, Hume DA. Interferon-γ: an overview of signals, mechanisms and functions. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2004;75:163–189. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0603252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gopinath VK, Musa M, Samsudin AR, Sosroseno W. Role of interleukin-1beta and tumour necrosis factor-alpha on hydroxyapatite-induced phagocytosis by murine macrophages (RAW264.7 cells) Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 2006;63:176–178. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2006.11978094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Romano M, Sironi M, Toniatti C, Polentarutti N, Fruscella P, Ghezzi P, et al. Role of IL-6 and its soluble receptor in induction of chemokines and leukocyte recruitment. Immunity. 1997;6:315–325. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80334-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rahat MA, Hemmerlein B. Macrophage-tumor cell interactions regulate the function of nitric oxide. Front. Physiol. 2013;4:144. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ford JH. Saturated fatty acid metabolism is key link between cell division, cancer, and senescence in cellular and whole organism aging. Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands) 2010;32:231–237. doi: 10.1007/s11357-009-9128-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Superko HR, Superko AR, Lundberg GP, Margolis B, Garrett BC, Nasir K, et al. Omega-3 fatty acid blood levels clinical significance update. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 2014;8:407–414. doi: 10.1007/s12170-014-0407-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zheng JS, Huang T, Yang J, Fu YQ, Li D. Marine N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are inversely associated with risk of type 2 diabetes in Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e44525–44538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wolfe LS. Eicosanoids: prostaglandins, thromboxanes, leukotrienes, and other derivatives of carbon-20 unsaturated fatty acids. J. Neurochem. 1982;38:1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1982.tb10847.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Calder PC. n-3 fatty acids, inflammation and immunity: new mechanisms to explain old actions. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2013;72:326–336. doi: 10.1017/S0029665113001031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Davidson J, Rotondo D, Rizzo MT, Leaver HA. Therapeutic implications of disorders of cell death signalling: membranes, micro-environment, and eicosanoid and docosanoid metabolism. Br. Pharmacol. 2012;166:1193–1210. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01900.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adam O, Beringer C, Kless T, Lemmen C, Adam A, Wiseman M, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of a low arachidonic acid diet and fish oil in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol. Int. 2003;23:27–36. doi: 10.1007/s00296-002-0234-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Calder PC. Omega-3 fatty acids and inflammatory processes: from molecules to man. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2017;45:1105–1115. doi: 10.1042/BST20160474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jeong BY, Ohshima T, Koizumi C. Hydrocarbon chain distribution of ether phospholipids of the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi and the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius. Lipids. 1996;31:9–18. doi: 10.1007/BF02522404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vysotskii MV, Ota T, Takagi T. n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in lipids of ascidian Halocynthia roretzi. Nippon Suisan. Gakk. 1992;58:953–958. doi: 10.2331/suisan.58.953. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Murakami A, Nakashima M, Koshiba T, Maoka T, Nishino H, Yano M, et al. Modifying effects of carotenoids on superoxide and nitric oxide generation from stimulated leukocytes. Cancer Lett. 2000;149:115–123. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(99)00351-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nathan C. Points of control in inflammation. Nature. 2002;420:846–852. doi: 10.1038/nature01320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Konishi I, Hosokawa M, Sashima T, Maoka T, Miyashita K. Suppressive effects of alloxanthin and diatoxanthin from Halocynthia roretzi on LPS-induced expression of pro-inflammatory genes in RAW264.7 cells. J. Oleo Sci. 2008;57:181–189. doi: 10.5650/jos.57.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Konishi I, Hosokawa M, Sashima T, Kobayashi H, Miyashita K. Halocynthiaxanthin and fucoxanthinol isolated from Halocynthia roretzi induce apoptosis in human leukemia, breast and colon cancer cells. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2006;142:53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2005.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mikami N, Hosokawa M, Miyashita K. Effects of sea squirt (Halocynthia roretzi) lipids on white adipose tissue weight and blood glucose in diabetic/obese KK-Ay mice. Mol. Med. Rep. 2010;3:449–453. doi: 10.3892/mmr_00000278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Monmai C, Go SH, Shin IS, You SG, Lee H, Kang S, et al. Immune enhancement effect of Asterias amurensis fatty acids through NF-kappaB and MAPK pathways on RAW 264.7 cells. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018;28:349–356. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1709.09005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lee C, Park MW, Lee CS, Kim SK, Kim WK. Effects of temperature and salinity on development of sea peach Halocynthia aurantium. J. Environ. Sci. Int. 2009;18:1171–1179. doi: 10.5322/JES.2009.18.10.1171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gotshall D. Guide to Marine Invertebrates: Alaska to Baja California. 2 Ed. Sea Challengers; Monterey, CA, USA: 2005. p. 117. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Garces R, Mancha M. One-step lipid extraction and fatty acid methyl esters preparation from fresh plant tissues. Anal. Biochem. 1993;211:139–143. doi: 10.1006/abio.1993.1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Park WJ, Kothapalli KS, Lawrence P, Tyburczy C, Brenna JT. An alternate pathway to long-chain polyunsaturates: the FADS2 gene product Delta8-desaturates 20:2n-6 and 20:3n-3. J. Lipid Res. 2009;50:1195–1202. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M800630-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cao RA, Lee Y, You S. Water soluble sulfated-fucans with immune-enhancing properties from Ecklonia cava. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014;67:303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Green LC, Wagner DA, Glogowski J, Skipper PL, Wishnok JS, Tannenbaum SR. Analysis of nitrate, nitrite, and [15N]nitrate in biological fluids. Anal. Biochem. 1982;126:131–138. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(82)90118-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim JB, Han AR, Park EY, Kim JY, Cho W, Lee J, et al. Inhibition of LPS-induced iNOS, COX-2 and cytokines expression by poncirin through the NF-kappaB inactivation in RAW 264.7 macrophage cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2007;30:2345–2351. doi: 10.1248/bpb.30.2345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Narayanan BA, Narayanan NK, Simi B, Reddy BS. Modulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase and related proinflammatory genes by the omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid in human colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63:972–979. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lechner M, Lirk P, Rieder J. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in tumor biology: the two sides of the same coin. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2005;15:277–289. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.De Pablo Manuel A, De Cienfuegos Gerardo Á. Modulatory effects of dietary lipids on immune system functions. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2000;78:31–39. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1711.2000.00875.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guertin MH, Robitaille K, Pelletier JF, Duchesne T, Julien P, Savard J, et al. Effects of concentrated long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation before radical prostatectomy on prostate cancer proliferation, inflammation, and quality of life: study protocol for a phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:64–73. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3979-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lee JM, Lee H, Kang S, Park WJ. Fatty acid desaturases, polyunsaturated fatty acid regulation, and biotechnological advances. Nutrients. 2016;8:23–35. doi: 10.3390/nu8010023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Olefsky JM, Glass CK. Macrophages, inflammation, and insulin resistance. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2010;72:219–246. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yi H, Yu C, Zhang H, Song D, Jiang D, Du H, et al. Cathelicidin-BF suppresses intestinal inflammation by inhibiting the nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway and enhancing the phagocytosis of immune cells via STAT-1 in weanling piglets. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015;28:61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2015.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Baeuerle PA, Baltimore D. NF-kappa B: ten years after. Cell. 1996;87:13–20. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81318-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tak PP, Firestein GS. NF-kappaB: a key role in inflammatory diseases. J. Clin. Invest. 2001;107:7–11. doi: 10.1172/JCI11830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cargnello M, Roux PP. Activation and function of the MAPKs and their substrates, the MAPK-activated protein kinases. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2011;75:50–83. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00031-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Li YY, Hsieh LL, Tang RP, Liao SK, Yeh KY. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) released by macrophages induces IL-6 secretion in the human colon cancer HT-29 cell line. Hum. Immunol. 2009;70:151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2009.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Han L, Song S, Niu Y, Meng M, Wang C. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) induced macrophages activation through GPR120-mediated Raf-ERK1/2-IKKbeta-NF-kappaB p65 signaling pathways. Nutrients. 2017;9:937–952. doi: 10.3390/nu9090937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Novak TE, Babcock TA, Jho DH, Helton WS, Espat NJ. NF-kappa B inhibition by omega -3 fatty acids modulates LPS-stimulated macrophage TNF-alpha transcription. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2003;284:L84–89. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00077.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhao Y, Joshi-Barve S, Barve S, Chen LH. Eicosapentaenoic acid prevents LPS-induced TNF-alpha expression by preventing NF-kappaB activation. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2004;23:71–78. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2004.10719345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology

RESOURCES