Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2022 Nov 7;14(11):e31197. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31197

Brain Metastases in Adults: A Five-Year Observational Study From King Abdulaziz Medical City

Jawahir O AlTamimi 1,, Hadeel A AlJohani 2, Nada Naaman 2, Reshale A Johar 2, Tala A Allam 2, Dr Ahmed I Lary 3
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC9728506  PMID: 36505114

Abstract

Background

As a well-documented fact, metastatic brain tumors are the most common cause of brain tumors in adults, with an incidence of 9-17%, based on various studies, although it was thought to be higher. The aim of this study was to describe recorded cases of metastatic brain tumors in the adult population of a tertiary care and oncology center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Methods

This study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) at King Khalid Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, including records from January 2016 to December 2020. The study implemented a retrospective cohort design to fulfill its aim. A data collection sheet containing demographic data such as age and gender, and information pertaining to the primary pathology, multiplicity, and survival outcome was used.

Results

A total number of 213 patients were enrolled in this study. Overall, 68.1% of the sample comprised of females. Approximately two-thirds (61.9%) of the patients’ imaging results revealed multiplicity, whereas the remaining third (38.1%) had solitary lesions. The estimated overall survival median after the diagnosis of brain metastasis was six months (95% CI: 5.5-6.5).

Conclusion

We recommend conducting a nationwide study to better understand the incidence in accordance to geographical and gender differences. We can further expand our research to include other institutes in Saudi Arabia, and include important predictors such as time from the diagnosis of primary pathology to brain metastasis, disease progression cost, and disease progression in the months prior to the patients’ death.

Keywords: epidemiology, breast cancer, lung cancer, metastases, brain metastases

Introduction

Although brain tumors account for less than 2% of all tumors worldwide, they are considered one of the most fatal cancers [1]. A total of 251,329 new deaths occurred from a total of 308,102 new cases of brain tumors in 2020, ranking 13th in mortality numbers worldwide [2]. Brain tumors are being increasingly studied in developed countries due to their considerable increase in incidence, poor prognosis, and mortality [1]. In fact, incidence of brain tumors is increasing worldwide. Advanced imaging, higher imaging frequency, and evolution of modern diagnostic techniques are thought to be the cause of this growth [2]. It has been reported that the prevalence of brain tumors in Saudi Arabia’s population is 0.3% [3]. A total of 367 new cases of brain tumors were reported in the latest 2016 report published by the Saudi Cancer Registry, making it the ninth most common cancer in females and the 10th in males in the population of Saudi Arabia [4-5]. Histopathological patterns of brain tumors were not specified in the report, however, and both primary and metastatic brain tumor cases were reported as a whole [6]. As a well-documented fact, metastatic brain tumors are the most common cause of brain tumors in adults with an incidence of 9-17%, based on various studies, although it was thought to be higher [7-8]. Mostly parenchymal, metastases have the ability to spread to various locations of the central nervous system, such as the leptomeninges and dura. The rise in metastatic brain tumors is linked to improved imaging and newer more efficient systemic therapies, which contribute to a higher survival rate and longer life expectancy after diagnosis of the primary cancer [7]. Such advances allow patients to live longer and have higher chances of primary tumor dissemination to the brain [7,9]. Although systemic chemotherapeutic agents control systemic disease, some agents, such as trastuzumab, do not penetrate the blood-brain barrier, failing to protect against brain metastases [7]. In most of the studies published worldwide, lung, breast, melanoma, renal, and colorectal primary cancer patients frequently develop brain metastases [7-8,10]. Nonetheless, racial, geographical, and environmental variation in trends of metastatic brain tumors is evident. For example, metastases from lung and breast cancer in African Americans were higher compared to white Americans in one study [8]. Variation in clinical factors at the time of presentation aids in prediction of the clinical course and the prognosis [9]. The first attempt to describe brain metastases as a part of a larger study in Saudi Arabia describing all intracranial masses (both neoplasms and non-neoplastic) was in 1989 [11]. Available data on brain tumors and brain metastases, in particular, are limited in the Saudi population [7]. In 2011, a single-centered study by Bangash reported and described patterns of metastases in the Saudi population [12]. Therefore, more recent epidemiological studies describing trends are needed to better understand ethnic, geographical, and environmental differences. Conducting such studies will ultimately direct the needed resources to help reach a better outcome. The aim of this study was to describe rates and trends of metastatic brain tumors in the adult population of a tertiary care and oncology center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Materials and methods

Study design, area, and settings

This was an observational study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) at King Khalid Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The retrospective cohort study design included records from January 2016 to December 2020. KAMC is a non-profit tertiary care hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, that provides high-standard patient care. Located in KAMC, Princess Noorah Oncology Center, a leading cancer center in the region and the most prominent cancer center in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia, serves the Western, Northern, and Southern parts of the Kingdom.

Identification of study participants

Patients with established primary tumors (controlled or active) outside the central nervous system (CNS) with evidence of brain metastases, aged 18 years and above, and treated in KAMC inpatient and outpatient facilities were included. Those with an initial diagnosis of brain metastasis that was discovered to be a primary CNS pathology, such as primary CNS tumor, abscess, or focus of demyelination, were excluded from the study. To achieve the outcomes of this study, all eligible patients in the five-year study period were entered using non-probability consecutive sampling.

Data collection process

A data collection sheet containing demographic data such as age and gender, and information pertaining to the primary pathology, multiplicity, and survival outcome was used. The authors have collected their data through the National Guard Hospital's BestCare system in Jeddah.

Data analysis

Data recorded were entered and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Categorical data were computed and presented in frequencies and percentages. Continuous data were used based on normality assessments and were presented in means and standard deviations or medians and quartiles to describe the data depending on distribution. Comparison of these variables was done using independent and dependent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data, as appropriate, and chi-square test for categorical data. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. A Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate survival analysis.

Results

Demographic data

A total number of 213 patients were enrolled in this study. Of the sample, 68.1% comprised of females. The mean age of patients was 53.6 ± 15.9 years. The vast majority of cases had breast cancer as their primary pathology (44.1%), followed by lung cancer (22.1%), renal cancer (6.1%), and colorectal cancer (2.8%). Other types of primary cancers that contributed to brain metastasis totaled to 24.9%. Approximately two-thirds (61.9%) of the patients’ imaging results revealed multiplicity, whereas the remaining third (38.1%) had solitary lesions. In regard to survival outcome, 72.3% of all patients were documented to have passed away. The estimated overall survival median after the diagnosis of brain metastasis was six months (95% CI: 5.5-6.5) (Tables 1, 2).

Table 1. Demographic data.

Characteristics N=213
Age (in years) 53.6 ± 15.9
Gender
Male 68 (31.9)
Female 145 (68.1)
Primary pathology
Lung cancer 47 (22.1)
Breast cancer 94 (44.1)
Renal cancer 13 (6.1)
Colorectal cancer 6 (2.8)
Others 53 (24.9)
Multiplicity
Yes 132 (61.9)
No 81 (38.1)
Survival outcome
Deceased 154 (72.3)
Alive 28 (13.1)
Unknown 31 (14.6)

Table 2. Means and medians for survival time.

M, months

Mean Median
Estimate Std. error 95% confidence interval Estimate Std. error 95% confidence interval
Lower bound Upper bound Lower bound Upper bound
58.243 M 1.818 M 54.680 M 61.806 M 60.000 M 2.749 M 54.611 M 65.389 M

Analytical analysis

There was a significant difference between both genders in terms of survival outcome (p=0.002); 77.4% (48 out of 62) males were announced deceased, while 69.6% of females (96 out of 138) passed away. The survival median for males specifically was 48 months (95% CI: 4.1-5.5), and females’ median equaled 60 months (95% CI: 5.3-6.7). Time of follow-up for 10 deceased patients was missing; therefore, they were not included in Tables 3, 4 and Figure 1.

Table 3. Case processing summary in regard to gender.

Gender Total No. of events Censored
N Percent
Male 68 54 14 22.6%
Female 145 100 42 30.4%
Overall 213 154 56 28.0%

Table 4. Means and medians for survival time based on gender.

M, months

Gender Mean Median
Estimate Std. error 95% confidence interval Estimate Std. error 95% confidence interval  
Lower bound Upper bound Lower bound Upper bound  
Male 50.279 M 2.506 M 45.367 M 55.190 M 48.000 M 3.489 M 41.161 M 54.839 M  
Female 61.578 M 2.281 M 57.107 M 66.049 M 60.000 M 3.724 M 52.702 M 67.298 M  
Overall 58.243 M 1.818 M 54.680 M 61.806 M 60.000 M 2.749 M 54.611 M 65.389 M  

Figure 1. Survival functions based on gender.

Figure 1

Time in months

In regard to primary pathology, significant differences (p = 0.006) in fatality were shown among the five cancer pathologies listed in Tables 5, 6, and Figure 2. Brain metastasis originating from colorectal cancer resulted in the highest rate of deaths (83.3%), while metastasis rising from primary renal cancer had a rate of 69.2%. Moreover, deaths due to brain metastasis from primary lung cancer and other unspecified primary cancers equaled 70.7 and 73.1, respectively. Even though breast cancer did not result in the highest rate of mortality (71.6%), it did account for the most cases of total deaths secondary to brain metastasis (63 out of 144). Lung, breast, and renal cancers had an estimated median survival of 60 months (95% CI: 4.9-7.1, 5.1-6.9, and 3.2-8.3, respectively). However, colorectal cancer patients had the shortest survival duration of 36 months (95% CI, 1.3-5.3). Finally, other types of metastatic primary malignancies had a survival span of 48 months (95% CI: 3.4-6.2). (Tables 5, 6 and Figure 2).

Table 5. Case processing summary in regard to cancer pathology.

Pathology Total No. of events Censored
N Percent
Lung 41 29 12 29.3%
Breast 88 63 25 28.4%
Renal 13 9 4 30.8%
Colorectal 6 5 1 16.7%
Other 52 38 14 26.9%
Overall 200 144 56 28.0%

Table 6. Means and medians for survival time in regard to pathology.

M, months 

Pathology Mean Median
Estimate Std. error 95% confidence interval Estimate Std. error 95% confidence interval
Lower bound Upper bound Lower bound Upper bound
Lung 57.884 M 3.404 M 51.212 M 64.555 M 60.000 M 5.838 M 48.557 M 71.443 M
Breast 62.902 M 2.690 M 57.629 M 68.175 M 60.000 M 4.782 M 50.628 M 69.372 M
Renal 62.769 M 5.899 M 51.206 M 74.332 M 60.000 M 14.379 M 31.816 M 88.184 M
Colorectal 44.000 M 8.898 M 26.561 M 61.439 M 36.000 M 11.758 M 12.955 M 59.045 M
Other 47.847 M 2.955 M 42.055 M 53.639 M 48.000 M 7.071 M 34.140 M 61.860 M
Overall 58.243 M 1.818 M 54.680 M 61.806 M 60.000 M 2.749 M 54.611 M 65.389 M

Figure 2. Survival functions based on pathology.

Figure 2

Brain metastasis characterized by multiplicity was an insignificant predictor of increased mortality with a p-value of 0.89. Overall, 70.6% of patients who had multiple metastatic lesions eventually died, and 74.3% of patients with a single metastatic mass died. Patients with multiple metastatic lesions survived for a median of 60 months (95% CI: 5.4-6.6), whereas patients with solitary lesions lived a median of 48 months (95% CI: 4.0-5.5) (Tables 7, 8 and Figure 3).

Table 7. Case processing summary in regard to multiplicity.

Multiplicity Total No. of Events Censored
N Percent
Yes 126 89 37 29.4%
No 74 55 19 25.7%
Overall 200 144 56 28.0%

Table 8. Means and medians for survival time in regards to multiplicity.

M, months

Multiplicity Mean Median
Estimate Std. error 95% confidence interval Estimate Std. error 95% confidence interval
Lower bound Upper bound Lower bound Upper bound
Yes 57.822 M 2.221 M 53.468 M 62.176 M 60.000 M 3.132 M 53.860 M 66.140 M
No 58.516 M 2.943 M 52.748 M 64.283 M 48.000 M 3.953 M 40.252 M 55.748 M
Overall 58.243 M 1.818 M 54.680 M 61.806 M 60.000 M 2.749 M 54.611 M 65.389 M

Figure 3. Survival functions based on multiplicity.

Figure 3

Discussion

Brain tumors are a diverse group of neoplasm. In the adult population, certain kinds of tumors are more prominent, such as glial neoplasms, meningioma, and metastasis [2]. These tumors are associated with a serious morbidity and high numbers of mortality, regardless of the tumor’s nature or histological grade [2]. Recently, brain metastasis increased as a consequence of the increase of cancer patients’ survival and the increase of use of diagnostic imaging modalities such as MRI [7,10]. The clinical course and prognosis is remarkably different due to certain predetermined factors such as the primary tumor’s histology, number of brain metastases, and extracranial disease state [13].

The results of the current study showed that among the study population, more than half were female patients. In line with prior similar studies, our results show that most cases of brain metastasis patients had their primary pathology as follows: breast cancer (44.1%), lung cancer (22.1%), renal cancer (6.1%), and colorectal cancer (2.8%). Given the fact that more than half of our patients were females, breast cancer was the primary pathology at the top of the list. Rastogi et al. reported that lung (68%) was the most common primary pathology site, followed by breast (11%) [14]. Similarly, Berghoff et al. outlines that breast cancer is the second most common cause of brain metastasis, second to lung cancer [11]. Moreover, Berghoff et al. reported in their study some other tumor types that seldom lead to brain metastasis, such as gastroesophageal cancers, genitourinary cancers, head and neck cancers, and sarcomas [11]. In study results, multiplicity was noted in two-thirds of the patients given their imaging results; hence, one-third of the patients had solitary lesions. Rastogi et al. reported that 80% of their study population had multiple brain lesions [14]. Yang et al. have discussed in their paper that having multiple brain lesions has been considered a negative prognostic factor in patients having brain metastasis [15].

The overall survival of patients following their diagnosis of brain metastasis was six months. In contrast with our results, Rastogi et al also reported a median overall survival rate of six months [14]. However, both Hazuka et al. and Lagerwaard et al. reported different survival rates: 3.4 months and 11 months, respectively [16,17]. A study conducted by Rades et al. showed a median overall survival rate of six months [18]. Although there was a significant difference between survival median for both genders in our study (48 months for males and 60 months for females), Harris et al. reported that gender was not a significant predictor of overall survival [19]. In respect of the survival rates, more than half of the patients enrolled in this study were reported to have passed away; such a result is consistent with that in the study by Bangash, who also reported over half (72.73%) of their participants passing away [13]. However, Rotta et al. reported that only 28% of their patients passed away [20].

The fatality of patients with brain metastases varied significantly according to the primary pathology. Colorectal cancer resulted in the highest death rates, followed by renal cancer, primary lung cancer, and other unspecified primary cancer. Lung, breast, and renal cancers had an estimated median survival of 60 months; however, colorectal cancer had the shortest survival duration (36 months). In contrast, a study conducted by Berghoff et al. reported that patients with breast cancer had the longest median overall survival duration (eight months), followed by patients with lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma (seven months) and melanoma (five months) [11]. Moreover, our study and Berghoff et al.’s study reported different overall median survival duration of colorectal cancer (3.6 months and 40 months, respectively) [10]. Even though Berghoff et al. reported renal cell carcinoma as their second best in terms of survival time, Bangash showed that it had the best overall survival duration [11-13]. Lastly, Tabouret et al. deduced a different but somewhat similar set of overall median survival duration, which is as follows: 2.7-6.3 months for lung cancer, 5.1-6 months for colorectal cancer, and 4.8-10 months for melanoma [21].

While breast cancer does not have the highest rate of mortality among patients with brain metastasis, it is accountable for the most cases of total deaths secondary to brain metastasis. In contrast to our results, Rotta et al. mentioned that lung cancer was responsible for the most deaths [20].

Limitations

Although the research tackles brain metastases and their association to various factors like primary pathology and gender, there are still limitations faced in the study. For example, our study is based on records of a single institute; its results might not reflect the general population despite its concurrence with the existing literature. The study, albeit setting a foundation for future research, has brushed over the topic in a superficial manner and requires extensive research in the future, such as performing comparative studies between the factors discussed in regard to brain metastases.

Conclusions

Brain metastases are a devastating neurological complication of systemic cancer. It leads to significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of brain metastasis is increasing with the advancement of diagnostic imaging. Various tumors can metastasize to the brain, our study demonstrated the most prevalent primary pathology tumors to result in a brain metastasis to be breast cancer, lung cancer, renal cancer, and colorectal cancer, respectively. Moreover, multiplicity was noted among patients having brain metastasis. We recommend carrying out a nationwide study to better understand the incidence in accordance to geographical and gender differences. We can further expand our research to include other institutes in Saudi Arabia and include important predictors like time from the diagnosis of primary pathology till brain metastasis, disease progression cost, disease progression in the months prior to the patients’ death.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the participants of this study.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.World Cancer Report 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO Press, 2015. McGuire S. Adv Nutr. 2016;7:418–419. doi: 10.3945/an.116.012211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World fact sheets. [ Mar; 2021 ];https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/900-world-fact-sheets.pdf 2020 3:2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Histopathological profile of brain tumors: a 12-year retrospective study from Madinah, Saudi Arabia. Mohammed AA, Hamdan AN, Homoud AS. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019;14:1106–1111. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_185_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Does brain tumor epidemiology differ from place to another? Saudi single tertiary care center experience. Alnaami I, Sarhan L, Alqahtani A, Alghamdi A, Alkhashrami S, Mostafa O. Biomed Res. 2018;29:2982–2987. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.The epidemiology of primary central nervous system tumors at the National Neurologic Institute in Saudi Arabia: a ten-year single-institution study. Almutrafi A, Bashawry Y, AlShakweer W, Al-Harbi M, Altwairgi A, Al-Dandan S. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2020;2020:1429615. doi: 10.1155/2020/1429615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Al-Shahrani ZS, Al-Rawaji AI, Al-Madouj AN, Al-Zahrani W. Saudi Cancer Registry: Cancer Incidence Report Saudi Arabia. Vol. 1. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Saudi Health Council; 2017. Saudi Cancer Registry: Cancer Incidence Report Saudi Arabia 2014; p. 82. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Demographic and histopathological patterns of neuro-epithelial brain tumors in Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Taha MS, Almsned FM, Hassen MA, et al. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 2018;23:18–22. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2018.1.20160543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Epidemiology of brain metastases. Nayak L, Lee EQ, Wen PY. Curr Oncol Rep. 2012;14:48–54. doi: 10.1007/s11912-011-0203-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Davis FG, Vigneau FD, Lai P, Sawaya RE. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2865–2872. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.12.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pattern and clinical risk factors of metastatic brain tumors at an academic centre in western Saudi Arabia. Mohammed Bangash MD. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257819792_Pattern_and_clinical_risk_factors_of_metastatic_brain_tumors_at_an_academic_centre_in_western_Saudi_Arabia?utm_medium=email&utm_source=transaction Int J Neurol Neurosurg. 2011;3:5. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Descriptive statistical analysis of a real life cohort of 2419 patients with brain metastases of solid cancers. Berghoff AS, Schur S, Füreder LM, et al. ESMO Open. 2016;1:0. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2015-000024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pattern of intracranial space-occupying lesions: the experience of the King Khalid University Hospital. Jamjoom ZA. Ann Saudi Med. 1989;9:3–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Incidence of brain tumours at an academic centre in Western Saudi Arabia. Bangash MH. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/eamj/article/view/86489 East African Med J. 2011;88:138–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Palliation of brain metastases: analysis of prognostic factors affecting overall survival. Rastogi K, Bhaskar S, Gupta S, Jain S, Singh D, Kumar P. Indian J Palliat Care. 2018;24:308–312. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_1_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Multiplicity does not significantly affect outcomes in brain metastasis patients treated with surgery. Yang K, Gutiérrez-Valencia E, Landry AP, et al. Neurooncol Adv. 2022;4:0. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Multiple brain metastases are associated with poor survival in patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy. Hazuka MB, Burleson WD, Stroud DN, Leonard CE, Lillehei KO, Kinzie JJ. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:369–373. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.2.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Identification of prognostic factors in patients with brain metastases: a review of 1292 patients. Lagerwaard F, Levendag P, Nowak PC, Eijkenboom WH, Hanssens PJ, Schmitz PM. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 19991;43:795–803. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00442-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Predicting overall survival in patients with brain metastases from esophageal cancer. Rades D, Dziggel L, Bartscht T, Gliemroth J. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25368288/ Anticancer Res. 2014;34:6763–6765. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.A single-institution analysis of 126 patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. Harris KB, Corbett MR, Mascarenhas H, Lee KS, Arastu H, Leinweber C, Ju AW. Front Oncol. 2017;7:90. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Analysis of survival in patients with brain metastases treated surgically: Impact of age, gender, oncologic status, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, number and localization of lesions, and primary cancer site. Rotta JM, Rodrigues DB, Diniz JM, et al. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2018;64:717–722. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.64.08.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Recent trends in epidemiology of brain metastases: an overview. Tabouret E, Chinot O, Metellus P, Tallet A, Viens P, Gonçalves A. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23155227/ Anticancer Res. 2012;32:4655–4662. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES