Abstract
Objective:
Inflammatory markers are among the possible contributing factors with a proposed role in hepatic and ischemic heart disease. The present study aimed to determine the association between high-sensitivity-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), liver elastography, and cardiac ischemic diseases in patients with fatty liver.
Methods:
In this cross-sectional comparative study, 103 consecutive patients with fatty liver were enrolled to undergo angiography. They were divided into groups with and without cardiac ischemia.
Results:
The results demonstrated that the mean hs-CRP was 2.3 and 10.9 mg/L in normal and ischemic angiography groups, respectively (P = 0.001). According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the predictive role for hs-CRP was 94.5% that had sensitivity and specificity of 95.2% and 90%, respectively, with a cut-off point of 3.1.
Conclusion:
This study showed that there is an association between the fatty liver, cardiac ischemia, and hs-CRP level.
Keywords: Cardiac ischemia, elastography, fatty liver, hs-CRP, hepatic fibrosis
Introduction
Fatty liver is a common hepatic disease that may originate from alcohol use (ALD) or diets (NAFLD).[1] The first stage in NAFLD is hepatic steatosis with the accumulation of triglyceride in hepatocytes.[2] The presence of triglyceride more than 5% in hepatocytes and about 55 g in hepatic tissue (g) is considered steatosis.[3] It may be stable or progressive to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), recognized by collagen accumulation and fibrosis with the possibility of progression to cirrhosis.[4] Also, cirrhosis may lead to hepatic cancer in 4 to 27% of cases.[5]
Ultrasound-based transient elastography is an important method to determine hepatic fibrosis with a further rate in harder and more elastic tissues.[6,7] NAFLD is also accompanied by a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases.[8] As reported by the World Health Organization (WHO), nearly 17 million deaths have occurred due to cardiovascular diseases.[9] Older age, male gender, family history, smoking, high cholesterol and triglyceride, low physical activity, and abdominal obesity are contributing factors.[10] Also, inflammation may result in the instability of atherosclerotic plaques leading to cardiovascular events.[7] C-reactive protein (CRP) is an important biomarker of inflammation, that is, a predictor of ischemic heart disease.[11,12]
CRP is an acute-phase reactant produced in the liver in response to inflammation and both CRP and hepatic fibrosis are related to interleukin-6.[13] CRP may conversely be decreased in myocardial infarction or even overproduced.[14] High-sensitivity-CRP (hs-CRP) is a non-specific and sensitive marker for inflammation, infection, and tissue injury.[15] CRP has stability for the long-term without diurnal alterations, high sensitivity, low cost, and maybe predictive for the risk of cardiovascular diseases.[16] Some studies have shown both intermediate and risk factor roles for hs-CRP.[17,18,19,20,21,22] It may also be affected by clinical, genetic, biochemical, and environmental factors.[23] Although some studies have demonstrated that CRP cannot be affected by aspirin in healthy subjects and patients;[21,22] it can be increased in cirrhosis patients.[24] Previous studies have shown the association between CRP and fatty liver and also cardiovascular diseases; however, it is not assessed simultaneously. Moreover, different results may be obtained from various populations. Regarding some uncertainties in this area, this study aimed to determine the association between hs-CRP, liver elastography, and cardiac ischemic diseases in patients with fatty liver.
Materials and Methods
In this cross-sectional comparative study, 103 consecutive patients with fatty liver attending Imam-Khomeini Hospital in 2018 were enrolled to undergo angiography. Inclusion criteria were patients with an age range from 20 to 70 years and fatty liver who signed informed consent. The exclusion criteria were patients with acute infection, septicemia, autoimmune disease, cancer, respiratory disease, the lack of informed consent, and who use anti-inflammatory drugs and steroid therapy. The study was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration Principles. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (Ethical code number IR.AJUMS.REC.1397.928, Date: 2019-03-09).
Data were gathered by questionnaire, biochemical and angiography analysis, and elastography findings. After signing the informed consent, patients were asked to attend the experiment after fasting for 12–14 h. All patients fulfilled the WHO MONICA questionnaire. Blood sampling (5 mL) was carried out for biochemical analysis and it was put at room temperature for 10 min. Then, the clot was removed, serum was obtained by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min, and stored at –20°C. The CRP was measured using a commercial Human CRP ELISA Kit (DCRP00, R&D Systems Inc., USA). The patients underwent a physical examination by a cardiologist and resting electrocardiography was recorded. Patients underwent angiography and were accordingly divided into groups with and without cardiac ischemia (codes 1.1 and 1.2 as myocardial infarction, codes 4.1–4.4, 1.3, 5.1–5.3, and 7.1 as cardiac ischemia). Also, the liver ultrasonography and elastography were done by a single device (Fibroscan, model 502; Echosens, Paris, France) and the same operator. The subjects were subdivided into groups with fibrosis (I, II, and III) and cirrhosis (IV).[25] The hs-CRP level was compared across the groups with the consideration of elastography grades and ultrasound fatty liver grades.
Data analysis was done using the SPSS software. The association of CRP levels as dependent variables with independent factors including cardiac disease severity and the intensity of liver disease was evaluated by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the effect of severity of these disorders on the CRP level. Also, ROC analysis and independent-sample t-tests were used. P values under 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Patients were female in 24.2% and 31.7% in those with abnormal and normal angiography results, respectively (P > 0.05). According to Table 1, age and obesity did not have a significant effect on angiography (P > 0.05). On the contrary, individuals with normal and abnormal angiography were different in background disease (P = 0.001) and drug history (P = 008). The involved vessels were left anterior descending (LAD), right coronary artery (RCA), left circumflex artery (LCX), left anterior descending artery + right coronary artery (LAD plus RCA), left anterior descending artery + left circumflex artery (LAD plus LCX), right coronary artery + left circumflex artery (RCA plus LCX), and three-vessel in 37.1%, 3.2%, 6.5%, 19.4%, 16.1%, 3.2%, and 14.5%, respectively.
Table 1.
Background variables across the groups
Variable | ANL angiography | NL angiography | P |
---|---|---|---|
Elderly age | 10 (16.1%) | 3 (7.3%) | >0.05 |
Overweight/obesity | 54 (87.1%) | 29 (70.7%) | >0.05 |
Background disease* | 43 (69.4%) | 12 (29.3%) | 0.001 |
Drug history** | 36 (58.1%) | 11 (26.8%) | 0.008 |
*including diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension. **including anti-hypertensive, anti-hyperlipidemia, glucose-lowering, and cardiotonic drugs
The fibrosis and fatty liver grades are shown in Table 2. Although higher fibrosis grades were observed in patients with abnormal angiography (P = 0.001), there was no significant difference between normal and abnormal angiography groups in terms of fatty liver grade (P > 0.05).
Table 2.
Fibrosis and fatty liver grades across the groups
Variable | ANL angiography | NL angiography | P |
---|---|---|---|
Fibrosis grade | |||
0 | 1 (1.6%) | 3 (7.3%) | 0.001 |
1 | 1 (1.6%) | 27 (65.9%) | |
2 | 26 (41.9%) | 9 (22.0%) | |
3 | 30 (48.4%) | 2 (4.9%) | |
4 | 4 (6.5%) | ---- | |
Fatty liver grade | |||
1 | 20 (32.3%) | 15 (36.6%) | >0.05 |
2 | 32 (51.6%) | 18 (43.9%) | |
3 | 10 (16.1%) | 8 (19.5%) |
Mean (standard deviation [SD]) hs-CRP was 2.3 [2.1] and 10.9 [5.3] mg/L in normal and ischemic angiography groups (P = 0.0001), respectively. According to the ROC analysis, the predictive role for hs-CRP was 94.5% (confidence interval [CI] 95% between 0.891 and 0.998) that had sensitivity and specificity of 95.2% and 90%, respectively, with a cut-off point of 3.1. According to Table 3, the comparison of mean hs-CRP between normal and abnormal angiography in patients with fatty liver was not differed (P > 0.05); however, this difference was observed in patients with hepatic fibrosis (P = 0.001). This difference (hs-CRP level in NL and ANL angiography groups with fibrosis) was observed in both individuals with no background diseases and individuals with background diseases (diabetes mellitus [DM], hyperlipidemia [HLP]; hypertension [HT]). In addition to individuals with no drug history, there was no significant difference in hs-CRP levels between groups (NL and ANL angiography) with fatty liver and drug history (P > 0.05).
Table 3.
hs-CRP in groups according to medical and drug history
Variable | ANL angiography | NL angiography | P |
---|---|---|---|
Fibrosis grade | |||
None | 8.2±4.8 | 2.1±1.3 | 0.001 |
DM | 27.8±33.4 | ----- | |
HLP | 5.9±2.4 | 4.5±6.0 | |
HTN | 7.6±5.6 | 1.9±0.6 | |
>1 | 14.7±22.2 | 1.3±0.0 | |
Others | 5.2±0.0 | 2.6±0.0 | |
Fatty liver grade | |||
None | 7.4±4.4 | 2.1±1.3 | >0.05 |
Anti-HTN | 3.9±0.9 | 1.9±0.7 | |
Anti-HLP | 7±2.2 | 5.7±6.7 | |
Cardiotonic | 2.9±1.3 | 1.7±0.0 | |
Glucose lowering | 2.8±1.4 | 1.3±0.0 | |
>1 | 3.3±0.8 | 2.6±0.0 |
Discussion
The association of CRP with the severity of fatty liver and cardiovascular diseases was assessed separately in previous studies, and these variables were simultaneously evaluated for the first time. This study was carried out to investigate the possible association between these variables, introduce a common biomarker among them, and consequently diagnose and probably prevent these diseases in their early stages. The mean hs-CRP was 10.9 and 2.3 mg/L in those with normal and abnormal angiography showing significant differences. Moreover, the cut-off was 3.1 with a sensitivity and specificity of 95 and 90%, respectively. However, there was a significant difference in the level of hs-CRP according to elastography fibrosis grade but not based on ultrasound fatty liver grade.
Ischemic heart disease or coronary heart disease happens when the blood vessels are narrowed due to an inflammatory disease, namely atherosclerosis. Recent studies showed that the atherosclerotic process occurs along with an increase in the markers of inflammation, for example, acute-phase protein and cytokines.[26] CRP is considered the first line of defense against pathogens and may contribute to atherosclerosis because it decreases the expression of nitric oxide synthase and prostacyclin synthase. However, this molecule induces macrophages to uptake LDL-C, an important step in atherosclerosis.[27] The mean level of this protein is 0.8 mg/L in healthy individuals and 50 mg to more than 500 mg/L in patients with inflammatory diseases.[28] Fatty liver diseases and coronary heart diseases are associated with each other through multiple pathophysiological mechanisms such as systemic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, hepatic insulin resistance, oxidative stress, and altered lipid metabolism.[29] Fatty liver disease can progress to fibrosis and cirrhosis and the degree of liver fibrosis contributes to cardiovascular risk.[30] Despite lacking a comprehensive study to evaluate the association between fatty liver disease, CRP, and ischemic heart disease, several studies have assessed these factors separately. Shah et al.[13] revealed that higher severity of hepatic fibrosis was related to higher IL-6 levels; however, the increased IL-6 conversely decreased the CRP level. Tohidi et al.[17] reported a significant association between hs-CRP and ischemic heart disease, and CRP measurement was advised in patients with medium-level risk for cardiovascular diseases. However, their study was done in a restricted age range and needed more participants. Lee et al.[18] showed that the risk of NAFLD increased with higher CRP among men aging from 30 to 59 years. Forooghi et al.[19] found that there was a significant association between hs-CRP and fatty liver disease in 55 patients. Yeniova et al.[20] showed that hs-CRP may be a useful biomarker for fatty liver disease. However, Dumitrascu et al.[26] showed that there is no serum marker, for example, hs-CRP, that has a good predictive role for cardiac involvement in patients with fatty liver. Similarly, the current study showed no significant association between hs-CRP and the results of elastography. One of the limitations of the present study was the use of a relatively small sample population. Also, this study was done in a referral tertiary health care center leading to less generalization potency.
The detailed mechanism linking fatty liver disease and ischemic heart disease is initiated from the process of atherosclerosis and dysfunction of the endothelium. Nitric oxide synthesis has an endogenous antagonist called asymmetric dimethylarginine, whose level increases in fatty liver patients.[31] Moreover, the level of homocysteine is also increased in fatty liver patients, which increases intrahepatic vascular resistance and consequently leads to impaired nitric oxide formation. However, oxidative stress can be originated from increased homocysteine, leading to increased platelet activation.[32] The increased systemic inflammation markers (e.g., hs-CRP and interleukin 6) also occur in fatty liver patients. These inflammation events can increase endothelial dysfunction, change the vascular tone, and enhance vascular plaque formation.[29] Thus, as shown in the present study, the level of hs-CRP had a significant difference between liver fibrosis patients (a severe form of the fatty liver) with abnormal and normal angiography.
Conclusion
Generally, this study showed that there is an association between the fatty liver, cardiac ischemia, and hs-CRP level. However, it seems that this association is only correct for the severe form of fatty liver (fibrosis) and not in its mild form.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgment
This paper is issued from the fellowship thesis in gastroenterology. This work was financially supported by grant RDC-9717 from the vice chancellor for Research Affairs of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences.
References
- 1.Toshikuni N, Tsutsumi M, Arisawa T. Clinical differences between alcoholic liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:8393–409. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cohen JC, Horton JD, Hobbs HH. Human fatty liver disease:Old questions and new insights. Science. 2011;332:1519–23. doi: 10.1126/science.1204265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Szczepaniak LS, Nurenberg P, Leonard D, Browning JD, Reingold JS, Grundy S, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure hepatic triglyceride content:Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in the general population. Am J PhysiolEndocrinol Metabol. 2005;288:E462–E8. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00064.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Argo CK, Caldwell SH. Epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. ClinLiver Dis. 2009;13:511–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2009.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Starley BQ, Calcagno CJ, Harrison SA. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma:Aweighty connection. Hepatology. 2010;51:1820–32. doi: 10.1002/hep.23594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph J-M, Yon S, Fournier C, Mal F, et al. Transient elastography:Anew noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound MedBiol. 2003;29:1705–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Talwalkar JA, Kurtz DM, Schoenleber SJ, West CP, Montori VM. Ultrasound-based transient elastography for the detection of hepatic fibrosis:Systematic review and meta-analysis. ClinGastroenterolHepatol. 2007;5:1214–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rehm J, Mathers C, Popova S, Thavorncharoensap M, Teerawattananon Y, Patra J. Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. Lancet. 2009;373:2223–33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60746-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mendis S, Puska P, Norrving B, Organization WH. Global Atlas on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control. World Health Organization. 2011 [Google Scholar]
- 10.Torpy JM, Burke AE, Glass RM. Coronary heart disease risk factors. JAMA. 2009;302:2388. doi: 10.1001/jama.302.21.2388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shrivastava AK, Singh HV, Raizada A, Singh SK. C-reactive protein, inflammation and coronary heart disease. Egypt Heart J. 2015;67:89–97. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Du Clos TW, Mold C. C-reactive protein. ImmunolRes. 2004;30:261–77. doi: 10.1385/IR:30:3:261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shah S, Ma Y, Scherzer R, Huhn G, French A, Plankey M, et al. Association of HIV, HCV and liver fibrosis severity with IL-6 and CRP levels. AIDS. 2015;29:1325–33. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Weinhold B, Rüther U. Interleukin-6-dependent and-independent regulation of the human C-reactive protein gene. Biochem J. 1997;327:425–9. doi: 10.1042/bj3270425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Casas J, Shah T, Hingorani A, Danesh J, Pepys M. C-reactive protein and coronary heart disease:Acritical review. JIntern Med. 2008;264:295–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.02015.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Devaki R, Gowdappa HB, Suma M, Prashanth V, Akila P, Devi BA, et al. A study of C-reactive protein and its relationship with CHD and lipid metabolism. Int J Pharm Sci RevRes. 2011;6:125–7. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee J, Yoon K, Ryu S, Chang Y, Kim H-R. High-normal levels of hs-CRP predict the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver in healthy men. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0172666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Foroughi M, Maghsoudi Z, Khayyatzadeh S, Ghiasvand R, Askari G, Iraj B. Relationship between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and inflammation in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver. AdvBiomed Res. 2016;5:28. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.176368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yeniova AO, Küçükazman M, Ata N, Dal K, Kefeli A, Başyiğit S, et al. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein is a strong predictor of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatogastroenterol. 2014;61:422–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chiang C-H, Huang C-C, Chan W-L, Chen J-W, Leu H-B. The severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease correlates with high sensitivity C-reactive protein value and is independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk in healthy population. ClinBiochem. 2010;43:1399–404. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Feldman M, Jialal I, Devaraj S, Cryer B. Effects of low-dose aspirin on serum C-reactive protein and thromboxane B2concentrations:Aplacebo-controlled study using a highly sensitive C-reactive protein assay. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:2036–41. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01289-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vaucher J, Marques-Vidal P, Waeber G, Vollenweider P. Cytokines and hs-CRP levels in individuals treated with low-dose aspirin for cardiovascular prevention:Apopulation-based study (CoLaus Study) Cytokine. 2014;66:95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rojo-Martínez G, Soriguer F, Colomo N, Calle A, Goday A, Bordiú E, et al. Factors determining high-sensitivity C-reactive protein values in the Spanish population. Di@bet. es study. EurJClin Invest. 2013;43:1–10. doi: 10.1111/eci.12002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mortensen C, Andersen O, Krag A, Bendtsen F, Møller S. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels predict survival and are related to haemodynamics in alcoholic cirrhosis. EurJGastroenterology Hepatol. 2012;24:619–26. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328351db6e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dumitrascu DL, Neuman MG. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease:An update on diagnosis. Clujul Med. 2018;91:147–50. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Madjid M, Willerson JT. Inflammatory markers in coronary heart disease. BrMed Bull. 2011;100:23–38. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldr043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mehta JL, Sukhija R, Romeo F, Sepulveda JL. Value of CRP in coronary risk determination. Indian Heart J. 2007;59:173–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pepys MB, Hirschfield GM. C-reactive protein:Acritical update. JClin Invest. 2003;111:1805–12. doi: 10.1172/JCI18921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stahl EP, Dhindsa DS, Lee SK, Sandesara PB, Chalasani NP, Sperling LS. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the heart:JACC state-of-the-art review. JAmCollCardiol. 2019;73:948–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dogan S, Celikbilek M, Yilmaz YK, Sarikaya S, Zararsiz G, Serin HI, et al. Association between liver fibrosis and coronary heart disease risk in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. EurJGastroenterolHepatol. 2015;27:298–304. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Francque SM, van der Graaff D, Kwanten WJ. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular risk:Pathophysiological mechanisms and implications. JHepatol. 2016;65:425–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Deanfield JE, Halcox JP, Rabelink TJ. Endothelial function and dysfunction:Testing and clinical relevance. Circulation. 2007;115:1285–95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.652859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]