Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2022 Nov 28;16(11):e0010833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010833

Heme-induced genes facilitate endosymbiont (Sodalis glossinidius) colonization of the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans) midgut

Laura J Runyen-Janecky 1,*, Jack D Scheutzow 1, Ruhan Farsin 1, Leah F Cabo 1, Katie E Wall 1, Katrina M Kuhn 1, Rashel Amador 1, Shaina J D’Souza 1, Aurelien Vigneron 2,¤, Brian L Weiss 2,*
Editor: José M C Ribeiro3
PMCID: PMC9731421  PMID: 36441823

Abstract

Tsetse flies (Glossina spp.) feed exclusively on vertebrate blood. After a blood meal, the enteric endosymbiont Sodalis glossinidius is exposed to various environmental stressors including high levels of heme. To investigate how S. glossinidius morsitans (Sgm), the Sodalis subspecies that resides within the gut of G. morsitans, tolerates the heme-induced oxidative environment of tsetse’s midgut, we used RNAseq to identify bacterial genes that are differentially expressed in cells cultured in high versus lower heme environments. Our analysis identified 436 genes that were significantly differentially expressed (> or < 2-fold) in the presence of high heme [219 heme-induced genes (HIGs) and 217 heme-repressed genes (HRGs)]. HIGs were enriched in Gene Ontology (GO) terms related to regulation of a variety of biological functions, including gene expression and metabolic processes. We observed that 11 out of 13 Sgm genes that were heme regulated in vitro were similarly regulated in bacteria that resided within tsetse’s midgut 24 hr (high heme environment) and 96 hr (low heme environment) after the flies had consumed a blood meal. We used intron mutagenesis to make insertion mutations in 12 Sgm HIGs and observed no significant change in growth in vitro in any of the mutant strains in high versus low heme conditions. However, Sgm strains that carried mutations in genes encoding a putative undefined phosphotransferase sugar (PTS) system component (SG2427), fucose transporter (SG0182), bacterioferritin (SG2280), and a DNA-binding protein (SGP1-0002), presented growth and/or survival defects in tsetse midguts as compared to normal Sgm. These findings suggest that the uptake up of sugars and storage of iron represent strategies that Sgm employs to successfully reside within the high heme environment of its tsetse host’s midgut. Our results are of epidemiological relevance, as many hematophagous arthropods house gut-associated bacteria that mediate their host’s competency as a vector of disease-causing pathogens.

Author summary

Tsetse flies feed exclusively on vertebrate blood. This nutrient source contains large quantities of heme, which can be toxic to the fly’s associated microorganisms. We investigated the genetic mechanisms that underlie the ability of the bacterial endosymbiont, Sodalis glossinidius (Sgm), to successfully reside within tsetse’s heme-rich midgut. Exposure of cultured Sgm to high levels of heme induced changes in the expression of genes that encode proteins involved in transcription, replication and repair of DNA, inorganic ion transport, and carbohydrate transport and metabolism processes. Changes in the expression of several of these same Sgm genes also occurred within tsetse’s midgut following exposure to a blood meal. Sgm genetically engineered to present mutations in several of these heme regulated genes were unable to successfully colonize tsetse’s gut. Our results provide insight into how bacteria that live in the gut of blood feeding arthropods mitigate the toxic effects of excessive heme. This information is of epidemiological relevance, as many of these bacteria influence their host’s ability to transmit disease pathogens that cause disease in humans and domesticated animals.

Introduction

Several arthropod taxa use vertebrate blood as their sole source of nutrients or as a nutrient supplement during metabolically costly reproductive processes. These arthropods are of epidemiological importance because they can transmit disease-causing pathogens between vertebrate hosts when they feed. In addition to potentially harboring pathogens, many hematophagous arthropods house a population-dependent assortment of symbiotic bacteria in their midgut that comes into direct contact with vertebrate blood each time their host feeds. These arthropods, pathogens, and symbiotic bacteria all face the unique challenge of accessing the rich supply of iron in the blood while overcoming the toxic effects of abundant free heme present in the environment during digestion of the meal. Meeting this challenge is vitally important for the survival of these organisms, which have presumably evolved several heme tolerance and detoxification mechanisms.

Heme (ferri-protoporphyrin IX) is composed of a heterocyclic organic porphyrin ring covalently bound to one ferrous iron atom. The majority of heme in the human body (~67%) is in hemoglobin, which is predominantly found in erythrocytes at a concentration of ~10 mM [1, 2]. Hematophagous arthropods ingest large amounts of vertebrate blood at each feeding. During digestion, heme, and the iron bound to it, are released into the midgut in large quantities, at which point they become toxic [1]. Specifically, free iron released from heme catalyzes the formation of hydroxyl radicals via Fenton chemistry, which directly damages a variety of biomolecules (e.g. DNA, proteins). Additionally, a high concentration of the porphyrin ring is itself toxic to many bacteria [3]. Heme can partition into the lipid bilayer and disrupt normal phospholipid bilayer function resulting in cell leakage and lysis [4], and can also catalyze the formation of highly reactive alkoxyl and peroxyl radicals that damage biomolecules including lipids, proteins, and DNA.

Male and female tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) both feed exclusively on vertebrate blood. Tsetse can house several microorganisms that may include pathogenic African trypanosomes (the etiological agents of human and animal African trypanosomiases), viruses, and symbiotic bacteria [5]. Heme liberated from digestion of the large blood meal (2–3 times the fly’s body mass each feeding) presents a metabolic challenge for the fly and its microbial partners. One of tsetse’s symbiotic bacteria, Sodalis glossinidius, resides intra- and extracellularly within tsetse’s midgut [6, 7]. Extracellular S. glossinidius are exposed to heme when its tsetse host consumes vertebrate blood. The bacterium contains a functional heme import system composed of the outer membrane protein HemR and a periplasmic/inner membrane ABC heme permease system (HemTUV) for use of the heme as an iron source [8]. However, nothing is known about how S. glossinidius tolerates and detoxifies heme, nor why the bacterium maintains genes necessary for heme biosynthesis [9]. As a first step in elucidating these mechanisms, we identify Sodalis genes that are differentially expressed in the presence of high heme, and then monitor Sodalis’ ability to reside in tsetse’s midgut when expression of a selection of these genes is experimentally eliminated by mutagenesis. Our results provide insight into how a symbiotic bacterium that resides in the gut of a hematophagous arthropod survives when exposed to high quantities of heme. This work may have epidemiological implications, as enteric symbiotic bacteria are well known modulators of pathogen infection establishment and transmission processes in several arthropod vector model systems.

Methods

Insect maintenance. Glossina morsitans morsitans (Gmm) were maintained in the Yale School of Public Health insectary at 25°C with 60–70% relative humidity. All flies received defibrinated bovine blood (Hemostat Laboratories) every 48 hours through an artificial membrane feeding system [10]. All experimentally derived changes to this feeding scheme are detailed in their respective Materials and Methods sections below.

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. E. coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani Broth (LB) with aeration or on Luria-Bertani Agar (L Agar) plates. All E. coli cultures were incubated at 37°C. Sodalis glossinidius morsitans (hereafter designated Sgm) were obtained by homogenizing a two week old Gmm pupae in 100 μl of Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth and then plating the homogenate on BHI agar plates supplemented with 10% defibrinated bovine blood (BHIB). A single colony was isolated and designated SgmF. Plates were incubated at 25°C and 10% CO2. Sgm clones were harvested and grown in BHI at 25°C and 10% CO2 in petri dishes without aeration.

Table 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids.

Strain or Plasmid Characteristics Reference
Bacterial Strains
E. coli Strains
DH5α endA1 hsdR17 supE44 thi-1 recA1 gyrA relA1 Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169 deoR [Φ80dlacΔ(lacZ)M15] [11]
BL21(DE3) FompT hsdSB (rB, mB) gal dcm (DE3) Novagen
Sodalis Strains
SgmF S. glossindius from Glossina moristans moristans S. Aksoy
Sgm F-PAR Parent strain for Sgm intron mutagenesis (SgmF/pAR1219) This study
URSOD7 KanR intron insertion at nucleotide 25 of SG1505 This study
URSOD25 KanR intron insertion at nucleotide 132 of SG0074 This study
URSOD26 KanR intron insertion at nucleotide 180 of SG2427 This study
URSOD27 KanR intron insertion at nucleotide 345 of SG2179 This study
URSOD28 KanR intron insertion at nucleotide 126 SG2061 This study
URSOD29 KanR intron insertion at nucleotide 390 of SGP2_
0009
This study
URSOD31 KanR intron insertion at nucleotide 24 of SGP1_
0002
This study
URSOD32 KanR intron insertion at nucleotide 114 of SG0437 This study
URSOD33 KanR intron insertion at nucleotide 33 of SG1100 This study
URSOD35 KanR intron insertion at nucleotide 348 of SG0182 This study
URSOD40 KanR intron insertion at nucleotide 102 of SG2280 This study
URSOD41 KanR intron insertion at nucleotide 99 of SG1275 This study
Plasmids
pAR1219 T7 polymerase under control of lac UV5 promoter for inducing intron mutagenesis [12]
pET-22b Expression vector; carbenicillin resistance Novagen

Antibiotics were used for E. coli at the following concentrations: carbenicillin (carb) 125 μg/ml, ampicillin (amp) 50 μg/ml, chloramphenicol (cam) 30 μg/ml, and kanamycin (kan) 50 μg/ml. Antibiotics were used for Sgm at the following concentrations: carbenicillin (carb) 125 μg/ml, chloramphenicol (cam) 3 μg/ml, and kanamycin (kan) 25 μg/ml.

Bacterial growth assays in heme

Clonal populations of Sgm were subcultured into BHI broth or BHI broth supplemented with hemin (0–150 μM, hereafter referred to as heme) and incubated at 25°C and 10% CO2. Growth was measured by OD600.

RNA sequencing and data analysis

Sgm cultured under normal (BHI) and high heme conditions (BHI supplemented with 100 μM heme for 24 hours) were used as control and treatment samples, respectively, for RNA-seq analyses. Total RNA was extracted from three distinct clonal populations of treatment and control cells (5 x 108 cells per replicate) using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s (Invitrogen) protocol. Purified RNA was subjected to DNase treatment using the TURBO DNA-free kit (Ambion) and quality checked on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer RNA Nano chip. mRNA libraries were prepared using the Illumina Ribo-Zero rRNA Depletion Kit following the manufacturer’s protocol. The six libraries were sequenced (paired-end) at the Yale Center for Genome Analysis using the Illumina HiSeq2500 system.

Using CLC Genomics Workbench version 8.5 (Qiagen), transcriptome reads were first trimmed and filtered to remove ambiguous nucleotides and low-quality sequences. The remaining reads were mapped to the annotated Sgm genome (bacteria.ensembl.org, genome ID GCA_000010085). Reads aligning uniquely to Sgm transcripts were used to calculate differential gene expression using CLC Genomics Workbench by employing a pairwise Baggeley’s test, corrected with a False Discovery Rate (FDR) at p<0.05. For clusters of orthologous genes (COG) analysis, the COGs mapped to Sgm genes were downloaded from the Integrated Microbial Genomes and Microbiomes (IMG/M) site hosted by the Department of Energy’s Joint Genome Institute (JGI) (img.jgi.doe.gov).

Quantitation of Sgm gene expression in vivo in tsetse’s midgut

Midguts dissected from female tsetse flies 24 hrs (considered recently replete) or 96 hrs (considered starved) after their last bloodmeal (n = 6 biological replicates from each timepoint, three midguts per replicate) represented high heme and low heme environments, respectively. Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and then treated with DNase (Turno DNA-free kit, Thermo Fisher) to remove contaminating DNA. cDNA was generated from 200 ng of total RNA purified from high and low heme midguts (using a Bio-Rad iScript cDNA synthesis kit) by priming the reaction with random hexamers to ensure the capture of Sgm derived transcripts. Primers used to amplify Sgm heme responsive cDNAs are listed in S1 Table. Constitutively expressed Sgm rplB was used to normalize transcript levels in each sample.

Construction of Sgm mutants

Mutations in the heme-induced genes (HIGs) were constructed using the Targetron Intron Mutagenesis kit (Sigma-Aldridge, St. Louis, MO) as described previously [13]. Briefly, the group II intron on pACD4K-C or pACD4K-C-loxP was altered according to the manufacturer’s instructions to contain a targeting site located within the coding sequence of the HIG. The altered intron plasmid containing the HIG targeting intron was electroporated into SgmF-PAR using the electroporation protocol describe by Dale et. al. [14]. pAR1219 carries the IPTG-inducible T7 RNA polymerase gene, which is required for transcription of the targeting intron in intron mutagenesis. Intron expression was induced with 500 μM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) for 1 hour and Sgm containing chromosomally inserted introns were selected for on BHIB agar containing kanamycin. Single colonies were restreaked after approximately 1 week on BHIB agar plates containing kanamycin. Insertion of the intron into the Sgm HIG, and elimination of the wildtype gene, was confirmed by PCR analysis using Sgm primer pairs that flank the HIG (S1 Table).

Tsetse per os colonization assay

Either the Sgm parent strain SgmF-PAR (control) or one of the HIG mutant strains (treatment) was added to heat inactivated (HI; 56°C for 30 min) bovine blood [at a concentration of 500 colony-forming units (CFU)/ml] and provided to flies (n = 25 per group) through an artificial membrane system [10]. Following per os inoculation with bacteria, flies were maintained on HI blood every 48 hr. Gut tissues were microscopically dissected at 1, 5 and 10 days post-inoculation with bacteria. Guts from each group (n = 5) and time point were homogenized in 0.85% NaCl, serially diluted, and plated on BHIB supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/ml). CFU per plate were manually counted to determine the number of treatment or control Sgm residing in each fly midgut. All per os colonization assays were performed in duplicate.

Results

Sgm grows in high heme conditions

Because Sgm resides within the midgut of hematophagous tsetse flies, we hypothesized that the bacteria would be able to grow in media containing high levels of heme. To test this hypothesis, we compared the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of heme for SgmF-PAR and E. coli BL21(DE3)/pET22b grown in vitro in broth culture. SgmF-PAR was able to grow in a significantly higher concentration of heme as compared to E. coli (Fig 1). The MIC of heme for Sgm grown in vitro in BHI at 25°C is between 100 and 150 μM. This is higher than the MIC for many other microbes, where the observed inhibitory concentration for heme is in the low μM range (reviewed in [15]). Sgm’s high MIC for heme likely reflects the bacterium’s evolution in the blood rich niche of tsetse’s gut.

Fig 1. Inhibition of bacterial growth by heme.

Fig 1

E. coli BL21(DE3)/pET22b and SgmF-PAR cultures were inoculated at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.04–0.08 into their respective growth media (LB media for E. coli and BHI and for Sgm) containing increasing concentrations of heme. E. coli (black bars) was incubated at 37°C and Sgm (grey bars) was incubated at 25°C. The OD600 of the cultures was measured at stationary phase (96 hours for Sgm and 24 hours for E. coli), and bacterial density at each heme dose was normalized to the density of cultures grown in the absence of added heme (0 μM). The averages of three trials are shown, and the standard deviation of the means are indicated by the error bars. Asterisks above bars indicate that E. coli and Sgm reached significantly different densities (p<0.05) at that heme concentration. Statistical significance was determined via multiple t-tests (GraphPad Prism v.9.4.1).

Identification of heme regulated genes in cultured Sgm

In the presence of high levels of heme, Sgm may alter gene expression to homeostatically mitigate heme toxicity. To identify Sgm heme regulated genes, we grew the bacteria in either normal BHI or BHI supplemented with 100 μM heme, which hereafter we refer to as ‘high heme’. Log-phase cells from both groups (n = 3 clonal populations per group) were harvested and subjected to RNA-seq analysis to identify genes that showed either increased (heme-induced genes, HIGs) or decreased (heme-repressed genes, HRGs) expression following exposure to high heme conditions. The total number of reads generated in each biological replicate, and the number of reads per biological replicate that mapped uniquely to the Sgm genome, are detailed in S2 Table (raw RNA-seq data is archived under NCBI BioProject ID PRJNA818891). Expression of 1495 genes was significantly differentially expressed in response to exposure to high heme (S1 Fig.). Of those, 219 genes were significantly induced at least 2-fold in the presence of high levels of heme, and a similar number of genes (217) were significantly repressed at least 2-fold (S2 Table). These 436 genes correspond to 18% of all genes in the Sgm genome. Many of the HIGs encode hypothetical proteins with unknown functions (50% of the heme-induced genes). Furthermore, a large percentage of HIGs encode genes involved in transcription (13%), replication/repair of DNA (12%), and carbohydrate transport and metabolism (11%) (Fig 2). The 20 genes that exhibited the largest changes in transcript abundance in response to high levels of heme are listed in Tables 2 and 3.

Fig 2. Distribution of heme-regulated genes in COG categories.

Fig 2

Sgm genes that showed ≥ 2-fold change in expression when grown in the presence of high heme (100 μM) were grouped according to their clusters of orthologous group (COG) designations. HIG, heme-induced genes; HRG, heme-repressed genes.

Table 2. Sgm heme-induced genes (top 20).

Gene Putative Function Induction levelb (fold increase)
SG2427a phosphotransfer system IIA component 10.8
SG2043 hypothetical protein 8.2
SG2044 hypothetical protein (possible transcriptional regulator) 7.4
SG1733 hypothetical protein (possibly unique to S. glossinidius) 7.3
SG1832 exisionase 6.3
SG2061a anti-sigma28 factor FlgM (FlgM) 6.1
SG2113 ornithine carbamoyltransferase chain I 6.0
SGP1_0054 hypothetical protein 5.7
SG2396 acetolactate synthase isozyme II small subunit 5.4
SG2179a regulation of response to periplasmic stress (CpxP) homologue) 5.1
SG0437a 2-isopropylmalate synthase (LeuA) 5.1
SGP1_0010 hypothetical protein with peptidase domain 4.8
SG0944 hypothetical protein 4.7
SG2049 ipaD family Type 3 secretion system effector protein 4.4
SGP2_0009a conserved hypothetical protein 4.4
SG1035 phage integrase 4.4
SG0182a fucose transport protein (FucP) 4.4
SGP1_0047 transposase 4.4
SG2106 transcriptional regulator 4.2
SG0148 type 6 secretion system effector protein 4.2
SGP1_0002a DNA-binding protein 4.1

aHIGs selected for further analysis (in vivo expression and in vivo colonization phenotype of associated mutant) along with SG0074 (universal stress protein A, UspA), SG1100 (cold-shock DNA binding protein), SG1275 (ferritin, FtnA), SG2280 (bacterioferritin, Bfr), SG1505 (heme binding and/or degradation protein, HemS).

bLevel of induction = fold-increase in gene expression in the presence of high versus low heme.

Table 3. Sodalis repressed induced genes (top 20).

Gene Putative Function Repression levelb (fold decrease)
SG0680 putative ammonium transport protein 6.8
SG0679 nitrogen regulatory protein P-II 6.8
SG0253 30S ribosomal protein S21 6.5
SG0620 hypothetical protein 5.6
SG1976 hypothetical protein 5.0
SG1621a erythronate-4-phosphate dehydrogenase 4.6
SG1909 thioredoxin 2 4.2
SG1845 conserved hypothetical protein 4.0
SG2279 30S ribosomal protein S10 4.0
SG0645 S-adenosylmethionine 4.0
SG0374 protein-export protein SecG 3.8
SG0466 pyruvate dehydrogenase complex repressor 3.7
SG1094 arginine ABC transporter permease component 3.5
SG0468 pyruvate dehydrogenase dihydrolipoyltransacetylase component 3.5
SG2277 50S ribosomal protein L4 3.5
SG0256 dihydroneopterin aldolase 3.5
SG2341 magnesium transport protein 3.4
SG1202 hypothetical phage protein 3.4
SG1748 GMP synthase 3.4
SG2268 50S ribosomal protein L14 3.4

aHRG selected for in vivo expression analysis.

bRepression level = fold-reduction in gene expression in the presence of high versus low heme.

High heme alters expression of Sgm heme and iron metabolism genes

Sgm’s chromosome contains genes that encode two putative ferritins (SG2280 and SG1275) and a protein annotated as a bacterioferritin co-migratory protein (SG1728), all of which could store free iron that might be liberated from excess heme. All three genes exhibited modest (~1.8-fold) but statistically significant increases in expression in the high heme growth conditions. Furthermore, expression of gene SG1505, which encodes a putative heme binding protein that might sequester heme, was also heme induced (1.9-fold). In contrast, expression of hemT, hemU, and hemV genes, which encode a previously characterized inner membrane heme transport system in Sgm, was decreased 1.4-, 1.9-, and 1.8-fold, respectively, in high heme growth conditions [8]. Additionally, genes that encode proteins homologous to the Dpp dipeptide/heme ABC inner membrane transport system in E. coli (SG0061-SG0064) had decreased expression (1.5–2.7 fold) in high heme conditions.

High heme alters expression of Sgm carbohydrate transport and metabolism genes

For the HIGs that had assigned COG designations, 11% of the heme-induced genes were associated with the carbohydrate transport and metabolism COG class G. These included genes annotated as part of putative L-fucose transport (SG0182-SG0183) and galactose ABC transport (SG0963-SG0965) systems. Furthermore, the HIGs also encode proteins that are part of three separate putative phosphotransferase systems (PTS) for sugar transport, including SG2041-SG2042 (PTS system component in the L-Ascorbate family), SG1327 (the first gene in an operon for a PTS system in the D-mannose family), and SG2427-SG2428 (PTS system, unassigned family). Finally, SG1701, which encodes a homologue of PtsH that is a common component in all PTS sugar transport systems, was induced 2-fold.

Blood feeding alters the expression of Sgm heme regulated genes in vivo in tsetse’s midgut

We next set out to determine whether Sgm genes that exhibited heme induced changes in expression in vitro similarly changed following exposure to high heme conditions in vivo in tsetse’s midgut. We did so by quantifying the expression of a random sampling (across COG categories) of seven HIGs from Table 2 and one HRG from Table 3 in Sgm residing naturally in tsetse’s midgut 24 hr (high heme environment) or 96 hr post-feeding (low heme environment) after flies received their last blood meal. We also quantified the expression of five additional HIGs (SG0074, SG1100, SG2280, SG1275, and SG1505) because they encoded potentially interesting proteins with respect to heme tolerance phenotypes (stress resistance and iron storage) (a summary of the Sgm genes we selected for in vivo expression analysis is shown in S3 Table). We observed that for each of the Sgm genes SG0437, SG2427, SG1100, SPG1_0002, SG1275, SG0182, SG2179, SG2061, SG2280, SG1505, and SG1621, the pattern of gene expression was similar both in vitro and in vivo in tsetse’s midgut. Conversely, expression of SGP2_0009 was undetectable in tsetse’s midgut, and SG0074 did not exhibit a significant change in expression in that environment (Fig 3). These results suggest that Sgm heme-responsive gene expression exhibits similar patterns in high heme conditions both in vitro and in vivo in tsetse’s midgut. Additionally, the heme induced genes may play a role in Sgm’s ability to tolerate and successfully reside within the high heme environment present in tsetse’s midgut following consumption of a blood meal.

Fig 3. Relative expression of Sgm heme-regulated genes in vivo in tsetse’s midgut either 24 hr or 96 hr (high and low heme environments, respectively) after flies had received their last blood meal.

Fig 3

Expression levels of each gene were quantified by RT-qPCR and normalized to Sgm’s constitutively expressed rplB gene. Individual dots represent one biological replicate, each containing three midguts. Sgm gene IDs and graph colors correspond to the COG category (shown in the box at bottom right) in which they each group. Sgm gene SG2061 is indicated by a cayenne asterisks because it also groups within the ‘transcription’ COG. Expression of SGP2_0009 was undetectable in Sgm that reside in tsetse’s midgut and thus left out of this figure. hpf, hours post-feeding. Bars represent median values, and statistical significance was determined via Student’s t-test (GraphPad Prism v.9.4.1).

Mutations in specific Sgm HIGs impact the bacterium’s ability to grow and survive within tsetse’s midgut

We determined that high heme conditions influence Sgm gene expression when the bacterium resides in tsetse’s midgut. We thus tested whether any of the HIGs encode proteins that contribute to Sgm’s ability to successfully colonize this niche. To do so, we used intron mutagenesis to generate 12 Sgm mutant strains, each of which fails to express one HIG, and then inoculated distinct groups of tsetse flies per os with either one Sgm HIG mutant strain or parent strain SgmF-PAR (wildtype for each gene). We then monitored the density of HIG mutant strains (normalized to parent strain SgmF-PAR) in tsetse guts at 1, 5, and 10 day time points post-inoculation. We observed that Sgm strains unable to express two putative sugar transporters [the PTS transporter component (SG2427) or the fructose transporter (SG0182)], bacterioferritin (SG2280), and a putative DNA binding protein (SGP1-0002), exhibited significant defects in survival and/or growth within tsetse’s midgut (Fig 4). As such, these HIGs encode proteins that mediate Sgms ability to reside within tsetse’s gut where the environment contains abundant blood meal-derived heme.

Fig 4. Colonization of tsetse with Sgm HIG mutants.

Fig 4

Distinct groups of tsetse flies (n = 25 per group) were inoculated per os (500 CFU/ml of blood) with one Sgm mutant strain or the parent strain (SgmF-PAR). Midguts (n = 5 per Sgm mutant and parent strain) were harvested at 1, 5, and 10 days post-inoculation and plated on selective media (kanamycin, 50 μg/ml) to determine bacterial density (CFUs/gut). Bars represent the fold-change in the number of CFUs/gut of each Sgm mutant strain relative to the number of CFUs/gut of the Sgm parent strain SgmF-PAR (mutant strain CFUs/parent strain CFUs) at each timepoint. The dashed line represents the value at which CFU/gut of parent strain SgmF-PAR and each mutant strain are the same. Strains indicated in red represent those that presented colonization defects in tsetse’s gut. Mutant strains 26, 31, 35, and 40 grew to a significantly lower density, in tsetse’s midgut compared to the parent strain by day 10 (p values for strains 26, 31, 35, and 40 = <0.0001, 0.003, 0.001, and <0.001, respectively). Statistical significance was determined via 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons (GraphPad Prism v.9.4.1).

The predicted protein products of two genes (SG0182 and SG2427) that enhance Sgm colonization of tsetse are homologous to sugar transporters

Because SG0182 and SG2427 mutants presented defects in tsetse fly colonization, we did additional bioinformatic analysis of the proteins encoded by these genes. We first compared the putative amino acid sequence of SG0182 with the nonredundant protein database using BLASTP. The putative protein is homologous to L-fucose:H+symport permeases in the Major Facilitator Superfamily in a wide variety of other bacterial species, and is 75% identical and 84% similar to the protein FucP, which transports fucose into E. coli. SG2427 is homologous to IIA subunits of the PTS sugar system in a wide variety of other bacterial species. In PTS systems, the phosphoryl group from phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) is transferred to a relay of several proteins or protein domains (including PTS enzymes I, HPr, IIA, and IIB), which ultimately results in the phosphorylating of sugars during transmembrane enzyme IIC-mediated transport into the cell. Except for Enzyme I and HPr, all of the enzymes are specific for a particular class of sugars. The top BLASTP matches by E-value for the SG2427 encoded protein were to putative PTS fructose transporter IIA subunits in Sodalis praecaptivus, Raoultella terrigena, Enterobacter sp. 10–1, Superficieibacter electus, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. SG2427 contains the Pfam domain (EIIA-man/PF03610) corresponding to the PTS system fructose IIA component.

Because PTS systems have been studied extensively in E. coli, and because Sgm and E. coli are in the same phylogenetic order (Enterobacteriales), we compared the putative SG2427 amino acid sequence to the proteins encoded by the E. coli K-12 substrain MG1655. SG2427 was 32% identical and 59% similar to the amino residues 14–128 of the 323 amino acid protein ManX, which is a PTS enzyme IIAB fusion protein that is part of the fairly promiscuous PTS system for transport of glucose, glucosamine, fructose, mannose, N-acetyl-glucosamine (Fig 5). Furthermore, SG2427 was 22% identical and 41% similar to putative PTS enzyme IIA component YadI in E.coli.

Fig 5. Comparison of Sgm putative PTS proteins encoded by SG2425-2427 with E. coli K12 proteins.

Fig 5

The three putative S. glossinidius proteins are shown at the top in red, blue, and green, with their E. coli K12 homologues shown below in matched color coding.

Like other PTS subunits, SG2427 is the first gene in an operon with genes that encode other subunits of the PTS transport system. The putative proteins encoded by those two genes (SG2426 and SG2425) were compared with the database of E. coli K12 proteins (Fig 5). SG2426 (putative PTS enzyme IIB component) was 25% identical and 52% similar to the amino residues 164–298 of the 323 amino acid fusion protein ManX (for transport of glucose, glucosamine, fructose, mannose, N-acetyl-glucosamine), 21% identical and 44% similar to PTS enzyme IIB component AgaV (for transport of N-acetyl-galactosamine), and 27% identical and 48% similar to PTS enzyme IIB component AgaB (transport of galactosamine). SG2425 (putative PTS enzyme IIC component) was 28% identical and 51% similar to PTS enzyme IIC component AgaC (for transport of galactosamine), and 26% identical and 51% similar to PTS enzyme IIC ManY (for transport of glucose, glucosamine, fructose, mannose, N-acetyl-glucosamine). The conservation of putative sugar transporter proteins in the Sgm genome, coupled with the defects in tsetse fly colonization of Sgm with mutations in the genes encoding these proteins, suggest sugar transporters play a key role in the ability of Sgm to mitigate heme toxicity.

Discussion

Selective pressures associated with surviving blood meal processing have likely resulted in a suite of heme tolerance mechanisms in bacterial symbionts that reside in the hostile gut of hematophagous insects. In this context, the goal of this study was to acquire insight into how Sgm, an endosymbiont of the obligately hematophagous tsetse fly, survives in the high heme environment of its insect host’s gut. We did so by culturing Sgm under high (100 μM of exogenous heme) or low (no exogenous heme added) heme conditions and then comparing the global transcriptional response between the two groups. We observed that approximately 200 Sgm genes were significantly induced at least 2-fold in response to 100 μM heme. A large percentage of these heme-induced genes mapped to orthologues in the ‘transcription’ COG category, suggesting complex transcriptional networks aid in adaptation to this environment by fine tuning gene expression including significant alteration of expression of transcriptional regulators in Sgm. Other bacterial transcriptomes show similar patterns of inducing transcription-related functions in response to blood or heme [1618]. Importantly, we also observed that a selection of Sgm genes induced in response to high heme culture conditions were similarly induced in Sgm that resided within the gut of replete as opposed to starved tsetse flies. Finally, Sgm strains with mutations in four HIGs (SG2427, SG0182, SG2280, and SGP1-0002) presented colonization defects when inoculated per os into tsetse flies. Our results taken together indicate that Sgm presents a robust transcriptional response when grown in high heme conditions, and that this genetic response is important for the bacterium to survive in the gut its tsetse host.

Processes that mitigate heme toxicity are predicted to be physiologically critical for Sgm that reside within the midgut lumen of hematophagous tsetse flies. As such, multiple tolerance mechanisms have likely evolved in the bacterium, including heme-responsive changes in gene expression that result in altered transport of heme across the bacterial cell membrane and/or intracellular sequestration of excess heme and iron. Our data suggest that Sgm reduces heme transport into the cell by decreasing expression of the genes SG1538-1540 and SG0061-SG0064, encoding the HemTUV and Dpp dipeptide/heme ABC inner membrane transport systems. We also found that transcription of Sgm SG1505 increases in response to high heme levels in vitro and is also induced in enteric Sgm after the fly host consumes a blood meal. This gene encodes HemS, which shares significant homology with proteins predicted to bind heme, thus reducing its toxicity, and transfer heme to other heme-degrading proteins [19, 20]. Furthermore, the HemS homologue in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (HmuS) has heme oxygenase activity that cleaves the protoporphyrin ring to release iron from heme [21]. While HemS may contribute to protecting Sgm from excess heme-associated toxicity, the protein is not essential as SG1505 Sgm mutants grow in high heme media and colonize tsetse at levels comparable to the parent strain. This could also reflect the fact that tsetse’s genome encodes a heme oxygenase [22, 23]. We also found that the expression of genes predicted to encode ferritin or ferritin-related proteins, which exhibit iron-storage functions in other bacteria, was induced by heme and induced in the fly after a blood meal. Mutagenesis of Sgm SG2280, which encodes a putative bacterioferritin, reduced the colonization of flies, suggesting that modulating iron levels is important in vivo.

Our data indicates that Sgm presents a general stress response when exposed to high heme. Seventy-eight percent of the genes encoding ribosomal proteins exhibit a modest (average of 2-fold) decrease in expression. SG1485 and SG0074, which encode homologues of the bacterial universal stress proteins UspE and UspA, respectively, present 2- and 3-fold changes in expression [24, 25]. These proteins mediate responses for several different stressors, including oxidative stress, acid stress, and growth arrest, and have been implicated in facilitating colonization of bacterial pathogens (reviewed in [26, 27]). Sgm SGP1-0002 presented a 4-fold increase in transcript abundance under high heme conditions, and the SGP1-0002 HIG mutant exhibited a colonization defect in tsetse’s gut. SGP1-0002 encodes a putative DNA binding protein that is 41% and 48% identical to paralogous H-NS and StpA global transcriptional regulators in E. coli. H-NS functions as both a scaffold protein that contributes to the nucleoid structure and as a global regulator of gene expression [28]. Additionally, stress resistance proteins are regulated by homologues of H-NS in several bacterial species [29, 30]. In one case, the Porphyromonas gingivalis DNA-binding protein PgDps is required for growth of the bacterium in high heme conditions and protects the bacterium from oxidative stress [31]. Our results suggest that maintenance of Sgm homeostasis during heme stress is mediated by a significant change in the expression of transcription and translation regulators. More work is required to determine if Sgm that reside within tsetse’s midgut respond similarly to high heme conditions.

Free iron released from heme can catalyze the formation of damaging hydroxyl radicals via Fenton chemistry or lipid peroxidation [32]. This process may result in the upregulation of bacterial oxidative stress detoxification genes in high heme environments. In Sgm, three genes known to counteract ROS were heme induced: SG0017 (encodes a putative manganese superoxide dismutase, which is already highly expressed by Sgm grown in BHI and induced 1.5-fold with the addition of heme), SG2325 (Fe/S biogenesis), and SG2047 (putative organic hydroperoxide resistance regulator). Other Sgm genes identified by Pontes et. al. [33] as potentially mitigating oxidative stress survival were not heme-induced in this study. This pattern of gene expression may be interpreted in different ways. In one scenario, the oxidative stress burden on Sgm cultured in the presence of 100 μM heme may actually be lower than predicted because the bacterium could employ other mitigation strategies that quickly lower ROS. Alternatively, Sgm’s response to high heme in vitro may reflect how the bacterium copes with this challenge when it resides naturally in tsetse’s midgut. In this scenario, Sgm may utilize its own oxidative stress-reducing mechanisms as well as benefit from those that its tsetse fly host employs to overcome excessive heme-induced ROS. In fact, a precedent for this theory exists in the mosquito Aedes aegypti, where immediately following a blood meal, heme mediated activation of protein kinase C causes decreases in ROS in the gut [34]. In a third scenario, some of Sgm’s oxidative stress survival genes might be constitutively expressed. In this case, the transcriptional response that coordinates changing the expression of a large number of oxidative stress survival genes in response to environmental signals may have been lost over the course of Sgm’s evolution in tsetse. Consistent with this idea, of the two major ROS sensing transcriptional regulator systems found in gamma-proteobacteria (OxyR and SoxR/S), Sgm has retained only OxyR during reductive evolution. If ROS levels are consistently high in tsetse’s gut, this may have selected for constitutive high-level expression of Sgm detoxification genes (i.e repressor proteins are not required to keep expression off at certain times). In fact, Sgm superoxide dismutase (SG0017) and a putative peroxidase (SG0642) are highly expressed in BHI, regardless of heme levels.

Eleven percent of the HIGs were in the carbohydrate transport and metabolism COG class. Regulation of carbohydrate transport and metabolism gene expression by exposure to heme, hemoglobin, or blood results in differential expression of genes associated with carbohydrate transport and metabolism in several bacterial pathogens [16,17,18,35,36]. In Sgm, the heme signal could correlate with the presence of erythrocytes whose membranes contain glycoproteins and serum sugars that could be used by the bacterium for growth. For example, fucose is found on the surface of erythrocytes [35], and Sgm SG0182, which encodes a putative fucose transporter FucP, was induced 4.4-fold in the presence of high heme. Deletion of this gene resulted in a slight decrease in Sgm colonization of tsetse, suggesting that the ability to import or bind to fucose might help Sgm colonize tsetse’s gut. Additionally, SG0963-SG0965, which constitute an operon that encodes a putative galactose ABC transporter, were inducted 2 to 3.7-fold by heme. Galactose present in the blood as a result of human digestion and absorption, and galactosylceramides have been detected on the membranes of both erythrocytes and leukocytes (reviewed [37]). Furthermore, the first gene in an operon that encodes the promiscuous PTS sugar transporter (SG1327, ManX), and SG1701, which encodes a putative homologue of a common component in all PTS sugar transport systems (PtsH), were induced in Sgm under high heme conditions [9, 38]. Finally, mutation of SG2427 (encodes a putative PTS sugar transporter) inhibited the ability of Sgm to colonize tsetse’s midgut. However, the identity of the transported molecule is unknown. Collectively, these data suggest the presence of heme may signal the availability of blood sugars that may be important for Sgm growth in tsetse.

Sgm infection prevalence, and density of infection, can vary significantly within and between populations of wild tsetse flies [3942]. Although the physiological mechanisms that underlie these differences in Sgm infection dynamics have never been experimentally addressed, we speculate that heme tolerance could be one contributing factor. More specifically, different tsetse populations feed on distinct vertebrate hosts, which may present different concentrations of heme in their blood [likely based on their thermogenic properties [43] and/or diet [44]]. Different tsetse populations could house Sgm that exhibit genetic variation within genes that mediate the bacterium’s response to heme toxicity. These variable genotypes could account for population-dependent discrepancies in Sgm infection prevalence and infection density. Similarly, tsetse flies within different populations may present variability in genes responsible for mediating blood meal processing mechanisms [45]. If this were the case then the amount of gut-associated free heme could be tsetse population dependent, and thus in some cases not enough to be toxic to Sodalis. Importantly, the dynamics of Sodalis infection in tsetse is of epidemiological consequence, as flies that harbor the bacterium at high density in their midgut are more susceptible to infection with pathogenic African trypanosomes than are their counterparts that lack the bacterium or that harbor the bacterium at relatively low densities [40, 41, 4648]. Thus, Sgm plays a prominent role in the parasite’s ability to complete its tsetse-specific developmental program and be transmitted to a new vertebrate host. More broadly speaking, in addition to tsetse flies, mosquitoes [49, 50], ticks [51], and sandflies [52] also house vector competence-mediating symbionts that must be able to survive within the high heme environment of their host’s gut. Our results, which provide insight into the physiological mechanisms that facilitate the retention of bacterial symbionts in the hostile gut environment of hematophagous arthropods, may contribute to the development of novel vector-borne disease control strategies.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Volcano plot depicting global transcriptomic changes in Sgm cultured in BHI broth supplemented with 100 μM heme vs. normal BHI broth.

All Sgm genes detected by RNA-seq are plotted on the graph, and each dot represents one gene. Genes represented in red are significantly differentially expressed (p-value of ≤ 0.05 and a fold-change ≥ 2, indicated by dashed, grey lines) in treatment vs. control cells. Green and blue genes are listed in Table 2, and green genes represent those experimentally mutated in Sgm and assayed for their colonization phenotype in tsetse’s gut (results shown in Fig 4).

(TIF)

S1 Table. PCR primers used in this study.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Raw transcriptome data from Sodalis glossinidius cultured in BHI containing 100 μM hemin for 24 hours compared to cells cultured in non-supplemented BHI.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Phenotypes associated with selected Sgm heme-induced genes.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Dr. Serap Aksoy (Yale School of Public Health) for use of equipment in her laboratory.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by NIH award AI124105 to LRJ. We also thank Dr. Serap Aksoy (Yale School of Public Health) for providing financial support required to rear the tsetse flies used in this study. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Graca-Souza AV, Maya-Monteiro C, Paiva-Silva GO, Braz GR, Paes MC, Sorgine MH, et al. Adaptations against heme toxicity in blood-feeding arthropods. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;36(4):322–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2006.01.009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lara FA, Lins U, Bechara GH, Oliveira PL. Tracing heme in a living cell: hemoglobin degradation and heme traffic in digest cells of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus. The Journal of experimental biology. 2005;208(Pt 16):3093–101. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01749 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stojiljkovic I, Kumar V, Srinivasan N. Non-iron metalloporphyrins: potent antibacterial compounds that exploit haem/Hb uptake systems of pathogenic bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 1999;31(2):429–42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01175.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schmitt TH, Frezzatti WA Jr., Schreier S. Hemin-induced lipid membrane disorder and increased permeability: a molecular model for the mechanism of cell lysis. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993;307(1):96–103. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1993.1566 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang J, Weiss BL, Aksoy S. Tsetse fly microbiota: form and function. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2013;3:69. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00069 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3810596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pinnock DE, Hess RT. The occurrence of intracellular rickettsia-like organisms in the tsetse flies, Glossina morsitans, G. fuscipes, G. brevipalpis and G. pallidipes. Acta Trop. 1974;31(1):70–9. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shaw MK, Moloo SK. Comparative study on Rickettsia-like organisms in the midgut epithelial cells of different Glossina species. Parasitology. 1991;102:193–9. doi: 10.1017/s003118200006248x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hrusa G, Farmer W, Weiss BL, Applebaum T, Roma JS, Szeto L, et al. TonB-dependent heme iron acquisition in the tsetse fly symbiont Sodalis glossinidius. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(8):2900–9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.04166-14 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4375324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Toh H, Weiss BL, Perkin SA, Yamashita A, Oshima K, Hattori M, et al. Massive genome erosion and functional adaptations provide insights into the symbiotic lifestyle of Sodalis glossinidius in the tsetse host. Genome Res. 2006;16(2):149–56. doi: 10.1101/gr.4106106 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Moloo SK. An artificial feeding technique for Glossina. Parasitology. 1971;63:507–12. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000080021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Davanloo P, Rosenberg AH, Dunn JJ, Studier FW. Cloning and expression of the gene for bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81(7):2035–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.2035 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Runyen-Janecky LJ, Brown AN, Ott B, Tujuba HG, Rio RV. Regulation of high-affinity iron acquisition homologues in the tsetse fly symbiont, Sodalis glossinidius. J Bacteriol. 2010. Epub 2010/05/25. doi: 10.1128/JB.00161-10 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dale C, Young SA, Haydon DT, Welburn SC. The insect endosymbiont Sodalis glossinidius utilizes a type III secretion system for cell invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(4):1883–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.021450998 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Choby JE, Skaar EP. Heme Synthesis and Acquisition in Bacterial Pathogens. J Mol Biol. 2016;428(17):3408–28. Epub 2016/03/29. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.03.018 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5125930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dos Santos PT, Larsen PT, Menendez-Gil P, Lillebaek EMS, Kallipolitis BH. Listeria monocytogenes Relies on the Heme-Regulated Transporter hrtAB to Resist Heme Toxicity and Uses Heme as a Signal to Induce Transcription of lmo1634, Encoding Listeria Adhesion Protein. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:3090. Epub 2019/01/09. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03090 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6305404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Knippel RJ, Zackular JP, Moore JL, Celis AI, Weiss A, Washington MK, et al. Heme sensing and detoxification by HatRT contributes to pathogenesis during Clostridium difficile infection. PLoS pathogens. 2018;14(12):e1007486. Epub 2018/12/24. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007486 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6303022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vebo HC, Snipen L, Nes IF, Brede DA. The transcriptome of the nosocomial pathogen Enterococcus faecalis V583 reveals adaptive responses to growth in blood. PLoS One. 2009;4(11):e7660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007660 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2766626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Anzaldi LL, Skaar EP. Overcoming the heme paradox: heme toxicity and tolerance in bacterial pathogens. Infect Immun. 2010;78(12):4977–89. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00613-10 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2981329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Runyen-Janecky LJ. Role and regulation of heme iron acquisition in gram-negative pathogens. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology. 2013;3:55. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00055 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3792355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Onzuka M, Sekine Y, Uchida T, Ishimori K, Ozaki SI. HmuS from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is a non-canonical heme-degrading enzyme to acquire iron from heme. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2017;1861(7):1870–8. Epub 2017/04/08. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.04.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Attardo GM, Abd-Alla AMM, Acosta-Serrano A, Allen JE, Bateta R, Benoit JB, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of six Glossina genomes, vectors of African trypanosomes. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):187. Epub 2019/09/04. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1768-2 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6721284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.International Glossina Genome I. Genome sequence of the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans): vector of African trypanosomiasis. Science. 2014;344(6182):380–6. Epub 2014/04/26. doi: 10.1126/science.1249656 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4077534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gustavsson N, Diez A, Nystrom T. The universal stress protein paralogues of Escherichia coli are co-ordinately regulated and co-operate in the defence against DNA damage. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43(1):107–17. Epub 2002/02/19. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02720.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nystrom T, Neidhardt FC. Isolation and properties of a mutant of Escherichia coli with an insertional inactivation of the uspA gene, which encodes a universal stress protein. J Bacteriol. 1993;175(13):3949–56. Epub 1993/07/01. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.13.3949-3956.1993 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC204822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kvint K, Nachin L, Diez A, Nystrom T. The bacterial universal stress protein: function and regulation. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003;6(2):140–5. Epub 2003/05/07. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(03)00025-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.O’Connor A, McClean S. The Role of Universal Stress Proteins in Bacterial Infections. Curr Med Chem. 2017;24(36):3970–9. Epub 2017/01/26. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666170124145543 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dorman CJ. Global regulators and environmental adaptation in Gram-negative pathogens. Clinical microbiology and infection: the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2009;15 Suppl 1:47–50. Epub 2009/03/03. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02684.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shen S, Fang FC. Integrated stress responses in Salmonella. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;152(3):75–81. Epub 2011/05/17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.04.017 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3164900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang G, Maier RJ. Bacterial histone-like proteins: roles in stress resistance. Curr Genet. 2015;61(4):489–92. Epub 2015/02/14. doi: 10.1007/s00294-015-0478-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gao JL, Lu Y, Browne G, Yap BC, Trewhella J, Hunter N, et al. The role of heme binding by DNA-protective protein from starved cells (Dps) in the Tolerance of Porphyromonas gingivalis to heme toxicity. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(50):42243–58. Epub 2012/10/23. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.392787 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3516768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Everse J, Hsia N. The toxicities of native and modified hemoglobins. Free Radic Biol Med. 1997;22(6):1075–99. Epub 1997/01/01. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(96)00499-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pontes MH, Babst M, Lochhead R, Oakeson K, Smith K, Dale C. Quorum sensing primes the oxidative stress response in the insect endosymbiont, Sodalis glossinidius. PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3541. Epub 2008/10/30. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003541 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2568817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Oliveira JH, Goncalves RL, Lara FA, Dias FA, Gandara AC, Menna-Barreto RF, et al. Blood meal-derived heme decreases ROS levels in the midgut of Aedes aegypti and allows proliferation of intestinal microbiota. PLoS pathogens. 2011;7(3):e1001320. Epub 2011/03/30. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001320 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3060171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lowe JB. The blood group-specific human glycosyltransferases. Baillieres Clin Haematol. 1993;6(2):465–92. Epub 1993/06/01. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3536(05)80155-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Akhter F, Womack E, Vidal JE, Le Breton Y, McIver KS, Pawar S, et al. Hemoglobin stimulates vigorous growth of Streptococcus pneumoniae and shapes the pathogen’s global transcriptome. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15202. Epub 2020/09/18. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71910-1 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7494912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Conte F, van Buuringen N, Voermans NC, Lefeber DJ. Galactose in human metabolism, glycosylation and congenital metabolic diseases: Time for a closer look. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2021;1865(8):129898. Epub 2021/04/21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2021.129898 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hall RJ, Flanagan LA, Bottery MJ, Springthorpe V, Thorpe S, Darby AC, et al. A Tale of Three Species: Adaptation of Sodalis glossinidius to Tsetse Biology, Wigglesworthia Metabolism, and Host Diet. mBio. 2019;10(1). Epub 2019/01/04. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02106-18 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6315101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Farikou O, Thevenon S, Njiokou F, Allal F, Cuny G, Geiger A. Genetic diversity and population structure of the secondary symbiont of tsetse flies, Sodalis glossinidius, in sleeping sickness foci in Cameroon. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2011;5(8):e1281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001281 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3160304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Griffith BC, Weiss BL, Aksoy E, Mireji PO, Auma JE, Wamwiri FN, et al. Analysis of the gut-specific microbiome from field-captured tsetse flies, and its potential relevance to host trypanosome vector competence. BMC microbiology. 2018;18(Suppl 1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1284-7 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6251097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wamwiri FN, Alam U, Thande PC, Aksoy E, Ngure RM, Aksoy S, et al. Wolbachia, Sodalis and trypanosome co-infections in natural populations of Glossina austeni and Glossina pallidipes. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6(1):232. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-232 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3751944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wamwiri FN, Ndungu K, Thande PC, Thungu DK, Auma JE, Ngure RM. Infection with the secondary tsetse-endosymbiont Sodalis glossinidius (Enterobacteriales: Enterobacteriaceae) influences parasitism in Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Glossinidae). Journal of insect science. 2014;14. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieu134 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hawkey CM, Bennett PM, Gascoyne SC, Hart MG, Kirkwood JK. Erythrocyte size, number and haemoglobin content in vertebrates. Br J Haematol. 1991;77(3):392–7. Epub 1991/03/01. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1991.tb08590.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zimmermann MB, Hurrell RF. Nutritional iron deficiency. Lancet. 2007;370(9586):511–20. Epub 2007/08/19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61235-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Champion CJ, Xu J. The impact of metagenomic interplay on the mosquito redox homeostasis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017;105:79–85. Epub 2016/11/24. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.11.031 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5401789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Aksoy E, Telleria EL, Echodu R, Wu Y, Okedi LM, Weiss BL, et al. Analysis of multiple tsetse fly populations in Uganda reveals limited diversity and species-specific gut microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(14):4301–12. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00079-14 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4068677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dieng MM, Dera KM, Moyaba P, Ouedraogo GMS, Demirbas-Uzel G, Gstottenmayer F, et al. Prevalence of Trypanosoma and Sodalis in wild populations of tsetse flies and their impact on sterile insect technique programmes for tsetse eradication. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):3322. Epub 2022/03/02. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06699-2 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8885713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Maudlin I, Welburn SC, Mehlitz D. The relationship between rickettsia-like-organisms and trypanosome infections in natural populations of tsetse in Liberia. Trop Med Parasitol. 1990;41(3):265–7. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gao H, Cui C, Wang L, Jacobs-Lorena M, Wang S. Mosquito Microbiota and Implications for Disease Control. Trends Parasitol. 2020;36(2):98–111. Epub 2019/12/24. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.001 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Saraiva RG, Dimopoulos G. Bacterial natural products in the fight against mosquito-transmitted tropical diseases. Natural product reports. 2020;37(3):338–54. Epub 2019/09/24. doi: 10.1039/c9np00042a . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Narasimhan S, Fikrig E. Tick microbiome: the force within. Trends Parasitol. 2015;31(7):315–23. Epub 2015/05/06. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2015.03.010 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4492851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Telleria EL, Martins-da-Silva A, Tempone AJ, Traub-Cseko YM. Leishmania, microbiota and sand fly immunity. Parasitology. 2018;145(10):1336–53. Epub 2018/06/21. doi: 10.1017/S0031182018001014 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6137379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010833.r001

Decision Letter 0

Mathieu Picardeau, José M C Ribeiro

24 Oct 2022

Dear Dr. Weiss,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Heme-induced genes facilitate endosymbiont (Sodalis glossinidius) colonization of the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans) midgut" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

José M. C. Ribeiro

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Mathieu Picardeau

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: Methods are well described and appropriate. Error bars are missing from one figure.

Reviewer #2: Yes for all.

Essentially, I would like to see a comparison between the heme concentration chosen with another one below the toxicity threshold (which my “smart guess” says it is what I expect to find in the in vivo situation), to exclude the stress response component. However, this would be out of the scope of this manuscript. Please, take this as a suggestion for further research.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Figure 2 is not legible.

Reviewer #2: About the results I have a couple of specific questions:

Line 279 -figure 3 – as the labile heme pool in the gut of glossina is not known (see comments on discussion), the term high and low heme is instead a hypothesis than a fact. So a change for something more attached to the experimental condition (just time after a blood meal) would be better.

Line 396 – if iron is important, then heme degradation should be modulated as well. Are there symbiont heme oxygenase homologs? Or is this ferritin important for handling non-heme iron? Or iron produced by a heme-degrading insect HO?

Is there a functional heme biosynthesis pathway in this bacteria? In the table, there are several genes related to achromobactin biosynthesis (however, I do not know if the complete route is found in Sgm genome), which is a siderophore, possibly related to iron sequestration, together with the role of the ferritin. This could mean that, in the presence of heme-derived stress, heme uptake is inhibited and iron sequestration is activated to provide a source of iron, or alternatively to simply work as an iron chelator.

Why are there so many type III secretion apparatus proteins upregulated by heme?

This symbiont works as a biotin source for the insect? Heme inducing activation of biotin biosynthesis would be an interesting aspect of the mutualistic interaction between host and bacteria.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: Yes, the main conclusions are all well supported.

Reviewer #2: Although several genes are clearly related to a heme response, and the authors provide evidence that, at least for some selected transcripts, a similar expression profile is also found in the insect midgut, my feeling is that they are dealing with a profile that has a component of a general stress response, as they see a reduction of major ribosomal components (they are abundant among the heme-repressed genes). Does this downregulation of protein synthesis also occur in vivo? Also, several stress response proteins are upregulated.

The experimental design chosen was to use a heme concentration that is deleterious but not lethal. I can understand the rationale for that strategy. However: what are the “free” heme concentrations that are attained in the midgut in vivo? Is there an experimental evaluation of labile heme (an expression to describe the heme pool that is available to change from one binding partner to another)? As these data are probably lacking, at least, can the authors provide a description of the rate of blood protein degradation in Glossina? This might work as an indirect (but acceptable) evidence that labile heme is being generated.

The common pattern from published research is that heme released from hemoglobin is quickly converted into aggregates in the gut of mosquitoes, kissing bugs, and ticks, but, as long as I know, there are not such studies available for Glossina. So, I wonder if heme (labile) concentrations are in fact escalating to 100micromolar.

Also, Sodalis is not the unique bacteria found in the Glossina midgut. The use of the antibiotic selects the mutant strain and allows comparison in a situation where other species are not present. As a simplifying experimental approach, this is ok but is a fact that needs to be recognized in the discussion.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: Runyen-Janecky et al report on an RNAseq analysis of genes regulated by heme exposure in the gut endosymbiont of tsetse. They hypothesized that as part of the process of adaptation to become a commensal in the gut of an obligatory bloodfeeder, the Sodalis bacteria should be able to tolerate extreme heme concentrations. Indeed, their data show this is the case and that many genes are differentially regulated in the bacteria in response to heme. Of these, a subset were mutagenized and shown to reduce colonization of the gut, demonstrating their adaptive nature. Overall, this is a well put together, original study that makes an important contribution to the field of vector biology. I will add that the manuscript is also extremely well written, and should be accessible to the broad audience at PLoS NTD. I only have a few minor concerns and some suggestions for data presentation that I hope the authors will consider.

In Figure 4, the authors show the results of colonization experiments with Sodalis strains deficient in various genes that had responded to heme. There are no error bars on the graph, even though the methods and legend indicate there were replicates. From the legend, N=25 per group, with n=5 for each data point. So should be five data points per time period. The graph itself is also odd. The Y-axis is labelled "log2 CFU/gut (Sgm-mutant/Sgm-WT)”, and this is fine. However, the numerical labels are not log2 values, they are linear values but on a log2 scaled axis. This is a bit confusing, as it would be simpler to just number from 1-4 (and -1 to-4), since those are the log2 values.

While the authors include all of the expression data values in the supplement, there is no corresponding figure in the manuscript that summarizes these data. There are many acceptable ways of showing the data: 1) linear plot of expression heme vs no heme for all genes; 2) volcano plot showing log2 fold change vs corrected p-value; 3) log10 (heme x non-heme expression) vs log2 fold change. Any of these would help to demonstrate the strong assymetric shift in expression that occurs upon treatment in a way that is essentially overlooked without such a summary.

The summary in Fig 2 is not very effect in communicating categories. There are too many similar colors, and the fonts on the figure are too small to read. Recommend changing to a different format.

Reviewer #2: Overall, a very interesting paper, the first to study how a symbiont from the intestinal microbiota of a blood-sucking insect deal with heme. It creates a straightforward experimental approach using an obligate symbiont and combines a transcriptome and mutational strategy.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Pedro L Oliveira

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010833.r003

Decision Letter 1

Mathieu Picardeau, José M C Ribeiro

18 Nov 2022

Dear Dr. Weiss,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Heme-induced genes facilitate endosymbiont (Sodalis glossinidius) colonization of the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans) midgut' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

José M. C. Ribeiro

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Mathieu Picardeau

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010833.r004

Acceptance letter

Mathieu Picardeau, José M C Ribeiro

23 Nov 2022

Dear Dr. Weiss,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Heme-induced genes facilitate endosymbiont (Sodalis glossinidius) colonization of the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans) midgut," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Volcano plot depicting global transcriptomic changes in Sgm cultured in BHI broth supplemented with 100 μM heme vs. normal BHI broth.

    All Sgm genes detected by RNA-seq are plotted on the graph, and each dot represents one gene. Genes represented in red are significantly differentially expressed (p-value of ≤ 0.05 and a fold-change ≥ 2, indicated by dashed, grey lines) in treatment vs. control cells. Green and blue genes are listed in Table 2, and green genes represent those experimentally mutated in Sgm and assayed for their colonization phenotype in tsetse’s gut (results shown in Fig 4).

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. PCR primers used in this study.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Raw transcriptome data from Sodalis glossinidius cultured in BHI containing 100 μM hemin for 24 hours compared to cells cultured in non-supplemented BHI.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Table. Phenotypes associated with selected Sgm heme-induced genes.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Runyen-Janecky et al_Response to Reveiwers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES