Skip to main content
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India logoLink to Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India
. 2021 Oct 6;72(6):542–544. doi: 10.1007/s13224-021-01520-y

Descriptive Study of Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy (OBPP) at a Tertiary Care Hospital

Sarvesh Kossambe 1,, Leela Kamath 1, K K Diwakar 1
PMCID: PMC9732160  PMID: 36506894

Abstract

Objective

To study the incidence and risk factors for obstetric brachial plexus palsy and assess the functional outcome.

Material and Methods

Five-year data of infants with OBPP were reviewed. Case–control study was performed using matched controls to identify the risk factors. Infants with OBPP were followed up to assess functional outcome.

Results

Of the 14,184 live births over a period of 5 years from 2013 to 2017, 23 (11 males, 12 females) had OBPP. Incidence of OBPP was 1.6 per 1000 live births. Higher birth weight (p-value 0.002) and instrumental delivery (p-value 0.02) were independent risk factors for obstetric brachial plexus palsy by multivariate logistic regression analysis. No cases of obstetric brachial plexus palsy were seen in babies born by cesarean section. 95% of the infants with obstetric brachial plexus palsy had complete recovery by 4 months of age.

Conclusion

Higher birth weight and instrumental vaginal delivery are independent risk factors for obstetric brachial plexus palsy. Cesarean section may have a protective effect against OBPP. Most infants with obstetric brachial plexus palsy have complete recovery.

Keywords: Obstetric brachial plexus palsy, Instrumental delivery, Birth weight, Residual deficit

Introduction

Obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) is a common birth injury, with a reported incidence of 0.38–5.1 per 1000 live births in various countries [1]. Although several known risk factors exist like shoulder dystocia and instrumental deliveries, more than 50% of infants with OBPP have no known risk factors [2].

Eighty to ninety-five percent of infants with obstetric brachial plexus palsy will recover spontaneously within the first 2 months of life [2]. The children who do not spontaneously recover by 2 months of age will likely have permanent loss.

Aims and Objective

To study the incidence and risk factors for obstetric brachial plexus palsy and assess the functional outcome.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was performed in the Department of Neonatology at MOSC Medical College Hospital, Kolenchery, Kerala, India. All the case files of infants with obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) in the 5-year period from January 2013 to December 2017 were reviewed. Demographic details, maternal and birth history, postnatal course and subsequent follow-up data of neurological findings (recovery/residual impairment) were obtained.

Case–control study was done to identify the risk factors for OBPP. Risk factors were analyzed using matched controls. Controls were selected as 2 infants of gestation ≥ 37 weeks born prior to each index case.

Statistical analysis: Statistical analysis was performed by using univariate and multivariate logistic regression model using R software EZR 1.35 version.

Results

Of the 14,184 live births in the 5-year period from 2013 to 2017, 23 (11 males and 12 females) had OBPP. Incidence of OBPP was 1.6 per 1000 live births.

Of the 23 cases of infants with OBPP, 14 infants weighed > 3.5 kg at birth, whereas in the control group, 6 out of 46 infants weighed more than 3.5 kg at birth. Nine out of twenty-three infants with OBPP were born by instrumental vaginal delivery and 14 were born by vaginal delivery without instrumentation. In the control group of 46 infants, only 1 was born by instrumental vaginal delivery, 22 by normal vaginal delivery and 23 by cesarean section. Higher birth weight (p-value 0.002) and instrumental delivery (p-value 0.02) were independent risk factors for obstetric brachial plexus palsy by multivariate logistic regression analysis. No cases of obstetric brachial plexus palsy were seen in babies born by cesarean section. (Table 1) Two infants were lost to follow-up. Twenty-one infants were followed up till 1 year of age. Twenty infants had complete recovery by 4 months age. Only 1 infant had residual deficit at the age of 1 year. (Table 2).

Table 1.

Risk factors for Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy

Variable Controls (n = 46) Cases (n = 23) Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
Odds ratio P—Value Odds ratio P – Value
Maternal age (years)  < 35 40 21 0.63 0.59
 ≥ 35 6 2
Parity Multipara 20 6 2.17 0.16
Primigravida 26 17
Mode of delivery Forceps assisted vaginal delivery 1 9 1 0.05* 1 0.08
Spontaneous vaginal delivery 22 14 0.07 0.01* 0.06 0.02*
LSCS 23 0 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.99
Birth weight  < 3.5 kg 40 9 10.37  < 0.001* 12.98 0.002*
 ≥ 3.5 kg 6 14
Gestational age  < 40 weeks 41 15 4.37 0.02* 2.76 0.29
 ≥ 40 weeks 5 8
Sex Male 24 12 1.00 1.00
Female 22 11
Maternal diabetes No 41 21 0.78 0.77
Yes 5 2
Shoulder dystocia No 46 10 7.43 e10 0.99
Yes 0 13

Table 2.

Follow-up of infants with Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy

Total live births in 5 years Total cases of OBPP Lost to follow up Complete recovery before 4 months age Complete recovery before 1 year age Residual deficit Incidence of OBPP per 1000 live births Persisting OBPP after 1 year age / 1000 live births
14,184 23 2 19 (95%) 1 1 1.6 0.07

Discussion

Incidence of OBPP has been reported to be 0.38–5.1 per 1,000 live births in various countries. [1] In western Sweden, the incidence was reported to be 2.9 per 1000 live births. [4] In a large 15-year study done in USA, incidence of brachial plexus palsy was seen to be steadily decreasing from 1.7/1000 live births in 1997 to 0.9/1000 live births in 2012. [2] In our study, incidence of OBPP was 1.6 per 1000 live births.

Shoulder dystocia was the most important risk factor for obstetric brachial palsy, while other risk factors were instrumental delivery, large baby, and maternal diabetes. [2, 3] Despite the fact that a number of risk factors have been associated with OBPP, the neonates who will demonstrate OBPP cannot be predicted. [3] Cesarean delivery was protective against OBPP and probably contributed to decreased incidence over last 15 years. [2] In our study, we found that shoulder dystocia, higher birth weight, post-dated gestation and instrumental vaginal deliveries had significant association with OBPP; however, higher birth weight and forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries were independent predictors of OBPP.

In the Swedish study, the prevalence of persisting OBPP at 18 months was 0.46 per 1000. [4] Most children with an OBPP recover completely, but one in five has symptoms of the injury at 10–12 years of age. It has been suggested that active elbow flexion, shoulder external rotation and forearm supination at three months can be used to predict outcome. [4, 5] In our study, it was found that 95% infants with OBPP had complete recovery. Incidence of persisting OBBB at 1 year of age was 0.07 per 1000 live births. With the almost vigilantic approach prevailing in the health supervisors of our country to prevent cesarean sections, it is likely that the number of cases of obstetric brachial plexus palsy could increase.

Conclusion

Larger infants born by vaginal delivery especially with assisted instrumentation may be at a higher risk for obstetric brachial plexus palsy, and this may be prevented by considering cesarean section. Most infants with obstetric brachial plexus palsy have complete recovery, but for those with permanent residual deficit quality of life is affected.

Limitation Multicenter studies involving larger number of cases of obstetric brachial plexus palsy are required to make definitive conclusions and recommendations.

Dr. Sarvesh Kossambe

is MBBS and MD Pediatrics from Goa University and DM Neonatology from MOSC Medical College of Kerala University of Health Sciences. Study was conducted at MOSC Medical College NICU during DM Neonatology training period.graphic file with name 13224_2021_1520_Figa_HTML.jpg

Author Contributions

KD conceived the idea of research paper. KD and LK helped with the study design. SK was involved in data collection and performed data analysis. KD and LK critically reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

None.

Declaration

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Human Animals Rights

None. (Data were retrospectively reviewed).

Footnotes

Sarvesh Kossambe is an M.D. (Paediatrics) D.M. (Neonatology), Department of Neonatology, MOSC Medical College Hospital, Kolenchery, Kochi, 682,311, Kerala, India; Leela Kamath is an MD, FRCP (Ped), FRCP Neonatal-Perinatal (Canada), Department of Neonatology, MOSC Medical College Hospital, Kolenchery, Kochi, 682,311, Kerala, India; K. K. Diwakar is an DCH, MD, DNB, FRCPCH (UK), Department of Neonatology, MOSC Medical College Hospital, Kolenchery, Kochi, 682,311, Kerala, India

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Hoeksma AF. Neurological recovery in obstetric brachial plexus injuries : an historical cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46(2):76–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2004.tb00455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abzug JM, Mehlman CT, Ying J. Assessment of current epidemiology and risk factors surrounding brachial plexus birth palsy. J Hand Surg Am. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Andersen J, Watt J, Olson J, et al. Perinatal brachial plexus palsy. Paediatr Child Health (Oxford) 2006;11(2):93–100. doi: 10.1093/pch/11.2.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Annika J, Paul U, Anna-Lena L. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy – A prospective, population-based study of incidence, recovery and long-term residual impairment at 10 to 12 years of age. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lagerkvist AL, Johansson U, Johansson A, et al. Obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a prospective, population-based study of incidence, recovery, and residual impairment at 18 months of age. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(6):529–534. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03479.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES