Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2022 Nov 22;22(12):7426–7433. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.2c01005

Synthesis, Structure, and Characterization of 4,4′-(Anthracene-9,10-diylbis(ethyne-2,1-diyl))bis(1-methyl-1-pyridinium) Bismuth Iodide (C30H22N2)3Bi4I18, an Air, Water, and Thermally Stable 0D Hybrid Perovskite with High Photoluminescence Efficiency

Lorenza Romagnoli , Andrea D’Annibale , Elena Blundo ‡,*, Antonio Polimeni , Alberto Cassetta §,*, Giuseppe Chita §, Riccardo Panetta , Andrea Ciccioli , Alessandro Latini †,*
PMCID: PMC9732820  PMID: 36510624

Abstract

graphic file with name cg2c01005_0011.jpg

4,4′-(Anthracene-9,10-diylbis(ethyne-2,1-diyl))bis(1-methyl-1-pyridinium) bismuth iodide (C30H22N2)3Bi4I18 (AEPyBiI) was obtained as a black powder by a very simple route by mixing an acetone solution of BiI3 and an aqueous solution of C30H22N2I2. This novel perovskite is air and water stable and displays a remarkable thermal stability up to nearly 300 °C. The highly conjugated cation C30H22N22+ is hydrolytically stable, being nitrogen atoms quaternarized, and this accounts for the insensitivity of the perovskite toward water and atmospheric oxygen under ambient conditions. The cation in aqueous solution is highly fluorescent under UV irradiation (emitting yellow-orange light). AEPyBiI as well is intensely luminescent, its photoluminescence emission being more than 1 order of magnitude greater than that of high-quality InP epilayers. The crystal structure of AEPyBiI was determined using synchrotron radiation single-crystal X-ray diffraction. AEPyBiI was extensively characterized using a wide range of techniques, such as X-ray powder diffraction, diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopies, thermogravimetry-differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA), elemental analysis, electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy (ESI-MS), and photoluminescence spectroscopy. AEPyBiI displays a zero-dimensional (0D) perovskite structure in which the inorganic part is constituted by binuclear units consisting of two face-sharing BiI6 octahedra (Bi2I93– units). The C30H22N22+ cations are stacked along the a-axis direction in a complex motif. Considering its noteworthy light-emitting properties coupled with an easy synthesis and environmental stability, and its composition that does not contain toxic lead or easily oxidable Sn(II), AEPyBiI is a promising candidate for environmentally friendly light-emitting devices.

Short abstract

A highly photoluminescent, water-stable bismuth iodide perovskite with a highly conjugated quaternary ammonium cation was synthesized. Its crystal structure was resolved and fully characterized. The perovskite displays a photoluminescence intensity comparable to that of methylammonium lead iodide in the same experimental conditions, without the toxicity problems associated to the use of lead and the water sensitivity problems of the commonly used methylammonium- and formamidinium-based perovskites.

Introduction

Hybrid metal halide perovskites (HMHPs) are intensely studied materials because of their peculiar photophysical properties and ease of synthesis, which sets them a class apart compared to conventional semiconductors. The largest amount of research is devoted to 3D perovskites, containing small cations, especially methylammonium, formamidinium and cesium, which display remarkable photovoltaic conversion efficiencies in laboratory-scale devices.1

Photovoltaics is undoubtedly the technologically and socially most relevant among the research fields involving HMHPs,2,3 but there is a growing interest in other applications, which make use of the electronic and photophysical properties of these materials,4 especially for light-emitting devices and photodetectors.58

HMHPs possess a wide range of desirable properties as semiconductors, i.e., easily variable band gap, easy synthesis, solution processability, no need for the same strict purity requirements of conventional semiconductors, no need for high-temperature processes, and no need for highly sophisticated and very expensive fabrication equipments.9

In spite of all their useful properties, it is quite surprising that until now no commercial devices of any type that use HMHPs are available. This is mostly due to their lack of stability toward environmental agents (H2O and O2) and their limited thermal stability.

This lack of chemical and thermal stability is due to the Brønsted acidity of the organoammonium cations typically used.1013 An effective method demonstrated to suppress the sensitivity to water and improve the thermal stability is the use of quaternary ammonium cations,14 which lack hydrolysable acidic protons.

In addition to the above problems, there are also specific problems for both Pb and Sn, the most intensely used metals in HMHPs. In the case of lead, its toxicity poses safety and environmental concerns, while in the case of tin, an additional stability problem arises due to the strong tendency of tin(II) to be oxidized to tin(IV) by atmospheric oxygen,15 thus complicating device manufacturing because of the need of operating in oxygen-free environments.

To eliminate lead from the composition of HMHPs, in addition to tin, other elements have been investigated, especially Ge2+, Sb3+, Bi3+, and Cu2+.16 Bi3+ is perhaps the most intensely studied for its lack of toxicity,17 but the performances of HMHPs containing Bi in photovoltaic devices are quite modest due to the larger band gap of Bi-HMHPs compared to their Pb counterparts.17

Although not particularly suitable for photovoltaics, the Bi-HMHPs reported in the literature show interesting photophysical properties, and very efficient light-emitting materials have been successfully prepared and characterized.18,19 Although to a lesser degree, Bi-HMHPs suffer from the same instability issues as their Pb counterparts.20

As previously written, quaternary ammonium cations have been demonstrated as a valid strategy to improve the Pb-HMHPs stability, both from thermal and chemical viewpoints. In addition to the stability improvement, quaternary ammonium cations possessing an electronic structure with extended conjugation display novel and potentially useful photophysical properties due to the interaction of the electronic structure of the organic cation with that of the inorganic sublattice.21 These interactions, which do not occur in HMHPs with “silent” cations such as methylammonium and formamidinium, open a vast range of possibilities with new, application-tailored properties. In our previous papers,22,23 we demonstrated the validity of this approach in the case of phenylviologen lead iodide, whose optoelectronic properties stem from the electronic interaction between the organic cations and the inorganic sublattice. The validity of the approach was demonstrated also by other groups.2426 The material displays excellent thermal and chemical stability as well as intense photoluminescence that may potentially be used for light-emitting devices. These devices, differently from those using conventional semiconductors, may be fabricated using solution-based processes that are considerably less expensive than those used for all-solid-state devices. Considering the promising results obtained in lead-based compounds, we decided to try to develop more environmentally benign alternatives based on nontoxic bismuth, as done previously in the literature for silent cations.17,20 In addition to that, we wanted to test cations with a more extended conjugation compared to viologens, but without the need of very complex and expensive synthetic protocols. In this respect, the versatility of 4-bromopyridine in building highly conjugated cations through relatively simple Sonogashira coupling27 offers the possibility to obtain a wide variety of organic salts to be reacted with bismuth iodide to obtain the corresponding perovskite. We tried this approach using as a spacer between the para-ethynylpyridinium moieties, one of the simplest polycyclic aromatic groups, the 9,10-antharcenyl, and the methyl group to quaternarize the pyridinic nitrogen atoms. We obtained an intensely fluorescent quaternary ammonium cation, namely, 4,4′-(anthracene-9,10-diylbis(ethyne-2,1-diyl))bis(1-methyl-1-pyridinium) (AEPy2+, structure in Figure 1 and fluorescence in Figures S1 and S2 of the Supporting Information), which can be easily combined with BiI3 to yield a new Bi-HMHP, which is here presented together with its complete structural and physicochemical characterization. The material is air and water insensitive and thermally very stable, as expected for a quaternary ammonium perovskite and shows an intense photoluminescence in the visible range.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structure of the AEPy2+ cation.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis

AEPyBiI was prepared by mixing solutions of BiI3 and AEPyI2

graphic file with name cg2c01005_m001.jpg

A typical synthesis is described as follows. In a glass vial, 50 mg (0.0753 mmol) of AEPyI2 is dissolved in 4 mL of distilled H2O; in another vial, 59 mg (0.100 mmol) of BiI3 is dissolved in 12 mL of acetone. The first solution, containing the organic salt, is then slowly added, dropwise, to the second; instantaneously, a dark-brown solid starts to precipitate. After the addition is complete, the mixture is vigorously shaken and left undisturbed for 24 h. After that, the dark solid is filtered under suction and washed with several portions of a 3:1 acetone/water mixture. It is then dried for 2 h under suction to yield 89 mg of crude product. The precipitate is subsequently dissolved in 45 mL of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). The dark red solution is filtered over a 0.45 μm PTFE syringe filter and exposed to CH2Cl2 vapors for 72 h in a closed container at room temperature. After vacuum filtration, the product is washed with multiple portions of CH2Cl2 and allowed to dry for 1 h under suction to yield 51 mg of pure AEPy3Bi4I18 as black crystals (47%) (Figure 2A,B). Single crystals suitable for structure determination by X-ray diffraction were grown by exposing saturated solutions of AEPy3Bi4I18 in DMF in silanized glass vials to CH2Cl2 vapors, in a closed vessel, for 72 h at 22 °C (Figure 2). The crystals in Figure 3, observed with polarized light and crossed polarizers, appear of homogeneous color or homogeneously dark as expected for anisotropic (i.e., noncubic) single crystals.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) AEPyBiI powder. (B) optical microscopic image of the AEPyBiI powder taken with 4× magnification in reflected light.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Optical microscopic image of AEPyBiI single crystals taken with 10× magnification with polarized transmitted light and crossed polarizers.

Structure, Composition, and Stability

AEPyBiI forms dark elongated platelet-shaped crystals with monoclinic structure and the space group P21/n.

The details of the crystal structure, determined by X-ray diffraction, are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Crystal Structure Data of AEPyBiI.

crystal data
chemical formula Bi2 I9, C30 H21 N2, C15 H11 N, C3 H7 N O
Mr 2247.89
crystal system, space group monoclinic, P21/n
temperature (K) 298
abc (Å) 10.958 (2), 33.008 (7), 17.070 (3)
α, β, γ (°) 90, 106.42 (3), 90
V (Å3) 5922 (2)
Z 4
radiation type synchrotron, λ = 0.70000 Å
μ (mm–1) 10.26
crystal size (mm) 0.07 × 0.05 × 0.05
data collection
diffractometer synchrotron
absorption correction empirical (using intensity measurements)
SADABS
no. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2.0σ(I)] reflections 69652, 10842, 10412
Rint 0.043
θmin = 1.2° θmax = 24.9°
refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.042, 0.112, 1.12
no. of reflections 10842
no. of parameters 551
H-atom treatment hydrogen site location: inferred from neighboring sites
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å–3) 1.98, −1.41

A projection of the unit cell is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Unit cell of AEPyBiI seen along the a crystallographic axis. Black: carbon; blue: nitrogen; white: hydrogen; purple: iodine. Bismuth atoms are the spherical shadows inside the face-sharing octahedra.

The structure of AEPyBiI is typical of zero-dimensional (0D) perovskites such as methylammonium bismuth iodide (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 and cesium bismuth iodide Cs3Bi2I9 containing isolated Bi2I9 polyhedra consisting in two BiI63– octahedra sharing one face.28,29 The asymmetric unit of the AEPyBiI crystallographic structure includes a Bi2I93– anion, a disordered DMF molecule, and one full plus half of AEPy2+ cations, with the second half of the incomplete AEPy2+ being generated by a center of symmetry lying on the geometric center of the anthracene moiety. A complete representation with the labeling scheme adopted is depicted in Figure S3. The two cations in the asymmetric units are rotated by 90° with respect to each other as represented in Figure S4. AEPy2+ cations give rise to a complex interaction network in the crystal. Indeed, AEPy2+ cations are stacked together along the a-direction according to an ABA repeating motif, where A indicates the AEPy2+ cation fully contained in the asymmetric unit and B indicates the AEPy2+ half cation observed in the asymmetric unit (see Figure S4). The ABA units extend along the a-direction according to the (ABA)(ABA)··· repeating scheme (Figure S5). A and B molecules are stacked in an almost parallel fashion due to the presence of π···π interaction between the aromatic systems. Indeed, the mean planes passing through the anthracene moieties of cations A and B form an angle of 3.3° with a distance of 3.50 Å between the planes. A further and distinct network of AEPy2+ cations is established between an AB unit interacting through C–H···π bonds with a further AEPy2+ cation and extending along the a-direction (Figure S6). While the AEPy2+ cations inside the AB unit interact through π···π bonds as previously described, the C–H···π bonds involve the methyl group bound to the pyridinium nitrogen, which interacts with the pyridinium (Py) aromatic system of neighboring AEPy2+ cation. The distance between the centroid of the pyridinium ring and C59 is 4.11 Å, while the C–H···Py distance is 3.66 Å.

Similarly to the case of (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9, the face-sharing BiI63– octahedra in the Bi2I93– units (Figure 5) are highly distorted with uneven interatomic distances and bond angles, thus suggesting a stereochemically active 6s lone pair, similar to the case of Pb-based HMHPs.30 This distortion agrees with those observed in other 0D bismuth iodide perovskites,19,20 i.e., the Bi–I distances in Bi1–I3, Bi1–I4, Bi1–I5, Bi2–I9, Bi2–I10, and Bi2–I11 are sensibly shorter than the distances Bi1–I6, Bi1–I7, Bi1–I8, Bi2–I6, Bi2–I7, and Bi2–I8 (Table S1 of the Supporting Information). Also, the bond angles show the same behavior seen for other perovskites, with the I–Bi–I angles formed with I atoms shared by the two octahedra having values below 90° versus values over 90° for I–Bi–I angles formed with no-shared I atoms (Table S2 of the Supporting Information).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Bi2I93– polyhedron. The two face-sharing BiI63– octahedra units are highly distorted due to stereochemically active 6s lone pair.

The Bi2I93– anions interact with the cations via the following hydrogen bonds: I3-H36C (3.07 Å), I7-H36A (2.99 Å), I3-H57 (3.08 Å), I10-H31 (3.10 Å), and I5-H23 (3.15 Å). As in the case of phenylviologen lead iodide, these interactions suggest the donor–acceptor semiconductor behavior of AEPyBiI with charge transfer processes from Bi2I93– anions to the cations.22

The bond lengths in the cation are consistent with those expected. In particular, the C–C distances in the acetylenic linkers (1.19 Å) between the pyridinic rings and the anthracene unit are consistent with the expected value for a triple bond (1.189 Å).31

The powder diffraction pattern of AEPyBiI is shown in Figure 6 together with the pattern calculated from the solved crystal structure. The five most intense reflections are indexed. The agreement is excellent. The agreement between the powder diffraction pattern and the structure obtained by the single-crystal data is further confirmed by the Le Bail fit (Figure S7 of the Supporting Information, Rp = 0.338, Rwp = 0.696, RBragg = 3.383).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Experimental versus calculated powder diffraction pattern of AEPyBiI.

The composition of AEPyBiI was investigated using CHNS analysis and ESI mass spectrometry. The CHNS analysis of AEPyBiI gave the following results: C 24.94%, H 1.65%, and N 2.40%. The calculated values are C 24.84%, H 1.53%, and N 1.93% for (C30H22N2)3Bi4I18. The slight discrepancy between experimental and calculated values has to be attributed to the entrapment of DMF molecules in the crystal structure during crystal growth. In fact, during the structure solution procedure, disordered DMF molecules were found. The composition of AEPyBiI has been also verified by ESI-MS spectra (Figure S8 in the Supporting Information), where the dominant peaks in the positive-ion spectrum are due to the intact divalent cation (m/z = 205) and the cation loses a methyl group and is consequently monovalent (m/z = 395).

The thermal stability of AEPyBiI was evaluated by TG-DTA (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

TG-DTA of AEPyBiI.

The material does not show thermal events up to approximately 300 °C and then starts losing weight. Then, two very broad endothermic events appear in the DTA profile, the first one starting around 300 °C and the second around 400 °C, both marked by a change in the slope of the TG curve, thus representing different stages of the material decomposition process. The fist endothermic peak can be attributed to structural solvent loss and degradation of the organic cation, while the second one, associated with a higher mass loss rate and constant slope, is assigned to the evaporation of BiI3, which possesses a very high vapor pressure above 300 °C (1 atm at 316 °C).32 No DTA peaks attributable to phase transitions are present in the DTA curve. AEPyBiI consequently possesses a remarkable thermal stability, and its crystal structure remains constant up to the decomposition temperature.

To test the stability of AEPyBiI toward water at room temperature, a powder sample was immersed in distilled water for 1 h, filtered, and dried. An X-ray powder diffraction scan was performed on the water-treated sample. The background-subtracted pattern (Figure S9 in the Supporting Information) does not show significant differences with the as-prepared sample (minor differences in relative intensities are due to preferred orientation effects that are unavoidable in a static Bragg–Brentano geometry like the one used here), thus demonstrating its water stability at room temperature.

All these factors are positive in the perspective of the use of AEPyBiI in real devices.

Spectroscopic Characterization

AEPyBiI was also characterized by Raman and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopies, as shown in Figure 8. The two techniques provide consistent results, showing an overall good agreement between the various spectral features observed.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Raman (A) and FTIR (B) spectra of AEPyBiI in the range from 350 to 2350 cm–1.

The bands are due only to the organic cation, considering the fact that Bi and I are heavy atoms and consequently the vibrations due to the inorganic sublattice cannot be seen in the instrument’s spectral range (400–4000 cm–1). The peak at 2165 cm–1 can be assigned to the carbon–carbon stretching of the two triple bonds present in the molecule, while the intense FTIR features in the range 900–650 cm–1 are typical of aromatic structures, as in our case (the same features are observed also in the Raman spectrum, yet less pronounced). The intense peaks around 1600 cm–1 can be assigned to the carbon–carbon stretching in aromatic rings. The 400–650 cm–1 region show peaks that can be attributed to the out-of-plane C–H bending vibrations.33 Both Raman and FTIR measurements were taken also in the range from 2350 to 4000 cm–1, but no peaks were observed.

The optical properties of AEPyBiI were probed by diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectroscopy and by photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. The pseudoabsorbance spectrum, as determined by UV–vis measurements, is shown in Figure 9A. The corresponding Tauc’s plot,34 evaluated by assuming a direct optical transition, can be seen in panel B. From the Tauc’s plot, we estimate an optical band gap energy Eg of 1.64 eV.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

(A) UV–vis spectrum of AEPyBiI. (B) Tauc’s plot (assuming a direct optical transition) for the determination of the band gap value Eg. (C) photoluminescence (PL) spectrum of AEPyBiI as compared to the PL spectrum of a high-quality InP epilayer and of MAPI. The excitation power was P = 2 μW. The inset shows the integrated intensity of the PL signal of AEPyBiI as a function of the excitation laser power. The data were fitted up to the dashed line (2 μW), leading to a linear behavior with exponent α shown in the plot.

To probe the optical efficiency of AEPyBiI and its potentiality for optoelectronic applications, we performed PL measurements at room temperature. The sample was excited by a 532 nm laser via a 100× objective; the signal was collected through the same objective, spectrally dispersed through a 150 grooves/nm monochromator, and detected with a Si-CCD. The spectrum of the perovskite can be seen in Figure 9C. The PL band is centered at about 1.83 eV, and thus about 200 meV above the gap estimated by the Tauc’s plot. For the evaluation of the efficiency of the emission of AEPyBiI, the figure also shows the spectrum of a high-quality 3-micron-thick (100) InP epilayer grown by metal–organic chemical vapor deposition at a temperature of 650 °C, a highly emissive material whose emission properties are well established, taken exactly under the same experimental conditions of the perovskite. AEPyBiI is indeed much more intense, its integrated intensity being larger than that of the InP signal by a factor of ∼35. We also compared the PL signal of AEPyBiI to that of methylammonium lead iodide CH3NH3PbI3 (MAPI), whose spectrum is shown in the figure, and found that the two are characterized by a comparable PL efficiency (the integrated intensity of MAPI being a factor of 1.1 larger than that of AEPyBiI). AEPyBiI features a very homogeneous PL signal (see Supporting Information, Figure S10). To test its robustness upon photoexcitation, we performed PL measurements by varying the excitation power from 40 nW to 20 μW. In this range, the lineshape of the PL signal does not show significant variation (see Supporting Information, Figure S11). The integrated area of the PL signal increases linearly up to about 2 μW, as can be seen in the inset of Figure 9C, where the data were fitted through the equation I = A·Pα, where I is the integrated intensity, P is the laser power, A is a scaling constant, and α is the exponent, which was found to be equal to 1.01 ± 0.02 by the fit, suggesting a modest density of nonradiative recombination channels. For P > 5 μW, the intensity deviates from the linear behavior, suggesting that a degradation of the sample is starting to occur.

Conclusions

A novel 0D hybrid bismuth iodide perovskite with a highly conjugated quaternary ammonium cation has been synthesized by a very simple procedure mixing solutions of bismuth and organic cation iodides in acetone and water, respectively, at room temperature. The so-obtained perovskite was characterized structurally, chemically, and optically. It shows remarkable chemical and thermal stability, being insensitive to water and decomposing around 300 °C. The material is highly photoluminescent, emitting in the red region of the visible spectrum with an integrated emission intensity in excess of a factor of 30 larger than InP and comparable to MAPI in the same excitation conditions. The emissive properties of the material, coupled with the easy synthesis and the lack of toxicity of bismuth, make it interesting for optoelectronic applications such as light-emitting devices.

Experimental section

The synthesis of 4,4′-(anthracene-9,10-diylbis(ethyne-2,1-diyl))bis(1-methyl-1-pyridinium) iodide is described in the Supporting Information. MAPI was prepared according to the literature procedure.10

Single-Crystal Structure Analysis

X-ray diffraction measurements were performed at the XRD1 beamline of the Elettra synchrotron radiation facility (Trieste, Italy)35,36 at room temperature (293 K). X-ray wavelength was set to 0.7 Å, while a Pilatus 2M (Dectris) detector was used for the diffraction experiments. Unit cell assignment, integration, and data reduction were performed with the XDS program;37 empirical absorption correction was applied using SADABS software.38 The structure was solved using SHELXT,39 while Fourier analysis and refinement were performed by the full-matrix least-squares methods based on F2 implemented in SHELXL40 through the OLEX2 software.41 Anisotropic thermal motion refinement have been used for all atoms with full occupancy with hydrogen atoms included at calculated positions with isotropic U factors = 1.2·Ueq (Ueq being the equivalent isotropic thermal factor of the bonded nonhydrogen atom). According to a difference Fourier map, a disordered DMF molecule was located and modeled. The disordered DMF molecule was then refined with full occupancy but keeping both geometry and isotropic thermal parameters restrained.

Powder X-ray Diffraction

Powder diffraction analysis was performed with a Malvern Panalytical X’Pert Pro MPD diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å). The diffractometer is equipped with a ultrafast X’Celerator RTMS detector. The used angular resolution in 2θ is 0.001°. The scans were collected in the 4.5–90° 2θ angular range. A beam knife was used in the 4.5–6.5° range to reduce the background. The Le Bail fit of the powder diffraction pattern was performed using the EXPO 2014 software.42

ESI-MS

The ESI-MS analysis (positive ions) was performed with a Thermo Scientific, TSQ QUANTUM ACCESS spectrometer equipped with a triple quadrupole analyzer. The compound was dissolved in methanol, in which it was slightly soluble.

CHNS Analysis

The C, H, N, and S contents of the material were determined with an EA 1110 CHNS-O elemental analyzer.

Thermogravimetry-Differential Thermal Analysis (TG-DTA)

TG-DTA was performed using a Netzsch STA 409 PC Luxx simultaneous thermal analyzer. The analysis was performed under flowing Ar atmosphere (85 cm3/min @ STP, purity ≥99.9995%) in an alumina crucible. A thermal scan rate of 10 K/min in the 30–500 °C temperature range was used.

UV–vis Spectroscopy

The diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectrum was acquired with a Shimadzu (Japan) UV2600 UV–vis spectrophotometer. The spectrophotometer is equipped with an ISR-2600 Plus integrating sphere (BaSO4 reference).

FTIR Spectroscopy

FTIR spectrum was acquired with a Bruker Alpha spectrophotometer in the 400–4000 cm–1 wavenumber range (resolution 4 cm–1). Data were acquired in ATR mode using the ATR Platinum Diamond 1 accessory.

Raman Spectroscopy

For Raman measurements, the excitation laser was provided by a single-frequency Nd:YVO4 laser (DPSS series by Lasos) emitting at 532 nm. The Raman signal was spectrally dispersed by a ACTON SP750 monochromator with a focal length of 750 mm and equipped with a 300 grooves/mm grating. The signal was detected by a back-illuminated N2-cooled Si-CCD camera (100BRX by Princeton Instruments). The laser light was filtered out by a very sharp long-pass Razor edge filter (Semrock). The spectral resolution was 2.8 cm–1. A 100× objective with NA = 0.9 was employed to excite and collect the light in a backscattering configuration.

PL Spectroscopy

PL measurements were taken in the same experimental configuration used for Raman measurements. In this case, the signal was spectrally dispersed by a Princeton Isoplane160 monochromator with a focal length of 200 mm and equipped with a 150 grooves/mm grating. To have reliable information of the PL lineshape and intensity, the system response was duly taken into account. The system response was measured using a blackbody source and comparing the measured spectrum with the blackbody nominal one.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Sapienza Università di Roma for financial support (grant no. RM11916B8879F09D) and the Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A for making available beamtime at the XRD1 beamline.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.cgd.2c01005.

  • Fluorescence spectrum of of AEPy2+ in water (Figure S1); Photo of a fluorescent water solution of AEPy2+ (Figure S2); AEPyBiI stick-and-ball representation together with the labelling scheme (Figure S3); AEPyBiI including the symmetry generated half AEPy2+ colored in orange (Figure S4); stick-and-ball representation of the (ABA)(ABA) network (Figure S5); stick-and-ball representation of the (AB)··· AEPy2+ interaction network (Figure S6); Le Bail fit of the experimental powder diffraction pattern (Figure S7); positive ions ESI mass spectrum (Figure S8); Background-subtracted XRD powder patterns (Figure S9); PL spectra of AEPyBiI acquired on 7 different points of the powder (Figure S10); normalized PL spectra (Figure S11); Bismuth-iodine interatomic distances (Table S1); I-Bi-I angles (Table S2) (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

cg2c01005_si_001.pdf (844.3KB, pdf)

References

  1. Green M. A.; Dunlop E. D.; Hohl-Ebinger J.; Yoshita M.; Kopidakis N.; Hao X. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 59). Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl. 2022, 30, 3–12. 10.1002/pip.3506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Suresh Kumar N.; Chandra Babu Naidu K. A review on perovskite solar cells (PSCs), materials and applications. J. Mater. 2021, 7, 940–956. 10.1016/j.jmat.2021.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Huang J.; Yuan Y.; Shao Y.; Yan Y. Understanding the physical properties of hybrid perovskites for photovoltaic applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17042. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.42. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Younis A.; Lin C.; Guan X.; Shahrokhi S.; Huang C.; Wang Y.; He T.; Singh S.; Hu L.; Duran Retamal J. R.; He J.; Wu T. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2005000 10.1002/adma.202005000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang Y.; Liu Y.; Cao S.; Wang J. A review on solution-processed perovskite/organic hybrid photodetectors. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 5302–5322. 10.1039/D1TC00643F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Veldhuis S. A.; Boix P. P.; Yantara N.; Li M.; Chien Sum V.; Mathews N.; Mhaisalkar S. G. Perovskite Materials for Light-Emitting Diodes and Lasers. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 6804–6834. 10.1002/adma.201600669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stylianakis M. M.; Maksudov T.; Panagiotopoulos A.; Kakavelakis G.; Petridis K. Inorganic and Hybrid Perovskite Based Laser Devices: A Review. Materials 2019, 12, 859. 10.3390/ma12060859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhou C.; Lin H.; Lee S.; Chaaban M.; Ma B. Organic–inorganic metal halide hybrids beyond perovskites. Mater. Res. Lett. 2018, 6, 552–569. 10.1080/21663831.2018.1500951. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schmidt-Mende L.; Dyakonov V.; Olthof S.; Ünlü F.; Moritz Trong Lê K.; Mathur S.; Karabanov A. D.; Lupascu D. C.; Herz L. M.; Hinderhofer A.; et al. Roadmap on organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite semiconductors and devices. APL Mater. 2021, 9, 109202 10.1063/5.0047616. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brunetti B.; Cavallo C.; Ciccioli A.; Gigli G.; Latini A. On the Thermal and Thermodynamic (In)Stability of Methylammonium Lead Halide Perovskites. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31896 10.1038/srep31896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Latini A.; Gigli G.; Ciccioli A. A study on the nature of the thermal decomposition of methylammonium lead iodide perovskite, CH3NH3PbI3: an attempt to rationalise contradictory experimental results. Sustainable Energy Fuels 2017, 1, 1351–1357. 10.1039/C7SE00114B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ciccioli A.; Latini A. Thermodynamics and the Intrinsic Stability of Lead Halide Perovskites CH3NH3PbX3. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 3756–3765. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Panetta R.; Righini G.; Colapietro M.; Barba L.; Tedeschi D.; Polimeni A.; Ciccioli A.; Latini A. Azetidinium lead iodide: synthesis, structural and physico-chemical characterization. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 10135–10148. 10.1039/C8TA02210K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ciccioli A.; Panetta R.; Luongo A.; Brunetti B.; Vecchio Ciprioti S.; Mele M. L.; Latini A. Stabilizing lead halide perovskites with quaternary ammonium cations: the case of tetramethylammonium lead iodide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 24768–24777. 10.1039/C9CP04051J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Park C.; Choi J.; Min J.; Cho K. Suppression of Oxidative Degradation of Tin-Lead Hybrid Organometal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells by Ag Doping. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 3285–3294. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01648. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Adjogri S. J.; Meyer E. L. A Review on Lead-Free Hybrid Halide Perovskites as Light Absorbers for Photovoltaic Applications Based on Their Structural, Optical, and Morphological Properties. Molecules 2020, 25, 5039. 10.3390/molecules25215039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang L.; Wang K.; Zou B. Bismuth Halide Perovskite-Like Materials: Current Opportunities and Challenges. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 1612–1630. 10.1002/cssc.201802930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lou Y.; Fang M.; Chen J.; Zhao Y. Formation of highly luminescent cesium bismuth halide perovskite quantum dots tuned by anion exchange. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 3779–3782. 10.1039/C8CC01110A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang B.; Chen J.; Hong F.; Mao X.; Zheng K.; Yang S.; Li Y.; Pullerits T.; Deng W.; Han K. Lead-Free, Air-Stable All-Inorganic Cesium Bismuth Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 12471–12475. 10.1002/anie.201704739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hoye R. L. Z.; Brandt R. E.; Osherov A.; Stevanovic V.; Stranks S. D.; Wilson M. W. B.; Kim H.; Akey A. J.; Perkins J. D.; Kurchin R. C.; et al. Methylammonium Bismuth Iodide as a Lead-Free, Stable Hybrid Organic-Inorganic Solar Absorber. Chem. – Eur. J. 2016, 22, 2605–2610. 10.1002/chem.201505055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tang Z.; Guloy A. M. A Methylviologen Lead(II) Iodide: Novel [PbI3-] Chains with Mixed Octahedral and Trigonal Prismatic Coordination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 452–453. 10.1021/ja982702i. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Latini A.; Quaranta S.; Menchini F.; Lisi N.; Di Girolamo D.; Tarquini O.; Colapietro M.; Barba L.; Demitri N.; Cassetta A. A novel water-resistant and thermally stable black lead halide perovskite, phenyl viologen lead iodide C22H18N2(PbI3)2. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 2616–2627. 10.1039/C9DT04148F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Blundo E.; Polimeni A.; Meggiolaro D.; D’Annibale A.; Romagnoli L.; Felici M.; Latini A. Brightly Luminescent and Moisture Tolerant Phenyl Viologen Lead Iodide Perovskites for Light Emission Applications. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2021, 12, 5456–5462. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yue C.-Y.; Zhao H.; Jiang H.; Guo Y.; Che H.; Li J.; Chu W.; Yuan Y.; Jing Z.; Lei X. Large Conjugated Organic Cations Sensitized Hybrid Lead Halides as Visible Light Driven Photocatalysts. Cryst. Growth Des. 2019, 19, 4564–4570. 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b00395. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wei Q.; Ge B.; Zhang J.; Sun A.; Li J.; Han S.; Wang G. Tripyridine-Derivative-Derived Semiconducting Iodo-Argentate/Cuprate Hybrids with Excellent Visible-Light-Induced Photocatalytic Performance. Chem. Asian J. 2019, 14, 269–277. 10.1002/asia.201801555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li F.-Y.; Wen X.; Xue Z.; Pan J.; Wei Q.; Wei L. Large Conjugated Bis/Triimidazolium Derivatives Directed Iodobismuthates(III): Syntheses, Structures, and Visible-Light-Induced Photocatalytic Properties. Cryst. Growth Des. 2022, 22, 4601–4609. 10.1021/acs.cgd.2c00521. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sonogashira K. Development of Pd–Cu catalyzed cross-coupling of terminal acetylenes with sp2-carbon halides. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 653, 46–49. 10.1016/S0022-328X(02)01158-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Eckhardt K.; Bon V.; Getzschmann J.; Grothe J.; Wisser F. M.; Kaskel S. Crystallographic insights into (CH3NH3)3(Bi2I9): a new lead-free hybrid organic–inorganic material as a potential absorber for photovoltaics. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 3058–3060. 10.1039/C5CC10455F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Park B.-W.; Philippe B.; Zhang X.; Rensmo H.; Boschloo G.; Johansson E. M. J. Bismuth Based Hybrid Perovskites A3Bi2I9 (A: Methylammonium or Cesium) for Solar Cell Application. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 6806–6813. 10.1002/adma.201501978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. D’Annibale A.; Panetta R.; Tarquini O.; Colapietro M.; Quaranta S.; Cassetta A.; Barba L.; Chita G.; Latini A. Synthesis, physico-chemical characterization and structure of the elusive hydroxylammonium lead iodide perovskite NH3OHPbI3. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 5397–5407. 10.1039/C9DT00690G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Prince E.International Tables for Crystallography. Volume C, Mathematical, Physical and Chemical Tables.; Kluwer: The Netherlands, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen X.; Myung Y.; Thind A.; Gao Z.; Yin B.; Shen M.; Cho S. B.; Cheng P.; Sadtler B.; Mishra R.; Banerjee P. Atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition of methylammonium bismuth iodide thin films. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 24728–24739. 10.1039/C7TA06578G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Silverstein R. M.; Webster F. X.; Kiemle D. J.. Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds, Wiley: Hoboken, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tauc J.; Grigorovici R.; Vancu A. Optical Properties and Electronic Structure of Amorphous Germanium. Phys. Status Solidi B 1966, 15, 627–637. 10.1002/pssb.19660150224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Bernstorff S.; Busetto E.; Gramaccioni C.; Lausi A.; Olivi L.; Zanini F.; Savoia A.; Colapietro M.; Portalone G.; Camalli M.; et al. The macromolecular crystallography beamline at ELETTRA. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1995, 66, 1661–1664. 10.1063/1.1145875. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lausi A.; Polentarutti M.; Onesti S.; Plaisier J. R.; Busetto E.; Bais G.; Barba L.; Cassetta A.; Campi G.; Lamba D.; et al. Status of the crystallography beamlines at Elettra. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2015, 130, 43 10.1140/epjp/i2015-15043-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kabsch W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D 2010, 66, 125–132. 10.1107/S0907444909047337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sheldrick G. M.SADABS, Software for Empirical Absorption Corrections; University of Göttingen: Göttingen, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sheldrick G. M. SHELXT - Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. A 2015, 71, 3–8. 10.1107/S2053273314026370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sheldrick G. M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. C 2015, 71, 3–8. 10.1107/S2053229614024218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Dolomanov O. V.; Bourhis L. J.; Gildea R. J.; Howard J. A. K.; Puschmann H. OLEX2: a complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. 10.1107/S0021889808042726. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Altomare A.; Cuocci C.; Giacovazzo C.; Moliterni A.; Rizzi R.; Corriero N.; Falcicchio A. EXPO2013: a kit of tools for phasing crystal structures from powder data. J. Appl.Crystallogr. 2013, 46, 1231–1235. 10.1107/S0021889813013113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

cg2c01005_si_001.pdf (844.3KB, pdf)

Articles from Crystal Growth & Design are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES