Best practices in pain assessment and management for children

Abstract

Pain assessment and management are essential components of paediatric care. Developmentally appropriate pain assessment is an important first step in optimizing pain management. Self-reported pain should be prioritized. Alternatively, developmentally appropriate behavioural tools should be used. Acute pain management and prevention guidelines and strategies that combine physical, psychological, and pharmacological approaches should be accessible in all health care settings. Chronic pain is best managed using combined treatment modalities and counselling, with the primary goal of attaining functional improvement. The planning and implementation of pain management strategies for children should always be personalized and family-centred.

Historically, children’s pain has been under-recognized (1) and under-treated (2), and while progress in both assessment and treatment has been made in recent years, a knowledge-to-practice gap remains. Pain is under-evaluated in many settings (3), with the youngest children (4) and individuals who are cognitively impaired being the most negatively impacted (5,6). Multiple reasons for suboptimal treatment of pain are reported, including the difficulty of assessing pain in children (7), lack of time and resources, and educational, cultural, and legal factors (8).

Suboptimal pain management can have negative consequences in the short and longer term (8), including progression of acute discomfort and distress, increased fear and pain during subsequent medical visits, the development of chronic pain, and future avoidance of medical care (9). In contrast, adequate pain management is associated with faster recovery and reduced health care resource utilization (10). Treating pain does not delay diagnosis or decision-making (11,12) and often improves the health care provider’s (HCP’s) ability to evaluate and treat children (9).

This position statement focuses on timely, developmentally appropriate pain assessment and management strategies for children in a family-centred context. It complements the Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) statement on procedural pain published in 2019 (13).

PAIN ASSESSMENT

Assessment is an essential step for optimal pain management (14). Appropriate assessment includes pain location, quality, duration, and intensity, and also requires use of a developmentally appropriate tool (Table 1) and repeated assessment(s) post-intervention. Particularly for chronic pain, a child’s psychosocial context, with impacts on daily life (e.g., family, sleep, play, and school), should also be assessed (15).

Table 1.

Recommended pain scales

Scales	Age group recommended	Indications				Comments
		Acute pain	Procedural pain	Post-op pain	Chronic Pain†
Self-report measures
NRS-11	≥6 yo	++	++	+	+	No ‘hard copy’ tool required
FPS-R	≥4 yo*	++	++	+		Preferred by children
CAS	≥8 yo	++	++	+
Observational measures
NFCS	0 to 4 months	++	++		++	Acute, procedural, and prolonged pain
NIPS	0 to 1 month	+	+			Some potential bias
FLACC r-FLACC	2 months to 7 yo	+	+/−	+		Conflicting recommendations for procedural pain
	4 to 19 yo	+	+/−	+
CHEOPS	1 to 7 yo		+/−	+		Score out of 13, conflicting recommendations for procedural pain
EVENDOL	0–7 yo	++	++		++	Score on 15

Supported by evidence: +/−, limited (conflictual recommendation); +, good (some bias, recommended in some review, less by other, weaker recommendation); ++, strong (less bias, more relevance, stronger recommendation). Based mainly on the reviews of references 4, 16, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29.

*Recommended for ≥7 years by some authors (16).

See also validated tools proposed in the text for chronic pain.

CAS, Color Analog Scale; CHEOPS, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale; EVENDOL, Evaluation Enfant, DOuLeur; FLACC, Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability; FPS-R, Faces Pain Scale-Revised; NFCS, Neonatal Facing Coding System; NIPS, Neonatal Infant Pain Scale; NRS-11, Numeric Rating Scale-11; r-FLACC, Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability revised for children with cognitive impairment; yo, years old.

Self-reported pain scales

Pain is a subjective experience that can be modulated by emotions, developmental factors, culture, current context, and previous pain experiences (14,15). Whenever possible, children’s pain should be evaluated through self-report rather than by proxy. Pain scales should be employed as directed, using consistent, standardized scale anchors to facilitate comparison.

Among more than 60 readily available measurement tools, the most recommended scales include the verbal Numeric Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) (Figure 1), and the Color Analogue Scale (CAS) (16). These scales work best for acute presenting pain but have also been used in the post-operative setting. No single self-report scale has been strongly endorsed for children <6 years old or for the assessment of chronic pain (16,17).

Figure 1.

Faces pain scale–revised.

Note: Consult the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) website for details. www.iasp-pain.org/Education/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1519

The NRS-11 scale ranks pain severity from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible or imaginable). The NRS-11 can be used for children ≥6 years old with acute pain (16,18). It can also be used, though with less supporting evidence, for post-operative and chronic pain. The main advantage of the NRS-11 is that it is verbally administered.

The FPS-R uses six facial images, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Children sometimes prefer FPS-R to the NRS-11 and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (14,15). The FPS-R can be used in children aged 4 to 7 years old (14,15) to evaluate acute and, with less evidence, post-operative pain (16). FPS-R is not recommended to evaluate chronic pain.

The CAS invites children to move a slider along the scale’s length to indicate how much pain they have (from “no pain” to “most pain”), with a 0 to 10 scale printed on the back. CAS is used in children ≥8 years old, mainly to evaluate acute and, with less evidence, post-operative pain. Evidence to support the use of CAS for chronic pain assessment has been inconclusive (16).

Chronic pain assessment requires an evaluation of its multiple dimensions, with critical focus on the impacts of pain on a child’s global functioning (e.g., school attendance, activities, socializing, and sleep) (19). Validated and readily available chronic pain assessment tools include the Bath Adolescent Pain Questionnaire (BAPQ), the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System’s (PROMIS’s) Pediatric Pain Interference Scale (PPIS), and the Pediatric Pain Questionnaire (PPQ) (15). For more information, see the Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital’s Toolbox for Children with Disabilities (20). Emotional functioning measures for anxiety, depressive symptoms, and pain catastrophizing (i.e., when an individual magnifies, dwells on, is pessimistic about or dreads pain), along with sleep measures, should also be employed to complete the evaluation (19).

Observational pain measures

For pre-verbal and non-verbal children, evaluating behavioural signs such as facial expression, cry, irritability, poor feeding, sleep disturbance, and inactivity can help decode a child’s discomfort level (21). Changing vital signs may be correlated with pain in infants, but are not reliable indicators in older children (4,21,22). Notably, an absence of change in vital signs does not indicate lack of pain in children.

When self-report of pain is not possible (e.g., due to young age, cognitive impairment, and mechanical ventilation), a behavioural pain scale or checklist should be used (23). For children with cognitive disability, never assume that a self-report cannot be obtained (4). If extent of intellectual disability truly precludes a child’s ability to self-report pain, an observational scale should be used in tandem with a parent or caregiver’s assessment. While self-reporting tools can be used by a caregiver or HCP to obtain a proxy assessment, caution is advised, particularly when an evaluator is not familiar with the child (23).

Out of more than 55 observational pain instruments currently available (4,24,25), only a small number are recommended (25). For infants, the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS), and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale are recommended most often (4), though one recent systematic review has also suggested that the EValuation ENfant DOuLeur (EVENDOL), COMFORT, and Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS) scales carry lower risk for bias than other tools (25). Alternative scales to consider for infant pain are the Échelle de Douleur et d’Inconfort du Nouveau-né (EDIN), to assess prolonged pain in preterm infants; the Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale (N-PASS) for acute and prolonged pain; and the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) for procedural pain in preterm and term neonates (25).

For toddlers and older children, the FLACC or the CHEOPS (Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale) scales are also considered reliable and validated tools (23). However, some research has suggested that the EVENDOL, COMFORT, and NFCS scales are better choices due to lower risk for bias (25).

The NIPS is a 0 to 7 point scale comprising physiological, behavioural, and contextual indicators that were developed to assess procedural pain in newborns and older infants (24,26).

The NFCS measures acute, procedural, or prolonged pain by assessing facial cues (25). For more information on pain assessment and management in neonates, see this joint statement from the CPS and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) (27).

The FLACC 0 to 10 scale is recommended for evaluating post-operative pain in children 2 months to 7 years old. The FLACC is not optimal for evaluating procedural pain or for children who show fewer physical or vocal manifestations of pain (28,29). Further, during a procedure developmentally appropriate positioning (e.g., swaddling limits activity evaluation) can interfere with FLACC assessment (7,29). A revised scale (r-FLACC) includes measures for assessing cognitively impaired or non-verbal children 4 to 19 years old (4,29,30) (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

FLACC and r-FLACC scales.

Adapted from Malviya 2006 (30) combining the original FLACC (text in bold) and the addition of the r-FLACC (text in italic)

The EVENDOL is a validated 15-point scale developed for children 0 to 7 years old in the emergency department and can be used for presenting, prolonged, and procedural pain (Figure 3) (25,31). It is particularly useful for children who show fewer physical or vocal manifestations of pain and is validated for use in prehospital settings (32).

Figure 3.

EVENDOL scale.

Instructions: ¹Assess at rest (R): observe the child from a distance, before performing any examination or procedure, at rest, ensuring the best possible conditions of safety and comfort, for example, with his/her parents, when he/she is playing. ²During examination or mobilization (M): assess pain during examination or mobilization or palpation of the painful area by nurse or by doctor. ³Reassess pain regularly after analgesic administration: wait 30 to 45 min if analgesic is administered by oral or rectal route, 5 to 10 min if administered by IV route. Note whether the child is at rest (R) or mobilized (M). From reference 31. Reproduced with permission.

The CHEOPS is a 14-point scale that measures post-operative pain. The main challenge with use is that a score of 4 to 6 represents no pain, which appears counterintuitive. Moreover, some studies have suggested that the CHEOPs scale is not appropriate for evaluating procedural pain (28). However, the MBPS (Modified Behavioral Pain Scale), a modified version of the CHEOPS, has been validated for evaluating immunization-related pain in children 2 to 22 months old, though it is not recommended for other procedures or age groups (33,34).

The COMFORT scale takes time to administer, but has been validated and adapted for use in children of all ages who are undergoing mechanical ventilation (23,25,26).

A valid behavioural scale for children experiencing chronic pain has not yet been identified (23).

TIMING OF ASSESSMENT

Evaluating a child’s pain at first encounter is recommended, with regular reassessments during care. Re-evaluating pain following every intervention and during every procedure is essential for assessing therapeutic efficacy. To optimize comparison, the same scale(s) should be used each time (Table 1) (21). The dual goals of pain measurement are to relieve children’s pain and assess their response to treatment.

ACUTE PAIN MANAGEMENT

Pain is the most common reason to seek medical attention in all acute care settings in Canada (21). There is strong evidence that pain can be treated early without affecting diagnostic accuracy (4,11,12). In fact, pain relief often makes examination and testing easier, thereby facilitating diagnosis. A growing body of evidence supports many different effective pain management strategies. General pain treatment includes pharmacological but also, concomitantly and equally importantly, physical and psychological therapies. Treatment of pain in the health care setting must include preventing and managing pain associated with procedures. Adjunctively with pain prevention see the “3 P” approach described in a previous CPS statement (13) and the acute pain toolkit from Children’s Healthcare Canada (CHC) (35).

PAIN MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES AND PROTOCOLS

Early pain assessment and management should be an essential component of any health care encounter. Advocating for nurse- or paramedic-initiated medical directives can empower these health professionals to address children’s pain needs in a timely fashion. For example, standing orders to administer analgesia or apply topical anesthetic before venipuncture in acute care settings facilitates early pain relief and may improve a child’s experience. Access to tools for distraction while awaiting a medical consultation or treatment can further improve the overall medical experience.

First-line medications

Combined with physical and psychological strategies, over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics can be used as monotherapy for mild to moderate (1–3 to 4–6/10) pain or as co-therapy for moderate to severe pain (4–6 to 7–10/10). OTC analgesics include acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen (Table 2) .

Table 2.

Dosing of pain medications for children and youth

	Dose (maximum)	Notes and contraindications (CI)
Ibuprofen, oral	10 mg/kg/dose (maximum 600 mg/dose) By mouth every 6 to 8 h, as needed (maximum daily: 40 mg/kg/day or 2400 mg/day)	• First-line for mild to moderate pain, co-analgesia for moderate to severe pain • Choose oral or intravenous (IV) NSAID, not both • This dose is generally for patients ≥6 months old CI: Allergy, moderate or severe dehydration, impaired renal function, severe impaired cardiac or hepatic function, active bleeding, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or ulcer, surgery planned in the next 24 h, coagulopathy, thrombopenia, active chickenpox, undergoing anticoagulant drug or chemotherapy
Acetaminophen, oral	15 mg/kg/dose (maximum 650 mg to 1 g/dose) By mouth every 4 to 6 h, as needed (maximum daily: 75 mg/kg/day or 4 g/day, whichever is less)	• First-line for mild pain if ibuprofen is contraindicated, co-analgesia for moderate to severe pain • Do not administer if IV acetaminophen is used CI: Allergy, severe hepatic impairment, acetaminophen intoxication
Morphine, oral	0.2 mg/kg/dose to 0.5 mg/kg/dose (maximum 15 mg/dose) By mouth every 4 to 6 h, as needed (maximum daily: 6 doses) (maximum 3 days for acute pain)	• Co-analgesia for moderate to severe pain with first-line medications • Make sure that ibuprofen and acetaminophen are taken around the clock before oral opiate, if no contraindications • Should not be used for an infant at home • Undergoing opioid monitoring (refer to local guidelines) • Discuss safe storing at home and safe disposal of unused medication CI: Allergy, unstable patient (including apnea)
Fentanyl, intranasal	1 mcg/kg/dose to 2 mcg/kg/dose (maximum 75 to 100 mcg/dose) Intranasal for 1 to 2 doses (maximum 100 mcg total, until alternative mode of analgesia is administered)	• Co-analgesia for severe pain with first-line medications • Divide dose between nostrils to maximize absorption • Use fentanyl 50 mcg/mL for a maximum of 1 mL per nostril • Use for patients ≥1 yo • Only for hospital use • Undergoing opioid monitoring (refer to local guidelines) CI: Allergy, unstable patient, active epistaxis, nasal abnormality
Ketorolac, IV	0.5 mg/kg/dose (maximum <16 years: 15 mg/dose, ≥16 years: 30 mg/dose) IV every 6 to 8 h as needed (maximum daily: 4 doses for a maximum of 2 days)	• May be used instead of oral ibuprofen if the patient has an IV line as first-line medication • Choose oral or IV NSAID, not both CI: See ibuprofen
Acetaminophen, IV	15 mg/kg/dose (maximum 1 g/dose) IV every 6 h over 15 minutes, as needed (maximum daily: 60 mg/kg/day or 4 g/day, whichever is less)	• May be used instead of oral acetaminophen if patient cannot tolerate medication by mouth • Do not administer faster than over 15 minutes because of risk of hypotension. Be especially careful with precarious hemodynamic patients • Expensive. Reserve for patients who cannot tolerate oral acetaminophen CI: Allergy, unstable patient, severe hepatic impairment, acetaminophen intoxication, neonates
Morphine, IV (intermittent dosing)	0.05 mg/kg/dose to 0.1 mg/kg/dose (maximum 5 mg/dose) IV over 5 minutes every 2 to 4 h, as needed	• Co-analgesia for severe pain with first-line medications • Consider lower doses in opioid-naïve patients • If pain is insufficiently controlled with intermittent morphine dosing, consider initiating a morphine infusion or patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Consultation with paediatric pain team is recommended • Undergoing opiate monitoring (refer to local guideline) CI: Allergy, unstable patient

NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; yo, years old.

Ibuprofen is more effective than acetaminophen for the treatment of children’s pain (36), particularly for acute pain, musculoskeletal trauma, headache, and post-dental extraction (21,37,38) and has a comparable safety profile (36,39). Moreover, ibuprofen is comparable to oral morphine for sprains, simple fractures, and following minor orthopedic procedures and tonsillectomy, with less risk for adverse events (40–43). The combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen to manage dental extraction or tonsillectomy pain is superior compared with acetaminophen used alone (21).

Opioid analgesia

Patients presenting with acute moderate to severe pain unlikely to be resolved by physical and psychological strategies and first-line analgesics should be offered pharmacological interventions on an escalating basis. Opioids should be used judiciously, with appropriate dosing assessment to avoid adverse events, and careful monitoring (Table 2). Co-therapy with OTC analgesics should be ongoing due to opioid-sparing effects and to reduce adverse events (21,39,44,45). Codeine should never be used in children under 18 years old, as per Health Canada directives (46,47).

In the context of the international opioid crisis, concerns regarding substance misuse and dependency following even short-term therapeutic use in youth have emerged (48–50). However, they should not discourage appropriate opioid use for children and youth presenting with acute severe pain or who are not responding to first-line treatments. In medical settings, opioid administration should be as rapid and painless as possible. When required at discharge (3), prescriptions of no more than five to ten doses are advised for a 2- to 3-day period (50). This prescription must be accompanied by instructions for follow-up if pain relief is inadequate, safe storage at home, and safe disposal of unused medication (i.e., returning it to a pharmacy) (48,51). See Solutions for Kids in Pain resources (51).

Intranasal (IN) fentanyl is an effective analgesic for treating acute moderate to severe pain in children and causes minimal distress at administration (52,53). IN fentanyl allows for faster and less painful administration than the IV or intramuscular (IM) routes and has a faster onset of action than oral delivery. Also safe and effective in the prehospital setting (54), IN fentanyl is the opioid of first-line for moderate to severe pain in Canadian paediatric EDs (55). It has also been evaluated as a safe and effective initial treatment for painful vaso-occlusive episodes (VOE) in sickle cell disease (SCD), reducing time to first parenteral opioid and the number of IV insertions (56–58).

IV opioids are often used preferentially in acute medical settings, once vascular access has been established (21), with IV morphine being the most common agent (59). IV and IN opioids must be monitored appropriately and titrated to effect, always considering severity of the patient’s pain and whether they are opioid-naive.

Analgesic adjuncts and alternatives

Numerous agents and routes of administration are being explored in the acute care setting. Recently, sub-dissociative dosing of IN ketamine has been shown to have comparable efficacy to IN fentanyl for limb injuries, but with increased risk for adverse effects (60–62). IV ketorolac appears to have opioid-sparing effects, but its role as monotherapy remains unclear (21). Other emerging options in Canada include IV acetaminophen. One retrospective study has reported promising results for IV acetaminophen in reducing pain in children with SCD presenting with VOE (63), but further study is required (Table 2).

CHRONIC PAIN

Chronic pain (defined as persistent or recurrent for >3 months) is a common problem that can significantly impact social, economic, and health outcomes for children, youth, and families. Pain can be secondary to underlying chronic conditions such as SCD or inflammatory bowel disease, or part of a primary pain disorder, as with irritable bowel syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome (64–66). Headaches, abdominal, and musculoskeletal pain are the most prevalent forms of paediatric chronic pain (67). Chronic pain prevalence rates in children range between 11% and 38% (67), are generally higher in girls, and increase with age (except for abdominal pain, which tends to present in younger children). Associated factors include lower socioeconomic status, anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem (67). Frequency of chronic pain in children rises when there is a parental history of chronic pain (68).

About 5% of children and youth living with chronic pain are functionally disabled by it (i.e., missing out on school and social activities) (64,69). Pain catastrophizing (70) can further influence pain-related behaviours, such as avoiding activity or physical hypervigilance.

Neuropathic pain can be secondary to several different conditions, such as trauma, surgery, cancer (or its treatment), autoimmune disorders (e.g., Guillain-Barré syndrome), or rare diseases (e.g., mitochondrial disorders) (71,72). Few studies on managing neuropathic pain in children have been published, and current guidance is based largely on experience with adults.

CHRONIC PAIN MANAGEMENT

Chronic pain is best managed by combining treatment modalities, including psychological, physical, occupational, and pharmacological therapies. Approaches should be individualized, with symptom severity, level of function, co-morbidities (including anxiety or depression), and the child’s and family’s ability to actively engage in therapy being prime considerations. The primary initial focus of treatment is functional improvement rather that pain reduction per se (70). In cases of severe functional disability, or when symptom intensity has not improved despite multimodal outpatient treatment, referral to an interdisciplinary chronic pain treatment program is needed (69,70).

Psychological therapies include psychoeducation, physiological self-regulation training (e.g., biofeedback, hypnosis), cognitive skills training, and behavioural exposure therapy. Involving parents and caregivers in pain and coping strategies education is key to success (73). The goal of physical therapy is to assess and treat secondary musculoskeletal impairments and use evidence-based chronic pain strategies, such as gradual exposure to movement, pacing, and graded motor imaging to increase tolerance of physical activity and optimize participation. Occupational therapy (OT) helps promote sensory rehabilitation to decrease sensitivity to stimuli that are perceived as painful. OT helps the child to get back to activities of daily living and self-care (70). Pharmacological therapy may include antidepressants (e.g., amitriptyline) or antiepileptics (e.g., gabapentin, pregabalin). There is no quality evidence for the pharmacological treatment of chronic non-cancer pain in children (74). For more on chronic pain management strategies, see the chronic pain toolkit from Children’s Healthcare Canada (35).

EMPOWERING PATIENTS, PARENTS, AND CAREGIVERS

Patient- and family-centred care are essential to pain management, and parents, children, and youth all have active roles to play in pain management and health care planning (75). At home, a child’s acute pain should be self-assessed whenever possible, and when a proxy is needed, parents or caregivers should be taught to assess a child’s pain regularly using developmentally appropriate tools (23,76). To facilitate both acute and chronic pain management at home, involving parents and caregivers in clinical encounters informs and empowers them to provide optimal pain management later on. Psychological strategies, such as distraction, can be equally useful on the home front, and physical care strategies, such as appropriate wound dressing or encouraging physical activity, are important, teachable ‘take home’ skills. Adequate analgesics should be prescribed, with detailed guidance on how best to prevent pain and risk for adverse events. Clear, written instructions on medication dose, frequency, and duration of use must be provided (35,77).

RECOMMENDATIONS

• Education on the use of developmentally appropriate pain assessment tools is an essential first step to providing optimal pain management in paediatrics.

• Whenever possible, children’s pain should be self-reported. When self-reporting is not possible or appropriate, an appropriate assessment tool should be used.

• In medical settings, pain management can be improved through:

  • mandatory pain assessment at the first encounter with children and youth,

  • timely reassessment (and documentation) during and after procedures, as appropriate, and following every clinical intervention,

  • integrating pain assessment and management steps into treatment algorithms, electronic medical records, hospital guidelines, and regional or provincial/territorial guidelines.

• Pain prevention and management guidelines must include psychological, physical, and pharmacological strategies for acute and chronic pain. Health care directives and practice guidelines should combine strategies and approaches in the health care setting and for use at home.

• When managing chronic pain in paediatrics, relief of symptoms and improved function are the primary goals.

• Parents and caregivers should be counselled and trained in appropriate pain assessment and management and provided with clear instructions for therapy and medication use at home.

Correspondence: Canadian Paediatric Society, 100–2305 St Laurent Blvd, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 4J8, Canada. Telephone: 613-526-9397, fax 613-526-3332, e-mail info@cps.ca, website www.cps.ca

All Canadian Paediatric Society position statements and practice points are reviewed regularly and revised as needed. Consult the Position Statements section of the CPS website www.cps.ca/en/documents for the most current version. Retired statements and practice points are removed from the website.

FUNDING

There is no funding to declare.

POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

CANADIAN PAEDIATRIC SOCIETY ACUTE CARE COMMITTEE (2020–2021)

Members: Carolyn Beck MD, Kevin Chan MD (Chair), Kimberly Dow MD (Board Representative), Karen Gripp MD, Kristina Krmpotic MD, Marie-Pier Lirette MD (Resident Member), Evelyne D. Trottier MD.

Liaisons: Laurel Chauvin-Kimoff MD (Past Chair 2012–2019), CPS Paediatric Emergency Medicine Section; Sidd Thakore MD, CPS Hospital Paediatrics Section.

CANADIAN PAEDIATRIC SOCIETY HOSPITAL PAEDIATRICS SECTION (2020–2021)

Executive members: Melanie Buba MD (President Elect), Marie-Joëlle Doré-Bergeron MD (Past President), Jessica Foulds MD (Member at Large), Smita Roychoudhury (Resident Liaison), Sepideh Taheri MD (Member at Large), Sidd Thakore MD (President), Kevin Weingarten MD (Secretary-Treasurer).

CANADIAN PAEDIATRIC SOCIETY PAEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE SECTION (2020–2021)

Executive members: Kevin Chan MD (Past President), Carolyn Cashin MD (Secretary-Treasurer), Laurel Chauvin-Kimoff MD (President), Dayae Jeong MD (Resident Member), April Kam MD (Member at Large), Michelle Long MD (Vice President), Andrea Robb MD (Member at Large).