Abstract
The aim of this study was conducted to assess the fracture resistance of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate all ceramic material “Celtra Press” compared to lithium disilicate one “IPS e-max Press” under simulated oral conditions. Fourteen ceramic crowns were fabricated on epoxy dies which were duplicated from stainless steel master die and divided into two equal groups (n=7) according to the material of construction; Group A: Crowns fabricated with IPS e-max Press material and Group B: Crowns fabricated with Celtra Press material. The crowns were then cemented onto their corresponding dies with a self-adhesive resin cement and subjected to thermocycling and cyclic loading. Then they were loaded to fractur in a universal testing machine. The results were tabulated and statistically analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Student t-test used to compare mean values. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05 and 95% Confidence interval. Statistical analysis was performed using Graph Pad Instat (Graph Pad, Inc.) software for windows. The mean ± SD values of fracture resistance were recorded for lithium Disilicate group (1706.01 ±154.32 N) meanwhile the mean ± SD value recorded with celtra group were (1550.67±196.71 N). Zirconia reinforced lithium silicate ceramic crowns produced comparable fracture resistance values to lithium disilicate ceramic crowns and both tested materials are within the clinically acceptable values in the posterior area.
Key Words: cyclic loading, fracture resistance, lithium disilicate
Resumo
Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a resistência à fractura do silicato de lítio reforçado com zircônio todo o material cerâmico "Celtra Press" em comparação com um "IPS e-max Press" em condições orais simuladas. Quatorze coroas cerâmicas foram fabricadas em moldes epóxi que foram duplicados a partir de moldes principais de aço inoxidável e divididos em dois grupos iguais (n=7) de acordo com o material de construção; Grupo A: Coroas fabricadas com material IPS e-max Press e Grupo B: Coroas fabricadas com material Celtra Press. As coroas foram então cimentadas nos seus moldes correspondentes com um cimento de resina auto-adesivo e submetidas a ciclos térmicos e cargas cíclicas. Em seguida, foram carregadas para fraturar numa máquina universal de ensaios. Os resultados foram tabulados e analisados estatisticamente utilizando os testes Kolmogorov-Smirnov e Shapiro-Wilk. O teste t de Student usado para comparar os valores médios. O nível de significância foi fixado em P ≤ 0,05 e intervalo de confiança de 95%. A análise estatística foi realizada utilizando o software Graph Pad Instat (Graph Pad, Inc.) para Windows. Os valores médios ± SD da resistência à fractura foram registados para o grupo Disilicate de lítio (1706,01 ±154,32 N) enquanto que os valores médios ± SD registados com o grupo celtra foram (1550,67±196,71 N). As coroas cerâmicas de silicato de lítio reforçado com zircónio produziram valores de resistência à fractura comparáveis aos das coroas cerâmicas de dissilicato de lítio e ambos os materiais testados estão dentro dos valores clinicamente aceitáveis na área posterior.
References
- 1.Dos Santos D. M, Moreno A, Vechiato-Filho A. J, Bonatto L, Pesqueira A. A, Laurindo M. C, Júnior, de Medeiros R. A, da Silva E. V, Goiato M. C. Current all-ceramic systems in dentistry: a review. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent. 2015;36:31–37. quiz 38, 40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Erden M. A. The Effect on Mechanical Properties of Pressing Technique in PM Steels. Acta Physica Polonica j. 2020 doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.135.1078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Al-akhali M., Kern M., Elsayed A., Samran A. Fracture resistance of ceramic and polymer-based occlusal veneer restorations . Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017;74:245–250. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Alkadi L., Ruse N. D. Fracture toughness of two lithium disilicate dental glass ceramics. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016;116:591–596. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Paulo J., Tribst M., Marcia L., Alves M., Oliveira M. De, Piva D., Melo R. M. De, Borges L. S., Paes-junior T. J. A., Antonio M. Reinforced Glass-ceramics : Parametric Inspection of Three- Dimensional Wear and Volumetric Loss after Chewing Simulation. Brazilian Dental J. 2019;30:505–510. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201902699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stawarczyk B., Dinse L., Eichberger M, Jungbauer R. Flexural strength , fracture toughness , three-body wear , and Martens parameters of pressable lithium-X-silicate ceramics. Dent. Mater. 2020;36:420–430. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kashkari A., Yilmaz B., Brantley W. A., Schricker S. R., Johnston W. M. Fracture analysis of monolithic CAD-CAM crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 doi: 10.1111/jerd.12462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hamza T. A., Sherif R. M. Fracture Resistance of f Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations. J. prosthodont. 2019;28(1):e259–e264. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Anadioti E, Aquilino S. A, Gratton D. G, Holloway J. A, Denry I, Thomas G. W, Qian F. 3D and 2D Marginal Fit of Pressed and CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Digital and Conventional Impressions. J. Prosthodont. 2014;23:610–617. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Riad M. H., Younis J. F., Zaghloul H. H., Cam C. A. D. Effect of processing technique and coping thickness on fracture resistance of lithium disilicate copings. Stomatological Dis Sci. 2017;1:14–21. doi: 10.20517/2573-0002.2016.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brandt S., Winter A., Lauer H. C., Kollmar F., Portscher-Kim S. J., Romanos G. E. IPS e. max for All-Ceramic Restorations : Clinical survival and success rates of full coverage crowns and fixed Partial Dentures. Mater. Res. 2019;1-10 doi: 10.3390/ma12030462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dettori J. The random allocation process: two things you need to know. Evid. Based. Spine. Care J. 2011;1:7–9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1267062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Amin Rania A, Abdellatif E. A . M, E. H. fracture resistance, finite element analysis and weibull risk of failure for endodontically treated molars restored with lithium disilicate and hybrid ceramic endocrowns with two preparation designs. Egypt. Dent. J. 2017;63:2803–2820. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Morresi A. L, D'Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D'Arcangelo C, Monaco A. Thermal cycling for restorative materials : Does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing. A literature review. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2014;29:295–308. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nawafleh N., Hatamleh M., Elshiyab S., Mack F. Lithium Disilicate Restorations Fatigue Testing Parameters: A Systematic Review. Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists. 2016;25(2):116–126. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sieper K., Wille S., Kern M., Cam C. A. D. Fracture strength of lithium disilicate crowns compared to polymer- in fi ltrated ceramic-network and zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017;74:342–348. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nakamura K., Harada A., Inagaki R., Kanno T., Niwano Y., Milleding P., Örtengren U. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2015;73(8):602–608. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2015.1007479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lameira D. P., Buarque Silva, W. A. Andrade, Silva F., De Souza G. M. Fracture Strength of Aged Monolithic and Bilayer Zirconia-Based Crowns. BioMed research international. 2015 doi: 10.1155/2015/418641. 418641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Taha D., Spintzyk S., Sabet A., Wahsh M., Salah T. Assessment of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations utilizing different machinable blocks subjected to thermomechanical aging. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2018;1-9 doi: 10.1111/jerd.12396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Abdelzaher Alaa, Omara A. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated: premolar teeth restored with cad/cam lithium disilicate endocrowns and h-shaped post : in vitro study:. Egypt. Dent. J. 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kang S., Chang J., Son H.-H. Flexural strength and microstructure of two lithium disilicate glass ceramics for CAD / CAM restoration in the dental clinic. Restor. Dent. Endod. 2013:134–140. doi: 10.5395/rde.2013.38.3.134. 7658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schwindling F., Rues S., Schmitter M. Fracture resistance of glazed, full-contour ZLS incisor crowns. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2017;61(3):344–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.12.00861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ghajghoui O., Tasar-Faruk S. Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Microleakage of Endocrowns with Different Intracoronal Depths and Restorative Materials Luted with Various resin cements. Mater. Res. 2019;12(16) doi: 10.3390/ma12162528. 2528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jassim Z. M., Majeed M. A. Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Monolithic Crowns Fabricated from Different all-ceramic CAD / CAM Materials ( an in vitro study ) Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 2018;11 1689-1697. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zierden K., Acar J., Rehmann P., Wöstmann B. Wear and Fracture Strength of New Ceramic Resins for Chairside Milling. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2018;31(1):74–76. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]