Skip to main content
The British Journal of Radiology logoLink to The British Journal of Radiology
. 2022 Nov 16;95(1140):20220516. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220516

Prognostication of overall survival in patients with brain metastases using diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI

Laiz Laura de Godoy 1, Yin Jie Chen 1, Sanjeev Chawla 1, Angela N Viaene 2, Sumei Wang 1, Laurie A Loevner 1, Michelle Alonso-Basanta 3, Harish Poptani 4, Suyash Mohan 1,
PMCID: PMC9733614  PMID: 36354164

Abstract

Objectives:

To investigate the prognostic utility of DTI and DSC-PWI perfusion-derived parameters in brain metastases patients.

Methods:

Retrospective analyses of DTI-derived parameters (MD, FA, CL, CP, and CS) and DSC-perfusion PWI-derived rCBVmax from 101 patients diagnosed with brain metastases prior to treatment were performed. Using semi-automated segmentation, DTI metrics and rCBVmax were quantified from enhancing areas of the dominant metastatic lesion. For each metric, patients were classified as short- and long-term survivors based on analysis of the best coefficient for each parameter and percentile to separate the groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare mOS between these groups. Multivariate survival analysis was subsequently conducted. A correlative histopathologic analysis was performed in a subcohort (n = 10) with DTI metrics and rCBVmax on opposite ends of the spectrum.

Results:

Significant differences in mOS were observed for MDmin (p < 0.05), FA (p < 0.01), CL (p < 0.05), and CP (p < 0.01) and trend toward significance for rCBVmax (p = 0.07) between the two risk groups, in the univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, the best predictive survival model was comprised of MDmin (p = 0.05), rCBVmax (p < 0.05), RPA (p < 0.0001), and number of lesions (p = 0.07). On histopathology, metastatic tumors showed significant differences in the amount of stroma depending on the combination of DTI metrics and rCBVmax values. Patients with high stromal content demonstrated poorer mOS.

Conclusion:

Pretreatment DTI-derived parameters, notably MDmin and rCBVmax, are promising imaging markers for prognostication of OS in patients with brain metastases. Stromal cellularity may be a contributing factor to these differences.

Advances in knowledge:

The correlation of DTI-derived metrics and perfusion MRI with patient outcomes has not been investigated in patients with treatment naïve brain metastasis. DTI and DSC-PWI can aid in therapeutic decision-making by providing additional clinical guidance.

Introduction

Brain metastases are the most frequent central nervous system tumors in adults, with increasing incidence due to improved access to diagnostic imaging methods and prolonged survival from primary neoplasms. 1–3 It is therefore essential to accurately prognosticate these patients for appropriate therapeutic decision-making. Several scoring systems have been proposed to predict the prognosis of brain metastases. The recursive portioning analysis (RPA) assesses the Karnofsky performance status (KPS), age, controlled primary tumor, and extracranial metastasis; the graded prognostic assessment (GPA) evaluates KPS, age, number of brain metastasis, and extracranial metastasis; and the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA) considers the same characteristic as GPA in addition to primary tumor histology. 4–6

It has been reported that the higher the number of quantitative measurements assessed, the less subjective the scoring system is. 7–9 GPA includes the number of brain metastases, and RPA does not, and GPA is found to be more clinically useful, providing better treatment guidance. 10 Moreover, RPA was inefficient in patients with more than four metastases 11 and large variability in prognosis was observed within the intermediate RPA II class, 12 while a lack of power was indicated to be a limitation of the DS-GPA in predicting survival between histologic subtypes. 6 Growing evidence suggests that when the prognosis is unclear, clinicians require additional guidance to select appropriate treatment recommendations. Multiparametric MRI including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and dynamic susceptibility contrast-perfusion-weighted imaging (DSC-PWI) provides metabolic and physiologic information complementing the morphologic information about metastasis number and location, thereby providing added value to be used as objective biomarkers for prognostication purposes. 13

A recent study suggested that combination of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with clinical prognostic markers improves the prognostication of patients with resected brain metastases. 14 However, ADC, which has the same physiologic significance as mean diffusivity (MD), provides only the information about the magnitude of water molecular motion. DTI is commonly used for brain imaging and provides additional information about the tensor orientation and shape, including fractional anisotropy (FA), linear anisotropy (CL), and planar anisotropy (CP). 15,16 Previous studies, including from our group, have demonstrated the utility of DTI metrics in differentiating solitary brain metastasis from glioblastomas, 17–20 as well as for prediction of overall survival in glioblastoma patients. 21 These studies indicate that FA, CL, and CP values provide additional information about tumor diffusion characteristics, which may also be helpful to noninvasively assess the microstructure of brain metastasis, strengthening the utility of a single metric ‘ADC’ to better separate risk groups.

Besides DTI, DSC-PWI derived cerebral blood volume (CBV) is a relevant and potent biomarker to assess tumor angiogenesis and microvasculature, 22,23 and has been demonstrated to be a valid biomarker to predict survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma – patients with increased relative CBV were associated with poorer outcomes. 24–26 On the contrary, in a previous histopathologic analysis, patients with brain metastases with high microvascular density and a neoangiogenic vascularization pattern had favorable survival times. 27 However, pretreatment perfusion characteristics of brain metastases are yet to show significant prediction of overall response. 13,28,29

The combination of both DTI and DSC-PWI derived metrics provides additional information on the intratumoral heterogeneity and has been shown to improve prognostication in high-grade gliomas. 30–33 Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic utility of DTI and DSC- PWI derived parameters in a relatively large cohort of patients with treatment naïve brain metastases. In order to validate the imaging findings, correlative histopathologic analysis measuring stromal component (desmoplastic reaction) was performed in a subset of patients.

Methods and materials

Patient population

This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) and was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The inclusion criteria included a histologically confirmed diagnosis of brain metastasis and availability of conventional and advanced (DTI and DSC-PWI) MRI scans prior to any treatment for brain metastasis.

Based upon the inclusion criteria, 101 patients (mean age = 59, SD±12 years, 49 males/ 52 females) with solitary and multiple brain metastases (two, three, or more than three) were included. Primary cancer was lung (n = 56), breast (n = 15), and other (n = 30). Six patients were excluded from the analysis of DSC- PWI due to the presence of susceptibility artifacts. Clinical data included tumor type, KPS, GPA, RPA, and overall survival, which was measured as the time interval from initial MRI diagnosis of brain metastasis until the date of death (n = 82) or last known clinical encounter, if the patient was alive (n = 19). The details of each patient’s demographic, clinical, and diffusion and perfusion MRI-derived parameters are described in Supplementary Table 1.

MR imaging data acquisition

Diffusion Tensor imaging

Axial DTI data were acquired using 30 noncollinear/noncoplanar directions with a single-shot spin-echo, echo-planar read-out sequence with parallel imaging using generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) and acceleration factor of 2. The sequence parameters were as follows: repetition time (TR) / echo time (TE) = 5,000/86 ms, number of excitations (NEX) = 3, field of view (FOV) = 22 x 22cm2, matrix size = 128 x 128, in-plane resolution = 1.72 x 1.72 mm2; slice thickness = 3 mm; b = 0, 1000 s/mm2; number of slices = 40; acquisition time 8 min.

Dynamic susceptibility Contrast-Perfusion-weighted imaging

For axial DSC- PWI, a bolus of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance; Bracco Diagnostics, Princeton, New Jersey) was injected with a preloading dose of 0.07 mmol/kg to reduce the effect of contrast agent leakage on CBV measurements. A T2*-weighted gradient-echo EPI was used during the second 0.07 mmol /kg bolus of contrast agent for the DSC- PWI. The injection rate was 5 ml s−1 for all patients and was immediately followed by a flush of saline (total of 20 ml at the same rate). The sequence parameters were as follows: TR/TE = 2000/45 ms; FOV = 22 x 22 cm2; matrix size = 128 x 128; in-plane resolution = 1.72 x 1.72 mm2; slice thickness = 3 mm; BW = 1346 Hz/pixel; flip angle = 90°; EPI factor = 128; echo spacing = 0.83; acquisition time 3 min and 10 sec. Forty-five sequential measurements were acquired for each section. After the preloading dose of the contrast agent, routine sequences were also obtained, including axial T 1-weighted 3D MPRAGE postcontrast (TR/TE/TI 1760/3.1/950 ms; 192 × 256 matrix size; 1-mm-section thickness; acquisition time 3 min and 10 s) and axial FLAIR (TR/TE/TI 9420/141/2500 ms; 3-mm-section thickness; acquisition time 3 min and 10 s).

Image processing and data analysis

The motion and eddy current correction modules were applied to raw DTI data using in-house developed software (IDL; ITT Visual Information Solutions, Boulder, Colorado). Pixel-wise MD, FA, CL, CP, and spherical coefficient (CS) maps were computed by using the methods described earlier. 34,35 Leakage-corrected CBV maps were generated by performing gamma-variate curve fitting from DSC-PWI data using NordicICE software (NordicNeuroLab, Bergen, Norway).

The DTI derived maps, CBV maps, and T2-FLAIR images were resliced and co-registered to contrast-enhanced T 1-weighted images. A semiautomatic approach was used to segment the contrast-enhancing regions of the dominant metastatic lesion by using a signal intensity-based thresholding method as defined previously. 34,35

Tissue-Based analysis

Representative histologic sections stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Masson’s Trichrome were used to assess the stromal component (desmoplastic reaction) within the tumor by a board-certified neuropathologist (A.N.V.). The staining procedure for Masson’s Trichrome included: slides were deparaffinized and hydrated, thereafter placed in Bouin’s fixative for 1 h in 60 ˚C oven, washed in running tap water for 5 min, rinsed in deionized water, and stained in Weigert’s Iron Hematoxylin for 10 min. Subsequently, slides were washed in running tap water for 10 min, rinsed in deionized water, stained in Beibrich Scarlet- Acid Fuchsin solution for 15 min, and rinsed in deionized water, stained in Phosphotungstic acid for 2 min. Finally, the slides were stained in Aniline Blue solution for 1 to 5 min, rinsed in 1% acetic acid, dehydrated and coverslipped. The amount of tumor stroma was qualitatively assessed as low (scant to little), moderate, and high (stroma comprising a noticeable proportion of the overall tumor volume).

Final data and statistical analysis

DTI metrics and DSC-PWI derived CBV values were quantified from enhancing areas of dominant metastasis segmented semi-automatically, as described above. We used continuous values and various breakdowns in terms of coefficients (Q10, Q25, Q50, Q75, and Q90) for each parameter and percentiles (25th, 50th, and 75th percentile) to separate the patients into two risk groups (short and long-term survivors) in a univariate analysis. The best combination for each parameter from preliminary results was as follows, MD: the lower 10th percentile MD values (Q10) reported as minimum MD (MDmin) and subsequently separated the risk groups above and below the median (50th percentile) of the MDmin. FA/CL/CP/CS: the lower 25th percentile FA/CL/CP/CS values (Q25) and subsequently separated the risk groups above and below the first quartile (25th percentile) of the FA/CL/CP/CS Q25. rCBV: the top 90th percentile rCBV values (Q90) reported as rCBVmax and subsequently separated the risk groups above and below the third quartile (75th percentile) of the rCBVmax. Kaplan-Meier survival curve plots and log-rank tests were used to compare the survival rates using the aforementioned imaging parameters (MDmin, FA Q25, CL Q25, CP Q25, CS Q25, and rCBVmax), as well as clinical variables (number of brain metastasis and site of primary tumor), and clinical scoring systems (GPA and RPA classes) as stratification factors. Subsequently, clinical and imaging variables that demonstrated significant predictive values and trends toward significance from univariate survival analyses were incorporated into multivariate survival analysis using the Cox regression hazard model with backward conditional method. A probabilistic (p) value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using a statistical package, SPSS for Windows (v. 18.0; Chicago, IL).

Additionally, a correlative histopathologic analysis was performed in a subset of patients on the opposite ends of the spectrum of DTI metrics and DSC-PWI derived rCBVmax. The DTI metrics were used as a surrogate marker of tumor cellularity and microarchitectural organization 13 and rCBVmax for tumor angiogenesis and neovascularization. 27  Group 1 (n = 6; Supplementary Table 1: patients 12, 31, 66, 84, 87, and 94) was selected to represent the best combination of the lowest values of MDmin (impaired mobility of water; high cellularity) and the highest values of FA Q25 and CP Q25 (increased anisotropy; high organization of the tumor microarchitecture), and the lowest values of rCBVmax (reduced angiogenesis; poor vascularity). Group 2 (n = 4, Supplementary Table 1: patients 13, 34, 77, and 81) was selected to have the best combination of the highest values of MDmin (facilitated mobility of water; low cellularity) and the lowest values of FA Q25 and CP Q25 (decreased anisotropy; poor organization of the tumor microarchitecture), and the highest values of rCBVmax (elevated angiogenesis; increased vascularity). Of note, similar to the main cohort, this subcohort of patients also had metastatic tumors from a variety of primary sites (six lung adenocarcinomas, one breast adenocarcinoma, one colorectal adenocarcinoma, one high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of lung origin, and one sarcoma of lung origin).

Results

Survival analysis

The Median KPS score was 80, and the median overall survival (mOS) for all patients was 301 days. In univariate analysis, survival differences by GPA class was significant (log-rank p < 0.001. Class 1: 339.35 ± 128.79 days; Class 2: 682.64 ± 100.49 days; Class 3: 1519.86 days; and Class 4: 1553.67 ± 425.63 days) and also for RPA class (log-rank p < 0.001. Class 1: 1533.13 ± 238.61 days; Class 2: 505.25 ± 72.71 days; Class 3: 123.75 ± 30.09 days), indicating a valid cohort. The mOS using tumor primary site (lung, breast, melanoma, kidney, colon, or other) was not significantly different (log-rank p > 0.05), and the number of brain metastasis showed a trend toward significance (log-rank p = 0.09), as independent predictors in univariate analysis.

Determination of long and short-term survivors using MRI data

Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed significant differences in mOS for MDmin (log-rank p < 0.05), FA Q25 (log-rank p < 0.01), CL Q25 (log-rank p < 0.05), and CP Q25 (log-rank p < 0.01), and a trend toward significance for rCBVmax (log-rank p = 0.07). However, CS Q25 (log-rank p > 0.05) did not predict survival (Figures 1 and 2 and Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Kaplan–Meier curves showing significantly higher overall survival (log-rank p = 0.013) in patients with MDmin above 50th percentile, significantly higher overall survival (log-rank p = 0.009) in patients with FA Q25 below 25th percentile, and significantly higher overall survival (log-rank p = 0.009) in patients with CP Q25 below 25th percentile.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Kaplan–Meier curves showing a non-significant difference in overall survival in for CS Q25 (log-rank p = 0.384) and a trend toward significance for rCBVmax (log-rank p = 0.073).

Table 1.

Determination of long and short-term survivors using MRI data

Coefficients Percentiles mOS log-rank p
MDmin Below the 50th percentile 470.81 ± 82.44 <0.05
Above the 50th percentile 983.44 ± 153.19
FA Q25 Below the 25th percentile 1269.92 ± 249.96 <0.01
Above the 25th percentile 565.073 ± 78.75
CL Q25 Below the 25th percentile 1162.31 ± 240.35 <0.05
Above 25th percentile 622.832 ± 92.68
CP Q25 Below the 25th percentile 1253.06 ± 252.02 <0.01
Above 25th percentile 571.86 ± 79.64
CS Q25 Below the 25th percentile 584.62 ± 140.18 >0.05
Above 25th percentile 785.69 ± 111.94
rCBVmax Below the 75th percentile 853.19 ± 98.71 0.07
Above the 75th percentile 1126.57 ± 268.98

CL, linear coefficient; CP, planar coefficient; CS, spherical coefficient; FA, fractional anisotropy; MDmin, minimum mean diffusivity; mOS, median overall survival; rCBVmax, maximum relative cerebral blood volume.

Determination of the best-predictive survival model

When statistically significant imaging and clinical independent prognostication parameters (MDmin, FA Q25, CL Q25, CP Q25, RPA, and GPA) and parameters with trends toward significance, such as rCBVmax (log-rank p = 0.07) and number of metastatic brain lesions (log-rank p = 0.09), from univariate analyses were incorporated into Cox proportion hazard regression test, the best-predictive survival model was obtained, which consisted of a combination of MDmin (p = 0.05), rCBVmax (p < 0.05), RPA (p < 0.0001), and number of brain metastasis (p = 0.07) in determining the OS.

Tissue-based analysis

Metastatic tumors showed an overall higher interstitial connective tissue (stromal component) in Group 1 (n = 6, mOS 83.33 ± 12.41 days) as compared to Group 2 (n = 4, mOS 1858.00 ± 707.81 days). The lowest values of MDmin and rCBVmax, along with the highest values of FA Q25 and CP Q25 (Group 1) significantly correlated with elevated stromal content and worse mOS (Figure 3). On the other hand, the highest values of MDmin and rCBVmax, along with the lowest values of FA Q25 and CP Q25 (Group 2) correlated with lower stromal content and better mOS (Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

55-year-old female with metastatic adenocarcinoma of colorectal origin, prior to any treatment for brain metastasis, presenting with mOS of 62 days. (A) Contrast-enhanced T 1-weighted image shows a heterogeneous enhancing lesion in the left inferior frontal lobe. (B) FLAIR images demonstrate surrounding vasogenic edema. (C) Decreased ADC (ADCmin = 0,000692) and (D) very high FA (FA Q25 = 0,12) values from the enhancing part. (E) DSC- PWI with low rCBV from the enhancing region of the tumor (rCBVmax = 6.28; white arrows in E). (F) and (G) Pathology from surgical resection demonstrates high stromal component (blue staining, black arrows in G). H&E stain (F) and Masson’s trichrome stain (G). Histological photos were taken at 100x magnification.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

45-year-old female with metastatic adenocarcinoma of breast, prior to any treatment for brain metastasis, presenting with mOS of 2859 days. (A) Contrast-enhanced T 1-weighted image shows a ring enhancing lesion delimitating a central area of necrosis in the left temporal lobe. (B) FLAIR images demonstrate surrounding vasogenic edema. (C) Increased ADC (ADCmin = 0,000905) and (D) very low FA (FA Q25 = 0,057) values from the enhancing part. (E) DSC- PWI with elevated rCBV from the enhancing region of the tumor (rCBVmax = 8.64, white arrows in E). (F) and (G) Pathology from surgical resection demonstrates a smaller stromal component (blue staining, white arrows in G). H&E stain (F) and Masson’s trichrome stain (G). Histological photos were taken at 100x magnification.

A quantitative measurement of the stromal component was not performed due to large variability across the slides. Thus, a qualitative assessment of low, moderate and high component was used instead. Assessment of the stromal component was facilitated by Masson’s Trichrome stained sections (blue staining). These findings were consistent within the two groups regardless of tumor site of primary origin.

Discussion

The prognostic value of ADC is well-known for extracranial cancers in predicting survival, response to therapy, and even propensity to form brain metastasis. 36,37 Primary CNS tumors with low ADC values have also been associated with worse outcomes. 38–40 Recently, ADC incorporated with standard clinical parameters has shown to improve the prediction of overall survival in patients with surgically resected brain metastasis. 14 In this study, the MDmin, FA Q25, CL Q25, CP 25, and CBVmax as independent measures separated risk groups in short and long-term survivors, and in a multivariate analysis, the combination of MDmin, rCBVmax, RPA, and the number of brain metastasis was the best predictive survival model, reinforcing the importance of MDmin and rCBVmax as imaging parameters to predict OS and a possible confounding effect of RPA and the number of metastatic lesions. In addition, we demonstrated a correlation between the amount of desmoplastic reaction and mOS, substantiating the DTI metrics and rCBVmax values.

The correlation of DTI-derived parameters and perfusion with patient outcomes has not been investigated in treatment naïve brain metastasis. However, a few studies reported the importance of ADC values in predicting survival in preoperative brain metastasis. 41,42 These studies reported aggressive tumor behavior in patients with low ADC values. In accordance with these studies, we also observed lower mOS in patients with MDmin below the median (similar physiological significance of ADC), and the MDmin remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis, supporting its prognostication value. However, other studies, 17–19 including from our group, 20 have demonstrated that the application of more gradient directions (DTI) can provide further tissue characterization and potentially be utilized for prognostication. We, therefore, evaluated several DTI parameters to noninvasively assess the tumor microarchitecture, demonstrating poor mOS in patients with low MDmin (impaired mobility of water) and high FA Q25, CL Q25, and CP 25 values (increased anisotropy). In other words, patients with high cellularity and organization of the tumor microarchitecture comprised short-term survivors. On the other hand, patients with high MDmin (facilitated mobility of water) and low FA Q25, CL Q25, and CP 25 values (decreased anisotropy), that is, low cellularity and disorganization of the tumor microarchitecture, were represented by long-term survivors.

Histopathologic studies have identified dense stromal matrix in primary tumors characterized by increased collagen fibril stiffness and anisotropy, described as a desmoplastic reaction, corroborating tumor growth. 43,44 In preoperative brain metastasis, Berghoff et al 2013 42 reported a significant correlation of prominent interstitial fibrosis with the semiquantitative DWI signal intensity, resembling the impaired mobility of water molecules in the intercellular space. By extending the quantitative assessment of multiple DTI parameters, we demonstrated higher stromal component in patients with overall worse survival prognosis, represented by the lowest MDmin values and the highest values of FA Q25 and CP Q25. In contrast, patients with the highest MDmin values and the lowest FA Q25 and CP Q25 values presented with low cellular stromal component and had better long-term survival. These results from analyzed DTI metrics may reflect the tumor microarchitecture density and organization, reinforcing the importance of the interstitial space in the pathobiology of brain metastasis and the potential of quantitative DTI metrics to indirectly evaluate histopathological features.

The efficacy of chemoradiation therapy relies on the effective delivery of therapeutic agents and oxygen to the tumor cells. However, delivery of the drug and oxygen is often impeded by abnormal blood vessels and the presence of tumor hypoxia. 45 Using MRI-based perfusion parameters such as vascular transfer constant (Ktrans, a measure of tumor blood flow and vascular permeability), several previous studies 46–49 have reported that patients with extracranial cancers exhibiting elevated pretreatment Ktrans harbor prolonged OS. In the present study, rCBVmax was found to be a significant predictor in the determination of OS from Cox regression analysis, and brain metastasis patients with higher pretreatment rCBVmax had longer mOS. Our results and those of earlier published reports support the notion that tumors with relatively higher blood flow/volume are associated with increased oxygenation levels resulting in better access to chemotherapeutic drugs and radiosensitivity and thereby associated with improved survival outcomes.

The dense stromal matrix has also been correlated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with deficient vasculature limiting the delivery of chemotherapy and resulting in resistance to systemic therapies. 50 Therapeutic targeting of stromal cells increases intratumoral perfusion and enhances therapeutic delivery. In the current study, the group of patients with the lowest values of rCBVmax (reduced tumor angiogenesis) showed higher stromal component and dismal survival rates. According to a prior histopathological study, 27 small peritumoral edema around brain metastasis was correlated with low microvascular density and neoangiogenic vascularization and was more likely to show brain-invasive growth than tumors with large edema. Therefore, rCBV as a measure of angiogenic activity may indirectly reflect tumor infiltration and predict OS.

There is a growing body of evidence supporting that advanced MRI techniques could potentially be integrated into the widely validated prognostic models for brain metastases patients, 14 such as RPA or GPA scores, which can be improved with quantitative imaging metrics assessing the metabolic and physiologic information of the tumor. Our results suggest that the incorporation of rCBVmax and MDmin could further enhance these prognostic markers, potentially contributing to therapeutic decision-making. For example, in future, brain metastases patients with a good prognosis can be offered more aggressive treatments, whereas, in patients with poor prognosis, optimal treatment focused on quality of life would be deemed more appropriate.

Despite promising findings, our study was also associated with certain limitations, including the retrospective study design. In addition, histological correlation was only performed on a limited sample size. Furthermore, our data is from a single institution and could benefit from validation in a multiinstitutional cohort, preferably in a larger prospective study.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we reported the prognostic value of DTI metrics and rCBVmax in segregating long and short-term survivors with brain metastasis and their correlation with tissue-based stromal features. Additionally, we reinforced the importance of MDmin and rCBVmax in a multivariate analysis. Further validation in larger prospective studies in a multiinstitutional setting may substantiate the incorporation of advanced imaging techniques into established risk stratification models.

Supplementary Table 1.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: CL- linear coefficient; CP- planar coefficient; CS- spherical coefficient; DSC-PWI - Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Perfusion Weighted Imaging; DTI - diffusion tensor imaging; FA-fractional anisotropy; MD – mean diffusivity; MDmin – minimum mean diffusivity; MRI – magnetic resonance imaging; mOS – median overall survival; rCBVmax- maximum relative cerebral blood volume.

Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank the University of Pennsylvania neuroradiology clinical research division, Lisa Desiderio, Lauren Karpf and MRI technicians, for their valuable contributions to this project.

Contributor Information

Laiz Laura de Godoy, Email: laiz.godoy@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Yin Jie Chen, Email: woodtreeyj@gmail.com.

Sanjeev Chawla, Email: sanjeev.chawla@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Angela N Viaene, Email: viaenea@chop.edu.

Sumei Wang, Email: sumei.wang19@gmail.com.

Laurie A Loevner, Email: laurie.loevner@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Michelle Alonso-Basanta, Email: michelle.alonso-basanta@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Harish Poptani, Email: harish.poptani@liverpool.ac.uk.

Suyash Mohan, Email: drsuyash@gmail.com.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Soffietti R, Rudā R, Mutani R . Management of brain metastases . J Neurol 2002. ; 249 : 1357 – 69 . doi: 10.1007/s00415-002-0870-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gavrilovic IT, Posner JB . Brain metastases: epidemiology and pathophysiology . J Neurooncol 2005. ; 75 : 5 – 14 . doi: 10.1007/s11060-004-8093-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Fox BD, Cheung VJ, Patel AJ, Suki D, Rao G . Epidemiology of metastatic brain tumors . Neurosurg Clin N Am 2011. ; 22 : 1 – 6 . doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2010.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Sperduto PW, Berkey B, Gaspar LE, Mehta M, Curran W . A new prognostic index and comparison to three other indices for patients with brain metastases: an analysis of 1,960 patients in the RTOG database . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008. ; 70 : 510 – 14 . doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gaspar L, Scott C, Rotman M, Asbell S, Phillips T, Wasserman T, et al . Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three radiation therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997. ; 37 : 745 – 51 . doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00619-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sperduto PW, Kased N, Roberge D, Xu Z, Shanley R, Luo X, et al . Summary report on the graded prognostic assessment: an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases . J Clin Oncol 2012. ; 30 : 419 – 25 . doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Yamamoto M, Sato Y, Serizawa T, Kawabe T, Higuchi Y, Nagano O, et al . Subclassification of recursive partitioning analysis class II patients with brain metastases treated radiosurgically . Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012. ; 83 : 1399 – 1405 . doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Serizawa T, Higuchi Y, Nagano O, Hirai T, Ono J, Saeki N, et al . Testing different brain metastasis grading systems in stereotactic radiosurgery: radiation therapy Oncology Group’s RPA, Sir, bsbm, GpA, and modified RPA . J Neurosurg 2012. ; 117 Suppl : 31 – 37 . doi: 10.3171/2012.8.GKS12710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Yu C, Sloan AE, Vengoechea J, Wang M, Dignam JJ, et al . A nomogram for individualized estimation of survival among patients with brain metastasis . Neuro Oncol 2012. ; 14 : 910 – 18 . doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Viani GA, da Silva LGB, Stefano EJ . Prognostic indexes for brain metastases: which is the most powerful? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012. ; 83 : e325 – 30 . doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Nieder C, Andratschke N, Grosu AL, Molls M . Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class does not predict survival in patients with four or more brain metastases . European Journal of Cancer 2001. ; 37 : S341 . doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)81757-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Estabrook NC, Lutz ST, Johnson CS, Lo SS, Henderson MA . Does graded prognostic assessment outperform recursive partitioning analysis in patients with moderate prognosis brain metastases? CNS Oncol 2016. ; 5 : 69 – 76 . doi: 10.2217/cns.15.45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pope WB . Brain metastases: neuroimaging . Handb Clin Neurol 2018. ; 149 : 89 – 112 . doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811161-1.00007-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zakaria R, Chen YJ, Hughes DM, Wang S, Chawla S, Poptani H, et al . Does the application of diffusion weighted imaging improve the prediction of survival in patients with resected brain metastases? A retrospective multicenter study . Cancer Imaging 2020. ; 20 : 16 . doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-0295-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Alexander AL, Hasan K, Kindlmann G, Parker DL, Tsuruda JS . A geometric analysis of diffusion tensor measurements of the human brain . Magn Reson Med 2000. ; 44 : 283 – 91 . doi: 10.1002/1522-2594(200008)44:2<283::aid-mrm16>3.0.co;2-v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Westin C-F, Maier SE, Mamata H, Nabavi A, Jolesz FA, Kikinis R . Processing and visualization for diffusion tensor MRI . Med Image Anal 2002. ; 6 : 93 – 108 . doi: 10.1016/s1361-8415(02)00053-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Calli C, Kitis O, Yunten N, Yurtseven T, Islekel S, Akalin T . Perfusion and diffusion MR imaging in enhancing malignant cerebral tumors . Eur J Radiol 2006. ; 58 : 394 – 403 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Tsuchiya K, Fujikawa A, Nakajima M, Honya K . Differentiation between solitary brain metastasis and high-grade glioma by diffusion tensor imaging . Br J Radiol 2005. ; 78 : 533 – 37 . doi: 10.1259/bjr/68749637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Yamasaki F, Kurisu K, Satoh K, Arita K, Sugiyama K, Ohtaki M, et al . Apparent diffusion coefficient of human brain tumors at MR imaging . Radiology 2005. ; 235 : 985 – 91 . doi: 10.1148/radiol.2353031338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Wang S, Kim S, Chawla S, Wolf RL, Knipp DE, Vossough A, et al . Differentiation between glioblastomas, solitary brain metastases, and primary cerebral lymphomas using diffusion tensor and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging . AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011. ; 32 : 507 – 14 . doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Mohan S, Wang S, Coban G, Kural F, Chawla S, O’Rourke DM, et al . Detection of occult neoplastic infiltration in the corpus callosum and prediction of overall survival in patients with glioblastoma using diffusion tensor imaging . Eur J Radiol 2019. ; 112 : 106 – 11 . doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lacerda S, Law M . Magnetic resonance perfusion and permeability imaging in brain tumors . Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2009. ; 19 : 527 – 57 . doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2009.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Thompson G, Mills SJ, Stivaros SM, Jackson A . Imaging of brain tumors: perfusion/permeability . Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2010. ; 20 : 337 – 53 . doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2010.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Romano A, Pasquini L, Di Napoli A, Tavanti F, Boellis A, Rossi Espagnet MC, et al . Prediction of survival in patients affected by glioblastoma: histogram analysis of perfusion MRI . J Neurooncol 2018. ; 139 : 455 – 60 . doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-2887-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Law M, Young RJ, Babb JS, Peccerelli N, Chheang S, Gruber ML, et al . Gliomas: predicting time to progression or survival with cerebral blood volume measurements at dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging . Radiology 2008. ; 247 : 490 – 98 . doi: 10.1148/radiol.2472070898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Bag AK, Cezayirli PC, Davenport JJ, Gaddikeri S, Fathallah-Shaykh HM, Cantor A, et al . Survival analysis in patients with newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma multiforme using pre- and post-treatment peritumoral perfusion imaging parameters . J Neurooncol 2014. ; 120 : 361 – 70 . doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1560-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Spanberger T, Berghoff AS, Dinhof C, Ilhan-Mutlu A, Magerle M, Hutterer M, et al . Extent of peritumoral brain edema correlates with prognosis, tumoral growth pattern, HIF1A expression and angiogenic activity in patients with single brain metastases . Clin Exp Metastasis 2013. ; 30 : 357 – 68 . doi: 10.1007/s10585-012-9542-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Essig M, Waschkies M, Wenz F, Debus J, Hentrich HR, Knopp MV . Assessment of brain metastases with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial results . Radiology 2003. ; 228 : 193 – 99 . doi: 10.1148/radiol.2281020298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zakaria R, Das K, Bhojak M, Radon M, Walker C, Jenkinson MD . The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of brain metastases: diagnosis to prognosis . Cancer Imaging 2014. ; 14 : 8 . doi: 10.1186/1470-7330-14-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Brancato V, Nuzzo S, Tramontano L, Condorelli G, Salvatore M, Cavaliere C . Predicting survival in glioblastoma patients using diffusion MR imaging metrics-A systematic review . Cancers (Basel) 2020. ; 12 ( 10 ): E2858 . doi: 10.3390/cancers12102858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Park JE, Kim HS, Jo Y, Yoo R-E, Choi SH, Nam SJ, et al . Radiomics prognostication model in glioblastoma using diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI . Sci Rep 2020. ; 10 ( 1 ): 4250 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61178-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Petrova L, Korfiatis P, Petr O, LaChance DH, Parney I, Buckner JC, et al . Cerebral blood volume and apparent diffusion coefficient-valuable predictors of non-response to bevacizumab treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma . J Neurol Sci 2019. ; 405 : 116433 . doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Puig J, Sánchez-González J, Blasco G, Daunis-I-Estadella P, Federau C, Alberich-Bayarri Á, et al . Intravoxel incoherent motion metrics as potential biomarkers for survival in glioblastoma . PLoS One 2016. ; 11 ( 7 ): e0158887 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wang S, Kim S, Chawla S, Wolf RL, Zhang W-G, O’Rourke DM, et al . Differentiation between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases using diffusion tensor imaging . Neuroimage 2009. ; 44 : 653 – 60 . doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Chawla S, Wang S, Mohan S, Nasrallah M, Verma G, Brem S, et al . Differentiation of brain infection from necrotic glioblastoma using combined analysis of diffusion and perfusion MRI . J Magn Reson Imaging 2019. ; 49 : 184 – 94 . doi: 10.1002/jmri.26053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Nakajo M, Kajiya Y, Kaneko T, Kaneko Y, Takasaki T, Tani A, et al . Fdg PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer: prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake values and apparent diffusion coefficient values of the primary lesion . Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010. ; 37 : 2011 – 20 . doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1529-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ohno Y, Koyama H, Yoshikawa T, Matsumoto K, Aoyama N, Onishi Y, et al . Diffusion-Weighted MRI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT: performance as predictors of tumor treatment response and patient survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy . AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012. ; 198 : 75 – 82 . doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Barajas RF Jr, Rubenstein JL, Chang JS, Hwang J, Cha S . Diffusion-Weighted MR imaging derived apparent diffusion coefficient is predictive of clinical outcome in primary central nervous system lymphoma . AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010. ; 31 : 60 – 66 . doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Wu C-C, Jain R, Radmanesh A, Poisson LM, Guo W-Y, Zagzag D, et al . Predicting genotype and survival in glioma using standard clinical MR imaging apparent diffusion coefficient images: a pilot study from the cancer genome atlas . AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018. ; 39 : 1814 – 20 . doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kim BS, Kim ST, Kim JH, Seol HJ, Nam D-H, Shin HJ, et al . Apparent diffusion coefficient as a predictive biomarker for survival in patients with treatment-naive glioblastoma using quantitative multiparametric magnetic resonance profiling . World Neurosurgery 2019. ; 122 : e812 – 20 . doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Zakaria R, Das K, Radon M, Bhojak M, Rudland PR, Sluming V, et al . Diffusion-Weighted MRI characteristics of the cerebral metastasis to brain boundary predicts patient outcomes . BMC Med Imaging 2014. ; 14 : 26 . doi: 10.1186/1471-2342-14-26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Berghoff AS, Spanberger T, Ilhan-Mutlu A, Magerle M, Hutterer M, Woehrer A, et al . Preoperative diffusion-weighted imaging of single brain metastases correlates with patient survival times . PLoS One 2013. ; 8 ( 2 ): e55464 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Koontongkaew S . The tumor microenvironment contribution to development, growth, invasion and metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas . J Cancer 2013. ; 4 : 66 – 83 . doi: 10.7150/jca.5112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Pham TT, Stait-Gardner T, Lee CS, Barton M, Graham PL, Liney G, et al . Correlation of ultra-high field MRI with histopathology for evaluation of rectal cancer heterogeneity . Sci Rep 2019. ; 9 ( 1 ): 9311 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45450-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Vaupel P, Kallinowski F, Okunieff P . Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: a review . Cancer Res 1989. ; 49 : 6449 – 65 . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Chawla S, Loevner LA, Kim SG, Hwang W-T, Wang S, Verma G, et al . Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI-derived intracellular water lifetime (τ I): a prognostic marker for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas . AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018. ; 39 : 138 – 44 . doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Chawla S, Kim S, Loevner LA, Hwang W-T, Weinstein G, Chalian A, et al . Prediction of disease-free survival in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging . AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011. ; 32 : 778 – 84 . doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Lichtor T . Molecular Considerations and Evolving Surgical Management Issues in the Treatment of Patients with a Brain Tumor [ BoD ]; 2015. . doi: 10.5772/58501 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Ohno Y, Nogami M, Higashino T, Takenaka D, Matsumoto S, Hatabu H, et al . Prognostic value of dynamic MR imaging for non-small-cell lung cancer patients after chemoradiotherapy . J Magn Reson Imaging 2005. ; 21 : 775 – 83 . doi: 10.1002/jmri.20297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Neesse A, Michl P, Frese KK, Feig C, Cook N, Jacobetz MA, et al . Stromal biology and therapy in pancreatic cancer . Gut 2011. ; 60 : 861 – 68 . doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.226092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1.

Articles from The British Journal of Radiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES