Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the association of diet quality and perception of consumption benefits with intake of fermented dairy products in a representative sample of the Polish population. The study was carried out in February 2020 and involved 2009 men and women randomly sampled from the representative Polish population stratified into two age groups (19–30 and 66–75 years). Dairy product intake was evaluated using a qualitative food frequency questionnaire. Diet quality was assessed by calculating the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) score. The perceived health benefit of dairy product consumption was assessed by a literature-based questionnaire. The Health Concern Scale was used to measure participants’ attitudes toward health. The median intake of fermented dairy products was 0.8 portion/day (IQR: 0.4–1.6). Intake of fermented dairy products was associated with a higher MEDAS score. We observed that people with the highest intake of fermented dairy products consumed more oils, vegetables, wine, legumes, fish and seafood, sweets and pastries, nuts, had a higher preference for white meat and were more likely to report their perceived benefits to maintain body weight, reduce cardiovascular risk, and improve immune and dental health. Moreover, a high intake of fermented dairy products was positively related to paying more attention to health. Our study identified patterns of health behaviors associated with the frequent consumption of fermented dairy products. We observed that the intake of fermented dairy products is associated with better diet quality, consumer self-consciousness, and a greater attitude toward personal health.
Keywords: dairy, fermented dairy, Mediterranean diet, diet quality, health benefits, health beliefs, health concern
1. Introduction
Unhealthy diets contribute to the increasing burden of non-communicable diseases.
Annually, noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) kill 41 million people each year and 17 million people die from them before age 70. Cardiovascular diseases account for most NCDs with 17.9 million deaths, followed by cancers (9.3 million), chronic respiratory diseases (4.1 million), and diabetes (2.0 million including kidney disease deaths caused by diabetes) [1]. Consumption of dairy products has the potential to protect against NCDs [2]. More research suggests that supplementation with dairy products and healthy eating patterns, such as the Mediterranean diet, may provide a numerous health benefits and improve health outcomes [3].
The most common examples of fermented dairy products are fermented milk items (e.g., yogurt, cultured cream, buttermilk, and kefir, although many variations of these products exist based on historical practices, geography, and type of milk), butter, and cheeses [2]. Fermented dairy products have existed for millennia as an outstanding way to preserve milk, and to provide safe food with desirable sensorial properties and numerous health benefits [4,5]. It should also be emphasized that dairy products constitute a heterogeneous food group, consisting of a large number of products that differ in both the nutritional composition, such as fat content, and the structure of the dairy matrix, which indicates that certain fermented milk products may have different effects on blood lipid levels [6]. Moreover, the presence of bacteria, fungi and yeast, through their metabolism and proteolytic action, can promote the release of fatty acids and peptides as well as minerals and vitamins (such as vitamins A, B1, B2, B6, B12, niacin, pantothenic acid and folic acid, as well as vitamin D, calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, zinc and potassium iodide [7]). Thereby, increasing their bioavailability from milk products may result in additional benefits for the body [8]. These effects may include the modulation of immune function, healthy intestinal microbiota, elimination of pathogens, decreased allergy, and other benefits that may slow down the deterioration of health [9]. An important issue that should also be emphasized is that of milk fat. After years of controversy, with many guidelines recommending a reduced intake of full-fat dairy products, in preference for the consumption of low or nonfat dairy foods, current knowledge points to the more appropriate recommendation of moderate consumption of full-fat dairy foods as part of a healthy lifestyle [10]. Saturated fats (SFA), cholesterol, and the caloric content of dairy products, have been the basis of past arguments against dairy fats. SFA has been considered to affect cardiovascular health negatively, but nowadays, a current meta-analysis of cohort studies suggested that total fat, SFA, MUFA, and PUFA intakes were not associated with an increased risk of cardio-vascular disease [10,11].
The presence of bacteria in fermented dairy products is very variable and depends mainly on the storage time. The shorter the time, the higher the values observed and technological process used. The main species in fermented milk products are L. lactis, S. salivarius ssp. thermophilus (S. thermophilus) and lactobacilli such as L. delbrueckii ssp in yoghurts and fermented milk and L. helveticus in Swiss cheeses [5]. It should be emphasized here that particular interest in the consumption of fermented dairy foods can be credited to the explosion of research into the human microbiome [12,13]. Studies have demonstrated that diet influences the structure and function of the gut microbiota [14,15]. It is believed that the consumption of fermented foods containing probiotics—“live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” [16,17]—is an effective way to introduce potentially beneficial microorganisms to the intestinal tract and help manage a wide range of disorders. Those among others include disorders associated with gut microbial dysbiosis, such as behavior and (gut-)brain disorders, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and coeliac disease, as well as extra-intestinal disorders, including allergy, asthma, obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease and cancer [17,18,19,20]. Another critical aspect affecting the health impact of fermented foods is the number of live microorganisms provided by the consumption of fermented foods. In a review by Rezac et al. [21], many fermented foods (cheese, yoghurt, sausages, vegetables, cereals, sour beer, kombucha, fermented fish, and tempeh) were found to contain 105–107 colony forming units (CFU) of LAB/(mL or g), with cultured dairy products containing up to 109 CFU/(mL or g) [17].
Thus, it seems necessary to increase the scale of educational activities related to the promotion of the consumption of fermented milk products to reduce the occurrence of noncommunicable diseases. The intention to maintain health may be one of the reasons for choosing particular groups of foods. The high share of fermented dairy products in Polish diet results from Poles’ belief in the benefits of their consumption [22]. However, these beliefs only sometimes concern the perception of all possible beneficial health effects. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the association between diet quality, perception of consumption benefits, and fermented dairy product intake in a representative sample of the Polish population.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection
The attempt to survey Poles’ opinions on dairy products and their aspect of innovation was representative, nationwide and included 2009 Poles aged 19–30 and 66–75. The survey was conducted using computer assisted personal interviews (CAPI) in January and February 2020. The sample for the survey had a quota-random character. The population characteristics that were taken into account in compiling the sample were: voivodship, borough size class, gender and age of the respondent in 2 categories: 19–30 years old and 66–75 years old. Due to the lack of data on food consumption, the studied sample consisted of1695 people.
2.2. Questionnaires
The structured questionnaire concerned the study of consumer behavior on the market of innovative dairy products with pro-healthy properties and the study of expectations towards these products. The questionnaire covered 8 thematic groups and contained 83 questions giving 302 result variables.
Dairy product consumption was assessed using a qualitative food frequency questionnaire where questions were created based on the validated KomPAN questionnaire [23] and Codex Alimentarius dairy food grouping [24]. Total fermented dairy product consumption was calculated as a sum of natural and sweetened fermented dairy products and rennet cheeses.
Diet quality was described with the German version of the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) score [25]. The questionnaire consists of 14 questions concerning the consumption of selected food groups. However, an original question relating to a dish with a traditional sauce of tomatoes, garlic, onion, or leeks sautéed in olive oil, was changed to servings of whole-grain cereal products. The questionnaire result allows for assessing to what extent the diet of the examined person is consistent with the Mediterranean diet pattern. This allowed for selecting groups whose diet was consistent with the principles of proper nutrition or was different from theirs.
The Health Concern Scale (HCS) allowed to assess the respondent’s attitudes to health. The questionnaire consists of 10 statements concerning the interest in health and the relationship between excessive consumption of sugar, fat, salt, cholesterol, and food additives and selected diseases [26].
The questions related to the health benefits of regular consumption of all analyzed dairy product was created based on the literature. The questions concerned weight management, heart, bone, digestive and dental health, and immune defense; however, respondents could also indicate no benefits.
2.3. Confounding Factors
Participants declared their weight, height and waist circumference. On this basis body mass index (BMI) was calculated (kg/m2) and classified as underweight (<18.50 kg/m2) normal (18.50–24.99 kg/m2), or overweight and obesity (≥25.00 kg/m2). Other confounders which were taken into account were: age cohort (19–30 y, 66–75 y), gender (women, men), smoking status (current, former, never), sleeping time (<6 h, 6–9 h, >9 h), TV watching time (<2 h, 2–4 h, 4–6 h, 6–8 h, 8–10 h, >10 h), education level (primary, secondary, vocational, higher, not wish to answer), economic status (very poor, poor, medium, good, very good, not wish to answer).
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Variables were presented as a median and interquartile range (IQR) if were continuous and as a percentage and number if were categorical. Differences of continuous variables across quartiles of total fermented dairy product consumption were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s post-hoc test. Differences of categorical variables were obtained using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. The associations between quintiles of total fermented dairy products consumption and MEDAS, its component, HCS and health benefits were evaluated by the generalized linear model. In all analysis, covariate adjustment set included age cohort, gender, smoking status, sleeping time, TV watching time, education level, economic status (all categorical). Due to skewed distributions input data were first log-transformed and analyzed with the generalized linear models. For clarity of presentation results were presented as back-transformed (exponentiated) least square means and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI). In similar manner, associations of HCS, perceived health benefits and MEDAS with consumption of fermented dairy products were evaluated using general linear model using the same adjustment set, as indicated above.
The significance level was set to p < 0.05. The statistical analysis was carried out using STATISTICA software (version 13.1 PL; StatSoft Inc.: Tulsa, OK, USA/Statsoft Inc.: Kraków, Poland).
3. Results
Table 1 shows the basic characteristics of the studied sample by quintiles of total fermented dairy products. The median consumption frequency was 0.8 (0.4; 1.6) portions/day. Participants in Q5 compared with Q3 declared higher waist circumference (87 cm vs. 80 cm, respectively) and in the age cohort of 19–30 years, were younger (25 years vs. 27 years, respectively). Participants who consumed fermented dairy products more frequently were more likely to be women, watch TV more than 6 h per day and less likely to sleep 6–9 h.
Table 1.
Basic characteristics.
| Total Fermented Dairy Products Consumption | p | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | ||
| Fermented dairy product consumption, times/d † | 0.2 (0.1; 0.2) | 0.4 (0.3; 0.7) | 0.8 (0.7; 0.9) | 1.2 (1.2; 1.3) | 2.1 (1.7; 2.6) | |
| Age cohort 19–30 y, years † | 26 (23; 28) | 26 (23; 29) | 27 (24; 29) a | 26 (22; 28) | 25 (21; 28) a | 0.022 |
| Age cohort 66–75 y, years † | 69 (67; 71) | 69 (67; 71) | 68 (67; 70) | 69 (67; 71) | 69 (67; 71) | 0.310 |
| Gender (women) | 48.1 (148) | 51.3 (180) | 58.7 (186) | 53.2 (166) | 59.0 (240) | 0.015 |
| Waist circumference, cm † | 86 (75; 100) | 83 (70; 95) | 80 (70; 90) a | 85 (75; 96) | 87 (76; 98) a | 0.016 |
| Body mass index-men, kg/m2 † | 25.9 (24.0; 28.7) | 26.0 (22.9; 28.0) | 25.6 (23.6; 27.8) | 26.0 (23.7; 28.7) | 26.0 (23.4; 28.7) | 0.613 |
| Body mass index-women, kg/m2 † | 24.5 (20.7; 29.3) | 23.4 (21.4; 27.7) | 23.8 (21.3; 26.7) | 24.2 (22.0; 27.6) | 24.2 (21.7; 27.8) | 0.520 |
| % Overweight and obese | 53.7 (123) | 51.5 (138) | 48.4 (119) | 53.3 (119) | 50.9 (172) | 0.773 |
| Smoking status (current) | 20.1 (62) | 24.8 (87) | 24.3 (77) | 23.7 (74) | 27.3 (111) | 0.290 |
| Physical activity (MVPA) | 61.0 (188) | 65.8 (231) | 68.8 (218) | 65.4 (204) | 61.2 (249) | 0.170 |
| TV watching time (more than 6 h) | 12.3 (38) | 17.4 (61) | 16.4 (52) | 18.9 (59) | 24.3 (99) | 0.001 |
| Sleeping time (6–9 h) | 79.2 (244) | 83.2 (292) | 77.9 (247) | 76.0 (237) | 74.0 (301) | 0.034 |
| Economic status (high and very high) | 25.0 (77) | 28.8 (101) | 25.9 (82) | 24.4 (76) | 28.0 (114) | 0.643 |
| Education level (higher) | 13.6 (42) | 15.1 (53) | 18.3 (58) | 11.9 (37) | 13.0 (53) | 0.167 |
Data are presented as % and number or (where †) median and interquartile range (IQR). The sample size may vary slightly in each variable due to missing data. MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. p value < 0.05: significance for Kruskal-Wallis test (Dunn’s post-hoc test—superscript letter e.g., a—denotes pair with a significant between-group effect) or Pearson’s chi square test.
Table 2 presents the association of MEDAS score and its components with total dairy fermented products consumption. Unadjusted data were presented in Table S1. Frequency of dairy fermented products consumption was associated with higher MEDAS score (Q1 = 5.6 IQR: 5.3; 5.9 to Q5 = 6.2 IQR: 5.9; 6.6, ptrend < 0.001). We observed that the frequency of dairy fermented products consumption was positively associated with frequent consumption of oils, vegetables, wine, legumes, fish and seafood, sweets and pastries, nuts (for all ptrend < 0.001) and a higher preference for white meat (ptrend = 0.014).
Table 2.
Association between MEDAS, its components and total fermented dairy products consumption.
| Total Fermented Dairy Products Consumption | p trend | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | ||
| MEDAS | 5.6 (5.3; 5.9) | 5.8 (5.4; 6.1) | 5.7 (5.4; 6.1) | 6.0 (5.6; 6.3) | 6.2 (5.9; 6.6) | <0.001 |
| Plant oils as main (yes) † | 73.1 (225) | 83.5 (293) | 86.4 (274) | 87.2 (272) | 83.1 (338) | 0.096 |
| Plant oils, times/d | 1.7 (1.4; 2.0) | 1.7 (1.5; 2.0) | 2.1 (1.8; 2.4) | 2.0 (1.7; 2.3) | 2.3 (2; 2.6) | <0.001 |
| Vegetables, times/d | 2.7 (2.3; 3.0) | 2.6 (2.3; 3.0) | 2.5 (2.2; 2.8) | 2.6 (2.3; 3.0) | 3.1 (2.8; 3.5) | <0.001 |
| Fruits and juices, times/d | 4.7 (4.2; 5.3) | 5.2 (4.6; 5.8) | 5.7 (5.1; 6.3) | 5.5 (4.9; 6.1) | 5.1 (4.6; 5.7) | 0.451 |
| Red meat, times/d | 4.8 (4.3; 5.5) | 5.1 (4.5; 5.9) | 5.2 (4.6; 5.9) | 6.0 (5.3; 6.8) | 5.6 (5.0; 6.3) | 0.168 |
| Butter and cream, times/d | 2.6 (2.2; 2.9) | 2.5 (2.2; 2.9) | 3.1 (2.7; 3.5) | 2.6 (2.3; 3.0) | 2.9 (2.6; 3.3) | 0.084 |
| Sweetened beverages, times/d | 4.0 (3.3; 4.8) | 5.0 (4.1; 6.0) | 4.9 (4.1; 5.8) | 4.6 (3.8; 5.6) | 4.5 (3.8; 5.4) | 0.687 |
| Wine, times/wk | 1.4 (1.1; 1.8) | 1.6 (1.2; 2.1) | 1.4 (1.1; 1.9) | 1.9 (1.4; 2.4) | 2.5 (2.1; 3.1) | <0.001 |
| Legumes, times/wk | 1.2 (1.0; 1.5) | 1.4 (1.2; 1.7) | 1.7 (1.5; 2.1) | 1.7 (1.4; 2.0) | 2.0 (1.7; 2.4) | <0.001 |
| Fish and seafood, times/wk | 1.3 (1.1; 1.6) | 1.6 (1.4; 1.9) | 1.7 (1.4; 2.0) | 1.9 (1.6; 2.2) | 2.1 (1.9; 2.4) | <0.001 |
| Sweets and pastries, times/wk | 3.7 (3.2; 4.2) | 4.0 (3.5; 4.6) | 4.5 (4.0; 5.1) | 4.4 (3.8; 5.0) | 4.9 (4.4; 5.5) | <0.001 |
| Nuts, times/wk | 0.6 (0.4; 0.9) | 0.8 (0.5; 1) | 1.1 (0.8; 1.4) | 1.1 (0.8; 1.5) | 1.6 (1.3; 2.1) | <0.001 |
| Preferable white meat (yes) † | 71.4 (220) | 75.2 (264) | 73.2 (232) | 79.8 (249) | 80.6 (328) | 0.014 |
| Whole grain products, times/d | 2.5 (2.1; 2.9) | 2.5 (2.1; 2.9) | 2.6 (2.3; 3.1) | 2.7 (2.4; 3.2) | 2.6 (2.3; 3.0) | 0.179 |
Data are presented as back-transformed least square means and 95% confidence interval (CI) or (where †) as % and number. The sample size may vary slightly in each variable due to missing data. MEDAS, MEDAS, Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener. All continuous data were adjusted for age cohort, gender, smoking status, sleeping time, TV watching time, education level, economic status (all categorical). p value < 0.05: significance for Wald’s test.
The results of the association between the total frequency of dairy fermented products consumptions and HSC, perceived health benefits are shown in Table 3. A high intake of fermented dairy products was positively related to paying more attention to health. Participants were more likely to report perceived health benefits to maintain normal body weight (Q5 = 39.6% vs. Q1 = 26.3%), reducing cardiovascular risk (Q5 = 52.3% vs. Q1 = 26.6%), and improving immune (Q5 = 67.3% vs. Q1 = 50.3%) and dental health (Q5 = 36.9% vs. Q1 = 27.3%) together with higher consumption of dairy fermented products. Participants who did not indicate benefits for health were negatively associated with fermented dairy product consumption (Q5 = 20.5% vs. Q1 = 51.6%).
Table 3.
Association of health concern scale and health beliefs with total fermented dairy products consumption.
| Total Fermented Dairy Products Consumption | p trend | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | ||
| % (n) | 18.2 (308) | 20.7 (351) | 18.7 (317) | 18.4 (312) | 24.0 (407) | |
| HCS † | 37.1 (35.3; 39.0) | 36.6 (34.8; 38.5) | 36.2 (34.4; 38.0) | 37.3 (35.5; 39.2) | 39.5 (37.7; 41.4) | 0.002 |
| Normal body weight | 26.3 (81) | 29.3 (103) | 38.2 (121) | 38.8 (121) | 39.6 (161) | 0.001 |
| Healthy heart | 26.6 (82) | 32.5 (114) | 39.4 (125) | 46.2 (144) | 52.3 (213) | <0.001 |
| Healthy bones | 56.5 (174) | 64.7 (227) | 71.9 (228) | 71.2 (222) | 67.6 (275) | 0.075 |
| Improved immunity | 50.3 (155) | 61.3 (215) | 67.2 (213) | 68.6 (214) | 67.3 (274) | 0.002 |
| Healthy digestive track | 59.1 (182) | 63.8 (224) | 68.5 (217) | 70.8 (221) | 61.2 (249) | 0.449 |
| Healthy teeth | 27.3 (84) | 29.3 (103) | 37.5 (119) | 36.5 (114) | 36.9 (150) | <0.001 |
| Not bring benefits | 51.6 (195) | 37.3 (131) | 26.2 (83) | 29.2 (91) | 20.6 (84) | <0.001 |
Data are presented as % and number or (where †) median and interquartile range (IQR). HCS, health concern scale. All continuous data were adjusted for age cohort, gender, smoking status, sleeping time, TV watching time, education level, economic status (all categorical). p value < 0.05: significance for Wald’s test.
Table 4 shows association between health beliefs attributed to the consumption of subgroups of fermented dairy products and the intake of respective subgroups. Heart health was the only belief associated with the intake of naturally fermented dairy products. All health beliefs, except improved dental health for flavored products and improved bone health, were associated with more frequent intake of those product subgroups. Regular consumers of all fermented dairy product subgroups were less likely to indicate no benefit from their consumption (b from −0.176 to −0.096) Higher health awareness (HCS) and better diet quality were associated with higher intake of natural (b = 0.037 and b = 0.005) and flavored (b = 0.027 and b = 0.006) dairy products, but not rennet cheese. Unadjusted data were presented in Table S2.
Table 4.
Association of health concern scale, health beliefs and diet quality with consumption of fermented products according to their subgroups.
| Natural Fermented Dairy Products | Flavored Fermented Dairy Products | Rennet Cheese | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HCS | 0.037 (0.005) | 0.027 (0.005) | −0.002 (0.006) |
| Normal body weight | 0.038 (0.022) | 0.084 (0.025) | 0.15 (0.029) |
| Heart health | 0.066 (0.021) | 0.154 (0.022) | 0.067 (0.027) |
| Bone health | −0.017 (0.018) | 0.044 (0.018) | 0.042 (0.021) |
| Immune defence | 0.024 (0.019) | 0.039 (0.019) | 0.07 (0.023) |
| Digestive health | −0.023 (0.018) | 0.021 (0.019) | 0.077 (0.023) |
| Dental health | 0.008 (0.022) | 0.055 (0.024) | 0.118 (0.027) |
| No benefits | −0.096 (0.037) | −0.176 (0.024) | −0.12 (0.025) |
| MEDAS | 0.005 (0.001) | 0.006 (0.001) | 0.002 (0.001) |
Data are presented as unstandardized regression coefficient (standard error) from a model adjusted for age cohort, gender, smoking status, sleeping time, TV watching time, education level, economic status (all categorical). HSC, health concern scale. MEDAS, Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener. Bolded are coefficients at p < 0.05.
4. Discussion
This study investigated dietary, lifestyle, and behavioral determinants of fermented dairy product intake in a representative sample of the Polish population. We observed that people with higher diet quality, as assessed by adherence to the Mediterranean diet. With respect to health attitudes, regular consumers paid more attention to their health. Moreover, a higher intake of fermented dairy products was more frequently motivated by perceived benefits for musculoskeletal, circulatory, digestive, and immunological systems. However, these motivations were mainly attributed to flavored fermented products and rennet cheeses. Similar results were obtained by Sajdakowska [23] when examining the importance of health aspects in Polish consumer choices of dairy product in the population of respondents from 16 voivodships in Poland who were aged 21 and over. In this study regarding opinions on the perception of dairy products, respondents declared the highest level of agreement with the statement that dairy products are a rich source of protein and that dairy products, particularly yoghurts, kefirs and butter milk, have a beneficial influence on immunity [23].
When consumed in enough proportions as part of a balanced diet on a regular basis, fermented dairy foods provide health benefits. In addition, these functional foods also provide the body with critical nutrients [3]. Fermented dairy products are a primary source of prebiotics and probiotics. Furthermore, those products offer a variety of compounds, including proteins, peptides, oligosaccharides, vitamins and organic acids (including fatty acids) with distinct health effects [9]. An important issue related to the consumption of fermented milk products is that the consumer should also be aware that fermentation of milk into cheese and yogurt has been shown to increase the levels of free amino acids detected in plasma, including α-amino butyric acid, alanine, asparagine, cysteine, glycine, glutamine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, ornithine, phenylalanine, proline, serine, threonine, tryptophan, tyrosine, and valine [27,28,29]. However, it should be taken into consideration that, while a moderate presence of free amino acids in the diet may have a beneficial effect on skeletal muscle synthesis and the fight against microbial infections [30,31], excessive concentrations can result in increased inflammation caused by elevated intestinal permeability, increased risk of cell atherosclerosis, impair the immune response to infection, and cause allergic reactions [31,32]. Increased levels of free fatty acids may be beneficial for health due to promoting growth of the host intestinal microbiota, enhancing immunity, regulating blood pressure, increasing the anabolism of muscle proteins, or inhibiting the binding of pathogens [27,33]. Very important as recent studies indicate about milk fat that higher intake of short-chain saturated fatty acids (SCSFAs) and medium-chain saturated fatty acids (MCSFAs) was inversely associated with dyslipidemia and diabetes (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.82 and OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.72, respectively). Among MUFAs, C18:1 was inversely associated with hypertension and diabetes fatty acid [34]. Moreover, many micronutrients (calcium, phosphorus, A and B vitamins, potassium, zinc, and choline) also have a higher bioavailability in yoghurt than in raw milk due to the acidity and fermentation process [6].
The benefits of fermented dairy product intake can be explained by immunological, anti-carcinogenic, immunomodulatory, antiallergic, antioxidative, as well as lipid-, glucose-, and blood-pressure-lowering effects [20]. Considering a high intake of fermented products as a part of healthy, sustainable dietary pattern shows the potential to expand its health effects. A number of experimental studies [3,35,36,37] support this point, showing that healthy diets supplemented with fermented dairy products might be superior to diets that exclude those products. Although guidelines are lacking for the minimum dose of live microorganisms that should be consumed, the European Union (EU) health claim for yoghurt and “improved lactose tolerance” stipulates that at least 108 CFU of live starter microorganisms per gram of yogurt [29,38]. In the recent research work of Derrien et al. [39] predicted that ingesting a dose of 1010 ingested bacterial cells would be sufficient to drastically shift the composition of the gut microbiota and impact the immune and neuroendocrine responses of the host.
In particular, the promotion of fermented dairy product intake to improve overall diet quality should be considered in countries and societies where those products are available at a relatively low cost [22,40]. As discussed above, there is a growing popular consensus that the consumption of fermented foods results in positive health effects. Much of this is driven by popular observations that generally fermented foods use unprocessed raw ingredients, contain little or no added preservatives, colors or flavorings, and are made using long-established, sustainable, and in many cases traditional technologies [41]. Consumers may be attracted to the concept that these are “live foods” containing natural and diverse microbiota [42].
The second significant implication reflects the target group promoting fermented dairy product intake. Our findings indicated that lower intake is driven by young age and male sex. The burden of health risks and exposures in a group of young adults is a key determinant of their status in further life. In this context, males are exposed more significant health harms by higher smoking rates, excessive alcohol consumption, or lower diet quality. Based on our findings and health benefits based on published literature, both groups can be considered as targets for interventions aiming to increase the intake of fermented dairy products. The authors of this work have a particular awareness that the consumption of dairy, particularly low-fat dairy, is advocated in most dietary guidelines worldwide. Still, there is, therefore, a necessity to expand such research could eventually have an impact on public health, such a refining guidelines, especially for fermented dairy foods, and a better understanding of the composition of different fermented food products as part of healthy, sustainable diets [17,29]. This approach can help convince consumers that consuming fermented dairy products helps maintain health and prevent disease ispart of an effort to increase life expectancy and improve life quality. To establish long-term, positive relations between the police maker and the final consumer, creating a coherent, transparent, well-thought-out communication strategy with the consumer is necessary. It is also important that the information communicated should be logical, uncomplicated and consistent, and communicated using the largest possible number of communication channels to increase the consumption of fermented milk products in various age groups adapted to their health expectations and health beliefs predictive of dieting intentions and behavior. Providing consumers with reliable scientific knowledge about the possible impact of food products on health, aimed at various social groups, will enable them to form the basis of new favorable nutritional beliefs, which translate into the inclusion of these products in the diet. Research that addresses these critical issues and explores beliefs about the benefits of consuming fermented dairy products in the broader context in which consumption decisions are made can be used to best target nutritional prevention efforts regarding social health.
Despite the strengths of the survey, such as sample size, nationally representative, randomly selected study sample and extensive covariate adjustment, its limitations cannot be neglected. Firstly, this was a cross-sectional study, which makes it impossible to identify cause-and-effect relationships. In addition, the age groups chosen for the study may be a limitation. They make it impossible to assess the relationship between changing eating habits over a lifespan. However, such a selection of respondents resulted from the original assumptions of the project. Another limitation are the use of self-reported questionnaires and declared values of anthropometric characteristics. Despite the use of validated tools, they rely on respondents’ memory bias and are prone to overestimating or underestimating the frequency of food consumption.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, our study identified patterns of health behaviors associated with frequent consumption of fermented products. We observed that the intake of fermented dairy products is associated with better diet quality, consumer self-consciousness, and a greater attitude to own health. Therefore, it seems necessary to develop pro-health attitudes and beliefs that encourage consumption of these products within the framework of national nutritional guidelines, which may protect and help and contribute to reducing the incidence of chronic non-communicable diseases in various age groups of the population.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu14235018/s1, Table S1: Association between MEDAS, its components and total fermented dairy products consumption; Table S2: Association of health concern scale, health beliefs and diet quality with consumption of fermented products according to their subgroups
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, K.E.P., Z.Y., M.B., J.Ż. and B.S.; methodology, K.E.P., A.D. (Anna Danielewicz), J.M., K.S. and A.D. (Aneta Dąbrowska); formal analysis, A.D. (Anna Danielewicz) and J.M.; data curation, A.D. (Anna Danielewicz) and J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, K.E.P., A.D. (Anna Danielewicz) and J.M.; writing—review and editing, A.D. (Anna Danielewicz), J.M., K.S., A.D. (Aneta Dąbrowska), T.S., Z.Y., M.B., M.D., J.Ż., B.S. and K.E.P.; visualization, A.D. (Anna Danielewicz) and J.M.; supervision, K.E.P., J.Ż. and B.S.; project administration, M.B., J.Ż. and B.S.; funding acquisition, J.Ż., Z.Y. and B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland in 2015, Resolution No. 9/2015.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
Due to ethical restrictions and participant confidentiality, data cannot be made publicly available. However, data from the DairyFunInn study are available upon request, for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. Data requests can be sent to the DairyFunInn study coordinator (Katarzyna Eufemia Przybyłowicz).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, the writing of the manuscript or the decision to publish the results.
Funding Statement
This research and APC was funded by The National Centre for Research and Development, Project No. WPC1/DairyFunInn/2019, amount of funding 1,950,000.00 PLN.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.World Health Organization. Noncommunicable Diseases. [(accessed on 26 September 2022)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases.
- 2.Savaiano D.A., Hutkins R.W. Yogurt, cultured fermented milk, and health: A systematic review. Nutr. Rev. 2021;79:599–614. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wade A.T., Davis C.R., Dyer K.A., Hodgson J.M., Woodman R.J., Murphy K.J. A Mediterranean diet supplemented with dairy foods improves markers of cardiovascular risk: Results from the MedDairy randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018;108:1166–1182. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marco M.L., Sanders M.E., Gänzle M., Arrieta M.C., Cotter P.D., De Vuyst L., Hill C., Holzapfel W., Lebeer S., Merenstein D., et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on fermented foods. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021;18:196–208. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-00390-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Illikoud N., Mantel M., Rolli-Derkinderen M., Gagnaire V., Jan G. Dairy starters and fermented dairy products modulate gut mucosal immunity. Immunol. Lett. 2022;251–252:91–102. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2022.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fernandez M., Picard-Deland É., Le Barz M., Daniel N., Marette A. Fermented Foods in Health and Disease Prevention. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2017. Yogurt and health; pp. 305–338. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Moreno Montoro M. Tesis Doctorales. Universidad de Granada; Granada, Spain: 2016. Design and Development of a Fermented Goat Milk as Functional Food Bioactive Peptides. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Meira S.M.M., Daroit D.J., Helfer V.E., Corrêa A.P.F., Segalin J., Carro S., Brandelli A. Bioactive peptides in water-soluble extracts of ovine cheeses from Southern Brazil and Uruguay. Food Res. Int. 2012;48:322–329. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.García-Burgos M., Moreno-Fernández J., Alférez M.J.M., Díaz-Castro J., López-Aliaga I. New perspectives in fermented dairy products and their health relevance. J. Funct. Foods. 2020;72:104059. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2020.104059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sendra E. Dairy Fat and Cardiovascular Health. Foods. 2020;9:838. doi: 10.3390/foods9060838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhu Y., Bo Y., Liu Y. Dietary total fat, fatty acids intake, and risk of cardiovascular disease: A dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. Lipids Health Dis. 2019;18:91. doi: 10.1186/s12944-019-1035-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McDonald D., Hyde E., Debelius J.W., Morton J.T., Gonzalez A., Ackermann G., Aksenov A.A., Behsaz B., Brennan C., Chen Y., et al. American Gut: An Open Platform for Citizen Science Microbiome Research. mSystems. 2018;3:e00031-18. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00031-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wolfe B.E., Dutton R.J. Fermented foods as experimentally tractable microbial ecosystems. Cell. 2015;161:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Leeming E.R., Johnson A.J., Spector T.D., Le Roy C.I. Effect of Diet on the Gut Microbiota: Rethinking Intervention Duration. Nutrients. 2019;11:2862. doi: 10.3390/nu11122862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pasolli E., De Filippis F., Mauriello I.E., Cumbo F., Walsh A.M., Leech J., Cotter P.D., Segata N., Ercolini D. Large-scale genome-wide analysis links lactic acid bacteria from food with the gut microbiome. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:2610. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16438-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hill C., Guarner F., Reid G., Gibson G.R., Merenstein D.J., Pot B., Morelli L., Canani R.B., Flint H.J., Salminen S., et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014;11:506–514. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li K.J., Burton-Pimentel K.J., Vergères G., Feskens E.J.M., Brouwer-Brolsma E.M. Fermented foods and cardiometabolic health: Definitions, current evidence, and future perspectives. Front. Nutr. 2022;9:976020. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.976020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Carding S., Verbeke K., Vipond D.T., Corfe B.M., Owen L.J. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in disease. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015;26:26191. doi: 10.3402/mehd.v26.26191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Morais L.H., Schreiber H.L.t., Mazmanian S.K. The gut microbiota-brain axis in behaviour and brain disorders. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021;19:241–255. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00460-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tamang J.P., Shin D.H., Jung S.J., Chae S.W. Functional Properties of Microorganisms in Fermented Foods. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:578. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rezac S., Kok C.R., Heermann M., Hutkins R. Fermented Foods as a Dietary Source of Live Organisms. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1785. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sajdakowska M., Gębski J., Gutkowska K., Żakowska-Biemans S. Importance of Health Aspects in Polish Consumer Choices of Dairy Products. Nutrients. 2018;10:1007. doi: 10.3390/nu10081007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gawęcki J., editor. Dietary Habits and Nutrition Beliefs Questionnaire and the Manual for Developing Nutritional Data. Committee of Human Nutrition Science, Polish Academy of Sciences; Olsztyn, Poland: 2018. [(accessed on 17 October 2022)]. Available online: http://www.knozc.pan.pl/ [Google Scholar]
- 24.World Health Organization. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations . Codex Alimentarius—Milk and Milk Products. 2nd ed. WHO; Rome, Italy: FAO; Rome, Italy: 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hebestreit K., Yahiaoui-Doktor M., Engel C., Vetter W., Siniatchkin M., Erickson N., Halle M., Kiechle M., Bischoff S.C. Validation of the German version of the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) questionnaire. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:341. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3337-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kähkönen P., Tuorila H.J. Consumer responses to reduced and regular fat content in different products: Effects of gender, involvement and health concern. Food Qual. Prefer. 1999;10:83–91. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00043-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pimentel G., Burnand D., Münger L.H., Pralong F.P., Vionnet N., Portmann R., Vergères G. Identification of Milk and Cheese Intake Biomarkers in Healthy Adults Reveals High Interindividual Variability of Lewis System-Related Oligosaccharides. J. Nutr. 2020;150:1058–1067. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dougkas A., Minihane A.M., Givens D.I., Reynolds C.K., Yaqoob P. Differential effects of dairy snacks on appetite, but not overall energy intake. Br. J. Nutr. 2012;108:2274–2285. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512000323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Drouin-Chartier J.P., Brassard D., Tessier-Grenier M., Côté J.A., Labonté M., Desroches S., Couture P., Lamarche B. Systematic Review of the Association between Dairy Product Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular-Related Clinical Outcomes. Adv. Nutr. 2016;7:1026–1040. doi: 10.3945/an.115.011403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Idrees M., Mohammad A.R., Karodia N., Rahman A. Multimodal Role of Amino Acids in Microbial Control and Drug Development. Antibiotics. 2020;9:330. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9060330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dioguardi F.S. Clinical use of amino acids as dietary supplement: Pros and cons. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2011;2:75–80. doi: 10.1007/s13539-011-0032-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Souza A.L., Fiorini Aguiar S.L., Gonçalves Miranda M.C., Lemos L., Freitas Guimaraes M.A., Reis D.S., Vieira Barros P.A., Veloso E.S., Carvalho T.G., Ribeiro F.M., et al. Consumption of Diet Containing Free Amino Acids Exacerbates Colitis in Mice. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1587. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kamei Y., Hatazawa Y., Uchitomi R., Yoshimura R., Miura S. Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Function by Amino Acids. Nutrients. 2020;12:261. doi: 10.3390/nu12010261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Currenti W., Godos J., Alanazi A.M., Grosso G., Cincione R.I., La Vignera S., Buscemi S., Galvano F. Dietary Fats and Cardio-Metabolic Outcomes in a Cohort of Italian Adults. Nutrients. 2022;14:4294. doi: 10.3390/nu14204294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.de Moreno de Leblanc A., Perdigón G. The application of probiotic fermented milks in cancer and intestinal inflammation. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2010;69:421–428. doi: 10.1017/S002966511000159X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pan D.D., Zeng X.Q., Yan Y.T. Characterisation of Lactobacillus fermentum SM-7 isolated from koumiss, a potential probiotic bacterium with cholesterol-lowering effects. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011;91:512–518. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sharifi M., Moridnia A., Mortazavi D., Salehi M., Bagheri M., Sheikhi A. Kefir: A powerful probiotics with anticancer properties. Med. Oncol. 2017;34:183. doi: 10.1007/s12032-017-1044-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to live yoghurt cultures and improved lactose digestion (ID 1143, 2976) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA J. 2010;8:1763. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1763. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Derrien M., van Hylckama Vlieg J.E. Fate, activity, and impact of ingested bacteria within the human gut microbiota. Trends Microbiol. 2015;23:354–366. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Górska-Warsewicz H., Rejman K., Laskowski W., Czeczotko M. Milk and Dairy Products and Their Nutritional Contribution to the Average Polish Diet. Nutrients. 2019;11:1771. doi: 10.3390/nu11081771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tamang J.P., Watanabe K., Holzapfel W.H. Review: Diversity of Microorganisms in Global Fermented Foods and Beverages. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:377. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Leeuwendaal N.K., Stanton C., O’Toole P.W., Beresford T.P. Fermented Foods, Health and the Gut Microbiome. Nutrients. 2022;14:1527. doi: 10.3390/nu14071527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Due to ethical restrictions and participant confidentiality, data cannot be made publicly available. However, data from the DairyFunInn study are available upon request, for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. Data requests can be sent to the DairyFunInn study coordinator (Katarzyna Eufemia Przybyłowicz).