Skip to main content
Thieme Open Access logoLink to Thieme Open Access
. 2022 Aug 24;54(Suppl 2):E1022–E1023. doi: 10.1055/a-1901-0829

Modified endoscopic vacuum therapy for hypopharyngeal acute leakage after foreign body perforation

João Guilherme Ribeiro Jordão Sasso 1, Erika Yuki Yvamoto 1, Rodrigo Silva de Paula Rocha 1, Igor Braga Ribeiro 1, Mateus Bond Boghossian 1, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura 1, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura 1
PMCID: PMC9736810  PMID: 36002012

Conventional endoscopic vacuum therapy is currently used worldwide to treat esophageal leaks, with a healing rate of 67 %–100 % 1 2 . The vacuum effect works through its effect on important mechanisms such as micro and macro deformation, tissue reperfusion, exudate control, and bacterial clearance 3 . Modified endoscopic vacuum therapy (MEVT) has some benefits when compared with the conventional technique, such as lower costs, less adherence, the requirement for fewer exchanges, and a shorter procedural duration 2 . In addition, it can be easily performed 4 . Although there were no reported cases of the use of hypopharyngeal vacuum therapy, we report a hypopharyngeal leak that was successfully treated with MEVT, leading to a new possibility when faced with hypopharyngeal defects.

A 42-year-old man came to the emergency room with progressive dysphagia 24 hours after eating food that included a piece of bone. A computed tomography (CT) scan detected a foreign body measuring 3.2 × 1.1 cm at the hypopharynx. Orotracheal intubation by bronchoscopy was indicated. Subsequently, the patient underwent endoscopic foreign body removal ( Fig. 1 ); on reviewing the mucosa, we noted signs of perforation ( Fig. 2 ). Therefore, MEVT was performed ( Fig. 3 ; Video 1 ). The patient remained intubated for 5 days, during which time he received MEVT, antibiotics, and corticosteroids. After this period, a new bronchoscopy was performed, which demonstrated improvement of the edema of the hypopharynx, and the patient was extubated.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

 Photograph of the foreign body, which was a piece of pork bone.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

 Endoscopic view showing a hypopharyngeal perforation.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

 Photograph of the modified endoscopic vacuum therapy device that was used.

Video 1  Endoscopy vacuum therapy is performed in the management of a hypopharyngeal leak caused by a perforation that was identified after endoscopic removal of a foreign body.

Download video file (39.7MB, mp4)

The patient progressively improved in terms of his clinical and laboratory parameters. He was evaluated by the otorhinolaryngology team after 8 days and a swallowing video-endoscopy was performed. This evaluation visualized complete velopharyngeal closure, the presence of salivary stasis, and preserved mobility, so his diet was upgraded to an oral homogeneous intake with a paste-like consistency. Endoscopic re-evaluation after 1 month demonstrated a white scar, with no signs of stenosis or other complications ( Fig. 4 ). Outpatient follow-up demonstrated good tolerance of a regular diet, and the patient did not report any complaints.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

 Endoscopic view showing a white scar after the leak had been successfully treated.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AG

Footnotes

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Endoscopy E-Videos : https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos .

Endoscopy E-Videos is an open access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online. Processing charges apply (currently EUR 375), discounts and wavers acc. to HINARI are available. This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos

References

  • 1.Virgilio E, Ceci D, Cavallini M. Surgical endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy (EVAC) in treating anastomotic leakages after major resective surgery of esophageal and gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 2018;38:5581–5587. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.do Monte Junior E S, de Moura D TH, Ribeiro I B et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy versus endoscopic stenting for upper gastrointestinal transmural defects: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc. 2021;33:892–902. doi: 10.1111/den.13813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.de Moura D TH, de Moura B FBH, Manfredi M A et al. Role of endoscopic vacuum therapy in the management of gastrointestinal transmural defects. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;11:329–344. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.de Moura D TH, Hirsch B S, do Monte Junior E S et al. Cost-effective modified endoscopic vacuum therapy for the treatment of gastrointestinal transmural defects: step-by-step process of manufacturing and its advantages. VideoGIE. 2021;6:523–528. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2021.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Endoscopy are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES