Abstract
Background
Thyroid dysfunction is common in patients with nephrotic syndrome, especially patients with primary membranous nephropathy (pMN). In view of both MN and thyroid dysfunction are associated with autoimmunity, the current study aimed to elucidate the significance of thyroid dysfunction in patients with pMN.
Methods
Four hundred and twenty patients with biopsy-proven pMN from 2018–2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical and pathological parameters, and treatment response of patients with and without thyroid dysfunction were analyzed.
Results
Ninety-one (21.7%) patients with pMN suffered from thyroid dysfunction, among which subclinical hypothyroidism (52.7%) was the main disorder. Compared to patients with normal thyroid function, patients with thyroid dysfunction presented with a higher level of proteinuria, a lower level of serum albumin, a higher level of serum creatinine and more severe tubulointerstitial injury at the time of biopsy. But the positive rate and level of circulating anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibody were comparable between these two groups. Though following the similar treatment, the percentage of no response to treatment were significantly higher in the patients with thyroid dysfunction (38.6 vs. 20.0%, P = 0.003). Similar to the urinary protein and the positivity of anti-PLA2R antibody, multivariate COX analysis showed thyroid dysfunction was also identified as an independent risk factor for the failure to remission (HR = 1.91, 95%CI, 1.07–3.40, P = 0.029).
Conclusion
In conclusion, thyroid dysfunction is common in the patients with pMN and might predict a severe clinical manifestation and a poor clinical outcome, which indicated that the thyroid dysfunction might be involved in the disease progression of pMN.
Keywords: Membranous nephropathy, Thyroid dysfunction, Anti-PLA2R antibody
Introduction
It is commonly known that hypothyroidism usually occurs in patients with proteinuria, in particular nephrotic syndrome. In addition to a series of cases [1, 2], several cohort studies also reported that patients with massive proteinuria may develop subclinical hypothyroidism or overt hypothyroidism [3–7]. Li et al. found the incidence of thyroid dysfunction, including subclinical hypothyroidism, overt hypothyroidism and low T3/T4 syndrome in patients with nephrotic syndrome could be as high as 82.0% [4]. Notably, the main pathological type of patients with nephrotic syndrome and thyroid dysfunction was membranous nephropathy [4, 5], which is the main cause of nephrotic syndrome in adult and characterized by the accumulation of glomerular subepithelial immune complexes deposition and the basement membrane thickening [8].
The main cause of thyroid dysfunction in patient with proteinuria was usually thought as the urinary loss of thyroid hormone [2], for its link to serum albumin. Reversely, it is reported that 10–30% patients with autoimmune thyroid disease could also involve with glomerular injury [9]. And the most common associated glomerular disease was membranous nephropathy, too [10]. Considering that both membranous nephropathy and thyroid dysfunction could be caused by autoimmune disorder, whether there was any special significance of thyroid dysfunction in patients with pMN remains unclear. In the current study, we investigated the clinical and pathological features of patients with combined pMN with thyroid dysfunction in a large consecutive cohort. Our findings are beneficial for understanding the significance of thyroid dysfunction in patients with pMN.
Methods
Patients
Four hundred and ninety-one consecutive patients with biopsy-proven pMN, diagnosed in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with membranous nephropathy secondary to known factors, such as malignant tumors, hepatitis virus B/C, systemic lupus erythematosus or heavy metal poisoning, were carefully excluded. Patients with known autoimmune thyroid disease, hypothalamic-pituitary axis dysfunction, pituitary tumors, absent thyroid gland, thyroid gland tumors before the onset of membranous nephropathy were also excluded from the study. Among them, thyroid function of 71 patients were not evaluated at the time of biopsy. Thus, 420 patients remained in this study (Fig. 1). The latest clinical data, including the free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), before renal biopsy and during follow-up were collected from the medical records. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated from serum creatinine levels using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation [11]. In this study, thyroid dysfunction consisted of hypothyroidism, subclinical hypothyroidism, and low T3 and/or T4 syndrome. Hypothyroidism was defined as a higher level of TSH combined with a lower level of FT4; subclinical hypothyroidism was defined as a higher level of TSH combined with a normal level of FT4; while low T3 and/or T4 syndrome was defined as only a merely lower FT3 and/or FT4. The research was in compliance of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethics committee of our hospital.
Fig. 1.
Flow chart of the enrollment
Renal histopathology
Renal biopsy was performed for all the patients at the time of diagnosis. Renal specimens were evaluated by direct immunofluorescence, light microscopy, and electron microscopy.
For direct immunofluorescence, IgG, IgM, IgA, C3c, C1q and fibrinogen were detected by fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated antibodies (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark) on frozen tissues. PLA2R expression in glomeruli was detected by indirect immunofluorescence with rabbit polyclonal anti-PLA2R antibodies as the primary antibody (Atlas Antibodies, Stockholm, Sweden) on frozen tissues.
For light microscopy, paraffin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff, periodic acid-silver methenamine, and Masson’s trichrome. Pathologic findings in the glomeruli, tubules, interstitium, and vessels were described in detail. Stages of MN were defined according to the Churg and Ehrenreich’s classification criteria. The chronic tubulointerstitial injury was defined as tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. The scoring of chronic tubulointerstitial injury were graded semi-quantitatively from 0 to 2: 0, normal; 1, < 25.0% of interstitia affected; 2, > 25.0% of interstitia affected.
Detection of anti-PLA2R antibody
Circulating anti-PLA2R antibody was detected in the automatic analyzer, using a commercial quantum-dots based fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Nanjing vazyme medical technology co.ltd, Nanjing, China) with the recombinant human PLA2R as the antigen, following the standard instructions recommended by the manufacturers. The level of anti-PLA2R antibody > 14RU/ml was designated as positivity.
Treatments and outcomes
Patients with pMN were treated according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines for membranous nephropathy. During follow-up, for evaluation of therapeutic responses, complete remission was defined as urinary protein excretion < 0.3 g/24 h with normal renal function. Partial remission was defined as urinary protein excretion < 3.5 g/24 h but > 0.3 g/24 h, or at least a 50% reduction from peak values with stable serum creatinine (no more than 25% increase from baseline). Treatment failure was defined as not reaching the criteria of partial remission. For evaluation of treatment outcomes, treatment failure was used as the primary endpoint. End-stage kidney disease(ESKD) (defined as eGFR < 15 ml/min*1.73m2 or dependence on dialysis) and eGFR decreasing more than 25% from baseline were used to evaluate the renal function.
Statistical analysis
All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software package, version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences of quantitative parameters were assessed using the t-test for data that were normally distributed or nonparametric test for data that were not normally distributed. Differences of qualitative data were compared using the chi-square test/Fisher’s exact test, otherwise, the Kruskal–Wallis or Mann–Whitney U tests were performed. Correlations of quantitative parameters were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis for data that were normally distributed and Spearman correlation coefficient analysis for data that were not normally distributed. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to analyze the clinical treatment outcomes of patients (Log-rank test). If the P value of the candidate predictor in univariate survival analysis was less than 0.05, this predictor would be included into the multivariable Cox regression models. All statistical analyses were two-tailed and P value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Prevalence and features of thyroid dysfunction in patients with pMN
Four hundred and twenty consecutive patients with renal biopsy-proven pMN were enrolled in this study. Among them, 91 (21.7%) patients suffered from thyroid dysfunction, including 48 (52.7%) patients with subclinical hypothyroidism, 16 (17.6%) patients with overt hypothyroidism, and 27 (29.7%) patients with low T3 and/or low T4 syndrome. The other 329 (78.3%) patients presented with normal thyroid function. Compared to the patients with normal thyroid function, patients with thyroid dysfunction had significantly lower levels of FT3 (3.3 ± 0.9 vs. 3.8 ± 0.6 pmol/L, P < 0.001) and FT4 (9.9 ± 1.8 vs. 11.1 ± 1.3 pmol/L, P < 0.001), but a higher level of TSH (5.7, 3.6–8.2 vs. 2.5, 1.7–3.2 uIU/ml, P < 0.001) (Table1).
Table 1.
The demographic and clinical characteristics of pMN patients with and without thyroid dysfunction
| Patients with thyroid dysfunction (n = 91) (21.7%) |
Patients with normal thyroid function (n = 329)( 78.3%) |
P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male/female | 56/35 | 191/138 | 0.550 |
| Age (years) | 53.3 ± 11.6 | 50.8 ± 13.6 | 0.092 |
| Time from onset to biopsy(months) | 3.0 (1.0–6.0) | 4.0 (1.0–12.0) | 0.199 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 45 (49.5) | 160 (48.6) | 0.890 |
| Urinary protein (g/24 h) | 6.0 (2.5–9.6) | 4.4 (2.2–6.6) | 0.001 |
| Serum albumin (g/L) | 21.3 ± 6.9 | 25.1 ± 6.6 | < 0.001 |
| Serum cholesterol (mmol/L) | 8.1 (6.4–10.2) | 6.8 (5.6–8.4) | < 0.001 |
| Serum triglyceride (mmol/L) | 2.4 (1.7–3.2) | 2.2 (1.5–3.2) | 0.051 |
| Nephrotic syndrome, n (%) | 61 (67.0) | 170 (51.7) | 0.009 |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 128.6 ± 21.2 | 135.6 ± 18.4 | 0.015 |
| Hematuria, n (%) | 54/80 (67.5) | 201/305 (65.9) | 0.331 |
| Serum creatinine (umol/L) | 78.5 ± 40.1 | 66.0 ± 19.8 | 0.003 |
| eGFR (ml/min*1.73m2) | 92.2 ± 23.5 | 102.7 ± 17.8 | < 0.001 |
| Free Triiodothyronine (pmol/L) | 3.3 ± 0.9 | 3.8 ± 0.6 | < 0.001 |
| Free thyroxine (pmol/L) | 9.9 ± 1.8 | 11.1 ± 1.3 | < 0.001 |
| Thyroid-stimulating hormone (uIU/ml) | 5.7 (3.6–8.2) | 2.5 (1.7–3.2) | < 0.001 |
| Serum C3 (mg/L) | 91.7 ± 21.8 | 94.9 ± 17.7 | 0.761 |
| Serum C4 (mg/L) | 26.4 ± 7.4 | 25.7 ± 7.6 | 0.233 |
| Serum IgG (mg/L) | 560.0 (443.8–828.3) | 656.5 (478.8–832.0) | 0.077 |
| Positivity of anti-PLA2R antibody, n (%) | 53/75 (58.2) | 175/272 (53.2) | 0.593 |
| Serum anti-PLA2R antibody, (RU/ml) | 47.6 (8.6–174.7) | 37.7 (5.8–104.8) | 0.178 |
MN: membranous nephropathy; PLA2R: phospholipase A2 receptor
Clinical characteristics of pMN patients combined with thyroid dysfunction
The demographic and clinical data of patients with and without thyroid dysfunction were shown in Table 1. Among the 91 patients with thyroid dysfunction, 56 patients were male and 35 were female, with a mean age of 53.3 ± 11.6 years, comparable to that of patients with normal thyroid function (53.3 ± 11.6 vs. 50.8 ± 13.6 years, P = 0.092). Compared to the patients with normal thyroid function, we found patients combined with thyroid dysfunction had a significantly higher percentage of nephrotic syndrome (67.0% vs. 51.7%, P = 0.009), presenting with more proteinuria (6.0, 2.5–9.6 vs. 4.4, 2.2–6.6 g/24 h, P = 0.001), a higher level of serum cholesterol (8.1, 6.4–10.2 vs. 6.8, 5.6–8.4 mmol/L, P < 0.001), while a lower level of serum albumin (21.3 ± 6.9 vs. 25.1 ± 6.6 g/L, P < 0.001). In addition, the kidney function was poorer in pMN patients combined with thyroid dysfunction, with a significantly higher level of serum creatinine (78.5 ± 40.1 vs. 66.0 ± 19.8 umol/L, P = 0.003) and lower level of eGFR (92.2 ± 23.5 vs. 102.7 ± 17.8 ml/min*1.73m2, P < 0.001). The level of hemoglobin of patients combined with thyroid dysfunction was 128.6 ± 21.2 g/L, significantly lower than that of patients with normal thyroid function (128.6 ± 21.2 vs. 135.6 ± 18.4 g/L, P = 0.015). Among all the patients, circulating anti-PLA2R antibody was detected in 347 patients, including 75 patients with thyroid dysfunction and 272 patients with normal thyroid function. The positive rate of circulating anti-PLA2R antibody at the time of diagnosis was similar in pMN patients with and without thyroid dysfunction (58.2 vs. 53.2%, P = 0.593). There was no significant difference in the level of anti-PLA2R antibody between these two groups, either (47.6, 8.6–174.7, 37.7, 5.8–104.8 RU/ml, P = 0.178) (Table 1).
The time from onset to biopsy, the prevalence of hypertension and hematuria, the level of serum triglyceride, serum IgG, serum C3 and serum C4 were comparable between these two groups (Table 1).
We also analyzed the correlation between FT3, FT4, and TSH and the clinical parameters of patients with pMN. We found the level of FT3 correlated negatively with urinary protein (r = -0.244, P < 0.001) and correlated positively with serum albumin (r = 0.358, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2A-B). The level of FT3 also associated negatively with serum creatinine (r = -0.142, P = 0.019) (Fig. 2C). The level of FT4 also showed a similar association with urinary protein (r = -0.316, P < 0.001) and serum albumin (r = 0.236, P < 0.001), but did not related to serum creatinine (r = -0.089, P = 0.141) (Fig. 2D-F). However, we found the level of TSH only correlated negatively with serum albumin (r = -0.124, P = 0.040), while it had no significant correlation with urinary protein (r = 0.082, P = 0.176) and the parameters of renal function (r = 0.024, P = 0.693) (Fig. 2G-I). But the levels of FT3, FT4, TSH had no relationship with circulating anti-PLA2R antibody level (Fig. 2J-L).
Fig. 2.
Correlations between the levels of FT3, FT4, TSH and the clinical parameters of patients with pMN
For the retrospective study, only 17/91 patients with thyroid dysfunction had anti- thyroglobulin antibody (TGAb) and anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb) detection record. Five of seventeen (29.4%) patients were TGAb positive and 6/17 (35.3%) patients were TPOAb positive. In the 17 patients, anti-PLA2R antibody was detected in 13 patients, and 3/9 (33.3%) patients with anti-PLA2R antibody positivity were TGAb/TPOAb positive, while in the 4 anti-PLA2R antibody negative patients, only 1 (25.0%) patient was TGAb/TPOAb positive. Nine of ninety-one patients had anti-thyrotropin receptor antibody (TRAb) detection record, but all of them were TRAb negative.
Pathological features of pMN patients with thyroid dysfunction
All the patients were biopsy-proven pMN by light microscopy, immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. By immunofluorescence, we found there was no significant difference in glomerular IgG deposition, IgA deposition, IgM deposition, C3 deposition or C1q deposition between patients with and without thyroid dysfunction (Table 2). The glomerular PLA2R expression was detected in 55 patients by immunofluorescence. The positive rate of PLA2R staining was comparable between these two group (72.7 vs. 81.8%, P = 0.674). By light microscopy, the Churg stages of the 91 patients with thyroid dysfunction consisted of 29 (31.9%) patients of stage I, 33 (36.2%) patients of stage II and 29 (31.9%) patients of stage III, with no significant difference with that of patients with normal thyroid function (P = 0.629) (Table 2). The percentage of sclerosis lesions in glomeruli was also comparable between the patients with and without thyroid dysfunction (5.6, 0.0–14.3% vs. 5.9, 0.0–13.5%, P = 0.860) (Table 2). But it was worth noting that for the patients with thyroid dysfunction, 14/91 (15.4%) patients showed moderate chronic tubulointerstitial injury, which was more common than that of patients with normal thyroid function (15.4 vs. 5.2%, P = 0.004). (Table 2).
Table 2.
The pathologic features of pMN patients with and without thyroid dysfunction
| Patients with thyroid dysfunction (n = 91) |
Patients with normal thyroid function (n = 329) |
P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MN stages, n (%) | 0.629 | ||
| I | 29 (31.9) | 118 (35.9) | |
| II | 33 (36.2) | 122 (37.1) | |
| III | 29 (31.9) | 89 (27.0) | |
| IgG deposition, n (%) | 91 (100.0) | 329 (100.0) | 1.000 |
| IgA deposition, n (%) | 21 (23.1) | 49 (14.9) | 0.064 |
| IgM deposition, n (%) | 89 (97.8) | 324 (98.5) | 0.655 |
| C3 deposition, n (%) | 91(100.0) | 329 (100.0) | 1.000 |
| C1q deposition, n (%) | 28 (30.8) | 96 (29.2) | 0.769 |
| Percentage of sclerosis, n (%) | 5.6 (0.0–14.3) | 5.9 (0.0–13.5) | 0.860 |
| PLA2R staining, n (%) | 8/11 (72.7) | 36/44 (81.8) | 0.674 |
| Chronic tubulointerstitial injury, n (%) | 0.004 | ||
| Grade 0 | 1 (1.1) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Grade 1 | 76 (83.5) | 312 (94.8) | |
| Grade 2 | 14 (15.4) | 17 (5.2) |
Treatment responses
During a mean follow-up of 17.6 ± 11.9 months, 34 (37.4%) patients with thyroid dysfunction and 109 (35.1%) patients with normal thyroid function were lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up time was similar between patients with and without thyroid dysfunction (17.6 ± 11.9 vs. 17.2 ± 10.3 months, P = 0.795). During follow-up, of the 57 patients with thyroid dysfunction, 48 (84.2%) patients received steroids and/or immunosuppressive drugs, which was similar to that of those with normal thyroid function (84.2% vs. 82.3%, P = 0.984) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Treatment and outcomes of pMN patients with and without thyroid dysfunction
| Patients with thyroid dysfunction (n = 57) (62.6%) |
Patients with normal thyroid function (n = 220) (64.9%) |
P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatments | 0.984 | ||
| ACEI/ARBs only, n (%) | 9 (15.8) | 39 (17.7) | |
| Corticosteriods + cyclophosphamide | 22 (38.6) | 84 (38.2) | |
| Calcineurin inhibitor w/o corticosteroids | 20 (35.1) | 73 (33.2) | |
| Rituximab | 6 (10.5) | 24 (10.9) | |
| Response to treatment | 0.013 | ||
| Complete remission, n (%) | 10 (17.5) | 47 (21.4) | |
| Partial remission, n (%) | 25 (43.9) | 129 (58.6) | |
| No response, n (%) | 22 (38.6) | 44 (20.0) | |
| Decreased eGFR > 25%, n (%) | 4 (7.0) | 12 (5.5) | 0.895 |
| ESKD, n (%) | 0 (0) | 2 (9.0) | 1.000 |
| Survival time of normal renal function (months) | 16.4 ± 11.6 | 16.2 ± 10.0 | 0.934 |
| Follow up time (months) | 17.6 ± 11.9 | 17.2 ± 10.3 | 0.795 |
ESKD: end-stage kidney disease
After treatments, 35/57 (61.4%) patients with dysfunction obtained remission, including 10 (17.5%) patients with complete remission and 25 (43.9%) patients with partial remission. The rate of remission was significantly lower than that of patients with normal thyroid function (61.4 vs. 80.0%, P = 0.013) (Table 3). The percentage of no response to treatment in patients with thyroid dysfunction was significantly higher than that of patients with normal thyroid function (38.6 vs. 20.0%, P = 0.003). Kaplan–Meier curve also revealed that the cumulative survival of failure to treatment in the patients with thyroid dysfunction was significantly lower than that of those with normal thyroid function (P = 0.010) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Kaplan–Meier analysis of failure to remission in pMN patients with and without thyroid dysfunction
Using univariate Cox regression analysis, thyroid dysfunction was identified as one of the risk factors for no remission of patients with pMN (HR = 1.84, 95%CI, 1.10–3.10, P = 0.021). Furtherly, multivariate analysis identified thyroid dysfunction as one of the independent risk factors for worse treatment response (HR = 1.91, 95%CI, 1.07–3.40, P = 0.029). The other independent risk factors included the positivity of anti-PLA2R antibody (HR = 2.95, 95%CI, 1.30–6.71, P = 0.010), the higher level of urinary protein (HR = 1.09, 95%CI, 1.02–1.17, P = 0.016). Compared with other pathological parameters, the severity of chronic tubulointerstitial injury on renal biopsy was also verified as a risk factor for clinical outcome of patients with pMN (HR = 2.44, 95%CI 1.27–4.69, P = 0.007). However, it was not the independent risk factor after multivariate analysis. (Table 4).
Table 4.
Risk factors for no remission in patients with pMN
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-value | HR (95%CI) | P-value | HR (95%CI) | |
| Female/male | 0.018 | 1.89 (1.12–3.21) | 0.210 | 1.54 (0.78–3.04) |
| Age (per1 year) | 0.088 | 1.02 (1.00–1.03) | 0.062 | 1.02 (1.00–1.04) |
| Anti-PLA2R antibody | ||||
| Negative | Reference | |||
| Positive | 0.003 | 3.36 (1.52–7.43) | 0.010 | 2.95 (1.30–6.71) |
| Urinary protein (per 1 g/24 h) | < 0.001 | 1.12 (1.06–1.17) | 0.016 | 1.09 (1.02–1.17) |
| Serum albumin (per 1 g/L) | 0.003 | 0.95 (0.91–0.98) | 0.777 | 0.99 (0.95–1.04) |
| Serum creatinine (per 1umol/L) | 0.001 | 1.01 (1.00–1.02) | 0.356 | 1.01 (1.00–1.02) |
| eGFR (per 1 ml/min*1.73m2) | < 0.001 | 0.98 (0.97–0.99) | ||
| Thyroid function | ||||
| Normal thyroid function | Reference | |||
| Thyroid dysfunction | 0.021 | 1.84 (1.10–3.10) | 0.029 | 1.91 (1.07–3.40) |
| Chronic tubulointerstitial injury (per 1 +) | 0.007 | 2.44 (1.27–4.69) | 0.789 | 1.15 (0.41–3.24) |
Renal outcomes
During the follow-up period, no patient with thyroid dysfunction progressed to ESKD, while 2 patients in the group with normal thyroid function received dialysis (0.0 vs. 9.0%, P = 1.000). Among the 57 patients with thyroid dysfunction, the eGFR of 4 (7.0%) patients showed a reduction of more than 25%, with no significant difference with that of patients with normal thyroid function (7.0 vs.5.5%, P = 0.895). (Table 3).
Thyroid function outcome
During follow-up, 34/57 patients with thyroid dysfunction had the thyroid function re-evaluated. Among them, we found 10 patients received the thyroid hormone replacement, 7 of whom were patients with overt hypothyroidism. Compared to the patients with replacement, patients without replacement had a similar remission of both thyroid dysfunction (54.2 vs. 60.0%, P = 1.000) and proteinuria (66.7 vs. 70.0%, P = 1.000). Nineteen patients got normal thyroid function during follow-up, including 14/23 patients with proteinuria remission and 5/11 patients with consistent proteinuria (60.9 vs. 45.5%, P = 0.475).
Discussions
Thyroid dysfunction is not uncommon in patients with nephrotic syndrome, and membranous nephropathy seems to be the most relevant primary glomerular disease in adult. But the clinical significance of thyroid dysfunction in patients with pMN in a larger cohort has never been well elucidated yet.
In this study, we found 91/420 (21.7%) patients with pMN suffered from thyroid dysfunction, and subclinical hypothyroidism 48/420 (11.4%) was the dominant disorder. These results were consistent with other studies in patients with proteinuria [3, 6, 7]. However, Li et found 260/317 (82.0%) patients with nephrotic syndrome showed abnormal thyroid function, consisting of 61 (19.2%) patients with subclinical hypothyroidism, 83 (26.2%) patients with overt hypothyroidism, and 116 patients (36.6%) with euthyroid sick syndrome [4]. The obvious higher prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in this study may be for that the patients in this study had a higher level of proteinuria, and a variety of the pathological types. All of that indicated that thyroid dysfunction was a commonly concomitant manifestation in patients with pMN.
Urine loss of thyroid hormones linked with plasma protein was thought as the original reason for the hypothyroid dysfunction in patients with proteinuria [12–16]. In the current study, we found patients with combined thyroid dysfunction had a higher level of urinary protein and lower level of serum albumin than that of patients with normal thyroid function. The levels of FT3 and FT4 correlated positively with the level of urinary protein and negatively with serum albumin. The level of TSH also associated with the serum albumin. Similar results were found in almost all the previous studies [1, 3, 4, 6, 7]. These findings seemed to indicate that the thyroid dysfunction in patients with pMN might be also secondary to the loss of thyroid hormones from urine, as thought in studies of patients with proteinuria [3, 14, 15, 17].
Previous studies found membranous nephropathy was also the most common pathological type in the autoimmune thyroiditis associated glomerulonephritis [10]. Both thyroglobulin (TG) and thyroperoxidase (TPO) had been found in the subepithelial immune deposits, as the main characteristic of membranous nephropathy, which may be the reason of the higher prevalence of membranous nephropathy associated with autoimmune thyroid disease [18–20]. Despite all the patients with known thyroid disease were excluded, we found 6/17 (35.3%) patients with thyroid dysfunction had TGAb and/or TPOAb. Jain et al. found 25/60 (41.7%) patients with nephrotic syndrome were TPOAb positive, who also suffered from severe proteinuria and poor renal function [5]. All of these indicated that the thyroid dysfunction of patients with pMN might not only be caused by urinary protein, but also involved with the coexistence of autoimmune thyroiditis. But whether there are some other mutual antigens linked MN with hypothyroidism is still unknown.
Megalin is a protein expressed on the apical surface of thyroid epithelial cells [20], which is also a possible immunologic target involved in the immunopathogenesis of glomerular injury in experimental Heymann model [21]. However, it is not the autoantigen of patients with membranous nephropathy, leading to a failure of connecting thyroid dysfunction with membranous nephropathy. Phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) expressed in the podocyte has been identified as the main autoantigen of pMN [22]. Recently, by using a highly sensitive time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay, Huang et al. found the positive rate of anti-PLA2R antibody in the patients with thyroid disease and pMN was 97.50% and 82.61%, respectively [23]. Immunohistochemistry also revealed an obvious staining of PLA2R in tissues from patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, with a positive rate of 66.67% [23]. These results indicated PLA2R as a potential pathogenic target antigen for both MN and autoimmune thyroid disease. However, in the current study, we found there was no significant difference of the positive rate or the level of anti-PLA2R antibody in the patients with or without thyroid dysfunction. Whether PLA2R is the underling mutual autoantigen between MN and autoimmune thyroid disease needs further investigation.
Based on previous studies and the findings in our study, thyroid dysfunction is common in MN. But whether thyroid dysfunction had a worse impact in the clinical outcomes of patients with pMN was also meaningful. In the current study, our results showed that patients with thyroid dysfunction had worse renal function, which might be the result of change in renal blood caused by the hypothyroidism [24]. Because thyroid hormones influence not only renal development, but also renal hemodynamics, GFR, and sodium and water homeostasis. A cross-sectional cohort of 74,356 adults by Chang et al. found subclinical hypothyroidism was a novel risk factor of reduced renal function [25]. We also found despite a strong association with the level of urinary protein, thyroid dysfunction was an independent risk factor for failure to remission. Thus, we speculated the subclinical or overt hypothyroidism may have a worse impact on the progression of MN in return.
Though our study also showed patients without thyroid hormone replacement had a similar remission of proteinuria to that of patient with replacement. A meta-analysis found thyroid hormone replacement therapy significantly increased the remission of nephrotic syndrome in patients with combined euthyroid sick syndrome [26]. And Shin et al. also found thyroid hormone replacement therapy attenuated the decline of renal function in chronic kidney disease patients with subclinical hypothyroidism [27]. But for the limited cases, it is hard for our study to conclude whether thyroid hormone replacement would benefit the clinical outcome of patient with combined pMN and thyroid dysfunction or not. Further investigation will be needed.
As a retrospective study, there were some limitations in the current study. First, we did not perform IF/IHC of PLA2R or THSD7A, or other antigens on all the patients’ kidney tissue. Second, the autoantibodies associated with autoimmune thyroiditis were detected in only a few patients. Third, almost half of the patients with thyroid dysfunction were lost to follow-up and the change of thyroid hormones during the follow-up were not detected regularly. And this is a monocentric and single ethnicity study, multiple center studies were needed to validate our results.
In conclusion, thyroid dysfunction is not uncommon in patients with pMN. Patients with combined thyroid dysfunction present with more severe proteinuria, lower level of serum albumin and worse kidney function at the baseline. And thyroid dysfunction might also predict a poor treatment response during follow-up. These findings indicated that thyroid dysfunction may be caused by the massive proteinuria or other immune factors, and could also exacerbate the glomerular damage in return.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Authors’ contributions
Data analysis and original manuscript drafting: Qiu-hua Gu and Xin Cao. Data collection: Xin Cao and Xiao-ming Mao. Study design: Qiu-hua Gu and Tie-kun Yan. Revision and confirming of the final manuscript: Jun-ya Jia and Tie-kun Yan.
Funding
This work is financially supported by grants from Natural Science Foundation of China (82000669), Tianjin Key Medical Discipline Construction Project (TJYXZDXY-071C) and Tianjin Municipal Education Research Project (20140115).
Availability of data and material
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The research was in compliance of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethics committee of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, approval number [IRB2022-YX-002–01]. All the patients agreed to participate in the study by providing the written informed consent.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
All of the authors declared no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Qiu-hua Gu and Xin Cao are contribute equally.
References
- 1.Singhania G, Singhania N. Membranous nephropathy associated with profound hypothyroidism. Clin Case Rep. 2020;8(1):120–122. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.2573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mario FD, Pofi R, Gigante A, Rivoli L, Rosato E, Isidori AM, Cianci R, Barbano B. Hypothyroidism and Nephrotic Syndrome: Why, When and How to Treat. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2017;15(5):398–403. doi: 10.2174/1570161115999170207114706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kwong N, Medici M, Marqusee E, Wassner AJ. Severity of Proteinuria Is Directly Associated With Risk of Hypothyroidism in Adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(2):e757–e762. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li LZ, Hu Y, Ai SL, Cheng L, Liu J, Morris E, Li Y, Gou SJ, Fu P. The relationship between thyroid dysfunction and nephrotic syndrome: a clinicopathological study. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6421. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42905-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jain D, Aggarwal HK, Pavan Kumar YM, Jain P. Evaluation of thyroid dysfunction in patients with nephrotic syndrome. Med Pharm Rep. 2019;92(2):139–144. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gilles R, den Heijer M, Ross AH, Sweep FC, Hermus AR, Wetzels JF. Thyroid function in patients with proteinuria. Neth J Med. 2008;66(11):483–485. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Singh S, Mishra OP, Mandal PP, Patel PS, Sharma SS, Saini H, Rani K, Chandrasekhar S, Singh MP. Thyroid function in patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021;53(9):1859–1864. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02778-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hoxha E, Reinhard L, Stahl RAK. Membranous nephropathy: new pathogenic mechanisms and their clinical implications. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 9.Ronco P, Debiec H. Pathophysiological lessons from rare associations of immunological disorders. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24(1):3–8. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-1009-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Santoro D, Vadala C, Siligato R, Buemi M, Benvenga S. Autoimmune Thyroiditis and Glomerulopathies. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017;8:119. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kong X, Ma Y, Chen J, Luo Q, Yu X, Li Y, Xu J, Huang S, Wang L, Huang W, Wang M, Xu G, Zhang L, Zuo L, Wang H, Chinese e GFRIC Evaluation of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate in the Chinese population. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28(3):641–651. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Burke CW, Shakespear RA. Triiodothyronine and thyroxine in urine. II. Renal handling, and effect of urinary protein. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1976;42(3):504–513. doi: 10.1210/jcem-42-3-504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shakespear RA, Burke CW. Triiodothyronine and thyroxine in urine. I. Measurement and application. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1976;42(3):494–503. doi: 10.1210/jcem-42-3-494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Afrasiabi MA, Vaziri ND, Gwinup G, Mays DM, Barton CH, Ness RL, Valenta LJ. Thyroid function studies in the nephrotic syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1979;90(3):335–338. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-90-3-335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Iversen E, Pedersen KO. Unconjugated thyroxine and triiodothyronine in urine: influence of age, sex, drugs and thyroid function. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1979;39(1):7–13. doi: 10.3109/00365517909104933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chandurkar V, Shik J, Randell E. Exacerbation of underlying hypothyroidism caused by proteinuria and induction of urinary thyroxine loss: case report and subsequent investigation. Endocr Pract. 2008;14(1):97–103. doi: 10.4158/EP.14.1.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yoshida K, Sakurada T, Kaise K, Kaise N, Nomura T, Itagaki Y, Yamamoto M, Saito S, Yoshinaga K. Measurement of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) in human urine. Endocrinol Jpn. 1988;35(5):733–739. doi: 10.1507/endocrj1954.35.733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sasaki K, Yasuda K, Nakanishi K, Rakugi H, Isaka Y, Yamato M. Membranous nephropathy secondary to Graves' disease with deposits of thyroid peroxidase in an adult. CEN Case Rep. 2014;3(1):90–93. doi: 10.1007/s13730-013-0093-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhao L, Liu Y, Su H, Shi X. Relationship between autoimmune thyroid disease and nephropathy: A clinicopathological study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(23):e26273. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shima Y, Nakanishi K, Togawa H, Obana M, Sako M, Miyawaki M, Nozu K, Iijima K, Yoshikawa N. Membranous nephropathy associated with thyroid-peroxidase antigen. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009;24(3):605–608. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-0973-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Christensen EI, Birn H, Storm T, Weyer K, Nielsen R. Endocytic receptors in the renal proximal tubule. Physiology (Bethesda). 2012;27(4):223–236. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00022.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Beck LH, Jr, Bonegio RG, Lambeau G, Beck DM, Powell DW, Cummins TD, Klein JB, Salant DJ. M-type phospholipase A2 receptor as target antigen in idiopathic membranous nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(1):11–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Huang B, Zhang Y, Wang L, Wu Q, Li T, Zhang J, Zhang Q, Sheng H, Bao J, Hu Z. Phospholipase A2 Receptor Autoantibodies as a Novel Serological Biomarker for Autoimmune Thyroid Disease Associated Nephropathy. Front Immunol. 2020;11:837. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mariani LH, Berns JS. The renal manifestations of thyroid disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(1):22–26. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010070766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chang YC, Chang CH, Yeh YC, Chuang LM, Tu YK. Subclinical and overt hypothyroidism is associated with reduced glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria: a large cross-sectional population study. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2031. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19693-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu H, Yan W, Xu G. Thyroid hormone replacement for nephrotic syndrome patients with euthyroid sick syndrome: a meta-analysis. Ren Fail. 2014;36(9):1360–1365. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2014.949559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shin DH, Lee MJ, Lee HS, Oh HJ, Ko KI, Kim CH, Doh FM, Koo HM, Kim HR, Han JH, Park JT, Han SH, Yoo TH, Kang SW. Thyroid hormone replacement therapy attenuates the decline of renal function in chronic kidney disease patients with subclinical hypothyroidism. Thyroid. 2013;23(6):654–661. doi: 10.1089/thy.2012.0475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.