Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 26;11(23):3784. doi: 10.3390/cells11233784

Table 1.

Prognostic value of ACC subtype after adjusting for clinicopathological parameters.

HR 95% CI p Value
TCGA-ACC Cohort
Age 1.013 (0.986–1.041) 0.351
Gender, male vs. female 1.455 (0.614–3.451) 0.394
Laterality, right vs. left 1.533 (0.664–3.54) 0.317
Stage
    Stage II vs. stage I 2.883 (0.301–27.628) 0.358
    Stage III vs. stage I 6.28 (0.641–61.55) 0.115
    Stage IV vs. stage I 16.164 (1.49–175.301) 0.022
    Stage unknow vs. stage I 2.451 (0.117–51.349) 0.564
ACC subtype
    ACC2 vs. ACC1 45.146 (7.393–275.694) 0
    ACC3 vs. ACC1 4.661 (0.877–24.779) 0.071
GEO cohort
Age 1.01 (0.99–1.031) 0.31
Gender, male vs. female 1.236 (0.649–2.354) 0.518
Laterality
    Right vs. left 1.15 (0.54–2.45) 0.717
    Unknow vs. left 1.2 (0.51–2.822) 0.677
Stage
    Stage II vs. stage I 2.765 (0.351–21.81) 0.334
    Stage III vs. stage I 8.223 (0.909–74.351) 0.061
    Stage IV vs. stage I 11.723 (1.504–91.399) 0.019
    Stage unknow vs. stage I 4.067 (0.453–36.548) 0.21
ACC subtype
    ACC2 vs. ACC1 4.959 (2.241–10.97) 0
    ACC3 vs. ACC1 2.578 (1.048–6.341) 0.039