Abstract
Thyroid hormone (TH) signaling is a prerequisite of normal tissue function. Environmental pollutants with the potential to disrupt endocrine functions represent an emerging threat to human health and agricultural production. We used our Thyroid Hormone Action Indicator (THAI) mouse model to study the effects of tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA; 150 mg/bwkg/day orally for 6 days) and diclazuril (10.0 mg/bwkg/day orally for 5 days), a known and a potential hormone disruptor, respectively, on local TH economy. Tissue-specific changes of TH action were assessed in 90-day-old THAI mice by measuring the expression of a TH-responsive luciferase reporter in tissue samples and by in vivo imaging (14-day-long treatment accompanied with imaging on day 7, 14 and 21 from the first day of treatment) in live THAI mice. This was followed by promoter assays to elucidate the mechanism of the observed effects. TBBPA and diclazuril impacted TH action differently and tissue-specifically. TBBPA disrupted TH signaling in the bone and small intestine and impaired the global TH economy by decreasing the circulating free T4 levels. In the promoter assays, TBBPA showed a direct stimulatory effect on the hdio3 promoter, indicating a potential mechanism for silencing TH action. In contrast, diclazuril acted as a stimulator of TH action in the liver, skeletal muscle and brown adipose tissue without affecting the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Thyroid axis. Our data demonstrate distinct and tissue-specific effects of TBBPA and diclazuril on local TH action and prove that the THAI mouse is a novel mammalian model to identify TH disruptors and their tissue-specific effects.
Keywords: TBBPA, diclazuril, endocrine disruption, tissue-specific thyroid hormone action, thyroid hormone action indicator mouse
1. Introduction
Thyroid hormone (TH) signaling is a well-known, fundamental regulator of cellular functions. Physiological levels of TH action represent a prerequisite of normal tissue function during development and adulthood [1]. Tissue TH action is regulated by a complex machinery that allows the generation and maintenance of tissue-specific signatures of TH action that can be independent of the relatively stable circulating serum TH levels [2,3,4,5,6].
Environmental pollutants with endocrine disruptor activity represent a growing concern, since these molecules reach the food chain via water and agricultural production and consequently can seriously impact human and animal health [7,8,9]. Despite intense efforts and progress made in the screening of potential endocrine disruptor activities, our knowledge is still limited concerning the impact of these molecules on tissue-specific TH action. This is also associated with the limitations of the available experimental models [10,11,12]. While in recent years the number of novel test systems has appeared to be growing, a common aspect of most in vivo models is the use of endogenous genes as markers of TH action. These genes are simultaneously regulated by numerous signaling systems, with potential interference between direct and indirect effects of the tested disruptor on TH economy [13,14]. Therefore, the assessment of endocrine disruptor activity in mammalian tissues remains a major challenge.
We generated the THAI transgenic mouse model, which has been proven suitable to selectively assess tissue-specific TH action in an unbiased manner using a TH-responsive luciferase reporter system while all members of the local TH signaling machinery remain intact [15,16,17]. We used this model to assess the endocrine disruptor activity of two compounds, tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) and diclazuril.
Tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) is the most common flame retardant used for the production of printed electronic circuit boards, various plastic products and textiles [18,19]. It is discharged into the environment during manufacturing, use and disposal of electrical equipment, which results in the contamination of air, water, soil, sediments and sewage sludge [20,21]. TBBPA was found to be a TH disrupting agent by studying Rana and Xenopus metamorphosis [10,22].
Alarmingly, TBBPA was also detected in aquatic food samples at concentrations as high as 207.3 ng/g lipid weight, further increasing human exposure [23]. Consequently, TBBPA was also found in human tissues, milk and serum, and its concentrations reached 37 ng/g in breast milk and 649 ng/g in umbilical cord serum [8,24,25]. In addition, TBBPA showed neurotoxic, nephrotoxic and hepatotoxic effects and also impacted reproductive health in various animal models [10,26,27]. In human studies, it has been shown to affect the endocrine and immune systems especially during development and pregnancy [12,28,29]. The acute toxicity indicated by the LD50 was determined to be between 5 and 10 g/bwkg after a single oral dose in mice, rats and rabbits [30].
Diclazuril is widely used as an antiprotozoal agent and acts by targeting the chlorophyll a-D1 complex. It is used to prevent and treat coccidiosis in multiple species and is also applied against equine protozoal myeloencephalitis, and to a lesser extent, toxoplasmosis and neosporosis [31,32]. Its oral or subcutaneous dosages up to 5000 mg/bwkg caused no mortality in mice and rats [33].
Coccidiosis poses an especially significant health risk in poultry, with significant economic consequences. As chickens are often treated with medicated food containing diclazuril, human exposure is a realistic scenario. Thus, the effect of diclazuril on the human TH economy needs to be further investigated [34]. Diclazuril is considered to be safe against toxoplasmosis during pregnancy in a mouse model [35]. However, continuous exposure leads to stable plasma levels, which raises human concerns and calls for further studies. Furthermore, its potential to disrupt hormonal signaling is poorly documented, but its ability to bind androgen receptors was shown, along with data of its potential to antagonize TH receptors in a high-throughput cell-based reporter gene assay [36,37].
Our data obtained in the THAI mouse demonstrate that TBBPA and diclazuril exert a tissue-specific impact on mammalian TH action detectable in living animals and in isolated tissue samples. The obtained data demonstrated the tissue-specific effects of TBBPA and diclazuril on local and global TH economy. They also proved that the THAI mouse provides a selective in vivo tissue-specific mammalian model to screen the potential of compounds to disrupt TH signaling.
2. Results
2.1. Tissue-Specific Effects of TBBPA and Diclazuril on Peripheral TH Action
To assess the effect of TBBPA and diclazuril on TH action in different peripheral tissues, we used our THAI mouse as an animal model [15]. TH action was assessed in tissue samples by measuring the mRNA level of the TH-responsive luciferase reporter system in dissected tissues with Taqman qPCR. We administered 150 mg/bwkg/day of TBBPA for 6 days and 10.0 mg/bwkg/day of diclazuril for 5 days by oral gavage.
After the TBBPA treatment, TH action remained unchanged in the heart, interscapular brown adipose tissue (BAT), skeletal muscle, skin, small intestines and liver (Figure 1A–F). In contrast, TH action in the bone was strongly decreased (Figure 1G).
Similarly to TBBPA, diclazuril left TH action unchanged in the heart, BAT, skin and small intestine (Figure 2A,B,D,E). However, diclazuril increased TH action in the skeletal muscle and liver (Figure 2C,F) and did not change TH action in the bone (Figure 2G).
2.2. Distinct Impacts of TBBPA and Diclazuril on Local TH Action in Live THAI Mice
After assessing the impact of the two compounds in various peripheral tissues, we were interested in whether a less invasive, in vivo method allowing a longer follow-up of the same animal would be adequate to assess trending changes that did not reach significance in tissue homogenates (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Therefore, we subjected the THAI mice to in vivo imaging according to our established protocol that allows the assessment of TH signaling in the small intestine and BAT of the THAI mouse [15]. We measured TH action in these tissues with a longer treatment time than in the previous experiments, using similar doses of the compounds. A 14-day-long treatment was accompanied with imaging on day 7, 14 and 21 from the first day of treatment. The animals were subjected to bioluminescent in vivo imaging before the first treatment, after 1 and 2 weeks of daily treatment and finally after one week from treatment withdrawal. Each animal served as a self-control for its own measurements.
In the small intestine, TH action was decreased after 2 weeks of TBBPA treatment and then recovered after the recovery week (Figure 3A). In contrast, diclazuril induced a significantly elevated TH action in BAT that also recovered after 1 week (Figure 3B). The observed changes confirmed the trend obtained in mRNA expression in tissue homogenates (Figure 1E and Figure 2B).
2.3. TBBPA Impacts the Hypothalamo–Pituitary–Thyroid (HPT) Axis, While Diclazuril Does Not
To assess whether the observed changes were the consequence of a local impact on TH action or were associated with an altered function of the HPT axis, we measured parameters that hallmark the activity of the HPT axis in animals treated with TBBPA or diclazuril.
After TBBPA treatment, trh expression in microdissected hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) samples did not change significantly, despite a trend toward an increase (63% increase, p = 0.064). This was accompanied by unaltered tshb mRNA levels in the pituitary (Figure 4A,B); in parallel, TH action remained unchanged in the microdissected hypothalamic arcuate nucleus median eminence (ARC-ME) region and in the pituitary (Figure 4C,D). Similar results were obtained with diclazuril (Figure 4E–H), except for the lack of a trend toward an increase in trh expression in the PVN.
However, despite the unchanged central parameters, massively decreased circulating free T4 (fT4) levels were detected after TBBPA treatment, while free T3 (fT3) remained unchanged (Figure 5A,B). Both fT4 and fT3 remained unchanged after diclazuril treatment (Figure 5C,D).
2.4. Diclazuril Does Not Impact the Cerebral Cortex; the Effect of TBBPA on dio3 Expression Is Counterbalanced by Local Mechanisms
Having studied the impact of TBBPA or diclazuril on the HPT axis, we also investigated how the cerebral cortex, a region protected by the blood–brain barrier, was affected by these compounds. Both treatments resulted in unchanged cortical TH action (Figure 6A,C).
Since the cortex is known to be programmed to maintain T3 homeostasis [2], we tried to characterize local regulators of TH action in the cortex under the present treatment. Monocarboxylate transporter 8 (MCT8) is one of the major TH transporters with a critical function in the brain. Neither TBBPA nor diclazuril had an effect on the mRNA levels of mct8, suggesting unaltered TH transport (Figure 6B,D).
Neuronal TH action is heavily regulated by type 3 deiodinase (D3), the main TH-degrading enzyme [38]. To further characterize the cortical effects of TBBPA or diclazuril, we also studied how dio3 was impacted. TBBPA exerted a tissue-specific effect on dio3 expression; it was decreased in the cortex, increased in the hippocampus and remained unchanged in the pituitary and liver (Figure 7A).
To understand whether these were indirect, compensatory changes or direct effects of TBBPA on the dio3 promoter, we performed promoter assays in HEK293T cell cultures transfected with a luciferase reporter linked to a dio3 promoter, which enabled the bioluminescent quantitation of promoter activity. TBBPA increased dio3-luciferase expression in hormone-free medium and did not have an additive effect in the presence of 50 nM T3, that, as expected, also induced reporter expression in the presence of TRβ (Figure 7B). In contrast, diclazuril did not regulate dio3 promoter activity either in the cerebral cortex or in the in vitro promoter assay (Figure 7A,C). Interestingly, TBBPA is likely able to impact the local TH action in various tissues by directly interacting with the dio3 promoter, but this effect seems to be insufficient to alter cortical TH action, as shown by the unaltered luciferase mRNA level.
3. Discussion
Environmental pollution is growing due to industrialization and intense arable and livestock farming. Many of the polluting compounds have been used widely for a long time, which has led to their accumulation in the environment [9]. As a consequence, chemical compounds reach the human population, and there is growing evidence suggesting that this interaction is associated with the development of human diseases [39,40,41]. Therefore, it has become critically important to uncover the potential hazards these molecules could exert on the population.
Endogenous, non-peptide hormones that control sexual functions, growth, cellular metabolism and differentiation often contain aromatic rings as a molecular backbone. Unsurprisingly, many cyclic and aromatic chemicals can interact with these molecules, thus interfering with various hormonal actions. Hormones of the thyroid gland represent no exceptions due to their aromatic amino acids that are critical for tissue function.
Impairments of TH action result in tissue disfunction, with documented consequences on human health [1,6]. TH economy is regulated by two major regulatory systems. Circulating TH levels are maintained centrally by the HPT axis, yet the target tissues have a striking autonomy to develop their own TH action by a cell-type specific local, intracellular regulatory system that involves TH activation and inactivation by deiodination, TH uptake by specific transporters and the TH receptor complex [4,5]. Due to this complex regulation, compounds like endocrine disruptors can affect TH economy also without affecting the circulating TH levels [42]. Therefore, it is of increasing interest to study the impact of endocrine disruptors on TH economy in a tissue-specific context.
In order to assess TH action in specific tissues of mice in the most unbiased way possible, we generated the THAI transgenic mouse model that expresses a specifically TH-responsive luciferase reporter system [15]. This model provides a proven approach to quantify the local TH action in microdissected brain regions, peripheral tissue samples and live mice by in vivo imaging [15,16,17]. Importantly, the assessment of TH signaling in this model is free from the confounding effects of non-TH-dependent pathways that are also able to impact the expression of endogenous TH-responsive genes, e.g., enpp2, a well-known endogenous TH marker gene that is also regulated by estrogen [43]. However, the reporter system of the THAI mouse overcomes these problems and provides a highly selective approach to assess TH action. While the THAI mouse provides a model to assess the disruptor potency of specific compounds in an intact mammalian tissue context, species-specific differences should be also kept in mind when extrapolating data. The picture could be further complicated by the species-specific metabolism of specific compounds, giving rise to bioactive metabolites. However, the THAI mouse can be subjected to in vivo imaging that allows to perform self-controlled experiments. This provides the advantage of studying the kinetics of the impact of disruptor exposure even during an extended time period that could much better model the real-life exposure of humans and animals. In addition, it also contributes to facilitating the reduction of the number of used experimental animals.
TBBPA and diclazuril treatments were performed according to literature data [27,44]. In comparison to the used dose, TBBPA concentration is significantly lower in human tissues (see Introduction), but it is obvious that only a fraction of the orally given dose will be deposited in tissues; furthermore, our exposure time was considerably shorter compared to real-life exposure.
TBBPA, a commonly used flame retardant, is known to impact TH economy. It was shown in an in vitro reporter assay in cultured neural cells that TBBPA can directly interfere with the response to T3 of TH-regulated genes [45]. It was also shown that TBBPA treatment decreased the circulating T4 levels in rats, which was accompanied with unchanged T3 and TSH levels [46].
We observed the same phenomenon in THAI mice. fT4 was decreased along with a strong trend toward an increase of TRH expression in the PVN that did not reach statistical significance. Based on this, it can be speculated that TBBPA acts at the level of the thyroid gland, e.g., by interfering with the hormone synthesis; the observed decrease in TH signaling in the bone and small intestine could be a direct consequence of decreased T4 levels. This hypothesis is supported by data showing that TH signaling in these tissues are markedly sensitive to the circulating TH levels compared to what observed in other tissues [15].
Tissue-specific TH action is a net result of TH availability and in certain tissues partially relies on the local deactivation of TH by the T3-degrading D3 enzyme. In hdio3 promoter assays, we found that TBBPA stimulated the dio3 promoter. This discovery suggests that altering the D3-encoding dio3 gene activity can be another checkpoint where TBBPA potentially interferes with local TH action. This would represent a novel example of how endocrine disruptors act via altering hormone metabolism/inactivation, one of the categories listed by the recent Consensus Statement on the characteristics of endocrine-disrupting chemicals [47]. Generally, increased net dio3 activity in the periphery could contribute to the observed lowered fT4 along with a relatively intact HPT axis. However, the tissue-specific changes of dio3 expression point towards a more complex phenomenon, which makes it difficult to formulate generalized conclusions about the peripheral TH metabolism.
Importantly, the statistically not significant change in trh expression in the PVN does not exclude the possibility of the large observed difference being a functional response of the HPT axis. This seems to be controversial, since another study using hypothalamic in vivo transfection of a trh-luc construct into the mouse hypothalamus found either an increase or a decrease in trh transcription depending on the TBBPA treatment regime [27]. However, it is difficult to compare these findings with our data, since we measured endogenous trh expression in microdissected PVN samples in contrast to the mentioned study in which the transcriptional activity of a ~500-bp trh 5′FR-luc was assessed in the whole hypothalamus [27]. It can be speculated that the impact of TBBPA on the HPT axis is a net effect of various minor effects resulting in the partial downregulation of the global TH economy.
The veterinary drug diclazuril is used as a coccidiostatic agent [31,32]. Our data also provided evidence that in addition to TBBPA, diclazuril acts as a modulator of tissue-specific TH signaling. In contrast to TBBPA, all effects of diclazuril we observed in the THAI mice were stimulatory of TH action. Interestingly, these changes were accompanied with unchanged circulating TH levels and unchanged HPT axis parameters and a lack of a direct effect on the dio3 promoter.
Considering that muscle, liver and fat have been reported to accumulate diclazuril [48], it is not surprising that the largest effects observed in the THAI mouse were found in these tissues. A longer exposure also allowed us to visualize the effect on BAT with in vivo imaging. Based on this, it is likely that the prolonged exposure increased the stimulatory capabilities of the drug on local TH action. However, after the recovery week, the observed effect disappeared, indicating a fast clearance in vivo. While these remarks suggest that diclazuril is rather an endocrine modulator than a disruptor, our data hint towards diclazuril being able to substantially modify the local TH action under continuous exposure.
In the case that the observed stimulatory effect of diclazuril occurred in treated poultry, this could result in elevated tissue energy expenditure and metabolism by increasing TH-dependent gene expression in the muscle and liver. While it has been thought that BAT-dependent thermogenesis is absent in the chicken, this has been recently questioned by demonstrating the emergence of beige-like fat as a physiological adaptation to cold [49]. This induction of BAT TH signaling by diclazuril could contribute to non-shivering thermogenesis and energy loss also in the chicken, but further studies are required to directly prove this hypothesis. Additionally, an effect of diclazuril on the growth performance and feed conversion of the chicken was studied, although the topic has not been widely investigated yet, and the results are controversial [50].
Medication may have a direct influence on growth performance, which might originate either from the direct modulation of tissue-specific TH signaling by a drug or from its inhibitory effect on subclinical or clinical coccidiosis, which of course per se negatively influences growth performance and body weight gain. In order to reveal a direct modulatory effect, studies on further target species are needed in the absence of coccidial infection. Would such effect truly exist, its connection to altered TH action would be plausible.
In summary, our data provide evidence of a tissue specific disruption of TH signaling by TBBPA in the mouse, while also revealing the stimulatory effect of diclazuril on TH signaling without affecting the HPT axis. The current experiments also prove that THAI mouse can be used as an in vivo model to assess the potential of specific compounds to disrupt TH economy. In the BAT and small intestine, THAI mouse also provides a tool to perform self-controlled longitudinal studies on live mice to assess modulation of TH signaling.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Animals
The experiments were performed on ~90-day-old male THAI#4 mice; in vivo imaging experiments were performed on white furred THAI mice. Animals had food and water ad libitum and were housed under standard conditions. The experimental protocol was reviewed and approved by the Animal Welfare Committee at the Institute of Experimental Medicine (PE/EA/106-2/2021).
4.2. Animal Treatment and Sample Collection
TBBPA (Sigma) was delivered by oral gavage in corn oil containing 2% Et-OH as a saline suspension, in a dose of 150 mg/bwkg/day as described [27]. The treatment lasted 6 days, and control animals received the vehicle. Diclazuril (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was delivered by oral gavage in a dose of 10.0 mg/bwkg/day as a saline suspension as described [44]. Diclazuril treatment lasted 5 days, and control animals received the vehicle. Following the last treatment, the animals were sacrificed by decapitation, and trunk blood was collected. Peripheral tissues and brain regions were harvested and flash-frozen in dry ice. The PVN and ARC-ME regions were microdissected with the Palkovits punch technique; bone was collected from the distal part of the tibia and skeletal muscle was collected from musculus gastrocnemius. Treatment for in vivo imaging was continued for 14 days, followed by a 7-day-long withdrawal.
4.3. In Vivo Imaging
In vivo imaging was performed on anesthetized animals according to our established protocol, as previously described [15]. In short, THAI mice were anesthetized with ketamine–xylazine (50 and 10 μg/bwkg, respectively) i.p. Hair covering the abdominal or scapular regions was removed by a commercial depilatory cream, and D-luciferin (sodium salt, Gold Biotechnology, St. Louis, MO, USA) was introduced i.p. (150 µg/bwg). Images were taken after 15 min of incubation with 3 min acquisition time. Measurements were taken after 7, 14 and 21 days after the first day of treatment.
4.4. Serum Hormone Measurements
FT4 and fT3 levels were measured with the AccuLite CLIA Microwells kit (cat. no. 1275-300B and 1375-300B, respectively, Monobind Inc., Lake Forest, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions in a Luminoskan Ascent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) machine. However, TBBPA being a structural analogue, we were curious about whether it directly distorted the results. Spiked samples were used to elucidate this; control and treated animal sera were spiked with TBBPA in excess and resulted in the same concentrations as the unspiked samples. We concluded that the CLIA method was fit for our analytical purpose.
4.5. Taqman qPCR
Total RNA from tissues was isolated with the NucleoSpin RNA kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with the following modifications. Non-brain samples were first homogenized with 1 mL Trizol reagent, extracted with 200 μL of chloroform and separated by centrifugation (15 min, 12,000× g on 4 °C). The supernatant was processed using the kit, as instructed. Then, 1 μg of total RNA was transcribed with the High-Capacity Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA), as instructed. The product cDNA content was measured with the Qubit ssDNA assay (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), using 10 ng of cDNA in all Taqman reactions (Viia7, Applied Biosystems). The Taqman gene expressions assays are detailed in Table 1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). qPCR on microdissected brain regions of the THAI mouse was performed as described [17]. If a gene of interest was measured above 34 cycles, preamplification was performed with 5.55 ng of cDNA/reaction (Applied Biosystems). The preamplified DNA was not normalized for DNA content but only with respect to preamplified hprt. The details of qPCR are shown in the figure legends when relevant.
Table 1.
Gene Symbol | Gene Name | Assay ID |
---|---|---|
actinb | β actin | Mm02619580_g1 |
dCpG luciferase | dCpG luciferase reporter (custom made) | AIY9ZTZ |
dio3 | deiodinase, iodothyronine type III | Mm00548953_s1 |
gapdh | glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | Mm99999915_g1 |
hprt1 | hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase | Mm01545399_m1 |
slc16a2 | MCT8, monocarboxylate transporter 8 | Mm01232724_m1 |
trh | Thyrotropin releasing hormone | Mm01963590_s1 |
tshb | thyroid stimulating hormone, beta subunit | Mm03990915_g1 |
4.6. Cell Transfection and Luciferase Assay
The hdio3 promoter–reporter construct contains 4327 bp of the 5′-flanking region plus 224 bp of the 5′-untranslated region of the human dio3 gene. It was a gift of Prof. M. Dentice (University of Naples Federico II Italy) and was prepared as earlier described [51]. HEK293T cells were plated on 24-well plates in normal medium (89% DMEM, 10% FBS, 1% penicillin–streptomycin). Before transfection, the medium was changed to a hormone-free medium containing charcoaled FBS. The cells were transfected with the dio3-luciferase reporter, Renilla luciferase reporter and TRβ with X-tremeGene HP DNA transfection reagent (cat. no. 06366236001, Roche Basel, Switzerland) overnight. Then, the medium was replaced with hormone-free medium containing 50 nM T3 and/or 1 μM of TBBPA/diclazuril. The cells were harvested after 24 h of treatment. Luciferase and Renilla activity were measured with the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions in a Luminoskan Ascent (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) machine as previously described [52].
4.7. Data Analysis
Data were analyzed with STATISTICA v13 software (Tibco Software, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Figures were prepared with Prism 9.3 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The figures show Tukey Box Plots; the box represents the two middle quartiles, the lower whisker represents the lower quartile, the upper whisker represents the upper quartile, the line represents the median, the dots represent outlier data. The number of used animals is indicated in figure legends. Null-hypothesis significance tests were conducted with a 95% level of confidence. The Student’s two sample two-sided t test was used to analyze two groups; one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey post-hoc test was used to compare more than two groups; ANOVA was applied as within-subjects ANOVA for in vivo imaging data. The models were deemed adequate based on residual plots and residual normal plots.
Acknowledgments
We thank Andrea Juhász for her excellent technical support.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: B.G., C.F., M.T. and A.K.; methodology: K.R., P.M., C.F. and B.G.; validation: R.S., C.F. and B.G.; formal analysis: R.S.; investigation: K.R., A.K., P.M. and R.S.; writing—original draft preparation: R.S., K.R. and B.G.; writing—review and editing: B.G. and C.F.; visualization: R.S.; supervision: B.G. and C.F.; project administration: B.G.; funding acquisition: B.G. and C.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The experimental protocol was reviewed and approved by the Animal Welfare Committee at the Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hungary (PE/EA/106-2/2021).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data are available on request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants to Project no. RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00011, titled National Laboratory of Translational Neuroscience implemented with the support provided by the Recovery and Resilience Facility of the European Union within the framework of Programme Széchenyi Plan Plus and the National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH) of Hungary (K125247).
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Larsen P.R., Davies T.F., Hay I.D. The Thyroid Gland. In: Wilson J.D., Foster D.W., Kronenberg H.M., Larsen P.R., editors. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. 9th ed. W.B. Saunders Co.; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 1998. pp. 389–515. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gereben B., Zavacki A.M., Ribich S., Kim B.W., Huang S.A., Simonides W.S., Zeold A., Bianco A.C. Cellular and molecular basis of deiodinase-regulated thyroid hormone signaling. Endocr. Rev. 2008;29:898–938. doi: 10.1210/er.2008-0019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boelen A., Kwakkel J., Fliers E. Beyond low plasma T3: Local thyroid hormone metabolism during inflammation and infection. Endocr. Rev. 2011;32:670–693. doi: 10.1210/er.2011-0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fekete C., Lechan R.M. Central regulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. Endocr. Rev. 2014;35:159–194. doi: 10.1210/er.2013-1087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gereben B., McAninch E.A., Ribeiro M.O., Bianco A.C. Scope and limitations of iodothyronine deiodinases in hypothyroidism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2015;11:642–652. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2015.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bianco A.C., Dumitrescu A., Gereben B., Ribeiro M.O., Fonseca T.L., Fernandes G.W., Bocco B. Paradigms of Dynamic Control of Thyroid Hormone Signaling. Endocr. Rev. 2019;40:1000–1047. doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Diamanti-Kandarakis E., Palioura E., Kandarakis S.A., Koutsilieris M. The impact of endocrine disruptors on endocrine targets. Horm. Metab. Res. 2010;42:543–552. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1252034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Feiteiro J., Mariana M., Cairrao E. Health toxicity effects of brominated flame retardants: From environmental to human exposure. Environ. Pollut. 2021;285:117475. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Guarnotta V., Amodei R., Frasca F., Aversa A., Giordano C. Impact of Chemical Endocrine Disruptors and Hormone Modulators on the Endocrine System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:5710. doi: 10.3390/ijms23105710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dong M., Li Y., Zhu M., Li J., Qin Z. Tetrabromobisphenol A Disturbs Brain Development in Both Thyroid Hormone-Dependent and -Independent Manners in Xenopus laevis. Molecules. 2021;27:249. doi: 10.3390/molecules27010249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Beck K.R., Sommer T.J., Schuster D., Odermatt A. Evaluation of tetrabromobisphenol A effects on human glucocorticoid and androgen receptors: A comparison of results from human- with yeast-based in vitro assays. Toxicology. 2016;370:70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2016.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mughal B.B., Fini J.B., Demeneix B.A. Thyroid-disrupting chemicals and brain development: An update. Endocr. Connect. 2018;7:R160–R186. doi: 10.1530/EC-18-0029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li J., Li Y., Zhu M., Song S., Qin Z. A Multiwell-Based Assay for Screening Thyroid Hormone Signaling Disruptors Using thibz Expression as a Sensitive Endpoint in Xenopus laevis. Molecules. 2022;27:798. doi: 10.3390/molecules27030798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Myosho T., Ishibashi A., Fujimoto S., Miyagawa S., Iguchi T., Kobayashi T. Preself-Feeding Medaka Fry Provides a Suitable Screening System for in Vivo Assessment of Thyroid Hormone-Disrupting Potential. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56:6479–6490. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c06729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mohacsik P., Erdelyi F., Baranyi M., Botz B., Szabo G., Toth M., Haltrich I., Helyes Z., Sperlagh B., Toth Z., et al. A Transgenic Mouse Model for Detection of Tissue-Specific Thyroid Hormone Action. Endocrinology. 2018;159:1159–1171. doi: 10.1210/en.2017-00582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu S., Shen S., Yan Y., Sun C., Lu Z., Feng H., Ma Y., Tang Z., Yu J., Wu Y., et al. Triiodothyronine (T3) promotes brown fat hyperplasia via thyroid hormone receptor alpha mediated adipocyte progenitor cell proliferation. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:3394. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31154-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sinkó R., Mohácsik P., Kővári D., Penksza V., Wittmann G., Mácsai L., Fonseca T.L., Bianco A.C., Fekete C., Gereben B. Different hypothalamic mechanisms control decreased circulating thyroid hormone levels in infection and fasting-induced Non-Thyroidal Illness Syndrome in male Thyroid Hormone Action Indicator Mice. Thyroid. :2022. doi: 10.1089/thy.2022.0404. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tong F., Gu X., Gu C., Xie J., Xie X., Jiang B., Wang Y., Ertunc T., Schaffer A., Ji R. Stimulation of Tetrabromobisphenol A Binding to Soil Humic Substances by Birnessite and the Chemical Structure of the Bound Residues. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016;50:6257–6266. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b06265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sunday O.E., Bin H., Guanghua M., Yao C., Zhengjia Z., Xian Q., Xiangyang W., Weiwei F. Review of the environmental occurrence, analytical techniques, degradation and toxicity of TBBPA and its derivatives. Environ. Res. 2022;206:112594. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yuan X., Li T., He Y., Xue N. Degradation of TBBPA by nZVI activated persulfate in soil systems. Chemosphere. 2021;284:131166. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lyche J.L., Rosseland C., Berge G., Polder A. Human health risk associated with brominated flame-retardants (BFRs) Environ. Int. 2015;74:170–180. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kitamura S., Kato T., Iida M., Jinno N., Suzuki T., Ohta S., Fujimoto N., Hanada H., Kashiwagi K., Kashiwagi A. Anti-thyroid hormonal activity of tetrabromobisphenol A, a flame retardant, and related compounds: Affinity to the mammalian thyroid hormone receptor, and effect on tadpole metamorphosis. Life Sci. 2005;76:1589–1601. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu A.F., Qu G.B., Yu M., Liu Y.W., Shi J.B., Jiang G.B. Tetrabromobisphenol-A/S and Nine Novel Analogs in Biological Samples from the Chinese Bohai Sea: Implications for Trophic Transfer. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016;50:4203–4211. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b06378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Barghi M., Shin E.S., Kim J.C., Choi S.D., Chang Y.S. Human exposure to HBCD and TBBPA via indoor dust in Korea: Estimation of external exposure and body burden. Sci. Total Environ. 2017;593–594:779–786. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cariou R., Antignac J.P., Zalko D., Berrebi A., Cravedi J.P., Maume D., Marchand P., Monteau F., Riu A., Andre F., et al. Exposure assessment of French women and their newborns to tetrabromobisphenol-A: Occurrence measurements in maternal adipose tissue, serum, breast milk and cord serum. Chemosphere. 2008;73:1036–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.07.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wu H., Wang J., Xiang Y., Li L., Qie H., Ren M., Lin A., Qi F. Effects of tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) on the reproductive health of male rodents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;781:146745. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Decherf S., Seugnet I., Fini J.B., Clerget-Froidevaux M.S., Demeneix B.A. Disruption of thyroid hormone-dependent hypothalamic set-points by environmental contaminants. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2010;323:172–182. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2010.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huang H., Liang J., Tang P., Yu C., Fan H., Liao Q., Long J., Pan D., Zeng X., Liu S., et al. Associations of bisphenol exposure with thyroid hormones in pregnant women: A prospective birth cohort study in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022;29:87170–87183. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21817-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Clayton E.M., Todd M., Dowd J.B., Aiello A.E. The impact of bisphenol A and triclosan on immune parameters in the U.S. population, NHANES 2003-2006. Environ. Health Perspect. 2011;119:390–396. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Darnerud P.O. Toxic effects of brominated flame retardants in man and in wildlife. Environ. Int. 2003;29:841–853. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(03)00107-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hackstein J.H., Mackenstedt U., Mehlhorn H., Meijerink J.P., Schubert H., Leunissen J.A. Parasitic apicomplexans harbor a chlorophyll a-D1 complex, the potential target for therapeutic triazines. Parasitol. Res. 1995;81:207–216. doi: 10.1007/BF00937111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Stock M.L., Elazab S.T., Hsu W.H. Review of triazine antiprotozoal drugs used in veterinary medicine. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018;41:184–194. doi: 10.1111/jvp.12450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.European Medicines Agency V.M.E.U. Diclazuril. Summary Report (1) European Medicines Agency; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 1996. Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Products. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Peek H.W., Landman W.J. Coccidiosis in poultry: Anticoccidial products, vaccines and other prevention strategies. Vet. Q. 2011;31:143–161. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2011.605247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Oz H.S. Novel Synergistic Protective Efficacy of Atovaquone and Diclazuril on Fetal-Maternal Toxoplasmosis. Int. J. Clin. Med. 2014;5:921–932. doi: 10.4236/ijcm.2014.515124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Park Y., Park J., Lee H.S. Endocrine disrupting potential of veterinary drugs by in vitro stably transfected human androgen receptor transcriptional activation assays. Environ. Pollut. 2021;286:117201. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Paul-Friedman K., Martin M., Crofton K.M., Hsu C.W., Sakamuru S., Zhao J., Xia M., Huang R., Stavreva D.A., Soni V., et al. Limited Chemical Structural Diversity Found to Modulate Thyroid Hormone Receptor in the Tox21 Chemical Library. Environ. Health Perspect. 2019;127:97009. doi: 10.1289/EHP5314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bianco A.C., Salvatore D., Gereben B., Berry M.J., Larsen P.R. Biochemistry, cellular and molecular biology and physiological roles of the iodothyronine selenodeiodinases. Endo. Rev. 2002;23:38–89. doi: 10.1210/edrv.23.1.0455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Demeneix B.A. Evidence for Prenatal Exposure to Thyroid Disruptors and Adverse Effects on Brain Development. Eur. Thyroid J. 2019;8:283–292. doi: 10.1159/000504668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mughal B.B., Demeneix B.A. Endocrine disruptors: Flame retardants and increased risk of thyroid cancer. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017;13:627–628. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Caporale N., Leemans M., Birgersson L., Germain P.L., Cheroni C., Borbely G., Engdahl E., Lindh C., Bressan R.B., Cavallo F., et al. From cohorts to molecules: Adverse impacts of endocrine disrupting mixtures. Science. 2022;375:eabe8244. doi: 10.1126/science.abe8244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zoeller R.T. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and thyroid hormone action. Adv. Pharmacol. 2021;92:401–417. doi: 10.1016/bs.apha.2021.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sarvari M., Kallo I., Hrabovszky E., Solymosi N., Rodolosse A., Liposits Z. Long-Term Estrogen Receptor Beta Agonist Treatment Modifies the Hippocampal Transcriptome in Middle-Aged Ovariectomized Rats. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2016;10:149. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lindsay D.S., Blagburn B.L. Activity of diclazuril against Toxoplasma gondii in cultured cells and mice. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1994;55:530–533. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Guyot R., Chatonnet F., Gillet B., Hughes S., Flamant F. Toxicogenomic analysis of the ability of brominated flame retardants TBBPA and BDE-209 to disrupt thyroid hormone signaling in neural cells. Toxicology. 2014;325:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2014.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cope R.B., Kacew S., Dourson M. A reproductive, developmental and neurobehavioral study following oral exposure of tetrabromobisphenol A on Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicology. 2015;329:49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2014.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.La Merrill M.A., Vandenberg L.N., Smith M.T., Goodson W., Browne P., Patisaul H.B., Guyton K.Z., Kortenkamp A., Cogliano V.J., Woodruff T.J., et al. Consensus on the key characteristics of endocrine-disrupting chemicals as a basis for hazard identification. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020;16:45–57. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0273-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhang M., Qiu J., Li X., Zhang W., Fan J., Zhou H., He L. Determination of residual enantiomers of diclazuril in chicken edible tissues by high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2019;1118–1119:203–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.04.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sotome R., Hirasawa A., Kikusato M., Amo T., Furukawa K., Kuriyagawa A., Watanabe K., Collin A., Shirakawa H., Hirakawa R., et al. In vivo emergence of beige-like fat in chickens as physiological adaptation to cold environments. Amino Acids. 2021;53:381–393. doi: 10.1007/s00726-021-02953-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Asadi Iraee H., Asadi Iraee M., Youssefi M.R., Abouhosseini Tabari M. Growth performance parameters in chicken experimental coccidiosis treated with Diclazuril and Clopidol: The need for assessing new anticoccidial resources. Iran. J. Vet. Med. 2015;9:189–194. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dentice M., Luongo C., Huang S., Ambrosio R., Elefante A., Mirebeau-Prunier D., Zavacki A.M., Fenzi G., Grachtchouk M., Hutchin M., et al. Sonic hedgehog-induced type 3 deiodinase blocks thyroid hormone action enhancing proliferation of normal and malignant keratinocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:14466–14471. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706754104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Egri P., Fekete C., Denes A., Reglodi D., Hashimoto H., Fulop B.D., Gereben B. Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide (PACAP) Regulates the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Thyroid (HPT) Axis via Type 2 Deiodinase in Male Mice. Endocrinology. 2016;157:2356–2366. doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data are available on request.