Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2022 Nov 30;23(23):15045. doi: 10.3390/ijms232315045

Polyenic Antibiotics and Other Antifungal Compounds Produced by Hemolytic Streptomyces Species

Jan Bobek 1,2,*, Eliška Filipová 1, Natalie Bergman 2, Matouš Čihák 1,3, Miroslav Petříček 1, Ana Catalina Lara 4, Vaclav Kristufek 4, Melinda Megyes 5, Theresa Wurzer 4,6, Alica Chroňáková 4, Kateřina Petříčková 1
Editor: Hindra Hindra
PMCID: PMC9740855  PMID: 36499372

Abstract

Streptomyces are of great interest in the pharmaceutical industry as they produce a plethora of secondary metabolites that act as antibacterial and antifungal agents. They may thrive on their own in the soil, or associate with other organisms, such as plants or invertebrates. Some soil-derived strains exhibit hemolytic properties when cultivated on blood agar, raising the question of whether hemolysis could be a virulence factor of the bacteria. In this work we examined hemolytic compound production in 23 β-hemolytic Streptomyces isolates; of these 12 were soil-derived, 10 were arthropod-associated, and 1 was plant-associated. An additional human-associated S. sp. TR1341 served as a control. Mass spectrometry analysis suggested synthesis of polyene molecules responsible for the hemolysis: candicidins, filipins, strevertene A, tetrafungin, and tetrin A, as well as four novel polyene compounds (denoted here as polyene A, B, C, and D) in individual liquid cultures or paired co-cultures. The non-polyene antifungal compounds actiphenol and surugamide A were also identified. The findings indicate that the ability of Streptomyces to produce cytolytic compounds (here manifested by hemolysis on blood agar) is an intrinsic feature of the bacteria in the soil environment and could even serve as a virulence factor when colonizing available host organisms. Additionally, a literature review of polyenes and non-polyene hemolytic metabolites produced by Streptomyces is presented.

Keywords: Actinomycetales, secondary metabolites, polyene antibiotics, Streptomyces, hemolysis, symbiosis, soil ecosystem

1. Introduction

1.1. The Role of Hemolysis in Streptomyces’ Interactions

Streptomyces produce a large variety of secondary metabolites (SM) that correspond to their environmental needs [1], of which antibacterial and antifungal agents are of utmost importance [2]. The chemical diversity of the SMs produced by Streptomyces species has most likely evolved as a direct result of their interactions with other organisms. Streptomyces’ interactions with plants and animals can be parasitic, as is the case of potato scab-causing streptomycetes, which infect the plant tuberosphere [3], or S. somaliensis and other strains that infect humans [4]. However, in most cases, they are beneficial and growth- promoting organisms. Streptomycetes form numerous mutualistic relationships with invertebrates and plants [5], and they protect their hosts against infection using antibiotics and antifungals.

Hemolysis—the rupture of erythrocytes—is a virulence factor of many pathogens with E. coli, Streptococci, Vibrio, and Staphylococcus aureus being some prominent examples [6]. The activity of hemolysins, however, is not restricted to erythrocytes only; hemolysins, by acting on cellular membranes, can also damage other eukaryotic cells [6,7]. Hemolysins are mostly lytic proteins—enzymes or channel-forming porins [8] or, rarely, polyene compounds (also referred to as polyene antibiotics or polyene antimycotics) [9].

1.2. Polyenes and Non-Polyene Hemolytic Metabolites: A Literature Review

Polyenes are poly-unsaturated compounds with linear or cyclic structures. Cyclic polyene antibiotics belong to the macrolide class of SMs, representing a large and variable group of antibiotics produced mostly by Streptomyces. They have a macrolactone ring to which typically two sugars and one amino sugar are attached [10]. Antibiotics in the polyene class possess a macrocyclic ring of carbon atoms closed by lactonization; the polyene group has, in addition, a series of conjugated double bonds of various length.

We searched the literature extensively to review mostly actinomycete-derived polyenes identified so far. They are listed in groups based on their structures together with their chemical formulas, molecular weight (MW), and assessed activities (Table 1); the representative structures are shown in Figure S1. Selected non-polyene, human cells-targeting metabolites included in the study are placed in Table 2. The primary selection criterion was the origin of compounds in streptomycetes or related bacteria and their reported activity towards eukaryotic cells. The majority of the compounds were discovered more than 50 years ago, therefore the data often lack sufficient structure determination and complex activity screenings. Crucial structural characteristics include a combination of a hydrophobic polyene region with a hydrophilic polyol part, often glycosylated, which enables the molecules to enter the cytoplasmic membranes of various organisms, exhibiting either irreversible destruction of the membrane or transient and reversible channel formation (e.g., in pentaenes or heptaenes, respectively). They form complexes, in which the polyene chain faces the lipid environment and the polyol chain is oriented towards the aqueous environment in the interior of the pores [11]. Polyenes often form complexes with sterols and exhibit variable specificities to ergosterols and cholesterols [12]. These traits strongly influence their cytotoxicity and, subsequently, their possible medical application.

Table 1.

Actinomycete polyene SMs. AB—antibacterial; AF—antifungal; AP/I—antiparasitic, insecticidal; HL/CL—hemo-/cytolytic; AC—anti-cancer. Asterisks indicate compounds with clinical (*) or agricultural (**) application.

Compound Formula Calculated Average Mass Activities Ref.
CYCLIC—TETRAENES AB AF AP/I HL/CL AC
Amphotericin A * C47H75NO17 926.1090 + + [13]
Antifungalmycin 702 C35H60O14 704.8530 + [14]
Arenomycin B (Lucensomycin) C36H55NO13 709.8316 + [15]
Aureofuscin C28H43NO12 585.6490 + [16]
Lucimycin (Lucensomycin, Etruscomycin) C36H53NO13 707.8158 + + [17]
NPP A1 C55H88N2O22 1129.3040 + [18]
Nystatin A1 (Fungicidin) * C47H75NO17 926.1090 - + [19]
Nystatin A2 C47H75NO16 910.1096
Nystatin A3 C53H85NO20 1056.2526
Pimaricin (Natamycin) */** C33H47NO13 665.7351 + - [20]
Polyfungin B C53H85NO19 1040.2532 + [21]
Protocidin C29H45NO13 615.6752 [22]
Rimocidin C39H61NO14 767.9117 - + [23]
Tetrafungin C47H82NO23 1029.1610 + [24]
Tetramycin A
Tetramycin B
C35H53NO13
C35H53NO14
695.8048
711.8042
+ + [25]
Tetrin A
Tetrin B
Tetrin C
C34H51NO13
C34H51NO14
C34H49NO13
681.7779
697.7773
679.7620
+ [26]
[27]
Toyamycin (Akitamycin) C41H65NO18 859.9630 + [28]
PA-166 C35H53NO14 711.8042 + [28]
CYCLIC—PENTAENES AB AF AP/I HL/CL AC
Aurenin (1’-Hydroxyisochainin) C33H54O11 626.7852 + [29]
Capacidin C54H85NO18 1050.2716 + [30]
Chainin C33H54O10 610.7858 + [31]
Elizabethin C35H58O12 670.8383 + [32]
Filipin I C35H58O9 622.8401 + + [33]
Filipin II C35H58O10 638.8395
Filipin III C35H58O11 654.8389
Filipin IV C35H58O11 654.8389
Fungichromin (Pentamycin) * C35H58O12 670.8383 + + + [34]
Homochainin C34H56O10 624.8126 + [31]
Isochainin C33H54O10 610.7858 + [35]
Kabicidin C35H60O13 688.8536 + [36]
Lienomycin C67H107NO18 1214.5825 + + + [37]
Moldicidin A C42H81NO19 904.1005 + [16]
Norchainin C32H52O10 596.7589 + [31]
Onomycin-I
Onomycin-II
C43H76NO17
C42H67NO17
879.0730
857.9905
+ [38]
Pentacidin C31H50O10 582.7320 + [16]
Pentafungin C41H74NO16 837.0357 + [39]
PA-153 C37H61NO14 743.8897 + [28]
S 728 C56H93NO20 1100.3492 + [16]
Reedsmycin A-E
Reedsmycin F
C36H58O10
C36H58O11
650.8505
666.8499
+ [40]
Selvamicin C47H76O18 929,0955 + [41]
Strevertene A
Strevertene B
Strevertene C
Strevertene D
Strevertene E
Strevertene F
Strevertene G
C31H48O10
C32H50O10
C32H50O10
C33H52O10
C33H52O10
C34H54O10
C31H50O9
580.7161
594.7430
594.7430
608.7699
608.7699
622.7968
566.7326
+ [42]
Takanawaene A
Takanawaene B
Takanawaene C
C30H48O8
C32H52O8
C33H51O8
536.7063
564.7601
578.7870
+ [43]
Thailandin A
Thailandin B
C39H62O14
C33H52O10
754.9208
608.7699
+ [44]
CYCLIC—HEXAENES AB AF AP/I HL/CL AC
Candihexin A C48H76NO19/C43H76NO19/C43H77NO19 971.1268/911.0718/912.0797 + [45]
Candihexin B C48H90NO21/C48H91NO21 1017.2367/1018.2447 + [45]
Candihexin E C38H67NO16 793.9471 + [45]
Cryptocidin C52H84NO17 995.2355 + + [46]
Grecomycin C38H41O10/C38H38O10 657.7375/654.712 + + [47]
CYCLIC—HEPTAENES AB AF AP/I HL/CL AC
Acmycin C36H68NO30 994.9247 + [48]
Amphotericin B C47H73NO17 924.0932 + + [49]
Aureofungin A C59H86N2O19/C59H88N2O19 1127.3339/1129.3498 + [50]
Aureofungin B C57H85NO19/C57H87NO19 1088.2972/1090.3131 + [50]
Candicidin A1 (VI, Levorin A0, Ascosin A1) *
Candicidin A2 (D, A, D1, Levorin A2, Ascosin A2)
Candicidin A3 (V, Levorin A3, Ascosin A3)
C59H84N2O17
C59H84N2O18
C59H86N2O18
1093.3272
1109.3186
1111.3345
+ + [51]
Candidin C47H71NO17 922.0773 + [52]
Flavumycin A C60H91N2O17/C54H79NO16 1112.3858/998.2184 + [53]
Fungimycin C59H86N2O17 1095.3351 + + + [54]
Hamycin A C58H86N2O19 1115.3229 + + + [55]
Isolevorin A2 C60H86N2O18 1123.3455 + [56]
Levorin A2 C59H86N2O18/C59H89N2O18 1111.3345/1114.3583 + [57]
Levorin B C62H98N2O25 1271.4586 + [58]
Lucknomycin C61H98N2O24/C54H80N2O19 1243.4482/1061.2313 + [59]
Partricin A C59H86N2O9 967.3399 + [60]
Partricin B C55H84N2O19 1077.2740 + [60]
Perimycin A C59H88N2O17 1097.3510 + [61]
Trichomycin A C58H84N2O18/C61H86N2O21 1097.3076/1183.3547 + + [62]
AF-1231 C42H68N2O17 873.0052 + [16]
DJ-400 B1
DJ-400 B2
C65H96N2O21
C58H86N2O20
1241.4781
1131.3223
+ [38]
67-121 A
67-121 C
C59H88N2O19
C65H98N2O28
1129.3498
1355.4898
+ [38]
NPP B1 C55H86N2O22 1127.2881 + [18]
LINEAR POLYENES AB AF AP/I HL/CL AC
AB023a
AB023b
C31H50O8
C32H52O8
550.7332
564.7601
+ [63]
Clethramycin C63H99N3O18S 1218.5545 + [64]
ECO-02301 C70H109N2O20 1298.6369 + [65]
Etnangien C49H76O11 841.1358 + [66]
Linearmycin A
Linearmycin B
Linearmycin C
C64H101NO16
C66H103NO16
C67H105NO16
1140.5031
1166.5410
1180.5678
+ + + [67]
Mediomycin
Mediomycin A
Mediomycin B
C62H99NO16S
C62H97NO18S
C62H97NO15
1146.5312
1176.5141
1096.4499
+ [64]
Meijiemycin C66H105NO19 1216.5550 + [68]
Mycangimycin C20H24O4 328.4082 + [69]
Neotetrafibricin A C67H105NO19 1228.5660 + [64]

Table 2.

Non-polyene SMs of actinomycetes targeting human cells.

Compound Formula Calculated Average Mass Activities Ref.
PEPTIDES
Surugamide A C48H81N9O8 912.21428 anticancer, antifungal [70]
Polyoxypeptin C35H60O14 704.84403 pro-apoptotic [71]
Bleomycin C55H84N17O21S3+ 1415.55415 anti-cancer [72]
Actinomycin D C62H86N12O16 1255.41969 anti-cancer [73]
Mirubactin C26H32N6O11 604.56701 siderophore [74]
ANTIMYCINS
Antimycin A C24H40N2O9 548.62641 inhibitor of respiration [75]
NON-POLYENIC MACROLIDES
FK506 (Tacrolimus) C44H69NO12 804.02005 immunosuppressive, antifungal [76]
FK520 (Ascomycin) C43H69NO12 792.00931 immunosuppressive, antifungal [77]
Meridamycin C45H75NO12 822.07844 neuroprotective [78]
Nemadectin C36H52O8 612.79481 antiparasitic [79]
Sirolimus (Rapamycin)–a cyclic molecule containing conjugated triene. C51H79NO13 914.17404 immunosuppressive, antifungal [80]
Venturicidin B C40H66O10 706.94776 antifungal [81]
NON-POLYENIC POLYKETIDES
Actiphenol C15H17NO4 275.30042 proteosynthesis inhibitor [82]
Kinamycin F C18H14N2O7 370.31373 anti-cancer [83]
Neoansamycin A C30H37NO7 523.61855 antibiotic, antiviral [84]
Nogalamycin C39H49NO16 787.80515 anti-cancer [85]
Reveromycin A C36H52O11 660.79303 EGF inhibitor [86]
OTHER—ACTIVE ON THE HUMAN CELLS
Neocarzinostatin C35H33NO12 659.63751 anti-cancer [87]
Nocardamine C27H48N6O9 600.70599 anti-cancer siderophore [88]

Almost all polyene compounds have been identified due to their antifungal activity [11] and some have been shown to possess other bioactivities, such as antibacterial (often targeting cell-wall lacking bacteria), antiparasitic (anti-Trichomonas activity has been reported most frequently, implying the compounds may find use in the treatment of combined vaginal infections), cytolytic, and anti-cancer activities.

Most of polyene antibiotics, including filipin and candicidin compounds with larger rings, exhibit hemolytic properties [89]. Filipin forms large aggregates within the erythrocyte membrane that render it permeable [90]. Other polyenes, however, impair plasma membranes by direct binding to ergosterol, as is the case of natamycin [91] or amphotericin [92]. All these polyene compounds are fungicidal and those with lower toxicity are used in medicine. For example, amphotericin B, natamycin and nystatin A1 are used in antifungal and antiprotozoal medications [90].

1.3. Hemolysis as a Virulence Factor

Whilst SM production in Actinobacteria has been extensively studied [2,69], the impact of hemolytic metabolites has not received much attention so far. As hemolysis can be considered a virulence factor [93,94], it may well be viewed as one of the adaptations that the bacteria employ to compete with other organisms in their environment. This theory is further supported by the example of the streptomycete strain S. sp. TR1341, extracted from the lungs of a senior male patient with relapsing bronchopneumonia, whose taxonomy indicates a distance from plant and human pathogenic strains [89]. It has been demonstrated that S. sp. TR1341 possesses a filipin biosynthetic gene cluster responsible for the bacteria’s hemolytic capabilities [89].

The β-hemolytic activity is not exclusively related to human-associated strains, but also occurs in soil-dwelling strains. About half of soil-derived Streptomyces strains exhibit β-hemolytic activity, whereas three out of four clinical Streptomyces isolates are β-hemolytic, according to Wurzer [95]. The soil-derived strains exhibiting β-hemolysis were collected (BCCO strains) and used here to search for the β-hemolytic compound production. The search was focused on polyene antibiotics as their role as hemolysins has not yet been systematically studied in Streptomyces. In addition, the 16S rRNA phylogeny of the BCCO strains used in this study was compared to that of well-known polyene producers.

2. Results

2.1. Sequencing Data and Phylogenetic Tree

According to the 16S rRNA-encoding gene similarities, 22 BCCO strains with β-hemolytic activities clustered with other Streptomyces and one strain with Nocardioides (BCCO 10_0486). Phylogenetic analysis showed no clear association between phylogeny and the production of particular polyene compounds (Figure 1); the clustering seems to correlate more with the isolation source (arthropod or soil) or the country of origin. However, there are a few clusters that contain strains of various origins (country/source): (i) BCCO 10_1099 (Papua New Guinea/ambrosia beetle) and BCCO 10_2196 (Czechia/millipede) clustered together with S. albidoflavus DSM40455; (ii) BCCO 10_0670 (Czechia/soil) and BCCO 10_1092 (Papua New Guinea/ambrosia beetle) clustered together with S. griseus subsp. griseus KCTC9080; and (iii) BCCO 10_1747 (Czechia/soil) and BCCO 10_2389 (Hungary/soil) clustered as S. drozdowiczii NRRL-B-24297.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Phylogeny of Streptomyces strains involved in the study inferred from 16S rRNA gene similarity. Color codes represent the type of a polyene produced by the strain, the isolation source, and the country of origin. Only bootstraps above 50 are shown. The question mark indicates metabolites detected in a co-culture. The sequences of type strains closely related to the sequences of known polyene producers and BCCO strains were included to support topography of phylogenetic tree. The strains were selected according to Labeda et al. [96]. Abbreviations: A.–Amycolatopsis, N.–Nocardioides, S.–Streptomycces.

Apparently, filipin, candicidin, nystatin A1, pimaricin, and actiphenol can be produced by strains from different phylogenetic groups. Our analysis suggests that strains with high phylogenetic relatedness and originating from the same habitat and country produce either the same polyene B (strains associated with ambrosia beetle from Papua New Guinea: BCCO 10_1093, 10_1095, 10_1104) or different compounds (soil strains from Hungary: BCCO 10_2295, 10_2309, 10_2325), as can be seen in our results below.

2.2. Characteristics of Morphological Differentiation and Hemolytic Activities in the Strains

Investigated strains were streaked on blood agar plates, and after 120 h of cultivation, pictures of growing mycelia and hemolytic zones were taken from the top and bottom sides of the dish. All lab-tested strains expressed β-hemolytic activity when grown on blood agar (Table S2).

2.3. Gamma-Butyrolactone-Induced Polyene Production

Gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) is an activator of SM production in Streptomyces. To test its capacity to induce polyene production, we inoculated a strain of Streptomyces as one line on the blood agar. Five microliters of GBL solution (ReagentPlus, ≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich Co. St. Louis, MO, USA) were dropped on a sterile filter paper strip which was then inserted perpendicularly to the line of Streptomyces. An increase in the hemolytic zone was observed after O/N cultivation on the cross-sections with the GBL-soaked paper strip in BCCO 10_0524, BCCO 10_0670, BCCO 10_1093, BCCO 10_1747, BCCO 10_2179, and BCCO 10_2389 (Figure S2). Remaining strains did not reveal any phenotypic difference in the presence of GBL.

2.4. Hemolytic Activity of Ethyl Acetate Extracts

To determine whether SMs produced by Streptomyces spp. into the medium could cause hemolysis, the culture supernatants were subjected to ethyl acetate extraction. A similar approach has already been used [89] to demonstrate that the polyene compound filipin is the only compound responsible for the hemolytic activity of their tested strain. The crude extracts (5 μL) were dropped on blood agar plates and incubated for 3 days with 5 μL of chloroform in the middle as a negative control (Figure S3). These experiments were performed in duplicate. Hemolytic activity was spotted on the blood agar for BCCO 10_1093, BCCO 10_1094, BCCO 10_1095, BCCO 10_1106, and BCCO 10_1499 strains. No hemolytic zone was observed in samples isolated from the BCCO 10_1099 strain and from the negative control. Nevertheless, the ethyl acetate extraction procedure led to a considerable reduction in the hemolytic activity when compared to hemolytic zones produced by the cell-free supernatants shown in Figure 2 (see below).

2.5. LC-MS Analysis of the Supernatant Extracts

After cultivation in liquid medium with or without blood, SPE was performed using the supernatants, followed by LC-MS. The presence of the polyenes listed in Table 1 was assayed in the metabolic extracts of selected beta-hemolytic streptomycete strains. The length of the polyene part influences the typical three-peak UV-VIS spectrum of the compounds [42]. This was used as a clue to identify putative, so far uncharacterized, polyenes in some extracts. The LC-MS analysis results are summarized in Table S3. The metabolites found are also listed in Figure 1 and Table S2.

Out of the 23 β-hemolytic tested strains, known polyene substances were likely detected in 12 strains (Table S2). Of these, candicidins A1–A3 were detected in two strains (BCCO 10_0524, BCCO 10_1099). Strevertene A was detected in two strains (BCCO 10_1499, BCCO 10_2155) and filipin III in BCCO 10_2155. Tetrafungin and tetrin A were found in BCCO 10_2325, BCCO 10_1092, BCCO 10_1093, BCCO 10_1094, BCCO 10_1095, BCCO 10_1104, and BCCO 10_2179.

A new polyene (retention time (tR) = 9.42 min, [M+H]+ m/z = 745.4166, UV/VIS wavelength of maximum absorbance: (289 nm), 327 nm, 343 nm, 362 nm), designated here as polyene B, was likely detected in 10 strains (BCCO 10_1092, BCCO 10_1093, BCCO 10_1094, BCCO 10_1095, BCCO 10_1097, BCCO 10_1104, BCCO 10_2179, BCCO 10_2282, BCCO 10_2325, and BCCO 10_2389). Its absorption spectrum suggests the presence of a pentaene structure, and the production is often associated with the formation of tetrafungin and tetrin A compounds (Table S2). The second novel polyene compound (tR = 8.23 min, UV/VIS wavelength of maximum absorbance: 311 nm, 326 nm, 343 nm) was designated polyene A and was present only in the extract of BCCO 10_1106 strain. The third, polyene D, tR = 10.6 min, UV/VIS wavelength of maximum absorbance: 287 nm, 345 nm, 362 nm, 384 nm, most probably has hexaene or methylhexaene structure [42]. No polyene-like compound was detected in individual cultures of five β-hemolytic strains (BCCO 10_0670, BCCO 10_1331, BCCO 10_2259, BCCO 10_2295, BCCO 10_2309), in both 7% blood-containing and blood-free media.

Besides the above-described polyenes, the extracts were screened for the presence of non-polyene, human cells-targeting SMs (Table 2). Of these, we identified Surugamide A, a non-ribosomal peptide with cathepsin B-inhibitory activity [70], in BCCO 10_0524 and BCCO 10_1099, the two strains that also produced candicidin A1-A3. The latter strain belongs to the S. albidoflavus clade according to our phylogenetic tree. In a recent study, S. albidoflavus J11074 has also been reported as a surugamide producer during cultivation under stress conditions [68].

2.6. Selected Hemolytic Activity Is Likely Not Due to Lytic Proteins

Four β-hemolytic strains (BCCO 10_1331, BCCO 10_2259, BCCO 10_2295, BCCO 10_2309), in which no polyene metabolite, and no other metabolites with possible hemolytic activity, were detected following standard cultivation, were further tested to show whether their hemolytic activity could be caused by extracellular protein(s). Each cell-free supernatant from these four 72-h-old cultures was split into three thirds: one was treated by proteinase K (1 μg/mL) for 60 min at 37 °C (to degrade extracellular hemolytic proteins), the second was incubated in the same conditions without the enzyme (serving as a negative control in which hemolytic activity was expected), and the third sample was incubated at 100 °C for 5 min (we expected it to lose its hemolytic activity completely). All samples lost their hemolytic activity after boiling, but not after the proteinase K treatment, suggesting that the hemolytic activity is associated with the SMs production rather than hemolytic proteins [97] in the tested streptomycetes (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Hemolytic activity of supernatants after proteinase K treatment or boiling. Cell-free supernatants from 72-h-old cultures of strains BCCO 10_1331, BCCO 10_2259, BCCO 10_2295, BCCO 10_2309 (listed from left) were treated by proteinase K (upper discs on each plate) or were boiled (discs on the left of each plate), or no additional treatment have been performed (control discs on the right side of each plate).

2.7. Hemolytic Compounds Identified in Paired Co-Cultures

Four β-hemolytic strains (BCCO 10_1331, BCCO 10_2259, BCCO 10_2295, BCCO 10_2309), in which no polyene compound was detected, nor was hemolytic activity unique for extracytoplasmic proteins in those strains (see Section 2.7), were subjected to paired co-cultures to promote the production of SMs in these strains. In the sample isolated from the paired co-culture [BCCO 10_1331 + BCCO 10_2309] we detected a fourth novel polyene-like compound (UV/VIS wavelength of maximum absorbance: 346 nm, 364 nm, and 386 nm; tR = 7.77 min, acquired [M+H]+ = 743.4131), here designated as polyene C, with a putative (methyl-)hexaene structure. The second paired co-culture [BCCO 10_2259 + BCCO 10_2295] revealed a known hemolytic compound, namely actiphenol (a non-polyene antibiotic with MW 275; tR = 4.65 min, identified pseudomolecular ion [M+H]+ = 276.1219 and after the loss of hydroxyl group as a water molecule 258.1144), with antifungal effects [82] (Table S3). We were not able to detect any compound in other paired co-cultures (BCCO 10_2259 + BCCO 10_2309; BCCO 10_2259 + BCCO 10_1331; BCCO 10_2295 + BCCO 10_2309; BCCO 10_2295 + BCCO 10_1331).

2.8. Inhibitory Activity of Streptomyces against Candida albicans or Filamentous Fungi

C. albicans and filamentous micromycetes were cultured with streptomycetes to verify that the hemolytic streptomycetes also possess antifungal properties. The strains of Streptomyces were inoculated in lines and cultivated for 72 h. Then, lines of C. albicans were added perpendicularly to those of Streptomyces and the culture was continued for an additional 24 h. Pictures of the results were taken and the inhibitory zone of C. albicans was measured (Table 3).

Table 3.

Inhibitory activity of Streptomyces spp. against Candida albicans.

BCCO Strain No. Metabolite Produced Streptomyces sp. (Vertical Line)
Candida albicans (Horizontal Line)
Size of Inhibitory Zone (mm) Size of Hemolytic Zone (mm)
10_1099 candicidin A, A1, A3; surugamide A graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i001.jpg 10 7
10_1093 tetrafungin, tetrin A, polyene B graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i002.jpg 5 9
10_1094 tetrafungin, tetrin A, polyene B graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i003.jpg 3 9
10_1095 tetrafungin, tetrin A, polyene B graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i004.jpg 3 7
10_1104 tetrafungin, tetrin A, polyene B graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i005.jpg 8 8
10_2282 tetrafungin, tetrin A, polyene B graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i006.jpg 12 16

Subsequently, strains of Streptomyces were cultured with Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus fumigatus, Fusarium spp., and Paecilomyces spp. to test for the antifungal activity of the produced SMs. The results of this experiment are summarized in Table 4. Based on these results, we may briefly conclude that streptomycetes producing polyene B are, to some extent, able to inhibit the growth of Paecilomyces spp. and Aspergillus niger, whereas Aspergillus fumigatus was mostly resistant. Fusarium spp. did not grow in the proximity of some polyene B-producing species (BCCO 10_1092, BCCO 10_1093, BCCO 10_1094), whereas it grew in the proximity of others (BCCO 10_1095, BCCO 10_1097, BCCO 10_1104, BCCO 10_2282, and BCCO 10_2389). The polyene A-producing BCCO 10_1106 inhibited only the growth of Paecilomyces spp., as was also the case of BCCO 10_2259, the strain which probably produces actiphenol. Strain BCCO 10_2309, the probable producer of polyene C, inhibited the growth of Paecilomyces spp. and Aspergillus niger but not that of Fusarium spp. and Aspergillus fumigatus. The candicidin-producing strain BCCO 10_1099 inhibited the growth of Aspergillus niger, Fusarium spp., and Paecilomyces spp., but it had no impact on that of Aspergillus fumigatus.

Table 4.

Inhibitory activity of Streptomyces spp. against filamentous fungi. Streptomycetes were inoculated in a square shape and the fungi were inoculated in lines. The size of the observed inhibitory zones is presented in mm above each picture. Pictures of hemolytic zones of streptomycetes were taken from the bottom of the dishes.

BCCO Strain No./Found Metabolite Paecilomyces spp. Fusarium spp. Aspergillus fumigatus Aspergillus niger Cultivation Timing/Streptomycete Hemolysis
10_2259 6 0 0 0 Streptomyces 144 h; fungus 72 h
actiphenol (?) graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i007.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i008.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i009.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i010.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i011.jpg
10_1099 10 no growth 0 6 Streptomyces 96 h; fungus 72h
candicidin graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i012.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i013.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i014.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i015.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i016.jpg
10_1106 8 0 0 2 Streptomyces 96 h; fungus 72 h
polyene A graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i017.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i018.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i019.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i020.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i021.jpg
10_1092 11 no growth 3 8 Streptomyces 144 h; fungus 72 h
tetrafungin, tetrin A, polyene B graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i022.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i023.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i024.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i025.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i026.jpg
10_1093 8 no growth 1 6 Streptomyces 96 h; fungus 72 h
tetrafungin, tetrin A, polyene B graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i027.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i028.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i029.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i030.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i031.jpg
10_1094 20 no growth 1 5 Streptomyces 96 h; fungus 72 h
tetrafungin, tetrin A, polyene B graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i032.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i033.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i034.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i035.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i036.jpg
10_1095 5 0 0 4 Streptomyces 96 h; fungus 72 h
tetrafungin, tetrin A, polyene B graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i037.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i038.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i039.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i040.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i041.jpg
10_1097 12 0 0 9 Streptomyces 96 h; fungus 72 h
polyene B graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i042.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i043.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i044.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i045.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i046.jpg
10_1104 24 3 3 16 Streptomyces 144 h; fungus 72 h
tetrafungin, tetrin A, polyene B graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i047.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i048.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i049.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i050.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i051.jpg
10_2282 20 0 0 6 Streptomyces 144 h; fungus 72 h
tetrafungin, tetrin A, polyene B graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i052.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i053.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i054.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i055.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i056.jpg
10_2389 no growth 0 0 12 Streptomyces 144 h; fungus 72 h
polyene B graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i057.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i058.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i059.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i060.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i061.jpg
10_2309 24 0 0 4 Streptomyces 144 h; fungus 72 h
polyene C (?) graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i062.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i063.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i064.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i065.jpg graphic file with name ijms-23-15045-i066.jpg

3. Discussion

Hemolytic capabilities might be beneficial to lyse eukaryotic cells in any streptomycete habitat, either to kill competitors or to obtain nutrients from their lysed cells. They might secondarily protect the streptomycete plant or animal symbionts against mycotic infections.

The SMs produced by streptomycetes traditionally receive considerable attention because of their promising and often successful clinical application [98]. Their hemolytic activities (or, in a broader sense, cytolytic activity, i.e., their ability to lyse eukaryotic cells) have, however, largely been overlooked, as the organisms are generally considered non-pathogenic. Nevertheless, hemolysis remains a natural part of the secondary metabolism of a substantial number of streptomycetes [90]. Recent studies have suggested that hemolysis may serve as a virulence factor [99,100], with filipin produced by Streptomyces sp. TR1341 as an example [89]. Cytolytic SMs may also provide the producer with the ability to acquire larger variability of substrates. Next, we cannot exclude the role of some hemolytic metabolites in the streptomycete programmed cell death, as has also been reported for other cytotoxins acting on DNA [101,102]; though the effect of polyenes in sterol-free bacterial membranes is much less severe [103].

To gain a better understanding of the role hemolysis might play in the soil ecosystem, we used streptomycete strains isolated from various environments for this study—12 isolates directly from the soil, 10 isolates from the bodies of invertebrates, such as ambrosia beetles (Hadrodemius globus, Dinoplatypus pallidus, Xyleborus perforans, Diapus pussilimus, Crossotarsus mniszechi, Hypoborus ficus) and millipedes (Archispirostreptus gigas, Telodeinopus aoutii), and 1 strain from plant roots (Zea mays). Ambrosia beetles live in symbiosis with ambrosia fungi to cover their nutritional needs and to create so-called fungal gardens. As such, they have developed a defensive symbiosis with actinomycetes, especially Streptomyces to protect themselves against fungi [104]. As the diversity of ambrosia beetles is huge (more than 3200 species), and ambrosia fungi are host-specific [105], it can be assumed that many different actinobacteria and their as yet unexplored secondary metabolites may be involved in defensive symbiosis in a particular species.

Our results indicate that a number of streptomycetes that live symbiotically or parasitically with invertebrates and plants produce polyenes as well as those living freely in soil. Interestingly, both beetle- and millipede-derived strains produce similar compounds, although the expected ecological functions differ: the defensive symbiosis of streptomycetes with ambrosia beetles is a well-known phenomenon [104]. On the other hand, there are no data about the symbiotic relationship of intestinal streptomycetes in millipedes. Their interaction may start incidentally, as a transient colonization. However, the fact that the same antifungal compounds produced in the beetles are produced in the millipedes may suggest a much tighter relationship, linked with the prevention of fungal pathogens growth in the host body.

To demonstrate a particular clash between streptomycetes and fungi, we performed a co-culture experiment using a yeast C. albicans (Table 3), and four different ascomycetes: Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus fumigatus, Fusarium spp., and Paecilomyces spp. (Table 4). When both organisms were inoculated at the same time, no inhibitory zones were observed, probably due to the time required for the onset of SM synthesis during streptomycete development. When Streptomyces spp. had a 24-h or 72-h advantage, various zones inhibiting the growth of fungi were observed after an additional 24 h or 72 h, a condition that may reflect a natural event when a streptomycete inhabits a symbiotic organism and protects it from fungal pathogens [106,107,108,109,110]. Thus, cultures of Streptomyces spp. with C. albicans revealed inhibitory zones of the yeast that vary between 3 and 12 mm among various, mostly tetrafungin/tetrin A/polyene B-producing streptomycete species. Aspergillus fumigatus looked highly resistant to the cytolytic metabolites produced by our set of streptomycetes. Aspergillus niger, on the other hand, could not grow in the vicinity of most of the streptomycetes. Fusarium spp. was sensitive only to several tetrafungin/tetrin A/polyene B-producing strains, whereas the sole polyene B-producers did not inhibit its growth. Nevertheless, all hemolytic streptomycetes, regardless of their compound production, were more or less able to inhibit the growth of Paecilomyces spp. which seemed to be most sensitive of the micromycetes tested.

Our LC-MS data combined with the UV-VIS absorption possibly revealed production of six previously characterized cyclic polyenes: candicidins A1, A2, filipin III, pentamycin (fungichromin), strevertene A, tetrafungin, and tetrin A [24,26,33,34,42,51], and four novel polyenes (A-D) in our set of Streptomyces species. Only four strains of the 23 assayed did not show any detectable putative polyenes. This may or may not necessarily mean that another non-polyenic cytotoxic SM is produced. In case of an undetected polyene production, the compounds can be unstable or they are not produced in the amount needed for the isolation method used in this study. Besides this, our results suggest that the production of polyenes is widespread among streptomycetes and often associated with their β-hemolytic and/or antifungal activities.

Tetraenes produced by seven strains belonged to two structural types: small tetrins with MW < 700 [26] and large nystatin and amphotericin B ressembling tetrafungin of MW > 1000 [24]. Unlike tetrins, the structure of tetrafungin in unknown, though the compound was discovered almost 40 years ago. Antifungal activities of the tetraenes have already been reported; however, their hemolytic capabilities were not explored.

Pentaenes were produced by the TR1341 control strain (filipin III and pentamycin). Filipin III was also found in the BCCO 10_2155 strain; however, the associated pentamycin was missing there. The hemolytic properties of the filipin-type compounds, produced by multiple streptomycete species, have long been recognized [111], as well as their antifungal activity. They exhibit equal affinity to ergosterol (the main fungal sterol) and to mammalian cholesterol, which complicates their wider medical use. The sterol-binding feature leads to perforations of the erythrocyte membranes explaining their hemolytic properties [90]. Activity of the filipin gene cluster is essential for β-hemolysis of the human-associated Streptomyces sp. TR1341 [89]. Filipin production does not seem to be linked to any particular phylogenetic clade. On the other hand, strevertene A, a similar pentaene lacking the methylated side chain, was found to be produced by two soil strains belonging to the same phylogenetic clade of S. avidinii NBRC13426, only (Figure 1). Another producer of strevertenes, the tomato-associated S. psammoticus, uses the compound to protect the host plants against Fusarium wilt [112]. Of the novel compounds, polyene B shared by 10 strains, shows the typical methylpentaene-specific absorption spectrum as filipin, but has substantially higher molecular mass. The compound is typically found in strains putatively producing tetraenes (Table S2). It seems unusual for a single strain to produce macrolides differing in the ring lengths as this is determined by the type I polyketide synthase (PKS-I) structure. Of course, we cannot exclude the presence of two different biosynthetic gene clusters in the producer strains, or PKS-I flexibility in the starter unit selection/the chain length control, as possible explanations. Next, a possibility of non-enzymatic degradation (e.g., oxidation) of the original, enzymatically synthesized compounds have to be taken in account as documented in nystatin [113]. However, a more detailed genomic analysis is needed to better understand the biosynthesis of these molecules.

Two novel compounds seem to belong to methylhexaenes—if we assume that a methyl group adjacent to the polyene chain shifts the absorption spectrum peaks to slightly higher wavelengths, as documented for methylpentaenes [42]. Polyene D was produced in a single strain pure culture (BCCO 10_2179), whereas polyene C in the culture of BCCO 10_1331 and BCCO 10_2309 strains. Hexaenes are the smallest, most under characterized polyene group, with just one well-described member: linearmycin [67]. The production of a hexaene derivative of nystatin as a result of a spontaneous mutation of the relevant PKS genes in S. noursei has also been reported [114]. All other hexaenic compounds have been detected based solely on their characteristic UV-VIS absorption and their antifungal activity (Table 1) and the relevant reports lack detailed structure and activity data. Therefore, the two potential novel hexaenes represent perfect targets for future purification as well as structure and activity assessments.

Heptaenes were represented by candicidins detected in two strains coming from different phylogenetic clades (Figure 1). Candicidins have been first identified in S. griseus IMRU3570 [115]. The candicidin complex consists of up to nine compounds (A-I) where only candicidin D has been fully structurally characterized [116]. Candicidins change permeability in the cell membrane of C. albicans [117], followed by the release of K+ ions from the intracellular space, which completes the cell lysis [118].

The mass spectrum of the polyene A peak (BCCO 10_1106) was indeterminate and we were therefore not able to determine its putative molecular formula. Its absorption spectrum resembles that of pentaenes, but the maxima are slightly lower. This suggests that the compound’s polyketide backbone might be further modified in an atypical way.

Streptomycetes undergo a complex life cycle that requires highly coordinated gene expression responsive to environmental changes [119,120,121]. Various small-molecular-weight signaling molecules participate in gene expression control. In this manner, GBLs stimulate metabolic production and act as natural auto-regulators [122]. They mediate intra- and/or interspecies communication via the so-called quorum sensing system. They also help them react effectively to competitive organisms as they may accelerate the transition from the exponential growth phase to sporulation, which includes the coordinated production of bioactive compounds [123]. Here we showed a positive effect of GBL on the production of hemolytic metabolites in several strains (Figure S2).

Co-cultures have been used successfully between various streptomycete species to activate secondary metabolism [124]. Likewise, complex hemolytic properties can be changed (increased or decreased) as a result of interaction among different species in one habitat [125]. In this work we applied the co-culture technique to those strains for which we had not been able to detect any hemolytic compound in a standard one-strain cultivation. Despite probable considerable losses of hemolytic compounds from samples when using the SPE “miniprep” technique, we were able to detect new compounds in the paired co-cultures of [BCCO 10_1331+BCCO 10_2309] and [BCCO 10_2259+BCCO 10_2295] strains. The first pair revealed the novel polyene C compound (mentioned above). The second pair revealed a known non-polyenic hemolytic compound actiphenol, a phenol metabolite with antifungal effects [126].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Strains

In total, 23 β-hemolytic isolates (besides one Nocardioides spp. they were exclusively strains of Streptomyces) were obtained from the Collection of Actinomycetes (Biology Centre Collection of Organisms, BCCO, České Budějovice, the Czech Republic, www.actinomycetes.bcco.cz, 9 November 2022) to compare the hemolytic activities of streptomycete isolates originating from various niches in different regions around the world (the strains are listed in Table S2). Of these, 12 originated from soil, 10 were arthropod-associated, and 1 was plant-associated. One additional strain is the human-associated Streptomyces spp. TR1341, a filipin producer that has already been analyzed [89]. This strain was used here as a positive control for the LC-MS analyses.

4.2. 16S rRNA-encoding Gene-Based Phylogeny

We constructed a phylogenetic tree in which we indicated the origin of the strain, the source of isolation, and the type of substance produced to determine the relatedness of the strains in this study and to compare the studied strains with known polyene antibiotic producers. The strains belonging to the BCCO collection are characterized using a combination of morphological features and basic molecular identification. The morphological characterization was performed according to the protocols of the International Streptomyces Project [127]. The molecular identification was performed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and an identity cut-off of 98.7% for classification as a known species [128]. Data are provided in the catalogue of the BCCO web pages (see above, Section 4.1) under the respective strain number. Overall, 113 sequences were obtained and used for the construction of the tree as described elsewhere [129]; 32 sequences belong to strains in the BCCO collection and 24 sequences belong to known polyene producers that are listed in Table S1. The remaining ones are reference strains used for phylogenetic placement. Of the 24 sequences of known polyene producers, 15 were downloaded from the EzTaxon (access on 4 April 2022) [130]. The 57 sequences used for phylogenetic placement were obtained from the NCBI database (access 04/04/2022) [131]. The sequences were aligned using Muscle (v3.8.425) [132], and the alignment was manually checked and edited to 1522 final, informative columns. The alignment was then used to produce a 1000-replicated bootstrap consensus maximum likelihood tree using RAxML (v8.2.11) [133]. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of the Amycolatopsis alba DSM44262 was used as outgroup. The tree was edited for publication using iTOL [134].

4.3. Culture Media and Cultivation Conditions

For liquid cultures, Streptomyces strains were cultivated in 5 mL of GYM medium [135] at 28 °C for 96 h if not stated otherwise. If required, the medium was supplemented with defibrinated rabbit’s blood (7%). Paired co-cultures, i.e., two Streptomyces strains inoculated equally into one medium, were performed for those strains in which hemolytic SMs had not been identified from previous one-strain cultures. For hemolytic assays, Columbia sheep blood agar (OXOID CZ s.r.o., Thermo Fisher Scientific, Brno, Czechia) was used.

4.4. Ethyl Acetate Extraction and Hemolytic Activity Testing

After centrifugation at 10,000× g at 4 °C for 10 min, NaCl was added to the supernatant, up to a concentration of 5 M. Subsequently, 1 mL of ethyl acetate was added to each vial and incubated on a shaker at 250 rpm and 4 °C for 30 min. Samples were centrifuged at 5000× g for 10 min, and the upper layer of ethyl acetate was transferred to a rotary vacuum evaporator until the sample was completely dry, followed by the addition of 10 μL of chloroform to each sample. Subsequently, 5 μL of each sample was dropped on a blood agar plate and incubated for 3 days with 5 μL of pure chloroform in the middle as a negative control.

4.5. Solid-Phase Extraction

The solid-phase extraction (SPE) procedure was performed as described elsewhere [136]. Briefly, each strain’s supernatant was isolated by centrifugation at 10,000× g at 4 °C for 10 min, and the pH was adjusted to 3–4 using formic acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). An Oasis HLB 3cc 60 mg cartridge (hydrophilic-lipophilic balanced sorbent, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was conditioned with 3 mL methanol, equilibrated with 3 mL Milli-Q water (Sigma-Aldrich Co. St. Louis, MO, USA), and subsequently, 3 mL of culture supernatant was loaded. The cartridge was then washed with 3 mL of water, and the absorbed substances were eluted with 1.5 mL of methanol.

4.6. LC-MS Analysis

The eluent of each strain was evaporated to dryness (Concentrator plus/Vacufuge® plus, Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany), and 150 μL of 50% methanol was added to each vial. The vials were centrifuged for 5 min at 5000 rpm (Centrifuge MiniSpin, Rotor F-45-12-11, Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany) and 50 µL of each sample was then loaded onto the LC-MS.

The analyses were performed on the Acquity UPLC system with a 2996 PDA detection system (194–600 nm), connected to an LCT premier XE time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). A 5 μL aliquot of each sample was loaded onto the Acquity UPLC BEH C18 LC column (50 mm × 2.1 mm I.D., particle size 1.7 μm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA), kept at 40 °C, and eluted with a two-component mobile phase, A and B, consisting of 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile, respectively, at a flow rate of 0.4 mL min−1. The analyses were performed under a linear gradient program (min/%B) 0/5; 1.5/5; 15/70; 18/99 followed by a 1.0-min column clean-up (99% B) and 1.5-min equilibration (5% B). The mass spectrometer operated in the positive “W” mode with capillary voltage set at +2800 V, cone voltage +40 V, dissolving gas temperature: 350 °C, ion source block temperature, 120 °C, cone gas flow 50 L h−1, dissolving gas flow 800 L h−1, scan time of 0.15 s, and an inter-scan delay of 0.01 s. The mass accuracy was kept below 6 ppm using the lock spray technology with leucine enkephalin as the reference compound (2 ng μL−1, 5 μL min−1). The MS chromatograms were extracted for [M+H]+ ions with a tolerance window of 0.05 Da, smoothed with the mean smoothing method (window size; four scans, number of smooths, two). The data were processed by MassLynx V4.1 (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The original method is described elsewhere [137].

4.7. Testing for the Presence of Extracellular Hemolytic Proteins

To test for the presence of extracellular hemolytic proteins [138], the supernatant collected (cultured 72 h, 28 °C, 200 rpm, centrifuged at 4000× g, 10 min) was filtered (pore size 5 microns) and divided into thirds. The first third of the supernatant was incubated with proteinase K (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) to a final concentration of 1 μg/mL at 37 °C for 60 min. The second third of the supernatant was incubated under the same conditions but without the enzyme (this sample served as a positive control as it was expected to maintain its hemolytic activity). The third part was incubated at 100 °C for 5 min (a negative control as we expected a loss of any hemolytic activity). We applied 5 μL of each sample to a paper disc placed on the blood agar. The samples were cultured overnight at 28 °C.

4.8. Antifungal Activity of Streptomyces

Selected Streptomyces strains were inoculated into a 1cm2 square shape in the middle of a blood agar Petri dish and cultivated at 28° C. After 0, 24 h, and 72 h, clinical isolates of Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus fumigatus, Fusarium spp., and Paecilomyces spp. were added in lines leading to the Streptomyces square and co-cultured at the same conditions for another 72 h. The growth inhibitory zones of the fungi were then measured.

5. Conclusions

An extensive literature review on polyenes and non-polyene hemolytic compounds produced by streptomycetes is presented. Among the secondary metabolites produced by a set of 23 β-hemolytic Streptomyces strains, known—candicidins, filipins, strevertene A, tetrafungin, and tetrin A—and novel—polyene AD—polyenic compounds were found. The new compound producers were incorporated into a streptomycete phylogenetic tree among known polyene producers. No clear relation between phylogeny and production of specific polyene types could be revealed. The obtained results suggested that SMs are responsible for hemolytic activities in Streptomyces spp. Their production was in some cases inducible by GBL or by co-cultivation with other Streptomyces strains. Our data suggest that streptomycetes may still serve as a promising source of novel SMs with antifungal and/or hemolytic activities.

Acknowledgments

We thank Miroslav Kolařík (Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague) for providing cultures isolated from ambrosia beetles in Papua-New Guinea to the BCCO Collection of Actinomycetes. Anna Koubová and Terézia Horváthová (Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, České Budějovice) are thanked for strain isolations from millipedes. Martina Petrlíková and Nikola Fuková are thanked for laboratory analyses.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms232315045/s1.

Author Contributions

The manuscript is based on E.F., N.B. and T.W.’s bachelor theses; supervision, writing and editing, experimental design, and co-culture experiments, J.B.; investigation: cultures, sample extraction, hemolysis test experiments, E.F. and N.B.; LC-MS and data evaluation, M.Č. and M.P.; strain collection management, β-hemolytic Streptomyces strain selection, supervision, pilot experiments, inhibitory activity screening, isolation of strains, and selection of strains for final dataset, A.C., V.K., M.M. and T.W.; identification of strains, 16S rRNA gene phylogeny analysis, literature review, A.C.L. and A.C.; conceptualization and methodology, literature review, interpretation of the results, and project supervision, K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the Czech Health Research Council project No. 17-30091A (K.P., A.C., A.C.L., and T.W.), the Czech Science Fund project No. 17-22572S (A.C.), and the Research Programme of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Strategy AV21 “Diversity of life and health of ecosystems” and “Land conservation and restoration” to A.C., A.C.L., V.K., M.M., and T.W. as well as projects of Charles University (SVV 260520 and Cooperatio 207032 Immunity and Infection) to J.B., K.P., M.Č. Project No.: UJEP-SGS-2020-53-002-2 was supported by grant within student grant competition at UJEP, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem (J.B.). M.M. was supported by the Erasmus Traineeship Programme (Erasmus Student Mobility Program, contract ID: 18/1/KA103/047073/SMP).

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Procopio R.E., Silva I.R., Martins M.K., Azevedo J.L., Araujo J.M. Antibiotics produced by streptomyces. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2012;16:466–471. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2012.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gross H. Strategies to unravel the function of orphan biosynthesis pathways: Recent examples and future prospects. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007;75:267–277. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-0900-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wanner L.A. A new strain of streptomyces causing common scab in potato. Plant. Dis. 2007;91:352–359. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.el Hassan A.M., Fahal A.H., Ahmed A.O., Ismail A., Veress B. The immunopathology of actinomycetoma lesions caused by streptomyces somaliensis. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2001;95:89–92. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(01)90346-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Seipke R.F., Kaltenpoth M., Hutchings M.I. Streptomyces as symbionts: An emerging and widespread theme? FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012;36:862–876. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00313.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang X.H., Austin B. Haemolysins in vibrio species. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005;98:1011–1019. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02583.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vesper S.J., Vesper M.J. Possible role of fungal hemolysins in sick building syndrome. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2004;55:191–213. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2164(04)55007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bhakdi S., Tranum-Jensen J. Complement lysis: A hole is a hole. Immunol. Today. 1991;12:318–320; discussion 321. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(91)90007-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dixon D.M., Walsh T.J. Antifungal agents. In: Baron S., editor. Medical. Microbiology. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; Galveston, TX, USA: 1996. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dinos G.P. The macrolide antibiotic renaissance. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017;174:2967–2983. doi: 10.1111/bph.13936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kristanc L., Bozic B., Jokhadar S.Z., Dolenc M.S., Gomiscek G. The pore-forming action of polyenes: From model membranes to living organisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2019;1861:418–430. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guo X., Zhang J., Li X., Xiao E., Lange J.D., Rienstra C.M., Burke M.D., Mitchell D.A. Sterol sponge mechanism is conserved for glycosylated polyene macrolides. ACS Cent. Sci. 2021;7:781–791. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Trejo W.H., Bennett R.E. Streptomyces nodosus sp. N., the amphotericin-producing organism. J. Bacteriol. 1963;85:436–439. doi: 10.1128/jb.85.2.436-439.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xiong Z.Q., Tu X.R., Wei S.J., Huang L., Li X.H., Lu H., Tu G.Q. The mechanism of antifungal action of a new polyene macrolide antibiotic antifungalmycin 702 from streptomyces padanus jau4234 on the rice sheath blight pathogen rhizoctonia solani. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shenin I., Solov’ev V.N., Nvinskii A.A. [structure of the polyenic antibiotic, arenomycin b] Antibiotiki. 1973;18:872–876. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yang J., Xu D., Yu W., Hao R., Wei J. Regulation of aureofuscin production by the PAS-LuxR family regulator AurJ3M. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2020;137:109532. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2020.109532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Graessle O.E., Phares H.F., Robinson H.J. In vitro studies with a new antimycotic agent: Lucensomycin. Antibiot Chemother. 1962;12:608–617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kim H.J., Kim M.K., Lee M.J., Won H.J., Choi S.S., Kim E.S. Post-pks tailoring steps of a disaccharide-containing polyene npp in pseudonocardia autotrophica. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0123270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hazen E.L., Brown R. Fungicidin, an antibiotic produced by a soil actinomycete. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1951;76:93–97. doi: 10.3181/00379727-76-18397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Struyk A.P., Hoette I., Drost G., Waisvisz J.M., Van Eek T., Hoogerheide J.C. Pimaricin, a new antifungal antibiotic. Antibiot Annu. 1957;5:878–885. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ulrych A., Derrick P.J., Adamek F., Novak P., Lemr K., Havlicek V. Dissociation of nystatin and amphotericin analogues: Characterisation of minor anti-fungal macrolides. Eur. J. Mass. Spectrom. 2010;16:73–80. doi: 10.1255/ejms.1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hamilton-Miller J.M. Chemistry and biology of the polyene macrolide antibiotics. Bacteriol. Rev. 1973;37:166–196. doi: 10.1128/br.37.2.166-196.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Davisson J.W., Tanner F.W., Jr., Finlay A.C., Solomons I.A. Rimocidin, a new antibiotic. Antibiot Chemother. 1951;1:289–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Veiga M., Fabregas J. Tetrafungin, a new polyene macrolide antibiotic. I. Fermentation, isolation, characterization, and biological properties. J. Antibiot. 1983;36:770–775. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.36.770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dornberger K., Fugner R., Bradler G., Thrum H. Tetramycin, a new polyene antibiotic. J. Antibiot. 1971;24:172–177. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.24.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pandey R.C., German V.F., Nishikawa Y., Rinehart K.L., Jr. Polyene antibiotics. Ii. The strucutre of tetrin a. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971;93:3738–3747. doi: 10.1021/ja00744a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ryu G., Choi W.C., Hwang S., Yeo W.H., Lee C.S., Kim S.K. Tetrin c, a new glycosylated polyene macrolide antibiotic produced by streptomyces sp. Gk9244. J. Nat. Prod. 1999;62:917–919. doi: 10.1021/np9805645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.English A.R., Mc B.T. Pa 150, pa 153, and pa 166: New polyene antifungal antibiotics: Biological studies. Antibiot Annu. 1957;5:893–896. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Taig M.M., Solov’eva N.K., Braginskaia P.S. [characteristics of the culture-producer of aurenin] Antibiotiki. 1969;14:873–876. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Caltrider P., Gottlieb D. Capacidin: A new member of the polyene antibiotic group. Antibiot Chemother. 1961;10:702–708. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pandey R.C., Narasimhachari N., Rinehart K.L., Jr., Millington D.S. Polyene antibiotics. Iv. Structure of chainin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972;94:4306–4310. doi: 10.1021/ja00767a045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Trinci A., Chalkley L.J. Comparison of the effects of the polyenes amphotericin b and elizabethin on candida pseudotropicalis. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1983;80:491–495. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(83)80045-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cirillo V.P., Harsch M., Lampen J.O. Action of the polyene antibiotics filipin, nystatin and n-acetylcandidin on the yeast cell membrane. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1964;35:249–259. doi: 10.1099/00221287-35-2-249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Umezawa S., Tanaka Y., Ooka M., Shiotsu S. A new antifungal antibiotic, pentamycin. J. Antibiot. 1958;11:26–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li Z., Rawlings B.J., Harrison P.H., Vederas J.C. Production of new polyene antibiotics by streptomyces cellulosae after addition of ethyl (z)-16-phenylhexadec-9-enoate. J. Antibiot. 1989;42:577–584. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.42.577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Endo M., Hayashida T., Tsunematsu Y. [application of an antifungal antibiotic (kabicidin) in cultures of cells] Jpn. J. Med. Sci. Biol. 1959;12:173–174. doi: 10.7883/yoken1952.12.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Brazhnikova M.G., Kudinova M.K., Lavrova M.F., Borisova V.N., Krugliak E.B. [isolation, purification and physico-chemical properties of antibiotic lienomycin] Antibiotiki. 1971;16:483–486. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bycroft B.W., Payne D.J. Dictionary of Antibiotics and Related Substances: With CD-ROM. 2nd ed. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Berdy J., Horváth I. Antibiotics produced by streptomyces vi. Pentafungin, a new antifungal antibiotic. J. Basic Microbiol. 2007;5:345–350. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yao T., Liu Z., Li T., Zhang H., Liu J., Li H., Che Q., Zhu T., Li D., Li W. Characterization of the biosynthetic gene cluster of the polyene macrolide antibiotic reedsmycins from a marine-derived streptomyces strain. Microb. Cell Fact. 2018;17:98. doi: 10.1186/s12934-018-0943-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Van Arnam E.B., Ruzzini A.C., Sit C.S., Horn H., Pinto-Tomas A.A., Currie C.R., Clardy J. Selvamicin, an atypical antifungal polyene from two alternative genomic contexts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:12940–12945. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613285113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Guo J., Schlingmann G., Carter G.T., Nakanishi K., Berova N. Absolute stereochemistry of the strevertenes. Chirality. 2000;12:43–51. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-636X(2000)12:1&#x0003c;43::AID-CHIR8&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim Y.P., Tomoda H., Iizima K., Fukuda T., Matsumoto A., Takahashi Y., Omura S. Takanawaenes, novel antifungal antibiotics produced by streptomyces sp. K99-5278. I. Taxonomy, fermentation, isolation and biological properties. J. Antibiot. 2003;56:448–453. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.56.448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Greule A., Intra B., Flemming S., Rommel M.G., Panbangred W., Bechthold A. The draft genome sequence of actinokineospora bangkokensis 44ehw(t) reveals the biosynthetic pathway of the antifungal thailandin compounds with unusual butylmalonyl-coa extender units. Molecules. 2016;21:1607. doi: 10.3390/molecules21111607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Martin J.F., McDaniel L.E. Isolation, purification and properties of the hexaene macrolides candihexin i and candihexin ii. J. Antibiot. 1974;27:610–619. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.27.610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sakamoto J.M. [study on antifungal antibiotics. Ii. Cryptocidin, a new antibiotic produced by streptomycetes] J. Antibiot. 1959;12:21–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Barashkova N.P., Shenin Iu D., Omel’chenko V.N., Konev Iu E. [actinomyces chromogenes var. Graecus var. Nov., a producer of a new hexaene antibiotic] Antibiotiki. 1977;22:832–837. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chakrabarti S., Chandra A.L. A new streptomycete and a new polyene antibiotic, acmycin. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 1982;27:167–172. doi: 10.1007/BF02877395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dutcher J.D. The discovery and development of amphotericin b. Dis. Chest. 1968;54((Suppl. S1)):296–298. doi: 10.1378/chest.54.Supplement_1.296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kotler-Brajtburg J., Medoff G., Kobayashi G.S., Boggs S., Schlessinger D., Pandey R.C., Rinehart K.L., Jr. Classification of polyene antibiotics according to chemical structure and biological effects. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1979;15:716–722. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.5.716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kligman A.M., Lewis F.S. In vitro and in vivo activity of candicidin on pathogenic fungi. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1953;82:399–404. doi: 10.3181/00379727-82-20128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Taber W.A., Vining L.C., Waksman S.A. Candidin, a new antifungal antibiotic produced by streptomyces viridoflavus. Antibiot Chemother. 1954;4:455–461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kruglikova L.F., Shenin Iu D. [characteristics of a new aromatic heptaenic antibiotic, flavumycin a] Antibiotiki. 1976;21:407–411. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mohan R.R., Pianotti R.S., Martin J.F., Ringel S.M., Schwartz B.S., Bailey E.G., McDaniel L.E., Schaffner C.P. Fungimycin production, isolation, biosynthesis, and in vitro antifungal activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1963;161:462–470. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gokhale B.B. Hamycin--A new antifungal antibiotic. Arch. Dermatol. 1963;88:558–560. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1963.01590230066010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Filippova A.I., Solov’ev S.N., Vasil’eva N.G., Dumova A.M., Egorenkova A.N. [isomerization of polyene antibiotics with characteristics of isolevorin a2] Antibiotiki. 1972;17:932–937. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Filippova A.I., Lashkov G.I., Kozel S.P., Shenin Iu D. [spectrophotometric research on the photochemical isomerization of the polyene macrolide antibiotic levorin a2] Antibiot Med. Biotekhnol. 1987;32:749–754. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Borowski E., Malyshkina M., Soloviev S., Ziminski T. Isolation and characterization of levorin a and b, the heptaene macrolide antifungal antibiotics of “aromatic” subgroup. Chemotherapy. 1965;10:176–194. doi: 10.1159/000220406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Martinez-Quesada J., Torres-Rodriguez J.M., Roses-Codinachs M., Amaral-Olivera M. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of lucknomycin, a new polyenic derivative, for candida and aspergillus spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1983;24:132–133. doi: 10.1128/AAC.24.1.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Luna T., Mazzolla R., Romano G., Blasi E. Potent antifungal effects of a new derivative of partricin a in a murine model of cerebral cryptococcosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997;41:706–708. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.3.706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Pawlak J., Sowinski P., Borowski E., Gariboldi P. Stereostructure of perimycin a. J. Antibiot. 1995;48:1034–1038. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.48.1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mendizabal A.F., Inza R., Salaber J.A. [trichomycin: A new antibiotic for the treatment of colpitis caused by trichomonas & candida albicans] Rev. Asoc. Med. Argent. 1957;71:48–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bortolo R., Spera S., Gugliemetti G., Cassani G. Ab023, novel polyene antibiotics. Ii. Isolation and structure determination. J. Antibiot. 1993;46:255–264. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.46.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cai P., Kong F., Fink P., Ruppen M.E., Williamson R.T., Keiko T. Polyene antibiotics from streptomyces mediocidicus. J. Nat. Prod. 2007;70:215–219. doi: 10.1021/np060542f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.McAlpine J.B., Bachmann B.O., Piraee M., Tremblay S., Alarco A.M., Zazopoulos E., Farnet C.M. Microbial genomics as a guide to drug discovery and structural elucidation: Eco-02301, a novel antifungal agent, as an example. J. Nat. Prod. 2005;68:493–496. doi: 10.1021/np0401664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Irschik H., Schummer D., Hofle G., Reichenbach H., Steinmetz H., Jansen R. Etnangien, a macrolide-polyene antibiotic from sorangium cellulosum that inhibits nucleic acid polymerases. J. Nat. Prod. 2007;70:1060–1063. doi: 10.1021/np070115h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Park H.S., Nah H.J., Kang S.H., Choi S.S., Kim E.S. Screening and isolation of a novel polyene-producing streptomyces strain inhibiting phytopathogenic fungi in the soil environment. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021;9:692340. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.692340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Almeida E.L., Kaur N., Jennings L.K., Carrillo Rincon A.F., Jackson S.A., Thomas O.P., Dobson A.D.W. Genome mining coupled with osmac-based cultivation reveal differential production of surugamide a by the marine sponge isolate streptomyces sp. Sm17 when compared to its terrestrial relative s. Albidoflavus j1074. Microorganisms. 2019;7:394. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7100394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chater K.F., Biro S., Lee K.J., Palmer T., Schrempf H. The complex extracellular biology of streptomyces. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2010;34:171–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00206.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Matsuda K., Kuranaga T., Sano A., Ninomiya A., Takada K., Wakimoto T. The revised structure of the cyclic octapeptide surugamide a. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2019;67:476–480. doi: 10.1248/cpb.c19-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Umezawa K., Nakazawa K., Ikeda Y., Naganawa H., Kondo S. Polyoxypeptins a and b produced by streptomyces: Apoptosis-inducing cyclic depsipeptides containing the novel amino acid (2s,3r)-3-hydroxy-3-methylproline. J. Org. Chem. 1999;64:3034–3038. doi: 10.1021/jo981512n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Umezawa H. Bleomycin and other antitumor antibiotics of high molecular weight. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. (Bethesda) 1965;5:1079–1085. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Johnson A.W. The chemistry of actinomycin d and related compounds. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1960;89:336–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1960.tb20156.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Giessen T.W., Franke K.B., Knappe T.A., Kraas F.I., Bosello M., Xie X., Linne U., Marahiel M.A. Isolation, structure elucidation, and biosynthesis of an unusual hydroxamic acid ester-containing siderophore from actinosynnema mirum. J. Nat. Prod. 2012;75:905–914. doi: 10.1021/np300046k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kido G.S., Spyhalski E. Antimycin a, an antibiotic with insecticidal and miticidal properties. Science. 1950;112:172–173. doi: 10.1126/science.112.2902.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hatanaka H., Iwami M., Kino T., Goto T., Okuhara M. Fr-900520 and fr-900523, novel immunosuppressants isolated from a streptomyces. I. Taxonomy of the producing strain. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 1988;41:1586–1591. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.41.1586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Andexer J.N., Kendrew S.G., Nur-e-Alam M., Lazos O., Foster T.A., Zimmermann A.S., Warneck T.D., Suthar D., Coates N.J., Koehn F.E., et al. Biosynthesis of the immunosuppressants fk506, fk520, and rapamycin involves a previously undescribed family of enzymes acting on chorismate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:4776–4781. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015773108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.He M., Haltli B., Summers M., Feng X., Hucul J. Isolation and characterization of meridamycin biosynthetic gene cluster from streptomyces sp. Nrrl 30748. Gene. 2006;377:109–118. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Doscher M.E., Wood I.B., Pankavich J.A., Ricks C.A. Efficacy of nemadectin, a new broad-spectrum endectocide, against natural infections of canine gastrointestinal helminths. Vet. Parasitol. 1989;34:255–259. doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(89)90055-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Seto B. Rapamycin and mtor: A serendipitous discovery and implications for breast cancer. Clin. Transl. Med. 2012;1:29. doi: 10.1186/2001-1326-1-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Rhodes A., Fantes K.H., Boothroyd B., McGonagle M.P., Crosse R. Venturicidin: A new antifungal antibiotic of potential use in agriculture. Nature. 1961;192:952–954. doi: 10.1038/192952a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Spizek J., Malek I., Suchy J., Vondracek M., Vanek Z. Metabolites of streptomyces noursei. V. Relation of the production of cycloheximide and actiphenol to the production of fungicidin. Folia Microbiol. 1965;10:263–266. doi: 10.1007/BF02871023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Seaton P.J., Gould S.J. New products related to kinamycin from streptomyces murayamaensis. Ii. Structures of pre-kinamycin, keto-anhydrokinamycin, and kinamycins e and f. J. Antibiot. 1989;42:189–197. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.42.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zhang J., Li S., Wu X., Guo Z., Lu C., Shen Y. Nam7 hydroxylase is responsible for the formation of the naphthalenic ring in the biosynthesis of neoansamycins. Org. Lett. 2017;19:2442–2445. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b01083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Bhuyan B.K., Smith C.G. Differential interaction of nogalamycin with DNA of varying base composition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1965;54:566–572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.54.2.566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Koshino H., Takahashi H., Osada H., Isono K. Reveromycins, new inhibitors of eukaryotic cell growth. Iii. Structures of reveromycins a, b, c and d. J. Antibiot. 1992;45:1420–1427. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.45.1420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Liu W., Nonaka K., Nie L., Zhang J., Christenson S.D., Bae J., Van Lanen S.G., Zazopoulos E., Farnet C.M., Yang C.F., et al. The neocarzinostatin biosynthetic gene cluster from streptomyces carzinostaticus atcc 15944 involving two iterative type i polyketide synthases. Chem. Biol. 2005;12:293–302. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.BeBoer C., Dietz A. The description and antibiotic production of streptomyces hygroscopicus var. Geldanus. J. Antibiot. 1976;29:1182–1188. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.29.1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Herbrik A., Corretto E., Chronakova A., Langhansova H., Petraskova P., Hrdy J., Cihak M., Kristufek V., Bobek J., Petricek M., et al. A human lung-associated streptomyces sp. Tr1341 produces various secondary metabolites responsible for virulence, cytotoxicity and modulation of immune response. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:3028. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Knopik-Skrocka A., Bielawski J. The mechanism of the hemolytic activity of polyene antibiotics. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 2002;7:31–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.te Welscher Y.M., Jones L., van Leeuwen M.R., Dijksterhuis J., de Kruijff B., Eitzen G., Breukink E. Natamycin inhibits vacuole fusion at the priming phase via a specific interaction with ergosterol. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010;54:2618–2625. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01794-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Gray K.C., Palacios D.S., Dailey I., Endo M.M., Uno B.E., Wilcock B.C., Burke M.D. Amphotericin primarily kills yeast by simply binding ergosterol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:2234–2239. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117280109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Elliott S.J., Srinivas S., Albert M.J., Alam K., Robins-Browne R.M., Gunzburg S.T., Mee B.J., Chang B.J. Characterization of the roles of hemolysin and other toxins in enteropathy caused by alpha-hemolytic escherichia coli linked to human diarrhea. Infect Immun. 1998;66:2040–2051. doi: 10.1128/IAI.66.5.2040-2051.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Scherr N., Nguyen L. Mycobacterium versus streptomyces--We are different, we are the same. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2009;12:699–707. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2009.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wurzer T. Bachelor’s Thesis. University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice; České Budějovice, Czech Republic: 2019. The Interaction of Streptomyces-like Bacteria and Model Microorganisms in Secondary Metabolite Production, Motility and Hemolytic Activities—Experimental. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Labeda D.P., Goodfellow M., Brown R., Ward A.C., Lanoot B., Vanncanneyt M., Swings J., Kim S.B., Liu Z., Chun J., et al. Phylogenetic study of the species within the family streptomycetaceae. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;101:73–104. doi: 10.1007/s10482-011-9656-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Rajesh T., Jeon J.M., Kim Y.H., Kim H.J., Yi da H., Park S.H., Choi K.Y., Kim Y.G., Kim J., Jung S., et al. Functional analysis of the gene sco1782 encoding streptomyces hemolysin (s-hemolysin) in streptomyces coelicolor m145. Toxicon. 2013;71:159–165. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Harir M., Bendif H., Bellahcene M., Pogni Z.F.R. Streptomyces secondary metabolites. In: Enany S., editor. Basic Biology and Applications of Actinobacteria. IntechOpen; London, UK: 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Bernal M.G., Campa-Cordova A.I., Saucedo P.E., Gonzalez M.C., Marrero R.M., Mazon-Suastegui J.M. Isolation and in vitro selection of actinomycetes strains as potential probiotics for aquaculture. Vet. World. 2015;8:170–176. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.170-176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Sheng Y., Ou Y., Hu X., Deng Z., Bai L., Kang Q. Generation of tetramycin b derivative with improved pharmacological property based on pathway engineering. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020;104:2561–2573. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10391-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Cinar B., Demir Z., Tunca S. Heterologous expression of 8-demethyl-tetracenomycin (8-dmtc) affected streptomyces coelicolor life cycle. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2021;52:1107–1118. doi: 10.1007/s42770-021-00499-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Tenconi E., Traxler M.F., Hoebreck C., van Wezel G.P., Rigali S. Production of prodiginines is part of a programmed cell death process in streptomyces coelicolor. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:1742. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Haro-Reyes T., Diaz-Peralta L., Galvan-Hernandez A., Rodriguez-Lopez A., Rodriguez-Fragoso L., Ortega-Blake I. Polyene antibiotics physical chemistry and their effect on lipid membranes; impacting biological processes and medical applications. Membranes. 2022;12:681. doi: 10.3390/membranes12070681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Grubbs K.J., Surup F., Biedermann P.H.W., McDonald B.R., Klassen J.L., Carlson C.M., Clardy J., Currie C.R. Cycloheximide-producing streptomyces associated with xyleborinus saxesenii and xyleborus affinis fungus-farming ambrosia beetles. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:562140. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.562140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Skelton J., Jusino M.A., Li Y., Bateman C., Thai P.H., Wu C., Lindner D.L., Hulcr J. Detecting symbioses in complex communities: The fungal symbionts of bark and ambrosia beetles within asian pines. Microb. Ecol. 2018;76:839–850. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1154-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Goettler W., Kaltenpoth M., McDonald S., Strohm E. Comparative morphology of the symbiont cultivation glands in the antennae of female digger wasps of the genus philanthus (hymenoptera: Crabronidae) Front. Physiol. 2022;13:815494. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.815494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Dhodary B., Spiteller D. Ammonia production by streptomyces symbionts of acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants strongly inhibits the fungal pathogen escovopsis. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1622. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9081622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Vergnes S., Gayrard D., Veyssière M., Toulotte J., Martinez Y., Dumont V., Bouchez O., Rey T., Dumas B. Phyllosphere colonization by a soil streptomyces sp. Promotes plant defense responses against fungal infection. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. MPMI. 2020;33:223–234. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-05-19-0142-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Kim D.R., Cho G., Jeon C.W., Weller D.M., Thomashow L.S., Paulitz T.C., Kwak Y.S. A mutualistic interaction between streptomyces bacteria, strawberry plants and pollinating bees. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:4802. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12785-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Dohet L., Grégoire J.C., Berasategui A., Kaltenpoth M., Biedermann P.H. Bacterial and fungal symbionts of parasitic dendroctonus bark beetles. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016;92 doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Schlosser E., Gottlieb D. Mode of hemolytic action of the antifungal polyene antibiotic filipin. Z. Naturforsch. B. 1966;21:74–77. doi: 10.1515/znb-1966-0120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Kim J.D., Han J.W., Lee S.C., Lee D., Hwang I.C., Kim B.S. Disease control effect of strevertenes produced by streptomyces psammoticus against tomato fusarium wilt. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011;59:1893–1899. doi: 10.1021/jf1038585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Shenin Y.D., Belakhov V.V., Araviiskii R.A. Nystatin: Methods of preparation, search for derivatives, and prospects for medicinal use (review) Pharm. Chem. J. 1993;27:84–92. doi: 10.1007/BF00781067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Brautaset T., Bruheim P., Sletta H., Hagen L., Ellingsen T.E., Strom A.R., Valla S., Zotchev S.B. Hexaene derivatives of nystatin produced as a result of an induced rearrangement within the nysc polyketide synthase gene in s. Noursei atcc 11455. Chem. Biol. 2002;9:367–373. doi: 10.1016/S1074-5521(02)00108-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Asturias J.A., Liras P., Martin J.F. Phosphate control of pabs gene transcription during candicidin biosynthesis. Gene. 1990;93:79–84. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90139-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Szczeblewski P., Laskowski T., Kubacki B., Dziergowska M., Liczmanska M., Grynda J., Kubica P., Kot-Wasik A., Borowski E. Analytical studies on ascosin, candicidin and levorin multicomponent antifungal antibiotic complexes. The stereostructure of ascosin a2. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:40158. doi: 10.1038/srep40158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Brajtburg J., Medoff G., Kobayashi G.S., Elberg S., Finegold C. Permeabilizing and hemolytic action of large and small polyene antibiotics on human erythrocytes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1980;18:586–592. doi: 10.1128/AAC.18.4.586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Hammond S.M., Kliger B.N. Mode of action of the polyene antibiotic candicidin: Binding factors in the wall of candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1976;9:561–568. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.4.561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Mikulik K., Bobek J., Zidkova J., Felsberg J. 6s rna modulates growth and antibiotic production in streptomyces coelicolor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;98:7185–7197. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5806-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Bobek J., Strakova E., Zikova A., Vohradsky J. Changes in activity of metabolic and regulatory pathways during germination of s. Coelicolor. BMC Genom. 2014;15:1173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Mikulik K., Suchan P., Bobek J. Changes in ribosome function induced by protein kinase associated with ribosomes of streptomyces collinus producing kirromycin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001;289:434–443. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.6017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Horinouchi S. A microbial hormone, a-factor, as a master switch for morphological differentiation and secondary metabolism in streptomyces griseus. Front. Biosci. 2002;7:d2045–d2057. doi: 10.2741/A897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Takano E. Gamma-butyrolactones: Streptomyces signalling molecules regulating antibiotic production and differentiation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2006;9:287–294. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2006.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Yamanaka K., Oikawa H., Ogawa H.O., Hosono K., Shinmachi F., Takano H., Sakuda S., Beppu T., Ueda K. Desferrioxamine e produced by streptomyces griseus stimulates growth and development of streptomyces tanashiensis. Microbiology (Reading) 2005;151:2899–2905. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28139-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Lee H.J., Whang K.S. Streptomyces rhizosphaerihabitans sp. Nov. And streptomyces adustus sp. Nov., isolated from bamboo forest soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016;66:3573–3578. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Human Z.R., Moon K., Bae M., de Beer Z.W., Cha S., Wingfield M.J., Slippers B., Oh D.C., Venter S.N. Antifungal streptomyces spp. Associated with the infructescences of protea spp. In south africa. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:1657. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Shirling E.B., Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of streptomyces species1. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1966;16:313–340. [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Chun J., Oren A., Ventosa A., Christensen H., Arahal D.R., da Costa M.S., Rooney A.P., Yi H., Xu X.-W., De Meyer S., et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018;68:461–466. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Kotrbová L., Lara A.C., Corretto E., Scharfen J., Ulmann V., Petříčková K., Chroňáková A. Evaluation and comparison of antibiotic susceptibility profiles of streptomyces spp. From clinical specimens revealed common and region-dependent resistance patterns. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13094-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Chun J., Lee J.H., Jung Y., Kim M., Kim S., Kim B.K., Lim Y.W. Eztaxon: A web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16s ribosomal rna gene sequences. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007;57:2259–2261. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64915-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Schoch C.L., Ciufo S., Domrachev M., Hotton C.L., Kannan S., Khovanskaya R., Leipe D., McVeigh R., O’Neill K., Robbertse B., et al. Ncbi taxonomy: A comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database. 2020;2020:baaa062. doi: 10.1093/database/baaa062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Edgar R.C. Muscle: A multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinform. 2004;5:113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Stamatakis A. Raxml version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Letunic I., Bork P. Interactive tree of life (itol) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Ochi K. Metabolic initiation of differentiation and secondary metabolism by streptomyces griseus: Significance of the stringent response (ppgpp) and gtp content in relation to a factor. J. Bacteriol. 1987;169:3608–3616. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.8.3608-3616.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Kamenik Z., Hadacek F., Mareckova M., Ulanova D., Kopecky J., Chobot V., Plhackova K., Olsovska J. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography fingerprinting method for chemical screening of metabolites in cultivation broth. J. Chromatogr. A. 2010;1217:8016–8025. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Cihak M., Kamenik Z., Smidova K., Bergman N., Benada O., Kofronova O., Petrickova K., Bobek J. Secondary metabolites produced during the germination of streptomyces coelicolor. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:2495. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Guan S., Ji C., Zhou T., Li J., Ma Q., Niu T. Aflatoxin b(1) degradation by stenotrophomonas maltophilia and other microbes selected using coumarin medium. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008;9:1489–1503. doi: 10.3390/ijms9081489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES