Abstract
Polymyxins are a class of lipopeptide anti-infective agents with potent and specific activity against Gram-negative bacteria. While toxicity concerns associated with polymyxin B and E (colistin) have historically limited their clinical application, today they are increasingly used as last-resort antibiotics given the rise of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. The adverse side effects of polymyxins are well known, particularly as related to their nephrotoxicity. Here, we describe the synthesis and evaluation of a novel series of polymyxin analogues, aimed at reducing their nephrotoxic effects. Using a semisynthetic approach, we explored modifications of the exocyclic part of the polymyxin scaffold, namely, the terminal amino acid and lipophilic tail. By incorporating a reductively labile disulfide linkage in the lipid tail, we obtained novel polymyxins that exhibit potent antibacterial activity on par with polymyxin B but with reduced toxicity toward human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells.
Introduction
Worldwide, the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria is on the rise while the pipeline of new antibiotics under development is nearly dry. This problem is most notable when it comes to the dearth of new antibiotics that target Gram-negative species. In this regard, the World Health Organization recently listed carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacteriaceae as pathogens for which new antibiotics are critically needed.1 To address this need, a number of approaches can be considered, including: (1) identifying and developing entirely new antibiotics with novel mechanisms of action, (2) looking for synergistic combinations of approved drugs, or (3) improving on already approved antibiotics by structural modification. While the first approach offers perhaps the best chance to address resistance, it is also inherently the most challenging. Alternatively, while combination therapies can show promising effects in in vitro assays, their applicability in vivo can be hampered by the different pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of the individual components. By comparison, pursuing improved structural analogues of known antibiotics as a means of enhancing activity and/or overcoming resistance or reducing toxicity has historically delivered many clinical successes and remains an important and fruitful strategy.
The polymyxins (as exemplified by polymyxin B1, Figure 1) are a well-established class of anti-Gram-negative antibiotics, first isolated from Bacillus polymyxa in the late 1940s.2 Since their initial discovery, many different polymyxin variants have been isolated from natural sources.3−7 Most extensively studied are the clinically used members of the family, polymyxin B and polymyxin E (commonly called colistin). The component amino acids are typically numbered as shown for polymyxin B1 in Figure 1. Polymyxin B and colistin differ only in the residue found at P6, which is d-Phe in polymyxin B and d-Leu in colistin. Structurally, polymyxins contain a macrocyclic heptapeptide, formed via an amide linkage between the C-terminus of the peptide and the side chain of the 2,4-diaminobutyric acid (Dab) residue found at P4, along with an exocyclic tripeptide that is acylated at the N-terminus with a fatty acid tail. The presence of five Dab residues gives the polymyxins a high net positive charge at physiological pH. The main target of the polymyxins is the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) portion of the bacterial outer membrane (OM), which explains their Gram-negative specific activity. Despite decades of research, the precise mechanism of action by which the polymyxins elicit their antibacterial effect is still an active area of investigation.8−10
Figure 1.
Structures of polymyxins and polymyxin-derived analogues. Typical numbering used for polymyxin residues is indicated in the structure for the natural product polymyxin B1. PMBN: polymyxin B nonapeptide.
It is hypothesized that the positively charged side chains of the five Dab residues allow for electrostatic interactions with the phosphate groups of lipid A, the lipid anchor of LPS.8 Binding studies also indicate that the interaction of polymyxins with LPS is affected by the type of LPS (either rough or smooth) used, suggesting that (modified) liposaccharides beyond lipid A may also influence binding.11 In addition to electrostatic interactions, hydrophobic contacts between the polymyxin’s fatty acyl tail as well as the hydrophobic amino acids at P6/P7 with the outer and inner membranes of susceptible bacteria also play a key role.8 Furthermore, it has been shown that membrane fluidization and lipid A aggregation are both observed upon exposure of bacterial cells to polymyxins.11 Additional mechanistic insights have come from studies with polymyxin nonapeptide (PMBN, Figure 1), a polymyxin B derivative devoid of the alkyl chain and N-terminal Dab residue. While PMBN is able to disrupt the Gram-negative OM and, in doing so, effectively synergizes with different antibiotics,12−15 it has no direct antimicrobial effects on its own. This observation clearly indicates the necessity of the lipid tail for the activity of the polymyxins.
Like other membrane-active cationic antimicrobial peptides, polymyxins selectively target bacterial membranes over mammalian membranes. Both charge and secondary structure are believed to be important contributors to this selectivity.16 Notably, while polymyxins are essentially nonhemolytic, their clinical application is dose-limited due to their well-documented nephrotoxicity, an effect that has historically limited their widespread use in treating infections.17,18 However, with the increasing incidence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, the use of polymyxin therapy is on the rise.19 In this regard, polymyxin analogues that maintain the potent antibacterial activity of natural products while exhibiting reduced toxicity are highly desirable.
The molecular basis of polymyxin toxicity is not completely understood. It is known, however, that PMBN is significantly less toxic than the parent compound polymyxin B.20,21 This indicates that the hydrophobic lipid tail together with the Dab residue at P1 of polymyxin B plays a key role in damaging renal tissue. At the cellular level, polymyxins appear to accumulate heavily in the proximal tubular cells,22 for which entry is facilitated by megalin,23,24 an endocytic receptor involved in nutrient and polybasic drug uptake.25,26 Excessive polymyxin accumulation via this resorption mechanism in turn interferes with cellular functions, causing either apoptosis27 or necrosis.28
To date, a number of approaches have been explored as a means of accessing less toxic polymyxin analogues.7,29−31 Administering colistin in the form of a colistin methane sulfonate (Figure 1) prodrug was explored early on,32 but the efficacy of this approach has been recently called into question.18 Given the central role of megalin and its affinity toward polybasic drugs, analogues with a reduced net positive charge have also been developed, of which NAB739 (Figure 1) is among the best-studied examples.28,33,34 Originally developed by Vaara and co-workers, NAB739 was found to be less toxic toward a porcine proximal tubule cell line,28 while outperforming polymyxin B in a mouse infection model of pyelonephritis caused by Escherichia coli.35 Structural variation of the fatty acid moiety has also been investigated as an approach to tuning the activity/toxicity ratio of the polymyxins. Researchers at Pfizer reported a series of biaryl amide substituted polymyxins with very promising activity and toxicity data on human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTECs). However, while the lead compound (5X, Figure 1) exhibited low toxicity in rats, it failed to do so in dogs where it was found to be no better than polymyxin B.30 Similarly, recent work by the groups of Blaskovich and Cooper revealed that polymyxin analogues containing fatty acids comprising aromatic biphenyls or biphenyl ethers maintain activity against relevant Gram-negative strains.36 These analogues were found to exhibit reduced nephrotoxicity as indicated by decreased levels of lactate dehydrogenase and γ-glutamyl transferase released by human primary kidney cells relative to those measured upon exposure to polymyxin B.36 In addition, Brown and co-workers recently disclosed SPR206 (Figure 1), a next-generation polymyxin bearing an N-terminal, β-branched aminobutyrate moiety featuring an aryl substituent.29 This compound was found to maintain potent antibacterial activity while showing lower cytotoxicity than polymyxin B in cell-based models as well as lower kidney exposure and toxicity in mouse models.29 In another approach, researchers at MicuRx recently disclosed a novel series of polymyxin analogues wherein the lipid tail is connected to the peptide via a hydrolytically labile ester linkage (Figure 1).37 The operating principle in these polymyxin analogues revolves around the exploitation of blood plasma esterases for the hydrolysis of the ester-linked lipid, a metabolic process envisioned to convert the active drug into less toxic metabolites. The first PK/PD and efficacy data for these interesting new analogues were reported in 2021 and a phase I trial is now underway with the lead candidate MRX-8 (specific structure not disclosed).38 Another approach aimed at developing polymyxins that are converted to a less toxic metabolite in vivo was recently reported by Rabanal and co-workers at the University of Barcelona wherein analogues containing a disulfide motif within the heptapeptide cycle were prepared and evaluated (Figure 1).39 In doing so, Dab4 and Thr10 were replaced by cysteine residues and the heptapeptide ring closure was subsequently achieved by disulfide formation. The most promising compound was equipped with a C10 lipid tail and norleucine at P6, which interestingly also led to activity against Gram-positive species including Staphylococcus aureus. While this compound was found to exhibit low acute toxicity, its nephrotoxicity appeared to be similar to that of polymyxin B, an issue that could be partially resolved by restoring the original hydroxyl-group-containing side chain at P10.40
As noted above, the nephrotoxicity of the polymyxins is attributed to their propensity to accumulate in kidney cells, an effect that appears to be associated with the presence of the N-terminal lipid tail given the comparatively reduced nephrotoxicity of PMBN. In considering alternative approaches to addressing this issue, we were intrigued by the potential to exploit the large difference in the reducing environment found inside proximal tubular cells relative to that of the bloodstream. The intracellular glutathione concentration of renal proximal tubule cells is approximately 5 mM41 while in healthy adults blood plasma concentrations of glutathione are nearly 1000-fold lower.42 To this end, we here report the design, synthesis, and evaluation of a series of polymyxin analogues wherein the lipid tail is connected to the peptide via a reductively labile disulfide linkage. The working hypothesis behind this strategy being that, upon entry to kidney cells, the disulfide-linked lipids are cleaved (owing to the high local concentration of glutathione) to generate polymyxin degradation products similar to the less toxic PMBN. A series of analogues were prepared via a convenient semisynthetic route allowing for the incorporation of a range of lipid groups. A number of the disulfide-linked polymyxins thus prepared were found to maintain the potent antibacterial activity of the clinically used antibiotic in vitro. Furthermore, the disulfide-linked polymyxins were found to be stable when incubated with glutathione at concentrations found in the bloodstream but were rapidly cleaved in the presence of glutathione at concentrations mimicking those found in renal cells. Notably, cell-based assays identified a subset of compounds that retained potent antibacterial activity while displaying lower toxicity than polymyxin B toward PTECs, the kidney cell type typically associated with the accumulation of polymyxins.22,24
Results and Discussion
In designing our semisynthetic, disulfide-linked lipid polymyxin analogues, we elected to replace the N-terminal Dab residue with cysteine (general strategy illustrated in Scheme 1). This provided a convenient means for introducing the disulfide-linked lipid at the N-terminus. In addition, the α-amino group of Cys approximates the side chain amine of the Dab1 residue, which is important for antimicrobial activity.36 To this end, we first prepared a series of cysteine-based building blocks containing a disulfide-linked lipid for subsequent coupling to the polymyxin core. The polymyxin core peptide was in turn generated by an established chemoenzymatic process wherein the N-terminal Dab residue and lipid were enzymatically removed.43 To this end, polymyxin B was first treated with the commercially available plant protease ficin to obtain PMBN. Selective Boc protection of the four Dab side chain amines was then achieved by treatment with 2-(tert-butoxycarbonyloxyimino)-2-phenylacetonitrile (Boc-ON) to afford the PMBN(Boc)4 building block on gram scale (see Scheme 1). Subsequent coupling of the disulfide-linked lipidated cysteine building blocks was then performed using standard amide-bond-forming conditions after which global deprotection with acid yielded the desired polymyxin analogues (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1. General Strategy for Semisynthesis of Disulfide-Containing Polymyxin Analogues.
Reagents and conditions: (a) ficin, dithiothreitol (DTT), water, 37 °C, o/n; (b) Boc-ON, Et3N, water/dioxane, room temperature (RT), 25 min; (c) (benzotriazol-1-yloxy)tris(dimethylamino)phosphonium hexafluorophosphate/N,N-di-isopropylethylamine (BOP/DIPEA), dichloromethane/dimethylformamide (DMF/DCM), RT, o/n; (d) trifluoroacetic acid/triisopropylsilane (TFA/TIPS)/H2O, RT, 1.5 h.
In the first generation of analogues explored, we specifically aimed to introduce disulfide-linked lipids that closely mimicked the all-carbon aliphatic lipid tails found naturally among the polymyxins. When produced by fermentation, polymyxins are obtained as mixtures of structurally similar isomers with slight differences in their fatty acid tails.44 In general, the antimicrobial potencies of these naturally occurring variants are similar.45−47 In our design, we therefore prepared disulfide-linked lipid analogues consisting of linear and branched aliphatic tails (see Scheme 2A). In addition, to further explore the structure–activity-toxicity relationships of our disulfide-linked lipid analogues, both l and d stereochemistries at the cysteine α-carbon were explored (compound numbering as X“a” and X“b”, respectively). Preparation of the Cys-derived building blocks first required access to aliphatic thiols 1–4 that were obtained commercially as for 1 and 2, or synthesized as for 3 and 4 (see Scheme 2A and Supporting Information Scheme S1). In the case of the starting cysteine building blocks used, the corresponding l- and d-cystine species offered the advantage of not requiring protection of the thiol side chain. To this end, N,N-di-Boc-protected 5a,b was reduced by treatment with triphenylphosphine and the free thiol species directly reacted with 2,2′-dithiobis(benzothiazole) to form activated disulfides 6a,b.48 These intermediates provided a convenient means for the introduction of the disulfide-linked lipids wherein reaction with the aliphatic thiol provided the desired products (7a,b–10a,b) in good yields. Notably, when an excess of the aliphatic thiol (typically 2–3 equiv) was used, the reaction was found to proceed to completion at room temperature, without formation of the undesired cystine disulfide, after which the excess aliphatic thiol and mercaptobenzothiazole byproduct were easily removed by column chromatography. A complementary set of disulfide-linked lipidated Cys building blocks were also prepared using the same lipid moieties but with a glycine unit appended to the cysteine amino group (see building blocks 13a,b–16a,bScheme 2A). This was done to probe the importance of the location of the free amine at the N-terminus and to more closely mimic the placement of the amino group of the Dab side chain as found in natural polymyxins. Starting from either l- or d-cystine, coupling with Boc-Gly-Osu gave carboxylic acids 11a,b. Subsequent reduction and reaction with 2,2′-dithiobis(benzothiazole) yielded the asymmetric disulfide intermediates 12a,b, which upon treatment with thiols 1–4, yielded 13a,b–16a,b. Building blocks 7a,b–10a,b and 13a,b–16a,b were then coupled to PMBN(Boc)4 in an overnight reaction using a 2-fold excess of the cysteine-derived building block with BOP/DIPEA activation leading to complete consumption of the PMBN(Boc)4 (based on LCMS assessment). The crude intermediates were then concentrated and directly deprotected by treatment with TFA/TIPS/H2O after which reversed-phase-high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) purification (see the General Procedures section) yielded polymyxin analogues 17a,b–20a,b and 21a,b–24a,b (Scheme 2B).
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Disulfide-Containing Polymyxin Analogues with Aliphatic Tails, Based on Cysteine-Containing Disulfides.
(A) Synthesis of cysteine-containing disulfides; (B) conjugation to protected polymyxin B nonapeptide. Reagents and conditions: (a) PPh3, H2O, THF, 50 °C, o/n; (b) 2,2′-dithiobis(benzothiazole), CHCl3, RT, 3 h; (c) corresponding thiol (1–4), CHCl3, RT, o/n; (d) corresponding disulfide building block (7a,b–10a,b and 13a,b–16a,b), BOP, DIPEA, RT, o/n; (e) TFA, TIPS, H2O, RT, 1.5 h.
The antibacterial activities of polymyxin analogues 17a,b–20a,b and 21a,b–24a,b were next evaluated against selected ATCC strains of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, and P. aeruginosa (Table 1). Polymyxin B and PMBN were also included as reference compounds. In line with expectation, PMBN was found to exhibit no bactericidal activity on its own (up to 32 μg/mL), while polymyxin B effectively prevented bacterial growth, with low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values. Gratifyingly, several of the disulfide-linked lipid polymyxin variants were also found to display good antimicrobial activity, indicating that disulfide-linked lipids are tolerated and that the polymyxin Dab residue at P1 can be replaced by cysteine-based building blocks. Notably, the l-cysteine-derived compounds lacking the additional N-terminal Gly motif (17a, 18a, 19a, 20a) exhibited reduced activity, especially against A. baumannii. The observation that 20a is the most active of these four analogues indicates that antibacterial activity can be enhanced by the introduction of a more hydrophobic alkyl tail, a finding in line with previous reports.29 Interestingly, coupling of a Gly unit to the amine of the N-terminal l-Cys residue was found to improve the activity for all compounds (21a, 22a, 23a, 24a) against the tested strains. Also, in comparison to the l-Cys-containing compounds, the analogues in which the disulfide-linked lipid was appended to a d-Cys residue were generally more active. This is particularly clear for 17b–19b with 18b showing MIC values on par with polymyxin B. Interestingly, in this series, the analogue with the larger branched lipid (20b) was found to exhibit somewhat lower activity. The effect of coupling a Gly unit to the amine of the d-Cys residue was also examined (as in compounds 21b, 22b, 23b, and 24b); however, this was found to provide only a marginal gain in potency. Collectively, these results suggest that for the polymyxin analogues here explored, the stereochemistry of the d-Cys residue plays a key role in governing antibacterial activity. Appending a Gly motif to the terminal Cys residue only led to increased antimicrobial activity for the inferior analogues bearing an N-terminal l-Cys.
Table 1. MIC Values for Disulfide-Linked Lipid Polymyxin Analogues 17a,b–20a,b and 21a,b–24a,b against Selected Gram-Negative Bacteria.
MIC values are derived from triplicate experiments and are expressed as μg/mL.
In addition to the aliphatic acyl chains found in the natural polymyxins, aromatic moieties and especially biphenyl systems have been explored in several studies.29,36,49 To further expand our library of analogues, we therefore chose to also prepare a series of polymyxins wherein aromatic moieties were linked to the N-terminus via a disulfide linkage. In doing so, we used [1,1′-biphenyl]-4-thiol and 4-phenoxybenzene thiol to form asymmetric disulfides with cysteine and then conjugated those to PMBN(Boc)4 (Scheme 3). The necessary [1,1′-biphenyl]-4-thiol and 4-phenoxybenzene thiol building blocks were synthesized from 4-iodo-1,1′-biphenyl and 1-iodo-4-phenoxybenzene, respectively, via a copper-catalyzed reaction with elemental sulfur followed by treatment with NaBH4 (Supporting Information Scheme S2A).50 While this approach provided access to the desired thiol, significant quantities of the corresponding symmetric disulfide were found to form during purification with column chromatography and were difficult to separate. Fortunately, we found that treatment of the column-purified thiol/disulfide mixtures with zinc dust under acidic aqueous conditions provided the thiol in a purity suitable for use in the following step. The direct treatment of Boc-l-Cys with the aromatic thiols in turn led to the formation of building blocks 25a and 26a while coupling with Boc-d-Cys resulted in 25b and 26b (Supporting Information Scheme S2B). For the preparation of the Cys-based building blocks with an additional Gly motif 27a,b and 28a,b, we opted to react the aromatic thiols with the previously used mercaptobenzothiazole-containing intermediates 12a and 12b (Supporting Information Scheme S2C). The subsequent conjugation of 25a,b–28a,b to PMBN(Boc)4 and subsequent deprotection provided access to the eight polymyxin analogues 29a,b–32a,b bearing disulfide-tethered aromatic groups at the N-terminus (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Disulfide-Containing Polymyxin Analogues with Aromatic Tails, Based on Cysteine-Containing Disulfides.
Reagents and conditions: (a) corresponding cysteine disulfide (25a,b–28a,b), BOP, DIPEA, RT, o/n; (b) TFA, TIPS, H2O, RT, 1.5 h.
The antibacterial activities of 29a,b–32a,b were assessed against the same panel of Gram-negative bacteria (Table 2) and found to be generally lower than the aliphatic analogues (Table 1). This reduced activity was somewhat surprising given the reported potency of amide-linked biphenyl and biphenyl ether polymyxin conjugates.36 In general, there was little difference in the MIC values observed for analogues bearing the biphenyl and biphenyl ether tails. Also, unlike the analogues bearing the aliphatic lipid tails, the activities observed for the aromatic series were not found to show a strong dependence on the stereochemistry of the Cys residue to which the lipid is attached. Furthermore, while in the aliphatic series the activity was improved by the addition of a Gly residue at the N-terminal Cys, the same trend is not seen for the aromatic analogues.
Table 2. MIC Values for Disulfide-Linked Lipid Polymyxin Analogues 29a,b–30a,b and 31a,b–32a,b against Selected Gram-Negative Bacteria.
MIC values are derived from triplicate experiments and are expressed as μg/mL.
The moderate antibacterial activity of analogues 29a,b–32a,b prompted to us to further investigate the linkage between the aromatic group and the disulfide moiety. Specifically, we were interested in knowing whether a benzyl motif, expected to impart greater flexibility, could be of benefit. To this end, we synthesized three additional aromatic analogues wherein a methylene group was introduced between the disulfide and the aromatic unit. In addition to analogues 36 and 37, bearing the biphenyl and biphenyl ether groups, respectively, we also prepared compound 38 featuring a 3-chlorobenzyl motif inspired by the N-terminal moiety featured in polymyxin analogue SPR206 recently disclosed by Spero Therapeutics (Figure 1).29 Also, we opted to prepare 36–38 as only the d-Cys variants given that among the analogues described above those with d-Cys at P1 consistently showed superior activity to the corresponding l-Cys species. The required building blocks 33–35 were prepared from the corresponding thiols and intermediate 6b (Supporting Information Scheme S3). Conjugation of 33–35 to PMBN(Boc)4, followed by global deprotection and HPLC purification, afforded polymyxin analogues 36–38 (Scheme 4). Assessment of the antibacterial activities for 36–38 (Table 3) revealed that analogues 36 and 37 show improved activities relative to their nonbenyzlic counterparts 29b and 30b. Analogue 38 containing the 3-chlorobenzyl motif also shows good antimicrobial potency, narrowly outperforming 36 and 37 against E. coli and K. pneumoniae. These results indicate that a well-positioned chlorine atom can recapitulate the contribution made by the second benzene ring, an observation in line with previous reports describing structure–activity relationship studies with different polymyxin analogues.29,51
Scheme 4. Synthesis of Disulfide-Containing Polymyxin Analogues with Benzylic Tails Based on d-Cysteine-Containing Disulfides.
Reagents and conditions: (a) corresponding cysteine disulfide (33–35), BOP, DIPEA, RT, o/n; (b) TFA, TIPS, H2O, RT, 1.5 h.
Table 3. MIC Values for Disulfide-Linked Lipid Polymyxin Analogues 36–38 against Selected Gram-Negative Bacteria.
MIC values are derived from triplicate experiments and are expressed as μg/mL.
We next tested the hypothesis that the disulfide linkage incorporated in these polymyxin analogues could be selectively cleaved under different reducing conditions. As noted above, there is an approximate 1000-fold difference in the glutathione concentration found inside proximal tubular cells and in blood.41,42 To mimic these conditions, we assessed the stability of two of the more active analogues, 18b and 23a, in the presence of high (5 mM) and low (5 μM) glutathione concentrations in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The selected compounds were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, with regular sampling and RP-HPLC analysis to monitor the stability of the compounds (Supporting Information Figure S1). Under conditions mimicking the higher intracellular concentration of glutathione, both 18b and 23a were completely degraded within the first hour of exposure. In contrast, when exposed to the milder reducing conditions (meant to mimic blood plasma levels of glutathione) only 10% degradation was seen in the first hour, with 70–80% of both compounds intact after 24 h. These findings suggest that the disulfide-linked lipid strategy may indeed provide a means to tune the metabolic stability of polymyxin analogues.
Evaluation of Cell-Based Toxicity
The cell-based toxicity of the disulfide-linked lipid polymyxin analogues was next evaluated against both erythrocytes and kidney cells. Gratifyingly, it was found that the new analogues induced little-to-no hemolysis (Supporting Information Figure S2). The nephrotoxicity associated with polymyxins is generally ascribed to their damaging effects on proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTECs) which exhibit excessive absorption of polycationic drugs.22 For this reason, in vitro toxicity screening using differentiated PTECs is seen as more predictive of cytotoxicity than testing on nondifferentiated cell lines.29,30 To this end, we employed differentiated conditionally immortalized PTECs (ciPTECs)52,53 to evaluate the toxicity of a selection of the most active polymyxin analogues prepared (Table 4). Residual mitochondrial activity of the ciPTECs after 24h of incubation with the polymyxin species was used as read-out.52 The selected polymyxin analogues were assessed at multiple concentrations covering a range of 0–100% viability, thereby generating robust TC50 (concentration required for half-maximal toxic effect) values. The nephrotoxicity of polymyxins and their derived nonapeptides has been studied for decades, using both in vitro(54) or in vivo(20,55) methods, and it is well established that PMBN is considerably less toxic than full-length polymyxin.20,54,55 As seen in Table 4, in our ciPTEC-based assays, the TC50 of PMBN was found to be more than 10 times higher than that of polymyxin B. This result matches well with those previously reported,30 indicating the suitability of our cellular model for evaluating the renal toxicity of the antibacterial compounds prepared as part of the current study.
Table 4. Cellular Toxicity of Disulfide Lipid-Linked Polymyxin Analogues as Determined on ciPTECsa.
Values are expressed relative to the toxicity of polymyxin B and represent the TC50 values determined after nonlinear regression. MIC values determined against E. coli ATCC 25922 (derived from Tables 1–3) included to provide comparison of antibacterial activity. Experiments were run in triplicate.
PMBN: Polymyxin B nonapeptide.
Encouragingly, all of the analogues tested were found to be less toxic than polymyxin B (Table 4 and Supporting Information Table S1, Figure S3). There was a range of toxicities observed among the compounds with antibacterial activities similar to polymyxin B. Analogues 19b, 22b, 23b, 24b, and 38 showed a modest 1.2- to 2.0-fold reduction in cell toxicity relative to polymyxin B while 17b and 21b, were found to be 3.0 and 4.4 times less toxic, respectively. Of particular note, however, are analogues 18b, 23a, and 24a, which were found to exhibit a 4.7-, 9.5-, and 8.0-fold reduction in cell toxicity, respectively, while maintaining potent antibacterial activity. While 18a is among the least toxic analogues, its antibacterial activity is moderate with an MIC of 16 μg/mL. Interestingly, 18b wherein the terminal Cys residue was stereochemically inverted to d-Cys resulted in a significant increase in antibacterial potency (MIC 1.0 μg/mL) while maintaining a reduced cell toxicity of some 4.7-fold lower than polymyxin B. Also of note, the addition of Gly to the terminal l-Cys reside in 18a leads to 22a, which shows some improvement in activity (MIC 4.0 μg/mL) along with a moderate increase in cell toxicity. Interestingly, the introduction of a slightly longer aliphatic tail as in 23a, 24a further enhances antibacterial activity while lowering toxicity. Given their promising combination of antibacterial activity and reduced cell toxicity, polymyxin analogues 18b, 23a, and 24a were further tested on an expanded panel of Gram-negative strains including drug-resistant isolates against which all three compounds maintained potent activity (Supporting Information Table S2). These findings indicate that the balance between activity and toxicity can be fine-tuned by: (i) proper choice of stereochemistry at the disulfide-linked Cys residue; (ii) structural elaboration at the Cys amino group; and (iii) variation of the length of the lipid moiety.
Contribution of Disulfide Linkage to Reduced Toxicity
To establish the extent to which the disulfide motif in these polymyxin analogues contributes to their reduced toxicity, we also synthesized and evaluated a variant of 18b wherein the disulfide was replaced with the corresponding C–C linkage. To do so, Boc-protected (R)-2-amino-8-methylnonanoic acid building block 44 was required. This was synthesized starting from the bismethyl ester of glutamic acid as shown in Scheme 5.56 Double Boc protection resulted in intermediate 39, which was in turn selectively reduced using DIBAL-H to give aldehyde 40. A Wittig reaction with the commercially available isopentyltriphenylphosphonium bromide yielded δ,ε-unsaturated ester 41 that was subsequently reduced to give protected amino acid 42. Removal of both Boc groups under acidic conditions followed by mono-Boc protection afforded intermediate 43, after which ester hydrolysis provided access to building block 44. Coupling of 44 to PMBN(Boc)4 followed by deprotection and purification by RP-HPLC was performed as for the other analogues to yield polymyxin variant 45 (Scheme 5B).
Scheme 5. Synthesis of the Polymyxin Analogue 45 Lacking a Reductively Labile Disulfide Bond.
(A) Synthesis of Boc-protected amino acid building block 44. (B) Conjugation to PMBN(Boc)4 and subsequent deprotection and purification. Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) Et3N, (Boc)2O, DCM, RT, o/n; (ii) DMAP, (Boc)2O, acetonitrile, RT, o/n; (b) DIBAL-H, Et2O, −78 °C, 15 min; (c) (3-methylbutyl)triphenylphosphonium bromide, potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide, toluene, −78 °C, 2 h; (d) Pd/C, triethylsilane, EtOH, RT, 40 min; (e) (i) HCl, THF/dioxane, RT, 4h; (ii) Et3N, (Boc)2O, MeOH, RT, o/n; (f) NaOH, dioxane/H2O, RT, o/n; (g) 44, BOP, DIPEA, RT, o/n; (h) TFA, TIPS, H2O, RT, 1.5 h.
The antibacterial activity of all-carbon lipid-containing analogue 45 was tested against a number of strains and found to be on par with that of disulfide-linked analogue 18b (Supporting Information Table S3). With regard to its effect on kidney cells, analogue 45 was found to be 2.4 times more toxic toward ciPTECs than 18b (TC50 of 82 μm for 45 vs 192 μM for 18b). Based on these findings, it appears that the reductively labile disulfide linkage in the lipid tail makes a significant contribution to the reduced toxicity observed for analogue 18b.
Conclusions
While polymyxins have been part of the clinical arsenal of antibiotics for more than half a century, their systemic use has historically been minimized due to toxicity concerns. The emergence of extensively resistant Gram-negative pathogens has led to renewed interest in the use of these lipopeptide agents as last-resort therapies and has spurred interest in next-generation polymyxins with improved safety profiles. The nephrotoxicity ascribed to the polymyxins is attributed to their capacity to accumulate in kidney cells. Notably, the interior of such cells presents a strongly reducing environment by virtue of the much higher glutathione concentration in comparison with that found in the bloodstream. We here report efforts aimed at developing a new class of semisynthetic polymyxins bearing a reductively labile disulfide linkage connecting the peptide and lipid moieties. The working principle behind this approach stems from the knowledge that the removal of the lipid tail from the polymyxin core results in products with significantly reduced nephrotoxicity. In pursuing these next-generation polymyxins, an efficient semisynthetic approach was employed providing access to a number of new analogues with differing disulfide-linked lipids and N-terminal amino acids. The antibacterial activity of these analogues compared well with that of polymyxin B and cell-based studies identified a subset of compounds that also demonstrate reduced toxicity. Stability studies in the presence of varying glutathione concentrations, as well as comparison with a non-disulfide-linked comparator, indicate that the working principle behind these next-generation polymyxins may offer a means of tuning their toxicity by exploiting their metabolic instability.
Experimental Section
Reagents
All reagents employed were of American Chemical Society (ACS) grade or finer and were used without further purification unless otherwise stated. Commercially sourced Polymyxin B was obtained as a mixture of isomers (Combi-Blocks, San Diego), with polymyxin B1, B2, and B3 accounting for >90%.
General Procedures
For compound characterization,1H NMR spectra were recorded at 400, 500, or 600 MHz, and chemical shifts are reported in parts per million downfield relative to CH3OH (δ 3.31), CHCl3 (δ 7.26) or DMSO (δ 2.50).1H NMR data are reported in the following order: multiplicity (s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; and m, multiplet), coupling constant (J), and the number of protons. 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 101, 126, or 151 MHz, and chemical shifts are reported relative to CDCl3 (δ 77.16), methanol (δ 49.00), or DMSO (δ 39.52).
All polymyxin analogues prepared were purified via preparative HPLC using a BESTA-Technik system with a Dr. Maisch Reprosil Gold 120 C18 column (25 × 250 mm, 10 μm) and equipped with an ECOM Flash UV detector monitoring at 214 nm. The following solvent system, at a flow rate of 12 mL/min, was used: solvent A, 0.1% TFA in water/acetonitrile 95/5; solvent B, 0.1% TFA in water/acetonitrile 5/95. Gradient elution was as follows: 100:0 (A/B) for 3 min, 100:0 to 85:15 (A/B) over 2 min, 60:40 (A/B) over 45 min, 60:40 to 0:100 (A/B) over 3 min, 0:100 (A/B) for 3 min, then reversion back to 100:0 (A/B) over 1 min, 100:0 (A/B) for 3 min. Depending on the polarity of the compounds, gradients were chosen between 10 and 60% maximum concentration of solvent B.
The purity of the polymyxin analogues was confirmed to be ≥95% by analytical RP-HPLC using a Shimadzu Prominence-i LC-2030 system with a Dr. Maisch ReproSil Gold 120 C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm) at 30 °C and equipped with a UV detector monitoring at 214 nm. The following solvent system, at a flow rate of 1 mL/min, was used: solvent A, 0.1% TFA in water/acetonitrile, 95/5; solvent B, 0.1% TFA in water/acetonitrile, 5/95. Gradient elution was as follows: 100:0 (A/B) for 3 min, 100:0 to 0:100 (A/B) over 47 min, 0:100 (A/B) for 4 min, then reversion back to 100:0 (A/B) over 1 min, 100:0 (A/B) for 5 min. For compound characterization, HRMS analysis was performed on a Shimadzu Nexera X2 UHPLC system with a Waters Acquity HSS C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.8 μm) at 30 °C and equipped with a diode array detector. The following solvent system, at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min, was used: solvent A, 0.1% formic acid in water; solvent B, 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. Gradient elution was as follows: 95:5 (A/B) for 1 min, 95:5 to 15:85 (A/B) over 6 min, 15:85 to 0:100 (A/B) over 1 min, 0:100 (A/B) for 3 min, then reversion back to 95:5 (A/B) for 3 min. This system was connected to a Shimadzu 9030 QTOF mass spectrometer (ESI ionization) calibrated internally with Agilent’s API-TOF reference mass solution kit (5.0 mM purine, 100.0 mM ammonium trifluoroacetate and 2.5 mM hexakis(1H,1H,3H-tetrafluoropropoxy)phosphazine) diluted to achieve a mass count of 10,000.
Synthesis of PMBN
Polymyxin B sulfate salt (3.0 g, 2.1 mmol) was dissolved in water (90 mL). Dithiothreitol (79 mg, 0.51 mmol) and ficin (MP Biomedicals, 0.79 g, ∼0.02 mmol, declared activity 215 BAPA u/g) were dissolved in water (10 mL) and added to the dissolved polymyxin B. Enzymatic digestion was run at 37 °C under N2 atmosphere overnight. When required, additional dithiothreitol (20 mg, 0.13 mmol) and ficin (100 mg, 0.003 mmol) were added, and the digestion time was prolonged. After complete digestion, the mixture was heated to reflux for 20 min, cooled down, and filtered. The pH of the filtrate was adjusted to 2 (5 M HCl) and extracted with n-butanol (4 × 25 mL). The combined aqueous layers were neutralized (NaOH 6 M) and freeze-dried. The crude material (white powder) was used without further purification in the following synthetic step. For biological testing, pure PMBN was obtained by RP-HPLC (General Procedures section), employing a 10–35% B gradient.
Synthesis of PMBN(Boc)4
PMBN (1.36 g (crude), 1.41 mmol) was dissolved in H2O (8.7 mL). Triethylamine (8.7 mL, 62.4 mmol) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 5 min. 2-(tert-Butoxycarbonyloxyimino)-2-phenylacetonitrile (1.55 g, 6.3 mmol) was dissolved in dioxane (8.8 mL) and added slowly to the PMBN solution. The mixture was stirred at RT for 30 min and quenched by methanolic NH3 (7 N, 6 mL). The mixture was concentrated, and the residue was dissolved in MeOH (130 mL). After filtration, the filtrate was concentrated and purified by flash chromatography,43 using a solvent system of 13% MeOH/1% Et3N/DCM. Yield: 1.2 g, 0.9 mmol, 64%.
General Method for the Synthesis of Analogues from PMBN(Boc)4
PMBN(Boc)4 (0.1 g, 0.07 mmol) was dissolved in DCM (2 mL). (Benzotriazol-1-yloxy)tris(dimethylamino)phosphonium hexafluorophosphate (BOP, 65 mg, 0.15 mmol) and Boc-protected cysteine-derived disulfide (0.15 mmol) were dissolved in DCM (2 mL) and added to the PMBN(Boc)4 solution. DIPEA (51 μL, 0.29 mmol) was added, and the reaction was run at RT overnight. After reaction completion, the reaction mixture was concentrated and the residue was treated with TFA/TIPS/H2O (95:2.5:2.5, 5 mL) for 90 min. The solution was transferred to cold (−20 °C) methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE, 40 mL), and the mixture was spun down (4500 rpm, 5 min). The obtained pellet was suspended in MTBE and spun down (4500 rpm, 5 min). The resulting pellet was freeze-dried from H2O/t-butanol to yield an off-white powder that was purified by RP-HPLC.
MIC Assays
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) on relevant Gram-negative bacteria were determined by broth microdilution, in accordance with CLSI guidelines. Indicated bacteria were taken from glycerol stocks and incubated overnight on blood agar at 37 °C. Well-isolated colonies were taken, suspended in TSB (5 mL), and grown to an OD600 of 0.5. Compounds to be tested were dissolved in DMSO (6.4 mg/mL), diluted in cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton Broth (CAMHB) (12.5 and 20 μg/mL Mg2+ and Ca2+, respectively), and diluted serially on polypropylene microtiter plates. To the diluted compounds (50 μL per well) was added 50 μL of relevant bacterial suspension, to yield a final concentration of 106 CFU/mL. Plates were covered by adhesive gas-permeable membranes and incubated at 37 °C. MIC was read out as the lowest concentration that inhibited visual bacterial growth. Shown values are consistent results from at least duplicate experiments.
Glutathione Stability Assay
Glutathione stock concentrations of 5.5 mM and 5.5 μM were prepared in PBS; 1.35 mL was taken and mixed with the tested compound (1 mg/mL, 0.15 mL). The sample vial was flushed with N2 and placed at RT in the autosampler of the HPLC equipment. Samples were drawn at t = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, and 24 h and analyzed by UV monitoring at 214 nm. An external calibration curve was constructed with the samples diluted in PBS. Calibration samples were run in duplicates.
Hemolysis and Cytotoxicity Assays
Hemolysis Assay
Red blood cells from defibrinated sheep blood (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were centrifuged (400g for 15 min at 4 °C) and washed with PBS containing 0.002% Tween20 four times. The red blood cells were normalized to obtain an absorbance value between 2.5 and 3.0 at 415 nm to stay in the linear range of the assay with maximum sensitivity. A serial dilution of the compounds (128–4 μg/mL, 75 μL) was prepared in a 96-well plate. Each plate contained a positive control (0.1% Triton-X final concentration, 75 μL) and a negative control (buffer, 75 μL). The normalized blood cells (75 μL) were added, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h while shaking at 500 rpm. After incubation, the plates were centrifuged (800g for 5 min at RT) and 25 μL of the supernatant was transferred to a second plate, containing 100 μL of PBS in each well. Absorbance was read-out at 415 nm. Values were corrected for background (negative control) and transformed to a percentage relative to the positive control. Results shown (Supporting Information Figure S2) are based on triplicate data.
ciPTEC Cell Culture
ciPTECs (OAT-1) cells,52,53 grown to 90–100% confluence, were washed by Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS; Gibco, Life Technologies, Paisley, U.K.) and detached by accutase (4 mL) for 5 min at 37 °C. The cells were then suspended in fresh medium (DMEM/F-12, supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, insulin (5 μg/mL), transferrin (5 μg/mL), selenium (5 μg/mL) hydrocortisone (35 ng/mL), Epidermal Growth Factor (10 ng/mL) and tri-iodothyronine (40 pg/mL)). Cell density was adjusted to 2.0 × 105 cells/mL, of which 100 μL was added to each well of a 96-well plate. The cells were incubated for 24 h at 33 °C, followed by 6 days at 37 °C, in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% (v/v) CO2. The medium was refreshed every second or third day.
ciPTEC Toxicity Assay
Compounds were dissolved and serially diluted in serum-free medium. Differentiated cells were washed once with HBSS and serially diluted compounds (80 μL/well) were transferred to the ciPTEC-containing plate. Compounds were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C; the cells were washed by HBSS, followed by incubation with 10% PrestoBlue cell viability reagent (Thermo Scientific, Vienna, Austria) in HBSS at 37 °C in the dark. Fluorescence was recorded (excitation: 530 nm, emission: 590 nm). Raw data are corrected for PrestoBlue background fluorescence and reported relative to the no-treatment control (cells with medium only). Viability data were fitted with GraphPad Prism software (version 5.03; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA), by nonlinear regression with 0 as bottom constraint. Presented data are based on triplicates.
Acknowledgments
Funding was provided by the European Research Council (ERC consolidator grant to NIM, grant agreement no. 725523).
Glossary
Abbreviations Used
- ACN
acetonitrile
- ATCC
American Tissue Culture Collection
- BAPA
Nα-benzoyl-l-arginine-4-nitroanilide
- BOP
benzotriazol-1-yloxy)tris(dimethylamino)phosphonium hexafluorophosphate
- CAMHB
Cation-Adjusted Mueller–Hinton Broth
- CFU
colony-forming units
- CLSI
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
- Dab
4-diaminobutyric acid
- DIPEA
N,N-di-isopropylethylamine
- DMEM
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
- HBSS
Hancks’ balanced salt solution
- MIC
minimal inhibitory concentration
- o/n
overnight
- OAT-1
organic anion transporter-1
- OM
outer membrane
- PMBN
polymyxin B nonapeptide
- ciPTEC
conditionally immortalized proximal tubule epithelial cell
- RP-HPLC
reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography
- TC50
half-maximum toxicity concentration
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01528.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- World Health Organization. Prioritization of Pathogens to Guide Discovery, Research and Development of New Antibiotics for Drug-Resistant Bacterial Infections, Including Tuberculosis; WHO: Geneva, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Ainsworth G. C.; Brown A. M.; Brownlee G. ‘Aerosporin’, an Antibiotic Produced by Bacillus Aerosporus Greer. Nature 1947, 160, 263. 10.1038/160263a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shoji J.; Kato T.; Hinoo I. The Structure Of Polymyxin S1. J. Antibiot. 1977, 30, 1035–1041. 10.7164/antibiotics.30.1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shoji J.; Kato T.; Hinoo H. The Structure of Polymyxin T1 - Studies on Antibiotics from the Genus Bacillus. XXII. J. Antibiot. 1977, 30, 1042–1048. 10.7164/antibiotics.30.1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin N. I.; Hu H.; Moake M. M.; Churey J. J.; Whittal R.; Worobo R. W.; Vederas J. C. Isolation, Structural Characterization, and Properties of Mattacin (Polymyxin M), a Cyclic Peptide Antibiotic Produced by Paenibacillus Kobensis M. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 13124–13132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimura Y.; Murai E.; Fujisawa M.; Tatsuki T.; Nobue F.; Polymyxin P. New Antibiotics of Polymyxin Group. J. Antibiot. 1969, 22, 449–450. 10.7164/antibiotics.22.449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown P.; Dawson M. J. Development of New Polymyxin Derivatives for Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-Negative Infections. J. Antibiot. 2017, 70, 386–394. 10.1038/ja.2016.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Velkov T.; Thompson P. E.; Nation R. L.; Li J. Structure–Activity Relationships of Polymyxin Antibiotics. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 1898–1916. 10.1021/jm900999h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sabnis A.; Hagart K. L. H.; Klöckner A.; Becce M.; Evans L. E.; Furniss R. C. D.; Mavridou D. A. I.; Murphy R.; Stevens M. M.; Davies J. C.; Larrouy-Maumus G. J.; Clarke T. B.; Edwards A. M. Colistin Kills Bacteria by Targeting Lipopolysaccharide in the Cytoplasmic Membrane. eLife 2021, 10, e65836 10.7554/eLife.65836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mandler M. D.; Baidin V.; Lee J.; Pahil K. S.; Owens T. W.; Kahne D. Novobiocin Enhances Polymyxin Activity by Stimulating Lipopolysaccharide Transport. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 6749–6753. 10.1021/jacs.8b02283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brandenburg K.; Arraiza M. D.; Lehwark-Ivetot G.; Moriyon I.; Zähringer U. The Interaction of Rough and Smooth Form Lipopolysaccharides with Polymyxins as Studied by Titration Calorimetry. Thermochim. Acta 2002, 394, 53–61. 10.1016/S0040-6031(02)00238-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vaara M.; Vaara T. Sensitization of Gram-Negative Bacteria to Antibiotics and Complement by a Nontoxic Oligopeptide. Nature 1983, 303, 526–528. 10.1038/303526a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ofek I.; Cohen S.; Rahmani R.; Kabha K.; Tamarkin D.; Herzig Y.; Rubinstein E. Antibacterial Synergism of Polymyxin B Nonapeptide and Hydrophobic Antibiotics in Experimental Gram-Negative Infections in Mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1994, 38, 374–377. 10.1128/AAC.38.2.374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Viljanen P.; Vaara M. Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Bacteria to Polymyxin B Nonapeptide. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1984, 25, 701–705. 10.1128/AAC.25.6.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vaara M. Polymyxin Derivatives That Sensitize Gram-Negative Bacteria to Other Antibiotics. Molecules 2019, 24, 249 10.3390/molecules24020249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dathe M.; Wieprecht T. Structural Features of Helical Antimicrobial Peptides: Their Potential to Modulate Activity on Model Membranes and Biological Cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 1999, 1462, 71–87. 10.1016/S0005-2736(99)00201-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akajagbor D. S.; Wilson S. L.; Shere-Wolfe K. D.; Dakum P.; Charurat M. E.; Gilliam B. L. Higher Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury With Intravenous Colistimethate Sodium Compared With Polymyxin B in Critically Ill Patients at a Tertiary Care Medical Center. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 1300–1303. 10.1093/cid/cit453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zavascki A. P.; Nation R. L. Nephrotoxicity of Polymyxins: Is There Any Difference between Colistimethate and Polymyxin B?. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02319-16 10.1128/AAC.02319-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans M. E.; Feola D. J.; Rapp R. P. Polymyxin B Sulfate and Colistin: Old Antibiotics for Emerging Multiresistant Gram-Negative Bacteria. Ann. Pharmacother. 1999, 33, 960–967. 10.1345/aph.18426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chihara S.; Ito A.; Yahata M.; Tobita T.; Koyama Y. Chemical Synthesis, Isolation and Characterization of α-N-Fattyacyl Colistin Nonapeptide with Special Reference to the Correlation between Antimicrobial Activity and Carbon Number of Fattyacyl Moiety. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1974, 38, 521–529. 10.1080/00021369.1974.10861184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Keirstead N. D.; Wagoner M. P.; Bentley P.; Blais M.; Brown C.; Cheatham L.; Ciaccio P.; Dragan Y.; Ferguson D.; Fikes J.; Galvin M.; Gupta A.; Hale M.; Johnson N.; Luo W.; McGrath F.; Pietras M.; Price S.; Sathe A. G.; Sasaki J. C.; Snow D.; Walsky R. L.; Kern G. Early Prediction of Polymyxin-Induced Nephrotoxicity With Next-Generation Urinary Kidney Injury Biomarkers. Toxicol. Sci. 2014, 137, 278–291. 10.1093/toxsci/kft247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Azad M. A. K.; Roberts K. D.; Yu H. H.; Liu B.; Schofield A. V.; James S. A.; Howard D. L.; Nation R. L.; Rogers K.; de Jonge M. D.; Thompson P. E.; Fu J.; Velkov T.; Li J. Significant Accumulation of Polymyxin in Single Renal Tubular Cells: A Medicinal Chemistry and Triple Correlative Microscopy Approach. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 1590–1595. 10.1021/ac504516k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suzuki T.; Hiroaki Y.; Jiro O.; Masaki K.; Takehiro Y.; Ken I. Megalin Contributes to Kidney Accumulation and Nephrotoxicity of Colistin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 6319–6324. 10.1128/AAC.00254-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abdelraouf K.; Kai-Tai C.; Taijun Y.; Ming H.; Tam V. H. Uptake of Polymyxin B into Renal Cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 4200–4202. 10.1128/AAC.02557-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Christensen E. I.; Birn H. Megalin and Cubilin: Multifunctional Endocytic Receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3, 258–267. 10.1038/nrm778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moestrup S. K.; Cui S.; Vorum H.; Bregengård C.; Bjørn S. E.; Norris K.; Gliemann J.; Christensen E. I. Evidence That Epithelial Glycoprotein 330/Megalin Mediates Uptake of Polybasic Drugs. J. Clin. Invest. 1995, 96, 1404–1413. 10.1172/JCI118176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Azad M. A. K.; Finnin B. A.; Poudyal A.; Davis K.; Li J.; Hill P. A.; Nation R. L.; Velkov T.; Li J. Polymyxin B Induces Apoptosis in Kidney Proximal Tubular Cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 4329–4335. 10.1128/AAC.02587-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mingeot-Leclercq M. P.; Tulkens P. M.; Denamur S.; Vaara T.; Vaara M. Novel Polymyxin Derivatives Are Less Cytotoxic than Polymyxin B to Renal Proximal Tubular Cells. Peptides 2012, 35, 248–252. 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown P.; Abbott E.; Abdulle O.; Boakes S.; Coleman S.; Divall N.; Duperchy E.; Moss S.; Rivers D.; Simonovic M.; Singh J.; Stanway S.; Wilson A.; Dawson M. J. Design of Next Generation Polymyxins with Lower Toxicity: The Discovery of SPR206. ACS Infect. Dis. 2019, 5, 1645–1656. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magee T. V.; Brown M. F.; Starr J. T.; Ackley D. C.; Abramite J. A.; Aubrecht J.; Butler A.; Crandon J. L.; Dib-Hajj F.; Flanagan M. E.; Granskog K.; Hardink J. R.; Huband M. D.; Irvine R.; Kuhn M.; Leach K. L.; Li B.; Lin J.; Luke D. R.; MacVane S. H.; Miller A. A.; McCurdy S.; McKim J. M.; Nicolau D. P.; Nguyen T.-T.; Noe M. C.; O’Donnell J. P.; Seibel S. B.; Shen Y.; Stepan A. F.; Tomaras A. P.; Wilga P. C.; Zhang L.; Xu J.; Chen J. M. Discovery of Dap-3 Polymyxin Analogues for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Nosocomial Infections. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 5079–5093. 10.1021/jm400416u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vaara M. Polymyxins and Their Potential Next Generation as Therapeutic Antibiotics. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1689 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnett M.; Bushby S. R.; Wilkinson S. Sodium Sulphomethyl Derivatives of Polymyxins. Br. J. Pharmacol. Chemother. 1964, 23, 552–574. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1964.tb01610.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vaara M.; John F.; Günther L.; Osmo S.; Juha A.; Frank H.; Niels F.-M.; Junya N.; Mikihisa T.; Timo V. Novel Polymyxin Derivatives Carrying Only Three Positive Charges Are Effective Antibacterial Agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 3229–3236. 10.1128/AAC.00405-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ali F. E. A.; Cao G.; Poudyal A.; Vaara T.; Nation R. L.; Vaara M.; Li J. Pharmacokinetics of Novel Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides NAB 7061 and NAB 739 in Rats Following Intravenous Administration. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2009, 64, 1067–1070. 10.1093/jac/dkp331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vaara M.; Vaara T.; Vingsbo Lundberg C. Polymyxin Derivatives NAB739 and NAB815 Are More Effective than Polymyxin B in Murine Escherichia Coli Pyelonephritis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 452–455. 10.1093/jac/dkx394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gallardo-Godoy A.; Muldoon C.; Becker B.; Elliott A. G.; Lash L. H.; Huang J. X.; Butler M. S.; Pelingon R.; Kavanagh A. M.; Ramu S.; Phetsang W.; Blaskovich M. A. T.; Cooper M. A. Activity and Predicted Nephrotoxicity of Synthetic Antibiotics Based on Polymyxin B. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 1068–1077. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gordeev M. F.; Liu J.; Wang X.; Yuan Z.. Antimicrobial Polymyxins for Treatment of Bacterial Infections. U.S. Patent US9,771,394B22017.
- Lepak A. J.; Wang W.; Andes D. R. Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of MRX-8, a Novel Polymyxin, in the Neutropenic Mouse Thigh and Lung Infection Models against Gram-Negative Pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 64, e01517-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rabanal F.; Grau-Campistany A.; Vila-Farrés X.; Gonzalez-Linares J.; Borràs M.; Vila J.; Manresa A.; Cajal Y. A Bioinspired Peptide Scaffold with High Antibiotic Activity and Low in Vivo Toxicity. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10558 10.1038/srep10558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rabanal Anglada F.Polymyxin-Based Compounds Useful as Antibacterial Agents. EP Patent EP3636659A12018.
- Lash L. H. Role of Glutathione Transport Processes in Kidney Function. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2005, 204, 329–342. 10.1016/j.taap.2004.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michelet F.; Gueguen R.; Leroy P.; Wellman M.; Nicolas A.; Siest G. Blood and Plasma Glutathione Measured in Healthy Subjects by HPLC: Relation to Sex, Aging, Biological Variables, and Life Habits. Clin. Chem. 1995, 41, 1509–1517. 10.1093/clinchem/41.10.1509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Dowd H.; Kim B.; Margolis P.; Wang W.; Wu C.; Lopez S. L.; Blais J. Preparation of Tetra-Boc-Protected Polymyxin B Nonapeptide. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 2003–2005. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.01.071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hee K. H.; Leaw Y. K. J.; Ong J. L.; Lee L. S. Development and Validation of Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method Quantitative Determination of Polymyxin B1, Polymyxin B2, Polymyxin B3 and Isoleucine-Polymyxin B1 in Human Plasma and Its Application in Clinical Studies. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2017, 140, 91–97. 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tam V. H.; Cao H.; Ledesma K. R.; Hu M. In Vitro Potency of Various Polymyxin B Components. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 4490–4491. 10.1128/AAC.00119-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kassamali Z.; Prince R. A.; Danziger L. H.; Rotschafer J. C.; Rhomberg P. R.; Jones R. N. Microbiological Assessment of Polymyxin B Components Tested Alone and in Combination. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 7823–7825. 10.1128/AAC.01021-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts K. D.; Azad M. A. K.; Wang J.; Horne A. S.; Thompson P. E.; Nation R. L.; Velkov T.; Li J. Antimicrobial Activity and Toxicity of the Major Lipopeptide Components of Polymyxin B and Colistin: Last-Line Antibiotics against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria. ACS Infect. Dis. 2015, 1, 568–575. 10.1021/acsinfecdis.5b00085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brzezinska E.; Ternay A. L. Disulfides. 1. Syntheses Using 2,2,-Dithiobis(Benzothiazole). J. Org. Chem 1994, 59, 8239–8244. 10.1021/jo00105a048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Okimura K.; Ohki K.; Sato Y.; Ohnishi K.; Sakura N. Semi-Synthesis of Polymyxin B (2-10) and Colistin (2-10) Analogs Employing the Trichloroethoxycarbonyl (Troc) Group for Side Chain Protection of α,γ-Diaminobutyric Acid Residues. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 55, 1724–1730. 10.1248/cpb.55.1724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang Y.; Qin Y.; Xie S.; Zhang X.; Dong J.; Ma D. A General and Efficient Approach to Aryl Thiols: CuI-Catalyzed Coupling of Aryl Iodides with Sulfur and Subsequent Reduction. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5250–5253. 10.1021/ol902186d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts K. D.; Zhu Y.; Azad M. A. K.; Han M.-L.; Wang J.; Wang L.; Yu H. H.; Horne A. S.; Pinson J.-A.; Rudd D.; Voelcker N. H.; Patil N. A.; Zhao J.; Jiang X.; Lu J.; Chen K.; Lomovskaya O.; Hecker S. J.; Thompson P. E.; Nation R. L.; Dudley M. N.; Griffith D. C.; Velkov T.; Li J. A Synthetic Lipopeptide Targeting Top-Priority Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1625 10.1038/s41467-022-29234-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nieskens T. T. G.; Peters J. G. P.; Schreurs M. J.; Smits N.; Woestenenk R.; Jansen K.; van der Made T. K.; Röring M.; Hilgendorf C.; Wilmer M. J.; Masereeuw R. A Human Renal Proximal Tubule Cell Line with Stable Organic Anion Transporter 1 and 3 Expression Predictive for Antiviral-Induced Toxicity. AAPS J. 2016, 18, 465–475. 10.1208/s12248-016-9871-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jansen J.; Schophuizen C. M. S.; Wilmer M. J.; Lahham S. H. M.; Mutsaers H. A. M.; Wetzels J. F. M.; Bank R. A.; van den Heuvel L. P.; Hoenderop J. G.; Masereeuw R. A Morphological and Functional Comparison of Proximal Tubule Cell Lines Established from Human Urine and Kidney Tissue. Exp. Cell Res. 2014, 323, 87–99. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duwe A. K.; Rupar C. A.; Horsman G. B.; Vas S. I. In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Antibiotic Activity of Polymyxin B Nonapeptide. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 1986, 30, 340–341. 10.1128/AAC.30.2.340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Danner R. L.; Joiner K. A.; Rubin M.; Patterson W. H.; Johnson N.; Ayers K. M.; Parrillo J. E. Purification, Toxicity, and Antiendotoxin Activity of Polymyxin B Nonapeptide. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1989, 33, 1428–1434. 10.1128/AAC.33.9.1428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kokotos G.; Padrón J. M.; Martín T.; Gibbons W. A.; Martín V. S. A General Approach to the Asymmetric Synthesis of Unsaturated Lipidic α-Amino Acids. The First Synthesis of α-Aminoarachidonic Acid. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3741–3744. 10.1021/jo9715128. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.