To the Editor:
Little is known about the clinical epidemiology of severe COVID-19 in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), a high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-burden region, where vaccine coverage remains poor and surges of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have overwhelmed underresourced health systems (1–4). We sought to determine the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to a national COVID-19 referral hospital in Uganda during 2020–2021.
Methods
This study was conducted at Entebbe Regional Referral Hospital (ERRH), a 200-bed public hospital in central Uganda, from March 22, 2020 to November 30, 2021. During this period, ERRH functioned as a national referral hospital for COVID-19; patients with COVID-19 nationwide were referred to the facility for management. There was no functional intensive care unit, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), or piped oxygen available at ERRH during the study period. Oxygen therapy was typically provided via nasal cannula and simple or non-rebreathing facemask using concentrators and/or cylinders, the latter filled from a pressure swing adsorption plant built on site. These devices were used in tandem for patients requiring high-level respiratory support. High-flow nasal oxygen or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) devices and chest radiography were infrequently available. All management decisions, informed by national COVID-19 treatment guidelines, were made by ERRH clinicians (5, 6).
Patients were included in this cohort study if they were: 1) ⩾5 years of age; 2) admitted to ERRH with COVID-19–related symptoms; and 3) had severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of a naso-/oropharyngeal swab sample at a Ministry of Health–accredited laboratory. Study participants were identified via review of hospital admission logs and medical charts, from which data were abstracted using a modified case record form developed by the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium and the World Health Organization (7). Most patients were identified retrospectively; a subset of patients, from whom blood samples were collected, were identified and enrolled prospectively.
Our primary outcome was the frequency of severe COVID-19 during the study period, defined as the proportion of all symptomatic COVID-19 admissions who fulfilled criteria for severe COVID-19. Based on World Health Organization guidelines, we considered patients to have severe COVID-19 if they met one or more of the following criteria: 1) oxygen saturation ⩽ 90%; 2) respiratory rate ⩾ 30 breaths/min; 3) showed signs of respiratory distress (chest indrawing, nasal flaring, grunting respirations); 4) received oxygen therapy (8). Although oxygen saturation was recorded for 99.0% of patients, a substantial proportion (67.6%) did not have their respiratory rate documented. As such, we assumed a missing-at-random mechanism and performed multiple imputation via chained equations (using all relevant clinical variables as predictors), generating five imputed datasets (mice R package) (9). After imputation, the pooled proportion of patients with severe COVID-19 and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined using Wilson scores (MIWilson R package) (10). Given the large proportion of missing respiratory rate data, we conducted three sensitivity analyses: one in which all missing respiratory rate and oxygen saturation values were assumed to be <30 breaths/min and >90%, respectively; a second in which we defined severe COVID-19 without a respiratory rate criterion; and a third in which severe COVID-19 was defined by receipt of oxygen therapy alone. For patients with severe COVID-19, we estimated cumulative incidence of hospital mortality considering discharge or transfer alive as a competing risk (cmprsk R package).
Each prospectively enrolled participant, their surrogate, or a parent/guardian provided written informed consent, and assent was obtained from patients aged 8–17 years. For retrospective chart review, informed consent was waived. Study protocols were approved by ethics committees at Uganda Virus Research Institute, Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, and Columbia University. Administrative clearance was provided by ERRH.
Results
We identified 1,418 patients admitted with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. After excluding 14 patients with unknown demographics or vital status and 328 asymptomatic individuals admitted for isolation, we analyzed data from 1,076 patients with symptomatic COVID-19 (772 [71.7%] identified retrospectively and 304 [28.3%] prospectively) (Table 1). Most patients were young adult males, and 6% were healthcare workers.
Table 1.
Patient characteristics in first imputed dataset stratified by COVID-19 severity
Patient Characteristic | All Patients (N = 1,076) | Mild–Moderate COVID-19 (n = 765) | Severe COVID-19 (n = 311) | P Value* |
---|---|---|---|---|
Male sex | 726/1,076 (67.5) | 521/765 (68.1) | 205/311 (65.9) | 0.533 |
Age, yr | 37 (29–48) | 34 (26–41) | 50 (40–62) | <0.001 |
Employed as healthcare worker | 66/1,076 (6.1) | 42/765 (5.5) | 24/311 (7.7) | 0.215 |
Hypertension | 194/1,076 (18.0) | 100/765 (13.1) | 94/311 (30.2) | <0.001 |
Diabetes mellitus | 67/1,076 (6.2) | 20/765 (2.6) | 47/311 (15.1) | <0.001 |
HIV infected | 59/1,076 (5.5) | 44/765 (5.8) | 15/311 (4.8) | 0.646 |
On ART before admission | 43/59 (72.9) | 30/44 (68.2) | 13/15 (86.7) | 0.361 |
Malaria infection† | 14/1,076 (1.3) | 8/765 (1.0) | 6/311 (1.9) | 0.247 |
Active or prior tuberculosis‡ | 6/1,076 (0.6) | 4/765 (0.5) | 2/311 (0.6) | 1.000 |
Duration of illness before hospitalization§ | 5 (3–7) | 4 (2–7) | 6 (3–7) | <0.001 |
History of fever | 371/1,076 (34.5) | 213/765 (27.8) | 158/311 (50.8) | <0.001 |
Night sweats | 23/1,076 (2.1) | 13/765 (1.7) | 10/311 (3.2) | 0.185 |
Headache | 410/1,076 (38.1) | 333/765 (43.5) | 77/311 (24.8) | <0.001 |
Cough | 768/1,076 (71.4) | 495/765 (64.7) | 273/311 (87.8) | <0.001 |
Shortness of breath | 336/1,076 (31.2) | 96/765 (12.5) | 240/311 (77.2) | <0.001 |
Rhinorrhea | 381/1,076 (35.4) | 333/765 (43.5) | 48/311 (15.4) | <0.001 |
Chest indrawing | 42/1,076 (0.9) | — | 42/311 (13.5) | — |
Nasal flaring | 20/1,076 (1.9) | — | 20/311 (6.4) | — |
Grunting respirations | 4/1,076 (0.4) | — | 4/311 (1.3) | — |
Temperature, °C | 36.5 (36.4–36.8) | 36.5 (36.4–36.7) | 36.5 (36.4–36.9) | 0.212 |
Heart rate, beats/min | 87 (78–99) | 85 (77–96) | 94 (84–110) | <0.001 |
Respiratory rate, breaths/min | 19 (18–22) | 18 (18–20) | 24 (20–28) | <0.001 |
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 127 (117–139) | 126 (117–137) | 130 (117–142) | 0.015 |
Oxygen saturation, % | 97 (95–98) | 98 (97–98) | 91 (86–95) | <0.001 |
Altered mental status‖ | 9/1,076 (0.8) | 2/765 (0.3) | 7/311 (2.3) | 0.003 |
Received oxygen therapy | 280/1,076 (26.0) | — | 280/311 (90.0) | — |
Oxygen flow rate, L/min¶ | 8 (5–15) | — | 8 (5-15) | — |
Received corticosteroids | 347/1,076 (32.2) | 96/765 (12.5) | 251/311 (80.7) | <0.001 |
Received corticosteroids with oxygen therapy | 246/280 (87.9) | — | 246/280 (87.9) | — |
Received antibacterial agent | 819/1,076 (76.1) | 520/765 (68.0) | 299/311 (96.1) | <0.001 |
Received antibacterial agent with oxygen therapy | 277/280 (98.9) | — | 277/280 (98.9) | — |
Duration of hospitalization, d** | 9 (7–12) | 9 (7–12) | 9 (6–13) | 0.381 |
Hospital outcome | ||||
Death | 81/1,076 (7.5) | 3/765 (0.4) | 78/311 (25.1) | <0.001 |
Discharge alive | 969/1,076 (90.1) | 755/765 (98.7) | 214/311 (68.8) | |
Transferred to other health facility alive | 26/1,076 (2.4) | 7/765 (0.9) | 19/311 (6.1) |
Definition of abbreviations: ART = antiretroviral therapy; COVID-19 = coronavirus disease; HIV = human immunodeficiency virus.
Data are presented as n/N (%) or median (interquartile range).
Wilcoxon rank-sum, Fisher exact, or chi-square test.
Rapid diagnostic test or smear microscopy positive.
Diagnosis as documented by treating clinicians.
Known for 973 patients.
Anything other than “alert” on AVPU (alert, responsive to voice, responsive to pain, unresponsive) mental status assessment.
Known for 209 patients.
Known for 1,068 patients.
After imputation, the proportion of symptomatic patients who met criteria for severe COVID-19 was 29.1% (95% CI, 26.9–31.5%), with peaks from March to August 2021 (Tables 1 and 2 and Figure 1A). Ninety percent of patients with severe COVID-19 received oxygen therapy, of whom approximately 88% and 99% received corticosteroids or antibacterial agents, respectively (Table 1). Patients with severe COVID-19 were older, more likely to have hypertension or diabetes, and presented later in the course of illness. We observed no associations between HIV, malaria, or tuberculosis and COVID-19 severity, though the latter two coinfections were rare.
Table 2.
Frequency of severe COVID-19 and related mortality during the study period stratified by case definition and approach to missing data
Case Definition Used to Define Severe COVID-19 and Approach to Missing Data | Proportion of Symptomatic Patients with Severe COVID-19 (95% CI)* | Hospital Mortality in Patients with Severe COVID-19 (95% CI)* |
---|---|---|
Modified WHO case definition† with multiple imputation of missing respiratory rate and oxygen saturation values | 29.1% (26.9–31.5%) | 25.1% (20.6–30.2%)‡ |
Modified WHO case definition† assuming all missing respiratory rate values <30 breaths/min and oxygen saturation values >90% | 28.4% (25.8–31.2%) | 25.1% (20.6–30.3%) |
Modified WHO case definition† excluding respiratory rate criterion and assuming all missing oxygen saturation values >90% | 28.3% (25.6–31.0%) | 25.3% (20.8–30.5%) |
Receipt of oxygen therapy alone | 26.0% (23.5–28.7%) | 27.1% (22.3–32.6%) |
Definition of abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; COVID-19 = coronavirus disease; WHO = World Health Organization.
Frequency defined as the proportion of all symptomatic COVID-19 admissions who fulfilled criteria for severe COVID-19.
Confidence intervals generated using Wilson scores.
One or more of the following criteria: oxygen saturation ⩽ 90%, respiratory rate ⩾ 30 breaths/min, signs of respiratory distress (chest indrawing, nasal flaring, grunting respirations), receipt of oxygen therapy.
Reflects first imputed dataset; results from other four imputed datasets as follows: 24.4 (20.0–29.4), 25.1 (20.6–30.2), 24.4 (20.0–29.5), 25.3 (20.8–30.4).
Figure 1.
Frequency of severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19), hospital mortality, and oxygen delivery during the study period. (A) Frequency of severe COVID-19 over study period, reflecting data pooled across five imputed datasets and defined as proportion of all symptomatic COVID-19 admissions who fulfilled criteria for severe COVID-19 (N = 1,076); shading indicates Wilson score 95% confidence interval (CI). (B) Cumulative incidence of hospital outcomes for patients with severe COVID-19 in first imputed dataset; shading indicates 95% CI (n = 309; 2 patients with unknown duration of hospitalization excluded). (C) Hospital vital status over study period for patients with severe COVID-19 in first imputed dataset (n = 311). (D) Density plot of peak oxygen flow rates received by patients with severe COVID-19 during study period, stratified by hospital vital status; dashed lines indicate median oxygen flow rate for each group (n = 209).
Hospital mortality for all patients with severe COVID-19 was 25.1% (95% CI, 20.6–30.2%) (Figure 1B). Temporally, mortality was highest (40% [50/125]; 95% CI, 31.8–48.8%) during the nationwide Delta variant–driven surge in May and June 2021 (11, 12) (Figure 1C). Patients who died frequently received high-level oxygen therapy (median flow rate, 20 L/min) (Figure 1D), with mortality of 52.6% (40/76; 95% CI, 41.5–63.5%) among patients who received ⩾15 L/min during admission. Estimates of the proportion of symptomatic patients with severe COVID-19 and related mortality were consistent across multiple assumptions about missing data and when severe COVID-19 was defined by receipt of oxygen therapy alone (Table 2).
Discussion
In a large cohort of patients hospitalized with symptomatic COVID-19 in Uganda, most of whom were young adults, we observed a high frequency of severe illness. Despite provision of locally maximal oxygen therapy, corticosteroids, and empiric antibacterial agents, mortality among the severely ill was substantial, comparable to if not higher than that reported among patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 in high-income countries (13–16).
Although early reports suggested that COVID-19–related morbidity and mortality in SSA were low, the frequency of severe COVID-19 and related mortality in our cohort were high (17–19). For patients who received ⩾15 L/min of oxygen therapy, outcomes were similar to those reported for adults with severe COVID-19 requiring IMV in high-income countries, with hospital mortality >50% (20). These findings emphasize the urgent need for improved vaccine coverage in Uganda and the African region, where only 20.8% and 17.3% of the population were fully vaccinated, respectively, as of June 10, 2022 (2).
More than 25% of all hospitalized patients received oxygen therapy, many at flow rates that are difficult to sustain without piped oxygen. As has been stressed throughout the pandemic, this observation highlights the profound need to improve oxygen delivery, a core component of acute care, throughout SSA (21, 22). Furthermore, because higher-level respiratory support (e.g., high-flow nasal oxygen, CPAP, IMV) necessitates consistent supplies of oxygen and electricity, strengthening basic health system infrastructure remains essential to raise the standard of intra- and interpandemic acute care in the region.
Our study has limitations. First, our findings are derived from a single center, albeit one that received patients with COVID-19 referred nationwide, with monthly admission rates that reflected national trends (12). Second, there were substantial missing data for respiratory rate, necessitating imputation. However, our findings were consistent across case definitions and assumptions about missing data. Third, although we determined hospital vital status for all analyzed patients, future studies are needed to characterize longer-term outcomes of COVID-19 in SSA.
The frequency of severe COVID-19 and related mortality in Uganda during 2020–2021 were substantial. Improvements in vaccine deployment and acute-care capacity are imperative to avoid preventable COVID-19–related morbidity and mortality in SSA.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgment
The authors thank the patients enrolled in this study, their families, and their fellow clinicians for providing outstanding clinical care despite considerable personal risk.
Members of the Collaboration for Clinical and Laboratory Characterization of COVID-19 in Uganda are as follows: National Influenza Center, Department of Arbovirology, Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda (Barnabas Bakamutumaho, Nicholas Owor, John Kayiwa, Mercy Haumba, Joyce Namulondo, Timothy Byaruhanga, Julius J. Lutwama, Joweria Nakaseegu, Jocelyn Kiconco, Annet Nankya, Irene Ataliba, Samuel Wavamuno); Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Program, Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda (Stephen Balinandi, Luke Nyakaruhuka, Jimmy Baluku, Alex Tumusiime, Jackson Kyondo, Sophia Mulei, Kilama Kamugisha, Gloria Akurut, Diana Nahamya); Immunisable Diseases Unit/Expanded Programme on Immunisation Laboratory, Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda (Peter Eliku, Phiona Tushabe, Joshua Buule, Joseph Gaizi, Prossy Namuwulya, Arnold Mugaga, Mary Nyacho, Henry Bukenya, Josephine Bwogi); European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership–Eastern Africa Consortium for Clinical Research, Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda (Benjamin Watyaba, Bernard Kikaire); Entebbe Regional Referral Hospital, Entebbe, Uganda (Moses Muwanga, Christopher Nsereko, Emmanuel Rwamutwe, Irene Nayiga, Stephen Kyebambe, Roselyn Mutonyi, Josephine Achan, Lucy Wanyenze, Alice Ndazarwe, Joseph Shinyale, Ruth Nakanjako, Richard Natuhwera, Annet Nsangi); Uganda Peoples’ Defence Force, Kampala, Uganda (Henry Kyobe Bosa); Public Health Emergency Operations Centre, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda (Felix Ocom); Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda (Noah Kiwanuka, Stevens Kisaka, James Arinaitwe); Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons; Center for Infection and Immunity, Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York (Max R. O’Donnell, Matthew J. Cummings).
Footnotes
A complete list of Collaboration for Clinical and Laboratory Characterization of COVID-19 in Uganda members may be found before the beginning of the References.
Supported by Fogarty International Center MakCHS-Berkeley-Yale Pulmonary Complications of AIDS Research Training (PART) Program grant D43TW009607 (subaward to B.B.); National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences grant UL1TR001873 (subaward to M.R.O’D.); National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant K23AI163364 (M.J.C), National Institutes of Health; and Burroughs Wellcome Fund/American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (M.J.C.).
Author Contributions: M.J.C. and B.B. conceived the study and its design. B.B., J.J.L., N.O., J. Kayiwa, J. Kiconco, M.M., C.N., E.R., I.N., S. Kyebambe, M.H., B.W., and B.K. collected, organized, and entered clinical data. M.J.C. and B.B. performed statistical analyses. B.B., H.K.B., F.O., S. Kisaka, N.K., M.R.O’D., and M.J.C. contributed to data analysis and interpretation. M.J.C. and B.B. drafted the manuscript. All authors critically revised the drafted manuscript and approved of the final manuscript.
Author disclosures are available with the text of this letter at www.atsjournals.org.
Contributor Information
Members of the Collaboration for Clinical and Laboratory Characterization of COVID-19 in Uganda:
Barnabas Bakamutumaho, Nicholas Owor, John Kayiwa, Mercy Haumba, Joyce Namulondo, Timothy Byaruhanga, Julius J. Lutwama, Joweria Nakaseegu, Jocelyn Kiconco, Annet Nankya, Irene Ataliba, Samuel Wavamuno, Stephen Balinandi, Luke Nyakaruhuka, Jimmy Baluku, Alex Tumusiime, Jackson Kyondo, Sophia Mulei, Kilama Kamugisha, Gloria Akurut, Diana Nahamya, Peter Eliku, Phiona Tushabe, Joshua Buule, Joseph Gaizi, Prossy Namuwulya, Arnold Mugaga, Mary Nyacho, Henry Bukenya, Josephine Bwogi, Benjamin Watyaba, Bernard Kikaire, Moses Muwanga, Christopher Nsereko, Emmanuel Rwamutwe, Irene Nayiga, Stephen Kyebambe, Roselyn Mutonyi, Josephine Achan, Lucy Wanyenze, Alice Ndazarwe, Joseph Shinyale, Ruth Nakanjako, Richard Natuhwera, Annet Nsangi, Henry Kyobe Bosa, Felix Ocom, Noah Kiwanuka, Stevens Kisaka, James Arinaitwe, Max R. O’Donnell, and Matthew J. Cummings
References
- 1. Edem B, Williams V, Onwuchekwa C, Umesi A, Calnan M. COVID-19-related research in Africa: a cross-sectional review of the International Clinical Trial Registration Platform (ICTRP) Trials . 2021;22:682. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05621-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention https://africacdc.org/COVID-19-vaccination/.
- 3. Tessema GA, Kinfu Y, Dachew BA, Tesema AG, Assefa Y, Alene KA, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic and healthcare systems in Africa: a scoping review of preparedness, impact and response. BMJ Glob Health . 2021;6:e007179. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rice BL, Annapragada A, Baker RE, Bruijning M, Dotse-Gborgbortsi W, Mensah K, et al. Variation in SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks across sub-Saharan Africa. Nat Med . 2021;27:447–453. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01234-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ministry of Health. https://www.health.go.ug/cause/national-guidelines-for-management-of-COVID-19/
- 6.Ministry of Health. https://psu.or.ug/3rd-edition-national-guidelines-for-COVID-19/
- 7.ISARIC-WHO. https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2015/08/ISARIC-WHO-SARICaseRecordForm21JUL15.SPRINT-SARI.pdf
- 8.World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-clinical-2021-2
- 9. van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw . 2011;45:1–67. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lott A, Reiter JP. Wilson confidence intervals for binomial proportions with multiple imputation for missing data. Am Stat . 2020;74:109–115. [Google Scholar]
- 11.World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa. https://www.afro.who.int/news/rife-COVID-19-variants-fuel-africas-surging-wave
- 12.World Health Organization. http://COVID19.who.int/region/afro/country/ug/
- 13. Roth GA, Emmons-Bell S, Alger HM, Bradley SM, Das SR, de Lemos JA, et al. Trends in patient characteristics and COVID-19 in-hospital mortality in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open . 2021;4:e218828. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Gray WK, Navaratnam AV, Day J, Wendon J, Briggs TWR. COVID-19 hospital activity and in-hospital mortality during the first and second waves of the pandemic in England: an observational study. Thorax . 2021 doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Piroth L, Cottenet J, Mariet AS, Bonniaud P, Blot M, Tubert-Bitter P, et al. Comparison of the characteristics, morbidity, and mortality of COVID-19 and seasonal influenza: a nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med . 2021;9:251–259. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30527-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Taniguchi Y, Kuno T, Komiyama J, Adomi M, Suzuki T, Abe T, et al. Comparison of patient characteristics and in-hospital mortality between patients with COVID-19 in 2020 and those with influenza in 2017-2020: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study in Japan. Lancet Reg Health West Pac . 2022;20:100365. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Njenga MK, Dawa J, Nanyingi M, Gachohi J, Ngere I, Letko M, et al. Why is there low morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 in Africa? Am J Trop Med Hyg . 2020;103:564–569. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Lawal Y. Africa’s low COVID-19 mortality rate: a paradox? Int J Infect Dis . 2021;102:118–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.10.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Bakamutumaho B, Cummings MJ, Owor N, Kayiwa J, Namulondo J, Byaruhanga T, et al. Collaboration for Clinical and Laboratory Characterization of COVID-19 in Uganda Severe COVID-19 in Uganda across two epidemic phases: a prospective cohort study. Am J Trop Med Hyg . 2021;105:740–744. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lim ZJ, Subramaniam A, Ponnapa Reddy M, Blecher G, Kadam U, Afroz A, et al. Case fatality rates for patients with COVID-19 requiring invasive mechanical ventilation: a meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med . 2021;203:54–66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2405OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Nakkazi E. Oxygen supplies and COVID-19 mortality in Africa. Lancet Respir Med . 2021;9:e39. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00087-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Stein F, Perry M, Banda G, Woolhouse M, Mutapi F. Oxygen provision to fight COVID-19 in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Glob Health . 2020;5:e002786. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]