Abstract
Chemokines are well equipped with chemo-attractive signals that can regulate cancer cell trafficking to specific organ sites. Currently, updated concepts have revealed the diverse role of chemokines in the biology of cancer initiation and progression. Genomic instabilities and alterations drive tumor heterogeneity, providing more options for the selection and metastatic progression to cancer cells. Tumor heterogeneity and acquired drug resistance are the main obstacles in managing cancer therapy and the primary root cause of metastasis. Studies emphasize that multiple chemokine/receptor axis are involved in cancer cell-mediated organ-specific distant metastasis. One of the persuasive mechanisms for heterogeneity and subsequent events is sturdily interlinked with the crosstalk between chemokines and their receptors on cancer cells and tissue-specific microenvironment. Among different metastatic niches, skeletal metastasis is frequently observed in the late stages of prostate, breast, and lung cancer and significantly reduces the survival of cancer patients. Therefore, it is crucial to elucidate the role of chemokines and their receptors in metastasis and bone remodeling. Here, we review the potential chemokine/receptor axis in tumorigenesis, tumor heterogeneity, metastasis, and vicious cycle in bone microenvironment.
Keywords: Chemokines, Cancer, Tumor heterogeneity, Drug resistance, Bone metastasis
1. Introduction
Chemokines were initially discovered as chemoattractant cytokines that could regulate leukocyte trafficking to distant organ sites [1]. Cancer cells express chemokine receptors and migrate towards organ-specific sites according to their chemokine gradient [2]. The non-random migration of cancer cells is regulated by several factors, including the organ’s anatomical location, blood circulation pattern, tumor-intrinsic factors, and the interaction between tumor cells and the microenvironment of the metastatic sites [3]. Therefore, it is logical to anticipate that chemokines are the key metastatic defining factors. The movement and accumulation of immune cells at the tumor site start after the attachment of chemokines to the specific receptors and participate in the regulation of immune surveillance, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis [4–6].
Previously, the major role of chemokines was predicted as an essential regulator of immune cell trafficking. However, the concepts are currently updated with crucial roles of chemokines in the biology of non-immune cell-mediated pathological conditions, including cancer initiation and progression (Fig. 1) [1]. Chemokines can regulate the expression of many growth and angiogenic factors in the tumor microenvironment [7], and additionally, they can direct the cancer cell movement required for metastasis [8]. Genome sequencing analysis revealed that tumor cells have diverse genetic profiles due to the frequent somatic alterations with high mutation frequencies in proto-oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and some other crucial genes associated with the poor prognosis of cancer patients [9]. Individual genetic makeup and genomic instability foster phenotypic and genetic diversity in cancer cells, contributing to tumor heterogeneity and become more heterogeneous over time. This tumor heterogeneity drives the resistance and metastatic capability of tumor cells [10]. Chemokines and their receptors facilitate the communication between disseminated tumor cells with the microenvironment of distant metastatic organ sites for organ-specific transmigration, seeding, and colonization [11]. Bone metastasis is one of the inclusive examples of organ-specific metastasis, where cancer cells imbalance the bone homeostasis and start a vicious cycle followed by dysregulated bone remodeling. Bone is the most common site for prostate, breast, and lung cancer metastasis [12]. It is important to note that it can rarely be cured once cancer metastasizes to the bones. Consequently, it reduces the life expectancy of cancer patients and often causes limb dysfunction, pathological fractures, spinal cord compression, and severe pain [13–17]. Bone metastatic cells are the malignant tumor cells of the extraosseous organ or tissue that metastasize to the bone via the lymphatic system, which can either be dormant or continue to grow and start a vicious cycle in the bone microenvironment [18,19]. Bone remodeling starts with the expression of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa-B ligand (RANKL) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) inside the bone marrow compartment [20]. It initiates the differentiation of osteoclast precursors to osteoclast. The ratio of osteoblast (bone formation) and osteoclast (bone resorption) follow a tight regulation which is crucial to maintain the consistency of bone mass [21]. An imbalance in bone homeostasis leads to pathophysiological conditions, including osteoporosis, heterotopic ossification, and bone fragility [22]. Therefore, it is necessary to gain in-depth knowledge to improve the expectancy and quality of cancer patient’s life. Here, we would like to focus on chemokines networks/axis in different types of cancer, tumor heterogeneity, drug resistance, and bone metastasis, followed by a vicious cycle of bone remodeling.
Fig. 1. Major chemokines/receptor axis involved in malignancy:

This illustration explains the multifaceted roles of chemokine ligands and their receptors in various malignancies. Many chemokines can bind to multiple receptors, and a single receptor can bind to multiple chemokines. Most of the chemokine axis facilitate proliferation, invasion, migration, and bone metastasis. Interaction and activation of different axis have been shown in different colors with major consequences in breast, prostate, and lung tumorigenesis. Other types of cancer cells have different profiles of chemokine-receptor expression, but CXCR4 is most common among breast, prostate and lung cancers.
2. Chemokines/cytokines: types and functions
Chemokines are a small family of chemoattractant cytokines (small molecules of polypeptides with a molecular weight of 8–10 kDa). They are produced by various immunocytes, tumor cells, and normal tissue of different organs in response to infections and are involved in tumor growth and progression [23,24]. Chemokines bind to the specific receptors, particularly the seven-transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptor of target cells, and control numerous biological and pathological processes. A single chemokine can bind with multiple receptors and vice versa [25]. Approximately 50 chemokines have been detected so far and based on the number and location of N-terminal cysteine molecules; chemokines can be classified into four subfamilies: CC, CXC, C, and CX3C. The CC subfamily has a broad chemotactic spectrum/chemokines effect on various immunocytes (monocytes, basophils, eosinophils, T lymphocytes, dendritic cells) and cancer cells. It represents the most significant subgroup with 28 members (CCL1 to CCL28). The CXC chemokines subfamily comprises 16 members (CXCL1 to CXCL16) and, based on EβLR motifs (glutamic acid, leucine, and arginine), can be further divided into two subgroups ELR+ve and ELR−ve [26]. This CXC subfamily of chemokines plays a direct/indirect role in either promotion (ELR+ve) or Inhibition (ELR−ve) of angiogenesis [27]. Furthermore, the C subfamily of chemokines contains only two members, including XCL1 and XCL2, while CX3CL1 is the only known member in the CX3C subfamily chemokines [28]. To date, more than 20 chemokine receptors have been identified and classified according to the different chemokine subfamily or ligands, i.e., CC receptor (CCR), CXC receptor (CXCR), C receptor (CR), and CX3C receptor (CX3CR) [29]. The expression of chemokine receptors is not limited to macrophages, neutrophils, or inflammatory cells, but some endothelial and tumor-derived epithelial cells also express these receptors [30]. In addition to the above chemokine receptors, some other kinds of chemokine receptors are also expressed on stromal cells called atypical chemokine receptors (ACKR). These receptors do not participate either in cell migration or activation, but they can hamper the availability and function of chemokines by scavenging them either by limiting their spatial availability or remove them from in vivo sites [31]. Though they are not participating in migration and cell activation, they are essential molecules in health and numerous diseases. Four groups of ACKR have been identified, including ACKR1, ACKR2, ACKR3, and ACKR4 [32].
Similar to chemokines, cytokines are a diverse family of low molecular weight proteins involved in cellular signaling pathways [33]. Generally, cytokines act as immuno-modulators in all manners, including autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine signaling [34]. Based on their origin and involvement, cytokines are broadly categorized in chemokines, interferons, interleukins, lymphokines, and tumor necrosis factors (TNF) [35]. Cytokines play crucial roles in the prevention of diseases, specifically in host immune responses to the infection and cancer [36]. It acts through cell surface receptors and can modulate humoral and cell-based immune responses [37]. Specific cytokines can be produced by more than one type of cells [26] and are released in response to different cellular stresses, including infection, inflammation, and carcinogen-induced injury [36]. The vital function of cytokines is to stimulate a host response to diminish cellular stress and subsequent damages [38]. Host reaction to cellular stress can impact tumor initiation and progression. Based on function, cytokines can be categorized into five major groups, including interleukins (IL), tumor necrosis factors (TNF), interferons (IFN), and colony-stimulating factors (CSF). Interleukins are the primary group in cytokines containing 12 members IL-1 to IL-12 [39]. In addition, cytokines can be further classified into the following three groups based on the nature of immune responses: adaptive immunity; pro- and anti-inflammatory signaling. In adaptive immunity, common γ chain receptor ligands, common β chain (CD131) receptor ligands, shared IL-2β chain (CD122) and shared receptors are usually involved in adaptive immunity while IL-1, IL-6, TNFα, Type I, II and III IFN cytokines are involved in pro-inflammatory signaling, whereas IL-10 and IL-12 cytokines participate in anti-inflammatory signaling pathway [35].
3. Chemokines helter-skelter in cancer
In the present scenario, it is well established that chemokines and their receptors participate in cancer progression. However, the regulatory mechanisms related to chemokines/receptors are still unclear [40]. After rigorous studies, researchers came to know that chemokines and their receptors are intensively involved in the process of metastasis [41, 42]. Metastasis is very dynamic and selective towards the specific organ, and different molecular axis is involved in various cancers, including breast, prostate, and lung cancer (Figs. 1 & 2). In addition to the role of chemokines in cancer, cytokines also participate in tumorigenesis, angiogenesis, metastatic niche formation, and bone remodeling.
Fig. 2. Chemokines-mediated tumorigenesis and bone tropism in lung, breast, and prostate cancers:

Chemokines directly affect the tumor microenvironment during the cancer progression. Involvement of chemokines in the different stages of cancer metastasis, such as angiogenesis, extravasation, and colonization to the distant organ or bone site (sequentially illustrated from left to right). Among all, the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis is significantly involved in the entire metastatic process. In contrast, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and CXCL8 majority participate in angiogenesis, while CCL2 and CCL5 drive metastasis and extravasation.
Statistically, in the year 2020, 19.3 million new cancer cases and 10 million cancer deaths were recorded worldwide. Briefly, female breast cancer (BC) 11.7 % (6.9 % deaths), lung cancer (LC) 11.4 % (18 % deaths), and prostate cancer (PCa) 7.3 % (3.8 % deaths) were the most common types [43]. However, in 2021, 1,898,160 new cancer cases are registered in the United States, out of which 608,570 cancer deaths are projected [44]. According to the American cancer society data, about 350,000 cancer patients die each year in the United States from bone metastasis [45]. The prevalence of bone metastasis among all metastatic cancer was 88.74 % in the PCa, 53.71 % in the BC, and 34.56 % in LC [45]. These three-carcinomas accounts for more than 80 % of patients with metastatic bone disease. Most cancer cells predominantly metastasize to axial skeletal including spine (87 %), ribs (77 %), pelvis (63 %), and humeri and femora (53 %), as well as the skull (35 %) [46]. In this section, we focus on the role of chemokines in the initiation and progression of various cancers which includes breast, prostate and lung and their metastatic potential.
3.1. Chemokines/receptors role in breast cancer and metastasis
Recent studies have elucidated the role of chemokine receptor CCR1 in human breast invasive ductal carcinoma is dependent on epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulation. For EGF mediated stimulation, a signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is required to activate the promoter of CCR1 via AKT-mTOR-STAT3 signaling and mediates invasion and metastasis of BC [47]. However, CCR2 chemokine receptors are potentially involved in the progression of early-stage BC and correlate with their invasive potential. The over-expression of CCR2 can enhance the invasion and viability of AUW225 BC cells [48]. Chemokine CCL2 can also induce and recruit the CCR2 expressing macrophages and promote metastasis in BC cells [49]. Specifically, CCR2/CCL2 axis mediates the p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and SMAD3 pathways for cancer cell growth, invasion, and metastasis [50]. CCR4 is expressed differentially in human BC cell lines, and CCR4 over-expression is highly associated with metastasis. The expression of CCR4 is positively correlated to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), which results in tumor relapse and metastasis to lymph nodes, lungs, and bones [51]. Furthermore, BC metastasis can be modulated by the activation of CCL5 and is dependent on the interaction with CCR5 [52]. Zhang et al. delineated the role of CCL5 in the metastasis and primary tumor load in the MMTV-PYMT transgenic BC mouse model, where CCL5/CCR3 signaling promotes pulmonary metastasis and tumor burden by inducing Th2 polarization of CD4+ T cells [53]. It has been evidenced that the CCR7 is highly expressed in triple-negative BC cells. In addition to that, ligands (CCL19 and CCL21) of CCR7 are also highly expressed in the lymph nodes of BC patients. At the same time, the rate of proliferation and metastasis is significantly reduced in the absence of CCR7 in BC cells [54,55]. Later, the triple-negative BC metastatic mouse model revealed that the knockout of CCR7 and CCR4 reduced the metastasis of 4T1 cells to the lymph node [56].
Similarly, the CXC family of chemokines and their receptors are also involved in signal transduction for BC metastasis. The involvement of CXCR1 was identified in the proliferation of cancer stem cells (CSCs) of HER-2-negative BC, and Inhibition of CXCR1 with allosteric inhibitor reparixin reduces the CSC population in the xenograft mouse model [57]. Likewise, Interleukin-8 (IL-8) can play a crucial role in the regulation of BC metastasis. Nannuru et al. studied the role of IL-8 and CXCR2 in the progression, migration, invasion, and metastasis of breast mesenchymal stem cells, bone metastasis, and tumor microenvironment [58,59]. Several clinical studies showed a high correlation between CXCR2 and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2), promoting BC metastasis and chemoresistance via down-regulating E-cadherin and β-catenin in cancer tissues [60]. At the same time, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and the CXCL1/CXCR2 axis promote BC metastasis via NF-κB/SRY-related HMG-box (SOX4) activation [61]. During tumor progression or malignant transformation, chemokines can trigger several signaling pathways. In the 4T1 mouse model of BC, secretion of CXCL10 is gradually increased and is involved in the regulation of cancer cell growth via NF-kB signaling [62]. Chemokine receptor CXCR4 is intensively involved in the tumorigenesis of BC. Previous studies revealed that CXCL12/CXCR4 axis fosters the metastasis of BC cells by natural selection. Moreover, CXCR4 participates in drug resistance by interfering with the recruitment of transcription factors p53 and death receptor 5 (DR5) or TRAIL receptor 2 (TRAILR2) [63,64].
Likewise, over-expression of CXCR6 in BC mediates cancer cell invasion and metastasis, whereas silencing CXCR6 using shRNA reduces cancer-promoting abilities. CXCR6/ERK1/2/RhoA/cofilin/F-actin pathway is involved in BC tumorigenesis and metastasis [65]. Furthermore, the indirect contribution of CXCR7 has been revealed in the regulation of CXCR4 expression on BC cells. CXCR7 acts as a scavenging receptor for CXCL12 and also upregulates the CXCR4 expression and develops the BC metastasis in CXCR7ΔEND/ΔEND mice [66,67]. Additionally, CXCR7/CXCL12 axis strongly supports BC cell survival with mesenchymal stromal stem cell-derived factors in the tumor microenvironment [68]. In vitro experiment shows that tamoxifen treatment increases the external secretion of CXCL16, which prompts the ability of migration and invasion of MCF-7 BC cells mediated by G-protein coupled receptors 30 [69]. In addition to the direct action on tumor metastasis, chemokines and their receptors influence the infiltration and recruitment of immune cells to create favorable conditions for metastasis. For example, the atypical chemokine receptor 2 (ACKR2) constrains the expression of CCR2 and prevents the infiltration of natural killer cells into the tumor site resulting in facilitating metastasis [70]. Atypical chemokines and their receptors may also participate as a component in the regulatory network for tumorigenesis [71]. Due to the frequent and critical involvement of chemokines and their receptors in breast carcinoma, rigorous attention has been paid to understand the complex phenomenon, including tumor heterogeneity, resistance, recurrence, and metastasis in the tumor microenvironment.
3.2. Chemokines/receptors role in prostate cancer and metastasis
In PCa progression and metastasis, several chemokines are extensively involved. The binding of CCL5 with CCR1 enhances the invasiveness of taxane-resistant PCa cells, via ERK and Rac activation and secretion of MMPs 2 and 9 [72]. Furthermore, the role of CXCR1 in PCa has been revealed by silencing its expression using RNA interference mechanisms. It was shown that CXCR1 is involved in tumor growth and makes androgen-independent, and IL-8 mediated growth of PCa cells [73]. In advanced PCa, blocking of CXCR2 deteriorates aggressiveness and induces senescence. Further, CXCR2 plays an essential role in infiltrating tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in the tumor microenvironment [74]. Shen et al. delineated the potential role of CXCR3 in the proliferation and invasion of PCa cells. Abnormal expression of CXCR3 elevates the expression of phospholipase C (PLCβ), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-1), and MMP-3 in vitro, indicating the role of CXCR3 in PCa cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis through activation of the PCLβ signaling pathway [75]. Recently, novel crosstalk between CXCR4 and phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase IIIα (PI4KIIIα) has been well established in PCa cells. Furthermore, SILAC-based quantitative proteomic analysis of PCa cells identified the PI4KIIIα and SAC1 phosphatase as potential regulators for CXCR4 expression [76]. Likewise, CXCR5 over-expression and its interaction with CXCL13 in PCa positively correlate with progression, migration, and invasion. Aberrant expression of oncogenic PKCε, a member of the PKC family, and loss of the tumor suppressor PTEN are involved in PCa cells migration and tumorigenesis [77]. Elevated expression of CXCR6 is also associated with PCa invasiveness and tumor growth. However, the CXCR6-CXCL16 axis promotes drug resistance and acts as a counter-defense mechanism [78]. The expression of some angiogenic factors such as IL-8 or VEGF is induced by CXCR6 over-expression. The CXCR6/CXCL16/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) circuit is mainly involved in PCa tumorigenesis and angiogenesis [79]. One of the pioneer’s studies addressed the role of CXCR7 with CXCL12 in PCa. CXCR7 functions as a chemokine receptor for CXCL12 and, similar to CXCR6, regulates the IL-8 or VEGF expression and activates the AKT pathways resulting in cancer invasion and angiogenesis [80]. In castration-resistance PCa (CRPC), CXCR7 over-expression activates the MAPK pathways that develop drug resistance even for second-generation antiandrogen (enzalutamide) therapy. Further, elevated CXCR7 levels activate ligand-independent MAPK/ERK signaling in enzalutamide resistance [81]. Lastly, CX3CR1 and its cognate ligand CXCL1/fractalkine regulate the PCa cell adhesion, migration, and survival. CX3CR1 expression also enhances the perineural invasion, dissemination, and metastasis of PCa [84]. CX3CR1 receptors are involved in the activation of endothelium results in tumor cell adhesion and neural tropism. Direct correlation of this chemokine receptor with neuronal invasiveness and bone metastasis was supported by over-expression of CX3CR1 in human pancreatic and BC cells. In contrast to the normal prostate gland epithelial tissue, the CX3CR1 over-expressed in PCa malignancy.
3.3. Chemokines/receptors role in lung cancer and metastasis
Likewise, the role of chemokines is also associated with lung tumorigenesis. In a CCR1 knockdown study using RNA-mediated interference, the invasiveness of human non-small cell LC (NSCLC) has been significantly suppressed with reduced expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) [82]. However, another study suggests crosstalk between tumor-associated macrophages and cancer cells via CCR2/CCL2 and CX3CR1/CX3CL1 axis are fundamental mechanisms for driving LC. Macrophage depletion using clodronate and genetic ablation of CCR2 and CX3CR1 reduced tumor growth and metastasis in vivo [83]. Similarly, inhibition of CCR4 by miR-532–5p induces apoptosis and reduces the invasiveness, and the metastatic capability of LC cells confirming the role of CCR4 in LC tumorigenesis [84]. However, CCL5/CCR5 axis is also reported in LC metastasis in association with immune cell infiltration and poor prognosis. The expression of CCL5 is inversely correlated with miR-147a level (downregulated) in NSCLC, and upregulation suppressed the growth and metastasis [85,86]. Furthermore, CXCR1 interferes with the therapeutic outcome in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment, first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC via JAK/STAT signaling pathway [87]. However, in a previous study, IL-8 and CXCR1 mediate mitogenic function in autocrine/paracrine signaling [88]. Elevated expression of CXCR2 is observed in both LC Stroma and tumor cells, and inhibition of CXCR2 using a selective inhibitor SB225002 promoted apoptosis and increased drug sensitivity corroborate the role of CXCR2 in drug resistance [89]. A very few reports elucidate the involvement of CXCR3 in lung carcinoma. Expression of IL-7 promotes CXCR3/CXCL9/CXCL10 axis-dependent T cell antitumor reactivity in LC [90]. CXCR4 receptor, specifically with CXCL12, is intensively intricate with tumorigenesis, angiogenesis, and metastatic processes in NSCLC. Additionally, CXCR4/STAT3/Slug signaling is operated to maintain radio-resistance in NSCLCs [91]. Whereas CXCR6 and CXCL16 are expressed together in human LC and involved in the regulation of viability and invasion of LC cells. Downregulation of CXCR6 or neutralization of CXCL16 with antibody retards the viability and invasiveness of LC cells in vitro [92]. The expression of CXCR7 is upregulated in LC tissue and enhances cell migration and polarization in vitro. In the xenograft mouse model, CXCR7 accelerates tumor growth and metastasis to the different organs, such as the liver and/or bone marrow [93]. Furthermore, Liu et al. investigated the role of the CX3CR1/CX3CL1 axis in six different human LC cell lines. Activation of this axis significantly potentiates the migration and invasion of LC via Src/focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling pathway [94].
3.4. Cytokines and immune cells in carcinogenesis
Several researchers have examined the tumor susceptibility against chemical carcinogenesis in immuno-deficient mice to delineate the involvement of cytokines and immune cells in carcinogenesis. In a series of findings, growth differentiated factor 15 (GDF15, a divergent member of the transforming growth factor β superfamily) and its cognate receptor, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) family receptor α-like (GFRAL) has been elucidated in obesity. GDF15 signaling requires the interaction of GFRAL with a coreceptor RET to induce weight loss in mice and nonhuman primates [95–99]. Most recently, a pathophysiological role of GDF15 has been elaborated in various tumorigenesis, metastasis, and cachexia [100–107]. Another study demonstrates that impairments in the function of IFN-γ enhanced the susceptibility of tumor formation with a short latency period against polycyclic hydrocarbon methylcholanthrene [108–110]. IFN-γ mediates pleiotropic effects in the innate and adaptive response against infection [111]. Two cytokines IL-12, and IL-23, that stimulate the production of IFN-γ and lack of p40 subunit from these interleukins, enhanced susceptibility of tumor growth in response to chemical carcinogens [112]. With this, mice lacking Stat1 and IFN-γ, and its receptor is also prone to develop tumors against chemical carcinogens [113]. Mice devoid of Natural Killer T (NKT) cells are at risk of developing tumors with chemical carcinogens because NKT cells are one of the critical sources for IFN-γ production [114]. IFN-γ can upregulate the expression of MHC class I expression during cancer development and elicit cell-mediated immunity [115,116].
Furthermore, cell-mediated immunity (recognition and rejection) against tumors from immuno-deficient hosts into post-transplanted wild-type animals reveal to be more sensitive towards carcinogens [117]. Recently, B and T cells deficient mice manifested as increased susceptibility for tumorigenesis after methylcholanthrene (a highly carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) treatment [118]. Bone tissues constitute a persistent site for metastasis in numerous malignancies, including BC, PCa, and LC. Cytokines such as IL-6, VEGF, RANKL, and TGFβ have been crucial in establishing a premetastatic niche, remodeling the bone microenvironment, and viable macro-metastasis [119,120]. It is not essential that all circulating tumor cells survive in the new tissue microenvironment during metastasis. Often, many cells undergo a dormancy state, while others remain as nonviable micro-metastasis [121,122]. Further, VEGF secretion initiated micro-metastasis formation followed by bone metastasis, inducing neovascularization and providing nutrient supply [123]. Additionally, VEGFR-1-positive bone marrow progenitors have been strongly correlated with the initiation of tumor premetastatic niche formation. Indeed, activation of the VEGF/VEGFR axis is crucial for establishing cancer metastasis [124]. Furthermore, angiogenesis and inflammation provide molecular links for the initiation and promotion of cancer. However, the function of angiogenesis for tumor promotion is well established [125]. Next, to understand the involvement of host immunity in tumor suppression, several investigators assessed the tumor incidence in immuno-deficient or knockdown/knockout animal models. Earlier in 1984, it was observed that CD8T cells could recognize the specific antigen of tumor cells, followed by cloning the first definitive tumor antigens [126,127]. Ever since, it became clear that the immune system of humans can detect the antigenic profile of tumors [128,129]. Other limitations are related to the infiltration of cytotoxic T cells into the tumor tissues, and T-cell infiltration into tumors correlates with an improved prognosis for the patient [130,131]. Some advanced therapies have been developed to overcome the limitations of infiltration of cytotoxic T cells, including antigen-specific vaccines or by adoptive transfer of tumor-specific T cells. Even though significant expansions of circulating tumor-specific T cells do not provide long-term benefits [132], importantly, it has been shown that induced or transferred T cells are very proficient and sensitive to eliminating tumor cells in vitro but frequently fail to do so in in vivo settings. In lymphoma-bearing mice, knockout of perforin and double knockout of perforin/interferon enhanced the metastasis rate results in decreased longevity of mice [133]. Likewise, the development of B cell lymphoma is persistent in fas-fas-ligand defective mice, and tumor induction in immuno-deficient mice compared to wild-type mice is very frequent. Similarly, the development of adenocarcinomas of the breast, lung, and colon in double knockout mice (Rag2/Stat1 and Ifn-α/Trp53) is very frequent as compare to wild-type mice [134].
Two different major pathways have been suggested in support of tumor proliferation and endurance of cancer cells by chemokines, including activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP kinase) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway [135]. Chemokines can also promote the tumor cell growth directly by inducing the expression of specific growth-stimulating genes, e.g., cyclin D1, oncogene FOS, and human heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF), and negatively regulates the expression of anti-apoptotic genes Bcl-2 and MDM2 [54,136]. Furthermore, chemokines and their receptors also participate indirectly in tumor growth, invasion, and immuno-suppression by stimulating the infiltration of leukocytes at the tumor sites to promote the secretion of IL-10 and TGF-β [137].
4. Chemokines in bone microenvironment versus vicious cycle and remodeling
The bone microenvironment is tightly regulated and maintains the homeostasis between diverse populations of resident cells and their functions. Bone is a very dynamic connective tissue that provides a physiological scaffold for the skeleton of the human body. Bone is a dwelling place for bone marrow which acts as a production house for postnatal hematopoiesis and a reservoir for minerals and energy (Fig. 3) [138–140]. In many types of malignancy, including BC, PCa, and LC, bone is a preferred metastatic site for homing cancer cells. Tumor cells, invasion, and colonization to the bone site alter the homeostasis of bone formation, and bone resorption leads to bone remodeling and, finally, the consequences of bone destruction. This osteolytic process is driven by several mediators such as RANKL and other factors which facilitate the expansion of metastasizing cancer cells in this niche [141,142]. Several chemokine family members were found to participate actively in bone remodeling in standard and malignant conditions [12,141–144].
Fig. 3. Bone homeostasis versus vicious cycle of bone metastasis:

Contribution of chemokines/cytokines in seeding and soiling of cancer cells in the bone microenvironment. (A) Normal bone homeostasis has been depicted on the left side, where a balance between bone formation and resorption has been shown with well-regulated RANK, RANKI, and OPG Systems. (B) Metastasis of cancer cells releases several factors such as IL-6, PTH-rP, MCSF, VEGF, MCP-1/CCL2, TGF-β, and RANKL in the bone microenvironment modulate the activities of osteoclasts and osteoblasts or bone homeostasis. In addition, bone cells also release pro-survival factors such as TGF-β, VEGF, IGFs to facilitate the growth of cancer cells with the bone microenvironment. This altered modeling starts a vicious cycle that promotes tumor cell growth and alteration in bone quality and bone remodeling process. Chemokines that regulate the osteolytic and osteoblastic bone remodeling are depicted on the right lower side.
4.1. Bone microenvironment and remodeling
Bone is metabolically active tissue and maintains homeostasis between bone formation and resorption. The basic multicellular unit is inhabited in the bone microenvironment and contributes to maintaining bone homeostasis. This multicellular unit comprises osteoblasts, osteoclasts, bone lining cells, and osteocytes (Fig. 3A). Osteoblasts participate in bone formation while osteoclasts reabsorb the bone. The function of bone lining cells is poorly defined, but these cells cover most of the endosteal bone surface [145]. Osteocytes are composed of almost 90 % of all bone cells and can regulate osteoclast and osteoblast activity. The osteocyte is a source of soluble factors and plays a role in both phosphate metabolism and calcium availability [146]. Mesenchymal origin cells, including osteoblasts, pre-adipocytes, chondrocytes, express osteocalcin, and adiponectin to varying stages of differentiation [147–150]. Additionally, osteoblastic monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) or CCL2 mediates the anabolic and catabolic effect of parathyroid hormone in bone [151,152]. Chondrocytes, adipocytes, hematopoietic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), fibroblasts, CXCL12-abimdant reticulocytes (CAR) cells, endothelial cells, pericytes, and nerve cells are also residing in the bone microenvironment [153–155]. Bone matrix which provides a healthy support to bone residing cells and play a crucial role in bone homeostasis, by regulating the level of growth factors, inorganic salts, and organic components [156,157]. Recently, it is revealed that the bone marrow endothelium, adipocytes, and immune cells infiltration also contribute to bone homeostasis. Aging and several diseases including cancer can imbalance the delicate bone homeostasis and create a structural defect and change the bone “soil” [158]. Different types of cells are involved in the formation and resorption of bone tissue. The primary cells which participate in bone formation are osteoblasts. These cells secrete extracellular matrix proteins, including type I collagen, osteopontin, osteocalcin, and alkaline phosphatase. The skeletal lineages towards the specification of osteoblast can be differentiated into three different stages: osteoprogenitor, pre-osteoblast, and osteoblast [159–161]. Furthermore, the differentiation of osteoblast requires a multitude of steps from stem cell differentiation to mature osteoblast. Two different kinds of stem cells, i.e., mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and skeletal stem cells (SSCs), differentiate into osteoblast individually. These cells are involved in bone tissue formation and mineralization [159]. Still, the relationship between these two stem cell populations has not been precisely determined. Another category of cells, including osteoclasts and osteocytes, regulate bone resorption. Osteoclasts are derived from the pre-osteoclasts cells that differentiate to form macrophages and monocytes [162]. Briefly, osteoclasts are large and multi-nucleated cells and are mainly involved in the resorption of bone. These cells are originated from hemopoietic lineage and differentiated into osteoclast with the interaction of macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) and RANKL. M-CSF and RANKL are required for the proliferation and differentiation of osteoclast precursors, respectively, and RANKL deficiency hinders the bone resorption in mice [163]. Together with this, we emphasize the role of chemokines and cytokines in bone metastasis and vicious cycle of remodeling.
4.2. Chemokines and bone metastasis
Several studies have been done to elucidate the role of chemokines in bone metastasis. The CCR2 receptor mediated CCL2/CCR2 axis significantly contributes to the growth of PCa cells in the bone [164,165]. CCL2 mediated expansion of bone metastasis is facilitated by CCR2+ve stromal cells, specifically in the case of PCa and BC bone metastasis. Chemotaxis of PCa cells is motivated by CCL2, suggesting the possible involvement of CCL2 in bone-specific migration of PCa cells [166]. Together with CCL2, RANKL, a receptor activator of NF-κB ligand, was reported to involve in the process of bone resorption by osteoclastogenesis and homing of cancer cells in PCa and BC bone metastasis, respectively [165,167,168]. However, another study suggests that the up regulation of CCL2/CCR2 accompanies PCa progression, metastasis, and relapse [169]. Additionally, PCa cells trigger the destructive cascade of osteoblastic CCL2 production in the bone microenvironment for metastatic progression. Further, CCL2 mediated destructive cascade (osteoclastogenesis) has been shown by injecting PCa cells in the tibia of mice [74]. The perturbation of bone marrow by bone marrow-suppressive chemotherapeutic drug cyclophosphamide mediates a transient increase in myeloid cells and myelogenic cytokines with CCL2, IL-6, and VEGF-A create a receptive microenvironment for PCa bone metastasis. Interestingly, anti-CCL2 antibody treatment significantly attenuates the tumor growth in the bone metastatic site [170]. The addition of CCL2 induces the expression of CCR4 together with CCL22 in PCa cells, and the CCR4/CCL17/CCL22 axis enhances the invasion and migration potential via phosphorylation of Akt [171]. Likewise, a comparative study of gene expression between PCa cell lines and tumors in immune-competent mice evidenced that the activation of the CCR5 signaling axis and blocking with CCR5 antagonist (maraviroc) reduces the bone metastatic potential of v-Src oncogene–transformed metastatic PCa cell lines [172]. CXCL10 and its receptor CXCR3 encourage BC bone metastasis and osteoclast activation, results in an increased rate of bone resorption in cancer patients. CXCL12/CXCR4 axis regulates cell migration and is a critical mediator of PCa bone metastasis. Another chemokine receptor, CX3CR1, is utilized by BC cells for extravasation from blood circulation, seeding, and colonization at skeletal metastatic site [173]. The abundant CX3CR1 expression is necessary for the adhesion of the tumor cells to endothelium, whereas mutated CX3CR1 mice show adhesion deficiency and abrogate tumor cell recruitment to the bone [75]. Due to the same axis in differentiated osteoblast, the CXCL1/CX3CR1 axis is intensively involved in PCa bone tropism. In an in vitro study, PCa cells migrate towards a medium conditioned by osteoblasts, which secrete the soluble form of the chemokine [174]. It is also elucidated that androgens facilitate the extravasation of CX3CRl+ve PCa cells towards the CXCL1 concentration gradient in the bone marrow [175]. The CX3CR1-CXCL1 axis activates EGFR-dependent SRC/FAK pathway and induces the migration of PCa cells towards the bone tissue [176]. In a comparative study with one hundred LC patients (between with and without bone metastasis), the CX3CL1–CX3CR1 axis activation is positively correlated with bone metastasis [177].
4.3. Chemokines and vicious bone cycle
The arrival of cancer cells (seeding) can induce chaos in the bone microenvironment by disrupting normal homeostasis (Fig. 3A) and start a vicious cycle. Several metastasized tumor cells die in the bone microenvironment, and some of them can be in a dormant state for years. In contrast, some tumor cells silently start to change the bone microenvironment as preparing the soil for proliferation. The vicious cycle develops either osteolytic (abnormal bone resorption by osteoclastogenesis) or osteoblastic (ossification by osteoblastogenesis) remodeling [178]. Osteolytic lesions provide suitable niches for tumor cells to communicate with nearby cells (e.g., osteoclast progenitor cells, pe-osteoclasts, mesenchymal cells, and pre-osteoblast cells). Several factors, including chemokines and multistep processes, are involved in starting a vicious cycle, and because of that, bone metastasis is frequently observed in the late stages of cancer. But once cancer cells metastasize to the bone, they become incurable [141]. Metastasized tumor cells produce multiple chemokines and eventually start osteolytic or osteoblastic bone remodeling followed by a vicious cycle, as indicated in Fig 3B. Pathologically activated osteolytic lesions and numerous growth factors from damaged bone matrix accelerate vicious cycle and release large amounts of calcium ions resulting in the maturation of osteoclasts and bone resorption [179].
Additionally, bone is highly vascularized with the network of sinusoidal endothelial cells pervade through the bone marrow and cortical surface lined up with the cortical surface forming arteries and arterioles. Understanding the network interplay is critical as bone provides an avenue for tumor cell migration and homing. In the bone marrow, sinusoidal and arterial endothelial cells are the significant populations. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) data also revealed a complex transcriptional heterogeneity among bone endothelial populations reacting deferentially (differences in vessel size and function) in response to different microenvironmental stimuli. Moreover, the bone microenvironment harboring different populations with MSCs facilitates a favorable niche for tumor cell seeding and colonization [180,181]. Diverse populations of MSCs with an elevated leptin receptor (Lepr) and CXCL12 are identified with scRNAseq studies. These cells are also known as Cxcl12-abundant reticular (CAR) cells and are characterized by their distinct morphology of processes wrapping around blood vessels, specifically in the perivascular region in the bone [182]. According to the transcriptional profile, these CAR cells can be primed towards adipogenic or osteogenic lineage with elevated expression of respective markers and designated as adipo-CARs and osteo-CARs [149,150,183]. Several other studies have also enlightened the heterogeneity of the MSCs and assisted in recognizing the specific cell populations involved in bone metastasis and remodeling (Fig. 3). Briefly, studies reported that different tumor cells have an abnormal expression of some specific chemokine receptors. One of the initial studies delineated the role of chemokines in organ-specific metastasis of breast carcinoma. They describe the role of CCR7 and CXCR4 that regulate the invasion and organ-specific metastasis in lung, liver, and bone and the preferred sites positive for CCL21 and CXCL12 (respective ligands for CCR7 and CXCR4) [184]. However, BC cells’ pervasive tendency to metastasize in lungs, bones, and the brain also depends on vascular anatomy. In the case of colorectal cancer, the primary determinant for metastasis is vascular anatomy which dictates metastatic tendency to the liver. Some organs, including the lung, brain, liver, lymph nodes, and bone marrow, are more prone to cancer metastasis, while others such as the kidneys, pancreas, and skin are less prone to metastasis [185].
Further studies showed that a non-metastatic B16 melanoma and lung metastatic cell line lacking with CCR7 expression was directed to metastasized for lymph nodes after CCR7 over-expression [186,187]. Similarly, CXCR4 expression on B16 melanoma cells induced metastasis to the lung [188]. Metastatic cancer cells derived from different cancers can hijack the chemokine receptor system to facilitate cellular migration and triggers bone metastasis at distant sites. However, various cancers acquire another mechanistic axis for bone metastasis in which CXCL12/CXCR4 are very common [185,189]. Additionally, various resident cells of specific organs, e.g., lung cells, secrete CXCL12 and CCL21, directing BC (CXCR4) and melanoma cells (CCR7) to the lung [184]. CCR9/CCL25 is a specific axis with melanoma tumors that shows a rare metastasis to the intestine [190,191].
In this context, under normal physiological conditions, CXCL8 can regulate the production of RANKL via osteoblasts and increase the rate of bone resorption with osteoclast promotion [142,192–194]. Therefore, metastasizing cancer cells acquired the ability to express CXCL8 can induce osteoclastogenesis followed by bone resorption. Indeed, several studies demonstrated that BC cells promoted osteoclastogenesis as indicated by increased generation of TRAP + cells out of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and inhibition of CXCL8 or its receptors down-regulate the process [190,193,195]. A similar in vivo study showed CXCL8 produced in CXCL8-transgenic mice upregulated the osteolysis, whereas antibodies against CXCL8 prevented bone damage and elevated the survival of mice [193]. Additionally, in BC, semaphorin D-mediated induction of IL-8 and LIX/CXCL5 increases osteoclast numbers, and shRNA silencing of semaphorin D reduces the levels of metastasis [194]. In numerous studies, analysis of plasma from BC patients identified a significant correlation between increased CXCL8 levels and a high degree of bone resorption as well as bone metastasis, supporting key roles for CXCL8 in pro-osteoclastogenic activity [193]. In addition to CXCL8, CCL2 and its receptor CCR2 are involved in the physiological bone remodeling process [196]. Activation of CCR2/CCL2 axis supports colonization of BC cells at bone metastatic site by promotion of osteoclast differentiation. Moreover, it was found that MAPK11 (p38β) activation in BC cells has given rise to elevated CCL2 production, which then contributed to increased bone resorption [193, 197,198]. Axis related to the CXCL12-CXCR4 pair, CCL5, and CCL3, and their shared receptors CCR1 and CCR5 are more complex, regulating bone remodeling in cancer. CXCL12-CXCR4 axis is of particular interest because CXCL12 was found to promote bone resorption under different pathophysiological conditions. In parallel, it is a leading factor in driving tumor cell homing to the bones in a massive number of malignancies [142,199]. Due to these multifaceted roles of CXCL12, it is expected that the CXCL12-CXCR4 pair is involved in regulating osteoclastogenesis and osteolysis in bone homing and needs to be extensively addressed in the future studies. In summary, chemokines/cytokines’ contribution in tumorigenesis and metastasis mainly depends on the metastatic tissue sites and crosstalk between chemokines and their respective receptors within the local microenvironment. However, current experimental evidence links specific chemokine/receptor axis to the metastatic niche formation, which promotes tumor growth in the prostate, breast, and lungs and is followed by tissue-specific metastasis.
5. Chemokines microcosmos versus tumor heterogeneity and resistance
High levels of heterogeneity in a tumor can modulate the aggressiveness, drug tolerance and can expand pre-existing sub-clonal drug-tolerant populations. Additionally, chemotherapeutic resistance is often entwined with cancer stem cells and followed by metastasis. Tumor heterogeneity potentiates cancer cells to evade apoptosis, drug resistance, and subsequently metastasis processes. The capability of tumor cells to initiate the heterogeneous population and appropriate account for metastasis reflecting heterogeneity along with cancer stem cells (CSCs) and assessment of heterogeneity is essential to improve the drug efficacy and therapeutic outcome [200]. One of the influential mechanisms for heterogeneity and subsequent events are interlinked with the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines by tumor cells and tumor microenvironment termed as cytokine storm [201]. Chronic inflammation is associated with several types of cancers, including helicobacter-associated gastric cancer, chronic colitis-associated colon cancer, and smoking-induced LC [202,203]. Plausible explanations for this paradigm are multifold. During chronic inflammatory responses to the infection or damage, the compensatory cell proliferation induced to regenerate lost or damaged tissues might lead to an increased chance of multiple mutations and a proliferative advantage for the cells carrying those mutations. Maeda et al. showed the correlation between cell loss and the subsequent regeneration in mouse chemical carcinogenesis models [204]. In addition, free radical oxygen species released by the inflammatory cells may increase the mutation rate in the proliferating epithelial stem cells. Genetic, as well as phenotypic tumor heterogeneity, seems like a big challenge in cancer management. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer stemness are two interlinked driving non-genetic phenotypic plasticity [205]. The microenvironment of cancer cells also remarkably supports CSCs with the secretion of chemokines and cytokines, including IL-6, stromal-derived factor-1, and IL-8, which promote drug resistance and metastasis [206,207]. Prompt microenvironment from cytokines and growth factors also participate crucially to determine the fate of CSCs in non-solid tumors [208]. Currently, the concept about CSCs is that they do not need undifferentiated stem cells for their origin. CSCs can be initiated from reprogrammed somatic cells and can achieve advanced properties, including cellular plasticity, resistance to apoptosis, immune evasion, and co-option of other tumor and stromal cells [209]. Suggestively, in addition to cellular motility, the role of chemokines and their receptors are deeply interlinked with the maintenance of CSCs and metastasis [210].
5.1. Chemokines and tumor heterogeneity
Two major axis of chemokines-receptors are involved in tumor heterogeneity, i.e., CXCL12/CXCR4 and CXCR1/CXCR2. In a recent study, the CXCR4-CXCL12 chemokines/receptor axis is one of the key regulators in maintaining CSCs. This axis is activated in the CD44+/CD133+ prostate progenitor population and supports clonal growth and malignancy. Further, using a xenograft mouse model, it was observed that as compared to monotherapy, a combination of Taxotere and AMD3100 (an antagonist of CXCR4) significantly eradicated PCa stem-like cells [211]. Similarly, the role of the intracellular chemokine CXCL12γ has been revealed in CSCs induction. Over-expression of CXCL12γ induced CSCs in PCa cells through CXCR4-mediated PKCα/NFκB signaling and promotes prostate tumor growth, metastasis, and chemoresistance in vivo [212]. Additional evidence supporting cancer stemness is linked with CXCR4/CXCL12 axis in carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) derived from BC patients. CAFs promote the proliferation of CD44+CD24− cells through their ability to secrete stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1), which may be mediated to SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling resulting in high spheroid formation with an enriched population of CSCs [213] and supported that CXCR4 expression enhances BC cells’ ability to form tumor mammospheres [214]. Later, Kong et al. reported that the over-expression of SDF-1 activates NF-kB pathways and induces the EMT and CSCs in a luminal-A subtype of breast carcinoma [215]. It was previously observed that the expression of CXCR4 is associated with poor prognosis in esophageal cancer patients and its role in an early metastatic spread in lymph nodes and bone marrow [216].
CXCR1/CXCR2 is another important chemokine receptor axis playing a role in tumor heterogeneity and maintains the stemness of CSCs in association with CXCL1 and CXCL8. Isolation and characterization of CSCs in 33 cell lines derived from normal and malignant mammary tissue identified the importance of CXCR1/IL-8 role in tumor heterogeneity, stem cells maintenance, and metastasis [217]. The selective depletion of the aldehyde dehydrogenase-positive BC CSCs population by blocking CXCR1 receptors induces apoptosis in the BC population. It reduces metastasis in vivo via FASL/FAS signaling pathways [218]. Another study demonstrated that the EGFR/HER2-dependent mechanism of the mammospheres-promoting effect of CXCL8 and blockade of CXCR1/2 together with specific inhibitors potentially reduced breast CSCs activity [219]. Further, administration of CXCL1 significantly abolishes the effects of XIAOPI (an inhibitor of pre-metastatic niche formation) in BC migration, invasion, stem cells subpopulations, EMT, or mammospheres formation abilities [220,221]. Similarly, over-expression of CXCL8 self-renews pancreatic CSCs through the CXCR1 and IL-8/CXCR1 axis and is associated with cancer stem cell-like properties that correlate with clinical prognosis in human pancreatic cancer cases [222]. Different studies also support the role of other chemokines, including CCL2, CCL5, CCR5, and CXCR7/ACKR3, in tumor heterogeneity and CSCs maintenance in BC [223–226].
5.2. Chemokines and drug resistance
Drug resistance remains a multifaceted obstacle to cure most cancers at present. Increasing evidence suggests that the tumor microenvironment plays a cardinal role in drug resistance [227]. Previously, researchers have highlighted the role of chemokines and cytokines in the mechanisms of cancer drug resistance and cancer progression. Secretion of inflammatory mediators such as cytokines and chemokines from the tumor microenvironment components or tumor cells directly influences cancer cell proliferation and metastasis-related to chemoresistance and poor prognosis [228]. These messenger molecules can be secreted by both the tumor microenvironment and cancer cells themselves and exert chemoresistance through autocrine/paracrine signaling by inhibiting apoptosis, increasing the proliferation and efflux of chemotherapeutic drugs. Furthermore, recent studies have described how specific cytokines secreted by cancer stromal cells confer resistance to chemotherapeutic treatments [228]. To better understand the mechanism of cancer drug resistance and to predict treatment outcomes, correlations between global chemokine/cytokine profiles and cancer drug resistance must be established. Here we discuss the recent discoveries in this field of therapy and chemoresistance concerning chemokines and cytokines and their implications for the future development of effective outcomes in BC, PCa, and LC and their organ-specific metastasis [229]. The chemoresistance role of chemokines and cytokines is well established in BC, PCa, and LC. For instance, the IL-6 and IL-8 level in tamoxifen-resistant BC cells increases compared to parental cells [229]. CAFs are the crucial components of TME that can reprogram extracellular matrix (ECM) and are an important regulator of chemotherapy resistance. It has been reported that CAFs treated with cisplatin conferred chemoresistance to LC cells by upregulating IL-11 in CAF cells, protects cisplatin-mediated apoptosis. Mechanistically, IL-11 induces the STAT3 pathway, increases anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 and survivin expression in cancer cells, and provides resistance to cancer cells [230]. IL-6 is also recognized as a key regulator of immunosuppression in patients with advanced cancer [231]. Several evidences propounded crosstalk of IL-6 with multidrug resistance (MDR) in cancers, suggesting that IL-6 is instrumental in the chemotherapeutic response of the drug. IL-6 promotes MDR expression through JAK/STAT3, PI3K/AKT, and RAS-MAPK pathways. Activation of these pathways induces the expression of genes involved in proliferation and survival, promoting drug resistance [232]. Chemokine and cytokine recruit and activate MSCs at tumor sites. Consequently, MSCs secrete more chemokines and cytokines, which participate in tumor growth and metastasis [233]. In a BC study, MSCs promote proliferation of MCF-7 cells and decrease cisplatin response by releasing IL-6, activating the STAT3 survival pathway, and reducing apoptosis, and explored a novel drug resistance mechanism of cisplatin [234]. Siltuximab, a chimeric, anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody, harbors potential therapeutic benefit in castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) patients. In combination with docetaxel, siltuximab is safe and shows preliminary efficacy in patients with CRPC [235]. As discussed previously, cancer stem cells play a cardinal role in disease recurrence, metastasis, and drug resistance. CXCR1, a receptor of CXCL8, is present on stem cells in BC that renders them resistant to drug response. Interestingly, reparexin, an allosteric inhibitor of CXCR1/2, reduces the CSCs population in the human BC xenograft mice model, thus, induces chemo-sensitization [236]. In a clinical trial, reparexin drug was safe in 20 patients with no serious adverse effects and CSCs markers were found to be decreased by ≥ 20 % in BC patients [57]. In another Phase1b clinical trial, the dose, safety, and pharmacokinetic profile of paclitaxel plus reparixin were determined in metastatic BC patients [237].
Like BC, chemoresistance was frequently observed in LC. In NSCLC, CCL5 secreted from CAFs induces chemoresistance in tumor cells via upregulating lncRNA HOTAIR expression and high levels of Bcl2 protein, which ultimately lead to cisplatin resistance in NSCLC [238]. Effector T-regulatory (Treg) cells predominantly express CCR4 in cancer tissues [239]. Although mTOR is essential for the immunosuppressive function of myeloid-derived-suppressor cells (MDSCs) [240], consistent rapalog (mTOR inhibitor) treatment promotes FoxP3+Tregs expansion in vivo that counterbalance with effector antitumor CD8 T-cell immunity. Consistently, Tregs Inhibition by using a small molecule antagonist of CCR4, a receptor highly expressed on rapalog-induced T regs, improved the antitumor efficacy of rapalogs and further restoring tumor-specific CD8 T-cell functions [241]. Tregs expansion in vivo limits the efficacy of the bi-therapy by altering the antitumor CD8 T-cell responses. A CCR4 antagonist prevents Tregs induction which considerably improved the efficacy of the bi-therapy by enhancing CD8 T cells-mediated antitumor immunity [242]. Also, the transcriptomic analysis showed marked downregulation of CXCR2 and BCL-2 in taxane-treated patients vs. taxane-naive patients as well as in in vitro settings. Furthermore, they determined that in vivo preclinical data analysis reveals taxane-platinum combinations are highly synergistic and sensitizes metastatic castration resistance PCa (mCRPC) tumors to cisplatin [243]. Over-expression of CXCR4 in NSCLC promotes cisplatin resistance via CXCR4-mediated CYP1B1 upregulation [244]. Similarly, CXCR2 upregulation renders NSCLC cells resistant to cisplatin and gemcitabine by activating JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway [245]. In a separate study, drugs (cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin) showed the same effect on tumor growth in immune-deficient mice. However, oxaliplatin exhibited a better response in wild-type mice with Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC), showing a high level of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 in the tumor microenvironment, facilitate the recruitment of T cells and NK cells. Therefore, the combination of oxaliplatin with anti-PDL1 or anti-NKG2D antibodies results in a better therapeutic effect. Combining the three drugs could effectively inhibit the growth of LLC tumors and improve the survival of tumor-bearing mice [246]. Anti-PDL-1 or CCR1 inhibitor alone moderately inhibits the primary tumor growth and lung metastasis. However, the combination of CCR1 inhibitor and anti-PDL1 antibody significantly reduces the tumor burden compared to single agents. In addition, CCR1 expressing CD11b + Ly6Ghi Ly6Chi MDSCs were found in a xenograft BC model and further reduced significantly with CCR1 blockade through CCX9588 [247]. KRAS/LKB1 is a driver mutation to develop primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in NSCLC. Combination therapy with anti-PDL-1 and all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) improved local and systemic T-cell proliferation and generated tumor-specific immunity. This study also implicated ELR + CXC chemokine-mediated enrichment of G-MDSCs as a potential mediator of immunosuppression in LKB1-deficient NSCLC. It provides a rationale for using ATRA in combination with anti-PDL-1 therapy in patients with LKB1-deficient NSCLC refractory to ICIs [248].
Additionally, bone marrow contains candidate components that could contribute to the emergence of drug resistance, including soluble factors, such as interleukins. Moreover, chemokines are known to be essential for hematopoietic cdl homing within the bone marrow. Stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1 or CXCL12) is constitutively expressed by bone marrow stromal cells, which can be considered as a primary source of chemokine in adults [249–251]. Price et al. demonstrated that dormant and proliferating BC cells occupy the niche in the bone marrow. Dormant cells reside in the E-selectin and CXCL12-rich vascular regions. CXCL12/CXCR4 axis renders dormant cancer cells resistant in the bone microenvironment [252]. In a preclinical model of BC, CXCR4/CXCL12 axis in M2 perivascular TAMs was implicated in disease relapse after chemotherapy. Interestingly a similar M2 population was noticed in BC patients with disease relapse and bone metastasis after chemotherapy [253]. Metastatic bone tumors express a high level of CCR5 and targeting CCR5 by maraviroc in PCa bone metastasis could be a promising treatment option [172]. Since, several studies indicate the substantial correlation of cytokines/chemokines with tumor heterogeneity, drug resistance, and metastasis. Specifically, tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance are the primary root cause of metastasis. Moreover, after acquiring these abilities (heterogeneity and drug resistance), chemokines and cytokines act as torchbearers for specified organotropism.
6. Major clinical trials related to chemokines in bone metastasis
Several clinical trials have been started based on the preclinical evidence related to the modulation of the different axis of chemokine receptors/ligands in PCa, BC, and LC patients with bone metastasis (Table 1) [254–256]. Three clinical trials have been started with bone metastatic cancer patients viz., 1). Evaluation of the safety and blocking efficacy of CCL2 in advanced stages of patients (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00992186). In the initial clinical trial, CNTO 888, an antibody that blocks CCL2, was used for metastatic castration-resistant PCa patients. Blocking CCL2 was not very efficient and probably because of compensatory mechanisms [254]. 2.) MLN1202, a monoclonal antibody against CCR2, has been used as anti-metastatic therapy for patients with bone metastasis in the phase II trial. Bone metastatic patients administered anti-CCR2 monoclonal antibody MLN1202 IV over 1 h on days 1,15, and 29 showed a decrease in urine n-telopeptide, suggesting a positive effect. (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03550508). To date, there is no availability of any anti-metastatic clinical regimen that demands additional criteria to investigate different factors and etiology for heterogeneity, stemness, and organotropic metastasis of cancer cells and microenvironment. Moreover, future studies will be decisive in targeting specific cancer axis of chemokine-chemokine receptors to manage therapeutic options for cancer and metastasis.
Table 1.
Major clinical trials related to the chemokine’s regulation in bone metastasis.
| Clinical trial number | Title | Status | Condition or disease | Interventions/treatment | Sponsors | Phases |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT03554317 | COMbination of Bipolar Androgen Therapy and Nivolumab (COMBAT-CRPC) | Active, not recruiting | Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Metastatic Prostate Cancer Prostate Cancer |
Drug: Testosterone cypionate Drug: Nivolumab |
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins | Phase 2 |
| NCT00992186 | A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Single-agent Carlumab (an Anti-Chemokine Ligand 2 [CCL2]) in Participants with Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer | Completed | Prostate Cancer | Drug: Carlumab | ||
| NCT03599453 | Chemokine Modulation Therapy and Pembrolizumab in Treating Participants with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer | Active, not recruiting | Triple -Negative Breast Cancer | Drug: Celecoxib Biological: Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b Drug: Rintatolimod Biological: Pembrolizumab |
Roswell Park Cancer Institute | Early Phase 1 |
| NCT04081389 | Chemokine Modulation Therapy and Standard Chemotherapy Before Surgery for the Treatment of Early-Stage Triple Negative Breast Cancer | Recruiting | Triple-Negative Breast Carcinoma | Drug: Celecoxib Drug: Cyclophosphamide Drug: Doxorubicin Drug: Doxorubicin Hydrochloride Drug: Paclitaxel Biological: Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b Drug: Rintatolimod |
Roswell Park Cancer Institute | Phase 1 |
| NCT01433172 | Combination Immunotherapy of GM.CD40 L Vaccine with CCL21 in Lung Cancer | Completed | Lung Cancer Adenocarcinoma |
Biological: Phase I - GM.CD40 L.CCL21 Vaccinations Biological: Phase II - GM.CD40 L cells Vaccinations Biological: Phase II - GM.CD40 L.CCL21 Vaccinations |
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute | Phase 1 Phase 2 |
| NCT05060796 | Study of CXCR5 Modified EGFR Targeted CAR-T Cells for Advanced NSCLC | Recruiting | Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Biological: CXCR5 modified EGFR Chimeric Antigen Receptor Autologous T cells | Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University | Early Phase 1 |
| NCT04153799 | Study of CXCR5 Modified EGFE Chimeric Antigen Receptor Autologous T Cells in EGFR- Positive Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Recruiting | Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Biological: CXCR5 modified EGFR Chimeric Antigen Receptor Autologous T cells | Sun Yat-sen University | Phase 1 |
| NCT01015560 | S0916, MLN1202 in Treating Patients with Bone Metastases | Completed | Metastatic Cancer Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific | Drug: anti-CCR2 monoclonal antibody MLN1202 | Southwest Oncology Group | Phase 2 |
| NCT03550508 | Safety, Tolerability and PK/PD of JMT103 in Patients with Bone Metastases from Tumors (JMT103) | Unknown | Bone Metastases | Biological: Anti-RANKL Monoclonal Antibody | Shanghai JMT-Bio Inc. | Phase 1 |
| NCT02688686 | Safety and Efficacy of DC-GK in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Bone Metastases | Unknown | Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Bone Metastases | Biological: genetically modified dendritic cells + cytokine-induced killer | Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences | Phase 1 Phase 2 |
7. Concluding remarks and future perspective
Conclusively, besides their traditional roles as a chemoattractant, chemokines play crucial roles in tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis. Several chemokines and chemokine receptors axis govern primary tumor lesions to bone metastasis and devastating skeletal remodeling. As reviewed in this manuscript, tumor cells in the bone microenvironment, distinct chemokine/chemokine receptor pairs/axis control cancer cell survival, proliferation, dormancy, and initiation of a vicious cycle. Further, we also focused on a massive amount of literature supporting chemokines’ vital role in bone remodeling. However, some axis can be dissected for specific cancer and bone metastasis despite the enormous complexity of the chemokines system and functional redundancy. It is important to note that numerous mice models devoid of specific chemokines/receptors display a distinct impairment of their skeletal remodeling status. Since incurability and high mortality rate (of bone metastatic cancer patients) demand to explore the most critical chemokine receptor axis playing a role in bone metastasis and remodeling, altogether, inhibition of metastasis or activation of dormant cancer cells into the bone and delineating specific axis in different cancers would be crucial for cancer therapeutics. The establishment of such kinds of chemokines/receptors axis could open new avenues in skeletal metastasis regulation and improvement of the quality of life of bone metastatic cancer patients.
In the last decade of cancer research, prevention or eradication of existing metastasis has been developed into the most critical scientific assignments. However, inhibition of metastasis by targeting tumor cells along with tumor microenvironment or specific host cells remains to be achieved. A classical concept related to cancer prevention or therapy is very much focused on tumor cells alone, but in modern notions, the tumor microenvironment is also under important consideration. The concept of pharmacological modulation of chemokines and their receptors to reduce chemokines regulated metastasis is under extensive investigation. Despite of the remarkable success, various knots/obstacles related to chemokines interplay remain to be solved. (A) The secretion of chemokines and the expression of their receptors are highly complex because of multi-ligand and multi-receptors interplay. (B) The expression of receptors and chemokines secretion can be either on tumor cells or at the metastatic site. (C) Modulating chemokines signaling may lead to alteration in chemokines profile, and harmful consequences can arise.
Funding
The work was supported by grants from the Department of Defense (DOD) through the Prostate Cancer Research Program under Award No. W81XWH-21-1-0640 (JAS) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) U01 CA185148, DOD W81XWH-18-1-0308 (SKB). Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Defense and other funding agencies.
Abbreviations:
- RANK
receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B
- RANKL
receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B -ligand
- OPG
osteoprotegerin
- IL-6
Interleukin 6
- PTH-rP
parathyroid hormone-related peptide
- MCSF
macrophage colony-stimulating factor
- VEGF
vascular endothelial growth factor
- MCP-1/CCL2
monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
- TGF-β
transforming growth factor-beta
- IGFs
insulin-like growth factors
Footnotes
Declaration of Competing Interest
SKB is co-founder of Sanguine Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Inc. Other authors declare no competing interests.
Data availability
Not applicable, all information in this review can be found in the reference list.
References
- [1].Kohli K, Pillarisetty VG, Kim TS, Key chemokines direct migration of immune cells in solid tumors, Cancer Gene Ther. (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Hughes CE, Nibbs RJB, A guide to chemokines and their receptors, FEBS J. 285 (16) (2018) 2944–2971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Pretzsch E, Bosch F, Neumann J, Ganse ho w P, Bazhin A, Guba M, Werner J, Angele M, Mechanisms of metastasis in colorectal cancer and metastatic organotropism: hematogenous versus peritoneal spread, J. Oncol 2019 (2019), 7407190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Tian W, Jiang X, Kim D, Guan T, Nicolls MR, Rockson SG, Leukotrienes in tumor-associated inflammation, Front. Pharmacol 11 (2020) 1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Zlotnik A, Burkhardt AM, Homey B, Homeostatic chemokine receptors and organ-specific metastasis, Nat. Rev. Immunol 11 (9) (2011) 597–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Sackstein R, Schatton T, Barthel SR, T-lymphocyte homing: an underappreciated yet critical hurdle for successful cancer immunotherapy, Lab. Invest 97 (6) (2017) 669–697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Majka M, Janowska-Wieczorek A, Ratajczak J, Ehrenman K, Pietrzkowski Z, Kowalska MA, Gewirtz AM, Emerson SG, Ratajczak MZ, Numerous growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines are secreted by human CD34(+) cells, myeloblasts, erythroblasts, and megakaryoblasts and regulate normal hematopoiesis in an autocrine/paracrine manner, Blood 97 (10) (2001) 3075–3085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Chow MT, Luster AD, Chemokines in cancer, Cancer Immunol. Res 2 (12) (2014) 1125–1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Colaprico A, Olsen C, Bailey MH, Odom GJ, Terkelsen T, Silva TC, Olsen AV, Cantini L, Zinovyev A, Barillot E, Noushmehr H, Bertoli G, Castiglioni I, Cava C, Bontempi G, Chen XS, Papaleo E, Interpreting pathways to discover cancer driver genes with Moonlight, Nat. Commun 11 (1) (2020) 69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Dagogo-Jack I, AT. Shaw, Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies, Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol 15 (2) (2018) 81–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Izraely S, Witz IP, Site-spedfic metastasis: a cooperation between cancer cells and the metastatic microenvironment, Int. J. Cancer 148 (6) (2021) 1308–1322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Coniglio SJ, Role of tumor-derived chemokines in osteolytic bone metastasis, Front. Endocrinol (Lausanne) 9 (2018) 313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A, Cancer statistics, 2017, CA Cancer J. Clin 67 (1) (2017) 7–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Logothetis C, Morris MJ, Den R, Coleman RE, Current perspectives on bone metastases in castrate-resistant prostate cancer, Cancer Metastasis Rev. 37 (1) (2018) 189–196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Bienz M, Saad F, Management of bone metastases in prostate cancer: a review, Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. Care 9 (3) (2015) 261–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Cosphiadi I, Atmakusumah TD, Siregar NC, Muthalib A, Harahap A, Mansyur M, Bone metastasis in advanced breast cancer: analysis of gene expression microarray, Clin. Breast Cancer 18 (5) (2018) elll7–ell22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Jehn CF, Diel IJ, Overkamp F, Kurth A, Schaefer R, Miller K, Luftner D, Management of metastatic bone disease algorithms for diagnostics and treatment, Anticancer Res. 36 (6) (2016) 2631–2637. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Macedo F, Ladeira K, Pinho F, Saraiva N, Bonito N, Pinto L, Goncalves F, Bone metastases: an overview, Oncol. Rev 11 (1) (2017) 321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Jiang W, Rixiati Y, Zhao B, Li Y, Tang C, Liu J, Incidence, prevalence, and outcomes of systemic malignancy with bone metastases, J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong) 28 (2) (2020), 2309499020915989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Mun SH, Park PSU, Park-Min KH, The M-CSF receptor in osteoclasts and beyond, Exp. Mol Med 52 (8) (2020) 1239–1254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Feng X, McDonald JM, Disorders of bone remodeling, Annu. Rev. Pathol 6 (2011) 121–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Coleman RE, Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity, Clin. Cancer Res 12 (20 Pt 2) (2006) 6243s–6249s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Miller MC, Mayo KH, Chemokines from a structural perspective, Int. J. Mol. Sci 18 (10) (2017) 2088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Sokol CL, Luster AD, The chemokine system in innate immunity, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol 7 (5) (2015), a016303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Martins-Green M, Petreaca M, Wang L, Chemokines and their receptors are key players in the orchestra that regulates wound healing, Adv. Wound Care 2 (7) (2013) 327–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Palomino DC, Marti LC, Chemokines and immunity, Einstein (Sao Paulo) 13 (3) (2015) 469–473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Keeley EC, Mehr ad B, Strieter RM, CXC chemokines in cancer angiogenesis and metastases, Adv. Cancer Res 106 (2010) 91–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Stievano L, Piovan E, Amadori A, C and CX 3 C chemokines: cell sources and physiopathological implications, Crit. Rev. Immunol 24 (3) (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Hughes CE, Nibbs RJ, A guide to chemokines and their receptors, FEBS J. 285 (16) (2018) 2944–2971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Lazennec G, Richmond A, Chemokines and chemokine receptors: new insights into cancer-related inflammation, Trends Mol. Med 16 (3) (2010) 133–144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Bonecchi R, Graham GJ, Atypical chemokine receptors and their roles in the resolution of the inflammatory response, Front. Immunol 7 (2016) 224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Bonecchi R, Graham GJ, Atypical chemokine receptors and their roles in the resolution of the inflammatory response, Front. Immunol 7 (2016) 224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Haddad JJ, Cytokines and related receptor-mediated signaling pathways, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 297 (4) (2002) 700–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Morán GAG, Parra-Medina R, Cardona AG, Quintero-Ronderos P, Rodríguez ÉG, Cytokines, Chemokines and Growth Factors, Autoimmunity: From Bench to Bedside [Internet], El Rosario University Press, 2013. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Turner MD, Nedjai B, Hurst T, Pennington DJ, Cytokines and chemokines: At the crossroads of cell signalling and inflammatory disease, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843 (11) (2014) 2563–2582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Kany S, Vollrath JT, Relja B, Cytokines in inflammatory disease, Int. J. Mol. Sci 20 (23) (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Vazquez MI, Catalan-Dibene J, Zlotnik A, B cells responses and cytokine production are regulated by their immune microenvironment, Cytokine 74 (2) (2015) 318–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Smith JA, Regulation of cytokine production by the unfolded protein response; implications for infection and autoimmunity, Front. Immunol 9 (2018) 422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Ferreira VL, Borba HH, Bonetti Ad.F., Leonart L, Pontarolo R, Cytokines and interferons: types and functions, Autoantib. Cytokines 13 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- [40].Nagarsheth N, Wicha MS, Zou W, Chemokines in the cancer microenvironment and their relevance in cancer immunotherapy, Nat. Rev. Immunol 17 (9) (2017) 559–572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Steeg PS, Targeting metastasis, Nat. Rev. Cancer 16 (4) (2016) 201–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Weigelt B, Peterse JL, Van’t Veer LJ, Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models, Nat. Rev. Cancer 5 (8) (2005) 591–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F, Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA Cancer J. Clin 71 (3) (2021) 209–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Erratum to “Cancer statistics, 2021”, CA Cancer J. Clin 71 (4) (2021) 359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Huang JF, Shen J, Li X, Rengan R, Silvestris N, Wang M, Derosa L, Zheng X, Belli A, Zhang XL, Li YM, Wu A, Incidence of patients with bone metastases at diagnosis of solid tumors in adults: a large population-based study, Ann. Transl. Med 8 (7) (2020) 482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A, Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA Cancer J. Clin 68 (6) (2018) 394–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Shin SY, Lee DH, Lee J, Choi C, Kim JY, Nam JS, Lim Y, Lee YH, C-C motif chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1) is a target of the EGF-AKT-mTOR-STAT3 signaling axis in breast cancer cells, Oncotarget 8 (55) (2017) 94591–94605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Brummer G, Acevedo DS, Hu Q, Portsche M, Fang WB, Yao M, Zinda B, Myers M, Alvarez N, Fields P, Hong Y, Behbod F, Cheng N, Chemokine signaling facilitates early-stage breast cancer survival and invasion through fibroblast-dependent mechanisms, Mol. Cancer Res 16 (2) (2018) 296–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Kitamura T, Qian BZ, Soong D, Cassetta L, Noy R, Sugano G, Kato Y, Li J, Pollard JW, CCL2-induced chemokine cascade promotes breast cancer metastasis by enhandng retention of metastasis-associated macrophages, J. Exp. Med 212 (7) (2015) 1043–1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Fang WB, Jokar I, Zou A, Lambert D, Dendukuri P, Cheng N, CCL2/CCR2 chemokine signaling Coordinates survival and motility of breast cancer cells through Smad3 protein- and p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-dependent mechanisms, J. Biol. Chem 287 (43) (2012) 36593–36608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Li JY, Ou ZL, Yu SJ, Gu XL, Yang C, Chen AX, Di GH, Shen ZZ, Shao ZM, The chemokine receptor CCR4 promotes tumor growth and lung metastasis in breast cancer, Breast Cancer Res. Treat 131 (3) (2012) 837–848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Mira E, Lacalle RA, Gonzalez MA, Gomez-Mouton C, Abad JL, Bemad A, Martinez AC, Manes S, A role for chemokine receptor transactivation in growth factor signaling, EMBO Rep. 2 (2) (2001) 151–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Zhang Q, Qin J, Zhong L, Gong L, Zhang B, Zhang Y, Gao WQ, CCL5-mediated Th2 immune polarization promotes metastasis in luminal breast cancer, Cancer Res. 75 (20) (2015) 4312–4321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Wu M-Y, Zhuang C-X, Yang H-X, Liang Y-R, Expression of Egr-1, c-fos and cyclin D1 in esophageal cancer and its precursors: an immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization study, World J. Gastroenterol 10 (4) (2004) 476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Sharma B, Singh S, Varney ML, Singh RK, Targeting CXCR1/CXCR2 receptor antagonism in malignant melanoma, Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 14 (4) (2010) 435–442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Cabioglu N, Yazici MS, Arun B, Broglio KR, Hortobagyi GN, Price JE, Sahin A, CCR7 and CXCR4 as novel biomarkers predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in T1 breast cancer, Clin. Cancer Res 11 (16) (2005) 5686–5693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Goldstein LJ, Perez RP, Yardley D, Han LK, Reuben JM, Gao H, McCanna S, Butler B, Ruffini PA, Liu Y, Rosato RR, Chang JC, A window-of-opportunity trial of the CXCR1/2 inhibitor reparixin in operable HER-2-negative breast cancer, Breast Cancer Res. 22 (1) (2020) 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Halpem JL, Kilbarger A, Lynch CC, Mesenchymal stem cells promote mammary cancer cell migration in vitro via the CXCR2 receptor, Cancer Lett. 308 (1) (2011) 91–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Houthuijzen JM, Jonkers J, Cancer-associated fibroblasts as key regulators of the breast cancer tumor microenvironment, Cancer Metastasis Rev. 37 (4) (2018) 577–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Xu H, Lin F, Wang Z, Yang L, Meng J, Ou Z, Shao Z, Di G, Yang G, CXCR2 promotes breast cancer metastasis and chemoresistance via suppression of AKT1 and activation of COX2, Cancer Lett. 412 (2018) 69–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Wang N, Liu W, Zheng Y, Wang S, Yang B, Li M, Song J, Zhang F, Zhang X, Wang Q, Wang Z, CXCL1 derived from tumor-associated macrophages promotes breast cancer metastasis via activating NF-kappaB/SOX4 signaling, Cell Death Dis. 9 (9) (2018) 880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Jin WJ, Kim B, Kim D, Park Choo HY, Kim HH, Ha H, Lee ZH, NF-kappaB signaling regulates cell-autonomous regulation of CXCL10 in breast cancer 4T1 cells, Exp. Mol. Med 49 (2) (2017) e295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Sun Y, Mao X, Fan C, Liu C, Guo A, Guan S, Jin Q, Li B, Yao F, Jin F, CXCL12-CXCR4 axis promotes the natural selection of breast cancer cell metastasis, Tumour Biol. 35 (8) (2014) 7765–7773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Nengroo MA, Maheshwari S, Singh A, Verma A, Arya RK, Chaturvedi P, Saini KK, Singh AK, Sinha A, Meena S, Gupta A, Mishra A, Sarkar J, Datta D, CXCR4 intracellular protein promotes drug resistance and tumorigenic potential by inversely regulating the expression of Death Receptor 5, Cell Death Dis. 12 (5) (2021) 464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Xiao G, Wang X, Wang J, Zu L, Cheng G, Hao M, Sun X, Xue Y, Lu J, Wang J, CXCL16/CXCR6 chemokine signaling mediates breast cancer progression by pERKl/2-dependent mechanisms, Oncotarget 6 (16) (2015) 14165–14178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Luker KE, Lewin SA, Mihalko LA, Schmidt BT, Winkler JS, Coggins NL, Thomas DG, Luker GD, Scavenging of CXCL12 by CXCR7 promotes tumor growth and metastasis of CXCR4-positive breast cancer cells, Oncogene 31 (45) (2012) 4750–4758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Stacer AC, Fenner J, Cavnar SP, Xiao A, Zhao S, Chang SL, Salomonnson A, Luker KE, Luker GD, Endothelial CXCR7 regulates breast cancer metastasis, Oncogene 35 (13) (2016) 1716–1724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Al-Toub M, Almohawes M, Vishnubalaji R, Alfoyez M, Aldahmash A, Kassem M, Alajez NM, CXCR7 signaling promotes breast cancer survival in response to mesenchymal stromal stem cell-derived factors, Cell Death Discov. 5 (2019) 87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Wu X.-a., Guo L.-y., Du Y.-e., Liu M.-r., Tu G, Tamoxifen enhances the abilities of migration and invasion of breast cancer MCF-7 cells via extemal secretion of CXCL16 from CAF cells mediated by GPR30, Tumor 36 (3) (2016) 272–279. [Google Scholar]
- [70].Hansell CAH, Fraser AR, Hayes AJ, Pingen M, Burt CL, Lee KM, Medina-Ruiz L, Brownlie D, Macleod MKL, Burgoyne P, Wilson GJ, Nibbs RJB, Graham GJ, The atypical chemokine receptor Ackr2 constrains NK cell migratory activity and promotes metastasis, J. Immunol 201 (8) (2018) 2510–2519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Massara M, Bonavita O, Mantovani A, Locati M, Bonecchi R, Atypical chemokine receptors in cancer; friends or foes? J. Leukoc. BioL 99 (6) (2016) 927–933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Kato T, Fujita Y, Nakane K, Mizutani K, Terazawa R, Ehara H, Kanimoto Y, Kojima T, Nozawa Y, Deguchi T, Ito M, CCR1/CCL5 interaction promotes invasion of taxane-resistant PC3 prostate cancer cells by increasing secretion of MMPs 2/9 and by activating ERK and Rac signaling, Cytokine 64 (1) (2013) 251–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Shamaladevi N, Lyn DA, Escudero DO, Lokeshwar BL, CXC receptor-1 silencing inhibits androgen-independent prostate cancer, Cancer Res. 69 (21) (2009) 8265–8274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Li X, Loberg R, Liao J, Ying C, Snyder LA, Pienta KJ, McCauley LK, A destructive cascade mediated by CCL2 facilitates prostate cancer growth in bone, Cancer Res. 69 (4) (2009) 1685–1692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Shen D, Cao X, Potential role of CXCR3 in proliferation and invasion of prostate cancer cells, Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol 8 (7) (2015) 8091–8098. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Sbrissa D, Semaan L, Govindarajan B, Li Y, Caruthers NJ, Stemmer PM, Cher ML, Sethi S, Vaishampayan U, Shisheva A, Chinni SR, A novel cross-talk between CXCR4 and PI4KIIIalpha in prostate cancer cells, Oncogene 38 (3) (2019) 332–344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Garg R, Blando JM, Perez CJ, Abba MC, Benavides F, Kazanietz MG, Protein kinase C epsilon cooperates with PTEN loss for prostate tumorigenesis through the CXCL13-CXCR5 pathway, Cell Rep. 19 (2) (2017) 375–388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Kapur N, Mir H, Sonpavde GP, Jain S, Bae S, Lillard JW Jr., Singh S, Prostate cancer cells hyper-activate CXCR6 signaling by cleaving CXCL16 to overcome effect of docetaxel, Cancer Lett. 454 (2019) 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Wang J, Lu Y, Wang J, Koch AE, Zhang J, Taichman RS, CXCR6 induces prostate cancer progression by the AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway, Cancer Res. 68 (24) (2008) 10367–10376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- [80].Wang J, Shiozawa Y, Wang J, Wang Y, Jung Y, Pienta KJ, Mehra R, Loberg R, Taichman RS, The role of CXCR7/RDC1 as a chemokine receptor for CXCL12/SDF-1 in prostate cancer, J. Biol. Chem 283 (7) (2008) 4283–4294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Li S, Fong KW, Gritsina G, Zhang A, Zhao JC, Kim J, Sharp A, Yuan W, Aversa C, Yang XJ, Nelson PS, Feng FY, Chinnaiyan AM, de Bono JS, Morrissey C, Rettig MB, Yu J, Activation of MAPK signaling by CXCR7 leads to enzalutamide resistance in prostate cancer, Cancer Res. 79 (10) (2019) 2580–2592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Wang CL, Sun BS, Tang Y, Zhuang HQ, Cao WZ, CCR1 knockdown suppresses human non-small cell lung cancer cell invasion, J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol 135 (5) (2009) 695–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Schm all A, Al-Tamari HM, Herold S, Kampschulte M, Weigert A, Wietelmann A, Vipotnik N, Grimminger F, Seeger W, Pullamsetti SS, Savai R, Macrophage and cancer cell cross-talk via CCR2 and CX3CR1 is a fundamental mechanism driving lung cancer, Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 191 (4) (2015) 437–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Hu J, Wang L, Guan C, MiR-532–5p suppresses migration and invasion of lung cancer cells through inhibiting CCR4, Cancer Biother. Radiopharm 35 (9) (2020) 673–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Zhang J, Wang J, Qian Z, Han Y, CCR5 is associated with immune cell infiltration and prognosis of lung cancer, J. Thorac. Oncol 14 (5) (2019) el02–el03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Lu Y, Luan XR, miR-147a suppresses the metastasis of non-small-cell lung cancer by targeting CCL5, J. Int. Med. Res 48 (4) (2020), 300060519883098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- [87].Yang F, Zhang S, Meng Q, Zhou F, Pan B, Liu F, Yu Y, CXCRl correlates to poor outcomes of EGFR-TKI against advanced non-small cell lung cancer by activating chemokine and JAK/STAT pathway, Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther 67 (2021), 102001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Zhu YM, Webster SJ, Flower D, Woll PJ, Interleukin-8/CXCL8 is a growth fador for human lung cancer cells, Br. J. Cancer 91 (11) (2004) 1970–1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Cheng Y, Mo F, Li Q, Han X, Shi H, Chen S, Wei Y, Wei X, Targeting CXCR2 inhibits the progression of lung cancer and promotes therapeutic effect of cisplatin, Mol. Cancer 20 (1) (2021) 62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Andersson A, Yang SC, Huang M, Zhu L, Kar UK, Batra RK, Elashoff D, Strieter RM, Dubinett SM, Sharma S, IL-7 promotes CXCR3 ligand-dependent T cell antitumor reactivity in lung cancer, J. Immunol 182 (11) (2009) 6951–6958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Kim JY, Kim HJ, Jung CW, Lee TS, Kim EH, Park MJ, CXCR4 uses STAT3-mediated slug expression to maintain radioresistance of non-small cell lung cancer cells: emerges as a potential prognostic biomarker for lung cancer, Cell Death Dis. 12 (1) (2021) 48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Hu W, Liu Y, Zhou W, Si L, Ren L, CXCL16 and CXCR6 are coexpressed in human lung cancer in vivo and mediate the invasion of lung cancer cell lines in vitro, PLoS One 9 (6) (2014), e99056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Liu H, Cheng Q, Xu DS, Wang W, Fang Z, Xue DD, Zheng Y, Chang AH, Lei YJ, Overexpression of CXCR7 accelerates tumor growth and metastasis of lung cancer cells, Respir. Res 21 (1) (2020) 287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Liu W, Liang Y, Chan Q, Jiang L, Dong J, CX3CL1 promotes lung cancer cell migration and invasion via the Src/focal adhesion kinase signaling pathway, Oncol. Rep 41 (3) (2019) 1911–1917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Emmerson PJ, Wang F, Du Y, Liu Q, Pickard RT, Gondarz MD, Coskun T, Hamang MJ, Sindelar DK, Ballman KK, Foltz LA, Muppidi A, Alsina-Femandez J, Bamard GC, Tang JX, Liu X, Mao X, Siegel R, Sloan JH, Mitchell PJ, Zhang BB, Gimeno RE, Shan B, Wu X, The metabolic effects of GDF15 are mediated by the orphan receptor GFRAL, Nat. Med 23 (10) (2017) 1215–1219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96].Hsu JY, Crawley S, Chen M, Ayupova DA, Lindhout DA, Higbee J, Kutach A, Joo W, Gao Z, Fu D, To C, Mondal K, Li B, Kekatpure A, Wang M, Laird T, Homer G, Chan J, McEntee M, Lopez M, Lakshminarasimhan D, White A, Wang SP, Yao J, Yie J, Matern H, Solloway M, Haldankar R, Parsons T, Tang J, Shen WD, Alice Chen Y, Tian H, Allan BB, Non-homeostatic body weight regulation through a brainstem-restricted receptor for GDF15, Nature 550 (7675) (2017) 255–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [97].Mullican SE, Lin-Schmidt X, Chin CN, Chavez JA, Furman JL, Armstrong AA, Beck SC, South VJ, Dinh TQ, Cash-Mason TD, Cavanaugh CR, Nelson S, Huang C, Hunter MJ, Rangwala SM, GFRAL is the receptor for GDF15 and the ligand promotes weight loss in mice and nonhuman Primates, Nat. Med 23 (10) (2017) 1150–1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [98].Tsai VW, Manandhar R, Jorgensen SB, Lee-Ng KK, Zhang HP, Marquis CP, Jiang L, Husaini Y, Lin S, Sainsbury A, Sawchenko PE, Brown DA, Breit SN, The anorectic actions of the TGFbeta cytokine MIC-1/GDF15 require an intact brainstem area postrema and nudeus of the solitary tract, PLoS One 9 (6) (2014), el 00370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [99].Yang L, Chang CC, Sun Z, Madsen D, Zhu H, Padkjaer SB, Wu X, Huang T, Hultman K, Paulsen SJ, Wang J, Bugge A, Frantzen JB, Norgaard P, Jeppesen JF, Yang Z, Secher A, Chen H, Li X, John LM, Shan B, He Z, Gao X, Su J, Hansen KT, Yang W, Jorgensen SB, GFRAL is the receptor for GDF15 and is required for the anti-obesity effects of the ligand, Nat. Med 23 (10) (2017) 1158–1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [100].Siddiqui JA, Pothuraju R, Khan P, Sharma G, Muniyan S, Seshacharyulu P, Jain M, Nasser MW, Batra SK, Pathophysiological role of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) in obesity, cancer, and cachexia, Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [101].Bauskin AR, Brown DA, Kuffner T, Johnen H, Luo XW, Hunter M, Breit SN, Role of macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 in tumorigenesis and diagnosis of cancer, Cancer Res. 66 (10) (2006) 4983–4986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [102].Corre J, Hebraud B, Bourin P, Concise review: growth differentiation factor 15 in pathology: a clinical role? Stem Cells Transl. Med 2 (12) (2013) 946–952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103].Eling TE, Baek SJ, Shim M, Lee CH, NSAID activated gene (NAG-1), a modulator of tumorigenesis, J. Biochem. Mol. BioL 39 (6) (2006) 649–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [104].Li C, Wang J, Kong J, Tang J, Wu Y, Xu E, Zhang H, Lai M, GDF15 promotes EMT and metastasis in colorectal cancer, Oncotarget 7 (1) (2016) 860–872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [105].Unsicker K, Spittau B, Krieglstein K, The multiple fecets of the TGF-beta femily cytokine growth/differentiation foctor-15/macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1, Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 24 (4) (2013) 373–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [106].Mimeault M, Batra SK, Divergent molecular mechanisms underlying the pleiotropic functions of macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 in cancer, J. Cell. Physiol 224 (3) (2010) 626–635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [107].Wang W, Yang X, Dai J, Lu Y, Zhang J, Keller ET, Prostate cancer promotes a vicious cycle of bone metastasis progression through inducing osteocytes to secrete GDF15 that stimulates prostate cancer growth and invasion, Oncogene 38 (23) (2019) 4540–4559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [108].Kaplan DH, Shankaran V, Dighe AS, Stockert E, Aguet M, Old LJ, Schreiber RD, Demonstration of an interferon γ-dependent tumor surveillance system in immunocompetent mice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sd 95 (13) (1998) 7556–7561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [109].Qin Z, Kim H-J, Hemme J, Blankenstein T, Inhibition of methylcholanthrene-induced carcinogenesis by an interferon γ receptor-dependent foreign body reaction, J. Exp. Med 195 (11) (2002) 1479–1490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [110].Street SE, Cretney E, Smyth MJ, Perforin and interferon-γ activities independently control tumor initiation, growth, and metastasis, Blood, J.e Am. Soc. Hematol 97 (1) (2001) 192–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [111].Bach EA, Aguet M, Schreiber RD, The IFNγ receptor: a paradigm for cytokine receptor signaling, Annu. Rev. Immunol 15 (1) (1997) 563–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [112].Yan J, Smyth MJ, Teng MW, Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 and their conflicting roles in cancer, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol 10 (7) (2018), a028530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [113].Levy DE, Gilliland DG, Divergent roles of STAT1 and STAT5 in malignancy as revealed by gene disruptions in mice, Oncogene 19 (21) (2000) 2505–2510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [114].Vivier E, Ugolini S, Blaise D, Chabannon C, Brossay L, Targeting natural killer cells and natural killer T cells in cancer, Natl. Rev. Immunol 12 (4) (2012) 239–252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [115].AT SVIHB, PE WJS, IFNgamma and lymphocytes prevent primary tumour development and shape tumour immunogenicity, Nature 410 (1) (2001) 107–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [116].Gao Y, Yang W, Pan M, Scully E, Girardi M, Augenlicht LH, Craft J, Yin Z, Gamma delta T cells provide an early source of interferon gamma in tumor immunity, J. Exp. Med 198 (3) (2003) 433–442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [117].Efremova M, Rieder D, Klepsch V, Charoentong P, Finotello F, Hackl H, Hermann-Kleiter N, Lower M, Baier G, Krogsdam A, Trajanoski Z, Targeting immune Checkpoints potentiates immunoediting and changes the dynamics of tumor evolution, Nat. Commun 9 (1) (2018) 32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [118].Kammertoens T, Qin Z, Briesemeister D, Bendelac A, Blankenstein T, B-cells and IL-4 promote methylcholanthrene-induced carcinogenesis but there is no evidence for a role of T/NKT-cells and their effector molecules (Fas-ligand, TNF-alpha, perforin), Int. J. Cancer 131 (7) (2012) 1499–1508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [119].Obenauf AC, Massague J, Surviving at a distance: organ-specific metastasis, Trends Cancer 1 (1) (2015) 76–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [120].Ren G, Esposito M, Kang Y, Bone metastasis and the metastatic niche, J. Mol. Med. (Berl) 93 (11) (2015) 1203–1212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [121].Lambert AW, Pattabiraman DR, Weinberg RA, Emerging biological principles of metastasis, Cell 168 (4) (2017) 670–691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [122].Valastyan S, Weinberg RA, Tumor metastasis: molecular insights and evolving paradigms, Cell 147 (2) (2011) 275–292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [123].Leber MF, Efferth T, Molecular principles of cancer invasion and metastasis (review), Int. J. Oncol 34 (4) (2009) 881–895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [124].Kaplan RN, Riba RD, Zacharoulis S, Bramley AH, Vincent L, Costa C, MacDonald DD, Jin DK, Shido K, Kerns SA, Zhu Z, Hiddin D, Wu Y, Port JL, Altorki N, Port ER, Ruggero D, Shmelkov SV, Jensen KK, Rafii S, Lyden D, VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the premetastatic niche, Nature 438 (7069) (2005) 820–827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [125].Folkman J, Angiogenesis: an organizing principle for drug discovery? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 6 (4) (2007) 273–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [126].Knuth A, Danowski B, Oettgen HF, Old LJ, T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity against autologous malignant melanoma: analysis with interleukin 2-dependent T-cell cultures, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sd. U. S. A 81 (11) (1984) 3511–3515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [127].van der Bruggen P, Traversari C, Chomez P, Lurquin C, De Plaen E, Van den Eynde B, Knuth A, Boon T, A gene encoding an antigen recognized by cytolytic T lymphocytes on a human melanoma, Science 254 (5038) (1991) 1643–1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [128].Van Der Bruggen P, Zhang Y, Chaux P, Stroobant V, Panichelli C, Schultz ES, Chapiro J, Van Den Eynde BJ, Brasseur F, Boon T, Tumor-specific shared antigenic peptides recognized by human T cells, Immunol Rev. 188 (2002) 51–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [129].de Jager W, te Velthuis H, Prakken BJ, Kuis W, Rijkers GT, Simultaneous detection of 15 human cytokines in a single sample of stimulated peripheral blood mononudear cells, Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol 10 (1) (2003) 133–139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [130].Naito Y, Saito K, Shiiba K, Ohuchi A, Saigenji K, Nagura H, Ohtani H, CD8+ T cells infiltrated within cancer cell nests as a prognostic factor in human colorectal cancer, Cancer Res. 58 (16) (1998) 3491–3494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [131].Galon J, Costes A, Sanchez-Cabo F, Kirilovsky A, Mlecnik B, Lagorce-Pages C, Tosolini M, Camus M, Berger A, Wind P, Zinzindohoue F, Bruneval P, Cugnenc PH, Trajanoski Z, Fridman WH, Pages F, Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome, Science 313 (5795) (2006) 1960–1964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [132].Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Robbins PF, Yang JC, Hwu P, Schwartzentruber DJ, Topalian SL, Sherry R, Restifo NP, Hubicki AM, Robinson MR, Raffeld M, Duray P, Seipp CA, Rogers-Freezer L, Morton KE, Mavroukakis SA, White DE, Rosenberg SA, Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes, Science 298 (5594) (2002) 850–854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [133].Smyth MJ, KY. Thia, S.E. Street, D. MacGregor, D.I. Godfrey, J.A. Trapani, Perforin-mediated cytotoxicity is critical for surveillance of spontaneous lymphoma, J. Exp. Med 192 (5) (2000) 755–760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [134].Klover PJ, Muller WJ, Robinson GW, Pfeiffer RM, Yamaji D, Hennighausen L, Loss of STAT1 from mouse mammary epithelium results in an increased Neu-induced tumor burden, Neoplasia 12 (11) (2010) 899–905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [135].Sun Y, Liu W-Z, Liu T, Feng X, Yang N, Zhou H-F, Signaling pathway of MAP K/ERK in cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, senescence and apoptosis, J. Recept. Signal Transduct 35 (6) (2015) 600–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [136].Ongusaha PP, Kwak JC, Zwible AJ, Macip S, Higashiyama S, Taniguchi N, Fang L, Lee SW, HB-EGF is a potent inducer of tumor growth and angiogenesis, Cancer Res. 64 (15) (2004) 5283–5290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [137].Karagiannidis I, Salataj E, Egal ESA, Beswick EJ, G-CSF in tumors: aggressiveness, tumor microenvironment and immune cell regulation, Cytokine 142 (2021), 155479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [138].Frisch BJ, The hematopoietic stem cell niche: What’s so special about bone? Bone 119 (2019) 8–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [139].Ho MS, Medcalf RL, Livesey SA, Traianedes K, The dynamics of adult haematopoiesis in the bone and bone marrow environment, Br. J. Haematol 170 (4) (2015) 472–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [140].Szade K, Gulati GS, Chan CKF, Kao KS, Miyanishi M, Marjon KD, Sinha R, George BM, Chen JY, Weissman IL, Where hematopoietic stem cells live: the bone marrow niche, Antioxid. Redox Signal 29 (2) (2018) 191–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [141].Weilbaecher KN, Guise TA, McCauley LK, Cancer to bone: a fetal attraction, Nat. Rev. Cancer 11 (6) (2011) 411–425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [142].Brylka LJ, Schinke T, Chemokines in physiological and pathological bone remodeling, Front. Immunol 10 (2019) 2182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [143].Koizumi K, Saitoh Y, Minami T, Takeno N, Tsuneyama K, Miyahara T, Nakayama T, Sakurai H, Takano Y, Nishimura M, Imai T, Yoshie O, Saiki I, Role of CX3CLl/fractalkine in osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption, J. Immunol 183 (12) (2009) 7825–7831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [144].Hoshino A, Ueha S, Hanada S, Imai T, Ito M, Yamamoto K, Matsushima K, Yamaguchi A, Iimura T, Roles of chemokine receptor CX3CR1 in maintaining murine bone homeostasis through the regulation of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts, J. Cell. Sd 126 (Pt 4) (2013) 1032–1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [145].Sims NA, Martin TJ, Coupling the activities of bone formation and resorption: a multitude of signals within the basic multicellular unit, Bonekey Rep. 3 (2014) 481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [146].Bonewald LF, The amazing osteocyte, J. Bone Miner. Res 26 (2) (2011) 229–238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [147].Tikhonova AN, Dolgalev I, Hu H, Sivaraj KK, Hoxha E, Cuesta-Dominguez A, Pinho S, Akhmetzyanova I, Gao J, Witkowski M, Guillamot M, Gutkin MC, Zhang Y, Marier C, Diefenbach C, Kousteni S, Heguy A, Zhong H, Fooksman DR, Butler JM, Economides A, Frenette PS, Adams RH, Satija R, Tsirigos A, Aifantis I, The bone marrow microenvironment at single-cell resolution, Nature 569 (7755) (2019) 222–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [148].Baryawno N, Przybylski D, Kowalczyk MS, Kfoury Y, Severe N, Gustafsson K, Kokkaliaris KD, Mercier F, Tabaka M, Hofree M, Dionne D, Papazian A, Lee D, Ashenberg O, Subramanian A, Vaishnav ED, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Regev A, Scadden DT, A cellular taxonomy of the bone marrow Stroma in homeostasis and leukemia, Cell 177 (7) (2019) 1915–1932 el6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [149].Wolock SL, Krishnan I, Tenen DE, Matkins V, Camacho V, Patel S, Agarwal P, Bhatia R, Tenen DG, Klein AM, Weiner RS, Mapping distinct bone marrow niche populations and their differentiation paths, Cell Rep. 28 (2) (2019) 302–311 e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [150].Bacdn C, Al-Sabah J, Velten L, Helbling PM, Grunschlager F, Hemandez-Malmierca P, Nombela-Arrieta C, Steinmetz LM, Trumpp A, Haas S, Combined single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveal the molecular, cellular and spatial bone marrow niche organization, Nat. Cell Biol 22 (1) (2020) 38–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [151].Siddiqui JA, Le Henaff C, Johnson J, He Z, Rifkin DB, Partridge NC, Osteoblastic monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-l) mediation of parathyroid hormone’s anabolic actions in bone implicates TGF-beta signaling, Bone 143 (2021), 115762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [152].Siddiqui JA, Johnson J, Le Henaff C, Bitei CL, Tamasi JA, Partridge NC, Catabolic effects of human PTH (1–34) on bone: requirement of monocyte chemoattractant Protein-1 in murine model of hyperparathyroidism, Sd. Rep 7 (1) (2017) 15300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [153].Buenrostro D, Mulcrone PL, Owens P, Sterling JA, The bone microenvironment: a fertile soil for tumor growth, Curr. Osteoporos. Rep 14 (4) (2016) 151–158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [154].Kang Y, Dissecting tumor-stromal interactions in breast cancer bone metastasis, Endocrinol. Metab. (Seoul) 31 (2) (2016) 206–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [155].Croucher PI, McDonald MM, Martin TJ, Bone metastasis: the importance of the neighbourhood, Nat. Rev. Cancer 16 (6) (2016) 373–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [156].Lind M, Growth factor Stimulation of bone healing. Effects on osteoblasts, osteomies, and implants fixation, Acta Orthop. Scand. Suppl 283 (1998) 2–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [157].Siddiqui JA, Partridge NC, Physiological bone remodeling: systemic regulation and growth factor involvement, Physiology (Bethesda) 31 (3) (2016) 233–245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [158].Fometti J, Welm AL, Stewart SA, Understanding the bone in cancer metastasis, J. Bone Miner. Res 33 (12) (2018) 2099–2113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [159].Ambrosi TH, Longaker MT, Chan CKF, A revised perspective of skeletal stem cell biology, Front. Cell Dev. Biol 7 (2019) 189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [160].Murphy MP, Irizarry D, Lopez M, Moore AL, Ransom RC, Longaker MT, Wan DC, Chan CKF, The role of skeletal stem cells in the reconstruction of bone defects, J. Craniofac. Surg 28 (5) (2017) 1136–1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [161].Long F, Building strong bones: molecular regulation of the osteoblast lineage, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 13 (1) (2011) 27–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [162].Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Akatsu T, Tanaka H, Sasaki T, Nishihara T, Koga T, Martin TJ, Suda T, Origin of osteoclasts: mature monocytes and macrophages are capable of differentiating into osteoclasts under a suitable microenvironment prepared by bone marrow-derived stromal cells, Proc. Natl· Acad. Sd. U. S. A 87 (18) (1990) 7260–7264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [163].Cappellen D, Luong-Nguyen NH, Bongiovanni S, Grenet O, Wanke C, Susa M, Transcriptional program of mouse osteoclast differentiation governed by the macrophage colony-stimulating factor and the ligand for the receptor activator of NFkappa B, J. Biol. Chem 277 (24) (2002) 21971–21982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [164].Lu Y, Cai Z, Xiao G, Liu Y, Keller ET, Yao Z, Zhang J, CCR2 expression correlates with prostate cancer progression, J. Cell. Biochem 101 (3) (2007) 676–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [165].Lu Y, Chen Q, Corey E, Xie W, Fan J, Mizokami A, Zhang J, Activation of MCP-1/CCR2 axis promotes prostate cancer growth in bone, Clin. Exp. Metastasis 26 (2) (2009) 161–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [166].Loberg RD, Day LL, Harwood J, Ying C, St John LN, Giles R, Neeley CK, Pienta KJ, CCL2 is a potent regulator of prostate cancer cell migration and proliferation, Neoplasia 8 (7) (2006) 578–586, 10.1593/neo.06280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [167].Mizutani K, Sud S, McGregor NA, Martinovski G, Rice BT, Craig MJ, Varsos ZS, Roca H, Pienta KJ, The chemokine CCL2 increases prostate tumor growth and bone metastasis through macrophage and osteoclast recruitment, Neoplasia 11 (11) (2009) 1235–1242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [168].Molloy AP, Martin FT, Dwyer RM, Griffin TP, Murphy M, Barry FP, O’Brien T, Kerin MJ, Mesenchymal stem cell secretion of chemokines during differentiation into osteoblasts, and their potential role in mediating interactions with breast cancer cells, Int. J. Cancer 124 (2) (2009) 326–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [169].Hao Q, Vadgama JV, Wang P, CCL2/CCR2 signaling in cancer pathogenesis, Cell Commun. Signal 18 (1) (2020) 82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [170].Park SI, Liao J, Berry JE, Li X, Koh AJ, Michalski ME, Eber MR, Soki FN, Sadler D, Sud S, Tisdelle S, Daignault SD, Nemeth JA, Snyder LA, Wronski TJ, Pienta KJ, McCauley LK, Cyclophosphamide creates a receptive microenvironment for prostate cancer skeletal metastasis, Cancer Res. 72 (10) (2012) 2522–2532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [171].Maolake A, Izumi K, Shigehara K, Natsagdoij A, Iwamoto H, Kadomoto S, Takezawa Y, Machioka K, Narimoto K, Namiki M, Lin WJ, Wufuer G, Mizokami A, Tumor-associated macrophages promote prostate cancer migration through activation of the CCL22-CCR4 axis, Oncotarget 8 (6) (2017) 9739–9751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [172].Sicoli D, Jiao X, Ju X, Velasco-Velazquez M, Ertel A, Addya S, Ii Z, Ando S, Fatatis A, Paudyal B, Cristofanilli M, Thakur ML, Lisanti MP, Pestell RG, CCR5 receptor antagonists block metastasis to bone of v-Src oncogene-transformed metastatic prostate cancer cell lines, Cancer Res. 74 (23) (2014) 7103–7114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [173].Shen F, Zhang Y, Jemigan DL, Feng X, Yan J, Garda FU, Meucci O, Salvino JM, Fatatis A, Novel small-molecule CX3CR1 antagonist impairs metastatic seeding and colonization of breast cancer cells, Mol. Cancer Res 14 (6) (2016) 518–527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [174].Shulby SA, Dolloff NG, Stearns ME, Meucci O, Fatatis A, CX3CR1-fractalkine expression regulates cellular mechanisms involved in adhesion, migration, and survival of human prostate cancer cells, Cancer Res. 64 (14) (2004) 4693–4698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [175].Jamieson WL, Shimizu S, D’Ambrosio JA, Meucci O, Fatatis A, CX3CR1 is expressed by prostate epithelial cells and androgens regulate the levels of CX3CL1/fractalkine in the bone marrow: potential role in prostate cancer bone tropism, Cancer Res. 68 (6) (2008) 1715–1722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [176].Liu P, Liang Y, Jiang L, Wang H, Wang S, Dong J, CX3CL1/fractalkine enhances prostate cancer spinal metastasis by activating the Src/FAK pathway, Int. J. Oncol 53 (4) (2018) 1544–1556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [177].Liu Y, Ma H, Dong T, Yan Y, Sun L, Wang W, Clinical significance of expression level of CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis in bone metastasis of lung cancer, Clin. Transl. Oncol 23 (2) (2021) 378–388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [178].Perez-Garda J, Munoz-Couselo E, Cortes J, Bone metastases: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities, EJC Suppl. 11 (2) (2013) 254–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [179].Yang Z, Yue Z, Ma X, Xu Z, Calcium homeostasis: a potential vicious cycle of bone metastasis in breast cancers, Front. Oncol 10 (2020) 293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [180].Shiozawa Y, Pedersen EA, Havens AM, Jung Y, Mishra A, Joseph J, Kim JK, Patel LR, Ying C, Ziegler AM, Pienta MJ, Song J, Wang J, Loberg RD, Krebsbach PH, Pienta KJ, Taichman RS, Human prostate cancer metastases target the hematopoietic stem cell niche to establish footholds in mouse bone marrow, J. Clin. Invest 121 (4) (2011) 1298–1312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [181].Correa D, Somoza RA, Lin P, Schiemann WP, Caplan AI, Mesenchymal stem cells regulate melanoma cancer cells extravasation to bone and liver at their perivascular niche, Int. J. Cancer 138 (2) (2016) 417–427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [182].Sugiyama T, Kohara H, Noda M, Nagasawa T, Maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine signaling in bone marrow stromal cell niches, Immunity 25 (6) (2006) 977–988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [183].Chai RC, McDonald MM, Visualisation of tumour cells in bone in vivo at single-cell resolution, Bone (2021), 116113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [184].Muller A, Homey B, Soto H, Ge N, Catron D, Buchanan ME, McClanahan T, Murphy E, Yuan W, Wagner SN, Barrera JL, Mohar A, Verastegui E, Zlotnik A, Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis, Nature 410 (6824) (2001) 50–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [185].Gao Y, Bado I, Wang H, Zhang W, Rosen JM, Zhang XH, Metastasis organotropism: redefining the congenial soil, Dev. Cell 49 (3) (2019) 375–391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [186].Wiley HE, Gonzalez EB, Maki W, Wu MT, Hwang ST, Expression of CC chemokine receptor-7 and regional lymph node metastasis of B16 murine melanoma, J. Natl. Cancer Inst 93 (21) (2001) 1638–1643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [187].Cunningham HD, Shannon LA, Calloway PA, Fassold BC, Dunwiddie I, Vielhauer G, Zhang M, Vines CM, Expression of the C-C chemokine receptor 7 mediates metastasis of breast cancer to the lymph nodes in mice, Transl Oncol. 3 (6) (2010) 354–361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [188].Murakami T, Maki W, Cardones AR, Fang H, Tun Kyi A, Nestle FO, Hwang ST, Expression of CXC chemokine receptor-4 enhances the pulmonary metastatic potential of murine B16 melanoma cells, Cancer Res. 62 (24) (2002) 7328–7334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [189].Budczies J, von Winterfeld M, Klauschen F, Bockmayr M, Lennerz JK, Denkert C, Wolf T, Warth A, Dietel M, Anagnostopoulos I, Weichert W, Wittschieber D, Stenzinger A, The landscape of metastatic progression patterns across major human cancers, Oncotarget 6 (1) (2015) 570–583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [190].Pathi SP, Kowalczewski C, Tadipatri R, Fischbach C, A novel 3-D mineralized tumor model to study breast cancer bone metastasis, PLoS One 5 (1) (2010) e8849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [191].Letsch A, Keilholz U, Schadendorf D, Assfalg G, Asemissen AM, Thiel E, Scheibenbogen C, Functional CCR9 expression is associated with small intestinal metastasis, J. Invest. Dermatol 122 (3) (2004) 685–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [192].Kelly T, Suva LJ, Nicks KM, MacLeod V, Sanderson RD, Tumor-derived syndecan-1 mediates distal cross-talk with bone that enhances osteoclastogenesis, J. Bone Miner. Res 25 (6) (2010) 1295–1304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [193].Kamalakar A, Bendre MS, Washam CL, Fowler TW, Carver A, Dilley JD, Bracey JW, Akel NS, Margulies AG, Skinner RA, Swain FL, Hogue WR, Montgomery CO, Lahiji P, Maher JJ, Leitzel KE, Ali SM, Lipton A, Nicholas RW, Gaddy D, Suva LJ, Circulating interleukin-8 levels explain breast cancer osteolysis in mice and humans, Bone 61 (2014) 176–185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [194].Yang YH, Buhamrah A, Schneider A, Lin YL, Zhou H, Bugshan A, Basile JR, Semaphorin 4D promotes skeletal metastasis in breast cancer, PLoS One 11 (2) (2016), e0150151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [195].Bendre MS, Margulies AG, Walser B, Akel NS, Bhattacharrya S, Skinner RA, Swain F, Ramani V, Mohammad KS, Wessner LL, Martinez A, Guise TA, Chirgwin JM, Gaddy D, Suva LJ, Tumor-derived interleukin-8 stimulates osteolysis independent of the receptor activator of nudear factor-kappaB ligand pathway, Cancer Res. 65 (23) (2005) 11001–11009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [196].Siddiqui JA, Partridge NC, CCL2/monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 and parathyroid hormone action on bone, Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 8 (2017) 49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [197].Bussard KM, Okita N, Sharkey N, Neuberger T, Webb A, Mastro AM, Localization of osteoblast inflammatory cytokines MCP-1 and VEGF to the matrix of the trabecula of the femur, a target area for metastatic breast cancer cell colonization, Clin. Exp. Metastasis 27 (5) (2010) 331–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [198].Lu X, Kang Y, Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 engages CCR2+ stromal cells of monocytic origin to promote breast cancer metastasis to lung and bone, J. Biol. Chem 284 (42) (2009) 29087–29096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [199].Sasaki S, Baba T, Nishimura T, Hayakawa Y, Hashimoto S, Gotoh N, Mukaida N, Essential roles of the interaction between cancer cell-derived chemokine, CCL4, and intra-bone CCR5-expressing fibroblasts in breast cancer bone metastasis, Cancer Lett. 378 (1) (2016) 23–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [200].Celia-Terrassa T, Jolly MK, Cancer stem cells and epithelial-to-Mesenchymal transition in cancer metastasis, Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med 10 (7) (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [201].Karagiannis GS, Condeelis JS, Oktay MH, Chemotherapy-induced metastasis: molecular mechanisms, clinical manifestations, therapeutic interventions, Cancer Res. 79 (18) (2019) 4567–4576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [202].Coussens LM, Werb Z, Inflammation and cancer, Nature 420 (6917) (2002) 860–867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [203].Lin WW, Karin M, A cytokine-mediated link between innate immunity, inflammation, and cancer, J. Clin. Invest 117 (5) (2007) 1175–1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [204].Maeda T, Hobbs RM, Merghoub T, Guemah I, Zelent A, Cordon-Cardo C, Teruya-Feldstein J, Pandolfi PP, Role of the proto-oncogene Pokemon in cellular transformation and ARF repression, Nature 433 (7023) (2005) 278–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [205].Jolly MK, Celià-Terrassa T, Dynamics of phenotypic heterogeneity associated with EMT and stemness during cancer progression, J. Clin. Med 8 (10) (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [206].Chen S, Huang EH, The colon cancer stem cdl microenvironment holds keys to future cancer therapy, J. Gastro intest. Surg 18 (5) (2014) 1040–1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [207].Pajonk F, Vlashi E, Characterization of the stem cell niche and its importance in radiobiological response, Semin. Radiat. Oncol 23 (4) (2013) 237–241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [208].Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ, Cancer stem cells: current status and evolving complexities, Cell Stem Cell 10 (6) (2012) 717–728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [209].Yang L, Shi P, Zhao G, Xu J, Peng W, Zhang J, Zhang G, Wang X, Dong Z, Chen F, Cui H, Targeting cancer stem cell pathways for cancer therapy, Signal Transdud. Target. Ther 5 (1) (2020) 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [210].Do HTT, Lee CH, Cho J, Chemokines and their Receptors: Multifaceted Roles in Cancer Progression and Potential Value as Cancer Prognostic Markers, Cancers (Basel) 12 (2) (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [211].Dubrovska A, Elliott J, Salamone RJ, Telegeev GD, Stakhovsky AE, Schepotin IB, Yan F, Wang Y, Bouchez LC, Kularatne SA, Watson J, Trussell C, Reddy VA, Cho CY, Schultz PG, CXCR4 expression in prostate cancer progenitor cells, PLoS One 7 (2) (2012), e31226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [212].Jung Y, Cackowski FC, Yumoto K, Decker AM, Wang J, Kim JK, Lee E, Wang Y, Chung JS, Gursky AM, Krebsbach PH, Pienta KJ, Morgan TM, Taichman RS, CXCL12gamma promotes metastatic castration-resistant prostate Cancer by inducing cancer stem cell and neuroendocrine phenotypes, Cancer Res. 78 (8) (2018) 2026–2039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [213].Huang M, Li Y, Zhang H, Nan F, Breast cancer stromal fibroblasts promote the generation of CD44+CD24- cells through SDF-1/CXCR4 interaction, J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res 29 (2010) 80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [214].Ablett MP, O’Brien CS, Sims AH, Famie G, Clarke RB, A differential role for CXCR4 in the regulation of normal versus malignant breast stem cell activity, Oncotarget 5 (3) (2014) 599–612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [215].Kong L, Guo S, Liu C, Zhao Y, Feng C, Liu Y, Wang T, Li C, Overexpression of SDF-1 activates the NF-kappaB pathway to induce epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell-like phenotypes of breast cancer cells, Int. J. Oncol 48 (3) (2016) 1085–1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [216].Kaifi JT, Yekebas EF, Schurr P, Obonyo D, Wachowiak R, Busch P, Heinecke A, Pantel K, Izbicki JR, Tumor-cell homing to lymph nodes and bone marrow and CXCR4 expression in esophageal cancer, J. Natl. Cancer Inst 97 (24) (2005) 1840–1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [217].Charafe-Jauffret E, Ginestier C, Iovino F, Wicinski J, Cervera N, Finetti P, Hur MH, Diebel ME, Monville F, Dutcher J, Brown M, Viens P, Xerri L, Bertucd F, Stassi G, Dontu G, Birnbaum D, Wicha MS, Breast cancer cell lines contain functional cancer stem cells with metastatic capadty and a distinct molecular signature, Cancer Res. 69 (4) (2009) 1302–1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [218].Ginestier C, Liu S, Diebel ME, Korkaya H, Luo M, Brown M, Wicinski J, Cabaud O, Charafe-Jauffret E, Birnbaum D, Guan JL, Dontu G, Wicha MS, CXCR1 blockade selectively targets human breast cancer stem cells in vitro and in xenografts, J. Clin. Invest 120 (2) (2010) 485–497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [219].Singh JK, Famie G, Bundred NJ, Simoes BM, Shergill A, Landberg G, Ho well SJ, Clarke RB, Targeting CXCR1/2 significantly reduces breast cancer stem cell activity and increases the efficacy of inhibiting HER2 via HER2-dependent and -independent mechanisms, Clin. Cancer Res 19 (3) (2013) 643–656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [220].Wang N, Zheng Y, Gu J, Cai Y, Wang S, Zhang F, Chen J, Situ H, Lin Y, Wang Z, Network-pharmacology-based validation of TAMS/CXCL-1 as key mediator of XIAO PI formula preventing breast cancer development and metastasis, Sd. Rep 7 (1) (2017) 14513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [221].Zheng Y, Wang N, Wang S, Yang B, Situ H, Zhong L, Lin Y, Wang Z, XIAOPI formula inhibits the pre-metastatic niche formation in breast cancer via suppressing TAMs/CXCL1 signaling, Cell Commun. Signal 18 (1) (2020) 48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [222].Chen L, Fan J, Chen H, Meng Z, Chen Z, Wang P, Liu L, The IL-8/CXCR1 axis is associated with cancer stem cell-like properties and correlates with clinical prognosis in human pancreatic cancer cases, Sd. Rep 4 (2014) 5911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [223].Tsuyada A, Chow A, Wu J, Somlo G, Chu P, Loera S, Luu T, Ii AX, Wu X, Ye W, Chen S, Zhou W, Yu Y, Wang YZ, Ren X, Li H, Scherle P, Kuioki Y, Wang SE, CCL2 mediates cross-talk between cancer cells and stromal fibroblasts that regulates breast cancer stem cells, Cancer Res. 72 (11) (2012) 2768–2779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [224].Zhang Y, Yao F, Yao X, Yi C, Tan C, Wei L, Sun S, Role of CCL5 in invasion, proliferation and proportion of CD44+/CD24- phenotype of MCF-7 cells and correlation of CCL5 and CCR5 expression with breast cancer progression, Oncol. Rep 21 (4) (2009) 1113–1121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [225].Jiao X, Velasco-Velazquez MA, Wang M, Li Z, Rui H, Peck AR, Korkola JE, Chen X, Xu S, DUHadaway JB, Guerrero-Rodriguez S, Addya S, Sicoli D, Mu Z, Zhang G, Stucky A, Zhang X, Cristofanilli M, Fatatis A, Gray JW, Zhong JF, Prendergast GC, Pestell RG, CCR5 govems DNA damage repair and breast cancer stem cell expansion, Cancer Res. 78 (7) (2018) 1657–1671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [226].Tang X, Li X, Li Z, Liu Y, Yao L, Song S, Yang H, Li C, Downregulation of CXCR7 inhibits proliferative capacity and stem cell-like properties in breast cancer stem cells, Tumour Biol. 37 (10) (2016) 13425–13433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [227].Baghban R, Roshangar L, Jahanban-Esfahlan R, Seidi K, Ebrahimi-Kalan A, Jaymand M, Kolahian S, Javaheri T, Zare P, Tumor microenvironment complexity and therapeutic implications at a glance, Cell Commun. Signal 18 (1) (2020) 59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [228].Reyes ME, de La Fuente M, Hermoso M, Ili CG, Brebi P, Role of CC chemokines subfamily in the platinum drugs resistance promotion in cancer, Front. Immunol 11 (2020) 901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [229].Jones VS, Huang RY, Chen LP, Chen ZS, Fu L, Huang RP, Cytokines in cancer drug resistance: cues to new therapeutic strategies, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1865 (2) (2016) 255–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [230].Tao L, Huang G, Wang R, Pan Y, He Z, Chu X, Song H, Chen L, Cancer-associated fibroblasts treated with cisplatin facilitates chemoresistance of lung adenocarcinoma through IL-11/IL-11R/STAT3 signaling pathway, Sci. Rep 6 (2016) 38408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [231].Unver N, McAllister F, IL-6 family cytokines: key inflammatory mediators as biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets, Cytokine Growth Fador Rev. 41 (2018) 10–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [232].Ghandadi M, Sahebkar A, Interleukin-6: a critical cytokine in cancer multidrug resistance, Curr. Pharm. Des 22 (5) (2016) 518–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [233].Zhang C, Zhai W, Xie Y, Chen Q, Zhu W, Sun X, Mesenchymal stem cells derived from breast cancer tissue promote the proliferation and migration of the MCF-7 cell line in vitro, Oncol. Lett 6 (6) (2013) 1577–1582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [234].Xu H, Zhou Y, Li W, Zhang B, Zhang H, Zhao S, Zheng P, Wu H, Yang J, Tumor-derived mesenchymal-stem-cell-secreted IL-6 enhances resistance to cisplatin via the STAT3 pathway in breast cancer, Oncol. Lett 15 (6) (2018) 9142–9150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [235].Hudes G, Tagawa ST, Whang YE, Qi M, Qin X, Puchalski TA, Reddy M, Cornfeld M, Eisenberger M, A phase 1 study of a chimeric monoclonal antibody against interleukin-6, siltuximab, combined with docetaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, Invest. New Drugs 31 (3) (2013) 669–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [236].Ruffini PA, The CXCL8-CXCR1/2 Axis as a therapeutic target in breast cancer stem-like cells, Front. Oncol 9 (2019) 40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [237].Schott AF, Goldstein LJ, Cristofanilli M, Ruffini PA, McCanna S, Reuben JM, Perez RP, Kato G, Wicha M, Phase ib pilot study to evaluate reparixin in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with HER-2-Negative metastatic breast cancer, Clin. Cancer Res 23 (18) (2017) 5358–5365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [238].Sun X, Chen Z, Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived CCL5 contributes to cisplatin resistance in A549 NSCLC cells partially through upregulation of IncRNA HOTAIR expression, Oncol. Lett 22 (4) (2021) 696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [239].Sugiyama D, Nishikawa H, Maeda Y, Nishioka M, Tanemura A, Katayama I, Ezoe S, Kanakura Y, Sato E, Fukumori Y, Karbach J, Jager E, Sakaguchi S, Anti-CCR4 mAb selectively depletes effector-type FoxP3+CD4+ regulatory T cells, evoking antitumor immune responses in humans, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A 110 (44) (2013) 17945–17950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [240].Wu T, Zhao Y, Wang H, Li Y, Shao L, Wang R, Lu J, Yang Z, Wang J, Zhao Y, mTOR masters monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in mice with allografts or tumors, Sci. Rep 6 (2016) 20250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [241].Beziaud L, Mansi L, Ravel P, Marie-Joseph EL, Laheurte C, Rangan L, Bonnefoy F, Pallandre JR, Boullerot L, Gamonet C, Vrecko S, Queiroz L, Maurina T, Mouillet G, Hon TN, Curtit E, Royer B, Gaugier B, Bayry J, Tartour E, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Pivot X, Borg C, Godet Y, Adotevi O, Rapalogs efficacy relies on the modulation of antitumor T-cell immunity, Cancer Res. 76 (14) (2016) 4100–4112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [242].Beziaud L, Boullerot L, Tran T, Mansi L, Marie-Joseph EL, Ravel P, Johannes L, Bayry J, Tartour E, Adotevi O, Rapalog combined with CCR4 antagonist improves anticancer vaednes efficacy, Int. J. Cancer 143 (11) (2018) 3008–3018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [243].Ruiz de Porras V, Wang XC, Palomero L, Marin-Aguilera M, Sole-Blanch C, Indacochea A, Jimenez N, Bystrup S, Bakht M, Conteduca V, Piulats JM, Buisan O, Suarez JF, Pardo JC, Castro E, Olmos D, Beltran H, Mellado B, Martinez-Balibrea E, Font A, Aytes A, Taxane-induced attenuation of the CXCR2/BCL-2 axis sensitizes prostate cancer to platinum-based treatment, Eur. Urol 79 (6) (2021) 722–733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [244].Xie S, Tu Z, Xiong J, Kang G, Zhao L, Hu W, Tan H, Tembo KM, Ding Q, Deng X, Huang J, Zhang Q, CXCR4 promotes cisplatin-resistance of non-small cell lung cancer in a CYP1B1-dependent manner, Oncol. Rep 37 (2) (2017) 921–928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [245].Wei L, Liu Y, Ma Y, Ding C, Zhang H, Lu Z, Gu Z, Zhu C, C-X-C chemokine receptor 2 correlates with unfavorable prognosis and facilitates malignant cell activities via activating JAK2/STAT3 pathway in non-small cell lung cancer, Cell Cyde 18 (24) (2019) 3456–3471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [246].Xin M, Lin D, Yan N, Li H, Li J, Huang Z, Oxaliplatin facilitates tumorinfiltration of T cells and natural-killer cells for enhanced tumor immunotherapy in lung cancer model, Anticancer Drugs (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [247].Mollica Poeta V, Massara M, Capucetti A, Bonecchi R, Chemokines and chemokine receptors: new targets for cancer immunotherapy, Front. Immunol 10 (2019) 379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [248].Li R, Salehi-Rad R, Crosson W, Momdlovic M, Lim RJ, Ong SL, Huang ZL, Zhang T, Abascal J, Dumitras C, Jing Z, Park SJ, Krysan K, Shackelford DB, Tran LM, Liu B, Dubinett SM, Inhibition of granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells overcomes resistance to immune Checkpoint Inhibition in LKB1-defident non-small cell lung cancer, Cancer Res. 81 (12) (2021) 3295–3308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [249].Burger JA, Kipps TJ, CXCR4: a key receptor in the crosstalk between tumor cells and their microenvironment, Blood 107 (5) (2006) 1761–1767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [250].Jung Y, Wang J, Schneider A, Sun YX, Koh-Paige AJ, Osman NI, McCauley LK, Taichman RS, Regulation of SDF-1 (CXCL12) production by osteoblasts; a possible mechanism for stem cell homing, Bone 38 (4) (2006) 497–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [251].Sun YX, Schneider A, Jung Y, Wang J, Dai J, Wang J, Cook K, Osman NI, Koh-Paige AJ, Shim H, Pienta KJ, Keller ET, McCauley LK, Taichman RS, Skeletal localization and neutralization of the SDF-1 (CXCL12)/CXCR4 axis blocks prostate cancer metastasis and growth in osseous sites in vivo, J. Bone Miner. Res 20 (2) (2005) 318–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [252].Price TT, Bumess ML, Sivan A, Warner MJ, Cheng R, Lee CH, Olivere L, Comatas K, Magnani J, Kim Lyerly H, Cheng Q, McCall CM, Sipkins DA, Dormant breast cancer micrometastases reside in specific bone marrow niches that regulate their transit to and from bone, Sd. Transl. Med 8 (340) (2016), 340ra73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [253].Hughes R, Qian BZ, Rowan C, Muthana M, Keklikoglou I, Olson OC, Tazzyman S, Danson S, Addison C, Qemons M, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Joyce JA, De Palma M, Pollard JW, Lewis CE, Perivascular M2 macrophages stimulate tumor relapse after chemotherapy, Cancer Res. 75 (17) (2015) 3479–3491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [254].Zhao L, Lim SY, Gordon-Weeks AN, Tapmeier TT, Im JH, Cao Y, Beech J, Allen D, Smart S, Muschel RJ, Recruitment of a myeloid cell subset (CD11b/Gr1 mid) via CCL2/CCR2 promotes the development of coloredal cancer liver metastasis, Hepatology 57 (2) (2013) 829–839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [255].Qian BZ, Li J, Zhang H, Kitamura T, Zhang J, Campion LR, Kaiser EA, Snyder LA, Pollard JW, CCL2 recruits inflammatory monocytes to facilitate breast-tumour metastasis, Nature 475 (7355) (2011) 222–225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [256].Wolf MJ, Hoos A, Bauer J, Boettcher S, Knust M, Weber A, Simonavicius N, Schneider C, Lang M, Sturzl M, Croner RS, Konrad A, Manz MG, Moch H, Aguzzi A, van Loo G, Pasparakis M, Prinz M, Borsig L, Heikenwalder M, Endothelial CCR2 signaling induced by colon cardnoma cells enables extravasation via the JAK2-Stat5 and p38MAPK pathway, Cancer Cell 22 (1) (2012) 91–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable, all information in this review can be found in the reference list.
