Skip to main content
American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology logoLink to American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology
. 2022 Oct 17;323(6):C1777–C1790. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00181.2022

The underappreciated role of resident epithelial cell populations in metastatic progression: contributions of the lung alveolar epithelium

Jessica L Christenson 1,, Michelle M Williams 1, Jennifer K Richer 1
PMCID: PMC9744653  PMID: 36252127

graphic file with name c-00181-2022r01.jpg

Keywords: alveoli, epithelium, lung, metastasis, pneumocytes

Abstract

Metastatic cancer is difficult to treat and is responsible for the majority of cancer-related deaths. After cancer cells initiate metastasis and successfully seed a distant site, resident cells in the tissue play a key role in determining how metastatic progression develops. The lung is the second most frequent site of metastatic spread, and the primary site of metastasis within the lung is alveoli. The most abundant cell type in the alveolar niche is the epithelium. This review will examine the potential contributions of the alveolar epithelium to metastatic progression. It will also provide insight into other ways in which alveolar epithelial cells, acting as immune sentinels within the lung, may influence metastatic progression through their various interactions with cells in the surrounding microenvironment.

INTRODUCTION

Metastasis is the spread of cancer cells from the original tumor to distant organs. Metastases are routinely difficult to treat and are ultimately responsible for the majority of cancer-related deaths (13). The cascade of events that occur during metastasis is well defined and includes the sequential stages of invasion, intravasation, circulation, extravasation, and colonization (reviewed in Ref. 4). Dissemination of cancer cells occurs early on in tumor development (5), but only a very limited number of cancer cells effectively metastasize (6, 7). As described by Welch and Hurst (8) in their review defining the hallmarks of metastasis, cancer cells must possess four key features to successfully metastasize: 1) motility and invasion, 2) the ability to modulate the secondary site, 3) plasticity, and 4) the ability to colonize the secondary tissue. Metastatic progression, however, involves more than dissemination of cancer cells from the primary site and seeding of a distant organ. Several distinct stages in progression occur after cancer cells reach the metastatic site, such as quiescence, colonization, outgrowth, and even secondary dissemination from the metastatic site (Fig. 1). Bearing that in mind, resident cells at the metastatic site undoubtedly play a key role in determining how metastatic progression develops and distinctions such as whether a metastatic cell undergoes quiescence/dormancy or colonizes the lung can have a dramatic impact on patient survival.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Metastatic progression. The well-known steps of the metastatic cascade define the early stages of metastatic progression involving dissemination and seeding of a distant site. Later stages of progression, including quiescence, colonization, and outgrowth, are distinct processes that occur within the metastatic site. The final stages of metastatic progression, which lead to terminal disease, include the outgrowth of macrometastases and/or secondary dissemination to other organs. It is critical that every stage of metastatic progression be considered when attempting to block or treat metastatic cancer. [Figure created with BioRender.com and published with permission.]

The lung is the second most frequent site of metastatic spread (9), and up to 54% of all cancer types, including breast and prostate, metastasize to the lung (10). Even when cancers metastasize to other organs initially, the lung is a common secondary metastatic site (11). Patients with lung metastases generally have poor overall survival. For instance, the median overall survival for patients with metastatic breast cancer is 2–5 years (12), but patients with lung metastases have substantially shortened survival with median survival dropping to just 13 mo (13). To effectively treat patients with lung metastases, it is critical that we understand the many and varied cellular interactions that occur in the metastatic microenvironment. Since the most abundant cell type in the lung is the epithelium, this review will examine the potential contributions of the alveolar epithelium to metastatic progression.

THE LUNG ALVEOLAR AIRSPACE

The primary site of metastasis within the lung is the parenchyma, the portion of the lung involved in gas exchange (14, 15). The parenchyma in the adult human lung comprises upward of 500 million alveoli, designed to maximize gas exchange by expanding the total surface area of the lung (16, 17). Alveoli are the terminal structures of the branched lung architecture and consist of four main components: 1) type I alveolar epithelial (AT1) cells, 2) type II alveolar epithelial (AT2) cells, 3) pulmonary surfactant, and 4) alveolar macrophages (AM) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The alveolar airspace. Alveoli are the terminal structures of the branched lung architecture where gas exchange occurs through the close association with pulmonary vasculature. There are four main components within the lumen of the alveolar airspace: type I alveolar epithelial cells, type II alveolar epithelial cells, pulmonary surfactant, and alveolar macrophages. RBCs, red blood cells. [Figure created with BioRender.com and published with permission.]

Type I Alveolar Epithelial Cells

Epithelial cells within the alveolar niche are called pneumocytes. AT1 pneumocytes cover ∼95% of the interior of each alveolus (17). These thin cells, with few organelles, share a basement membrane with capillary endothelium and form tight junctions with surrounding cells to form a barrier to limit fluid infiltration into the alveolus (17). Although the primary role of AT1 cells is to perform gas exchange, which is enabled by their close proximity to pulmonary capillaries, they also assist with ion and fluid homeostasis and communicate directly with AT2 cells in response to pulmonary stretch and injury (17, 18).

Type II Alveolar Epithelial Cells

AT2 pneumocytes are large, cuboidal cells with microvilli on their apical surface (17). They are distinguished by large granular secretory bodies, called lamellar bodies, that occupy up to 25% of their cytoplasmic space (17). AT2 cells are commonly called the “defenders of the alveolus” (19, 20) and have three primary functions: 1) to facilitate AT1 gas exchange by secreting pulmonary surfactant, 2) to serve as the stem cells of the alveolar epithelium, a necessary component of wound resolution (20), and 3) to serve as the master regulators of host defense and repair within the lung by initiating and coordinating the repair process. This critical immunological coordination is achieved through direct and indirect interactions with cells in the microenvironment (2022).

Pulmonary Surfactant

AT2 cells produce and secrete pulmonary surfactant, which is stored intracellularly in lamellar bodies (17). Surfactant is a lipid and protein conglomerate that reduces surface tension within the alveolus and prevents airway collapse during exhalation (23). Surfactant evenly covers the inner surface of alveoli and is composed of a lower aqueous hypophase and upper phospholipid phase. Once released into the hypophase, the contents of AT2 lamellar bodies transform into lattice-like tubular myelin to form the upper phospholipid layer (reviewed in Ref. 24). Surfactant is composed of 90% lipids, 80%–90% of which are phospholipids, and 10% proteins (25), including surfactant proteins (SP-) A, B, C, and D (26). Hydrophobic SP-B and SP-C are required for regulation of surface tension and are located within the upper phase of phospholipids. In contrast, hydrophilic SP-A and SP-D are present in the hypophase and are involved in modulating innate host immunity, another major function of pulmonary surfactant (26). SP-A and SP-D bind to the surfaces of various pathogens to segregate them from epithelial cell membranes and facilitate their elimination by AM (20).

Alveolar Macrophages

AM are located within the lumen of alveoli, directly exposed to air (27). AM are a resident cell population distinct from recruited macrophages, which arise from circulating monocytes, and those that reside between the airway epithelium, termed interstitial macrophages (reviewed in Refs. 27 and 28). AM populate the alveoli soon after birth and originate from yoke sac-derived fetal monocytes, a process completely independent of bone marrow-derived monocytes. AM are long-lived and replenished throughout life by self-renewal (29, 30). In fact, ∼40% of the AM population within the lung is replaced each year (31). AM phagocytose and destroy inhaled particles and pathogens as well as dead cells and irregularly formed surfactant (17, 27). AM activity increases during infection (17), and AM secrete proinflammatory cytokines to enhance pulmonary immune responses (20, 28).

THE ROLE OF ALVEOLAR EPITHELIAL CELLS IN METASTASIS

AT1 and AT2 cells are the most prominent cells within the alveolus and are, thus, closely associated with cancer cells during metastasis. Although further research is needed and much remains unknown, several initial studies indicate that alveolar epithelial cells may have a considerable impact on metastatic progression. The following discussion will enumerate our current understanding of how the alveolar epithelium contributes to different stages of metastatic progression (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The role of the lung alveolar epithelium in metastatic progression. Alveoli are the primary location of metastasis within the lung, and alveolar epithelial cells are the most prominent resident cells within the alveolar airspace. Recent studies indicate that interactions between metastatic and epithelial cells in the alveoli promote metastatic progression at several stages throughout this process (3239). [Figure created with BioRender.com and published with permission.]

Preparation of the Premetastatic Niche and Seeding

A groundbreaking study in 2015 found that neutrophils promote breast cancer lung metastasis by preparing the metastatic niche for seeding. This study showed that neutrophils traffic to the lung before metastasis. Metastasis was significantly enhanced by neutrophil trafficking to the premetastatic niche and the recruitment of neutrophils to the lung was dependent on both the presence of a primary tumor as well as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) signaling from the lung. These data suggested that primary cancer cells induce cells within the lung to recruit neutrophils (40). It was later discovered that primary tumor-derived exosomal RNA activates toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) on AT2 cells, subsequently inducing secretion of chemokines that recruit neutrophils to the lung (32, 33). This process is reminiscent of what happens in the lung during inflammation and infection. TLRs recognize bacterial products, and TLR activation in AT2 cells induces chemokine secretion and recruitment of neutrophil to the lung (4143). Similarly, primary tumor-derived exosomal microRNA can induce C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) expression and secretion in AT2 cells. Lung CCL2 serves as a chemoattractant for myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC), which then promote metastasis (34). Incidentally, these MDSC effects may be dependent on diminished levels of lysosomal acid lipase (LAL) in AT2 cells. LAL expression in AT2 cells downregulates the synthesis and secretion of tumor-promoting cytokines and decreases the recruitment and expansion of MDSC. Essentially, LALHi AT2 cells, which are responsible for regulation of lung homeostasis and immune responses (44), prevent metastasis by limiting the number of MDSC present within the lung. What these data suggest is that primary tumor signaling to lung AT2 cells plays a significant role in determining whether disseminating tumor cells can effectively seed the lung.

Disseminated Tumor Cell Quiescence and Dormancy

When disseminated tumor cells enter the alveolus, they frequently come into direct contact with AT1 cells. A recent study found that the direct cell-cell interactions between AT1 and disseminated tumor cells stimulate tumor cell dormancy (35). Interestingly, this effect is predicated on the ability of cancer cells to form cellular protrusions that maximized their direct contact with AT1 cells. AT1 cells induce prosurvival and growth-restrictive gene expression in cancer cells that subsequently lead to quiescence. Mechanistically, AT1 cells suppress apoptosis and induced dormancy in cancer cells by activating signaling pathways associated with cancer dormancy, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Src family kinase (SFK) signaling. These effects were only observed in more indolent cancer cells, as opposed to more aggressive, highly proliferative cancer cells, which suggests that cancer cells themselves play a critical role in this reciprocal interaction (35). Another more recent study showed similar results, indicating that coculture with AT1 cells induces a transcriptional program in tumor cells that is associated with disseminated dormant cancer cells (36).

Metastatic Niche Formation and Colonization

Metastatic cells can alter the metastatic niche early in metastatic progression in ways that allow for subsequent metastatic colonization. In an effort to better understand and characterize changes to the early metastatic niche, Ombrato et al. (37) developed a unique labeling system that could assist in isolating cells directly adjacent to metastatic cells. In this system, mammary carcinoma cells secrete a soluble red fluorescent protein (RFP) that is taken up by surrounding cells in the lung. These RFP-positive cells could then be sorted out and compared with nonadjacent RFP-negative cells (37). Using this system, they found that early metastases induced a more stem-like phenotype in adjacent AT2 cells. These epithelial cells began to express progenitor markers and exhibit higher proliferative activity (37). Similar results were observed in a model of ovarian cancer pulmonary metastasis. In that study, alveolar epithelial cells adopted a stem-like lineage and began to express the pulmonary progenitor marker CD90 (38, 45). Together, these data indicate that tumor cells modify the surrounding metastatic niche by inducing stemness in adjacent AT2 cells to create a more tumor-permissive microenvironment. The metastasis-associated AT2 phenotype described in these studies is remarkably similar to what happens to AT2 cells during wound repair. To restore normal alveolar structure following injury, AT2 cells proliferate, enhance stemness, and transdifferentiate into AT1 cells to finalize wound resolution (46, 47). Thus, cancer cells may co-opt this AT2 wound repair process to facilitate metastatic progression.

Reversal of Disseminated Tumor Cell Dormancy

When disseminated tumor cells invade a distant metastatic site, the cells either undergo cell death or establish themselves within the tissue, termed seeding. At this stage, metastatic tumor cells can actively proliferate to colonize the site or they enter a dormant state of quiescence where they can survive for long periods of time (Fig. 1 and reviewed in Ref. 48). This state of dormancy is what accounts for patients presenting with metastatic disease years after their initial diagnosis. The reversal of tumor cell dormancy is an active area of research for cancer biologists and AT2 transdifferentiation may support this process. One study found that coculturing AT2 cells with cancer cells enhance transdifferentiation to AT1 cells, which subsequently promotes the proliferation of indolent breast cancer cells in a three-dimensional (3-D) culture model of dormancy. This interaction caused an upregulation of AT2 transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) secretion and snail family transcriptional repressor 2 (SNAI2) expression in cancer cells (39). Although it is unclear how to reconcile these results with the other AT1 cell data described earlier, future research may clarify the link between these disparate studies. In fact, the “reversal of dormancy” described in this study was recapitulated by culturing indolent cancer cells in conditioned media from AT2 cells stimulated with proinflammatory lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which suggests that it may be AT2 activation, rather than transdifferentiation, that induces cancer cell proliferation. It is also possible that additional characterization could discover whether the transdifferentiated phenotype described in this study is similar to the stem-like phenotype described earlier (37, 38). Ultimately, these disparate AT1 cell functions may not be mutually exclusive, but only context-dependent.

Metastatic Outgrowth

AT2 cells have also been shown to promote cancer cell proliferation. Ombrato et al. (37) used the niche labeling system described above to isolate AT2 cells and coculture them with cancer cells. Metastasis-adjacent AT2 cells promoted the growth of cancer cells in 3-D culture (37). Moreover, while looking at the growth-suppressive effects of AT1 cells, Montagner et al. (35) postulate that the AT2 cells emanate proliferative cues that AT1 cells block to induce dormancy. Although these studies are limited, they strongly suggest that AT2 cells may play a role in metastatic outgrowth as well.

ALVEOLAR EPITHELIAL CELL INTERACTIONS

Although the number of studies examining how alveolar epithelial cells contribute to metastasis is limited, numerous studies examine the interactions between alveolar epithelial cells and cells within the microenvironment. Every day we inhale more than 2,500 gallons of nonsterile air (49), which causes some distinct challenges for maintenance of homoeostasis within the lung. Mason (49) described the situation succinctly in his review on lung epithelial cells in which he states that “The alveolus must deal with low levels of inhaled organisms without inducing much of an inflammatory response [to avoid injury] but then must switch and produce a significant immune response once an overt infection is established.” The lung epithelium preserves homeostasis and is the first line of host defense against pathogens and inhaled particles (50). AT2 cells, in particular, are considered master regulators of immune responses within the alveolus (51), integrating signals from a variety of cells to coordinate responses to injury and infection (Fig. 4). Listed below are some of the primary ways in which AT2 cells influence adjacent cells in the lung microenvironment. This list includes cellular interactions compiled from studies investigating various lung conditions such as chronic disease, allergies, bacterial infection, inflammation, viral infection, and injury. Many of these studies were conducted using mouse models, and while the mouse lung is incredibly similar to the human lung, there are some subtle differences that may influence the translation of some of these results to humans (reviewed in Refs. 52 and 53). The extent to which AT2 cells interact with surrounding cells strongly suggests that similar interactions may occur during metastasis, especially considering that injury and inflammation often occur in the lung during metastasis.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Type II alveolar epithelial (AT2) cells are the master regulators of immune responses within the alveolus. AT2 cells act as sentinels within the lung, integrating signals from surrounding immune and stromal cells in response to injury and disease. Through these interactions AT2 cells influence the behavior of these cells to coordinate immune responses. B, B cells; DCs, dendritic cells; EC, endothelial cells; FB, fibroblasts; Gran, granulocytes; ILC, innate lymphoid cells; Mφ, macrophages; NK, natural killer cells; T, T cells. [Figure created with BioRender.com and published with permission.]

Granulocytes

Granulocytes (Gran) are the most common type of immune cells in circulation (54). These relatively short-lived cells are distinguished by the presence of numerous cytoplasmic granules that release cytokines in response to immunogenic stimuli (55). Gran rapidly migrate from the blood into tissues following chemoattractant signals where they play important roles in clearing pathogens and regulating immune responses. There are three types of Gran (neutrophils, eosinophils, and basophils) with specialized biological functions (reviewed in Ref. 56). Neutrophils are the most abundant Gran, and they play a significant role in metastasis. Neutrophil plasticity means they can be both pro- or antimetastatic depending on the context and microenvironmental signals (reviewed in Ref. 57). For instance, the most established antitumor effects of neutrophils is direct killing through the production of reactive oxygen species (58), whereas secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) by mature neutrophils is known to promote tumor progression (59). The body of literature characterizing the contributions of neutrophils and basophils to metastatic progression is expansive (reviewed in Refs. 6062). Eosinophils, on the other hand, seem to be primarily antitumor (63). Interestingly, the lung has resident populations of both basophils and eosinophils with functions distinct from their circulating counterparts (64, 65), but more research is needed to fully characterize their functions in normal lung homeostasis and disease.

Interactions between AT2 cells and granulocyte populations have been relatively well studied. AT2 cells are a major source of neutrophil-stimulating cytokines within the lung. AT2 secretion of chemoattractants like C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CXCL5), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and G-CSF accelerate neutrophil recruitment to the lung (6668). Direct interactions between AT2 cells and neutrophils also alter expression of surface receptor levels on neutrophils, including toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) which is a principal regulator of neutrophil survival (69, 70). Similarly, secretion of macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α/CCL3) by infected AT2 cells serves as a strong inducer of eosinophil recruitment (71). There is even evidence that AT2 cells engulf apoptotic eosinophils, which is believed to contribute to resolution of inflammation (72, 73). Neutrophils have reciprocal effects on AT2 cells as well. Depending on the circumstances, neutrophils can promote AT2 proliferation (73), induce cytokine secretion (74), and trigger oxidant-independent cell death (75). How the extensive cross talk between these two cell types may contribute to metastatic progression needs to be explored in more detail and given the importance of neutrophils in seeding the lung, future studies exploring these interactions could lead to the discovery of effective antimetastatic treatment strategies.

Monocytes/Macrophages

Macrophages (Mφ) are innate immune cells that engulf dead cells and pathogens and secrete immune modulatory cytokines. There are many tissue resident Mφ populations that maintain homeostasis (reviewed in Ref. 76). Alternatively, during inflammation monocytes are recruited from the bone marrow to sites of injury or infection where they differentiate into Mφ (reviewed in Ref. 77). A key feature of Mφ is their incredible plasticity (78). Depending on the microenvironmental signals, Mφ can alter their phenotypes to appropriately respond to localized situations (reviewed in Ref. 79). In cancer, both tissue-resident and recruited Mφ can be anti- or protumor, and in their protumor state, they contribute to immune suppression and tumor progression. For example, antitumor Mφ secrete classic inflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-12, whereas protumor Mφ secrete immune suppressive cytokines like IL-8 and IL-10 (reviewed in Ref. 80). The role of Mφ in metastasis has been extensively studied, and they facilitate metastasis at multiple stages throughout progression (reviewed in Ref. 81).

In the lung, AT2 cells interact with both resident AM and recruited monocytes/Mφ during injury and disease. To maintain homeostasis, AM and AT2 cells engage in a significant amount of cross talk (reviewed in Ref. 82). Secreted factors from bacterial-activated AT2 cells, tested using conditioned media, modulate AM activation and promote migration, phagocytosis, and polarization toward a protumor phenotype (83). Alternatively, incubation with AT2-derived surfactant proteins (SP-A and SP-D) suppresses Mφ phagocytic activity (84). AT2 cells also influence monocyte behavior. They produce the inflammatory modulator LL-37 that acts as a chemoattractant for monocytes (85, 86). Proinflammatory stimulated AT2 cells promote monocyte migration across the alveolar epithelial barrier in a baso-apical direction by secreting monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and CCL5 apically and upregulating intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM-1) integrin expression (87). These complex interactions are intricately regulated and given that Mφ plays such a critical role in metastasis, it seems probable that interactions between Mφ and alveolar epithelial cells contribute to metastatic progression. Future studies will determine to what extent.

Dendritic Cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) are myeloid-derived professional antigen-presenting immune cells that facilitate communication between the innate and adaptive immune systems (88). These phagocytic cells process antigens and present them to T and B lymphocytes to establish long-lasting adaptive immune responses (89, 90). In cancer, DCs promote metastasis through immune evasion (91). This process, termed “DC tolerization,” involves the reprogramming of DCs to block antitumor immune recognition (92). Reduced DC maturation and recruitment leads to dysfunctional lymphocyte activation (reviewed in Refs. 93 and 94). Although there are limited numbers of DCs present in the lung, they are highly sensitive to changes within the microenvironment (95). They reside beneath the epithelium in the airways and sample antigens on the luminal surface using their finger-like protrusions (96). Overall, DCs maintain homeostasis within the lung by fostering adaptive immunity in response to pathogenesis and tissue damage (reviewed in Ref. 89). Due to their close proximity, lung epithelial cells can profoundly affect DC localization and function. AT2-derived CCL20 promotes DC recruitment to the lung (97, 98). Similarly, AT2-derived GM-CSF induces DC recruitment to the lung in addition to promoting DC activation and migration to draining lymph nodes to present antigen to lymphocytes (99). Ultimately, AT2 cells modulate T cell proliferation and cytokine release through contact-dependent interactions with DCs (100). Given the wide-ranging effects that DCs have on downstream adaptive immunity, AT2-DC interactions certainly have the potential to affect metastatic progression.

Innate Lymphoid Cells

Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) exist functionally at the intersection between innate and adaptive immunity (101). These lymphocytes, which lack antigen-specific receptors, sense changes in the microenvironment through cytokine receptors like innate immune cells. They then secrete a group of cytokines and inflammatory mediators similar to those secreted by T cells (101, 102). The primary role of ILCs is to protect epithelial barriers and maintain tissue homeostasis (103, 104). There are three types of ILC (ILC1, ILC2, and ILC3) that are distinguished by the signaling molecules they respond to and secrete (102). ILC2s are the most prevalent ILC population in the lung and are regarded to be a tissue-resident cell type (105, 106). ILC2s are responsive to lung injury and play a significant role in inflammation and tissue repair (reviewed in Ref. 107). ILCs have both pro- and antimetastatic functions, depending on the tissue and cancer type (reviewed in Ref. 108). One prominent study found that activated ILC2 in the lung promotes metastasis by suppressing the function of immune-mediated antitumor activity (109). ILCs in the lung are located in the alveolar airspace, in close proximity to epithelial cells (110). Several studies show that AT2 cells secrete stimulatory factors, such as IL-33, IL-25, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) (110, 111), which can activate ILC secretion of cytokines that support airway remodeling and motility (111113). Future studies are needed to determine the direct link between AT2 cells, ILCs, and metastasis.

Natural Killer Cells

Natural killer (NK) cells are large granular lymphocytic innate immune cells with cytotoxic and cytokine-producing effector functions. They recognize cells in distress, with problems such as microbial infection or cancer, and induce autologous cell death. Receptor recognition ensures a balance between activating and inhibitory signals that make certain that healthy cells are tolerated, whereas stressed cells are destroyed (114, 115). NK cells play a critical role in lung pathogenesis (reviewed in Refs. 116 and 117). They also have a well-documented role in immunosurveillance during metastasis by targeting and directly killing disseminated tumor cells (reviewed in Ref. 118). Interestingly, recent data indicate that interactions with tumor cells may shift NK cells toward a more prometastatic phenotype (reviewed in Ref. 119). The lung has one of the highest frequencies of NK cells of any tissue in the body (120, 121), and NK cells are exclusively found within the parenchyma of the lung (122). During pathogenesis, lung epithelial cells begin to express stress signals, such as upregulation of natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D) receptor ligand, that promote recruitment and activation of NK cells (123, 124). It remains unclear whether the effects of lung epithelial cells on NK cells could lead to a more pro- or antimetastatic NK phenotype within the metastatic microenvironment. Perhaps future studies will help elucidate the details of these interactions and fill this intriguing gap in knowledge.

T Cells

T lymphocytes have multiple, sometimes contradictory, roles in immunity, depending on the type of T cells being considered. There are three main T cell types that are activated upon antigen recognition: helper (Th), cytotoxic (Tc), and regulatory (Treg) T cell. CD4+ Th cells secrete cytokines that enhance immune responses and CD8+ Tc kill target cells by inducing cell death, whereas CD4+ Tregs suppress other T cell functions to dampen the immune system. T cells recognize antigens presented by cells on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Many cells within the body present intracellular antigens on MHC class I molecules (MHC-I) to CD8+ Tc cells. However, in general, only professional antigen-presenting cells (Mφ, DCs, and B cells) express MHC class II molecules (MHC-II) to CD4+ cells (125, 126). Similarly, based on their alternative functions, CD4+ Th and CD8+ Tc are considered antimetastatic, whereas CD4+ Treg are prometastatic (127). There is currently a significant amount of research engaged in manipulating T cell populations toward antitumor phenotypes to facilitate patient survival (128).

T cells play a significant role in lung immunity (reviewed in Ref. 129), and AT2 cells activated by pathogens secrete factors that recruit T lymphocytes to the lung (130). T cells also interact directly with the lung epithelium. Although epithelial cell types are not traditionally considered immunogenic, AT2 cells, unlike AT1 cells, constitutively express MHC-II (131, 132), and several studies have established that AT2 cells present antigens via MHC-II to CD4+ T cells (133, 134). What remains unclear is how exactly AT2 cell antigen presentation affects CD4+ function given the somewhat inconsistent data. AT2 cells do not express the classic CD4+ T cell costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 (131), which has caused some researchers to postulate that AT2-CD4+ T cell interactions cause T cell tolerance (135). However, other studies identified alternative T cell costimulatory molecules, like CD54, CD58, and TGF-β, that are highly expressed in AT2 cells (131, 136). What is clear is that AT2 antigen presentation is limited and causes relatively poor CD4+ T cell stimulation, when compared with professional antigen-presenting cells (135, 137). Physiologically this means that AT2 cells are able to activate a constrained immune response without causing additional damage to the lung (137). Most relevant to metastasis are several studies that found that AT2 antigen presentation stimulated T cell activation. AT2-T cell activation subsequently caused altered T cell localization, accompanied by loss of barrier immunity (138), and induction of Tregs (134), which could promote metastatic seeding and outgrowth, respectively. Based on these data, there is a high likelihood that AT2 activation during metastasis could subsequently, in a reciprocal manner, promote metastatic outgrowth through acquisition of suppressive CD4+ T cell phenotypes.

B Cells

B cells are probably best known for their roles in antibody production and long-term immunity. They are the principal regulators of the antibody-mediated adaptive immune response (139, 140). In cancer, regulatory B cells (Breg) are known to promote tumor growth and metastasis by suppressing antitumor immune responses (reviewed in Refs. 141 and 142). In the tumor microenvironment, these cells suppress effector T and NK cell function, promote the generation of Treg, and educate MDSCs (143, 144). B cells are also the most common lymphocytic cell population in the lung (145), and activation of airway epithelial cells leads to epithelial secretion of BAFF (B cell activating factor of the TNF family, TNFSF13B) (146). BAFF is known to stimulate B cell maturation, proliferation, and promote immunoglobulin A (IgA) secretion, a known B cell mechanism of immune suppression (147149). Although more research is needed, B cell stimulation may be another way in which alveolar epithelial cells facilitate metastatic progression by dampening immune responses within the lung.

Fibroblasts

Fibroblasts (FBs) are mesenchymal cells known for their plasticity. They are the most common cells in connective tissue and are responsible for synthesizing and maintaining the extracellular matrix (ECM) (150). FBs, within both the tumor and metastatic microenvironments, promote cancer development and metastatic progression in several ways, such as establishing premetastatic niches, promoting angiogenesis, and modulating immune responses (reviewed in Refs. 151 and 152). Interstitial FBs are the resident population within the lung (153, 154). AT2 cells and FB communicate extensively during lung development (reviewed in Ref. 155). In alveoli, fibroblasts directly link AT2 cells to capillary endothelial cells through gaps in the basement membrane, forming a bridge from the vasculature to the airway lumen for immune cells (156). In coculture and conditioned media experiments, AT2 cells induce FB collagen type I secretion (157), reduce adhesion, increase aggregation (158), inhibit proliferation (159), and block differentiation (160). These cell-cell interactions also have effects on AT2 cells. For instance, FBs, depending on the circumstances, can promote AT2 proliferation and activate SP-A gene expression (157, 159), both of which could have considerable repercussions for metastatic progression.

Endothelial Cells

Endothelial cells (ECs) form the lining of blood vessels throughout the body and control the passage of materials from circulation into tissues. Mature endothelial cells are long-lived but also retain the ability to proliferate and migrate allowing for rapid repair of damage to vessels and the creation of new vasculature (161). A major step in metastasis is the intravasation into and extravasation out of blood vessels, which allows tumor cells to disseminate to distant organs. Although endothelial cells can act as a barrier to metastasis, they can also promote metastatic progression. Signaling from tumor cells dramatically alters the phenotypes of adjacent endothelial cells (reviewed in Ref. 162). One example of this involves secretion of cancer-derived exosomes that induce full body vascular permeability, which ultimately facilitates disseminating tumor cell transendothelial migration during metastasis (163). Pulmonary ECs line the vasculature of the alveolus and interact directly with AT1 cells to form a thin, gas-diffusible surface to facilitate gas exchange and cell trafficking (reviewed in Ref. 164). Based on their close proximity, the cross talk between alveolar epithelial and pulmonary ECs is extensive (reviewed in Refs. 165 and 166). Certain outcomes of these interactions may have relevance to cancer metastasis. For instance, AT2 cells can modulate vascular permeability to maintain the alveolar-capillary/air-blood barrier (167). During sepsis, when vasculature becomes leaky, AT2 cells secrete lipid-related factors to decrease permeability (168). Similarly, alveolar epithelial cells upregulate endothelial growth factor expression during injury (20, 169). In a reciprocal manner, pulmonary EC dysfunction can cause abnormal epithelial differentiation (170). Although more research is needed to determine how these interactions may influence metastatic progression, the field is ripe for investigation. Several cell culture models have been created to mimic the alveolar-capillary barrier (171, 172), and a recently developed imaging technique, using 3-D optical imaging/computed tomography (OI/CT), can image alveolar-capillary barrier permeability in real-time in live mice (173).

AT1 Cell Interactions

Although AT2 cells are the primary alveolar epithelial cells that interact with stromal cells in the microenvironment, AT1 cells can influence stromal cell behavior as well. A primary way that AT1 cells affect the microenvironment is by impacting AT2 cells directly. AT1 cells can inhibit AT2 proliferation in a contact-dependent manner (174). Beyond that AT1 cells can directly mediate innate immune responses during infection by secreting CXCL5 (175), which plays a major role in immune cell chemotaxis (176). More specifically, AT1 cells contribute to neutrophil transepithelial migration (177), inhibit proliferation of fibroblasts (178), and promote alveolar angiogenesis through vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) expression (179). These studies, while limited, suggest that AT1 cells may have a greater impact on alveolar homeostasis than previously believed. Likewise, they may have a greater-than-expected role in metastatic progression.

DISCUSSION

Research on AT2 cells has escalated dramatically in the past few years due to the fact that AT2 cells are the main targets of SAR-CoV-2 (COVID-19) viral infection. Given this, it is likely that interest in the role of AT2 cells in other contexts, such as cancer, will increase in coming years. Having a better understanding of how alveolar epithelial cells respond to and affect metastases could dramatically impact patient survival by addressing some of the current challenges in managing metastatic disease, such as developing more effective treatment strategies (180). Based on some of the similarities observed in alveolar epithelial cell responses to disease/injury and metastasis, therapies currently approved for common lung conditions may be viable therapies in the treatment of patients with lung metastases. Furthermore, more research is needed to determine how currently approved therapies for the treatment of lung metastasis, such as chemotherapy, affect resident cells within metastatic tissues. It is certainly possible that while current treatments have antitumor effects on metastatic cells, these drugs could have dramatically different effects on resident cells that could subsequently lead to treatment failure or recurrence. Another topic that should be considered is how aging may affect how AT2 cells interact with different cell populations within the alveolar niche, especially considering that the majority of cancers occur in aged individuals. It is increasingly accepted that aging causes tissue dysfunction that is significantly relevant to cancer development (reviewed in Ref. 181). Less is known regarding how aging affects metastasis, but since aging impairs AT2 cell function (182), lung metastatic progression could be significantly affected by patient age as well. Ultimately, published data strongly suggest that alveolar epithelial cells play a role in metastatic progression. Future research will help to determine the mechanisms underlying these effects, and targeting the interactions between resident lung cells, immune cells, and tumor metastases could have dramatic effects on metastatic progression and patient survival.

GRANTS

This work was supported by an ACS IRG No. 16-184-56 from the American Cancer Society to the University of Colorado Cancer Center, a METAvivor Early Career Investigator Award No. 25B0307 (to J.L.C.), and National Cancer Institute Grants T32 CA190216-01A1 (to J.L.C.) and F32 CA239436 (to M.M.W.).

DISCLOSURES

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

J.L.C. prepared figures; J.L.C. drafted manuscript; J.L.C., M.M.W., and J.K.R. edited and revised manuscript; J.L.C., M.M.W., and J.K.R. approved final version of manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This article is part of the special collection “Tumor Host Interactions in Metastasis.” Dr. Mythreye Karthikeyan and Dr. Nadine Hempel served as Guest Editors of this collection. Graphical abstract image created with BioRender.com and published with permission.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Steeg PS. Targeting metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 16: 201–218, 2016. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Fidler IJ, Kripke ML. The challenge of targeting metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 34: 635–641, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s10555-015-9586-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Spano D, Heck C, De Antonellis P, Christofori G, Zollo M. Molecular networks that regulate cancer metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol 22: 234–249, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fares J, Fares MY, Khachfe HH, Salhab HA, Fares Y. Molecular principles of metastasis: a hallmark of cancer revisited. Signal Transduct Target Ther 5: 28, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0134-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Chemi F, Mohan S, Guevara T, Clipson A, Rothwell DG, Dive C. Early dissemination of circulating tumor cells: biological and clinical insights. Front Oncol 11: 672195, 2021. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.672195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Zhang L, Ridgway LD, Wetzel MD, Ngo J, Yin W, Kumar D, Goodman JC, Groves MD, Marchetti D. The identification and characterization of breast cancer CTCs competent for brain metastasis. Sci Transl Med 5: 180ra148, 2013. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Baccelli I, Schneeweiss A, Riethdorf S, Stenzinger A, Schillert A, Vogel V, Klein C, Saini M, Bäuerle T, Wallwiener M, Holland-Letz T, Höfner T, Sprick M, Scharpff M, Marmé F, Sinn HP, Pantel K, Weichert W, Trumpp A. Identification of a population of blood circulating tumor cells from breast cancer patients that initiates metastasis in a xenograft assay. Nat Biotechnol 31: 539–544, 2013. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Welch DR, Hurst DR. Defining the hallmarks of metastasis. Cancer Res 79: 3011–3027, 2019. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Jamil A, Kasi A. Lung metastasis. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing LLC, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhao X, Wen X, Wei W, Chen Y, Zhu J, Wang C. Clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients treated surgically for metastatic lung tumors. Oncotarget 8: 46491–46497, 2017. [Erratum in Oncotarget 10: 252, 2019]. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Stella GM, Kolling S, Benvenuti S, Bortolotto C. Lung-seeking metastases. Cancers 11: 1010, 2019. doi: 10.3390/cancers11071010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Cheang MC, Voduc D, Speers CH, Nielsen TO, Gelmon K. Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 28: 3271–3277, 2010. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Schlappack OK, Baur M, Steger G, Dittrich C, Moser K. The clinical course of lung metastases from breast cancer. Klin Wochenschr 66: 790–795, 1988. doi: 10.1007/BF01726581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Jin L, Han B, Siegel E, Cui Y, Giuliano A, Cui X. Breast cancer lung metastasis: Molecular biology and therapeutic implications. Cancer Biol Ther 19: 858–868, 2018. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2018.1456599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Harkema JR, Wagner JG. Pathology of the respiratory system. In: Toxicologic Pathology for Non-Pathologists, edited by Steinbach TJ, Patrick DJ, Cosenza ME. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2019, p. 311–354. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ochs M, Nyengaard JR, Jung A, Knudsen L, Voigt M, Wahlers T, Richter J, Gundersen HJ. The number of alveoli in the human lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169: 120–124, 2004. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200308-1107OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Brandt JP, Mandiga P. Histology, alveolar cells. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing LLC, 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Crosby LM, Waters CM. Epithelial repair mechanisms in the lung. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 298: L715–L731, 2010. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00361.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Mason RJ, Williams MC. Type II alveolar cell. Defender of the alveolus. Am Rev Respir Dis 115: 81–91, 1977. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1977.115.S.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Fehrenbach H. Alveolar epithelial type II cell: defender of the alveolus revisited. Respir Res 2: 33–46, 2001. doi: 10.1186/rr36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Whitsett JA, Alenghat T. Respiratory epithelial cells orchestrate pulmonary innate immunity. Nat Immunol 16: 27–35, 2015. doi: 10.1038/ni.3045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Chuquimia OD, Petursdottir DH, Rahman MJ, Hartl K, Singh M, Fernandez C. The role of alveolar epithelial cells in initiating and shaping pulmonary immune responses: communication between innate and adaptive immune systems. PLoS One 7: e32125, 2012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zhao CZ, Fang XC, Wang D, Tang FD, Wang XD. Involvement of type II pneumocytes in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med 104: 1391–1395, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Keough K. Surfactant composition and extracellular transformations. In Lung Surfactant: Cellular and Molecular Processing, edited by Rooney SA. Austin, Texas: RG Landes Company, 1998, p. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Griese M. Pulmonary surfactant in health and human lung diseases: state of the art. Eur Respir J 13: 1455–1476, 1999. doi: 10.1183/09031936.99.13614779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Haagsman HP, Diemel RV. Surfactant-associated proteins: functions and structural variation. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 129: 91–108, 2001. doi: 10.1016/s1095-6433(01)00308-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Tan SY, Krasnow MA. Developmental origin of lung macrophage diversity. Development 143: 1318–1327, 2016. doi: 10.1242/dev.129122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Hussell T, Bell TJ. Alveolar macrophages: plasticity in a tissue-specific context. Nat Rev Immunol 14: 81–93, 2014. doi: 10.1038/nri3600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Hashimoto D, Chow A, Noizat C, Teo P, Beasley MB, Leboeuf M, Becker CD, See P, Price J, Lucas D, Greter M, Mortha A, Boyer SW, Forsberg EC, Tanaka M, van Rooijen N, García-Sastre A, Stanley ER, Ginhoux F, Frenette PS, Merad M. Tissue-resident macrophages self-maintain locally throughout adult life with minimal contribution from circulating monocytes. Immunity 38: 792–804, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Sawyer RT, Strausbauch PH, Volkman A. Resident macrophage proliferation in mice depleted of blood monocytes by strontium-89. Lab Invest 46: 165–170, 1982. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Janssen WJ, Barthel L, Muldrow A, Oberley-Deegan RE, Kearns MT, Jakubzick C, Henson PM. Fas determines differential fates of resident and recruited macrophages during resolution of acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 184: 547–560, 2011. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201011-1891OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Liu Y, Gu Y, Han Y, Zhang Q, Jiang Z, Zhang X, Huang B, Xu X, Zheng J, Cao X. Tumor exosomal RNAs promote lung pre-metastatic niche formation by activating alveolar epithelial TLR3 to recruit neutrophils. Cancer Cell 30: 243–256, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Antonopoulos D, Balatsos NAA, Gourgoulianis KI. Cancer's smart bombs: tumor-derived exosomes target lung epithelial cells triggering pre-metastatic niche formation. J Thorac Dis 9: 969–972, 2017. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Gu P, Sun M, Li L, Yang Y, Jiang Z, Ge Y, Wang W, Mu W, Wang H. Breast tumor-derived exosomal microRNA-200b-3p promotes specific organ metastasis through regulating CCL2 expression in lung epithelial cells. Front Cell Dev Biol 9: 657158, 2021. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.657158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Montagner M, Bhome R, Hooper S, Chakravarty P, Qin X, Sufi J, Bhargava A, Ratcliffe CDH, Naito Y, Pocaterra A, Tape CJ, Sahai E. Crosstalk with lung epithelial cells regulates Sfrp2-mediated latency in breast cancer dissemination. Nat Cell Biol 22: 289–296, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41556-020-0474-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Zangrossi M, Chakravarty P, Romani P, Dupont S, Hooper S, Sahai E, Montagner M. A lung organotypic coculture reveals a role for TFEB-lysosomal axis in the survival of disseminated dormant cancer cells. Cancers 13: 1007, 2021. doi: 10.3390/cancers13051007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ombrato L, Nolan E, Kurelac I, Mavousian A, Bridgeman VL, Heinze I, Chakravarty P, Horswell S, Gonzalez-Gualda E, Matacchione G, Weston A, Kirkpatrick J, Husain E, Speirs V, Collinson L, Ori A, Lee JH, Malanchi I. Metastatic-niche labelling reveals parenchymal cells with stem features. Nature 572: 603–608, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1487-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Hayashi T, Sano K, Aburatani H, Yaegashi N, Konishi I. Initialization of epithelial cells by tumor cells in a metastatic microenvironment. Oncogene 39: 2638–2640, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-1171-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Zhou Y, Liu Q, Dai X, Yan Y, Yang Y, Li H, Zhou X, Gao W, Li X, Xi Z. Transdifferentiation of type II alveolar epithelial cells induces reactivation of dormant tumor cells by enhancing TGF-β1/SNAI2 signaling. Oncol Rep 39: 1874–1882, 2018. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Wculek SK, Malanchi I. Neutrophils support lung colonization of metastasis-initiating breast cancer cells. Nature 528: 413–417, 2015. doi: 10.1038/nature16140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Jeyaseelan S, Chu HW, Young SK, Worthen GS. Transcriptional profiling of lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury. Infect Immun 72: 7247–7256, 2004. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.12.7247-7256.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Jeyaseelan S, Manzer R, Young SK, Yamamoto M, Akira S, Mason RJ, Worthen GS. Induction of CXCL5 during inflammation in the rodent lung involves activation of alveolar epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 32: 531–539, 2005. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2005-0063OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Craig A, Mai J, Cai S, Jeyaseelan S. Neutrophil recruitment to the lungs during bacterial pneumonia. Infect Immun 77: 568–575, 2009. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00832-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Zhao T, Ding X, Du H, Yan C. Lung epithelial cell-specific expression of human lysosomal acid lipase ameliorates lung inflammation and tumor metastasis in Lipa(−/−) mice. Am J Pathol 186: 2183–2192, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Leeman KT, Fillmore CM, Kim CF. Lung stem and progenitor cells in tissue homeostasis and disease. Curr Top Dev Biol 107: 207–233, 2014. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-416022-4.00008-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Barkauskas CE, Cronce MJ, Rackley CR, Bowie EJ, Keene DR, Stripp BR, Randell SH, Noble PW, Hogan BL. Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung. J Clin Invest 123: 3025–3036, 2013. doi: 10.1172/JCI68782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Zemans RL, Henson PM, Henson JE, Janssen WJ. Conceptual approaches to lung injury and repair. Ann Am Thorac Soc 12, Suppl 1: S9–S15, 2015. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201408-402MG. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Park SY, Nam JS. The force awakens: metastatic dormant cancer cells. Exp Mol Med 52: 569–581, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0423-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Mason RJ. Epithelial cells | type II cells. In: Encyclopedia of Respiratory Medicine, edited by Laurent GJ, Shapiro SD.. Oxford: Academic Press, 2006, p. 138–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Croasdell Lucchini A, Gachanja NN, Rossi AG, Dorward DA, Lucas CD. Epithelial cells and inflammation in pulmonary wound repair. Cells 10: 339, 2021. doi: 10.3390/cells10020339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Leiva-Juárez MM, Kolls JK, Evans SE. Lung epithelial cells: therapeutically inducible effectors of antimicrobial defense. Mucosal Immunol 11: 21–34, 2018. doi: 10.1038/mi.2017.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Rydell-Törmänen K, Johnson JR. The applicability of mouse models to the study of human disease. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ) 1940: 3–22, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9086-3_1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Meyerholz DK, Suarez CJ, Dintzis SM, Frevert CW. 9—Respiratory system. In: Comparative Anatomy and Histology (2nd ed.), edited by Treuting PM, Dintzis SM, Montine KS. San Diego: Academic Press, 2018, p. 147–162. [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Tigner A, Ibrahim SA, Murray I. Histology, white blood cell. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing LLC., 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Prinyakupt J, Pluempitiwiriyawej C. Segmentation of white blood cells and comparison of cell morphology by linear and naïve Bayes classifiers. Biomed Eng Online 14: 63, 2015. doi: 10.1186/s12938-015-0037-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Geering B, Stoeckle C, Conus S, Simon HU. Living and dying for inflammation: neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils. Trends Immunol 34: 398–409, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Giese MA, Hind LE, Huttenlocher A. Neutrophil plasticity in the tumor microenvironment. Blood 133: 2159–2167, 2019. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-844548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Gershkovitz M, Caspi Y, Fainsod-Levi T, Katz B, Michaeli J, Khawaled S, Lev S, Polyansky L, Shaul ME, Sionov RV, Cohen-Daniel L, Aqeilan RI, Shaul YD, Mori Y, Karni R, Fridlender ZG, Binshtok AM, Granot Z. TRPM2 mediates neutrophil killing of disseminated tumor cells. Cancer Res 78: 2680–2690, 2018. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Ardi VC, Kupriyanova TA, Deryugina EI, Quigley JP. Human neutrophils uniquely release TIMP-free MMP-9 to provide a potent catalytic stimulator of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 20262–20267, 2007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706438104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Wu M, Ma M, Tan Z, Zheng H, Liu X. Neutrophil: a new player in metastatic cancers. Front Immunol 11: 565165, 2020. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.565165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Xiong S, Dong L, Cheng L. Neutrophils in cancer carcinogenesis and metastasis. J Hematol Oncol 14: 173, 2021. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01187-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Marone G, Schroeder JT, Mattei F, Loffredo S, Gambardella AR, Poto R, de Paulis A, Schiavoni G, Varricchi G. Is there a role for basophils in cancer? Front Immunol 11: 2103, 2020. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Grisaru-Tal S, Dulberg S, Beck L, Zhang C, Itan M, Hediyeh-Zadeh S, Caldwell J, Rozenberg P, Dolitzky A, Avlas S, Hazut I, Gordon Y, Shani O, Tsuriel S, Gerlic M, Erez N, Jacquelot N, Belz GT, Rothenberg ME, Davis MJ, Yu H, Geiger T, Madi A, Munitz A. Metastasis-entrained eosinophils enhance lymphocyte-mediated antitumor immunity. Cancer Res 81: 5555–5571, 2021. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-0839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Park MD, Merad M. Cooperation between the alveolar epithelium and lung-resident basophils shapes alveolar macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol 21: 344, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00561-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Weller PF, Spencer LA. Functions of tissue-resident eosinophils. Nat Rev Immunol 17: 746–760, 2017. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Yamamoto K, Ahyi AN, Pepper-Cunningham ZA, Ferrari JD, Wilson AA, Jones MR, Quinton LJ, Mizgerd JP. Roles of lung epithelium in neutrophil recruitment during pneumococcal pneumonia. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 50: 253–262, 2014. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0114OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Conese M, Copreni E, Di Gioia S, De Rinaldis P, Fumarulo R. Neutrophil recruitment and airway epithelial cell involvement in chronic cystic fibrosis lung disease. J Cyst Fibros 2: 129–135, 2003. doi: 10.1016/S1569-1993(03)00063-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Koyama S, Sato E, Masubuchi T, Takamizawa A, Kubo K, Nagai S, Izumi T. Alveolar type II-like cells release G-CSF as neutrophil chemotactic activity. Am J Physiol 275: L687–693, 1998. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.1998.275.4.L687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. von Schéele I, Larsson K, Palmberg L. Interactions between alveolar epithelial cells and neutrophils under pro-inflammatory conditions. Eur Clin Respir J 1: 24545, 2014. doi: 10.3402/ecrj.v1.24545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Sabroe I, Prince LR, Jones EC, Horsburgh MJ, Foster SJ, Vogel SN, Dower SK, Whyte MK. Selective roles for Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 in the regulation of neutrophil activation and life span. J Immunol 170: 5268–5275, 2003. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.10.5268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Olszewska-Pazdrak B, Casola A, Saito T, Alam R, Crowe SE, Mei F, Ogra PL, Garofalo RP. Cell-specific expression of RANTES, MCP-1, and MIP-1α by lower airway epithelial cells and eosinophils infected with respiratory syncytial virus. J Virol 72: 4756–4764, 1998. doi: 10.1128/JVI.72.6.4756-4764.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Sexton DW, Blaylock MG, Walsh GM. Human alveolar epithelial cells engulf apoptotic eosinophils by means of integrin- and phosphatidylserine receptor-dependent mechanisms: a process upregulated by dexamethasone. J Allergy Clin Immunol 108: 962–969, 2001. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.119414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Wang C, Wang J, Guo HF, Liu RY. Involvement of annexin I in the dexamethasone-mediated upregulation of A549 cells phagocytosis of apoptotic eosinophils. Immunol Lett 111: 103–110, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2007.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. van Wetering S, Mannesse-Lazeroms SP, van Sterkenburg MA, Hiemstra PS. Neutrophil defensins stimulate the release of cytokines by airway epithelial cells: modulation by dexamethasone. Inflamm Res 51: 8–15, 2002. doi: 10.1007/pl00000282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Simon RH, DeHart PD, Todd RF 3rd.. Neutrophil-induced injury of rat pulmonary alveolar epithelial cells. J Clin Invest 78: 1375–1386, 1986. doi: 10.1172/JCI112724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Gordon S, Plüddemann A. Tissue macrophages: heterogeneity and functions. BMC Biol 15: 53, 2017. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0392-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Shi C, Pamer EG. Monocyte recruitment during infection and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 11: 762–774, 2011. doi: 10.1038/nri3070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Lawrence T, Natoli G. Transcriptional regulation of macrophage polarization: enabling diversity with identity. Nat Rev Immunol 11: 750–761, 2011. doi: 10.1038/nri3088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol 11: 723–737, 2011. doi: 10.1038/nri3073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Zhou J, Tang Z, Gao S, Li C, Feng Y, Zhou X. Tumor-associated macrophages: recent insights and therapies. Front Oncol 10: 188, 2020. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Nielsen SR, Schmid MC. Macrophages as key drivers of cancer progression and metastasis. Mediators Inflamm 2017: 9624760, 2017. doi: 10.1155/2017/9624760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Bissonnette EY, Lauzon-Joset JF, Debley JS, Ziegler SF. Cross-talk between alveolar macrophages and lung epithelial cells is essential to maintain lung homeostasis. Front Immunol 11: 583042, 2020. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.583042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Chuquimia OD, Petursdottir DH, Periolo N, Fernández C. Alveolar epithelial cells are critical in protection of the respiratory tract by secretion of factors able to modulate the activity of pulmonary macrophages and directly control bacterial growth. Infect Immun 81: 381–389, 2013. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00950-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Janssen WJ, McPhillips KA, Dickinson MG, Linderman DJ, Morimoto K, Xiao YQ, Oldham KM, Vandivier RW, Henson PM, Gardai SJ. Surfactant proteins A and D suppress alveolar macrophage phagocytosis via interaction with SIRP α. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 178: 158–167, 2008. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200711-1661OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Tjabringa GS, Rabe KF, Hiemstra PS. The human cathelicidin LL-37: a multifunctional peptide involved in infection and inflammation in the lung. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 18: 321–327, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2005.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. De Y, Chen Q, Schmidt AP, Anderson GM, Wang JM, Wooters J, Oppenheim JJ, Chertov O. LL-37, the neutrophil granule- and epithelial cell-derived cathelicidin, utilizes formyl peptide receptor-like 1 (FPRL1) as a receptor to chemoattract human peripheral blood neutrophils, monocytes, and T cells. J Exp Med 192: 1069–1074, 2000. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.7.1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Rosseau S, Selhorst J, Wiechmann K, Leissner K, Maus U, Mayer K, Grimminger F, Seeger W, Lohmeyer J. Monocyte migration through the alveolar epithelial barrier: adhesion molecule mechanisms and impact of chemokines. J Immunol 164: 427–435, 2000. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.1.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392: 245–252, 1998. doi: 10.1038/32588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Cook PC, MacDonald AS. Dendritic cells in lung immunopathology. Semin Immunopathol 38: 449–460, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s00281-016-0571-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Upham JW, Hughes TL. Dendritic cells. In: Encyclopedia of Respiratory Medicine (2nd ed.), edited by Janes SM. Oxford: Academic Press, 2006, p. 185–189. [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Kenkel JA, Tseng WW, Davidson MG, Tolentino LL, Choi O, Bhattacharya N, Seeley ES, Winer DA, Reticker-Flynn NE, Engleman EG. An immunosuppressive dendritic cell subset accumulates at secondary sites and promotes metastasis in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 77: 4158–4170, 2017. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Meyer MA, Baer JM, Knolhoff BL, Nywening TM, Panni RZ, Su X, Weilbaecher KN, Hawkins WG, Ma C, Fields RC, Linehan DC, Challen GA, Faccio R, Aft RL, DeNardo DG. Breast and pancreatic cancer interrupt IRF8-dependent dendritic cell development to overcome immune surveillance. Nat Commun 9: 1250, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03600-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. DeVito NC, Plebanek MP, Theivanthiran B, Hanks BA. Role of tumor-mediated dendritic cell tolerization in immune evasion. Front Immunol 10: 2876, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Vilgelm AE, Richmond A. Chemokines modulate immune surveillance in tumorigenesis, metastasis, and response to immunotherapy. Front Immunol 10: 333, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Banchereau J, Briere F, Caux C, Davoust J, Lebecque S, Liu YJ, Pulendran B, Palucka K. Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol 18: 767–811, 2000. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Veres TZ, Zoltán Veres T, Voedisch S, Spies E, Tschernig T, Braun A. Spatiotemporal and functional behavior of airway dendritic cells visualized by two-photon microscopy. Am J Pathol 179: 603–609, 2011. [Erratum in Am J Pathol 179: 2674, 2011]. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.04.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Hielpos MS, Ferrero MC, Fernández AG, Bonetto J, Giambartolomei GH, Fossati CA, Baldi PC. CCL20 and β-defensin 2 production by human lung epithelial cells and macrophages in response to brucella abortus infection. PLoS One 10: e0140408, 2015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Thorley AJ, Goldstraw P, Young A, Tetley TD. Primary human alveolar type II epithelial cell CCL20 (macrophage inflammatory protein-3α)-induced dendritic cell migration. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 32: 262–267, 2005. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2004-0196OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Unkel B, Hoegner K, Clausen BE, Lewe-Schlosser P, Bodner J, Gattenloehner S, Janßen H, Seeger W, Lohmeyer J, Herold S. Alveolar epithelial cells orchestrate DC function in murine viral pneumonia. J Clin Invest 122: 3652–3664, 2012. doi: 10.1172/JCI62139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Wang H, Su Z, Schwarze J. Healthy but not RSV-infected lung epithelial cells profoundly inhibit T cell activation. Thorax 64: 283–290, 2009. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.094870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Eberl G, Colonna M, Di Santo JP, McKenzie AN. Innate lymphoid cells. Innate lymphoid cells: a new paradigm in immunology. Science (New York, NY) 348: aaa6566, 2015. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa6566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Panda SK, Colonna M. Innate lymphoid cells in mucosal immunity. Front Immunol 10: 861, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Spits H, Artis D, Colonna M, Diefenbach A, Di Santo JP, Eberl G, Koyasu S, Locksley RM, McKenzie AN, Mebius RE, Powrie F, Vivier E. Innate lymphoid cells—a proposal for uniform nomenclature. Nat Rev Immunol 13: 145–149, 2013. doi: 10.1038/nri3365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Sonnenberg GF, Artis D. Innate lymphoid cells in the initiation, regulation and resolution of inflammation. Nat Med 21: 698–708, 2015. doi: 10.1038/nm.3892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Sadik S, Lu Y, Zhu S, Cai J, Mi LL. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s): the spotlight in asthma pathogenesis and lung tissue injury. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 49: 208–216, 2021. doi: 10.15586/aei.v49i2.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Mindt BC, Fritz JH, Duerr CU. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells in pulmonary immunity and tissue homeostasis. Front Immunol 9: 840, 2018. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Monticelli LA, Sonnenberg GF, Artis D. Innate lymphoid cells: critical regulators of allergic inflammation and tissue repair in the lung. Curr Opin Immunol 24: 284–289, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2012.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Ercolano G, Falquet M, Vanoni G, Trabanelli S, Jandus C. ILC2s: new actors in tumor immunity. Front Immunol 10: 2801, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Schuijs MJ, Png S, Richard AC, Tsyben A, Hamm G, Stockis J, Garcia C, Pinaud S, Nicholls A, Ros XR, Su J, Eldridge MD, Riedel A, Serrao EM, Rodewald HR, Mack M, Shields JD, Cohen ES, McKenzie ANJ, Goodwin RJA, Brindle KM, Marioni JC, Halim TYF. ILC2-driven innate immune checkpoint mechanism antagonizes NK cell antimetastatic function in the lung. Nat Immunol 21: 998–1009, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0745-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Molofsky AB, Van Gool F, Liang HE, Van Dyken SJ, Nussbaum JC, Lee J, Bluestone JA, Locksley RM. Interleukin-33 and interferon-γ counter-regulate group 2 innate lymphoid cell activation during immune perturbation. Immunity 43: 161–174, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.05.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Mohapatra A, Van Dyken SJ, Schneider C, Nussbaum JC, Liang HE, Locksley RM. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells utilize the IRF4-IL-9 module to coordinate epithelial cell maintenance of lung homeostasis. Mucosal Immunol 9: 275–286, 2016. doi: 10.1038/mi.2015.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Monticelli LA, Sonnenberg GF, Abt MC, Alenghat T, Ziegler CG, Doering TA, Angelosanto JM, Laidlaw BJ, Yang CY, Sathaliyawala T, Kubota M, Turner D, Diamond JM, Goldrath AW, Farber DL, Collman RG, Wherry EJ, Artis D. Innate lymphoid cells promote lung-tissue homeostasis after infection with influenza virus. Nat Immunol 12: 1045–1054, 2011. doi: 10.1031/ni.2131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Puttur F, Denney L, Gregory LG, Vuononvirta J, Oliver R, Entwistle LJ, Walker SA, Headley MB, McGhee EJ, Pease JE, Krummel MF, Carlin LM, Lloyd CM. Pulmonary environmental cues drive group 2 innate lymphoid cell dynamics in mice and humans. Sci Immunol 4: eaav7638, 2019. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aav7638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Colucci F, Caligiuri MA, Di Santo JP. What does it take to make a natural killer? Nat Rev Immunol 3: 413–425, 2003. doi: 10.1038/nri1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Moretta A, Bottino C, Mingari MC, Biassoni R, Moretta L. What is a natural killer cell? Nat Immunol 3: 6–8, 2002. doi: 10.1038/ni0102-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Cong J, Wei H. Natural killer cells in the lungs. Front Immunol 10: 1416, 2019. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Culley FJ. Natural killer cells in infection and inflammation of the lung. Immunology 128: 151–163, 2009. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03167.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. López-Soto A, Gonzalez S, Smyth MJ, Galluzzi L. Control of metastasis by NK cells. Cancer Cell 32: 135–154, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Chan IS, Ewald AJ. The changing role of natural killer cells in cancer metastasis. J Clin Invest 132: e143762, 2022. doi: 10.1172/JCI143762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Walzer T, Bléry M, Chaix J, Fuseri N, Chasson L, Robbins SH, Jaeger S, André P, Gauthier L, Daniel L, Chemin K, Morel Y, Dalod M, Imbert J, Pierres M, Moretta A, Romagné F, Vivier E. Identification, activation, and selective in vivo ablation of mouse NK cells via NKp46. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 3384–3389, 2007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609692104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Grégoire C, Chasson L, Luci C, Tomasello E, Geissmann F, Vivier E, Walzer T. The trafficking of natural killer cells. Immunol Rev 220: 169–182, 2007. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2007.00563.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Marquardt N, Kekäläinen E, Chen P, Kvedaraite E, Wilson JN, Ivarsson MA, Mjösberg J, Berglin L, Säfholm J, Manson ML, Adner M, Al-Ameri M, Bergman P, Orre AC, Svensson M, Dahlén B, Dahlén SE, Ljunggren HG, Michaëlsson J. Human lung natural killer cells are predominantly comprised of highly differentiated hypofunctional CD69(−)CD56(dim) cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol 139: 1321–1330.e4, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.07.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Calabrese DR, Aminian E, Mallavia B, Liu F, Cleary SJ, Aguilar OA, Wang P, Singer JP, Hays SR, Golden JA, Kukreja J, Dugger D, Nakamura M, Lanier LL, Looney MR, Greenland JR. Natural killer cells activated through NKG2D mediate lung ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Clin Invest 131: e137047, 2021. doi: 10.1172/JCI137047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Aminian E, Mallavia B, Liu F, Cleary SJ, Wang P, Singer JP, Hays SR, Golden JA, Kukreja J, Dugger D, Nakamura M, Lanier LL, Looney MR, Greenland JR, Calabrese DR. Natural killer cells recognize pulmonary epitherlial stress molecules during primary graft dysfunction. J Heart Lung Transplant 40: S147, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.01.449. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Betts JG, Young KA, Wise JA, Johnson E, Poe B, Kruse DH, Korol O, Johnson JE, Womble M, DeSaix P. The adaptive immune response: T lymphocytes and their functional types. In: Anatomy and Physiology. Houston, Texas: OpenStax, 2013. https://openstax.org/details/books/anatomy-and-physiology. [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Warrington R, Watson W, Kim HL, Antonetti FR. An introduction to immunology and immunopathology. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 7: S1, 2011. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-7-S1-S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Pardoll D. Metastasis-promoting immunity: when T cells turn to the dark side. Cancer Cell 16: 81–82, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Waldman AD, Fritz JM, Lenardo MJ. A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice. Nat Rev Immunol 20: 651–668, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0306-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Chen K, Kolls JK. T cell-mediated host immune defenses in the lung. Annu Rev Immunol 31: 605–633, 2013. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-100019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Hernández-Santos N, Wiesner DL, Fites JS, McDermott AJ, Warner T, Wüthrich M, Klein BS. Lung epithelial cells coordinate innate lymphocytes and immunity against pulmonary fungal infection. Cell Host Microbe 25: 630, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Corbière V, Dirix V, Norrenberg S, Cappello M, Remmelink M, Mascart F. Phenotypic characteristics of human type II alveolar epithelial cells suitable for antigen presentation to T lymphocytes. Respir Res 12: 15, 2011. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Hasegawa K, Sato A, Tanimura K, Uemasu K, Hamakawa Y, Fuseya Y, Sato S, Muro S, Hirai T. Fraction of MHCII and EpCAM expression characterizes distal lung epithelial cells for alveolar type 2 cell isolation. Respir Res 18: 150, 2017. doi: 10.1186/s12931-017-0635-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Debbabi H, Ghosh S, Kamath AB, Alt J, Demello DE, Dunsmore S, Behar SM. Primary type II alveolar epithelial cells present microbial antigens to antigen-specific CD4+ T cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 289: L274–L279, 2005. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00004.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Gereke M, Jung S, Buer J, Bruder D. Alveolar type II epithelial cells present antigen to CD4(+) T cells and induce Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 179: 344–355, 2009. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200804-592OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Lo B, Hansen S, Evans K, Heath JK, Wright JR. Alveolar epithelial type II cells induce T cell tolerance to specific antigen. J Immunol 180: 881–888, 2008. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.2.881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Zissel G, Ernst M, Rabe K, Papadopoulos T, Magnussen H, Schlaak M, Müller-Quernheim J. Human alveolar epithelial cells type II are capable of regulating T-cell activity. J Investig Med 48: 66–75, 2000. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Toulmin SA, Bhadiadra C, Paris AJ, Lin JH, Katzen J, Basil MC, Morrisey EE, Worthen GS, Eisenlohr LC. Type II alveolar cell MHCII improves respiratory viral disease outcomes while exhibiting limited antigen presentation. Nat Commun 12: 3993, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23619-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Shenoy AT, Lyon De Ana C, Arafa EI, Salwig I, Barker KA, Korkmaz FT, Ramanujan A, Etesami NS, Soucy AM, Martin IMC, Tilton BR, Hinds A, Goltry WN, Kathuria H, Braun T, Jones MR, Quinton LJ, Belkina AC, Mizgerd JP. Antigen presentation by lung epithelial cells directs CD4(+) T(RM) cell function and regulates barrier immunity. Nat Commun 12: 5834, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26045-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Bonilla FA, Oettgen HC. Adaptive immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 125: S33–40, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Marshall JS, Warrington R, Watson W, Kim HL. An introduction to immunology and immunopathology. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 14: 49, 2018. doi: 10.1186/s13223-018-0278-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Schwartz M, Zhang Y, Rosenblatt JD. B cell regulation of the anti-tumor response and role in carcinogenesis. J Immunother Cancer 4: 40, 2016. doi: 10.1186/s40425-016-0145-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Yuen GJ, Demissie E, Pillai S. B lymphocytes and cancer: a love-hate relationship. Trends Cancer 2: 747–757, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2016.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Tadmor T, Zhang Y, Cho HM, Podack ER, Rosenblatt JD. The absence of B lymphocytes reduces the number and function of T-regulatory cells and enhances the anti-tumor response in a murine tumor model. Cancer Immunol Immunother 60: 609–619, 2011. doi: 10.1007/s00262-011-0972-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Bodogai M, Moritoh K, Lee-Chang C, Hollander CM, Sherman-Baust CA, Wersto RP, Araki Y, Miyoshi I, Yang L, Trinchieri G, Biragyn A. Immunosuppressive and prometastatic functions of myeloid-derived suppressive cells rely upon education from tumor-associated B cells. Cancer Res 75: 3456–3465, 2015. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Pabst R, Tschernig T. Lymphocytes in the lung: an often neglected cell. Numbers, characterization and compartmentalization. Anat Embryol (Berl) 192: 293–299, 1995. doi: 10.1007/BF00710098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. McNamara PS, Fonceca AM, Howarth D, Correia JB, Slupsky JR, Trinick RE, Al Turaiki W, Smyth RL, Flanagan BF. Respiratory syncytial virus infection of airway epithelial cells, in vivo and in vitro, supports pulmonary antibody responses by inducing expression of the B cell differentiation factor BAFF. Thorax 68: 76–81, 2013. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Lied GA, Berstad A. Functional and clinical aspects of the B-cell-activating factor (BAFF): a narrative review. Scand J Immunol 73: 1–7, 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2010.02470.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Khan WN. B cell receptor and BAFF receptor signaling regulation of B cell homeostasis. J Immunol 183: 3561–3567, 2009. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0800933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Shalapour S, Font-Burgada J, Di Caro G, Zhong Z, Sanchez-Lopez E, Dhar D, Willimsky G, Ammirante M, Strasner A, Hansel DE, Jamieson C, Kane CJ, Klatte T, Birner P, Kenner L, Karin M. Immunosuppressive plasma cells impede T-cell-dependent immunogenic chemotherapy. Nature 521: 94–98, 2015. doi: 10.1038/nature14395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Dick MK, Miao JH, Limaiem F. Histology, fibroblast. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing LLC., 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Sahai E, Astsaturov I, Cukierman E, DeNardo DG, Egeblad M, Evans RM, Fearon D, Greten FR, Hingorani SR, Hunter T, Hynes RO, Jain RK, Janowitz T, Jorgensen C, Kimmelman AC, Kolonin MG, Maki RG, Powers RS, Puré E, Ramirez DC, Scherz-Shouval R, Sherman MH, Stewart S, Tlsty TD, Tuveson DA, Watt FM, Weaver V, Weeraratna AT, Werb Z. A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Rev Cancer 20: 174–186, 2020. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0238-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Wang Z, Liu J, Huang H, Ye M, Li X, Wu R, Liu H, Song Y. Metastasis-associated fibroblasts: an emerging target for metastatic cancer. Biomark Res 9: 47, 2021. doi: 10.1186/s40364-021-00305-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Barron L, Gharib SA, Duffield JS. Lung pericytes and resident fibroblasts: busy multitaskers. Am J Pathol 186: 2519–2531, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. White ES. Lung extracellular matrix and fibroblast function. Ann Am Thorac Soc 12, Suppl 1: S30–S33, 2015. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201406-240MG. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Minoo P, King RJ. Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in lung development. Annu Rev Physiol 56: 13–45, 1994. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.56.030194.000305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Sirianni FE, Chu FS, Walker DC. Human alveolar wall fibroblasts directly link epithelial type 2 cells to capillary endothelium. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168: 1532–1537, 2003. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200303-371OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Griffin M, Bhandari R, Hamilton G, Chan YC, Powell JT. Alveolar type II cell-fibroblast interactions, synthesis and secretion of surfactant and type I collagen. J Cell Sci 105: 423–432, 1993. doi: 10.1242/jcs.105.2.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Horne NS, Capetandes A, Frieri M. Normal human lung fibroblasts (NHLF) stimulated with conditioned media (CM) from D. pteronyssinus-treated confluent type II alveolar epithelial A549 cells (cA549) show decreased adhesion and increased aggregation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 115: S49, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.12.211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Adamson IY, Young L, King GM. Reciprocal epithelial: fibroblast interactions in the control of fetal and adult rat lung cells in culture. Exp Lung Res 17: 821–835, 1991. doi: 10.3109/01902149109062880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Epa AP, Thatcher TH, Pollock SJ, Wahl LA, Lyda E, Kottmann RM, Phipps RP, Sime PJ. Normal human lung epithelial cells inhibit transforming growth factor-β induced myofibroblast differentiation via prostaglandin E2. PLoS One 10: e0135266, 2015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P (Editors). Blood vessels and endothelial cells. In: Molecular Biology of the Cell. New York: Garland Science, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Maishi N, Hida K. Tumor endothelial cells accelerate tumor metastasis. Cancer Sci 108: 1921–1926, 2017. doi: 10.1111/cas.13336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Zhou W, Fong MY, Min Y, Somlo G, Liu L, Palomares MR, Yu Y, Chow A, O'Connor ST, Chin AR, Yen Y, Wang Y, Marcusson EG, Chu P, Wu J, Wu X, Li AX, Li Z, Gao H, Ren X, Boldin MP, Lin PC, Wang SE. Cancer-secreted miR-105 destroys vascular endothelial barriers to promote metastasis. Cancer Cell 25: 501–515, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Block ER. Pulmonary endothelial cell pathobiology: implications for acute lung injury. Am J Med Sci 304: 136–144, 1992. doi: 10.1097/00000441-199208000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Hough RF, Bhattacharya S, Bhattacharya J. Crosstalk signaling between alveoli and capillaries. Pulm Circ 8: 2045894018783735, 2018. doi: 10.1177/2045894018783735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Oczypok EA, Perkins TN, Oury TD. Alveolar epithelial cell-derived mediators: potential direct regulators of large airway and vascular responses. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 56: 694–699, 2017. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2016-0151PS. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Bhattacharya J, Matthay MA. Regulation and repair of the alveolar-capillary barrier in acute lung injury. Annu Rev Physiol 75: 593–615, 2013. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Wang L, Taneja R, Wang W, Yao LJ, Veldhuizen RA, Gill SE, Fortin D, Inculet R, Malthaner R, Mehta S. Human alveolar epithelial cells attenuate pulmonary microvascular endothelial cell permeability under septic conditions. PLoS One 8: e55311, 2013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Maniscalco WM, Watkins RH, Finkelstein JN, Campbell MH. Vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA increases in alveolar epithelial cells during recovery from oxygen injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 13: 377–386, 1995. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.13.4.7546767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Yao J, Guihard PJ, Wu X, Blazquez-Medela AM, Spencer MJ, Jumabay M, Tontonoz P, Fogelman AM, Boström KI, Yao Y. Vascular endothelium plays a key role in directing pulmonary epithelial cell differentiation. J Cell Biol 216: 3369–3385, 2017. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201612122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Hermanns MI, Unger RE, Kehe K, Peters K, Kirkpatrick CJ. Lung epithelial cell lines in coculture with human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells: development of an alveolo-capillary barrier in vitro. Lab Invest 84: 736–752, 2004. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Dohle E, Singh S, Nishigushi A, Fischer T, Wessling M, Möller M, Sader R, Kasper J, Ghanaati S, Kirkpatrick CJ. Human co- and triple-culture model of the alveolar-capillary barrier on a basement membrane mimic. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 24: 495–503, 2018. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2018.0087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Molotkov A, Bhatt N, Doubrovin M, Castrillon J, Massa C, Gerber A, D'Armiento J, Goldklang M, Mintz A. Multimodality molecular imaging of the alveolar-capillary barrier in lung disease using albumin based optical and PET tracers. Mol Biomed 1: 17, 2020. doi: 10.1186/s43556-020-00020-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Mason RJ, McCormack FX. Alveolar type II cell reactions in pathologic states. In: Lung Surfactant: Basic Research in the Pathogenesis of Lung Disorders, edited by Muller B, von Wichert PB.. Basel: Karger, 1994, p. 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Yamamoto K, Ferrari JD, Cao Y, Ramirez MI, Jones MR, Quinton LJ, Mizgerd JP. Type I alveolar epithelial cells mount innate immune responses during pneumococcal pneumonia. J Immunol 189: 2450–2459, 2012. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Guo L, Li N, Yang Z, Li H, Zheng H, Yang J, Chen Y, Zhao X, Mei J, Shi H, Worthen GS, Liu L. Role of CXCL5 in regulating chemotaxis of innate and adaptive leukocytes in infected lungs upon pulmonary influenza infection. Front Immunol 12: 785457, 2021. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.785457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Lin WC, Gowdy KM, Madenspacher JH, Zemans RL, Yamamoto K, Lyons-Cohen M, Nakano H, Janardhan K, Williams CJ, Cook DN, Mizgerd JP, Fessler MB. Epithelial membrane protein 2 governs transepithelial migration of neutrophils into the airspace. J Clin Invest 130: 157–170, 2020. doi: 10.1172/JCI127144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Correll KA, Edeen KE, Zemans RL, Redente EF, Serban KA, Curran-Everett D, Edelman BL, Mikels-Vigdal A, Mason RJ. Transitional human alveolar type II epithelial cells suppress extracellular matrix and growth factor gene expression in lung fibroblasts. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 317: L283–L294, 2019. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00337.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Vila Ellis L, Cain MP, Hutchison V, Flodby P, Crandall ED, Borok Z, Zhou B, Ostrin EJ, Wythe JD, Chen J. Epithelial VEGFA specifies a distinct endothelial population in the mouse lung. Dev Cell 52: 617–630.e6, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Parker AL, Benguigui M, Fornetti J, Goddard E, Lucotti S, Insua-Rodríguez J, Wiegmans AP, Early Career Leadership Council of the Metastasis Research Society. Current challenges in metastasis research and future innovation for clinical translation. Clin Exp Metastasis 39: 263–277, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10585-021-10144-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Casás-Selves M, Degregori J. How cancer shapes evolution, and how evolution shapes cancer. Evolution (N Y) 4: 624–634, 2011. doi: 10.1007/s12052-011-0373-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Yazicioglu T, Mühlfeld C, Autilio C, Huang CK, Bär C, Dittrich-Breiholz O, Thum T, Pérez-Gil J, Schmiedl A, Brandenberger C. Aging impairs alveolar epithelial type II cell function in acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 319: L755–L769, 2020. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00093.2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES