Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Zoological Studies logoLink to Zoological Studies
. 2022 Sep 16;61:e36. doi: 10.6620/ZS.2022.61-36

Roosting-site Selection by Overwintering Black-necked Cranes in the Caohai Wetland, Guizhou Province, China: Implications for Conservation Management

Xue Gou 1,2, Yuan Zhu 1,2, Xijiao Sun 2,3, Chanshi Hu 2,4, Mingming Zhang 1,2, Romaan Hayat Khattak 5, Haijun Su 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC9745570  PMID: 36568819

Abstract

Stable and high-quality roosting-sites are crucial for the survival of migratory wading birds in winter. The black-necked crane (Grus nigricollis) is the only crane species that lives on the Tibetan plateau for its entire life. Every year, black-necked cranes routinely migrate to the wetlands on the southern lower plateau and roost at wetland sites. Currently, many roosting-sites are under threat from wetland degradation resulting from human disturbance, and changes in water depths and the landscape environment. To understand how the black-necked crane selects roosting-sites given these influencing factors, we conducted a study in the Caohai wetland in China by comparing and modeling the selection of roosting habitat. The vegetation factors mainly included the vegetation height of the swamp patch where the roosting-site was located (VHP) and the vegetation height in the roosting-site (VHR), and the geographic factors mainly included the height of the nearest hill (HNH) and the visible range (VR). These four factors were first considered by the black-necked cranes when choosing roosting-sites on the lakeshore. The roosting-site selection model of black-necked cranes was fitted as (P = eLogit(p) /(1 + eLogit(p)) Logit(p) = 1.243 + 8.397(VHP) -7.999(VHR) -4.105(HNH) + 1.584(VR)). In the Caohai wetland, black-necked cranes preferred roosting-sites away from human disturbances, such as villages/settlements and roads, and where the distance to main roads was > 1,300 m, the distance to villages/residential areas was > 650 m, the distance to rural/service roads was > 500 m, the relatively open area with surrounding hills had a relative height < 15 m, the visible range area was > 550,000 m2, and the shallow swamp area had a water depth of < 5 cm with a vegetation height of < 15 cm. Outside the area of the roosting-site, the surrounding vegetation height was 35 cm–60 cm. We believe that human disturbance, not energy savings or heat loss, was the main factor influencing crane roost site selection. We first gathered data about black-necked crane selection of roosting-sites in a highly complex wetland system. Based on our findings, we strongly recommend appropriately managing the habitat patches in the Caohai wetland, which will have implications for the conservation management of overwintering black-necked cranes in wetlands.

Keywords: Caohai, China, Grus nigricollis, Human disturbance, Overwintering wetlands, Roosting

BACKGROUND

Habitat selection relates to the environmental requirements needed by animals for survival (Falconi et al. 2015). As an important part of a habitat, a roosting-site (a sites for sleeping) is critical for an animal’s life cycle. Because of this, many roosting species can have strong selectivity toward roosting-sites (He et al. 2011). Generally, the influencing factors of roost site selection by animals include the geographical environment (Chandler et al. 1995), a safe environment to prevent mortalities due to predation, a stable temperature (Elmore et al. 2004; Sprague et al. 2008), and minimal human disturbance (Wang et al. 2019). Still, the main factors always depend on the specific species and the location where roosting occurs. Many of the 15 extant species of cranes undertake roosting, but there is surprisingly little information on the roosting habits of species found in Asia. Except for the gray-crowned crane (Balearica regulorum) and black-crowned crane (Balearica pavonina) that both roost on trees, the other roosting crane species usually roost in relatively large but shallow wetlands that are safe from too much human disturbance (Shenk and Ringelman 1992; Wang et al. 2019), such as marshes or saline-alkaline marshes, mires and shoals (Hoyo et al. 1996), and broad rivers with short vegetation (Pearse et al. 2017). Factors such as environmental and human disturbance may play a vital role in the selection of crane roosting-sites (Li et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2019). The black-necked cranes (Grus nigricollis) are among the least studied crane species, and there is sparse information regarding factors that are used to select roosting-sites in winter (Li 2014). General observations suggest that overwintering black-necked cranes diurnally choose to roost in valleys, shoals near the water (Li and Li 2005), shallow areas of lakes, reservoirs, or ponds (Liu et al. 2008; He et al. 2011), and islands in rivers (Lei et al. 2012). However, few studies have reported how the black-necked crane chooses roosting-sites on severe winter nights. The main factors affecting this behavior, especially in wetlands with intensive human disturbance and complex environments, are unknown. Understanding this critical requirement for this species is important to develop management plans that are suitable for specific important roosting-sites.

The black-necked crane, also called the Tibetan crane, breeds on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Six wintering areas have been identified at low altitudes of the Qinghai-Tibet and Yunnan-Guizhou Plateaus (Li FS 2014). Among the wintering areas, the Caohai wetland in Guizhou Province is one of the largest wintering sites for the global population, which was estimated at 10,000–10,200. Approximately 1,500–2,000 cranes overwinter at the Caohai wetland (Li and Yang 2003; Li and Li 2005; BirdLife International 2017; Sun et al. 2018). At Caohai, black-necked cranes usually fly out from the roosting-sites to the surrounding agricultural areas to forage every morning and then fly back to the roosting-sites by evening (Zhao et al. 2008; Wu et al. 2020). Black-necked cranes have used the same roosting-sites at lakeshore areas for years (Végvári and Barta 2015). At Caohai, black-necked cranes have roosted at seven roosting-sites for more than five years at each site (Sun et al. 2018). They flock flock together on severe winter nights scattered among these seven roosting-sites with flocks of 30 to > 300 individuals (Sun et al. 2018; see Figs. S1–4). It is not clear why the cranes appear to selectively use seven locations for roosting. In this study, we ascertain which habitat and human-related features appear to influence the selection of these sites for crane roosting.

The Caohai wetland adjoins Weining County in Guizhou Province, China. Like many other wintering wetlands, this wetland has been suffering from intense human disturbance, urban expansion, and degradation of wetland ecosystems (Ran et al. 2017). This issue is especially urgent as the government is planning to raise the water level from 2171.7 to 2,173 m or expand the water area of the Caohai wetland for various purposes, potentially affecting the roosting-sites of overwintering black-necked cranes (Ran et al. 2017). We determine the selectivity of roosting-sites by black-necked cranes and the main influencing factors. These findings would be helpful to predict how changes in this wetland will impact crane overwintering survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Area

The Caohai wetland (China Caohai National Nature Reserve, 26°47'–26°52'N, 104°10'–104°20'E) is located in the central part of the Wumeng Mountains on the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau in Southwest China. The total area of the Caohai Reserve is 120 km2 with 25 km2 encompassing water with an average water depth of 1.35 m, and a normal water level of 2171.7 m. It is the largest natural freshwater lake in Guizhou and is also a typical representative of a wetland ecosystem on the plateau in Southwest China because of its complex mix of natural habitats and human-dominated land uses (Zhang et al. 2007; Lei et al. 2017). Topographically, the Caohai wetland is plain with highlands and hills around it. Its lakeshores are mainly marshes, meadows, and abandoned vegetable fields, and around the lake there are farming lands, and several villages with more than 100 thousand inhabitants (Xu et al. 2008; Ran et al. 2017). Caohai is abundant with aquatic plants in the lake and lakeshore, such as Myriophyllum verticillatum, Juncellus serotinus, Scirpus validus, and Juncus effusus. The primary overwintering habitat for migrating birds is the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, and, every winter, more than 70,000 waterbirds migrate to the Caohai wetland (Zhang et al. 2014). It has therefore been listed as an Asian Important Bird Area (Code: CN274) by BirdLife International (Chan 2009).

Determining roosting-sites

Although we determined seven roosting-sites of black-necked cranes by long-term routine monitoring, to obtain more specific points, we conducted additional observations from 2016 to 2019 (the end of November of the year to mid-March the following year, namely, the whole overwintering period of cranes) to locate additional sites if any. We identified a roosting-site as any location that had a flock of > five black-necked cranes for at least ten days. Sites were deemed different if they were ≥ 300 m apart. We used a monocular telescope (SWAROVSKI-STS65HD) to observe when cranes returned from foraging sites to the lakeshore, forming flocks in the late afternoon every day. Then, cross positioning with a compass and two observation positions was conducted to determine the exact coordinates of the roosting locations on the Personal Digital Assistant maps (Liu and Lu 2010). The sizes of roosting-sites varied with crane flock size. The range and area of the single swamp patch of the roosting-site was mapped using ArcGIS (version 10.3.0) software. Despite additional efforts to locate new roosting-sites, we were unable to find any beyond the seven sites that had already been documented (Sun et al. 2018). These seven sites were used for our study (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

Roosting-sites of black-necked cranes in the Caohai wetland, China, and the study quadrats sampled in this study.

Investigation of influencing factors

As shown in table 1, initially, to obtain as much habitat information as possible, 14 habitat measurements that could potentially influence crane selection were measured. We categorized these 14 factors into four categories. Category I was water environment and included only water depth (WD), as we observed and previously reported (Kong et al. 2008). Black-necked cranes typically waded in water overnight, so the depth of water was considered first. Category II was human disturbance, which we measured from a distance between the surveyed quadrats and the roads, paths, villages, and farmlands, where the primary human activities occurred. Category III related to the vegetation at sites, including the vegetation height of the swamp patch where the roosting-site was located (VHP), vegetation height in the roosting-site area (VHR), and vegetation cover (VC). The height and coverage of vegetation on the ground often affect a black-necked crane’s take-off and landing because it has a large body and wingspan and requires preparation for take-off or landing. Category IV was a measure of the overall landscape and included the nearest distance to surrounding hills (NDH), the height of nearest hill (HNH), visible angle (VA), visible range (VR), and area of the swamp patch (ASP). We knew that these cranes always choose a place to stay overnight with no breeze to avoid heat loss in the winter (Carr 2013), but it is not practical to measure the wind and heat conditions in a vast swamp patch at certain points at night. Therefore, we determined that the surrounding hills and an open swamp patch could reflect the wind and heat conditions. In addition, crane vision is connected to alert responses toward human disturbance. We did not choose to measure food because black-necked cranes are omnivorous and because roosting-site are used for sleeping and not for foraging (Sun et al. 2018).

Table 1.

Influencing factors measured for roosting-site selection by black-necked cranes and their descriptions for the Caohai wetland, Guizhou Province, China

graphic file with name zoolstud-61-036-t001.jpg

Open in a new tab

We conducted sampling quadrats in the roosting areas and non-roosting areas for comparison (Fig. 1). We did not set quadrats in the northeastern and northern part of Caohai Lake because there were several docks near the town in Weining County, and because black-necked cranes had never appeared in this area for more than ten years (Wu et al. 2020). Quadrat field surveys were conducted intensively for the overwintering population of black-necked cranes in stable periods from December to February of the following year. To avoid disturbing the cranes, we investigated the quadrats after they all flew away from the roosting-sites to the foraging sites in the morning. We generally started working at around 9 am and finished at around 1 pm before the cranes flew back in the early evening. We set a quadrat within the center of the roosting area. Then on the two sides of the opposite directions of the lakeshore, the following quadrats were set at an interval of 25 m–50 m until outside the roosting area was reached. Seventy-four quadrats with dimensions of 2 m × 2 m in roosting areas were investigated during our study period (3 years), and 74 quadrats (control sampling) in non-roosting areas (with intervals of > 100 m) were surveyed in swamp patches by the lakeshore.

Data analysis

To test if roost sites were selected relative to non-roost sites, we conducted comparisons of measured variables between these two categories of sites. First, a one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test each influencing factor’s normality. Then, an independent-samples t-test was used to determine if the measurements followed a normal distribution. If data were not normal, we used the Mann-Whitney U test to compare variables. We regarded statistical significance if P < 0.05. The variables without any statistical significance were excluded.

The resource selectivity function was developed based on logistic regression to determine factors that varied between roost sites of black-necked cranes and the non roost sites. This information was needed to control the autocorrelations between variables (Lahaye and Gutiérrez 1999; Wang and Wang 2006). Therefore, we used the Pearson correlation coefficient to test if variables were correlated, and we removed variables with high correlations (r > 0.6) to fit the logistic regression model. First, the selected variables were standardized to eliminate the differences generated by different statistical dimensions (Li et al. 2001). Second, the values of the roosting-site quadrats were set as 1, while the control quadrats were set as 0. Then, the backward step method in binomial logistic regression was applied to build the preliminary roosting-site selection model of black-necked cranes. Some variables were excluded through a stepwise conditional check (Pearce and Ferrier 2000). Finally, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to test the efficacy of the model (Boyce et al. 2002).

The resource selectivity function is a linear logarithmic model that includes several independent habitat variables. This model can be used to determine the correlations between variables and the selectivity for each variable (Li et al. 2001). The formula was:

w(x)=exp(β0+β1x1+β2x2+...+βkxk)

X was the independent variable, and β was the selectivity coefficient.

Then, the roosting-site selection model that indicated the possibility of black-necked cranes choosing a site as the roosting-site was built as:

P(x)=exp(β0+β1x1+β2x2+...+βkxk)1+exp(β0+β1x1+β2x2+...+βkxk)

Where P(x) = 0 or 1 represented crane nonselection or selection, respectively; the logistic regression coefficient could estimate the selectivity coefficient β. We used SPSS v20 software for these analyses.

In addition, to compare and determine the selectivity toward the different levels within the same variable, we used Vanderploeg selectivity coefficients (Wi) and the Scavia selectivity index (Ei) (Vanderploeg and Scavia 1979) to calculate the preference of black-necked cranes for different levels within a habitat factor, which can also serve as a verification of the roosting-site selection model. The formula was as follows:

Ei=(Wi−1n)(Wi+1n)
Wi=(ripi)∑(ripi)

In the formulas, n is the number of ecofactor traits; Pi refers to the number of quadrats with trait i; and ri means the number of quadrats with trait i that the black-necked cranes chose the farming area. Ei= -1 represents no choice; -1 < Ei< 0 represents a tendency to avoid; Ei= 0 or approaching 0 represents a random choice; 0 < Ei< 1 represents a positive choice and Ei= 1 represents a highly positive choice (Wu et al. 2020).

The criteria for statistically significant differences were as follows: extremely significant difference (P < 0.01), significant difference (P < 0 .05), and no significant difference (P > 0.05). The correlation ratings were extremely strong correlation (0.8 < r ≤ 1.0), strong correlation (0.6 < r ≤ 0.8), medium correlation (0.4 < r ≤ 0.6), minimal correlation (0.2 < r ≤ 0.4), and minimum or no correlation (0.0 < r ≤ 0.2) (Lahaye and Gutiérrez 1999).

RESULTS

Influencing factors on roost site selection by black-necked cranes

Comparisons between study quadrats and control quadrats for all 14 habitat factors showed that 13 habitat factors had significant differences (P < 0.05) except vegetation coverage (VC; P = 0.21), which indicated that characteristics of black-necked crane roost sites were significantly different from characteristics at control sites. Several variables showed highly significant differences (Table 2).

Table 2.

Significance test on influencing factors between the study quadrats and control quadrats

graphic file with name zoolstud-61-036-t002.jpg

Open in a new tab

Roost site selection by black-necked cranes

Correlation analysis indicated that among these factors (Table 3), the following factors showed strong correlations (r > 0.6) with each other: VA and DTR (r = -0.606), VA and VR (r = -0.692), DV and NDH (r = 0.861), DV and DF (r = 0.799), DV and DP (r = 0.639), DV and ASP (r = 0.647), NDH and DF (r = 0.739), NDH and DP (r = 0.819), ASP and DP (r = 0.683), ASP and DF (r = 0.737), ASP and NDH (r = 0.744), and ASP and VR (r = 0.684).

Table 3.

Correlation analysis of habitat factors (variables)

graphic file with name zoolstud-61-036-t003.jpg

Open in a new tab

According to the correlations and the information on the Caohai wetland, the redundant factors, including VC, DF, DP, NPH, VA, and ASP, could be excluded for logistic regression model fitting. Then, we analyzed eight independent (r ≤ 0.6) influencing factors on the roosting-sites of black-necked cranes. Finally, only four factors, including VHP (β = 8.397), VHR (β = -7.999), HNH (β = -4.105), and VR (β = 1.584), were used in the logistic regression formula according to the results of the test (Table 4). Therefore, the roosting-site selection model was determined to be P = eLogit(p) /(1 + eLogit(p)), Logit(p) = 1.243 + 8.397VHP -7.999VHR -4.105HNH + 1.584VR. The ROC curve testing of this formula showed that the area under the curve for this model reached 99.2%, which indicated that the regression formula had a high ability to differentiate roost sites, further suggesting that the chosen variables were important in influencing roost site selection (Fig. 2).

Table 4.

Selectivity coefficient of variables for the model of roosting-site selection by black-necked cranes

graphic file with name zoolstud-61-036-t004.jpg

Open in a new tab

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Open in a new tab

The test results of the ROC curve. Note: the diagonal represents that the model had no judgment ability (50% area and below), while above the diagonal represents that the model had judgment ability (50% or above).

Selectivity to levels within the main influencing factors

The results of the Vanderploeg selectivity coefficients (Wi) and Scavia selectivity index (Ei) in terms of the eight main factors were as follows (see Table 5): cranes preferred to choose the swamp area with minimal human disturbance (the DMR > 1,300 m (Ei =0.602),DV>650m(Ei=0.662),DTR>500m (Ei= 0.469)), a vast area (HNH < 15 m (Ei= 0.589), VR > 550,000 m2 (Ei= 0.297)), low vegetation height (VHR < 5 cm (Ei= 0.293), VHP in 35 cm–60 cm (Ei= 0.595)), and shallow water (WD < 5 cm (Ei= 0.449)) to roost overnight.

Table 5.

Selectivity of black-necked cranes for roosting-sites using Vanderploeg selectivity coefficients (Wi) and Scavia selectivity index (Ei)

graphic file with name zoolstud-61-036-t005.jpg

Open in a new tab

DISCUSSION

Factors influencing the selection of roosting-sites by black-necked cranes

According to the roosting-site selection model we obtained, the most important influencing factors included: (1) the vegetation height of the swamp patch where the roosting-site was located (VHP; β = 8.397), which suggests that cranes prefer sites with good vegetation cover. (2) The vegetation height in the roosting area (VHR) (β = -7.999) was negatively related to a crane’s choice. Black-necked cranes prefer to choose places with lower vegetation heights, relative to control sites, for roosting. This may be a function of the large body size of cranes who cannot easily take off (Lu et al. 2017). If cranes wanted to take off rapidly at short notice, they would jump and flap their wings quickly for vertical takeoff (Lu et al. 2017; Hoyo et al. 1996). Therefore, very tall vegetation would be a hindrance. (3) The height of the nearest hill (HNH) (β = -4.105), and (4) the visible range (VR) (β = 1.584) showed that black-necked cranes preferred to choose places that were flat with a broad area in the lakeshore area. These findings are similar to the results for the Dashanbao wetland, another important overwintering site of black-necked cranes in Yunnan Province (Li et al. 2018). In summary, geographic factors and vegetation factors appear to be primary factors that influence black-necked cranes’ selection of roost sites. Comparatively, the interference factors did not serve as the main influencing factors, perhaps because human activities often occurred far away from the roosting area and not in the swamp patches of the lakeshore (Zhang et al. 2019).

How black-necked cranes select a roosting-site in the Caohai wetland

Although the resource selectivity function and roosting-site selection model could systematically analyze wild animal selectivity of various habitat variables, as well as consider the combined effects of these variables (Wang and Wang 2006), the functions treated all habitat factors equally, so the model could not compare or rank the selectivity of different gradients in a habitat factor (Yang et al. 2006). For this reason, we used the selectivity coefficients and selectivity index (Vanderploeg and Scavia 1979) to analyze the selection preference of black-necked cranes for different levels of primary habitat factors as a complement to the roosting-site selection model.

According to the selectivity coefficients and selectivity index (Table 5), the black-necked cranes selected roost sites in the Caohai wetland that primarily avoided human disturbances, such as villages/settlements and roads. Therefore, the most suitable areas were > 1,300 m from main roads, the distance to villages/residential area was > 650 m and the distance to rural/tractor roads was > 500 m. In terms of geographical factors, the black-necked cranes preferred the relatively open area with the surrounding mountain height of < 15 cm and a visible range of > 550,000 m2, which the roosting-site selection model also verified. The black-necked cranes preferred to roost in the shallow swamp area with a water depth < 5 cm and a vegetation height < 15 cm. Other studies have reported that swamps, marshes, and shallow water habitats are essential habitats for black-necked crane roosting but have not evaluated selection (Li and Li 2005; Liu et al. 2008; He et al. 2011). Similarly, the red-Crowned crane (Grus japonensis), Siberian crane (Grus leucogeranus), Sandhill crane (Grus canadensis), Common crane (Grus grus), and other crane species have also been found to roost in wetlands such as manufactured wetlands, shallow lakes, rivers, ponds, and reservoirs (Folk and Tacha 1990; Avilés 2004; Wu 2005; Pearse et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2019), but very few studies have examined whether these roost sites are preferentially selected due to specific variables (He et al. 2011).

He et al. (2011) discussed that the black-necked cranes choose shallow water swamps as roosting-sites to save energy and reduce heat loss. Due to the relatively broad environment of the lakeshore, we assumed that energy saving and heat loss were not the main influencing factors, but that human disturbance would be. When there is extremely high pressure from human disturbance or habitat loss, black-necked cranes may be forced to abandon swamps, and even wetlands altogether, as roosting-sites. An extreme case was reported for the Huize wetland and Yongshan wetland, both in Yunnan Province, where the black-necked cranes were found roosting on the hillsides near the lakes because their roosting-sites on the lakeshore disappeared and were heavily disturbed by humans (Wu et al. 2013; Lu et al. 2017). The microenvironment of the hillside may be more helpful to cranes for energy conservation and heat loss reduction, but this is not normal for cranes. According to our results, we suggest that the habitat patches in the Caohai wetland be appropriately managed, and extreme cases such as Huizhe and Yongshan be avoided in Caohai or other wetlands where black-necked cranes overwinter.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the above results, as summarized below: (1), Geographic factors and vegetation factors appear to be the main factors influencing black-necked cranes’ selection of roost sites at Caohai. (2), The black-necked cranes roosting-sites in the Caohai wetland were much further away from human disturbances, such as villages/settlements and roads, relative to control sites. (3), Energy savings and heat loss were unlikely to be the main influencing factors leading to roost site selection.

We first gathered data about black-necked crane selection of roosting-sites in a highly complex wetland system. Based on the current study’s finding, we strongly recommend appropriately managing the Caohai wetlands, which will have implications for the conservation management of overwintering black-necked cranes in wetlands.

Supplementary materials

Fig. S1.

Black-necked Crane in their roosting sites in Caohai, photoed in early morning.

zoolstud-61-036-s001.docx (113.2KB, docx)
Fig. S2.

Black-necked in non-roosting-site, Caohai wetland.

zoolstud-61-036-s002.docx (706.2KB, docx)
Fig. S3.

Swamp near the village.

Fig. S4.

View of lakeshore, the opposite is near the Weining County town.

zoolstud-61-036-s004.docx (390.3KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We are particularly grateful to the following projects for funding this research: National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (31860610); Provincial Science and Technology Plan of Guizhou (QianKeHeZhiCheng [2021] YiBan 500; [2019]1068); Provincial Key Science and Technology Project of Guizhou ([2016]3022-1).

Footnotes

Authors’ contributions: GX, SH, ZY and SX conceived the study; GX, HC, SX and ZY analyzed the data; GX, ZY and SH wrote the manuscript. HS and RHK supervised the research and provided multiple revisions of the writing. CH conducted research method guidance for the article. MZ and XS implemented the field surveys and collected the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Consent for publication: All of the author’s consent to the publication of this manuscript.

Ethics approval consent to participate: Not applicable.

References

  1. Avilés JM. 2004. Common cranes Grus grus and habitat management in holm oak dehesas of Spain. Biodivers Conserv 13:2015–2025. doi:10.1023/B:BIOC.0000039999.57645.23.
  2. BirdLife International. 2017. Grus nigricollis. The IUCN Red List of threatened species:e.T22692162A110659467. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-3.RLTS.T22692162A180030167.en.
  3. Boyce MS, Vernier PR, Nielsen SE, Schmiegelow FKA. 2002. Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol Model 157:281–300. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00200-4.
  4. Braun-Blanquet J, Fuller GD, Conard HS. 1993. Plant sociology: the study of plant communities. Nature 132:300. doi:10.1038/132300a0.
  5. Carr JM. 2013. Diurnal and nocturnal avian antipredator behavior in thermally challenging conditions. PhD dissertations, Indiana State University, USA.
  6. Chan S. 2009. Directory of important bird areas in China (mainland): key sites for conservation. BirdLife International Cambridge, UK.
  7. Chandler CR, Ketterson ED, Nolan V. 1995. Spatial aspects of roost-site selection in breeding male Dark-Eyed Juncos. Condor 97(1):279–282.
  8. Elmore LW, Miller DA, Vilella FJ. 2004. Selection of diurnal roosts by red bats (Lasiurus borealis) in an intensively managed pine forest in Mississippi. Forest Ecol Manag 199(1):11–20. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.03.045.
  9. Falconi N, Vieira EM, Baumgarten J, Faria D, Fernandez G, Gastón A. 2015. The home range and multi-scale habitat selection of the threatened maned three-toed sloth (Bradypus torquatus). Mamm Biol 80(5):431–439. doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2015.01.009.
  10. Folk MJ, Tacha TC. 1990. Sandhill crane roost site characteristics in the North Platte River Valley. J Wildl Manage 54(3):480–486. doi:10.2307/3809662.
  11. He P, Kong DJ, Liu Q, Yu HZ, Zhao JL, Yang XJ. 2011. Roosting-site characteristics of wintering black-necked Cranes (Grus nigricollis) at Napahai, Yunnan. Zool Res 32(2):150–156. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1141.2011.02150. . [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Hoyo JD, Elliott A, Sargatal J. 1996. Handbook of the birds of the world, Volume 3: Hoatzin to auks. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain.
  13. Kong DJ, Yang XJ, Zhong XY, Dao MB, Zhu Y. 2008. Diurnal time budget and behavior rhythm of wintering black-necked crane (Grus nigricollis) at Dashanbao in Yunnan. Zool Res 29(2):195–202.
  14. Lahaye WS, Gutiérrez RJ. 1999. Nest sites and nesting habitat of the Northern Spotted Owl in Northwestern California. Condor 101(2):324–330. doi:10.2307/1369995.
  15. Lei GL, Sang J, Zheng Z. 2012. Site and behavior of sleep of Grus nigricollis in Kazi Water Reserve of Linzhou, Tibet. Journal of West China Forestry Science 41(4):93–97. doi:10.16473/j.cnki. xblykx1972.2012.04.002.
  16. Lei Y, Wei GS, Liu Q, Liu W, Li ZJ, Wang RB, Tiang K. 2017. Population dynamics of Asian Openbill (Anastomus oscitans) in Caohai Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China. Chinese J Zool 52(2):203–209. doi:10.13859/j.cjz.201702003.
  17. Li FS. 2014. IUCN Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) conservation plan. Zool Res 35(S1):3–9. doi:10.11813/j.issn.2095-8137.2014. s1.0003.
  18. Li FS, Yang F. 2003. Population numbers and distribution of Black-necked Cranes (Grus nigricollis) in the Yungui Plateau. Chinese J Zool 38(03):43–46. doi:10.13859/j.cjz.2003.03.009.
  19. Li R, Jiao YM, Liu X. 2018. Habitat suitability analysis of Black-necked Crane nocturnal habitat based on MaxEnt model: A case study of Dashanbao Black-necked Crane National Nature Reserve in Yunnan. Journal of China West Normal University (Natural Sciences) 39(04):352–357. doi:10.16246/j.issn.1673-5072.2018. 04.003.
  20. Li XH, Ma ZJ, Li DM, Ding CQ, Zhai TQ, Lu BZ. 2001. Using Resource Selection Functions to study nest site selection of Crested ibis. Biodivers Sci 9(4):352–358. doi:10.17520/biods. 2001052.
  21. Li ZM, Li FS. 2005. Study on Black-necked cranes. Shanghai Technological and Educational Press, Shanghai, China.
  22. Li ZQ, Wang Z, Ge C. 2013. Time budgets of wintering Red-Crowned Cranes: effects of habitat, age and family size. Wetlands 33(2):227–232. doi:10.1007/s13157-012-0371-z.
  23. Liu Q, Yang XJ, Zhu JG, Zhao JL, Yu HZ. 2008. Flock of Black-necked Crane wintering at Napahai Nature Reserve, China. Zool Res 29(5):533–560. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1141.2008.05553.
  24. Liu YJ, Lu WP. 2010. Research and application of triangulation method. Jiangsu Communications Technology (3):26–28.
  25. Lu GY, Wang RX, Ma L, Yang XJ. 2017. Characteristics of dry upland roosts of the Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis) wintering in Yongshan, China. Wilson J Ornithol 129(2):323–330. doi:10.1676/15-191.1.
  26. Pearce J, Ferrier S. 2000. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol Model 133(3):225–245. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00322-7.
  27. Pearse AT, Krapu GL, Brandt DA. 2017. Sandhill crane roost selection, human disturbance, and forage resources. J Wildlife Manage 81(3):477–486. doi:10.1002/jwmg.21215.
  28. Ran JC, Meng WP, Su HJ, Zhang MM. 2017. The impact of environmental problems on black-necked crane (Grus nigricollis) and the management strategies at Caohai Wetland, Guizhou, China. Chinese J Wildlife 38(01):35–39. doi:10.19711/j.cnki.issn2310-1490.2017.01.006.
  29. Shenk TM, Ringelman JK. 1992. Habitat use by cross-fostered Whooping Cranes in Colorado. J Wildlife Manage 56(4):769–776. doi:10.2307/3809472.
  30. Sprague AJ, Hamilton DJ, Diamond AW. 2008. Site safety and food affect movements of semipalmated sandpipers (Calidris pusilla) migrating through the upper bay of fundy. Avian Conserv Ecol 3(2):259–287. doi:10.5751/ACE-00252-030204.
  31. Sun XJ, Zhang MM, Hannah L, Hu C, Su HJ. 2018. Field observations on the behavior of wintering Black-necked Cranes (Grus nigricollis) at roosting sites in Caohai, Guizhou. Chinese J Zool 53(02):180–190. doi:10.13859/j.cjz.201802003.
  32. Vanderploeg HA, Scavia D. 1979. Calculation and use of selectivity coefficients of feeding: Zooplankton grazing. Ecol Model 7(2):135–149. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(79)90004-8.
  33. Végvári Z, Barta Z. 2015. Roost site selection of the Common Crane in its largest European stop-over site. Ardea 103(2):175–181. doi:10.5253/arde.v103i2.a6.
  34. Wang C, Dong B, Zhu M, Huang H, Liu LP. 2019. Habitat selection of wintering cranes (Gruidae) in typical lake wetland in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(8):8266–8279. doi:10.1007/s11356-019-04306-y. . [DOI] [PubMed]
  35. Wang ZH, Wang XM. 2006. The validity of using a resource selection functions model to predict den habitat of the Tibetan fox (Vulpes ferrilata). Biodivers Sci 14(05):382–391. doi:10.1360/biodiv. 060001.
  36. Wu DW, Hu CS, Zhang MM, Li ZM, Su HJ. 2020. Foraging habitat selection of overwintering Black-necked Cranes in the farming area surrounding the Caohai Wetland, Guizhou Province, China. Avian Res 11(01):74–82. doi:10.1186/s40657-020-00192-y.
  37. Wu JD. 2005. Behavior study of wintering Siberian Cranes at Poyang Lake. In: Wang QS, Li FS (ed). Crane research in China. Yunnan Educational Publishing House, Kunming, China.
  38. Wu Z, Zhang K, Li W. 2013. Number, habitats, and roosting sites of wintering Black-necked Cranes in Huize Nature Reserve, Yunnan, China. Mt Res Dev 33(3):314–322. doi:10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00066.1.
  39. Xu ZL, Yang BH, Liu W. 2008. Preliminary studies on restoration and reconstitution of vegetation in Caohai National Nature Reservation Area. Inner Mongolia Forestry Investigation and Design 31(1):5–9.
  40. Yang CH, Zhang HM, Zhou XP, Wang PY, Wang XM. 2006. Review of habitat selection in the Giant Panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). Acta Ecologica Sinica 26(10):3442–3453.
  41. Zhao JL, Han LX, Feng L, Wu ZR, Yu HZ. 2008. Wintering behaviors and habitat using of Black-necked Crane in Napahai Nature Reserve, Yunnan Province. Sichuan Journal of Zoology (01):87–91.
  42. Zhang HH, Li MJ, Yao SL. 2007. Research on Caohai. Guizhou Science and Technology Press, Guiyang, China.
  43. Zhang HB, Su HJ, Liu W, Zhang MM, Li ZM. 2014. Relationship of community structure of main waterfowl with habitat in Caohai National Nature Reserve in winter. J Ecol Rural Environ 30(5):601–607.
  44. Zhang MM, Zhang LJ, Su HJ, Cai JY, Hu CS. 2019. Study on the landscape pattern changes and the landscape development intensity of Caohai National Nature. J Ecol Rural Environ 35(3):300–306.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1.

Black-necked Crane in their roosting sites in Caohai, photoed in early morning.

zoolstud-61-036-s001.docx (113.2KB, docx)
Fig. S2.

Black-necked in non-roosting-site, Caohai wetland.

zoolstud-61-036-s002.docx (706.2KB, docx)
Fig. S3.

Swamp near the village.

zoolstud-61-036-s003.docx (151KB, docx)
Fig. S4.

View of lakeshore, the opposite is near the Weining County town.

zoolstud-61-036-s004.docx (390.3KB, docx)

Articles from Zoological Studies are provided here courtesy of Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica

RESOURCES