ABSTRACT
Objective:
To analyze the association of dysglycemia with clinical, laboratory, and radiographic characteristics of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), as well as with their tuberculosis treatment outcomes.
Methods:
This was a longitudinal study involving 140 patients diagnosed with PTB (positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis or positive Xpert MTB/RIF results from sputum samples). Patients were evaluated at diagnosis (M0), after completing the second month of treatment (M2), and at the end of treatment (MEND). At M0, the patients were classified into three groups: normoglycemia+PTB (NGTB); pre-diabetes mellitus+PTB (PDMTB), and diabetes mellitus+PTB (DMTB), in accordance with glycated hemoglobin levels (< 5.7%, 5.7%-6.4%, and ≥ 6.5%, respectively). Treatment outcomes were classified as favorable (cure or treatment completion) and unfavorable (death, loss to follow-up, or treatment failure).
Results:
In our sample, 76 patients (61.4%) had dysglycemia, 20 of whom (14.3%) had DM at M0. The patients with dysglycemia, in comparison with those in the NGTB group, more frequently presented with positive sputum smear microscopy (94.2% vs. 75.9%; p = 0.003); cavities (80.2% vs. 63.0%; p = 0.03); bilateral lesions (67.4% vs. 46.0%; p = 0.02); and higher median of affected thirds of the lungs (3.0 vs. 2.0; p = 0.03) on chest radiography. No significant differences regarding outcomes were found among the groups, but tuberculosis lethality was higher in the DMTB group than in the PDMTB and NGTB groups (20% vs. 2.2%).
Conclusions:
PTB patients with dysglycemia had laboratory and radiographic manifestations indicative of more advanced disease, and the risk of death was higher in the DMTB group. These findings reinforce the recommendation for early screening for DM in patients with newly diagnosed tuberculosis in order to reduce the risk of death during treatment.
Keywords: Tuberculosis/diagnosis, Tuberculosis/diagnostic imaging, Tuberculosis/therapy, Diabetes mellitus, Treatment outcome
RESUMO
Objetivo:
Analisar a associação de disglicemia e características clínicas, laboratoriais e radiográficas em pacientes com tuberculose pulmonar (TBP), bem como a associação de disglicemia e desfechos do tratamento da tuberculose.
Métodos:
Estudo longitudinal com 140 pacientes com diagnóstico de TBP (culturas de escarro positivas para Mycobacterium tuberculosis ou resultados positivos do teste Xpert MTB/RIF em amostras de escarro). Os pacientes foram avaliados no momento do diagnóstico (M0), após dois meses de tratamento (M2) e no fim do tratamento (MFIM). Em M0, os pacientes foram divididos em três grupos: normoglicemia+TBP (NGTB); pré-diabetes mellitus+TBP (PDMTB) e diabetes mellitus+TBP (DMTB), de acordo com os níveis de hemoglobina glicada (< 5,7%, 5,7%-6,4% e ≥ 6,5%, respectivamente). Os desfechos do tratamento foram classificados em favoráveis (cura ou conclusão do tratamento) e desfavoráveis (óbito, perda de seguimento ou falência do tratamento).
Resultados:
Em nossa amostra, 76 pacientes (61,4%) apresentavam disglicemia, 20 (14,3%) dos quais apresentavam DM em M0. Os pacientes com disglicemia, em comparação com os do grupo NGTB, apresentaram mais frequentemente baciloscopia de escarro positiva (94,2% vs. 75,9%; p = 0,003); cavidades (80,2% vs. 63,0%; p = 0,03); lesões bilaterais (67,4% vs. 46,0%; p = 0,02) e maior mediana de terços pulmonares acometidos (3,0 vs. 2,0; p = 0,03) na radiografia de tórax. Não foram observadas diferenças significativas entre os grupos quanto aos desfechos, mas a letalidade da tuberculose foi maior no grupo DMTB do que nos grupos PDMTB e NGTB (20% vs. 2,2%).
Conclusões:
Pacientes com TBP e disglicemia apresentaram manifestações laboratoriais e radiográficas indicativas de doença mais avançada, e o risco de óbito foi maior no grupo DMTB. Esses achados reforçam a recomendação de detecção precoce de DM em pacientes com tuberculose recém-diagnosticada, a fim de reduzir o risco de óbito durante o tratamento.
Descritores: Tuberculose/diagnóstico, Tuberculose/diagnóstico por imagem, Tuberculose/terapia, Diabetes mellitus, Resultado do tratamento
INTRODUCTION
In recent years, the association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and tuberculosis (DMTB) has been recognized as an important public health problem. DM increases the risk of developing active tuberculosis by 2-3 times, and patients with DMTB more often have unfavorable tuberculosis treatment outcomes when compared with tuberculosis patients without DM. 1 - 3 The innate and adaptive immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis are altered in patients with DM, increasing the risk of either primary infection or reactivation of tuberculosis infection. 4 The hyperinflammatory host response associated with tuberculosis can cause hyperglycemia, hinder the clinical management of patients with DM, and induce the development of DM in patients with pre-DM. 5
The progress made toward tuberculosis elimination has been recently affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in reduced access to tuberculosis services, leading to an 18% drop in the number of newly diagnosed tuberculosis cases and increased numbers of tuberculosis-related deaths. These figures may be further hampered by the rapid increase in DM in recent years, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. 6 Prospective studies evaluating the role of dysglycemia (DM and pre-DM) in the clinical presentation of tuberculosis and response to tuberculosis treatment under routine conditions carried out in countries with a high tuberculosis burden are still scarce in the literature. 7 , 8 Data on DMTB provided by the Brazilian Ministry of Health 9 and based on reported tuberculosis cases to the Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (Brazilian Case Registry Database) showed that, between 2019 and 2021, 10% of the patients with tuberculosis reported to be diabetic.
In the present study, we aimed to describe the clinical, laboratory, and radiographic characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients with and without dysglycemia, as well as to analyze the association of these characteristics with tuberculosis treatment outcomes.
METHODS
Between September of 2016 and November of 2020, we carried out a longitudinal study involving patients with PTB treated at the Municipal Health Care Center in the city of Duque de Caxias, Brazil.
A consecutive, convenience sample of individuals seeking the center with cough for at least two weeks was screened for tuberculosis with the use of a clinical score 10 based on respiratory signs and symptoms suggestive of the disease. Patients with a score ≥ 5 had a medium/high probability of having PTB and were invited to participate in the study. 10 Patients who were ≥ 18 years of age and agreed to be interviewed, to undergo anthropometric measurements and chest radiography (CXR), and to have clinical samples collected were included in the study. Participants with a positive culture for M. tuberculosis and/or a positive Xpert MTB/RIF assay (GeneXpert; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) result from sputum samples were defined as having PTB. According to the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) profile, tuberculosis patients were categorized into three groups: normoglycemic group (NGTB; HbA1c < 5.7%); pre-diabetic group (PDMTB; 5.7% ≤ HbA1c ≤ 6.4%); and diabetic group (DMTB; HbA1c ≥ 6.5%). 11 - 13 All HbA1c assays were performed in a certified laboratory (Laboratório de Análises Clínicas da Unigranrio) in the city of Duque de Caxias.
After giving written informed consent, the patients were evaluated at the moment of receiving the diagnosis of tuberculosis or during the first week of tuberculosis treatment initiation (M0), after completing the second month of treatment (M2), and at the end of the treatment (MEND). During the visits, patients underwent anthropometric measurements (weight and height), sputum tests (sputum smear microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF, culture for M. tuberculosis, first-line drug susceptibility testing [BACTEC MGIT 960 SIRE; Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA]), blood tests (fasting glycemia and HbA1c), and CXR. Participants also completed a questionnaire, administered by a trained nurse, with questions about sociodemographic characteristics, as well as signs and symptoms suggestive of PTB. Tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use was evaluated by a specific questionnaire. 14 A pulmonologist, blinded to the patients’ glycemic profile, evaluated CXR by using a standardized form regarding the presence of lung cavities (number and size) and extension of lung involvement (unilateral or bilateral lesions and number of affected thirds of the lungs). Information on tuberculosis treatment outcomes was obtained from clinical records, and these outcomes were classified as favorable (cure or treatment completion) or unfavorable (death, loss to follow-up, or treatment failure).
Absolute and relative frequencies of categorical variables were calculated; for continuous variables, medians and interquartile ranges were described. Associations of categorical variables with dysglycemia and treatment outcome were assessed by the chi-square test (or Fischer’s exact test, when indicated), and ORs and respective 95% CIs were described. To compare continuous variables, the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used. The significance level was set at 5%, and p values were two-tailed. Multivariate analyses of the association of clinical, laboratory, and radiographic characteristics with HbA1c levels and tuberculosis treatment outcomes were performed using logistic regression. Box plots of the distribution of HbA1c levels at M0, M2 and MEND, as well as among patients who died or not, were built. For statistical analyses, the IBM SPSS Statistics software package, version 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) and the R program 2019 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) were used.
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho on 07/02/2015 (CAAE no. 45637715.5.0000.5257).
RESULTS
During the study period, 318 eligible patients with respiratory symptoms and medium/high clinical score results for PTB were identified. Of those 318 patients, 8 patients (3.8%) were excluded: 3 individuals were unable to collect or deliver a sputum sample and were referred to further investigation; blood samples were not collected from another 3; and it was not possible to process the samples sent to the laboratory from 2 participants. Of the 310 participants initially included in the study, 140 (45.2%) had a diagnosis of PTB.
Most PTB patients were male (n = 93; 66.4%); the medians of age and BMI were, respectively, 36 years and 19.7 kg/m2. Non-White participants were more represented (n = 116; 82.9%), and 75 patients (53.6%) attended school for less than 8 years. Tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use was identified, respectively, in 42.9%, 49.3%, and 24.3% of the patients (Table 1). Previous tuberculosis treatment and HIV infection were observed in 12.9% and 7.2%, respectively (Table S1 (125.9KB, pdf) ).
Table 1. Sociodemographic data of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (N = 140), in accordance with glycated hemoglobin levels at the time of diagnosis.a .
| Variable | NGTB group | PDMTB group | pb | DMTB group | pc | pd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 54) | (n = 66) | (n = 20) | |||||
| Sex | Female | 16 (29.6) | 23 (34.8) | 0.56 | 8 (40.0) | 0.41 | 0.46 |
| Male | 38 (70.4) | 43 (65.2) | 12 (60.0) | ||||
| Age | years | 33.5 [24.0-46.0] | 35.5 [26.7-48.5] | 0.29 | 44.0 [37.2-57.0] | 0.01 | 0.08 |
| Skin color | White | 12 (22.2) | 9 (13.6) | 0.23 | 3 (15.0) | 0.74 | 0.25 |
| Non-White | 42 (77.8) | 57 (86.4) | 17 (85.0) | ||||
| Schooling | < 8 years | 25 (46.3) | 40 (60.6) | 0.14 | 10 (50.0) | 0.79 | 0.22 |
| ≥ 8 years | 29 (53.7) | 26 (39.4) | 10 (50.0) | ||||
| BMI | kg/cm2 | 19.6 [17.2-21.1] | 19.2 [18.2-21.5] | 0.38 | 23.1 [20.0-26.6] | < 0.005 | 0.05 |
| BMI | ≥ 18.5 kg/cm2 | 33 (61.1) | 44 (66.7) | 0.56 | 18 (90.0) | 0.02 | 0.19 |
| < 18.5 kg/cm2 | 21 (38.9) | 22 (33.3) | 2 (10.0) | ||||
| Tobacco | No | 33 (61.1) | 31 (47.7) | 0.19 | 15 (75.0) | 0.41 | 0.48 |
| Yes | 21 (38.9) | 34 (52.3) | 5 (25.0) | ||||
| Alcohol | No | 27 (50.0) | 30 (46.2)e | 0.71 | 13 (65.0) | 0.30 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 27 (50.0) | 35 (53.8)e | 7 (35.0) | ||||
| Illicit drugs | No | 41 (75.9) | 47 (72.3)e | 0.68 | 17 (85.5) | 0.53 | 1.00 |
| Yes | 13 (24.1) | 18 (27.7)e | 3 (15.0) | ||||
NGTB: normoglycemia (NG; glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c < 5.7%]) + tuberculosis (TB); PDMTB: pre-diabetes mellitus (PDM; HbA1c = 5.7-6.4%) + TB; and DMTB: (DM; HbA1c ≥ 6.5%) + TB. aValues expressed as n (%) or median [IQR]. bNGTB vs. PDMTB. cNGTB vs. DMTB. dNGTB vs. PDMTB+DMTB. en = 65.
The prevalence of dysglycemia among the patients at M0 was 61.4% (pre-DM, in 47.1% and DM, in 14.3%). Among the 20 patients with DM, 13 (65.0%) had a previous diagnosis of type 2 DM. Blood glucose was measured in all patients; however, information on fasting was recorded only in 112 patients (80.0%). The test was performed after fasting in 73.2% (82/112), and in 11.0% (9/82) of these cases the values were ≥ 126 mg/dL. Of those 9 patients, 4 (44.4%) had a previous diagnosis of type 2 DM.
Age and BMI medians were significantly higher in the DMTB group. Higher use of tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs was observed in the PDMTB group (Table 1).
Regarding symptoms suggestive of PTB, previous tuberculosis treatment, and HIV infection, no statistical differences were observed between normoglycemic and dysglycemic patients with tuberculosis. Cough and sputum were reported by all patients, as both variables were included in the definition of individuals with respiratory symptoms, an eligibility criterion adopted in the study (Table S1 (125.9KB, pdf) ).
CXR findings and microbiological and molecular test results at diagnosis of PTB and during follow-up
At diagnosis of PTB, patients in the PDMTB group more frequently presented with cavitary disease on CXR (84.8%) when compared with those in the NGTB (63.0%) and DMTB (65.0%) groups. There were no statistical differences in the mean number of cavities and in the number of cavities larger than 2 cm among the three groups of patients. However, bilateral lesions were more frequently observed in the DMTB group than in the NGTB group (70% vs. 46%; p = 0.03). The mean number of thirds of the lungs affected was statistically higher in the DMTB and PDMTB groups than in the NGTB group. In patients with dysglycemia, in comparison with those in the NGTB group, cavities (80.2% vs. 63.0%) and bilateral lesions on CXR (67.4% vs. 46.0%) were more common, and there was also a higher number of affected thirds of the lungs (median, 3 vs. 2). During the follow-up period (M2 and MEND), no statistical differences were observed in CXR findings among the three groups of patients (Table 2).
Table 2. Chest radiography findings in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (N = 140) at diagnosis, after completing the second month of treatment, and at the end of tuberculosis treatment, in accordance with the levels of glycated hemoglobin.a .
| Finding | NGTB group | PDMTB group | pb | DMTB group | pc | pd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0 | (n = 54) | (n = 66) | (n = 20) | ||||
| Presence of cavity | Yes | 34 (63.0) | 56 (84.8) | 0.01 | 13 (65.0) | 1.00 | 0.03 |
| No | 20 (37.0) | 10 (15.2) | 7 (35.0) | ||||
| Number of cavities | 3.0 [1.0-4.0] | 3.0 [2.0-4.0] | 0.64 | 3.0 [1.0-6.0] | 0.97 | 0.68 | |
| Cavity > 2 cm | Yes | 33 (97.1) | 52 (92.9) | 0.64 | 13 (100) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| No | 1 (2.9) | 4 (7.1) | 0 (0.0) | ||||
| Lesione | Unilateral | 27 (54.0) | 22 (33.3) | 0.03 | 6 (30.0) | 0.11 | 0.02 |
| Bilateral | 23 (46.0) | 44 (66.7) | 14 (70.0) | ||||
| Number of affected thirds | 2.0 [2.0-3.2] | 3.0 [2.0-4.0] | 0.06 | 3.0 [2.2-4.5] | 0.06 | 0.03 | |
| M2 | NGTB group | PDMTB group | pb | DMTB group | pc | pd | |
| (n = 27) | (n = 26) | (n = 11) | |||||
| Presence of cavity | Yes | 13 (48.1) | 14 (53.8) | 0.78 | 7 (63.6) | 0.48 | 0.61 |
| No | 14 (51.9) | 12 (46.2) | 4 (36.4) | ||||
| Number of cavities | 2.0 [1.0-3.0] | 2.0 [1.0-3.0] | 0.79 | 2.0 [1.0-4.0] | 0.91 | 0.87 | |
| Cavity > 2 cm | Yes | 8 (61.5) | 10 (71.0) | 0.69 | 6 (85.7) | 0.35 | 0.45 |
| No | 5 (38.5) | 4 (28.6) | 1 (14.3) | ||||
| Lesionf | Unilateral | 15 (57.7) | 9 (34.6) | 0.16 | 9 (90.0) | 0.11 | 0.61 |
| Bilateral | 11 (42.3) | 17 (65.4) | 1 (10.0) | ||||
| Number of affected thirds | 2.0 [1.0-2.2] | 2.0 [2.0-3.0] | 0.09 | 2.0 [1.7-2.0] | 0.71 | 0.13 | |
| MEND | NGTB group | PDMTB group | pb | DMTB group | pc | pd | |
| (n = 29) | (n = 35) | (n = 12) | |||||
| Presence of cavity | Yes | 5 (17.2) | 7 (20.0) | 1.00 | 1 (8.3) | 0.65 | 1.00 |
| No | 24 (82.8) | 28 (80.0) | 11 (91.7) | ||||
| Number of cavities | 1.0 [1.0-2.5] | 1.0 [1.0-2.0] | 0.75 | 1.0 [1.0-1.0] | 1.00 | 0.83 | |
| Cavity > 2 cm | Yes | 4 (80.0) | 5 (71.4) | 1.00 | 1 (100) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| No | 1 (20.0) | 2 (28.6) | 0 (0.0) | ||||
| Lesiong | Unilateral | 13 (65.0) | 10 (37.0) | 0.08 | 10 (100) | 0.06 | 0.57 |
| Bilateral | 7 (35.0) | 17 (63.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||||
| Number of affected thirds | 1.5 [1.5-2.0] | 2.0 [1.0-2.0] | 0.17 | 1.0 [1.0-2.0] | 0.39 | 0.48 | |
NGTB: normoglycemia (NG; glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c < 5.7%]) + tuberculosis (TB); PDMTB: pre-diabetes mellitus (PDM; HbA1c = 5.7-6.4%) + TB; DMTB: (DM; HbA1c ≥ 6.5%) + TB; M0: at diagnosis; M2: after completing two months of treatment; and MEND: at the end of treatment. aValues expressed as n (%) or median [IQR]. bNGTB vs. PDMTB. cNGTB vs. DMTB. dNGTB vs. PDMTB + DMTB. en = 136. fn = 62. gn = 57.
Positivity on sputum smear microscopy was significantly higher in the PDMTB and DMTB groups (93.0%) than in the NGTB group (75.9%; p = 0.005); however, positive Xpert MTB/RIF and M. tuberculosis culture results in sputum were similar among the groups (Table 3). Resistant M. tuberculosis strains were more common in the NGTB (20.9%) and PDMTB (19.0%) groups than in the DMTB group (10.0%). The most common drug resistance patterns were monoresistance to streptomycin (45.8%, 11/24) and to isoniazid (25.0%, 6/24). During follow-up, no significant differences were observed regarding microbiological test results in the three groups of patients (Table 3).
Table 3. Microbiological data of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (N = 140) at diagnosis, after completing the second month of treatment, and at the end of tuberculosis treatment, in accordance with the levels of glycated hemoglobin.a .
| Variable | NGTB group | PDMTB group | pb | DMTB group | pc | pd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0 | (n = 54) | (n = 66) | (n = 20) | ||||
| Xpert MTB/RIF in sputume | Nondetectable | 3 (5.7) | 2 (3.0) | 0.65 | 0 (0.0) | 0.55 | 0.36 |
| Detectable | 50 (94.3) | 64 (97.0) | 20 (100) | ||||
| Smear microscopy | Negative | 13 (24.1) | 5 (7.6) | 0.01 | 1 (5.0) | 0.09 | 0.005 |
| Positive | 41 (75.9) | 61 (92.4) | 19 (95.0) | ||||
| Positive smear microscopy | < 3+ | 20 (48.8) | 32 (52.5) | 0.84 | 10 (52.6) | 1.00 | 0.70 |
| 3+ | 21 (51.2) | 29 (47.5) | 9 (47.0) | ||||
| MTB culture | Negative | 3 (5.6) | 1 (1.1) | 0.32 | 0 (0.0) | 0.55 | 0.29 |
| Positive | 51 (94.4) | 65 (98.5) | 20 (100) | ||||
| Drug susceptibility testingf | Sensitive | 38 (79.2) | 51 (81.0) | 1.00 | 18 (90.0) | 0.41 | 0.81 |
| Resistant | 10 (20.9) | 12 (19.0) | 2 (10.0) | ||||
| Drug resistancef | Rifampin | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.12 | 0 (0.0) | 0.66 | 0.15 |
| Isoniazid | 4 (8.3) | 1 (1.6) | 1 (5.0) | ||||
| Ethambutol | 1 (2.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||||
| Pyrazinamide | 1 (2.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||||
| Streptomycin | 2 (4.2) | 8 (12.7) | 1 (5.0) | ||||
| Isoniazid + Streptomycin | 2 (4.2) | 3 (5.7) | 0 (0.0) | ||||
| M2 | NGTB group | PDMTB group | pb | DMTB group | pc | pd | |
| (n = 25) | (n = 32) | (n = 9) | |||||
| Smear microscopy | Negative | 19 (76.0) | 26 (81.3) | 0.74 | 7 (78.0) | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| Positive | 6 (24.0) | 6 (18.8) | 2 (22.0) | ||||
| Positive smear microscopy | < 3+ | 5 (83.3) | 6 (100) | 1.00 | 2 (100) | 1.00 | 0.42 |
| 3+ | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||||
| MTB cultureg | Negative | 13 (72.0) | 13 (87.0) | 0.41 | 5 (83.0) | 1.00 | 0.43 |
| Positive | 5 (28.0) | 2 (13.0) | 1 (17.0) | ||||
| MEND | NGTB group | PDMTB group | pb | DMTB group | pc | pd | |
| (n = 13) | (n = 23) | (n = 3) | |||||
| Smear microscopy | Negative | 12 (92.0) | 22 (96.0) | 1.00 | 3 (100) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Positive | 1 (8.0) | 1 (4.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||||
| Positive smear microscopy | < 3+ | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100) | 1.00 | 0 (0.0) | N/A | 1.00 |
| 3+ | 1 (100) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | N/A | |||
| MTB cultureh | Negative | 5 (83.0) | 11 (100) | 0.35 | 0 (0.0) | 0.35 | |
| Positive | 1 (16.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | ||||
NGTB: normoglycemia (NG; glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c < 5.7%]) + tuberculosis (TB); PDMTB: pre-diabetes mellitus (PDM; HbA1c = 5.7-6.4%) + TB; DMTB: (DM; HbA1c ≥ 6.5%) + TB; MTB: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; M0: at diagnosis; M2: after completing two months of treatment; and MEND: at the end of treatment. aValues expressed as n (%). bNGTB vs. PDMTB. cNGTB vs. DMTB. dNGTB vs. PDMTB + DMTB. en = 139. fn = 131. gn = 39. hn = 17.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical, radiographic, and microbiological characteristics associated with dysglycemia
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of clinical, radiographic, and microbiological characteristics at M0 associated with dysglycemia are presented in Table 4. Higher BMI, presence of cavities on CXR, and positive sputum smear microscopy were independently associated with dysglycemia among the patients with PTB.
Table 4. Univariate and multivariate analysis of clinical, radiographic, and microbiological characteristics at the time of diagnosis of tuberculosis associated with dysglycemia among patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.
| Variable | Normoglycemia | Dysglycemia | Analysis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGTB group | PDMTB+DMTB groups | Unadjusted | Adjusted | |
| (n = 54) | (n = 86) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Age, years | 33.5 [24.4-45.0] | 38.0 [27.0-50.8] | 1.20 (0.95-1.52) | 1.12 (0.86-1.46)* |
| Female sex | 16 (29.6) | 31 (36.0) | 1.33 (0.64-2.82) | 1.07 (0.48-1.46) |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 19.6 [17.3-21.0] | 19.9 [18.4-22.5] | 1.11 (1.00-1.24) | 2.36 (1.31-4.61)** |
| Positive smear microscopy | 41 (75.9) | 80 (93.0) | 4.13 (1.50-12.07) | 4.59 (1.38-17.75) |
| Cavity on chest radiography | 34 (63.0) | 69 (80.2) | 2.37 (1.10-5.18) | 2.81 (1.13-7.22) |
Values expressed as n (%) or median [IQR]. *OR considering an increment of 10 years. **OR considering an increment of 5 units of BMI.
Variation in HbA1c levels during tuberculosis treatment
The distributions of HbA1c levels (in %) assessed at M0, M2 and MEND are shown in Figure 1. A significant reduction in HbA1c above normal levels (≥ 5.7%) was observed at M2, particularly in the PDMTB group (from 47% at M0 to 14% at M2), that is, among the 66 patients in the PDMTB group at M0, dysglycemia was not confirmed at M2 in 46 (70%). The median HbA1c levels in the PDMTB and DMTB groups, respectively, significantly decreased from M0-5.9% [5.8-6.1%] and 9.7% [6.8-11.8%]-to M2-5.4% [5.1-5.6%] and 8.1% [5.9-12.5%]-to MEND-5.4% [5.2-5.7%] and 8.4% [6.3-10.3%]. We found a significant reduction in dysglycemic levels at M2 compared with those at M0 (61% vs. 25%; p = 0.001), which stabilized between M2 and MEND (25% vs. 28%; p = 1.0). However, among 8 of the patients in the PDMTB group at M2, 5 (62.5%) already had HbA1c levels ≥ 5.7% at M0.
Figure 1. Proportion of patients diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis regarding glycemic state (determined by glycated hemoglobin levels) at three moments of evaluation: at the diagnosis of tuberculosis (M0; n = 140); after completing the second month of treatment (M2; n = 99); and at the end of tuberculosis treatment (MEND; n = 86). DM: diabetes mellitus.
Tuberculosis treatment outcomes
All patients used the standard regimen for tuberculosis treatment (including patients with isoniazid resistance, who had their treatment extended to nine months), and the mean duration of tuberculosis treatment (in months) in the NGTB, PDMTB, and DMTB groups, respectively, were 6.8, 6.2, and 7.1 months (p = 0.13). Information on tuberculosis treatment outcomes was available for all patients except 1 (referred to another clinic). Among the 139 patients evaluated, 29 were lost to follow-up, 2 had treatment failure, 102 had favorable treatment outcomes (7 cured and 95 completed treatment), and 6 died. There were no significant associations of sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory variables with the treatment outcomes. Patients in the PDMTB and DMTB groups showed no significantly higher frequencies of unfavorable outcomes (death, treatment dropout, or treatment failure) when compared with those in the NGTB group (25.0% vs. 33.9%). At MEND, 12 patients in the PDMTB group had favorable outcomes (cure or treatment completion). Likewise, there was no significant difference between tuberculosis treatment outcomes (favorable or unfavorable) and HbA1c levels (p = 0.38). However, of the 6 patients who died, 4 were in the DMTB group. Tuberculosis lethality was 20% (4/20) among the patients in the DMTB group, whereas it was 2.2% in the PDMTB (1/46) and NGTB (1/45) groups. Despite the analysis limitation due to the small number of events, we observed a significant association between death and higher HbA1c levels (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Box plots showing glycated hemoglobin levels at the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis whose outcome was survival or death. *Nonparametric Wilcoxon-Mann-Whiney test.
DISCUSSION
In countries with a high tuberculosis burden such as Brazil, few prospective studies have analyzed the clinical, microbiological, and radiographic characteristics of PTB patients or the role of DM and pre-DM in PTB treatment outcomes. 8 , 10
In our study, the frequency of DM among PTB patients (14.2%) was higher than that reported in another study in Brazil 8 and closer to those reported in other series (from 12.8% to 25%), 16 - 19 but lower than that reported in a study conducted in India, 15 in which the proportion of patients with tuberculosis and DM was 30%. In countries such as China 20 and Kenya, 21 the frequency of the DMTB association has been found to be lower (5.0% and 6.3%, respectively) than that found in our study. In other studies carried out in Brazil, the frequency of DM among tuberculosis patients was similar to our findings (13.6% and 14%). 22 , 23 The differences in the prevalence of DM observed in those studies, carried out in different geographical regions, may be associated with genetic predispositions to DM, dietary habits (including alcohol consumption), obesity, age distribution, and sedentary lifestyle, but they may also be due to diverse methods to evaluate dysglycemia. 15 - 23
Although the screening for DM in patients with tuberculosis at the beginning of treatment is internationally recommended, the test to be used (fasting glucose, glucose tolerance test, or HbA1c) and the timing of repeat testing may vary according to local conditions. 24 - 26 In our study, the information on fasting glycemia was collected in only 58.6% of the patients. Therefore, we chose to use HbA1c as a screening test, considering levels ≥ 6.5% as the criterion for DM diagnosis. 11 , 13 , 27 The use of HbA1c as a screening test for DM has some advantages, such as not requiring the patient to fast and having greater pre-analytical stability. However, the test has limitations: it is more expensive and influenced by other conditions (age, ethnicity, and presence of anemia). 27 Moreover, HbA1c testing can detect up to a third less DM cases when compared with a blood glucose fasting level ≥ 126 mg/dL. 28
Symptoms of tuberculosis in patients with DM appear to be more common and severe than do those described in patients with tuberculosis without DM. 22 , 29 However, we found no significant differences regarding the typology or duration of symptoms between the NGTB group and the dysglycemic groups in our cohort. Patients with DMTB had a higher mean age and BMI (suggestive of overweight), which is a common finding in patients with type 2 DM, as reported in other studies. 16 , 21 , 24
CXR findings in patients with the DMTB are more frequently associated with the presence of multiple cavities and bilateral pulmonary involvement. Patients with DMTB also have a higher frequency of “atypical” findings on CXR, with lesions in the lower lobes, especially in patients with poor glycemic control. 30 - 32 In our sample, the presence of cavities, bilateral lesions, and involvement of a greater number of thirds of the lungs were more common among dysglycemic patients. As there are scarce data on the radiographic and inflammatory profiles of DMTB patients during tuberculosis treatment, 33 our findings corroborate the results described in one study 34 involving guinea pigs with chronic hyperglycemia and showing a lower innate immune response in the presence of alveolar macrophages infected by M. tuberculosis. The animals presented a delay in the specific T response and subsequent hyperinflammation, with high levels of Th1, Th2, and Th17 cytokines; neutrophilia; and high pulmonary bacillary load. 34 The fact that sputum smear microscopy is more frequently positive in dysglycemic patients might be a consequence of a reduced control in M. tuberculosis multiplication. In case series in India 17 and in China, 20 higher proportions of positive sputum smear microscopy were also reported among diabetic patients.
No differences regarding the use of alcohol, tobacco, or illicit drugs were found among the groups studied, corroborating what has been described in other studies. 19 , 20 However, studies carried out in Brazil 22 , 29 identified a higher frequency of tobacco use in patients with DMTB than in those with tuberculosis without DM. In a cohort of tuberculosis patients in South Korea, the risk of death was almost five-fold greater in the presence of DM and tobacco use. 35
The differences in radiographic and microbiological findings observed between normoglycemic and dysglycemic patients at the diagnosis of tuberculosis were no longer present during follow-up. However, the analysis of radiographic and microbiological examinations during follow-up involved a smaller number of patients, and, therefore, our sample might have lacked power to identify such differences. In addition, the high proportion of deaths in the DMTB group (20%) might indicate a less effective response to antituberculosis therapy in patients with DMTB. The duration of tuberculosis treatment for patients with DMTB recommended by most guidelines, 24 , 36 including the Brazilian recommendations, 37 is the same for patients with tuberculosis without DM. However, patients with DMTB usually have a higher risk of toxicity to antituberculosis drugs (peripheral neuropathy due to isoniazid and ocular neuropathy due to ethambutol), drug interactions (in particular, rifampin), and low plasma concentrations of antituberculosis drugs. 38 All of these factors might contribute to unfavorable treatment outcomes in these patients.
In our study, pre-DM was identified in 47.1% of the patients with tuberculosis, which was higher than that described in other studies, with prevalences ranging from 7.4% to 37.5%. 8 , 16 , 17 , 19 - 21 However, we observed a significant reduction in HbA1c levels in the second month of treatment. Normalization of glycemic levels during tuberculosis treatment in initially dysglycemic patients has also been reported by other authors. 19 , 39 , 40 In the study by Calderon et al. carried out in Peru, 19 the prevalence of pre-DM patients decreased from 31% at the diagnosis of tuberculosis to 17% after completing the second month of treatment, maintaining the same proportion at the sixth month of treatment. These findings suggest that dysglycemia identified at the time of diagnosis is partially due to stress-induced hyperglycemia, a consequence of the inflammatory response to M. tuberculosis, which gradually decreases in consequence of infection control. 29 , 40
Tuberculosis treatment outcomes were not significantly different between normoglycemic and dysglycemic patients. The reason for the lack of such differences might be due to the inclusion of a nonbiological variable, such as loss to follow-up, among the unfavorable outcomes. However, when analyzing the cases that progressed to death, there was higher lethality among the patients in the DMTB group, and an association between higher levels of HbA1c and death was observed. The association between DM and death during tuberculosis treatment was previously described in a systematic review and in a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2 , 3 in which the OR for death/treatment failure ranged from 1.69 2 to 1.88. 3 )
Our study has limitations that are mainly related to the sample size, which might have limited the detection of significant associations, particularly during follow-up, when there was a further reduction in the number of participants. Furthermore, by including only patients with a medium/high probability of PTB using a clinical score for screening, we did not analyze patients with less exuberant symptoms, that is, in the early stages of the disease or with “atypical” presentations. Despite these limitations, the prospective nature of the study, with the collection of clinical, laboratory, and radiographic data at three different moments (M0, M2, and MEND) made it possible to assess the evolution of these parameters, such as the variation of HbA1c levels and their association with treatment outcomes.
In summary, we presented the results of a prospective cohort of patients with confirmed PTB, identifying high proportions of patients with associated DM and pre-DM, more advanced disease in patients with dysglycemia, and higher frequency of deaths among patients with the DMTB association. These findings reinforce the need for dysglycemia screening at the time of diagnosis of tuberculosis in order to identify patients with pre-DM and DM early, offering them treatment for both diseases. New prospective studies, involving a representative sample of patients with tuberculosis, are needed to understand the role of dysglycemic states in tuberculosis and in the risk of progression to DM.
Footnotes
Study carried out in the Serviço de Tisiologia, Centro Municipal de Saúde de Duque de Caxias, Secretaria Municipal de Duque de Caxias, Duque de Caxias (RJ) Brasil.
Financial support: This study received financial support from the Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ, Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for the Support of Research in the State of Rio de Janeiro; Grant no. 15/2014-Programa de Cooperação Bilateral FAPERJ/Associação Columbia Global Center/Brasil-2014 [Bilateral Cooperation Program]). ALK is a senior scientist from the Brazilian Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, National Council for Scientific and Technological Development). LIG is the recipient of a grant from the CNPq (Grant no. 115148/2020-5).
REFERENCES
- 1.Jeon CY, Harries AD, Baker MA, Hart JE, Kapur A, Lönnroth K. Bi-directional screening for tuberculosis and diabetes a systematic review. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15(11):1300–1314. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02632.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baker MA, Harries AD, Jeon CY, Hart JE, Kapur A, Lönnroth K. The impact of diabetes on tuberculosis treatment outcomes a systematic review. BMC Med. 2011;9:81–81. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Huangfu P, Ugarte-Gil C, Golub J, Pearson F, Critchley J. The effects of diabetes on tuberculosis treatment outcomes an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2019;23(7):783–796. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.18.0433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Restrepo BI, Schlesinger LS. Host-pathogen interactions in tuberculosis patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2013;93(0):S10–S14. doi: 10.1016/S1472-9792(13)70004-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Elife Persistent inflammation during anti-tuberculosis treatment with diabetes comorbidity. Elife. 2019;8:e46477. doi: 10.7554/eLife.46477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.World Health Organization (WHO) [homepage on the Internet] Global tuberculosis report 2021. Geneva: WHO; c2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240037021 [Google Scholar]
- 7.Calderon RI, Arriaga MB, Aliaga JG, Barreda NN, Sanabria OM, Barreto-Duarte B. Persistent dysglycemia is associated with unfavorable treatment outcomes in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis from Peru. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;116:293–301. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Arriaga MB, Araújo-Pereira M, Barreto-Duarte B, Nogueira B, Freire MVCNS, Queiroz ATL. The Effect of Diabetes and Prediabetes on Antituberculosis Treatment Outcomes A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study. J Infect Dis. 2022;225(4):617–626. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brasil . Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Informática do SUS (DATASUS) Brasília: DATASUS; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Souza JBOE, Filho, Sanchez M, Seixas JM, Maidantchik C, Galliez R, Moreira ADSR. Screening for active pulmonary tuberculosis Development and applicability of artificial neural network models. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2018;111:94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2018.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde . Cadernos de Atenção Básica n. 35. Estratégias para o cuidado com da pessoa com doença crônica. 2014. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/estrategias_cuidado_pessoa_doenca_cronica_cab35.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 12.American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. J Clin Appl Res Educ. 2020;43(Suppl 1) doi: 10.2337/dc20-S012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.World Health Organization . Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycemia. Geneva: World Health Organization; c2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/definition-and-diagnosis-of-diabetes-mellitus-and-intermediate-hyperglycaemia [Google Scholar]
- 14.World Health Organization . The ASSIST project - Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test - ASSIST Questionnaire Version 3.0 (Portuguese) Geneva: World Health Organization; http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/activities/assist_portuguese.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 15.Viswanathan V, Kumpatla S, Aravindalochanan V, Rajan R, Chinnasamy C, Srinivasan R. Prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes and associated risk factors among tuberculosis patients in India. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sarker M, Barua M, Guerra F, Saha A, Aftab A, Mahbub Latif AH. Double Trouble Prevalence and Factors Associated with Tuberculosis and Diabetes Comorbidity in Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0165396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mave V, Meshram S, Lokhande R, Kadam D, Dharmshale S, Bharadwaj R. Prevalence of dysglycemia and clinical presentation of pulmonary tuberculosis in Western India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21(12):1280–1287. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sharma B, Khanal VK, Jha N, Pyakurel P, Gurung GN. Study of the magnitude of diabetes and its associated risk factors among the tuberculosis patients of Morang, Eastern Nepal. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1545–1545. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7891-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Calderon RI, Arriaga MB, Lopez K, Barreda NN, Sanabria OM, Fróes JF., Neto High prevalence and heterogeneity of Dysglycemia in patients with tuberculosis from Peru a prospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):799–799. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4416-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang Q, Ma A, Han X, Zhao S, Cai J, Ma Y. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes among newly detected pulmonary tuberculosis patients in China a community based cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Owiti P, Keter A, Harries AD, Pastakia S, Wambugu C, Kirui N. Diabetes and pre-diabetes in tuberculosis patients in western Kenya using point-of-care glycated haemoglobin. Public Health Action. 2017;7(2):147–154. doi: 10.5588/pha.16.0114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Almeida-Junior JL, Gil-Santana L, Oliveira CA, Castro S, Cafezeiro AS, Daltro C. Glucose Metabolism Disorder Is Associated with Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Individuals with Respiratory Symptoms from Brazil. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Leal SB, Araújo GS, Nery JS, Santos CAST, Oliveira MG, Barreto ML. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of cases of tuberculosis associated with diabetes in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2017;50(3):408–412. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0409-2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.World Health Organization (WHO) [homepage on the Internet] Collaborative Framework for Care and Control of Tuberculosis and Diabetes. Geneva: WHO; c2011. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44698/9789241502252_eng.pdf [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lin Y, Harries AD, Kumar AMV, Critchley JA, van Crevel R, Owiti P, et al. Management of Diabetes Mellitus-Tuberculosis. A Guide to the Essencial Practice [monograph on the Internet] Paris: International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease; 2018. http://warn-carn-tb.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/TheUnion_Managment-DM-TB-en.pdf [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Riza A, Pearson F, Ugarte-Gil C, Alisjahbana B, van de Vijver S, Panduru NM, et al. Clinical management of concurrent diabetes and tuberculosis and the implications for patient services. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(9):740–753. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70110-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.American Diabetes Association Classification and diagnosis of diabetes Diabetes. Care. 2015;38:S8–S16. doi: 10.2337/dc15-S005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cowie CC, Rust KF, Byrd-holt DD, Gregg EW, Ford ES, Geiss LS. Prevalence of diabetes and high risk for diabetes using A1C criteria in the U S. population in 1988-2006. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):562–568. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gil-Santana L, Almeida-Junior JL, Oliveira CA, Hickson LS, Daltro C, Castro S. Diabetes Is Associated with Worse Clinical Presentation in Tuberculosis Patients from Brazil A Retrospective Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pérez-Guzman C, Torres-Cruz A, Villarreal-Velarde H, Salazar-Lezama MA, Vargas MH. Atypical radiological images of pulmonary tuberculosis in 192 diabetic patients a comparative study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001;5(5):455–461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dooley KE, Chaisson RE. Tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus convergence of two epidemics. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(12):737–746. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70282-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jiménez-Corona EM, Cruz-Hervert LP, García-García L, Ferreyra-Reyes L, Delgado-Sánchez G, Bobadilla-Del-Valle M. Association of diabetes and tuberculosis impact on treatment and post-treatment outcomes. Thorax. 2013;68(3):214–220. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-201756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kumar NP, Fukutani KF Shruthi BS, Alves T, Silveira-Matos OS, Rocha MS, et al. Persistent inflammation during anti-tuberculosis treatment with diabetes comorbidity. Elife. 2019;8:e46477. doi: 10.7554/eLife.46477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vallerskog T, Martens GW, Kornfeld H. Diabetic mice display a delayed adaptive immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol. 2010;184(11):6275–6282. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Reed GW, Choi H, Lee SY, Lee M, Kim Y, Park H. Impact of diabetes and smoking on mortality in tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e58044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nahid P, Dorman SE, Alipanah N, Barry PM, Brozek JL, Cattamanchi A. Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(7):e147–e195. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Brasil . Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância das Doenças Transmissíveis, editors. Manual de recomendações para o Controle da Tuberculose no Brasil. 2. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Magis-Escurra C, Carvalho ACC, Kritski AL, Girardi E. Tuberculosis. Sheffield, UK: European Respiratory Society; 2018. Tuberculosis and Comorbidities. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Oluboyo PO, Erasmus RT. The significance of glucose intolerance in pulmonary tuberculosis. Tubercle. 1990;71(2):135–138. doi: 10.1016/0041-3879(90)90010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Boillat-Blanco N, Ramaiya KL, Mganga M, Minja LT, Bovet P, Schindler C. Transient Hyperglycemia in Patients With Tuberculosis in Tanzania Implications for Diabetes Screening Algorithms. J Infect Dis. 2016;213(7):1163–1172. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]