Abstract
Introduction
The aim of this study was to investigate the association of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MRCNS) on preoperative skin and surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing spinal surgery.
Methods
A total of 507 cases (239 males and 268 females; mean age: 56.1 years) were included in this retrospective study, using prospectively collected data. All patients underwent skin culturing of the surgical site preoperatively. To identify independent risk factors for SSIs as the dependent variable, sequential multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted. Age, sex, body mass index, presence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), steroid uses, the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) ≥3, MRCNS-positivity on skin bacterial culture, instrumentation, and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score were used as independent variables.
Results
Preoperatively, MRCNS was detected from skin culture in 50 (9.9%) cases. The frequency of RA, steroid uses, and ASA-PS ≥3 was significantly higher in MRCNS-positive cases than in MRCNS-negative cases. There were 21 (4.1%) post-spinal surgery SSI cases. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that JOA scores (odds ratio (OR), 0.864; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.764-0.977) and MRCNS-positivity (OR, 5.060; 95% CI, 1.787-14.323) were significantly associated with SSIs.
Conclusions
Preoperatively, the incidence of MRCNS was 9.9%; it was the most common cause of postoperative SSIs. MRCNS-positivity was the most associated factor for SSIs.
Keywords: Surgical site infection, Spine surgery, Skin culture, Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci
Introduction
Surgical site infections (SSIs) lead to increased other complications, reoperation, readmission, poor outcomes, and costs. The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) reported that the incidence of SSIs after spinal surgeries was a 0.72% incidence for laminectomy, compared to an 8.7% incidence for spinal refusion in patients1). Postoperative SSIs are often the multifactorial etiology such as a combination of pre-, intra-, and postoperative factors. One factor that causes SSIs is contamination from the patient's skin flora. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) species, such as S. epidermidis, S. hominis, S. capitis, and S. lugdunensis, are the most common skin bacterial colonizers2). On the other hand, the most common pathogens that cause SSIs after spinal surgeries are Staphylococcus aureus3) and CNS4). Methicillin-resistant (MR) strains that are relatively common include MR S. aureus (MRSA) or MR S. epidermis (MRSE). MRSE causes a type of MRCNS infection that frequently occurs in revision4) or instrumentation surgery2). The new CDC Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection recommends administration of prophylactic antibiotics via intravenous drip infusion during the perioperative period3); the selected antibiotics should work against the most common surgical site pathogens. Therefore, cephazolin, which has activity for Staphylococcus and is safe, is recommended as the first choice in spinal surgery. However, the administration of cephazolin is crucial for patients with MR bacteria preoperatively. Moreover, the association between the prevalence of MRSA or MRCNS in the patient's skin at the surgical site before surgery and SSIs remains unclear.
The purpose of this study was to clarify the characteristics of the patients with MR strains in their skin flora and to examine whether preoperative skin bacteria of the surgical site are associated with the pathogenesis of SSIs after spinal surgery.
Materials and Methods
Subjects
This was a retrospective cohort study for consecutive patients undergoing spinal surgery at a single institution between March 2015 and February 2021. Patients with preoperative infectious disease, infectious wound conditions, and lacking data were excluded from this study. A total of 507 cases (239 males and 268 females) were included in the study (Fig. 1). We prospectively collected demographic, clinical, and microbiological data for all patients. The average age of the patients was 56.1 (range: 5-88) years. The percentage of posterior surgery was 98.4% (499/507). The distribution of prior diagnoses and the incidence of required instrumentation surgery are shown in Table 1. The percentage of patients requiring instrumentation surgery was 45.2%. All of the patients gave written informed consent and explicitly provided permission for this study before the assessments. This research has been approved by the IRB of the authors' affiliated institution (approval number: 2019-1038).
Figure 1.
Flow diagram in this study.
The subjects included 507 patients who underwent posterior spine surgery at our department. The frequency of SSIs and MRCNS-SSI was significantly higher in patients who were MRCNS-positive (8/50 and 5/50 cases) than in those who were negative (13/457 and 4/457 cases).
Table 1.
Preoperative Diagnosis.
Diagnosis | Cases | Received instrumentation, N (%) |
---|---|---|
Trauma | ||
Cervical | 6 | 6 (100) |
Thoracic, lumbar | 12 | 11 (91.7) |
Degenerative disease | ||
Cervical | 154 | 50 (32.5) |
Thoracic, lumbar | 163 | 60 (36.8) |
Spinal cord tumor | 56 | 5 (8.9) |
Spinal deformity | 88 | 81 (92.0) |
RA | 5 | 5 (100) |
DSA | 6 | 3 (50) |
Others | 16 | 5 (31.3) |
Total | 507 | 229 (45.2) |
RA, rheumatoid arthritis; DSA, destructive spondyloarthropathy
Preoperative protocol to prevent for SSIs
We performed perioperative management for this study as previously described4). Patients who smoke were instructed to cease smoking at least 4 weeks prior to surgery. Patients who were diagnosed with diabetes and hemoglobin A1C values >7 underwent glycemic control prior to surgery. Patients over the age of 60 controlled their blood glucose levels using a sliding scale for 1-2 weeks post-surgery until their blood glucose levels were normal.
We administered prophylactic antibiotics via intravenous drip infusion only in the pre- and intraoperative periods of all consecutive spinal surgeries. An additional dose of antibiotics was given every 4 h intraoperatively. Cephazolin was administered (based on weight) as the first choice, unless the patient had a history of significant allergy, such as anaphylactic shock, systemic skin eruption, or toxic kidney or liver dysfunction. Vancomycin was administered based on weight 3 h preoperatively in 7 of 16 patients (43.8%) with MR strains detected preoperatively between May 2019 and February 2021. We removed hair in the cervical surgical area using clippers in the operating room before surgery when necessary. We washed the surface of the surgical site using chlorhexidine and then immediately coated with an iodine drape. During surgery, the surgical site was irrigated using a saline solution every 30 min before closure of the surgical site. The continuous negative pressure suction drainage was removed 48 h after surgery.
SSI definitions and treatments
We defined postoperative SSIs according to the CDC/NHSN definition and identification of SSIs and confirmed by a positive culture of wound site specimens after the index procedure5). Superficial SSIs were defined only as the skin or subcutaneous tissue of the incisions. Deep SSIs were defined as the fascia and muscle layers of the incision. We administrated cephazolin immediately as the first choice when the patient had evidence of an SSI. If the patient had presented with MR bacteria preoperatively, we administered sensitive antibiotics. All subjects were assessed for the development of additional SSIs within 1 year.
Culture analysis
All patients underwent a skin culture examination of the surgical site in the outpatient room 7 days preceding surgery. All culture specimens were obtained with sterile rayon-tipped swabs. The swab was immediately brought to the microbiology laboratory at our institution. All cultures were monitored for 7 days. If bacteria were detected, their sensitivity to various antibiotics was tested.
Evaluation of clinical outcomes and ASA-PS ≥3
To assess the severity of clinical symptoms, all patients were evaluated by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score to assess cervical myelopathy prior to surgery. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) Classification System has been in use for over 60 years. The purpose of the system is to assess and communicate a patient's pre-anesthesia medical comorbidities. After modifications in 1962 and recent years, the ASA established a system of six classes. Class I indicates “a normal, healthy patient,” class II “a patient with mild systemic disease,” class III “a patient with severe systemic disease,” class IV “a patient with severe systemic disease that is a consistent threat to life,” class V “a moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation,” and class VI “a declared brain-dead patient whose organs are being removed for donor purposes.” The classification system alone does not predict the perioperative risks, but when used with other factors (e.g., type of surgery, frailty, level of deconditioning), it can be helpful in predicting perioperative risks.
Statistical analysis
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) ver.24.0J was used for statistical calculations. We compared the patients who were MRCNS-positive or negative using a Mann-Whitney U test and a chi-square test to analyze quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. The threshold of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Sequential univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors for SSI. The independent variables of multivariate analysis included factor with p<0.05 after univariate analysis. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), ASA-PS ≥3 (a patient with severe systemic disease), JOA score, and MRCNS-positivity on skin bacterial culture were used as the independent variables, which had p-values of <0.05 from the univariate analysis. We employed the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate the association between the JOA score and SSI. Values are presented as median and interquartile range.
Results
Preoperative skin bacterial culture
Preoperatively, 188 (37.1%) patients had methicillin-sensitive coagulase-negative staphylococci (MSCNS), whereas 50 (9.9%) had MRCNS (Fig. 2). A total of 28 patients tested positive for the two types of bacteria. There were no cases in which MRSA was detected.
Figure 2.
Bacteria from preoperative skin cultures.
Preoperatively, 188 (37.1%) patients had MSCNS, and 49 (9.7%) had MRCNS. A total of 28 patients tested positive for the two types of bacteria. There were no cases in which MRSA was detected.
Characterization of patients with MRCNS-positive
To characterize MRCNS-positive patients, we compared them with those who were negative on preoperative skin culture (Table 2). The frequency of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), steroid use, and ASA-PS ≥3 was significantly higher (p=0.004, 0.05, and 0.033) in patients who were MRCNS-positive than in those who were negative (Table 2).
Table 2.
Demographic Data of Patients with MRCNS-Positive and MRCNS-Negative Preoperative Skin Culture.
MRCNS+(n=49) | MRCNS−(n=458) | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Agea (years) | 65.00 (50.25–74.00) | 64.00 (47.00–73.00) | 0.968 |
Males (% of group) | 30 (61.2) | 209 (45.6) | 0.050 |
Main surgical lesion—cervical spine, n (%) | 22 (44.9) | 170 (37.1) | 0.542 |
BMIa (kg/m2) | 24.50 (20.66–28.00) | 24.00 (20.83–27.14) | 0.448 |
Obesity, n (%) | 22 (44.9) | 189 (41.3) | 0.649 |
Smoker, n (%) | 3 (6.1) | 25 (5.5) | 0.745 |
Hypertension, n (%) | 14 (28.6) | 164 (35.8) | 0.348 |
Diabetes, n (%) | 13 (26.5) | 88 (19.2) | 0.258 |
Hyperlipidemia, n (%) | 3 (6.1) | 27 (5.9) | 1.000 |
Chronic renal failure, n (%) | 3 (6.1) | 23 (5.0) | 0.730 |
Cancer, n (%) | 5 (10.2) | 33 (7.2) | 0.398 |
RA, n (%) | 4 (8.2) | 4 (0.9) | 0.004* |
Steroid use, n (%) | 6 (12.2) | 12 (2.6) | 0.005* |
Immunosuppressive drugs use, n (%) | 2 (4.1) | 10 (2.2) | 0.326 |
ASA-PS ≥3, n (%) | 22 (44.9) | 133 (29.0) | 0.033* |
JOA scorea | 13.00 (10.13–15.38) | 14.00 (11.00–16.00) | 0.196 |
BMI, body mass index; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; ASA-PS, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status; MRCNS, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association
*Chi-square test, p<0.05. aValues are presented as median and interquartile range.
Incidence of SSIs and associated factors
In the present study, 21 (4.1%) patients had SSIs after spinal surgery; these patients were classified as the SSI group. There were 10 superficial and 11 deep SSIs. Moreover, 18 of the 21 patients (85.7%) had comorbidities, whereas 17 (81.0%) had undergone spinal instrumentation surgery. Cases of SSIs are shown in Table 3. Causative bacteria of SSIs were MRCNS in 8 (38.1%) patients, MSCNS in 2, Bacillus subtilis in 2, Enterobacter cloacae in 2, Propionibacterium acnes in 2, Corynebacterium striatum in 1, Escherichia coli in 1, and MRSA in 1. Four cases had no bacterial growth on their cultures, even though the patient displayed clinical signs that were indicative of an infection. Superficial SSIs cases were administrated only antibiotics. Patients with deep SSIs were treated by surgical intervention as well as antibiotics. Those without SSI were classified as the non-SSI group. The frequency of SSIs and MRCNS-SSI was significantly higher (p<0.001) in MRCNS-positive patients (8/50 and 5/50 cases) than in those who were negative (13/457 and 4/457 cases) (Fig. 1).
Table 3.
Cases of SSI.
Age, gender | Diagnosis | Medical history | Bacteria of skin culture | Inst. | Type of SSI (SSI lesion) | Bacteria of SSI | Additional surgery |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
56, male | CSM | Athetoid cerebral palsy | MSCNS | Yes | Superficial (cervical) | MRCNS | Yes |
66, female | Trauma | Collagen disease (steroid) | MRCNS | Yes | Superficial (thoracic) | MSCNS
MSSA |
No |
80, male | LSS | Post-operation of cancer | Bacillus subtilis | Yes | Superficial (lumbar) | N.D. | No |
69, female | LSS | Chronic renal failure | MRCNS | Yes | Superficial (lumbar) | MRCNS | No |
84, female | LDH | None | N.D. | Yes | Superficial (lumbar) | N.D. | No |
88, female | Trauma | Hypertension | MSCNS | Yes | Superficial (thoracic) | N.D. | No |
13, male | Scoliosis | Mental retardation | MSCNS | Yes | Superficial (thoracic) | N.D. | No |
62, male | Cervical OPLL | Cirrhosis | N.D. | No | Superficial (cervical) | Propionibacterium acnes | No |
52, female | LSS | Asthma, diabetes, obesity | MRCNS | Yes | Superficial (lumbar) | MRCNS | No |
64, male | Tethered syndrome | Hypertension | Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis | No | Superficial (lumbar) | Corynebacterium striatum | No |
14, female | Scoliosis | Rett syndrome | N.D. | Yes | Deep (lumbar) | Escherichia coli | Yes |
51, male | Cervical OPLL | Scabies (steroid) | MSCNS | No | Deep (cervical) | Enterobacter cloacae | Yes |
72, female | CSM | RA (steroid) | N.D. | Yes | Deep (cervical) | MRCNS | Yes |
48, female | CSM | Athetoid cerebral palsy | MRCNS | Yes | Deep (cervical) | MRCNS | Yes |
65, male | LSS | Diabetes | MRCNS | Yes | Deep (lumbar) | MRCNS | Yes |
66, male | Trauma | None | MRCNS | Yes | Deep (thoracic) | MRCNS | Yes |
75, female | CSM | Post-operation of cancer | N.D. | Yes | Deep (cervical) | MRCNS | Yes |
43, female | Cervical and thoracic OPLL | Obesity | MSCNS | Yes | Deep (cervical) | MSCNS | Yes |
40, male | Spinal tumor | None | N.D. | Yes | Deep (thoracic) | Propionibacterium acnes | Yes |
76, male | LSS | Hypertension, malignant lymphoma | MSCNS | No | Deep (lumbar) | Enterococcus faecalis | Yes |
75, female | Atlantoaxial subluxation | RA, infection of THA | MSCNS | Yes | Deep (cervical) | MRSA | Yes |
SSI, surgical site infection; Inst., instrumentation surgery; LSS, lumbar spinal stenosis; LDH, lumbar disc herniation; CSM, cervical spondylotic myelopathy; OPLL, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; THA, total hip arthroplasty; MSCNS, methicillin-sensitive coagulase-negative staphylococci; MRCNS, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci; MSSA, methicillin-sensitive S.aureus; MRSA, methicillin-resistant S.aureus; N.D., not detected
Table 4 shows the associated factors of SSIs in patients after their spinal surgeries. According to a chi-square test, the frequency of RA, steroid use, ASA-PS ≥3, and positive results for MRCNS was significantly higher in patients with SSI than in those without SSI (Table 4). A Mann-Whitney U test showed that the JOA score was significantly higher in patients with SSI than in those without SSI (Table 4). Univariate logistic regression analyses revealed a significant association between the prevalence of SSI and the ASA-PS ≥3 (odds ratio (OR), 2.953; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.064-8.195), JOA scores (OR, 0.828; 95% CI, 0.730-0.941), and positive results for MRCNS (OR, 3.667; 95% CI, 1.185-11.352) (Table 4). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the JOA scores (OR, 0.864; 95% CI, 0.764-0.977) and positive results for MRCNS (OR, 5.060; 95% CI, 1.787-14.323) were significantly associated with postoperative SSIs (Table 4). We employed the ROC curve to determine the cutoff value of the JOA score, which correlated with postoperative SSI. The optimal cutoff point of the JOA score was measured at 11.25 with 50.0% and 74.2% sensitivity and specificity, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.302 (95% CI, 0.174-0.429, p=0.003, Fig. 3).
Table 4.
Univariate and Multivariate Predictors of SSI in Patients after Spinal Surgeries.
Variables | Patients with SSI (n=21) | Patients without SSI (n=486) | p-Valueb | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | p-Value | OR | 95% CI | p-Value | ||||
Agea, years | 65.50
(51.25–75.00) |
54.44
(47.00–73.00) |
0.832 | 1.044 | 0.985–1.044 | 0.338 | 0.998 | 0.971–1.025 | 0.874 |
Female sex | 11 | 257 | 1.000 | 0.978 | 0.361–2.654 | 0.965 | 1.596 | 0.607–4.195 | 0.343 |
BMIa, kg/m2 | 24.42
(20.40–28.56) |
23.90
(20.65–27.03) |
0.649 | 1.014 | 0.871–1.180 | 0.857 | 1.018 | 0.927–1.118 | 0.709 |
Obesity, n (%) | 10 | 201 | 0.653 | 1.750 | 0.372–8.240 | 0.479 | – | – | – |
Hypertension, n (%) | 6 | 172 | 0.643 | 0.757 | 0.226–2.530 | 0.651 | – | – | – |
Diabetes, n (%) | 2 | 99 | 0.277 | 0.278 | 0.056–1.372 | 0.116 | – | – | – |
Hyperlipidemia, n (%) | 1 | 29 | 1.000 | 1.020 | 0.113–9.237 | 0.986 | – | – | – |
Chronic renal failure, n (%) | 1 | 25 | 1.000 | 0.434 | 0.030–6.168 | 0.537 | – | – | – |
Cancer, n (%) | 3 | 35 | 0.203 | 1.303 | 0.267–6.350 | 0.744 | – | – | – |
RA, n (%) | 2 | 6 | 0.039# | 1.966 | 0.169–22.913 | 0.589 | – | – | – |
Steroid use, n (%) | 4 | 14 | 0.005# | 3.398 | 0.688–16.792 | 0.133 | – | – | – |
Immunosuppressive drugs use, n (%) | 1 | 11 | 0.402 | 0.903 | 0.044–18.411 | 0.947 | – | – | – |
Smoking, n (%) | 0 | 28 | 0.621 | 0.000 | 0 | 0.998 | – | – | – |
ASA-PS ≥3, n (%) | 12 | 143 | 0.013# | 2.953 | 1.064–8.195 | 0.038 | 2.566 | 0.961–6.854 | 0.060 |
JOA scorea | 10.70
(7.00–13.50) |
13.20
(11.00–16.00) |
0.042* | 0.828 | 0.730–0.941 | 0.004 | 0.864 | 0.764–0.977 | 0.020 |
MRCNS-positive preoperatively, n (%) | 7 | 42 | 0.002# | 3.667 | 1.185–11.352 | 0.024 | 5.060 | 1.787–14.323 | 0.002 |
Primary surgical lesion—cervical spine, n (%) | 9 | 178 | 0.645 | 0.026 | −0.025–0.047 | 0.563 | – | – | – |
Instrumentation, n (%) | 15 | 214 | 0.023# | 2.422 | 0.687–8.541 | 0.169 | – | – | – |
No. of surgical levelsa, n (%) | 4.50
(2.00–5.00) |
4.00
(2.00–5.00) |
0.189 | 1.164 | 0.959–1.412 | 0.124 | – | – | – |
Duration of surgerya, min | 276.00
(183.25–371.75) |
217.00
(154.25–321.00) |
0.167 | 0.998 | 0.993–1.003 | 0.404 | – | – | – |
Blood lossa, ml | 355.00
(112.50–737.50) |
150.00
(50.00–400.00) |
0.178 | 1.000 | 1.000–1.001 | 0.297 | – | – | – |
SSI, surgical site infection; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; ASA-PS, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association
aValues are presented as median and interquartile range. bSignificant differences (p<0.05) between values for patients with and without SSI were calculated using the *Mann–Whitney U test. #Chi-square test
Figure 3.
The ROC curve to determine the cutoff value of the JOA score, which was correlated with postoperative SSI.
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that elucidates the association between MR strains from preoperative skin culture and SSIs after spinal surgery. MRCNS was the most common cause of postoperative SSIs, and being MRCNS-positive by skin bacterial culture and neurological status were risk factors for SSIs.
CNS is the most common skin flora bacteria6). In our study, 37.1% of the detected bacteria were MSCNS, similar to previous reports. Further examination showed that MRCNS was detected at 9.9%. Regarding MRSA colonialization, patients with ≥7 days preoperative hospitalization, MRSA carriers, those with a history of MRSA infection, liver cirrhosis, and chronic skin disease, or those with prior nursing home admission had a high MRSA colonization risk7). In our study, although there were no cases in which MRSA was detected from the skin of the surgical site, we found that those who became MRCNS-positive were immunosuppressed and had severe systemic diseases. Therefore, we recommend preoperative skin culture screening for this category of patients since performing this procedure for all patients is a problem in medical insurance.
Contamination from the patient's skin flora is the common source of SSIs. Cronquist et al. investigated the density of bacterial counts on the skin of neurosurgical patients and examined the association between total colony-forming unit counts of the skin flora at the operative site and SSIs. They found no association between preoperative bacterial skin counts and SSIs8). However, Whyte et al. showed that the patient's skin has been demonstrated to be a very significant source of contamination in general surgery9). Although the concordance rate between bacteria of the preoperative skin culture and bacteria of SSI was not high in our study (28.6%), detecting five MRCNS cases in the postoperative skin culture indicated that contamination from the skin flora might be a risk factor for SSIs.
S. aureus is the most frequent pathogen that causes SSIs10), accounting for approximately 50% of all SSIs11). S. epidermidis is a common pathogen in immunosuppressed hosts or patients with indwelling intravascular catheters or cardiac prostheses12). S. epidermidis is also a common organism often associated with spinal instrumentation surgeries and accounts for up to 31.4% of SSIs13). P. acnes is also part of the normal skin flora. Recently, it has been identified as a common cause of delayed SSIs and is also associated with spinal instrumentation surgeries14). Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, such as MRSA and vancomycin-resistant enterococci that cause SSIs are increasing in recent years15) and account for up to 35% of S. aureus infections in primary cases and up to 48% in revision surgeries13). MRSE, a type of MRCNS, first emerged in the 1960's16) and is an increasing cause of infection in patients with granulocytopenia17). In our study, the most common source of SSI was MRCNS (38.1%). The pathogenesis of MRCNS included a wide distribution of the mecA gene, which has been previously reported to be associated with methicillin resistance18). Multivariate logistic analyses showed that MRCNS was the most significant risk factor after spinal surgery. In addition, all eight cases in which the cause of SSIs was MRCNS required instrumentation surgery, which has been reported to be significantly associated factor in spinal surgery2). Additionally, a previous report suggested that individualized prophylaxis reduces SSIs by gram-negative bacteria based on urine cultures from patients who met one of the following risk criteria for urinary tract colonization: hospitalization duration longer than 7 days, indwelling catheter, neurogenic bladder, history of urinary incontinence, or a history of recurrent urinary tract infections19). The association between MR bacteria detected preoperatively at the surgical site and SSI remains unclear. Low administration rate of vancomycin prophylaxis during the preoperative period might be a possible cause (14%, 7/50 patients who had MRCNS preoperatively detected). Therefore, we recommend individual administration of sensitive antibiotics in cases of an MRCNS-positive preoperative skin culture.
A meta-analysis revealed 13 risk factors that included ASA-PS ≥3, diabetes, obesity, BMI, revision surgery, smoking, urinary tract infection, hypertension, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, and dural tears in spinal surgery20). Although another study showed that diabetes was a risk factor for postoperative SSIs after spinal surgery21), only two patients with SSIs had diabetes, and diabetes was not associated with SSIs in our study. These results suggest that tighter glycemic control mitigates the risk of postoperative SSIs. Our study suggested that the severity of neurological findings according to the JOA score was associated with SSIs. Therefore, we must be attentive in preventing SSIs in patients with neurological deficit such as severe cervical spondylotic myelopathy and spinal cord injuries.
The current study had several limitations. First, we used qualitative cultures rather than quantitative culture data. Therefore, an increase in the risk of infection is unclear. Moreover, it is difficult to prove that the pathogenesis of SSI was preoperative skin bacteria. Second, we evaluated clinical outcome using the JOA score to assess cervical myelopathy for all included patients diagnosed with trauma or spinal deformity. Third, we did not distinguish between patients who received instrumentation and those who did not. Lastly, in our protocol, cephazolin or vancomycin was administered to patients who had MRCNS preoperatively. Therefore, we should prospectively evaluate an SSI prevention protocol for high-risk patients with a medical record of MR strains7). Yamada et al. administered selected high-risk patients with vancomycin (VCM) prophylaxis immediately after initial routine antibiotic prophylaxis to maximize MRSA protection7). Our results also recommend routine antibiotic and VCM prophylaxis to patients who had MRCNS after the preoperative screening.
Conclusions
The incidence of MRCNS was the most common cause of postoperative SSI after spinal surgery. The preoperative presence of bacteria on the skin of the surgical site may predict SSIs in patients especially in those who are immunosuppressed or have severe systemic diseases.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that there are no relevant conflicts of interest.
Sources of Funding: None.
Author Contributions: All authors participated in the study design. GK wrote and prepared the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the article.
Ethical Approval: This research has been approved by the IRB of the authors' affiliated institutions (2019-1038).
Informed Consent: All subjects provided informed consent to participate in this study.
Acknowledgement
This study was supported by Dr. Atsushi Ono from the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hirosaki Memorial Hospital, Aomori and by Dr. Toshihiro Tanaka from the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Takaoka Seishikai Hospital.
References
- 1.Edwards JR, Peterson KD, Mu Y, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(10):783-805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V, et al. Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(5):387-97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Todd B. New CDC Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. Am J Nurs. 2017;117(8):17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Numasawa T, Ono A, Wada K, et al. Is postoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis needed for the management of surgical site infection after spinal instrumentation surgery? Spine. 2015;4(2):1000219. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(5):309-32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Savage JW, Weatherford BM, Sugrue PA, et al. Efficacy of surgical preparation solutions in lumbar spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(6):490-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yamada K, Abe H, Higashikawa A, et al. Evidence-based care bundles for preventing surgical site infections in spinal instrumentation surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(24):1765-73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cronquist AB, Jakob K, Lai L, et al. Relationship between skin microbial counts and surgical site infection after neurosurgery. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(8):1302-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Whyte W, Hambraeus A, Laurell G, et al. The relative importance of routes and sources of wound contamination during general surgery. I. Non-airborne. J Hosp Infect. 1991;18(2):93-107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) report, data summary from October 1986-April 1996, issued May 1996. A report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system. Am J Infect Control. 1996;24(5):380-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pull ter Gunne AF, Mohamed AS, Skolasky RL, et al. The presentation, incidence, etiology, and treatment of surgical site infections after spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(13):1323-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bisno AL. Cutaneous infections: microbiologic and epidemiologic considerations. Am J Med. 1984;76(5A):172-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Abdul-Jabbar A, Berven SH, Hu SS, et al. Surgical site infections in spine surgery: identification of microbiologic and surgical characteristics in 239 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(22):E1425-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Warner SJ, Uppstrom TJ, Miller AO, et al. Epidemiology of deep surgical site infections after pediatric spinal fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(3):E163-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Prokuski L. Prophylactic antibiotics in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16(5):283-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kjellander JO, Klein JO, Finland M. In vitro activity of penicillins against Staphylococcus albus. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1963;113:1023-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wade JC, Schimpff SC, Newman KA, et al. Staphylococcus epidermidis: an increasing cause of infection in patients with granulocytopenia. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97(4):503-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Suzuki E, Hiramatsu K, Yokota T. Survey of methicillin-resistant clinical strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci for mecA gene distribution. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36(2):429-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nunez-Pereira S, Pellise F, Rodriguez-Pardo D, et al. Individualized antibiotic prophylaxis reduces surgical site infections by gram-negative bacteria in instrumented spinal surgery. Eur Spine J. 2011;20 Suppl 3:397-402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Meng F, Cao J, Meng X. Risk factors for surgical site infections following spinal surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22(12):1862-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Armaghani SJ, Archer KR, Rolfe R, et al. Diabetes is related to worse patient-reported outcomes at two years following spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(1):15-22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]