Skip to main content
International Journal of Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Microbiology
. 2022 Dec 6;2022:6831092. doi: 10.1155/2022/6831092

Screening and Identification of Thermotolerant and Osmotolerant Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BKHE Isolated from Kinema of Eastern Nepal for Alkaline Protease Production

Gyanu Raj Pandey 1,2,, Asmita Shrestha 1,2, Tika B Karki 3, Shardul Neupane 3, Sabnam Ojha 3, Prashanna Koirala 3, Parash Mani Timilsina 3
PMCID: PMC9747305  PMID: 36523751

Abstract

Alkaline protease is one of the most important industrial enzymes which are excessively used in the detergent industry, food industry, feed industry, pharmaceutical industry, leather industry, etc. 60% of the produced alkaline protease is consumed by the detergent industry alone. In the present study, bacterial isolates that can produce alkaline protease for purpose of bio-detergent were screened among the isolates isolated from kinema (an alkaline fermented food of eastern Nepal). Selected bacterial isolates were further screened for hemolysis activity and the production of other hydrolytic enzymes. Four bacterial isolates selected were tested for their capacity to produce alkaline protease in five different fermentation mediums. Isolate BKHE produces a high amount of alkaline protease (0.4705 ± 0.035 U/mL/min) in fermentation medium M2 (sucrose, 11 g/L; yeast extract, 5 g/L; and KNO3, 5.2 g/l, pH 9). The selected isolate was identified as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BKHE based on 16S rRNA sequencing and phenotypic features. This bacterial strain was also found to be thermotolerant (confluent growth at 50°C) and salt tolerant up to 10% NaCl concentration. With its versatile ability, bacterial isolate or purified enzymes have potential applications in the food and detergent industry.

1. Introduction

During the 20th century, also called the age of organic chemistry, coastal environments receive a variety of land-derived organic inputs, both natural and synthetic. Among them, detergents are probably the largest class of technical products for domestic use [1]. Then, with the rise of enzyme technology, the field of detergent science has been more advanced and the market expanded. Enzymes with a variety of applications in the detergent industry, food industry, feed industry, pharmaceutical industry, leather industry, peptide synthesis, and recovery of silver from used X-ray films are developed [2]. Among these, detergent industries are the primary consumers of enzymes, in terms of both volume and value [3], consuming about 60% of all the enzymes produced [4]. Among hydrolytic enzymes, microbial alkaline protease dominates commercial applications with a significant share of the market captured by subtilisins and/or alkaline protease from Bacillus spp. for laundry detergent applications [5]. Alkaline proteases added to laundry detergents enable the release of proteinaceous material from stains [6]. The increased usage of these proteases as the detergent additive is mainly due to the cleaning capabilities of these enzymes in environmentally acceptable nonphosphate detergents [2]. Along with alkaline protease; cellulase, lipase, and amylase are the major enzymes incorporated in detergent formulation, amylase being the second most important enzyme used in the detergent industry [7].

Although protease-producing microorganisms, plants, and animals are widespread, microbial communities are preferred due to their growth and simplicity for the generation of new recombinant enzymes with desired properties [8]. Protease-producing microbes and their various applications were reviewed elsewhere [2]. Especially, there are many studies on the production of protease from the genus Bacillus [914], and many studies claim that alkaline protease produced by Bacillus spp. can remove blood stains and blood clots [8, 1517].

Bacillus species are mostly isolated from soil, or from environments that may have been contaminated directly or indirectly by soil, but are also found in water, food, and clinical specimens. This group of bacteria exhibits a wide diversity of physiological abilities, ranging from psychrophilic to thermophilic, and acidophilic to alkaliphilic; some strains are salt tolerant and some are halophilic [18]. It is important to select an isolation source for isolating bacterial species with proper physiological features [19].

Our source of isolation is kinema, a soybean-fermented food, which is traditionally consumed by the non-Brahmin Nepalese inhabiting the hilly region of eastern Nepal, Darjeeling hills, and Sikkim of India, and some parts of Bhutan [20]. The process of making kinema is discussed elsewhere [21]. The desired state of fermentation is indicated by the formation of a typical kinema flavor dominated by ammonia [21], so kinema is mostly alkaline and the pH range is from 6.6 to 8.5 [20]. Different Bacillus spp. have been previously reported from kinema from a different region of India [2226]. Screening and production of alkaline protease for bio-detergent application from kinema samples was not reported to date. We have selected kinema as it is already a selective niche for Bacillus with alkaline pH. We aim to isolate and identify thermotolerant and osmotolerant Bacillus sp. that are capable of producing alkaline protease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microorganisms and Their Maintenance

The organisms used in this study were isolated from kinema samples on nutrient agar. Three sundried kinema samples were collected from the hilly area of the Dhankuta District of Nepal. 0.2 gm of kinema samples were homogenized with 10 mL of sterile physiological saline (0.85%). The kinema homogenate was taken for serial dilution and spread plated on nutrient agar followed by incubation at 37°C for 24 hours under aerobic conditions. Isolates having different colony morphology were collected and purified by sub-culturing in a nutrient agar plate. Among the isolates, Gram-positive and rod-shaped bacteria were taken for further research activities.

All the isolated organisms were preserved by lyophilization [27] and stored at −80°C for long-term storage and a bacterial slant was prepared for research activities.

2.2. Alkaline Protease Screening

Ten gram-positive and rod-shaped bacterial isolates were screened on an alkaline agar medium with sodium caseinate for their ability to produce alkaline protease (0.5% tryptone, 0.25% yeast extract, 0.1% glucose, 1% sodium caseinate, 0.44% trisodium citrate. 2H2O, 20 mM CaCl2. 6H2O, and 1.5% agar (pH: 8)) [10, 14]. They were incubated at 30°C for 48 hours [14].

2.3. Screening for Hemolysis Activity

To the sterile blood agar base which has been melted and cooled to 45 to 50°C, 5% (vol/vol) sterile defibrinated blood that has been warmed to room temperature was added. The media then was poured into Petri plates avoiding any bubbles. They were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Hemolysis was recorded by the appearance of a zone of clearing around the colonies [28].

2.4. Screening for Production of Hydrolytic Enzymes

An amylolytic test was carried out by culturing bacteria on starch agar (Nutrient Agar with 0.2% starch), incubated at 37°C. After 48 hours the plates were flooded with 1% Lugol's iodine reagent for 10 mins and drained off. The clear halo region indicated starch hydrolysis [18].

The bacteria were grown on nutrient agar with 1% CMC for cellulolytic activity. The CMC agar plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. At the end of the incubation, the agar medium was flooded with an aqueous solution of Congo red (1% w/v) for 15 minutes. The Congo red solution was then poured off, and the plates were further treated by flooding with 1 M NaCl for 15 minutes. The formation of a clear zone of hydrolysis indicated cellulose degradation [29].

The ability of lipase production was carried out in Petri dishes using a medium (composition: peptone 0.5%; yeast extract 0.3%; tributyrin 1% and agar 2% in distilled water) [30]. The cultured plates were incubated at 30°C for 48 hours.

Skim milk powder, 5 g in 50 ml of distilled water; agar, and 1 g in 50 ml of distilled water were autoclaved separately at 121°C, cooled to 45°C, mixed, and poured into Petri plates. The cultured plates were incubated at 30°C for 48 hours. The halo region indicated protease production [18].

Gelatin liquefaction (the formation of a liquid) was tested by stabbing gelatin agar (semisolid with 7.5 g/L agar) in deep tubes. After 48 h of incubation, the cultures were placed in a refrigerator at 4°C until the bottom resolidifies. If gelatin was hydrolyzed, the medium will remain liquid after refrigeration. If gelatin was not hydrolyzed, the medium will resolidify during the time it is in the refrigerator [31].

2.5. Alkaline Protease Production in Different Medium Composition

The selected isolates were cultured in different production mediums: M1 (gelatin broth containing: gelatin, 10 g/L; casein enzymatic hydrolyzate, 10 g/L; and NaCl (w/v), 100 g/L; pH 9) [11]; M2 containing ((g/L): sucrose, 11; yeast extract, 5; and KNO3, 5.2, pH9, modified with no trace elements and optimal concentration of given composition) [32]; M3 containing (1% glucose, 0.5% peptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.5% KH2PO4, 20% NaCl, 20% Na2CO3 autoclaved separately and final pH 10.0) [12]; M4 containing ((g/L): casein, 5; peptone, 5; yeast extract, 2; NaCl, 5; MgSO4.7H2O, 0.2; CaCl2, 0.1; K2HPO4, 1; and Na2CO3, 10, pH 10.3. Sodium carbonate was separately autoclaved and added to the rest of the medium after cooling) [33] and M5 containing ((g/L): glucose, 10; peptone, 5; yeast extract, 5; K2HPO4, 1; MgSO4, 7; H2O, 0.2; Na2CO3, 10; NaCl, 5; pH 10.5) [13]. All the experiments were carried out at 37°C, 120 rpm, and 48 hours of incubation.

2.6. Protease Assay

The reaction mixture in a total volume of 11 ml was composed of 5 ml of 0.65% casein in 50 mM Potassium Phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, and an enzyme solution of 1 ml, 0.75 ml, and 0.5 ml for 3 different test sets. After 10 min incubation at 37°C, the reaction was terminated with 5 ml of 110 Mm trichloroacetic acid followed by another incubation of 30 min at 37°C. To 2 ml test filtrate, 5 ml of 500 mM sodium carbonate was added followed by 1 ml 1 M Folin-Ciocalteu's phenol reagent. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 30 min and then allowed to cool to room temperature and test filtrate absorbance measured at 660 nm along with blank and standard solution in UV-1800 Shimadzu spectrophotometer. One unit of protease activity was defined as the amount of enzyme which released 1 μmole tyrosine per min under the assay condition [34].

2.7. Identification of Selected Bacterial Isolate

2.7.1. Molecular Characterization of Selected Isolate

DNA extraction and Sequencing of 16S rRNA Gene: bacterial isolate BKHE was cultured in 10 mL nutrient broth. Incubation was performed at 37°C for 24 hours. The genomic DNA of the bacteria was isolated according to the procedure of Sambrook and Russel [35].

The 16S rRNA gene of the bacterial isolate was amplified using universal primers FL (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) [36]. The amplified segment was purified and sequenced at Macrogen Inc., South Korea using sequencing primers 785F (5′-GGATTAGATACCATGGTA-3′) and 907R (5′-CCG TCAATTCMTTTRAGTTT-3′).

Raw sequences were assembled and trimmed using the codon code aligner. The contig sequence generated was subjected to BLASTN and the database “rRNA/ITS databases” was selected. Twelve highly similar sequences (based on blast results) were taken in FASTA format for phylogenetic analysis.

2.7.2. Maximum Parsimony Analysis of Taxa

The evolutionary history was inferred using the maximum parsimony method. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analyzed [37]. The MP tree was obtained using the tree-bisection-regrafting (TBR) algorithm [38] with search level 1 in which the initial trees were obtained by the random addition of sequences (10 replicates). This analysis involved 13 nucleotide sequences. All positions with less than 95% site coverage were eliminated, i.e., fewer than 5% alignment gaps, missing data, and ambiguous bases were allowed at any position (partial deletion option). Evolutionary analysis was conducted in MEGA X [39].

2.7.3. Morphological and Biochemical Characterization

The selected protease-producing isolate BKHE was identified using morphological and biochemical characteristics, according to -Bergey's Manual of Systemic Bacteriology [18] while the sugar utilization test was performed as manufacturer's instruction using Himedia KB009TM HiCarbo Kit (KB009A/KB009B1/KB009C).

2.8. Salt and Temperature Tolerance Test for Selected Strain

For temperature tolerance, the organism was cultured in Nutrient broth and incubated at different temperatures (30°C, 40°C, 45°C, 50°C, 60°C) and for salt tolerance, the organism was cultured in Nutrient broth with different salt concentrations (2%, 6% and 10% (w/v)) [18]. The cell density was measured using a DEN-1B Grant bio Densitometer. 18 phi test tubes were used for generating data and data were obtained in McFarland standards.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using OriginPro 9.0, IBM SPSS 15.0, and Microsoft excel. ANOVA was performed for quantitative data where the Tukey test was used to compare the means at a 95% confidence interval.

3. Result

3.1. Isolation and Screening

Among the purified isolates, only 10 isolates were found to be Gram-positive and rod-shaped bacteria. Only Gram-positive and rod-shaped bacteria were further screened for alkaline protease activity. Figure 1 illustrated three of the Gram-positive and rod-shaped bacteria.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Gram-positive microscopic observation of some isolates (1000X): (a) isolate BKTD; (b) isolate BKHA; (c) isolate BKHE.

3.2. Screening for Alkaline Protease Positive Isolates

Among nine selected isolates studied for casein hydrolysis, isolates BKTB, BKHB, BKHC, and BKHD were found to produce significantly smaller halo zone in comparison with isolate BKTC (6.33 mm, SE = 0.88) at p < 0.05 confidence level. The differences in the diameter of halo zones of isolates BKTD (3.33 mm, SE = 0.33), BKRK (4.66 mm, SE = 0.33), BKHA (4.33 mm, SE = 0.33), and BKHE (5.66 mm, SE = 0.67) were insignificant at p < 0.05 confidence level as shown in Figure 2. One of the selected isolates (BKTA) showed a negative result in casein hydrolysis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of halo zones in sodium caseinate agar by different bacterial isolates. The mean diameter of the halo zone is significantly lower in comparison with the mean value of BKTC at α = 0.05.

3.3. Screening for Hemolytic Activity and Production of Hydrolytic Enzymes

Further screening of bacterial isolate was based on its capabilities to hydrolyze blood cells and produce other hydrolytic enzymes. Results are shown in Table 1, isolates BKTB, BKTC, BKTD, BKRK, and BKHE were found to show β-hemolysis. Along with hemolysis property, these isolates were able to produce other hydrolytic enzymes which are widely used in detergent formulation after protease. Figure 3 illustrated the hydrolytic enzymes produced by one of the isolated BKHE.

Table 1.

Results of hemolytic activity and hydrolytic enzymes.

Isolates Amylase Lipase Cellulase Gelatinase Protease (skimmed milk) Hemolysis
BKTB + + + +
BKTC + + + + + +
BKTD + + + + + +
BKRK + + + + +
BKHA + + +
BKHB + + + +
BKHC + + + + +
BKHD + + + + +
BKHE + + + + +

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Hydrolytic enzymes production test for isolate BKHE: (a) alkaline protease screening in sodium caseinate agar (pH: 8); (b) protease screening in skim milk agar; (c) lipase screening in tributyrin agar; (d) amylase screening in starch agar.

3.4. Alkaline protease production in different medium compositions

The one-waybetween-groups analysis was performed to observe the enzymatic activity of different bacterial isolates (Figure 4(a)), and Figure 4(b) illustrated the enzymatic activity in different production mediums. While comparing means of enzymatic activity between different medium compositions produced by different bacterial strains, cell-free fermentation broth of isolates BKHE (0.4705 U/mL/min, SE = 0.035) and BKTC (0.3252 U/mL/min, SE = 0.031) showed significantly high enzymatic activity in production medium M2 at p < 0.05 confidence level; cell-free fermentation broth of BKTD (0.155 U/mL/min, SE = 0.059) and BKRK (0.193 U/mL/min, SE = 0.015) showed significantly high enzymatic activity in production medium M3 at p < 0.05 confidence level, as shown in Figure 4(a).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of enzyme alkaline protease activity produced by different bacterial isolates (a) and in different production mediums (b).

But while comparing means of enzymatic activity between different bacterial isolates, cell-free fermentation broth of isolate BKHE in production medium M2 showed significantly high enzymatic activity than other bacterial isolates at p < 0.05 confidence level. So, a high enzyme-producing isolate was found to be isolate BKHE and the best production medium among the compared ones was production medium M2.

3.5. Identification of Selected Bacteria

3.5.1. Molecular Characterization of Selected Isolate

Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, isolate BKHE showed high sequence similarity to members of the genus Bacillus (Figure 5). BLAST result among “16S ribosomal RNA sequences (Bacteria and Archaea)” database BKHE showed 99.93% similarity with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain NBRC 15535; 99.86% similarity with B. amyloliquefaciens strain BCRC 11601; 99.59% similarity with B. velezensis strain FZB42 and B. valismortis strain DSM 11031; 99.52% similarity with B. nematocida strain B-16, B. subtilis subtilis strain 168, and B. nakamurai strain NRRL B-41091.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Maximum parsimony tree generated from 16S rRNA sequence data. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% of bootstrap replicates are collapsed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test is shown next to branches.

3.5.2. Phenotypic Description of B. amyloliquefaciens BKHE

Gram-stain-positive rods of size 3–5 μm, motile, thermotolerant, and subterminal ellipsoidal spore-forming. Colonies on nutrient agar medium were dirty white, smooth, slightly viscous, slightly raised and circular, and approximately 3-4 mm in diameter at 37°C after 24 h. Catalase positive but oxidase negative. Positive for acetoin, gelatinase, lipase, proteinase, and amylase production but negative for indole, H2S, urease, cellulose, and arginine dihydrolase. Nitrate was reduced to nitrite. Citrate was utilized but not malonate. It was able to utilize maltose, fructose, glucose, trehalose, sucrose, glycerol, sorbitol, mannitol, and cellobiose. It was sensitive to ciprofloxacin (30 mcf), gentamycin (10 mcf), tetracycline (30 mcf), moxifloxacin (5 mcf), levofloxacin (5 mcf), azithromycin (15 mcf), erythromycin (15 mcf), vancomycin (30 mcf), and rifampicin (5 mcf). Growth of up to 10% NaCl was reported. Confluent growth was reported up to 50°C. Confluent growth up to pH 9.5 and no growth at pH 4.5 was reported.

3.6. Salt Tolerance and Temperature Tolerance Test for Selected Strain

Selected strain B. amyloliqueficiens BKHE was grown in different salt concentrations. Cell density was not significantly different among the medium with different salt concentrations at p < 0.05 confidence level as illustrated in Figure 6(a). Cell density at 10% sodium chloride concentration was 2.05 ± 0.07 MF. It was also cultured in nutrient broth and incubated at a different temperature, high cell density was observed at 45°C (4.55 MF, SE = 0.21) which is significantly higher than cell densities when incubated at 30°C, 40°C, 50°C, and 60°C at p < 0.05 confidence level as shown in Figure 6(b).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Comparison of cell density of B. amyloliqueficiens BKHE (a) in different salt concentrations and (b) at different temperatures (b).

4. Discussion

We have identified alkaline protease, amylase, lipase, and surfactant-producingB. amyloliquefaciens strain BKHE, which was isolated from the kinema sample from eastern Nepal. Only isolate with viscous colony texture, Gram-positive and, rod-shaped were screened for alkaline protease production, as these are the basic features of Bacillus spp [18]. Among nine alkaline protease-positive strains, five of them (BKTB, BKTC, BKTD, BKRK, and BKHE) were able to hydrolyze blood cells. But the result of screening for alkaline protease showed that isolate BKTD produced a significantly smaller halo zone when compared with other hemolysis-positive isolates. So, only isolates BKTC, BKTD, BKRK, and BKHE were further compared quantitatively for the production of alkaline protease in different production mediums. A hemolytic activity might indicate the bacterial isolate is a biosurfactant producer, although other various lytic enzymes produced by strain may cause hemolysis [41]. Biosurfactants, along with their wide applications, are antimicrobials too [42]. So, the product from hemolytic bacteria along with protease activity can be effectively used in hospitals to remove blood spills and clots and kill infectious microbes. Another screening parameter was the capability to produce other hydrolytic enzymes. Since other enzymes such as amylase, lipase, and cellulase are also used in detergent formulations, so the capacity to produce these will be of great significance. Among four selected isolates, BKTC and BKTD were found to produce all sets of hydrolytic enzymes, while BKHE and BKRK were cellulase negative (from Table 1). Since the production cost and downstream process cost of the enzyme are high, it is important to reduce the cost to make these enzymes sellable to detergent industries. The benefit of producing multiple hydrolytic enzymes lies here, as multiple enzymes can be coproduced in the same fermentation media by the same bacterial strain. As these enzymes are used together not only in detergent industries, these are used together in the food and pharmaceutical industries too. Coproduction of cocktail enzymes is one way to reduce the cost of production and these approaches were found to be practical by other researchers [4, 7, 43].

Among the four isolates selected, the highest alkaline protease was produced by BKHE in medium M2 (sucrose, 11 g/L; yeast extract, 5 g/L; and KNO3, 5.2 g/l, pH 9). While comparing different media compositions, M2 was found to be best among the medium compared. BKTC also showed high production (significantly high when compared with BKTD and BKRK but significantly low when compared with BKHE at a confidence level of p < 0.05) and this paper only deals with the preliminary screening and media selection for the production of alkaline protease. Optimum conditions are yet to be identified for the production of alkaline protease production. The optimum condition depends on temperature, pH, media composition, oxygen transfer rate, and different bacterial strains [13, 32, 4449]. So, there are many factors to be considered for optimal production from the selected isolate. In our study, medium M2 has been identified as the best medium among the selected ones for protease production. Sucrose in the medium induces protease production [32] and nitrate salt helps to accelerate the production [50]. While in some, yeast extract gave high protease production than nitrate [13], and in some gelatin induced protease production [11]. There has also been a report of better alkaline production in the presence of glucose as a carbon source and yeast extract and peptone as an organic nitrogen source [12, 33]. The results shown by our isolates are also different for different isolates. BKHE produced high alkaline protease in presence of yeast extract, sucrose, and potassium nitrate and low production in gelatin-based and glucose-based mediums. So, the selection of appropriate carbon and nitrogen source is highly dependent upon the bacterial strain and needs to be optimized as per the requirement of the strain.

16S rRNA sequencing showed that the isolate is “Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BKHE” and further phenotypic features of the strain were studied to conclude the taxonomy with the polyphasic approach [18, 51]. Phenotypic features of the selected strain were compared with phenotypic features of B. amyloliquefaciens [18] B. velezensis [40] and B. valismortis [18] obtained from the database. Since BLAST result and phylogenetic analysis (Figure 6) suggest the strain belongs to B. amyloliquefaciens but differentiating margins with other species were little. While comparing the phenotypic features in Table 2, BKHE was found to match most of the features with B. amyloliqueficiens, the only differences observed were in the fermentation of raffinose and salicin. B. amyloliqueficiens and BKHE are oxidases negative while B. velezensis and B. valismortis are positive. Phenotypic features of BKHE that differ from B. velezensis were H2S production and utilization of lactose, xylose, raffinose, melibiose, L-arabinose, mannose, salicin, inositol, α-methyl-D-glucoside, and ONPG as shown in the table. Differences between BKHE and B. valismortis also can be observed in Table 2. On basis of both 16S rRNA sequencing and phenotypic features of the strain BKHE, it was identified as “B. amyloliqueficiens BKHE.”

Table 2.

Phenotypic features of selected isolate and comparison with closely related species based on BLAST result.

Tests BKHE B. amyloliqueficiens [18] B. velezensis [40] B. valismortis [18]
Colony characteristics
 Colony form Circular
 Elevation Slightly raised
 Margin Undulate
 Texture Slightly viscous
 Opacity Opaque
 Surface Smooth
 Chromogenesis Dirty white Creamy white
 Diameter (cm) 0.3–0.4
Gram staining + + + +
Shape of cell Rod Rod Rod Rod
Size of cell 3–5 um 1.5–3.5 um
Spore staining + + + +
Spore position Subterminal
Spore shape Ellipsoidal Ellipsoidal Ellipsoidal Ellipsoidal
Growth at temperature
 30 + + +
 40 + + + +
 45 + +
 50 + ± +
 60
Nacl tolerance
 1% + +
 2% + + + +
 5% + + + +
Growth at Ph
 4.5 ±
 6 + + + +
 7.2 + + + +
 8 + + +
 9.5 + + +
Indole production
Voges-Proskauer + + + +
Hydrogen sulfide +
Arginine dihydrolase
Motility + + + +
Nitrate reduction test + ± + +
Catalase + + +
Oxidase + +
Citrate utilization + ± +
Malonate utilization
Acid from
 Lactose ± +
 Xylose ± + +
 Maltose + + + +
 Fructose + + + +
 Dextrose + + + +
 Galactose +
 Raffinose + +
 Trehalose + ± + +
 Melibiose +
 Sucrose + + + +
 L-arabinose ± + +
 Mannose ± + +
 Inulin
 Sodium gluconate
 Glycerol + + +
 Salicin + + +
 Dulcitol
 Inositol +
 Sorbitol + ± + +
 Mannitol + + + +
 Adonitol
 Arabitol
 Erythritol
α-methyl-D-glucoside +
 Rhamnose +
 Cellobiose + + + +
 Melezitose
α-methyl-D-mannoside
 Xylitol
 D-arabinose
 Sorbose
Hydrolysis of
 Urea
 Gelatin + + +
 Lipid (tributyrin) +
 Casein + + + +
 Cellulose
 Starch + + + +
 ONPG ± +
 Esculin + +
Resistance to antibiotics AMP, CXM, AMC, CTX
Sensitive to antibiotics CIP, GEN, TE, MO, LE, AZM, E, VA,RIF

AMP–ampicillin (10 mcf); CXM–cefuroxime (30 mcf); AMC–amoxicillin (10 mcf); CTX–cefotaxime (30 mcf); CIP–ciprofloxacin (30 mcf); GEN–gentamycin (10 mcf); TE–tetracycline (30 mcf); MO–moxifloxacin (5 mcf); LE–levofloxacin (5 mcf); AZM–azithromycin (15 mcf); E–erythromycin (15 mcf); VA–vancomycin (30 mcf); RIF–rifampicin (5 mcf).

Alkaline protease with desirable properties such as activity at high pH, salinity, and temperature is suitable for commercial application in detergent industries [44, 52]. Proteases from hyperthermophiles and thermophiles are the natural choice for exploring inherent heat stability [53]. So, exploring ecological niches such as extreme or high temperature, pH, salinity, pressure, and toxicity is one of the promising ways to isolate microbes with required properties [19, 53]. Kinema, also being alkaline and dried, makes a suitable niche for isolating alkaline protease-positive isolates. B. amyloliquefaciens BKHE was found to have confluent growth at 50°C as the kinema sample was sundried and thermotolerant strains were able to cope with the drying process. Also, this strain was found to be tolerant to high salt concentration and high pH, so alkaline protease produced from this isolate could be used in formulations of bio-detergent, although further screening in purified enzymes is yet to be done. Also, this strain could be used for the coproduction of protease, amylase, and lipase, which are also used in detergent formulations.

5. Conclusion

A bacterial isolate with high alkaline protease-producing ability was identified as B. amyloliquefaciens BKHE based on 16S rRNA sequencing and phenotypic features. The strain was found to be cellulase negative and was positive for protease, amylase, and lipase. Also, its ability to withstand high temperatures and osmolarity opens the door for versatile applications of bacteria or enzymes in the food, feed, and detergent industry. Since our strain produces multiple enzymes, it can be used for the coproduction of multiple enzymes which could be used in the detergent and food industry.

Acknowledgments

The authors thankfully acknowledge Shubham Biotech Nepal Pvt. Ltd., and the LOFAB lab of Kathmandu University, for providing research space. They are grateful to Mr. Dinesh Tiwari and Rajkumar Shrestha for their support during research activities. This work was financed by Biotechnological Research and Development Center Private Limited (2073/074) and Shubham Biotech Nepal Private Limited (2073/074).

Data Availability

Data are available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN121504

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Aboul-Kassim T. A., Simoneit B. R. T. Detergents: a review of the nature, chemistry, and behavior in the aquatic environment. Part I. Chemical composition and analytical techniques. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology . 1993;23(4):325–376. doi: 10.1080/10643389309388456. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kumar C. G., Takagi H. Microbial alkaline proteases: from a bioindustrial viewpoint. Biotechnology Advances . 1999;17(7):561–594. doi: 10.1016/S0734-9750(99)00027-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mitidieri S., Souza Martinelli A. H., Schrank A., Vainstein M. H. Enzymatic detergent formulation containing amylase from Aspergillus Niger: a comparative study with commercial detergent formulations. Bioresource Technology . 2006;97(10):1217–1224. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.05.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Özbek Yazıcı S., Özmen I. Optimization for coproduction of protease and cellulase from Bacillus subtilis M-11 by the Box–Behnken design and their detergent compatibility. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering . 2020;37(1):49–59. doi: 10.1007/s43153-020-00025-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ward O. P. Proteolytic Enzymes . Vol. 3. Oxford, NY, USA: Pergamon Press; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Maase F. W. J. L., van Tilburg R. The benefit of detergent enzymes under changing washing conditions. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society . 1983;60(9):1672–1675. doi: 10.1007/BF02662431. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hmidet N., El-Hadj Ali N., Haddar A., Kanoun S., Alya S. K., Nasri M. Alkaline proteases and thermostable-amylaseco-produced by Bacillus licheniformis NH1: characterization and potential application as detergent additive. Biochemical Engineering Journal . 2009;47(3):71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2009.07.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Subba Rao C., Sathish T., Ravichandra P., Prakasham R. S. Characterization of thermo- and detergent stable serine protease from isolated Bacillus circulans and evaluation of eco-friendly applications. Process Biochemistry . 2009;44(3):262–268. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2008.10.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Agasthya A. S., Sharma N., Mohan A., Mahal P. Isolation and molecular characterisation of alkaline protease producing Bacillus thuringiensis. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics . 2013;66(1):45–51. doi: 10.1007/s12013-012-9396-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aftab S. Screening, isolation and characterization of alkaline protease producing bacteria from soil. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences . 2006;9(11):2122–2126. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2006.2122.2126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Patel R., Dodia M., Singh S. P. Extracellular alkaline protease from a newly isolated haloalkaliphilic Bacillus sp.: production and optimization. Process Biochemistry . 2005;40(11):3569–3575. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mehrotra S., Pandey P. K., Gaur R., Darmwal N. S. The production of alkaline protease by a Bacillus species isolate. Bioresource Technology . 1999;67(2):201–203. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00107-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shine K., Kanimozhi K., Panneerselvam A., Muthukumar C., Thajuddin N. Production and optimization of alkaline protease by Bacillus cereus RS3 isolated from desert soil. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. . 2016;3(7):193–202. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Eftekhar F., Fouladi J., Faghihi M. Isolation and identification of an alkaline protease producing Bacillus from soil. Journal of Biotechnology . 2003;1(3):183–185. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oberoi R., Beg Q. K., Puri S., Saxena R. K., Gupta R. Characterization and wash performance analysis of an SDS-stable alkaline protease from a Bacillus sp. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology . 2001;17(5):493–497. doi: 10.1023/a:1011918806201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Adinarayana K., Ellaiah P., Prasad D. S. Purification and partial characterization of thermostable serine alkaline protease from a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis PE-11. AAPS PharmSciTech . 2003;4(4):440–448. doi: 10.1208/pt040456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Banerjee U. C., Sani R. K., Azmi W., Soni R. Thermostable alkaline protease from Bacillus brevis and its characterization as a laundry detergent additive. Process Biochemistry . 1999;35(1-2):213–219. doi: 10.1016/s0032-9592(99)00053-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schleifer K.-H. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology: the firmicutes, Second . 3. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2009. Phylum XIII. Firmicutes gibbons and murray 1978, 5 (firmacutes [sic] gibbons and murray 1978, 5) pp. 19–128. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zinder S. H., Salyers A. A. Microbial ecology - new directions, new importance. In: Garrity G. M., Brenner D. J., Krieg N. R., Staley J. T., editors. Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology Volume Two; Part A Introductory Essays Second Eci . East Lansing, Michigan: Springer; 2001. pp. 101–109. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sarkar P. K., Tamang J. P., Cook P. E., Owens J. D. Kinema - a traditional soybean fermented food: proximate composition and microflora. Food Microbiology . 1994;11(1):47–55. doi: 10.1006/fmic.1994.1007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tamang J. P., Sarkar P. K., Hesseltine C. W. Traditional fermented foods and beverages of darjeeling and Sikkim - a review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture . 1988;44(4):375–385. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740440410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rai A. K., Sanjukta S., Chourasia R., Bhat I., Bhardwaj P. K., Sahoo D. Production of bioactive hydrolysate using protease, β-glucosidase and α-amylase of Bacillus spp. isolated from kinema. Bioresource Technology . 2017;235:358–365. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tamang J. P., Thapa S., Dewan S., Jojima Y., Fudou R., Yamanaka S. Phylogenetic analysis of Bacillus strains isolated from fermented soybean foods of asia: kinema , chungkokjang and natto. Journal of Hill Research . 2002;15(2):56–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tamang J. P. Native microorganisms in the fermentation of kinema. Indian Journal of Microbiology . 2003;43(2):127–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sarkar P. K., Hasenack B., Nout M. J. R. Diversity and functionality of Bacillus and related genera isolated from spontaneously fermented soybeans (Indian Kinema) and locust beans (African Soumbala) International Journal of Food Microbiology . 2002;77(3):175–186. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00124-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kumar J., Sharma N., Kaushal G., et al. Metagenomic insights into the taxonomic and functional features of kinema , a traditional fermented soybean product of Sikkim himalaya. Frontiers in Microbiology . 2019;10(August):1744–1817. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.ATCC. ATCC Bacterial Culture Guide, Manassas . Manassas, Virginia, USA: American Type Culture Collection; 2015. Preservation: Lyophilization; pp. 21–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Carrillo P. G., Mardaraz C., Pitta-Alvarez S. I., Giulietti A. M. Isolation and selection of biosurfactant-producing bacteria. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology . 1996;12(1):82–84. doi: 10.1007/BF00327807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ariffin H., Abdullah N., Umi Kalsom M. S., Shirai Y., Hassan M. . Production and characterization of cellulase by Bacillus pumilus EB3. International Journal of Engineering and Technologies . 2006;3(1):47–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Griebeler N., Polloni A. E., Remonatto D., et al. Isolation and screening of lipase-producing fungi with hydrolytic activity. Food and Bioprocess Technology . 2011;4(4):578–586. doi: 10.1007/s11947-008-0176-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Balan S. S., Nethaji R., Sankar S., Jayalakshmi S. Production of gelatinase enzyme from Bacillus spp isolated from the sediment sample of Porto Novo Coastal sites. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine . 2012;2(3):S1811–S1816. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60500-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Oskouie S. F. G., Tabandeh F., Yakhchali B., Eftekhar F. Response surface optimization of medium composition for alkaline protease production by Bacillus clausii. Biochemical Engineering Journal . 2008;39(1):37–42. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2007.08.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gessesse A., Gashe B. A. Production of alkaline protease by an alkaliphilic bacteria isolated from an alkaline soda lake. Biotechnology Letters . 1997;19(5):479–481. doi: 10.1023/A:1018308513853. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Aldrich S. Enzymatic Assay of Protease Casein as a Substrate . Sigma, S.A. France: Merck KGaA; 1999. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/technical-documents/protocols/biology/enzymatic-assay-of-protease-casein-as-a-substrate.html . [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sambrook J., Russel W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual . New York. NY, USA: Cold Spring Harboc Laboratory Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lane D. J. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E., Goodfellow M., editors. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics . Amsterdam, Netherlands: Evielser; 1991. pp. 115–147. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution . 1985;39(4):783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nei M., Kumar S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics . New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C., Tamura K., Mega X. Mega X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution . 2018;35(6):1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ruiz-García C., Béjar V., Martínez-Checa F., Llamas I., Quesada E. Bacillus velezensis sp. nov., a surfactant-producing bacterium isolated from the river Vélez in Málaga, southern Spain. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology . 2005;55(1):191–195. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63310-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.San Keskin N. O., Han D., Devrim Ozkan A., Angun P., Onarman Umu O. C., Tekinay T. Production and structural characterization of biosurfactant produced by newly isolated staphylococcus xylosus STF1 from petroleum contaminated soil. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering . 2015;133:689–694. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.07.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Harshada K. Biosurfactant: a potent antimicrobial agent. Journal of Microbiology & Experimentation . 2014;1(5):173–177. doi: 10.15406/jmen.2014.01.00031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Limkar M. B., Pawar S. V., Rathod V. K. Statistical optimization of xylanase and alkaline protease coproduction by Bacillus spp using Box- Behnken Design under submerged fermentation using wheat bran as a substrate. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology . 2019;17:455–464. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2018.12.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Maurer K. Detergent proteases. Current Opinion in Biotechnology . 2004;15(4):330–334. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2004.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kshetri P., Ningombam O. Optimization of alkaline protease production by alkaliphilic Bacillus sp . KW2 in low cost medium using statistical approaches. Applied Microbiology: Open Access . 2016;2(3) doi: 10.4172/2471-9315.1000117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sreedevi B., Rasekhar K., Pramodakumari J. Optimization of alkaline protease production medium components and physical parameters by Bacillus cereus strain P5 through central composite design. Biotechnol. An Indian J. . 2017;13 [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Boominadhan U., Rajakumar R., Karpaga P., Sivakumar V., Joe M. M. Optimization of protease enzyme production using Bacillus sp . Isolated from different wastes. Botany Research International . 2009;2(2):83–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Adinarayana K., Ellaiah P. Response surface optimization of the critical medium components for the production of alkaline protease by a newly isolated Bacillus sp. Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences . 2002;5(3):272–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cheng S. W., Wang Y. F., Wang M. L. Statistical optimization of medium compositions for alkaline protease production by newly isolated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. J. Chem. Biochem. Eng. . 2012;26(3):225–231. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ferrero M. A., Castro G. R., Abate C. M., Baigori M. D., Siñeriz F. Thermostable alkaline proteases of Bacillus licheniformis MIR 29: isolation, production and characterization. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology . 1996;45(3):327–332. doi: 10.1007/s002530050691. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gillis M., Vandamme P., De Vos P., Swings J., Kersters K. Polyphasic taxonomy. In: Garrity G. M., Brenner D. J., Krieg N. R., Staley J. T., editors. Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology Volume Two Part A Introductory Essays . Vol. 2. East Lansing, Michigan: Springer; 2015. pp. 43–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Almas S., Hameed A., Shelly D., Mohan P. Purification and characterization of a novel alkaline protease from Bacillus strain SAL1. African Journal of Biotechnology . 2009;8(15):3603–3609. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sinha R., Khare S. K. Thermostable proteases. In: Satyanarayana T., Littlechild J., Kawarabayasi Y., editors. Thermophilic Microbes in Environmental and Industrial Biotechnology . New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2013. pp. 859–880. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN121504


Articles from International Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES