Table 3.
Optimized PV parameters of the proposed HJSCs with comparison to similar HJSCs in the literature. [Theo. = Theoretical SQ limit, Exp. = Experimental, Sim. = Simulation].
| Absorber material | Types | Junction Formed | JSC (mA/cm2) | VOC (mV) | FF (%) | PCE (%) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sb2Se3 | Theo. | Homo | 39.99 | 935 | 87.70 | 32.74 | [95] |
| Exp. | Hetero | 30.80 | 423 | 58.10 | 7.50 | [96] | |
| Exp. | Hetero | 32.58 | 400 | 70.30 | 9.20 | [97] | |
| Exp. | Hetero | 30.86 | 488 | 67.19 | 10.12 | [98] | |
| Sim. | Hetero | 38.15 | 410 | 74.08 | 11.52 | [65] | |
| Sim. | Hetero | 38.40 | 850 | 86.56 | 28.20 | ∗ | |
| Sb2S3 | Theo. | Homo | 25.47 | 1309 | 90.50 | 30.14 | [95] |
| Exp. | Hetero | 14.73 | 645 | 65.69 | 6.27 | [61] | |
| Exp. | Hetero | 15.29 | 748 | 57.07 | 6.53 | [64] | |
| Sim. | Hetero | 23.73 | 970 | 72.32 | 16.65 | [24] | |
| Sim. | Hetero | 24.00 | 1230 | 89.60 | 26.60 | ∗ |
∗
This work.