Skip to main content
Preventive Medicine Reports logoLink to Preventive Medicine Reports
. 2022 Oct 28;30:102035. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102035

Smoking prevalence among Asian Americans: Associations with education, acculturation, and gender

Chaelin K Ra a,b,, Nazife Pehlivan c, Ho Kim c, Steve Sussman d, Jennifer B Unger d, Michael S Businelle b,e
PMCID: PMC9747624  PMID: 36531113

Abstract

There is evidence that smoking prevalence rates are related to acculturation, education, and gender among Asian Americans. However, no studies have examined how smoking rates among Asian Americans vary based on acculturation, education, and gender together. This study used National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data (2010–2018) to examine cigarette smoking prevalence among Asian American men and women aged 18 and older (N = 14,680). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between educational attainment (i.e., college graduate or higher vs some college or lower), years spent in the United States (U.S.) as a proxy for acculturation (i.e., less than 10 years (less acculturated) vs 10 years or more (more acculturated) vs U.S.-born), and cigarette smoking prevalence across gender controlling for age, marital status, poverty (at/above vs below poverty threshold), country of origin (Chinese vs Filipino vs Asian Indian vs Other Asian), and the survey year. Current smoking prevalence was 9.0 % among all Asian Americans − 5.0 % among women and 13.5 % among men. Among respective gender-specific subgroups, U.S.-born Asian women without a college degree and more acculturated Asian immigrant men without a college degree had the highest odds of smoking (OR: 4.096 [95 % CI: 2.638, 6.360] and 1.462 [95 % CI: 1.197, 1.774], respectively). Findings indicated that less educated U.S.-born Asian women and less educated Asian immigrant men are at greatest risk for smoking. Smoking prevalence among Asian Americans is highly related to acculturation, education, and gender. Findings may inform development of policies and programs that are targeted toward smoking cessation among Asian Americans.

Keywords: Asian American, Smoking, Acculturation, Gender differences

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

Cigarette smoking is the leading preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States (U.S.) (Gfroerer et al., 2013, Prochaska et al., 2017, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2014). In 2019, 14 % of U.S. adults were current smokers, and cigarette smoking caused more than 480,000 deaths per year (Cornelius et al., 2020). Previous studies have shown that the prevalence of smoking among Asian Americans is lower than the general U.S. population (7 % vs 14 %) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention., 2020, Cornelius et al., 2020, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2014). Thus, smoking among Asian Americans has remained relatively understudied. The prevalence of smoking has only dropped by 1.8 % from 9.2 % to 7.4 % in Asian Americans while it has decreased by 6.1 % from 21.1 % to 15.0 % in non-Hispanic White, 5.9 % from 20.5 % to 14.6 % in non-Hispanic Black, and 2.7 % from 12.5 % to 9.8 % in Hispanic in the last decade (American Lung Association, 2019).

Previous research has indicated that the prevalence of smoking in Asian Americans may be under-reported due to exclusive use of English language instruments (Chae et al., 2006, Lew and Tanjasiri, 2003, Rao et al., 2022, Glenn et al., 2009). Smoking prevalence in Asian countries is generally much higher than in the U.S. For instance, the World Health Organization reported that smoking rates in Japan, South Korea, and China were 22 %, 22 %, and 25 % respectively in 2018 (World Health Organization, 2019). Due to substantial heterogeneity in smoking rates based upon gender, educational attainment, country of origin, and level of acculturation (e.g., U.S.-born vs Asian immigrants), examination of smoking rates in Asian Americans requires consideration of these important variables (An et al., 2008, Chae et al., 2006, Drouhot and Garip, 2021, Ma et al., 2004, Tsai et al., 2008; R. Yang & Charles, 2021). Thus, failing to address those in Asian smoking prevalence is inequitable and a missed opportunity for public health intervention.

It is well-established that acculturation is an important predictor of immigrant health (An et al., 2008, Castro et al., 2009, Kuerban, 2016, Lee et al., 2000, Ma et al., 2004, Ra et al., 2013, Rodriquez et al., 2019, Sam and Berry, 2006). Acculturation is a process whereby immigrants develop relationships with the new culture of their host country, which results in changes in health beliefs and behaviors (Cornelius et al., 2020, Ma et al., 2004). There is a broadly accepted paradigm that U.S. immigrants, including Hispanics and Asians, tend to be healthier than their U.S.-born counterparts, but they tend to adopt health-deteriorating behaviors (e.g., eating junk food, being sedentary) as they become more acculturated to the U.S. culture (Kuerban, 2016, Ra et al., 2013, Rodriquez et al., 2019). Thus, it is critical to consider differences among not only immigrants vs US born counterparts, but also immigrants at different levels of acculturation in Asian American health (Ma et al., 2004, Ra et al., 2013, Rodriquez et al., 2019, Sam and Berry, 2006, Sandberg, 1974).

Although greater U.S. acculturation has been linked with an increase in risky health behaviors, this link has not been consistently supported regarding smoking behaviors (Abraído-Lanza et al. 2005; An et al. 2008; Choi et al. 2008; Crespo et al. 2001; Kandula and Lauderdale 2005; Shelley et al. 2004). Research has shown that Asian female immigrants that are more acculturated to the U.S. are more likely to smoke (Ma et al., 2004, Patel et al., 2018, Rodriquez et al., 2019); whereas studies have indicated mostly opposite findings among male immigrants (An et al., 2008, Ma et al., 2004, Patel et al., 2018). In most Asian cultures, men are more likely to use tobacco products than women partially because many Asian cultures consider female smoking to be socially unacceptable (Li and Hummer, 2015, Maxwell et al., 2005, Morrow and Barraclough, 2010, Patel et al., 2018, Tsai et al., 2008). There is evidence that the risk of any form of tobacco use increases among Asian immigrant women as they acculturate more to the U.S. cultural norms (An et al., 2008, Gotay et al., 2015, Maxwell et al., 2005, McCarthy et al., 2005, Patel et al., 2018, Reiss et al., 2015, Sandberg, 1974; J. Zhang & Wang, 2008). It may be due to the US culture where female smoking is more acceptable (An et al., 2008). Conversely, tobacco use among Asian immigrant men typically declines with increasing acculturation because tobacco use is typically less prevalent among males in the U.S. than is the case in most Asian countries (An et al., 2008, Gotay et al., 2015, Patel et al., 2018, Reiss et al., 2015; J. Zhang & Wang, 2008). Thus, more U.S. acculturated Asian men and less acculturated Asian women are more likely to be non-smokers (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011, Lee et al., 2000, Martins et al., 2015, Moeschberger et al., 1997), compared with less U.S. acculturated Asian men and more acculturated Asian women, respectively.

Level of educational attainment is highly related to smoking prevalence in the U.S. Specifically, smoking rates generally decrease with increased education (Agaku et al., 2020, Fujiwara and Kawachi, 2009, Gage et al., 2018, Heckman et al., 2016, Leas et al., 2020, Nguyen-Grozavu et al., 2020, Tsai et al., 2008). In addition, there is evidence that lower levels of education were related to the usual pattern of increased smoking rates with increasing acculturation. Ra and her colleagues (2013) reported that U.S. acculturation tends to be positively associated with higher smoking behavior among less educated Korean immigrants. Another study on Asian immigrants in the U.S. reported that those with less than 12 years of education were more likely to be current smokers with longer residence in the U.S. (Li & Hummer, 2015).

As mentioned above, previous studies have investigated the relationships between acculturation and smoking and the moderating effects of education or gender (Li and Hummer, 2015, Ra et al., 2013, Cho et al., 2004, Shelley et al., 2004, Pampel et al., 2020, An et al., 2008; Ma et al,. 2004; An et al., 2008, Mukherjea et al., 2014). Yet, no studies have examined how smoking rates among Asian Americans vary based on acculturation, education, and gender examined concurrently. Thus, this study aims to examine differences in smoking prevalence attributed to educational attainment, acculturation, and gender and identify the highest risk subgroups for smoking among Asian Americans using nationally representative data, which includes non-English speaking Asian immigrant populations. Based on previous research, we hypothesized that the relationship between acculturation level (i.e., U.S.-born vs newer immigrants vs older immigrants) and smoking rates would be modified by educational attainment, and the highest risk groups for smoking accounting for educational attainment and the level of acculturation will be different across gender within Asian subgroups.

2. Methods

2.1. Data

This study used the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series National Health Interview Survey (IPUMS NHIS) data from 2010 to 2018 (Blewett et al., 2019). The sample for this analysis was restricted to adults aged 18 or older who reported their ethnicity as non-Hispanic and Asian yielding a final sample size of 14,680. The analyses were weighted to account for the complex sample design. Detailed information about the sample design, sampling weights, and surveys are available at the NHIS IPUMS Health Surveys website. The study procedure was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (IRB#:14371).

2.2. Measures

The main predictors of current smoking prevalence were acculturation and educational attainment in multivariate logistic regression models for the overall Asian American sample as well as women and men, separately. For acculturation, we included not only the length of residence in the U.S. but also the nativity. Thus, this sample included both foreign-born and U.S.-born Asians, years spent in the U.S. They were categorized into three groups and used as a proxy of acculturation based on previous research (Abraído-Lanza et al., 2006, Li and Hummer, 2015, Ra et al., 2013, Cho et al., 2004, Shelley et al., 2004, Pampel et al., 2020, An et al., 2008; Ma et al,. 2004). The three levels of acculturation were: 1) less than 10 years (less acculturated immigrants), 2) 10 years or more (more acculturated immigrants), and 3) U.S.-born Asians. Educational attainment was dichotomized into “some college or less” (less educated) vs “college graduate or more” (highly educated) since Asian Americans overall have the highest percentage of adults with college degree or higher among all races (Ryan & Bauman, 2016). Smoking prevalence was assessed using a binary categorical variable (i.e., current smoker vs not current smoker). Current smokers were those who reported having smoked at least 100 cigarettes during their lifetimes and smoked every day or some days in the last month at the time of interview.

Covariates included age, marital status, poverty status, the interview language (i.e., English” vs “Other”), country of origin, and survey year. Marital status was dichotomized as “married or living with a partner” vs “separated, divorced, widowed, or never married.” Poverty status was coded as “at/above poverty threshold” vs “below poverty threshold” where poverty was defined as “the ratio of family income to the U.S. Census Bureau’s poverty thresholds for the year in question” by the NHIS.

2.3. Analyses

Three multivariate logistic regressions for 1) all Asian Americans, 2) women only, and 3) men only were conducted to estimate the odds of being a current smoker depending on educational attainment and years spent in the U.S. adjusted for age, marital status, poverty status, interview language, and the survey year. All analyses were performed using RStudio (1.4.1717). We took into account the NHIS complex sampling design to obtain proper variance estimates by using provided weights in the dataset (Blewett et al., 2019; IPUMS Health Surveys).

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive analyses

Table 1 displays weighted distributions of the predictor variables across all Asian Americans as well as women and men separately. Overall, the average age was 44.5 years old (SD = 17.7). Most participants (i.e., 59.1 %) reported being married or living with a partner, 15.2 % were living below the poverty threshold, and 93.4 % had English proficiency sufficient to respond the interview in English. Among all Asian American respondents, 76.9 % were foreign born and immigrated to the U.S. (23.2 % lived in the U.S. for less than 10 years, 53.7 % lived in the U.S. for 10 years or longer) and 23.1 % were born in the U.S. Educational attainment was slightly higher among men than women, 59.4 % of men vs 54.0 % of women reported having graduated college or more. Men were 21.6 % Chinese, 17.0 % Filipino, 28.3 % Asian Indian, and 33.0 % other Asian; whereas women were 22.8 % Chinese, 22.1 % Filipino, 20.6 % Asian Indian, and 34.5 % other Asian. Among Asian Americans 5.0 % of women and 13.5 % of men were current smokers.

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics of Sociodemographic Characteristics.

Non-Hispanic Asian Americans
All
Female
Male
N % N % N %
Age (M/SD) 44.5 17.71 45.5 18.07 43.4 17.20



Marital Status
 Married/living with partner 8,563 59.1 % 4,521 58.5 % 4,042 59.8 %



Poverty
 Below poverty threshold 2,351 15.2 % 1,289 15.8 % 1,062 14.6 %



Interview Language
 English 13,604 93.4 % 7,201 92.8 % 6,403 94.2 %



Educational Attainment
 College or more 7,831 56.5 % 3,994 54.0 % 3,837 59.4 %
 Years spent in the US
 Less than 10 years 3,439 23.2 % 1,778 22.7 % 1,661 23.8 %
 10 years or more 7,642 53.7 % 4,231 55.1 % 3,411 52.1 %
 U.S.-born 3,599 23.1 % 1,821 22.2 % 1,778 24.1 %



Country of Origin
 Chinese 3,144 22.2 % 1,698 22.8 % 1,446 21.6 %
 Filipino 3,109 19.7 % 1,838 22.1 % 1,271 17.0 %
 Asian Indian 3,127 24.2 % 1,395 20.6 % 1,732 28.3 %
 Other Asian 5,300 33.8 % 2,899 34.5 % 2,401 33.0 %



Smoking Status
 Current Smoker 1,411 9.0 % 434 5.0 % 977 13.5 %



Unweighted N 14,680 7,830 6,850

Source National Health Interview Survey 2010–2018.

N: raw sample size; %: Weighted percentage.

M: mean; SD: standard deviation.

Prevalence estimates are weighted to reflect survey design and differential non-response.

Table 2 presents crude frequencies and weighted distributions of current smoking prevalence, stratified by educational attainment and level of acculturation for the overall sample as well as women and men separately. Prevalence of current smoking was higher among individuals with lower (i.e., some college or less) vs higher educational attainment (i.e., college graduate or more) at all levels of acculturation, and the same patterns were found in both men and women. In terms of acculturation, prevalence of current smoking increased as duration of U.S. residence increased in less educated subgroups in the overall Asian American sample (10.4 % among less acculturated immigrants vs 13.1 % among more acculturated immigrants vs 17.0 % among U.S.-born). However, the effects of acculturation on smoking prevalence were different across genders. While there were large differences between genders in low acculturation (immigrants with less than 10 years of residence in U.S.) and low educational attainment subgroups (3.5 % in females vs 18.8 % in males), the subgroups of U.S.-born higher educational attainment brought gender differences in cigarette smoking prevalence closer (4.7 % in females vs 6.1 % in males) (See Table 2).

Table 2.

Unweighted frequencies and weighted probabilities of dependent variables.


Currently Smoking
Years spent in US
<10Y
10Y+
US born
Educational Attainment N % (95 % CI) N % (95 % CI) N % (95 % CI)
Total
 some college or less 123 10.4 (8.4, 12.4) 487 13.1 (11.8, 14.4) 346 17.0 (14.9, 19.1)
 college graduate or more 164 6.8 (5.6, 8.0) 194 4.7 (3.9, 5.4) 97 5.3 (4.3, 6.4)
Female
 some college or less 24 3.5 (1.9, 5.2) 140 6.2 (5.1, 7.3) 159 16.5 (13.8, 19.2)
 college graduate or more 24 1.8 (1.0, 2.6) 39 1.5 (1.0, 2.0) 48 4.7 (3.3, 6.1)
Male
 some college or less 99 18.8 (14.9, 22.7) 347 23.3 (20.7, 25.9) 187 17.5 (14.4, 20.6)
 college graduate or more 140 11.8 (9.7, 14.0) 155 7.8 (6.4, 9.2) 49 6.1 (4.3, 7.8)

Source National Health Interview Survey 2010–2018.

N: raw sample size; %: Weighted percentage.

<10Y: less than 10 years in the U.S., 10Y+: 10 years or more in the U.S.

Prevalence estimates are weighted to reflect survey design and differential non-response.

Table 3 presents relations between each predictor variable and current smoking. Compared to immigrants with less than a college education and less than 10 years in the U.S. (reference group), those with a college degree and 10 years or more in the U.S. had significantly lower prevalence of current smoking overall and also for women and men separately (overall OR: 0.444 [95 % CI: 0.321, 0.615]; women OR: 0.368 [95 % CI: 0.171, 0.791]; men OR: 0.459 [95 % CI: 0.317, 0.662]). Similarly, U.S.-born respondents with a college degree had significantly lower prevalence of smoking overall and for men (overall OR: 0.417 [95 % CI: 0.286, 0.607]; men OR: 0.446 [95 % CI: 0.282, 0.708]) compared to the reference group. U.S.-born women with a college degree were not significantly different from the reference group.

Table 3.

Logistic regression results predicting odds of current smoking among Non-Hispanic Asian Americans.

Currently Smoking
All Female Male
Adjusted OR (95 % CI) Adjusted OR (95 % CI) Adjusted OR (95 % CI)
(Intercept) 0.096 (0.064,0.143) 0.018 (0.007,0.049) 0.512 (0.323,0.810)



Covariates
Sex
 Female 1
 Male 3.286 (2.849,3.789)



Age 0.989 (0.985,0.993) 0.989 (0.983,0.995) 0.988 (0.983,0.994)



Marital Status
 Never Married/Divorced/Widowed/Separated 1 1 1
 Married/Living with a partner 0.886 (0.769,1.020) 0.814 (0.650,1.020) 0.898 (0.740.1.091)



Poverty
 At/Above poverty threshold 1 1 1
 Below poverty threshold 0.959 (0.797,1.153) 1.055 (0.768.1.449) 0.911 (0.733,1.133)



Interview Language
 Other 1 1 1
 English 0.774 (0.593,1.009) 2.519 (1.146,5.537) 0.561 (0.409,0.769)



Country of Origin
 Chinese 1 1 1
 Filipino 1.891 (1.527,2.342) 2.946 (1.950,4.450) 1.481 (1.136,1.932)
 Asian Indian 0.868 (0.682,1.104) 0.604 (0.334,1.091) 0.894 (0.681.1.174)
 Other Asian 1.885 (1.578,2.253) 2.127 (1.424, 3.177) 1.875 (1.505,2.335)



Year 0.973 (0.947,1.000) 0.964 (0.919,1.012) 0.980 (0.948,1.013)



Predictors
Years Spent in U.S.
 Less than 10 years 1 1 1
 10 years or more 1.542 (1.195,1.989) 2.115 (1.241,3.605) 1.456 (1.066,1.987)
 U.S. born 1.508 (1.149,1.979) 4.099 (2.399,7005) 0.890 (0.635,1.248)



Educational Attainment
 Some college or less 1 1 1
 College graduate or more 0.741 (0.561,0.979) 0.649 (0.321,1.314) 0.741 (0.538,1.021)



Years Spent in U.S.: Educational Attainment
 Less than 10 years: Some college or less 1 1 1
 10 years or more: College graduate or more 0.444 (0.321,0.615) 0.368 (0.171,0.791) 0.459 (0.317,0.662)
 U.S. born: College graduate or more 0.417 (0.286,0.607) 0.462 (0.206,1.037) 0.446 (0.282,0.708)



Unweighted N 14,680 7,830 6,850

Source: National Health Interview Survey 2010–2018.

CI: confidence interval, OR: odds ratio.

Fig. 1 shows the marginal probabilities and odds of current smoking among Asian Americans by educational attainment and acculturation level. The subgroup of immigrants who had resided in the U.S. less than 10 years (i.e., less acculturated) and were less educated was the reference group for each analysis (i.e., all sample, women, and men).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Marginal Probabilities and Odds Ratios of Current Smoking by Educational Attainment and Level of Acculturation Notes: Odds ratios are included in the figure with a reference group (OR: 1.000). Reference group: the subgroup of immigrants who had resided in the U.S. less than 10 years (i.e., less acculturated) and were less educated for each analysis (i.e., all Asian Americans, women, and men). All models were adjusted for age, marital status, poverty status, the interview language, country of origin, and survey year. * indicates significant odds ratio at p <.05. Confidence intervals are included in the text. < college: some college or less, college+: college graduate or more, < 10Y: less than 10 years in the U.S., 10Y+:10 years or more in the U.S.

Compared to the reference group, among all Asian Americans without a college degree, odds of smoking were significantly higher if they were immigrants who resided in the U.S. for 10 years or more (OR: 1.537 [95 % CI: 1.323, 1.786]) or U.S.-born (OR: 1.507 [CI: 1.209, 1.878]). In all subgroups of Asian Americans with a college degree, regardless of the level of acculturation, the odds of smoking were significantly lower compared to the reference group (OR for immigrants who resided in the U.S for less than 10 years: 0.741 [CI: 0.583, 0.932]; OR for immigrants who resided in the U.S. for 10 years or more: 0.507 [CI: 0.399, 0.638], and OR for the U.S.-born: 0.463 [CI: 0.353, 0.613], respectively). Similar negative associations between educational attainment and current smoking prevalence were also found in both gender subgroups.

Among respective gender-specific subgroups, U.S.-born Asian women without a college degree (OR: 4.096 [95 % CI: 2.638, 6.360]) and immigrant men without a college degree who resided in the U.S. for 10 years or more had the highest odds of smoking (OR: 1.462 [95 % CI: 1.197, 1.774]).

4. Discussion

The primary purpose of this study was to examine the intersectionality of acculturation, education, and gender as it influences smoking prevalence in the Asian American population and to identify the highest risk subgroups for smoking among the Asian American population. Overall, higher level of education was associated with lower smoking prevalence in both Asian men and women. The effects of acculturation on smoking prevalence were not consistent across gender and were modified by educational attainment. Among Asian immigrants, highly educated men and women were less likely to be current smokers the longer they resided in the U.S.; however, less educated immigrant men and women were more likely to smoke as they lived longer in the U.S. U.S.-born Asian women tended to be more likely to smoke than Asian immigrant women while U.S.-born Asian men tended to be less likely to smoke than Asian immigrant men regardless of their educational attainment. Overall, findings indicate that US-born Asian women without a college degree and Asian immigrant men without a college degree that have resided in the U.S. for at least 10 years have the highest smoking prevalence of all Asians in the U.S.

Our findings are consistent with previous research studies that have indicated that Asians with a college degree are less likely to smoke regardless of gender and level of acculturation. The negative relationship between higher education and smoking is well documented (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2014, Leas et al., 2020, Nguyen-Grozavu et al., 2020, Pierce et al., 1989). The “socio-ecological effect” indicates that more highly educated individuals have fewer friends who smoke, are exposed to fewer smoking advertisements, and perceive stronger anti-smoking norms (de Walque, 2007, Nguyen-Grozavu et al., 2020, Leas et al., 2020). This could be a primary driver of lower smoking prevalence among Asian Americans.

The observed differences in smoking prevalence based on educational attainment support the idea of segmented assimilation (Abraído-Lanza et al., 2006, Li and Hummer, 2015, Ra et al., 2013). As mentioned earlier, smoking rates differ greatly across levels of education – highly educated Asian immigrants were less likely to smoke than less educated Asian immigrants. Moreover, smoking rates among highly educated Asian immigrants were lower among those with longer residence in the U.S. Conversely, less educated immigrants tended to have greater prevalence of smoking with greater length of U.S. residence. Highly educated immigrants may settle into higher income neighborhoods and interact with others with higher levels of education and thus be more likely to adopt anti-tobacco sentiments (Li and Hummer, 2015, Ra et al., 2013). In contrast, individuals with less education and fewer financial resources tend to start at the bottom of the occupational hierarchy (Li and Hummer, 2015, Ra et al., 2013). They likely have more direct daily contact with lower income adults and other immigrants that have higher smoking prevalence rather than higher income adults and college graduates that are less likely to smoke (Li and Hummer, 2015, Ra et al., 2013). However, this was not applied to U.S.-born Asian American men and women who were considered most acculturated to the U.S. culture.

Smoking behaviors are influenced by cultural norms (An et al., 2008, Tsai et al., 2008). Regardless of level of education, Asian female immigrants were less likely to smoke than U.S.-born women while Asian male immigrants were more likely to smoke than U.S.-born Asian men. In most Asian countries, smoking among men is much higher than women, although there has been a rapid increase in the rate of smoking among women in Asian countries (J. J. Yang et al., 2019). Due to traditional values and normative gender expectations, female smoking is socially less acceptable in Asian countries than in the U.S. (An et al., 2008, Tsai et al., 2008). Even though the smoking rate among women in the U.S. has declined steadily, it still remains higher than that of women in Asian countries (J. J. Yang et al., 2019; M. Zhang et al., 2019). U.S.-born Asian women who are more acculturated to the U.S. culture where gender equality is more valued and female smoking is viewed more favorably, tend to be more likely to smoke than Asian immigrants (An et al., 2008). Conversely, U.S.-born Asian men smoke less than Asian male immigrants since smoking is generally less tolerated in the U.S. than in Asian countries (An et al., 2008, Ma et al., 2004).

This study has several limitations. First, we used cross-sectional data to examine smoking prevalence among Asian Americans. Thus, it was not possible to disentangle the temporal order of educational attainment and period of residence in the U.S. among Asian immigrants. Educational attainment may have occurred either prior to immigration to the U.S. or afterwards. Second, we used years of living in the U.S. as a proxy measure for acculturation (Abraído-Lanza et al., 2006, Li and Hummer, 2015, Ra et al., 2013) and included survey language (English vs other) as a covariate in the analyses. Although duration of residence is one of the most important dimensions of acculturation (Li & Hummer, 2015), other studies have used various scales to measure acculturation in greater detail, which include a series of questions on cultural lifestyle and indigenous beliefs that are associated with smoking behaviors (Schwartz et al., 2010, Wallace et al., 2010). Incorporating an acculturation scale in the NHIS survey or other surveys could help improve understanding of the interactions between education and acculturation and the trajectories of smoking prevalence among Asian Americans. In addition, we could not disaggregate the Asian subgroups based on their ethnicity due to the complexity of the analysis and lack of the sample size. Asian Americans are culturally heterogeneous, thus the findings of this study may not be generalized to a certain Asian ethnicity. Future study with sufficient sample size should examine the same relationships and how the findings differ based on their ethnicity.

5. Conclusions

This study addresses an important gap in the literature on smoking in Asian Americans. This is the first study to examine the intersectionality of acculturation, education, and gender as it influences smoking prevalence in the Asian American population. Findings indicated that smoking prevalence among Asian Americans is highly dependent upon interactions among these variables. Specifically, U.S.-born Asian women without a college degree and Asian immigrant men without a college degree were identified as the subgroups with the greatest risk for smoking. Findings from the current study may inform development of policies and programs that are targeted toward smoking cessation among Asian Americans by focusing on reducing the prevalence of smoking in those subgroups at high risk. For instance, smartphone-based just-in-time smoking cessation interventions could be developed to address the specific needs of U.S.-born Asian women without a college degree and Asian immigrant men without a college degree. Identifying smoking related risk behaviors (e.g., smoking urges, stress, alcohol use) and providing tailored intervention content in real-time may help reduce smoking cigarettes across Asian American populations (see Hébert et al., 2020).

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Funding

The Oklahoma Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust (TSET) grant R21-02 and NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA225520 awarded to the Stephenson Cancer Center partially supported effort devoted to the development of this manuscript. This work was also supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (BK21 Center for Integrative Response to Health Disasters, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University; NO.4199990514025).

Data availability

The authors do not have permission to share data.

References

  1. Abraído-Lanza A.F., Armbrister A.N., Flórez K.R., Aguirre A.N. Toward a theory-driven model of acculturation in public health research. American Journal of Public Health. 2006;96(8):1342–1346. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.064980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agaku I.T., Odani S., Okuyemi K.S., Armour B. Disparities in current cigarette smoking among US adults, 2002–2016. Tobacco control. 2020;29:269–276. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-054948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. American Lung Association. (2019). Overall Tobacco Trends.
  4. An N., Cochran S., Mays V., McCarthy W. Influence of American acculturation on cigarette smoking behaviors among Asian American subpopulations in California. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2008;10(4):579–587. doi: 10.1080/14622200801979126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blewett L.A., Drew J.A.R., King M.L., Williams K.C.W. IPUMS; Minneapolis, MN: 2019. IPUMS Health Surveys: National Health Interview Survey, Version 6.4. [Google Scholar]
  6. Castro, Y., Reitzel, L.R., Businelle, M.S., Kendzor, D.E., Mazas, C.A., Li, Y., et al. (2009). Acculturation differentially predicts smoking cessation among Latino men and women. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers, 18, 3468-3475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Quitting smoking among adults–United States, 2001–2010. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2011;60:1513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). State Tobacco Activities Tracking & Evaluation (STATE) system. Map of current cigarette use among adults (Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System); 2017.
  9. Chae D.H., Gavin A.R., Takeuchi D.T. Smoking prevalence among asian americans: findings from the National Latino and Asian American Study (NLAAS) Public health reports. 2006;121(6):755–763. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cho Y., Frisbie W.P., Hummer R.A., Rogers R.G. Nativity, duration of residence, and the health of Hispanic adults in the United States. International Migration Review. 2004;38(1):184–211. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cornelius M.E., Wang T.W., Jamal A., Loretan C.G., Neff L.J. Tobacco product use among adults—United States, 2019. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2020;69(46):1736–1742. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6946a4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. de Walque D. Does education affect smoking behaviors?: Evidence using the Vietnam draft as an instrument for college education. Journal of Health Economics. 2007;26(5):877–895. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Drouhot L.G., Garip F. What’s Behind a Racial Category? Uncovering Heterogeneity Among Asian Americans Through a Data-Driven Typology. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation. Journal of the Social Sciences. 2021;7:22–45. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fujiwara T., Kawachi I. Is education causally related to better health? A twin fixed-effect study in the USA. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2009;38(5):1310–1322. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gage S.H., Bowden J., Davey Smith G., Munafo M.R. Investigating causality in associations between education and smoking: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2018;47:1131–1140. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gfroerer J., Dube S.R., King B.A., Garrett B.E., Babb S., McAfee T. Vital signs: current cigarette smoking among adults aged≥ 18 years with mental illness—United States, 2009–2011. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2013;62:81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Glenn B.A., Surani Z., Chawla N., Bastani R. Tobacco use among South Asians: results of a community-university collaborative study. Ethn Health. 2009;14(2):131–145. doi: 10.1080/13557850802307817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gotay C.C., Reid M.S., Dawson M.Y., Wang S. Acculturation and smoking in North Americans of Chinese ancestry: A systematic review. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2015;106(5):e333. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4762. e340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hébert E.T., Ra C.K., Alexander A.C., Helt A., Moisiuc R., Kendzor D.E., Vidrine D.J., Funk-Lawler R.K., Businelle M.S. A Mobile Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention for Smoking Cessation: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of medical Internet research. 2020;22(3):e16907. doi: 10.2196/16907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heckman J.J., Humphries J.E., Veramendi G. Returns to education: The causal effects of education on earnings. Health and Smoking. 2016 doi: 10.1086/698760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kuerban A. Healthy migrant effect on smoking behavior among Asian immigrants in the United States. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2016;18(1):94–101. doi: 10.1007/s10903-014-0155-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. E.C. Leas D.R. Trinidad J.P. Pierce T. Benmarhnia The effect of college attendance on young adult cigarette, e-cigarette, cigarillo, hookah and smokeless tobacco use and its potential for addressing tobacco-related health disparities Preventive Medicine 132 2020 105954 105954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  23. Lee S.-K., Sobal J., Frongillo E.A. Acculturation and health in Korean Americans. Social science & medicine. 2000;51(2):159–173. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00446-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lew R., Tanjasiri S.P. Slowing the epidemic of tobacco use among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health. 2003;93(5):764–768. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.5.764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li J., Hummer R.A. The relationship between duration of US residence, educational attainment, and adult health among Asian immigrants. Population research and policy review. 2015;34(1):49–76. doi: 10.1007/s11113-014-9344-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ma G.X., Tan Y., Toubbeh J.I., Su X., Shive S.E., Lan Y. Acculturation and smoking behavior in Asian-American populations. Health Education Research. 2004;19:615–625. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Martins D.C., Gorman K.S., Miller R.J., Murphy L., Sor S., Martins J.C., Vecchiarelli M.L. Assessment of food intake, obesity, and health risk among the homeless in Rhode Island. Public Health Nursing. 2015;32(5):453–461. doi: 10.1111/phn.12180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Maxwell A.E., Bernaards C.A., McCarthy W.J. Smoking prevalence and correlates among Chinese-and Filipino-American adults: findings from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. Preventive Medicine. 2005;41(2):693–699. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.01.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McCarthy W., Divan H., Shah D., Maxwell A., Freed B., Bastani R., et al. California Department of Health Services; Sacramento (CA): 2005. California Asian Indian tobacco use survey: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  30. Moeschberger M.L., Anderson J., Kuo Y.-F., Chen M.S., Wewers M.E., Guthrie R. Multivariate profile of smoking in Southeast Asian men: a biochemically verified analysis. Preventive Medicine. 1997;26(1):53–58. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.9993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Morrow M., Barraclough S. Gender equity and tobacco control: bringing masculinity into focus. Global health promotion. 2010;17(1_suppl):21–28. doi: 10.1177/1757975909358349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mukherjea A., Wackowski O.A., Lee Y.O., Delnevo C.D. Asian american, native hawaiian and pacific islander tobacco use patterns. American journal of health behavior. 2014;38(3):362–369. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.38.3.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nguyen-Grozavu F.T., Pierce J.P., Sakuma K.-L., Leas E.C., McMenamin S.B., Kealey S., Benmarhnia T., Emery S.L., White M.M., Fagan P., Trinidad D.R. Widening disparities in cigarette smoking by race/ethnicity across education level in the United States. Preventive Medicine. 2020;139:106220. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pampel F., Khlat M., Bricard D., Legleye S. Smoking among immigrant groups in the United States: prevalence, education gradients, and male-to-female ratios. Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2020;22(4):532–538. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Patel M., Mistry R., Maxwell A.E., Divan H.A., McCarthy W.J. Contextual factors related to conventional and traditional tobacco use among California Asian Indian immigrants. Journal of community health. 2018;43(2):280–290. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0419-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pierce J.P., Fiore M.C., Novotny T.E., Hatziandreu E.J., Davis R.M. Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States: projections to the year 2000. Jama. 1989;261:61–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Prochaska J.J., Das S., Young-Wolff K.C. Smoking, mental illness, and public health. Annual review of public health. 2017;38(1):165–185. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ra C.K., Cho Y., Hummer R.A. Is acculturation always adverse to Korean immigrant health in the United States? Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2013;15(3):510–516. doi: 10.1007/s10903-012-9723-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rao M., Bar L., Yu Y., Srinivasan M., Mukherjea A., Li J., Chung S., Venkatraman S., Dan S., Palaniappan L. Disaggregating Asian American cigarette and alternative tobacco product use: results from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 2006–2018. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities. 2022;9(3):856–864. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01024-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Reiss K., Lehnhardt J., Razum O. Factors associated with smoking in immigrants from non-western to western countries–what role does acculturation play? A systematic review. Tobacco induced diseases. 2015;13:1–23. doi: 10.1186/s12971-015-0036-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rodriquez E.J., Fernández A., Livaudais-Toman J.C., Perez-Stable E.J. How does acculturation influence smoking behavior among Latinos? The role of education and national background. Ethnicity & disease. 2019;29(2):227–238. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.2.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ryan, C.L., & Bauman, K. (2016). Educational Attainment in the United States: 2015. In U.S.D.o. Commerce (Ed.).
  43. Sam D.L., Berry J.W., editors. The Cambridge Handbook of Acculturation Psychology. Cambridge University Press; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sandberg N.C. Case Study of Metropolitan Los Angeles; 1974. Ethnic Identity and Assimilation: The Polish-American Community. [Google Scholar]
  45. Schwartz S.J., Unger J.B., Zamboanga B.L., Szapocznik J. Rethinking the concept of acculturation: implications for theory and research. Am Psychol. 2010;65:237–251. doi: 10.1037/a0019330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Shelley D., Fahs M., Scheinmann R., Swain S., Qu J., Burton D. Acculturation and tobacco use among Chinese Americans. American journal of public health. 2004;94(2):300–307. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tsai Y.-W., Tsai T.-I., Yang C.-L., Kuo K.N. Gender differences in smoking behaviors in an Asian population. Journal of Women's Health. 2008;17(6):971–978. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. US Department of Health and Human Services . Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General; Rockville: 2014. Surgeon general’s report: the health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wallace P.M., Pomery E.A., Latimer A.E., Martinez J.L., Salovey P. A review of acculturation measures and their utility in studies promoting Latino health. Hispanic journal of behavioral sciences. 2010;32(1):37–54. doi: 10.1177/0739986309352341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. World Health Organization WHO global report on trends in prevalence of tobacco smoking 2000–2025. World Health. 2019 Organization. [Google Scholar]
  51. Yang R., Charles M. Traditional Asians? Race, Ethnicity, and Gender Policy Attitudes in the United States. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation. Journal of the Social Sciences. 2021;7:130–153. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang J.J., Yu D., Wen W., Shu X.-O., Saito E., Rahman S., Gupta P.C., He J., Tsugane S., Xiang Y.-B., Gao Y.-T., Koh W.-P., Tamakoshi A., Irie F., Sadakane A., Tsuji I., Kanemura S., Matsuo K., Nagata C., Chen C.-J., Yuan J.-M., Shin M.-H., Park S.K., Pan W.-H., Qiao Y.-L., Pednekar M.S., Gu D., Sawada N., Li H.-L., Gao J., Cai H., Grant E., Tomata Y., Sugawara Y., Ito H., Wada K., Shen C.-Y., Wang R., Ahn Y.-O., You S.-L., Yoo K.-Y., Ashan H., Chia K.S., Boffetta P., Inoue M., Kang D., Potter J.D., Zheng W. Tobacco Smoking and Mortality in Asia: A Pooled Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(3):e191474. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang M., Liu S., Yang L., Jiang Y., Huang Z., Zhao Z., et al. Prevalence of Smoking and Knowledge About the Hazards of Smoking Among 170 000 Chinese Adults, 2013–2014. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;21:1644–1651. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang J., Wang Z. Factors associated with smoking in Asian American adults: a systematic review. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2008;10(5):791–801. doi: 10.1080/14622200802027230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Further reading

  1. The World Bank. (2020). Prevalence of current tobacco use (% of adults).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The authors do not have permission to share data.


Articles from Preventive Medicine Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES