Abstract
Background
The optimal dose of tranexamic acid to inhibit hyperfibrinolysis in postpartum haemorrhage is unclear. Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss in Hemorrhagic Cesarean Delivery (TRACES) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, multicentre dose-ranging study to determine the dose–effect relationship for two regimens of intravenous tranexamic acid vs placebo.
Methods
Women experiencing postpartum haemorrhage during Caesarean delivery were randomised to receive placebo (n=60), tranexamic acid 0.5 g (n=57), or tranexamic acid 1 g i.v. (n=58). Biomarkers of fibrinolytic activation were assayed at five time points, with inhibition of hyperfibrinolysis defined as reductions in the increase over baseline in D-dimer and plasmin–antiplasmin levels and in the plasmin peak time.
Results
In the placebo group, hyperfibrinolysis was evidenced by a mean increase over baseline [95% confidence interval] of 93% [68–118] for D-dimer level at 120 min and 56% [25–87] for the plasmin–antiplasmin level at 30 min. A dose of tranexamic acid 1 g was associated with smaller increases over baseline (D-dimers: 38% [13–63] [P=0.003 vs placebo]; plasmin–antiplasmin: –2% [–32 to 28] [P=0.009 vs placebo]). A dose of tranexamic acid 0.5 g was less potent, with non-significant reductions (D-dimers: 58% [32–84] [P=0.06 vs placebo]; plasmin–antiplasmin: 13% [18–43] [P=0.051]). Although both tranexamic acid doses reduced the plasmin peak, reduction in plasmin peak time was significant only for the 1 g dose of tranexamic acid.
Conclusions
Fibrinolytic activation was significantly inhibited by a dose of intravenous tranexamic acid 1 g but not 0.5 g. Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modelling of these data might identify the best pharmacodynamic monitoring criteria and the optimal tranexamic acid dosing regimen for treatment of postpartum haemorrhage.
Clinical trial registration
Keywords: antifibrinolytic drug, D-dimer, fibrinogen, fibrinolysis, plasmin, plasmin–antiplasmin complex, postpartum haemorrhage, thrombin, tranexamic acid
Editor's key points.
-
•
Hyperfibrinolysis can occur in postpartum haemorrhage after Caesarean delivery as evident in elevation of D-dimer and plasmin–antiplasmin levels.
-
•
In the TRACES biomarker study, a dose of at least tranexamic acid 1 g i.v. was needed to inhibit activation fibrinolysis.
-
•
Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modelling of these data and further studies are required to identify the optimal tranexamic acid dosing regimen for treatment of postpartum haemorrhage.
Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal death worldwide.1 The antifibrinolytic drug tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces bleeding and the need for transfusion during major surgery or trauma.2 In the context of PPH after vaginal delivery, a high (4 g) dose of TXA was shown to (i) decrease the volume and duration of blood loss, transfusion needs, and maternal morbidity; and (ii) rapidly inhibit fibrinolysis as quantified by a smaller increase over baseline in plasma D-dimer level.3,4 In the international World Maternal Antifibrinolytic (WOMAN) trial, administration of a single 1 g dose of TXA within 3 h of PPH onset (repeated once if necessary) was associated with a lower haemorrhage-related mortality rate.5 TXA appeared to be safe because the incidence of serious adverse events (thromboembolism or seizure) was not elevated.5 Prophylactic use of TXA 1 g before vaginal or Caesarean delivery has also been studied.6,7 Ahmadzia and colleagues8 recommended a dose of 600 mg to prevent PPH after elective non-haemorrhagic Caesarean delivery. The Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss in Hemorrhagic Cesarean Delivery (TRACES) biomarkers study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised dose-ranging study that includes patients experiencing PPH during Caesarean delivery based on laboratory outcomes.9,10 After the validation of the innovative assays in the TRACES pilot study, we compared two TXA dosing regimens (a standard dose of 1 g and a low dose of 0.5 g) with placebo for inhibition of fibrinolysis, as quantified by changes over time in haemostatic variables.
Methods
The TRACES trial was approved by a competent national authority (French Drug Safety Agency; reference: 2015–00249926) and an independent ethics committee (CPP North Ouest France; reference 15/50 020216) before initiation of the study, in accordance with Article L1121-4 of the French Public Health Code. This trial was registered on June 13, 2016, at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 02797119), in accordance with the French legislation on biomedical research.
The protocol of the TRACES trial has been described in detail elsewhere.9,10 The TRACES pilot study (n=22) was conducted in 2014 to validate the simultaneous thrombin–plasmin assay and the TXA dosage (n=9), and to create a preliminary pharmacokinetic (PK) model.10,11 The trial was conducted between March 2016 and December 2019 in eight centres in France, all of which complied strictly with French national guidelines on the management of PPH.12 An external data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) reviewed the study's scientific quality from the design stage through to the data analysis stage. After publication of the WOMAN trial, the DSMB recommended to focus on biomarkers and the pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study because the trial was not powered for important clinical outcomes. The funding agencies had no influence on data collection, analysis, interpretation, or reporting.
Study design
All participants received comprehensive information about the study and gave their written consent before Caesarean delivery. Patients were included in the biomarker study if they experienced a bleeding volume ≥800 ml after Caesarean delivery and had available assay data on at least two D-dimer measurements.10 The exclusion criteria, randomisation procedures, and preparation of drug and placebo for administration have been described elsewhere.10
Outcomes
Primary outcome was the difference in the increase over baseline in plasma D-dimer level 120 min after the start of the infusion between treatment and placebo. Secondary outcomes were the treatment vs placebo differences in plasma D-dimer (Immunoturbidimetric, STA-LIAtest®, Diagnostica STAGO, Asnières-sur-Seine, France) and plasmin–antiplasmin (PAP) complex level increase over baseline (TECHNOZYM® PAP Complex ELISA Kit; Technoclone, Vienna, Austria) at four time points, plasmin generation (PG), thrombin generation (TG),13, 14, 15, 16 haemostatic variables (fibrinogen, fibrin monomers, factor II, factor V, antithrombin, and thrombin–antithrombin complexes), and the clinical outcomes at each time point.10,17
Data management and statistical methods
Data management
The study team included the coordinating investigator, the study sponsors' representatives, and the lead investigators from each centre. Informed consent and data collection procedures were monitored by the sponsor. Study data were reviewed in a blind manner by an independent DSMB.
Sample size
The sample size calculation of 48 patients per group was based on an expected 30% difference in the treated vs placebo groups for the increase over baseline in D-dimer level at T120.4,10
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed by the University of Lille's Biostatistics Department using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). All tests were two-tailed. The threshold for statistical significance was set to P<0.05. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis for all patients, including those who received a rescue dose of TXA after PPH of >1500 ml. Baseline characteristics were described for each group.
Quantitative variables are expressed as mean (standard deviation [sd]) when normally distributed or median (inter-quartile range [IQR]) otherwise. Categorical variables are expressed as frequency (percentage). Normality of distributions was assessed using histograms and the Shapiro–Wilk test.
Intergroup comparisons of D-dimer and PAP complex levels at each time (30, 60, 120, and 360 min) were performed using a non-parametric analysis of variance. Intergroup comparisons of changes in biochemical parameters between baseline and other times (30, 120, and 360 min) were performed using the constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model with centre as a random effect.18,19 For clinical variables and variables related to PPH treatments, placebo and treatment groups were compared using the cLDA model with centre as a random effect or (for quantitative longitudinal outcomes) analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline values.19, 20, 21 Binary variables were compared using a mixed logistic regression model, including treatment as fixed effect and centre as random effect (adjusted odds ratios were calculated as a measure of treatment effect size). Linear mixed regression model with centre as a random effect was used to compare groups with regard to non-longitudinal quantitative outcomes. If the model's residuals were not normally distributed (even after logarithmic transformation), non-parametric analysis was applied. Serious and non-serious adverse events were recorded up to Day 42 after delivery for each group.
Results
There were 151 patients experiencing haemorrhagic Caesarean delivery with assay data on at least two D-dimer measurements included in the TRACES biomarkers trial by the eight centres between 2016 and 2019 (57, 51, and 53 subjects in the placebo, low dose, and standard dose groups, respectively) (Fig. 1). Protocol deviations were noted for four subjects. Baseline subject characteristics and obstetrical data are summarised in Table 1. One or more rescue doses were given to seven (11%) subjects in the placebo group, five (9%) in the low, and eight (14%) in the standard dose groups attributable to PPH >1500 ml, for a total median [IQR] weighted-based dosing of 0 [0–7.4], 6.2 [3.5–17.6], and 12.5 [8–23.3] mg kg−1, respectively.
Fig 1.
Study flow chart. PK, pharmacokinetic; PPH, postpartum haemorrhage; TXA, tranexamic acid.
Table 1.
Baseline anthropometric, obstetric, and bleeding characteristics, by group. CD, Caesarean delivery; IQR, inter-quartile range; PPH, postpartum haemorrhage; TXA, tranexamic acid. Values are quoted as the mean (standard deviation), unless otherwise indicated. T0, at inclusion (baseline); T1, at the end of double-blind TXA or placebo infusion.
| Placebo (n=60) | TXA 0.5 g (n=58) | TXA 1 g (n=57) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 33.1 (5.8) [21–42] | 33.7 (5.5) [23–46] | 33.2 (4.2) [23–42] |
| Weight before pregnancy (kg) | 73.2 (21.3) | 73.8 (21.3) | 75.5 (18.8) |
| Weight at the end of pregnancy (kg) | 84.6 (19.6) | 85.3 (19.7) | 86.3 (15.2) |
| Height (cm) | 163.0 (7.2) | 165.1 (7.5) | 165.3 (7.0) |
| BMI (kg m−2) | 31.6 (6.7) | 31.4 (6.5) | 31.7 (5.4) |
| Gestational age (weeks) | 38.0 (2.4) | 37.8 (2.3) | 38.1 (2.2) |
| Nulliparity, n (%) | 14 (23) | 16 (28) | 14 (25) |
| Illness during pregnancy, n (%) | 46 (77) | 42 (75) | 42 (74) |
| Caesarean delivery indications and causes of postpartum haemorrhage Atony, n (%) |
45 (75) | 41 (71) | 41 (72) |
| Multiple pregnancies, n (%) | 13 (22) | 11 (20) | 10 (18) |
| Previous Caesarean delivery, n (%) | 19 (32) | 14 (24) | 15 (26) |
| Previous postpartum haemorrhage, n (%) | 9 (15) | 12 (21) | 8 (15) |
| Dystocia, n (%) | 6 (10) | 4 (7) | 5 (9) |
| Macrosomia, n (%) | 7 (12) | 4 (7) | 3 (5) |
| Preeclampsia, n (%) | 1 (2) | 2 (3) | 2 (3) |
| Placenta praevia or accreta, n (%) | 14 (24) | 15 (26) | 14 (25) |
| Baseline blood loss at T0 (ml), median (IQR) | 902 [852–1100] | 1038 [900–1200] | 1048 [940–1308] |
| Delay birth inclusion (min) | 39.3 (79.6) | 29.9 (62.1) | 21.8 (30.5) |
| Caesarean delivery duration (min), median (IQR) | 52 [44–71.5] | 63 [48–85] | 51.5 [45–69] |
| General anaesthesia, n (%) | 2 (3) | 3 (5) | 3 (5) |
| Laboratory data | |||
| Haemoglobin (g dl−1) | 10.6 (1.5) | –10.9 (1.3) | 10.6 (1.3) |
| Fibrinogen (g L−1) | 4.3 (0.9) | 4.5 (0.9) | 4.5 (0.8) |
| D-dimer (ng ml−1), median (IQR) | 2850 [3130–6780] | 2925 [1960–6670] | 2950 [2040–3750] |
| Plasmin–antiplasmin complexes (ng ml−1), median (IQR) | 441 [302–1161] | 452 [312–1224] | 403 [295–472] |
Hyperfibrinolysis in the placebo group
Hyperfibrinolysis occurred in the placebo group, identified by an increase over baseline in D-dimer level at 120 min (median increase [IQR]: 4470 [1610–8360] ng ml−1), median increase percentage [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 93 [68–118]%), and in PAP level at 30 min (258 [104–507] ng ml−1; 56 [25–87]%).
Inhibition of fibrinolysis by tranexamic acid
We observed a significant difference between the standard dose TXA group and placebo group with regard to median [IQR] plasma D-dimer level at 120 min (4340 [3240–5960] ng ml−1) vs 8930 [95% CI: 3820–17 940] ng ml−1, respectively; P=0.03) (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Table S1). The D-dimer increase over baseline at T120 was lower in the standard dose group (630 [95% CI: 240–2000] ng ml−1, with a moderate size effect: Cohen's d=0.51) but not in the low dose group (Supplementary Table S2). The percentage increase over baseline in D-dimer level at T120 was lower in the standard dose group (38% [95% CI: 13–63%] vs 93% [95% CI: 68–118%] in the placebo group; P=0.003 vs placebo) but not in the low dose group (58% [95% CI: 32–84%]; P=0.058 vs placebo) (Fig. 2b; Supplementary Table S3).
Fig 2.
Biomarkers of fibrinolysis activation in the placebo, low dose (TXA 0.5 g), and standard dose (TXA 1 g) groups over baseline. (a) Box plots showing the median [IQR] D-dimer level increase (ng ml−1) over baseline at 2 h after infusion in the placebo, low dose (TXA 0.5 g), and standard dose (TXA 1 g) groups. A linear mixed model was used to compare the three groups. (b–f) Laboratory data for the placebo group (black diamonds), the TXA 0.5 g group (dark grey squares), and the TXA 1 g group (light grey triangles). Significant differences between T0 and each time point are indicated by an asterisk (for TXA 0.5 g vs placebo) or a star (TXA 1 g vs placebo). (b) The D-dimer level increased less from T0 to T120 in the standard dose group than in the placebo group. The figure shows the percentage increase between baseline and T30, T120, and T360 in the placebo (TXA 0 g), low dose (TXA 0.5 g), and standard dose (TXA 1 g) groups. The groups were compared by applying a mixed linear model of covariance. (c) Plasma PAP complex levels increased less from T0 to T30 and T60 in the standard dose group than in the placebo group. The figure shows the percentage increase between baseline and T30, T60, T120, and T360 in the placebo, low dose (TXA 0.5 g), and standard dose (TXA 1 g) groups. The groups were compared by a mixed linear model of covariance. (d) The PG peak from T0 to T30, T60, T120, and T360 was significantly lower in the low dose group (TXA 0.5 g) and the standard dose (TXA 1 g) group than in the placebo group. The groups were compared by a mixed linear model of covariance. (e) The PG peak time decreased more in the standard (TXA 1 g) group than in the placebo group. The figure shows the percentage decrease between baseline and T30, T120, and T360 in the placebo, low dose (TXA 0.5 g), and standard dose (TXA 1 g) groups. The groups were compared by a mixed linear model of covariance. (f) The time interval between the thrombin generation peak and the PG peak decreased significantly more in the standard dose (TXA 1 g) group than in the placebo group. The figure shows the percentage decrease from baseline (T0) to each time point (T30, T60, T120, and T360). The groups were compared by a mixed linear model of covariance. PAP, plasmin–antiplasmin; PG, plasmin generation; TXA, tranexamic acid.
The median [IQR] PAP complex level was lower in the standard dose group than in the placebo group after 30 min (347 [261–485] ng ml−1 vs 639 [455–199] ng ml−1, respectively) and after 60 min (499 [379–1110] ng ml−1 vs 1160 [717–2530] ng ml−1, respectively) (Supplementary Table S1). The percentage increase in PAP from baseline at 30 min in the placebo group (56% [95% CI: 25–87%]) was lower in the standard dose group (–2% [95% CI: –32%–28%]; P=0.009) but not in the low dose group (13% [95% CI: –18%–43%]; P=0.051) (Fig. 2c; Supplementary Table S3).
The PG peak was lower in the two TXA groups relative to the placebo group at each time point (Fig. 2d; Supplementary Table S4). The time to plasmin peak and the time interval between the TG and PG peaks were lower at each time point (relative to placebo) in the standard dose group but not in the low dose group (Fig 2e and f; Supplementary Table S4). There was no significant impact of the two TXA dose regimens (relative to placebo) on plasma levels of fibrinogen, fibrin monomers, factor II, factor V, antithrombin, and thrombin–antithrombin complexes or the TG potential (as quantified by the TG peak and the area under the curve) (Supplementary Tables S1 and S5).
The median plasma and urine TXA concentrations for the 90 treated subjects are summarised in Table 2. At T360, TXA was totally excreted in both groups.
Table 2.
Plasma and urine tranexamic acid concentrations. IQR, inter-quartile range.
| Tranexamic acid 0.5 g (n=45) | Tranexamic acid 1 g (n=45) | |
|---|---|---|
| Plasma concentration, median [IQR] (mg L−1) | ||
| T1 | 32 [10–46] | 75 [55–116] |
| T30 | 21 [17–23] | 41 [33–48] |
| T60 | 15 [13–17] | 30 [23–36] |
| T120 | 10 [7–11] | 18 [15–22] |
| T360 | 2 [1–6] | 4 [3–6] |
| Urine concentration, median [IQR] (mg L−1) | ||
| T0–T120 | 1573 [1174–3550] | 3198 [2153–3910] |
| T120–T360 | 2598 [2020–3435] | 4640 [3125–6471] |
Clinical outcomes
Median additional blood loss at 6 h was lower in the standard dose group (134 [95% CI: 50–419] ml) than in the low dose group (300 [95% CI: 68–630] ml; P=0.042). However, median additional blood loss in the placebo group (208 [95% CI: 55–539] ml) did not differ from that observed in the standard dose group (P=0.35) or in the low dose group (P=0.28). There were no differences between the placebo and treated groups with regard to total blood loss at 6 h, duration of bleeding, proportion of subjects with life-threatening blood loss (>2500 ml), fall in haemoglobin level, anaemia, need for transfusion or procoagulant treatment, incidence of invasive procedures, ICU admission rate, or incidence of organ failure (Supplementary Table SC).
Safety endpoints
Relative to the placebo group, non-serious adverse events (e.g. nausea and vomiting) were more frequent in the standard dose group but not in the low dose group (Supplementary Table SC). There were no seizures, no thrombotic events, no cases of renal failure, and two cases of transient blood creatinine elevation in the placebo group.
Discussion
The results of the TRACES biomarker study suggest that (i) there was activation of fibrinolysis in PPH after Caesarean delivery, (ii) a dose of TXA 1 g was associated with lower levels (relative to placebo) of hyperfibrinolysis biomarkers, and (iii) a low (0.5 g) dose of TXA was less effective than a standard 1 g dose. Hence, in a context of haemorrhage and intense fibrinolytic activation, one can assume that a dose of at least TXA 1 g must be administered.
Activation of fibrinolysis and inhibition by tranexamic acid
The mechanisms underlying fibrinolysis activation in PPH have not been extensively characterised. The physiological activation of fibrinolysis is observed 30 min after delivery as evidenced by elevation in plasma D-dimer and PAP levels.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 In the context of PPH, there were early but variable increases in plasma D-dimer. In a sub-study of the WOMAN trial, Roberts and colleagues23 detected coagulopathy in 38 (23%) out of 167 patients. The mean (sd) D-dimer concentration was 7.1 (7.0) mg L−1 in the TXA group (n=83) and 9.6 (8.6) mg L−1 in the placebo group (n=84) (P=0.09).24
As Miszta and colleagues16 demonstrated for three different doses (5, 10, and 15 mg kg−1) in 30 elective Caesarean deliveries, the TRACES results suggest that PG peak was lower in both treated groups, although the 1 g dose of TXA (but not 0.5 g) reduced the PG peak time and the time interval between TG and PG peaks.
The results of the TRACES trial suggest that a 1 g dose of TXA was able to inhibit fibrinolytic activation. Indeed, elevated plasma levels of fibrinolysis activation markers tended to be reduced by the standard dose of TXA but not by the low dose. PD modelling will be performed to include the additional doses and their correlation with intensity of fibrinolysis activation and residual TXA plasma concentrations.
How can the optimal dose of tranexamic acid be determined?
A trial by Li and colleagues25 evaluated the efficacy of TXA by targeting a plasma concentration of 10 mg L−1 and a reduction in maximal lysis from 100% (after addition of tissue plasminogen activator) to 17% (in the treated plasma). The trial had several limitations. First, the ex vivo definition of the treated plasma antifibrinolytic impact did not take into account the high variability of fibrinolytic activation in PPH. Second, the target plasma TXA concentration of 10 mg L−1 was defined in an in vitro model. Third, the model was not improved by including body weight as a covariable. Fourth, the 15 mg kg−1 dose was limited to a maximum total dose of 1 g. And fifth, urine samples were not collected, restricting validation of excreted concentrations.8,25
A PK model has been created from the TRACES data in the context of ongoing haemorrhage. The model was initially based on 53 data points from nine haemorrhagic patients in the TRACES pilot study and then consolidated by analysis of 385 blood samples and 117 urine samples from 79 patients.10,11,26 A two-compartment model with dual (urinary and non-urinary) first-order excretion of TXA best predicted its plasma and urine concentrations.11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 Parametric non-linear mixed-effect modelling (Monolix 2020R1, Lixoft, Anthony, France) was computed. Central compartment volume increased with body weight measured before pregnancy. The final model was internally validated using a 550-run bootstrap. The non-urinary excretion pathway can be interpreted as TXA loss into haemorrhaged blood, as hypothesised in cases of massive trauma-induced haemorrhage.27 This study supports giving a dose of TXA 1 g and repeating administration in the event of massive haemorrhage and intense fibrinolytic activation as in PPH.
Is there a dose–response relationship for blood loss reduction?
We did not observe a significant difference in additional blood loss between either of the TXA groups and the placebo group. However, there was a non-significant trend towards lower additional blood loss in the TXA 1 g group relative to the TXA 0.5 g group. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between either of the TXA groups and the placebo group with regard to total blood loss, anaemia, transfusion requirement, maternal morbidity, or well-being. Our results must be interpreted in light of the study sample size, which was smaller than that of the pragmatic WOMAN trial, in which 10 051 patients were randomised to receive TXA 1 g and 10 009 placebo.5 In the WOMAN trial, 28% of patients received TXA 2 g, and bleeding-related maternal death rate was significantly lower only when TXA was administered within 3 h of delivery.5 In our previous A multi-centre open-label randomised controlled trial measuring the efficacy of tranexamic acid to reduce postpartum haemorrhage volume (EXADELI) study, a high dose of TXA 4 g was clinically effective when given at the onset of PPH.3 Similarly, in trauma patients with haemodynamic decompensation, an early (<1 h) repeated dose of TXA 3 g reduced 30 day mortality compared with placebo, whereas a pre-hospital dose of TXA 1 or 2 g did not.28 However, administration of TXA 4 g was questioned because of the reported risk of seizure after cardiac surgery, venous thrombotic events in gastrointestinal bleeding, and suspected kidney injury in patients with preeclampsia.29, 30, 31
Optimal time interval for tranexamic acid administration
The WOMAN trial showed that TXA administration was ineffective after >3 h of PPH.5 The HALT-IT Trial Collaborators30 explained the presence of an optimal time interval by (i) a lack of effect of TXA on late plasminogen activation by urokinase–plasminogen activator and (ii) the competitive mechanism of action of TXA on alpha-2 plasmin inhibitor. This competitive mechanism might explain the lack of effectiveness of low-dose TXA in the present study. Accordingly, international guidelines recommend TXA administration within 3 h of bleeding onset.5,32
Impact of tranexamic acid on thrombin generation and plasma fibrinogen levels
The TRACES biomarker study suggests that TXA had no impact on the TG potential or plasma levels of fibrinogen, fibrin monomers, thrombin–antithrombin complexes, or factor II. These findings are consistent with the TG data of Ahmadzia and colleagues.8 The EXADELI trial suggested that a high TXA dose was not able to avoid a decrease in plasma fibrinogen levels or to restore them.3 The biomarker data from the TRACES trial confirmed that there was no impact of a low or standard dose of TXA on fibrinogen plasma levels; this implies that fibrinogen levels should be restored by administration of plasma, fibrinogen concentrate, or cryoprecipitate concomitantly with fibrinolysis inhibition.
Study strengths
The TRACES trial had a robust double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised design. The rigorous, repeated collection of samples provided valuable information and enabled adapting the TXA dose and dosing schedule as a function of hyperfibrinolysis intensity and duration.
Study limitations
Despite its prospective, randomised design, this study had a number of limitations. First, the sample size (175 patients) might have been too small to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of TXA. Publication of the results of the WOMAN trial prompted us to reconsider the number of participants required, and the DSMB advised us to focus on the biomarker aspect of the protocol. Accordingly, we recruited the more than 144 patients needed to perform the laboratory and PK analyses.
Conclusions
The TRACES biomarker study shows that a dose of at least tranexamic acid 1 g i.v. was needed to inhibit postpartum haemorrhage-induced hyperfibrinolysis. Pharmacodynamic modelling or further dose-ranging studies should help determine the optimal dose and dosing schedule for use of tranexamic acid in the setting of postpartum haemorrhage after Caesarean delivery.
Authors' contributions
Study conception/design: ASDB, AD, SS, EJ, BH, EJ
Preliminary studies for specific assays: ASDB, BH, EJ
Preliminary studies of the dose-ranging model: ASDB, SG, BH, PO
Preliminary studies of a simultaneous thrombin–plasmin generation assay: ASDB, SS, EJ
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses: SG, PO
Elaboration of tranexamic acid assay method: BH
Validation of production of the study drug: BH
Data acquisition: ASDB, AT, HKM, AR, GM, BC, FB, ALG, RF, EP, LG, AD, SS, EJ, BH
Data management: ASDB, AT, HKM, AR, GM, BC, FB, AL-G, RF, EP, LG, AD, SS, EJ, BH
Data analysis: ASDB, SG, MK, GL, AD, SS, EJ, BH, PO
Data interpretation: ASDB, SG, GL, AD, SS, EJ, BH, PO
Article drafting: ASDB, SG, DF, AD, SS, EJ, BH, PO
Article revision: SG, MK, DF, AT, HK-M, AR, GM, BC, FB, AL-G, RF, EP, LG, GL, AD, SS, EJ, BH, PO
Final article revision: ASDB
Final article approval: all authors
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the TRACES trial collaborators: Christine Nobecourt-Rémy (the TRACES research midwife) for contributions to study conception, elaboration of sample distribution channels, elaboration of the electronic case report form (e-CRF), data collection, and patient follow-up; Florence Duflot, who elaborated the e-CRF and managed the data; Aramatoulaye Sambou, Anne-Sophie Blain, and Laetitia Delassus, who managed the reglementary and quality control aspects of the trial and audited the data; and Stéphanie Simonici, Natalie Puche, Dominique Grenier, Caroline Kitel, Imen Saidi, and Nawal Benzekri, who performed laboratory tests and collected data. The authors also thank the anaesthesiologists, obstetricians, obstetric anaesthesia nurses (especially Céline Lapornik), and midwives who cared for and recruited patients with postpartum haemorrhage. The authors also thank Yves Ozier and Claude D'Ercole, members of the data and safety monitoring committee.
Handling editor: Hugh C Hemmings Jr
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.08.033.
Declarations of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Funding
French Ministry of Health (PHRC 14–0032) for the TRACES trial; French National Drug Safety Agency (ANSM 015–003) for the biomarker sub-study
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following are the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Alkema L., Chou D., Hogan D., et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. Lancet. 2016;387:462–474. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00838-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Franchini M., Mannucci P.M. The never-ending success story of tranexamic acid in acquired bleeding. Haematologica. 2020;105:1201–1205. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.250720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ducloy-Bouthors A.-S., Jude B., Duhamel A., et al. High-dose tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in postpartum haemorrhage. Crit Care. 2011;15:R117. doi: 10.1186/cc10143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ducloy-Bouthors A.S., Duhamel A., Kipnis E., et al. Postpartum haemorrhage related early increase in D-dimers is inhibited by tranexamic acid: haemostasis parameters of a randomized controlled open labelled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116:641–648. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shakur H., Roberts I., Fawole B., et al. Effect of early tranexamic acid administration on mortality, hysterectomy, and other morbidities in women with post-partum haemorrhage (WOMAN): an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2105–2116. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30638-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sentilhes L., Winer N., Azria E., et al. Tranexamic acid for the prevention of blood loss after vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:731–742. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sentilhes L., Sénat M.V., Le Lous M., et al. Tranexamic acid for the prevention of blood loss after cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1623–1634. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2028788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ahmadzia H.K., Luban N.L.C., Li S., et al. Optimal use of intravenous tranexamic acid for hemorrhage prevention in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225:85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.11.035. e1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bouthors A.-S., Hennart B., Jeanpierre E., et al. Therapeutic and pharmaco-biological, dose-ranging multicentre trial to determine the optimal dose of TRAnexamic acid to reduce blood loss in haemorrhagic CESarean delivery (TRACES): study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19:148. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2420-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ducloy-Bouthors A.-S., Jeanpierre E., Saidi I., et al. TRAnexamic acid in hemorrhagic CESarean section (TRACES) randomized placebo-controlled dose-ranging pharmacobiological ancillary trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19:149. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2421-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gilliot S., Ducloy-Bouthors A.S., Hennart B., et al. Hypothesis for a partially non urinary elimination of tranexamic acid in haemorrhagic caesarean section: TRACES pilot pharmacokinetic study: pharmacokinetics of tranexamic acid in obstetrics. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2020;153 doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sentilhes L., Vayssière C., Deneux-Tharaux C., et al. Postpartum hemorrhage: guidelines for clinical practice from the French college of gynaecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF): in collaboration with the French society of anesthesiology and intensive Care (SFAR) Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;198:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.van Geffen M., Loof A., Lap P., et al. A novel hemostasis assay for the simultaneous measurement of coagulation and fibrinolysis. Hematology. 2011;16:327–336. doi: 10.1179/102453311X13085644680348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.van Geffen M., Menegatti M., Loof A., et al. Retrospective evaluation of bleeding tendency and simultaneous thrombin and plasmin generation in patients with rare bleeding disorders. Haemophilia. 2012;18:630–638. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02759.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ducloy-Bouthors A.-S., Lassalle F., Gilliot S., et al. Fibrinolysis after an elective Caesarean section without postpartum hemorrhage: pilot study for reference values from the simultaneous thrombin and plasmin generation assay. Austin Hematol. 2021;6:1035. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Miszta A., Ahmadzia H.K., Luban N.L.C., et al. Application of a plasmin generation assay to define pharmacodynamic effects of tranexamic acid in women undergoing cesarean delivery. J Thromb Haemost. 2021;19:221–232. doi: 10.1111/jth.15114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Meher S., Cuthbert A., Kirkham J.J., et al. Core outcome sets for prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: an international Delphi consensus study. BJOG. 2019;126:83–93. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liang K.Y. Longitudinal data analysis of continuous and discrete responses for pre–post designs. Indian J Stat Ser B. 2000;62:134–148. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu G.F., Lu K., Mogg R., Mallick M., Mehrotra D.V. Should baseline be a covariate or dependent variable in analyses of change from baseline in clinical trials? Stat Med. 2009;28:2509–2530. doi: 10.1002/sim.3639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vickers A.J. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Conover W.J., Iman R.L. Analysis of covariance using the rank transformation. Biometrics. 1982;38:715–724. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gerbasi F.R., Bottoms S., Farag A., Mammen E.F. Changes in hemostasis activity during delivery and the immediate postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:1158–1163. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90006-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Roberts I., Shakur H., Fawole B., et al. Haematological and fibrinolytic status of Nigerian women with post-partum haemorrhage. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:143. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1794-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shakur-Still H., Roberts I., Fawole B., et al. Effect of tranexamic acid on coagulation and fibrinolysis in women with postpartum haemorrhage (WOMAN-ETAC): a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:100. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14722.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li S., Ahmadzia H.K., Guo D., et al. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tranexamic acid in women undergoing cesarean delivery. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87:3531–3541. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gilliot S., Bouthors A.-S., Loingeville F., et al. Pharmacokinetics of curative tranexamic acid in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:578. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Grassin-Delyle S., Theusinger O.M., Albrecht R., et al. Optimisation of the dosage of tranexamic acid in trauma patients with population pharmacokinetic analysis. Anaesthesia. 2018;73:719–729. doi: 10.1111/anae.14184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Guyette F.X., Brown J.B., Zenati M.S., et al. Tranexamic acid during prehospital transport in patients at risk for hemorrhage after injury: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;156:105. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Murkin J.M., Falter F., Granton J., Young B., Burt C., Chu M. High-dose tranexamic acid is associated with nonischemic clinical seizures in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:350–353. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c92b23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.HALT-IT Trial Collaborators Effects of a high-dose 24-h infusion of tranexamic acid on death and thromboembolic events in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding (HALT-IT): an international randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;395:1927–1936. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30848-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Meibody F., Jamme M., Tsatsaris V., et al. Post-partum acute kidney injury: sorting placental and non-placental thrombotic microangiopathies using the trajectory of biomarkers. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020;35:1538–1546. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shakur H., Beaumont D., Pavord S., Gayet-Ageron A., Ker K., Mousa H.A. Antifibrinolytic drugs for treating primary postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2:CD012964. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.